Knowledge

Talk:Beam (structure)

Source đź“ť

179: 158: 74: 53: 284: 263: 189: 22: 294: 84: 508:
I reviewed and agree with your point. I just added a new short paragraph to the lead, noting the usage in automobile and truck frames, machine frames, and other structural and mechanical systems. Did that seem to address it well enough, or do you think we should add some more down in the body areas
414:
It might be worth including somewhere in these articles possibly after " Under gravity loads, the top of the beam is under compression while the bottom of the beam is under tension, leaving the middle of the beam relatively stress-free in the middle of the span, with shear stress above the supports."
462:
Please explain stiffness and how it relates to I. For instance, my Calculus textbook reads "The stiffness of the beam is a constant times I" (Thomas' Calculus, 11ed, Media Upgrade, p. 1070) in a discussion regarding the use of I-beams versus square or rectangular beams, yet I have not yet been able
388:
How about just changing the reference to Channel to make the article more universal, which would also tie in with using generic terms like pipe and angle elsewhere. Although we don't use the term pipe either, now I think about it, we call them Circular Hollow Sections (CHS) or Rectangular (RHS) or
490:
This article is written as though beams are structural elements only found in buildings, roadways and bridges. In machine design, all the elements of beam theory may come into play. For example, in designing a frame for a hydraulic press, the reaction beam against which the cylinder bears while
398:
One more question, on the bit about trusses being treated as beams, is this right? You certainly might use a truss where a beam might be used but you surely wouldn't treat it as such for design purposes. Am I missing something here?
368:
The article refers to C-channel sections. I don't know if this is the correct terminology, in the UK we use Parallel Flange Channels (PFCs) or Rolled Steel Channels (RSCs). Is C-channel an American term?
491:
pressing the load sees the same sort of stresses as its counterpart supporting a bridge. The difference is only in the force vector. This article needs some serious attention in that respect.
679: 697: 693: 245: 784: 595: 476: 605: 140: 518: 502: 415:
a note it is the reason why (in the UK) Building Regulations specify that holes drilled for cables etc. should be through the centre of the beam.
377:
It's an American term. The American Institute of Steel Construction uses C as the designator for standard channel sizes in its specifications. --
779: 485: 764: 130: 635: 625: 645: 211: 615: 759: 745: 585: 596:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070322183324/http://urban.arch.virginia.edu:80/~km6e/arch324/content/lectures/lec-10/review-of-09.html
443:
In the US, S shapes are Standard I-shapes that are not very popular anymore. They have narrow flanges and are subject to buckling.
794: 202: 163: 106: 575: 316: 606:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070504030331/http://urban.arch.virginia.edu:80/~km6e/arch324/content/lectures/lec-08/pres.html
789: 599: 472: 340: 419:
If it's one of those prestressed concrete beams then drilling through the middle would probably cut one of the tendons. --
774: 544: 235: 536: 97: 58: 567: 769: 609: 480: 307: 268: 550: 696:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
423: 514: 464: 740: 452: 33: 636:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070212205935/http://physics.uwstout.edu:80/statstr/Strength/Beams/beam51.htm
626:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070302091811/http://physics.uwstout.edu:80/StatStr/Strength/Beams/beam41.htm
715:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
646:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140916020643/http://design.medeek.com:80/resources/beam/beam_calculator.pl
438: 566:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 616:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070212205812/http://physics.uwstout.edu:80/statstr/Strength/indexfbt.htm
524: 510: 498: 586:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070213074412/http://www.awc.org:80/calculators/span/calc/default.htm
315:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
210:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
731: 21: 700:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
529:
A beam is also a word for a girder, or am I wrong? Shouldn't they be cross referenced? Thanks.
716: 639: 629: 540: 409: 703: 649: 39: 723: 670: 619: 576:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070210155548/http://www.awc.org:80/Publications/download.html
532: 494: 8: 448: 89: 600:
http://urban.arch.virginia.edu/%7Ekm6e/arch324/content/lectures/lec-10/review-of-09.html
682:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 589: 378: 194: 722:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
457: 299: 207: 178: 157: 559: 563: 610:
http://urban.arch.virginia.edu/%7Ekm6e/arch324/content/lectures/lec-08/pres.html
579: 444: 429: 346: 73: 52: 688:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 434:
Why is an S-beam called an S-beam when it is shaped more like the letter C. --
753: 102: 689: 435: 420: 400: 370: 283: 262: 188: 312: 468: 293: 349:
in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
345:
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
83: 655:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
640:
http://physics.uwstout.edu/statstr/Strength/Beams/beam51.htm
630:
http://physics.uwstout.edu/statstr/Strength/Beams/beam41.htm
650:
http://design.medeek.com/resources/beam/beam_calculator.pl
570:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
363: 620:
http://physics.uwstout.edu/statstr/Strength/indexfbt.htm
463:
to find such an equation aside from manipulating the
590:
http://www.awc.org/calculators/span/calc/default.htm
311:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 289: 206:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 184: 101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 79: 692:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 785:C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings 751: 678:This message was posted before February 2018. 580:http://www.awc.org/Publications/download.html 389:Square (SHS). Catchy names don't you think? 19: 558:I have just modified 8 external links on 486:Beam theory is not unique to structures 220:Knowledge:WikiProject Civil engineering 780:WikiProject Civil engineering articles 752: 223:Template:WikiProject Civil engineering 765:High-importance Architecture articles 667:to let others know (documentation at 467:to fit into the general equation of 305:This article is within the scope of 200:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 15: 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 347:project-independent quality rating 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Architecture 14: 806: 760:Start-Class Architecture articles 562:. Please take a moment to review 118:Template:WikiProject Architecture 325:Knowledge:WikiProject Technology 292: 282: 261: 187: 177: 156: 82: 72: 51: 20: 795:WikiProject Technology articles 328:Template:WikiProject Technology 240:This article has been rated as 135:This article has been rated as 545:09:54, 18 September 2013 (UTC) 439:04:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 424:04:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC) 1: 519:03:42, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 503:03:24, 16 December 2011 (UTC) 465:Euler-Bernoulli Beam Equation 453:20:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC) 319:and see a list of open tasks. 214:and see a list of open tasks. 203:WikiProject Civil engineering 109:and see a list of open tasks. 746:08:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC) 7: 790:C-Class Technology articles 10: 811: 775:Top-importance CE articles 709:(last update: 5 June 2024) 555:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 481:21:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 246:project's importance scale 141:project's importance scale 373:July 8, 2005 12:13 (UTC) 344: 277: 239: 172: 134: 67: 46: 403:July 8, 2005 14:50 (UTC) 98:WikiProject Architecture 770:Start-Class CE articles 551:External links modified 381:8 July 2005 14:35 (UTC) 308:WikiProject Technology 28:This article is rated 121:Architecture articles 690:regular verification 511:Georgewilliamherbert 680:After February 2018 659:parameter below to 331:Technology articles 90:Architecture portal 734:InternetArchiveBot 685:InternetArchiveBot 195:Engineering portal 34:content assessment 710: 535:comment added by 525:Beams and Girders 361: 360: 357: 356: 353: 352: 300:Technology portal 256: 255: 252: 251: 217:Civil engineering 208:Civil engineering 164:Civil engineering 151: 150: 147: 146: 802: 744: 735: 708: 707: 686: 674: 560:Beam (structure) 547: 333: 332: 329: 326: 323: 302: 297: 296: 286: 279: 278: 273: 265: 258: 257: 228: 227: 224: 221: 218: 197: 192: 191: 181: 174: 173: 168: 160: 153: 152: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 810: 809: 805: 804: 803: 801: 800: 799: 750: 749: 738: 733: 701: 694:have permission 684: 668: 568:this simple FaQ 553: 530: 527: 495:Bigdumbdinosaur 488: 460: 432: 412: 366: 330: 327: 324: 321: 320: 298: 291: 271: 225: 222: 219: 216: 215: 193: 186: 166: 137:High-importance 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 62:High‑importance 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 808: 798: 797: 792: 787: 782: 777: 772: 767: 762: 728: 727: 720: 653: 652: 644:Added archive 642: 634:Added archive 632: 624:Added archive 622: 614:Added archive 612: 604:Added archive 602: 594:Added archive 592: 584:Added archive 582: 574:Added archive 552: 549: 526: 523: 522: 521: 487: 484: 473:99.129.145.159 459: 456: 431: 428: 427: 426: 411: 410:Drilling holes 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 393: 392: 391: 390: 383: 382: 365: 362: 359: 358: 355: 354: 351: 350: 343: 337: 336: 334: 317:the discussion 304: 303: 287: 275: 274: 266: 254: 253: 250: 249: 242:Top-importance 238: 232: 231: 229: 212:the discussion 199: 198: 182: 170: 169: 167:Top‑importance 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 807: 796: 793: 791: 788: 786: 783: 781: 778: 776: 773: 771: 768: 766: 763: 761: 758: 757: 755: 748: 747: 742: 737: 736: 725: 721: 718: 714: 713: 712: 705: 699: 695: 691: 687: 681: 676: 672: 666: 662: 658: 651: 647: 643: 641: 637: 633: 631: 627: 623: 621: 617: 613: 611: 607: 603: 601: 597: 593: 591: 587: 583: 581: 577: 573: 572: 571: 569: 565: 561: 556: 548: 546: 542: 538: 534: 520: 516: 512: 507: 506: 505: 504: 500: 496: 492: 483: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 455: 454: 450: 446: 441: 440: 437: 425: 422: 418: 417: 416: 402: 397: 396: 395: 394: 387: 386: 385: 384: 380: 379:Spindustrious 376: 375: 374: 372: 348: 342: 339: 338: 335: 318: 314: 310: 309: 301: 295: 290: 288: 285: 281: 280: 276: 270: 267: 264: 260: 259: 247: 243: 237: 234: 233: 230: 213: 209: 205: 204: 196: 190: 185: 183: 180: 176: 175: 171: 165: 162: 159: 155: 154: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 732: 729: 704:source check 683: 677: 664: 660: 656: 654: 557: 554: 537:2.235.212.17 531:— Preceding 528: 493: 489: 461: 442: 433: 413: 367: 306: 241: 201: 136: 112:Architecture 103:Architecture 96: 59:Architecture 40:WikiProjects 671:Sourcecheck 226:CE articles 30:Start-class 754:Categories 741:Report bug 509:as well? 322:Technology 313:technology 269:Technology 724:this tool 717:this tool 469:Stiffness 458:Stiffness 445:PCJohnson 730:Cheers.— 533:unsigned 364:Cimments 657:checked 564:my edit 272:C‑class 244:on the 139:on the 665:failed 436:Gbleem 430:S-beam 421:Gbleem 401:Leithp 371:Leithp 36:scale. 661:true 541:talk 515:talk 499:talk 477:talk 449:talk 131:High 698:RfC 675:). 663:or 648:to 638:to 628:to 618:to 608:to 598:to 588:to 578:to 236:Top 756:: 711:. 706:}} 702:{{ 673:}} 669:{{ 543:) 517:) 501:) 479:) 451:) 743:) 739:( 726:. 719:. 539:( 513:( 497:( 475:( 471:. 447:( 341:C 248:. 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Architecture
WikiProject icon
icon
Architecture portal
WikiProject Architecture
Architecture
the discussion
High
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Civil engineering
WikiProject icon
icon
Engineering portal
WikiProject Civil engineering
Civil engineering
the discussion
Top
project's importance scale
WikiProject icon
Technology
WikiProject icon
icon
Technology portal
WikiProject Technology
technology

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑