742:
merely a transfer from such a body which we see to a glorifying body in the kingdom of Osiris.furthermore,the book is just a collection of spells to counteract actions of evil-spirits which try to prevent this BA or glorifying soul from reaching Fields of Peace which are the real kingdom of gods.The most important part of this book is what is called negative confession in the hall of double MAAT i.e.two godesses of truth , where a person must declare his innocence before 42 god.This declaration costitutes basic moral values of humankind uptill now e.g.1- I have not done violence 2-I have not commited theft 3-I have not acted deceitfully 4-I have not uttered falsehood 5-I have not uttered falsehood 6-I have not uttered evil words 7-I have attacked no man 8- I have not laid waste the lands which have been ploughed 9-I have not defiled the wife of a man 10-I have not commited any sin against purity 11-I have not struck fear into any man 12-I have not been a man of anger 13-I have not made myself deaf to the words of right and truth. 14-I have made no man to weep. 15-I have not judged hastily 16-I have not acted with deceit and I have not worked wickedness 17-I have not cursed the god 18- I have not increased my wealth except with justly things.
1754:(For future reference, new discussion topics go at the bottom of the talk page.) I don't see what's objectionable about this passage. It only says "For every 'I have not...' in the Negative Confession, it is possible to read an unexpressed 'Thou shalt not'. While the Ten Commandments of Jewish and Christian ethics are rules of conduct laid down by a perceived divine revelation, the Negative Confession is more a divine enforcement of everyday morality." The first sentence is pretty obviously true, and because the Egyptians didn't have ethical codes laid out by divine revelation, the second sentence more or less follows from it. Besides, if a statement in a Knowledge article is based on the consensus of scholars in the relevant field of expertise, then it is neutral by Knowledge's definition, and as far as I know, this is the consensus.
1171:
328:
649:
583:
1406:
place poetry, prayer, or spiritual prose on tombstones or in ceremonies. My classmates at
Cambridge, their parents and grandparents would no doubt refer to eulogies or whatever prose or poetry was relevant to their lives in this way, not as 'spells', I trust men and women of ancient Eygpt were not significantly less textured in their own appreciation of life. This text may offer a glimpse into an ancient literary canon that should not be trivialized in one stroke as 'spells' - this trivializing limits rather than liberates thinking about the text's significance.
121:
938:
Kingdom, can hardly be called a version at all because there is no real standard text. And the so-called "Saite" recension is really just a fossilized compilation used much later and is evolved from New
Kingdom examples: Raymond O. Faulkner, The Egyptian Book of the Dead, The Book of Going forth by Day. The First Authentic Presentation of the Complete Papyrus of Ani translated by Raymond Faulkner, edited by Eva von Dassow, with contributions by Carol Andrews and Ogden Goelet (Chronicle Books, San Francisco), c 1994.
573:
546:
478:
457:
252:
225:
179:
154:
21:
112:
1543:
661:
262:
1057:
1595:
1274:
it here because the article shouldn't have comments like this within it - discussion should happen here. I just wondered if 4WhatMakesSense had any references to this alternative interpretation of the picture? If it's a significant point of view within the academic community we should of course include it.
919:, just like any other good book one selects: like "Moby Dick", "Atlas Shrugged", the "Bible" (New T, or Old T,)... etc. "It takes a Village"... SonoranDesert AZfellow.. ....You know how you get to like your Favorite Chapters,Quotes,Sayings?-... (Or.. the favorite Question you ask your Favorite GOD?) -
1731:
The section on "Judgement" with the analogy to "the Ten
Commandments of Jewish and Christian ethics" seems to summarise an opinionated source as if it were simply factual. Opinions can be valid to mention, if they are particularly influential, but they should be framed as such. Possibly direct quotes
1632:
I do not see how the english word "dead" has come out of the translation. The word "dead" is by no means equivalent to what the Khemet referred to as leaving life. It is clear that there is much more to it. Simplifying the name pf texts as something to do with modern death greatly diminishes the true
1513:
Spells are deadly serious business to people who believe in them! Likewise incantations that will subdue the demons you will meet along the way. One day
Christian mythology will be seen by all for the ridiculous childishness it is, and any references to it by those living 5000 years from now may well
1405:
Why the focus on 'spells'? This trivializes the text's content & context. Why not consider a new paradigm: the translated text reads more like poetry, consistent with what we know of
Egyptian culture. Poetry suitable for certain occasions. In contemporary cultures it is not uncommon for people to
1273:
added this comment into the main picture's caption; "Ed.NMEMS ~ That's not what it shows, it is a woman(Ammit) in court testifying against a married man. The uploaded image cuts out him & his wife, but the ring on his left hand(Ankh) means he is not allowed to be with others(Married)". I've moved
956:
some different books of the dead, in fact nearly every New
Kingdom book of the dead is a unique "version" as is already mentioned in the article. And yes, there was a set version used after the 26th dynasty, in the Saite period, where the contents were arranged in a thematic order that was relatively
948:
As for the difference between a hieratic and cursive hieroglyphic version that is different from the Theban recension, there is no difference. Any "version" could be written in either way, so how is this to be classified as a different text? This would be akin to saying a bible set in Times New Roman
1907:
Here's a funny continuation of this saga. This is a game of chinese whispers going through history. It was
Richard Karl Lepsius, who asked the local arabs what they were called, and having found them in a 'tomb' (probably wasn't a tomb), they called it the 'Tomb Books'. Which Lepsius then translated
1849:
for details. Most of the sources still call this composition "Book of the Dead", even though most of them mention that the name is modern and the
Egyptian title meant something like "Book of Coming Forth by Day". If most of the sources abandoned the term "Book of the Dead", Knowledge would, too, but
937:
I just removed some text from the article claiming four different versions of the book of the dead. Budge's outdated work wrongly perpetuates
Naville's idea that there were different "Theban" and "Saite" versions of the book of the dead. The so-called "Theban" version (or recension), from in the New
436:
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of
Knowledge than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations
1450:
by Robert K. Ritner, 1993, pp. 236–249). The term the Egyptian used for the divisions of the Book of the Dead meant something more like "spell" than "chapter", as funerary texts were believed to have magical effects, and their texts could be re-adapted for use by the living (Ritner 1993, pp. 41–42,
1293:
It is not a Funerary Text. They call it that because it was buried with someone. But the Text is about how people lived their days. Please help correct the context, and use the correct names, rather than the conventional, Religious Slander = "Book of the Dead". Such slander has no Academic Value or
1665:
I take issue with the popular name, not the Knowledge entry. I'm simply pointing out that the name assigned alters the perspective of the entire work to any new user hoping to find infornation here. It might be already widely known, but the amount of times "Book Of The Dead" has been used in this
760:
I think this has good potential, but the grammar and diction is terrible. Please consider re-writing, as this is not encyclopedic; for example, "the title of the famous old book"? Well, no. That's not proper. As a matter of fact, the more I read this segment, the more I think it's too biased. The
741:
pert em hru is a hieroglyphic expression which means in english -coming forth by day- It is usually the title of the famous old book known as -book of the dead- although this recent title is rediculous and meaningless because there is no such thing as death in old Egypt.what is really happening
877:
Based on past edits in history page, I believe we're looking out for the status of this article in the future because there will be more and more non-standard amoral edits until... what? Should we block anonymous users from editing right now or what's another plan to deal with this situation?
1490:
Hello TranscendTranslation! When I worked on this article a couple of years ago, most of the sources I was working from tended towards the term "spell". This is inevitably only a small sliver of the literature - I'm sure we could benefit from more material about the different approaches to
1908:
into German as 'Tötenbuch' or again translated into English, 'Book of the Dead'. It doesn't end there. In Tibet, Walter Evans-Wentz had the Bardo To Dol translated, and thought it was 'like the Egyptian Book Of The Dead'. And thus, he called the Bardo Todol 'The Tibetan Book Of The Dead'.
1822:
In other words, something completely different in wording and meaning. Orientalising has meant that Ancient Egypt was re-framed as a culture obsessed with death rather than life, including immortality. It was consciously contrasted with Greek obsession with youth and vitality.
1152:"A comprehensive written version appears in the 1999 film "The Mummy" and its 2000 sequel as the means of ressurecting the dead, starting with the titular mummy Imhotep. It appears alongside the fictional Book of the Living, which is the way they stop the mummy in the movie
1231:
Yes I will as soon as my books which are in transit arrive. Its not so much that what Taylor says is wrong but that an article which draws largely from one source is not likely to reflect a well rounded view of the subject. Don't take this as a major crit - just an
1648:
As may be, but what's the relevance to this article? "Book of the Dead" is by far the name by which this is most widely known in the English language, and that's not a translation of the original Egyptian, it's a translation of Lepsius' 1842 German rendering.
892:. Since the vandals all seem to be annons, then semi-protection might help. However, since there was almost two weeks between vandalisms, it might not happen. The best thing to do is just keep the page on your watchlist and check every edit.
1491:
interpreting the texts. If you can see errors or omissions please feel to make amendments - the key principle is that the article ought to reflect the balance of opinion that can be read in secondary and tertiary sources on the subject.
414:
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
1201:
Although I can see that this article is improving I am a bit concerned that nearly all references are Taylor (and a few Faulkner). I am not wholly convinced by some of assertions and I think this is the danger of a single
811:
The 18:07, 22 April 2006 edit of the above article on the Gospel story added a new next-to-last paragraph to the Meaning section with this opening sentence: "There is an increadibly similar tale told in the, pre-Christian,
1876:
1831:
1819:, "rw nw prt m hrw" translates into: ‘Utterances of Coming Forth in the Day’. More smoothly translated: Words of Coming Forth in the Day. In other words, how to achieve enlightenment, during life. Not after death.
1472:, it would have to include analysis of the texts' value as literature. I'm not very knowledgeable on that subject, though, and I'm not sure where to find this kind of detailed analysis in the Egyptological sources.
1732:
would be appropriate, or language along the lines of "some authors have compared it to". Currently this section seems to have been edited to look simple / factual / unbiased, without actually being such.
1864:
Then perhaps it should be called both. A reference to it's historic mistranslation/misrepresentation - no matter how often repeated - and an actual translation of the title according to Ancient Egyptian.
932:
928:
How many chapters do you think are in the Book of the Dead? Where do you think that the dead people go? How do they die so fast? Could the Egyptians in the afterlife still have their books of the deads?
823:
article did not confirm the assertion. Can anyone document the assertion with either a primary source or a secondary source that cites a primary source to the same effect? Thx for your assistance.
1366:
957:
fixed. These points will be addressed in the article, where they can be properly introduced and cited, but please, please, please, don't go to Budge for interpretation or English translation!
971:
This section appears to be vandalized. I am not well-versed in this and so do not want to attempt to do anything about it. But will someone who is more adept, please look into this..
1434:
I will say that "spell" may seem trivializing to modern Westerners, but to the ancient Egyptians, speech and writing were believed to have a profound power, which the Egyptians called
995:
Hi, I just checked the whole article, including the weighing of the heart section. Everything seems to be accurate; the translation is from Goelet's 1988 work cited in the references.
1885:
Knowledge articles can only be at one title (one URL). But the second sentence of this article does give the Egyptian title: "the original Egyptian name for the text, transliterated
1442:
into English is probably "magic", but that word, like "spell", still has some negative connotations, where people assume magic is opposed to and inferior to religion. In contrast,
1931:
1872:
1827:
729:
1867:
Also, calling it 'Book Of The Dead' creates a confusing connection to the Tibetan Book Of The Dead. Which is also a mistranslation... Tibet's Bardo Thodol translates as,
1407:
961:
1519:
1316:
1129:
1032:
844:
788:
1246:
Look forward to it! Yes, I quite agree, it's a little too reliant on one source to be (say) FA material. I'm sure there are also plenty of areas where views differ.
1103:
1627:
1583:
982:
966:
403:
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
1395:
1139:
337:
235:
437:
or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
318:
1671:
1638:
1464:, "While trusting in the magical potency of words, the authors of these incantations often achieved the heightened intensity of formulation which is poetry" (
1382:
1533:
941:
As for the Heliopolitan version, (supposedly 5th dynasty), the author must have this confused with something else. There was a heliopolitan version of the
835:
Well, the Hebrews cobbled together their religion from the cultures that surrounded them; what would be noteworthy about any given Biblical element is its
762:
1711:: The italics are for non-English text, which in this case means the Egyptian phrase. The comma isn't a part of that phrase and should not be italicized.
1425:, and the divisions of the book are always called either "chapters" or "spells" in Egyptological writing. I didn't write this article, but you could ask
1163:
750:
2015:
342:
1675:
1642:
1990:
1935:
1667:
1634:
125:
1835:
1587:
986:
1481:
1320:
639:
1939:
1902:
1880:
1859:
1073:
and are dealt with by editors who may be unfamiliar with the article in question, so please try to be specific about the edits you want. Cheers,
920:
862:
792:
528:
392:
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
2020:
2005:
308:
848:
1911:"We owe that super cool name to Karl Richard Lepsius , described as the founder of German Egyptology , who apparently named it “Tötenbuch”,
1347:
the black book of the dead was created in 16 bc by the one caydious known as the 3rd egyption king who was kidnapped in 17bc by leon henry
2010:
1523:
1190:
765:
1008:
1659:
1922:"In 1927, The Tibetan Book of the Dead was published by Oxford University Press. Evans-Wentz chose the title "Book of the Dead" because
1446:
was one of the central principles of ancient Egyptian religion, and power-infused writing and speech were an essential part of ritual (
1621:
1500:
1980:
1975:
1763:
1303:
1720:
1255:
1241:
1226:
2000:
1995:
1985:
1666:
article, it would embed in any reader the notion that that is what it was always called instead of just being a 160 year old name.
284:
2040:
736:
The following is some material from an article redirected here. The author woul;d like it merged into the article, or restored.
629:
1570:
In the second-to-last paragraph under the "spells" subsection, the last sentence contains an incorrect word. " giving him power
1342:
2050:
2030:
1415:
896:
889:
679:
518:
1360:
1092:
When was it probably written, please? There are no dates. Yeah there are, it said around the New Kingdom (1550 BC) to 50 BC.
1815:
According to the Knowledge entry in this article, the Ancient Egyptian title is: r(ꜣ)w n(y)w prt m hrw(w)). According to the
1741:
1036:
185:
159:
827:
2060:
1515:
1312:
1283:
1155:
1125:
1028:
840:
784:
1826:
It seems incongruent for the English translation to be so different from the Ancient Egyptian title in the same sentence.
1383:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130514100911/http://www.cultorweb.com/eBooks/Archeo/The.Egyptian.Book.of.the.Dead.(1895).pdf
730:
425:
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Knowledge, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
367:
2055:
1099:
854:
275:
230:
50:
377:
372:
1726:
1288:
978:
362:
1702:
923:
2035:
1328:
605:
1211:
2045:
2025:
1970:
1960:
1063:
I fixed the one example of each which I saw during a quick scan. If there are others, please make another request.
494:
1805:
1787:
1265:
1133:
1004:
38:
32:
882:
1965:
1810:
1411:
1082:
1311:
Slander? Any disadvantaged parties have been dead (pardon, have emerged into the light of day) for millennia.
1107:
1021:
From what I just read my own translation is "Men talking in the day". Where does "Book of the dead" fit in?
804:
1680:
596:
551:
283:
subjects on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
134:
1871:: "Bardo Thödol, (Tibetan: “Liberation in the Intermediate State Through Hearing”)... Seems like a trend.
1614:
1217:
Perhaps you could let me know which statements you're worried about and which sources you're consulting.
1016:
713:
records the results of the weighing of the heart? I wonder if a previous writer has confused Thoth with
674:
556:
485:
462:
902:
1299:
1196:
90:
1159:
872:
604:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
493:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1549:
1400:
858:
816:, in which Horus feeds a similar number of people with a similarly small amount of bread." (sic)
1919:
Egyptian 'Book of the Dead', BCE - University of Washington Information School, October 12, 2023
1052:
Punctuation goes inside quotation marks. Citations should follow punctuation, not the reverse.
1769:
83:
1846:
1698:
1338:
805:
327:
140:
1916:
1650:
1295:
1270:
1121:
1095:
1024:
974:
267:
190:
164:
20:
8:
1898:
1855:
1759:
1716:
1477:
1356:
1042:
1000:
1799:
1781:
1496:
1279:
1251:
1222:
1186:
1078:
915:), you don't understand that this is just "the Book of the Dead", and... it is for the
908:
1737:
1579:
1391:
1237:
1207:
42:
1792:
For now, i remove the *, please restore it if i just overlooked where it points to.
819:
That edit does not document the first sentence. My check of external sources at the
1708:
1694:
1457:
1456:
That doesn't mean the Book of the Dead and other funerary texts weren't poetry. As
1334:
824:
820:
813:
648:
1603:
1113:
1868:
572:
545:
1894:
1851:
1841:
Knowledge bases its article titles on the names that are most commonly used in
1755:
1712:
1473:
1352:
996:
958:
747:
1954:
1794:
1776:
1492:
1461:
1426:
1275:
1247:
1218:
1182:
1074:
588:
1927:
1842:
1749:
1733:
1469:
1422:
1387:
1233:
1203:
1178:
1087:
666:
1149:
A new section, "In Popular Culture", should be published, starting with:
893:
945:, but the book of the dead wasn't even invented yet in the 5th Dynasty.
477:
456:
1774:
What does the * refer to? I find it only once in the page with Ctrl-F.
280:
1913:
perhaps from the Arabic term used by villagers to describe tomb papyri
888:
If you feel that the page should be protected, you can request it at
879:
1118:
I think that we should have some facts and pictures on this page.
178:
153:
1429:, who did most of the work here, his reasons for choosing "spell".
1070:
251:
224:
714:
601:
1367:
THE BOOK OF THE DEAD The Papyrus of Ani by E. A. WALLIS BUDGE
1816:
710:
490:
722:
1685:
Should the comma be in italics or normal? "transliterated
1537:
933:
Exactly four different "versions" of the book of the dead?
721:
Just checked again myself, seems Thoth is the scribe of
949:
is a different bible than one set in Century Gothic.
731:
User_talk:Sam_Spade#thank_you.2C_please_one_question
704:
656:
600:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
578:
489:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
279:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
257:
783:
Is that list authentic? Items 4 and 5 are the same.
701:Removed a myspace link someone placed on the page.
696:
1448:The Mechanics of Ancient Egyptian Modern Practice
1952:
1924:it reminded him of the Egyptian Book of the Dead
188:, a project which is currently considered to be
1421:Knowledge articles must use the terminology of
1181:that support the change you want to be made. --
1140:Edit request from 75.178.184.130, 18 April 2010
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1468:, 2006, p. 8). If this article were to reach
1534:Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2015
967:First few sentences of 'weighing the heart'
761:moral of the story is, please re-write it.
2016:Top-importance Egyptian Religion articles
1991:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Arts
1932:2001:1C00:1E20:D900:D108:E292:4ECE:682B
1873:2001:1C00:1E20:D900:E41D:5620:598D:2C45
1828:2001:1C00:1E20:D900:E41D:5620:598D:2C45
1574:them" ought to read " giving him power
1953:
1628:Why is this called "Book Of The Dead"?
1071:Knowledge semi-protected edit requests
890:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
2021:Egyptian Religion work group articles
2006:Top-importance Ancient Egypt articles
1466:Ancient Egyptian Literature, Volume I
354:WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:
200:Knowledge:WikiProject Religious texts
725:, marking a record as Anubis weighs.
594:This article is within the scope of
483:This article is within the scope of
273:This article is within the scope of
203:Template:WikiProject Religious texts
184:This article is within the scope of
111:
109:
105:
2011:GA-Class Egyptian Religion articles
709:Can someone check and confirm that
293:Knowledge:WikiProject Ancient Egypt
139:It is of interest to the following
13:
911:? ...(If you do, then you-(as one
907:Anybody object to putting this in
647:
326:
296:Template:WikiProject Ancient Egypt
14:
2072:
41:. If you can improve it further,
1981:Knowledge vital articles in Arts
1976:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
1633:value of what has been written.
1593:
1541:
1169:
1055:
659:
581:
571:
544:
476:
455:
260:
250:
223:
177:
152:
119:
110:
19:
2001:GA-Class Ancient Egypt articles
1996:GA-Class vital articles in Arts
1986:GA-Class level-5 vital articles
1514:be felt by them as "trivial"...
634:This article has been rated as
523:This article has been rated as
313:This article has been rated as
2041:Top-importance Africa articles
1903:18:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
1881:01:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
1860:20:31, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
1836:15:25, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
1134:06:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
962:02:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
2051:Top-importance Egypt articles
2031:Low-importance Death articles
1806:05:39, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
1788:23:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
1660:21:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
1643:20:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
672:This article is supported by
608:and see a list of open tasks.
497:and see a list of open tasks.
335:This article is supported by
287:and see a list of open tasks.
1850:it won't happen until then.
1764:01:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
1742:13:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
1676:15:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
1524:15:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
1501:23:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
1482:19:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
1416:15:06, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
1321:15:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
1256:21:56, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1242:20:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
1227:20:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
1212:20:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
1009:22:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
987:21:39, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
897:15:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
883:08:38, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
849:15:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
793:15:56, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
614:Knowledge:WikiProject Africa
338:Egyptian religion work group
7:
2061:WikiProject Africa articles
1940:17:38, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
1891:Book of Coming Forth by Day
1811:Mistranslation Of The Title
1564:to reactivate your request.
1552:has been answered. Set the
1460:put it when discussing the
1396:10:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
1037:10:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
617:Template:WikiProject Africa
503:Knowledge:WikiProject Death
186:WikiProject Religious texts
10:
2077:
2056:WikiProject Egypt articles
1727:analogy to modern religion
1622:17:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
1588:16:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
1438:. The best translation of
1289:Book of Going Forth By Day
1191:01:29, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
1164:00:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
863:14:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
828:22:25, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
640:project's importance scale
529:project's importance scale
506:Template:WikiProject Death
408:Standardize the Chronology
319:project's importance scale
1721:23:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
1703:23:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
1361:17:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
1343:17:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
1333:the follow was inserted:
1329:remove inserted paragraph
751:11:58, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
717:(who does the weighing).
655:
633:
566:
522:
471:
349:
334:
312:
276:WikiProject Ancient Egypt
245:
172:
147:
65:
61:
2036:GA-Class Africa articles
1887:r(ꜣ)w n(y)w prt m hrw(w)
1108:18:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
1083:00:34, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
924:18:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
766:22:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
206:Religious texts articles
2046:GA-Class Egypt articles
2026:GA-Class Death articles
1971:GA-Class vital articles
1961:Knowledge good articles
1351:It was just vandalism.
1304:11:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
1294:Bearing on The Truth.
1284:11:09, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
1266:Comment on main picture
1069:requests are listed in
1689:," or "transliterated
839:originating elsewhere.
652:
331:
299:Ancient Egypt articles
1966:History good articles
1847:Knowledge:Common name
1146:{{editsemiprotected}}
1066:{{editsemiprotected}}
1049:{{editsemiprotected}}
806:Feeding the multitude
651:
330:
126:level-5 vital article
39:good article criteria
33:History good articles
1681:A comma with italics
1408:TranscendTranslation
1271:User:4WhatMakesSense
853:Oh no it’s broken:)
268:Ancient Egypt portal
91:Good article nominee
1889:, is translated as
1017:Literal translation
1817:English Wiktionary
909:Category:Dialogues
903:Category:Dialogues
653:
597:WikiProject Africa
332:
135:content assessment
66:Article milestones
1620:
1568:
1567:
1197:Taylor dependency
1124:comment added by
1098:comment added by
1039:
1027:comment added by
989:
977:comment added by
694:
693:
690:
689:
686:
685:
675:WikiProject Egypt
539:
538:
535:
534:
486:WikiProject Death
450:
449:
446:
445:
442:
441:
236:Egyptian religion
218:
217:
214:
213:
104:
103:
100:
99:
57:
2068:
1843:reliable sources
1802:
1797:
1784:
1779:
1753:
1691:rw nw prt m hrw,
1656:
1617:
1612:
1609:
1606:
1597:
1596:
1559:
1555:
1545:
1544:
1538:
1458:Miriam Lichtheim
1423:reliable sources
1379:
1378:
1374:
1179:reliable sources
1173:
1172:
1148:
1147:
1136:
1110:
1068:
1067:
1059:
1058:
1051:
1050:
1022:
972:
873:Vandal situation
821:Book of the Dead
814:book of the dead
669:
664:
663:
662:
622:
621:
618:
615:
612:
591:
586:
585:
584:
575:
568:
567:
562:
559:
548:
541:
540:
511:
510:
507:
504:
501:
480:
473:
472:
467:
459:
452:
451:
351:
350:
301:
300:
297:
294:
291:
270:
265:
264:
263:
254:
247:
246:
241:
238:
227:
220:
219:
208:
207:
204:
201:
198:
181:
174:
173:
168:
156:
149:
148:
132:
123:
122:
115:
114:
113:
106:
86:
84:January 10, 2011
63:
62:
46:
27:Book of the Dead
23:
16:
15:
2076:
2075:
2071:
2070:
2069:
2067:
2066:
2065:
1951:
1950:
1926:. ..." Source:
1813:
1800:
1795:
1782:
1777:
1772:
1747:
1729:
1687:rw nw prt m hrw
1683:
1652:
1630:
1615:
1607:
1604:
1594:
1557:
1553:
1542:
1536:
1470:featured status
1403:
1401:Book of Spells?
1380:
1376:
1372:
1370:
1369:
1331:
1296:4WhatMakesSense
1291:
1268:
1199:
1177:please provide
1170:
1145:
1144:
1142:
1119:
1116:
1093:
1090:
1065:
1064:
1056:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1019:
969:
952:Now yes, there
935:
905:
875:
809:
734:
707:
699:
665:
660:
658:
620:Africa articles
619:
616:
613:
610:
609:
587:
582:
580:
560:
554:
508:
505:
502:
499:
498:
465:
386:Needed articles
382:
298:
295:
292:
289:
288:
266:
261:
259:
239:
233:
205:
202:
199:
197:Religious texts
196:
195:
162:
160:Religious texts
133:on Knowledge's
130:
120:
82:
12:
11:
5:
2074:
2064:
2063:
2058:
2053:
2048:
2043:
2038:
2033:
2028:
2023:
2018:
2013:
2008:
2003:
1998:
1993:
1988:
1983:
1978:
1973:
1968:
1963:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1920:
1909:
1865:
1812:
1809:
1771:
1770:Chapters 1–16*
1768:
1767:
1766:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1682:
1679:
1663:
1662:
1629:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1566:
1565:
1546:
1535:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1516:88.111.224.129
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1485:
1484:
1453:
1452:
1431:
1430:
1402:
1399:
1368:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1330:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1313:88.111.224.129
1290:
1287:
1267:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1198:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1156:75.178.184.130
1141:
1138:
1126:86.154.121.185
1115:
1112:
1089:
1086:
1044:
1041:
1029:41.241.164.166
1018:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
968:
965:
934:
931:
904:
901:
900:
899:
874:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
841:88.111.224.129
808:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
785:88.111.224.129
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
745:
744:
733:
728:
727:
726:
706:
703:
698:
695:
692:
691:
688:
687:
684:
683:
680:Top-importance
671:
670:
654:
644:
643:
636:Top-importance
632:
626:
625:
623:
606:the discussion
593:
592:
576:
564:
563:
561:Top‑importance
549:
537:
536:
533:
532:
525:Low-importance
521:
515:
514:
512:
509:Death articles
495:the discussion
481:
469:
468:
466:Low‑importance
460:
448:
447:
444:
443:
440:
439:
434:
433:
423:
422:
412:
411:
401:
400:
390:
389:
381:
380:
375:
370:
365:
359:
356:
355:
347:
346:
343:Top-importance
333:
323:
322:
315:Top-importance
311:
305:
304:
302:
285:the discussion
272:
271:
255:
243:
242:
240:Top‑importance
228:
216:
215:
212:
211:
209:
182:
170:
169:
157:
145:
144:
138:
116:
102:
101:
98:
97:
94:
87:
79:
78:
75:
72:
68:
67:
59:
58:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2073:
2062:
2059:
2057:
2054:
2052:
2049:
2047:
2044:
2042:
2039:
2037:
2034:
2032:
2029:
2027:
2024:
2022:
2019:
2017:
2014:
2012:
2009:
2007:
2004:
2002:
1999:
1997:
1994:
1992:
1989:
1987:
1984:
1982:
1979:
1977:
1974:
1972:
1969:
1967:
1964:
1962:
1959:
1958:
1956:
1941:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1824:
1820:
1818:
1808:
1807:
1804:
1803:
1798:
1790:
1789:
1786:
1785:
1780:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1751:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1678:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1661:
1658:
1657:
1655:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1623:
1618:
1611:
1610:
1600:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1563:
1560:parameter to
1551:
1547:
1540:
1539:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1489:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1462:Pyramid Texts
1459:
1455:
1454:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1427:User:The Land
1424:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1398:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1384:
1375:
1362:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1340:
1336:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1286:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1272:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1137:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1111:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1100:208.38.79.131
1097:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1062:
1053:
1040:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
988:
984:
980:
976:
964:
963:
960:
955:
950:
946:
944:
943:creation myth
939:
930:
926:
925:
922:
918:
914:
910:
898:
895:
891:
887:
886:
885:
884:
881:
864:
860:
856:
855:91.225.19.234
852:
851:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
826:
822:
817:
815:
807:
794:
790:
786:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
767:
764:
763:64.246.144.52
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
749:
743:
739:
738:
737:
732:
724:
720:
719:
718:
716:
712:
702:
681:
678:(assessed as
677:
676:
668:
657:
650:
646:
645:
641:
637:
631:
628:
627:
624:
607:
603:
599:
598:
590:
589:Africa portal
579:
577:
574:
570:
569:
565:
558:
553:
550:
547:
543:
542:
530:
526:
520:
517:
516:
513:
496:
492:
488:
487:
482:
479:
475:
474:
470:
464:
461:
458:
454:
453:
438:
431:
428:
427:
426:
421:
418:
417:
416:
409:
406:
405:
404:
398:
395:
394:
393:
387:
384:
383:
379:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
360:
358:
357:
353:
352:
348:
344:
341:(assessed as
340:
339:
329:
325:
324:
320:
316:
310:
307:
306:
303:
290:Ancient Egypt
286:
282:
281:Egyptological
278:
277:
269:
258:
256:
253:
249:
248:
244:
237:
232:
231:Ancient Egypt
229:
226:
222:
221:
210:
193:
192:
187:
183:
180:
176:
175:
171:
166:
161:
158:
155:
151:
150:
146:
142:
136:
128:
127:
117:
108:
107:
95:
93:
92:
88:
85:
81:
80:
76:
73:
70:
69:
64:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1923:
1912:
1890:
1886:
1825:
1821:
1814:
1793:
1791:
1775:
1773:
1730:
1690:
1686:
1684:
1664:
1653:
1651:
1631:
1602:
1601:, thanks! --
1598:
1580:Eloquentmess
1575:
1571:
1569:
1561:
1550:edit request
1465:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1404:
1386:
1381:
1346:
1332:
1292:
1269:
1232:observation.
1200:
1174:
1154:
1151:
1143:
1117:
1094:— Preceding
1091:
1060:
1054:
1046:
1020:
979:69.112.28.37
970:
953:
951:
947:
942:
940:
936:
927:
917:"common man"
916:
913:"Osiris-You"
912:
906:
876:
836:
818:
810:
746:
740:
735:
708:
700:
673:
667:Egypt portal
635:
595:
524:
484:
435:
430:Data sorting
429:
424:
420:Stub sorting
419:
413:
407:
402:
396:
391:
385:
336:
314:
274:
189:
141:WikiProjects
124:
89:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
1654:Ravenswing
1335:Jonpatterns
1120:—Preceding
1043:Punctuation
1023:—Preceding
973:—Preceding
825:Thomasmeeks
1955:Categories
1869:Brittanica
1668:Jevinchi07
1635:Jevinchi07
1554:|answered=
768:MaytrixInk
37:under the
1928:Knowledge
1895:A. Parrot
1852:A. Parrot
1756:A. Parrot
1713:A. Parrot
1474:A. Parrot
1353:A. Parrot
1175:Not done:
997:Jeff Dahl
959:Jeff Dahl
748:Sam Spade
129:is rated
1796:PizzaMan
1778:PizzaMan
1493:The Land
1276:The Land
1248:The Land
1219:The Land
1183:Darkwind
1122:unsigned
1096:unsigned
1075:Celestra
1025:unsigned
1005:contribs
975:unsigned
921:Mmcannis
131:GA-class
51:reassess
1917:Source:
1750:Irtapil
1734:Irtapil
1578:them."
1451:63–64).
1388:Rajmaan
1234:Apepch7
1204:Apepch7
1202:source.
1114:mummies
638:on the
527:on the
397:Cleanup
368:history
317:on the
191:defunct
165:defunct
74:Process
1845:; see
1709:Adûnâi
1695:Adûnâi
1371:": -->
894:Koweja
715:Anubis
611:Africa
602:Africa
552:Africa
137:scale.
96:Listed
77:Result
1616:Meep?
1558:|ans=
1548:This
711:Thoth
705:Thoth
557:Egypt
500:Death
491:Death
463:Death
378:purge
373:watch
118:This
1936:talk
1899:talk
1877:talk
1856:talk
1832:talk
1760:talk
1738:talk
1717:talk
1699:talk
1693:"?--
1672:talk
1639:talk
1599:Done
1584:talk
1576:over
1520:talk
1497:talk
1478:talk
1444:heka
1440:heka
1436:heka
1412:talk
1392:talk
1373:edit
1357:talk
1339:talk
1317:talk
1300:talk
1280:talk
1252:talk
1238:talk
1223:talk
1208:talk
1187:talk
1160:talk
1130:talk
1104:talk
1088:Time
1079:talk
1061:Done
1033:talk
1001:Talk
983:talk
954:were
880:Gh87
859:talk
845:talk
789:talk
723:Duat
697:Edit
363:edit
71:Date
1915:."
1893:".
1801:♨♨♨
1783:♨♨♨
1608:Hef
1556:or
837:not
630:Top
519:Low
309:Top
1957::
1938:)
1930:.
1901:)
1879:)
1858:)
1834:)
1762:)
1740:)
1719:)
1701:)
1674:)
1641:)
1605:El
1586:)
1572:of
1562:no
1522:)
1499:)
1480:)
1414:)
1394:)
1359:)
1341:)
1319:)
1302:)
1282:)
1254:)
1240:)
1225:)
1210:)
1189:)
1162:)
1132:)
1106:)
1081:)
1035:)
1007:)
1003:•
985:)
878:--
861:)
847:)
791:)
682:).
555::
345:).
234::
54:it
45:.
1934:(
1897:(
1875:(
1854:(
1830:(
1758:(
1752::
1748:@
1736:(
1715:(
1697:(
1670:(
1637:(
1619:)
1613:(
1582:(
1518:(
1495:(
1476:(
1410:(
1390:(
1377:]
1355:(
1337:(
1315:(
1298:(
1278:(
1250:(
1236:(
1221:(
1206:(
1185:(
1158:(
1128:(
1102:(
1077:(
1031:(
999:(
981:(
857:(
843:(
787:(
642:.
531:.
432:.
410:.
399:.
388:.
321:.
194:.
167:)
163:(
143::
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
_01.svg){kind=small}
