Knowledge

Talk:Budweiser

Source 📝

2722:. The link between Budweiser and Budweiser Gardens is tenuous at best: the venue is owned by Larimer County and managed by Global Spectrum. I can’t even find any evidence that Budweiser has anything to do with the running of the venue at all. It seems that all they do is pay a fee to have their name over the door. There is no evidence they have any control over which acts appear at the venue. There doesn’t seem to be any evidence that Budweiser even knew that Cosby would be appearing at the venue or that they could do anything to stop him appearing even if they did know. There’s certainly no evidence that Budweiser approved the act. The connection between the venue and Budweiser is so tenuous that the venue isn’t even mentioned in this article. As far as I can tell all we have is that Budweiser paid to have their name put over the door of a venue, and a celebrity who has been accused of a crime appeared at that venue several years later? Is that an accurate summary of what can be establised with reliable soucres? Unless we can show that Budweiser was aware that Cosby was appearing at the venue and had some sort of control of the venue that might have enabled them to prevent that, then there is simply no connection between Budweiser and Cosby. At this stage there is no evidence that anybody working for Budweiser even knows who Bill Cosby is. In summary, my opinion is that this material doesn’t belong here until we get some reliable sources to indicate that someone at Budweiser was aware that Cosby was appearing and approved that appearance. FWIW, I also do not work for Budweiser. I have never even drunk Budweiser. Having lived most of my life in a different hemisphere (both ways) I don’t think I have ever even seen a Budweiser. 1279:
and convert the starches in the malt to fermentable sugars. Most malts have enough spare Amylases to also convert extra starches to sugars. The adjuncts are boiled to a mush - called cooker mash - and added to the main malted barley mash where they, being mostly starch, are converted by the spare enzymes into fermentables. This started in the USA well over a hundred years ago to dilute the proteins found in malts from the six-row barley traditional in American Brewing. These extra proteins were producing unwelcome hazes in the finished beer, at a time when glassware became generally affordable, and although modern malts overcome this problem, the use of cereal adjuncts has continued, this being part of the expected flavour and body of the brews. Around 30% adjucts would be fairly normal, according to the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica 50% or more could be used in the USA back then. 80% just wouldn't work, so as posted above a citation would be welcome. The article seems to be a bit confusing as it could be read that the use of adjuncts began during Prohibition, not so. --
884: 866: 2506: 2127:. The articles in question here do not share the same topic, two are breweries which simply have Budweiser in their name, one is a beer called Budweiser, one is the town Budweis, and one is a trademark dispute - there is no topic or concept in common, simply a loose connection with the name Budweis or Budweiser. Making the trademark dispute the primary topic is not a viable solution as that appears to be the least likely target for a reader putting in a search for Budweiser, and merely delays and confuses the reader who is searching for either the Anheuser–Busch beer (most likely), or for one of the other topics associated with the name (which may include the trademark dispute, but as page hits indicate, is the least likely target). On page hits 3739:. The issue is still clearly highly contested after a move request which did not even have the scope to deal with it. The final closer of the 2014 move review referenced above commented that RfC is exactly the right place to discuss the article title: "(...) however, using requested moves to settle content issues is outside its scope (and would be outside the scope of the closer to factor in). For complex content decisions, consider opening a request for comment, which can have multiple options, including a proposal to move various articles around." 2143:. That Knowledge may be influencing the trademark dispute by making the American beer the primary target is worth considering, and makes one hesitate, however a counter argument could be that by not making what is clearly the primary target the primary topic, we are siding with the German breweries. I think we need to lay aside the politics, and simply follow our own guidelines and common sense - what are most readers looking for when they type in a search for "Budweiser": they are searching for the American beer. Therefore: 952: 564: 390: 1065: 278: 251: 3412:
introduced in cans in 1966. Bottled Michelob was originally sold in a uniquely shaped bottle named the teardrop bottle because it resembled a water droplet. The teardrop bottle was awarded a medal from the Institute of Design in 1962. Five years later the bottle was redesigned for efficiency in the production line. This bottle was used until 2002 when it was dropped in favor of a traditional bottle. The teardrop bottle was used again from January 2007 to October 2008.
478: 667: 646: 677: 2376:
American gets more hits, because of the US market size compared to English-speaking part of the European market; but 20% is nowhere nearly insignificant proportion, and rather makes sense looking at the markets where the products are dominant. However, the crucial point that has seemingly been missed by the participants of the discussion, is that in the United Kingdom and in Ireland, the only product labeled as "Budweiser" is the European
1586: 1156: 2704: 220: 288: 786: 554: 765: 533: 2676:. Bud has their name on the building. Yes, because they hope for a positive association with the acts that pass through...but to say they sponsor him just isn't accurate, and to single him out and bring his current issues into this article is undue. Who cares what Judd Apatow has to say? It's been a while since I've looked at dispute resolution. Perhaps a 3rd opinion is needed. -- 2799:
Finding a sponsor for a venue is a really big deal with long-term ramifications in terms of branding, and there are all sorts of legal contracts that prevent sponsors from pulling out. And without some evidence, it seems incredible that someone sponsoring a building would have any ability to forbid the owners from using that building for its intended purpose. The
3138:. Despite the fact that majority was against this specific move, it was judged as a consensus for a move, arguing that "a majority of all participants favored a change over the status quo", even though the majority did't favor that the title "Budweiser" is given to this brand. There was neither an explanation on how a majority prefers taking side in 2232:, please see my closing comments above. My determination was that there was a solid consensus for a change from the status quo, and of the two discussed options, the proposed move had the most support. It was definitely a difficult discussion to close, and I'm always available to discuss my closes further.-- 378: 1650:
3 in favor). As such, a majority of all participants favored a change over the status quo, and the proposed move was the best supported of the two changes (I do note that a few participants favoring one change specifically opposed the other). I kept the 4 remaining oppose votes in mind, but gave less
1010:
It is not debated that those chemicals are off flavors at all. There are no styles where acetaldehyde (green apple) flavor is acceptable, and only a handful of beer styles where diacetyl is acceptable (always in very small amounts). You could consult the Beer Judge Certification program style guide
3328:
This is such a blatant breach of the neutrality of the Knowledge. You CĂșchullain do not seem to understand the word consensus. Consensus is not a majority decision and also not what most people want. Consensus is a decision that everybody involved can live with. A decision making Knowledge a part of
2819:
PS, since inclusion of the material hinges on the assertion that "there IS an association now between a prominent beer brand and an alleged rapist", then we will need to establish that as notable and verifiable in its own right" through the usual means: multiple reliable sources making such a claim.
2793:
My opinion remains unchanged. When we have some evidence from a reliable source that Anheuser-Busch is informed in advance who plays at their venues, and that it is possible for Anheuser-Busch to withdraw their name from the site, and that it is possible for Anheuser-Busch to forbid the managers and
2249:
I completely fail to see how the admin concluded that there was any consensus whatever, let alone one in favour of the move. As I count it, four editors supported the move, five said leave it alone and five said redirect it to the trademark dispute. Four v nine is not a consensus. I intend to go to
1514:
After numerous deaths in football stadiums, Brazil passed a law in 2003 outlawing alcohol sales in stadiums. FIFA demanded that Brazil allow alcohol sales at the World Cup because Budweiser is a major World Cup sponsor and so it can make Budweiser the "Official Beer of the FIFA World Cup", a role it
1424:
It's a slander. Busch may well have preferred to drink wine (so what) but the "dot schlop" comment was really a *self-deprecating joke* that he made when a dinner companion ordered a Budweiser in his presence. He wasn't going around secretly cackling about getting the rubes to drink "dot schlop." He
4279:
The section labelled 'Beer' states, "Budweiser is produced using barley malt, rice, water, hops and yeast" Labelling requirements in the EU are very strict and require that the ingredients are accurate and listed in order of quantity. The Budweiser label states that the ingredients are water, rice,
4256:
Maybe, I should not have framed this proposal as "compromise solution", but rather as new proposal to reduce ambiguity. Frankly, I do not see any major advantage of the solution that is currently in place over this idea, while I do see an advantage of this option (avoiding that people searching for
2401:
Besides that, CĂșchullain made a decision based on the fact that the "majority of all participants favored a change over the status quo". But dividing the participants into 3 groups with 3 goals and calling the previous situation an undesirable status quo is artificially fragmenting the participants
1278:
Ok Rice 101. Non-malted adjuncts such as rice or maize are used in many International lagers outside of Germany, and particularly in American mainstream beers. Miller uses maize. Malted barley contains enzymes called Amylase (Alpha and Beta) that are released on mashing in hot water at the brewery
3686:
The argument that "Budweiser" stands for (Anheuser–Busch) in the English speaking world is true! Counter: Firstly - this is an encyclopaedia not a tabloid. Secondly - the internationality that English has acquired demands a title not based on colloquialism or one specific countries' traditions but
3653:
I just did a lot of cleanup. Much of the text was unencyclopedic or discussing non-notable ad campaigns. I also don't believe a 1-year sponsorship contract of NASCAR drivers in the 80s merits mention; I left the longer contracts and some of the events they had previously paid the naming rights for
3199:
Concerning your initial statement: I have noticed that it is common for people from the United States to refer to the company as Budweiser even though it is really called Anheuser-Busch. Does this help to explain why you find the article confusing? I have not ever seen any marketing communications
2798:
be allowable. But at this stage we have no evidence that this is the case. Based on the reliable sources provided so far and those I have been able to find on my own, Anheuser-Busch does not have the ability to do any of those things. It would be rather extraordinary of they did have those powers.
1014:
I only say all this because I think the clause"anheuser-busch believes..." should be removed since it implies that only AB considers them flaws and they are otherwise not generally considered flaws. Seems almost biased against AB. You could completely remove that clause and still keep the entire
3087:
I accuse the decision makers of corruption. You can discus all you want about it as long as you want. But to decide to give a disputed name, reason of many lawsuits in many countries, direct access to one companies trade mark just stinks of corruption. If you show me a similar other occurrence in
2110:
There is a viable argument for which approach is more appropriate: a search for "Budweiser" landing the reader on a standard dab page, or on the article about the beer by Anheuser–Busch with a hat note to a dab page. However, I don't see restoring the trademark dispute article with links to other
1263:
The makers of sake and other rice wines would disagree that rice is unfermentable. Rice and corn used in the production of beer, and all other alcohol production, are reduced to their starch components and combined with enzymes to produce sugars. That sugar is then fermented with the rest of the
4252:
I get the point, but you don't think it would be better to explicitly show here that this article is about Budweiser by AB InBev and not Budweiser Budwar (to avoid any confusion). The way I'm proposing also would avoid that someone searching for Budweiser by AB InBev would end up in an incorrect
3535:
Consensus refers to the primary way decisions are made on Knowledge, and it is accepted as the best method to achieve our goals, i.e. to achieve our five pillars. Consensus on Knowledge does not mean unanimity (which, although an ideal result, is not always achievable); nor is it the result of a
3411:
Michelob is a 5% ABV pale lager developed by Adolphus Busch in 1896 as a "draught beer for connoisseurs". In 1961, Anheuser-Busch produced a pasteurized version of Michelob which allowed legal shipment of the beer across state lines. Bottled beer began to be shipped soon after, and the brand was
2620:
I do not, and never have, worked for Budweiser or anyone affiliated with Budweiser. Please shove the unfounded accusation somewhere dark. Numerous performers and entertainment, yes...so why focus on Cosby? To make Bud look bad or to get more eyes on the Cosby fiasco by adding it to tangentially
2375:
The move by CĂșchullain was based on an assumption that most readers who type "Budweiser" are looking for an American beer. That assumption distorts some of the facts that we have. The European product gets about 20% of the amount of the monthly hits that the American product gets. Obviously the
1454:
The current article goes into some depth about the Budweiser bottle, but almost entirely ignores other types of packaging. I was planning on adding information specifically related to Budweiser can packaging. Much of this information will be tailored to look at the latest can design change that
3035:
Why is Knowledge taking a side in a trade dispute? Why is Knowledge promoting a trademark and what is more a disputed trademark? Has Anheuser-Busch made a big contribution to Knowledge? Has Anheuser-Busch been threatening Knowledge? Has Knowledge moved into advertising? What is happening here.
3343:
The move discussion occurred two years ago and was endorsed at move review. If you still disagree, you can start a new RM if you wish, but it doesn't seem likely that you'll find a different consensus. And again, my opinion is that the time and effort would be better spent cleaning up the
2820:
While I don't doubt that you personally make such an association, that alone doesn't make it notable or verifiable. If you can provide the results of a survey making such an association, or you can show multiple non-opinion newspaper articles that make such a claim, then w have something.
2746:, I agree that it is probably unlikely that marketing people at Anheuser-Busch had direct control over which performers perform in the venue with the 'Budweiser' label pasted prominently on their site, but if you look at it in terms of results, of course there is a strong association. 3269:
in fall 2014 was hotly contested, and the result was taken to Move Review. The current name is the result of that discussion. Unclear whether it is worth the turmoil of a new move discussion, when we can anticipate more disagreement and something close to a tie vote again.
1793:- Both are big selling beers with very similar names, the current disambiguation works just fine. There is no evidence to suggest that either is the primary topic as search results will bring up both beers in the search results. Also moving the American beer to the article " 1227:
I remember a few years ago is 80% rice , why 30% now ? Anheuser Busch was one of them. They survived by converting to cereal beer made from non-fermentable grains like rice. Anheuser still makes its Budweiser from 80% rice, unlike the traditional all-malted barley beer.
2574:. It is marketing. At this venue, they host numerous performers and entertainment, all with the idea of the principle of association -- to link, in peoples' minds, the idea of their for-sale beer product with these performers as a way to increase sales; so if the band 1379:, but I cannot find any information beyond this (except for internet hearsay.) Unless this is a credible claim, and someone has a more credible source, I think that comment should be taken out because it adds little to the article and cannot be verified. Thoughts? 4257:
Budweiser Budwar not immediately noticing that they're on the wrong article - note that Budweiser by AB InBev is not very well-known in many European countries and that enwiki isn't only used in English-speaking countries but also by English-speaking people).
3250:, I deleted the section called 'history' because it was a history of Anheuser Busch, not of (US) Budweiser. If somebody is keen, it is worth transcribing into the AB-Inbev article, respecting the authorship of previous editors (I've forgotten the mechanism).-- 2280:, you can count me as sixth, i have completely missed this request. I do strongly oppose to such move, as wiki should stay neutral and not to prioritize any sides of the dispute. Unfortunately, i have no experience with "MR". Could you help to arrange this? 2215:
is the proper venue to have it reconsidered; you should speak with the closing admin before going there if you plan to. But the claim about Knowledge taking sides is bogus. If we decided to not move the page because of that, it would be akin to censorship.
3308:, and the decision was endorsed. If there's another move it needs to be through another consensus, and it doesn't strike me as likely. I imagine the time and effort will be better spent improving the articles than moving them around again.-- 1651:
consideration to those that did not specifically contend with English use. A no consensus close would leave us in a situation comparatively few participants preferred; I find rough consensus in favor of the best supported individual option.
3654:(although this list can be shortened, too). I added refs, too. I would welcome feedback, but I think this covers many of the objections the nominator had. I could still remove about a paragraph worth of text but don't want to go overboard.- 3681:
The article is not neutral, Historically "Budweiser" comes from the town of ČeskĂ© Budějovice, the name "Budweiser" should not be used solely as disambiguation for the Anheuser–Busch brewed Beer! The title should be moved from Budweiser -:
4334:
Does anyone know more about the Budweiser brand lawsuits? Was it resolved in some cases by consumption? And if Anheuser-Busch historically stole the name from the Budejovice brewery, shouldn't it be better to rename its American brew?
1449: 2770:
to disguise the drugging. Of course it is possible for Anheuser-Busch to withdraw their name from the site, or forbid the management of the place not to host rapists. It is not some sideline issue when a prominent American filmmaker,
1839:
A trademark dispute is a poor reason for dictating naming conventions. The dispute is between a large beverage company that gets a lot of hits and is referenced by a lot of other articles; and a smaller beverage company that isn't.
3039:
Budweiser as a definition should go directly describing a person or something coming from Budweis. In a second step it should mention the products or trademarks using Budweiser and than it should not prioritize one product over the
1055: 2402:
who want to stay brand-neutral and oppose having the American product labeled as just "Budweiser". The brand-neutral position was supported by 8 (+me now is 9) and opposed by 7; but still a move towards one brand was executed.
3110:
This is a very strange article, especially as there is a separate article regarding the Anheuser-Busch company, this article should concentrate on the Budweiser brand and leave the history of Anheuser-Busch to the that named
2385: 1912:- While I hate to go against what actually does seem like a fairly clear case of common name, the fairly controversial nature of the topic makes it seem more logical for the Budweiser page to remain a disambiguation page.-- 4237:
I know we don't count votes in most circumstances, only an almost universally rejected move proposal really doesn't need a "compromise". A move proposal was made, it was wholly rejected, and I think we just move on now.
4117: 3361:
I disagree on the base of neutrality. Knowledge should not endorse a brand owned by one company above the same brand owned by another company. It is plain advertising this move and I am astonished that you do not see
2505: 2359:
The move review is closed as endorsing the current title. The closing administrator advises us never again using a RM for content disputes. If the dispute is complex, the administrator recommended RFC. Thoughts?
4280:
corn syrup, barley, malt extract, hop extract and yeast. There are two serious differences. First there is the addition of corn syrup and second, according to the label, Budweiser contains neither malt nor hops.
153: 3200:
from Anheuser-Busch discouraging or clarifying this distinction. I am not an expert in marketing, but I would guess that it's better for sales if consumers assume that each family of brands is independent.
3575:
I'd object to a merge. This is one of the best known beer brands in the world and there are plenty of sources discussing it that justify a distinct article. Just remove the duplication with the company's
1366: 3455:
I am posting this here because nobody will see it on the talk page of the logo. The logo is just text with a simple crown graphic and probably should be available as simple public domain text file under
1182:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. 3088:
Knowledge I would be astonished. This is not about how many people want to read about a trademark of Anheuser and Bush but of the neutrality of the Knowledge and that went strait out of the window.
3105: 2193:
How can be a result of the request move, if no consensus was found? I absolutely agree with IJA and others that both are big selling beers, this move would be making Knowledge take sides in the "
1249:
You really need a citation for that. Any beer with 80% rice would be virtually unfermentable. Rice has almost no sugar so it would be next to impossible to make a ~4% abv beer with 80% adjunct
1007:"...giving it more time to reabsorb and process green beer flavors, such as acetaldehyde and diacetyl, that Anheuser-Busch believes are off-flavors which detract from overall drinkability..." 2131:
with an average monthly hit of 30,000 is the most likely target, and that is more than the combined average of the other articles, which is less than 20,000 a month. All things considered,
2766:(latest count) of drugging and raping them. Like it or not, there IS an association now between a prominent beer brand and an alleged rapist. Not only that, the allegations are that Cosby 3795: 2961: 1111: 1071: 1434:
Yeah, Bud is quite bland, but anyone who thinks you can hide bad ingredients or technique in such a bland beer doesn't know anything about brewing. It's a boring beer made very well.
2459:
Update: "Thanks to the registrations of trademarks Budweiser or Budweiser Budvar, that belong to BudějovickĂœ Budvar, ABI cannot use its key brand Budweiser in almost 70 countries." (
3142:
over "status quo", nor how is a "status quo" an undesirable status. In contrary, a majority of participants favored to stay brand-neutral, which is the opposite of what was done.--
2929: 3813: 3809: 2979: 2975: 1464: 2529:-- but lists numerous sponsorships of race car drivers, Clydesdale horses, ad nauseum -- why not include Cosby when it includes all the other sponsorships? Not only that but 1146: 1455:
occurred in 2011, as well as the reasons and possible consequences of the change. Also, I plan on adding a chart, similar to that under the "Bottle" section, for the can.
3259: 1414: 1254: 1239: 1045: 1020: 2427:
name to one specific brand because that would represent neither the global situation, nor the situation in the English-speaking world but rather just North America.--
3486: 3156:
one strange thing in this article is talking about Budweiser Brands, Budweiser is a brand not a owner of brands, the owner of the different brands is Anheuser-Busch.
2640: 1418: 2763: 147: 3425: 1562: 1544: 1404: 3900: 3781: 3030: 2500: 2115:
doesn't hold up, as a broad concept article would need to have topics in common, other than similarity of name, enough that an article could be written, such as
1400: 1390: 4340: 1213: 4310: 3320: 2878:
It seems like this conversation has gone a bit stale. I'm planning on removing the tag soon since only one person has voiced their concern with the section. --
3605:
do. I support either sourcing or removing any unsourced statements and merging any content not specifically related to the Budweiser brand onto the AB page.-
2595: 1638:. Effectively, three options have been considered: 1) the proposed move (7 in favor), 2) an alternative option moving/restoring the concept dab (now located 3560:
as people want to include the history of the American brewers. This change will resolve that issue and I can't think of any new issues it will generate. --
4433: 4116:. The American beer got 85% of the article traffic compared to the Czech beer, despite the fact that it wasn't at the base name "Budweiser" for two months. 3744: 3569: 3120: 2294:
Seventh. There's more world than just the US, and besides, it's Anheuser-Busch that stole the trademark of breweries from a town named literally Budweis.
3186:. I don't think that ownership comes into it. I think that you have found an opportunity for improving this part of the article, as it could be confusing. 3688: 2591: 2407:
I believe we should remain neutral because the division of what "Budweiser" means is significant even within the English speaking world. I propose that
848: 3645: 1460: 4336: 3499:
While it is not a majority opinion, we may have a consensus that this article should not stand on its own. It discusses one of the many brands of the
747: 2860: 2839: 2780: 2659: 2607: 2534: 3548: 2139:
criteria so a search for "Budweiser" should land the leader on that page, with hat notes pointing to the current dab page which would be renamed as
3130:
This article is about the American lager beer produced by Anheuser-Busch, named Budweiser. Somehow this article was moved from its original title
2747: 930: 4383: 3740: 3444: 2731: 338: 2930:
https://web.archive.org/20150202210400/http://adage.com/article/special-report-super-bowl/bud-proudly-macro-swagger-filled-super-bowl-ad/296932/
2835: 2776: 2556:
to add nonsense about Cosby's alleged criminal acts on the Budweiser page just because their name is on a building where he performed a show. --
1093:
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
4295:
Then go ahead and correct it, citing the label as source, with reference to the labelling regulations that require the label to be accurate. --
3756: 3536:
vote. Decision-making involves an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns, while respecting Knowledge's policies and guidelines.
2758:
in customer's minds ideas the positive associations about performers, fun, and Budweiser beer. In this situation, one of the performers at the
3287:
If the OP has a different idea of what this page should be, do a mock-up in a sandbox and put it where we can see it. Otherwise, let it rest.
2542: 628: 348: 3861: 3588: 3407:
Frankly, the current content is probably too long, and will then need some condensing. For example, this is the total coverage of Michelob.
3305: 3279: 2879: 2677: 2622: 2557: 2308: 2259: 1595: 1456: 2933: 2325:
Eighth. Please restore this back to the disambiguation page. SilkTork seems to be biased to move this page in favor of the American brand.
4398: 4304: 3985: 2939: 1515:
has played since 1986. In response, Brazil passed a law paving the way for alcohol sales in the World Cup, nicknamed the "Budweiser Bill".
810: 4324: 3634:
too notable to be merged into a parent article. If info overlaps, that's a content issue that should be fixed on the respective articles.
3049: 2887: 2855: 2272: 4443: 4428: 3884:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
3671: 3622: 1621:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
924: 838: 3687:
neutral and descriptive facts. The current title does not fulfil these criteria and is to some extend misleading. Requests for comment!
2829: 1443: 2024:
near us. If a newer multinational company adopted the same name and took over the Knowledge name space I would be less than impressed.
1034:"The Czech Budweiser is sold in some countries as Budejovicky Budvar but is known as Budweiser throughout." Thoughout what or where? 883: 865: 79: 4182: 3938:, a long-running series of international legal disputes concerning the ownership and use of the Budweiser name. In some juristictions 2380:, as it is the sole owner of the "Budweiser" trademark in the EU; and so in the UK and Ireland the American Anheuser-Busch product is 4418: 2868: 2812: 2788: 2490: 2334: 1858: 737: 314: 4032: 3791:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
4378: 3703: 980: 2803:
of proof is on those making claims that Anheuser-Busch have these abilities. Until that is satisfied, the material doesn't belong.
2606:
if they think you work for Budweiser or have marketing ties to the parent company or one of its marketing or publicity agencies.--
1904: 1746: 957:
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
3525:
will need condensed since it's much too long. No beer company article on Knowledge devotes that much space to any single brand.
798: 4131: 4087: 3296: 3238: 2472: 2454: 2436: 4053: 2320: 2303: 2244: 2105: 1934: 1162: 4070: 3934:, and the proposed move does not precisely duplicate any previously proposed move. The name "Budweiser" is the subject of the 3782:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071128193838/http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/press-center/releases2/greenpeace-exposes-anheuser-bu
3371: 3356: 3338: 2685: 2667: 2630: 2615: 2565: 2289: 2224: 1958: 1887: 1503: 1497: 4403: 4393: 4149: 3723: 3209: 3165: 3151: 2159: 2033: 1531: 618: 408: 85: 4104: 2654:(with two references) was added about the Cosby issue, it got deleted, sure looks like a cover-up to me, and a violation of 2072: 2053: 2012: 1991: 1927:- Anyone searching with "Budweiser" is most likely, by far, searching for this topic. A hatnote can handle the others. -- 1830: 1785: 1358: 1340: 4448: 4266: 4247: 4022: 2482: 2326: 1919: 1769: 1410: 1250: 1235: 1041: 1016: 814: 301: 256: 4195:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3064: 2264:
Consensus isn't determined by simply counting votes, but rather by the strength and validity of the underlying arguments.
1298:
Why is Budweiser italicized throughout the article? Yes, it is a foreign word, but we don't italicize other brand names.
4423: 3748: 3097: 3078: 1896: 1132: 713: 1943:, which is page views? Or the second one, which is long-term educational significance? Oh wait, either way it's a rout. 1810: 1258: 1243: 470:
This is a list of single time tasks that need action. Once you have completed them, please remove them from the list.
168: 4413: 4408: 3962: 3866: 3387:. But much more often, the article is about a brewing company with coverage of individual beers within that brand. See 3025: 1435: 30: 3785: 2197:" and Knowledge should always remain neutral. Is it legitimate that if others strongly oppose to perform such a move? 1375:, but the article does not cite any credible source (it actually has no citation.) The article, from Salon.com, says, 1024: 135: 3696: 1396: 1386: 900: 44: 3773: 3706:
which endorsed the consensus solution of the current status quo. Although I don't agree, I will still live with it.-
1663: 4438: 4126: 4027: 3915: 3583: 3351: 3315: 2239: 2206: 1658: 1288: 1273: 1209: 1107: 593:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
464: 313:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
4300: 3981: 3565: 3440: 3255: 2892: 2647: 2530: 2255: 1895:
per IJA. Instead I suggest that the trademark dispute article be made primary, as the most educational topic. --
1724: 793: 770: 594: 496: 437: 99: 3995:. It's not unusual for Knowledge to "take a side" in a dispute based on prevalence in reliable sources, such as 3812:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2978:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2460: 1692:– By hit count or by links, the American beer is far and away the primary topic for the English-speaking world. 1125:
I believe this article may have been vandalized. I believe someone replaced Adolphus Busch with Jack Burrell.
4388: 4078:. This is the English Knowledge, and an English speaker searching for "Budweiser" is looking for this article. 1354: 1307: 709: 690: 651: 447: 442: 104: 20: 3597:. The American Budweiser beer, however you feel about how it tastes, deserves a standalone article, just like 2754:, presumably Budweiser, which is one of America's top brands of beer. Anheuser-Busch marketers have sought to 2369: 432: 2188: 1876: 1576: 1222: 74: 4231: 2415:(with added explanation of the meaning of the German word), but at the same time I also support redirecting 4453: 3856: 3676: 1140: 1049: 891: 871: 231: 129: 3481: 2750:. They control where the name 'Budweiser' appears. They pay to have their name on a prominent venue which 2599: 2522: 1979: 1734: 4351: 4201: 3935: 3641: 3304:
I closed the last RM two years ago, based on my reading of the consensus. The decision was challenged at
3139: 2934:
http://adage.com/article/special-report-super-bowl/bud-proudly-macro-swagger-filled-super-bowl-ad/296932/
2420: 2194: 2093: 1798: 1639: 1205: 1103: 1002: 65: 3831:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2997:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2940:
https://web.archive.org/20120421081217/http://www.thesunnews.com/2011/08/03/2313953/business-briefs.html
2578:
appears at the Budweiser Gardens, beer drinkers will be positively associated with this music. The word
2038:
In this case, however, Anheuser–Busch seems to have taken over the Knowledge space about 140 years ago.
4344: 4296: 3977: 3772:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 3561: 3461: 3450: 3436: 3251: 3131: 2478: 2442: 2412: 2277: 2251: 2140: 2132: 2128: 1868: 1847: 1713: 1686: 1673: 577: 538: 403: 261: 185: 2838:, not the beer directly, but indirectly. When more sources are found, the information will be added.-- 125: 4363: 3875: 1821:
makes a very good case. WP should remain neutral bearing in mind the long-running trademark dispute.
1612: 2943: 1311: 4017: 4008: 3943: 3888:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3544: 3421: 2486: 2377: 2354: 2330: 2020:, and comment, beer can be a big part of local culture. We have the relatively small and historic 190: 899:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
708:. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the 4329: 4289: 3847: 2825: 2808: 2727: 2533:-- seems like this page is run by public relations people touting Budweiser and Anheuser-Busch.-- 2392:
article is grossly misleading for readers from the United Kingdom and Ireland; and has a lesser "
1900: 1852: 1742: 1718: 1527: 1136: 1097:
has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
175: 109: 4222:
we respect ], but by adding "(AB InBev)" to the name of the article, we increase the precision.
3816:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
3071:
Have you read the above move discussion? Are you accusing all its participants of corruption? –
2982:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1426: 4320: 4113: 3832: 3769: 3692: 3635: 3392: 2998: 2393: 2136: 1940: 1931: 1439: 456: 3926: 2650:. Right now, the whole segment seems to be focused on irrelevant Clydesdale horses; when only 4206:
I have seen that the majority prefers keeping the name Budweiser for this article because of
4170: 3973: 3885: 3819: 3017: 2985: 2179: 1842: 1708: 1622: 1563:
Brazilian Senate approves ‘Budweiser bill’ ending dispute with FIFA over World Cup sponsoring
1377:"Adolphus Busch, the dynasty’s founder, called his beer “dot schlop” and drank wine instead." 695: 237: 2083: 4211: 4207: 4166: 4158: 4123: 4083: 4041: 4004: 3839: 3580: 3500: 3400: 3348: 3312: 3275: 3005: 2864: 2843: 2784: 2663: 2611: 2538: 2236: 2112: 2101: 1971: 1655: 1382: 1231: 1128: 1037: 2636: 8: 4243: 4049: 4012: 3947: 3540: 3417: 3383:
Knowledge does have some articles that cover only one specific (very popular) beer. e.g.
3234: 3205: 3147: 2718:
I've tried hard to see both sides of the argument here, but this really does seem like a
2468: 2450: 2432: 2365: 2316: 2285: 2202: 1953: 1880: 1509: 1284: 1269: 219: 55: 2586:
to host events like having embattled comedian Bill Cosby perform at the venue, they are
4285: 4066: 3960: 3798:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 3683:
Budweiser (Anheuser–Busch) , the current title has a bias towards US American readers.
3292: 2964:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2821: 2804: 2723: 2719: 2553: 2299: 2156: 2029: 1975: 1738: 1523: 1350: 1303: 1094: 141: 70: 4315:
There is a total of 28 sources in that section now, which I think is enough sources.
3838:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
3175: 3004:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2111:
possible Budweiser targets as appropriate or viable. The argument that the page was a
4316: 4142: 2911: 2068: 2008: 1987: 1826: 1702: 1166: 1120: 1075: 806: 51: 2063:- returning to the July 2014 version would be the best way to deal with this issue. 4100: 3786:
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/press-center/releases2/greenpeace-exposes-anheuser-bu
3457: 3367: 3334: 3161: 3116: 3093: 3060: 3045: 3013: 2883: 2800: 2681: 2626: 2561: 2525:
about one of Budweiser's sponsors, when a Budweiser venue hosts embattled comedian
2048: 1916: 1764: 1029: 2570:
Of course Budweiser sponsors Cosby. They own a big venue with the prominent title
1056:
File:Budweiser beverage delivery truck Romulus Michigan.JPG Nominated for Deletion
161: 4162: 4120: 4079: 4044:
the single word title is the more appropriate for the English language Knowledge
3996: 3577: 3384: 3345: 3309: 3271: 3076: 2919: 2905: 2673: 2590:
the idea of Budweiser + Cosby. There are numerous references to this association
2549: 2233: 2097: 2092:
since he did some of the July work and moved some of the Budweiser material into
2021: 1928: 1801:" and Knowledge should remain neutral on such issues and not favour either side. 1652: 1476: 1293: 682: 1634:
This is a difficult close, but I find a rough consensus to move this article to
4262: 4239: 4227: 4045: 3910: 3557: 3556:. I support this proposal. The article as it stands has frequently fallen into 3518: 3488: 3388: 3329:
the Anheuser and Busch advertisement campaign is something I can not live with.
3247: 3230: 3224: 3201: 3143: 2655: 2464: 2446: 2428: 2361: 2312: 2281: 2229: 2198: 1948: 1519: 1280: 1265: 1187: 490: 3804:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2970:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2178:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
199: 4372: 4359: 4281: 4062: 3951: 3931: 3736: 3718: 3666: 3617: 3529: 3476: 3288: 2603: 2295: 2149: 2120: 2089: 2025: 1806: 1372: 1346: 1299: 1194: 1190:
then you may need to upload it to Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
4210:, but it still can create some confussion. What about renaming this article 4003:. Here, English-language sources overwhelmingly use "Budweiser" to refer to 3055:
Is there any other example of such a blatant product promotion in Knowledge?
563: 389: 4274: 4000: 2709: 2266: 2218: 2212: 2169: 2124: 2064: 2004: 1983: 1822: 1779: 1698: 1471: 590: 1450:
Adding information about cans under the "Containers and packaging" section
1064: 4096: 3950:
in that it gives apparent support to one of the parties in this dispute.
3805: 3735:
with templates, sufficient publicization to get enough input and all per
3602: 3598: 3363: 3330: 3171: 3157: 3127: 3112: 3089: 3056: 3041: 2971: 2772: 2644: 2039: 1913: 1755: 1319: 569: 477: 395: 293: 3972:
this objection. Knowledge should not take sides in a trademark dispute.
2916:
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add
2521:
Seems like rather clear violations of Knowledge's neutrality rules when
277: 250: 204: 3072: 2847: 2526: 2510: 1545:
Brazil Moves To Ease Soccer Beer Ban, As World Cup Spat With FIFA Grows
699: 3946:
has sole control. The current title of this article is a violation of
2582:
is not just a "name on a building" but a PAID choice. When this venue
1425:
was *making a joke.* (the source is *American Mercury*, 1929, quoted (
507:
Add {{Portal|Beer}} to the See also section of high-relevance articles
4258: 4223: 4219: 4215: 3921: 3905: 3765: 3522: 3514: 3179: 3135: 2901: 2851: 2424: 2416: 2408: 2389: 1967: 1794: 1682: 1677: 1643: 1635: 802: 203: 24: 4355: 3939: 3710: 3658: 3609: 3468: 2703: 2635:
Budweiser is a prominent beer, spends huge $ $ on marketing, uses
2116: 1818: 1802: 704: 666: 645: 201: 3182:) that are associated with or derived from the main brand, called 2924:
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
2846:) 15:23, 17 January 2015 (UTC) Please understand, of course, that 1155: 3497:
Is this article about the Budweiser brand or Anheuser and Busch?.
2944:
http://www.thesunnews.com/2011/08/03/2313953/business-briefs.html
586: 3106:
Is this article about the Budweiser brand or Anheuser and Busch?
2794:
owners of the site from hiring certain acts, then this material
1867:
Only one article in the list is called simply "Budweiser", i.e.
1733:- there's no one topic that outnumbers all others put together. 377: 4139:. Cuchullain's data shows this is the clear-cut primary topic. 3976:
does not apply because it territory dependent (US v Europe).--
205: 3460:. A good example of "not meeting threshold of creativity" is 1427:
http://www.beerhistory.com/library/holdings/kingofbeer3.shtml
896: 310: 4218:
for this article. By keeping the redirect for this article
3503:
company. Hence, it should be one of the brands discussed in
3395:, for example. Frankly, that does seem to be the best bet. 2949:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
1518:
How can this be added to the article? Should it be added to
287: 3229:
Any reason not to move it back? Would make sense to me... —
1072:
File:Budweiser beverage delivery truck Romulus Michigan.JPG
785: 764: 582: 553: 532: 306: 3776:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1875:
that Budweiser could be considered less, in the spirit of
1646:(5 in favor), and 3) leaving the dab page at "Budweiser" ( 712:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the 1549: 1011:(www.bjcp.org) as a source for desired flavors in beer. 1871:. The others are partial title matches whose relevance 1611:
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
1367:"Even Adolphus Busch didn't like it.." Is this credible? 4169:
is the primary article in the English-speaking world. –
2900:
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
1754:, clear primary topic among a collection of also-rans. 1598:
on 9 September 2014. The result of the move review was
2548:
They don't sponsor Cosby. That's the difference. It's
1371:
This comment, located under the "Beer" section, cites
801:), a project to build and improve articles related to 160: 2168:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1147:
File:A bottle of Budweiser.JPG Nominated for Deletion
2643:
and this linkage is referenced in reliable sources.
2481:
is the best solution. Why hasn't this been done yet.
1317:
Good question, it's half italics, half not italics.
895:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 672: 581:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 559: 385: 305:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 283: 15: 4311:
requesting removal of not enough sources in section
3808:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2974:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2836:
Judd Apatow criticizing the Budweiser Gardens venue
2388:). Therefore having the American product under the 1625:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1193:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no 2182:. No further edits should be made to this section. 929:This article has not yet received a rating on the 3942:has sole control of the name, and in some others 3399:i.e. Make this Bud article into a section of the 2088:as a kind of concept DAB. I'm leaving a ping for 4370: 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 3031:Knowledge taking a side in a trademark dispute. 2501:Advertising bias and removal of sourced content 1797:" would be making Knowledge take sides in the " 1409:I would vote in favor of removing the comment. 992: 3794:This message was posted before February 2018. 3403:article that I have done a lot of updating on. 2960:This message was posted before February 2018. 975:MRV, Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch) → Budweiser, 174: 3464:, which oddly enough also involves a crown.- 965:RM, Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch) → Budweiser, 4434:WikiProject St. Louis Culture working group 2672:The Budweiser Events Center is operated by 3874:The following is a closed discussion of a 3764:I have just modified one external link on 1939:Hmm, should we use the first criterion of 970: 485:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 3416:Would Bud deserve more space than that?? 993:Talk:Budweiser#Requested_move_June_6_2020 3704:Knowledge:Move review/Log/2014 September 2504: 981:Knowledge:Move_review/Log/2014_September 217: 4384:Low-importance Food and drink articles 4371: 3757:External links modified (January 2018) 2748:Anheuser-Busch owns the Budweiser name 2648:criticized Budweiser for hosting Cosby 1974:like it was until July this year. See 1202:This notification is provided by a Bot 1100:This notification is provided by a Bot 1015:meaning of the rest of the statement. 2742:Thank you for your view. In terms of 2602:, which the community might see as a 1165:, has been nominated for deletion at 1074:, has been nominated for deletion at 3893:The result of the move request was: 3702:This has been discussed before. See 2762:is a prominent celebrity accused by 2531:EVEN talk page commentary is removed 1630:The result of the move request was: 1580: 971:Talk:Budweiser#Requested_move_(2014) 946: 889:This article is within the scope of 791:This article is within the scope of 575:This article is within the scope of 323:Knowledge:WikiProject Food and drink 299:This article is within the scope of 213: 4399:WikiProject Food and drink articles 3266: 1197:then it cannot be uploaded or used. 326:Template:WikiProject Food and drink 236:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 13: 4444:Unknown-importance Brands articles 4429:High-importance St. Louis articles 3178:to be describing the brands (like 1970:should just be turned back into a 376: 14: 4465: 4191:The discussion above is closed. 4040:By the very basic foundations of 3768:. Please take a moment to review 2904:. Please take a moment to review 4419:Mid-importance Missouri articles 4112:. The governing concern here is 3174:I understand the section titled 2702: 1584: 1154: 1063: 950: 882: 864: 784: 763: 675: 665: 644: 562: 552: 531: 476: 388: 286: 276: 249: 218: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 4379:C-Class Food and drink articles 2858:, such that jokes + beer =: --> 2834:Fair enough. Right now we have 2411:redirects to slightly reworked 2096:. He may want to comment here. 1596:listed at Knowledge:Move review 1161:An image used in this article, 1070:An image used in this article, 843:This article has been rated as 823:Knowledge:WikiProject St. Louis 742:This article has been rated as 623:This article has been rated as 343:This article has been rated as 4253:article (or a disambiguation). 3511:Unless several users disagree, 3487:Will merge this page into the 2311:created, please get involved. 1556: 1538: 1393:) 07:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 1171:Deletion requests October 2011 1163:File:A bottle of Budweiser.JPG 826:Template:WikiProject St. Louis 722:Knowledge:WikiProject Missouri 497:Beer and brewery stub articles 1: 4305:00:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC) 3646:23:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC) 3267:Talk:Budweiser#Requested move 2888:01:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 2523:referenced content is removed 2491:04:30, 29 December 2014 (UTC) 2473:06:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC) 2455:14:17, 26 November 2014 (UTC) 2437:03:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC) 2335:04:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC) 2321:19:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 2304:18:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC) 2290:05:44, 6 September 2014 (UTC) 2273:02:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC) 2260:20:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC) 2080:Some editors want to restore 1419:01:29, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 1341:15:36, 25 November 2011 (UTC) 1312:15:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC) 1259:01:29, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 1244:07:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC) 1080:Deletion requests August 2011 1025:01:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC) 903:and see a list of open tasks. 725:Template:WikiProject Missouri 597:and see a list of open tasks. 401:This article is supported by 317:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 4404:Mid-importance Beer articles 4394:Low-importance Beer articles 4325:16:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC) 3862:14:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC) 3749:19:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC) 3623:20:47, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 3589:18:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 3570:18:32, 6 February 2017 (UTC) 3549:15:47, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 3482:20:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC) 3445:11:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC) 3426:23:22, 3 February 2017 (UTC) 3265:The last move discussion at 2869:15:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 2830:07:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC) 2813:21:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 2789:12:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 2777:criticizes Budweiser Gardens 2732:02:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 2686:01:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC) 2668:21:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2631:14:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2616:13:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2566:12:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2543:11:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 2370:09:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC) 1980:the change into a normal dab 1978:for what it looked like and 1705:) 13:20, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 1405:08:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC) 1359:15:49, 2 December 2011 (UTC) 1345:I went ahead an changed it. 1214:15:25, 23 October 2011 (UTC) 1141:23:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC) 909:Knowledge:WikiProject Brands 7: 4449:WikiProject Brands articles 4364:16:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 4352:Budweiser trademark dispute 4345:11:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC) 4214:, but keeping the redirect 4119:This is pretty clear cut.-- 3936:Budweiser trademark dispute 3930:– This is a discussion per 3140:Budweiser trademark dispute 3026:17:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC) 2517:in London, Ontario, Canada. 2421:Budweiser trademark dispute 2245:17:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 2225:14:44, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 2207:05:59, 30 August 2014 (UTC) 2195:Budweiser trademark dispute 2160:19:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 2106:16:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 2094:Budweiser trademark dispute 2073:14:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 2054:13:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC) 2034:19:20, 20 August 2014 (UTC) 2013:00:12, 18 August 2014 (UTC) 1992:08:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC) 1799:Budweiser trademark dispute 1777:. Clear cut primary topic. 1664:19:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC) 1504:Brazilian's Budweiser bill= 1169:in the following category: 1078:in the following category: 987:RM Budweiser → (AB InBev), 912:Template:WikiProject Brands 424:Beer WikiProject task list: 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 4470: 4424:C-Class St. Louis articles 3867:Requested move June 6 2020 3825:(last update: 5 June 2024) 3761:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 3697:23:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 3521:article. Before doing so, 3462:File:Best_Western_logo.svg 3176:Budweiser#Budweiser brands 3132:Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch) 2991:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2922:|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} 2897:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2479:Budweiser (disambiguation) 2443:Budweiser (disambiguation) 2413:Budweiser (disambiguation) 2141:Budweiser (disambiguation) 2133:Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch) 2129:Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch) 1959:04:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC) 1935:00:16, 5 August 2014 (UTC) 1920:17:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC) 1869:Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch) 1687:Budweiser (disambiguation) 1674:Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch) 1474:sounds like a plan to me. 1112:21:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 931:project's importance scale 849:project's importance scale 748:project's importance scale 629:project's importance scale 603:Knowledge:WikiProject Beer 349:project's importance scale 302:WikiProject Food and drink 4414:C-Class Missouri articles 4409:WikiProject Beer articles 4290:10:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC) 4267:00:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC) 4248:22:27, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 4232:21:38, 18 June 2020 (UTC) 4183:22:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC) 3916:13:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC) 3672:00:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC) 2423:, rather than giving the 2084:the pre-July 2014 version 1905:05:18, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 1888:01:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC) 1859:21:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1831:21:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1811:19:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1786:15:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1770:15:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1747:14:58, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1735:but what is going on here 1725:13:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC) 1532:05:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC) 1498:11:04, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 1465:00:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 1444:04:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC) 1289:06:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC) 1050:05:17, 12 June 2010 (UTC) 928: 877: 842: 779: 741: 660: 622: 606:Template:WikiProject Beer 547: 419: 384: 359: 355: 342: 271: 244: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 4193:Please do not modify it. 4150:15:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 4132:01:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 4105:01:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC) 4088:06:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC) 4071:06:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC) 4054:22:10, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 4033:22:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 4009:Budweiser Budvar Brewery 3986:15:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 3963:11:11, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 3881:Please do not modify it. 3724:18:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC) 3372:21:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC) 3357:19:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 3339:18:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC) 3321:14:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC) 3297:13:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC) 3280:01:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC) 3260:20:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC) 3239:23:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC) 3210:22:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC) 3166:21:10, 6 June 2016 (UTC) 3152:18:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC) 3098:19:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC) 3079:20:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC) 3065:10:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC) 2445:should be the best way. 2175:Please do not modify it. 1731:On the face of it oppose 1618:Please do not modify it. 1395:*Edit - forgot to sign* 1274:15:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC) 688:This article is part of 4439:C-Class Brands articles 3121:15:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC) 3050:13:45, 5 May 2016 (UTC) 2893:External links modified 2441:I agree, a redirect to 1470:As long as you provide 329:Food and drink articles 3495:See the discussion in 3393:Miller Brewing Company 2518: 2477:Agreed, a redirect to 1999:– revert to that nice 1947:as per both criteria. 1877:WP:Partial title match 1206:CommonsNotificationBot 1104:CommonsNotificationBot 813:and contribute to the 381: 226:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 4389:C-Class Beer articles 4297:John Maynard Friedman 3978:John Maynard Friedman 3562:John Maynard Friedman 3437:John Maynard Friedman 3252:John Maynard Friedman 2710:third opinion request 2508: 2278:John Maynard Friedman 2252:John Maynard Friedman 2189:Result of the request 2001:broad concept article 1577:Requested move (2014) 1223:hey,30% or 80% rice ? 794:WikiProject St. Louis 463:page, to edit, click 380: 100:Neutral point of view 4330:Disputes with Budvar 4212:Budweiser (AB InBev) 4167:Budweiser (AB InBev) 4061:per WP:COMMONNAME.-- 4005:Budweiser (AB InBev) 3927:Budweiser (AB InBev) 3806:regular verification 3733:Support a proper RfC 3677:Requests for comment 3630:per Ich. Subject is 3501:Anheuser-Busch InBev 3401:Anheuser-Busch InBev 2972:regular verification 2957:to let others know. 2908:. If necessary, add 2856:ten-year association 2779:for hosting Cosby.-- 2621:related articles? -- 2604:conflict of interest 2396:" for other readers. 2384:at all even by law ( 805:and the surrounding 691:WikiProject Missouri 105:No original research 4454:Closed move reviews 4202:Compromise solution 4165:. It is clear that 4095:per WP:COMMONNAME. 3796:After February 2018 3431:Makes sense to me. 2962:After February 2018 2953:parameter below to 1510:2014 FIFA World Cup 1003:Off flavors comment 979:, 22 October 2014, 809:. We invite you to 360:Related taskforces: 3850:InternetArchiveBot 3801:InternetArchiveBot 3451:Logo should be PD? 2967:InternetArchiveBot 2641:beer to sell Cosby 2637:Cosby to sell beer 2519: 2061:Agree with Jenks24 1997:Agree with Jenks24 1195:fair use rationale 1095:commons:COM:SPEEDY 969:, 28 August 2014, 892:WikiProject Brands 829:St. Louis articles 382: 232:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 4129: 3904: 3901:non-admin closure 3826: 3586: 3517:content into the 3513:I will merge the 3354: 3318: 3024: 2992: 2760:Budweiser Gardens 2737: 2736: 2572:Budweiser Gardens 2515:Budweiser Gardens 2394:educational value 2242: 1706: 1661: 1606: 1605: 1600:Closure endorsed. 1569:, (May 10, 2012). 1553:(March 07, 2012). 1385:comment added by 1357: 1310: 1234:comment added by 1220: 1219: 1175:What should I do? 1167:Wikimedia Commons 1131:comment added by 1118: 1117: 1084:What should I do? 1076:Wikimedia Commons 1040:comment added by 1000: 999: 945: 944: 941: 940: 937: 936: 859: 858: 855: 854: 807:metropolitan area 758: 757: 754: 753: 728:Missouri articles 639: 638: 635: 634: 526: 525: 522: 521: 518: 517: 514: 513: 467: 415: 414: 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 4461: 4180: 4175: 4147: 4145: 4127: 3958: 3944:Budweiser Budvar 3929: 3913: 3908: 3898: 3883: 3860: 3851: 3824: 3823: 3802: 3722: 3715: 3670: 3663: 3638: 3621: 3614: 3584: 3480: 3473: 3458:Template:PD-logo 3352: 3316: 3228: 3020: 3019:Talk to my owner 3015: 2990: 2989: 2968: 2923: 2915: 2706: 2699: 2698: 2513:appeared at the 2378:Budweiser Budvar 2355:Content dispute? 2269: 2240: 2221: 2177: 2152: 2086: 2046: 1951: 1885: 1857: 1855: 1850: 1845: 1782: 1762: 1723: 1721: 1716: 1711: 1693: 1659: 1620: 1588: 1587: 1581: 1570: 1560: 1554: 1542: 1496: 1494: 1491: 1488: 1485: 1482: 1479: 1394: 1349: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1325: 1322: 1302: 1264:mash and yeast. 1246: 1186:If the image is 1158: 1151: 1150: 1143: 1067: 1060: 1059: 1052: 991:, 13 June 2020, 977:Closure endorsed 954: 953: 947: 917: 916: 913: 910: 907: 886: 879: 878: 868: 861: 860: 831: 830: 827: 824: 821: 811:join the project 788: 781: 780: 775: 767: 760: 759: 730: 729: 726: 723: 720: 685: 680: 679: 678: 669: 662: 661: 656: 648: 641: 640: 611: 610: 607: 604: 601: 578:WikiProject Beer 572: 567: 566: 556: 549: 548: 543: 535: 528: 527: 480: 473: 472: 454: 421: 420: 404:WikiProject Beer 398: 393: 392: 367: 357: 356: 331: 330: 327: 324: 321: 296: 291: 290: 280: 273: 272: 267: 264: 253: 246: 245: 229: 223: 222: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 4469: 4468: 4464: 4463: 4462: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4369: 4368: 4332: 4313: 4277: 4246: 4204: 4199: 4176: 4171: 4143: 4141: 4114:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 4052: 3997:Senkaku Islands 3952: 3925: 3911: 3906: 3879: 3869: 3854: 3849: 3817: 3810:have permission 3800: 3774:this simple FaQ 3759: 3716: 3707: 3679: 3664: 3655: 3636: 3615: 3606: 3551: 3493: 3474: 3465: 3453: 3385:Pilsner Urquell 3222: 3108: 3033: 3023: 3018: 2983: 2976:have permission 2966: 2917: 2909: 2895: 2674:Global Spectrum 2503: 2382:not a Budweiser 2357: 2267: 2219: 2191: 2186: 2173: 2150: 2137:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 2082: 2040: 2022:Harveys Brewery 1949: 1941:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1881: 1853: 1848: 1843: 1841: 1780: 1756: 1719: 1714: 1709: 1707: 1616: 1592:This discussion 1585: 1579: 1574: 1573: 1561: 1557: 1543: 1539: 1506: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1480: 1477: 1475: 1472:proper sourcing 1452: 1380: 1369: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1318: 1296: 1229: 1225: 1149: 1126: 1123: 1058: 1035: 1032: 1005: 951: 915:Brands articles 914: 911: 908: 905: 904: 845:High-importance 828: 825: 822: 819: 818: 774:High‑importance 773: 727: 724: 721: 718: 717: 698:related to the 683:Missouri portal 681: 676: 674: 654: 608: 605: 602: 599: 598: 568: 561: 541: 510: 452: 394: 387: 365: 328: 325: 322: 319: 318: 292: 285: 265: 259: 230:on Knowledge's 227: 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 4467: 4457: 4456: 4451: 4446: 4441: 4436: 4431: 4426: 4421: 4416: 4411: 4406: 4401: 4396: 4391: 4386: 4381: 4367: 4366: 4331: 4328: 4312: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4276: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4254: 4242: 4203: 4200: 4198: 4197: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4152: 4134: 4107: 4090: 4073: 4056: 4048: 4035: 3989: 3988: 3974:WP:COMMON NAME 3919: 3891: 3890: 3876:requested move 3870: 3868: 3865: 3844: 3843: 3836: 3789: 3788: 3780:Added archive 3758: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3751: 3727: 3726: 3678: 3675: 3592: 3591: 3541:Peter K Burian 3539: 3519:Anheuser-Busch 3492: 3489:Anheuser-Busch 3485: 3452: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3418:Peter K Burian 3389:Castle Brewery 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3244: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3212: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3107: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3082: 3081: 3068: 3067: 3032: 3029: 3016: 3010: 3009: 3002: 2947: 2946: 2938:Added archive 2936: 2928:Added archive 2894: 2891: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2752:serves alcohol 2735: 2734: 2715: 2714: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2502: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2483:69.116.183.192 2457: 2404: 2403: 2398: 2397: 2356: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2327:69.116.183.192 2230:User:Jirka.h23 2190: 2187: 2185: 2184: 2170:requested move 2164: 2163: 2162: 2108: 2075: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2015: 2003:. Good catch. 1994: 1961: 1945:Strong support 1937: 1922: 1907: 1890: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1834: 1833: 1813: 1788: 1772: 1749: 1690: 1689: 1680: 1669: 1667: 1628: 1627: 1613:requested move 1607: 1604: 1603: 1589: 1578: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1555: 1536: 1535: 1520:Anheuser-Busch 1505: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1451: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1431: 1430: 1411:76.100.114.214 1368: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1295: 1292: 1251:76.100.114.214 1236:180.111.235.43 1224: 1221: 1218: 1217: 1199: 1198: 1191: 1177: 1176: 1159: 1148: 1145: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1115: 1091: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1068: 1057: 1054: 1042:211.225.37.107 1031: 1028: 1017:76.100.114.214 1004: 1001: 998: 997: 996: 995: 985: 984: 983: 955: 943: 942: 939: 938: 935: 934: 927: 921: 920: 918: 901:the discussion 887: 875: 874: 869: 857: 856: 853: 852: 841: 835: 834: 832: 789: 777: 776: 768: 756: 755: 752: 751: 744:Mid-importance 740: 734: 733: 731: 687: 686: 670: 658: 657: 655:Mid‑importance 649: 637: 636: 633: 632: 625:Mid-importance 621: 615: 614: 612: 595:the discussion 574: 573: 557: 545: 544: 542:Mid‑importance 536: 524: 523: 520: 519: 516: 515: 512: 511: 509: 508: 499: 484: 482: 481: 461:the tasks list 451: 450: 445: 440: 435: 429: 426: 425: 417: 416: 413: 412: 409:Low-importance 400: 399: 383: 373: 372: 370: 368: 362: 361: 353: 352: 345:Low-importance 341: 335: 334: 332: 320:Food and drink 315:the discussion 298: 297: 281: 269: 268: 266:Low‑importance 257:Food and drink 254: 242: 241: 235: 224: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4466: 4455: 4452: 4450: 4447: 4445: 4442: 4440: 4437: 4435: 4432: 4430: 4427: 4425: 4422: 4420: 4417: 4415: 4412: 4410: 4407: 4405: 4402: 4400: 4397: 4395: 4392: 4390: 4387: 4385: 4382: 4380: 4377: 4376: 4374: 4365: 4361: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4342: 4338: 4327: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4306: 4302: 4298: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4255: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4236: 4235: 4234: 4233: 4229: 4225: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4209: 4208:WP:COMMONNAME 4196: 4194: 4189: 4188: 4184: 4181: 4179: 4174: 4168: 4164: 4160: 4159:WP:COMMONNAME 4156: 4153: 4151: 4148: 4146: 4138: 4135: 4133: 4130: 4124: 4122: 4118: 4115: 4111: 4108: 4106: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4091: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4074: 4072: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4057: 4055: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4042:WP:COMMONNAME 4039: 4036: 4034: 4031: 4030: 4026: 4025: 4021: 4020: 4016: 4015: 4010: 4006: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3991: 3990: 3987: 3983: 3979: 3975: 3971: 3967: 3966: 3965: 3964: 3961: 3959: 3957: 3956: 3949: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3928: 3923: 3918: 3917: 3914: 3909: 3902: 3896: 3889: 3887: 3882: 3877: 3872: 3871: 3864: 3863: 3858: 3853: 3852: 3841: 3837: 3834: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3821: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3797: 3792: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3762: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3734: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3725: 3720: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3705: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3694: 3690: 3684: 3674: 3673: 3668: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3652: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3633: 3629: 3625: 3624: 3619: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3590: 3587: 3581: 3579: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3537: 3532: 3531: 3526: 3524: 3520: 3516: 3512: 3508: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3490: 3484: 3483: 3478: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3463: 3459: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3414: 3413: 3408: 3405: 3404: 3402: 3396: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3360: 3359: 3358: 3355: 3349: 3347: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3336: 3332: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3319: 3313: 3311: 3307: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3268: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3226: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3211: 3207: 3203: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3080: 3077: 3074: 3070: 3069: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3037: 3028: 3027: 3021: 3014: 3007: 3003: 3000: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2987: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2963: 2958: 2956: 2952: 2945: 2941: 2937: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2921: 2913: 2907: 2903: 2898: 2890: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2822:Mark Marathon 2818: 2814: 2810: 2806: 2805:Mark Marathon 2802: 2797: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2724:Mark Marathon 2721: 2717: 2716: 2712: 2711: 2705: 2701: 2700: 2687: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2516: 2512: 2507: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2405: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2271: 2270: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2243: 2237: 2235: 2231: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2183: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2158: 2157: 2154: 2153: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2121:Supreme court 2118: 2114: 2113:WP:CONCEPTDAB 2109: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2090:User:SilkTork 2087: 2085: 2079: 2076: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2059: 2055: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2045: 2044: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1995: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1972:WP:CONCEPTDAB 1969: 1965: 1962: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1952: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1936: 1933: 1930: 1926: 1923: 1921: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1908: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1897:65.94.169.222 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1860: 1856: 1851: 1846: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1817: 1814: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1789: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1763: 1761: 1760: 1753: 1750: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1739:In ictu oculi 1736: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1688: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1662: 1656: 1654: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1626: 1624: 1619: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1590: 1583: 1582: 1568: 1564: 1559: 1552: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1524:Wholesomegood 1521: 1516: 1512: 1511: 1499: 1495: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1378: 1374: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1196: 1192: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1181: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1153: 1152: 1144: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1133:99.50.119.143 1130: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1096: 1092: 1090: 1089: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1053: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1027: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1012: 1008: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960:Discussions: 956: 949: 948: 932: 926: 923: 922: 919: 902: 898: 894: 893: 888: 885: 881: 880: 876: 873: 870: 867: 863: 862: 850: 846: 840: 837: 836: 833: 816: 812: 808: 804: 800: 796: 795: 790: 787: 783: 782: 778: 772: 769: 766: 762: 761: 749: 745: 739: 736: 735: 732: 715: 711: 707: 706: 701: 697: 693: 692: 684: 673: 671: 668: 664: 663: 659: 653: 650: 647: 643: 642: 630: 626: 620: 617: 616: 613: 609:Beer articles 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 579: 571: 565: 560: 558: 555: 551: 550: 546: 540: 537: 534: 530: 529: 506: 504: 500: 498: 495: 493: 492: 487: 486: 483: 479: 475: 474: 471: 468: 466: 462: 458: 455:This list is 449: 446: 444: 441: 439: 436: 434: 431: 430: 428: 427: 423: 422: 418: 410: 407:(assessed as 406: 405: 397: 391: 386: 379: 375: 374: 371: 369: 364: 363: 358: 354: 350: 346: 340: 337: 336: 333: 316: 312: 308: 304: 303: 295: 289: 284: 282: 279: 275: 274: 270: 263: 258: 255: 252: 248: 247: 243: 239: 233: 225: 221: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 4333: 4317:Grapefanatic 4314: 4278: 4205: 4192: 4190: 4177: 4172: 4154: 4140: 4136: 4109: 4092: 4075: 4058: 4037: 4028: 4023: 4018: 4013: 4007:rather than 4001:Sea of Japan 3992: 3969: 3954: 3953: 3948:WP:NPOVTITLE 3920: 3894: 3892: 3880: 3873: 3848: 3845: 3820:source check 3799: 3793: 3790: 3763: 3760: 3732: 3709: 3708: 3689:Bengt Hennig 3685: 3680: 3657: 3656: 3650: 3649: 3631: 3627: 3626: 3608: 3607: 3594: 3593: 3553: 3552: 3534: 3528: 3527: 3510: 3509: 3504: 3496: 3494: 3467: 3466: 3454: 3432: 3415: 3410: 3409: 3406: 3398: 3397: 3382: 3303: 3284: 3245: 3183: 3109: 3038: 3034: 3011: 2986:source check 2965: 2959: 2954: 2950: 2948: 2899: 2896: 2877: 2795: 2768:used alcohol 2767: 2759: 2755: 2751: 2743: 2708:Response to 2707: 2651: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2550:undue weight 2520: 2514: 2381: 2358: 2265: 2217: 2192: 2174: 2167: 2155: 2148: 2144: 2125:Central Asia 2081: 2077: 2060: 2049: 2042: 2041: 2017: 2000: 1996: 1963: 1954: 1944: 1924: 1917:(let's chat) 1909: 1892: 1882: 1872: 1815: 1790: 1778: 1774: 1765: 1758: 1757: 1751: 1730: 1694: 1691: 1668: 1647: 1631: 1629: 1617: 1610: 1599: 1591: 1566: 1558: 1548: 1540: 1517: 1513: 1507: 1453: 1436:99.249.15.40 1408: 1381:— Preceding 1376: 1373:this article 1370: 1297: 1277: 1262: 1248: 1230:— Preceding 1226: 1201: 1200: 1179: 1178: 1170: 1127:— Preceding 1124: 1099: 1098: 1079: 1033: 1013: 1009: 1006: 988: 976: 966: 959: 958: 890: 844: 792: 743: 710:project page 703: 689: 624: 576: 502: 501: 489: 488: 469: 460: 453: 402: 344: 300: 238:WikiProjects 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3886:move review 3603:Coors Light 3599:Miller Lite 3344:articles.-- 3306:move review 2773:Judd Apatow 2720:WP:COATRACK 2645:Judd Apatow 2600:you deleted 2180:move review 1623:move review 1567:Merco Press 1397:99.18.97.24 1387:99.18.97.24 1180:Don't panic 1036:—Preceding 696:WikiProject 570:Beer portal 457:transcluded 396:Beer portal 294:Food portal 148:free images 31:not a forum 4373:Categories 4163:Cuchullain 4121:CĂșchullain 4080:Rreagan007 3857:Report bug 3578:CĂșchullain 3346:CĂșchullain 3310:CĂșchullain 3272:EdJohnston 2861:Tomwsulcer 2848:Bill Cosby 2840:Tomwsulcer 2781:Tomwsulcer 2660:Tomwsulcer 2608:Tomwsulcer 2554:a coatrack 2535:Tomwsulcer 2527:Bill Cosby 2511:Bill Cosby 2234:CĂșchullain 2135:meets the 2098:EdJohnston 2018:Also agree 1653:CĂșchullain 815:discussion 714:discussion 700:U.S. state 4220:Budweiser 4216:Budweiser 4173:Northwest 4014:King of ♄ 3922:Budweiser 3895:not moved 3840:this tool 3833:this tool 3766:Budweiser 3523:Budweiser 3515:Budweiser 3507:article. 3225:Der Golem 3202:My Gussie 3184:Budweiser 3180:Bud Light 3144:Der Golem 3136:Budweiser 3012:Cheers. — 3006:this tool 2999:this tool 2902:Budweiser 2859:$ $ $ .-- 2852:Budweiser 2801:WP:BURDEN 2744:processes 2580:Budweiser 2509:Comedian 2465:Der Golem 2447:Jirka.h23 2429:Der Golem 2425:Budweiser 2417:Budweiser 2409:Budweiser 2390:Budweiser 2362:George Ho 2313:Jirka.h23 2282:Jirka.h23 2199:Jirka.h23 1968:Budweiser 1883:AjaxSmack 1873:vis-Ă -vis 1795:Budweiser 1683:Budweiser 1678:Budweiser 1644:Budweiser 1636:Budweiser 1281:MichaelGG 1266:MaximZero 1121:Vandalism 989:Not moved 820:St. Louis 803:St. Louis 771:St. Louis 88:if needed 71:Be polite 25:Budweiser 21:talk page 4337:AlĂ­k2002 4282:OrewaTel 4063:Ortizesp 3955:Tammbeck 3940:AB InBev 3846:Cheers.— 3741:Manelolo 3289:Prof. Mc 3111:article. 2912:cbignore 2764:32 women 2652:one line 2296:KiloByte 2151:SilkTork 2117:Football 2078:Comment: 2026:Gregkaye 1695:Relisted 1383:unsigned 1355:contribs 1347:Hot Stop 1308:contribs 1300:Hot Stop 1232:unsigned 1188:non-free 1129:unsigned 1038:unsigned 1030:Meaning? 719:Missouri 705:Missouri 652:Missouri 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 4240:doktorb 4178:Passage 4144:Calidum 4046:doktorb 3970:support 3770:my edit 3651:Comment 3576:page.-- 3558:wp:FORK 3554:Support 3433:Support 3248:wp:fork 3022::Online 2951:checked 2906:my edit 2854:have a 2656:WP:NPOV 2588:linking 2584:chooses 2268:Calidum 2220:Calidum 2145:Support 2065:Edwardx 2005:Wbm1058 1984:Jenks24 1964:Comment 1925:Support 1823:Edwardx 1781:Calidum 1775:Support 1752:Support 1699:Jenks24 1294:Italics 847:on the 799:Culture 746:on the 627:on the 587:Brewery 438:history 347:on the 228:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 4356:đ•đ•„đ”œ 4155:Oppose 4137:Oppose 4110:Oppose 4097:Aoba47 4093:Oppose 4076:Oppose 4059:Oppose 4038:Oppose 3993:Oppose 3932:WP:BRD 3912:{talk} 3907:~SS49~ 3737:WP:RFC 3637:Lizard 3628:Oppose 3595:Oppose 3530:WP:CON 3364:Jochum 3331:Jochum 3285:Agreed 3172:Jochum 3158:Jochum 3128:Jochum 3113:Jochum 3090:Jochum 3057:Jochum 3042:Jochum 3040:other. 2920:nobots 2880:Onorem 2678:Onorem 2623:Onorem 2598:which 2576:Metric 2558:Onorem 2461:source 2386:source 2250:MR. -- 2043:bd2412 1914:Yaksar 1910:Oppose 1893:Oppose 1816:Oppose 1791:Oppose 1759:bd2412 1457:Zlaval 906:Brands 897:brands 872:Brands 589:, and 234:scale. 126:Google 4244:words 4050:words 4011:. -- 3073:Smyth 2796:might 2213:WP:MR 2123:, or 1955:Slash 1879:. — 1642:) to 1632:Move. 967:Moved 503:Other 491:Stubs 459:from 448:purge 443:watch 311:drink 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 4360:talk 4354:. -- 4350:See 4341:talk 4321:talk 4301:talk 4286:talk 4275:Beer 4263:talk 4259:SFBB 4228:talk 4224:SFBB 4161:and 4157:per 4101:talk 4084:talk 4067:talk 3999:and 3982:talk 3745:talk 3719:talk 3693:talk 3667:talk 3642:talk 3618:talk 3601:and 3566:talk 3545:talk 3505:that 3491:page 3477:talk 3441:talk 3435:. -- 3422:talk 3391:and 3368:talk 3335:talk 3293:talk 3276:talk 3256:talk 3246:Per 3235:talk 3231:Luis 3206:talk 3162:talk 3148:talk 3117:talk 3094:talk 3061:talk 3046:talk 2955:true 2884:talk 2865:talk 2850:and 2844:talk 2826:talk 2809:talk 2785:talk 2756:link 2728:talk 2682:talk 2664:talk 2639:and 2627:talk 2612:talk 2596:here 2594:and 2592:here 2562:talk 2552:and 2539:talk 2487:talk 2469:talk 2451:talk 2433:talk 2366:talk 2331:talk 2317:talk 2300:talk 2286:talk 2256:talk 2203:talk 2102:talk 2069:talk 2030:talk 2009:talk 1988:talk 1976:here 1950:Red 1901:talk 1827:talk 1807:talk 1743:talk 1703:talk 1640:here 1594:was 1528:talk 1508:RE: 1461:talk 1440:talk 1415:talk 1401:talk 1391:talk 1351:talk 1304:talk 1285:talk 1270:talk 1255:talk 1240:talk 1210:talk 1137:talk 1108:talk 1046:talk 1021:talk 839:High 694:, a 600:Beer 583:Beer 539:Beer 465:here 433:edit 309:and 307:food 262:Beer 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 3814:RfC 3784:to 3711:Ich 3682:--> 3659:Ich 3632:far 3610:Ich 3469:Ich 3362:it. 3134:to 2980:RfC 2942:to 2932:to 2658:.-- 2463:)-- 2419:to 2172:. 1929:ВÂČC 1819:IJA 1803:IJA 1737:? 1550:NPR 925:??? 738:Mid 702:of 619:Mid 591:Pub 339:Low 176:TWL 4375:: 4362:) 4343:) 4323:) 4303:) 4288:) 4265:) 4230:) 4103:) 4086:) 4069:) 3984:) 3968:I 3924:→ 3897:. 3878:. 3827:. 3822:}} 3818:{{ 3747:) 3695:) 3644:) 3568:) 3547:) 3443:) 3424:) 3370:) 3337:) 3295:) 3278:) 3258:) 3237:) 3208:) 3164:) 3150:) 3119:) 3096:) 3063:) 3048:) 2993:. 2988:}} 2984:{{ 2918:{{ 2914:}} 2910:{{ 2886:) 2867:) 2828:) 2811:) 2787:) 2775:, 2730:) 2713:: 2684:) 2666:) 2629:) 2614:) 2564:) 2541:) 2489:) 2471:) 2453:) 2435:) 2368:) 2360:-- 2333:) 2319:) 2309:MR 2302:) 2288:) 2258:) 2205:) 2147:. 2119:, 2104:) 2071:) 2032:) 2011:) 1990:) 1982:. 1966:. 1903:) 1829:) 1809:) 1745:) 1697:. 1685:→ 1676:→ 1615:. 1565:, 1547:, 1530:) 1522:? 1463:) 1442:) 1417:) 1403:) 1287:) 1272:) 1257:) 1242:) 1212:) 1204:-- 1139:) 1110:) 1102:-- 1048:) 1023:) 585:, 411:). 366:/ 260:: 156:) 54:; 4358:( 4339:( 4319:( 4299:( 4284:( 4261:( 4226:( 4128:c 4125:/ 4099:( 4082:( 4065:( 4029:♠ 4024:♣ 4019:♩ 3980:( 3903:) 3899:( 3859:) 3855:( 3842:. 3835:. 3743:( 3721:) 3717:( 3691:( 3669:) 3665:( 3640:( 3620:) 3616:( 3585:c 3582:/ 3564:( 3543:( 3533:: 3479:) 3475:( 3439:( 3420:( 3366:( 3353:c 3350:/ 3333:( 3317:c 3314:/ 3291:( 3274:( 3254:( 3233:( 3227:: 3223:@ 3204:( 3170:@ 3160:( 3146:( 3126:@ 3115:( 3092:( 3075:\ 3059:( 3044:( 3008:. 3001:. 2882:( 2863:( 2842:( 2824:( 2807:( 2783:( 2726:( 2680:( 2662:( 2625:( 2610:( 2560:( 2537:( 2485:( 2467:( 2449:( 2431:( 2364:( 2329:( 2315:( 2298:( 2284:( 2254:( 2241:c 2238:/ 2201:( 2100:( 2067:( 2050:T 2028:( 2007:( 1986:( 1932:☎ 1899:( 1854:p 1849:b 1844:p 1825:( 1805:( 1766:T 1741:( 1720:p 1715:b 1710:p 1701:( 1660:c 1657:/ 1648:4 1602:. 1526:( 1493:3 1490:8 1487:F 1484:J 1481:T 1478:C 1459:( 1438:( 1429:) 1413:( 1399:( 1389:( 1353:- 1336:3 1333:8 1330:F 1327:J 1324:T 1321:C 1306:- 1283:( 1268:( 1253:( 1238:( 1208:( 1135:( 1106:( 1044:( 1019:( 933:. 851:. 817:. 797:( 750:. 716:. 631:. 505:: 494:: 351:. 240:: 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Budweiser
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Food and drink

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑