21:
403:
382:
201:
183:
211:
413:
298:
277:
308:
152:
703:
Once these matters have been seen to, tell me (here or on my talk page) and I will come around and make a copyedit to get rid of any small grammatical, flow and style issues. If the above points are seen to, the article will be very close to good quality. Otherwise, I would like to say that it is an
683:
The section "Powers and tasks" has large lacks in referencing, and there are also other areas with such lacks. Note that in-line referencing should not be used when the main referencing is as footnote. I am also concerned that using the constitution is not acceptable, because it is a primary source,
662:
The comment under "The
Council and the enactment of legislation in France" is just not how we write things here on Wikipeida. In addition to the weasel approach of stating what the reader "should" do, it is our approach that Knowledge provides the full array of encyclopedic information on the topic.
670:
The header "The
Council and the enactment of legislation in France" contains a lot of redundant information. It is implied by the scope of the article that it is about the council, and by nature of that also in France. Therefore, "Enactment of legislation" would bear the same meaning. I would also
896:
I find it to be more than a "good article". I would say it's one of the best articles I read on wikipedia. And prolly the best english speaking article about anything french, and is better than most of those. It is much better than its french counterpart. And it's all neutral. And does not align
892:
Hello, this article was extremelly precise, it had literally not one inaccuracy, I did not spot any spelling mistake, it was well organised, it had pictures. Sources, it features IPA etc.....it's fine. Almost everything is explained, complete. It's much more neutral than most of french wikipedia
691:
Titles (such as prime minister) are only capitalized when in front of the name). So you say: Prime
Minister François Fillon; François Fillon is prime minister; François Fillon is Prime Minister of France (because in the latter, it is a unique title, and therefore becomes a
744:
France have no official "coat of arms" (because in a "République", cannot be existing official "coat of arms"... So this one have nothing else to do on this page !... The "Conseil
Constitutionnel" have a logo*, better adding it on the page than that fantasy picture !...
776:
There is a part that reads "French courts when then prohibited from making rulings of a general nature." which means absolutely nothing, instead of whatever it is trying to say. I do not have the knowledge required to fix this typo, so I am hoping someone who does will.
641:
With the web site in the infobox, the "external links" section can be removed. Remember that an "ideal" article does not have an "external link" or "see also" section, because these will have been incorporated into the main text, the infobox and the
753:
Most republic have. And well there's one, it's just not official. Many governement logos are "not official" as far as I remember the rooster is used a symbol but is not defined as "official symbol". Anyway, yes council's logo sounds a better idea.
645:
Images are all free, but there is on the French article several interior images of the court. Could these also be added. Could the exterior image be moved further up (it looks bad when it crashes with the references). Also please add
684:
and that all legislative texts need to be interpreted. This can only be done in secondary sources, and then it is these that need to be referenced. If the article numbers are there simply to guide the user, then it is fine. See
842:
that " It is not for the
Constitutional Council, when a referral is made to it under Article 61 of the Constitution, to consider the consistency of a statute with the provisions of a treaty or an international agreement; "
612:
The article seems to cover the main topics well, and has mostly good referencing, but there are a number of style and copyediting issues that need to be addressed before the article will pass GAN. Some comments:
624:
The last section, "location", could just as well be moved to the lead, and perhaps be stuck in somewhere else, such as perhaps membership or history (or anywhere). It just doesn't look good with a one-sentence
833:
663:
Basically the first thing you are doing is asking people to leave
Knowledge and go somewhere else to read about the topic, while what people actually want is a objective and down-to-earth text
680:
Could you convert the list of members to a table, with for instance the sections "member", "appointed by" and "member since", and perhaps a "notes" (including stating that Debré is president).
550:
for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
880:
103:
84:
677:
Under "power and tasks" there are is a numbered list, each with a paragraph. It would be a lot better if these were just left as separate paragraphs with no list and numbering.
897:
with official version, and has an encyclopedic style. It's a beautiful article. It also gives everything and more than what you'd find from any official source at once.
820:
517:
788:
766:
872:
736:
469:
868:
730:
659:
There are quite a number in-line external links, and these should be removed. They should either be moved to the references or the external links.
364:
671:
have said that "evolution" is redundant to "history" (though I will let it pass), and that "members" would be more accurate than "membership".
521:
915:
259:
926:
792:
993:
839:
587:
459:
122:
963:
934:
253:
978:
354:
41:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
674:
There are a lot of very short paragraphs, particularly in the "membership" section, but also throughout the rest of the article.
998:
561:
714:
983:
953:
948:
816:
824:
607:
524:, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide
784:
435:
47:
988:
632:
42:
968:
920:
887:
330:
973:
876:
502:
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
638:
would be fine. What is essential is the logo, name, chair, location, establishment, members and official web site.
38:
426:
387:
958:
115:
96:
77:
228:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
321:
282:
163:
748:
506:
The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
20:
486:
556:
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
771:
224:
188:
704:
interesting, comprehensive and balanced article covering an important topic. Keep up the good work.
617:
The lead is short for this length of an article; it should perhaps be twice the current length. See
434:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
329:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
32:
720:
The article has been on hold for two weeks without any improvements. I am therefore failing it.
583:
569:
494:, the President of the Republic does not pronounce any oath during the Inauguration Ceremony.
169:
864:
812:
780:
803:
Nicolas
Sarkozy is life member even if he doesn't want to be (cf talk in french article).
8:
650:
151:
911:
762:
727:
711:
604:
628:
Could an infobox be added, along with the official logo (per French article). I think
749:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fr/5/59/Logo_Conseil_Constitutionnel_France.gif
685:
575:
547:
525:
497:
557:
418:
809:
Wow. Oops. No kidding. That's interesting. Why don't you put a link to it.
930:
618:
507:
942:
907:
846:
However, the article says the contrary in the " Powers and tasks " category.
758:
722:
706:
599:
313:
925:
What cases are (not) accepted? Who can argue in front of the
Conseil? Etc.
590:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
693:
853:' decision by the Cour de Cassation) and judiciary courts (since 1989, '
553:(struck: possible "weasel words" that weren't, because context is clear)
412:
402:
381:
798:
216:
850:
200:
182:
210:
431:
741:
I am a french lawyer and historian... (sorry for my bad english).
510:; be aware that the lead should adequately summarize the article.
297:
276:
326:
854:
834:
The council doesn't declare a law in contravention of treaties
539:
535:
531:
229:
492:
849:
This control is made by administrative (since 1975, '
430:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
408:
325:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
303:
206:
51:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
258:This article has not yet received a rating on the
940:
546:You may wish to consider adding an appropriate
838:In 1975, the Constitutional Council said in a
737:Coat of arms is absolutly not official !!!...
900:So, it should be reviewed as good article.
588:Talk:Constitutional Council of France/GA1
656:to link to the category on the Commons.
149:
941:
562:User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a
424:This article is within the scope of
319:This article is within the scope of
222:This article is within the scope of
145:
860:I'm french, sorry for my english.
857:' decision by the Conseil d'État).
232:and the subjects encompassed by it.
168:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
1010:
522:Knowledge:Manual of Style (dates)
994:Mid-importance politics articles
411:
401:
380:
306:
296:
275:
209:
199:
181:
150:
19:
964:Unknown-importance law articles
667:. Please remove this statement.
568:You may wish to browse through
487:Oath of office of the President
464:This article has been rated as
359:This article has been rated as
27:Constitutional Council (France)
979:Top-importance France articles
921:How are proceedings conducted?
444:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
37:nominee, but did not meet the
1:
999:WikiProject Politics articles
731:19:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
447:Template:WikiProject Politics
438:and see a list of open tasks.
333:and see a list of open tasks.
984:All WikiProject France pages
954:Old requests for peer review
949:Former good article nominees
935:20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
881:19:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
715:11:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
699:We no longer wikilink dates.
608:11:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
339:Knowledge:WikiProject France
7:
793:20:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
342:Template:WikiProject France
139:Former good article nominee
10:
1015:
470:project's importance scale
365:project's importance scale
260:project's importance scale
45:. Editors may also seek a
989:B-Class politics articles
916:19:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
888:Good article nomiation v2
825:07:32, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
767:19:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
633:Infobox Government agency
463:
396:
358:
291:
257:
238:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
194:
176:
136:
59:
55:
969:WikiProject Law articles
893:articles about France.
241:Template:WikiProject Law
974:B-Class France articles
570:User:AndyZ/Suggestions
158:This article is rated
558:Knowledge's best work
498:Automated peer review
39:good article criteria
959:B-Class law articles
427:WikiProject Politics
123:Good article nominee
572:for further ideas.
725:
709:
602:
543:
513:
322:WikiProject France
164:content assessment
78:September 28, 2008
60:Article milestones
884:
867:comment added by
815:comment added by
783:comment added by
772:Confusing Wording
723:
707:
600:
529:
518:Knowledge:Context
511:
484:
483:
480:
479:
476:
475:
450:politics articles
375:
374:
371:
370:
270:
269:
266:
265:
144:
143:
132:
131:
116:November 15, 2009
1006:
903:Thanks for all.
883:
861:
827:
795:
729:
713:
655:
649:
637:
631:
606:
528:for the article.
452:
451:
448:
445:
442:
421:
416:
415:
405:
398:
397:
392:
384:
377:
376:
347:
346:
343:
340:
337:
316:
311:
310:
309:
300:
293:
292:
287:
279:
272:
271:
246:
245:
242:
239:
236:
219:
214:
213:
203:
196:
195:
185:
178:
177:
161:
155:
154:
146:
137:Current status:
118:
99:
80:
57:
56:
23:
16:
15:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1005:
1004:
1003:
939:
938:
923:
890:
862:
836:
817:178.197.239.119
810:
801:
778:
774:
739:
721:
705:
653:
647:
635:
629:
598:
582:This review is
578:
500:
489:
449:
446:
443:
440:
439:
419:Politics portal
417:
410:
390:
345:France articles
344:
341:
338:
335:
334:
312:
307:
305:
285:
243:
240:
237:
234:
233:
225:WikiProject Law
215:
208:
162:on Knowledge's
159:
114:
95:
76:
12:
11:
5:
1012:
1002:
1001:
996:
991:
986:
981:
976:
971:
966:
961:
956:
951:
922:
919:
889:
886:
835:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
800:
797:
773:
770:
738:
735:
734:
733:
701:
700:
697:
689:
681:
678:
675:
672:
668:
660:
657:
643:
639:
626:
622:
593:
592:
577:
574:
566:
565:
554:
551:
544:
514:
499:
496:
488:
485:
482:
481:
478:
477:
474:
473:
466:Mid-importance
462:
456:
455:
453:
436:the discussion
423:
422:
406:
394:
393:
391:Mid‑importance
385:
373:
372:
369:
368:
361:Top-importance
357:
351:
350:
348:
331:the discussion
318:
317:
301:
289:
288:
286:Top‑importance
280:
268:
267:
264:
263:
256:
250:
249:
247:
221:
220:
204:
192:
191:
186:
174:
173:
167:
156:
142:
141:
134:
133:
130:
129:
126:
119:
111:
110:
107:
100:
97:August 5, 2009
92:
91:
88:
81:
73:
72:
69:
66:
62:
61:
53:
52:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1011:
1000:
997:
995:
992:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
970:
967:
965:
962:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
946:
944:
937:
936:
932:
928:
918:
917:
913:
909:
904:
901:
898:
894:
885:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
858:
856:
852:
851:Jacques Vabre
847:
844:
841:
826:
822:
818:
814:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
796:
794:
790:
786:
785:99.72.244.156
782:
769:
768:
764:
760:
755:
751:
750:
746:
742:
732:
728:
726:
719:
718:
717:
716:
712:
710:
698:
695:
690:
687:
682:
679:
676:
673:
669:
666:
661:
658:
652:
644:
640:
634:
627:
623:
620:
616:
615:
614:
610:
609:
605:
603:
597:
591:
589:
585:
580:
579:
573:
571:
563:
559:
555:
552:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
527:
523:
519:
515:
509:
505:
504:
503:
495:
493:
491:According to
471:
467:
461:
458:
457:
454:
437:
433:
429:
428:
420:
414:
409:
407:
404:
400:
399:
395:
389:
386:
383:
379:
378:
366:
362:
356:
353:
352:
349:
332:
328:
324:
323:
315:
314:France portal
304:
302:
299:
295:
294:
290:
284:
281:
278:
274:
273:
261:
255:
252:
251:
248:
231:
227:
226:
218:
212:
207:
205:
202:
198:
197:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
179:
175:
171:
165:
157:
153:
148:
147:
140:
135:
127:
125:
124:
120:
117:
113:
112:
108:
106:
105:
101:
98:
94:
93:
89:
87:
86:
82:
79:
75:
74:
70:
67:
64:
63:
58:
54:
50:
49:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
33:good articles
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
924:
905:
902:
899:
895:
891:
863:— Preceding
859:
848:
845:
837:
811:— Preceding
802:
779:— Preceding
775:
756:
752:
747:
743:
740:
702:
664:
611:
595:
594:
581:
567:
501:
490:
465:
425:
360:
320:
244:law articles
223:
170:WikiProjects
138:
121:
102:
83:
48:reassessment
46:
31:
30:
26:
694:proper noun
642:references.
584:transcluded
560:. See also
230:legal field
104:Peer review
85:Peer review
43:renominated
943:Categories
869:Clubber.11
686:WP:PRIMARY
665:right here
651:commonscat
217:Law portal
128:Not listed
596:Reviewer:
576:GA Review
908:Joujyuze
877:contribs
865:unsigned
840:decision
813:unsigned
781:unsigned
759:Joujyuze
724:Arsenikk
708:Arsenikk
625:section.
601:Arsenikk
441:Politics
432:politics
388:Politics
109:Reviewed
90:Reviewed
619:WP:LEAD
548:infobox
526:context
508:WP:LEAD
468:on the
363:on the
160:B-class
68:Process
855:Nicolo
542:; null
336:France
327:France
283:France
166:scale.
71:Result
29:was a
586:from
931:talk
927:Ds77
912:talk
873:talk
821:talk
789:talk
763:talk
540:2005
536:1999
532:1995
520:and
516:Per
65:Date
538:,n
534:,n
460:Mid
355:Top
254:???
235:Law
189:Law
945::
933:)
914:)
906:--
879:)
875:•
823:)
799:NS
791:)
765:)
757:--
696:).
654:}}
648:{{
636:}}
630:{{
530:n
929:(
910:(
871:(
819:(
787:(
761:(
688:.
621:.
564:.
512:4
472:.
367:.
262:.
172::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
