1595:. Policy (or best practice, or even common practice, for that matter) does not state that primary sources cannot be used. They cannot be further interpreted by us; they do not form a suitable basis for entire articles, because they do not fulfill notability requirements; and they need more careful selection because of the lack of secondary corroboration. However, it is untrue to claim that we cannot use material from scientific articles "because it is primary". We do so in tens of thousands of articles. The threshold here is low because publication in a reliable journal implies that peer review has already happened (which is a form of secondary validation). Further,
744:
723:
229:
1637:
is a secondary source (verified by peer review). This discussion made me smile because I have published papers with less peer challenge than this suggestion (how many angels are we counting on the pinhead) and the comment (supported by this paper as a citation) hasn’t even been written yet, so the argument is perceptual. The topic the paper raises contributes to the breadth of the main article and increases its notability outwith whether we consider the source to be notable (which is not the right question imho).
509:
1199:
754:
283:
262:
293:
1149:
1131:
499:
478:
401:
614:
391:
370:
1056:
1035:
220:
604:
1232:
583:
1261:
871:
1526:
The only question is whether it's notable. Both
Wiemann et al 2018 and Schweitzer et al 2014 are notable publications, both are unquestionably highly cited. The paper in question, Anderson 2023, uses organic geochemical theory to show that both of these papers overlooked the big picture regarding how
1636:
Please do add the material supported by the paper as a citation, which we can then review and adjust as appropriate. I think we are agreed that the article in itself qualifies for comment not just because it is presenting primary data supported by secondary and tertiary observations but because it
1545:
I does not matter that we as editors judge
Anderson to correct. That is just the personal opinions of editor which do not count in Knowledge. What matters is if we can find any independent secondary reliable sources that state in their publications that they accept Anderson as correct. Deciding what
1305:
I hope this message is reaching user
Sceptic view (pardon my newbie-ness). I'm messaging about your file "Fossil record gaps 20131028.pdf", used in the article "Fossil," under the heading "Limitations." As far as I can tell, this image is too small/low-res to read, and no larger image is available.
1676:
I see this topic has had a bit of discussion and the general consensus is the citation in question should be added. As I replied in the topic discussion thread itself, I would help do it but I don't have the ability yet to edit semi-protected articles. I am commenting here just so others are aware
1522:
I tend to agree with the OP of this comment thread, having read over the paper more in-depth. Looking over the paper, the part that connects the hypotheses by
Schweitzer et al 2014 and Wiemann et al 2018 is certainly correct. This is not up for debate, it's like a mathematical proof, the theory is
1395:
Here is a recent, peer-reviewed publication describing, for the first time with in-depth chemistry, how biological cells and soft tissues preserve into the fossil record. Since this page is on fossilization, I think the information from this publication may be desirable to add. Here is the link to
1651:
I see these needed edits still haven't been made. It has been a while since this discussion, I would help make them myself, but I do not yet have the ability to edit semi-protected articles such as the Fossil
Knowledge page. However, with as much discussion as has occurred regarding adding this
1507:
And for whether or not it’s correct, it’s a review article, all the information in it is directly verifiable by reading it. There’s no data to analyze, meaning the input of so-called “secondary sources” will change nothing regarding the chemical theory. If you actually read the paper, what it’s
1530:
I don't see how one could rationally consider
Anderson 2023 to not be "notable", whether it was published yesterday or 5 years ago. This is likely why the paper managed to get published in a prestigious journal like Earth-Science Reviews. Not even the editor or academic reviewers were able to
1621:
To add to what
Elmidae is saying here, this paper seems to be summarising the work of two other papers from different authors, so I don't think this is a straightforward case of WP:PRIMARY. I'll look into it a bit more once I find the time. (unless someone else gets to it first, of
1599:- those criteria are meant to determine whether a topic deserves its own article, not whether it deserves mention within another article. In summary, yes, this looks like it should be mentioned in the article because it is a topical, plausible finding from a reliable source. --
1503:
I’m the person who posted the original comment. The article clearly combines the two leading ideas for how original soft tissues fossilize, one by Dr. Mary
Schweitzer and colleagues, the other by Dr. Jasmina Wiemann and colleagues. There is zero question this is
1464:
Looks like it’s published in a peer-reviewed journal to me. Earth-Science
Reviews is a highly respected source in the geological sciences, and Elsevier is a reputable publisher. The information presented has clearly been vetted by other scientists.
1671:
1560:
If that's the case, then the soft tissue fossilization hypotheses from
Schweitzer et al 2014 and Wiemann et al 2018 should, at a minimum, be added. Anderson 2023 certainly functions as a peer-reviewed secondary source for those two other
1372:
If there is something about the Cincinnati fossils that sheds particular light on some aspect of fossils generally, then a mention in this article (with reliable source that, among other things, establishes notability) is appropriate.
1449:
that reports original findings or ideas, which has not been commented by other scientists. It likely is too soon to include it in Knowledge until a reliable secondary source evaluates the research presented in this paper.
1480:
Regardless of where its is published, is still a primary research that should be discussed in sufficient independent secondary reliable sources to determine whether it is notable enough to include in an article. That is
1513:
1414:
1564:
Also, as is, some of the sections pertaining to soft tissue fossilization in the "Fossil" wikipedia article don't even have citations. I believe the "Carbonization" subsection is one. This needs to be fixed.
153:
1203:
1720:
530:-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1527:
soft tissue fossilization occurs; this is to the point that Anderson 2023 was able to show that the chemical mechanisms presented by both papers are interconnected, often being identical.
1390:
1710:
233:
1686:
1725:
705:
1509:
1418:
1682:
1657:
1410:
1546:
is either correct or not or the truth or not is not the job of Knowledge editors. It needs to be stated by independent secondary reliable sources in their publications.
1830:
1775:
1678:
1653:
147:
565:
1113:
1790:
1366:
695:
1795:
1296:
819:
460:
352:
1740:
1508:
saying is 100% correct. The chemical theory presented that connects Schweitzer’s and Wiemann’s hypotheses is inarguable regarding its correctness.
1438:
982:
1212:
1365:
has a (unfortunately deserved) maintenance tag for lack of reliable sourcing. So there is room for improvement there. There is also a redlink to
1785:
1770:
942:
555:
891:
1318:
999:
1780:
1160:
1136:
1007:
1343:
Thanks for your comment. This is an article about fossils in general and I think it would be more appropriate to add any details to the
1328:
Hello! Perhaps we could also add a section regarding the fossils from the Ordovician fossils that can be found near Cincinnati, Ohio? --
1825:
1820:
1323:
1103:
672:
627:
588:
79:
1755:
1705:
1517:
450:
1735:
531:
342:
1369:
in the section on Ordovician geology, and I'm guessing this is just the place to discuss these fossils if this article is created.
1805:
1765:
1715:
1382:
1079:
882:
809:
1835:
1810:
1760:
1745:
1246:
908:
85:
1356:
1337:
1815:
1566:
1532:
1466:
1430:
1003:
522:
483:
1301:
FYI, I just sent this message to user 'Sceptic view." If they don't respond, at some point I'll delete the file link.
1063:
1040:
656:
652:
426:
30:
1750:
1730:
168:
1800:
1282:
1208:
The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article:
135:
1700:
99:
1423:
We haven't heard back on the above comment in a while ^^ ...anyone have any thoughts as to what to do with it?
1661:
1631:
104:
44:
20:
1611:
917:
785:
772:
728:
417:
375:
318:
309:
267:
74:
1399:
1616:
1574:
1555:
1540:
1498:
1474:
1459:
242:
1646:
1652:
specific citation, it does sound like it is needed and should be added as soon as conveniently possible.
619:
65:
129:
1314:
1280:
on 25 September 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
668:
185:
1434:
848:
125:
1078:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
858:
853:
1627:
1592:
1570:
1536:
1470:
1404:
And here is a link to a news article that describes the peer-reviewed article in layman's terms:
1378:
1347:
article and/or create a new article to describe the Ordovician fossils of the Cincinnati region.
843:
109:
1075:
1214:
Congressional Research Service: Fossils on Public Lands - Current Federal Laws and Regulations
317:
resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
175:
1310:
1241:
975:
901:
832:
640:
248:
190:
1596:
1486:
1426:
1407:
632:
1361:
Agreed. Knowledge definitely has a place for good writing about regional geology, and the
8:
1352:
644:
636:
514:
219:
55:
667:. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also
1642:
1482:
1374:
1333:
965:
930:
664:
70:
1672:
Addressing the "Fossilization and Preservation of Biological Cells and Tissues" Topic
1607:
1551:
1494:
1455:
1273:
51:
313:, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
141:
1623:
1268:
743:
722:
161:
1362:
1344:
1446:
1348:
1287:
1068:
957:
925:
913:
759:
406:
298:
1198:
199:
1694:
1638:
1329:
1072:
991:
987:
648:
1601:
1547:
1490:
1451:
1155:
753:
527:
1400:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825223000569#f0040
935:
660:
204:
659:
in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than
292:
282:
261:
1148:
1130:
498:
477:
921:
776:, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
400:
201:
1523:
either right or wrong, and reading over it, the theory is correct.
203:
1597:
notability concerns do not apply below the indivual article level
1531:
question its significance to our understanding of fossilization.
781:
422:
314:
1721:
Knowledge level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1277:
777:
613:
24:
1391:
Fossilization and Preservation of Biological Cells and Tissues
1231:
1055:
1034:
205:
1217:, a report commissioned by Congress and in the public-domain.
390:
369:
870:
603:
582:
421:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
1250:. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
1306:
Can this be fixed so that it does show a readable table?
1193:
1408:
https://phys.org/news/2023-05-dinosaur-tissues-deep.html
1711:
Knowledge vital articles in Biology and health sciences
1677:
the addition of this citation still needs addressing.
160:
1726:
B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
631:, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on
1067:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
749:
609:
526:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
504:
396:
288:
15:
1831:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
1776:B-Class Palaeontology articles of Top-importance
1692:
425:on Knowledge. Leave messages on the WikiProject
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
174:
1791:Mid-importance Evolutionary biology articles
1286:; for the discussion at that location, see
1170:Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
1297:Fossil record gaps 20131028.pdf unreadable
1173:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
680:Knowledge:WikiProject Evolutionary biology
1796:WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
683:Template:WikiProject Evolutionary biology
904:into articles about endangered species.
1741:Top-importance B-Class Geology articles
1510:2600:1004:B266:86E8:E4C4:5A20:7A93:2066
978:into articles about endangered species.
217:
1693:
1411:2606:A800:CD80:AD4:40F6:6C96:DD34:F7ED
1786:B-Class Evolutionary biology articles
1771:Top-importance Palaeontology articles
635:and its associated subfields such as
1255:
1226:
1061:This article is within the scope of
520:This article is within the scope of
213:
1244:by Knowledge editors, which is now
540:Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology
247:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
1781:WikiProject Palaeontology articles
1324:Cincinnati Fossils from Ordovician
1088:Knowledge:WikiProject Tree of Life
1000:Science collaboration of the month
784:. For more information, visit the
653:evolutionary developmental biology
543:Template:WikiProject Palaeontology
14:
1847:
1826:WikiProject Tree of Life articles
1821:Top-importance taxonomic articles
1091:Template:WikiProject Tree of Life
1008:WikiProject Animals Collaboration
1756:High-importance Biology articles
1706:Knowledge level-4 vital articles
1259:
1230:
1197:
1147:
1129:
1054:
1033:
869:
752:
742:
721:
673:WikiProject Evolutionary biology
628:WikiProject Evolutionary biology
612:
602:
581:
507:
497:
476:
399:
389:
368:
291:
281:
260:
227:
218:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1736:Top-importance Geology articles
1108:This article has been rated as
814:This article has been rated as
700:This article has been rated as
671:for more information) or visit
560:This article has been rated as
455:This article has been rated as
347:This article has been rated as
1806:Top-importance animal articles
1766:B-Class Palaeontology articles
1716:B-Class level-4 vital articles
1176:Guild of Copy Editors articles
1:
1591:Note on primary sources: see
1082:and see a list of open tasks.
918:Tool use by non-human animals
794:Knowledge:WikiProject Animals
686:Evolutionary biology articles
534:and see a list of open tasks.
435:Knowledge:WikiProject Biology
327:Knowledge:WikiProject Geology
42:Put new text under old text.
1836:Old requests for peer review
1811:WikiProject Animals articles
1761:WikiProject Biology articles
1746:WikiProject Geology articles
797:Template:WikiProject Animals
438:Template:WikiProject Biology
330:Template:WikiProject Geology
7:
620:Evolutionary biology portal
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1852:
1816:B-Class taxonomic articles
1114:project's importance scale
820:project's importance scale
706:project's importance scale
669:Knowledge:Contributing FAQ
655:. It is distinct from the
566:project's importance scale
461:project's importance scale
353:project's importance scale
1687:07:28, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1662:07:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
1319:01:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
1309:Cheers, AmateurHistorian
1142:
1107:
1049:
1004:Article Improvement Drive
976:GLAM/ARKive donated texts
902:GLAM/ARKive donated texts
826:
813:
737:
699:
597:
559:
523:WikiProject Palaeontology
492:
454:
384:
346:
276:
255:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1751:B-Class Biology articles
1731:B-Class Geology articles
1647:07:12, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
1632:12:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
1617:07:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
1575:04:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
1556:01:11, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
1541:21:58, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
1518:20:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
1499:20:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
1475:17:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
1460:13:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
1439:01:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
1383:18:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
1357:18:17, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
1338:17:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
1064:WikiProject Tree of Life
657:WikiProject Tree of Life
625:This article is part of
1801:B-Class animal articles
1419:05:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
770:is within the scope of
1701:B-Class vital articles
546:Palaeontology articles
75:avoid personal attacks
1266:The contents of the
1167:Guild of Copy Editors
1161:Guild of Copy Editors
1137:Guild of Copy Editors
934:(a species in family
641:quantitative genetics
321:for more information.
234:level-4 vital article
100:Neutral point of view
1396:the actual article:
1158:by a member of the
831:WikiProject Animals
677:Evolutionary biology
633:evolutionary biology
589:Evolutionary biology
105:No original research
1367:Cincinnatian Series
773:WikiProject Animals
645:molecular evolution
637:population genetics
515:Paleontology portal
418:WikiProject Biology
310:WikiProject Geology
1483:Knowledge:Too soon
1094:taxonomic articles
997:Nominate and vote:
966:Zaniolepis frenata
931:Sphaerium beckmani
243:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1615:
1441:
1429:comment added by
1294:
1293:
1254:
1253:
1225:
1224:
1192:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1154:This article was
1124:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1015:
716:
715:
712:
711:
576:
575:
572:
571:
471:
470:
467:
466:
363:
362:
359:
358:
212:
211:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1843:
1679:Winged Angel Fly
1654:Winged Angel Fly
1605:
1604:
1593:WP:PRIMARYSOURCE
1424:
1311:AmateurHistorian
1285:
1263:
1262:
1256:
1234:
1227:
1201:
1194:
1178:
1177:
1174:
1171:
1168:
1151:
1144:
1143:
1133:
1126:
1125:
1096:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1058:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1037:
1030:
1029:
873:
865:
864:
828:
827:
802:
801:
798:
795:
792:
762:
757:
756:
746:
739:
738:
733:
725:
718:
717:
688:
687:
684:
681:
678:
622:
617:
616:
606:
599:
598:
593:
585:
578:
577:
548:
547:
544:
541:
538:
517:
512:
511:
510:
501:
494:
493:
488:
480:
473:
472:
443:
442:
441:Biology articles
439:
436:
433:
409:
404:
403:
393:
386:
385:
380:
372:
365:
364:
335:
334:
333:Geology articles
331:
328:
325:
301:
296:
295:
285:
278:
277:
272:
264:
257:
256:
240:
231:
230:
223:
222:
214:
206:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1851:
1850:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1691:
1690:
1674:
1600:
1393:
1363:Geology of Ohio
1345:Geology of Ohio
1326:
1299:
1281:
1260:
1175:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1093:
1090:
1087:
1084:
1083:
1043:
1012:
863:
800:animal articles
799:
796:
793:
790:
789:
758:
751:
731:
685:
682:
679:
676:
675:
618:
611:
591:
545:
542:
539:
536:
535:
513:
508:
506:
486:
457:High-importance
440:
437:
434:
431:
430:
415:is part of the
405:
398:
379:High‑importance
378:
332:
329:
326:
323:
322:
297:
290:
270:
241:on Knowledge's
238:
228:
208:
207:
202:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1849:
1839:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1818:
1813:
1808:
1803:
1798:
1793:
1788:
1783:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1763:
1758:
1753:
1748:
1743:
1738:
1733:
1728:
1723:
1718:
1713:
1708:
1703:
1673:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1619:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1562:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1505:
1447:primary source
1392:
1389:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1370:
1325:
1322:
1303:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1291:
1264:
1252:
1251:
1235:
1223:
1222:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1190:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1179:
1152:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1122:
1121:
1118:
1117:
1110:Top-importance
1106:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1080:the discussion
1059:
1047:
1046:
1044:Top‑importance
1038:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1010:
994:
979:
970:
969:
968:
960:
958:Campocraspedon
955:Invertebrates:
952:
939:
926:Animal suicide
914:Photoperiodism
905:
896:
879:Here are some
878:
876:
874:
862:
861:
856:
851:
846:
840:
837:
836:
824:
823:
816:Top-importance
812:
806:
805:
803:
764:
763:
760:Animals portal
747:
735:
734:
732:Top‑importance
726:
714:
713:
710:
709:
702:Mid-importance
698:
692:
691:
689:
624:
623:
607:
595:
594:
592:Mid‑importance
586:
574:
573:
570:
569:
562:Top-importance
558:
552:
551:
549:
532:the discussion
519:
518:
502:
490:
489:
487:Top‑importance
481:
469:
468:
465:
464:
453:
447:
446:
444:
411:
410:
407:Biology portal
394:
382:
381:
373:
361:
360:
357:
356:
349:Top-importance
345:
339:
338:
336:
303:
302:
299:Geology portal
286:
274:
273:
271:Top‑importance
265:
253:
252:
246:
224:
210:
209:
200:
198:
197:
194:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1848:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1804:
1802:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1792:
1789:
1787:
1784:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1774:
1772:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1762:
1759:
1757:
1754:
1752:
1749:
1747:
1744:
1742:
1739:
1737:
1734:
1732:
1729:
1727:
1724:
1722:
1719:
1717:
1714:
1712:
1709:
1707:
1704:
1702:
1699:
1698:
1696:
1689:
1688:
1684:
1680:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1640:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1620:
1618:
1613:
1609:
1603:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:152.7.255.224
1563:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1553:
1549:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1533:152.7.255.224
1529:
1525:
1521:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1487:WP:USEPRIMARY
1484:
1479:
1478:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1467:152.7.255.224
1463:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1431:204.84.244.11
1428:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1409:
1405:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1375:Kent G. Budge
1371:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1321:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1307:
1302:
1289:
1288:its talk page
1284:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1270:
1265:
1258:
1257:
1249:
1248:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1228:
1216:
1215:
1211:
1210:
1207:
1205:
1200:
1196:
1195:
1180:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1138:
1135:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1115:
1111:
1105:
1102:
1101:
1098:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1042:
1039:
1036:
1032:
1031:
1009:
1005:
1001:
998:
995:
993:
992:Atka mackerel
989:
988:Junqueira cow
986:
984:
980:
977:
974:
971:
967:
964:
961:
959:
956:
953:
951:
948:
947:
946:
944:
940:
937:
933:
932:
927:
923:
919:
915:
912:
910:
906:
903:
900:
897:
895:
893:
889:
888:
886:
885:
884:
877:
875:
872:
867:
866:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
841:
839:
838:
834:
830:
829:
825:
821:
817:
811:
808:
807:
804:
787:
783:
779:
775:
774:
769:
768:
761:
755:
750:
748:
745:
741:
740:
736:
730:
727:
724:
720:
719:
707:
703:
697:
694:
693:
690:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
649:phylogenetics
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
629:
621:
615:
610:
608:
605:
601:
600:
596:
590:
587:
584:
580:
579:
567:
563:
557:
554:
553:
550:
537:Palaeontology
533:
529:
528:palaeontology
525:
524:
516:
505:
503:
500:
496:
495:
491:
485:
484:Palaeontology
482:
479:
475:
474:
462:
458:
452:
449:
448:
445:
428:
424:
420:
419:
414:
408:
402:
397:
395:
392:
388:
387:
383:
377:
374:
371:
367:
366:
354:
350:
344:
341:
340:
337:
320:
316:
312:
311:
306:
300:
294:
289:
287:
284:
280:
279:
275:
269:
266:
263:
259:
258:
254:
250:
244:
236:
235:
225:
221:
216:
215:
196:
195:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1675:
1425:— Preceding
1422:
1406:
1403:
1398:
1394:
1327:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1267:
1245:
1237:
1213:
1159:
1109:
1085:Tree of Life
1076:tree of life
1073:phylogenetic
1062:
1041:Tree of Life
996:
981:
972:
962:
954:
949:
941:
929:
907:
898:
890:
881:
880:
868:
815:
786:project page
771:
766:
765:
701:
626:
561:
521:
456:
416:
412:
348:
319:project page
308:
304:
249:WikiProjects
232:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1624:Licks-rocks
1283:its history
1242:peer review
1240:received a
1156:copy edited
936:Sphaeriidae
661:systematics
307:is part of
305:Talk:Fossil
148:free images
31:not a forum
1695:Categories
1622:course.)--
1445:This is a
1272:page were
883:Open Tasks
1349:GeoWriter
1269:Subfossil
427:talk page
237:is rated
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1639:Geneus01
1612:contribs
1504:notable.
1427:unsigned
1330:Totaroga
1247:archived
1204:Category
1071:and the
1069:taxonomy
950:Mammals:
943:Requests
922:Omnivore
892:Copyedit
665:taxonomy
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1602:Elmidae
1561:papers.
1548:Paul H.
1491:Paul H.
1452:Paul H.
1112:on the
963:Fishes:
909:Improve
849:history
818:on the
791:Animals
782:zoology
778:animals
729:Animals
704:on the
564:on the
459:on the
432:Biology
423:biology
376:Biology
351:on the
324:Geology
315:geology
268:Geology
239:B-class
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
1278:Fossil
1274:merged
1238:Fossil
983:Expand
973:Merge:
899:Merge:
767:Fossil
651:, and
413:Fossil
245:scale.
126:Google
25:Fossil
1276:into
859:purge
854:watch
833:To-do
226:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1683:talk
1658:talk
1643:talk
1628:talk
1608:talk
1571:talk
1552:talk
1537:talk
1514:talk
1495:talk
1485:and
1477::::
1471:talk
1456:talk
1435:talk
1415:talk
1379:talk
1353:talk
1334:talk
1315:talk
844:edit
780:and
663:and
451:High
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1104:Top
938:),
810:Top
696:Mid
556:Top
343:Top
176:TWL
1697::
1685:)
1660:)
1645:)
1630:)
1610:·
1573:)
1554:)
1539:)
1516:)
1497:)
1489:.
1473:)
1458:)
1437:)
1417:)
1381:)
1373:--
1355:)
1336:)
1317:)
1006:,
1002:,
990:,
928:,
924:,
920:,
916:,
647:,
643:,
639:,
156:)
54:;
1681:(
1656:(
1641:(
1626:(
1614:)
1606:(
1569:(
1550:(
1535:(
1512:(
1493:(
1469:(
1454:(
1433:(
1413:(
1377:(
1351:(
1332:(
1313:(
1290:.
1221:‌
1164:.
1116:.
985::
945::
911::
894::
887::
835::
822:.
788:.
708:.
568:.
463:.
429:.
355:.
251::
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
