31:
190:
169:
200:
22:
322:
the others and some which are stricter than the others. For example, Hanafis are also stricter about prayer. Except for hajj, prayers are supposed to be done in their proper time instead of being "liberal" and combining them. And witr is considered to be wajib so a strict Hanafi would actually be praying more often than someone from a different madhab. It isn't
Knowledge's place to say that the Hanafis are wrong.
95:
85:
64:
274:
458:"An 8th century Somali theologian named Shaykh Uthman bin Ali al-Zeylai wrote the only authoritative text on the Hanafi school of Islam. His book is called the Tabayin al-Haqa’iq li Sharh Kanz al-Daqa’iq. Its four volumes are still in print." -- Perhaps more details needed on this? I've never heard about the person or the book...
555:"Faith neither increases nor decreases" and that "Actions are not a part of faith" is the standpoint of the Shafi mzahab and not Hanafi. Imam Abu Hanifa's opinion is that Faith increases and decreases AND actions are part of faith. But obviously I need to provide a proof. In any case I think this statement needs a proof.
830:
What you're looking for is summarized in the section "Sources and methodology", albeit there's room for improvement. Islamic schools of law mostly differ is rather technical aspects of their legal methodology and in various consequences these have on specific rulings. It's difficult to find a concise
420:
Also, those places which follow the Shafi school probably should be removed from this article as they are not relevant to the Hanafi school (i.e. "The Kurds of Turkey, Syria and Iraq follow the Shafi school." and also "while Upper Egypt (Southern Egypt) and the Sudan are Maliki.") Essentially they
321:
Is it possible to have a discussion about the vandalism? Someone seems simply motivated to present a negative view of the Hanafi madhab. For every madhab, there are a number of rulings which are distinctive and stand out from the others. For every madhab, there are some rulings which are easier than
581:
someone has claimed in the article that hanafi school allows praying in languages other than arabic which i don't believe is correct, could not verify this anywhere in any source posted or elsewhere. consulted others for advice, this does not appear to be true but if it is it is a unique claim that
816:
It is not very clear what the Hanafi believe. I did not find it during a quick but complete read-through, even though their views should have both their own section and a prominent place (at least a paragraph) in the lead. I don't know anything about the Hanafi or Islam in general, or I would fix
670:
I am a muslim myself and my religion DOES NOT SUPPORT WAR AGAINST DISBELIEVERS JUST BECAUSE OF THEIR DISBELIEF!! This page deliberately presents my religion as a religion of murder and terror. SO I AM REQUESTING TO PLEASE REMOVE THIS PAGE'S FALSE CONTENT and replace it with information found from
343:
Something of the Hanafi methodology should be presented, particularly in contrast to the other schools. The growth and development of the school, from Abu Hanifa and his school, to his two students, Imam
Muhammad and Abu Yusuf, and the early alliance of the hanafi school with the state should be
904:
outlines that dates can be given in the Hijri calendar when it is relevant, but should be followed by the
Gregorian conversion. I think this is a good idea, as the Gregorian dates are relevant in an English language article. I would suggest that phrases such as "the 3rd Hijri century" should be
655:
The article treats the subject of how the Hanafi School was applied several centuries ago, but since it is not applied in that way in Bosnia, Albania, Turkey or India today, it would be interesting and clarifying to read something about its present-day application, written by someone who knows
613:. This is known in the religious jargon as "Raju'", i.e. reverting. I have myself attended one class of the course taught to people as part of becoming a scholar (in Pakistan) and there is in deed evidence in the books taught. Unfortunately, I don't remember the name of the book.
478:--the Taliban practised an extreme perversion of faith. i'd say they were influenced by the wahhabis, or at least brainwashed by their mulllahs into accepting a pseudo-religion that is nothing like the true, beautiful, infinitely, wonderfully-malleable Islam.
359:"Bosnia-Herzegovina, Albania the Indian subcontinent, amongst the Muslim communities of the Balkans (in Bulgaria and Romania for example) Central Asia (Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan etc) the Muslims of China the Muslims of Russia and Ukraine (Tatars and Turks)."
333:
10:21, 27 January 2007 (UTC) The section about where Hanafi adherents are located is a little confusing. I tried to clean up some sentence structure, but I am not familiar enough with the topic to address any more, for fear of changing the meaning.
527:
Abu
Hanifah and the Maturidis say that "Faith neither increases nor decreases" and that "Actions are not a part of faith" has been removed until a valid citation is made. Tabligh Jmaat has been removed from the adherents. They do not adhere to any
414:
Also, where it says "Hanafi is predominant...", the word Hanafi should probably be used as an adjectives to describe those who adhere to the Hanafi school and not the school. Perhaps "The Sunni
Muslims in Pakistan and ... are predominantly
375:
This article certainly needs work, but "north" doesn't mean "up". As far as I know, "Upper" geographically means "higher", or you can think of it as "upstream", in Egypt's case that's actually south. In any case, the wording is confusing.
941:
Some of these points are already covered, but in particular, the first two are not. Also, I think what is there should be condensed, and superfluous information (such as who compiled it) should be moved elsewhere or removed.
752:
You may have noticed that the edit summary for removal of the content you have restored included a link to a discussion on a wiki project. You'll have to look in the archives for it now, but the result was a
757:
that inclusion of that material in this article violated WP policy. That means you should not restore it without obtaining a new consensus for its inclusion. I'll summarize the rationale for you here. Per
561:
In fact, it was well known that Abu
Hanifah and Imam Haramain Al-Juwaini held that action are not part of faith, however, there are indications that they both retracted this view latter in their lives.
500:
The article describes at length the places/cultures in which Hanafi school is predominant and it talks about it being a conservative school of Sunni Islam, but the one thing it fails to do is describe
931:
What are the acceptable methods by which you should investigate and draw conclusions from those source? (e.g., rational inquiry, analogical reasoning, literal interpretation, diplomatic consensus?)
356:
There are two things wrong with this sentence. "Northern Egypt" and "upper Egypt" are the same thing. Everything after Maliki doesn't make sense structurally, and there's no end parenthesis.
504:, i.e. what its core beliefs that distinguish it from other schools within Sunni Islam. Can someone with some knowledge on this expand/clean up the article to get this key point across? --
1004:
469:
Alright, but just to clear this up, wasn't the
Taliban a Hanafi group? Or were they influenced by Wahhabism? At any rate, even Wahhabis are not as strict and fannatical as they.
778:. A selective focus on Hanafi views about certain topics like apostasy, slavery, etc does not reflect how the subject is treated in RSs, and so it violates the relevant policy,
994:
881:
Please, correct in the article that Spain and
Morocco were and are followers of the Maliki Madhab, except for small groups that follow other schools in present-day Spain.
35:
567:
1009:
661:
886:
762:, the coverage of a subject on WP has to reflect its coverage in RSs. There are a number of RSs on the Hanafi school whose scope is similar to this article, such as
558:
What? Where's your source for that? Imam Shafie was famous for his debate with the people of Irja' or the
Murjiah, whom believed that action are not part of faith.
516:
err..i'd suggest you read the article carefully. it's all there, dude. and...hanafism is certainly not conservative, compared to hanbalism or shafiism, for example.
966:
329:
agreed. these vandals can't seem to accept the fact that other schools of thought have different views from theirs with regard to certain things. such sore losers.
694:
for content guidelines. The aim of wiki articles is neither to criticize nor praise Islam, the aim is to just summarize verifiable recent reliable sources, see
576:
723:
397:
747:
353:"Northern Egypt is mixed Hanafi/Shafi while upper Egypt and the Sudan are Maliki, Turkey, the Levant (Syria, Lebanon and Iraq are mixed Shafi/Hanafi."
686:
Knowledge is not a blog, and does not summarize what "I am a Muslim myself and my religion does not or does..." type personal opinions. For why, read
858:
590:
1019:
141:
602:
151:
535:
409:
I assume that the incomplete sentence and its lack of commas refers to the places that are predominantly Hanafi or follow the Hanafi madhab.
252:
840:
901:
711:
571:
400:
989:
771:
609:
It is actually half correct. Imam Abu Hanifa indeed believed (used to) that reciting Quran in foreign language was permissible, but
550:
924:
The introduction for this article could be improved. I think the main questions that need to be answered in the introduction are:
425:
1014:
999:
616:
The wikipedia article is incorrect when it says that later scholars overruled the ruling. It was the Imam himself who did Tauba.
380:
563:
489:
1034:
657:
452:
242:
870:
1024:
882:
672:
481:
797:, so I'm moving it there. However, there are some issues with it, which I'll take up on the talk page for that article.
665:
962:
680:
473:
325:
There has been a lot of anti-Hanafi vandalism on this page it seems. I'm not sure what the best way to handle this is.
1039:
116:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
846:
117:
890:
984:
866:
598:
951:
461:
431:
824:
1029:
919:
735:
508:
348:
217:, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
806:
543:
338:
44:
445:
108:
69:
645:
582:
should definitely provide some documentation for support. for the moment i think it should be removed.
369:
970:
775:
876:
650:
213:
174:
787:
495:
676:
632:, however, I am still required to open a discussion here. I would suggest reading my comments on
485:
299:
492:
Yes, but it would probably be more useful to say that
Afghanistan is a basically Hanafi region.
831:
summary in reputable sources (as opposed to some weak sources which oversimplify the matters).
441:
306:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
862:
820:
50:
914:
854:
759:
641:
586:
531:
8:
754:
717:
594:
307:
21:
767:
928:
What are the sources from which Hanafi laws are derived? (e.g., Hadith, Sunnah, Quran?)
836:
802:
740:
731:
763:
436:
The article says blasphemy is not punishable under Hanafi law, but it doesn't mention
947:
910:
783:
707:
629:
449:
316:
628:, though the more relevant discussion can be found on that article's talk page. Per
633:
539:
422:
286:
956:
637:
345:
344:
mentioned. Also the figure of 45% should be referenced (I couldn't find one yet).
779:
687:
335:
978:
832:
811:
798:
727:
619:
470:
905:
replaced with "the 3rd century AH (9th century CE) throughout this article.
793:
Your added material on intoxicating beverages would make a good addition to
943:
906:
703:
699:
691:
377:
100:
724:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Islam#NPOV issues in Hanafi, Maliki and Shafi'i
695:
625:
389:
366:
440:. This information would be a valuable addition, particularly with the
393:
365:
Also, the article doesn't really flow well from one topic to the next.
294:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
205:
189:
168:
199:
895:
505:
437:
466:"it is considered to be the school most open to modern ideas"
794:
113:
522:
1005:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
611:
he himself (not later scholars) took back his point of view
448:, and the Constitution is silent on apostasy. —
84:
63:
961:
I want to get hanafi region complete books in pashto pdf
937:
What is Hanafism's role in the present day Islamic world?
444:
case so topical; Hanafi law is the default system in the
218:
790:, etc, which does reflect how RSs treat those subjects.
817:
this myself: perhaps someone else can take care of it?
772:
The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal History
195:
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
90:
995:
Knowledge vital articles in Philosophy and religion
392:does indeed refer to southern Egypt, refrence the
1010:C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
934:When was Hanafism established, and, briefly, how?
976:
782:. Instead, these views should be discussed in
577:reciting quran in languages other than arabic?
776:The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World
298:] The anchor (#Modern history) has been
362:The above is not a complete sentence.
19:
1020:High-importance Islam-related articles
977:
851:Please add criticism on hanafi fiqh.
268:
211:This article is within the scope of
106:This article is within the scope of
15:
221:and the subjects encompassed by it.
49:It is of interest to the following
13:
14:
1051:
624:Content was recently merged from
990:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
671:reliable hanafi muslim scholars.
272:
198:
188:
167:
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
247:This article has been rated as
146:This article has been rated as
1015:C-Class Islam-related articles
1000:C-Class level-5 vital articles
971:11:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
551:Isn't it the other way around?
1:
952:23:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
871:13:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
736:22:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
712:02:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
681:03:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
572:07:56, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
490:04:32, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
426:21:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
401:22:23, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
381:01:24, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
349:06:10, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
120:and see a list of open tasks.
915:15:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
509:16:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
474:16:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
370:22:20, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
7:
1035:Mid-importance law articles
646:05:38, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
446:Constitution of Afghanistan
126:Knowledge:WikiProject Islam
10:
1056:
1025:WikiProject Islam articles
920:Improving the Introduction
891:17:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
453:08:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
253:project's importance scale
152:project's importance scale
129:Template:WikiProject Islam
807:14:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
603:03:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
339:20:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
246:
227:Knowledge:WikiProject Law
183:
145:
78:
57:
1040:WikiProject Law articles
847:Criticism on Hanafi fiqh
841:03:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
825:18:13, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
788:Islamic views on slavery
230:Template:WikiProject Law
666:12:03, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
502:what Hanafi actually is
985:C-Class vital articles
877:Al Andalus and Marocco
462:Is the Taliban Hanafi?
442:Abdul Rahman (convert)
432:Blasphemy and Apostasy
300:deleted by other users
132:Islam-related articles
534:comment was added by
36:level-5 vital article
1030:C-Class law articles
656:something about it.
396:among other things.
45:content assessment
873:
857:comment added by
784:Apostasy in Islam
651:Application today
630:Knowledge:Merging
606:
589:comment added by
547:
314:
313:
289:in most browsers.
267:
266:
263:
262:
259:
258:
162:
161:
158:
157:
109:WikiProject Islam
1047:
852:
823:
821:Compassionate727
751:
634:Talk:Sunni Islam
605:
583:
529:
496:So...what is it?
308:Reporting errors
276:
275:
269:
235:
234:
231:
228:
225:
208:
203:
202:
192:
185:
184:
179:
171:
164:
163:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
96:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
58:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1046:
1045:
1044:
975:
974:
959:
922:
902:manual of style
898:
879:
849:
818:
814:
745:
743:
720:
653:
622:
584:
579:
564:210.195.104.253
553:
530:—The preceding
525:
498:
464:
434:
319:
310:
292:
291:
290:
273:
232:
229:
226:
223:
222:
214:WikiProject Law
204:
197:
177:
148:High-importance
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
94:
92:
73:High‑importance
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
1053:
1043:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1002:
997:
992:
987:
958:
955:
939:
938:
935:
932:
929:
921:
918:
897:
894:
878:
875:
848:
845:
844:
843:
813:
810:
742:
739:
719:
716:
715:
714:
658:81.236.219.119
652:
649:
621:
618:
578:
575:
552:
549:
524:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
497:
494:
463:
460:
457:
433:
430:
429:
428:
421:are off-topic.
417:
416:
411:
410:
406:
405:
404:
403:
384:
383:
331:
330:
318:
315:
312:
311:
305:
304:
303:
287:case-sensitive
281:
280:
279:
277:
265:
264:
261:
260:
257:
256:
249:Mid-importance
245:
239:
238:
236:
210:
209:
193:
181:
180:
178:Mid‑importance
172:
160:
159:
156:
155:
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1052:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
996:
993:
991:
988:
986:
983:
982:
980:
973:
972:
968:
964:
954:
953:
949:
945:
936:
933:
930:
927:
926:
925:
917:
916:
912:
908:
903:
893:
892:
888:
884:
883:45.142.46.127
874:
872:
868:
864:
860:
856:
842:
838:
834:
829:
828:
827:
826:
822:
809:
808:
804:
800:
796:
791:
789:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
760:WP:PROPORTION
756:
749:
738:
737:
733:
729:
725:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
684:
683:
682:
678:
674:
673:103.230.104.1
668:
667:
663:
659:
648:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
617:
614:
612:
607:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
574:
573:
569:
565:
559:
556:
548:
545:
541:
537:
533:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
507:
503:
493:
491:
487:
483:
482:76.108.26.211
479:
476:
475:
472:
467:
459:
455:
454:
451:
447:
443:
439:
427:
424:
419:
418:
413:
412:
408:
407:
402:
399:
398:12.20.127.229
395:
391:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
379:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
350:
347:
341:
340:
337:
328:
327:
326:
323:
309:
301:
297:
296:
295:
288:
284:
278:
271:
270:
254:
250:
244:
241:
240:
237:
220:
216:
215:
207:
201:
196:
194:
191:
187:
186:
182:
176:
173:
170:
166:
165:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
60:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
963:39.38.73.195
960:
957:Hanafi books
940:
923:
899:
880:
853:— Preceding
850:
815:
792:
755:WP:CONSENSUS
744:
721:
669:
654:
623:
615:
610:
608:
580:
560:
557:
554:
526:
501:
499:
480:
477:
468:
465:
456:
435:
364:
361:
358:
355:
352:
342:
332:
324:
320:
293:
285:Anchors are
282:
248:
233:law articles
212:
147:
107:
101:Islam portal
51:WikiProjects
34:
774:(paywall),
766:(paywall),
748:Zachdavid17
722:Please see
718:NPOV issues
626:Sunni Islam
585:—Preceding
423:Pepsidrinka
390:Upper Egypt
219:legal field
979:Categories
741:NPOV redux
702:for more.
638:MezzoMezzo
394:Upper Nile
346:EsatErbili
206:Law portal
859:Wikiacc97
591:Sawyer207
523:Adherents
336:Randomned
317:Vandalism
39:is rated
867:contribs
855:unsigned
833:Eperoton
799:Eperoton
728:Eperoton
690:. Study
599:contribs
587:unsigned
544:contribs
532:unsigned
471:Giorgioz
438:apostasy
415:Hanafi."
944:Qntmnan
907:Qntmnan
780:WP:NPOV
768:Iranica
704:RLoutfy
688:WP:WWIN
636:first.
528:mazhab.
378:Yodakii
302:before.
251:on the
150:on the
41:C-class
536:Afrazj
450:JEREMY
47:scale.
896:Dates
812:Views
795:Khamr
700:WP:RS
692:WP:PG
620:Merge
123:Islam
114:Islam
70:Islam
28:This
967:talk
948:talk
911:talk
900:The
887:talk
863:talk
837:talk
803:talk
732:talk
708:talk
698:and
696:WP:V
677:talk
662:talk
642:talk
595:talk
568:talk
540:talk
486:talk
367:Zain
283:Tip:
142:High
770:,
764:EI2
506:Hux
243:Mid
224:Law
175:Law
981::
969:)
950:)
913:)
889:)
869:)
865:•
839:)
805:)
786:,
734:)
726:.
710:)
679:)
664:)
644:)
601:)
597:•
570:)
546:).
542:•
488:)
376:--
965:(
946:(
909:(
885:(
861:(
835:(
819:—
801:(
750::
746:@
730:(
706:(
675:(
660:(
640:(
593:(
566:(
538:(
484:(
255:.
154:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
