590:
377:
356:
643:
618:
310:
285:
223:
693:
254:
387:
492:
465:
502:
1020:! As I said earlier, I agree that there should be better sourcing and agree with you entirely that this shouldn't really be what's cited. I'm also not sure that this is the best way to phrase the content in general but my thoughts at the time were mostly surrounding how some people are abused this way and ignoring that might not be what's best. I've reread the thread and
1129:
homeschooling advocacy, if anything. The person who added the tag seemed to think that this article was biased towards criticism. I don't want to go too much the other way, but I do think there could be a better general balance. Do you think I'm on the right track here? I might try to make some bold edits later.
807:, surveys of homeschoolers show that a majority of homeschoolers in the USA are motivated by "conservative Christian beliefs, and seek to remove their children from mainstream culture"." with updated sourcing to criticism? E. Bartholet is a vocal critic of homeschooling and her writings maybe considered biased.
1147:
So for better or worse I have never had any exposure to homeschooling, good or bad, so I'd like to think I'm approaching the subject from a disinterested perspective. With that in mind the sentence you quoted doesn't seem particularly biased one way or another. I skimmed through a few random passages
1001:
for the content in question? If that's the best we can provide then it probably doesn't belong, since that's hardly an unbiased review form a site whose advocacy is evidence just by reading the full url of the link. When that is the source given it does come across as an issue, and is the main issue
1359:
Thanks for your work on this so far! I think it's very good. I'm sorry to say I honestly don't know how much time I'll have to spend on this article in the near term, but I'll probably keep coming back and tweaking and adding things here and there. I've still watchlisted it, so I'll comment if any
1193:
for that statement says "these are subjective questionnaires completed by children’s parents and it is difficult to determine the validity of parents’ views of their own child’s social skills" but the content in the article certainly does not reflect that this is the a survey of how parents viewed
924:
Aspects of the danger of potential educational neglect are already mentioned in the last paragraph of the lead section. However, "not educating children at all" is not a form of homeschooling, but simply the abscence of getting an education (which can also happen to school children who can't cope
822:
The entire article otherwise has to have been written by people willing to extrapolate very limited research. A lot of the referenced being used are from advocacy groups, or corporations that have learning tools to sell. Critics can't be dismissed simply by them having a critical opinion, that's
1024:
mentions that there's already content about the dangers of educational neglect at the end of the lead and it's somewhat vague? It doesn't mention educational neglect explicitly. I don't think indoctrination is the best way to put it. This source could potentially be used for something different
1194:
their child's socialization skills. I've made an attempt to reword that to reflect the source. It could probably be worded better or even just removed or moved into the article itself instead of the lede, but what it said was certainly not reflective of the actual content of the reference. -
1128:
and work from there? What are your thoughts on the neutrality tag? I do think statements like "Also known as interest-led or child-led learning, unschooling attempts to follow opportunities as they arise in real life, through which a child will learn without coercion" is more biased towards
823:
already understood. Compare it to homeopathy maybe, there's many critical voices on the practice, yet they are taken fully seriously on Wiki. Despite being biased. You could start by demonstrating why you think that her writings aren't good, and not just that she disagrees with you. ~~
1166:
I think I was just being picky about the word coercion because it implies students who aren't unschooled are being coerced. Feel free to tackle this whenever you're ready to. I'm interested in doing something eventually myself but I can get indecisive and distracted so we'll see.
1123:
Honestly I'm still trying to decide that myself. Part of the reason I've had difficulty envisoning certain changes to this article is that I don't want to generalize and I'm a bit anxious about where I'd even start in some respects. I'm wondering if maybe I should start improving
1188:
is fine too. I did come across a sentence which concerned me, namely the sentence in the lede about homeschooled students "have equally or better developed social skills and participate more in cultural and family activities on average than public school students." The
982:
One potential is that one might think that educational neglect overlaps with
Unschooling and that they're synonymous terms, but I think that would be more of an opinion to combine the two and not a fact, so I think it's appropriate to list them as too separate things.
939:
I disagree that there's nothing to discuss. I'm not even involved in any of this and I saw the content added and removed a few times. I was trying to friendly reach out to the editors in question so we could try to reach some sort of consensus.
1091:
With the
Kunzman source in mind do you have a proposed wording for the content? The source does seem focused on the homeschooling through a religious lens, I'll try later to find some sources that discuss a more generalized context as well. -
1393:
I'd also like to note that my interest in this article may ebb and flow but I don't plan on completely forgetting about it. It's difficult to find the motivation when dealing with an article like this. Anyways, I haven't done much with
898:
Personally, I think it's relevant to include information about different types of homeschooling instead of just generalizing across the board. Some people recieve a relatively good education at home, like one of my parents, and others
1026:
967:
I have since changed it to say "-in a less strict manor, which in some cases may include the children not being educated at all". I think that this makes it more clear that it only applies to some children, and not all.
963:
That being said, I think that it makes sense to acknowledge that educational neglect exists, and not over-generalize. I don't see how only including the views of homeschool-avocate parents helps the article remain
1052:
Unfortunately I can't view the GBooks link it's saying the page is unavailable for viewing (I notice what can be viewed changes so I'll try again later) but I think the
Kunzman paper would be a good source, it's
153:
1265:
Just wanted to pop in and thank you for all your recent edits here! You've done some great work. I meant to do something about the state of the article a year and a half ago and I completely forgot about it.
1031:. I'm not sure I'm explaining my thoughts the best here, but maybe you kind of get what I'm trying to say? This is more an American-centric context and maybe what I'm thinking about would be more suited to
1250:
I haven't read it fully yet, but a quick skim shows that it covers and critiques a lot of the topics covered in this article. It may be useful as a source, and also may point us to other useful sources.
1360:
disputes crop up, as well as commenting in other talk page discussions. I suggest you make whatever edits strike you as improvements and I will do the same, and they can thus build on each other.
1283:
Thank you for the appreciation! I just had to do something about the completely uncritical reiteration of those studies. Based on what I've seen so far, I'm sure a lot remains to be done.
1363:
I'd suggest we try to get that article-wide neutrality tag off first, if we're satisfied with the lead. Any sections that we still think are unbalanced can be tagged individually.
1317:
I've tried to improve the history section. I'm not sure how helpful my edits have been but hopefully it's better than it was before. I'm open to respectfully ruthless feedback.
1152:. I'm not going to start messing with the article in my current tired state, but I'll at least try to tackle some of that over-reliable of quotation marks in a little while. -
903:. I also agree about Tacyarg's argument about sourcing. I see where you're coming from in regards to that. Educational neglect does seem to be a term that is used elsewhere
887:. Ft109, I appreciate your efforts, but I'm more inclined to agree with Tacyarg. However, whenever there's disagreements about things, starting a discussion on the revelant
214:
147:
523:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
1300:
today. I'm incredibly busy this weekend but I'll try to remember to take a look at this article again sometime past
Tuesday. We can try to collaborate a bit. :)
560:
447:
1208:
I've been busier today than I thought I would be so I didn't really have the time to do anything drastically different, but I did make a few changes.
709:
1395:
997:
I know I haven't edited or commented before now but I've been watching this for a few days, and I have a question; is there a better source than
824:
1245:
851:
1435:
I found another source for us to read. Obviously not as great as a journal article but one is linked within the source that may be promising?
925:
with the school system). So no, there's nothing to discuss about that; this edit was simply inappropriate, unneutral and factually wrong.--
1341:
I was also wondering how exactly you wanted to approach collaboration here? I work on a section, you work on a section? Some other method?
880:
874:
780:
761:
1505:
649:
623:
550:
1490:
437:
79:
832:
1209:
1141:
918:
1515:
1495:
597:
475:
1436:
1054:
713:
1525:
525:
85:
44:
168:
1500:
413:
222:
135:
1520:
1485:
316:
290:
992:
1125:
1032:
721:
30:
977:
1415:
I am much the same way, so I completely understand. Thank you for your latest edits and for the new source to read.
1510:
515:
470:
1462:
1449:
1423:
1410:
1388:
1371:
1353:
1329:
1312:
1291:
1278:
1259:
952:
934:
960:
As the person who originally added "not educating children at all", I'll admit I should've worded it differently.
400:
361:
99:
1185:
1011:
1190:
129:
104:
20:
1227:
1203:
1179:
1161:
1101:
1086:
1066:
1047:
74:
998:
1454:
Thank you for this. I agree that this is useful, possibly in itself, and also whatever papers it links to.
1239:
265:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
1213:
1211:
816:
125:
412:
topics on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
65:
185:
175:
855:
724:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
1002:
I have with the content; the wording could possibly be solved by drawing from a better source. -
988:
973:
109:
904:
892:
271:
1446:
1407:
1385:
1350:
1326:
1309:
1275:
1224:
1176:
1138:
1083:
1044:
949:
930:
915:
888:
812:
773:
754:
699:
654:
628:
321:
295:
141:
1184:
Ah, I see what you mean. I think changing the word coercion to something like guidance or
717:
8:
804:
253:
55:
984:
969:
828:
704:
409:
70:
1246:
Homeschooling: Parent Rights
Absolutism vs. Child Rights to Education & Protection
507:
51:
1029:
392:
161:
1456:
1438:
1430:
1417:
1399:
1377:
1365:
1342:
1318:
1301:
1297:
1285:
1267:
1253:
1216:
1199:
1168:
1157:
1149:
1130:
1097:
1075:
1062:
1036:
1021:
1007:
957:
941:
926:
907:
900:
808:
798:
895:. So let's all talk about this and try to come to some sort of understanding?
233:
1479:
24:
1215:. If there's anything that I did that was controversial, we can discuss it.
884:
237:
589:
238:
1195:
1153:
1093:
1071:
1058:
1017:
1003:
520:
519:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
1148:
and the main thing that I saw was that this article learns heavily on
405:
376:
355:
642:
617:
309:
284:
235:
386:
239:
491:
464:
1074:
The second source is the better of the two anyways. :)
1057:
and used as a reference by a few dozen other papers. -
160:
497:
404:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
382:
15:
710:Homeschooling international status and statistics
1477:
652:, a project which is currently considered to be
319:, a project which is currently considered to be
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
803:What do you think about moving "According to
174:
893:repeatedly restoring the content in question
1398:yet but I think it could useful elsewhere.
664:Knowledge:WikiProject Alternative education
691:
667:Template:WikiProject Alternative education
1296:That's how I feel about what I did with
698:Text and/or other creative content from
251:
1478:
529:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
687:
648:This article is within the scope of
513:This article is within the scope of
398:This article is within the scope of
315:This article is within the scope of
247:
331:Knowledge:WikiProject Homeschooling
270:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
1506:Low-importance Philosophy articles
1126:Homeschooling in the United States
1033:Homeschooling in the United States
588:
334:Template:WikiProject Homeschooling
14:
1537:
1491:Top-importance education articles
650:WikiProject Alternative education
641:
616:
535:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
500:
490:
463:
385:
375:
354:
308:
283:
252:
221:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
875:"Not educating children at all"
854:. 10 April 2020. Archived from
555:This article has been rated as
538:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
442:This article has been rated as
422:Knowledge:WikiProject Education
1516:Low-importance ethics articles
1496:WikiProject Education articles
1463:00:11, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1450:00:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
844:
670:Alternative education articles
425:Template:WikiProject Education
1:
919:11:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
416:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1526:Old requests for peer review
1228:04:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
1204:20:10, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1180:18:23, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1162:18:18, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1142:17:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1102:17:20, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1087:07:24, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1067:04:56, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
1048:11:20, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
1016:Thanks for bringing this up
1012:08:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
993:08:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
978:08:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
953:08:50, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
935:23:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
852:"The Risks of Homeschooling"
7:
1501:C-Class Philosophy articles
817:05:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1542:
1521:Ethics task force articles
1486:C-Class education articles
1376:Okay, sounds like a plan.
1244:I just found this source:
561:project's importance scale
448:project's importance scale
1389:03:13, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
1372:02:15, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
1354:21:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
1330:08:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
1313:04:10, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1292:04:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1279:03:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1260:02:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
1240:Arizona Law Review source
1186:just removing it outright
891:should happen instead of
736:
732:
708:was copied or moved into
636:
596:
571:
567:
554:
485:
441:
370:
317:WikiProject Homeschooling
303:
278:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1424:17:21, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
1411:10:55, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
1511:C-Class ethics articles
1055:been subsequently cited
833:01:16, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
572:Associated task forces:
593:
516:WikiProject Philosophy
337:Homeschooling articles
260:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
661:Alternative education
624:Alternative education
592:
401:WikiProject Education
215:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1028:? There's also this
716:. The former page's
105:No original research
805:Elizabeth Bartholet
722:provide attribution
541:Philosophy articles
1150:using scare quotes
737:Article milestones
594:
526:general discussion
428:education articles
266:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1035:. Your thoughts?
794:
793:
790:
789:
774:February 17, 2008
728:
727:
686:
685:
682:
681:
678:
677:
611:
610:
607:
606:
603:
602:
508:Philosophy portal
458:
457:
454:
453:
410:education-related
349:
348:
345:
344:
246:
245:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1533:
1461:
1444:
1441:
1434:
1422:
1405:
1402:
1383:
1380:
1370:
1348:
1345:
1324:
1321:
1307:
1304:
1290:
1273:
1270:
1258:
1222:
1219:
1174:
1171:
1136:
1133:
1081:
1078:
1042:
1039:
947:
944:
913:
910:
867:
866:
864:
863:
848:
776:
757:
734:
733:
730:
729:
707:
695:
694:
688:
672:
671:
668:
665:
662:
645:
638:
637:
632:
620:
613:
612:
579:
569:
568:
543:
542:
539:
536:
533:
510:
505:
504:
503:
494:
487:
486:
481:
478:
467:
460:
459:
430:
429:
426:
423:
420:
395:
393:Education portal
390:
389:
379:
372:
371:
366:
358:
351:
350:
339:
338:
335:
332:
329:
312:
305:
304:
299:
287:
280:
279:
263:
257:
256:
248:
240:
226:
225:
216:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1541:
1540:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1476:
1475:
1455:
1442:
1439:
1428:
1416:
1403:
1400:
1381:
1378:
1364:
1346:
1343:
1322:
1319:
1305:
1302:
1298:dynamic pricing
1284:
1271:
1268:
1252:
1242:
1220:
1217:
1172:
1169:
1134:
1131:
1079:
1076:
1040:
1037:
945:
942:
911:
908:
877:
872:
871:
870:
861:
859:
850:
849:
845:
801:
772:
753:
703:
692:
669:
666:
663:
660:
659:
626:
577:
540:
537:
534:
531:
530:
506:
501:
499:
479:
473:
427:
424:
421:
418:
417:
391:
384:
364:
336:
333:
330:
327:
326:
293:
264:on Knowledge's
261:
242:
241:
236:
213:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1539:
1529:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1488:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1391:
1361:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
965:
961:
876:
873:
869:
868:
842:
841:
837:
836:
835:
800:
797:
792:
791:
788:
787:
784:
777:
769:
768:
765:
758:
755:April 24, 2008
750:
749:
746:
743:
739:
738:
726:
725:
720:now serves to
696:
684:
683:
680:
679:
676:
675:
673:
646:
634:
633:
621:
609:
608:
605:
604:
601:
600:
595:
585:
584:
582:
580:
574:
573:
565:
564:
557:Low-importance
553:
547:
546:
544:
512:
511:
495:
483:
482:
480:Low‑importance
468:
456:
455:
452:
451:
444:Top-importance
440:
434:
433:
431:
414:the discussion
397:
396:
380:
368:
367:
365:Top‑importance
359:
347:
346:
343:
342:
340:
313:
301:
300:
288:
276:
275:
269:
258:
244:
243:
234:
232:
231:
228:
227:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1538:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1492:
1489:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1481:
1464:
1460:
1459:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1448:
1445:
1437:
1432:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1421:
1420:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1409:
1406:
1397:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1384:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1362:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1331:
1328:
1325:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1288:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1277:
1274:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1257:
1256:
1248:
1247:
1229:
1226:
1223:
1214:
1212:
1210:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1175:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1127:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1073:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1046:
1043:
1034:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1000:
996:
995:
994:
990:
986:
985:Shane04040404
981:
980:
979:
975:
971:
970:Shane04040404
966:
962:
959:
956:
955:
954:
951:
948:
938:
937:
936:
932:
928:
923:
922:
921:
920:
917:
914:
905:
902:
896:
894:
890:
886:
882:
858:on 2020-05-01
857:
853:
847:
843:
840:
834:
830:
826:
821:
820:
819:
818:
814:
810:
806:
796:
785:
783:
782:
778:
775:
771:
770:
766:
764:
763:
759:
756:
752:
751:
747:
744:
741:
740:
735:
731:
723:
719:
715:
711:
706:
705:Homeschooling
701:
697:
690:
689:
674:
657:
656:
651:
647:
644:
640:
639:
635:
630:
625:
622:
619:
615:
614:
599:
591:
587:
586:
583:
581:
576:
575:
570:
566:
562:
558:
552:
549:
548:
545:
528:
527:
522:
518:
517:
509:
498:
496:
493:
489:
488:
484:
477:
472:
469:
466:
462:
461:
449:
445:
439:
436:
435:
432:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
394:
388:
383:
381:
378:
374:
373:
369:
363:
360:
357:
353:
352:
341:
328:Homeschooling
324:
323:
318:
314:
311:
307:
306:
302:
297:
292:
291:Homeschooling
289:
286:
282:
281:
277:
273:
267:
259:
255:
250:
249:
230:
229:
224:
220:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
25:Homeschooling
22:
18:
17:
1457:
1418:
1366:
1340:
1286:
1254:
1249:
1243:
1122:
901:really don't
897:
878:
860:. Retrieved
856:the original
846:
838:
802:
795:
779:
760:
700:this version
653:
556:
524:
514:
443:
399:
320:
272:WikiProjects
218:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1396:this source
958:@Clovermoss
781:Peer review
762:Peer review
148:free images
31:not a forum
1480:Categories
1458:Crossroads
1440:Clovermoss
1431:Crossroads
1419:Crossroads
1401:Clovermoss
1379:Clovermoss
1367:Crossroads
1344:Clovermoss
1320:Clovermoss
1303:Clovermoss
1287:Crossroads
1269:Clovermoss
1255:Crossroads
1218:Clovermoss
1170:Clovermoss
1132:Clovermoss
1077:Clovermoss
1038:Clovermoss
1022:Maxeto0910
943:Clovermoss
927:Maxeto0910
909:Clovermoss
862:2020-05-04
839:References
809:Barbie1979
532:Philosophy
521:philosophy
471:Philosophy
889:talk page
714:this edit
419:Education
406:education
362:Education
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
964:neutral.
879:Pinging
825:Kameloso
786:Reviewed
767:Reviewed
655:inactive
629:inactive
322:inactive
296:inactive
219:555 days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
885:Tacyarg
799:Biased?
745:Process
718:history
559:on the
446:on the
262:C-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1447:(talk)
1408:(talk)
1386:(talk)
1351:(talk)
1327:(talk)
1310:(talk)
1276:(talk)
1225:(talk)
1191:source
1177:(talk)
1139:(talk)
1084:(talk)
1072:@Aoidh
1045:(talk)
950:(talk)
916:(talk)
748:Result
598:Ethics
476:Ethics
268:scale.
126:Google
1196:Aoidh
1154:Aoidh
1094:Aoidh
1059:Aoidh
1018:Aoidh
1004:Aoidh
881:Ft109
712:with
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1200:talk
1158:talk
1098:talk
1063:talk
1008:talk
999:this
989:talk
974:talk
931:talk
883:and
829:talk
813:talk
742:Date
408:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
702:of
551:Low
438:Top
176:TWL
1482::
1443:🍀
1404:🍀
1382:🍀
1347:🍀
1323:🍀
1306:🍀
1272:🍀
1221:🍀
1202:)
1173:🍀
1160:)
1135:🍀
1100:)
1080:🍀
1065:)
1041:🍀
1010:)
991:)
976:)
946:🍀
933:)
912:🍀
906:.
831:)
815:)
578:/
474::
217::
209:,
205:,
201:,
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
1433::
1429:@
1198:(
1156:(
1096:(
1061:(
1006:(
987:(
972:(
929:(
865:.
827:(
811:(
658:.
631:)
627:(
563:.
450:.
325:.
298:)
294:(
274::
211:6
207:5
203:4
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.