1575:
that
Knowledge capitalizes if sources seem to somewhat prefer capitals. The preference must be consistent (i.e. verging on universal) across independent reliable sources." I never like to add material to guidelines if it can be avoided, but after 20+ years it is clear that the extant wording is, in some strange way, not quite clear enough to a small subset of editors who very strongly persist in willfully misinterpreting it, no matter how many times RMs conclude the opposite of how they'd like them to conclude. This problem accounts for probably 75% of the conflicts over capitalization in RMs, and probably 95% of the drama about capitalization in RMs.
550:
1244:
341:
1091:
822:
801:
1522:
very few
Knowledge editors agree with.). You know that I, and many other Knowledge editors, disagree with your interpretation; in fact it forms the basis of many of your complaints about "over capitalization" (who is doing the over-capitalization? It's not gremlins, it's other Knowledge editors.). I support you being able to voice your views; I suggest you accept that other people can have a difference of opinion and voice their views, rather than being capital-W Wrong.
1107:
832:
254:
2276:
capitalization", which verges on the opposite. Even 25% could be argued to be "substantial", but is very obviously not the intent of the guideline. A 60% capitalization rate (especially after demonstrable influence from WP's own over-capitalization) is neither "consistent" capitalization nor "a substantial majority". In actual practice, RM expects to see a 90+ percent capitalization rate to consider it consistent across the substantial majority of indy RS.
462:
383:
1161:. It was also quite vague, as it claimed this alleged "success" occurred "in recent years", yet the two cited sources were from 1994 and 2008, that's certainly not recent. The second source ironically didn't even talk about improvements under the IR, but the opposite, such as women "using their appearance and sexuality to fight the regime" and "Prospects for young people are not good and many graduates are lucky to get jobs as taxi drivers." --
976:
709:
688:
224:
719:
299:
541:
1048:
1037:
1026:
1015:
1004:
614:
604:
583:
934:
2008:(To be clear, I'm opposing this RM on the nom's argument, so fair enough for Cinderella to quote me in favor. For the record, I stand by what I wrote above - I don't think CONSISTENT is strong grounds for anything. Every evolution needs to stand or fall on its own merits. Just... this case is one where there's obviously plenty of support in sources for a capital, so let's go with that.)
906:
1553:
influence of WP on writers, especially among recent books that include so many enabled by WP. If you look at what proper names look like in n-gram stats, they are 95% and more capitalized. These arguments based on a recent modest majority are far short of our criteria. So it's not so simple as you say, see?
2332:
bar of being "consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources" is nowhere near met. Consistency is also a non-argument, given the above evidence that articles on revolutions elsewhere are already completely mixed. Basically there is no valid reason to oppose given
1552:
again and see. Second, when the n-gram stats show a recent modest preference for capitalization, that is counting occurences in titles (including titles of cited works) and headings and such; and for sources more recent than WP's capitalization of the term, there's also the "unreasonably effective"
1521:
No, I know that the standard you prefer (as does Tony) is that MOS:CAPS suggests de-capitalizing if essentially anyone is found who might not capitalize it. And sometimes not even that (I've seen you argue that the
Knowledge MOS is so "powerful" that sources don't matter, which is simply a standard
1615:
of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in
Knowledge ." Ngrams tend to over-report capitalisation since they do not distinguish things like headings, captions or the titles of works in citations that normally use title case. Allowing for this, we see a slight majority for the capitalised
1574:
is entirely correct, yet a vague confusion that it somehow means this seems to be the source of a lot of RM repetitive but invalid arguments at RMs. It would probably make sense to just add a footnote at that part of MOS:CAPS (and the corresponding part of WP:NCCAPS) that says "This does not mean
2248:
I would keep all of these with the existing capitalization except for maybe
Romanian, although I wouldn't actively press to have it recapitalized; your first batch is decisive evidence for those pages being treated as proper names, but this does not belittle the other revolutions currently being
1842:
as Ham II indicated above. I don't find the list he provided "cherry picked" because they specifically include the term "revolution," like this article does. (And if there are articles on national revolutions where we don't capitalize the term, as SmC and
Cinderella seem to suggest, please show
1738:
No, the majority of conflict articles not have the descriptive term (revolution, war, battle, offensive, rebellion, uprising, etc., etc.) capitalized. You've just cherry-picked a tiny handful that happen to pass the "are consistently capitalized in independent reliable sources" test. You have
1529:
just a month or so ago. There are plenty of times I grudgingly think you're right, just I don't generally need to bother to vote in those cases because the anti-capitals crowd usually has good turnout at RM. But this case is quite straightforward: usage shows sources prefer capital R. Ergo
1142:
LouisAragon, if you can 'find a plethore of sources that dismiss the "broadening of education and healthcare" stuff', why have you not done so? If you disbelieve that the broadening of education and healthcare 'is a IRI project, and not a continuation of the Shah's policies', why have you not
2275:
That's not correct at all; you're trying to rewrite the guideline on-the-fly to mean what you wish it meant, which is sharply divergent from what it actually says and means. It requires consistent capitalization across a substantial majority of independent reliable sources, not "substantial
1340:
2249:
treated as proper names; 99% support for capitalization is great and makes those completely indisputable, but 60%+ (i.e. 50% more support for capitalization) support is substantial enough that we should not default to downcasing when it is clearly not the common method;
2122:
These examples (from ones mentioned above) span the range of marginal (Haitian, Russian) to clear (American, French) "consistently capitalized" per source statistics. The
Iranian revolution and the other recently lowercased ones do not come close to these.
1143:
challenged this with evidence to the contrary? There ought to be a mention of the
Revolution's effect on domestic policy in the lead, and a one-sentence summary of a section of the main text is hardly burdening the lead with excessive text.
2071:
shown in the nominator's own ngram; itself shows far more than a simple majority (+50% for capitalization); the method by which the prevailing style in sources has changed is irrelevant; all that matters is that it took place.
2169:
Probably in all the these WP's over-capitalization has influenced the usage in recent years. We should not be doing that. Caps on WP mean proper name, and people believe us, so we should be careful not to over-cap things.
1642:
1176:
166:
1223:
1098:
916:
1415:, which shows that it was majority lowercase when the article was created capped in 2003, and there's a minor trend to more capping since then, likely affected by WP, but not approaching a strong majority or the
2328:(which is usually better indicative of usage in running text, since it eliminates title-case usage in book and chapter titles) we see that the sentence case form has an actual lead over the title case. Thus the
1648:
WP had an article on the subject using "Iranian
Revolution", so the present lean toward capital R is clearly a case of citogenesis. And it doesn't constitute consistent capitalization in independent RS anyway.
2325:
1412:
1372:
2224:
2204:
2194:
2229:
2214:
2163:
2151:
2145:
2092:
2219:
2209:
2199:
2139:
2116:
2110:
2104:
2157:
2098:
2189:
1644:
which should reduce some (not all) inclusion of title-case headlines, constrained to pertinent date ranges. It notably shows that "Iranian revolution" was overwhelmingly preferred until
1192:
1204:
411:
2379:
per
Amakuru. (And emphatically not on the basis that "consistently ... in a substantial majority" means something like "verging on universal" or "90+ percent". It does not.)
160:
2496:
1493:
A light apparent majority, caused by not weeding out title-case headlines, is not our standard. Consistently capitalized in independent RS is out standard. You know this.
215:
1219:
1114:
920:
2297:
I've seen all of these points from you before; I know what your interpretation of the guideline is, but for now I will stand by mine even if you think it is "Wrong".
2491:
1993:
that capitalization of the word "revolution" be consistent across all articles, nor should there be; Knowledge should follow the capitalization used in the sources.
989:
1857:
I've looked and I think there are only these five that have the same construction (without other modifiers or qualifiers, e.g. dates) and are in sentence case:
2431:
554:
265:
1815:
is capitalised (because it is consistently capitalised in sources) and others, where it is lowercase. In short, there is no consistant capitalisation of
1227:
888:
946:
430:
2446:
660:
670:
1284:
783:
1280:
975:
2421:
1283:
within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the
2486:
2436:
92:
57:
2476:
2416:
1185:
878:
2081:
2441:
2426:
1401:
181:
2306:
2292:
1288:
2481:
2371:
941:
911:
148:
2506:
2461:
2406:
2270:
1966:
1625:
1170:
1152:
950:
773:
203:
98:
2386:
1952:
1665:
223:
2003:
1852:
2451:
1232:
854:
367:
2132:
2053:
2035:
2017:
1488:
1428:
2501:
2471:
2466:
2346:
1445:
1389:
741:
362:
306:
43:
1828:
1733:
1591:
1539:
1509:
2287:
1750:
1688:
1660:
1586:
1504:
1469:
1464:
1209:
211:
207:
1755:
635:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
315:
142:
2243:
2179:
1934:
1562:
1292:
636:
472:
319:
2411:
2401:
1137:
745:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
358:
112:
1526:
2456:
1159:
845:
806:
486:
482:
138:
117:
33:
1319:
1181:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
749:
478:
87:
945:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
2302:
2266:
2077:
1948:
1200:
563:
357:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
284:
261:
188:
2184:
Draw your own conclusions from more. Which would you change per guidelines, and which leave as they are?
627:
588:
283:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
78:
1980:
1702:
To the extent that it is practical, titles should be consistent among articles covering similar topics.
732:
693:
280:
198:
1336:
1332:
322:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about
2365:
2026:
argument is spurious but disagree with the move for other reasons - which was the point of the post.
1939:
Note that four of the five mentioned are entirely the work of Dicklyon, Cinderella, and SMcCandlish (
1276:
1811:, in particular. However, even if this interpretation were given credence, there are articles where
340:
2511:
1677:
majority of cap usage: this is not the case. GoodDay, this is not a forum for vague recollections.
327:
264:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been
1902:
853:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2298:
2262:
2073:
2049:
2031:
1999:
1944:
1824:
1621:
1397:
1380:
1307:
1255:
1196:
1166:
1148:
352:
122:
154:
2383:
1918:
1641:. This is not consistently capitalized in independent reliable sources. Here's a better N-gram
442:
423:
272:
404:
2284:
1910:
1890:
1882:
1747:
1657:
1583:
1501:
1461:
569:
1355:
1260:
2359:
2023:
1922:
1898:
1848:
1839:
1808:
1792:
1760:
1697:
1525:
For the record, I am not some sort of reverse pro-capital letters extremist. Hell, I just
461:
382:
8:
2119:
was majority capitalized 100 years ago, around 80% in recent decades, 90% more recently.
1940:
1914:
1870:
1862:
1858:
1776:
1705:
540:
276:
68:
2239:
2175:
2128:
2045:
2027:
2013:
1995:
1962:
1906:
1894:
1886:
1820:
1768:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1617:
1558:
1535:
1484:
1424:
1393:
1376:
1350:
1296:
1251:
1162:
1144:
323:
311:
83:
37:
2380:
2342:
2334:
1874:
1866:
1709:
1548:
say "WP capitalizes when sources seem to prefer capitals". Quite the contrary – read
1450:
1441:
1177:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
64:
2279:
1930:
1878:
1742:
1729:
1652:
1634:
1578:
1516:
1496:
1456:
1364:
2257:
the practically unanimous support seen in, for example, American Revolution, only
174:
1844:
1683:
837:
2354:; ngrams clearly show there's a lack of clarity on if it should be capitalized.
2095:
was only half capitalized 200 years ago, but more like 95% for the last century.
736:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to
1479:
per nominator's own ngrams which show a clear preference for capitalization.
238:
234:
2395:
2235:
2171:
2124:
2009:
1976:
1958:
1554:
1544:
It's not nearly as simple as that, on two points: First, our guideline does
1531:
1480:
1420:
1218:
is a pivotal issue for Khamenei, it is logical to make it so in the article.
1215:
2234:(the others mentioned above are not common enough to show up in the stats).
2338:
2040:
Our views on this case differ because the guidance at MOS:CAPS calls for a
1804:
1788:
1780:
1437:
1360:
619:
2101:
similarly, the evolution to proper name status is way over 100 years old.
1984:
1926:
1725:
1090:
724:
831:
821:
800:
239:
2089:
the n-gram stats for revolutions that we treat as having proper names:
1957:
Indeed, we have fixed a lot of over-capitalized terms in recent years.
1678:
253:
466:
2113:
was half capitalized 100 years ago, about 90% for the last 30 years.
1106:
2329:
2250:
1638:
1608:
1549:
1416:
1368:
850:
236:
1943:
even without a formal RM), and all five are from after mid-2023.
1611:: "only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a
1530:
Knowledge also should use capital R. It is as simple as that.
708:
687:
2166:
caps were in a minority until the latest year or two of stats
1799:
should be capitalised in this article title misrepresents the
1791:
to suggest there are exceptions to this instruction. Invoking
240:
1989:
As I've said before, this is an invalid rationale. There is
1419:
criterion of "consistently capitalized" in reliable sources.
632:
361:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
737:
2337:
type arguments, meaning we have no choice but to move. —
2107:
is more recent. Half capitalized in 2000, now around 90%.
1673:—SnowFire, please read MOSCAPS. There would have to be an
1616:
form but not a substantial majority required by MOS:CAPS.
933:
905:
603:
582:
271:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
2142:
just reached half capped in 2006, barely to 65% recently.
1572:
say "WP capitalizes when sources seem to prefer capitals"
1271:
740:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please
1527:
did a non-controversial move away from capital letters
1158:
The two sources didn't support that statement anyways
173:
1436:- I've always seen this written in capitalised form.
465:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
987:
This article has been checked against the following
849:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
827:
714:
631:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
609:
371:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
28:
2497:
Middle Eastern military history task force articles
2492:B-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
2393:
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1191:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
187:
1773:topic-specific conventions on article titles
1771:which explains that it refers to documented
1363:). Not consistently capped in sources - per
2432:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in History
1739:fundamentally misunderstood WP:CONSISTENT.
1250:It has been proposed in this section that
1099:Middle Eastern military history task force
1787:for article titles. There is nothing at
939:This article is within the scope of the
538:
2447:High-importance Islam-related articles
2394:
2333:above, merely personal preference and
959:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
949:. To use this banner, please see the
1386:This is a contested technical request
1220:2601:C4:C300:2890:A5F3:AE3C:9723:E346
962:Template:WikiProject Military history
2154:is limping along at near half-capped
2148:is somewhat less capped than Iranian
1238:
843:This article is within the scope of
730:This article is within the scope of
625:This article is within the scope of
534:
293:
248:
15:
2422:Knowledge vital articles in History
1983:on an argument of consistency (see
1704:" The similar topics here would be
568:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
13:
1105:
1089:
974:
14:
2523:
2487:B-Class military history articles
2437:B-Class vital articles in History
1383:) 09:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
1275:will list this discussion on the
2477:Mid-importance politics articles
2417:Knowledge level-4 vital articles
1242:
1233:Requested move 12 September 2024
1046:
1035:
1024:
1013:
1002:
932:
904:
830:
820:
799:
744:where you can contribute to the
717:
707:
686:
612:
602:
581:
548:
539:
460:
381:
339:
297:
252:
222:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
883:This article has been rated as
778:This article has been rated as
665:This article has been rated as
2442:B-Class Islam-related articles
2427:B-Class level-4 vital articles
2387:04:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
2372:00:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2347:12:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
2307:01:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
2293:00:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
2271:04:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2244:03:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2180:03:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2133:03:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2082:02:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2054:02:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2036:01:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2018:00:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2004:00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1967:00:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1953:20:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1935:19:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1853:18:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1829:08:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1756:07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1734:07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1689:01:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1666:20:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1626:22:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1592:19:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1563:02:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1540:00:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1510:20:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1489:19:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1470:20:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
1446:09:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1429:04:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1402:03:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1210:Hijab as a life-or-death issue
863:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
2482:WikiProject Politics articles
2022:One can acknowledge that the
1819:with which to be consistent.
866:Template:WikiProject Politics
857:and see a list of open tasks.
639:and see a list of open tasks.
310:for general discussion about
285:contentious topics procedures
55:Put new text under old text.
2507:Cold War task force articles
2462:Top-importance Iran articles
2407:Old requests for peer review
1287:). Please base arguments on
1186:Iranian Revolution Women.jpg
1138:Revert with odd edit summary
942:Military history WikiProject
7:
2044:and not a simple majority.
1359:– Change to sentence case (
645:Knowledge:WikiProject Islam
63:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
2528:
2452:WikiProject Islam articles
1981:Siamese revolution of 1688
1007:Referencing and citation:
889:project's importance scale
784:project's importance scale
758:Knowledge:WikiProject Iran
671:project's importance scale
648:Template:WikiProject Islam
412:Featured article candidate
365:. Editors may also seek a
2502:B-Class Cold War articles
2472:B-Class politics articles
2467:WikiProject Iran articles
2324:. If we run an ngram for
1205:22:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
1171:12:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
1153:07:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
1113:
1097:
1072:
1068:
986:
965:military history articles
927:
882:
815:
777:
761:Template:WikiProject Iran
702:
664:
597:
576:
521:
459:
450:Good article reassessment
379:
375:
287:before editing this page.
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
2326:"Iranian revolution was"
281:normal editorial process
21:
1979:in the RM to capitalse
1228:17:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
1073:Associated task forces:
1018:Coverage and accuracy:
268:as a contentious topic.
2412:B-Class vital articles
2402:Delisted good articles
1919:Tajikistani Revolution
1877:. These are the rest:
1767:of naming. It invokes
1291:, and keep discussion
1110:
1094:
1051:Supporting materials:
979:
651:Islam-related articles
277:standards of behaviour
88:avoid personal attacks
2457:B-Class Iran articles
2225:Guatemalan Revolution
2195:Nicaraguan Revolution
1911:Guatemalan Revolution
1903:Monégasque Revolution
1891:Philippine Revolution
1883:Nicaraguan Revolution
1109:
1093:
978:
555:level-4 vital article
524:Delisted good article
359:good article criteria
216:Auto-archiving period
113:Neutral point of view
2230:Ethiopian Revolution
2215:Argentine Revolution
2160:caps are in minority
2069:substantial majority
2042:substantial majority
1923:Ethiopian Revolution
1899:Argentine Revolution
1613:substantial majority
1320:requested move/dated
1308:subst:requested move
1289:article title policy
1285:closing instructions
1279:current discussions
846:WikiProject Politics
314:. Any such comments
273:purpose of Knowledge
118:No original research
2164:Tunisian Revolution
2152:Sudanese Revolution
2146:Romanian Revolution
2093:American Revolution
1915:Andorran Revolution
1871:Tunisian revolution
1863:Sudanese revolution
1859:Romanian revolution
1783:) tells use to use
1706:American Revolution
1568:our guideline does
1117:(c. 1945 – c. 1989)
1115:Cold War task force
1040:Grammar and style:
993:for B-class status:
2299:Flemmish Nietzsche
2263:Flemmish Nietzsche
2220:Rwandan Revolution
2210:Serbian Revolution
2200:Belgian Revolution
2140:Iranian Revolution
2117:Russian Revolution
2111:Mexican Revolution
2105:Haitian Revolution
2074:Flemmish Nietzsche
1945:Flemmish Nietzsche
1907:Rwandan Revolution
1895:Serbian Revolution
1887:Belgian Revolution
1722:Russian Revolution
1718:Mexican Revolution
1714:Haitian Revolution
1356:Iranian revolution
1351:Iranian Revolution
1261:Iranian revolution
1252:Iranian Revolution
1197:Community Tech bot
1111:
1095:
980:
947:list of open tasks
748:and help with our
564:content assessment
387:Article milestones
347:Iranian Revolution
324:Iranian Revolution
312:Iranian Revolution
309:
262:contentious topics
99:dispute resolution
60:
38:Iranian Revolution
2158:Syrian Revolution
2099:French Revolution
1875:Yemeni revolution
1867:Syrian revolution
1801:spirit and intent
1710:French Revolution
1404:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1326:
1256:renamed and moved
1133:
1132:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1064:
1063:
951:full instructions
899:
898:
895:
894:
869:politics articles
794:
793:
790:
789:
681:
680:
677:
676:
628:WikiProject Islam
533:
532:
529:
528:
515:February 11, 2019
511:February 11, 2017
507:February 11, 2016
503:February 11, 2013
499:February 11, 2012
495:February 11, 2011
487:September 8, 2006
483:September 8, 2005
479:September 8, 2004
334:
333:
305:
292:
291:
247:
246:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
2519:
2368:
2362:
2357:
2291:
2190:Cuban Revolution
1991:zero expectation
1879:Cuban Revolution
1754:
1686:
1664:
1590:
1520:
1508:
1468:
1384:
1358:
1328:
1323:
1311:
1302:
1274:
1263:
1246:
1245:
1239:
1080:
1070:
1069:
1054:
1050:
1049:
1043:
1039:
1038:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1010:
1006:
1005:
984:
983:
967:
966:
963:
960:
957:
956:Military history
936:
929:
928:
923:
912:Military history
908:
901:
900:
871:
870:
867:
864:
861:
840:
835:
834:
824:
817:
816:
811:
803:
796:
795:
766:
765:
762:
759:
756:
742:join the project
733:WikiProject Iran
727:
722:
721:
720:
711:
704:
703:
698:
690:
683:
682:
653:
652:
649:
646:
643:
622:
617:
616:
615:
606:
599:
598:
593:
585:
578:
577:
561:
552:
551:
544:
543:
535:
522:Current status:
464:
445:
443:January 11, 2006
426:
407:
405:January 29, 2005
386:
385:
377:
376:
343:
336:
335:
301:
300:
294:
256:
249:
241:
227:
226:
217:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
2527:
2526:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2512:Requested moves
2392:
2391:
2366:
2361:Queen of Hearts
2360:
2355:
2277:
1740:
1684:
1650:
1576:
1514:
1494:
1454:
1354:
1344:
1317:
1305:
1277:requested moves
1270:
1259:
1243:
1235:
1212:
1193:nomination page
1179:
1140:
1078:
1052:
1047:
1041:
1036:
1030:
1025:
1019:
1014:
1008:
1003:
964:
961:
958:
955:
954:
914:
868:
865:
862:
859:
858:
838:Politics portal
836:
829:
809:
763:
760:
757:
754:
753:
723:
718:
716:
696:
667:High-importance
650:
647:
644:
641:
640:
618:
613:
611:
592:High‑importance
591:
562:on Knowledge's
559:
549:
441:
422:
403:
380:
349:was one of the
298:
275:, any expected
243:
242:
237:
214:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
2525:
2515:
2514:
2509:
2504:
2499:
2494:
2489:
2484:
2479:
2474:
2469:
2464:
2459:
2454:
2449:
2444:
2439:
2434:
2429:
2424:
2419:
2414:
2409:
2404:
2390:
2389:
2374:
2349:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2227:
2222:
2217:
2212:
2207:
2202:
2197:
2192:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2182:
2161:
2155:
2149:
2143:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2114:
2108:
2102:
2096:
2084:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2038:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1779:(also part of
1758:
1691:
1668:
1647:
1628:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1523:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1431:
1411:lowercase per
1346:
1345:
1327:
1301:
1267:
1266:
1247:
1234:
1231:
1211:
1208:
1189:
1188:
1178:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1139:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1112:
1102:
1101:
1096:
1086:
1085:
1083:
1081:
1075:
1074:
1066:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1044:
1033:
1022:
1011:
997:
996:
994:
981:
971:
970:
968:
937:
925:
924:
909:
897:
896:
893:
892:
885:Mid-importance
881:
875:
874:
872:
855:the discussion
842:
841:
825:
813:
812:
810:Mid‑importance
804:
792:
791:
788:
787:
780:Top-importance
776:
770:
769:
767:
729:
728:
712:
700:
699:
697:Top‑importance
691:
679:
678:
675:
674:
663:
657:
656:
654:
637:the discussion
624:
623:
607:
595:
594:
586:
574:
573:
567:
545:
531:
530:
527:
526:
519:
518:
473:On this day...
457:
456:
453:
446:
438:
437:
434:
427:
419:
418:
415:
408:
400:
399:
396:
393:
389:
388:
373:
372:
344:
332:
331:
328:Reference desk
316:may be removed
302:
290:
289:
257:
245:
244:
235:
233:
232:
229:
228:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2524:
2513:
2510:
2508:
2505:
2503:
2500:
2498:
2495:
2493:
2490:
2488:
2485:
2483:
2480:
2478:
2475:
2473:
2470:
2468:
2465:
2463:
2460:
2458:
2455:
2453:
2450:
2448:
2445:
2443:
2440:
2438:
2435:
2433:
2430:
2428:
2425:
2423:
2420:
2418:
2415:
2413:
2410:
2408:
2405:
2403:
2400:
2399:
2397:
2388:
2385:
2382:
2378:
2375:
2373:
2369:
2363:
2353:
2350:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2336:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2320:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2289:
2286:
2283:
2282:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2228:
2226:
2223:
2221:
2218:
2216:
2213:
2211:
2208:
2206:
2203:
2201:
2198:
2196:
2193:
2191:
2188:
2183:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2168:
2167:
2165:
2162:
2159:
2156:
2153:
2150:
2147:
2144:
2141:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2121:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2112:
2109:
2106:
2103:
2100:
2097:
2094:
2091:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2070:
2066:
2063:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2046:Cinderella157
2043:
2039:
2037:
2033:
2029:
2028:Cinderella157
2025:
2024:WP:CONSISTENT
2021:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1996:Cinderella157
1994:
1992:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1841:
1840:WP:CONSISTENT
1837:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1821:Cinderella157
1818:
1814:
1810:
1809:WP:CONSISTENT
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1793:WP:CONSISTENT
1790:
1786:
1785:sentence case
1782:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1762:
1761:WP:CONSISTENT
1759:
1757:
1752:
1749:
1746:
1745:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1698:WP:CONSISTENT
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1682:
1681:
1676:
1672:
1669:
1667:
1662:
1659:
1656:
1655:
1645:
1643:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1618:Cinderella157
1614:
1610:
1606:
1603:
1593:
1588:
1585:
1582:
1581:
1573:
1571:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1528:
1524:
1518:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1506:
1503:
1500:
1499:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1466:
1463:
1460:
1459:
1452:
1449:
1448:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1394:Cinderella157
1391:
1387:
1382:
1378:
1377:Cinderella157
1374:
1370:
1366:
1362:
1357:
1352:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1325:
1321:
1315:
1309:
1300:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1273:
1265:
1262:
1257:
1253:
1248:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1216:Hijab in Iran
1207:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1187:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1163:HistoryofIran
1160:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1145:Stara Marusya
1135:
1116:
1108:
1104:
1103:
1100:
1092:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1082:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1067:
1060:
1058:
1053:criterion met
1045:
1042:criterion met
1034:
1031:criterion met
1023:
1020:criterion met
1012:
1009:criterion met
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
995:
992:
991:
985:
982:
977:
973:
972:
969:
952:
948:
944:
943:
938:
935:
931:
930:
926:
922:
918:
913:
910:
907:
903:
902:
890:
886:
880:
877:
876:
873:
856:
852:
848:
847:
839:
833:
828:
826:
823:
819:
818:
814:
808:
805:
802:
798:
797:
785:
781:
775:
772:
771:
768:
764:Iran articles
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
734:
726:
715:
713:
710:
706:
705:
701:
695:
692:
689:
685:
684:
672:
668:
662:
659:
658:
655:
638:
634:
630:
629:
621:
610:
608:
605:
601:
600:
596:
590:
587:
584:
580:
579:
575:
571:
565:
557:
556:
546:
542:
537:
536:
525:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:April 1, 2009
488:
484:
480:
476:
474:
468:
463:
458:
454:
452:
451:
447:
444:
440:
439:
435:
433:
432:
428:
425:
424:April 3, 2005
421:
420:
416:
414:
413:
409:
406:
402:
401:
397:
394:
391:
390:
384:
378:
374:
370:
369:
364:
360:
356:
355:
354:
353:good articles
348:
345:
342:
338:
337:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
308:
304:This page is
303:
296:
295:
288:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
267:
263:
258:
255:
251:
250:
231:
230:
225:
221:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
2381:SilverLocust
2376:
2351:
2321:
2280:
2258:
2254:
2086:
2068:
2064:
2041:
1990:
1988:
1835:
1816:
1812:
1800:
1796:
1784:
1777:WP:LOWERCASE
1772:
1764:
1743:
1701:
1693:
1679:
1675:overwhelming
1674:
1670:
1653:
1630:
1612:
1604:
1579:
1569:
1567:
1545:
1497:
1476:
1457:
1433:
1408:
1385:
1349:
1329:
1313:
1303:
1268:
1249:
1236:
1213:
1190:
1180:
1141:
1134:
988:
940:
884:
844:
779:
731:
666:
626:
620:Islam portal
570:WikiProjects
553:
523:
470:
449:
448:
429:
417:Not promoted
410:
368:reassessment
366:
351:
350:
346:
270:
259:
219:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
2281:SMcCandlish
2259:substantial
1795:to suggest
1769:WP:TITLECON
1744:SMcCandlish
1724:and so on.
1654:SMcCandlish
1580:SMcCandlish
1517:SMcCandlish
1498:SMcCandlish
1458:SMcCandlish
1341:direct move
1333:current log
1304:Please use
1029:Structure:
917:Middle East
746:discussions
725:Iran portal
431:Peer review
363:renominated
307:not a forum
161:free images
44:not a forum
2396:Categories
2335:WP:IKNOWIT
2205:Revolution
1845:Jessintime
1843:them.) ~~
1817:revolution
1813:revolution
1797:revolution
1763:refers to
1451:WP:IKNOWIT
1337:target log
750:open tasks
477:column on
320:refactored
266:designated
2356:Charlotte
2261:support.
2253:does not
1975:To quote
1635:WP:NCCAPS
1390:permalink
1365:WP:NCCAPS
1324:directly.
558:is rated
467:Main Page
279:, or any
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
2330:MOS:CAPS
2251:MOS:CAPS
2236:Dicklyon
2172:Dicklyon
2125:Dicklyon
2087:Consider
2067:per the
2010:SnowFire
1977:SnowFire
1959:Dicklyon
1765:patterns
1639:MOS:CAPS
1609:MOS:CAPS
1555:Dicklyon
1550:MOS:CAPS
1532:SnowFire
1481:SnowFire
1421:Dicklyon
1417:MOS:CAPS
1369:MOS:CAPS
1293:succinct
990:criteria
921:Cold War
860:Politics
851:politics
807:Politics
455:Delisted
436:Reviewed
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
2377:Support
2352:Support
2339:Amakuru
2322:Support
2255:require
1671:Support
1631:Support
1605:Comment
1438:GoodDay
1413:n-grams
1409:Support
1281:subpage
887:on the
782:on the
669:on the
560:B-class
469:in the
395:Process
326:at the
220:30 days
167:WP refs
155:scholar
2065:Oppose
1927:Ham II
1836:Oppose
1726:Ham II
1694:Oppose
1685:(talk)
1477:Oppose
1434:Oppose
1371:. See
1330:Links:
1214:Since
566:scale.
513:, and
398:Result
139:Google
1805:WP:AT
1789:WP:AT
1781:WP:AT
1646:after
1361:WP:AT
1312:. Do
1297:civil
642:Islam
633:Islam
589:Islam
547:This
204:Index
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
2367:talk
2343:talk
2303:talk
2267:talk
2240:talk
2176:talk
2129:talk
2078:talk
2050:talk
2032:talk
2014:talk
2000:talk
1985:here
1963:talk
1949:talk
1931:talk
1921:and
1873:and
1849:talk
1838:per
1825:talk
1807:and
1730:talk
1696:per
1680:Tony
1633:per
1622:talk
1607:per
1559:talk
1536:talk
1485:talk
1442:talk
1425:talk
1398:talk
1381:talk
1373:here
1367:and
1316:use
1295:and
1224:talk
1201:talk
1167:talk
1149:talk
755:Iran
738:Iran
694:Iran
661:High
392:Date
260:The
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
2290:😼
1987:),
1941:one
1803:of
1753:😼
1700:: "
1663:😼
1589:😼
1570:not
1546:not
1507:😼
1467:😼
1392:).
1314:not
1272:bot
1258:to
1254:be
1195:. —
879:Mid
774:Top
318:or
189:TWL
2398::
2384:💬
2370:)
2364:•
2345:)
2305:)
2278:—
2269:)
2242:)
2178:)
2131:)
2080:)
2052:)
2034:)
2016:)
2002:)
1965:)
1951:)
1933:)
1925:.
1917:,
1913:,
1909:,
1905:,
1901:,
1897:,
1893:,
1889:,
1885:,
1881:,
1869:,
1865:,
1861:,
1851:)
1827:)
1775:.
1741:—
1732:)
1720:,
1716:,
1712:,
1708:,
1651:—
1637:,
1624:)
1577:—
1561:)
1538:)
1495:—
1487:)
1455:—
1453:.
1444:)
1427:)
1400:)
1375:.
1353:→
1339:•
1335:•
1322:}}
1318:{{
1310:}}
1306:{{
1299:.
1269:A
1226:)
1203:)
1169:)
1151:)
1079:/
919:/
915::
509:,
505:,
501:,
497:,
493:,
489:,
485:,
481:,
218::
210:,
206:,
169:)
67:;
2358:(
2341:(
2301:(
2288:¢
2285:☏
2265:(
2238:(
2174:(
2127:(
2076:(
2048:(
2030:(
2012:(
1998:(
1961:(
1947:(
1929:(
1847:(
1823:(
1751:¢
1748:☏
1728:(
1661:¢
1658:☏
1620:(
1587:¢
1584:☏
1557:(
1534:(
1519::
1515:@
1505:¢
1502:☏
1483:(
1465:¢
1462:☏
1440:(
1423:(
1396:(
1388:(
1379:(
1264:.
1222:(
1199:(
1165:(
1147:(
953:.
891:.
786:.
752:.
673:.
572::
517:.
475:"
471:"
330:.
212:2
208:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.