Knowledge

Talk:Iranian Revolution

Source 📝

1575:
that Knowledge capitalizes if sources seem to somewhat prefer capitals. The preference must be consistent (i.e. verging on universal) across independent reliable sources." I never like to add material to guidelines if it can be avoided, but after 20+ years it is clear that the extant wording is, in some strange way, not quite clear enough to a small subset of editors who very strongly persist in willfully misinterpreting it, no matter how many times RMs conclude the opposite of how they'd like them to conclude. This problem accounts for probably 75% of the conflicts over capitalization in RMs, and probably 95% of the drama about capitalization in RMs.
550: 1244: 341: 1091: 822: 801: 1522:
very few Knowledge editors agree with.). You know that I, and many other Knowledge editors, disagree with your interpretation; in fact it forms the basis of many of your complaints about "over capitalization" (who is doing the over-capitalization? It's not gremlins, it's other Knowledge editors.). I support you being able to voice your views; I suggest you accept that other people can have a difference of opinion and voice their views, rather than being capital-W Wrong.
1107: 832: 254: 2276:
capitalization", which verges on the opposite. Even 25% could be argued to be "substantial", but is very obviously not the intent of the guideline. A 60% capitalization rate (especially after demonstrable influence from WP's own over-capitalization) is neither "consistent" capitalization nor "a substantial majority". In actual practice, RM expects to see a 90+ percent capitalization rate to consider it consistent across the substantial majority of indy RS.
462: 383: 1161:. It was also quite vague, as it claimed this alleged "success" occurred "in recent years", yet the two cited sources were from 1994 and 2008, that's certainly not recent. The second source ironically didn't even talk about improvements under the IR, but the opposite, such as women "using their appearance and sexuality to fight the regime" and "Prospects for young people are not good and many graduates are lucky to get jobs as taxi drivers." -- 976: 709: 688: 224: 719: 299: 541: 1048: 1037: 1026: 1015: 1004: 614: 604: 583: 934: 2008:(To be clear, I'm opposing this RM on the nom's argument, so fair enough for Cinderella to quote me in favor. For the record, I stand by what I wrote above - I don't think CONSISTENT is strong grounds for anything. Every evolution needs to stand or fall on its own merits. Just... this case is one where there's obviously plenty of support in sources for a capital, so let's go with that.) 906: 1553:
influence of WP on writers, especially among recent books that include so many enabled by WP. If you look at what proper names look like in n-gram stats, they are 95% and more capitalized. These arguments based on a recent modest majority are far short of our criteria. So it's not so simple as you say, see?
2332:
bar of being "consistently capitalized in a substantial majority of independent, reliable sources" is nowhere near met. Consistency is also a non-argument, given the above evidence that articles on revolutions elsewhere are already completely mixed. Basically there is no valid reason to oppose given
1552:
again and see. Second, when the n-gram stats show a recent modest preference for capitalization, that is counting occurences in titles (including titles of cited works) and headings and such; and for sources more recent than WP's capitalization of the term, there's also the "unreasonably effective"
1521:
No, I know that the standard you prefer (as does Tony) is that MOS:CAPS suggests de-capitalizing if essentially anyone is found who might not capitalize it. And sometimes not even that (I've seen you argue that the Knowledge MOS is so "powerful" that sources don't matter, which is simply a standard
1615:
of independent, reliable sources are capitalized in Knowledge ." Ngrams tend to over-report capitalisation since they do not distinguish things like headings, captions or the titles of works in citations that normally use title case. Allowing for this, we see a slight majority for the capitalised
1574:
is entirely correct, yet a vague confusion that it somehow means this seems to be the source of a lot of RM repetitive but invalid arguments at RMs. It would probably make sense to just add a footnote at that part of MOS:CAPS (and the corresponding part of WP:NCCAPS) that says "This does not mean
2248:
I would keep all of these with the existing capitalization except for maybe Romanian, although I wouldn't actively press to have it recapitalized; your first batch is decisive evidence for those pages being treated as proper names, but this does not belittle the other revolutions currently being
1842:
as Ham II indicated above. I don't find the list he provided "cherry picked" because they specifically include the term "revolution," like this article does. (And if there are articles on national revolutions where we don't capitalize the term, as SmC and Cinderella seem to suggest, please show
1738:
No, the majority of conflict articles not have the descriptive term (revolution, war, battle, offensive, rebellion, uprising, etc., etc.) capitalized. You've just cherry-picked a tiny handful that happen to pass the "are consistently capitalized in independent reliable sources" test. You have
1529:
just a month or so ago. There are plenty of times I grudgingly think you're right, just I don't generally need to bother to vote in those cases because the anti-capitals crowd usually has good turnout at RM. But this case is quite straightforward: usage shows sources prefer capital R. Ergo
1142:
LouisAragon, if you can 'find a plethore of sources that dismiss the "broadening of education and healthcare" stuff', why have you not done so? If you disbelieve that the broadening of education and healthcare 'is a IRI project, and not a continuation of the Shah's policies', why have you not
2275:
That's not correct at all; you're trying to rewrite the guideline on-the-fly to mean what you wish it meant, which is sharply divergent from what it actually says and means. It requires consistent capitalization across a substantial majority of independent reliable sources, not "substantial
1340: 2249:
treated as proper names; 99% support for capitalization is great and makes those completely indisputable, but 60%+ (i.e. 50% more support for capitalization) support is substantial enough that we should not default to downcasing when it is clearly not the common method;
2122:
These examples (from ones mentioned above) span the range of marginal (Haitian, Russian) to clear (American, French) "consistently capitalized" per source statistics. The Iranian revolution and the other recently lowercased ones do not come close to these.
1143:
challenged this with evidence to the contrary? There ought to be a mention of the Revolution's effect on domestic policy in the lead, and a one-sentence summary of a section of the main text is hardly burdening the lead with excessive text.
2071:
shown in the nominator's own ngram; itself shows far more than a simple majority (+50% for capitalization); the method by which the prevailing style in sources has changed is irrelevant; all that matters is that it took place.
2169:
Probably in all the these WP's over-capitalization has influenced the usage in recent years. We should not be doing that. Caps on WP mean proper name, and people believe us, so we should be careful not to over-cap things.
1642: 1176: 166: 1223: 1098: 916: 1415:, which shows that it was majority lowercase when the article was created capped in 2003, and there's a minor trend to more capping since then, likely affected by WP, but not approaching a strong majority or the 2328:(which is usually better indicative of usage in running text, since it eliminates title-case usage in book and chapter titles) we see that the sentence case form has an actual lead over the title case. Thus the 1648:
WP had an article on the subject using "Iranian Revolution", so the present lean toward capital R is clearly a case of citogenesis. And it doesn't constitute consistent capitalization in independent RS anyway.
2325: 1412: 1372: 2224: 2204: 2194: 2229: 2214: 2163: 2151: 2145: 2092: 2219: 2209: 2199: 2139: 2116: 2110: 2104: 2157: 2098: 2189: 1644:
which should reduce some (not all) inclusion of title-case headlines, constrained to pertinent date ranges. It notably shows that "Iranian revolution" was overwhelmingly preferred until
1192: 1204: 411: 2379:
per Amakuru. (And emphatically not on the basis that "consistently ... in a substantial majority" means something like "verging on universal" or "90+ percent". It does not.)
160: 2496: 1493:
A light apparent majority, caused by not weeding out title-case headlines, is not our standard. Consistently capitalized in independent RS is out standard. You know this.
215: 1219: 1114: 920: 2297:
I've seen all of these points from you before; I know what your interpretation of the guideline is, but for now I will stand by mine even if you think it is "Wrong".
2491: 1993:
that capitalization of the word "revolution" be consistent across all articles, nor should there be; Knowledge should follow the capitalization used in the sources.
989: 1857:
I've looked and I think there are only these five that have the same construction (without other modifiers or qualifiers, e.g. dates) and are in sentence case:
2431: 554: 265: 1815:
is capitalised (because it is consistently capitalised in sources) and others, where it is lowercase. In short, there is no consistant capitalisation of
1227: 888: 946: 430: 2446: 660: 670: 1284: 783: 1280: 975: 2421: 1283:
within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the
2486: 2436: 92: 57: 2476: 2416: 1185: 878: 2081: 2441: 2426: 1401: 181: 2306: 2292: 1288: 2481: 2371: 941: 911: 148: 2506: 2461: 2406: 2270: 1966: 1625: 1170: 1152: 950: 773: 203: 98: 2386: 1952: 1665: 223: 2003: 1852: 2451: 1232: 854: 367: 2132: 2053: 2035: 2017: 1488: 1428: 2501: 2471: 2466: 2346: 1445: 1389: 741: 362: 306: 43: 1828: 1733: 1591: 1539: 1509: 2287: 1750: 1688: 1660: 1586: 1504: 1469: 1464: 1209: 211: 207: 1755: 635:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 315: 142: 2243: 2179: 1934: 1562: 1292: 636: 472: 319: 2411: 2401: 1137: 745: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 358: 112: 1526: 2456: 1159: 845: 806: 486: 482: 138: 117: 33: 1319: 1181:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
749: 478: 87: 945:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 2302: 2266: 2077: 1948: 1200: 563: 357:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the 284: 261: 188: 2184:
Draw your own conclusions from more. Which would you change per guidelines, and which leave as they are?
627: 588: 283:
may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the
78: 1980: 1702:
To the extent that it is practical, titles should be consistent among articles covering similar topics.
732: 693: 280: 198: 1336: 1332: 322:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 2365: 2026:
argument is spurious but disagree with the move for other reasons - which was the point of the post.
1939:
Note that four of the five mentioned are entirely the work of Dicklyon, Cinderella, and SMcCandlish (
1276: 1811:, in particular. However, even if this interpretation were given credence, there are articles where 340: 2511: 1677:
majority of cap usage: this is not the case. GoodDay, this is not a forum for vague recollections.
327: 264:
procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been
1902: 853:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2298: 2262: 2073: 2049: 2031: 1999: 1944: 1824: 1621: 1397: 1380: 1307: 1255: 1196: 1166: 1148: 352: 122: 154: 2383: 1918: 1641:. This is not consistently capitalized in independent reliable sources. Here's a better N-gram 442: 423: 272: 404: 2284: 1910: 1890: 1882: 1747: 1657: 1583: 1501: 1461: 569: 1355: 1260: 2359: 2023: 1922: 1898: 1848: 1839: 1808: 1792: 1760: 1697: 1525:
For the record, I am not some sort of reverse pro-capital letters extremist. Hell, I just
461: 382: 8: 2119:
was majority capitalized 100 years ago, around 80% in recent decades, 90% more recently.
1940: 1914: 1870: 1862: 1858: 1776: 1705: 540: 276: 68: 2239: 2175: 2128: 2045: 2027: 2013: 1995: 1962: 1906: 1894: 1886: 1820: 1768: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1617: 1558: 1535: 1484: 1424: 1393: 1376: 1350: 1296: 1251: 1162: 1144: 323: 311: 83: 37: 2380: 2342: 2334: 1874: 1866: 1709: 1548:
say "WP capitalizes when sources seem to prefer capitals". Quite the contrary – read
1450: 1441: 1177:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
64: 2279: 1930: 1878: 1742: 1729: 1652: 1634: 1578: 1516: 1496: 1456: 1364: 2257:
the practically unanimous support seen in, for example, American Revolution, only
174: 1844: 1683: 837: 2354:; ngrams clearly show there's a lack of clarity on if it should be capitalized. 2095:
was only half capitalized 200 years ago, but more like 95% for the last century.
736:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to 1479:
per nominator's own ngrams which show a clear preference for capitalization.
238: 234: 2395: 2235: 2171: 2124: 2009: 1976: 1958: 1554: 1544:
It's not nearly as simple as that, on two points: First, our guideline does
1531: 1480: 1420: 1218:
is a pivotal issue for Khamenei, it is logical to make it so in the article.
1215: 2234:(the others mentioned above are not common enough to show up in the stats). 2338: 2040:
Our views on this case differ because the guidance at MOS:CAPS calls for a
1804: 1788: 1780: 1437: 1360: 619: 2101:
similarly, the evolution to proper name status is way over 100 years old.
1984: 1926: 1725: 1090: 724: 831: 821: 800: 239: 2089:
the n-gram stats for revolutions that we treat as having proper names:
1957:
Indeed, we have fixed a lot of over-capitalized terms in recent years.
1678: 253: 466: 2113:
was half capitalized 100 years ago, about 90% for the last 30 years.
1106: 2329: 2250: 1638: 1608: 1549: 1416: 1368: 850: 236: 1943:
even without a formal RM), and all five are from after mid-2023.
1611:: "only words and phrases that are consistently capitalized in a 1530:
Knowledge also should use capital R. It is as simple as that.
708: 687: 2166:
caps were in a minority until the latest year or two of stats
1799:
should be capitalised in this article title misrepresents the
1791:
to suggest there are exceptions to this instruction. Invoking
240: 1989:
As I've said before, this is an invalid rationale. There is
1419:
criterion of "consistently capitalized" in reliable sources.
632: 361:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be 737: 2337:
type arguments, meaning we have no choice but to move.  —
2107:
is more recent. Half capitalized in 2000, now around 90%.
1673:—SnowFire, please read MOSCAPS. There would have to be an 1616:
form but not a substantial majority required by MOS:CAPS.
933: 905: 603: 582: 271:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the
2142:
just reached half capped in 2006, barely to 65% recently.
1572:
say "WP capitalizes when sources seem to prefer capitals"
1271: 740:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please
1527:
did a non-controversial move away from capital letters
1158:
The two sources didn't support that statement anyways
173: 1436:- I've always seen this written in capitalised form. 465:
Facts from this article were featured on Knowledge's
987:
This article has been checked against the following
849:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 827: 714: 631:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 609: 371:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
28: 2497:
Middle Eastern military history task force articles
2492:B-Class Middle Eastern military history articles 2393: 46:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1191:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 187: 1773:topic-specific conventions on article titles 1771:which explains that it refers to documented 1363:). Not consistently capped in sources - per 2432:Knowledge level-4 vital articles in History 1739:fundamentally misunderstood WP:CONSISTENT. 1250:It has been proposed in this section that 1099:Middle Eastern military history task force 1787:for article titles. There is nothing at 939:This article is within the scope of the 538: 2447:High-importance Islam-related articles 2394: 2333:above, merely personal preference and 959:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 949:. To use this banner, please see the 1386:This is a contested technical request 1220:2601:C4:C300:2890:A5F3:AE3C:9723:E346 962:Template:WikiProject Military history 2154:is limping along at near half-capped 2148:is somewhat less capped than Iranian 1238: 843:This article is within the scope of 730:This article is within the scope of 625:This article is within the scope of 534: 293: 248: 15: 2422:Knowledge vital articles in History 1983:on an argument of consistency (see 1704:" The similar topics here would be 568:It is of interest to the following 36:for discussing improvements to the 13: 1105: 1089: 974: 14: 2523: 2487:B-Class military history articles 2437:B-Class vital articles in History 1383:) 09:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC) 1275:will list this discussion on the 2477:Mid-importance politics articles 2417:Knowledge level-4 vital articles 1242: 1233:Requested move 12 September 2024 1046: 1035: 1024: 1013: 1002: 932: 904: 830: 820: 799: 744:where you can contribute to the 717: 707: 686: 612: 602: 581: 548: 539: 460: 381: 339: 297: 252: 222: 58:Click here to start a new topic. 883:This article has been rated as 778:This article has been rated as 665:This article has been rated as 2442:B-Class Islam-related articles 2427:B-Class level-4 vital articles 2387:04:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC) 2372:00:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC) 2347:12:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC) 2307:01:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 2293:00:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC) 2271:04:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2244:03:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2180:03:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2133:03:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2082:02:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2054:02:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2036:01:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2018:00:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 2004:00:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1967:00:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1953:20:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1935:19:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1853:18:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC) 1829:08:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1756:07:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1734:07:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1689:01:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC) 1666:20:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1626:22:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1592:19:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1563:02:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1540:00:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC) 1510:20:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1489:19:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1470:20:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC) 1446:09:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1429:04:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1402:03:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC) 1210:Hijab as a life-or-death issue 863:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 1: 2482:WikiProject Politics articles 2022:One can acknowledge that the 1819:with which to be consistent. 866:Template:WikiProject Politics 857:and see a list of open tasks. 639:and see a list of open tasks. 310:for general discussion about 285:contentious topics procedures 55:Put new text under old text. 2507:Cold War task force articles 2462:Top-importance Iran articles 2407:Old requests for peer review 1287:). Please base arguments on 1186:Iranian Revolution Women.jpg 1138:Revert with odd edit summary 942:Military history WikiProject 7: 2044:and not a simple majority. 1359:– Change to sentence case ( 645:Knowledge:WikiProject Islam 63:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 2528: 2452:WikiProject Islam articles 1981:Siamese revolution of 1688 1007:Referencing and citation: 889:project's importance scale 784:project's importance scale 758:Knowledge:WikiProject Iran 671:project's importance scale 648:Template:WikiProject Islam 412:Featured article candidate 365:. Editors may also seek a 2502:B-Class Cold War articles 2472:B-Class politics articles 2467:WikiProject Iran articles 2324:. If we run an ngram for 1205:22:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC) 1171:12:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC) 1153:07:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC) 1113: 1097: 1072: 1068: 986: 965:military history articles 927: 882: 815: 777: 761:Template:WikiProject Iran 702: 664: 597: 576: 521: 459: 450:Good article reassessment 379: 375: 287:before editing this page. 93:Be welcoming to newcomers 22:Skip to table of contents 2326:"Iranian revolution was" 281:normal editorial process 21: 1979:in the RM to capitalse 1228:17:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC) 1073:Associated task forces: 1018:Coverage and accuracy: 268:as a contentious topic. 2412:B-Class vital articles 2402:Delisted good articles 1919:Tajikistani Revolution 1877:. These are the rest: 1767:of naming. It invokes 1291:, and keep discussion 1110: 1094: 1051:Supporting materials: 979: 651:Islam-related articles 277:standards of behaviour 88:avoid personal attacks 2457:B-Class Iran articles 2225:Guatemalan Revolution 2195:Nicaraguan Revolution 1911:Guatemalan Revolution 1903:Monégasque Revolution 1891:Philippine Revolution 1883:Nicaraguan Revolution 1109: 1093: 978: 555:level-4 vital article 524:Delisted good article 359:good article criteria 216:Auto-archiving period 113:Neutral point of view 2230:Ethiopian Revolution 2215:Argentine Revolution 2160:caps are in minority 2069:substantial majority 2042:substantial majority 1923:Ethiopian Revolution 1899:Argentine Revolution 1613:substantial majority 1320:requested move/dated 1308:subst:requested move 1289:article title policy 1285:closing instructions 1279:current discussions 846:WikiProject Politics 314:. Any such comments 273:purpose of Knowledge 118:No original research 2164:Tunisian Revolution 2152:Sudanese Revolution 2146:Romanian Revolution 2093:American Revolution 1915:Andorran Revolution 1871:Tunisian revolution 1863:Sudanese revolution 1859:Romanian revolution 1783:) tells use to use 1706:American Revolution 1568:our guideline does 1117:(c. 1945 – c. 1989) 1115:Cold War task force 1040:Grammar and style: 993:for B-class status: 2299:Flemmish Nietzsche 2263:Flemmish Nietzsche 2220:Rwandan Revolution 2210:Serbian Revolution 2200:Belgian Revolution 2140:Iranian Revolution 2117:Russian Revolution 2111:Mexican Revolution 2105:Haitian Revolution 2074:Flemmish Nietzsche 1945:Flemmish Nietzsche 1907:Rwandan Revolution 1895:Serbian Revolution 1887:Belgian Revolution 1722:Russian Revolution 1718:Mexican Revolution 1714:Haitian Revolution 1356:Iranian revolution 1351:Iranian Revolution 1261:Iranian revolution 1252:Iranian Revolution 1197:Community Tech bot 1111: 1095: 980: 947:list of open tasks 748:and help with our 564:content assessment 387:Article milestones 347:Iranian Revolution 324:Iranian Revolution 312:Iranian Revolution 309: 262:contentious topics 99:dispute resolution 60: 38:Iranian Revolution 2158:Syrian Revolution 2099:French Revolution 1875:Yemeni revolution 1867:Syrian revolution 1801:spirit and intent 1710:French Revolution 1404: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1326: 1256:renamed and moved 1133: 1132: 1129: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1064: 1063: 951:full instructions 899: 898: 895: 894: 869:politics articles 794: 793: 790: 789: 681: 680: 677: 676: 628:WikiProject Islam 533: 532: 529: 528: 515:February 11, 2019 511:February 11, 2017 507:February 11, 2016 503:February 11, 2013 499:February 11, 2012 495:February 11, 2011 487:September 8, 2006 483:September 8, 2005 479:September 8, 2004 334: 333: 305: 292: 291: 247: 246: 79:Assume good faith 56: 27: 26: 2519: 2368: 2362: 2357: 2291: 2190:Cuban Revolution 1991:zero expectation 1879:Cuban Revolution 1754: 1686: 1664: 1590: 1520: 1508: 1468: 1384: 1358: 1328: 1323: 1311: 1302: 1274: 1263: 1246: 1245: 1239: 1080: 1070: 1069: 1054: 1050: 1049: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1032: 1028: 1027: 1021: 1017: 1016: 1010: 1006: 1005: 984: 983: 967: 966: 963: 960: 957: 956:Military history 936: 929: 928: 923: 912:Military history 908: 901: 900: 871: 870: 867: 864: 861: 840: 835: 834: 824: 817: 816: 811: 803: 796: 795: 766: 765: 762: 759: 756: 742:join the project 733:WikiProject Iran 727: 722: 721: 720: 711: 704: 703: 698: 690: 683: 682: 653: 652: 649: 646: 643: 622: 617: 616: 615: 606: 599: 598: 593: 585: 578: 577: 561: 552: 551: 544: 543: 535: 522:Current status: 464: 445: 443:January 11, 2006 426: 407: 405:January 29, 2005 386: 385: 377: 376: 343: 336: 335: 301: 300: 294: 256: 249: 241: 227: 226: 217: 192: 191: 177: 108:Article policies 29: 16: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2512:Requested moves 2392: 2391: 2366: 2361:Queen of Hearts 2360: 2355: 2277: 1740: 1684: 1650: 1576: 1514: 1494: 1454: 1354: 1344: 1317: 1305: 1277:requested moves 1270: 1259: 1243: 1235: 1212: 1193:nomination page 1179: 1140: 1078: 1052: 1047: 1041: 1036: 1030: 1025: 1019: 1014: 1008: 1003: 964: 961: 958: 955: 954: 914: 868: 865: 862: 859: 858: 838:Politics portal 836: 829: 809: 763: 760: 757: 754: 753: 723: 718: 716: 696: 667:High-importance 650: 647: 644: 641: 640: 618: 613: 611: 592:High‑importance 591: 562:on Knowledge's 559: 549: 441: 422: 403: 380: 349:was one of the 298: 275:, any expected 243: 242: 237: 214: 134: 129: 128: 127: 104: 74: 12: 11: 5: 2525: 2515: 2514: 2509: 2504: 2499: 2494: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2474: 2469: 2464: 2459: 2454: 2449: 2444: 2439: 2434: 2429: 2424: 2419: 2414: 2409: 2404: 2390: 2389: 2374: 2349: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2227: 2222: 2217: 2212: 2207: 2202: 2197: 2192: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2182: 2161: 2155: 2149: 2143: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2114: 2108: 2102: 2096: 2084: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2038: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1779:(also part of 1758: 1691: 1668: 1647: 1628: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1523: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1431: 1411:lowercase per 1346: 1345: 1327: 1301: 1267: 1266: 1247: 1234: 1231: 1211: 1208: 1189: 1188: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1139: 1136: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1112: 1102: 1101: 1096: 1086: 1085: 1083: 1081: 1075: 1074: 1066: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1044: 1033: 1022: 1011: 997: 996: 994: 981: 971: 970: 968: 937: 925: 924: 909: 897: 896: 893: 892: 885:Mid-importance 881: 875: 874: 872: 855:the discussion 842: 841: 825: 813: 812: 810:Mid‑importance 804: 792: 791: 788: 787: 780:Top-importance 776: 770: 769: 767: 729: 728: 712: 700: 699: 697:Top‑importance 691: 679: 678: 675: 674: 663: 657: 656: 654: 637:the discussion 624: 623: 607: 595: 594: 586: 574: 573: 567: 545: 531: 530: 527: 526: 519: 518: 473:On this day... 457: 456: 453: 446: 438: 437: 434: 427: 419: 418: 415: 408: 400: 399: 396: 393: 389: 388: 373: 372: 344: 332: 331: 328:Reference desk 316:may be removed 302: 290: 289: 257: 245: 244: 235: 233: 232: 229: 228: 194: 193: 131: 130: 126: 125: 120: 115: 106: 105: 103: 102: 95: 90: 81: 75: 73: 72: 61: 52: 51: 48: 47: 41: 25: 24: 19: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2524: 2513: 2510: 2508: 2505: 2503: 2500: 2498: 2495: 2493: 2490: 2488: 2485: 2483: 2480: 2478: 2475: 2473: 2470: 2468: 2465: 2463: 2460: 2458: 2455: 2453: 2450: 2448: 2445: 2443: 2440: 2438: 2435: 2433: 2430: 2428: 2425: 2423: 2420: 2418: 2415: 2413: 2410: 2408: 2405: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2397: 2388: 2385: 2382: 2378: 2375: 2373: 2369: 2363: 2353: 2350: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2289: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2252: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2221: 2218: 2216: 2213: 2211: 2208: 2206: 2203: 2201: 2198: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2188: 2183: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2168: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2159: 2156: 2153: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2121: 2120: 2118: 2115: 2112: 2109: 2106: 2103: 2100: 2097: 2094: 2091: 2090: 2088: 2085: 2083: 2079: 2075: 2070: 2066: 2063: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2046:Cinderella157 2043: 2039: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028:Cinderella157 2025: 2024:WP:CONSISTENT 2021: 2020: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1996:Cinderella157 1994: 1992: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1841: 1840:WP:CONSISTENT 1837: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1821:Cinderella157 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809:WP:CONSISTENT 1806: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1793:WP:CONSISTENT 1790: 1786: 1785:sentence case 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1761:WP:CONSISTENT 1759: 1757: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1745: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1698:WP:CONSISTENT 1695: 1692: 1690: 1687: 1682: 1681: 1676: 1672: 1669: 1667: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1645: 1643: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1618:Cinderella157 1614: 1610: 1606: 1603: 1593: 1588: 1585: 1582: 1581: 1573: 1571: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1524: 1518: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1475: 1471: 1466: 1463: 1460: 1459: 1452: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1394:Cinderella157 1391: 1387: 1382: 1378: 1377:Cinderella157 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1357: 1352: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1325: 1321: 1315: 1309: 1300: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1265: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1241: 1240: 1237: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216:Hijab in Iran 1207: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163:HistoryofIran 1160: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1145:Stara Marusya 1135: 1116: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1100: 1092: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1082: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1067: 1060: 1058: 1053:criterion met 1045: 1042:criterion met 1034: 1031:criterion met 1023: 1020:criterion met 1012: 1009:criterion met 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 995: 992: 991: 985: 982: 977: 973: 972: 969: 952: 948: 944: 943: 938: 935: 931: 930: 926: 922: 918: 913: 910: 907: 903: 902: 890: 886: 880: 877: 876: 873: 856: 852: 848: 847: 839: 833: 828: 826: 823: 819: 818: 814: 808: 805: 802: 798: 797: 785: 781: 775: 772: 771: 768: 764:Iran articles 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 734: 726: 715: 713: 710: 706: 705: 701: 695: 692: 689: 685: 684: 672: 668: 662: 659: 658: 655: 638: 634: 630: 629: 621: 610: 608: 605: 601: 600: 596: 590: 587: 584: 580: 579: 575: 571: 565: 557: 556: 546: 542: 537: 536: 525: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 491:April 1, 2009 488: 484: 480: 476: 474: 468: 463: 458: 454: 452: 451: 447: 444: 440: 439: 435: 433: 432: 428: 425: 424:April 3, 2005 421: 420: 416: 414: 413: 409: 406: 402: 401: 397: 394: 391: 390: 384: 378: 374: 370: 369: 364: 360: 356: 355: 354: 353:good articles 348: 345: 342: 338: 337: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 308: 304:This page is 303: 296: 295: 288: 286: 282: 278: 274: 269: 267: 263: 258: 255: 251: 250: 231: 230: 225: 221: 213: 209: 205: 202: 200: 196: 195: 190: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 140: 137: 136:Find sources: 133: 132: 124: 123:Verifiability 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 110: 109: 100: 96: 94: 91: 89: 85: 82: 80: 77: 76: 70: 66: 65:Learn to edit 62: 59: 54: 53: 50: 49: 45: 39: 35: 31: 30: 23: 20: 18: 17: 2381:SilverLocust 2376: 2351: 2321: 2280: 2258: 2254: 2086: 2068: 2064: 2041: 1990: 1988: 1835: 1816: 1812: 1800: 1796: 1784: 1777:WP:LOWERCASE 1772: 1764: 1743: 1701: 1693: 1679: 1675:overwhelming 1674: 1670: 1653: 1630: 1612: 1604: 1579: 1569: 1567: 1545: 1497: 1476: 1457: 1433: 1408: 1385: 1349: 1329: 1313: 1303: 1268: 1249: 1236: 1213: 1190: 1180: 1141: 1134: 988: 940: 884: 844: 779: 731: 666: 626: 620:Islam portal 570:WikiProjects 553: 523: 470: 449: 448: 429: 417:Not promoted 410: 368:reassessment 366: 351: 350: 346: 270: 259: 219: 197: 184: 178: 170: 163: 157: 151: 145: 135: 107: 32:This is the 2281:SMcCandlish 2259:substantial 1795:to suggest 1769:WP:TITLECON 1744:SMcCandlish 1724:and so on. 1654:SMcCandlish 1580:SMcCandlish 1517:SMcCandlish 1498:SMcCandlish 1458:SMcCandlish 1341:direct move 1333:current log 1304:Please use 1029:Structure: 917:Middle East 746:discussions 725:Iran portal 431:Peer review 363:renominated 307:not a forum 161:free images 44:not a forum 2396:Categories 2335:WP:IKNOWIT 2205:Revolution 1845:Jessintime 1843:them.) ~~ 1817:revolution 1813:revolution 1797:revolution 1763:refers to 1451:WP:IKNOWIT 1337:target log 750:open tasks 477:column on 320:refactored 266:designated 2356:Charlotte 2261:support. 2253:does not 1975:To quote 1635:WP:NCCAPS 1390:permalink 1365:WP:NCCAPS 1324:directly. 558:is rated 467:Main Page 279:, or any 101:if needed 84:Be polite 34:talk page 2330:MOS:CAPS 2251:MOS:CAPS 2236:Dicklyon 2172:Dicklyon 2125:Dicklyon 2087:Consider 2067:per the 2010:SnowFire 1977:SnowFire 1959:Dicklyon 1765:patterns 1639:MOS:CAPS 1609:MOS:CAPS 1555:Dicklyon 1550:MOS:CAPS 1532:SnowFire 1481:SnowFire 1421:Dicklyon 1417:MOS:CAPS 1369:MOS:CAPS 1293:succinct 990:criteria 921:Cold War 860:Politics 851:politics 807:Politics 455:Delisted 436:Reviewed 199:Archives 69:get help 42:This is 40:article. 2377:Support 2352:Support 2339:Amakuru 2322:Support 2255:require 1671:Support 1631:Support 1605:Comment 1438:GoodDay 1413:n-grams 1409:Support 1281:subpage 887:on the 782:on the 669:on the 560:B-class 469:in the 395:Process 326:at the 220:30 days 167:WP refs 155:scholar 2065:Oppose 1927:Ham II 1836:Oppose 1726:Ham II 1694:Oppose 1685:(talk) 1477:Oppose 1434:Oppose 1371:. See 1330:Links: 1214:Since 566:scale. 513:, and 398:Result 139:Google 1805:WP:AT 1789:WP:AT 1781:WP:AT 1646:after 1361:WP:AT 1312:. Do 1297:civil 642:Islam 633:Islam 589:Islam 547:This 204:Index 182:JSTOR 143:books 97:Seek 2367:talk 2343:talk 2303:talk 2267:talk 2240:talk 2176:talk 2129:talk 2078:talk 2050:talk 2032:talk 2014:talk 2000:talk 1985:here 1963:talk 1949:talk 1931:talk 1921:and 1873:and 1849:talk 1838:per 1825:talk 1807:and 1730:talk 1696:per 1680:Tony 1633:per 1622:talk 1607:per 1559:talk 1536:talk 1485:talk 1442:talk 1425:talk 1398:talk 1381:talk 1373:here 1367:and 1316:use 1295:and 1224:talk 1201:talk 1167:talk 1149:talk 755:Iran 738:Iran 694:Iran 661:High 392:Date 260:The 175:FENS 149:news 86:and 2290:😼 1987:), 1941:one 1803:of 1753:😼 1700:: " 1663:😼 1589:😼 1570:not 1546:not 1507:😼 1467:😼 1392:). 1314:not 1272:bot 1258:to 1254:be 1195:. — 879:Mid 774:Top 318:or 189:TWL 2398:: 2384:💬 2370:) 2364:• 2345:) 2305:) 2278:— 2269:) 2242:) 2178:) 2131:) 2080:) 2052:) 2034:) 2016:) 2002:) 1965:) 1951:) 1933:) 1925:. 1917:, 1913:, 1909:, 1905:, 1901:, 1897:, 1893:, 1889:, 1885:, 1881:, 1869:, 1865:, 1861:, 1851:) 1827:) 1775:. 1741:— 1732:) 1720:, 1716:, 1712:, 1708:, 1651:— 1637:, 1624:) 1577:— 1561:) 1538:) 1495:— 1487:) 1455:— 1453:. 1444:) 1427:) 1400:) 1375:. 1353:→ 1339:• 1335:• 1322:}} 1318:{{ 1310:}} 1306:{{ 1299:. 1269:A 1226:) 1203:) 1169:) 1151:) 1079:/ 919:/ 915:: 509:, 505:, 501:, 497:, 493:, 489:, 485:, 481:, 218:: 210:, 206:, 169:) 67:; 2358:( 2341:( 2301:( 2288:¢ 2285:☏ 2265:( 2238:( 2174:( 2127:( 2076:( 2048:( 2030:( 2012:( 1998:( 1961:( 1947:( 1929:( 1847:( 1823:( 1751:¢ 1748:☏ 1728:( 1661:¢ 1658:☏ 1620:( 1587:¢ 1584:☏ 1557:( 1534:( 1519:: 1515:@ 1505:¢ 1502:☏ 1483:( 1465:¢ 1462:☏ 1440:( 1423:( 1396:( 1388:( 1379:( 1264:. 1222:( 1199:( 1165:( 1147:( 953:. 891:. 786:. 752:. 673:. 572:: 517:. 475:" 471:" 330:. 212:2 208:1 201:: 185:· 179:· 171:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 146:· 141:( 71:.

Index

Skip to table of contents
talk page
Iranian Revolution
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
Index
1
2

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.