1945:
you not find a direct citation of his statement - which is in any case obviously a subjective judgement? Also, are there not contemporaneous assessments of the
Strangite behavior as being somewhat unsavory you might include to add balance? The review for the Strang biography - the link to which appears above - which you brand as likely biased because it appears on a LDS website, says the author "persuasively argues that charges of Strangite “consecration”—the church’s enemies called it thievery - were far from baseless, although she maintains that “Strangites did not steal anything more than the Gentiles stole from them” (330)"
1733:
latter two authors of a critical portion of Strang's diary, which led them to some questionable conclusions about Strang's motives. He equally sought to rescue Strang's reputation from the sensationalist articles and other drivel that so often passed for "histories" of the man throughout the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Fitzpatrick was not the least bit interested in vindicating Strang's claims (not that this, of itself, would have made his book questionable as a source, by the way); rather, he wished to rescue Strang's reputation from the misrepresentations made by these two earlier biographers and others.
589:
579:
558:
1118:
1091:
190:
1128:
900:
879:
1007:
986:
502:
795:
1017:
1278:
1253:
774:
698:
910:
805:
526:
440:
409:
426:
1979:(1) The current version of this article has not really been substantially changed from the 2007 GA version. I know--I wrote about 70% of this article, prior to submitting it for initial GA review. If you will compare the changes between the end of 2007 and today, the only even remotely substantial changes were to the opening section--and even this wasn't really anything all that "substantial." So how is it that this article was so
1221:
378:
1915:
are invited to examine these references, and if anyone (Iamknowledgable included) can find any subjectivity, you are welcome to elaborate on it, and if it's justified, we'll change the article accordingly. Otherwise, I don't see any legitimate reason to challenge my use of
Fitzpatrick in this article, based on what I have presented, here. Nor have I seen one valid reason to demote it from "GA" status. -
688:
667:
2092:, and merely indicats that the man occupied that position (whether he was a real prophet, or--as we apparently both believe--a wannabe). Nothing more. Doesn't indicate approval or rejection of his prophetic claims, nor any statement on the quality of his performance in that role; merely that he occupied an office or position with that label on it. Nothing "subjective," here. Objection refuted.
1713:). In more than one instance, either subjective judgments concerning the behavior of the Strang or the Strangites is based on this source. Innuendos are incorporated in the language here, such as Strang's supposed "serving" as "Prophet, Seer and Revelator" - a position to which he apparently annointed himself to and which involved receiving to himself great personal wealth and multiple wives.
2291:
450:
1955:
term "serve" in that statement because that in itself is not neutral and unbiased. The sentence can be rewritten without the superfluous wording - and semantic baggage - simply "As
Prophet, Seer and Revelator of his church..." (And there's a similar occurrence in a reference to LDS founder Joseph Smith which can also be thus trimmed.)
1901:(18) Note 74: Another ptentially "subjective" statement, and given the fact that the only sources for this seem to be Strangite ones, I've changed the article to reflect this, and added the Strangite source to cooborate Fitzpatricks. Okay--I'll grant this one, but only based upon the source issues involved, not on any "subjectivity".
2584:"They had not been home long when a knock was heard at the front door. Father went to the door and opened it, even though it was late for callers and none too many came calling. There before the door stood a man covered with blood, his hand in a sling made of a bloody handkerchief. Father invited him in and gave him a chair.
2079:
against Mr. Strang? If so, that's fine; I'm an agnostic, myself, and don't give a damn about any of his prophetic claims--which I personally think were laughable--but I DO want to see the man's story as accurately told as I (or anyone else) can tell it. If I've told a falsehood, expose it; and I'll
1914:
I know this may seem petulant or childish to some, but I did it to make a point, namely that I just can't see anything that justifies an accusation of "subjective judgments" such as was made by User
Iamknowledgable. I mean no offense whatsoever to this person, but I just can't see it. Other editors
1732:
a vindication of Strang's prophetic claims--which
Fitzpatrick openly rejected, as anyone who's ever read his book will know. Rather, it comprises a vindication of Strang against spurious claims by Milo Quaife and Omar Riegal--authors of two earlier "biographies" of Strang--namely misquotation by the
1658:
These two photos (Bedford and the Voree Plates) were deleted from the article due to copyright issues. I thought I had gotten permission from the proper person to use them, but it turns out that gentleman was not the original copyright owner. Hence, in accordance with his instructions and
Knowledge
1438:
I was the initial GA reviewer. I actually though the lead was nice, but I agree it could use some expansion. The ibid format in the footnotes did not make for a difficult read at all. I must say just a note: this was most certainly not a "quick pass" - I went through and read the entire article.
2580:
I am a descendant of "nonbeliever" who encountered King Strang's violent reign on Beaver Island, This article paints him as a gentle leader with he worst about hi being polygamy. An obvious whitewash. I am currently editing my great great grandmothers manuscript which include a chapter that not only
2042:
thing that is "subjective" in
Fitzpatrick's choosing to quote Sholes' statement, just as there is nothing "subjective" in itself when other biographers quote anti-Strang statements made by others, as well. They are simply reporting opinions offered by others, much like a news reporter might. There
1944:
For instance, Christopher Sholes - who many years after Strang's death went on to work out the design for the first mass-produced typewriter - is quoted as vouching for the good behavior and character of Strang's followers through
Fitzpatrick book. Sholes, after all, was a newspaper man himself: can
1753:
As I said, Fitzpatrick's book has its issues, the greatest of which (in my opinion) is that it seeks more to be precisely what its title says--a "vindication" of Strang against misrepresentations made by earlier historians and biographers--than a detailed, comprehensive, critical study of his life.
2747:
is so preoccuppied with seemingly burnishing Strang's reputation against assault that it completely leaves out material of actual interest that historians have studied. Elvira Fields, whose theological articles made her a major player in
Strangism and whose intriguing ambiguity with gender make her
1936:
I maintain anyone who compares the current version of this article to that which passed GA review in late 2007 cannot but see that it has been augmented and altered in ways which would tend to call into question its ability to pass the GA standard for being written in a neutral point of view manner
1782:
You seem to think that Strang's claim to have "served" as "Prophet, Seer and
Revelator" constitutes such a "subjective judgment"--but then again, so do similar claims mounted by hundreds of would-be "prophets" throughout history! Is Fitzpatrick's bio now suddenly suspect, simply because it reports
2029:
subjective--just as the "unsavory" statements you want me to quote to provide so-called "balance" would be equally-subjective. Sholes (a non-Strangite and non-Mormon, BTW) had just as much right to offer his assessment of Strang as any other person on earth, and Fitzpatrick merely reports Sholes'
2019:
care that the 1850 U.S. census lists him as "James J. Strang," not "Jessie James Strang." I would figure that the man clearly knew his own name, and ought to have been able to give it to the census taker correctly--not to mention that his associates of the time repeatedly refer to him as "James,"
1954:
Your rejection of my comment regarding the term "serve" being employed to describe his position as "Prophet, Seer and Revelator" completely misses my point by painting it as a rejection that Strang held that position. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I simply object to the inclusion of the
1825:
This is not the first time someone has questioned my use of Fitzpatrick's book, if I recall correctly. Hence, as a continuation of the retort I gave to the objections listed above, I provide the following note-by-note defense of each use of Fitzpatrick's work in this arcticle (21, out of 89 total
1640:
different from how I learned it in school, but that's part of the overall wikipedia learning experience. I really appreciate all your hard work on this. I inserted a new footnote (moved the George Miller info from a citation to a footnote "b"), and created a "citations" header for that section.
1606:
Thanks for pointing that out. I meant to put the information in the references section, thought I had, actually, but I guess I overlooked it. It's there now. As for how it's cited, in school, that's probably right, how you had it. But WP has it's own style for things, like closing quote placement,
1595:
Lara, thanks very much for helping with the references on this article. Question: I notice that all references to the Book of the Law of the Lord were corrected to read "Strang: 1856," but there is no first reference naming this book. I've been out of school for awhile, and I know that things on
2501:
Reviewing the sources, nearly all of them come from official Mormon church websites. While the citations refer to excerpts from otherwise uncited newspaper articles, etc. that are mentioned on these website, few independent citations for these sources are given. Since the websites in question are
2785:
Far better sources are available and should be consulted. Vickie Cleverly Speek appears in the sources list but is cited only once; Roger van Noord is similarly cited only once; and Miles Harvey, Don Faber, and several others aren't in the sources at all. Any quality article that summarizes what
2175:
I will be out of town for a week starting Sunday, but you are welcome to respond to any of this as you like, and we can continue the discussion upon my return. Please again understand that none of this is meant "personally" toward you; I'm sure your objections are totally good-faith, just as my
2057:
that book for yourself. Not saying you haven't; I'd just like to know. If you have, please tell me, specifically, what you find objectionable about the specific things I used it as a source for--per "Fitzpatrick, Vindicated", above--and we can talk. If you haven't, you ought to read it before
2052:
to me and the rest of us that Fitzpatrick's book is an invalid source for the material I used it for (see "Fitzpatrick, Vindicated," above), and I'll find another source. Otherwise, I'm under no obligation whatsoever to do so. I'm getting the impression (rightly or wrongly, and if wrongly, I
2010:) that Fitzpatrick's book--specifically, for the references I used it for (see "Fitzpatrick, Vindicated" above)--is an invalid source. With all due respect, you have not done this--and until you do so, I am not under any obligation whatsoever to provide other sources in any of those instances.
1742:
Mr. Fitzpatrick's book, as I have, or you'd probably know that already. And since BYU is the flagship university of a church that is directly and historically opposed to Strang's prophetic claims, I think a good case could be made against the objectivity of that reviewer's characterization of
2505:
Of particular concern is the "Assassination" section, which claims that Strang was ambushed, shot in the back, and "not one person on board the ship made any effort to warn or to aid the intended victim". Such a claim really should have a better source than an Apologetics website belonging to
2005:
uses I detailed in "Fitzpatrick, Vindicated" above, Fitzpatrick was not being one bit subjective in any of those instances, save the one I noted. You have not provided one iota of evidence to prove otherwise. If you want me to find other sources you need first to prove (not just allege, but
2502:
OFFICIAL Mormon website run by the Mormon church (see "mormonbeliefs.com", a frequent source for this page), the neutrality (and accuracy) of these newspaper excerpts, etc. is called into question. Can anyone provide a third-party source for some of these newspaper excerpts, etc.?
1958:
I do appreciate your not intending any insult towards me, and I feel likewise towards you, but nonetheless I am somewhat concerned that alterations of this formerly excellent article subsequent to being approved under the Knowledge GA standards do not measure up to that standard.
1747:
he was making such a characterization. Add to that this gentleman's use of "questionable" to describe certain of Strang's doctrines, and one definitely has reason to challenge how neutral and objective his review is--and equally to challenge your use of it as one basis for your
1708:
It relies heavily on one particular source - a book by Doyle C. Fitzpatrick titled The King Strang Story: A Vindication Of James J. Strang - which among similar biographies of Jessie James "King" Strang was alone labeled as "partisan" by a Brigham Young University reviewer
1596:
Knowledge are different from what I was taught in English class there and in college (no "ibids," etc. on Knowledge, for instance), but shouldn't we make the first reference to the Book of the Law a full reference, with Book title, etc.? Thanks again for your work! -
2742:
The delisting above was very due. This article is in very unfortunately shabby shape for a figure of such interest and influence in American religious history, and with several serious biographies written about him. Often while reading I had the sense
1996:
to do that, given that the Fitzpatrick book itself IS a valid source, as I used it (see "Fitzpatrick, Vindicated," above. I freely admit that Fitzpatrick's book, like all biographies ever written since the beginning of time, is subjective--maybe even
1940:
Why, if so many of these citations can be be corroborated through other sources than the Fitzpatrick book and the Strangite sect is this not done? I would urge you to improve the article in that regard or revert it to its previous incarnation.
2152:
particular usages are wrong. Nor can you demonstrate that Fitzpatrick is unreliable in the places I used him for, simply because he stated his own opinions elsewhere in his bio--not without equally calling into question all of those
2593:
The man told how Strang had tied him to a tree and whipped him and nearly killed him because he tried to liberate his brother , whom they had tied to another tree and cut his heart out and hung it on a stick where he could see it."
2043:
is not one shred of merit in your objection. If you would like to add statements by some reasonably-notable (or even not notable) persons negative toward Strang, you are welcome to do so, if you cite the sources as I have done.
2581:
relays the family's fears when they sailed to this island to fish for the summer but of her encounter with a bloody man whom Strang had ordered beaten and sought help at her doorstep. Here is an excerpt of the manuscript:
1353:
Copious use of in-line citations, moreso than most GA candidates actually. References section is well formatted with good sources, external links looks like it provides reader with some interesting further reading on the
2034:' opinion of something I had done or written, if Mr. Hanks (just for sake of an illustration) had ever offered one. Hanks and Sholes are/were both famous men, and Fitzpatrick merely offers the quote from that angle:
2101:
because of the website, but because the author used a subjective adjective to describe Fitzpatrick's book, without ever offering any explanation of why he had done so. He didn't use any adjectives to describe the
153:
2737:
2139:
bios of the man, as in all histories ever written. Are we upset because Fitzpatrick seeks to extol Strang as a man (even though he utterly rejects his claims), rather than to tear him down as it seems
2127:
subjective, as he is ofttimes throughout his bio--this is one weakness of it, and you will recall that I affirmed that I had issues of my own with his book. However, other biographers have been
2166:(9) You've answered none of my original five questions to you in your first entry on this subject, above; nor have you answered any of the "Fitzpatrick, Vindicated" questions I asked. Do you
3061:
2425:
1800:(5) What does Strang's having had "multiple wives" (a fact no one can dispute) have to do with the GA worthiness of this article, or the veracity of Fitzpatrick's book as a viable source?
516:
1904:(18) Note 77: Another potentially "subjective" statement, but it's confirmed in other sources (one of which is contained in Note 75, which is not from the Fitzpatrick book!). No dice.
649:
2135:
biographer is subjective to a degree--Fitzpatrick, as a former business executive rather than an academic, is simply more blunt about it, in places. But the subjectivity is there in
1797:(4) How does Strang's having allegedly "anointed himself" have anything to do with the veracity of Fitzpatrick's book as a source, or this article's GA worthiness?? Please explain.
1728:
I wrote a good portion of this article, and while Fitzpatrick's book has its issues, the things I quoted from it are sound. The "vindication" Fitzpatrick spoke of in the title was
2896:
Jensen, Robin Scott (2007). "Mormons Seeking Mormonism: Strangite Success and the Conceptualization of Mormon Ideology, 1844–50". In Bringhurst, Newell G.; Hamer, John C. (eds.).
2748:
very interesting to historians, almost wholly disappears from Strang's life. Meanwhile, the page is crowded with irrelevant remarks like how Strang was better than Smith because
2443:
2439:
1794:
have to do with GA worthiness? Fitzpatrick never said one word about any such wealth, so what source(s) do you care to offer to tell the rest of us where you came up with that??
1768:, not Jesse James Strang. One would imagine that anyone seeking to challenge the veracity of this article or its worthiness for GA could at least get Mr. Strang's name right??
2711:
This article has a number of claims lacking citations, and relies heavily on citations to the subject's own works. There may also be some issues with plagiarism - for example
3056:
1675:
329:
3086:
1653:
639:
147:
2786:
reliable secondary sources have to say about James Strang should cite the following (non-exhaustive). I have added these to the main article as "Further references".
3156:
2599:
2084:
thing yet that you have said that holds any water, here. You say "served" is somehow subjective--I don't see how. Same with your complaints about its usage in the
1619:
1550:
539:
310:
3007:
3091:
1960:
1714:
1399:
All in all a comprehensive article, one can tell lots of work went into this, especially with referencing and citations. Good job! Next step I would suggest a
511:
419:
1211:
3166:
1235:
1158:
3111:
2144:
might desire? Are the critics "objective" because they criticize Strang, while Fitzpatrick is "subjective", for defending him? I didn't use Fitzpatrick for
1457:
851:
1907:(19) Note 81: Fact. The fact that some accused the captain of complicity is contained in an orginal source from that period, which is contained in Note 81.
272:
3066:
615:
3171:
3081:
2216:
1894:
whipped, on Strang's orders. Bedford himself testified to this, and to his own resulting determination to seek revenge on Strang, by killing him. See
1790:(3) Where's the "great personal wealth" you say Strang amassed (since Strang himself certainly never seems to have ever had any of it!!), and what does
1783:
that Strang made such claims? After all, I think ALL of the sources listed in the BYU review would indicate Strang said the same thing, does that make
756:
2614:
1175:
348:
1486:
1443:
1073:
968:
861:
2575:
1472:
has been revising the article quite a bit and has both expanded the lead and removed the 'ibid's. My objections have been removed. Good job. Cheers!
2256:
2246:
2236:
1663:
1502:
1284:
1258:
1836:(3) Note 10: Is there a "subjective" issue here, with the fact that Strang read Volney, or that Volney apparently exercized some influence on him?
1407:
3161:
3071:
2756:
sources or to negatively reviewed secondary sources and too little awareness of the serious scholarship on Strang that is available to be cited.
2114:
be described as subjective! It wasn't just the site; more than that, it was these facts I have mentioned here that led me to offer that opinion.
602:
563:
201:
1394:
3151:
3106:
1201:
2590:“It means that I swear vengeance on Strang the Mormon,” the stranger replied. “And that I shall have his heart's blood for the day's work.”
2534:
2880:
The King of Confidence: A Tale of Utopian Dreamers, Frontier Schemers, True Believers, False Prophets, and the Murder of an American Monarch
2792:
Beshears, Kyle (Spring–Summer 2023). "'In Love and Union': The Writings of Mr. Charles J. Douglass, Secret Plural Wife of a Mormon King".
2185:
1814:
1705:
Does this article yet meet Knowledge's Good Article criteria since being altered subsequent to passing review in late 2007? I think not.
3176:
1539:. Slide 15. The website reads "Preliminary Draft Version Not to Be Circulated, Cited or Quoted Without Written Permission of the Author"
1230:
1165:
1101:
534:
291:
2148:
kinds of references; I used his book for the things I indicated in "Fitzpatrick, Vindicated," above, and you haven't proven that any of
3101:
1323:
746:
79:
2752:. I am sure that contributors over the years have acted in good faith; however, there has been too much willingness to go straight to
2603:
3136:
3121:
2569:
1063:
958:
2421:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2286:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
1496:
GAR now closed (keep!), but please check the archived discussion in case there are still useful suggestions for minor improvements.
2491:
1968:
1722:
1170:
467:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
2161:
own impressions and opinions of Strang into what they wrote, too. There's no such thing as truly "objective" history, my friend!!
1645:
1631:
1584:
1372:
From a perusal of the article history and the respective edit summaries going back a few months, the article appears to be stable.
3146:
3076:
2333:
2123:
maintains that the Gentiles did not steal..." etc.; I assume that was a typo? Now here, I would agree that Fitzpatrick is being
2048:(5) I am not required to find another independent source for Sholes' comment, for the same reason I used in item "2" above. You
468:
2063:(6) Your objection to my use of "serve" is almost incomprehensible to me. I don't get it. You're upset because I said "Strang
1608:
1576:(one of Strang's newspapers). I will rewrite the sentence, using these citations. If anyone finds any other references in the
1476:
1432:
3141:
3126:
1860:(11) Note 35: This is Sholes' opinion, not Fitzpatricks or mine; Fitzpatrick is merely quoting it. Where's the "subjectivity?"
2769:
so bad that my first reaction was that any kind of review, even a critical one, would give it a dignity that it didn't deserve
2712:
3046:
2818:
DeRogatis, Amy (Spring–Summer 2023). "Intimate Exposure: The Charley Douglass Daguerreotype and American Religious History".
2683:
2667:
1743:
Fitzpatrick's book as being "partisan" in the first place--especially since this reviewer didn't bother to explain precisely
1153:
85:
1990:"Why, if so many of these citations can be cooroborated through other sources than the Fitzpatrick book...is this not done?"
2626:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1149:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
722:
472:
168:
44:
2733:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2276:
2266:
2226:
2176:
retorts are. I wish you all the best, and look forward to your reply upon my return, if you wish to make one. Cheers! -
1572:
regarding Strang's excommunication, together with Strang's own comments on having never been summoned for a trial, in the
1425:
3096:
3051:
2595:
1929:
1910:(20) Note 87: Again, an indisputable fact, confirmed in other sources, and certainly not requiring any elaboration, here.
1698:
1387:
1141:
1096:
1039:
934:
827:
216:
135:
2106:
titles, so why that one? He also uses the adjective "questionable" to describe Strang's "doctrines;" who died and made
1924:
3131:
3116:
2886:
2663:
1337:
476:
211:
30:
2805:
Blythe, Christopher James (June 2014). "The Coronation of James J. Strang and the Making of Beaver Island Mormonism".
2397:
2053:
apologize!) that you have something "personal" against Fitzpatrick and/or his book, and I am wondering if you've even
3003:
2978:
2960:
2945:
2904:
2847:
2515:
2338:
2217:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070929122436/http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1970/4/1970_4_4.shtml
1890:(17) Note 73: Okay, here's the first possibly "subjective" statement I've found. Now it's indisputable that Bedford
1413:
2355:
2208:
2648:
1600:
594:
2377:
3041:
2191:
1820:
1689:
1366:
Article seems to be presented in a NPOV manner, both in its use of language and use of citations, as noted above.
711:
672:
463:
414:
207:
99:
2442:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2257:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131021190040/http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang%2C%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm
2247:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131021190040/http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang%2C%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm
2237:
https://web.archive.org/web/20131021190040/http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang%2C%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm
1754:
That said, I haven't seen one reason in your objection to reject it as a viable source, as used in this article.
1030:
991:
923:
884:
818:
779:
104:
20:
1382:, but that's okay. Could use perhaps two more public domain or fair use rationale images, but no biggie here.
129:
2640:
2387:
2220:
1830:(1) Note 6: This fact is confirmed in so many different sources that it doesn't even merit elaboration, here.
74:
2704:
1949:
2700:
2530:
2486:
2328:
1895:
389:
206:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
2774:
The only author cited on the page more often than Fitzpatrick is James Strang himself, whose writings are
1562:
2496:
1483:
1454:
1440:
1404:
1391:
125:
65:
2767:
besides this one. More to the point, a review in an academic journal for Mormon history called the book
2461:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2303:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2260:
2250:
2240:
1948:
As to the proper sequence of "King" Strang's name, that is also a mootable point as can be discerned at
2354:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2207:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
2075:
as assistant manager of a Checker's restaurant?" Where's the issue, here??? I don't see it. Are you
1964:
1718:
1590:
1390:. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. —
611:
2724:
189:
175:
1983:
before (as you affirm), but is so terrible today?? Please provide specific examples, if you would.
1038:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
933:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
826:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
721:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
614:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2999:
2696:
2613:
2526:
2477:
2319:
2036:"here's a reasonably-notable person who actually met Strang, and here's what he thought of him."
1336:
status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the
1325:
109:
2446:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2462:
2351:
2304:
1685:
1498:
1421:
2449:
1866:(13) Note 66: Are we saying this didn't happen? Still not seeing any "subjectivity," though!
1863:(12) Note 65: Are we saying this didn't happen? Still not seeing any "subjectivity," though!
1668:
1400:
395:
2110:
God?? Unless he's the Almighty, this gentleman's use of "questionable" in that context can
1360:
Article is indeed thorough, covering a large time period and giving details in each section.
2744:
2720:
2511:
2469:
2311:
1542:
I have hidden it for the time being. Perhaps another ref can be found to replace this one.
1473:
1429:
1289:
1263:
1133:
341:
2759:
Sourcing is a serious issue. The secondary source cited most often is Doyle Fitzpatrick's
2080:
change it and apologize for having (unwittingly, to be sure) told it. But I haven't seen
1887:(16) Note 72: Fact. Confirmed by other sources. How is this supposed to be "subjective?"
578:
557:
322:
303:
284:
265:
246:
141:
8:
2181:
2001:
subjective and opinionated, in places, than usual (see No. "8" below). However, for the
1920:
1810:
1535:
from Council Bluffs: Mormons Who Made it So Far, Then Left for Wisconsin and Michigan]".
377:
55:
2644:
2923:
2675:
2608:
2428:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2409:
2365:
2277:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071013071439/http://mormonbeliefs.com/book_of_the_law.htm
2267:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071013071439/http://mormonbeliefs.com/book_of_the_law.htm
2227:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071013071439/http://mormonbeliefs.com/book_of_the_law.htm
1625:
1556:
1510:
70:
2764:
2761:
The King Strang Story: A Vindication of James J, Strang, the Beaver Island Mormon King
2468:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2310:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1710:
2975:
2957:
2942:
2901:
2883:
2844:
2775:
2753:
2522:
1678:
1580:
or elsewhere, please feel free to insert them, with appropriate citation. Thanks! -
1379:
51:
2587:“What does this mean?” Father asked, motioning to the man’s blood covered clothing.
2991:
2866:
2836:
2398:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071124113011/http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/diamond.htm
2280:
2270:
2230:
703:
455:
1857:(10) Note 32: Fact. Confirmed in other sources. Where's the "subjectivity" here?
1851:(8) Note 30: Fact. Confirmed in other sources. Where's the "subjectivity," here?
161:
2938:
2716:
2547:
2541:
2507:
2204:
1854:(9) Note 31: Fact. Confirmed in other sources. Where's the "subjectivity" here?
1022:
915:
810:
425:
2381:
2097:(7) I said that the review appearing on the BYU website was "likely biased" not
1420:
I don't think this article meets GA standards. For example, the lead is brief -
1117:
1090:
2378:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080704055509/http://www.leelanaupost.com/2006/01/
2177:
1916:
1806:
1660:
1642:
1597:
1581:
1469:
2750:
Unlike Smith, however, Strang offered his plates to the public for examination
2434:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
1515:
I'm going through and working on the references. I came across the following:
3035:
2995:
1930:
1699:
1613:
1544:
1450:
1414:
1146:
2779:
2633:
2401:
2391:
2347:
2200:
2085:
1333:
1145:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
24:
2388:
https://archive.is/20060323034655/http://www.signaturebooks.com/strang.htm
2221:
http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/ah/1970/4/1970_4_4.shtml
2857:
Foster, Lawrence (June 1981). "James J. Strang: The Prophet Who Failed".
2840:
2738:
Steps for improving the article: replace Fitzpatrick; cite Speek, Harvey,
2435:
2926:
1950:
http://records.ancestry.com/Jesse_James_Strang_records.ashx?pid=17058394
1016:
1006:
985:
501:
2954:
King of Beaver Island: The Life and Assassination of James Jesse Strang
899:
878:
2298:
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
2067:
as Prophet...," etc.--much as I might equally write that "George Bush
2015:(3) I don't care what Ancestry.com might choose to call Mr. Strang; I
927:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of
715:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of
2914:
Quist, John (1989). "Polygamy Among James Strang and His Followers".
2415:
2371:
2261:
http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang%2C%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm
2251:
http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang%2C%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm
2241:
http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/Strang%2C%20The%20Martyred%20Prophet.htm
2031:
717:
607:
2870:
1974:
None of what follows is "personal," so please don't take it as such:
1884:
author ten bills, five of which passed? Where's the "subjectivity?"
1528:
525:
3024:
1378:
Only one image, which is public domain (needs to be updated on the
1277:
1252:
1035:
929:
823:
794:
773:
475:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
439:
408:
2088:
article. The term "served," as used here (and there), is utterly
1848:(7) Note 24: Again, indisputable. What's "subjective" about this?
1386:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to
1220:
2972:
Assassination of a Michigan King: The Life of James Jesse Strang
2715:
is being nearly directly quoted, but is not attributed as such.
2833:
James Jesse Strang: The Rise and Fall of Michigan's Mormon King
2807:
Communal Societies: Journal of the Communal Studies Association
1520:
2765:
I'm not sure if National Heritage has published any other book
1777:"subjective judgments concerning behavior of the (???) Strang
1611:. Let me know if you see any other errors and I'll fix them.
2030:
opinion in the same way (for example) that one might report
1880:(15) Note 69: Indisputable fact. Are we saying that Strang
1869:(14) Note 68: Indisputable fact. Are we saying that Strang
210:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
3062:
Mid-importance biography (politics and government) articles
3019:
Klaus Hansen, "James J. Strang and the Amateur Historian",
1845:(6) Note 23: Indisputable fact. Nothing "subjective" here!
1842:(5) Note 14: Indisputable fact. Nothing "subjective" here!
1676:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/James Strang/archive2
1524:
2546:
I added two additional reliable sources to the section. ––
2358:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2211:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
687:
666:
1347:
Very well written article, easy to follow and comprehend.
1609:
Wp:cite#Short footnotes with alphabetized full citations
1839:(4) Note 13: Nothing "subjective" here, that I can see.
1833:(2) Note 7: Indisputable fact; what's the issue, here??
160:
1332:
I am glad to report that this article nomination for
3057:
C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
1877:
win the resulting vote? Where's the "subjectivity?"
1426:
Knowledge:Footnotes#Citing a footnote more than once
1123:
1034:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1012:
905:
822:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
800:
693:
606:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
584:
445:
220:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
15:
2859:
Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture
2438:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2071:as president of the US from 2000-2008," or "I once
1898:
for the quote. So, no "subjectivity" here, either.
1873:face this challenge to his credentials, or that he
1711:
http://byustudies.byu.edu/showtitle.aspx?title=7441
1654:Deletion of Thomas Bedford and Voree Plates photos
1453:for some more ways to help improve this article.
3087:Mid-importance Latter Day Saint movement articles
2898:Scattering of the Saints: Schism Within Mormonism
3157:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
3033:
2933:Silitto, John and Staker, Susan (eds.). (2002).
2281:http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/book_of_the_law.htm
2271:http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/book_of_the_law.htm
2231:http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/book_of_the_law.htm
1764:(1) "Jesse James (King) Strang"?? His name was
1299:Knowledge:WikiProject Temperance and Prohibition
1287:, a project which is currently considered to be
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1759:Now let's take a look at your other objections:
1302:Template:WikiProject Temperance and Prohibition
624:Knowledge:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement
3092:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement articles
2424:This message was posted before February 2018.
1607:for example. For more information on this see
627:Template:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement
3167:Mid-importance US State Legislatures articles
2382:http://www.leelanaupost.com/leelanau_history/
1937:in its use of language and use of citations.
174:
3112:Low-importance WikiProject Illinois articles
3067:Politics and government work group articles
2916:John Whitmer Historical Association Journal
2820:John Whitmer Historical Association Journal
2576:King Strang's violent history not told here
1805:Just a preliminary retort, for starters. -
3172:WikiProject US State Legislatures articles
3082:C-Class Latter Day Saint movement articles
2969:
2951:
2817:
2346:I have just modified 3 external links on
2199:I have just modified 7 external links on
1424:- and the article footnotes use 'ibid' -
3023:6, no. 1 (Spring 1971): 73–76, here 73,
2791:
2402:http://www.mormonbeliefs.com/diamond.htm
2392:http://www.signaturebooks.com/strang.htm
375:
3162:C-Class US State Legislatures articles
3072:Old requests for Biography peer review
3034:
2935:Mormon Mavericks: Essays on Dissenters
2895:
2877:
2856:
2804:
1659:policy, I have removed both photos. -
1285:WikiProject Temperance and Prohibition
512:the politics and government work group
3152:Low-importance United States articles
3107:C-Class WikiProject Illinois articles
3021:Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought
2913:
2830:
603:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement
202:Philosophy and religion good articles
2622:The following discussion is closed.
1283:This article is within the scope of
1139:This article is within the scope of
1028:This article is within the scope of
921:This article is within the scope of
816:This article is within the scope of
709:This article is within the scope of
600:This article is within the scope of
461:This article is within the scope of
371:
2794:John Whitmer Historical Association
2170:answers for any of these questions?
2058:attacking its veracity as a source.
2020:never (to my knowledge) as "Jesse."
1305:Temperance and Prohibition articles
1231:WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures
1186:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
394:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
13:
3177:WikiProject United States articles
2778:and whose citation may constitute
2416:http://www.strangite.org/Photo.htm
2372:http://www.strangite.org/Photo.htm
1641:Thanks again for all your work! -
1568:I have found one reference in the
1219:
1189:Template:WikiProject United States
630:Latter Day Saint movement articles
524:
500:
14:
3188:
3102:Mid-importance Wisconsin articles
2350:. Please take a moment to review
2203:. Please take a moment to review
1738:But perhaps you haven't actually
1529:http://www.strangite.org/Iowa.htm
3137:Low-importance politics articles
3122:Mid-importance Michigan articles
2974:. University of Michigan Press.
2956:. University of Illinois Press.
2835:. University of Michigan Press.
2813:(1) – via Gale Academic OneFile.
2729:The discussion above is closed.
2289:
1992:It wasn't done because I am not
1449:To other talk page readers, see
1276:
1251:
1126:
1116:
1089:
1015:
1005:
984:
908:
898:
877:
803:
793:
772:
696:
686:
665:
595:Latter Day Saint movement portal
587:
577:
556:
448:
438:
424:
407:
376:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
2684:Watch article reassessment page
1206:This article has been rated as
1068:This article has been rated as
963:This article has been rated as
856:This article has been rated as
751:This article has been rated as
731:Knowledge:WikiProject Wisconsin
644:This article has been rated as
485:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
3147:C-Class United States articles
3077:WikiProject Biography articles
3013:
1048:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
943:Knowledge:WikiProject Michigan
836:Knowledge:WikiProject Illinois
734:Template:WikiProject Wisconsin
488:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
3142:WikiProject Politics articles
3127:WikiProject Michigan articles
3008:06:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
2882:. Little, Brown and Company.
2521:if you can improve the page,
2492:08:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
1228:This article is supported by
1051:Template:WikiProject Politics
1042:and see a list of open tasks.
946:Template:WikiProject Michigan
937:and see a list of open tasks.
842:WikiProject Illinois articles
839:Template:WikiProject Illinois
830:and see a list of open tasks.
725:and see a list of open tasks.
618:and see a list of open tasks.
509:This article is supported by
42:Put new text under old text.
3047:Old requests for peer review
2705:21:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
1664:22:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
1646:20:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1632:17:33, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1601:13:20, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1585:04:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
1563:05:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
1503:21:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
1487:12:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
1477:13:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
1458:00:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
1444:19:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1433:12:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1408:04:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
1395:04:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
473:contribute to the discussion
7:
2763:(National Heritage, 1970).
2725:00:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
3193:
3097:C-Class Wisconsin articles
3052:C-Class biography articles
2455:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2343:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2334:13:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
2196:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1690:20:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
1364:4. Neutral point of view?:
1296:Temperance and Prohibition
1259:Temperance and Prohibition
1212:project's importance scale
1074:project's importance scale
969:project's importance scale
862:project's importance scale
757:project's importance scale
650:project's importance scale
330:Featured article candidate
214:. Editors may also seek a
3132:C-Class politics articles
3117:C-Class Michigan articles
2970:van Noord, Roger (1997).
2952:van Noord, Roger (1988).
2570:15:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
2535:15:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
2516:23:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
1931:Good article reassessment
1775:examples of your alleged
1700:Good article reassessment
1451:Good article reassessment
1415:Good article reassessment
1388:Good article reassessment
1338:six good article criteria
1271:
1227:
1205:
1142:WikiProject United States
1111:
1067:
1000:
962:
893:
855:
788:
750:
681:
643:
621:Latter Day Saint movement
612:Latter Day Saint movement
572:
564:Latter Day Saint movement
532:
508:
433:
402:
358:
349:Good article reassessment
273:Good article reassessment
228:
224:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
2731:Please do not modify it.
2624:Please do not modify it.
2186:22:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
1969:19:58, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
1925:01:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
1815:18:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
1723:18:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
1674:At nominator's request,
1147:United States of America
2604:19:00, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
2339:External links modified
2192:External links modified
1896:The Man Who Shot Strang
1821:Fitzpatrick, vindicated
1636:Now I see it! This is
1428:- extensively. Cheers!
1351:2. Factually accurate?:
533:This article has had a
420:Politics and Government
311:WikiProject peer review
3042:Delisted good articles
2900:. John Whitmer Books.
2878:Harvey, Miles (2020).
2687:• GAN review not found
2131:subjective; in truth,
2025:(4) Sholes' statement
1826:footnote/references):
1484:Curt Wilhelm VonSavage
1455:Curt Wilhelm VonSavage
1441:Curt Wilhelm VonSavage
1422:Knowledge:Lead section
1405:Curt Wilhelm VonSavage
1392:Curt Wilhelm VonSavage
1358:3. Broad in coverage?:
1224:
1192:United States articles
529:
505:
384:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
2697:~~ AirshipJungleman29
1401:Knowledge:Peer review
1370:5. Article stability?
1223:
712:WikiProject Wisconsin
528:
504:
464:WikiProject Biography
361:Delisted good article
208:good article criteria
100:Neutral point of view
2841:10.3998/mpub.6963838
2436:regular verification
1134:United States portal
1031:WikiProject Politics
924:WikiProject Michigan
819:WikiProject Illinois
254:Good article nominee
105:No original research
2831:Faber, Don (2016).
2497:Neutral POV Concern
2426:After February 2018
2157:sources, who weave
2119:(8) You said that "
1780:or the Strangites."
1771:(2) Please provide
1160:Articles Requested!
2625:
2527:Rachel Helps (BYU)
2480:InternetArchiveBot
2431:InternetArchiveBot
2322:InternetArchiveBot
1766:James Jesse Strang
1591:Reference question
1531:The Trail Ran East
1225:
1102:State Legislatures
737:Wisconsin articles
530:
506:
491:biography articles
390:content assessment
229:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
2623:
2506:Strang's church.
2456:
1578:Times and Seasons
1570:Times and Seasons
1380:Wikimedia Commons
1345:1. Well written?:
1321:
1320:
1317:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1246:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1084:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1054:politics articles
979:
978:
975:
974:
949:Michigan articles
872:
871:
868:
867:
767:
766:
763:
762:
660:
659:
656:
655:
551:
550:
547:
546:
370:
369:
366:
365:
304:November 12, 2007
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
3184:
3027:
3017:
2984:
2966:
2930:
2910:
2892:
2874:
2853:
2827:
2814:
2801:
2695:
2686:
2680:
2671:
2652:
2567:
2562:
2557:
2552:
2545:
2490:
2481:
2454:
2453:
2432:
2413:
2369:
2332:
2323:
2296:
2293:
2292:
1961:Iamknowledgeable
1787:unreliable, too?
1715:Iamknowledgeable
1682:
1628:
1622:
1616:
1559:
1553:
1547:
1307:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1280:
1273:
1272:
1267:
1255:
1248:
1247:
1194:
1193:
1190:
1187:
1184:
1136:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1120:
1113:
1112:
1107:
1104:
1093:
1086:
1085:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1049:
1046:
1025:
1020:
1019:
1009:
1002:
1001:
996:
988:
981:
980:
951:
950:
947:
944:
941:
918:
913:
912:
911:
902:
895:
894:
889:
881:
874:
873:
844:
843:
840:
837:
834:
813:
808:
807:
806:
797:
790:
789:
784:
776:
769:
768:
739:
738:
735:
732:
729:
706:
704:Wisconsin portal
701:
700:
699:
690:
683:
682:
677:
669:
662:
661:
632:
631:
628:
625:
622:
597:
592:
591:
590:
581:
574:
573:
568:
560:
553:
552:
493:
492:
489:
486:
483:
469:join the project
458:
456:Biography portal
453:
452:
451:
442:
435:
434:
429:
428:
427:
422:
411:
404:
403:
387:
381:
380:
372:
359:Current status:
344:
342:January 10, 2024
325:
323:December 7, 2007
306:
287:
285:November 1, 2007
268:
266:October 30, 2007
249:
247:October 22, 2007
226:
225:
192:
185:
184:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
3192:
3191:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3183:
3182:
3181:
3032:
3031:
3030:
3018:
3014:
2989:
2981:
2963:
2939:Signature Books
2907:
2889:
2871:10.2307/3166882
2850:
2740:
2735:
2734:
2690:
2682:
2661:
2638:
2632:
2628:
2618:
2611:
2609:GA Reassessment
2578:
2563:
2558:
2553:
2548:
2539:
2499:
2484:
2479:
2447:
2440:have permission
2430:
2407:
2363:
2356:this simple FaQ
2341:
2326:
2321:
2294:
2290:
2209:this simple FaQ
2194:
1934:
1823:
1703:
1680:
1671:
1656:
1626:
1620:
1614:
1593:
1557:
1551:
1545:
1513:
1474:Wassupwestcoast
1430:Wassupwestcoast
1418:
1330:
1304:
1301:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1261:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1166:Become a Member
1132:
1127:
1125:
1105:
1099:
1053:
1050:
1047:
1044:
1043:
1023:Politics portal
1021:
1014:
994:
948:
945:
942:
939:
938:
916:Michigan portal
914:
909:
907:
887:
841:
838:
835:
832:
831:
811:Illinois portal
809:
804:
802:
782:
736:
733:
730:
727:
726:
702:
697:
695:
675:
629:
626:
623:
620:
619:
593:
588:
586:
566:
490:
487:
484:
481:
480:
454:
449:
447:
423:
417:
388:on Knowledge's
385:
340:
321:
302:
283:
264:
245:
198:was one of the
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
3190:
3180:
3179:
3174:
3169:
3164:
3159:
3154:
3149:
3144:
3139:
3134:
3129:
3124:
3119:
3114:
3109:
3104:
3099:
3094:
3089:
3084:
3079:
3074:
3069:
3064:
3059:
3054:
3049:
3044:
3029:
3028:
3011:
2988:
2987:
2985:
2979:
2967:
2961:
2949:
2931:
2911:
2905:
2893:
2888:978-0316463591
2887:
2875:
2865:(2): 182–192.
2854:
2848:
2828:
2815:
2802:
2788:
2739:
2736:
2728:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2688:
2629:
2620:
2619:
2617:
2612:
2610:
2607:
2577:
2574:
2573:
2572:
2537:
2498:
2495:
2474:
2473:
2466:
2419:
2418:
2404:
2396:Added archive
2394:
2386:Added archive
2384:
2376:Added archive
2374:
2340:
2337:
2316:
2315:
2308:
2284:
2283:
2275:Added archive
2273:
2265:Added archive
2263:
2255:Added archive
2253:
2245:Added archive
2243:
2235:Added archive
2233:
2225:Added archive
2223:
2215:Added archive
2193:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2172:
2171:
2163:
2162:
2116:
2115:
2094:
2093:
2060:
2059:
2045:
2044:
2022:
2021:
2012:
2011:
1985:
1984:
1976:
1975:
1933:
1928:
1912:
1911:
1908:
1905:
1902:
1899:
1888:
1885:
1878:
1867:
1864:
1861:
1858:
1855:
1852:
1849:
1846:
1843:
1840:
1837:
1834:
1831:
1822:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1802:
1801:
1798:
1795:
1788:
1769:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1755:
1750:
1749:
1735:
1734:
1702:
1697:
1695:
1693:
1692:
1670:
1667:
1655:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1592:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1533:
1532:
1512:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1491:
1490:
1470:User:Ecjmartin
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1417:
1412:
1384:
1383:
1373:
1367:
1361:
1355:
1348:
1329:
1322:
1319:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1311:
1310:
1308:
1281:
1269:
1268:
1256:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1239:
1236:Mid-importance
1226:
1216:
1215:
1208:Low-importance
1204:
1198:
1197:
1195:
1179:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1156:
1154:Template Usage
1150:
1138:
1137:
1121:
1109:
1108:
1106:Low‑importance
1094:
1082:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1070:Low-importance
1066:
1060:
1059:
1057:
1040:the discussion
1027:
1026:
1010:
998:
997:
995:Low‑importance
989:
977:
976:
973:
972:
965:Mid-importance
961:
955:
954:
952:
935:the discussion
920:
919:
903:
891:
890:
888:Mid‑importance
882:
870:
869:
866:
865:
858:Low-importance
854:
848:
847:
845:
828:the discussion
815:
814:
798:
786:
785:
783:Low‑importance
777:
765:
764:
761:
760:
753:Mid-importance
749:
743:
742:
740:
723:the discussion
708:
707:
691:
679:
678:
676:Mid‑importance
670:
658:
657:
654:
653:
646:Mid-importance
642:
636:
635:
633:
616:the discussion
599:
598:
582:
570:
569:
567:Mid‑importance
561:
549:
548:
545:
544:
531:
521:
520:
517:Mid-importance
507:
497:
496:
494:
460:
459:
443:
431:
430:
412:
400:
399:
393:
382:
368:
367:
364:
363:
356:
355:
352:
345:
337:
336:
333:
326:
318:
317:
314:
307:
299:
298:
295:
288:
280:
279:
276:
269:
261:
260:
257:
250:
242:
241:
238:
235:
231:
230:
222:
221:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3189:
3178:
3175:
3173:
3170:
3168:
3165:
3163:
3160:
3158:
3155:
3153:
3150:
3148:
3145:
3143:
3140:
3138:
3135:
3133:
3130:
3128:
3125:
3123:
3120:
3118:
3115:
3113:
3110:
3108:
3105:
3103:
3100:
3098:
3095:
3093:
3090:
3088:
3085:
3083:
3080:
3078:
3075:
3073:
3070:
3068:
3065:
3063:
3060:
3058:
3055:
3053:
3050:
3048:
3045:
3043:
3040:
3039:
3037:
3025:
3022:
3016:
3012:
3010:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2993:
2986:
2982:
2980:9780472084548
2977:
2973:
2968:
2964:
2962:0-252-01472-3
2959:
2955:
2950:
2947:
2946:1-56085-154-6
2944:
2940:
2936:
2932:
2928:
2925:
2921:
2917:
2912:
2908:
2906:9781934901021
2903:
2899:
2894:
2890:
2885:
2881:
2876:
2872:
2868:
2864:
2860:
2855:
2851:
2849:9780472052899
2846:
2842:
2838:
2834:
2829:
2825:
2821:
2816:
2812:
2808:
2803:
2799:
2795:
2790:
2789:
2787:
2783:
2781:
2777:
2772:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2757:
2755:
2751:
2746:
2732:
2727:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2714:
2706:
2702:
2698:
2693:
2689:
2685:
2679:
2678:
2674:
2669:
2665:
2660:
2659:
2655:
2650:
2646:
2642:
2637:
2636:
2631:
2630:
2627:
2616:
2606:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2596:73.161.66.184
2591:
2588:
2585:
2582:
2571:
2568:
2566:
2561:
2556:
2551:
2543:
2538:
2536:
2532:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2503:
2494:
2493:
2488:
2483:
2482:
2471:
2467:
2464:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2451:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2433:
2427:
2422:
2417:
2411:
2405:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2373:
2367:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2344:
2336:
2335:
2330:
2325:
2324:
2313:
2309:
2306:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2287:
2282:
2278:
2274:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2222:
2218:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2197:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2174:
2173:
2169:
2165:
2164:
2160:
2156:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2105:
2100:
2096:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2061:
2056:
2051:
2047:
2046:
2041:
2038:There is not
2037:
2033:
2028:
2024:
2023:
2018:
2014:
2013:
2009:
2004:
2000:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1977:
1973:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1932:
1927:
1926:
1922:
1918:
1909:
1906:
1903:
1900:
1897:
1893:
1889:
1886:
1883:
1879:
1876:
1872:
1868:
1865:
1862:
1859:
1856:
1853:
1850:
1847:
1844:
1841:
1838:
1835:
1832:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1803:
1799:
1796:
1793:
1789:
1786:
1781:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1767:
1763:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1752:
1751:
1746:
1741:
1737:
1736:
1731:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1677:
1673:
1672:
1669:Withdrawn FAC
1666:
1665:
1662:
1647:
1644:
1639:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1630:
1629:
1623:
1618:
1617:
1610:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1599:
1586:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1574:Gospel Herald
1571:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1561:
1560:
1554:
1549:
1548:
1540:
1538:
1537:Strangite.org
1530:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1504:
1501:
1500:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1468:
1459:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1445:
1442:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1416:
1411:
1409:
1406:
1402:
1397:
1396:
1393:
1389:
1381:
1377:
1374:
1371:
1368:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1356:
1352:
1349:
1346:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1339:
1335:
1327:
1309:
1292:
1291:
1286:
1282:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1237:
1234:(assessed as
1233:
1232:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1183:United States
1177:
1174:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1162:
1161:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1151:
1148:
1144:
1143:
1135:
1124:
1122:
1119:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1103:
1098:
1097:United States
1095:
1092:
1088:
1087:
1075:
1071:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1058:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1024:
1018:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1003:
999:
993:
990:
987:
983:
982:
970:
966:
960:
957:
956:
953:
936:
932:
931:
926:
925:
917:
906:
904:
901:
897:
896:
892:
886:
883:
880:
876:
875:
863:
859:
853:
850:
849:
846:
829:
825:
821:
820:
812:
801:
799:
796:
792:
791:
787:
781:
778:
775:
771:
770:
758:
754:
748:
745:
744:
741:
724:
720:
719:
714:
713:
705:
694:
692:
689:
685:
684:
680:
674:
671:
668:
664:
663:
651:
647:
641:
638:
637:
634:
617:
613:
609:
605:
604:
596:
585:
583:
580:
576:
575:
571:
565:
562:
559:
555:
554:
542:
541:
536:
527:
523:
522:
518:
515:(assessed as
514:
513:
503:
499:
498:
495:
478:
477:documentation
474:
470:
466:
465:
457:
446:
444:
441:
437:
436:
432:
421:
416:
413:
410:
406:
405:
401:
397:
391:
383:
379:
374:
373:
362:
357:
353:
351:
350:
346:
343:
339:
338:
334:
332:
331:
327:
324:
320:
319:
315:
313:
312:
308:
305:
301:
300:
296:
294:
293:
289:
286:
282:
281:
277:
275:
274:
270:
267:
263:
262:
258:
256:
255:
251:
248:
244:
243:
239:
236:
233:
232:
227:
223:
219:
218:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
197:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
3020:
3015:
2990:
2971:
2953:
2934:
2919:
2915:
2897:
2879:
2862:
2858:
2832:
2823:
2819:
2810:
2806:
2797:
2793:
2784:
2773:
2768:
2760:
2758:
2749:
2741:
2730:
2710:
2691:
2676:
2672:
2658:Article talk
2657:
2656:
2653:
2634:
2621:
2615:James Strang
2592:
2589:
2586:
2583:
2579:
2564:
2559:
2554:
2549:
2504:
2500:
2478:
2475:
2450:source check
2429:
2423:
2420:
2348:James Strang
2345:
2342:
2320:
2317:
2297:
2288:
2285:
2201:James Strang
2198:
2195:
2167:
2158:
2154:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2098:
2089:
2086:Joseph Smith
2081:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2054:
2049:
2039:
2035:
2026:
2016:
2007:
2002:
1998:
1993:
1989:
1980:
1957:
1953:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1913:
1891:
1881:
1874:
1870:
1824:
1791:
1784:
1779:
1776:
1772:
1765:
1744:
1739:
1729:
1707:
1704:
1694:
1657:
1637:
1624:
1612:
1594:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1555:
1543:
1541:
1536:
1534:
1514:
1499:Geometry guy
1497:
1482:Great job!
1466:
1465:
1419:
1398:
1385:
1375:
1369:
1363:
1357:
1350:
1344:
1334:good article
1331:
1326:good article
1288:
1229:
1207:
1171:Project Talk
1159:
1140:
1069:
1029:
964:
928:
922:
857:
817:
752:
716:
710:
645:
601:
540:now archived
538:
510:
462:
396:WikiProjects
360:
347:
335:Not promoted
328:
309:
290:
271:
253:
252:
217:reassessment
215:
200:
199:
196:James Strang
195:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:James Strang
19:This is the
2992:Hydrangeans
2826:(1): 20–40.
2800:(1): 41–54.
2713:this source
2694:: Delisted.
2645:visual edit
2525:and do so!
1981:"excellent"
1376:6. Images?:
1324:Successful
535:peer review
292:Peer review
212:renominated
148:free images
31:not a forum
3036:Categories
2776:WP:PRIMARY
2754:WP:PRIMARY
2717:Nikkimaria
2542:Hyperglyph
2508:Hyperglyph
2487:Report bug
2329:Report bug
1748:objection.
1511:References
1328:nomination
2922:: 31–48.
2470:this tool
2463:this tool
2410:dead link
2366:dead link
2312:this tool
2305:this tool
2178:Ecjmartin
2032:Tom Hanks
1917:Ecjmartin
1807:Ecjmartin
1661:Ecjmartin
1643:Ecjmartin
1598:Ecjmartin
1582:Ecjmartin
728:Wisconsin
718:Wisconsin
673:Wisconsin
608:Mormonism
537:which is
482:Biography
415:Biography
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
2927:43200832
2745:the page
2476:Cheers.—
2318:Cheers.—
2003:specific
1994:required
1773:specific
1467:Comment.
1290:inactive
1264:inactive
1045:Politics
1036:politics
992:Politics
940:Michigan
930:Michigan
885:Michigan
833:Illinois
824:Illinois
780:Illinois
610:and the
354:Delisted
316:Reviewed
297:Reviewed
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
2996:she/her
2668:history
2649:history
2635:Article
2523:Be Bold
2414:tag to
2370:tag to
2352:my edit
2205:my edit
2129:equally
2125:utterly
2090:neutral
1681:Georgia
1210:on the
1072:on the
967:on the
860:on the
755:on the
648:on the
386:C-class
237:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
2692:Result
2406:Added
2362:Added
2077:biased
2073:served
2069:served
2065:served
1882:didn't
1875:didn't
1871:didn't
1521:May 23
1354:topic.
1176:Alerts
392:scale.
259:Listed
240:Result
126:Google
3004:edits
2924:JSTOR
2780:WP:OR
2677:Watch
2555:ORMAL
2159:their
2155:other
2150:those
2146:those
2133:every
2104:other
2050:prove
2008:prove
1679:Sandy
1527:). "[
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
3000:talk
2976:ISBN
2958:ISBN
2943:ISBN
2902:ISBN
2884:ISBN
2845:ISBN
2721:talk
2701:talk
2664:edit
2641:edit
2600:talk
2531:talk
2512:talk
2182:talk
2168:have
2112:only
2099:just
2055:read
1999:more
1988:(2)
1965:talk
1921:talk
1811:talk
1792:that
1785:them
1740:read
1719:talk
1686:Talk
1638:much
1627:Love
1615:Lara
1558:Love
1546:Lara
1525:1997
471:and
278:Kept
234:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
2867:doi
2837:doi
2565:UDE
2444:RfC
2400:to
2390:to
2380:to
2279:to
2269:to
2259:to
2249:to
2239:to
2229:to
2219:to
2142:you
2137:all
2121:she
2108:him
2082:one
2040:one
1892:was
1745:why
1730:not
1403:.
1202:Low
1064:Low
959:Mid
852:Low
747:Mid
640:Mid
176:TWL
3038::
3006:)
3002:|
2998:|
2941:.
2937:.
2918:.
2863:50
2861:.
2843:.
2824:43
2822:.
2811:34
2809:.
2798:43
2796:.
2782:.
2771:.
2723:)
2703:)
2681:•
2666:|
2647:|
2643:|
2602:)
2533:)
2514:)
2457:.
2452:}}
2448:{{
2412:}}
2408:{{
2368:}}
2364:{{
2184:)
2027:is
2017:do
1967:)
1923:)
1813:)
1721:)
1688:)
1523:,
1446:.
1410:.
1340::
1238:).
1100::
519:).
418::
156:)
54:;
3026:.
2994:(
2983:.
2965:.
2948:.
2929:.
2920:9
2909:.
2891:.
2873:.
2869::
2852:.
2839::
2719:(
2699:(
2673:·
2670:)
2662:(
2654:·
2651:)
2639:(
2598:(
2560:D
2550:F
2544::
2540:@
2529:(
2510:(
2489:)
2485:(
2472:.
2465:.
2331:)
2327:(
2314:.
2307:.
2295:Y
2180:(
1963:(
1919:(
1809:(
1717:(
1709:(
1684:(
1621:❤
1552:❤
1519:(
1489:.
1460:.
1293:.
1266:)
1262:(
1214:.
1076:.
971:.
864:.
759:.
652:.
543:.
479:.
398::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.