Knowledge

Talk:Lok Biradari Prakalp

Source 📝

474:
Prakashwata, I request guests to my house, who have the time to spend the 45 mins that the CD is long, to watch it. I have had personal interaction with Prakashbahu. What we need is a multi-dimensional description of an organisation. I found this blog while doing a Google search, it was the only one that has a few negative lines written about the project. That itself makes the blog notable. Moreover the blog states that the LBP school is excellent but should be open not just to the Madia but to Dalits too.
335: 236: 191: 353: 257: 222: 243: 267: 871:
heading should be "External links" (plural) even if there is only a single link listed. If several external links are listed and the subject of the article is a living person, organization, web service, or otherwise has an official website, it is normal practice to place the link to that site at the top of the list
722:
Why would he be critical about the project he served all his life. If he has made adverse comments though, they should be here too, however I am not aware of them. Glad that you have tried search, there is so little on the LBP or on Prakash bhau, except the same story repeated over and over, which is
407:
The reason to put the allegations in the LBP page is to give the article a balance. The person who is operating the blog lives in Aheri, near the project, we can have an exception here, please read the blog, it is not vindictive. The statement deserves to be there. Wikirules are to be followed in the
870:
External links section If an article has external links, the standard format is to place them in a bulleted list under a primary heading at the end of the article. External links should identify the link and briefly summarize the website's contents and why the website is relevant to the article. The
717:
Of course there are the doctors and other names in the list of alumni on the LBP website. When I wrote Dignat and Arti, I meant Digant and Arti and not Aniket, Arti is Prakashbahu's daughter and she is a nurse. I do not know why you feel that I assumed X is Vilas Manohar, I thought X was Remteke the
679:
I have reverted illustrious alumni to illustrious Madia Gond alumni, as that is what they are, Digant, Arti too are alumni of the school, but they are not on the list as they are not Madia Gond, the logic is that Digant did not become a doctor because of the opportunity the school provided, but the
497:
Yogesh, I don't claim that the blog is criticizing LBP out of personal pique (I think Redtigerxyz too was raising that hypothetical only to explain the general principal that motivates wikipedia policy), or that you are adding this information to wikipedia in bad faith. However the fact, which we
481:
Please check the author tag of this article it says Knowledge Contributers, and not Yogesh Khandke. Every one of us owns authorship, I have found something, I have put it in the article, the reference is not good, you find a reference which is good enough and not just remove what is written like a
538:
To clarify, Vilas Manohar is NOT the X in the hypothetical example, the point I wanted to make is the person is not notable, "I found this blog while doing a Google search, it was the only one that has a few negative lines written about the project. That itself makes the blog notable" Sorry to
477:
There are a million lines on wikipedia without citations, some go around with the tag for years. As responsible editors and not vandals, I hope that you who have removed the above insertions, would please put them back, the reference perhaps is not wikistandard, please find one instead of just
473:
I had suggested that the blog be read, the writer has no grudge, the blog compliments the activities of the LBP. Please check for yourself. I too have no grudge, I myself have been to LBP, I have read the three books written by the Vilas Manohar. I have a copy of the wonderful CD Aranyatil
458:
Imagine X has a grudge against Y, so X writes a blog alleging Y's institution is corrupt. That does not mean that X's allegations are accurate or represent popular sentiment. If say X was a notable social worker or individual or a notable NGO, then the allegations can be included.
700:"Dr.Kanna Madavi, Dr.Pandurang Pungati, Dr.Komti Durwa, Dr.Sudhakar Wachami the Madia Gond tribal boys from the area completed their schooling at Hemalkasa. Dr. Digant and Aniket sons of Prakash and Mandakini, also completed their schooling at Hemalkasa." 505:
I agree that many wikipedia pages contain unsourced, dubious and even blatantly false claims; but that is not, and should not be, the standard by which we make editorial decisions. Of course, we should ideally search for sources ourselves,
808:, then I am wrong, the sarcasm and cockiness in which this thing is put forward points to the fact that I may have to eat my words. But I remember reading somewhere (wiki) that External References is a bad style, I may however be wrong. 153: 740:
All the references should be cited using an identical citation tag, I have used the tags but find them a little confusing at times, will somebody help in displaying all the references using an appropriate tag.
441:. This is basic wikipedia policy, which cannot be contravened in order to provide, so-called, balance. Either find some criticism from a reliable source, or don't include it; there is no third option. 378: 966: 984: 980: 603: 491: 147: 680:
school opened doors to the Madia. I hope what I wish to communicate is clear. The other Madia achievers are there in the image, please if you can read put them on the list.
401: 450: 723:
there because of the Ramon Magsaysay award. I have written to Marathi Manus to help us with the references. In the mean time I strongly suggest we have the section back.
387:
a blog alleges ..." Anybody's allegations are not worth putting on a wiki page, the allegations must be by a notable individual or organization or printed in
1056: 823:
Yogesh, my post was not intended to be sarcastic or cocky; only to state the facts as clearly and succinctly as possible. Since we agree on the reading of
431: 417: 854: 836: 732: 712: 644: 529: 408:
spirit. Not like a machine. Also it would have been better if you had discussed before, deletion. That is civility as we were in touch any way.
325: 1061: 666: 553: 465: 660:
is NOT. All articles are in Vithoba are to it's standard is an incorrect assumption. Every article is diff, and of a diff class (rating).--
44: 1032: 79: 892: 817: 962:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
168: 845:
says that if it is there it should not be duplicated in the Links. So removed. Please help fill the blank fields in the info box.
613:
Please place comments in the appropriate section so that the discussion can be followed easily by any redaer now or in the future.
478:
taking the text you do not like off, this is in the interests of Knowledge, if the reference is bad let it carry a tag. Please.
799: 135: 922: 1051: 942: 315: 580:
is full of hearsay and opinions. If something is good for a FA article it must be so for one that is just beginning its life.
85: 952: 932: 1066: 543:
or a reputable local daily like Maharashtra Times, Lokasatta or Samna then the criticism can be considered to be from a
1046: 30: 129: 914: 750: 689: 779: 755: 897: 125: 99: 983:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
502:
and therefore by long-standing and well-established wikipedia policy, its opinion should not be on the LBP page.
104: 20: 631:
Unless someone produces a reliable source for criticism of LBP, there is nothing more to discuss on the topic.
74: 175: 1027: 698:
By the way, the information is contained not only in the picture, but also on the LBP website, which says,
202: 482:
vandal. That is team work. Moreover it is a bad idea and prejudice to only target what one does not like.
343: 290: 280: 227: 65: 1002:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
913:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 235: 888: 850: 813: 746: 728: 685: 585: 487: 427: 413: 141: 1018: 539:
disagree but that does not make it notable, if the criticism by Vilas Manohar is covered by say,
422:
Wild swipes made at a district do, complementary statements do, uncomplimentary don't. Not fair.
109: 987:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
510:
deleting article content; and I did search on Google but didn't locate anything useful yet. See
1003: 910: 190: 804:
If Knowledge articles about any organization etc., should link to the subject's official site
617: 577: 573: 569: 990: 923:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090206180602/http://mahresult.nic.in/ssc2008/divi2/S2-SCHOL.HTM
208: 943:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090213135749/http://mahresult.nic.in/hsc2008/divi2/H2-COLP.htm
1010: 906: 24: 8: 884: 846: 832: 809: 795: 775: 742: 724: 708: 681: 640: 599: 581: 525: 483: 446: 423: 409: 55: 767:
says that "Knowledge articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity
515: 969:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 953:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090201005842/http://mahresult.nic.in/hsc2008/HS-OVALL.htm
933:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090205160704/http://mahresult.nic.in/ssc2008/SS-OVALL.htm
70: 1009:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
518: 926: 51: 946: 437:
I have again removed the section since it relies on a blog, which is not considered
661: 548: 460: 396: 161: 863: 842: 824: 764: 621: 520:
to see why leaving in unsourced, or poorly sourced information is bad practice.
956: 936: 828: 791: 704: 674: 636: 595: 540: 521: 442: 975:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1040: 787: 780:
agree the page you cited states that the official website should be linked.
544: 499: 438: 392: 388: 272: 391:
newspaper etc. The blog does not establish it's notability, also is not a
976: 511: 657: 565: 242: 288:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the 334: 653: 625: 561: 352: 256: 221: 771:
link to the subject's official site, if any." (emphasis added).
285: 572:, rules are to be interpreted by how they are practiced. Is 570:
http://www.kamat.com/database/content/hero-stones/index.htm
917:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
827:, we can readd the link and consider this issue resolved. 379:"Non-complementary comments on the Lok Briadari Prakalp" 695:
Took me a minute but I understand what you mean now! :)
160: 806:
means that it should be displayed as an external link
718:
writer of the blog Marathi Manus, or perhaps myself.
624:. The site is not used as a reference in this or the 498:
all agree on, remains that the blog is not upto the
342:
This article is not assigned to a workgroup. Please
262: 15: 979:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 927:http://mahresult.nic.in/ssc2008/divi2/S2-SCHOL.HTM 947:http://mahresult.nic.in/hsc2008/divi2/H2-COLP.htm 720:I wonder where Vilas Manohar came in the picture? 1038: 873:(if it is not already in an appropriate infobox) 564:a FA status article carries an internal link to 284:, which aims to improve Knowledge's coverage of 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 965:This message was posted before February 2018. 841:Inserted Infobox which displays the website, 174: 957:http://mahresult.nic.in/hsc2008/HS-OVALL.htm 937:http://mahresult.nic.in/ssc2008/SS-OVALL.htm 1057:Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance 188: 905:I have just modified 4 external links on 616:Discuss any issues you may have with the 1039: 1062:India articles without a WikiProject 568:, which carries reference to a blog 278:This article is within the scope of 184: 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 13: 360:This article was last assessed in 351: 333: 14: 1078: 909:. Please take a moment to review 790:in the External Links section ? 265: 255: 241: 234: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 786:So should we provide a link to 760:This is a minor point but ... 320:This article has been rated as 1: 1052:Low-importance India articles 42:Put new text under old text. 588:) 05:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 7: 1033:08:38, 5 January 2018 (UTC) 300:Knowledge:WikiProject India 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 1083: 1067:WikiProject India articles 996:(last update: 5 June 2024) 902:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 326:project's importance scale 303:Template:WikiProject India 1047:Stub-Class India articles 893:08:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 855:07:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 837:07:13, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 818:07:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 800:06:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 751:04:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 733:04:26, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 713:03:37, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 690:03:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 667:15:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 645:05:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 604:05:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 590:(comment moved here from 554:04:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 530:03:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 492:02:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC) 466:15:33, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 451:11:23, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 432:10:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 418:10:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 402:14:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 359: 341: 319: 250: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 756:Linking of official site 576:a peer reviewed source? 898:External links modified 877: 356: 346:with your suggestions. 338: 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 868: 355: 337: 100:Neutral point of view 977:regular verification 907:Lok Biradari Prakalp 879:Hope the infobox is 105:No original research 25:Lok Biradari Prakalp 967:After February 2018 776:User:Yogesh Khandke 1021:InternetArchiveBot 972:InternetArchiveBot 357: 339: 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 997: 788:LBP Official site 606: 500:required standard 376: 375: 372: 371: 368: 367: 281:WikiProject India 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1074: 1031: 1022: 995: 994: 973: 664: 589: 551: 463: 399: 308: 307: 304: 301: 298: 275: 270: 269: 268: 259: 252: 251: 246: 245: 244: 239: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 216: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1037: 1036: 1025: 1020: 988: 981:have permission 971: 915:this simple FaQ 900: 758: 677: 662: 622:Talk:Hero stone 549: 461: 397: 381: 305: 302: 299: 296: 295: 271: 266: 264: 240: 233: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1080: 1070: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1015: 1014: 1007: 960: 959: 951:Added archive 949: 941:Added archive 939: 931:Added archive 929: 921:Added archive 899: 896: 885:Yogesh Khandke 860: 859: 858: 857: 847:Yogesh Khandke 810:Yogesh Khandke 784: 783: 772: 757: 754: 743:Yogesh Khandke 738: 737: 736: 735: 725:Yogesh Khandke 702: 696: 682:Yogesh Khandke 676: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 648: 647: 634: 633: 632: 629: 614: 610:A few points: 582:Yogesh Khandke 559: 558: 557: 556: 541:Times of India 533: 532: 503: 484:Yogesh Khandke 471: 470: 469: 468: 435: 434: 424:Yogesh Khandke 420: 410:Yogesh Khandke 380: 377: 374: 373: 370: 369: 366: 365: 358: 348: 347: 340: 330: 329: 322:Low-importance 318: 312: 311: 309: 306:India articles 277: 276: 260: 248: 247: 231:Low‑importance 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1079: 1068: 1065: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1035: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1023: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1001: 1000: 999: 992: 986: 982: 978: 974: 968: 963: 958: 954: 950: 948: 944: 940: 938: 934: 930: 928: 924: 920: 919: 918: 916: 912: 908: 903: 895: 894: 890: 886: 882: 876: 874: 867: 865: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 839: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 821: 820: 819: 815: 811: 807: 802: 801: 797: 793: 789: 781: 777: 773: 770: 766: 763: 762: 761: 753: 752: 748: 744: 734: 730: 726: 721: 716: 715: 714: 710: 706: 703: 701: 697: 694: 693: 692: 691: 687: 683: 668: 665: 659: 655: 652: 651: 650: 649: 646: 642: 638: 635: 630: 627: 623: 620:reference at 619: 615: 612: 611: 609: 608: 607: 605: 601: 597: 593: 587: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 563: 555: 552: 546: 542: 537: 536: 535: 534: 531: 527: 523: 519: 516: 513: 509: 504: 501: 496: 495: 494: 493: 489: 485: 479: 475: 467: 464: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 448: 444: 440: 433: 429: 425: 421: 419: 415: 411: 406: 405: 404: 403: 400: 394: 390: 386: 385:Marathi Manus 363: 354: 350: 349: 345: 336: 332: 331: 327: 323: 317: 314: 313: 310: 293: 292: 287: 283: 282: 274: 263: 261: 258: 254: 253: 249: 229: 226: 223: 219: 218: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1019: 1016: 991:source check 970: 964: 961: 904: 901: 880: 878: 872: 869: 861: 805: 803: 785: 768: 759: 739: 719: 699: 678: 591: 560: 507: 480: 476: 472: 436: 384: 382: 362:January 2013 361: 321: 291:project page 289: 279: 273:India portal 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 881:appropriate 663:Redtigerxyz 550:Redtigerxyz 462:Redtigerxyz 398:Redtigerxyz 148:free images 31:not a forum 1041:Categories 1028:Report bug 658:Hero stone 566:hero stone 199:Stub-class 1011:this tool 1004:this tool 829:Abecedare 792:Abecedare 778:doesn't " 705:Abecedare 656:is a FA, 637:Abecedare 596:Abecedare 594:section. 522:Abecedare 443:Abecedare 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1017:Cheers.— 864:wp:ELYES 843:WP:ELYES 825:WP:ELYES 765:WP:ELYES 628:article. 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 911:my edit 654:Vithoba 626:Vithoba 562:Vithoba 324:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 769:should 675:Alumni 592:Alumni 508:before 205:scale. 126:Google 866:says 862:What 618:Kamat 578:Kamat 574:Kamat 545:WP:RS 514:, or 439:WP:RS 393:WP:RS 389:WP:RS 297:India 286:India 228:India 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 889:talk 851:talk 833:talk 814:talk 796:talk 774:But 747:talk 729:talk 709:talk 686:talk 641:talk 600:talk 586:talk 526:talk 512:WP:V 488:talk 447:talk 428:talk 414:talk 395:. -- 344:help 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 985:RfC 955:to 945:to 935:to 925:to 547:.-- 316:Low 176:TWL 1043:: 998:. 993:}} 989:{{ 891:) 883:. 875:. 853:) 835:) 816:) 798:) 749:) 731:) 711:) 688:) 643:) 602:) 528:) 517:, 490:) 459:-- 449:) 430:) 416:) 156:) 54:; 1030:) 1026:( 1013:. 1006:. 887:( 849:( 831:( 812:( 794:( 782:" 745:( 727:( 707:( 684:( 639:( 598:( 584:( 524:( 486:( 445:( 426:( 412:( 383:" 364:. 328:. 294:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Lok Biradari Prakalp
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
India
WikiProject icon
India portal

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.