Talk:Middle Francia

2429:

title Emperor. This ruler, Lothair I, divided his own kingdom into three for his sons on his death (855), although the eldest son, Louis II, had already been given the rule of Italy (which was a kingdom of its own and always had been since the Frankish conquest of 774, but it was also a part of the middle realm created in 843) and had been crowned co-Emperor in 844. The region of Provence (which was already well-defined) was given to the youngest son, Charles, and the rest was left intact for the middle son, Lothair II. It is this remainder, which corresponds to nothing which had previously existed (unlike Italy and Provence) which came to be called Lotharingia (because it endured long enough to need a name, in a way Middle Francia never did). Middle Francia was an ephemeral hodgepodge of regions created to put an end to a civil war. After a dozen years it was broken up: but a rump of it, equally hodgepodge, was retained as a kingdom for a younger son. This is why simply redirecting Middle Francia to

789:

other hand, Lotharingia is described as "a region in northwest Europe, comprising the Low Countries, the western Rhineland, the lands today on the border between France and Germany, and what is now western Switzerland." This indicates that Lotharingia was not a separate kingdom or independent nation, but just a region or territory of land. Also, the article states that "it was born of the tripartite division in 855 of the kingdom of Middle Francia" saying that Lotharingia became an independent state after Middle Francia existed, but during the time that Middle Francia was its own kingdom, Lotharingia was just a region within it. Therefore, this shows, at least to me, that Middle Francia and Lotharingia were two, separate, historical entities, and thusly, in my opinion, they should not be merged together into a single article. My regards,

2421:

with citations. If the above is true please provide a reliable third party source which backs up your statements. On the other articles where you a have adopted the same approach, your views have to date been show to be eccentric at best, false at worst so don;t be surprised if your point of view is not taken at face value without some form of verification. I have no interest in this article other than to check that normal wikipedia standards are maintained. At the moment we finally have some citations here, but the source is at least questionable. I am going to check the sequence of events when I get into a LIbrary at some stage this week. For the moment you would do this article a great service if you would find some sources that back up the statements you are making and the article itself.

3462:

delete the "mental-illness" comment as well, that sort of language has got many an editor blocked. You really need to pay attention to requests for sources. So far you have produced maps that do not even show "Middle Francia" but do show Lotharingia. You have referenced a google list that mentions the name in several cases, but that is very ambiguous. You also seem to be using the maps as original research which is not allowed on Knowledge. As I pointed out above one of them states that it developed into Lotharingia which would support the merger proposal. From what I can see so far it would be sufficient to describe the events of the Treaty of Verdun and then use the history of Lotharingia, Bergundy etc. where appropriate. There may be a case for a stub but you haven't made it yet. --

1214:

which is unsourced and uncited. And, as Srnec said earlier, Middle Francia had "no special capital, flag, currency, foreign affairs, ministry, etc. It was a ninth-century western European jurisdiction with no antecedents and no descendants, save Lotharingia, which was just as makeshift and pragmatic. Its history is no more than the biography of Lothair after 843." Simply, that's the reason why the Middle Francia article, full of unnecessary background and epilogue, should be merged into Lotharingia, which has all of the important information regarding Middle Francia but with sources and citations and excluding all of this background and epilogue. My regards,

412: 391: 1447:"Middle Francia" and are redirected to "Lotharingia" should be able to read the section on Middle Francia and get everything the article has to say about it. Some of that could be fixed by simply moving most of what is in the lead about Middle Francia to the section, and leaving behind a summary (i.e., what is supposed to be in a lead). More broadly, to see what is and is not included, it actually takes going fact by fact and making sure that they are all included. It is not mine or Laurinavicius's duty to do that job. Preserving content is the job of whomever does the transfer, presumably you, Srnec. - 527: 422: 2135: 712:, especially since near contemporaries weren't even sure to which Lothair the term referred. I preformed the merger and I can assure Rrius that no useful and true information was lost. If he thinks otherwise, can he cite the lost information? And the two "oppose votes" look rather silly telling the proposer that Lotharingia is only a part of Middle Francia, since the proposal specifically asks that the difference between them be covered at Lotharingia, which it currently is. 345: 327: 1010:

its jurisdiction, which only gives a brief description of the kingdom. Yes, there should be a portion of the Lotharingia article that gives information regarding the region while it was under the dominance of Middle Francia. But no, the entire Middle Francia article should not be merged with Lotharingia just because there is a brief description of Middle Francia in the Lotharingia article. Middle Francia deserves its own article. My regards,

191: 243: 222: 2156:

nothing to do with Middle Francia. He was already King of Italy, which was, on the theories being advanced here, a sub-subkingdom of the subkingdom of Middle Francia, I guess. If Lotharingia, which was far larger than Lorraine, can be merged into the latter acceptably, why can't Middle Francia be merged into Lotharingia? You just don't know what you're talking about. Some knowledge of the subject matter would help greatly.

253: 517: 496: 1078:(843) and until his death. Its history is no more than the biography of Lothair after 843. It has no special capital, flag, currency, foreign affairs, ministry, etc. It is a ninth-century western European jurisdiction with no antecedents and no descendants, save Lotharingia, which was just as makeshift and pragmatic. (Provence and Italy existed before, during and after Middle Francia.) In essence it was 3596:

or has no idea it is going on. The result of the previous discussion was to preserve the status quo for the time being. There has not been sufficient time to step back and evaluate, so I think that we should continue to preserve the status quo for the time being or, at most, trim this article back a bit. Moving from a 3–3 tie to 4–3 in favour of a merger is not consensus. -

735:. This came to my attention 11 days later, so I reverted and contributed to the discussion. A month later, September 25, 2009, User:Spshu disagreed with the merger on this talk page. Then, 10 hours later, Srnec argued for the merge, calling the the opposing arguments "silly" because they disagree with the initial post. Just over a day later, he again made this a redirect. 1774:

Louis II, was given Italy and the Imperial Frankish crown. The youngest, Charles, received Provence. The middle son, Lothair II, received the lands north of Provence. Now, just like Middle Francia, Lothair's new domain lacked both an ethnic and a linguistic unity. Because of this, contemporaries were unsure of how to name this new kingdom, and so, ultimately named it

862:

regarding the sub-kingdom would be discluded from the merge and ultimately deleted. This just seems absurd to me! And, Srnec, I feel that there is a need to speak of what became of Middle Francia after Lothair I's death, as it gives a complete history of Middle Francia. Just ending the information abruptly with his death is not what should be done. My regards,

3278:, Eighth Edition, (This edition contains all maps of the Seventh Revised and Enlarged Edition and a special suppliment of historical maps for the period since 1929 prepared by C. S. Hammond and Company), Published by the Colonial Offset Co., Inc., Pikesville, Maryland, Sole Distributors Barnes and Nobles Inc., New York, N.Y., pp. 226, (1956). 3866:, Eighth Edition, (This edition contains all maps of the Seventh Revised and Enlarged Edition and a special suppliment of historical maps for the period since 1929 prepared by C. S. Hammond and Company), Published by the Colonial Offset Co., Inc., Pikesville, Maryland, Sole Distributors Barnes and Nobles Inc., New York, N.Y., pp. 226, (1956). 1891:

antecedents and no descendants, save Lotharingia, which was just as makeshift and pragmatic." Thus, it's much more feasible to move all of the key information and details to Lotharingia, and leave all of the background and epilogue, which make up a susbstantial majority of the Middle Francia article, behind. My regards,

1782:, which means "kingomd Lothair's" (a reference to Lothair I). Also, Lotharingia was certainly a state! It was its own independent kingdom from 855-925, then a duchy and a state of the Holy Roman Empire from 925 to 1737, when it was ceded by the HRE to France after the War of the Polish Succession. My regards, 2569:. I am as I said going to check this when I get into a library. That is probably showing you more respect than you deserve given your poor record on other pages. That aside, you really have to learn (aside from formatting) that the Knowledge woks off sources not the opinions of individual editors. -- 4159:

is contemporary—then it can refer to Lotharingia alone as much as to all of Lothair's realm. For this reason I argued above that the two pages should be merged. "Middle Francia" is really just the first phase in the history of Lotharingia, when it was attached to Burgundy, Provence and Italy. Lothair

3024:

That citation uses "Middle Francia" as a term within an article under another name. I can't see any dispute that the name exists, the question is if the article should be merged or not. I am still neutral on that issue but I don't see you presenting any evidence. As far as I can see, looking at the

2787:

All you have done there ArmChair is to repeat what you said before. You have still failed to provide any citations, I have again had to remove excessive white space and use indentations for you. Smec, it would help if you could also provide a reference on this which can settle the dispute - and I

2433:

is the most efficient option. Contemporaries did not even know whether the term "Lotharingia" arose in reference to the first Lothair or the second, evidencing the fact that the creation of Lotharingia and Middle Francia were the same event, only that the latter kingdom also contained the old regions

2129:

is an acceptable English name for Lotharingia dispite being source on the Lotharingia article. Austrasia and Lorraine are better canididates for Lotharingia to merge with than Middle Francia (Francia Media). Middle Francia should have been reunited under Louis II as his younger brothers died before

904:

First of all, once again, Lotharingia does not do a complete job of dealing with the information at this article. Whatever you think, some of what Middle Francia was will only make sense here. Whether it overlaps other articles is beside the point. Someone who wants to learn about what Middle Francia

743:

does not have all the information. For example, the entire last paragraph is not included there and would not make sense there. Finally, this is a topic that is unlikely to draw much attention on its own, so we should draw attention to it in larger forums. I'll give notice of the issue at the related

4087:

In 844, Lothair I ceded the Kingdom of Italy to his son Louis II, who ruled it as nominally independent. (Riché, P. 1993 "The Carolingians" Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press. p.179) Significance: In conjunction with the circulation breakdown between the north and Italy, implies that Middle

4083:

In 847, Lothair I visited Rome following a major Muslim 846 raid, which was his last visit south of the Alps. (Costambeys, M. 2011 "The Carolingian World." Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. p.391) Significance: No direct political control would have been exerted on the southern areas, suggesting

3595:

To address the particular count, I disagree. We just had a discussion about this not long ago that ended with three supporting a merger and three opposing it. I have basically ignored the discussion because it didn't seem to be covering any new ground. I presume Spshu has either similarly ignored it

3557:

I'm fine with stubbifying the article by cutting out all of the background and epilogue, but I still would prefer merging/re-directing the article into Lotharingia, as all of the important and relevant information is just a duplicate of information found on other pages. However, Snowded's compromise

1096:

OH! I understand now! I said earlier that I was no expert on this subject and I just completely proved that here. I understood this incorrectly and thought that the information on Lotharingia and Middle Francia suggested that they existed at the same period of time, which is what completely threw me

957:. Your argument makes very little sense. "Middle Francia" is a term that has historical meaning. It makes no sense to have readers going to the "Middle Francia" section of "Lotharingia" to find part of the story (not even all of the Middle Francia-related material in that article is in that section). 807:

There is no use talking about "independent nations" in Carolingian Europe. Middle Francia was a division of the empire, probably never expected to last very long and certainly not designed to break up the single empire. Lotharingia was as much a kingdom (land ruled by a king) as Middle Francia after

738:

First of all, there is clearly a discussion to be had before a merger. Merging almost immediately after the proposal and very shortly after a second editor argues against the merger is improper. Wait for consensus. Second, it would be best to address the actual points made. Both of us argued that it

3921:

You made exactly the same point above with more or less identical words. You are now repeating it and you are not addressing the issue of citation in any way. You can't go from a map to a statement that something it notable. You are not (and todate never have) addressed the issue. Please follow

3792:

You use a map to establish that a name exists, marginal and not really a reliable source. That needs books or papers. You use that as evidence of notability, it says nothing about notabilituy. All we have is your assertion, on the other side we have citations. I have put a new welcome notice on

3461:

I'm just trying to show you by example how Knowledge editors as asked to format talk pages ArmChair. Your previous failure to comply with those was one of the reasons behind you last block. I'll leave the formatting of your list, but have indented your above paragraph per guidlines. I suggest you

3333:

I am not sure how two map catalogues constitute a reference. The map you have now referenced several times (and the additional one above) supports the merger as far as I can see, so do some of the Google Book references. One for examples states that it as a precursor of Lotharingia which supports

2428:

Eccentric is a kind way of putting it. I would have called it bullshit from one who doesn't know what he's talking about. It's true that in 843 the Frankish realm was divided (geographically) into three kingdoms for three kings, with the ruler of the middle kingdom (Middle Francia) also bearing the

2278:

The source is borderline reliable, but it's all that I had to work with at the moment, which is why I used it. I plan on replacing it with a more reliable source in the near-future. The only reason I have not yet done so is the fact that I'm working on several term papers that have kept me occupied

1773:

Yes, the Frankish Empire was divided into three separate sub-divisions by the Treaty of Verdun. That much is true. However, Lothair I, who ruled Middle Francia, created, on his deathbed, the Treaty of Prüm. This treaty divided the realm into three partitions for each of Lothair's sons. The eldest,

1357:

or elsewhere on Knowledge. If someone looking for information about Middle Francia can't go to one article and find all the information one would expect to find in an article on Middle Francia, then a merger is wholly unjustifiable. You say you made sure all "pertinent information" was "mentioned".

1009:

Srnec, it's simple: during this time period, Lotharingia was a region and Middle Francia was an independent kingdom. There were two different historical entities! It just seems absurd to me to re-direct an entire article, full of information on a kingdom, to the article of one of the region's under

994:

Finally, will you stop redirecting this article before there is consensus? Your having made a contribution on this talk page is absolutely not consensus, yet that seems to be the trigger for each of your premature mergers. Whether it is arrogance or sneakiness that causes you to do it, please stop.

788:

are two separate entities. Just look in each article's opening sentence: in the former article, Middle Francia is described as "a short-lived realm created for Emperor Lothair I (843-855) wedged between East Francia and West Francia" meaning that Middle Francia is its own independent nation. On the

772:

I also feel that Rrius was also right in posting notices on the WikiProject talk pages that these articles are a part of. Drawing attention in larger forums is necessary for more editors to assess each side's arguments and then make a decision on which side to support, which is especially necessary

3744:

No one disputes the term ArmChair, the issue is notability. Also deriving material in the way you describe from a map is original research (OR). At the moment I see several citations from people in support of the merger which relate to notability, longevity etc. All I see from you is a constant

2420:

ArmChair, you are a disruptive editor with a poor history of ignoring WIkipedia rules and getting multiple blocks in both your current and new persona. You should not be surprised when other editors keep a track on your edits. All I see from you above is a series of statements without any backup

1372:

By "pertinent" information, I meant both relevant and important to Middle Francia. While I see that both Lothair I and Lotharingia do contain the key portions of information, many of the important details have been left out. These details must be included in Lotharingia and/or Lothair I before any

4126:

This is not so. "infobox former country" is just the name of the template, the term is not displayed anywhere on the page if it is transcluded. There were no "countries" in the modern sense in the medieval period to begin with, but there would be no point in creating an identical template called

4039:

In order to objectively resolve the past issue of Middle Francia as a political entity, I propose the following list for all involved editors to post their research on Lothair I's governmental relationship with his agglomeration of land as defined by the 843 Treaty of Verdun. Please keep evidence

3124:

I would not say "one and the same", but the connexion is sufficiently close because Lotharingia was the only part of Middle Francia that was created by the Treaty of Verdun. The other parts, Provence and Italy, had histories and were merely attached to the miscellaneous lands of Lotharingia for a

1182:

There is no material here that is not somewhere else in this encyclopedia. As it should be. There is nothing "uniquely" Middle Frankish that would only belong here. There is, in fact, nothing more that could be added. As I said, and as Laurinavicius seems now to realise, nothing can be said about

1163:

The fact that the information overlaps with other articles is immaterial. If it were wholly covered by "Lotharingia" and only relevant to that, that would be one thing. In fact, there is material in "Middle Francia" that is not in "Lotharingia", and Middle Francia is relevant to a number of other

1024:

Oh, one more thing. Srnec, you asked me earlier to define "independent sub-kingdom", so I will. Middle Francia, in several articles that I read, is described as an independent kingdom or independent sub-division of the Frankish Empire. So, "independent sub-kingdom" is a combination of the two, as

4079:

Mints throughout Middle Francia were non-standardized, and had extremely small outputs of coins. A breakdown in circulation occurred between Italy and the north. Hoards of West Frankish coins existed throughout middle Francia. (Coupland, S. 2007 "Carolingian Coinage and the Vikings." Aldershot:

3985:

No info box, no piplinks for other articles. Possible reference to related articles to help navigation. Smec, you seem to have the best handle on referenced material and the weather is keeping me away from the University Library. Can you sharpen it up? Given some of the nonsense above I am

2614:

Statements 2 and 3 are both false. Middle Francia was partitioned into three for the three sons of Lothair I. After that it did not exist. Burgundy was not one of those paritions. Nor was Lombardy, nor Friesland. The term "half-breed" is ridiculously out of place in this discussion. And kingdoms

2193:

I must say that I concur with Rrius here: this discussion has been going on for a lengthy period of time, there is no consensus for a merge, and there appears to be no possibility of a consensus in the foreseeable future. Therefore, I support his suggestion of just leaving the article be for the

1890:

The history of Middle Francia is little more than just a biography describing Lothair I between 843 and 855. As Srnec and I have both said earlier, Middle Francia had "no special capital, flag, currency, foreign affairs, ministry, etc. It was a ninth-century western European jurisdiction with no

1685:

Ahh, that is the exact same way that I felt previously. However, there is one piece of crucial information that makes your line of argument incorrect: Lotharingia technically did not exist under the rule of Middle Francia. Lotharingia was "born of the tripartite division in 855 of the kingdom of

1213:

Exactly! Every piece of important information on Middle Francia is already contained, and cited, in both the Lotharingia and Lothair I articles. Meanwhile, the article on Middle Francia contains mostly background and epilogue information and much less information on Middle Francia itself, all of

2155:

Lotharingia is a rump of Austrasia in the same way it is a rump of the Roman Empire. And what was it about Aachen that made it the capital of Middle Francia? Was it where the legislature sat? Or the supreme court? Or where the king spent most of his time? Louis II's being crowned co-emperor has

1446:

My first hint on picking up some of what isn't there is to read over what has been said on this talk page. Another is to compare the article here with the section called "Middle Francia" at Lotharingia. Since the kingdom Lotharingia is not the same thing as Middle Francia, people who search for

3572:

I'm fine with stubbing it, but I'm still not convinced by this "it replicates information from three other pages" argument. Someone who wants to find out about this topic shouldn't have to go traipsing about the project to find the information. Having this page here, which explains what Middle

3513:

At the moment it would appear that we have three editors in favour of merger, supported by several citations. Against that we have one editor using maps in a form of original research. I suppose a possible compromise is to leave a one paragraph stub with links. I'm open to that but happy to

885:

article currently explains Middle Francia, the circumstances of its formation and of its breakup, but as it was never a natural unit, only a historiographic term for the divison of the empire ruled by Lothair I directly as king, there is no using speaking of it except in connexion to the years

846:

You've got it all wrong. It was a part of Francia even after 843, since the Empire remained. I never said it was a part of Lotharingia, although some historians call it the "Lotharingian axis". What true information isn't merged? You mentioned the last paragraph, but it's not even about Middle

2177:

This discussion has been going in earnest on for a month now. There are three people who support merger (Wetman, Srnec, and Laurinavicius) and three who oppose (Spshu, AVD, and me)—there was actually one more who opposed, but he or she left the project in part due to the ham-fisted way Srnec

861:

I concur with Rrius here. It seems to me that, to put it simply, this merge proposal serves to put a portion of the information regarding an independent sub-kingdom of the Frankish Empire within the article regarding a region which was included within this sub-kingdom, while some information

1307:

Also, there are sources for this information at both articles. While, there are no paranthetical citations (which I mistakenly said there were previously), there are both references and external links (particularly in Lotharingia) that the reader can view in order to validate the article's

739:

seems wrong to handle the whole in the article devoted to one or all of the parts. Address why that seems actually necessary. Third, I also mentioned that Middle Francia was an actual kingdom, and the term is used in discussing it (as opposed to "that forerunner of Lothuringia"). Third,

812:

be explained in one article, which is by far the most efficient way to do it, since the two cannot be separate in any historical account and there is not enough to say about Middle Francia to justify a separate article. That is why this article is complete (and unsourced) duplication.

1303:

You're right, pertinent information that is not mentioned in either Lotharingia or Lothar I definitely should, if the merge is carried out, be moved from this article to the article with which this one is merged into, whether it be Lotharingia or Lothar I. A re-direct alone would not

2279:

for the past few days and will continue to do so for the next several days, so I won't have the time to do so. In the meantime, I'll add several more citations from the Riddle source, as that is much more relialbe. Srnec, the term can be found on pages 208-211. My regards,

827:

It is of use talking about independent nations. After the division, its territory as no longer ruled as part of Francia. It was a distinct realm. And, again, it was certainly not a part of Lotharingia. Quite the opposite. Finally, not all the information is duplicated at

2178:

originally carried out the merger. To my mind, the current situation, which does not appear to be changing, shows no consensus in favour of a merger. I think the best course is to allow this article to exist for the time being and revist the issue at some point. -

1164:

topics, including Lothair and the various successor states. Moreover, anyone seeking to add information on the topic of Middle Francia is not likely to do so while it is a subtopic of "Lotharingia", or is likely to be stopped if he or she does on grounds of

679:

Lotharingia is only one of the subparts of Middle Francia. It is its own historical entity, and the term is used in discussing it. I can only imagine that is what the question "does this term have historical use" means, but it is so vague, I can't be sure.

1284:. It is incumbent upon the person performing the merger to find and preserve that information. What's more, I will not accept "it's not sourced" for a reason to refuse any more than I do for the merger in the first place. Absolutely nothing is sourced at 1234:

Lotharingia contain the information shows that this should not be a redirect to one of them. Instead, this article should be improved to contain the sourced material those do. Knowledge isn't about deleting imperfect articles; it is about improving them.

808:

855. But it was a duchy (land ruled by a duke) in 925. Lotharingia did not exist before 855, just as Middle Francia is not spoken of after that date. They were two separate historical entities—but that's just what Wetman admitted when he asked that the

3083:, while some were alluding to his son Lothar II." It goes on to add that while historians unanimously use it in the latter sense, the term "Lotharingian axis" is sometimes a synonym for "Middle Francia". On p. 313 in the same volume it refers to "that 763:

here, the way this matter went about is completely inappropriate. Before such a decision on whether or not to merge these pages was made and carried out, there needs to be time for discussion on the talk page and for a consensus to be reached. Twice,

4154:

Middle Francia was definitely a territory, but I'm not sure it was a state. The kingdom was defined at Verdun in 843, but the next year Lothair gave Italy to his son. If Middle Francia is a modern scholarly construct—and I don't believe the term

4138:

transcluded by the template, unfortunately, is the "states and terrories" category, often leading to redlinks, but not in this case. I seriously doubt that you will be able to dispute that Middle Francia happened to be a "state or territory".

876:

What is the meaning of "independent sub-kingdom"? Everybody understands perfectly what the merge is about, but unlike you and Rrius I believe that since no article on Middle Francia can be anything more than a stub, a duplication of a part of

1344:

First, once again, a bibliography is not the same as in-line references. Second, not all the information is included. I've pointed out some above, but even a comparison of the length of this article and the anemic "Middle Francia" section of

4184:

This article provides 3 references. Two mention the subject, however they do not seem to support the depth of this article. So I've tagged it as requiring footnotes, requiring more sources, and also as possibly containing original research.

768:

has merged these two articles together after little discussion had been made, after barely any time had elapsed, and without anything near to a consensus, which is simply improper! That is not how merging, and this encyclopedia and general,

2869:

A map is not a reference ArmChair, it may establish the name but there is no material on weight, if this article should be merged or anything else. You need reputable sources (books, academic papers) to support any position on Knowledge.

609:. Simply, a consensus could not be reached amongst the six editors who participated in the discussion, who were split half-and-half between supporting and opposing the merge proposal. Thus, the article remains as it is for the moment. 3530:

I think the arguments for a merge (i.e. redirect) are stronger, but as a participant I cannot be the final judge. My opposition to the very existence of this page is that it can be nothing but a duplication of material either at

1280:(Outdent) If this is eventually merged (as appears to be the direction this is moving in), it needs to actually be merged. That requires more than simply making this a redirect. There is material in this article that is not at 1082:. It was a solution to a problem of the inheritance of Louis the Pious's sons: they retained a united empire but each got his own sphere of royal influence. There is nothing more to say. This is why it is best just to merge. 2230:

I'm not impressed with that source, but plan to look up the subject when I get a chance over the next few days. For the moment at least someone has put in one source. If its not reliable then I will propose for deletion.

4080:

Variorum Collected Study Series. p.191-193) Significance: Lothair exercised little economic control over Middle Francia, and the people living there traded using the currency of, and thus with the people of, West Francia.

773:

on a lesser-known topic, like this one. Otherwise, most editors (like myself) would never have come across this debate and it likely would have remained deadlocked with little possibility of a consensus being reached.

3986:

happy to support a merge as well as this compromise Given that the only citations say that the two terms are used interchangeably then any a reference to a review by other editors would probably support a merge--

153: 1690:

after 843". Thus, the information on this page, which is entirely unsourced, should be merged/re-directed into Lotharingia or Lothair I, both of which have sources and citations for this information. My regards,

1052:

It just seems absurd to me to re-direct an entire article, full of information on a kingdom, to the article of one of the region's under its jurisdiction, which only gives a brief description of the kingdom.

881:'s article, or excessively padded with "background" and "epilogue", it is conveniently merged into Lotharingia ("Lothair's kingdom", sometimes thought to refer to Lothair I by contemporaries). The current 3610:

I looked at the previous discussion and saw much opinion and little citation. Knowledge doesn't simply work from votes, and I am not sure if you can count editors not contributing the this debate. --

3185:

Is there a rule that all kingdoms, no matter how ephemeral, must have articles of their own? Remember, this is the early Middle Ages. It is hard to distinguish the kingdom from the king at times.

3079:, vol. 3, we read that contemporaries "did not agree on which ruler this name referred to. Some, when speaking of the 'kingdom of Lothar', intended to refer to the Emperor Lothar I and hence to 4058:

London: Royal Historical Society. Fifth Series, Vol. 35, p.80) Significance: Lothair I had international political relations, and potentially a military (or the more common system of war bands).

1405:

I just feel that there are some details that are in Middle Francia that should be added into Lotharingia before any move would take place. If you want specific ones, I'll give them. My regards,

1183:

Middle Francia that cannot be said of Lothair I's reign after 843. They are practically synonymous. It hurts because it doesn't help the reader to sort things out and put things in context. The

1358:

Pertinent to what? To Lotharingia? What did you exclude? On what basis. If we do move to a point where we merge, I will demand that you justify each and every fact you seek not to preserve. -

4069:

New York: Oxford University Press. p.75) Significance: A system of centralized rule would have been non-extant without the use of conventional royal tours, or a reasonable facsimile of such.

4054:

In 847, Lothair I, with Charles the Bald and Louis the German met at Meerssen, and sent an embassy to the Danish king requesting a cessation of his raids on Frankish land. (Reuter, T. 1985

1097:

off. Now, after having a more complete understanding of the material, I am better able to formulate an educated opinion on the merge proposal. Therefore, I change my vote from "Oppose" to

3573:

Francia was, where it came from, and what happened to it, allows people to get the basics, then move on to whichever facet interests them. To me that is preferable to sending them to

1991: 731:

This has been handled wholly inappropriately. On August 15, 2009, User:Wetman put a merger tag on article page. A mere 16 hours later, User:Srnec merged by making this a redirect to

931:

and in a section title "Middle Francia". It couldn't be easier. When Lothair I died, Middle Francia ceased to have any meaning as a political unit and it has no history after that.

4076:

Oxford: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Vol. 23, No. 3, p.326) Significance: Small subdivisions of land in the Middle Francia region could operate effectively without superior control.

1373:

possible merger should take place. I still support the merge proposal, but I agree with Rrius that a large amount of work must be done before any merger could occur. My regards,

2085:

Yes, the entire article is simply background and epilogue, as both Srnec and I have stated numerous times. There is little meaningful information in this article. My regards,

4002:

I think I can live with a simple navigational stub. I will do something about this hopefully later today and then we can see if everybody else can live with the result. —

147: 4034: 3543:. There is nothing unique to be said. But if someone can change that in the future with secondary sources of which I am unaware, it can obviously be re-article-ized. — 1493:

Good. Now, we need to tally the support and oppose votes and see if there is a consensus to merge or not to merge before a merge is possibly carried out. My regards,

905:

was shouldn't have to read all of Lothair's article and the articles of each of the three realms formed from it. Furthermore, if this were to be a redirect why would

583: 2565:

Making one of my periodic attempts to teach you the basic conventions of editing I have formatted your above comment. In response, a simple and blunt statement"

4127:"medieval political entity" just to satisfy people obsessing over the correct nomenclature in the name of transcluded templates. There is nothing wrong with 2125:

was crown co-ruler/Emperor with Lothiar, so there was more to Middle Francia than just Emperor Lothair I. You, Srnec (and Wetman), also ignore the fact that

1943: 1900: 1791: 1700: 356:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please 927:

that should be contained in a separate article on Middle Francia? Be specific. If they want to know what Middle Francia was, it is described in the lead at

478: 3932: 3916: 3803: 3787: 3755: 3739: 3694: 3679: 3657: 3642: 3472: 3447: 3344: 3035: 2975: 2942: 2880: 2864: 2798: 2609: 2579: 2414: 2061: 1984: 1928: 1884: 1058:. It happened to be more enduring than the equally makeshift polity known as Middle Francia. The two never existed at the same time. Middle Francia is 4103: 2754: 2624: 2548: 2443: 2080: 2002: 4261: 3106:

These reliable, scholarly sources clearly indicate that Lotharingia and Middle Francia are one and the same, and thus, should be merged. My regards,

573: 3647:

Deal with content Armchair don't attack other editors. I have yet to see you provide any reliable source evidence on this subject. Please try --

309: 4266: 4065:

had been entirely replaced by smaller counties, a significant influence in the partitions established by the Treaty of Verdun. (O'Brien, P. 2010

3793:

your user page. I suggest you spend some time reading it. Oh and you still haven't either withdrawn or justified the personal attacks above --

3327: 3248: 4256: 4231: 357: 2745:

the above 3 statements again. They are correct. I have a question to ask ... "Srnec, what is your first-language" (i.e., 'Mother-Tongue').

3075:(Bristol: Wyndham Hall, 1985) refers to the "territory of Lotharingia (Lorraine), the original middle inheritance north of the Alps". In the 4241: 4226: 4108: 468: 1767: 1679: 549: 1686:

Middle Francia", as stated in the its article. As Srnec put it, the history of Middle Francia "history is no more than the biography of

1054:" This demonstrates a misunderstanding on your part, and a pretty bad one. There was no Lotharingia before 855, when it was created for 4251: 4148: 79: 4236: 3586: 3567: 3148: 3134: 3115: 2302: 2288: 2225: 2203: 2150: 2108: 2094: 1528: 1502: 1488: 1470: 1400: 1382: 1349:(and even giving due consideration to MF's brief treatment in the lead) indicates that this article is not completely encompassed in 1339: 1317: 1244: 1223: 1177: 1110: 1091: 1034: 1019: 899: 871: 822: 798: 647: 633: 3912: 3783: 3735: 3675: 3638: 3443: 3323: 3244: 2971: 2938: 2860: 2750: 2605: 2544: 2410: 2057: 1980: 1924: 1880: 1763: 1675: 4216: 4173: 1797: 299: 4160:

is perhaps under-studied compared to his brothers and I am not aware that he treated his entire realm as a unity: it was more a

4026: 4011: 3620: 3605: 3552: 3500: 3194: 3139:

You're right, "one and the same" was a poor choice of words on my part. "Sufficiently close" is much, much better. My regards,

2259: 2241: 886:

843–55. There is no Middle Francia after his death. The history of its components is (or should be) covered elsewhere (e.g. at

540: 501: 444: 352: 332: 44: 3684:

Evidence Armchair or withdraw that. You really seen set on another lengthly block. I suggest you withdraw those comments --

3100: 2187: 689: 4246: 4221: 3334:

the text in that article, and would again support the merger. However there may be a case for renaming any merged article --

2273: 2165: 1456: 1367: 1208: 1004: 940: 918: 856: 841: 721: 703: 168: 85: 4072:

Nobility were established in individual farming communities to integrate newly conquered Frankish lands. (Moreland, J. 1992

4211: 135: 2615:

don't mother other kingdoms. Your use of scare-quotes only suggests that you don't really know what you're talking about.

3908: 3779: 3745:

repetition of the same map and a failure to deal with the OR question. I also see no withdrawal of personal attacks. --

3731: 3671: 3634: 3439: 3319: 3240: 2967: 2934: 2856: 2746: 2601: 2540: 2434:

of Italy and Provence, which had pre-existed it. (Lothair I had been King of Italy since 815, if I remember correctly.) —

2406: 2053: 1976: 1920: 1876: 1759: 1671: 2293:

I added The New Cambridge Medieval History as a source. That should be sufficiently reliable, I presume? :) My regards,

30: 3981:

and the "Lotharingian axis (ref to New Cambridge Medieval History) is sometimes seen as a synonym for Middle Francia.

2216:

a reliable source? Is this a joke? And on what page of the more reliable Riddle can I find the term "Middle Francia"?

3201: 1025:

Middle Francia was its own independent nation, and a sub-division or sub-kingdom of the Frankish Empire. My regards,

435: 396: 275: 3878: 3765: 3704: 3298: 2926: 2836: 2736: 1039:

Why do you say "There were two different historical entities!" as if that is being denied? This article is full of

3524: 4117: 99: 3177: 129: 4124: 673: 618: 104: 20: 3514:

support a merge. Unless new evidence is advanced and/or new editors engage we should really close this off. --

1440: 1297: 945:

I stated above where you can find the information that isn't included, but I tire of repeating of myself. The

753: 3922:

WIkipedia guidelines for formatting talk page. Please pay attention to WIkipedia standards for evidence. --

3224: 2130:

him, not a scant mention of this at the Lotharingia article even though you declare that subsection complete.

946: 74: 1538: 4194: 266: 227: 202: 125: 887: 638:

In this case, the terms "move request" and "merge proposal" essentially mean the same thing. My regards,

65: 4164:

of territories that had no time to develop into a more unified monarchy (unlike East and West Francia).

4123:

presupposes that the article is about a "former country" according to some strict or narrow definition.

3314: 2071:

about the period between 843 and 855. That would be the only period when Middle Francia even existed.

175: 3996: 3508: 1055: 1862:, in other words nominal Imperial unity (and Lordship over his two brothers lands) was maintained. 411: 390: 1330:

article when I performed the merge unilaterally. That is why all we need do is create a redirect.

847:

Francia! There is (almost) no need speaking of Middle Francia after the death of Lothair I (855).

548:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

443:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

274:

on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3893: 3874: 3849: 3563: 3360: 3261: 3257: 3158: 3144: 3111: 2930: 2298: 2284: 2199: 2090: 1939: 1896: 1787: 1696: 1498: 1466: 1410: 1378: 1313: 1219: 1106: 1030: 1015: 867: 794: 655: 643: 614: 190: 109: 3297:, Histoire Et Géographie - Atlas Général Vidal-Lablache, Librairie Armand Colin, Paris, (1898). 1168:. It does not hurt anything to have this article, so I don't see the reason for this proposal. - 2966:"The districts between Neustria and Austrasia were called Media Francia or simply Francia." 2933:(in his book) would certainly qualify as a bone-fide reference wouldn't you say eh Snowded? 208: 4197: 4128: 141: 4099: 3071:(London: Hambledon Press, 1986) reads "Middle Kingdom, see Lotharingia". Otis C. Mirchell, 2456:

To Snowded, and Srnec. Please inspect the statements below, and point out any falsehoods,

1990:

A viable basis has been offered, but you don't understand the history. Here's a good link:

1475:

I said above: "I made sure all pertinent information was mentioned, and then some, in the

708:

It is an ephemeral historical entity and there is no use in treating it separately of the

8: 4144: 55: 3974: 3559: 3306: 3209: 3140: 3107: 2294: 2280: 2195: 2086: 1935: 1892: 1783: 1692: 1494: 1462: 1406: 1374: 1309: 1215: 1102: 1063: 1026: 1011: 950: 863: 790: 639: 610: 427: 70: 3087:

which had now become Lotharingia." I believe all of this information is found in the

3173: 2122: 545: 51: 4189: 3970: 3536: 2948: 1843: 1563: 1075: 669: 600: 3558:

proposal seems like the best thing to do at this time, in my opinion. My regards,

2194:

moment and possibly bring up the merge proposal in the future. My regards to all,

1461:

Yes, the person who performs the merger should be the one to do this. My regards,

161: 4169: 4095: 4007: 3601: 3582: 3548: 3496: 3190: 3130: 3096: 3064: 2737:

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/shepherd/carolingian_empire_843_888.jpg

2620: 2439: 2269: 2255: 2221: 2183: 2161: 2146: 2104: 2076: 1998: 1559: 1524: 1484: 1452: 1436: 1396: 1363: 1335: 1293: 1240: 1204: 1173: 1165: 1087: 1000: 936: 914: 895: 852: 837: 818: 749: 717: 699: 685: 629: 440: 4161: 4140: 3897: 3886: 3772: 3718: 3427: 3419: 3395: 3383: 3232: 3220: 3202: 2955: 2844: 2705: 2680: 2667: 2508: 2483: 2470: 2400: 2367: 2342: 2329: 2043: 2035: 2028: 1962: 1954: 1910: 1866: 1851: 1825: 1809: 1798: 1753: 1709: 1657: 1622: 1582: 1548: 781: 24: 4205: 780:

the merger. Though I am no expert on this topic, it seems obvious to me that

532: 258: 776:

Now, on to my opinion of the merger. Once again, I agree with Rrius here: I

4017: 3987: 3960: 3923: 3794: 3746: 3725: 3711: 3685: 3648: 3611: 3515: 3463: 3387: 3379: 3335: 3236: 3228: 3216: 3169: 3026: 2963: 2871: 2848: 2840: 2789: 2671: 2663: 2570: 2474: 2466: 2333: 2325: 2232: 1966: 1958: 1855: 1847: 1821: 1817: 1606: 1570: 1326:

I made sure all pertinent information was mentioned, and then some, in the

421: 2134: 4186: 3978: 3973:

as the Middle inheritance (ref. Mitchell) following the collapse of the

3574: 3540: 3488: 3407: 3367: 3088: 2720: 2688: 2539:

You both will have to look hard, because the above statements are true.

2523: 2491: 2430: 2382: 2350: 2114: 2047: 2024: 1950: 1749: 1730: 1665: 1629: 1618: 1586: 1552: 1476: 1428: 1388: 1350: 1346: 1327: 1285: 1281: 1184: 1044: 928: 924: 906: 882: 829: 785: 740: 732: 665: 661: 1288:, despite the assertions above. Bibliographies are not the same thing. - 694:

Don't Agree with merger. Lotharingia is only a part of Middle Francia.

4165: 4003: 3597: 3578: 3544: 3492: 3186: 3126: 3092: 2616: 2435: 2265: 2251: 2217: 2179: 2157: 2142: 2100: 2072: 1994: 1812:

serves a purpose. It clearly records one of the successor-states that

1520: 1480: 1448: 1432: 1392: 1359: 1331: 1289: 1236: 1200: 1169: 1083: 996: 932: 910: 891: 848: 833: 814: 765: 760: 745: 713: 695: 681: 625: 4046:

Number and extent of royal tours undertaken by Lothair I prior to 847.

4179: 3532: 3403: 2716: 2684: 2519: 2487: 2378: 2346: 2121:. Additionally, Middle Francia had a capital, Aachen. Additionally, 2118: 1687: 1354: 1071: 878: 3315:

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/history_shepherd_1923.html

344: 326: 3415: 3411: 2728: 2724: 2696: 2692: 2531: 2527: 2499: 2495: 2390: 2386: 2358: 2354: 2126: 1196: 954: 3969:

Middle Francia was a short lived entity formed as a result of the

4113:

Srnec, I think you are under the mistaken impression that use of

3371: 2712: 2659: 2515: 2462: 2374: 2321: 2038:

deserves its own article (i.e., the one it already has). I will

1970: 1859: 1839: 1835: 1829: 1813: 1638: 1610: 1590: 1067: 1043:

information all of which is available—sourced—elsewhere, like at

242: 221: 2567:

Produce citations for your opinions or please. oh please shut up

1574: 271: 4074:

Integration and Social Reproduction in the Carolingian Empire.

744:

project pages, please add it anywhere else you can think of. -

660:

Does this term have historical use? Why not combine this with

3295:

Le partage de l'Empire carolingien au Traité de Verdun en 843

1913:

deserves its own article (the one it presently has). I will

1647: 1598: 1594: 1519:

As I've said, though, it's not all there. You missed stuff. -

516: 495: 4084:

its de facto independence from Middle Francia following 847.

3422:

has more than passed the threshold for its own article, and

1733:

was never a State, it was an invented name for a portion of

2399:

Snowded is only here, being a "****", because I would like

1934:

Your opinion is not a viable counter-argument. My regards,

1816:

was partitioned into (the other two successor-states being

3073:

Two German crowns: monarchy and empire in medieval Germany

1710:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Treaty_of_Verdun_-ca.svg

1353:. It is not enough to say that some of it is contained at 4088:

Francia's rule was never, in practice, extended to Italy.

949:

ceased to have any meaning as a political unit after the

2099:

Which is a reason to improve it, not to get rid of it. -

1969:

have the virtue of being direct descendants of "Mother"

1195:(realm of Lothair I) and its endings in the province of 1191:

known as "Lothair's realm", which has its beginnings in

544:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 3487:

Currently "Middle Francia" is boldened in the lead of

1858:... Lothar retained the style and title of Emperor of 832:, and a lack of references is not a reason to merge. - 160: 4040:

concise in order to ensure an effective resolution.

3307:

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/index.html

3288:, Henry Holt and Company, New York, pp. 80, (1932). 1391:

article that needs to be said about Middle Francia.

1387:

It's still not clear to me what is missing from the

522: 439:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 417: 270:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 248: 15: 3223:comes up at lot eh. Next, here is a damn map ok. 3168:merging. A short-lived Kingdom is still a Kingdom. 4035:Research on the Political Status of Middle Francia 2788:suggest you ignore the mother-tongue nonsense. -- 1479:article when I performed the merge unilaterally." 4131:other than the coins shown in the "flag" slots. 2067:You'll notice that the article as it stands says 4203: 3454:****ing around with my formatting, ... it shows 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2403:kept as an article (thus he wants it killed). 2246:What are you two talking about? Who mentioned 2012:. I simply do not agree with the merger that 4056:Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 3721:(between the brown-line, and the green-line), 3434:. Snowded, I am tried of talking to you ... 2113:Looking at the 1991 Encyclopedia Brittanica, 1865:It is very important to keep this article on 174: 3069:Politics and ritual in early medieval Europe 2264:It's the source being used in the article. 1949:You have offered no viable basis to favour 1187:article is essentially about the rise of a 188: 3977:. The area north of Alps became known as 3965:Its time we sorted this. How about this: 3402:and its subsequent fragmentation produced 2600:Snowded, you are incredibly ill-mannered. 1566:(843) into three sister allied Kingdoms, 4262:Mid-importance European history articles 3426:have made any rationale case as to why 1427:No need to give them, just add them to 4267:All WikiProject European history pages 4204: 953:, so perhaps it should be merged with 558:Knowledge:WikiProject European history 366:Knowledge:WikiProject Former countries 4257:Start-Class European history articles 4232:WikiProject Former countries articles 4061:By 800, the residual system of Roman 3370:. His maps support the existance of 3025:map supports a merger if anything -- 2715:and its "half-breed" children (i.e., 2518:and its "half-breed" children (i.e., 2377:and its "half-breed" children (i.e., 1748:If a merging is to occur, then merge 923:What information is not contained at 561:Template:WikiProject European history 369:Template:WikiProject Former countries 3286:Atlas of Medieval and Modern History 1431:and then redirect this title there. 538:This article is within the scope of 433:This article is within the scope of 350:This article is within the scope of 264:This article is within the scope of 184: 4242:Mid-importance Middle Ages articles 4227:Start-Class former country articles 3869:this map (which is on p. 56 of the 3418:(i.e., Northern Italy). In short, 605:The result of the move request was 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 13: 1869:as a separate article, and I will 14: 4278: 4252:All WikiProject Middle Ages pages 3728:(to the right of the green-line), 3359:of was constitutes a reference. 453:Knowledge:WikiProject Middle Ages 4237:Start-Class Middle Ages articles 3714:(to the left of the brown-line), 3491:, which I think is sufficient. — 2248:The Middle Ages for Know-It-Alls 2214:The Middle Ages for Know-It-Alls 2133: 1824:). Lothar was not just King of 1668:is asinine, and frankly stupid. 525: 515: 494: 456:Template:WikiProject Middle Ages 420: 410: 389: 343: 325: 251: 241: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1621:consisted only of a portion of 664:, explaining the difference? -- 578:This article has been rated as 473:This article has been rated as 304:This article has been rated as 4217:Mid-importance France articles 4198:08:30, 24 September 2023 (UTC) 3909:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 3780:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 3732:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 3672:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 3635:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 3440:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 3430:can not at least have its own 3320:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 3241:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 3077:New Cambridge Medieval History 2968:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 2935:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 2857:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 2747:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 2602:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 2541:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 2407:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 2054:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 1977:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 1921:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 1877:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 1760:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 1672:ArmchairVexillologistDonLives! 857:02:09, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 842:02:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 823:01:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 799:15:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 754:04:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 722:23:00, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 704:13:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 4174:14:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 4149:13:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC) 4027:20:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 4012:20:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3997:20:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3933:18:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3917:16:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3804:16:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3788:16:31, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3756:14:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3740:14:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3695:14:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3680:13:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3658:13:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3643:13:23, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3621:07:26, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3606:00:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 3587:20:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 3568:20:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 3553:05:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 3525:08:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3501:06:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3473:07:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3448:06:51, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3345:05:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3328:06:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3249:16:28, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 3195:20:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 3178:14:34, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 3149:07:25, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3135:06:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3116:06:12, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3101:06:05, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 3036:05:21, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 2976:03:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 2943:05:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 2881:18:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 2865:16:14, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 2799:07:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 2755:03:50, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 2625:20:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 2610:06:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 2580:06:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 2549:06:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 2444:22:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 2415:16:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 2303:02:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 2289:00:35, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 2274:22:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 2260:15:17, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 2242:06:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 2226:04:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 1846:843 made Charles the King of 1230:The very fact that Lothair I 947:Confederate States of America 648:00:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 634:04:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 552:and see a list of open tasks. 447:and see a list of open tasks. 278:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 4247:Start-Class history articles 4222:All WikiProject France pages 4042:1. Areas Requiring Research 3885:? As well the existance of 3771:? As well the existance of 2204:01:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2188:01:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2166:04:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 2151:14:19, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 2109:01:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 2095:14:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 1529:01:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 1503:04:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 1489:04:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 1471:01:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 1457:16:36, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 1441:01:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 619:01:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC) 541:WikiProject European history 353:WikiProject Former countries 284:Knowledge:WikiProject France 7: 4212:Start-Class France articles 3456:mental-illness on your part 3256:(Note: some are written by 2081:02:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC) 2062:02:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC) 2003:00:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC) 1985:08:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1944:06:53, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1929:06:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1901:05:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1885:04:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1792:01:03, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 1768:08:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1701:07:33, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1680:04:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1401:00:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC) 1383:05:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1368:05:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1340:03:49, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1318:03:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1298:01:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1245:01:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1224:00:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC) 1209:02:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 1178:01:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 1111:04:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1092:02:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC) 1035:23:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 1020:23:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 1005:23:03, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 941:20:35, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 919:20:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 900:23:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 888:Kingdom of Italy (medieval) 872:17:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 690:04:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 624:There was no move request. 287:Template:WikiProject France 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 4283: 4109:"infobox" misunderstanding 3357:you are not the sole Judge 3268:would accept, eh Snowded? 3219:search, Please note that 2008:Srnec ... I do understand 1653:Hence, the merging of the 584:project's importance scale 479:project's importance scale 310:project's importance scale 4104:12:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 3856:would accept, eh Snowded? 3239:. There ... happy now? 2023:Write all you want about 1737:that was land-grabbed by 1658:Kingdom of Middle Francia 1623:Kingdom of Middle Francia 1583:Kingdom of Middle Francia 1308:information. My regards, 1062:than the division of the 577: 564:European history articles 510: 472: 405: 338: 303: 236: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 3881:How is reading this map 3378:), and the existance of 2031:alone. The short-lived 1854:, and Louis the King of 1562:was partitioned via the 674:23:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC) 4067:Atlas of World History. 3894:William Robert Shepherd 3875:William Robert Shepherd 3850:William Robert Shepherd 3670:as a matter of course. 3664:veiled personal attacks 3625:So once again Snowded, 3361:William Robert Shepherd 3262:William Robert Shepherd 3258:William Robert Shepherd 2931:William Robert Shepherd 2851:. There ... is that a 1828:he was also Emperor of 1776:regnum quondam Lotharii 1607:Kingdom of East Francia 1593:, thin-strip along the 1571:Kingdom of West Francia 1543:Sigh, here goes .... I 436:WikiProject Middle Ages 372:former country articles 4118:Infobox former country 3424:neither you, nor Srnec 1717:was divided into (i). 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 4050:2. Cited Information 3862:William R. Shepherd, 3662:Snowded, you deal in 3284:William R. Shepherd, 3274:William R. Shepherd, 2662:was partitioned into 2465:was partitioned into 2324:was partitioned into 1850:, Lothar the King of 1646:thin-strip along the 100:Neutral point of view 3631:only one that counts 2835:Snowded, Do you see 2708:is the link between 2683:later broke up into 2511:is the link between 2486:later broke up into 2370:is the link between 2345:later broke up into 1739:Francia Occidentalis 1719:Francia Occidentalis 459:Middle Ages articles 105:No original research 3363:is an authority on 1842:. Even though the 1662:smaller-subdivision 3975:Carolingian Empire 3668:borderline sarcasm 3436:put-up, or shut-up 3432:stub-of-an-article 2839:. This map shows 1838:you say? Yes ... 1743:Francia Orientalis 1727:Francia Orientalis 1539:AVD's intervention 1064:Carolingian Empire 951:American Civil War 428:Middle Ages portal 267:WikiProject France 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 4147: 4025: 3995: 3931: 3883:Original Research 3802: 3769:Original Research 3754: 3693: 3656: 3619: 3523: 3509:Current situation 3471: 3343: 3214:"quick-and-dirty" 3034: 2879: 2797: 2578: 2240: 1560:Empire of Francia 1101:. Happy editing! 598: 597: 594: 593: 590: 589: 546:history of Europe 489: 488: 485: 484: 384: 383: 380: 379: 320: 319: 316: 315: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 4274: 4143: 4122: 4116: 4024: 4022: 3994: 3992: 3971:Treaty of Verdun 3930: 3928: 3871:Historical Atlas 3864:Historical Atlas 3852:is an authority 3801: 3799: 3753: 3751: 3692: 3690: 3655: 3653: 3618: 3616: 3537:Treaty of Verdun 3522: 3520: 3470: 3468: 3342: 3340: 3276:Historical Atlas 3264:is an authority 3033: 3031: 2949:Treaty of Verdun 2878: 2876: 2796: 2794: 2577: 2575: 2239: 2237: 2137: 2020:are advocating. 1844:Treaty of Verdun 1808:This article on 1801:serves a purpose 1564:Treaty of Verdun 1076:Treaty of Verdun 909:be the target? - 566: 565: 562: 559: 556: 555:European history 535: 530: 529: 528: 519: 512: 511: 506: 502:European history 498: 491: 490: 461: 460: 457: 454: 451: 430: 425: 424: 414: 407: 406: 401: 393: 386: 385: 374: 373: 370: 367: 364: 363:Former countries 358:join the project 347: 340: 339: 333:Former countries 329: 322: 321: 292: 291: 288: 285: 282: 261: 256: 255: 254: 245: 238: 237: 232: 224: 217: 216: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 4282: 4281: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4202: 4201: 4182: 4120: 4114: 4111: 4037: 4018: 3988: 3963: 3924: 3795: 3747: 3701:valid reference 3686: 3649: 3612: 3516: 3511: 3464: 3336: 3207: 3161: 3159:Struck comments 3065:Janet L. Nelson 3027: 2872: 2790: 2571: 2233: 1803: 1780:Lotharii regnum 1609:(i.e., most of 1573:(i.e., most of 1547:the merging of 1541: 1047:, for instance. 710:regnum Lotharii 658: 656:Merger proposal 603: 563: 560: 557: 554: 553: 531: 526: 524: 504: 458: 455: 452: 449: 448: 441:the Middle Ages 426: 419: 399: 371: 368: 365: 362: 361: 290:France articles 289: 286: 283: 280: 279: 257: 252: 250: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 4280: 4270: 4269: 4264: 4259: 4254: 4249: 4244: 4239: 4234: 4229: 4224: 4219: 4214: 4181: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4162:personal union 4110: 4107: 4094: 4093: 4092: 4090: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4070: 4059: 4048: 4047: 4041: 4036: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4029: 3962: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3940: 3939: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3898:Middle Francia 3896:thought that 3887:Middle Francia 3867: 3857: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3819: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3773:Middle Francia 3729: 3722: 3719:Middle Francia 3715: 3708: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3510: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3428:Middle Francia 3420:Middle Francia 3398:existed from 3396:Middle Francia 3384:Middle Francia 3348: 3347: 3233:Middle Francia 3221:Middle Francia 3206: 3203:Middle Francia 3200: 3199: 3198: 3160: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3125:brief period. 3119: 3118: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2956:Middle Francia 2945: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2855:for you eh? : 2845:Middle Francia 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2770: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2739: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2706:Middle Francia 2700: 2681:Middle Francia 2675: 2668:Middle Francia 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2582: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2509:Middle Francia 2503: 2484:Middle Francia 2478: 2471:Middle Francia 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2423: 2422: 2401:Middle Francia 2368:Middle Francia 2343:Middle Francia 2330:Middle Francia 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2291: 2207: 2206: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2131: 2111: 2044:Middle Francia 2042:any merger of 2036:Middle Francia 2029:Middle Francia 2027:... and leave 2006: 2005: 1963:Middle Francia 1955:Middle Francia 1947: 1946: 1911:Middle Francia 1909:In my opinion 1904: 1903: 1867:Middle Francia 1852:Middle Francia 1826:Middle Francia 1810:Middle Francia 1802: 1799:Middle Francia 1796: 1795: 1794: 1754:Middle Francia 1704: 1703: 1651: 1650: 1643: 1642: 1634: 1633: 1615: 1614: 1603: 1602: 1579: 1578: 1549:Middle Francia 1540: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1321: 1320: 1305: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1211: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1048: 1022: 975: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 802: 801: 782:Middle Francia 774: 770: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 657: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 602: 599: 596: 595: 592: 591: 588: 587: 580:Mid-importance 576: 570: 569: 567: 550:the discussion 537: 536: 520: 508: 507: 505:Mid‑importance 499: 487: 486: 483: 482: 475:Mid-importance 471: 465: 464: 462: 445:the discussion 432: 431: 415: 403: 402: 400:Mid‑importance 394: 382: 381: 378: 377: 375: 348: 336: 335: 330: 318: 317: 314: 313: 306:Mid-importance 302: 296: 295: 293: 276:the discussion 263: 262: 246: 234: 233: 231:Mid‑importance 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 25:Middle Francia 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4279: 4268: 4265: 4263: 4260: 4258: 4255: 4253: 4250: 4248: 4245: 4243: 4240: 4238: 4235: 4233: 4230: 4228: 4225: 4223: 4220: 4218: 4215: 4213: 4210: 4209: 4207: 4200: 4199: 4196: 4193: 4192: 4188: 4175: 4171: 4167: 4163: 4158: 4157:Francia media 4153: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4146: 4142: 4137: 4132: 4130: 4129:this revision 4125: 4119: 4106: 4105: 4101: 4097: 4086: 4082: 4078: 4075: 4071: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4057: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4045: 4044: 4043: 4028: 4023: 4021: 4015: 4014: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 4000: 3999: 3998: 3993: 3991: 3983: 3982: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3966: 3934: 3929: 3927: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3914: 3910: 3906: 3902: 3899: 3895: 3891: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3868: 3865: 3861: 3858: 3855: 3851: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3805: 3800: 3798: 3791: 3790: 3789: 3785: 3781: 3777: 3774: 3770: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3758: 3757: 3752: 3750: 3743: 3742: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3730: 3727: 3723: 3720: 3716: 3713: 3709: 3706: 3702: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3691: 3689: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3677: 3673: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3660: 3659: 3654: 3652: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3617: 3615: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3603: 3599: 3594: 3588: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3560:Laurinavicius 3556: 3555: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3521: 3519: 3502: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3474: 3469: 3467: 3460: 3459: 3457: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3425: 3421: 3417: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3346: 3341: 3339: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3316: 3313: 3309: 3308: 3305: 3301: 3300: 3296: 3293: 3289: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3277: 3273: 3269: 3267: 3263: 3260:). I presume 3259: 3255: 3251: 3250: 3246: 3242: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3215: 3211: 3204: 3197: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3150: 3146: 3142: 3141:Laurinavicius 3138: 3137: 3136: 3132: 3128: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3108:Laurinavicius 3105: 3104: 3103: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3085:Francia media 3082: 3081:Francia media 3078: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3063:The index of 3037: 3032: 3030: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2960:Media Francia 2957: 2953: 2950: 2947:Prior to the 2946: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2882: 2877: 2875: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2800: 2795: 2793: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2738: 2735: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2711: 2707: 2704: 2701: 2698: 2694: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2679: 2676: 2673: 2669: 2665: 2661: 2658: 2655: 2654: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2581: 2576: 2574: 2568: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2514: 2510: 2507: 2504: 2501: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2482: 2479: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2457: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2432: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2392: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2373: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2295:Laurinavicius 2292: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2281:Laurinavicius 2277: 2276: 2275: 2271: 2267: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2238: 2236: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196:Laurinavicius 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2139:Oppose Merger 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087:Laurinavicius 2084: 2083: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2021: 2019: 2018:Laurinavicius 2015: 2011: 2010:"the History" 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1936:Laurinavicius 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1916: 1912: 1907: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1893:Laurinavicius 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1872: 1868: 1863: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1806: 1800: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1784:Laurinavicius 1781: 1777: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1755: 1751: 1746: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1735:Francia Media 1732: 1728: 1725:, and (iii). 1724: 1723:Francia Media 1720: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1707: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1693:Laurinavicius 1689: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1669: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1656: 1649: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1635: 1631: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1624: 1620: 1612: 1608: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1581: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1565: 1561: 1556: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1495:Laurinavicius 1492: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463:Laurinavicius 1460: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1412: 1408: 1407:Laurinavicius 1404: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1375:Laurinavicius 1371: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1310:Laurinavicius 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1216:Laurinavicius 1212: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1193:Francia media 1190: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1103:Laurinavicius 1100: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1027:Laurinavicius 1023: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012:Laurinavicius 1008: 1007: 1006: 1002: 998: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 921: 920: 916: 912: 908: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 889: 884: 880: 875: 874: 873: 869: 865: 864:Laurinavicius 860: 859: 858: 854: 850: 845: 844: 843: 839: 835: 831: 826: 825: 824: 820: 816: 811: 806: 805: 804: 803: 800: 796: 792: 791:Laurinavicius 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 762: 759:I agree with 758: 757: 756: 755: 751: 747: 742: 736: 734: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 706: 705: 701: 697: 693: 692: 691: 687: 683: 678: 677: 676: 675: 671: 667: 663: 649: 645: 641: 640:Laurinavicius 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 623: 622: 621: 620: 616: 612: 611:Laurinavicius 608: 585: 581: 575: 572: 571: 568: 551: 547: 543: 542: 534: 533:Europe portal 523: 521: 518: 514: 513: 509: 503: 500: 497: 493: 492: 480: 476: 470: 467: 466: 463: 446: 442: 438: 437: 429: 423: 418: 416: 413: 409: 408: 404: 398: 395: 392: 388: 387: 376: 359: 355: 354: 349: 346: 342: 341: 337: 334: 331: 328: 324: 323: 311: 307: 301: 298: 297: 294: 277: 273: 269: 268: 260: 259:France portal 249: 247: 244: 240: 239: 235: 229: 226: 223: 219: 218: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 4190: 4183: 4156: 4135: 4133: 4112: 4091: 4073: 4066: 4062: 4055: 4049: 4038: 4019: 3989: 3984: 3968: 3967: 3964: 3925: 3904: 3901:A.D. 843-855 3900: 3889: 3882: 3870: 3863: 3859: 3853: 3796: 3775: 3768: 3761: 3748: 3726:West Francia 3712:West Francia 3700: 3687: 3667: 3663: 3650: 3630: 3626: 3613: 3517: 3512: 3465: 3455: 3451: 3435: 3431: 3423: 3400:A.D. 843-855 3399: 3391: 3388:East Francia 3380:West Francia 3375: 3364: 3356: 3337: 3318: 3311: 3310: 3303: 3302: 3294: 3291: 3290: 3285: 3281: 3280: 3275: 3271: 3270: 3265: 3253: 3252: 3237:East Francia 3229:West Francia 3217:Google Books 3213: 3208: 3184: 3165: 3163: 3162: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3072: 3068: 3062: 3028: 2959: 2951: 2873: 2852: 2849:East Francia 2841:West Francia 2791: 2742: 2709: 2702: 2677: 2672:East Francia 2664:West Francia 2656: 2572: 2566: 2512: 2505: 2480: 2475:East Francia 2467:West Francia 2459: 2405: 2396: 2395: 2371: 2364: 2363: 2339: 2338: 2334:East Francia 2326:West Francia 2318: 2317: 2247: 2234: 2213: 2176: 2138: 2068: 2052: 2039: 2032: 2022: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2007: 1975: 1967:East Francia 1959:West Francia 1957:. At least 1948: 1919: 1917:any merger. 1914: 1908: 1906:I disagree. 1905: 1875: 1873:any merger. 1870: 1864: 1856:East Francia 1848:West Francia 1834: 1822:East Francia 1818:West Francia 1807: 1804: 1779: 1775: 1758: 1747: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713: 1708: 1705: 1670: 1661: 1655:larger-whole 1654: 1652: 1616: 1557: 1544: 1542: 1426: 1279: 1231: 1192: 1188: 1098: 1079: 1060:nothing more 1059: 1051: 1040: 809: 777: 737: 730: 709: 659: 607:no consensus 606: 604: 579: 539: 474: 434: 351: 305: 265: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 3979:Lotharingia 3575:Lotharingia 3541:Lotharingia 3489:Lotharingia 3408:Lotharingia 3368:Cartography 3089:Lotharingia 2954:, the term 2853:"reference" 2721:Lotharingia 2689:Lotharingia 2524:Lotharingia 2492:Lotharingia 2431:Lotharingia 2383:Lotharingia 2351:Lotharingia 2115:Lotharingia 2048:Lotharingia 2025:Lotharingia 1951:Lotharingia 1750:Lotharingia 1731:Lotharingia 1666:Lotharingia 1630:Netherlands 1619:Lotharingia 1597:, Northern 1587:Netherlands 1553:Lotharingia 1477:Lotharingia 1429:Lotharingia 1389:Lotharingia 1351:Lotharingia 1347:Lotharingia 1328:Lotharingia 1286:Lotharingia 1282:Lotharingia 1185:Lotharingia 1045:Lotharingia 929:Lotharingia 925:Lotharingia 907:Lotharingia 883:Lotharingia 830:Lotharingia 786:Lotharingia 741:Lotharingia 733:Lotharingia 662:Lotharingia 450:Middle Ages 397:Middle Ages 199:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 4206:Categories 4096:Xuxalliope 3890:is notable 3854:"that you" 3848:I presume 3776:is notable 3764:this map, 3627:your voice 3365:Historical 3266:"that you" 3254:References 3227:map shows 3205:references 3091:article. — 2653:To Srnec, 2117:is a rump 2033:Kingdom of 1589:, Eastern 1074:after the 1056:Lothair II 810:difference 4063:civitates 4016:Thanks -- 3905:"notable" 3699:As per a 3533:Lothair I 3404:Friesland 3394:). Now, 2964:existance 2962:) was in 2717:Friesland 2685:Friesland 2520:Friesland 2488:Friesland 2379:Friesland 2347:Friesland 2212:You call 2119:Austrasia 1688:Lothair I 1660:into the 1355:Lothair I 1072:Lothair I 1070:ruled by 1041:unsourced 879:Lothair I 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 3879:this map 3766:this map 3705:this map 3416:Lombardy 3412:Burgundy 3392:A.D. 843 3376:A.D. 843 3355:Snowded 2952:A.D. 843 2927:this map 2837:this map 2729:Lombardy 2725:Burgundy 2710:"Mother" 2697:Lombardy 2693:Burgundy 2532:Lombardy 2528:Burgundy 2513:"Mother" 2500:Lombardy 2496:Burgundy 2391:Lombardy 2387:Burgundy 2372:"Mother" 2359:Lombardy 2355:Burgundy 2127:Lorraine 2123:Louis II 1721:, (ii). 1637:Eastern 1625:namely, 1304:suffice. 1197:Lorraine 1166:WP:UNDUE 955:Virginia 601:Untitled 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 4020:Snowded 3990:Snowded 3926:Snowded 3903:, was 3892:(i.e., 3797:Snowded 3762:reading 3760:How is 3749:Snowded 3724:(iii). 3688:Snowded 3651:Snowded 3629:is the 3614:Snowded 3518:Snowded 3466:Snowded 3458:, eh). 3450:(P.S., 3372:Francia 3338:Snowded 3170:GoodDay 3029:Snowded 2958:(i.e., 2874:Snowded 2792:Snowded 2743:re-read 2741:Please 2713:Francia 2660:Francia 2573:Snowded 2516:Francia 2463:Francia 2375:Francia 2322:Francia 2235:Snowded 2069:nothing 1971:Francia 1860:Francia 1840:Francia 1836:Francia 1830:Francia 1814:Francia 1715:Francia 1639:Belgium 1611:Germany 1591:Belgium 1585:(i.e., 1099:Support 1068:Francia 582:on the 477:on the 308:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 4180:Tagged 3717:(ii). 3666:, and 3414:, and 3390:(post 3386:, and 3235:, and 3166:oppose 2925:A map 2847:, and 2727:, and 2695:, and 2670:, and 2530:, and 2498:, and 2473:, and 2389:, and 2357:, and 2332:, and 2040:oppose 1965:, and 1915:oppose 1871:oppose 1820:, and 1805:Look. 1741:, and 1575:France 1545:oppose 1189:region 1080:ad hoc 778:Oppose 666:Wetman 281:France 272:France 228:France 205:scale. 126:Google 4166:Srnec 4134:What 4004:Srnec 3710:(i). 3598:Rrius 3579:Rrius 3545:Srnec 3539:, or 3493:Srnec 3374:(pre 3187:Srnec 3127:Srnec 3093:Srnec 2617:Srnec 2436:Srnec 2266:Srnec 2252:Rrius 2218:Srnec 2180:Rrius 2158:Srnec 2143:Spshu 2101:Rrius 2073:Srnec 2046:into 1995:Srnec 1953:over 1752:into 1648:Rhine 1599:Italy 1595:Rhine 1551:into 1521:Rrius 1481:Srnec 1449:Rrius 1433:Srnec 1393:Srnec 1360:Rrius 1332:Srnec 1290:Rrius 1237:Rrius 1201:Srnec 1170:Rrius 1084:Srnec 997:Rrius 933:Srnec 911:Rrius 892:Srnec 849:Srnec 834:Rrius 815:Srnec 769:work! 766:Srnec 761:Rrius 746:Rrius 714:Srnec 696:Spshu 682:Rrius 626:Srnec 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 4187:siro 4170:talk 4145:(𒁳) 4100:talk 4008:talk 3961:Stub 3913:talk 3907:). 3784:talk 3736:talk 3676:talk 3639:talk 3602:talk 3583:talk 3564:talk 3549:talk 3497:talk 3452:stop 3444:talk 3324:talk 3299:here 3245:talk 3225:This 3212:, a 3210:Here 3191:talk 3174:talk 3145:talk 3131:talk 3112:talk 3097:talk 2972:talk 2939:talk 2861:talk 2751:talk 2703:(3). 2678:(2). 2657:(1). 2621:talk 2606:talk 2545:talk 2506:(3). 2481:(2). 2460:(1). 2440:talk 2411:talk 2397:(4). 2365:(3). 2340:(2). 2319:(1). 2299:talk 2285:talk 2270:talk 2256:talk 2222:talk 2200:talk 2184:talk 2162:talk 2147:talk 2105:talk 2091:talk 2077:talk 2058:talk 2016:and 1999:talk 1981:talk 1940:talk 1925:talk 1897:talk 1881:talk 1832:. 1788:talk 1764:talk 1706:No. 1697:talk 1676:talk 1617:Now 1558:The 1525:talk 1499:talk 1485:talk 1467:talk 1453:talk 1437:talk 1411:talk 1397:talk 1379:talk 1364:talk 1336:talk 1314:talk 1294:talk 1241:talk 1220:talk 1205:talk 1174:talk 1107:talk 1088:talk 1031:talk 1016:talk 1001:talk 937:talk 915:talk 896:talk 868:talk 853:talk 838:talk 819:talk 795:talk 784:and 750:talk 718:talk 700:talk 686:talk 670:talk 644:talk 630:talk 615:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 4141:dab 3877:), 3873:of 3778:. 3577:. - 3438:. 2929:by 2393:). 2250:? - 2014:you 1778:or 1729:. 1664:of 1232:and 890:). 574:Mid 469:Mid 300:Mid 176:TWL 4208:: 4172:) 4139:-- 4136:is 4121:}} 4115:{{ 4102:) 4010:) 3915:) 3786:) 3738:) 3703:, 3678:) 3641:) 3633:. 3604:) 3585:) 3566:) 3551:) 3535:, 3499:) 3446:) 3410:, 3406:, 3382:, 3326:) 3247:) 3231:, 3193:) 3176:) 3164:I 3147:) 3133:) 3114:) 3099:) 3067:, 2974:) 2941:) 2870:-- 2863:) 2843:, 2753:) 2731:). 2723:, 2719:, 2691:, 2687:, 2666:, 2623:) 2608:) 2547:) 2534:). 2526:, 2522:, 2494:, 2490:, 2469:, 2442:) 2413:) 2385:, 2381:, 2361:. 2353:, 2349:, 2336:. 2328:, 2301:) 2287:) 2272:) 2258:) 2231:-- 2224:) 2202:) 2186:) 2164:) 2149:) 2141:. 2107:) 2093:) 2079:) 2060:) 2050:. 2001:) 1993:. 1983:) 1973:. 1961:, 1942:) 1927:) 1899:) 1883:) 1790:) 1766:) 1756:. 1745:. 1699:) 1678:) 1555:. 1527:) 1501:) 1487:) 1469:) 1455:) 1439:) 1399:) 1381:) 1366:) 1338:) 1316:) 1296:) 1243:) 1222:) 1207:) 1199:. 1176:) 1109:) 1090:) 1033:) 1018:) 1003:) 939:) 917:) 898:) 870:) 855:) 840:) 821:) 797:) 752:) 720:) 702:) 688:) 672:) 646:) 632:) 617:) 156:) 54:; 4195:o 4191:χ 4185:— 4168:( 4098:( 4006:( 3911:( 3860:. 3782:( 3734:( 3707:, 3674:( 3637:( 3600:( 3581:( 3562:( 3547:( 3495:( 3442:( 3322:( 3312:. 3304:. 3292:. 3282:. 3272:. 3243:( 3189:( 3172:( 3143:( 3129:( 3110:( 3095:( 2970:( 2937:( 2859:( 2749:( 2699:. 2674:. 2619:( 2604:( 2543:( 2502:. 2477:. 2438:( 2409:( 2297:( 2283:( 2268:( 2254:( 2220:( 2198:( 2182:( 2160:( 2145:( 2103:( 2089:( 2075:( 2056:( 1997:( 1979:( 1938:( 1923:( 1895:( 1879:( 1786:( 1762:( 1695:( 1674:( 1641:, 1632:, 1613:) 1601:) 1577:) 1523:( 1497:( 1483:( 1465:( 1451:( 1435:( 1413:) 1409:( 1395:( 1377:( 1362:( 1334:( 1312:( 1292:( 1239:( 1235:- 1218:( 1203:( 1172:( 1105:( 1086:( 1066:/ 1050:" 1029:( 1014:( 999:( 995:- 935:( 913:( 894:( 866:( 851:( 836:( 817:( 793:( 748:( 716:( 698:( 684:( 680:- 668:( 642:( 628:( 613:( 586:. 481:. 360:. 312:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index