Knowledge

Talk:Middlesex

Source 📝

1485:
counties are really administrative areas, not geographic areas (by administrative area I'm referring to County Councils and their predecessors etc). County names are only used informally as geographic areas. Real geographic areas include 'the South Downs', 'the Welsh valleys' and 'the Wash' and are obviously not aligned to counties. Shropshire contains a wider diversity of geological features than anywhere else on the planet; if counties were based on geological areas it would have to split into many tiny counties, which it obviously is not. Therefore to use the term county to refer either to geographic or geologic area is purely informal. The use of county names in institutions is a matter of preference only, eg Humberside Airport retains this name even though Humberside county, an artificial creation, has been abolished, ie there never was a historic county of Humberside, and the name of the airport is not an indicator that Humberside exists, similarly sports clubs with Middlesex in their title do not suggest that Middlesex continues to exist in any meaningful sense. If an intelligent person not familiar with the old county boundary were asked to draw a geographical area based on the centre of 'Middlesex', it is doubtful whether his shape would reflect either the size or shape of the old county boundary; this is because there is no natural geographic area for Middlesex.
550: 2783:
historic buildings. Yes, I know, it lacked citations but to use that as an excuse to wipe out 6,000 plus words and files of reasonably constructive quality does seems excessive. A simpler 'references needed' tag would have done, or you could surely have found those references yourself. Those buildings are notable and they are in Middlesex which makes your reversal even more puzzling. I think there will be some editors out there who might consider your staggered large scale reversals without any discussion or serious explanation, as bordering on being disruptive. Please put them back. I agree that much of the content involved would benefit from a good edit, but a face lift, not a decapitation.
1160:
the administrative county of London as forms part of the counties of Middlesex, Surrey, and Kent, shall on and after the appointed day be severed from those counties, and form a separate county for all non-administrative purposes by the name of the county of London; and it shall be lawful for Her Majesty the Queen to appoint a sheriff of that county, and to grant a commission of the peace and court of quarter sessions, to that county; and, subject to the provisions of this Act, all enactments, laws, and usages with respect to counties in England and Wales, and to sheriffs, justices, and quarter sessions shall, so far as circumstances admit, apply to the county of London"
1718:(now only for very formal purposes and e.g. fire) which joins Slough (which includes Langley, Colnbrook and Horton) in being inappropriate being on the wrong side of the Thames but no less so than being on the far side of the upper tributary marking the Middlesex boundary, those knowledgeable of geography and history see how counter to basic river borders it is to say any of those are in Middlesex. Yet many businesses of manual trade and trying to humble themselves nearer to Staines there do: and likewise for the fraction Egham Hythe that falls under Staines postally. Likewise Denham!!! 283: 486: 2566:
take place would be to find a way, whenever ambiguity might occur, to refer to a non-traditional county by its more precise description, pedantic though that at times might be. I also see merit in not trying to combine two different entities into one article, just because the name is the same. Thus, we would have, for example, articles for 'Essex (traditional county)' and Essex (ceremonial county), or something similar. This is not the place for this discussion though. It should be in UK geography/counties.
831: 219: 540: 519: 649: 624: 359: 929: 477: 2522:
statements you refer to, about Middlesex being a thing of the past, go beyond confusing the county council with the county itself, but topicss like that have been debated to death on WP, as I am sure you know. The treatment of UK counties by WP will change at some point, it is only a question of when: the confusion and false information the wp policy creates is ongoing, this map description being just one more example of this.
726: 1257:
people still perceive themselves as living in the county of Middlesex. To millions of people, mainly residents and former residents and their friends and relatives Middlesex still exists. To most of these people a county is just an area that contains several towns and villages and not necessarily a political or administrative division. Therefore I don't think Middlesex should be described as a former county.
1114:
existed. Legal documents asked for county to be provided and there was no such thing as the county of Greater London. Even the timing as to the abolition of postal county address in 1996 is not reflective of the real situation as without a postcode the mail would take longer to arrive without the county than with. I accept that now Counties have been phased out but they are still used by institutions:
716: 695: 821: 800: 1213:" and "Despite the disappearance of the county council, Middlesex is still used as an area name". Note that historic in this context is the WP-preferred version of the term you are calling Geographic ("Geographic" is ambiguous as all defintions of counties are arguably geographic). What do you actually want to 1663:
ii. The first district listed was lost from the county to Hertfordshire in a spot of shrewd developer leaning-on councillor representations which accompanied Potters Bar's rapid but low-to-mid density new town development which happened at the time, similar for the latter which went to Surrey. These
1120:
Most of Middlesex regions existed in the Doomsday book and there are not other locales in the UK with the same town name, so you wouldn't need the postal county. However, beyond this date the county is still shown on Greater London A-Z. The banks of the river Thames are known by the County names. The
1894:
If you ask the majority of the residents of Harrow, Hayes, Hounslow, Northwood, Northolt, Southall, Greenford, Ruislip, etc. which county they live in, most will say Middlesex, not London. Irrespective of whether or not it exists for administrative purposes people still perceive themselves as living
1741:
The case of Egham Hythe, Staines upon Thames is a fascinating example where since 1996 sensible logic demands acceptance of the true county AND historic county. Only postal pedants stuck in the past would put the two varieties of: Egham Hythe, (Surrey), Staines upon Thames, Middlesex. Why ever not
1159:
it continues to exist (and indeed the name pre-dated the county), and vestiges of this continue in the naming of the banks of the river for the boatrace (which dates from 1829 so was quite correct then). In fact that part of London has been in neither Middlesex of Surrey since 1889. "Such portion of
2585:
An historic or a historic? This mini edit war comes up everywhere, not just today on this article. My view is that 'an' is formally correct but that recent (ie last 50 years) common usage has swayed towards 'a', making that now informally correct. It is formally correct because the noun begins with
1484:
I found the article confusing. The beginning of the article gives the impression that the county still exists, when for practical purposes it has been abolished, and therefore we should use the term 'was' and not 'is'. Counties have a long tradition of having their boundaries altered. As such
1256:
What is a county? And, What is Middlesex? If you ask the majority of the residents of Harrow, Hayes, Hounslow, Northwood, Northolt, Southall, Greenford, Ruislip, etc. which county they live in, most will say Middlesex, not London. Irrespective of whether or not it exists for administrative purposes
1183:
The other issue comes to the idea of the GLC abolishing the County. Having read the 1963 act briefly it doesn't abolish the county merely replaces adminstrative body, nor did it create a new county by name. There were London Boroughs in Middlesex extant before this act such as Twickenham. Then also
2565:
Exactly what, I do not know, and I do not pretend any change will be simple because valid cases can be made for and against any change. The current system is not working properly so some change will need to take place. A simple but effective way to avoid the confusion and arguments that constantly
1113:
There is certainly some misinformation with regards Middlesex. A county is not simply an administrative area but a region that has historical significance. So while it might be true that Middlesex was covered by the Greater London administration rather than a county administration the County still
2630:
Unless I have very bad at hearing, nearly everyone uses 'an' not 'a' and drops the 'h' when speaking the word (out loud or silently to themselves when reading). This is except at the start of a sentence , eg 'Historical is a curious word'. But in that case a or an does not apply. The exception is
1768:
Great additions. We need to make sure there is nothing in the introduction that is not also mention in the text, for example the term 'county corporate'. Just need to make sure that is mentioned later. I think the intro is a little top-heavy and includes some repetition. Just needs a copyedit and
1737:
it seems for its bulk (where now London) and anti-snobbish camps on small northern and southwestern fringes, with anti-snobbery becoming downright humiliating where used where their county is outside all Middlesex borders (except wide post town borders). These deliberately self-abasing zones are
1689:
is London, since 1996 finally! I write it on envelopes willingly. Yes Twickenham, London, Yes Bromley, London, Yes Croydon, London, even Havering atte Bower and Harefield. This leaves only pedants and the totally hidebound insisting Bromley is in Kent, squabbling over Greenwich being in Kent,
1381:
Another issue is the mention of steadyly declining population except at the surrounds- I am not sure what the source states with regards to this but it seems a peripheral point as there was no real centre to Middx after 1889 plus there is the whole change in population due to the War to take into
1341:
Nonsense all along Royal Mail had a rule of allowing Hampton Wick, Middlesex, Kingston (upon Thames), Surrey being totally permissible. Read more books on the subject. Besides they are both now London, so thus alas, even if you are writing to Kingston (or New Malden) there is nothing wrong with
1187:
The real issue is that the 1888 Local Government act did not make the administrative body of county council equivalent to the county as Sussex, Suffolk and Lincolnshire all had more than one council without any obvious subdivisions. Therefore the change of the administration doesn't automatically
1729:
Many people cannot get enough of addressing themselves in a non-accurate county, and particularly where the new replacement is further from London. Yet the opposite was a generation before true of Chiswick to Tottenham before 1965 who were far more rapidly willing to embrace their new status of
2782:
I was tempted to revert your entire set of reversals but prudence got the better of me, so here we are in talk. Unless you are still composing a weightier tome, the talk page explanation you referred us to above is a big straggly and severely lacking in detail. I will focus on one section, the
1234:
I recognise that "historic counties of England" is the current preferred term but it is meaningless (all counties have histories). Lincolnshire is a historic county in that it has a very long history, but it is not abolished. For counties that have been abolished we should use a term like
2521:
We mean the traditional English county of course - other uses of the word are handled in the disambiguation link at the start of the article. I appreciate your self-reversal although I am not sure the your version is much of an improvement to what I put down. I think the frequently incorrect
1401:
Middlesex still exists as a geographical area and county. Only the administrative council was abolished. The is a boundary indicated by signs, there is a Middlesex University, Middlesex Cricket Club, etc. To refer to Middlesex in the past is extremely inaccurate. This needs to be rectified.
1180:- this is a unit that is still in existence Today even if it is not required on the Postal address. This is in the same manner as Twickenham wasn't needed on address with a postcode with TW1. Now the problem comes in viewing the region when there is no longer a need for a postal address. 1322:
even though it is using the KT1 postcode. Much of Hampton Wick is in the TW postcode. Postcodes only referred to the main sorting office and I believe I was told once that the reason for the KT part was because of the one-time use of a boat meaning Kingston made the
1502:
Most people living in Harrow, Hounslow, Greenford, and other parts of the postal county of Middlesex still regard themselves as living in the county of Middlesex. It may no longer be a necessary part of the address but people see themselves as being in Middlesex.
1681:
6. Monken Hadley was in both 'systems' lost in 1889. The residents of Monken Hadley became forever associated with Barnet for better for worse postally in 1889, and later become optionally Greater London, creating a bewildering choice of three categories.
1690:
Richmond in Surrey, Chiswick in London the list goes on forever and with three stages of arbitrary cut-off, all popularly based on living postal service advice which in itself is wrong on historic borders so adding further wonderful stupidity to arguments.
1326:
It would seem that there is now a common, if not universal usage, so even if not technically correct it probably meets wiki standards to state it. Though, Hampton Wick was definitely entirely in Middlesex, also they wouldn't have been in Vince Cable's
1738:
where the county is Berkshire, Hertfordshire, Buckinghamshire or Surrey, yet pre-1996 born people insist on postal counties which themselves were never accurate and from that year became totally arbitrary so can be replaced with true counties.
1370:
There are several sections in the article that could do with refining but there are references that don't obviously seem to support the case in all instances and I am reluctant to make a change that may be sources contradicting each other.
2863:
From a document 'County of London, Records of Old Middlesex, Conference of 21st November 1894. Opening Statement by the Chairman o the London Committee, with Annexures and List of Proposals made at or after the Conference' note, page 10
1121:
county existed for 100s of years but it still exists in some sense of the idea. As for people confused enough over Hampton Court... the boudary is set by whether it is the North bank of the Thames (Middlesex) or the South for (Surrey).
1318:
The question is what was the situation when the postal counties were in force. From past experience anything pre-2000 and minor is remarkably difficult to find on the internet. There are places which use the Middlesex too:
1837:— but supporting this also its distance from other villages, strongly warehousing, light engineering and farming character with a very light scattering of Victorian homes probably all made it irresistible to add it to 1578:
that ended in 1965. They were in Middlesex and Surrey respectively. They are now in Greater London. Minor aristocrats may equally try to have written and spoken that Kensington is still Middlesex etc. but really...
1895:
in the county of Middlesex. To millions of people, mainly residents or former residents and their friends and relatives Middlesex still exists. Therefore I don't think it should be described as a former county.
153: 1632:
to the Palace; Norden justly waxed lyrical about it and most Middlesex and London Regions topographers since time immemorial.) London please. They make it greater and carry on being grand on its outskirts.
1623:
who also claim by a placename roadsign or two the name Hampton Court, all traditionally part of Hampton, whatever this palace does for you it must copy whatever county since 1996 you insist on using for
1053:
Hmmm. I find the lead a bit dramatic for my taste... "forged in the Norse–Saxon wars of the ninth century"! In fact the tone of the whole article is a bit chatty. But, yeah the *structure* may be useful.
996:
Economy up to C20: some stuff in Cambridge County History and may be data in census reports. Certain amount of industry (smallarms, soap and so on) and also agriculture giving way to market gardening.
1787:
In 1965 Middlesex split to three counties (Surrey/Greater London/Hertfordshire). The text implied that some land went to Berkshire in 1965, but that only happened later because of other changes.
2679: 1875:
If we are going to add a postal county map to the infobox, we need one that shows Middlesex in context with the other postal counties. So, a map of England with the postal county highlighted.
1424:
Middlesex is a former county. The article states "After 1965 Middlesex continued to be used as an area name" and "Middlesex is still used in the names of organisations based in the area".
2392: 2262: 2152: 2014: 1733:
Now the dust has finally settled since the 1996 ending of post towns having postal counties, I logically now conclude that 'the address propagators of Middlesex' have neatly divided into
2499:
The assumption is that, because the County Council was abolished, Middlesex was abolished. Did Middlesex not exist before 1889? That was when the Middlesex County Council was formed.
344:: Royal Mail no longer use or recommend the use of a postal county in addresses and have changed their nomenclature to 'former postal county', and Knowledge articles reflect this. 2410: 2406: 2280: 2276: 2170: 2166: 2032: 2028: 1188:
remove the county in the broadest sense. I think the lead should read more along the lines of "Middlesex is a geographic county and a former administrative region in England."
2701: 1582:
2. i. What residents and businesses of Willesden, Tottenham, Hornsey and Chiswick (broadly drawn) thought at various points during the period 1889–1965 when they were in the
1206:
abolished by the 1963 act, the fact wasn't replaced it with a new county doesn't mean it didn't disappear at that time. The 1964 act replaced it for all other legal purposes.
1276:
The reference given states that it was given a KT Postcode but doesn't mention the county code as being Surrey. I'm fairly sure all of Middlesex was in the postal county.
490: 2961: 1721:
Denham is great, you can now acceptably write it as it really is: Denham, Uxbridge, Buckinghamshire. As different parts of Uxbridge can have different postal counties.
2358: 147: 1574:
1. Boat Race over-fanatics (to the detriment of all the other serious events on watercourses in Britain) would really note: Chiswick and Barnes were never in the
1536:
Actually most people living in these areas regard themselves as living in London! Have you actually bothered to ask all 1 million (probably more) of these people?
1184:
there is the issue that the GLC was abolished in 1986 yet the locales still needed to be placed in a county and this was always the same as the postal county code.
1784:
The City of London was already a county corporate before 1889, the 1888 act made County of London, Middlesex and City of London all "counties for other purposes".
1139:
A county, certainly in statutory terms, is both an area of land and an entity with which certain offices or institutions are attached. Thus a county would have a
1155:
Middlesex was explicitly extinguished administratively by the London Government Act 1963 and for other purposes by the Administration of Justice Act 1964. As a
2931: 903: 1488:
Let us call a spade a spade. A county has always been an administrative area, let us not try to blur the issue by using the term to mean something else.
2896: 2719:
That said, some of the stuff added about things that happened while Middlesex actually existed (like the film industry) should be rewritten appropriately.
2673: 1990: 993:
Something about the pre-1888 administration: note that it was very much subject to City of London as early as 11th century: eg appointment of sheriffs.
2248: 1612:. I offer up the fact of all places in Greater London being in London and the argument since 1996 is totally solved. Hence you don't hear it made. 2142: 1553: 1537: 782: 606: 2956: 2946: 772: 596: 2663: 2646: 2621: 2555: 2534: 2512: 999:
Expand history (other than local government): Sources admit that there is little distinct from that of London/The Metropolis, but there is a bit
2921: 2368: 2333: 2124: 1932:
Say that to the millions of residents that live in the places that I mentioned above. Middlesex County Council was abolished in 1965 thats all.
2690: 2491:
When we talk of Middlesex where do we mean? The County, the Province or the Tribal Lands? Possibly you did not even realise there is a choice!
2976: 2936: 2458: 893: 2818:
Please don't add maps without dates. Also, note it is typical to show a map of a geographic entity using the last set of boundaries it had.
1671:
so much liked the sound of joining Hertfordshire outright as to make the postal system change in 1965. A bribe seems likely or similar.
370: 2906: 2613:
I prescribe to how one reads – surely that must be the criterium, not what it looks like on the page; it feels uncomfortable without the
1439:
Middlesex continues to be used as a place name. If your article states it is no longer used as a place name. This is clearly incorrect.
861: 282: 79: 2981: 2951: 2941: 2916: 2388:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2258:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2148:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2010:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
2926: 1762: 260: 2359:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110704190912/http://217.154.230.218/NR/rdonlyres/EAC40083-0CF8-491A-909E-19E4165F9B7B/0/infono25.pdf
2971: 2000: 1244: 943: 2328: 2218: 315:: Middlesex was abolished as a county in 1965 for both "administrative" and "non-administrative" —i.e. all— purposes. Following 2807: 2772: 2750: 1336: 1313: 1229: 1197: 1171: 1097: 2080: 1478: 2476:, because the first description is misleading because historic implies no longer. Another editor thinks otherwise. Thoughts? 1959: 1923: 1545: 1527: 1433: 865: 293: 85: 1749:
sketch of upper, middle and lower class. Surrey/Herts/Berks is superior to Middlesex, but Middlesex is superior to London.
1355: 2966: 2844: 1821:
Also: your correction to clarify a final destination was Berkshire is true. The land was lost to Surrey then to Berkshire:
1077: 1063: 2468:
There is a handy map at the start of the article with Middlesex shown in context with other counties. The description was
2362: 1825:. Readers of this talk may wish to know why after one change in 1965, that further one followed. This is because of the 2858: 1089: 655: 629: 388: 1862: 1803: 168: 1812:
Thanks. 1. No impact "on Royal Mail's postal counties" is better. It may have impacted logistically and financially.
1446: 857: 844: 805: 30: 2882: 2728: 2372: 1742:
Egham Hythe, Staines (upon Thames), Surrey? One day Staines upon Thames itself will be commonly Surrey on envelopes.
1391: 135: 2223: 2085: 1409: 1365: 748: 572: 44: 2378: 2350: 2240: 2102: 1991:
http://www.webcitation.org/5yo0mVCtM?url=http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1963/cukpga_19630033_en_1
1982: 1941: 1904: 2911: 2901: 2249:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071026152503/http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/history/london-life/rural-middlesex.html
1558:
My clarification reveals the postal choas at the root of many of the fictitious arguments above - quickly compare
1202:
When the County of London was created in 1889 - Middlesex was reduced. The administrative county of Middlesex was
1176:
having dug out an old book: "Middlesex The Jubilee of the County Council 1889 -1939" there is a term that is used
2575: 2485: 1965: 1769:
copying (or moving) into the body of the article. I'm going to try to fix that, but I might not have enough time.
376: 99: 2852: 2792: 2409:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2279:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2169:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2031:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2798:
A list of buildings here is not useful. Some of it was repetition from the prose, such as Middlesex Guildhall.
1889: 1461:
But the article doesn't say it is no longer used as a place name. You have now introduced text in violation of
1266: 104: 20: 1994: 1664:
were suburban with considerable open space relative to the east, middle, west and north of the former county.
1133: 549: 264: 74: 2369:
https://web.archive.org/web/20071001000231/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10020530
2125:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080315025055/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10061441
1047: 2453: 2323: 2213: 2075: 1210: 739: 700: 563: 524: 499: 129: 2252: 1884: 1454: 1068:
Agreed. Ideally we need a GA/FA article on a former state or province for guidance, but I can't find one.
327:. The second wording makes more sense because it is still an area name, if no longer a functioning county. 2607: 1417: 1285: 1029: 1012: 256: 65: 2827: 2428:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2298:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2188:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2050:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1497: 2848: 2713: 2660: 2618: 2552: 2509: 2349:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2239:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 2101:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1981:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1518:
Even if that was the case which I strongly doubt it would be irrelevant as the county no longer exists.
1512: 1300: 1161: 185: 1914:
and on many previous occaisions here and elsewhere its a dead issue. Please leave it to rest in peace.
125: 2867:*Middlesex before 1889 - population 2 920 485, rateable value (excluding City of London) £22 370 371 1870: 1108: 2128: 2118: 1602: 1035: 988: 976: 190: 747:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
571:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2813: 2788: 2746: 2686: 2642: 2603: 2571: 2530: 2481: 2463: 2444: 2314: 2204: 2066: 1148: 1093: 949: 175: 109: 2413:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2283:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2173:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2035:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
2695: 2429: 2346: 2299: 2236: 2189: 2051: 1450: 1221: 955: 2001:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090202095925/http://opsi.gov.uk/SI/si1994/Uksi_19940330_en_1.htm
1667:
5. Interestingly the councillors of the first area - a wide mound of gentle top slopes of the
2878: 2832: 2416: 2286: 2176: 2038: 1620: 1591: 1413: 849: 836: 505: 2143:
ftp://ftp.royalmail.com/Downloads/public/cmwalk/doc/active/doc21800003/PAF_Digest_Dec_03.pdf
1378:
with an "o". Similarly it refers to the creation of the county system occuring in 900 A.D.
2840: 2436: 2306: 2196: 2058: 1846: 1842: 1645: 1616: 1493: 1462: 1442: 1405: 1320: 1271: 1240: 1085: 933: 660: 634: 358: 316: 2004: 8: 2873:
In the document 'Correspondence with the ] the pre-1889 population is given as 2 920 000
2738: 1947: 1937: 1900: 1660:(the latter postally lost in 1995) now have non-Middlesex non-Greater London counties. 1541: 1508: 1309: 1262: 1225: 1167: 1059: 961: 55: 1698:
Hidebound residents of Wraysbury fare no better with their pre-mid 19th century (before
2784: 2742: 2682: 2638: 2599: 2567: 2526: 2477: 2395:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2363:
http://217.154.230.218/NR/rdonlyres/EAC40083-0CF8-491A-909E-19E4165F9B7B/0/infono25.pdf
2265:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2155:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 2136: 2112: 2017:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1387: 1332: 1281: 1193: 1129: 869: 440: 421: 287: 141: 70: 2435:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2305:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2195:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2057:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2502: 1637: 1396: 380: 51: 1674:
5.a 'Royal Mail' adds additional credence to self-promoters who claim the redundant
1122: 2874: 2373:
http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10020530&c_id=10001043
1955: 1919: 1857: 1757: 1575: 1559: 1523: 1350: 1296:
1 High Street, Hampton Wick, Kingston-Upon-Thames, Surrey, KT1 4DA 45 High Street,
161: 2580: 2379:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070610062802/http://www.pbtfc.degz.co.uk/index1.htm
2098: 1978: 1711: 1703: 1675: 1625: 1489: 1236: 1144: 856:
on Knowledge. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can
227: 2823: 2803: 2768: 2724: 2709: 2704:. Additions to this article written that suggest the opposite will be removed. 1933: 1896: 1880: 1799: 1686: 1504: 1474: 1429: 1305: 1297: 1258: 1218: 1163: 1073: 1055: 1043: 853: 2401:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2271:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2161:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 2023:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 199: 2890: 1628:. (Robbins devoted 9 pages of the smaller Part Two (pp 217-363) of his book 1587: 1466: 1383: 1328: 1294: 1277: 1189: 1125: 731: 555: 218: 1794:
There are a few other things, but those are the ones I immediately noticed.
1708:
postally, Middlesex after its post town only — until being redundant in 1996
1563: 1151:
and so on, irrespective of its administrative/local government status. As a
2633: 1995:
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1963/cukpga_19630033_en_1
1826: 1668: 1140: 255:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other 1002:
Communications/Transport: was important for the development of the county.
2402: 2382: 2272: 2162: 2024: 1951: 1929: 1915: 1850: 1750: 1746: 1641: 1519: 1343: 852:
dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the
1910:
This has already been addressed both at the end of the discussion above
1781:
The creation of the County of London in 1889 had no impact on Royal Mail
204: 2253:
http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/history/london-life/rural-middlesex.html
1830: 1649: 539: 518: 2819: 2799: 2764: 2720: 2705: 2342: 2232: 2094: 1974: 1876: 1838: 1795: 1715: 1699: 1609: 1470: 1425: 1069: 1039: 937: 203: 24: 1209:
The current lead of this article states "Middlesex is one of the 39
1745:
Of such hidebound postal people one is thus always reminded of the
1734: 648: 623: 201: 2702:
we do not write about former counties as if they continue to exist
1592:
Controversy and complex, undocumentable, gradual or sudden changes
1465:
five times in a 24 hour period. This is not permitted (please see
2129:
http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10061441
2119:
http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10031163
1653: 1302:
Church Grove, Hampton Wick, Kingston-Upon-Thames, Surrey, KT1 4AL
1235:"abolished counties of England" or "former counties of England". 725: 1834: 744: 568: 1374:
For example the book I have states the first reference as 704
205: 1822: 1657: 2763:
There is still a lot more work to do on this article first.
1710:. Its true and administrative county in 1965 flipped from 1017:
City of London and Middlesex as a combined area for justice
2353:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2243:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2105:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1985:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1608:
iii. Now they may want to believe they are in Middlesex.
1115: 820: 799: 715: 694: 2592:
ric county - is on the second syllable, unlike with 'a h
1217:
in this article's lead - it already covers your point?--
2005:
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1994/Uksi_19940330_en_1.htm
1702:) county being written and spoken as it actually was, " 1601:, and 'taxed' and 'publicly serviced and improved' by 160: 2837:
I don't think there's a schwa; the /l/ is syllabic.
2737:
Plenty of clutter removed there. Will you handle the
1299:
Hampton Wick, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT1 4EH,
826: 743:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 721: 567:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 545: 15: 2547:To what specific change of treatment do you refer? 2405:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2275:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2165:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 2027:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1009:Middlesex as a place for innovation in governance: 987:More details about the county council, summarising 2962:GA-Class Surrey-related articles of Low-importance 2501:I have ammended the caption to read, Middlesex in 1829:which "cut it off entirely from its county" said 975:Move Arms of Middlesex County Council section to 2888: 1845:civil parish. It is shameful that exists under 1038:has anything to offer us in terms of structure? 658:, a project which is currently considered to be 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 2870:*Middlesex after 1889 - 380 814 and £2 800 000 2700:The Knowledge convention is settled and clear, 1774:I've made some changes, to clarify some things: 1648:and its own countrified core don't you know?); 2391:This message was posted before February 2018. 2261:This message was posted before February 2018. 2151:This message was posted before February 2018. 2013:This message was posted before February 2018. 1678:are more accurate than any others in history. 1376:"in the Province which is called Middleseaxon" 386:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can 2932:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Geography 1694:8. Confusion just outside the historic county 213: 174: 2674:Proposed changes to dealing with UK counties 2897:Knowledge articles that use British English 2631:someone from the East End of London, as in 1849:, it should be subsumed within Colnbrook.- 2231:I have just modified one external link on 2093:I have just modified one external link on 231:, which has its own spelling conventions ( 2341:I have just modified 3 external links on 1973:I have just modified 2 external links on 1586:(Postcode Area of London in officialdom) 1342:writing, Kingston upon Thames, London. - 1117:and the Road signs still had the county. 337:But it is still used in postal addresses? 2474:Middlesex as one of the English counties 1644:, the appropriately-named high place of 1554:Postal anomalies 1889-1965 and 1965-1996 842:This article falls within the scope of 2957:Low-importance Surrey-related articles 2947:Mid-importance London-related articles 2889: 2383:http://www.pbtfc.degz.co.uk/index1.htm 2334:External links modified (January 2018) 2922:Knowledge vital articles in Geography 263:, this should not be changed without 2977:Mid-importance UK geography articles 2937:GA-Class vital articles in Geography 919: 737:This article is within the scope of 654:This article is within the scope of 561:This article is within the scope of 476: 474: 470: 272: 1082:The tone has now been toned down. 670:Knowledge:WikiProject Hertfordshire 23:for discussing improvements to the 13: 2907:Geography and places good articles 1638:South Mimms (rural/urban district) 878:Knowledge:WikiProject UK geography 673:Template:WikiProject Hertfordshire 371:Geography and places good articles 14: 2993: 2493:We do know that anyone who says, 2345:. Please take a moment to review 2235:. Please take a moment to review 2097:. Please take a moment to review 1977:. Please take a moment to review 1847:how to write about UK settlements 881:Template:WikiProject UK geography 379:. If you can improve it further, 2982:Knowledge pages with to-do lists 2952:GA-Class Surrey-related articles 2942:GA-Class London-related articles 2917:Knowledge level-5 vital articles 2859:Population before and after 1889 1597:ii. In this period they were in 927: 829: 819: 798: 724: 714: 693: 647: 622: 548: 538: 517: 484: 475: 357: 281: 217: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 2927:GA-Class level-5 vital articles 1610:But you can't have it both ways 898:This article has been rated as 777:This article has been rated as 601:This article has been rated as 2972:GA-Class UK geography articles 2808:10:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 2793:10:26, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 2773:09:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC) 1911: 870:how to write about settlements 504:It is of interest to multiple 367:has been listed as one of the 1: 2664:13:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC) 2647:10:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC) 2622:08:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC) 2608:08:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC) 2586:an h and the stress - an hist 2576:08:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC) 2556:06:12, 5 September 2018 (UTC) 2535:05:52, 5 September 2018 (UTC) 2513:14:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC) 2486:12:08, 4 September 2018 (UTC) 2329:07:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC) 1615:3. The long-held beauty spot 1546:02:43, 27 December 2014 (UTC) 1528:18:25, 21 December 2014 (UTC) 1513:14:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC) 1479:15:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 1455:14:53, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 1434:10:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 1418:07:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC) 1078:18:17, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1064:16:14, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 1048:14:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC) 751:and see a list of open tasks. 575:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 2691:08:45, 10 October 2018 (UTC) 2470:Historic extent of Middlesex 2459:16:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC) 1564:the postal maps of Middlesex 1211:historic counties of England 757:Knowledge:WikiProject Surrey 581:Knowledge:WikiProject London 325:Middlesex is a former county 7: 2967:WikiProject Surrey articles 2828:07:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC) 2741:article with similar zeal? 1960:01:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 1942:01:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 1924:00:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 1905:00:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 1885:07:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC) 1863:08:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 1804:06:54, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 1763:21:33, 16 August 2013 (UTC) 1356:09:18, 17 August 2013 (UTC) 1267:00:45, 3 January 2015 (UTC) 1013:Middlesex Justices Act 1792 858:join us at the project page 760:Template:WikiProject Surrey 584:Template:WikiProject London 308:Does Middlesex still exist? 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 2998: 2495:"Middlesex does not exist" 2422:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2338:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2292:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2228:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2182:(last update: 5 June 2024) 2090:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 2044:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1970:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1392:11:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 1337:10:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 1314:21:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 1286:17:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 1230:11:21, 29 March 2012 (UTC) 1198:11:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 1172:21:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 1134:17:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 904:project's importance scale 783:project's importance scale 607:project's importance scale 298:Frequently asked questions 2883:18:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC) 2853:10:55, 16 June 2021 (UTC) 2751:20:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC) 2729:15:36, 18 July 2019 (UTC) 2714:15:33, 18 July 2019 (UTC) 2681:if anyone is interested. 2219:22:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC) 1498:11:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 1366:Minor issues with sources 1245:11:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 897: 814: 776: 709: 656:WikiProject Hertfordshire 642: 600: 533: 512: 461: 403: 399: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 2081:18:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC) 1948:Knowledge is not a forum 1841:and it now falls within 1603:Middlesex County Council 1291:A casual Google reveals: 1098:16:18, 11 May 2013 (UTC) 1036:History of Hertfordshire 989:Middlesex County Council 977:Middlesex County Council 845:WikiProject UK geography 2912:GA-Class vital articles 2902:Knowledge good articles 2224:External links modified 2086:External links modified 1966:External links modified 1584:Postal County of London 1569:Popular myths dispelled 1149:commission of the peace 984:Prepare for FA review: 763:Surrey-related articles 587:London-related articles 1890:Middlesex still exists 979:(leaving summary here) 676:Hertfordshire articles 321:Middlesex was a county 75:avoid personal attacks 2661:Gareth Griffith‑Jones 2619:Gareth Griffith‑Jones 2553:Gareth Griffith‑Jones 2510:Gareth Griffith‑Jones 1656:don't you know?) and 884:UK geography articles 837:United Kingdom portal 491:level-5 vital article 377:good article criteria 100:Neutral point of view 2403:regular verification 2273:regular verification 2163:regular verification 2025:regular verification 1843:Colnbrook with Poyle 1617:Hampton Court Palace 1123:The_Boat_Race#course 448:Good article nominee 429:Good article nominee 261:relevant style guide 257:varieties of English 105:No original research 2497:is talking rubbish. 2393:After February 2018 2263:After February 2018 2153:After February 2018 2015:After February 2018 1030:Article improvement 259:. According to the 2678:Please check here 2472:. I changed it to 2447:InternetArchiveBot 2398:InternetArchiveBot 2317:InternetArchiveBot 2268:InternetArchiveBot 2207:InternetArchiveBot 2158:InternetArchiveBot 2069:InternetArchiveBot 2020:InternetArchiveBot 967:Updated 2014-01-18 868:and guidelines on 740:WikiProject Surrey 564:WikiProject London 500:content assessment 404:Article milestones 319:we can either say 86:dispute resolution 47: 2855: 2843:comment added by 2503:England and Wales 2423: 2293: 2183: 2045: 1871:Postal county map 1445:comment added by 1408:comment added by 1178:Geographic County 1109:What is a county? 1088:comment added by 1027: 1026: 918: 917: 914: 913: 910: 909: 793: 792: 789: 788: 688: 687: 684: 683: 617: 616: 613: 612: 469: 468: 457: 456: 422:February 18, 2008 395: 352: 351: 296: 271: 270: 212: 211: 66:Assume good faith 43: 2989: 2838: 2457: 2448: 2421: 2420: 2399: 2327: 2318: 2291: 2290: 2269: 2217: 2208: 2181: 2180: 2159: 2140: 2116: 2079: 2070: 2043: 2042: 2021: 1860: 1855: 1760: 1755: 1652:(which includes 1619:is like its two 1576:County of London 1560:County of London 1457: 1420: 1353: 1348: 1100: 968: 931: 930: 920: 886: 885: 882: 879: 876: 860:where there are 839: 834: 833: 832: 823: 816: 815: 810: 802: 795: 794: 765: 764: 761: 758: 755: 734: 729: 728: 718: 711: 710: 705: 697: 690: 689: 678: 677: 674: 671: 668: 651: 644: 643: 638: 626: 619: 618: 589: 588: 585: 582: 579: 558: 553: 552: 542: 535: 534: 529: 521: 514: 513: 497: 488: 487: 480: 479: 478: 471: 462:Current status: 443: 424: 401: 400: 384: 361: 354: 353: 286: 285: 273: 224:This article is 221: 214: 206: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 2997: 2996: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2887: 2886: 2861: 2835: 2816: 2814:Maps need dates 2698: 2676: 2659:Totally agree. 2598:story lesson'. 2583: 2466: 2464:Map description 2451: 2446: 2414: 2407:have permission 2397: 2351:this simple FaQ 2336: 2321: 2316: 2284: 2277:have permission 2267: 2241:this simple FaQ 2226: 2211: 2206: 2174: 2167:have permission 2157: 2134: 2110: 2103:this simple FaQ 2088: 2073: 2068: 2036: 2029:have permission 2019: 1983:this simple FaQ 1968: 1892: 1873: 1858: 1851: 1758: 1751: 1712:Buckinghamshire 1676:postal counties 1556: 1440: 1403: 1399: 1368: 1351: 1344: 1274: 1145:lord lieutenant 1111: 1083: 1032: 1023: 1022: 942: 928: 883: 880: 877: 874: 873: 835: 830: 828: 808: 762: 759: 756: 753: 752: 730: 723: 703: 675: 672: 669: 666: 665: 632: 586: 583: 580: 577: 576: 554: 547: 527: 498:on Knowledge's 495: 485: 439: 420: 348: 347: 299: 297: 265:broad consensus 228:British English 208: 207: 202: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 2995: 2985: 2984: 2979: 2974: 2969: 2964: 2959: 2954: 2949: 2944: 2939: 2934: 2929: 2924: 2919: 2914: 2909: 2904: 2899: 2860: 2857: 2845:81.136.239.157 2834: 2831: 2815: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2732: 2731: 2697: 2696:Recent changes 2694: 2675: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2625: 2624: 2582: 2579: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2516: 2515: 2500: 2498: 2492: 2465: 2462: 2441: 2440: 2433: 2386: 2385: 2377:Added archive 2375: 2367:Added archive 2365: 2357:Added archive 2335: 2332: 2311: 2310: 2303: 2256: 2255: 2247:Added archive 2225: 2222: 2201: 2200: 2193: 2146: 2145: 2131: 2123:Added archive 2121: 2087: 2084: 2063: 2062: 2055: 2008: 2007: 1999:Added archive 1997: 1989:Added archive 1967: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1927: 1926: 1891: 1888: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1807: 1806: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1785: 1782: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1727: 1726: 1696: 1695: 1687:Greater London 1567: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1531: 1530: 1482: 1481: 1437: 1436: 1398: 1395: 1367: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1324: 1303: 1292: 1273: 1270: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1207: 1185: 1181: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1015: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1000: 997: 994: 991: 981: 980: 970: 925: 923: 916: 915: 912: 911: 908: 907: 900:Mid-importance 896: 890: 889: 887: 854:United Kingdom 841: 840: 824: 812: 811: 809:Mid‑importance 803: 791: 790: 787: 786: 779:Low-importance 775: 769: 768: 766: 749:the discussion 736: 735: 719: 707: 706: 704:Low‑importance 698: 686: 685: 682: 681: 679: 652: 640: 639: 627: 615: 614: 611: 610: 603:Mid-importance 599: 593: 592: 590: 573:the discussion 560: 559: 543: 531: 530: 528:Mid‑importance 522: 510: 509: 503: 481: 467: 466: 459: 458: 455: 454: 451: 444: 441:March 31, 2008 436: 435: 432: 425: 417: 416: 413: 410: 406: 405: 397: 396: 362: 350: 349: 346: 345: 339: 329: 328: 310: 300: 280: 279: 278: 276: 269: 268: 222: 210: 209: 200: 198: 197: 194: 193: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2994: 2983: 2980: 2978: 2975: 2973: 2970: 2968: 2965: 2963: 2960: 2958: 2955: 2953: 2950: 2948: 2945: 2943: 2940: 2938: 2935: 2933: 2930: 2928: 2925: 2923: 2920: 2918: 2915: 2913: 2910: 2908: 2905: 2903: 2900: 2898: 2895: 2894: 2892: 2885: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2871: 2868: 2865: 2856: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2833:pronunciation 2830: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2790: 2786: 2785:Roger 8 Roger 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2743:Roger 8 Roger 2740: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2693: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2683:Roger 8 Roger 2680: 2665: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2639:Roger 8 Roger 2636: 2635: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2600:Roger 8 Roger 2597: 2596: 2591: 2590: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2568:Roger 8 Roger 2557: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2527:Roger 8 Roger 2525: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2514: 2511: 2507: 2504: 2496: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2478:Roger 8 Roger 2475: 2471: 2461: 2460: 2455: 2450: 2449: 2438: 2434: 2431: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2418: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2394: 2389: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2339: 2331: 2330: 2325: 2320: 2319: 2308: 2304: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2288: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2264: 2259: 2254: 2250: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2242: 2238: 2234: 2229: 2221: 2220: 2215: 2210: 2209: 2198: 2194: 2191: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2178: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2154: 2149: 2144: 2138: 2132: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2120: 2114: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2091: 2083: 2082: 2077: 2072: 2071: 2060: 2056: 2053: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2040: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2016: 2011: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1984: 1980: 1976: 1971: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1864: 1861: 1856: 1854: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1786: 1783: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1773: 1772: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1761: 1756: 1754: 1748: 1743: 1739: 1736: 1731: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1719: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1688: 1683: 1679: 1677: 1672: 1670: 1665: 1661: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1634: 1631: 1627: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1611: 1606: 1604: 1600: 1595: 1593: 1589: 1588:is irrelevant 1585: 1580: 1577: 1572: 1570: 1565: 1561: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1500: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1486: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463:WP:UKCOUNTIES 1460: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1379: 1377: 1372: 1357: 1354: 1349: 1347: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1293: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1124: 1118: 1116: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1090:81.152.162.31 1087: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1016: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1008: 1007: 1001: 998: 995: 992: 990: 986: 985: 983: 982: 978: 974: 973: 972: 969: 966: 963: 960: 957: 954: 951: 948: 945: 941: 939: 935: 924: 922: 921: 905: 901: 895: 892: 891: 888: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 846: 838: 827: 825: 822: 818: 817: 813: 807: 804: 801: 797: 796: 784: 780: 774: 771: 770: 767: 750: 746: 742: 741: 733: 732:Surrey portal 727: 722: 720: 717: 713: 712: 708: 702: 699: 696: 692: 691: 680: 667:Hertfordshire 663: 662: 657: 653: 650: 646: 645: 641: 636: 631: 630:Hertfordshire 628: 625: 621: 620: 608: 604: 598: 595: 594: 591: 574: 570: 566: 565: 557: 556:London portal 551: 546: 544: 541: 537: 536: 532: 526: 523: 520: 516: 515: 511: 507: 501: 493: 492: 482: 473: 472: 465: 460: 452: 450: 449: 445: 442: 438: 437: 433: 431: 430: 426: 423: 419: 418: 414: 411: 408: 407: 402: 398: 393: 391: 390: 382: 378: 374: 373: 372: 366: 363: 360: 356: 355: 343: 340: 338: 334: 331: 330: 326: 322: 318: 317:WP:UKCOUNTIES 314: 311: 309: 305: 302: 301: 295: 292: 289: 284: 277: 275: 274: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 223: 220: 216: 215: 196: 195: 192: 189: 187: 183: 182: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2872: 2869: 2866: 2862: 2839:— Preceding 2836: 2817: 2781: 2699: 2677: 2634:My Fair Lady 2632: 2614: 2594: 2593: 2588: 2587: 2584: 2564: 2548: 2523: 2505: 2494: 2473: 2469: 2467: 2445: 2442: 2417:source check 2396: 2390: 2387: 2340: 2337: 2315: 2312: 2287:source check 2266: 2260: 2257: 2230: 2227: 2205: 2202: 2177:source check 2156: 2150: 2147: 2092: 2089: 2067: 2064: 2039:source check 2018: 2012: 2009: 1972: 1969: 1928: 1893: 1874: 1852: 1827:M25 motorway 1752: 1744: 1740: 1732: 1728: 1720: 1707: 1697: 1684: 1680: 1673: 1669:London Basin 1666: 1662: 1635: 1629: 1614: 1607: 1598: 1596: 1583: 1581: 1573: 1568: 1557: 1501: 1487: 1483: 1447:78.86.30.242 1441:— Preceding 1438: 1404:— Preceding 1400: 1380: 1375: 1373: 1369: 1345: 1327:constiuency. 1275: 1272:Hampton Wick 1255: 1214: 1203: 1177: 1156: 1152: 1141:high sheriff 1119: 1112: 1084:— Preceding 1034:I wonder if 1033: 971: 964: 958: 952: 946: 932: 926: 899: 875:UK geography 843: 806:UK geography 778: 738: 659: 602: 562: 506:WikiProjects 489: 464:Good article 463: 447: 446: 428: 427: 387: 385: 381:please do so 369: 368: 364: 341: 336: 332: 324: 320: 312: 307: 303: 290: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 232: 225: 184: 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 2875:Jackiespeel 1747:Two Ronnies 1706:" but then 1642:Potters Bar 1621:Royal Parks 1410:86.8.65.214 1323:deliveries. 866:to do lists 226:written in 148:free images 31:not a forum 2891:Categories 2454:Report bug 2324:Report bug 2214:Report bug 2076:Report bug 1912:above here 1831:Spelthorne 1730:London. 1725:Conclusion 1700:post towns 1650:Spelthorne 1490:FreeFlow99 1237:FreeFlow99 1204:explicitly 934:To-do list 850:user-group 434:Not listed 375:under the 2739:Yorkshire 2437:this tool 2430:this tool 2343:Middlesex 2307:this tool 2300:this tool 2233:Middlesex 2197:this tool 2190:this tool 2137:dead link 2113:dead link 2095:Middlesex 2059:this tool 2052:this tool 1975:Middlesex 1934:AlwynJPie 1897:AlwynJPie 1839:Colnbrook 1716:Berkshire 1630:Middlesex 1599:Middlesex 1538:Justgravy 1505:AlwynJPie 1397:Existence 1306:Lozleader 1259:AlwynJPie 1164:Lozleader 1157:placename 1056:Lozleader 938:Middlesex 862:resources 494:is rated 365:Middlesex 237:travelled 88:if needed 71:Be polite 25:Middlesex 21:talk page 2841:unsigned 2524:Tēnā koe 2443:Cheers.— 2313:Cheers.— 2203:Cheers.— 2065:Cheers.— 1950:enough! 1735:snobbish 1443:unsigned 1406:unsigned 1384:Tetron76 1382:account. 1329:Tetron76 1278:Tetron76 1190:Tetron76 1126:Tetron76 1086:unsigned 661:inactive 635:inactive 496:GA-class 389:reassess 249:artefact 186:Archives 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 2581:Grammar 2347:my edit 2237:my edit 2141:tag to 2117:tag to 2099:my edit 1979:my edit 1654:Laleham 1626:Hampton 962:refresh 950:history 902:on the 781:on the 605:on the 412:Process 253:analyse 245:defence 154:WP refs 142:scholar 2549:Diolch 2506:Diolch 2133:Added 2109:Added 1952:Tmol42 1930:Tmol42 1916:Tmol42 1853:Adam37 1835:Surrey 1753:Adam37 1704:Bucks. 1636:4. i. 1520:Tmol42 1467:WP:3RR 1346:Adam37 1215:change 1153:county 754:Surrey 745:Surrey 701:Surrey 578:London 569:London 525:London 502:scale. 453:Listed 415:Result 241:centre 233:colour 126:Google 1823:Poyle 1658:Poyle 1646:Ridge 1222:anion 956:watch 483:This 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 2879:talk 2849:talk 2824:talk 2820:MRSC 2804:talk 2800:MRSC 2789:talk 2769:talk 2765:MRSC 2747:talk 2725:talk 2721:MRSC 2710:talk 2706:MRSC 2687:talk 2643:talk 2604:talk 2572:talk 2531:talk 2482:talk 1956:talk 1938:talk 1920:talk 1901:talk 1881:talk 1877:MRSC 1859:Talk 1833:and 1800:talk 1796:MRSC 1759:Talk 1685:7. 1590:for 1542:talk 1524:talk 1509:talk 1494:talk 1475:talk 1471:MRSC 1451:talk 1430:talk 1426:MRSC 1414:talk 1388:talk 1352:Talk 1333:talk 1310:talk 1282:talk 1263:talk 1241:talk 1226:talk 1219:Nilf 1194:talk 1168:talk 1130:talk 1094:talk 1074:talk 1070:MRSC 1060:talk 1044:talk 1040:MRSC 944:edit 936:for 848:, a 409:Date 294:edit 288:view 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 2411:RfC 2381:to 2371:to 2361:to 2281:RfC 2251:to 2171:RfC 2127:to 2033:RfC 2003:to 1993:to 1714:to 1562:to 1469:). 894:Mid 773:Low 597:Mid 323:or 176:TWL 2893:: 2881:) 2851:) 2826:) 2806:) 2791:) 2771:) 2749:) 2727:) 2712:) 2689:) 2645:) 2637:. 2617:. 2606:) 2574:) 2551:, 2533:) 2508:, 2484:) 2424:. 2419:}} 2415:{{ 2294:. 2289:}} 2285:{{ 2184:. 2179:}} 2175:{{ 2139:}} 2135:{{ 2115:}} 2111:{{ 2046:. 2041:}} 2037:{{ 1958:) 1940:) 1922:) 1903:) 1883:) 1802:) 1605:. 1594:. 1571:: 1544:) 1526:) 1511:) 1496:) 1477:) 1453:) 1432:) 1416:) 1390:) 1335:) 1312:) 1284:) 1265:) 1243:) 1228:) 1196:) 1170:) 1147:, 1143:, 1132:) 1096:) 1076:) 1062:) 1046:) 864:, 392:it 383:. 335:: 306:: 251:, 247:, 243:, 239:, 235:, 156:) 54:; 2877:( 2847:( 2822:( 2802:( 2787:( 2767:( 2745:( 2723:( 2708:( 2685:( 2641:( 2615:n 2602:( 2595:i 2589:o 2570:( 2529:( 2480:( 2456:) 2452:( 2439:. 2432:. 2326:) 2322:( 2309:. 2302:. 2216:) 2212:( 2199:. 2192:. 2078:) 2074:( 2061:. 2054:. 1954:( 1936:( 1918:( 1899:( 1879:( 1798:( 1640:( 1566:. 1540:( 1522:( 1507:( 1492:( 1473:( 1449:( 1428:( 1412:( 1386:( 1331:( 1308:( 1280:( 1261:( 1239:( 1224:( 1192:( 1166:( 1128:( 1092:( 1072:( 1058:( 1042:( 965:· 959:· 953:· 947:· 940:: 906:. 872:. 785:. 664:. 637:) 633:( 609:. 508:. 394:. 342:A 333:Q 313:A 304:Q 291:· 267:. 191:1 188:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Middlesex
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Archives
1

British English
varieties of English
relevant style guide
broad consensus

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.