819:
787:
874:
847:
977:
771:
884:
989:
803:
386:
755:
624:
214:
739:
297:
276:
1336:: I was about to close the discussion as "moved", as there are supporting arguments, and no opposing arguments. But there were two issues that caught my eye: first — I am not sure about the consensus regarding "Raytheon" being a disamb, or redirect. The second thing — there are around 1,000 mainspace incoming links to "Raytheon". Do these links need to be re-targeted to something else, or be left as is? —usernamekiran
1029:
245:
696:
685:
674:
663:
307:
1176:- what's the basis for arguing that this article should be the primary meaning of "Raytheon"? I'd imagine that when most people today say "Raytheon", they're referring to the current company, not the one that merged into it 3 years ago. For example, when my wife's cousin says he works for Raytheon, he isn't telling us he got laid off 3 years ago and is unemployed. He's saying he works for RTX.
582:
538:
652:
1309:(but somewhat ambivalent). Technically (and legally, which I know isn't dispositive on Knowledge policy), UTC acquired Raytheon Company as a subsidiary and changed its name from UTC to Raytheon Technologies Corporation (and subsequently, to RTX). It was discussed as a merger of equal from a management standpoint, but it was technically an acquisition.
1316:
Moreover, it seems a bit much to have separate pages for
Raytheon Company, the new Raytheon subdivision of RTX, Raytheon Missile and Defense, and Raytheon Intelligence and Space. All four pages deal with basically the same business enterprise; the only real change across them is (1) their acquisition
1312:
The wholly-owned
Raytheon Company is effectively the "Raytheon" subdivision of RTX. Technically a bit of the old Rockwell stuff made its way into the Raytheon subdivision, and some of the old Raytheon Company stuff made its way into Collins . . . but other than that, the Raytheon subdivision of RTX
1103:
can be created. Regarding the incoming links to "Raytheon", it has been pointed out some links to need to retargeted. This should be done by someone familiar with the subject. Thank you everybody for keeping the discussion civil. Regards, —usernamekiran
762:
552:
1498:
I think you did. I was mostly just trying to get him back here to see if he felt those concerns were addressed. Assuming they have been, I'm sure if he feels they've been addressed this discussion can be wrapped up.
794:
560:
810:
564:
164:
1600:
746:
548:
1595:
826:
568:
404:
1620:
507:
205:
1630:
1358:
1357:, which you've apparently agreed there is a consensus for. I don't see the need for a disambiguation page at all, as a hatnote should suffice, but one can be created at
1100:
778:
556:
1655:
1615:
1353:, while the rest are probably for the previous incarnations of Raytheon, which the moved article will be covering. As for the consensus regarding the move, it is to
1206:, the topic of this article is the pre-merger company, not the present-day division. Wouldn’t a new article be named simply Raytheon and this article be left as-is?
1625:
637:
158:
967:
914:
1524:
from mainspace. I was not sure if the links needed to be retargeted. BilCat has addressed that as well. I will shortly close the discussion. —usernamekiran
1318:
1520:
This has been addressed. The second doubt was about incoming links, as the
Raytheon (which is currently a redirect to "RTX Corporation"), has more than
363:
931:
594:
1438:
1394:
1665:
1650:
1590:
1007:
957:
623:
1099:
as proposed. As discussed in the discussion below, "Raytheon" page does not need to be a disambiguation page. If necessary in the future,
1675:
1670:
1585:
1441:
for the new
Raytheon division, but I stopped working on it once the discussionsnon expanding this articleto cover the division began. If
1086:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
921:
443:
430:
1640:
1580:
90:
1246:"Raytheon" should be a disambiguation page. We can sort of which one is which with the short descriptions on a disambiguation page --
1361:. (That's my "involved" advice. If you're not certain about the consensus on that, then you can let another editor make the close.)
1570:
926:
353:
1660:
1645:
1635:
1575:
1159:
Per nom. I'm involved, as I've made comments in discussions elsewhere on the issue, or I'd just close this and move it myself.
589:
543:
1424:, yes. I think it would be better if I defer this. I'm also not sure when I will get free time on my computer. —usernamekiran
1397:. I don't know if that's a duplicate article from this one, but I think that needs to be resolved before any move comes here.
1610:
909:
598:
96:
17:
905:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
417:
329:
213:
1552:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1002:
897:
857:
852:
437:
1605:
1516:
I do not have any objections/opinions regarding this discussion. The only doubt was the comment by IP above which said
1057:
179:
41:
1049:
1565:
1247:
146:
1108:
55:
1508:
1476:
1406:
1068:
320:
281:
110:
1528:
1428:
1409:
498:
115:
31:
1521:
1340:
1326:
1149:
1387:
1234:
1215:
85:
1467:'s concerns. Once all that is cleared up, I'm sure either one of us would be satisfied enough to move this.
1458:
1370:
1255:
1190:+1. What does the usage of this look like in reliable sources? Are news articles using the old name or RTX?
593:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
411:
398:
256:
1449:, it will be expanded to cover the current division, and I'll request the draft's deletion at that point.
1295:
1276:
1194:
1185:
140:
424:
76:
1511:
1493:
1479:
818:
1168:
196:
1077:
136:
1090:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1060:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
328:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1525:
1425:
1337:
1322:
1105:
201:
120:
186:
1211:
1145:
470:
1035:
1251:
1087:
1053:
1045:
450:
262:
994:
889:
1317:
by UTC/RTX and (2) about 3 years of changes in how the company was internally organized.
1040:
8:
1504:
1472:
1402:
1272:
1181:
244:
66:
1464:
1463:
Thank you. That resolves my concerns. I'm not quite certain if you have a response to @
1376:
1291:
1230:
1130:
786:
81:
1484:
Which of
Usernamekiran's concerns did I not address? I thought I'd answered them all.
152:
1207:
1141:
62:
1489:
1454:
1442:
1366:
1164:
1114:
456:
312:
1267:
or to have RTX Corporation and
Raytheon as two separate articles? Please clarify.
172:
1350:
1264:
1122:
487:
873:
846:
1500:
1468:
1434:
1416:
1398:
1268:
1177:
463:
224:
1559:
1287:
1226:
1191:
1126:
902:
976:
770:
901:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1485:
1450:
1421:
1362:
1225:- We can add the new Raytheon division of RTX to the Raytheon article. --
1160:
385:
229:
802:
754:
228:
1446:
1380:
1354:
1346:
1118:
226:
35:
325:
1313:
is largely the same business line as the
Raytheon Company page.
738:
230:
1379:
I came here with the same intent yesterday, but noticed that
405:
Knowledge:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
296:
275:
1601:
Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
581:
537:
1596:
C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
171:
984:
879:
635:
This article has been checked against the following
324:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
302:
26:
1621:
North
American military history task force articles
763:
Military science, technology, and theory task force
1631:United States military history task force articles
1656:C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
1616:C-Class North American military history articles
1557:
44:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1626:C-Class United States military history articles
1349:, some will probably need to be re-targeted to
185:
1518:"Raytheon" should be a disambiguation page.
444:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
431:Category:Company articles needing attention
1076:The following is a closed discussion of a
1027:
795:North American military history task force
393:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
811:United States military history task force
1034:Text and/or other creative content from
587:This article is within the scope of the
242:
14:
1558:
607:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
597:. To use this banner, please see the
1666:Mid-importance Massachusetts articles
1651:Low-importance United States articles
1591:Military aviation task force articles
610:Template:WikiProject Military history
469:Help expand stub articles located at
1095:The result of the move request was:
1023:
895:This article is within the scope of
418:Category:Unassessed company articles
318:This article is within the scope of
238:
942:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
261:It is of interest to the following
34:for discussing improvements to the
24:
1676:WikiProject United States articles
1671:WikiProject Massachusetts articles
1586:C-Class military aviation articles
975:
945:Template:WikiProject United States
817:
801:
785:
769:
753:
737:
622:
25:
1687:
1641:Post-Cold War task force articles
1581:C-Class military history articles
1052:on April 2020. The former page's
1548:The discussion above is closed.
1263:Are you suggesting merging into
987:
882:
872:
845:
694:
683:
672:
661:
650:
580:
536:
495:Tag company talk pages with the
384:
305:
295:
274:
243:
212:
56:Click here to start a new topic.
1571:Mid-importance company articles
962:This article has been rated as
358:This article has been rated as
338:Knowledge:WikiProject Companies
1661:C-Class Massachusetts articles
1646:C-Class United States articles
1636:C-Class Post-Cold War articles
1576:WikiProject Companies articles
484:Tag company articles with the
341:Template:WikiProject Companies
13:
1:
1133:) 23:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
1000:This article is supported by
332:and see a list of open tasks.
53:Put new text under old text.
1611:Weaponry task force articles
1069:Requested move 5 August 2023
747:Military aviation task force
590:Military history WikiProject
375:WikiProject Companies To-do:
7:
1529:14:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
1512:03:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
1494:03:28, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
1480:01:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
1459:01:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
1429:22:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
1410:15:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
1371:08:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
1341:07:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
1327:02:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
1296:17:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
1277:04:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
1256:04:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
1235:16:16, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
1216:01:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
1195:22:42, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
1186:12:00, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
1169:02:52, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
1150:03:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
1109:14:46, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
61:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1692:
968:project's importance scale
655:Referencing and citation:
364:project's importance scale
1606:C-Class weaponry articles
1359:Raytheon (disambiguation)
1345:On the incoming links to
1125:is called "Raytheon". --
1101:Raytheon (disambiguation)
1044:was copied or moved into
1003:WikiProject Massachusetts
983:
961:
898:WikiProject United States
867:
825:
809:
793:
777:
761:
745:
720:
716:
634:
613:military history articles
575:
370:
357:
290:
269:
91:Be welcoming to newcomers
1566:C-Class company articles
1550:Please do not modify it.
1286:- Two separate pages. --
1083:Please do not modify it.
903:United States of America
827:Post-Cold War task force
721:Associated task forces:
666:Coverage and accuracy:
1121:– The new division of
980:
948:United States articles
822:
806:
790:
774:
758:
742:
699:Supporting materials:
627:
471:Category:Company stubs
251:This article is rated
86:avoid personal attacks
1046:Raytheon Technologies
979:
821:
805:
789:
773:
757:
741:
626:
508:requests for comments
499:WikiProject Companies
321:WikiProject Companies
206:Auto-archiving period
111:Neutral point of view
18:Talk:Raytheon Company
1522:1,000 incoming links
1388:R with possibilities
995:Massachusetts portal
890:United States portal
116:No original research
1058:provide attribution
916:Articles Requested!
779:Weaponry task force
688:Grammar and style:
641:for B-class status:
1334:page mover comment
981:
823:
807:
791:
775:
759:
743:
628:
595:list of open tasks
257:content assessment
97:dispute resolution
58:
1152:
1064:
1063:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1013:
840:
839:
836:
835:
832:
831:
712:
711:
657:criterion not met
599:full instructions
531:
530:
527:
526:
523:
522:
519:
518:
237:
236:
77:Assume good faith
54:
16:(Redirected from
1683:
1443:Raytheon Company
1420:
1392:
1386:
1134:
1115:Raytheon Company
1085:
1043:
1041:Raytheon Company
1031:
1030:
1024:
997:
992:
991:
990:
950:
949:
946:
943:
940:
892:
887:
886:
885:
876:
869:
868:
863:
860:
849:
842:
841:
728:
718:
717:
702:
698:
697:
691:
687:
686:
680:
676:
675:
669:
665:
664:
658:
654:
653:
632:
631:
615:
614:
611:
608:
605:
604:Military history
584:
577:
576:
571:
544:Military history
540:
533:
532:
502:
491:
457:Portal:Companies
399:Article requests
388:
381:
380:
372:
371:
346:
345:
344:company articles
342:
339:
336:
315:
313:Companies portal
310:
309:
308:
299:
292:
291:
286:
278:
271:
270:
254:
248:
247:
239:
231:
217:
216:
207:
190:
189:
175:
106:Article policies
27:
21:
1691:
1690:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1414:
1390:
1384:
1383:is tagged with
1351:RTX Corporation
1265:RTX Corporation
1123:RTX Corporation
1081:
1071:
1039:
1028:
993:
988:
986:
947:
944:
941:
938:
937:
936:
922:Become a Member
888:
883:
881:
861:
855:
726:
700:
695:
689:
684:
678:
673:
667:
662:
656:
651:
612:
609:
606:
603:
602:
546:
515:
512:
496:
485:
343:
340:
337:
334:
333:
311:
306:
304:
284:
255:on Knowledge's
252:
233:
232:
227:
204:
132:
127:
126:
125:
102:
72:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1689:
1679:
1678:
1673:
1668:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1638:
1633:
1628:
1623:
1618:
1613:
1608:
1603:
1598:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1578:
1573:
1568:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1439:Draft:Raytheon
1395:Draft:Raytheon
1373:
1330:
1329:
1314:
1310:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1258:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1171:
1112:
1093:
1092:
1078:requested move
1072:
1070:
1067:
1062:
1061:
1056:now serves to
1032:
1020:
1019:
1016:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1008:Mid-importance
999:
998:
982:
972:
971:
964:Low-importance
960:
954:
953:
951:
935:
934:
929:
924:
919:
912:
910:Template Usage
906:
894:
893:
877:
865:
864:
862:Low‑importance
850:
838:
837:
834:
833:
830:
829:
824:
814:
813:
808:
798:
797:
792:
782:
781:
776:
766:
765:
760:
750:
749:
744:
734:
733:
731:
729:
723:
722:
714:
713:
710:
709:
707:
705:
704:
703:
692:
681:
670:
659:
645:
644:
642:
629:
619:
618:
616:
585:
573:
572:
541:
529:
528:
525:
524:
521:
520:
517:
516:
514:
513:
511:
510:
504:
503:project banner
493:
481:
473:
459:
446:
433:
420:
407:
392:
390:
389:
377:
376:
368:
367:
360:Mid-importance
356:
350:
349:
347:
330:the discussion
317:
316:
300:
288:
287:
285:Mid‑importance
279:
267:
266:
260:
249:
235:
234:
225:
223:
222:
219:
218:
192:
191:
129:
128:
124:
123:
118:
113:
104:
103:
101:
100:
93:
88:
79:
73:
71:
70:
59:
50:
49:
46:
45:
39:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1688:
1677:
1674:
1672:
1669:
1667:
1664:
1662:
1659:
1657:
1654:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1622:
1619:
1617:
1614:
1612:
1609:
1607:
1604:
1602:
1599:
1597:
1594:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1574:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1564:
1563:
1561:
1551:
1530:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1465:Usernamekiran
1462:
1461:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1389:
1382:
1378:
1377:Usernamekiran
1374:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1339:
1335:
1332:
1331:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:TheNorseEagle
1315:
1311:
1308:
1305:
1304:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1202:
1201:
1196:
1193:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1172:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1140:
1139:
1132:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1102:
1098:
1091:
1089:
1084:
1079:
1074:
1073:
1066:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1033:
1026:
1025:
1009:
1006:(assessed as
1005:
1004:
996:
985:
978:
974:
973:
969:
965:
959:
956:
955:
952:
939:United States
933:
930:
928:
925:
923:
920:
918:
917:
913:
911:
908:
907:
904:
900:
899:
891:
880:
878:
875:
871:
870:
866:
859:
858:Massachusetts
854:
853:United States
851:
848:
844:
843:
828:
820:
816:
815:
812:
804:
800:
799:
796:
788:
784:
783:
780:
772:
768:
767:
764:
756:
752:
751:
748:
740:
736:
735:
732:
730:
725:
724:
719:
715:
708:
706:
701:criterion met
693:
690:criterion met
682:
679:criterion met
671:
668:criterion met
660:
649:
648:
647:
646:
643:
640:
639:
633:
630:
625:
621:
620:
617:
600:
596:
592:
591:
586:
583:
579:
578:
574:
570:
569:Post-Cold War
566:
565:United States
562:
561:North America
558:
554:
550:
545:
542:
539:
535:
534:
509:
505:
500:
494:
489:
483:
482:
480:
478:
474:
472:
468:
466:
465:
460:
458:
455:
453:
452:
447:
445:
442:
440:
439:
434:
432:
429:
427:
426:
421:
419:
416:
414:
413:
408:
406:
403:
401:
400:
395:
394:
391:
387:
383:
382:
379:
378:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
355:
352:
351:
348:
331:
327:
323:
322:
314:
303:
301:
298:
294:
293:
289:
283:
280:
277:
273:
272:
268:
264:
258:
250:
246:
241:
240:
221:
220:
215:
211:
203:
200:
198:
194:
193:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
131:
130:
122:
121:Verifiability
119:
117:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
98:
94:
92:
89:
87:
83:
80:
78:
75:
74:
68:
64:
63:Learn to edit
60:
57:
52:
51:
48:
47:
43:
37:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1549:
1517:
1445:is moved to
1437:: I created
1333:
1306:
1283:
1260:
1243:
1222:
1208:WikiRedactor
1203:
1173:
1156:
1142:Adumbrativus
1137:
1136:
1113:
1096:
1094:
1082:
1075:
1065:
1036:this version
1001:
963:
927:Project Talk
915:
896:
636:
588:
490:|Companies}}
476:
475:
462:
461:
449:
448:
436:
435:
423:
422:
410:
409:
397:
396:
359:
319:
263:WikiProjects
209:
195:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
105:
30:This is the
1248:67.70.25.80
1088:move review
677:Structure:
159:free images
42:not a forum
1560:Categories
1138:Relisting.
553:Technology
1501:estar8806
1469:estar8806
1435:Estar8806
1417:Estar8806
1399:estar8806
1269:Graywalls
1178:Parsecboy
1050:this edit
335:Companies
326:companies
282:Companies
99:if needed
82:Be polite
32:talk page
1447:Raytheon
1381:Raytheon
1355:Raytheon
1347:Raytheon
1288:Jax 0677
1227:Jax 0677
1174:Question
1127:Jax 0677
1119:Raytheon
638:criteria
557:Weaponry
549:Aviation
492:template
451:Maintain
425:Copyedit
197:Archives
67:get help
40:This is
38:article.
36:Raytheon
1307:Support
1261:Comment
1244:Comment
1204:Comment
1157:Support
1054:history
966:on the
506:Answer
438:Infobox
362:on the
253:C-class
210:90 days
165:WP refs
153:scholar
1526:(talk)
1486:BilCat
1451:BilCat
1426:(talk)
1363:BilCat
1338:(talk)
1284:Reply
1223:Reply
1161:BilCat
1106:(talk)
932:Alerts
488:portal
412:Assess
259:scale.
137:Google
1393:from
1097:moved
1048:with
477:Other
464:Stubs
180:JSTOR
141:books
95:Seek
1505:talk
1490:talk
1473:talk
1455:talk
1422:Bill
1403:talk
1367:talk
1323:talk
1292:talk
1273:talk
1252:talk
1231:talk
1212:talk
1182:talk
1165:talk
1146:talk
1131:talk
173:FENS
147:news
84:and
1038:of
958:Low
354:Mid
187:TWL
1562::
1507:)
1492:)
1475:)
1457:)
1405:)
1391:}}
1385:{{
1369:)
1325:)
1294:)
1275:)
1254:)
1233:)
1214:)
1192:Ed
1184:)
1167:)
1148:)
1135:—
1117:→
1080:.
1010:).
856::
727:/
567:/
563:/
559:/
555:/
551:/
547::
501:}}
497:{{
486:{{
208::
167:)
65:;
1509:★
1503:(
1488:(
1477:★
1471:(
1453:(
1433:@
1419::
1415:@
1407:★
1401:(
1375:@
1365:(
1321:(
1290:(
1271:(
1250:(
1229:(
1210:(
1180:(
1163:(
1144:(
1129:(
970:.
601:.
479::
467::
454::
441::
428::
415::
402::
366:.
265::
202:1
199::
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
69:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
