Knowledge

Talk:Real-Time Streaming Protocol

Source đź“ť

616:
The most valuable ability of a resource constrained IP CCTV camera/network server is the multi-cast ability of a media stream to multiple destinations. The multi-cast is available only by using the RTP-over-UDP protocol - a one of several RTSP transports. Not only that, but also, the UDP transport is the best way of achieving the maximum throughput of a video/audio stream between a producer and consumer device over an IP network. In fact, the most recent and arguably the most widely accepted standard in the area of IP-based physical security is the ONVIF standard (www.onvif.org), which requires the UDP transport as mandatory for any product claiming compatibility the the ONVIF standard. Please review the topic and correct any unconfirmed claims.
249: 222: 191: 317: 615:
Description of DESCRIBE request asserts that the UDP transport is: "deprecated and very rarely used". As a person, who is actively involved in software development in the area of IP video surveillance and security products, I would like to assure you, that this information is completely incorrect.
418:
By the way, RTSP CAN be used to download files using http or ftp. You just ask the server for a describe, and get an SDP file back, which tells the location of a http or ftp server (I'm quite sure SDP allows this). You wouldn't initiate the download using RTSP once you have the SDP. (I'd be
414:
I removed it, because RTSP is NOT a "real time protocol" in this sense! As I explained above, RTSP is just the "remote". True, it's typically used with RTP to do the "real time streaming" part, but then this disadvantage is more appropriate with RTP.
760:
section. I'm planning on making that change very soon, but I wanted to let people know why I'm making the change. All of the "Real-" this and "Real-" that references in the first paragraph make for a confusing introduction to readers of the article.
703:
It seems to be implied (incorrectly) that RTSP will trigger an RTP stream exclusively. Suggest using the more generic "stream" nomenclature (mirroring RFC 2326) when discussing RTSP unless discussing something specific to RTP in regards to RTSP.
447:
RtpRtspStack. Google search results just show me same wiki pages as this one. So where do I find more information about RtpRtspStack? Does the author, who put the note to this streaming server in this article, make a typo error?
153: 684: 147: 842: 749:
in 2005 (though Magnus Westerlund generously left several of us in the heading of the publication of RFC 7826 in 2016, even though many of us moved on to other things).
627: 475: 365: 715: 459: 470:
Given the current page makes no mention of RtpRtspStack (and the only occurrence of 'stack' looks nothing like that), perhaps this comment needs to be deleted. --
326: 232: 361: 837: 479: 389: 331: 44: 505: 651: 307: 719: 631: 524: 463: 598: 572: 546: 509: 501: 559:
Okay guys I made the change. I cited the FFmpeg documentation, and removed all the chatter about no references. RTSP was already mentioned in
832: 436: 168: 135: 827: 297: 79: 730:
The relationship between "RTSP" and "RTP" is confusing in this article (and in general). I'll accept my share of the blame for that.
847: 745:. However, I'm a very experienced Knowledge editor (editing since 2001) and I haven't really been dealing with RTSP since leaving 698: 485: 679: 642:-over-UDP. Which has nothing to do with video quality, throughput or whatever else. Sigh. Time to fix the article again I guess. 563:, but I did make a formatting change to make a bulletted list rather than prose. Should be good on those two articles for now. — 129: 685: 610: 442: 85: 623: 471: 428: 369: 273: 756:' use of the proprietary "RDT" alternative to RTP should be moved out of the introduction of the article, and into a new " 822: 711: 397: 125: 781: 638:
You missed what it talked about. You're referring (explicitly) about RTP-over-UDP, and instead the article referred to
455: 30: 667: 175: 381:
Seriously, you're comparing two things that have totaly different functions. RTSP is your remote, RTP is your TV.
852: 256: 227: 99: 765: 104: 20: 406: 74: 769: 202: 24: 490:
The main article needs to be updated as it indicates that FFmpeg supports RTSP but without documentation.
141: 65: 657: 515:
Yes, this seems like dated information, based on your link. Any objections to changing the article? —
432: 272:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
393: 109: 378:
Let me answer that question with another question: How different is an airplane from an airport?
269: 664:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: 109.77.xx.xx and the indefinite article
208: 707: 619: 568: 520: 451: 424: 385: 357: 8: 725: 647: 190: 55: 70: 675: 51: 161: 777: 564: 516: 643: 594: 542: 816: 734: 753: 746: 738: 671: 737:
up front. I was one of the co-authors of RTSP 1.0 and RTSP 2.0, and I was
560: 773: 803: 590: 538: 496: 265: 261: 248: 221: 348: 534: 786: 419:
surprissed if this is used anywhere, it's quite pointless.)
742: 316: 668:
Talk:XMPP#Please discuss changes to the indefinite article
741:' representative in our discussions with others at the 843:
C-Class Computer networking articles of Mid-importance
160: 260:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 15: 814: 533:If there's anything that needs to be updated in 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 174: 838:Mid-importance Computer networking articles 188: 815: 833:C-Class Computer networking articles 254:This article is within the scope of 184: 804:https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2326 493:The documentation can be found in: 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 13: 497:http://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html#rtsp 315: 14: 864: 828:Low-importance Computing articles 848:All Computer networking articles 699:RTSP does not mandate use of RTP 486:FFMpeg has documentation on RTSP 353:How different is RTSP from RTP? 247: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 302:This article has been rated as 282:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing 797: 772:article. More in a bit... -- 599:12:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 573:02:04, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 547:14:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 525:03:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 285:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 782:11:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 611:Deprecation of UDP transport? 510:16:08, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 464:12:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC) 443:RtpRtspStack - I cant find it 324:This article is supported by 276:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 770:Real Time Streaming Protocol 480:01:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 437:06:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 25:Real-Time Streaming Protocol 7: 632:08:49, 9 October 2012 (UTC) 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 869: 823:C-Class Computing articles 400:) 19:07, 15 September 2005 308:project's importance scale 720:18:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC) 372:) 12:46, 24 February 2005 323: 301: 242: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 764:So my plan is to create 757: 680:15:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 652:12:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC) 853:All Computing articles 537:please do that too. -- 320: 270:information technology 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 733:I'm going to note my 407:Removed Disadvantages 327:Networking task force 319: 257:WikiProject Computing 100:Neutral point of view 752:The paragraph about 735:conflict-of-interest 105:No original research 658:Indefinite article 321: 288:Computing articles 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 766:an "#RTP" section 722: 710:comment added by 622:comment added by 454:comment added by 439: 427:comment added by 402: 388:comment added by 374: 360:comment added by 346: 345: 342: 341: 338: 337: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 860: 806: 801: 705: 693: 692: 688: 634: 561:FFmpeg#Protocols 466: 422: 401: 382: 373: 354: 290: 289: 286: 283: 280: 251: 244: 243: 238: 235: 224: 217: 216: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 868: 867: 863: 862: 861: 859: 858: 857: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 802: 798: 789: 728: 701: 694: 690: 686: 660: 617: 613: 488: 449: 445: 409: 383: 355: 351: 287: 284: 281: 278: 277: 236: 230: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 866: 856: 855: 850: 845: 840: 835: 830: 825: 808: 807: 795: 794: 790: 788: 785: 727: 724: 700: 697: 683: 659: 656: 655: 654: 624:87.110.179.226 612: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 552: 551: 550: 549: 528: 527: 487: 484: 483: 482: 472:202.74.169.146 444: 441: 429:157.193.214.17 408: 405: 404: 403: 379: 362:203.101.73.166 350: 347: 344: 343: 340: 339: 336: 335: 332:Mid-importance 322: 312: 311: 304:Low-importance 300: 294: 293: 291: 274:the discussion 252: 240: 239: 237:Low‑importance 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 865: 854: 851: 849: 846: 844: 841: 839: 836: 834: 831: 829: 826: 824: 821: 820: 818: 805: 800: 796: 793: 784: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 762: 759: 755: 750: 748: 744: 740: 736: 731: 723: 721: 717: 713: 712:96.91.184.221 709: 696: 689: 682: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 636: 635: 633: 629: 625: 621: 600: 596: 592: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 531: 530: 529: 526: 522: 518: 514: 513: 512: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 494: 491: 481: 477: 473: 469: 468: 467: 465: 461: 457: 453: 440: 438: 434: 430: 426: 420: 416: 412: 399: 395: 391: 390:213.224.83.20 387: 380: 377: 376: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 333: 330:(assessed as 329: 328: 318: 314: 313: 309: 305: 299: 296: 295: 292: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 258: 253: 250: 246: 245: 241: 234: 229: 226: 223: 219: 218: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 799: 791: 763: 754:RealNetworks 751: 747:RealNetworks 739:RealNetworks 732: 729: 706:— Preceding 702: 695: 661: 639: 618:— Preceding 614: 500: 495: 492: 489: 456:80.228.181.6 446: 421: 417: 413: 410: 352: 349:RTSP vs. RTP 325: 303: 255: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 726:RTP section 450:—Preceding 423:—Preceding 384:—Preceding 356:—Preceding 148:free images 31:not a forum 817:Categories 792:References 787:References 589:Thanks! -- 565:fudoreaper 517:fudoreaper 233:Networking 644:Flameeyes 279:Computing 266:computing 262:computers 228:Computing 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 708:unsigned 620:unsigned 452:unsigned 425:unsigned 398:contribs 386:unsigned 370:contribs 358:unsigned 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 768:in the 672:Andrewa 502:Omoreno 306:on the 199:C-class 154:WP refs 142:scholar 535:ffmpeg 268:, and 205:scale. 126:Google 774:RobLa 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 778:talk 758:#RTP 743:IETF 716:talk 687:edit 676:talk 666:and 662:See 648:talk 640:RTSP 628:talk 595:talk 591:Kvng 569:talk 543:talk 539:Kvng 521:talk 506:talk 476:talk 460:talk 433:talk 394:talk 366:talk 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 298:Low 176:TWL 819:: 780:) 718:) 678:) 670:. 650:) 630:) 597:) 571:) 545:) 523:) 508:) 478:) 462:) 435:) 396:• 368:• 334:). 264:, 231:: 156:) 54:; 776:( 714:( 691:] 674:( 646:( 626:( 593:( 567:( 541:( 519:( 504:( 474:( 458:( 431:( 392:( 364:( 310:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Real-Time Streaming Protocol
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Computing
Networking
WikiProject icon

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑