Knowledge

Talk:SpamCop

Source 📝

915: 450: 179: 649: 95: 390: 53: 349: 889: 622: 470: 203: 22: 829: 815: 532: 369: 74: 801: 484: 546: 518: 376: 217: 159: 1107:- I was invited here by RfC bot. I know nothing about Spamcop. That said, it seems to me that the service is "Spamcop;" the website is "spamcop.net." The article needs an infobox with the url in it. Absent the userbox, SteveT's suggestion about including the url earl on in the lede makes sense. In fact, the url should probably be mentioned early in the lede whether or not it is included in an infobox. 81: 556: 285: 1085:, I have concluded that rather than undoing the edit, it would be better to further edit the article to meet the latest editor's desire to have it mentioned more prominently (earlier) that spamcop.net is the service being discussed (especially as distinguished from spamcop.com). I shall wait until about 18 November, 2012 to do this for more comments before I proceed. 1208:
without a resolution to the problem that led to the first edit: "When I read this article it took quite a wile to figure out if .net or .com was the 'good' domain." Would someone else be willing to give it a try without violating the latest editor's concern? Perhaps a infobox that includes the URL, as suggested, above, by Ebikguy?
979:
This talk page is a real mess. Most messages are not signed and are inserted in random order. I have started trying to reorganize this page by breaking it up into subjects and referencing signatures by using the history file. This project will take some time which I have currently run out of. But
1242:
Reason: SpamCop makes no attempt to find the "sender" of the spam in the sense of the individual/ e-mail address of the sender, because its analysis relies on the internet headers of the spam and the sender can not be reliably determined from the headers. Instead, it looks for an IP address outside
989:
I have finished my work of reorganization. I hope no one will find any objection to my work. There has been no edits to the text itself. The only changes have been to add headers and signatures and to resort into standard Knowledge order, oldest first, newest last. If anyone feels my choice of
1207:
Edit 528575802 02:53, 18 December 2012‎ by anonymous editor ‎150.101.222.216 undid both the original edit (518331812 at 14:48, 17 October 2012) and my re-edit (524130145 at 03:21, 21 November 2012 ) with the comment, "this is an advertising page...." I understand the point; however, we are left
1183:
Yikes, I did not realize I hadn't logged in when I completed the edit so it appears to be from 99.62.148.86 rather than from me (SteveT). Is there any way to "fix" the Revision History so that it appears to be by me (as it was!)?
1058:
My personal preference would be to undo the edit (but I don't feel strongly enough or sufficiently experienced to actually perform the undo on my own without further feedback). What do others (especially the editor, 108.93.101.129)
1243:
the receiver's server network. It also makes no attempt to create any lists of websites, it only includes in its blacklist IP addresses that have delivered spam to reporters' (or their e-mail service providers') networks.
1295:, spam fighters and anti-spam services are notoriously prone to smear campaigns by spammers. To make sure we're not just repeating claims made by individual members of an astroturfing campaign, any controversy we cover 1299:
be covered by a reliable source unconnected with SpamCop. The only reference in the portion of the article I removed was to the SpamCop website, and even then it did not acknowledge the existence of any controversy.
1041:
14:48, 17 October 2012‎ 108.93.101.129 . . (11,495 bytes) (+4)‎ . . (Added ".net" to the first mention of SpamCop. (When I read this article it took quite a wile to figure out if .net or .com was the "good"
1053:
The purported reason for the edit is "When I read this article it took quite a wile to figure out if .net or .com was the 'good' domain." But the distinction is made at end of the very first paragraph!
1025: 1362: 879: 1078:
Unless I find something that suggests a different timeframe, I am planning to undo the change after about 30 days of the origin of my post here, which would be on or about 18 November, 2012.
1382: 1467: 667: 770: 1462: 869: 1472: 1457: 1417: 1357: 316: 168: 63: 926: 845: 1256: 1221: 1098: 1073: 1234:
to "to report IP addresses found by SpamCop's analysis to be senders of the spam to the abuse reporting addresses of those IP addresses." and removing:
612: 149: 1377: 193: 440: 1352: 1261: 836: 806: 1372: 1347: 143: 1007: 1392: 1422: 1447: 706: 693: 1397: 1155:‹› Absent further comments and the passing of my self-professed deadline, I have made the edit. Further comments are still welcome. 1427: 1412: 1367: 430: 1442: 1285: 602: 1032: 1452: 1387: 1342: 250: 188: 67: 990:
headers should be changed, feel free to do so as it was simply my best attempt at putting some semblance of order to this page.
1407: 1309: 266: 1437: 1272:
for these mostly true "claims of controversy," even though perhaps the only sources are the SpamCop web site, Forum and FAQ?
1266:"→ Controversy: remove section; all claims of controversy unsourced for 7+ years despite maintenance tag requesting sources" 1197: 1168: 1142: 1116: 276: 271: 1082: 999: 680: 578: 261: 119: 700: 406: 1020: 1328: 325:
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
1402: 1036:. The RfC process is for new comments from uninvolved editors. Please do not repeat the above debate in the RfC. 569: 523: 459: 359: 102: 58: 1432: 761: 397: 354: 1291:
No, I think a web forum can absolutely not be used to provide evidence of a controversy. Besides not being a
994: 984: 974: 80: 1320:
It seems to me, that spamcop is not actually working right now. I'm not getting anything back from there. --
1315: 1050:
The service is not spamcop.net, but SpamCop. spamcop.net is the machine part of the URL of the web address.
674: 661: 33: 687: 920: 500: 237: 1238:"and websites referenced in the mailout are used to create a blocklist for SpamCop's list recipients." 375: 299: 844:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
577:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
405:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
118:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
21: 950: 733: 115: 1321: 713: 39: 1305: 8: 1279: 1250: 1215: 1191: 1162: 1136: 1112: 1092: 1067: 1016: 328:
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
294: 814: 531: 368: 73: 963: 719: 561: 1301: 1226:
The same IP address has added a further edit. I am changing some of the content:
750: 726: 933: 1336: 1275: 1246: 1211: 1187: 1158: 1132: 1108: 1088: 1063: 1012: 1292: 648: 939: 991: 981: 449: 841: 178: 111: 937: 935: 402: 389: 348: 107: 94: 52: 888: 621: 469: 202: 1026:
Request for Comment: Recent Edit (17 Oct, 2012) by 108.93.101.129
828: 800: 574: 483: 1230:"to report businesses to the sender's ISP or hosting provider." 216: 1363:
Start-Class Computer networking articles of Unknown-importance
940: 668:
Knowledge:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
545: 517: 896:
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
629:
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
477:
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
284: 210:
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
1004:
Is there a critique of the various anti-spam tools/filters?
158: 1030:
Anyone unfamiliar with the RfC process should first read
1383:
Start-Class Computer Security articles of Mid-importance
1468:
Marketing & Advertising articles needing attention
840:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 573:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 551: 401:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 106:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1463:
Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
306:Review importance and quality of existing articles 148:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1046:Is this really needed? I have some reservations: 854:Knowledge:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising 1473:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles 1458:Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles 1334: 857:Template:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising 309:Identify categories related to Computer Security 1418:Start-Class software articles of Low-importance 1358:Unknown-importance Computer networking articles 707:Category:Company articles needing infoboxes 694:Category:Company articles needing attention 19: 656:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 315:Identify articles for creation (see also: 1378:Mid-importance Computer Security articles 297:. Please allow some days for processing. 1353:Start-Class Computer networking articles 1262:Recent Edit (18 May, 2014) by Psychonaut 837:WikiProject Marketing & Advertising 1373:Start-Class Computer Security articles 1335: 1348:Unknown-importance Computing articles 732:Help expand stub articles located at 1393:Computing articles needing attention 860:Marketing & Advertising articles 834:This article is within the scope of 681:Category:Unassessed company articles 567:This article is within the scope of 395:This article is within the scope of 100:This article is within the scope of 15: 1423:Software articles needing attention 1268:Well, yes, but surely there's room 38:It is of interest to the following 13: 1448:Company articles needing attention 887: 620: 482: 468: 448: 283: 215: 201: 177: 157: 14: 1484: 1398:Computing articles needing images 322:Identify articles for improvement 1428:Software articles needing images 1413:Low-importance software articles 1368:All Computer networking articles 913: 827: 813: 799: 758:Tag company talk pages with the 647: 554: 544: 530: 516: 491:An editor has requested that an 388: 374: 367: 347: 224:An editor has requested that an 93: 79: 72: 51: 20: 1443:Low-importance company articles 980:I will continue working on it. 874:This article has been rated as 607:This article has been rated as 587:Knowledge:WikiProject Companies 435:This article has been rated as 128:Knowledge:WikiProject Computing 1453:WikiProject Companies articles 1388:All Computer Security articles 1343:Start-Class Computing articles 747:Tag company articles with the 590:Template:WikiProject Companies 415:Knowledge:WikiProject Software 131:Template:WikiProject Computing 1: 1408:Start-Class software articles 1257:04:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 1222:03:51, 18 December 2012 (UTC) 1198:23:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 1169:03:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC) 1083:WP:Revert only when necessary 848:and see a list of open tasks. 581:and see a list of open tasks. 457:This article is supported by 418:Template:WikiProject Software 409:and see a list of open tasks. 293:will be generated shortly by 251:WikiProject Computer Security 189:WikiProject Computer Security 186:This article is supported by 166:This article is supported by 122:and see a list of open tasks. 1438:Start-Class company articles 1329:10:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC) 1143:03:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1117:20:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC) 1099:04:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 1074:01:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 1000:Alternative Anti-spam tools? 638:WikiProject Companies To-do: 7: 851:Marketing & Advertising 807:Marketing & Advertising 10: 1489: 1039:Quoting the edit comment: 1021:02:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC) 1008:IDS spam-filter-comparison 613:project's importance scale 441:project's importance scale 150:project's importance scale 962:This page is archived by 895: 873: 822: 633: 628: 606: 539: 490: 476: 456: 434: 383: 244: 223: 209: 185: 165: 147: 88: 46: 1310:08:14, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 1286:02:44, 29 May 2014 (UTC) 995:01:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC) 985:19:44, 19 May 2007 (UTC) 1129:Thank you, Ebikeguy! 1403:All Computing articles 1006:Perhaps starting with 892: 734:Category:Company stubs 625: 487: 473: 453: 288: 220: 206: 182: 162: 116:information technology 28:This article is rated 1433:All Software articles 975:Talk page reorganized 891: 771:requests for comments 762:WikiProject Companies 624: 570:WikiProject Companies 486: 472: 460:WikiProject Computing 452: 287: 219: 205: 181: 169:Networking task force 161: 103:WikiProject Computing 1316:Is it still working? 398:WikiProject Software 312:Tag related articles 249:Things you can help 1033:Responding to RfC's 300:More information... 893: 626: 488: 474: 454: 289: 221: 207: 183: 163: 134:Computing articles 34:content assessment 972: 971: 967: 908: 907: 904: 903: 900: 899: 794: 793: 790: 789: 786: 785: 782: 781: 511: 510: 507: 506: 421:software articles 342: 341: 338: 337: 334: 333: 1480: 1325: 1283: 1254: 1219: 1195: 1166: 1140: 1096: 1071: 961: 941: 917: 916: 910: 909: 880:importance scale 862: 861: 858: 855: 852: 831: 824: 823: 818: 817: 816: 811: 803: 796: 795: 765: 754: 720:Portal:Companies 662:Article requests 651: 644: 643: 635: 634: 595: 594: 593:company articles 591: 588: 585: 564: 562:Companies portal 559: 558: 557: 548: 541: 540: 535: 534: 533: 528: 520: 513: 512: 503:to this article. 423: 422: 419: 416: 413: 392: 385: 384: 379: 378: 377: 372: 371: 370: 365: 362: 351: 344: 343: 317:Article requests 302: 246: 245: 240:to this article. 136: 135: 132: 129: 126: 97: 90: 89: 84: 83: 82: 77: 76: 75: 70: 55: 48: 47: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1333: 1332: 1323: 1318: 1293:reliable source 1274: 1264: 1245: 1210: 1186: 1157: 1131: 1087: 1062: 1028: 1002: 977: 968: 942: 936: 914: 859: 856: 853: 850: 849: 812: 809: 778: 775: 759: 748: 592: 589: 586: 583: 582: 560: 555: 553: 529: 526: 420: 417: 414: 411: 410: 373: 366: 363: 357: 303: 298: 281: 133: 130: 127: 124: 123: 78: 71: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 1486: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1317: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1240: 1239: 1232: 1231: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1120: 1119: 1081:After reading 1060: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1027: 1024: 1011: 1005: 1001: 998: 976: 973: 970: 969: 960: 959: 956: 955: 954: 953: 945: 944: 943: 938: 934: 932: 931: 918: 906: 905: 902: 901: 898: 897: 894: 884: 883: 876:Low-importance 872: 866: 865: 863: 846:the discussion 832: 820: 819: 810:Low‑importance 804: 792: 791: 788: 787: 784: 783: 780: 779: 777: 776: 774: 773: 767: 766:project banner 756: 744: 736: 722: 709: 696: 683: 670: 655: 653: 652: 640: 639: 631: 630: 627: 617: 616: 609:Low-importance 605: 599: 598: 596: 579:the discussion 566: 565: 549: 537: 536: 527:Low‑importance 521: 509: 508: 505: 504: 489: 479: 478: 475: 465: 464: 455: 445: 444: 437:Low-importance 433: 427: 426: 424: 407:the discussion 393: 381: 380: 364:Low‑importance 352: 340: 339: 336: 335: 332: 331: 330: 329: 326: 323: 320: 313: 310: 307: 291:Article alerts 282: 280: 279: 274: 269: 264: 258: 255: 254: 242: 241: 222: 212: 211: 208: 198: 197: 194:Mid-importance 184: 174: 173: 164: 154: 153: 146: 140: 139: 137: 120:the discussion 98: 86: 85: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1485: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1338: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1326: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1284: 1281: 1277: 1271: 1259: 1258: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1217: 1213: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1189: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1141: 1138: 1134: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1097: 1094: 1090: 1084: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1065: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1037: 1035: 1034: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1009: 997: 996: 993: 987: 986: 983: 965: 958: 957: 952: 949: 948: 947: 946: 929: 928: 923: 922: 912: 911: 890: 886: 885: 881: 877: 871: 868: 867: 864: 847: 843: 839: 838: 833: 830: 826: 825: 821: 808: 805: 802: 798: 797: 772: 768: 763: 757: 752: 746: 745: 743: 741: 737: 735: 731: 729: 728: 723: 721: 718: 716: 715: 710: 708: 705: 703: 702: 697: 695: 692: 690: 689: 684: 682: 679: 677: 676: 671: 669: 666: 664: 663: 658: 657: 654: 650: 646: 645: 642: 641: 637: 636: 632: 623: 619: 618: 614: 610: 604: 601: 600: 597: 580: 576: 572: 571: 563: 552: 550: 547: 543: 542: 538: 525: 522: 519: 515: 514: 502: 498: 494: 485: 481: 480: 471: 467: 466: 462: 461: 451: 447: 446: 442: 438: 432: 429: 428: 425: 408: 404: 400: 399: 394: 391: 387: 386: 382: 361: 356: 353: 350: 346: 345: 327: 324: 321: 318: 314: 311: 308: 305: 304: 301: 296: 292: 286: 278: 275: 273: 270: 268: 265: 263: 260: 259: 257: 256: 252: 248: 247: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 218: 214: 213: 204: 200: 199: 195: 192:(assessed as 191: 190: 180: 176: 175: 171: 170: 160: 156: 155: 151: 145: 142: 141: 138: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 104: 99: 96: 92: 91: 87: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 50: 49: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1322: 1319: 1296: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1244: 1241: 1233: 1225: 1209: 1206: 1185: 1156: 1130: 1126: 1104: 1086: 1080: 1077: 1061: 1057: 1045: 1040: 1038: 1031: 1029: 1003: 988: 978: 925: 919: 875: 835: 753:|Companies}} 739: 738: 725: 724: 712: 711: 699: 698: 686: 685: 673: 672: 660: 659: 608: 568: 496: 492: 458: 436: 396: 290: 233: 229: 225: 187: 167: 101: 40:WikiProjects 1324:Manorainjan 964:ClueBot III 30:Start-class 1337:Categories 1302:Psychonaut 497:photograph 230:photograph 64:Networking 1270:somewhere 842:Marketing 584:Companies 575:companies 524:Companies 360:Computing 295:AAlertBot 125:Computing 112:computing 108:computers 59:Computing 1109:Ebikeguy 1042:domain)) 1013:Wikidity 921:Archives 755:template 714:Maintain 688:Copyedit 412:Software 403:software 355:Software 68:Security 1105:Comment 878:on the 769:Answer 701:Infobox 611:on the 439:on the 267:history 1276:SteveT 1247:SteveT 1212:SteveT 1188:SteveT 1159:SteveT 1133:SteveT 1089:SteveT 1064:SteveT 1059:think? 751:portal 675:Assess 114:, and 36:scale. 1127:Reply 992:Dbiel 982:Dbiel 927:Index 740:Other 727:Stubs 501:added 493:image 277:purge 272:watch 253:with: 238:added 226:image 1306:talk 1297:must 1280:talk 1251:talk 1216:talk 1192:talk 1163:talk 1137:talk 1113:talk 1093:talk 1068:talk 1017:talk 262:edit 234:logo 870:Low 603:Low 499:be 495:or 431:Low 236:be 232:of 228:or 144:??? 1339:: 1308:) 1125:◌ 1115:) 1019:) 930:) 764:}} 760:{{ 749:{{ 358:: 196:). 110:, 66:/ 62:: 1304:( 1282:) 1278:( 1253:) 1249:( 1218:) 1214:( 1194:) 1190:( 1165:) 1161:( 1139:) 1135:( 1111:( 1095:) 1091:( 1070:) 1066:( 1015:( 1010:? 966:. 951:1 924:( 882:. 742:: 730:: 717:: 704:: 691:: 678:: 665:: 615:. 463:. 443:. 319:) 172:. 152:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Computing
Networking
Security
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Computing
computers
computing
information technology
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
Taskforce icon
Networking task force
Taskforce icon
WikiProject Computer Security
Mid-importance
Note icon
Note icon
added
WikiProject Computer Security
edit
history
watch
purge

AAlertBot

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.