308:
period when its popularity had declined so much that it was almost declared dead. Both books, the first coauthored by
Emanuel Leeuwenberg and Peter van der Helm and the second written by van der Helm on his own, represent a somewhat unconventional approach to one of the core principles of gestalt thinking...I worry that it will not lead many researchers to use SIT as a basis of their own theoretical and empirical work as the approach taken seems somewhat too detached from mainstream vision science (eg the reference list is strongly biased to the authors’ own work and slightly outdated).
74:
53:
183:
158:
22:
84:
291:, even if its reverted to the stub you linked, there are still major problems. The only 2 citations in that version are to broken links, so it's essentially unsourced. This is far from my speciality, so I can't say off the top of my head if sufficient secondary and tertiary sources exist about this subject that it would meet
307:
In the slipstream of the many publications surrounding the centennial anniversary of gestalt psychology (100 years after
Wertheimer’s landmark paper in 1912), Cambridge University Press published two books authored by two of the proponents who kept some of the ideas of gestalt psychology alive, in a
278:
I agree. Out the 13 sources currently in the reference list, 7 of them cite van der Helm's work and papers he co-authored with
Leeuwenberg and/or van Lier and the others don't do anything to support the notability of the subject. Out of the 6 non-van der Helm citations, all but 1 were published
251:
The primary author of this article may have placed undue weight on the research of van der Helm. Seven refs are sourced to this individual. External links were made to this individual's personal pages, here and elsewhere. Significant chunks of text appear to be copied or rephrased from this
328:
Interesting review you found. It seems to confirm legitimacy, but it also seems to imply non-Notability. I can't quite decide what to do here. I think I'll let it sit a while and see if we get any more input. There are posts on two apparently-dead wikiprojects and
253:
314:
Would it make sense to condense this article (<5 sentences) and nest it under gestalt psychology in a controversial section or something like that? If not, does it belong on
Knowledge at all?
303:
is a reputable journal or if there's any connection between the authors, so that should be explored if this article is going to stick around. These parts were interesting though,
256:
259:, as the research of this individual which and has gained no known secondary recognition. I tried to clean up a little, but I fear we may need to revert to
140:
341:
323:
255:, as someone else as noted above. I deleted an entire section on Transparallel processing and Transparallel mind, two articles deleted at
363:
130:
332:
Perception
Journal: It had an impact factor of 0.9 last year, and ~1.3 most years. I get the impression that is a rather low figure.
368:
189:
163:
106:
299:
from 2015 of 2 books by van der Helm and
Leeuwenberg was interesting. Note: I only skimmed the review and I have no idea if
358:
272:
97:
58:
241:
260:
33:
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
296:
279:
decades before van der Helm's studies, one as early as 1909. It sounds like a violatation of
39:
319:
292:
284:
246:
194:
168:
8:
21:
237:
229:
89:
337:
315:
268:
352:
280:
233:
333:
288:
264:
228:
A lot of the text of the article appears to be identical to this page:
102:
73:
52:
182:
157:
232:. Is this plagiarism, and if so, in which direction? --
263:
unless we get a knowledgeable editor to review this.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
79:
230:https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0084530/doc/sit.html
257:WP:Articles_for_deletion/Transparallel_processing
350:
192:, a project which is currently considered to be
204:Knowledge:WikiProject Cognitive science
19:
351:
207:Template:WikiProject Cognitive science
295:for its own article. I thought this
188:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
15:
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
364:Low-importance psychology articles
14:
380:
181:
156:
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology
82:
72:
51:
20:
369:WikiProject Psychology articles
135:This article has been rated as
118:Template:WikiProject Psychology
1:
342:06:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
324:21:46, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
190:WikiProject Cognitive science
109:and see a list of open tasks.
273:16:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
7:
359:C-Class psychology articles
10:
385:
210:Cognitive science articles
141:project's importance scale
242:05:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
176:
134:
67:
46:
98:WikiProject Psychology
28:This article is rated
283:at a minimum, if not
252:individual's website
121:psychology articles
34:content assessment
226:
225:
222:
221:
218:
217:
201:Cognitive science
164:Cognitive science
151:
150:
147:
146:
90:Psychology portal
376:
212:
211:
208:
205:
202:
185:
178:
177:
172:
160:
153:
152:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
85:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
47:
31:
25:
24:
16:
384:
383:
379:
378:
377:
375:
374:
373:
349:
348:
249:
209:
206:
203:
200:
199:
166:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
83:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
382:
372:
371:
366:
361:
347:
346:
345:
344:
330:
312:
311:
310:
248:
245:
224:
223:
220:
219:
216:
215:
213:
186:
174:
173:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
381:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
356:
354:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:
302:
298:
294:
293:WP:NOTABILITY
290:
286:
285:WP:PLAGIARISM
282:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
214:
197:
196:
191:
187:
184:
180:
179:
175:
170:
165:
162:
159:
155:
154:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
306:
300:
250:
247:COI Template
227:
193:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
353:Categories
316:Permstrump
301:Perception
112:Psychology
103:Psychology
59:Psychology
261:this stub
195:inactive
169:inactive
234:Rmalouf
139:on the
30:C-class
297:review
36:scale.
334:Alsee
329:here.
289:Alsee
281:WP:OR
265:Alsee
338:talk
320:talk
269:talk
238:talk
131:Low
355::
340:)
322:)
287:.
271:)
240:)
336:(
318:(
267:(
236:(
198:.
171:)
167:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
