884:
the show cannot be inserted within the article. Second, Schiff, perhaps ironically enough, is not necessarily the final arbiter of what Toby felt about anything. An actor playing Hamlet could, as did
Laurence Olivier, decide to play the famous Gertrude scenes with a heavy air of repressed Oedipal desire; it does not, however, mean that that's what that production's "Hamlet"--the collaborative creation of directors, designers (did Schiff pick out Toby's neckties?), and most importantly, a writer(s)--actually wanted. In essence, Schiff's take on the character, while an informed and important one, is also limited, contingent, and prejudiced. As such, "evidence" gleaned from such interviews should more properly be placed in a separate section or flagged as the actor's opinion (though I realize this would complicate the article's in-universe style). Additionally, even were one to decide that C.J. was Toby's "closest friend"--and that is conjecture--one must also ask what it means to be "close" to Toby. Aside from one reference to his visiting his nieces and nephews for the holidays (presumably Hanukkah) and a game of pick-up ball with the president, Toby appears to not have had much of a social life outside the confines of the White House. Might all of this debate be about a character element that really tells us very little about the character? As well, one cannot make definitive comparisons--"oldest," "closest"--without having all the necessary history elements of the narrative universe. We know from his California recruiting drive that Toby and C.J. know one another by voice alone, are on a first-name basis, and are comfortable bantering with one another, but that does not necessarily make them "friends." Finally, C.J. is (apparently) Toby's longest-tenured acquaintance/friend among the later senior staffers... that we know of. Both he and Josh are very active in Democratic politics prior to Bartlet's primary run, for example, and certainly might have known one another, crossed paths, fought over the same woman, etc., but the show simply never tells us if A) they met in N.H. after Josh joined the campaign, B) they had a passing acquaintance, but Josh ran in more elevated Democratic strata than serial loser Toby, or C) something else more sordid/mundane. That many of us debate these matters speaks well of the show's enduring appeal and complex (if amorphous) set of intertwined histories. It's great that we want to make the WW universe as well-rounded and knowable as the one we wake up in every day. Yet such conjectural debates seem more appropriate for a fan site rather than the wikipedia project. --
1061:
loyalty to the
President, because if it was discovered that his own Chief of Staff defied his actions and had to be summarily fired, it would severely weaken the President. Add in his loyalty to and friendship with CJ, and potential lingering anger toward his brother, and the story goes like this: Toby learns from Annabeth about the leak, and later Kate Harper tells him that the FBI believes the leak is from the White House; Toby realizes that only a select few people had the information, and CJ had outed herself to him by asking if David had ever mentioned a military shuttle; Toby decides that he will use this as his opportunity to blame himself and protect CJ, though when meeting with the prosecutor, he can't bring himself to point the finger at David and besmirch his brother for something he didn't actually do.--
821:
characters. They often shared things with each other that they didn't tell others (Hoynes, the thing with C.J.'s dad, Toby's brother killing himself), I mean, hell, Toby's final scene in the series was with C.J. and dealt with them rebuilding their close friendship. I mean, in my mind this is honestly like trying to cite moments where, say, Sam and
Ainsley flirting... it's just, that's what a large part of their relationship was. They were each other's best friends, just like Josh and Sam were best friends or Jed and Leo were best friends. They were extremely close, there was a flirtatious dynamic. To not even discuss the depth of their friendship and their closeness when we *do* discuss it for Sam and Josh just seems silly to me.
1144:
had an affair with that random person we see in "In the Shadow of Two Gunmen, Part I" and
Senator Rafferty, whom he has a drink with in the sixth season episode where he learns about his brother's death.) Also, marriage can be pretty complicated even when there are no extramarital affairs involved. It's much more likely, though, that Liz is referring to the fact that she knows her husband is having an affair and yet she's still with him because even though she hates him for having an affair, she loves him and wants to be with him or she's still staying for the sake of their children or whatever. Besides, none of this will ever get included in the article because it is pure
1042:
beyond the boundaries of the character. One interesting twist in the plot line that was mentioned in the latter part of the final series (but not developed significantly) was that
Ziegler had leaked the story not to save the astronauts (which he himself had said would have been against the astronauts wishes... and that even his own brother, had he been on the station, would have insisted on the Military Shuttle not being revealed just to save three lives), but to reveal the US's program of 'weaponizing space' in direct contravention of several international treaties.
271:
205:
121:
103:
710:
1169:
a veteran or a military buff. Later on, at 40:31 to 40:33 Toby says "I got better treatment at Pan Mun Jom." That's a Korean village on the DMZ, and a site of a POW camp, but the POWs were released in 1953 so Toby couldn't have been there as a POW. However, it is possible that he may have been stationed there as a member of the military, if he didn't just visit as a politician. I know this is rather weak, but I'd like to know what other people think.
321:
303:
626:"When Josh left the White House towards the end of Bartlet's second term to run a Presidential campaign and didn't take Toby with him, Toby viewed this as a betrayal and was extremely hostile to Josh until long after." I got the impression Toby didn't want at all to come with Josh, because he didn't believe Santos was the man for the Democrats. Second, Toby didn't want to leave Bartlet and thought Josh abandoned the president.
331:
195:
171:
72:
21:
483:
that Tobdy needs Josh for law advice. Removing the "is a lawyer" bit -- which never had much evidence, anyhow. I would also like to stress that this is not a fan site and, as such, we should not put down speculation or presumptions, but only a basic encyclopedic outline of the character. So even before my evidence today, we really did not have enough to make the claim in the article.
1358:
characters " article. Your rump article is actually a bigger "waste" of
Knowledge space than the larger version and has become - because of your deletions - even incoherent. But deleting this type of content and articles is a slippery slope because then one'd be able to say that the episode articles should be deleted and so on... -- fdewaele, 31 January 2013.
806:
the context; on the other hand, I have read in a couple of places that, although the two characters had not necessarily been intended as romantic interests for one another, Richard Schiff and
Allison Janney often liked to bring layers of subtext into their characters' interactions that were not in the script. I'll try to dig up the original source.
1352:"What Knowledge is not". You are pushing a personal agenda. So please first have an open discussion on what should remain and what is to be deleted before destroying Knowledge content. Please stop your personal crusade and go to arbitration or I'll have to start an edit war until after open discussion a majority view is reached.
790:
it remains speculative at best. (Even if
Richard Schiff was being serious, he was still speculating as well.) I think, therefore, that this mention ought to be removed as unsourced speculation. (FYI, my personal view is that Toby's closest friend is Sam, not C.J., but that's just my opinion.) Thoughts? --
1420:
I am an experienced
Wikipedian and I already know the policies - such as Assume Good Faith and WP:BOLD. The condescending advice and insults above are a breach of that policy. I have made a valid effort to correct an article which is flawed. People are allowed to make changes to articles anytime they
1205:
Reviewing the DVD of "In
Excelsis Deo" (season 1, ep. 10) it is difficult to determine the exact line, but it may be "he got better treatment at Panmunjom" rather than "I got beter treatment at Panmunjom" but the former version is confusing because Panmunjom was the site of the Korean war peace talks
1183:
As with Law School, there is direct evidence that TZ isn't a vet. In S4 'Angel Maintenance', when Toby talks to Congressman Richardson, Chairman of the House Black Caucus, they end discussing the draft and the selective service lottery system. TZ's was 125 in the last year of the draft missing out by
1168:
I just finished watching In Excelsis Deo and I noticed two things. At 4:48 to 5:00 on the DVD Toby is able to identify a very old, partially-obscured Marine tattoo correctly, citing both war and battalion (Marine battalion second and seventh), which is obscure information for anyone who is not either
1143:
I'm sorry, but that theory is based on extremely flimsy evidence. Since when does having a drink with someone automatically mean having an affair? (I know, you said "hints" at an affair, but really, we can "hint" anything out of any action. Based on this logic here, we could "hint" that Toby has also
963:
I don't agree. Their previous attempts mean that viable embryos might well have remained after their divorce. Because we simply cannot know and her previous ardent support of IVF promotes the likelihood that Abdrea might have tried this on her own, the ultimate pregnancy should be considered as the
820:
This is certainly not the only article I've read where Richard Schiff discusses the Toby/C.J. thing and the adding of flirtation and their deep relationship. I've honestly never even heard of someone who's watched this show and didn't pick up on the Toby/C.J. thing, it's a pretty major aspect of both
805:
CJ is certainly Toby's oldest friend of the major characters (they knew each other prior to joining the campaign), whether or not she's his closest friend is moving into speculation (I'd argue yes, but that's just my opinon). I agree that Schiff was probably joking in the interview referenced, given
759:
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
1351:
Get of your soapbox. You're acting very hypocritical: without debate YOU delete content, and then you go on accusing me of doing things without debate. I merely restored the ex ante situation in order to be able to have a debate without losing content. Besides nothing you claim is actually listed on
878:
I absolutely agree with Hnsampat on the above points. There is no direct evidence that there are any romantic feelings between Toby and C.J., aside from the occasional remark that passes for Noel Coward-esque by-play between the two of them. (And even this was far stronger in the Sorkin years than
863:
writers, since they are the ones who ultimately decide what the "truth" about the characters is.) I mean, there are abundant sources out there citing the flirtatious nature of Josh and Donna's relationship (and they've been available even since before Josh and Donna got together). Just remember that
1477:
I can only second what Go Phightins said. Strive for consensus because unilaterally acting is no way to ensure article quality. I also agree with the idea of having a general discussion whether biographical articles on fictional characters are appropriate but it should encompass a general guideline
1045:
While I wouldn't necessarily say this is within character, it is far closer to Toby's character than the 'astronaut-saving' reasons mentioned above. Lastly, it is a technical weak point in the storyline that a space station emergency like this was employed at all. The space station has an 'escape
948:
The article currently says that it's not clear whether Toby and Andi conceived by natural means or by in vitro fertilization but the show never even hints that in vitro was a possibility. Granted, they tried in vitro four years earlier, but that was before they divorced. It also seems unlikely that
858:
I agree that Toby and C.J. were close, as indicated by all of the examples cited above. However, I'm not necessarily sure that C.J. was Toby's "closest" friend and that their relationship had any "flirting" aspect to it, which is what the article was saying before I removed that bit. If all of this
789:
Reading the transcript of that interview, I read it to mean the Schiff was lightheartedly suggesting that Toby and C.J. will end up as a couple, not meaning to seriously suggest such a possibility. No other sources have been cited for such "flirting" aspect of their relationship and frankly I think
784:
There's a short paragraph in the "At the White House" section where it is stated that Toby's closest relationship at the White House was with C.J. and that this relationship had a "flirtatious" aspect to it. It essentially suggests that there is some romantic subtext between the two characters. The
1362:
Funny you should mention deleting articles about individual episodes of The West Wing. They should ALL be deleted. Consider this: there are articles listing episodes for other popular TV shows (All in the Family, MASH, Hill Street Blues, Cheers, and Mary Tyler Moore) but there are not hundreds of
883:
colleagues. Had she had one of her tongue-in-cheek exchanges involving Toby--"You want to make out with me right now." "Well, when don't I?"--with a subordinate it would have been fairly out of character. Finally, Hnsampat is quite right in emphasizing two points. First, one's personal take on
830:
I wish I could get my hands on more of the articles and interviews Schiff's done on the subject. He was light-hearted in nature when he said things because, sure, why wouldn't he be? But does that make it less valid? Either way, other parts of this article cite Richard Schiff as a source on things
504:
He's not a lawyer, and I've removed this from the article. Sam was speaking in generalizations when he said "Everyone in the room's a lawyer." as it would have been awkward and unrealistic to say "Everyone in the room except Toby's a lawyer." The "we" implied in Leo's declaration of joining Josh's
482:
Ah hah! Finally! See Season 4, Episode 17, about the Federal Whistleblower case. Toby calls in Josh specifically to get a lawyer in the room and admonishes Josh when a piece of federal law slips his mind and he makes a mistake. They make it clear that Josh went to law school, Toby did not, and
470:
In Season 4, Episode 11 or so, when Toby and Will are first working together, Will tells Toby that he is a lawyer and Toby makes a negative remark. It definitely does not give anyone the impression that Toby is a lawyer, too. Personally, I don't think the show has ever made it clear one way or
541:
Toby is certainly not a lawyer, nor did he go to Law School. In S4 Episode "Privateers", Toby berates Josh for not informing of the details surrounding immunity from prosecution, and goes onto say something along the lines of "...were you not listening that day in Law School?", suggesting that TZ
1060:
I can't say I was very good at reading deeply into the show, so maybe this is all said from a shallow perspective, but I always felt that CJ was the leak, Toby realized it rather quickly, and Toby fell on the sword to allow CJ to continue on as Chief of Staff. You could even say it was an act of
1357:
Personally I think the content is well sourced to other links - which is the only way to do with TV characters. Either you do it this way or otherwise the article has no right of existence at all and should be AfD. The remaining content can than be added to the main TWW article or in a "List of
1209:
If he was a POW, Lance Corporal Hufnagle (the homeless vet) would have passed through that Korean town. Maybe it is a reference to the conditions under which US POW's (including both Hufnagle and Toby's father?) were held by the North Koreans while waiting POW exchange, or of the prompt medical
1201:
Given the age of Toby's father, and that "he needed the GI Bill" (The Two Bartlets, season 3, ep. 12) it can be speculated that his father was a WW2 or Korean War veteran of the USMC 2/7. It should also be noted that the Second Battalion of the of the Seventh Marine Regiment is one of the most
1041:
This is a very well written article... kudos to the authors. One item of interest relates to the Military Shuttle leak storyline. Schiff himself is known to have hated the storyline, and most of us who followed the series would agree that for Ziegler to have been the source of the leak is far
840:
Either way, some of the stuff that's been reverted is stuff dealing with C.J. and Toby's falling out after Toby's leak and then not reuniting until Toby's last scene... and none of that stuff can be debated in any way, shape or form. It's what happened. I'm adding that back in. As for the other
561:
Teaching at Columbia? My interpretation of this exchange at the start of Season 7 was that he was LIVING in Columbia (The Country, not the School), for reasons that later become obvious... What reason is that? All of season 7 had people visiting Toby in his DC apartment. And if you turn on the
1506:
I just watched the episode and it was pretty clear Toby said " I got better treatment at Panmunjomm. not "he" I think we just need to remember this is a tv show and this episode confused many people as it inferred that Toby was a vet but the writers decided to go a different direction with the
1102:
At the start of the Santos campaign - Toby is seen with the President's daughter going out for a drink several times. It is discovered that Toby has been sending her Bartlett's old speeches for the benefit of her husband's Congressional election campaign. There is a hint of an affair. Later we
1335:
Knowledge requires reliable sources, which exist in the real world (magazine, newspaper, or a book). A Knowledge article which has not other source is not a source in itself. Continually adding content that has no source besides some other Knowledge article is the same as having no source at
1291:
This character is fictional. It is appropriate to have an article but not to detail everything the character "did." He was never "born" on such and such a date, and did not "attend" college. Please see the article "what Knowledge is not" for discussion of in-universe style and indiscriminate
1315:
I have discussed it, above. The article violates Knowledge guidelines on in-universe style. Creating a lengthy article about someone who never lived and never achieved anything is not in accordance with this site. Please read the useful article "What Knowledge is not" to learn more. Thank
1103:
discover that the President's daughter's husband's campaign is hurt by his affair with the family Nanny. When CJ confronts Liz Bartlett about it - she says "I knew - look - marriage is complicated" apparently referring to a fallout due to the prior affair with Toby.
949:
Toby would agree to in vitro considering his strong objections to raising the children out of wedlock. Obviously, we can't prove anything beyond a doubt but, given the absence of any mention of using in vitro to conceive the twins, I think the line should be removed.
566:
I guess we will find out -- and we should not write on the topic until we do -- but I disagree. He is from NY, he is an intellectual, teaching at Columbia makes sense. If he were hiding in Columbia, how is he in the states now? Anyhow, only a few episodes left..
1224:
He doesn't say "I" got better treatment, he says, "guy" got better treatment. The full line is, "Took the ambulance an hour and twenty minutes to get there. A lance coproral in the U.S. Marines. Second of the Seventh. Guy got better treatment in Pan Moon Jong."
679:
In the episode with the female cantor and the organ, isn't Rabbi Glassman's strikingly anti-fundamentalist speech a more certain hint that Toby belongs to a Reform temple than the clues listed in the article? Or would mentioning it just be gilding the lily?
1075:
He's not saving CJ or indeed the President. He's saving Leo McGarry and therefore the Santos Presidential campaign. If he wanted to save the President or CJ surely the confession would have come closer to her testimony rather than just before McGarry's
405:
In spite of being called Tobias by his father in flashbacks and CJ in one instance, there is no evidence that this is his legal name. Documents (including his pardon) shown or read throughout the series only ever refer to him as Toby.
280:
181:
1493:
This page was relisted today for deletion. I would agree that the article could be tidied up a bit (and would be happy to do so once consensus is reached), but I strongly feel that the article should be kept. Discussion welcome.
1258:
1443:
says that you should be bold, not reckless. Deleting tons of content without discussion is reckless. I am assuming that you're acting in good faith, but I don't think you havea firm grasp of consensus, which is how
417:
1202:
historically significant and decorated USMC units, having served in many WW2 and Korean War campaigns including Guadalcanal, Okinawa, and Chosin Reservoir, so this episode is a tribute to veterans on many levels.
1233:
864:
what can seem unbelievably obvious to you or me may not be so obvious to somebody else, which is why we need sources. Also, we need sources to make sure that we aren't passing off our own opinions as facts. --
1046:
pod' designed to deal with precisely this type of failure. This is clearly within the "poetic license" range, I guess, but for me was a weak point of a series that was very, very good for it's entire run.
1184:
30 and avoided being called up. His comment afterward and his general demeanor suggest a certain relief about this; something which would be different, I guess, if he has volunteered for the Armed Forces.
505:
legal team could well have only implied Sam and himself, and even if it didn't Toby's an intelligent enough guy that it certainly wouldn't be to Josh's destriment to have him involved. But the events of "
600:
It's deliberately ambiguous, to keep you guessing during the space shuttle intrigue. We can't conclusively determine either way, and it's misleading to state that he is teaching at the University.
879:
in the succeeding seasons.) As well, C.J., the only female senior staffer for most of the show's history, engaged in more more flirtatious back-and-forth with her colleagues simply because they
979:
I removed the reference simply because the show never directly raises the question of how the twins came to be conceived and so I feel there's no point in us raising the question here. --
756:
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
964:
result of two possible paths. Finally, multiple births are more common under IVF, and we have no evidence or mention of Andie and Toby having resumed a physical relationship. --
494:
He wasn't a lawyer at least to the best of my knowledge. Also the discussion boards are for all sorts of rambling. Toby is a Political Drifter who found something with Bartlet. (
745:
717:
1436:
I apologize if you feel condescension; it was not intentional, but the fact remains that you do not have a solid grasp of policies; if you did, you would know that the editing
704:
1292:
information. Furthermore, Knowledge articles which have no sources do not count as reliable sources. Sources must be secondary, as in something existing in the real world.
413:
1280:
1097:
621:
1276:
1229:
1087:
611:
1248:
529:
650:
I'm not sure, but I think it's simply called "disclosure of classified information." (The only one-word summary I can think of that could possibly apply would be
510:
1215:
918:
640:
WHAT the crime was was clearly explained; however, what exactly was the NATURE of it? Treason? Fraud? Etc? What would be the legal term? Thanks in advance.
1192:
774:
666:
547:
1307:
Please first DISCUSS such a radical move before unilaterally deleting its content. I will thus revert all your deletions to this and similar articles. --
261:
1244:
737:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with
1524:
509:" make it clear that Toby's not a lawyer and no law degree is ever mentioned, nor does it fit with the other knowledge we have of Toby's background. --
1252:
694:. I don't think it is ever explicitly said that Toby is part of a Reform temple. I've removed that tidbit of speculation from the article entirely. --
779:
627:
1118:
630:
444:. When discussing this in the Cheif of Staff's office, Leo, Toby, Sam and Josh are present. Leo states two things that indicate Toby is a lawyer:
383:
1211:
1062:
914:
1390:, where an experienced Wikipedian will guide you for a certain amount of time. It's up to you, but they're helpful to learn Knowledge's policies.
1544:
1534:
1188:
543:
285:
255:
137:
893:
421:
1448:
is done here. We need one giant discussion to determine consensus as to whether "biographical info" should be placed on characters' articles.
1136:
850:
761:
1519:
1472:
1414:
898:
There are examples of their "flirting" relationship, for instance in “Somebody's Going to Emergency, Somebody's Going to Jail" (s2, ep 16):
513:
51:
1564:
377:
41:
922:
1430:
1372:
1345:
1325:
1301:
1127:
I don't remember that being in any Episode during either the 6th or 7th Season. Which Episode(s) did it show Toby and Liz having a drink?
873:
799:
1237:
1157:
815:
460:
This leads me to believe that Toby is a lawyer. Goodness, everyone else on the show is except the Bartlets! Comment if you disagree. -
1549:
1330:
1286:
988:
128:
108:
1055:
937:
498:
1554:
658:
1539:
734:
1027:
698:
518:
A reference to Toby being a lawyer is back in the article. Could someone please remove it? --LWSchurtz 11:01, 10 October 2008
753:
749:
726:
592:
1110:
227:
1091:
487:
475:
1529:
1128:
842:
231:
1465:
1407:
1272:
1083:
765:
607:
1070:
615:
525:
353:
1012:
1559:
669:
352:-related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
218:
176:
1051:
1036:
994:
644:
551:
571:
1187:
Perhaps the comment was an ironic one? Or, as you say perhaps TZ is, despite appearances, a armed forces buff!
1178:
973:
464:
1219:
1000:
1196:
859:
is really, really obvious, then there should be no problem finding sources for it. (I'd say get sources from
471:
the other. And I don't think speculation and trivia and the nitty-gritty details belong in an encyclopedia.
344:
308:
562:
closed captioning it says teaching at Columbia with a u instead of Colombia with an O which is the country.
1503:
684:
83:
958:
427:
400:
556:
437:
1047:
1426:
1368:
1341:
1321:
1297:
1114:
811:
27:
721:
is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under
1132:
969:
889:
846:
635:
136:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1456:
1398:
588:
the country. Without any reference to suggest one way or another, I'm removing the reference.
1163:
89:
1499:
1422:
1364:
1337:
1317:
1293:
1268:
1174:
1106:
1079:
933:
807:
674:
603:
521:
409:
1386:, a concept which it seems evident you don't fully grasp. Perhaps you should enroll in an
20:
8:
1383:
1226:
1066:
965:
954:
885:
771:
581:
71:
654:, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't apply here, since Toby wasn't "spying" in any way.)--
1449:
1391:
1153:
1023:
984:
869:
795:
722:
495:
1488:
1008:
943:
210:
133:
1495:
1387:
1170:
929:
223:
1363:
articles about every episode. Why should the West Wing be treated any different?
226:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
1440:
950:
641:
589:
336:
1243:
According to the subtitles on HBO max, the line is, “I got better treatment”.
1513:
1479:
1379:
1308:
1149:
1019:
980:
865:
791:
695:
655:
30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
1145:
1018:
The episode itself is already cited. That should be sufficient, I think. --
1004:
738:
691:
681:
506:
441:
690:
Actually, this whole issue is pretty speculative, which would constitute
580:
While it's certainly reasonable to assume that most likely Toby works at
461:
270:
222:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge articles about
709:
785:
only source cited for this is an interview that Richard Schiff gave on
568:
484:
472:
204:
1421:
wish when there is a good reason for it - which there is in this case.
651:
120:
102:
585:
1260:
IT WOULD BE NICE TO BE CONSISTET ABOUT WHETHER IT'S 'CJ' OR 'C.J.'
349:
320:
302:
1210:
attention the POWs received after being returned at Panmunjom.
1478:
for all types of fictional characters, not only for TWW. --
194:
170:
733:
Knowledge article constitutes fair use. In addition to the
928:
Yeah, but it's CJ. Who doesn't want to make out with CJ
1227:
http://www.westwingepguide.com/S1/Episodes/10_IED.html
705:
Fair use rationale for Image:Schiff on West Wing1.jpg
348:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
326:
200:
132:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1206:and POW repatriation, not the site of a POW camp.
764:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
904:You want to make out with me right now, don’t you?
622:Did Josh realy wanted Toby at the Santos campaign?
382:This article has not yet received a rating on the
260:This article has not yet received a rating on the
456:take a leave of absence and join your legal team.
1511:
230:. To improve this article, please refer to the
1003:, not sure how to cite this in the article. --
1098:Toby's relationship with President's daughter
584:, it is also possible he's spending time in
665:any allusion to treason should be removed
146:Knowledge:WikiProject Fictional characters
1525:WikiProject Fictional characters articles
1382:on the issue, but Knowledge is driven by
149:Template:WikiProject Fictional characters
1148:. Thanks for your efforts, though! :) --
831:about Toby, so we could do that as well.
69:
1545:High-importance The West Wing articles
1535:Unknown-importance television articles
1512:
754:Knowledge:Fair use rationale guideline
414:2601:200:C100:86A0:9459:D3FC:A320:3C6D
1520:C-Class fictional character articles
440:wants him to sue the Knights of the
342:This article is within the scope of
216:This article is within the scope of
126:This article is within the scope of
65:
15:
1565:Unknown-importance Judaism articles
1230:2601:8:A280:C11:293A:7EC1:B040:5262
841:stuff, we can keep discussing it.--
88:It is of interest to the following
13:
1331:Knowledge articles are not sources
1287:Notability, length and in-universe
708:
542:himself did not go to Law School.
452:That said, say the word and we'll
269:
14:
1576:
1550:The West Wing task force articles
448:Everyone in the room is a lawyer!
752:. Using one of the templates at
329:
319:
301:
240:Knowledge:WikiProject Television
203:
193:
169:
129:WikiProject Fictional characters
119:
101:
70:
19:
1555:WikiProject Television articles
780:Toby/CJ "flirting" relationship
434:And It's Surely to Their Credit
243:Template:WikiProject Television
26:This article was nominated for
1540:C-Class The West Wing articles
1281:12:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
938:13:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
775:10:25, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
766:Media copyright questions page
718:Image:Schiff on West Wing1.jpg
593:16:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
432:In the second season episode,
1:
1504:04:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
1071:17:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
989:23:40, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
974:23:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
959:16:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
894:15:42, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
874:16:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
851:09:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
816:10:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
800:05:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
735:boilerplate fair use template
514:09:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
488:02:44, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
454:(implied to be Leo and Toby)
362:Knowledge:WikiProject Judaism
356:and see a list of open tasks.
278:This article is supported by
140:and see a list of open tasks.
1473:21:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1431:18:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1415:02:28, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1373:00:09, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
1346:21:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1326:21:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1302:17:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
1238:09:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
1092:00:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
762:criteria for speedy deletion
631:14:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
499:04:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
476:21:05, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
465:20:00, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
365:Template:WikiProject Judaism
152:fictional character articles
7:
1530:C-Class television articles
1197:03:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
699:02:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
685:02:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
552:03:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
438:Southern Poverty Law Center
10:
1581:
1220:18:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
1137:19:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
1056:21:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
1028:02:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1013:02:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
923:02:52, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
746:the image description page
659:00:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
645:22:44, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
572:17:26, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
384:project's importance scale
262:project's importance scale
1378:You're welcome to open a
1253:02:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
1179:07:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
748:and edit it to include a
670:01:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
616:20:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
422:08:50, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
381:
314:
277:
259:
188:
114:
96:
1560:C-Class Judaism articles
1158:11:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
1119:03:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
727:explanation or rationale
436:, Josh is told that the
281:the West Wing task force
1037:Shuttle Leak Background
995:City College sweatshirt
50:, 4 December 2010, see
40:, 6 November 2013, see
713:
274:
219:WikiProject Television
78:This article is rated
1048:Posthocergopropterhoc
729:as to why its use in
712:
273:
234:for the type of work.
143:Fictional characters
134:fictional characters
109:Fictional characters
1380:Request for comment
911:Well, when don’t I?
582:Columbia University
557:Post West Wing Life
345:WikiProject Judaism
246:television articles
228:join the discussion
224:television programs
1482:, 2 February 2013.
1311:, 31 January 2013.
750:fair use rationale
714:
275:
84:content assessment
1507:character later.
1271:comment added by
1146:original research
1121:
1109:comment added by
1082:comment added by
692:original research
606:comment added by
524:comment added by
428:Toby's law degree
424:
412:comment added by
401:Toby's legal name
398:
397:
394:
393:
390:
389:
296:
295:
292:
291:
211:Television portal
164:
163:
160:
159:
64:
63:
60:
59:
1572:
1470:
1463:
1454:
1412:
1405:
1396:
1283:
1104:
1094:
725:but there is no
636:Nature of Crime?
618:
533:
407:
370:
369:
368:Judaism articles
366:
363:
360:
339:
334:
333:
332:
323:
316:
315:
305:
298:
297:
248:
247:
244:
241:
238:
232:style guidelines
213:
208:
207:
197:
190:
189:
184:
173:
166:
165:
154:
153:
150:
147:
144:
123:
116:
115:
105:
98:
97:
81:
75:
74:
66:
32:
31:
23:
16:
1580:
1579:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1510:
1509:
1491:
1466:
1457:
1450:
1423:Catherinejarvis
1408:
1399:
1392:
1388:adoption course
1365:Catherinejarvis
1338:Catherinejarvis
1333:
1318:Catherinejarvis
1294:Catherinejarvis
1289:
1266:
1263:
1166:
1111:124.184.169.174
1100:
1077:
1039:
997:
946:
808:Shoemoney2night
782:
707:
677:
638:
624:
601:
559:
519:
511:Harlequin212121
430:
403:
367:
364:
361:
358:
357:
335:
330:
328:
286:High-importance
245:
242:
239:
236:
235:
209:
202:
179:
151:
148:
145:
142:
141:
82:on Knowledge's
79:
12:
11:
5:
1578:
1568:
1567:
1562:
1557:
1552:
1547:
1542:
1537:
1532:
1527:
1522:
1490:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1418:
1417:
1360:
1359:
1354:
1353:
1332:
1329:
1313:
1312:
1288:
1285:
1262:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1165:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1129:98.163.120.145
1099:
1096:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1031:
1030:
996:
993:
992:
991:
966:Patchyreynolds
945:
942:
941:
940:
886:Patchyreynolds
856:
855:
854:
853:
843:67.165.141.239
835:
834:
833:
832:
825:
824:
823:
822:
781:
778:
772:BetacommandBot
706:
703:
702:
701:
676:
673:
664:
662:
661:
637:
634:
623:
620:
598:
597:
596:
595:
575:
574:
558:
555:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
491:
490:
479:
478:
429:
426:
402:
399:
396:
395:
392:
391:
388:
387:
380:
374:
373:
371:
354:the discussion
341:
340:
337:Judaism portal
324:
312:
311:
306:
294:
293:
290:
289:
276:
266:
265:
258:
252:
251:
249:
215:
214:
198:
186:
185:
174:
162:
161:
158:
157:
155:
138:the discussion
124:
112:
111:
106:
94:
93:
87:
76:
62:
61:
58:
57:
56:
55:
45:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1577:
1566:
1563:
1561:
1558:
1556:
1553:
1551:
1548:
1546:
1543:
1541:
1538:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1526:
1523:
1521:
1518:
1517:
1515:
1508:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1481:
1476:
1475:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1464:
1462:
1461:
1455:
1453:
1447:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1416:
1413:
1411:
1406:
1404:
1403:
1397:
1395:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1356:
1355:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1284:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1273:86.166.54.162
1270:
1261:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1228:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1164:Toby as a vet
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1095:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:86.163.128.24
1081:
1073:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1043:
1034:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
990:
986:
982:
978:
977:
976:
975:
971:
967:
961:
960:
956:
952:
939:
935:
931:
927:
926:
925:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
905:
901:
896:
895:
891:
887:
882:
876:
875:
871:
867:
862:
852:
848:
844:
839:
838:
837:
836:
829:
828:
827:
826:
819:
818:
817:
813:
809:
804:
803:
802:
801:
797:
793:
788:
777:
776:
773:
769:
768:. Thank you.
767:
763:
757:
755:
751:
747:
744:Please go to
742:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
719:
711:
700:
697:
693:
689:
688:
687:
686:
683:
672:
671:
668:
667:72.189.90.159
660:
657:
653:
649:
648:
647:
646:
643:
633:
632:
629:
619:
617:
613:
609:
608:93.96.129.194
605:
594:
591:
587:
583:
579:
578:
577:
576:
573:
570:
565:
564:
563:
554:
553:
549:
545:
531:
527:
523:
517:
516:
515:
512:
508:
503:
502:
500:
497:
496:JJGlendenning
493:
492:
489:
486:
481:
480:
477:
474:
469:
468:
467:
466:
463:
458:
457:
453:
449:
445:
443:
439:
435:
425:
423:
419:
415:
411:
385:
379:
376:
375:
372:
355:
351:
347:
346:
338:
327:
325:
322:
318:
317:
313:
310:
307:
304:
300:
299:
287:
284:(assessed as
283:
282:
272:
268:
267:
263:
257:
254:
253:
250:
233:
229:
225:
221:
220:
212:
206:
201:
199:
196:
192:
191:
187:
183:
182:The West Wing
178:
175:
172:
168:
167:
156:
139:
135:
131:
130:
125:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
104:
100:
99:
95:
91:
85:
77:
73:
68:
67:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1492:
1467:
1459:
1458:
1451:
1445:
1437:
1419:
1409:
1401:
1400:
1393:
1361:
1334:
1314:
1290:
1264:
1259:
1245:Veggiegirl12
1223:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1186:
1182:
1167:
1101:
1078:— Preceding
1074:
1059:
1044:
1040:
1032:
998:
962:
947:
910:
906:
903:
899:
897:
880:
877:
860:
857:
786:
783:
770:
758:
743:
730:
716:
715:
678:
675:Reform clues
663:
639:
625:
599:
560:
540:
526:68.97.49.124
507:Life on Mars
459:
455:
451:
447:
446:
442:Ku Klux Klan
433:
431:
408:— Preceding
404:
343:
279:
217:
127:
90:WikiProjects
47:
38:no consensus
37:
1267:—Preceding
1105:—Preceding
602:—Preceding
520:—Preceding
1514:Categories
1496:B Hastings
1446:everything
1171:Sandarmoir
930:chrisboote
628:Stevendirk
237:Television
177:Television
52:discussion
42:discussion
1489:Relisting
1460:Phightins
1438:guideline
1402:Phightins
1384:consensus
1212:Lowenslow
1063:Avenger42
951:Nsfreeman
944:Pregnancy
915:Lowenslow
861:West Wing
787:The View.
652:espionage
642:Jessikins
590:Doctofunk
1480:fdewaele
1309:fdewaele
1269:unsigned
1189:Robjgfox
1150:Hnsampat
1107:unsigned
1080:unsigned
1020:Hnsampat
999:Located
981:Hnsampat
866:Hnsampat
792:Hnsampat
739:fair use
723:fair use
696:Hnsampat
656:Hnsampat
604:unsigned
586:Colombia
544:Robjgfox
522:unsigned
410:unsigned
28:deletion
1441:WP:BOLD
1005:Blue387
682:Kasreyn
359:Judaism
350:Judaism
309:Judaism
80:C-class
462:Scm83x
450:, and
86:scale.
1265:N/T
569:Rlove
485:Rlove
473:Rlove
1500:talk
1427:talk
1369:talk
1342:talk
1336:all.
1322:talk
1316:you.
1298:talk
1277:talk
1249:talk
1234:talk
1216:talk
1193:talk
1175:talk
1154:talk
1133:talk
1115:talk
1088:talk
1067:talk
1052:talk
1024:talk
1009:talk
1001:here
985:talk
970:talk
955:talk
934:talk
919:talk
907:Toby
890:talk
881:were
870:talk
847:talk
812:talk
796:talk
731:this
612:talk
548:talk
530:talk
418:talk
48:keep
913:--
378:???
256:???
1516::
1502:)
1452:Go
1429:)
1394:Go
1371:)
1344:)
1324:)
1300:)
1279:)
1251:)
1236:)
1218:)
1195:)
1177:)
1156:)
1135:)
1117:)
1090:)
1069:)
1054:)
1026:)
1011:)
987:)
972:)
957:)
936:)
921:)
909::
902::
900:CJ
892:)
872:)
849:)
814:)
798:)
741:.
614:)
550:)
532:)
501:)
420:)
288:).
180::
1498:(
1468:!
1425:(
1410:!
1367:(
1340:(
1320:(
1296:(
1275:(
1247:(
1232:(
1214:(
1191:(
1173:(
1152:(
1131:(
1113:(
1086:(
1065:(
1050:(
1022:(
1007:(
983:(
968:(
953:(
932:(
917:(
888:(
868:(
845:(
810:(
794:(
610:(
546:(
528:(
416:(
386:.
264:.
92::
54:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.