Knowledge

Talk:Uprising in Serbia (1941)

Source 📝

864: 1303:
made a more limited scope for this article. I think you precipitated a lot by accusing others of Great-Serbianism etc. and that way you create an unecessary counter-reaction. Now, regarding the matter itself, I can see valid points in your proposal to enlarge this article scope to entire Yugoslavia. I think that is a better option than creating separate articles for uprisings in different regions, but I am undecided yet. A proper RfM with a proper content discussion, without nationalist distractions, would be just ideal.
240: 222: 1052: 324: 303: 856: 618: 1124:@Director, it is really getting tiring your continuos accusations of "Serbian nationalism" towards other users. Even if, you encounter nationalist editors, it has nothing to do with wikipedia rules. One thing are personal beleaves, and completelly another Knowledge rules and editing. So, if we remove your useless and disruptive blabla accusations of "Great-Serbian nationalism", what we have here? We basically have that you edit-wared instead of making a proper 634: 650: 191: 486: 334: 876:, or rather a half-dozen of them. Are you suggesting the rest of the rebellion should have a separate article so as to accommodate your love of your country? Should those parts of the central Uzice uprising that took place outside of the imaginary "Serbia" the title refers to be separately covered? How about we create an "Uprising in Montenegro (1941)" article for just some parts of this singular event, would that feel proper to you? 601: 558: 536: 444: 408: 547: 525: 514: 1428:"federal" on 4th July, when the decision for uprising was brought. Indeed, there were separate provincial committees of the Communist Party for each of the six modern republics, which, as I understand, operated semi-independently. So, it is not entirely without merit to treat each uprising separately. 1302:
But Direktor, I think you are making a conspiracy theory where there isn´t one. I don´t think no one wanted to pretend Serbia was all over Yugoslavia, it´s just that simply the editors of this article focused primarelly on Serbia and the uprising events that took place in nowadays Serbia. They simply
1013:
There is no common name, a proper Google Books check shows 60 for Yugoslavia and 52 for Serbia. Quite a few of the Yugoslavia hits are obviously about the coup d'etat, so there is no clear majority of sources. On this occasion, I believe Ad is right, regardless of his motive. The move is opposed, and
803:
That were small fights, majority of them with few hundreds combatants, but with interesting episodes (switching sides, etc.). Battle of Šabac is one of the earliest, if not the earliest example of 100 killed civilians for each killed German soldier. Battle of Kraljevo was the last battle chetniks and
1321:
some sort of "plot" than the reverse: it makes sense if you don't really think about it, and aren't familiar with the extent of the rebellion. I also don't think anyone here is actually trying to promote any kind of Greater-Serbianism. What I'm doing is pointing out that the layout of the article I
1250:
So that's two things. Then there's the obvious fact that if this article does retain its "Serbia" title, that automatically splits the coverage of the 1941 uprising in Yugoslavia into potentially four or five articles, each more pointless than the next - and ironically analogous to the breakup of
747:
This article should mention: preparations for uprising (revisionst like to point that CPY launched uprising only when Wehrcmaht attacked USSSR - in fact preparations begun already in May), Mihailovic's opportunistic views, Partisans action in July/Augusts, joint Partisns-Chetniks attack western
1336:
So if the title is indeed a product of unfamiliarity with the full scope of the rebellion, that makes it no more of a good idea. But I think it does betray a bit of "Serbian-centrism", if you will, as I can't believe anyone who's read-up on this could imagine the rebels actually stopped at the
1427:
There might be a certain bias among us "local" editors, as we were taught in elementary schools about 6 distinct uprisings, one in each constituent republic. Each republic had a different public holiday (five between 7th and 27th July, plus Macedonian on the 9th November) and the seventh was
882: 1326:
the "Serbia" in the title refers to Greater Serbia (likely unintentionally), and am mentioning that as another entry in the list of serious problems that title would have. What I'm angry about is constantly expecting Antidiskriminator's "oversight" whenever I edit anything
1265:
sure! It isn't a "Serbia issue" with you guys around if it doesn't take at least a month. Maybe we can have an RM that takes five weeks, and spend hundreds of hours pointlessly debating over the most obviously-beneficial improvements to the project? Every suggestion
748:
Serbia, Republic of Uzice, creation og Goverment of Nationa Salvation, chetnik-partisan split nad Mihailovic offer to Wehrmacht to fight agaist partisans and their decline, operation Uzice, operation Mihailovic. See Serbian article. --
1486: 920: 153: 916: 1094:
which it took place. Not only that, but to have that sourced map up there showing the extent of the rebellion, and calling it "uprising in Serbia", can also be seen as highly offensive in implying "Serbia" refers to
1434:
to do that is another issue. As its scope is currently outlined, this article could stand the scrutiny, however, most sections are stubs. I can't find much material on Knowledge about other uprisings in Yugoslavia;
1502: 731:
I have gone ahead and structured it like that and copy edited it. I probably won't get to help expanding it properly for several weeks though. I've removed the speedy delete tag based on the scope outlined above.
625: 422: 1514: 641: 608: 426: 418: 789:
G'day, I assume you have some sources for the large number of sections entitled Battle of...? Perhaps the sr WP article has citations? Unsourced material will get tagged fairly swiftly. Regards,
705:
Can I get it clear what you are saying? Do you consider this should have a background section, then a section covering 1. the uprising to late September, then summary sections covering 2. the
1379:, so in that context its OK. Also, I think the Serbian border you refered as 1918/45 is actually the post 1945 one, as the border at Drina before WWII was actually right in midle of the 1211:
Not only is it wrong as such, its also offensive and misleading as it inescapably suggests "Yugoslavia" is somehow equivalent to "Serbia". One can interpret that as an expression of
1444: 147: 841:) of this article because the scope of this article is uprising in Serbia which is in all its aspects distinctive topics from uprisings in other regions of former Yugoslavia. -- 657: 430: 1082:
we can cover this (one) uprising in multiple articles, the scopes of which would be arbitrarily cut off at the vague imaginary border of a vague, imaginary 1941 "Serbia", or
684:
This article should cover all events from April/May od 1941 until December 1941. Republic of Uzice was formed in September/October and lasted until end of November. --
1251:
Yugoslavia in a pretty comical way ("this isn't Serbia so we're splitting away.."). There's also the fact that these people in 1941 were fighting and rebelling - for
499: 1573: 1495: 1578: 1583: 1563: 1588: 1568: 1461:
Agree in all respects, there is plenty of material to populate this article, which might eventually be a content fork of the summary article you refer to.
1397:
I get sick of repeating something so self-evident, but "Serbia" didn't have a border between 1929 and 1941, because it wasn't a subdivision of Yugoslavia.
1037: 1074:@Peacemaker, setting aside the fact that the current title is more common no matter how you slice it, I'd like to point out that this is really about the 285: 1006: 970: 939: 886: 1470: 1456: 456: 44: 1406: 1023: 390: 1533: 1447:
in summary style, with local uprisings having individual articles where necessary, but we cannot force editors to work in that particular order.
778: 741: 726: 279: 1392: 1362: 1312: 1137: 1558: 258:
and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
809: 485: 1219:
to refer to these territories as "Serbia" from a factual perspective. Then there's the issue of a-historical terminology, and the fact that
993:
comments about me, Google count estimated hits or few maps you brought here can not justify violation of wikipedia rules. Please follow
1593: 79: 168: 1598: 1270:
weighed with regard to whether its somehow anti-Serbian on some level, or part of an anti-Serbian plot? Then, if you don't manage to
135: 1548: 1538: 1528: 380: 838: 1247:(aside from "Greater Serbia" ofc) does any part of Bosnia or Montenegro or Croatia or Slovenia(!) fall under the term "Serbia". 798: 451: 413: 850: 763: 699: 460: 85: 1553: 1543: 827: 129: 30: 1296: 1117: 910: 356: 125: 250: 227: 99: 175: 104: 20: 1491:
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
74: 867:
Locator map of Serbia in Yugoslavia; of course, by 1941 there was no "Serbia" anywhere for about 23 years...
455:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a 1510: 1440: 1436: 347: 308: 202: 1033: 1002: 935: 846: 65: 975: 679: 141: 24: 1466: 1402: 1019: 794: 774: 737: 722: 355:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1506: 1443:. I suppose it would be more logical (and I would prefer that) to have an overview article about 784: 190: 109: 1452: 1029: 998: 931: 842: 1086:
we can have one article about this one uprising, and define it by the real historical country
1059:
the "Serbia" from your preferred title? Because that certainly can be seen as the implication.
208: 1388: 1308: 1133: 714: 1376: 859:
Sourced map of the uprising; incidentally, the caption says "Uprising in Yugoslavia, 1941"
8: 1271: 1236: 55: 1354: 1288: 1109: 962: 902: 70: 915:
Incorrect. Deghosted search results shows there are more hits for uprising in Serbia (
1487:
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
1462: 1448: 1398: 1015: 892:, as I'm really sick of having my edits subjected to a "customary" oversight by you. 873: 820: 805: 790: 770: 756: 733: 718: 692: 51: 1274:
everything, you can "threaten" to boycott the article like Antid's proclaiming. Now
1142:
And its really tiring for me to point out that I'm not making random claims but can
863: 832: 254:, a collaborative effort to improve the Knowledge coverage of articles related to 161: 1384: 1304: 1129: 1125: 994: 927: 710: 1380: 1212: 1099:. I mean this is one of the most obviously-necessary moves that ever got done. 1096: 1051: 706: 1317:
No, let me be clear: I think it far more likely the naming of the article was
1522: 1347: 1281: 1256: 1102: 955: 895: 855: 339: 239: 221: 889: 813: 749: 685: 1207:"Uprising in Serbia" is an absurd title for an uprising which took place 990: 769:
I would if I could read the lingo. But we seem to be in rough agreement.
617: 323: 302: 1187:
I put forward here. Since the accusations aren't my argument. Obviously.
255: 1128:. Also, please stick to the content and keep nationalism out of here. 952:
how Google tests are performed. And I'll not create POVFORKS, thanks.
1338: 1183:
If we remove accusations of Serbian nationalism we have absolutely
989:
I contested your move of this page with valid argument given. Your
649: 633: 1215:, maybe it is, maybe it isn't - but be that as it may, its still 600: 352: 1341:), or that rebellion in Montenegro wasn't a huge part of this 1223:
what area "Serbia" is supposed to refer to in a 1941 context (
872:
Not surprised to see someone like you promoting a nationalist
1224: 888:, and I'm moving it back. Otherwise, we can handle this on 1255:
And - on top of all this, what little can be divined from
443: 407: 1232: 1028:
My motive? This is another article I will never edit. --
984:"total count of results shown on the last results page" 997:, restore the original title and request its moving.-- 930:, restore the original title and request its moving.-- 160: 804:
partisans waged against Germans; it was trigger for
497:
This article has been checked against the following
351:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 329: 15: 1228: 1078:, and in that respect - we have only two choices: 926:I contested your move of this page. Please follow 284:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1259:suggests "uprising in Yugoslavia" is more common. 1520: 33:for general discussion of the article's subject. 1574:Start-Class European military history articles 1501:Participate in the deletion discussion at the 1579:European military history task force articles 810:sr:File:Kraljevo-streljanje-doubijanje-41.jpg 174: 1584:Start-Class German military history articles 1564:Start-Class Balkan military history articles 982:which can be significantly different to the 1589:German military history task force articles 1569:Balkan military history task force articles 188: 1496:Nemci vode ustanike na streljanje 1941.jpg 1014:a RM is the appropriate course of action. 1050: 862: 854: 449:This article is within the scope of the 1534:Unknown-importance Yugoslavia articles 1521: 469:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 459:. To use this banner, please see the 1559:Start-Class military history articles 1322:found could easily be interpreted as 472:Template:WikiProject Military history 1439:redirects to a short section within 978:explains that what you presented is 626:European military history task force 345:This article is within the scope of 184: 207:It is of interest to the following 23:for discussing improvements to the 13: 648: 642:German military history task force 632: 616: 609:Balkan military history task force 599: 484: 14: 1610: 1594:Start-Class World War II articles 1599:World War II task force articles 1375:But PANONIAN map shows only the 556: 545: 534: 523: 512: 442: 406: 332: 322: 301: 264:Knowledge:WikiProject Yugoslavia 238: 220: 189: 45:Click here to start a new topic. 1549:High-importance Serbia articles 1539:WikiProject Yugoslavia articles 1529:Start-Class Yugoslavia articles 1445:Partisan uprising in Yugoslavia 919:) than uprising in Yugoslavia ( 385:This article has been rated as 267:Template:WikiProject Yugoslavia 1383:, so it was no border at all. 1: 1471:23:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1457:16:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1407:10:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1393:08:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1363:12:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 1313:06:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 1297:01:33, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 1138:16:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1118:09:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1038:07:37, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1024:01:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 1007:19:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 971:18:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 940:18:09, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 911:16:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 851:13:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 359:and see a list of open tasks. 42:Put new text under old text. 1441:Independent State of Croatia 1437:Partisan uprising in Croatia 986:, which is what I presented. 980:"the "match" count estimate" 452:Military history WikiProject 365:Knowledge:WikiProject Serbia 7: 1554:WikiProject Serbia articles 1544:Start-Class Serbia articles 1515:04:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC) 717:then an Aftermath section? 368:Template:WikiProject Serbia 50:New to Knowledge? Welcome! 10: 1615: 1337:1918/45 border of Serbia ( 1278:the proper Wiki attitude. 517:Referencing and citation: 391:project's importance scale 286:project's importance scale 828:11:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC) 799:05:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 779:04:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 764:04:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 742:12:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 727:10:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 700:04:03, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 656: 640: 624: 607: 582: 578: 496: 475:military history articles 437: 384: 317: 283: 246:Uprising in Serbia (1941) 233: 215: 80:Be welcoming to newcomers 25:Uprising in Serbia (1941) 1430:Whether we, as editors, 1146:show bias of that sort. 658:World War II task force 583:Associated task forces: 528:Coverage and accuracy: 248:is within the scope of 1060: 883:Uprising in Yugoslavia 868: 860: 653: 637: 621: 604: 561:Supporting materials: 489: 251:WikiProject Yugoslavia 197:This article is rated 75:avoid personal attacks 1185:every single argument 1054: 866: 858: 652: 636: 620: 603: 488: 100:Neutral point of view 1209:all over Yugoslavia. 715:Operation Mihailovic 105:No original research 1245:under no definition 1221:no one really knows 837:I object renaming ( 550:Grammar and style: 503:for B-class status: 270:Yugoslavia articles 1507:Community Tech bot 1213:Greater-Serbianism 1061: 950:no idea whatsoever 869: 861: 680:Contested deletion 654: 638: 622: 605: 490: 457:list of open tasks 348:WikiProject Serbia 203:content assessment 86:dispute resolution 47: 1377:Republic of Užice 1030:Antidiskriminator 999:Antidiskriminator 948:You clearly have 932:Antidiskriminator 885:" is more common 843:Antidiskriminator 806:Kraljevo massacre 675: 674: 671: 670: 667: 666: 663: 662: 574: 573: 552:criterion not met 530:criterion not met 519:criterion not met 461:full instructions 401: 400: 397: 396: 296: 295: 292: 291: 183: 182: 66:Assume good faith 43: 1606: 1361: 1360: 1357: 1350: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1284: 1116: 1115: 1112: 1105: 969: 968: 965: 958: 909: 908: 905: 898: 825: 818: 761: 754: 697: 690: 611:(c. 500–present) 590: 580: 579: 564: 560: 559: 553: 549: 548: 542: 538: 537: 531: 527: 526: 520: 516: 515: 494: 493: 477: 476: 473: 470: 467: 466:Military history 446: 439: 438: 433: 414:Military history 410: 403: 402: 373: 372: 369: 366: 363: 342: 337: 336: 335: 326: 319: 318: 313: 305: 298: 297: 272: 271: 268: 265: 262: 242: 235: 234: 224: 217: 216: 200: 194: 193: 185: 179: 178: 164: 95:Article policies 16: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1519: 1518: 1503:nomination page 1489: 1355: 1352: 1348: 1345: 1327:Serbia-related. 1289: 1286: 1282: 1279: 1263:lets discuss... 1110: 1107: 1103: 1100: 1090:it took place, 963: 960: 956: 953: 903: 900: 896: 893: 835: 821: 814: 787: 785:Battle sections 757: 750: 711:Operation Uzice 693: 686: 682: 588: 562: 557: 551: 546: 540: 535: 529: 524: 518: 513: 474: 471: 468: 465: 464: 416: 387:High-importance 371:Serbia articles 370: 367: 364: 361: 360: 338: 333: 331: 312:High‑importance 311: 269: 266: 263: 260: 259: 201:on Knowledge's 198: 121: 116: 115: 114: 91: 61: 12: 11: 5: 1612: 1602: 1601: 1596: 1591: 1586: 1581: 1576: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1556: 1551: 1546: 1541: 1536: 1531: 1499: 1498: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1429: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1381:Drina Banovina 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1339:PANONIAN's map 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1260: 1243:know, is that 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1097:Greater Serbia 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1010: 1009: 987: 943: 942: 924: 878: 877: 834: 831: 786: 783: 782: 781: 745: 744: 729: 707:Uzice Republic 681: 678: 673: 672: 669: 668: 665: 664: 661: 660: 655: 645: 644: 639: 629: 628: 623: 613: 612: 606: 596: 595: 593: 591: 585: 584: 576: 575: 572: 571: 569: 567: 566: 565: 554: 543: 532: 521: 507: 506: 504: 491: 481: 480: 478: 447: 435: 434: 411: 399: 398: 395: 394: 383: 377: 376: 374: 357:the discussion 344: 343: 327: 315: 314: 306: 294: 293: 290: 289: 282: 276: 275: 273: 243: 231: 230: 225: 213: 212: 206: 195: 181: 180: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 102: 93: 92: 90: 89: 82: 77: 68: 62: 60: 59: 48: 39: 38: 35: 34: 28: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1611: 1600: 1597: 1595: 1592: 1590: 1587: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1542: 1540: 1537: 1535: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1524: 1517: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1364: 1358: 1351: 1344: 1340: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1325: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1292: 1285: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1264: 1258: 1254: 1248: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1186: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1113: 1106: 1098: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1058: 1053: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1012: 1011: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 985: 981: 977: 974: 973: 972: 966: 959: 951: 947: 946: 945: 944: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 922: 918: 914: 913: 912: 906: 899: 891: 887: 884: 880: 879: 875: 871: 870: 865: 857: 853: 852: 848: 844: 840: 830: 829: 826: 824: 819: 817: 811: 807: 801: 800: 796: 792: 780: 776: 772: 768: 767: 766: 765: 762: 760: 755: 753: 743: 739: 735: 730: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 703: 702: 701: 698: 696: 691: 689: 677: 659: 651: 647: 646: 643: 635: 631: 630: 627: 619: 615: 614: 610: 602: 598: 597: 594: 592: 587: 586: 581: 577: 570: 568: 563:criterion met 555: 544: 541:criterion met 533: 522: 511: 510: 509: 508: 505: 502: 501: 495: 492: 487: 483: 482: 479: 462: 458: 454: 453: 448: 445: 441: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 415: 412: 409: 405: 404: 392: 388: 382: 379: 378: 375: 358: 354: 350: 349: 341: 340:Serbia portal 330: 328: 325: 321: 320: 316: 310: 307: 304: 300: 299: 287: 281: 278: 277: 274: 257: 253: 252: 247: 244: 241: 237: 236: 232: 229: 226: 223: 219: 218: 214: 210: 204: 196: 192: 187: 186: 177: 173: 170: 167: 163: 159: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 123:Find sources: 120: 119: 111: 110:Verifiability 108: 106: 103: 101: 98: 97: 96: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 72: 69: 67: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52:Learn to edit 49: 46: 41: 40: 37: 36: 32: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1500: 1490: 1467:send... over 1463:Peacemaker67 1449:No such user 1431: 1403:send... over 1399:Peacemaker67 1342: 1323: 1318: 1275: 1272:WP:STONEWALL 1267: 1262: 1252: 1249: 1244: 1240: 1239:?). What we 1220: 1216: 1208: 1206: 1184: 1143: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1056: 1020:send... over 1016:Peacemaker67 983: 979: 949: 836: 822: 815: 802: 795:send... over 791:Peacemaker67 788: 775:send... over 771:Peacemaker67 758: 751: 746: 738:send... over 734:Peacemaker67 723:send... over 719:Peacemaker67 694: 687: 683: 676: 498: 450: 431:World War II 386: 346: 249: 245: 209:WikiProjects 171: 165: 157: 150: 144: 138: 132: 122: 94: 19:This is the 1253:Yugoslavia. 991:Flag-waving 539:Structure: 199:Start-class 148:free images 31:not a forum 1523:Categories 1385:FkpCascais 1324:suggesting 1305:FkpCascais 1130:FkpCascais 874:WP:POVFORK 261:Yugoslavia 256:Yugoslavia 228:Yugoslavia 1268:carefully 1235:or maybe 976:WP:GOOGLE 88:if needed 71:Be polite 21:talk page 1349:Director 1283:Director 1126:WP:RM/CM 1104:Director 995:WP:RM/CM 957:Director 928:WP:RM/CM 897:Director 833:Renaming 500:criteria 423:European 56:get help 29:This is 27:article. 1261:I mean 1257:WP:SETs 713:and 4. 389:on the 154:WP refs 142:scholar 1276:that's 1144:easily 816:Bojan 752:Bojan 688:Bojan 427:German 419:Balkan 362:Serbia 353:Serbia 309:Serbia 205:scale. 126:Google 1217:wrong 1088:where 1076:scope 890:WP:AE 823:Talk 759:Talk 709:, 3. 695:Talk 169:JSTOR 130:books 84:Seek 1511:talk 1453:talk 1432:want 1389:talk 1356:talk 1343:etc. 1309:talk 1290:talk 1237:this 1233:this 1229:this 1225:this 1134:talk 1111:talk 1057:this 1034:talk 1003:talk 964:talk 936:talk 921:link 917:link 904:talk 847:talk 839:diff 812:).-- 381:High 162:FENS 136:news 73:and 1505:. — 1346:-- 1319:not 1280:-- 1227:?, 1101:-- 1092:for 1055:Is 954:-- 894:-- 280:??? 176:TWL 1525:: 1513:) 1469:) 1455:) 1405:) 1391:) 1311:) 1241:do 1231:, 1136:) 1084:b) 1080:a) 1036:) 1022:) 1005:) 938:) 923:). 849:) 797:) 777:) 740:) 725:) 589:/ 429:/ 425:/ 421:/ 417:: 156:) 54:; 1509:( 1465:( 1451:( 1401:( 1387:( 1359:) 1353:( 1307:( 1293:) 1287:( 1132:( 1114:) 1108:( 1032:( 1018:( 1001:( 967:) 961:( 934:( 907:) 901:( 881:" 845:( 808:( 793:( 773:( 736:( 721:( 463:. 393:. 288:. 211:: 172:· 166:· 158:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 133:· 128:( 58:.

Index

talk page
Uprising in Serbia (1941)
not a forum
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Neutral point of view
No original research
Verifiability
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Yugoslavia
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Yugoslavia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.