237:
32:
793:
648:
356:
338:
366:
1031:. However, the EN article is already good enough so it is not clear that there would really be much value in expanding it, the AR article is under-sourced thus would probably not meet the quality requirements from EN Wiki, and the template has been here since 2008 so it is extremely unlikely that someone will work on this since it hasn't happened in the last 16 years. I think that, for articles such as this one, the template should be removed.
915:
206:
426:
286:
268:
1260:
project... sadly, you have to verify each one yourself (or through some bot or metric, accepting some errors). For example I use some templates to select articles for my students for various activities, and sigh, we have a lot of false positives (ex. the 'requested image' template, used on talk, is very often left in place in articles that have images - this needs some major cleanup, sigh).
961:
486:
Basically, if there is not an article name specified, I want there to be a Google translate link generated based on the title in the foreign language at wikidata. (Currently, if no title is specified, no machine translation link is added.) This behavior already exists elsewhere in the template, just trying to add it for the machine translation as well.
1207:. Finally, there is the issue of whether you want paid OKA editors to be spending time on this, rather than translating articles; I think the goal of removing unneeded templates is a good one, so this is mostly a question of prioritization of editor time, and in this case, OKA funds as well; not something that I can or should have any input on.
1020:(e.g., contains one section that the EN article misses, despite the EN article being better overall), using this template does more harm than good in my opinion as it dilutes the signal (since almost all Knowledge articles will have at least one other language for which the article is at least marginally better).
1195:
should prevail. So, while I agree with your proposal of how it *ought* to be used, I'm not sure where I stand on the question of whether that should be codified by additional language in the template, and will be interested in what other feedback you get about it. I can see pluses and minuses on both
1297:
Regarding use of translators time: I agree that it is better for them to focus on translating than fixing templates. However, I'm planning for OKA to be a very long-term project and to scale it even further, so I assume we will eventually run out of "Good content" to translate, so I want to explore
942:
When there are multiple languages, the template says "You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in...". This is wrong, because it refers to multiple articles. In the section of the template code for when more than one language is specified, please replace
1183:
has that level of visibility, and it doesn't argue that the article is deficient in any way, so has a lower bar for inclusion: there is not so much objection to "one editor thinks this article could be improved by expanding it with translations from the
Spanish article" as there is to "one editor
1259:
I mostly agree; the issue is that articles are expanded sometimes but the template is not removed. And yes, sometimes it is added when the differences are not major. But like with all other templates, there is no manpower to verify them. If you want to use this or anything other for any serious
485:
pinging you at your request. My earlier post: " Right now the link for corresponding article has a switch so that it calls
Wikidata information where the article is not specified. I would like the same behavior to happen for the creation of the machine translation link at translate.google.com."
1304:
2) Removing noise, so that these maintenance tags can actually be used by the broader community (as Piotr mentioned, it's currently hard to use these tags as a signal, which is unfortunate). There's also the general concern that the community has of paid editors not helping with the "clean up"
1065:
to be considered. The "guidance" offered in most templates is often nothing more than the opinion of the editor who wrote the documentation for the template, subject to the changes to the doc made by other editors, based on their opinions, so you could say that the guidance is based on
1308:(on a related note: if you're aware of important simple maintenance tasks that require a lot of manpower and that are neglected in Knowledge, I'm also happy to look into it as a potential project for OKA, such as the "image requested" one mentioned by Piotr)
1168:
template on top of an article purely because they disagree with the content, and sometimes when they have raised objections on the Talk page that have been roundly rejected, but that is not a legitimate use of those templates, and they may be removed per
734:
622:
1034:
Is there any general guidance as to when it is considered ok to delete this template? If we can align on clear criteria, I could task the translators in my non-profit to go through the full backlog and remove it when required.
618:
1147:
As far as placing the bar high, I would agree with that as well, but it is still quite subjective, and difficult to codify. Some templates are scrutinized more than others; for example, some editors will place a
1141:
589:
1294:
Then I will start removing this template on a few pages such as the example I shared, adding a link to that discussion in the edit descriptions, and see if anyone objects to this approach.
529:
to a question I posed there, regarding a subtask that I believe would be necessary in order to implement your request. I'm still looking around for other methods that might work; perhaps
1001:
I would like to use the "Expand" templates (in various languages) to help identify articles that could benefit from the help of a translator, in the context of our work at the non-profit
1137:
456:
446:
578:
1203:
of the template; in those cases the template should be moved to the section in question, and if it is absent, just add the header by itself, and place the template under it with
597:
197:
1346:
712:
1221:
One other solution for a similar situation: when you have an empty article section for which you wish to highlight articles in other languages, you could place a
617:, which seems to be correct according to the /doc here, but this does not seem to make any difference. The template still displays "Slovenian" and looks for e.g.
905:
52:. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
17:
1336:
1341:
1351:
952:
517:
691:
Yes, there are many. Click on "Wikidata item" on the
Template page and scroll down to see links to this template on other languages' Wikipedias. –
130:
542:
891:
Editors have different preferences for which articles belong where, and so it is very confusing to people trying to go through the categories.
760:
996:
1140:
ended with a strong Keep); where there is some contention is about whether to place the template at the top, or bottom of articles (e.g.,
640:
1173:; having a template that impugns the content of an article based on one person's opinion is generally seen as disruptive. I don't think
1055:
1028:
165:
1356:
304:
293:
273:
1008:
To make this template truly useful, I think it would be better if it was only used when the corresponding other-language article is
1361:
1232:
1002:
685:
495:
93:
1366:
1005:. However, I find it challenging because a large share of articles tagged with this template do not really need to be expanded.
738:
193:
189:
1305:
activities, so I'm hoping we can increasingly take a role in these maintenance tasks that volunteers don't typically like to do
862:
848:
807:
662:
60:}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
900:
853:
Yes, in theory, and
Slovenian has the same problem. I think it's better that that bridge be crossed when it happens, though.
671:
171:
628:
Do we need to revert the category moves, or can the template be modified to generate categories using "Slovene", please? –
388:
205:
1252:
700:
572:
1286:
785:
80:
1317:
1216:
990:
551:
1298:
other value-adding activities that translators can do on
Knowledge. Cleaning up these translation tags can help with:
1272:
567:
74:
57:
88:
379:
343:
111:
676:
Are there versions of this template for use in other Wikis, for articles that could be expanded from
English?
297:, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to
160:
49:
526:
872:
248:
62:
151:
43:
840:
777:
632:
473:
184:
1236:
432:
525:, this might need a feature that is not yet available in order to implement it. I got a response at
1177:
1110:
816:
723:
115:
37:
387:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1130:
921:
607:
1120:
513:
491:
623:
Special:WhatLinksHere/Category:Biography articles needing translation from
Slovenian Knowledge
582:
837:
830:
774:
746:
629:
254:
1225:
1199:
Regarding your point about the foreign article just being better in one section, see param
1078:
896:
90:
1144:, and also at the linked Tfd) but this has not resulted in any change in present behavior.
425:
8:
696:
299:
141:
53:
706:
590:
Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_25#Slovenian_Wikipedia_categories
1282:
1248:
1212:
1103:
563:
538:
156:
1102:
for example, and the design and documentation of those templates have correspondingly
1266:
1191:. Often there is objection to adding more guidance in writing, where common sense or
1162:
1071:
948:
681:
593:
555:
522:
509:
487:
137:
1240:
619:
Special:WhatLinksHere/Category:Articles needing translation from
Slovenian Knowledge
220:
91:
1088:
981:
857:
802:
657:
96:
1313:
1188:
1170:
1062:
1051:
1024:
892:
371:
1192:
1095:
1067:
756:
692:
1301:
1) Identifying real cases where the articles would benefit from being expanded
216:
1330:
1278:
1244:
1208:
1039:
559:
534:
503:
480:
67:
1136:) have a reasonably high level of visibility, and are not very contentious (
435:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
303:. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
1262:
1152:
1099:
1043:
970:
944:
677:
977:
854:
799:
768:
716:
654:
530:
792:
647:
221:
1309:
1047:
877:
A lot of articles fit into multiple topic categories. For example:
384:
365:
355:
337:
218:
98:
887:
Articles about natural disasters could fall into "hist" and "sci".
812:
Thank you, that resolves the immediate need. But if somebody uses
1012:
than the
English article. When the corresponding article is only
943:"the corresponding article" with "the corresponding articles".
909:
307:, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
222:
761:
meta:Table_of_Wikimedia_projects#Projects_per_language_codes
598:
Category:Articles needing translation from Slovene Knowledge
1074:. (That said, a few templates get a lot of attention, like
1070:, sometimes of a pretty low level, and often most based on
583:
https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/English_list.php
285:
267:
1061:
Yes, I would support this in principle, but there is also
884:
Articles about elections could fall into "gov" and "hist".
881:
Articles about athletes could fall into "bio" and "sport".
733:
is still looking for the old category name with diacritic
577:
The language code sl is still given the name Slovenian at
95:
89:
735:
Category:Articles needing translation from N’Ko Knowledge
713:
Category:Articles needing translation from N'Ko Knowledge
78:. Functionality of the template can be checked using
906:
Template-protected edit request on 13 September 2024
383:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
361:
106:
1023:I would suggest putting the bar high. For example,
836:, will it still be looking for the old category? –
1347:WikiProject Translation studies (general) articles
1184:thinks the content of this article is in dispute".
1046:FYI as I suspect you may have an opinion on this
1328:
592:ended a unanimous consensus to use the name
1337:Template-Class Translation studies articles
1233:Principle of legality in criminal law#Italy
527:Module talk:Wd#Titles from other wikipedias
1342:NA-importance Translation studies articles
1187:One possible problem with the proposal is
997:Guidance for when to remove this template
550:That one went stale, but I re-upped with
313:Knowledge:WikiProject Translation studies
291:This template is within the scope of the
247:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1352:WikiProject Translation studies articles
316:Template:WikiProject Translation studies
72:Any contributor may edit the template's
752:also exists but is not currently used.
50:heavily used or highly visible template
14:
1329:
1263:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
377:This template is within the scope of
236:
234:
18:Template talk:Expand language/sandbox
596:. The categories have been moved to
420:
230:
26:
253:It is of interest to the following
114:for discussing improvements to the
24:
773:are you able to assist, please? –
672:Equivalent template in other Wikis
25:
1378:
625:rather than "Slovene Knowledge".
1357:Template-Class language articles
1106:of consensus.) I would say that
959:
913:
791:
646:
573:Slovene Knowledge, not Slovenian
431:This template was nominated for
424:
364:
354:
336:
284:
266:
235:
204:
131:Click here to start a new topic.
30:
1362:NA-importance language articles
600:& subcats, but are empty.
397:Knowledge:WikiProject Languages
294:WikiProject Translation Studies
1367:WikiProject Languages articles
1318:15:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1287:06:43, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1273:05:36, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1253:00:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1217:20:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1056:19:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1018:better in very selective parts
991:14:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
953:13:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
579:Module:Language/data/ISO_639-2
568:04:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
518:23:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
496:13:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
400:Template:WikiProject Languages
13:
1:
1291:Thanks both for the response!
1029:this corresponding AR article
901:20:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
701:20:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
686:21:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
391:and see a list of open tasks.
128:Put new text under old text.
1237:Armed Forces of Belarus#CSTO
863:16:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
849:15:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
808:15:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
786:12:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
663:04:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
641:08:29, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
319:Translation studies articles
7:
936:to reactivate your request.
924:has been answered. Set the
136:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1383:
543:05:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
1116:(and its child templates
873:Multiple topic categories
349:
279:
261:
166:Be welcoming to newcomers
1231:template instead, as in
38:Template:Expand language
1094:, the structure of the
711:After a speedy move to
58:edit template-protected
1027:has less details than
161:avoid personal attacks
66:to add usage notes or
455:, 5 August 2011, see
445:, 16 April 2021, see
380:WikiProject Languages
198:Auto-archiving period
1241:Steam railcar#Sweden
1010:substantially better
56:, editors may use {{
533:will have an idea.
310:Translation studies
300:Translation Studies
274:Translation studies
759:are not listed at
474:improving template
249:content assessment
172:dispute resolution
133:
1100:Welcome templates
1014:marginally better
940:
939:
594:Slovene Knowledge
556:User:Calliopejen1
469:
468:
465:
464:
419:
418:
415:
414:
411:
410:
403:language articles
331:
330:
327:
326:
229:
228:
152:Assume good faith
129:
105:
104:
16:(Redirected from
1374:
1269:
1230:
1224:
1206:
1202:
1182:
1176:
1167:
1161:
1157:
1151:
1135:
1129:
1125:
1119:
1115:
1109:
1093:
1087:
1083:
1077:
989:
974:
967:
963:
962:
931:
927:
917:
916:
910:
844:
835:
829:
825:
821:
815:
795:
781:
772:
751:
745:
732:
728:
722:
650:
636:
616:
612:
606:
507:
484:
437:
436:
428:
421:
405:
404:
401:
398:
395:
374:
369:
368:
358:
351:
350:
340:
333:
332:
321:
320:
317:
314:
311:
288:
281:
280:
270:
263:
262:
240:
239:
238:
231:
223:
209:
208:
199:
107:
99:
48:because it is a
34:
33:
27:
21:
1382:
1381:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1327:
1326:
1271:
1267:
1228:
1222:
1204:
1200:
1180:
1178:Expand language
1174:
1165:
1159:
1155:
1149:
1133:
1127:
1123:
1117:
1113:
1111:Expand language
1107:
1091:
1085:
1081:
1075:
1025:this EN article
999:
975:
968:
960:
958:
929:
925:
914:
908:
875:
860:
859:it has begun...
842:
833:
827:
823:
819:
817:expand language
813:
805:
804:it has begun...
779:
766:
749:
743:
730:
729:with parameter
726:
724:expand language
720:
709:
674:
660:
659:it has begun...
634:
614:
610:
604:
603:I have updated
575:
552:this discussion
501:
478:
476:
402:
399:
396:
393:
392:
372:Language portal
370:
363:
318:
315:
312:
309:
308:
225:
224:
219:
196:
178:
177:
147:
116:Expand language
101:
100:
94:
31:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1380:
1370:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1344:
1339:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1306:
1302:
1299:
1295:
1292:
1261:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1197:
1185:
1145:
1131:Expand Catalan
998:
995:
994:
993:
984:
938:
937:
918:
907:
904:
889:
888:
885:
882:
874:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
858:
826:) rather than
803:
715:, the article
708:
705:
704:
703:
673:
670:
668:
666:
665:
658:
608:Expand Slovene
574:
571:
548:
547:
546:
545:
475:
472:
467:
466:
463:
462:
461:
460:
450:
429:
417:
416:
413:
412:
409:
408:
406:
389:the discussion
376:
375:
359:
347:
346:
341:
329:
328:
325:
324:
322:
289:
277:
276:
271:
259:
258:
252:
241:
227:
226:
217:
215:
214:
211:
210:
180:
179:
176:
175:
168:
163:
154:
148:
146:
145:
134:
125:
124:
121:
120:
119:
103:
102:
97:
92:
87:
86:
35:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1379:
1368:
1365:
1363:
1360:
1358:
1355:
1353:
1350:
1348:
1345:
1343:
1340:
1338:
1335:
1334:
1332:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1264:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1227:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1179:
1172:
1164:
1154:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1132:
1122:
1121:Expand German
1112:
1105:
1104:higher levels
1101:
1097:
1090:
1080:
1073:
1069:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1036:
1032:
1030:
1026:
1021:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1004:
992:
987:
986:
979:
972:
966:
957:
956:
955:
954:
950:
946:
935:
932:parameter to
923:
919:
912:
911:
903:
902:
898:
894:
886:
883:
880:
879:
878:
864:
861:
856:
852:
851:
850:
847:
845:
839:
832:
824:|langcode=nqo
818:
811:
810:
809:
806:
801:
798:
794:
790:
789:
788:
787:
784:
782:
776:
770:
764:
762:
758:
757:N'Ko language
753:
748:
741:
739:
736:
731:|langcode=nqo
725:
718:
714:
707:N'Ko language
702:
698:
694:
690:
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
669:
664:
661:
656:
653:
649:
645:
644:
643:
642:
639:
637:
631:
626:
624:
620:
615:|name=Slovene
609:
601:
599:
595:
591:
586:
584:
580:
570:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
521:
520:
519:
515:
511:
505:
500:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
482:
471:
458:
454:
451:
448:
444:
441:
440:
439:
438:
434:
430:
427:
423:
422:
407:
390:
386:
382:
381:
373:
367:
362:
360:
357:
353:
352:
348:
345:
342:
339:
335:
334:
323:
306:
302:
301:
296:
295:
290:
287:
283:
282:
278:
275:
272:
269:
265:
264:
260:
256:
250:
246:
242:
233:
232:
213:
212:
207:
203:
195:
191:
188:
186:
182:
181:
173:
169:
167:
164:
162:
158:
155:
153:
150:
149:
143:
139:
138:Learn to edit
135:
132:
127:
126:
123:
122:
117:
113:
109:
108:
85:
83:
82:
77:
76:
69:
65:
64:
63:documentation
59:
55:
51:
47:
45:
39:
36:
29:
28:
19:
1205:|section=yes
1096:User warning
1037:
1033:
1022:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1007:
1000:
982:
964:
941:
933:
922:edit request
890:
876:
841:
822:again (with
796:
778:
765:
755:Code nqo or
754:
742:
710:
675:
667:
651:
633:
627:
602:
587:
576:
549:
523:Calliopejen1
510:Calliopejen1
488:Calliopejen1
477:
470:
452:
442:
378:
305:project page
298:
292:
255:WikiProjects
244:
201:
183:
110:This is the
79:
73:
71:
61:
46:from editing
42:permanently
41:
1277:Very true.
1226:Further ill
1079:Talk header
831:Expand N'Ko
747:Expand N'Ko
717:Madina-Oula
1331:Categories
1268:reply here
1072:WP:SILENCE
1016:, or only
926:|answered=
893:Numberguy6
855:* Pppery *
800:* Pppery *
655:* Pppery *
508:thoughts?
457:discussion
447:discussion
81:test cases
68:categories
1201:|section=
1193:consensus
1068:consensus
838:Fayenatic
775:Fayenatic
693:Jonesey95
630:Fayenatic
588:However,
554:. Adding
394:Languages
385:languages
344:Languages
174:if needed
157:Be polite
118:template.
112:talk page
54:consensus
44:protected
1279:Mathglot
1245:Mathglot
1209:Mathglot
1189:WP:CREEP
1171:WP:WTRMT
1163:Disputed
1138:this Tfd
1063:WP:CREEP
1040:Mathglot
560:Mathglot
535:Mathglot
504:Mathglot
481:Mathglot
433:deletion
245:template
202:365 days
185:Archives
142:get help
1089:Infobox
1044:Piotrus
971:TTWIDEE
945:TTWIDEE
678:Irtapil
75:sandbox
1196:sides.
978:Ahecht
769:Pppery
737:, see
719:using
531:Thayts
251:scale.
1310:7804j
1239:, or
1048:7804j
930:|ans=
920:This
846:ondon
797:Fixed
783:ondon
652:Fixed
638:ondon
613:with
243:This
170:Seek
1314:talk
1283:talk
1249:talk
1213:talk
1142:here
1052:talk
985:PAGE
983:TALK
965:Done
949:talk
897:talk
697:talk
682:talk
581:per
564:talk
539:talk
514:talk
492:talk
453:Keep
443:Keep
159:and
1158:or
1153:POV
1098:or
1003:OKA
928:or
763:.
585:.
40:is
1333::
1316:)
1285:)
1251:)
1243:.
1235:,
1229:}}
1223:{{
1215:)
1181:}}
1175:{{
1166:}}
1160:{{
1156:}}
1150:{{
1134:}}
1128:{{
1126:,
1124:}}
1118:{{
1114:}}
1108:{{
1092:}}
1086:{{
1084:,
1082:}}
1076:{{
1054:)
976:--
951:)
934:no
899:)
834:}}
828:{{
820:}}
814:{{
750:}}
744:{{
740:.
727:}}
721:{{
699:)
684:)
621:/
611:}}
605:{{
566:)
558:.
541:)
516:)
494:)
200::
192:,
140:;
84:.
70:.
1312:(
1281:(
1265:|
1247:(
1211:(
1050:(
1042:@
1038:@
988:)
980:(
973::
969:@
947:(
895:(
843:L
780:L
771::
767:@
695:(
680:(
635:L
562:(
537:(
512:(
506::
502:@
490:(
483::
479:@
459:.
449:.
257::
194:2
190:1
187::
144:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
