484:
472:
172:
The standard adopted for determining who qualifies as a 'victim' for the purposes of seeking relief was broad in the case, with the Human Rights
Committee and the Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination disagreeing as to the exact scope of the standard. The standard established by the
155:
found that the statements in question "ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred," and that "the deference to Hitler and his principles and 'footsteps' must ...be taken as incitement at least to racial discrimination, if not to violence. As such, the "exceptionally/manifestly offensive"
136:], given that they were of exceptionally/manifestly offensive character, are not protected by the due regard clause, and that accordingly his acquittal by the Supreme Court of Norway gave rise to a violation of article 4, and consequently article 6, of the
401:
161:
49:. As such, the UN Committee found that the speaker's comments contained ideas of racial superiority and hatred, making the speech "exceptionally offensive" and not protected by the right to freedom of expression.
46:
277:
354:
299:
542:
106:. The majority held that the speech contained derogatory and offensive remarks, but that no actual threats were made, nor any instructions to carry out any particular actions.
659:
80:(threatening, insulting, or subjecting to hatred, persecution or contempt, any person or group of persons because of their creed, race, color or national or ethnic origin).
525:
146:
the deference to Hitler and his principles and 'footsteps' must in the
Committee's view be taken as incitement at least to racial discrimination, if not to violence
137:
77:
152:
20:
707:
461:
413:
Temperman, Jeroen (2015). "Comparative international perspectives: CERD and the
European Court of Human Rights on the 'right to be free from incitement'".
244:
62:
530:
321:
574:
564:
126:
the prohibition of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred is compatible with the right to freedom of opinion and expression
454:
415:
6 - Comparative international perspectives: CERD and the
European Court of Human Rights on the 'right to be free from incitement'
513:
503:
447:
102:
would involve prohibiting Nazi organizations, which it considered would go too far and be incompatible with the right to
34:
would involve prohibiting Nazi organizations, which it considered would go too far and be incompatible with the right to
376:
702:
697:
629:
430:
331:
254:
692:
682:
639:
115:
76:
Some witnesses filed a complaint with the police, and Sjølie was charged with a violation of section 135a of the
218:"The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway, Communication No. 30/2003, U.N. Doc. CERD/C/67/D/30/2003 (2005)"
687:
598:
498:
476:
569:
88:
30:. The Supreme Court of Norway acquitted the giver of the speech, and found that penalizing approval of
557:
41:
Afterwards the
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination found that the acquittal by the
156:
statements were not protected by the due regard clause. It found as such, that the acquittal by the
182:
552:
520:
157:
92:
42:
26:
The case involved an antisemitic speech given during a march in commemoration of the Nazi leader
652:
407:
173:
Human Rights
Committee in 2003 has "also been adopted by the European Court of Human Rights."
634:
586:
84:
217:
8:
613:
508:
439:
426:
377:"Taking "Great Care": Defining Victims of Hate Speech Targeting Religious Minorities"
327:
250:
103:
35:
418:
422:
162:
International
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
47:
International
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
608:
57:
In 2000, a group known as the "Bootboys" organized a march in commemoration of
676:
124:
On 15 August 2005, it delivered the decision. The
Committee reaffirmed that
323:
Compass - Manual for Human Rights
Education with Young People (2012 edition
66:
58:
27:
121:
On 9 March 2005, the Committee declared the communication admissible.
70:
61:, near Oslo. There was an antisemitic speech by the march's leader
483:
114:
On 17 June 2003, representatives of the Jewish community and the
471:
99:
31:
98:
The Supreme Court of Norway found that penalizing approval of
526:
Center for Studies of the Holocaust and Religious Minorities
132:
19:(Communication No. 30/2003) was a case decided by the UN
469:
153:
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
21:
Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
355:"The Supreme Court looks at the boundary of racism"
674:
417:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 122–160.
109:
220:. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library
52:
581:The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
455:
300:"Boot Boys leader acquitted in Supreme Court"
17:The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
708:Antisemitic attacks and incidents in Europe
462:
448:
278:"Neo-Nazi leader escapes jail after trial"
144:Significant conclusions include also that
412:
95:in an 11-6 decision on 17 December 2002.
91:. He was finally acquitted again by the
239:
237:
235:
212:
210:
208:
206:
204:
202:
200:
198:
130:the statements of Mr. Sjolie [
675:
83:Sjølie was initially acquitted by the
443:
369:
347:
314:
292:
270:
232:
195:
160:was a violation of article 4 of the
45:was a violation of article 4 of the
249:. Council of Europe. January 2014.
167:
118:filed a communication before CERD.
13:
565:Norwegian people of Jewish descent
14:
719:
395:
514:2008–2009 Oslo anti-Israel riots
482:
470:
326:. Council of Europe. June 2015.
640:Norwegian Centre Against Racism
630:Jewish Children's Home in Oslo
1:
188:
531:Jewish deportees during WWII
423:10.1017/CBO9781316440513.007
110:CERD proceedings and opinion
7:
176:
116:Norwegian Antiracist Centre
53:Background and case results
10:
724:
478:Jews and Judaism in Norway
89:Borgarting Court of Appeal
648:
622:
597:
541:
491:
703:Jews and Judaism in Oslo
698:Jewish Norwegian history
183:Det Mosaiske Trossamfund
87:, then convicted by the
570:Norway–Israel relations
158:Supreme Court of Norway
43:Supreme Court of Norway
693:Human rights in Norway
683:Antisemitism in Norway
654:List of Norwegian Jews
635:Jewish Museum in Oslo
587:With Israel for Peace
246:Manual on hate speech
688:Free speech case law
151:With the trial, the
78:Norwegian Penal Code
623:Other organizations
402:CERD/C/67/D/30/2003
128:and concluded that
661:List of synagogues
670:
669:
575:Friends of Israel
104:freedom of speech
85:Halden City Court
36:freedom of speech
715:
662:
655:
601:
545:
486:
479:
474:
464:
457:
450:
441:
440:
436:
389:
388:
386:
384:
373:
367:
366:
364:
362:
351:
345:
344:
342:
340:
318:
312:
311:
309:
307:
296:
290:
289:
287:
285:
274:
268:
267:
265:
263:
241:
230:
229:
227:
225:
214:
168:Adopted standard
723:
722:
718:
717:
716:
714:
713:
712:
673:
672:
671:
666:
660:
653:
644:
618:
599:
593:
543:
537:
487:
477:
468:
433:
404:- CERD decision
398:
393:
392:
382:
380:
379:. Chicago Bound
375:
374:
370:
360:
358:
353:
352:
348:
338:
336:
334:
320:
319:
315:
305:
303:
298:
297:
293:
283:
281:
276:
275:
271:
261:
259:
257:
243:
242:
233:
223:
221:
216:
215:
196:
191:
179:
170:
112:
55:
12:
11:
5:
721:
711:
710:
705:
700:
695:
690:
685:
668:
667:
665:
664:
657:
649:
646:
645:
643:
642:
637:
632:
626:
624:
620:
619:
617:
616:
611:
605:
603:
595:
594:
592:
591:
590:
589:
584:
577:
567:
562:
561:
560:
553:Norwegian Jews
549:
547:
539:
538:
536:
535:
534:
533:
528:
518:
517:
516:
511:
506:
495:
493:
489:
488:
467:
466:
459:
452:
444:
438:
437:
431:
410:
405:
397:
396:External links
394:
391:
390:
368:
346:
332:
313:
291:
269:
255:
231:
193:
192:
190:
187:
186:
185:
178:
175:
169:
166:
111:
108:
69:was made and "
54:
51:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
720:
709:
706:
704:
701:
699:
696:
694:
691:
689:
686:
684:
681:
680:
678:
663:
658:
656:
651:
650:
647:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
627:
625:
621:
615:
612:
610:
607:
606:
604:
602:
596:
588:
585:
583:
582:
578:
576:
573:
572:
571:
568:
566:
563:
559:
556:
555:
554:
551:
550:
548:
546:
540:
532:
529:
527:
524:
523:
522:
519:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
501:
500:
497:
496:
494:
490:
485:
480:
473:
465:
460:
458:
453:
451:
446:
445:
442:
434:
432:9781316440513
428:
424:
420:
416:
411:
409:
408:CERD decision
406:
403:
400:
399:
378:
372:
356:
350:
335:
333:9789287181558
329:
325:
324:
317:
301:
295:
279:
273:
258:
256:9789287178770
252:
248:
247:
240:
238:
236:
219:
213:
211:
209:
207:
205:
203:
201:
199:
194:
184:
181:
180:
174:
165:
163:
159:
154:
149:
148:(Para 10.4).
147:
142:
141:(Para 10.5).
140:
139:
134:
131:
127:
122:
119:
117:
107:
105:
101:
96:
94:
93:Supreme Court
90:
86:
81:
79:
74:
72:
68:
64:
60:
50:
48:
44:
39:
37:
33:
29:
24:
22:
18:
580:
579:
504:Antisemitism
481:
475:
414:
381:. Retrieved
371:
359:. Retrieved
349:
337:. Retrieved
322:
316:
304:. Retrieved
294:
282:. Retrieved
280:. Dagsavisen
272:
260:. Retrieved
245:
222:. Retrieved
171:
150:
145:
143:
135:
129:
125:
123:
120:
113:
97:
82:
75:
63:Terje Sjølie
56:
40:
25:
16:
15:
302:. Dagbladet
73:" shouted.
67:Nazi salute
59:Rudolf Hess
28:Rudolf Hess
677:Categories
600:Synagogues
509:Jew Clause
383:August 17,
361:August 17,
339:August 17,
306:August 17,
284:August 17,
262:August 17,
224:August 17,
189:References
138:Convention
23:in 2005.
614:Trondheim
521:Holocaust
71:Sieg Heil
177:See also
492:History
558:Rabbis
544:Groups
499:Norway
429:
330:
253:
100:Nazism
65:, the
32:Nazism
609:Oslo
427:ISBN
385:2019
363:2019
357:. DT
341:2019
328:ISBN
308:2019
286:2019
264:2019
251:ISBN
226:2019
419:doi
133:sic
679::
425:.
234:^
197:^
164:.
38:.
463:e
456:t
449:v
435:.
421::
387:.
365:.
343:.
310:.
288:.
266:.
228:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.