Knowledge

Timariots

Source 📝

20: 70:). The timariot was granted feudatory with the obligation to go mounted to war and to supply soldiers and sailors in numbers proportionate to the revenue of the appanage. The timariot owed personal service for his sword in time of war and for a certain sum of money owed a number of soldiers as a substitute ( 170:
Timar-status could be inherited, but the pieces of land were not inheritable to avoid the creation of any stable landed nobility. Timars were not hereditary until a decree was passed in 1585. Those who vied for timar status were fiercely competitive and the barrier to entry was high. The sipahis were
166:
When the Ottomans conquered new territory, it was common practice to grant timars to the local aristocracy of conquered lands. The Ottomans co-opted the local nobility and eased the burden of conquest. The first group of timars in the Balkans had a strong Christian majority (60 percent in Serbia and
106:
and then the sultan himself. This semi-feudal arrangement allowed for the Ottomans to organize large armies at once, thus making an imperial army from what was still essentially a medieval economy. This system of using agricultural revenue to pay troops was influenced by a similar Byzantine practice
65:
The timariots provided the backbone of the Ottoman cavalry force and the army as a whole. They were obligated to fight as cavalrymen in the Ottoman military when called upon. The timariots had to assemble with the army when at war, and had to take care of the land entrusted to him in times of peace.
119:
of each sanjak listed the specific amount of taxes and services that the timariot could collect. The central government enforced these laws rigorously, and a sipahi could lose his timar for violating regulations. The timar-holders took precautions to keep peasants on their land and were also owed
162:
horse had also to be equipped with armor of very thin steel. Tents for different purposes e.g., for treasury, kitchen, saddlery store, etc. had to be provided. This ensured that all equipment and troops for campaigns was determined in advance and Ottoman commanders knew the exact number of their
62:, which were usually recently conquered plots of agricultural land in the countryside. Far less commonly, the sultan would grant a civil servant or member of the imperial family a timar. Also non-military timar holders were obliged to supply the imperial army with soldiers and provisions. 110:
During peace, timariots were expected to manage the lands they were given. Each timariot did not own the land that had been granted. All agricultural lands in the Empire that were considered state property (or
115:) could be granted as timars. Timariots could be removed and transferred when the sultan deemed it necessary. However, timariots were expected to collect taxes and manage the peasantry. The 462: 154:
had to be accompanied by a soldier in a coat of mail, for income above 15.000 akçe by additional soldier for each additional 3.000 akçe. Above a certain income of the
98:
being determined by revenue. The number of the timariots in the sultan's army fluctuated between 50,000 and 90,000 men. Timariots were themselves organized by
472: 467: 124:
per year, but most timariots did not make anywhere close to that. In the 1530s, 40 percent of timariots received less than 3,000
167:
82 percent in Bosnia in 1467-69), but the Christian sipahis gradually disappeared due to dispossession or conversion to Islam.
370: 257: 218: 402:
Douglas, Harry (1987). "The Ottoman 'timar' system and its transformation, 1563-1656" (Document). Indiana University.
78:) was bound to live on the timariot’s estate and look after the land. When summoned for campaign the timariot and his 442: 283: 146:
had to provide was dependent on the size of his land holdings. When the annual income of the holding was above 4.000
120:
certain labor from peasants, such as building a barn. The maximum amount of income from one timar was 9,999
66:
When at war, the timariot had to bring his own equipment and in addition a number of armed retainers (
273: 247: 403: 360: 8: 417:
The Cambridge History of Turkey Volume 2: the Ottoman Empire as a World Power 1453-1603
438: 366: 279: 253: 214: 41: 208: 407: 134: 456: 52:. In return for service, each timariot received a parcel of revenue called a 49: 171:
also in constant competition for control of the Ottoman military with the
128:
in revenue. Higher ranking officers could receive a ziamet (up to 100,000
102:
who ruled over groups of timars. The sanjak-beys were subordinate to the
99: 94:
or men-at-arms as well as their own equipment on campaign, the number of
172: 103: 86:. When a timariot failed to obey the summon he was deprived of his 210:
Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise to Western Power
142:), depending on importance. The number of men and equipment the 83: 147: 19: 435:
An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300–1914
159: 151: 45: 379: 316: 304: 87: 54: 426:
The Ottoman Empire : Conquest, Organization and Economy
340: 249:
Land and Privilege in Byzantium: The Institution of Pronoia
107:
and other Near Eastern states prior to the Ottoman Empire.
59: 292: 227: 90:
for one or two years. Timariots were expected to bring
185: 328: 463:Cavalry units and formations of the Ottoman Empire 454: 433:İnalcık, Halil; Quataert, Donald, eds. (2003) . 245: 432: 415:Faroqhi, Suraiya N.; Fleet, Kate, eds. (2012). 385: 322: 310: 252:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 581–. 414: 346: 298: 233: 239: 358: 352: 18: 423: 401: 334: 275:First Encyclopaedia of Islam: 1913-1936 191: 455: 206: 473:Social classes in the Ottoman Empire 213:. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. 202: 200: 246:Mark C. Bartusis (3 January 2013). 207:Hanson, Victor Davis (2007-12-18). 13: 14: 484: 197: 82:had to present themselves with a 468:Feudalism in the Ottoman Empire 359:André Clot (13 February 2012). 437:. Cambridge University Press. 278:. BRILL. 1993. pp. 772–. 266: 1: 428:. Cambridge University Press. 419:. Cambridge University Press. 178: 424:İnalcık, Halil, ed. (1978). 7: 386:İnalcık & Quataert 2003 323:İnalcık & Quataert 2003 311:İnalcık & Quataert 2003 10: 489: 395: 44:) was the name given to a 163:forces for mobilization. 362:Suleiman the Magnificent 347:Faroqhi & Fleet 2012 299:Faroqhi & Fleet 2012 234:Faroqhi & Fleet 2012 16:Ottoman cavalry soldiers 365:. Saqi. pp. 43–. 26: 22: 48:cavalryman in the 27: 372:978-0-86356-803-9 259:978-1-139-85146-6 220:978-0-307-42518-8 480: 448: 429: 420: 411: 389: 383: 377: 376: 356: 350: 344: 338: 332: 326: 320: 314: 308: 302: 296: 290: 289: 270: 264: 263: 243: 237: 231: 225: 224: 204: 195: 189: 488: 487: 483: 482: 481: 479: 478: 477: 453: 452: 445: 398: 393: 392: 384: 380: 373: 357: 353: 345: 341: 333: 329: 321: 317: 309: 305: 297: 293: 286: 272: 271: 267: 260: 244: 240: 232: 228: 221: 205: 198: 190: 186: 181: 17: 12: 11: 5: 486: 476: 475: 470: 465: 451: 450: 443: 430: 421: 412: 397: 394: 391: 390: 388:, p. 119. 378: 371: 351: 349:, p. 290. 339: 327: 325:, p. 112. 315: 313:, p. 107. 303: 301:, p. 295. 291: 284: 265: 258: 238: 236:, p. 229. 226: 219: 196: 194:, p. 107. 183: 182: 180: 177: 138:(over 100,000 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 485: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 460: 458: 446: 444:0-521-57456-0 440: 436: 431: 427: 422: 418: 413: 409: 405: 400: 399: 387: 382: 374: 368: 364: 363: 355: 348: 343: 337:, p. 10. 336: 331: 324: 319: 312: 307: 300: 295: 287: 285:90-04-09796-1 281: 277: 276: 269: 261: 255: 251: 250: 242: 235: 230: 222: 216: 212: 211: 203: 201: 193: 188: 184: 176: 174: 168: 164: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 136: 131: 127: 123: 118: 114: 108: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 63: 61: 57: 56: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 31: 25: 21: 449:Two volumes. 434: 425: 416: 381: 361: 354: 342: 335:Douglas 1987 330: 318: 306: 294: 274: 268: 248: 241: 229: 209: 192:İnalcık 1978 187: 169: 165: 155: 143: 139: 133: 129: 125: 121: 116: 112: 109: 95: 91: 79: 75: 71: 67: 64: 53: 50:Ottoman army 37: 33: 29: 28: 23: 100:sanjak-beys 457:Categories 179:References 144:timariotes 104:beylerbeyi 408:303473407 173:janissary 117:kanunname 404:ProQuest 74:). The ( 36:holder; 30:Timariot 396:Sources 175:class. 132:) or a 92:cebelus 84:cuirass 42:Turkish 38:tımarlı 441:  406:  369:  282:  256:  217:  160:sipahi 152:sipahi 96:cebelu 80:cebelu 76:cebelu 72:cebelu 68:cebelu 46:Sipahi 24:Sipahi 156:timar 130:akces 88:timar 55:timar 34:tımar 439:ISBN 367:ISBN 280:ISBN 254:ISBN 215:ISBN 158:the 150:the 148:akçe 140:akce 126:akce 122:akce 113:miri 60:fief 58:, a 32:(or 135:has 40:in 459:: 199:^ 447:. 410:. 375:. 288:. 262:. 223:.

Index


Turkish
Sipahi
Ottoman army
timar
fief
cuirass
timar
sanjak-beys
beylerbeyi
has
akçe
sipahi
sipahi
janissary
İnalcık 1978


Carnage and Culture: Landmark Battles in the Rise to Western Power
ISBN
978-0-307-42518-8
Faroqhi & Fleet 2012
Land and Privilege in Byzantium: The Institution of Pronoia
ISBN
978-1-139-85146-6
First Encyclopaedia of Islam: 1913-1936
ISBN
90-04-09796-1
Faroqhi & Fleet 2012
İnalcık & Quataert 2003

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.