Knowledge

Type safety

Source 📝

904:
it visible when such facilities are used. Unfortunately, this was not consequently implemented in the original language report and its implementation. There still remained unsafe facilities such as the type cast syntax and variant records (inherited from Pascal) that could be used without prior import. The difficulty in moving these facilities into the SYSTEM pseudo-module was the lack of any identifier for the facility that could then be imported since only identifiers can be imported, but not syntax.
204:. Type safety is sometimes alternatively considered to be a property of facilities of a computer language; that is, some facilities are type-safe and their usage will not result in type errors, while other facilities in the same language may be type-unsafe and a program using them may encounter type errors. The behaviors classified as type errors by a given programming language are usually those that result from attempts to perform operations on 1133:
records) or moved to pseudo-module UNSAFE. For facilities where there is no identifier that could be imported, enabling identifiers were introduced. In order to enable such a facility, its corresponding enabling identifier must be imported from pseudo-module UNSAFE. No unsafe facilities remain in the language that do not require import from UNSAFE.
717:, which tells the function to expect a pointer to a character-string and yet supplies an integer argument, may be accepted by compilers, but will produce undefined results.) This is partially mitigated by some compilers (such as gcc) checking type correspondences between printf arguments and format strings. 1409:
is a type-safe language. A Common Lisp compiler is responsible for inserting dynamic checks for operations whose type safety cannot be proven statically. However, a programmer may indicate that a program should be compiled with a lower level of dynamic type-checking. A program compiled in such a mode
859:
Sometimes a part of the type safety is implemented indirectly: e.g. the class BigDecimal represents a floating point number of arbitrary precision, but handles only numbers that can be expressed with a finite representation. The operation BigDecimal.divide() calculates a new object as the division of
346:
In isolation, type soundness is a relatively weak property, as it essentially just states that the rules of a type system are internally consistent and cannot be subverted. However, in practice, programming languages are designed so that well-typedness also entails other, stronger properties, some of
903:
Modula-2 is a strongly-typed language with a design philosophy to require any unsafe facilities to be explicitly marked as unsafe. This is achieved by "moving" such facilities into a built-in pseudo-library called SYSTEM from where they must be imported before they can be used. The import thus makes
1132:
A recent revision of the language applied the original design philosophy rigorously. First, pseudo-module SYSTEM was renamed to UNSAFE to make the unsafe nature of facilities imported from there more explicit. Then all remaining unsafe facilities where either removed altogether (for example variant
863:
In this case if the division has no finite representation, as when one computes e.g. 1/3=0.33333..., the divide() method can raise an exception if no rounding mode is defined for the operation. Hence the library, rather than the language, guarantees that the object respects the contract implicit in
797:
is type-safe. It has support for untyped pointers, but this must be accessed using the "unsafe" keyword which can be prohibited at the compiler level. It has inherent support for run-time cast validation. Casts can be validated by using the "as" keyword that will return a null reference if the cast
1241:
has had a number of type safety requirements, some of which are kept in some compilers. Where a Pascal compiler dictates "strict typing", two variables cannot be assigned to each other unless they are either compatible (such as conversion of integer to real) or assigned to the identical subtype.
720:
In addition, C, like Ada, provides unspecified or undefined explicit conversions; and unlike in Ada, idioms that use these conversions are very common, and have helped to give C a type-unsafe reputation. For example, the standard way to allocate memory on the heap is to invoke a memory allocation
1818:
The two child classes have members of different types. When downcasting a parent class pointer to a child class pointer, then the resulting pointer may not point to a valid object of correct type. In the example, this leads to garbage value being printed. The problem could have been avoided by
1055:
The ISO Modula-2 standard corrected this for the type cast facility by changing the type cast syntax into a function called CAST which has to be imported from pseudo-module SYSTEM. However, other unsafe facilities such as variant records remained available without any import from pseudo-module
700:
is type-safe in limited contexts; for example, a compile-time error is generated when an attempt is made to convert a pointer to one type of structure to a pointer to another type of structure, unless an explicit cast is used. However, a number of very common operations are non-type-safe; for
465:
and Zilles defined a strongly-typed language as one in which "whenever an object is passed from a calling function to a called function, its type must be compatible with the type declared in the called function." In 1977, Jackson wrote, "In a strongly typed language each data area will have a
561:
defined by programmers even when this is not strictly necessary for memory safety or for the prevention of any kind of catastrophic failure. Allocations are given a type describing its contents, and this type is fixed for the duration of the allocation. This allows type-based
273:, then expressions accepted by that type system must evaluate to a value of the appropriate type (rather than produce a value of some other, unrelated type or crash with a type error). Vijay Saraswat provides the following, related definition: 619:, will adhere to that contract: hence in that function the operations permitted on that object will be only those defined by the methods of the class the object implements. This will guarantee that the object integrity will be preserved. 1543:
explicitly prevents the compiler from performing a safe conversion from integer to floating-point value. When the program runs it will output a garbage floating-point value. The problem could have been avoided by instead writing
415:) proposed in academic programming language research. Many languages, on the other hand, are too big for human-generated type safety proofs, as they often require checking thousands of cases. Nevertheless, some languages such as 466:
distinct type and each process will state its communication requirements in terms of these types." In contrast, a weakly typed language may produce unpredictable results or may perform implicit type conversion.
289:, which are specific to each programming language. Consequently, a precise, formal definition of type soundness depends upon the style of formal semantics used to specify a language. In 1994, Andrew Wright and 401:
of different types. For instance, inches and millimeters may both be stored as integers, but should not be substituted for each other or added. A type system can enforce two different types of integer for
297:, which is closest to the notion of type safety as understood by most programmers. Under this approach, the semantics of a language must have the following two properties to be considered type-sound: 654:, but also to encourage type-safe programming. To resolve these conflicting goals, Ada confines type-unsafety to a certain set of special constructs whose names usually begin with the string 731:), which the calling code must explicitly or implicitly cast to the appropriate pointer type. Pre-standardized implementations of C required an explicit cast to do so, therefore the code 234:
and consulting them as needed to detect imminent errors, or a combination of both. Dynamic type enforcement often allows programs to run that would be invalid under static enforcement.
809:
type (from which all other types are derived) runs the risk of defeating the purpose of the C# type system. It is usually better practice to abandon object references in favour of
1418:
The following examples illustrates how C++ cast operators can break type safety when used incorrectly. The first example shows how basic data types can be incorrectly cast:
2105: 573:. Pierce says, "it is extremely difficult to achieve type safety in the presence of an explicit deallocation operation", due to the dangling pointer problem. However 312:
or can be reduced towards a value in some well-defined way. In other words, the program never gets into an undefined state where no further transitions are possible.
461:
Programming languages are often colloquially classified as strongly typed or weakly typed (also loosely typed) to refer to certain aspects of type safety. In 1974,
544: 520: 496: 2249:
Type safety is hence also a matter of good class definition: public methods that modify the internal state of an object shall preserve the object itegrity
431:, used to "escape" from the usual restricted environment in which I/O is possible, circumvents the type system and so can be used to break type safety.) 546:, causing a type error when the variable is read. Conversely, if the language is memory-safe, it cannot allow an arbitrary integer to be used as a 237:
In the context of static (compile-time) type systems, type safety usually involves (among other things) a guarantee that the eventual value of any
2298:
In C, the proper method is to declare that malloc returns a pointer to void, then explicitly coerce the pointer into the desired type with a cast.
443:
written in other languages; such errors could render a given implementation type unsafe in certain circumstances. An early version of Sun's
277:
A language is type-safe if the only operations that can be performed on data in the language are those sanctioned by the type of the data.
2204: 2113: 880: 435:
is another example of such an "escape" feature. Regardless of the properties of the language definition, certain errors may occur at
241:
will be a legitimate member of that expression's static type. The precise requirement is more subtle than this — see, for example,
891:
to interact with non-ML code (such as C libraries) that may require data laid out in specific ways. Another example is the SML/NJ
419:, which has rigorously defined semantics, have been proved to meet one definition of type safety. Some other languages such as 171: 2451: 2291: 887:, provide libraries that offer unsafe operations. These facilities are often used in conjunction with those implementations' 570: 61: 2542: 1856: 1381:(because they are not identical, even though the components of that user defined type are identical) and an assignment of 622:
Exceptions to this are object oriented languages that allow dynamic modification of the object structure, or the use of
436: 231: 2234: 2188: 2069: 2054:
Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on Libraries, Languages and Compilers for Array Programming
810: 577:
is generally considered type-safe and uses a borrow checker to achieve memory safety, instead of garbage collection.
2328: 335: 356: 246: 2007: 794: 547: 427:
to meet some definition of type safety, provided certain "escape" features are not used (for example Haskell's
420: 293:
formulated what has become the standard definition and proof technique for type safety in languages defined by
1925: 1907: 1238: 623: 305: 673:
is a subset of Ada eliminating all its potential ambiguities and insecurities while at the same time adding
838: 616: 378:
that could otherwise arise from a pointer to one type of object being treated as a pointer to another type.
727:, with an argument indicating how many bytes are required. The function returns an untyped pointer (type 626:
to modify the content of an object to overcome the constraints imposed by the class methods definitions.
574: 281:
However, what precisely it means for a program to be "well typed" or to "go wrong" are properties of its
875:
has rigorously defined semantics and is known to be type-safe. However, some implementations, including
888: 670: 440: 220:
when there's no definition on how to handle this case. This classification is partly based on opinion.
217: 164: 2370: 1992:
Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages - POPL '82
876: 834: 826: 360: 213: 135: 2148: 799: 697: 639: 597: 309: 238: 205: 798:
is invalid, or by using a C-style cast that will throw an exception if the cast is invalid. See
666:
constructs very carefully and only when necessary; programs that do not use them are type-safe.
2143: 782: 763: 615:
Each function that exchanges objects derived from a specific class, or implementing a specific
523: 456: 331: 322:
After each evaluation step, the type of each expression remains the same (that is, its type is
79: 41: 2283: 2268: 57: 2391: 776: 294: 157: 110: 806: 2547: 2275: 892: 688:
to the language itself (in form of pre-, and post-conditions, as well as type invariants).
444: 330:
A number of other formal treatments of type soundness have also been published in terms of
197: 601: 8: 2412: 853: 502:
memory error allows writing a bit pattern that does not represent a legitimate member of
75: 2521: 2474: 2437: 2075: 2013: 685: 674: 658:. Unchecked_Deallocation can be effectively banned from a unit of Ada text by applying 651: 558: 529: 505: 481: 351:
Prevention of illegal operations. For example, a type system can reject the expression
290: 2478: 2447: 2287: 2230: 2184: 2079: 2065: 2003: 1968: 1897: 849: 412: 316: 286: 120: 2525: 2017: 557:
across allocations of different types. But most languages enforce the proper use of
2513: 2490: 2176: 2153: 2057: 1995: 1958: 1902: 1892: 814: 678: 554: 499: 282: 223: 185: 2349: 2259: 2049: 895:
itself, which must use unsafe operations to execute ML code entered by the user.
643: 586: 386: 140: 130: 66: 2263: 1987: 563: 462: 382: 115: 105: 70: 779:
cannot be implicitly converted to or from integers or other enumeration types.
2536: 2279: 2171:
Jackson, K. (1977). "Parallel processing and modular software construction".
1972: 647: 475: 369: 125: 100: 2517: 2061: 2495: 2441: 1963: 1946: 1857:"What to know before debating type systems | Ovid [blogs.perl.org]" 770: 432: 375: 258: 227: 145: 2205:"CS1130. Transition to OO programming. – Spring 2012 --self-paced version" 2157: 1999: 1550:
The next example shows how object references can be incorrectly downcast:
1836: 1406: 872: 752: 590: 416: 394: 84: 22: 2032: 600:
essentially defines the structure of the objects derived from it and an
2180: 201: 1883:
Milner, Robin (1978), "A Theory of Type Polymorphism in Programming",
608:
for handling these objects. Each time a new object is created it will
478:. For instance, in an implementation of a language that has some type 2175:. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 54. pp. 436–443. 2134:
Liskov, B; Zilles, S (1974). "Programming with abstract data types".
398: 242: 209: 385:, can detect and reject out-of-bound accesses, preventing potential 2461: 1222:(* enabling identifier for foreign function interface facility *) 783:
C++ explicit constructors and C++11 explicit conversion operators
677:
to the language features available. SPARK avoids the issues with
363: 2092: 411:
Type safety is usually a requirement for any toy language (i.e.
756: 734: 723: 593:
is in place. This is expressed in terms of class definitions.
589:
languages type safety is usually intrinsic in the fact that a
16:
Extent to which a programming language discourages type errors
2323: 2321: 884: 755:
operator returns a pointer of type based on operand, whereas
701:
example, the usual way to print an integer is something like
553:
As a minimal condition, a type-safe language must not allow
550:, hence there must be a separate pointer or reference type. 713:
at run-time to expect an integer argument. (Something like
629: 580: 566:
to infer that allocations of different types are distinct.
2318: 2258: 2207:. Cornell University, Department of Computer Science. 2005 984:(* but type cast syntax can be used without such import *) 381:
More sophisticated type systems, such as those supporting
230:, or dynamic, associating type information with values at 1994:. Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 207–212. 2472: 1938: 1389:
would be legal because the subtypes they are defined to
662:
to this unit. It is expected that programmers will use
747:
Some features of C++ that promote more type-safe code:
2056:. Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 1–14. 1242:
For example, if you have the following code fragment:
829:
is designed to enforce type safety. Anything in Java
406: 532: 508: 484: 2504:
Macrakis, Stavros (April 1982). "Safety and power".
2050:"Towards size-dependent types for array programming" 2034:
Operational Semantics and Polymorphic Type Inference
848:
enforcement, each object, before usage, needs to be
469: 341: 2267: 2173:Design and Implementation of Programming Languages 2048:Henriksen, Troels; Elsman, Martin (17 June 2021). 918:(* allows the use of certain unsafe facilities: *) 538: 514: 490: 1945:Wright, A. K.; Felleisen, M. (15 November 1994). 1908:20.500.11820/d16745d7-f113-44f0-a7a3-687c2b709f66 498:which allows some bit patterns but not others, a 2534: 2392:"reinterpret_cast conversion - cppreference.com" 1988:"Principal type-schemes for functional programs" 1228:(* pragma for foreign function interface to C *) 681:by disallowing allocation at run time entirely. 439:due to bugs in the implementation, or in linked 2047: 1944: 1919: 1917: 304:A well-typed program never gets "stuck": every 2329:"The Separation of Safe and Unsafe Facilities" 1986:Damas, Luis; Milner, Robin (25 January 1982). 766:to achieve polymorphism without void pointers. 2309: 1878: 1876: 165: 2413:"dynamic_cast conversion - cppreference.com" 2229:. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. p. 158. 2133: 1914: 856:but only inside properly allocated objects. 226:can be static, catching potential errors at 1985: 1827:that throws an exception on invalid casts. 1393:identical. However, an assignment such as 1369:Under strict typing, a variable defined as 257:Intuitively, type soundness is captured by 1873: 172: 158: 2494: 2147: 1962: 1906: 1896: 1204:(* Type cast in Modula-2 Revision 2010 *) 450: 2503: 2479:"A Syntactic Approach to Type Soundness" 1947:"A Syntactic Approach to Type Soundness" 1923: 630:Type safety issues in specific languages 581:Type safety in object oriented languages 447:was vulnerable to this sort of problem. 2170: 1885:Journal of Computer and System Sciences 762:C++ code can use virtual functions and 2535: 2506:ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 2436: 2224: 1882: 265:Well-typed programs cannot "go wrong". 2095:. Smlnj.org. Retrieved on 2013-11-02. 2030: 860:two numbers expressed as BigDecimal. 773:that performs run-time type checking. 837:and each object is an instance of a 269:In other words, if a type system is 2252: 407:Type-safe and type-unsafe languages 13: 2110:GHC libraries manual: base-3.0.1.0 813:, similar to templates in C++ and 785:prevent implicit type conversions. 14: 2559: 2350:"ISO Modula-2 Language Reference" 777:C++11 strongly-typed enumerations 769:Safer casting operators, such as 474:Type safety is closely linked to 470:Memory management and type safety 355:as invalid, because the division 342:Relation to other forms of safety 2466:Portland Pattern Repository Wiki 1410:cannot be considered type-safe. 879:(SML/NJ), its syntactic variant 642:was designed to be suitable for 336:structural operational semantics 208:that are not of the appropriate 2443:Types and Programming Languages 2405: 2384: 2363: 2342: 2303: 2243: 2227:Types and programming languages 2218: 2197: 2164: 2127: 1413: 1127:(* Type cast in ISO Modula-2 *) 2098: 2086: 2041: 2024: 1979: 1924:Saraswat, Vijay (1997-08-15). 1849: 1603:// virtual destructor for RTTI 1400: 1385:is illegal. An assignment of 867: 739:became the accepted practice. 252: 1: 2430: 569:Most type-safe languages use 2225:Pierce, Benjamin C. (2002). 1898:10.1016/0022-0000(78)90014-4 800:C Sharp conversion operators 686:statically checked contracts 675:statically checked contracts 7: 2543:Programming language topics 2483:Information and Computation 1951:Information and Computation 1830: 1801:// will output garbage data 1225:<*FFI="C"*> 898: 889:foreign function interfaces 10: 2564: 2270:The C Programming Language 1522:// output integer as float 1501:// reinterpret bit pattern 671:SPARK programming language 454: 196:are the extent to which a 1233: 877:Standard ML of New Jersey 374:Type systems can prevent 1842: 1552: 1420: 1244: 1135: 1058: 906: 261:'s pithy statement that 200:discourages or prevents 2518:10.1145/1005937.1005941 2371:"Common Lisp HyperSpec" 2312:Programming in Modula-2 2062:10.1145/3460944.3464310 1926:"Java is not type-safe" 852:. Java allows usage of 820: 759:returns a void pointer. 2496:10.1006/inco.1994.1093 2310:Niklaus Wirth (1985). 1964:10.1006/inco.1994.1093 864:the class definition. 805:Undue reliance on the 742: 733:(struct foo *) malloc( 698:C programming language 634: 540: 516: 492: 457:Strong and weak typing 451:Strong and weak typing 332:denotational semantics 42:Strong vs. weak typing 2415:. En.cppreference.com 2394:. En.cppreference.com 2158:10.1145/942572.807045 2000:10.1145/582153.582176 1738:// upcast always safe 789: 541: 517: 493: 359:is not defined for a 295:operational semantics 2276:Englewood Cliffs, NJ 2031:Tofte, Mads (1988). 893:interactive toplevel 691: 612:with that contract. 530: 506: 482: 445:Java virtual machine 308:is either already a 198:programming language 2473:Wright, Andrew K.; 2438:Pierce, Benjamin C. 2136:ACM SIGPLAN Notices 1774:// invalid downcast 650:and other forms of 559:abstract data types 397:originating in the 249:for complications. 2475:Matthias Felleisen 2314:. Springer Verlag. 2181:10.1007/BFb0021435 2106:"System.IO.Unsafe" 1546:float fval = ival; 1395:T1.Q := D1.Q; 721:function, such as 652:system programming 571:garbage collection 536: 512: 488: 353:3 / "Hello, World" 291:Matthias Felleisen 2453:978-0-262-16209-8 2293:978-0-13-110362-7 2264:Dennis M. Ritchie 1539:In this example, 844:To implement the 679:dangling pointers 555:dangling pointers 539:{\displaystyle t} 515:{\displaystyle t} 491:{\displaystyle t} 413:esoteric language 317:subject reduction 315:Preservation (or 287:dynamic semantics 212:, e.g., adding a 182: 181: 2555: 2529: 2500: 2498: 2469: 2457: 2424: 2423: 2421: 2420: 2409: 2403: 2402: 2400: 2399: 2388: 2382: 2381: 2379: 2377: 2367: 2361: 2360: 2358: 2356: 2346: 2340: 2339: 2337: 2335: 2325: 2316: 2315: 2307: 2301: 2300: 2274:(2nd ed.). 2273: 2256: 2250: 2247: 2241: 2240: 2222: 2216: 2215: 2213: 2212: 2201: 2195: 2194: 2168: 2162: 2161: 2151: 2131: 2125: 2124: 2122: 2121: 2112:. Archived from 2102: 2096: 2090: 2084: 2083: 2045: 2039: 2038: 2028: 2022: 2021: 1983: 1977: 1976: 1966: 1942: 1936: 1935: 1933: 1932: 1921: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1900: 1880: 1871: 1870: 1868: 1867: 1853: 1826: 1822: 1814: 1811: 1808: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1796: 1793: 1790: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1772: 1769: 1766: 1763: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1751: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1730: 1727: 1724: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1712: 1709: 1706: 1703: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1682: 1679: 1676: 1673: 1670: 1667: 1664: 1661: 1658: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1643: 1640: 1637: 1634: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1622: 1619: 1616: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1558:<iostream> 1556: 1547: 1542: 1541:reinterpret_cast 1535: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1520: 1517: 1514: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1499: 1496: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1480:reinterpret_cast 1478: 1475: 1472: 1469: 1468:// integer value 1466: 1463: 1460: 1457: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1426:<iostream> 1424: 1397:would be legal. 1396: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1372: 1365: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1353: 1350: 1347: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1335: 1332: 1329: 1326: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1311: 1308: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1266: 1263: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1229: 1226: 1223: 1220: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1077: 1074: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1051: 1048: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1036: 1033: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1003: 1000: 997: 994: 991: 988: 985: 982: 979: 976: 973: 970: 967: 964: 961: 958: 955: 952: 949: 946: 943: 940: 937: 934: 931: 928: 925: 922: 919: 916: 913: 910: 815:generics in Java 738: 730: 726: 716: 715:printf("%s", 12) 712: 708: 704: 703:printf("%d", 12) 665: 661: 657: 644:embedded systems 545: 543: 542: 537: 521: 519: 518: 513: 500:dangling pointer 497: 495: 494: 489: 430: 387:buffer overflows 354: 224:Type enforcement 186:computer science 174: 167: 160: 93:Minor categories 50:Major categories 29:General concepts 19: 18: 2563: 2562: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2533: 2532: 2460: 2454: 2433: 2428: 2427: 2418: 2416: 2411: 2410: 2406: 2397: 2395: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2375: 2373: 2369: 2368: 2364: 2354: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2333: 2331: 2327: 2326: 2319: 2308: 2304: 2294: 2257: 2253: 2248: 2244: 2237: 2223: 2219: 2210: 2208: 2203: 2202: 2198: 2191: 2169: 2165: 2149:10.1.1.136.3043 2132: 2128: 2119: 2117: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2091: 2087: 2072: 2046: 2042: 2029: 2025: 2010: 1984: 1980: 1943: 1939: 1930: 1928: 1922: 1915: 1881: 1874: 1865: 1863: 1855: 1854: 1850: 1845: 1833: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1815: 1812: 1809: 1806: 1803: 1800: 1797: 1794: 1791: 1788: 1785: 1782: 1779: 1776: 1773: 1770: 1767: 1764: 1761: 1758: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1734: 1731: 1728: 1725: 1722: 1719: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1695: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1680: 1677: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1665: 1662: 1659: 1656: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1590: 1587: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1575: 1572: 1569: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1557: 1554: 1545: 1540: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1527: 1524: 1521: 1518: 1515: 1512: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1494: 1491: 1488: 1485: 1482: 1479: 1476: 1473: 1470: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1458: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1425: 1422: 1416: 1403: 1394: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1363: 1360: 1357: 1354: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1309: 1306: 1303: 1300: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1282: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1267: 1264: 1261: 1258: 1255: 1252: 1249: 1246: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1090: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1004: 1001: 998: 995: 992: 989: 986: 983: 980: 977: 974: 971: 968: 965: 962: 959: 956: 953: 950: 947: 944: 941: 938: 935: 932: 929: 926: 923: 920: 917: 914: 911: 908: 901: 870: 854:primitive types 823: 792: 745: 732: 728: 722: 714: 710: 706: 702: 694: 663: 659: 655: 637: 632: 587:object oriented 583: 531: 528: 527: 507: 504: 503: 483: 480: 479: 472: 459: 453: 429:unsafePerformIO 428: 409: 383:dependent types 352: 347:which include: 344: 255: 178: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2561: 2551: 2550: 2545: 2531: 2530: 2501: 2470: 2458: 2452: 2432: 2429: 2426: 2425: 2404: 2383: 2362: 2341: 2317: 2302: 2292: 2266:(March 1988). 2251: 2242: 2235: 2217: 2196: 2189: 2163: 2126: 2097: 2085: 2070: 2040: 2023: 2008: 1978: 1937: 1913: 1891:(3): 348–375, 1872: 1861:blogs.perl.org 1847: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1832: 1829: 1553: 1421: 1415: 1412: 1402: 1399: 1387:T1 := T2; 1383:T1 := D2; 1375:not compatible 1245: 1235: 1232: 1136: 1059: 907: 900: 897: 869: 866: 822: 819: 791: 788: 787: 786: 780: 774: 767: 760: 744: 741: 693: 690: 648:device drivers 636: 633: 631: 628: 582: 579: 564:alias analysis 535: 511: 487: 471: 468: 455:Main article: 452: 449: 408: 405: 404: 403: 392: 391: 390: 379: 367: 343: 340: 328: 327: 320: 313: 302: 279: 278: 267: 266: 254: 251: 194:type soundness 180: 179: 177: 176: 169: 162: 154: 151: 150: 149: 148: 143: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 111:Flow-sensitive 108: 103: 95: 94: 90: 89: 88: 87: 82: 73: 64: 52: 51: 47: 46: 45: 44: 39: 31: 30: 26: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2560: 2549: 2546: 2544: 2541: 2540: 2538: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2502: 2497: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2449: 2446:. MIT Press. 2445: 2444: 2439: 2435: 2434: 2414: 2408: 2393: 2387: 2372: 2366: 2351: 2345: 2330: 2324: 2322: 2313: 2306: 2299: 2295: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2280:Prentice Hall 2277: 2272: 2271: 2265: 2261: 2255: 2246: 2238: 2236:0-262-16209-1 2232: 2228: 2221: 2206: 2200: 2192: 2190:3-540-08360-X 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2167: 2159: 2155: 2150: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2130: 2116:on 2008-07-05 2115: 2111: 2107: 2101: 2094: 2089: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2071:9781450384667 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2044: 2036: 2035: 2027: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1982: 1974: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1941: 1927: 1920: 1918: 1909: 1904: 1899: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1879: 1877: 1862: 1858: 1852: 1848: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1828: 1551: 1548: 1419: 1411: 1408: 1398: 1392: 1376: 1243: 1240: 1134: 1057: 905: 896: 894: 890: 886: 882: 878: 874: 865: 861: 857: 855: 851: 847: 842: 840: 836: 832: 828: 827:Java language 818: 816: 812: 808: 803: 801: 796: 784: 781: 778: 775: 772: 768: 765: 761: 758: 754: 750: 749: 748: 740: 737:(struct foo)) 736: 725: 718: 699: 689: 687: 684:Ada2012 adds 682: 680: 676: 672: 667: 653: 649: 645: 641: 627: 625: 620: 618: 613: 611: 607: 603: 599: 594: 592: 588: 578: 576: 572: 567: 565: 560: 556: 551: 549: 533: 525: 509: 501: 485: 477: 476:memory safety 467: 464: 458: 448: 446: 442: 438: 434: 426: 422: 418: 414: 400: 396: 393: 388: 384: 380: 377: 376:wild pointers 373: 372: 371: 370:Memory safety 368: 365: 362: 358: 350: 349: 348: 339: 337: 333: 325: 321: 318: 314: 311: 307: 303: 300: 299: 298: 296: 292: 288: 284: 276: 275: 274: 272: 264: 263: 262: 260: 250: 248: 244: 240: 235: 233: 229: 225: 221: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 175: 170: 168: 163: 161: 156: 155: 153: 152: 147: 144: 142: 139: 137: 136:Substructural 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 98: 97: 96: 92: 91: 86: 83: 81: 77: 74: 72: 68: 65: 63: 59: 56: 55: 54: 53: 49: 48: 43: 40: 38: 35: 34: 33: 32: 28: 27: 24: 21: 20: 2512:(2): 25–26. 2509: 2505: 2489:(1): 38–94. 2486: 2482: 2465: 2442: 2417:. Retrieved 2407: 2396:. Retrieved 2386: 2374:. Retrieved 2365: 2353:. Retrieved 2344: 2332:. Retrieved 2311: 2305: 2297: 2269: 2254: 2245: 2226: 2220: 2209:. Retrieved 2199: 2172: 2166: 2142:(4): 50–59. 2139: 2135: 2129: 2118:. Retrieved 2114:the original 2109: 2100: 2088: 2053: 2043: 2033: 2026: 1991: 1981: 1957:(1): 38–94. 1954: 1950: 1940: 1929:. Retrieved 1888: 1884: 1864:. Retrieved 1860: 1851: 1825:dynamic_cast 1817: 1549: 1538: 1417: 1414:C++ examples 1405:In general, 1404: 1390: 1374: 1368: 1237: 1131: 1054: 902: 871: 862: 858: 845: 843: 830: 824: 804: 793: 771:dynamic cast 746: 719: 705:, where the 695: 683: 668: 638: 621: 614: 609: 605: 595: 584: 568: 552: 522:into a dead 473: 460: 433:Type punning 424: 410: 395:Logic errors 345: 329: 323: 280: 270: 268: 259:Robin Milner 256: 247:polymorphism 236: 228:compile time 222: 193: 189: 183: 121:Intersection 36: 23:Type systems 2548:Type theory 2462:"Type Safe" 2093:Standard ML 1837:Type theory 1821:static_cast 1753:static_cast 1407:Common Lisp 1401:Common Lisp 873:Standard ML 868:Standard ML 846:type safety 660:pragma Pure 591:type system 417:Standard ML 253:Definitions 202:type errors 190:type safety 85:Duck typing 37:Type safety 2537:Categories 2431:References 2419:2022-09-21 2398:2022-09-21 2282:. p.  2211:2023-09-15 2120:2008-07-17 2009:0897910656 1931:2008-10-08 1866:2023-06-27 1819:replacing 833:inside an 664:Unchecked_ 656:Unchecked_ 624:reflection 306:expression 239:expression 131:Refinement 80:structural 2260:Kernighan 2144:CiteSeerX 2080:235474098 2037:(Thesis). 1973:0890-5401 1762:&> 1564:namespace 1489:&> 1432:namespace 1379:DualTypes 1361:DualTypes 1289:DualTypes 850:allocated 764:templates 617:interface 441:libraries 399:semantics 324:preserved 243:subtyping 210:data type 106:Dependent 2526:10426644 2477:(1994). 2440:(2002). 2355:24 March 2334:24 March 2018:11319320 1831:See also 1792:<< 1780:<< 1555:#include 1513:<< 1507:<< 1423:#include 1371:TwoTypes 1343:TwoTypes 1250:TwoTypes 1168:CARDINAL 1091:CARDINAL 1056:SYSTEM. 1032:(* or *) 1020:CARDINAL 1008:CARDINAL 899:Modula-2 811:generics 606:contract 526:of type 524:variable 437:run-time 425:believed 357:operator 301:Progress 232:run-time 101:Abstract 71:inferred 67:Manifest 1588:virtual 1304:Integer 1265:Integer 1192:INTEGER 1156:INTEGER 1115:INTEGER 1079:INTEGER 1041:INTEGER 996:INTEGER 954:ADDRESS 881:Mythryl 831:happens 548:pointer 421:Haskell 364:divisor 218:integer 146:Session 116:Gradual 76:Nominal 62:dynamic 2524:  2450:  2376:26 May 2290:  2233:  2187:  2146:  2078:  2068:  2016:  2006:  1971:  1804:return 1759:Child2 1741:Child2 1720:Parent 1693:Child1 1663:public 1657:Parent 1654:public 1648:Child2 1627:public 1621:Parent 1618:public 1612:Child1 1594:Parent 1582:public 1576:Parent 1525:return 1295:record 1256:record 1239:Pascal 1234:Pascal 1213:IMPORT 1210:UNSAFE 1180:UNSAFE 1141:UNSAFE 1138:IMPORT 1103:SYSTEM 1064:SYSTEM 1061:IMPORT 966:SYSTEM 948:SYSTEM 930:SYSTEM 912:SYSTEM 909:IMPORT 835:object 807:object 757:malloc 735:sizeof 729:void * 724:malloc 711:printf 709:tells 610:comply 463:Liskov 361:string 283:static 216:to an 214:string 206:values 141:Unique 126:Latent 58:Static 2522:S2CID 2076:S2CID 2014:S2CID 1843:Notes 1823:with 1744:& 1723:& 1669:float 1645:class 1609:class 1573:class 1561:using 1486:float 1471:float 1429:using 1377:with 885:MLton 839:class 604:as a 598:class 402:them. 310:value 271:sound 2448:ISBN 2378:2013 2357:2015 2336:2015 2288:ISBN 2231:ISBN 2185:ISBN 2066:ISBN 2004:ISBN 1969:ISSN 1795:endl 1777:cout 1756:< 1684:main 1516:endl 1510:fval 1504:cout 1495:ival 1483:< 1474:fval 1456:ival 1444:main 1316:Real 1277:Real 1247:type 1207:FROM 1186:CAST 1109:CAST 978:word 960:addr 942:addr 936:WORD 924:word 883:and 825:The 821:Java 751:The 696:The 669:The 575:Rust 423:are 334:and 285:and 245:and 192:and 78:vs. 69:vs. 60:vs. 2514:doi 2491:doi 2487:115 2284:116 2177:doi 2154:doi 2058:doi 1996:doi 1959:doi 1955:115 1903:hdl 1893:doi 1681:int 1633:int 1567:std 1453:int 1441:int 1435:std 1391:are 1373:is 1328:var 1322:end 1283:end 1216:FFI 1147:VAR 1070:VAR 987:VAR 972:ADR 921:VAR 753:new 743:C++ 640:Ada 635:Ada 602:API 585:In 184:In 2539:: 2520:. 2508:. 2485:. 2481:. 2464:. 2320:^ 2296:. 2286:. 2278:: 2262:; 2183:. 2152:. 2138:. 2108:. 2074:. 2064:. 2052:. 2012:. 2002:. 1990:. 1967:. 1953:. 1949:. 1916:^ 1901:, 1889:17 1887:, 1875:^ 1859:. 1783:c2 1771:); 1747:c2 1732:c1 1702:c1 1696:c1 1687:() 1678:}; 1642:}; 1606:}; 1600:{} 1597:() 1498:); 1447:() 1355:D2 1349:D1 1337:T2 1331:T1 1201:); 1177::= 1124:); 1100::= 1050:); 1038::= 1029:); 1017::= 981:); 963::= 841:. 817:. 802:. 795:C# 790:C# 707:%d 646:, 596:A 338:. 326:). 188:, 2528:. 2516:: 2510:7 2499:. 2493:: 2468:. 2456:. 2422:. 2401:. 2380:. 2359:. 2338:. 2239:. 2214:. 2193:. 2179:: 2160:. 2156:: 2140:9 2123:. 2082:. 2060:: 2020:. 1998:: 1975:. 1961:: 1934:. 1905:: 1895:: 1869:. 1813:} 1810:; 1807:0 1798:; 1789:b 1786:. 1768:p 1765:( 1750:= 1735:; 1729:= 1726:p 1717:; 1714:5 1711:= 1708:a 1705:. 1699:; 1690:{ 1675:; 1672:b 1666:: 1660:{ 1651:: 1639:; 1636:a 1630:: 1624:{ 1615:: 1591:~ 1585:: 1579:{ 1570:; 1534:} 1531:; 1528:0 1519:; 1492:( 1477:= 1465:; 1462:5 1459:= 1450:{ 1438:; 1364:; 1358:: 1352:, 1346:; 1340:: 1334:, 1325:; 1319:; 1313:: 1310:Q 1307:; 1301:: 1298:I 1292:= 1286:; 1280:; 1274:: 1271:Q 1268:; 1262:: 1259:I 1253:= 1219:; 1198:n 1195:, 1189:( 1183:. 1174:i 1171:; 1165:: 1162:n 1159:; 1153:: 1150:i 1144:; 1121:n 1118:, 1112:( 1106:. 1097:i 1094:; 1088:: 1085:n 1082:; 1076:: 1073:i 1067:; 1047:n 1044:( 1035:i 1026:i 1023:( 1014:n 1011:; 1005:: 1002:n 999:; 993:: 990:i 975:( 969:. 957:; 951:. 945:: 939:; 933:. 927:: 915:; 692:C 534:t 510:t 486:t 389:. 366:. 319:) 173:e 166:t 159:v

Index

Type systems
Type safety
Strong vs. weak typing
Static
dynamic
Manifest
inferred
Nominal
structural
Duck typing
Abstract
Dependent
Flow-sensitive
Gradual
Intersection
Latent
Refinement
Substructural
Unique
Session
v
t
e
computer science
programming language
type errors
values
data type
string
integer

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.