Knowledge

User:AtheWeatherman/RFA criteria

Source 📝

53:
But, the main overriding theme is, as long is the user is not going to misuse the tools intentionally and is civil to others, you will usually find me in the support category, just take a look
33:
Around 2,000 edits+, however this can vary, especially if there is a high percentage of automated edits, if this is the case I would want to see around 5,000+ edits.
70: 26:
Now, since I vote quite a lot in RFA's and the like, I have decided to do a summary of criteria that I want to see.
36:
Good communication, this includes edits all around the wiki, as well as civility and well reasoned decisions.
54: 42:
Experience and accuracy in any areas the candidate wants to go into, eg deleted edits in CSD etc.
8: 17: 45:
If a previous RFA failed, I would expect improvements and a 3-9 month delay between them
64: 48:Not blocked for at least a year prior to the RFA. 62: 39:Good use of edit summaries, at least 90%+. 14: 63: 23: 24: 82: 13: 1: 7: 71:User criteria for adminship 30:Around 6 months+ experience 10: 87: 18:User:AtheWeatherman 78: 86: 85: 81: 80: 79: 77: 76: 75: 61: 60: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 84: 74: 73: 59: 58: 50: 49: 46: 43: 40: 37: 34: 31: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 83: 72: 69: 68: 66: 56: 52: 51: 47: 44: 41: 38: 35: 32: 29: 28: 27: 19: 25: 57:! :) 65:Category 16:< 55:here 67::

Index

User:AtheWeatherman
here
Category
User criteria for adminship

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.