17:
disorganized, uncoordinated edits. Many articles seem to fluctuate around a kind of equilibrium, with a whole bunch of people editing, but mostly just undoing each other's edits. I'm still glad that WP exists, and that it's free-as-in-speech, but I'm no longer actively participating much as an editor, and I no longer have any articles on my watchlist. I used to have a list here of articles I'd worked on that I was proud of, but at least one of them has been hijacked by an editor with a POV to push, and I'm now ashamed to be associated with it. I've intentionally munged my password, so I can no longer log in.
16:
Knowledge was fun for a few years, but at this point I think it's entered a stage where it's just not fun anymore. The emphasis is no longer on adding content, but rather on arguing and edit wars. Many articles seem to reach a certain level of quality, and then gradually degrade due to random,
74:
69:
46:. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the
79:
47:
51:
24:
Multi-licensed with the
Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
31:
8:
35:
43:
39:
30:
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under
63:
61:
75:Wikipedians contributing under CC BY-SA 2.0
70:Wikipedians contributing under CC BY-SA 1.0
62:
13:
80:Wikipedians in Southern California
14:
91:
38:Attribution Share-Alike license
1:
7:
32:Knowledge's copyright terms
10:
96:
29:
58:
57:
87:
36:Creative Commons
20:
19:
95:
94:
90:
89:
88:
86:
85:
84:
60:
59:
52:Multi-licensing
48:CC dual-license
12:
11:
5:
93:
83:
82:
77:
72:
56:
55:
27:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
92:
81:
78:
76:
73:
71:
68:
67:
65:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
28:
25:
22:
21:
18:
23:
15:
44:version 2.0
40:version 1.0
64:Categories
54:guides.
34:and the
50:and
42:and
66::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.