43:
exceptional candidate, I might still consider you even if you have less than that. Prior experience on other wikis is also helpful. It doesn't matter whether or not they are operated by the WMF, but editors from other WMF wikis are more likely to be familiar with the way
Knowledge works. It's a plus
76:
Evidence that you understand basic
Knowledge policies and will use the tools responsibly. I understand that all humans make mistakes, but I will think twice about supporting you if only 50% of articles that you nominate for CSD actually get
47:
No blocks within the past six months. However, this depends on the reason for the block and the duration of it. Having a completely clean block log is best, of course.
30:. This criteria is flexible, and I will not rigidly stick to it all the time. It is mainly just a framework to personally help me evaluate candidates.
39:
At least six months of experience and around 5,000 edits, of which a decent portion should be in the mainspace. However, if you are a
87:
I don't insist upon large amounts of recognized content, such as GAs and FAs, but I would like to see at least some content work.
90:
I care more about maturity than age; if you're young but are nonetheless a competent and mature editor, I'll probably support.
110:
94:
54:. Of course, I understand we're all humans and lose it occasionally, so isolated incidents are understandable.
97:
at RfA. I will only ask ones that are relevant to adminship and your actions on
Knowledge.
8:
27:
57:
Demonstrable participation in at least one major admin area. These areas include
51:
17:
66:
104:
70:
62:
58:
44:
if you have responsibly used advanced user permissions on other wikis.
102:
26:I am a firm believer that adminship should be
14:
103:
81:
23:
24:
122:
33:
13:
1:
7:
111:User criteria for adminship
10:
127:
95:ridiculous questions
93:I will not ask you
118:
82:Some other notes
126:
125:
121:
120:
119:
117:
116:
115:
101:
100:
84:
52:civility record
36:
22:
21:
20:
18:User:Biblioworm
12:
11:
5:
124:
114:
113:
99:
98:
91:
88:
83:
80:
79:
78:
74:
55:
48:
45:
35:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
123:
112:
109:
108:
106:
96:
92:
89:
86:
85:
75:
72:
68:
64:
60:
56:
53:
49:
46:
42:
38:
37:
34:Core criteria
31:
29:
19:
40:
25:
28:no big deal
105:Category
77:deleted.
67:WP:RFPP
50:A good
71:WP:AIV
69:, and
63:WP:XFD
59:WP:CSD
16:<
41:very
107::
65:,
61:,
73:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.