31:
169:, this gives me serious concerns about what you'd be like as an admin. I can't tell if you have the right kind of experience if I don't know what you want adminship for. And if you want to, say, close deletion debates, I want to see you have some idea of how things work there.
200:
ignore poor answers if you look good everywhere else. I probably will be neutral if you don't say what you want the tools for. I'll consider waiving lack of experience on a case-by-case basis, this is never an "automatic"
161:
You can't get enough experience to be an admin in less than 3 months, period. And a lot can change around here in 3 months, so I want to see you've been around here recently. Besides, recent edits are the ones I like to
189:
I'll consider <200 if you've been here a long time, contributed significantly to a featured article, or everything you want to do with the tools doesn't really require
Knowledge: namespace experience (i.e. vandal
91:
141:
High edit summary usage. What's high? It's not really defined, but I have yet to see anyone fall in the "grey area" that I haven't found other reasons to determine my "vote".
154:
The
Knowledge: namespace is where policy discussions are, where deletion debates are, and basically all sorts of other places admins will be involved. Yes,
121:
158:, but admins do a lot of the behind-the-scenes work that keeps this place running, and so just being a good writer isn't necessarily enough.
204:
If you've clearly made a good-faith attempt to improve recently or there's some reason your numbers are off, I'll probably ignore it.
288:
I supported you last time, you've fixed whatever I opposed on last time, or I didn't comment last time and would support otherwise.
64:
candidates, here because I believe in transparency of standards and because I get lazy in my "support" comments sometimes ;).
155:
253:
This wouldn't have happened if you had used your admin tools better before, and is probably a sign of meeting oppose factor 2.
301:
50:
186:
to articles, such that you haven't had time to rack up thousands of edits. Featured articles really help here.
193:
I may consider waiving the recent part if you've been here a while or have a good reason for your inactivity.
94:, because I liked it better than my old one. Not really a caveat, but I'm throwing that in there anyway.
81:
282:
I feel the desysoping was unjustified or I feel you've learned your lesson and won't do it again.
124:, or similar pages; while these pages have their place, they're not what I'm looking for here.
138:
you want the tools, and preferably experience in those areas that non-admins can help out in.
8:
87:
I get to ignore what this page says whenever I want, of course, as each RfA is different.
247:
Incivility should not be tolerated, and having the tools makes POV-pushing a lot easier.
172:
You really should explain what you're doing to an article. It doesn't take long, either.
30:
151:
Well, it's a quick and dirty, although certainly not perfect, way to judge experience.
117:
68:
46:
45:
If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting
295:
276:
61:
17:
90:
I basically stole the current format (but not the criteria!) from
234:
A very recent unsuccessful RfA (less than a month or two ago).
165:
If you can't be bothered to write good answers to questions
37:
This user subpage is currently inactive and is retained for
112:
At least 200 Knowledge: namespace edits. Note that this
250:
Basically evidence of meeting some other oppose factor.
84:. So don't be surprised if it looks different later.
256:
Admins should be easy to contact outside
Knowledge.
67:Questions, comments, and complaints are welcome at
259:Likely nothing has changed within the last month.
49:or seeking broader input via a forum such as the
293:
275:I feel the block was unjustified, or it was for
263:
228:A previous involuntary desysoping by the ArbCom.
80:This criteria is subject to change. In fact, it
176:
109:At least 1000 and preferably 2000 total edits.
279:. Lots of 3RR blocks are a bad sign, however.
60:Some general thoughts on what I look for in
98:
208:
134:Good answers to questions. I want to see
225:Blocks within the last couple of months.
219:Obvious failure in any support criteria.
14:
294:
269:See the ones under reasons I support.
222:General incivility, POV-pushing, etc.
25:
23:
127:At least 3 months of fairly heavy
24:
313:
92:Grandmasterka's RfA criteria page
29:
238:
13:
1:
213:
156:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
145:
7:
302:User criteria for adminship
264:Possible mitigating factors
177:Possible mitigating factors
10:
318:
244:Hopefully this is obvious.
103:
74:
82:has changed once already
122:Esperanza coffee lounge
99:Reasons I might Support
209:Reasons I might Oppose
182:You have contributed
116:include edits to the
285:Activate your email.
47:the user in question
231:No email activated.
58:
57:
309:
54:
33:
26:
317:
316:
312:
311:
310:
308:
307:
306:
292:
291:
266:
241:
216:
211:
179:
167:on your own RfA
148:
106:
101:
77:
44:
43:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
315:
305:
304:
290:
289:
286:
283:
280:
273:
272:Probably none.
270:
265:
262:
261:
260:
257:
254:
251:
248:
245:
240:
237:
236:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
215:
212:
210:
207:
206:
205:
202:
194:
191:
187:
178:
175:
174:
173:
170:
163:
159:
152:
147:
144:
143:
142:
139:
132:
125:
110:
105:
102:
100:
97:
96:
95:
88:
85:
76:
73:
56:
55:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
314:
303:
300:
299:
297:
287:
284:
281:
278:
274:
271:
268:
267:
258:
255:
252:
249:
246:
243:
242:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
217:
203:
199:
195:
192:
188:
185:
184:significantly
181:
180:
171:
168:
164:
160:
157:
153:
150:
149:
140:
137:
133:
130:
126:
123:
119:
115:
111:
108:
107:
93:
89:
86:
83:
79:
78:
72:
70:
65:
63:
52:
48:
42:
40:
35:
32:
28:
27:
19:
197:
183:
166:
135:
128:
113:
69:my talk page
66:
59:
51:village pump
38:
36:
18:User:BryanG
190:fighting).
41:reference.
39:historical
239:Rationale
146:Rationale
296:Category
131:editing.
114:does not
214:Factors
201:oppose.
118:Sandbox
104:Factors
75:Caveats
162:check.
129:recent
120:, the
198:might
16:<
277:3RR
136:why
62:RfA
298::
196:I
71:.
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
