User talk:Erik the Red 2

9033:"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Knowledge. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at 1486: 5877: 4599: 4018: 2922: 5287: 4162: 2047: 88: 5783: 4230:

does it say i cant support the unity of the so-called opressed parts of china? EH? so, i'm a criminal JUST BECAUSE I DONT SHARE THEIR VIEWS AND INSTEAD OPPOSE IT!? and foryour infomation on wehrmachtvnn, i already changed the biased bits! and what eye-for-eye? when did you find me putting biased bits in articles!? apparantly all those free tibet/taiwan/east turkestan templates are okay because it obeys the wikipedia rules, so what rule did my template break!?

4636: 8740: 1908: 3341: 4341: 32: 8631: 8511: 8344: 5347: 5171: 4380: 7225: 8240: 8136: 8032: 7928: 7804: 7712: 7612: 7512: 7412: 7312: 7124: 7024: 6848: 6645: 6469: 6295: 3417: 5072: 5938: 4818: 4767: 2677: 4257: 4340: 4182:

if that makes me an ultranationalist(which i presume is a bad thing judjing from what you say), does all those free tibet/taiwan/east turkestan templates remain okay? all those free tibet and whatever separtist leiency editors. why arnt they been banned then if opposing their views makes me elgible for a ban?

551:

In general, you've been completely disruptive. Please refrain from such behaviour in future discussions, it's completely couter productive, and in already hot subjects such as this, downright immature. If you wish to continue your participation in the discussion, I suggest you do so in a calmer manner.--

4937:

for the mop, and reviewing that RfA reveals that you were one of my opposers last time round. I was wondering if you'd like to comment on my current status in the Knowledge community, and if you believe I would be ready to run for adminship again in future? Please respond wherever you feel it is most

4181:

okay, you say that im a high profilic nationalist POV editor, right? well, you are wrong on saying im a high profilic editor, frw know me (not counting on whoever those was that spied on me) and also. MY POV is not biased, at least not yet from my edits, okay, so i created the one china template, but

3980:

That doesn't sound like the Wiki five pillars to me...but is actually bullying and rather attempt at intimidation, rather than substantiation of claims of inaccuracy. Goes on to claim he has fellow 'pals who will back him up.' This sounds strangely like Brooklyn justice to me, collusive tyranny to be

3073:

Thank you so much for your support on my RFA, which today passed unanimously. I will do my best to make sure that I don't let any of you down. If you ever need any help with anything, feel free to ask me, i'll be happy to. Also, i do understand your concerns about my lack of image knowledge, and i do

550:

Your conduct in the discussion about Kurt Weber has been appaling. You have repeatedly labelled multiple users including myself, and most notably, Majorly as trolls. You have frequently used insulting sarcasm and patronisation to get your point across. You have even attacked Majorly on his talk page.

4158:

cikket. Én szeretném a Magyarországról szóló hiányos, vagy rossz adatokat javítani a wikipedián, de nem kapom meg a lehetőségét, hiába nevezek meg forrást, nem hajlandók elfogadni, hanem ahhoz a helytelen elképzeléshez ragaszkodnak, hogy Magyarország már 1526-tól osztrák örökös tartomány volt, pedig

3019:

was a threat. If you didn't mean it to be a threat then you need to work on your communication skills. My edits were plainly not disruptive and I feel you are just trying to shut me up.In fact, I feel your edits are clearly disruptive in how you are preventing any and all changes to the Barack Obama

1082: 4229:

yeah yeah suuure. so, you mean that wikipedis is okay for free tibetan (or free whatever) separtists to roam this wiki and yet I CANT OPPOSE THAT IN MY VIEWS!? what do you think wikipedia is? icant change someone's mind just for the sake of it,and they are allowed to express their views, since when

3535:

I'm literally minutes from putting it in and I'm working on links, yada yada...and I said that I was getting started. Sheesh. I don't think those userboxes help. They drive deletionism. Will let you know how many CONTENT-ADDERS get "driven there", by the boxes. Instead I have a deletion notice

2293:

which George saw fit to leave in place. Liebman is basically an idiot who keeps turning up now and then after having been banned over a year ago for continual disruption. He's a self-styled baseball trivia expert who is in fact a laughingstock at SABR, only he doesn't know that (unless he's reading

3563:

Go add some content or send me some editors who want to do so. Your boxes (literally minutes after my posting and while I'm IN THE MIDDLE of writing the article) have a negative effect, not a positive one. If you want to "help", go advertise for me on some relevant category or project site, so I

3823:

Please stop trolling, and try to sign your username. Not every fact that exists merits entry into Knowledge; the Chicago Tribune publishes a lot of irrelevant material. It doesn't show a linkage between the two, I've reviewed books before, am I suddenly "linked" to them? Drawing a conclusion from

2351: 57:

Hello. As you may have noticed, I have not been on Knowledge for the last month or so. That was really a break to regain my sanity after much editing. I also had complex personal issues, regarding and not regarding wiki, and I read a few things that made me lose my faith in Knowledge. Now I think

7896:

I was just about to rename the article entitled "Bibliophilia" as "Bibliophily" on the grounds that the former is not an English word (not in the OED, not in the British National Corpus, not in any other dictionary I can lay my hands on), whereas the latter is, when I noticed that you'd made the

5473:

that you have contributed to the editing or maintenance of the article. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your

2568:

Erik, regarding your recent edit to the Napoleon article. I've been working hard on this article and improving the references in response to peer review. Your recent good faith revert reinserted an error into the archer reference and removed references I had spent time researching. How do you

1353:

Hey, thanks for that :). I'm definetly going to take those pointers to heart, although i'm not currently looking for any kind of admin rights; my current tasks (and there's a long, long list of things to do) don't require them. It's still nice to get affirmation that i'm doing the right sort of

3987:

The only substantive challenge to my post was saying it was 'without references'. But, I did include those references when I found them citing academic work that contributes to the understanding of the article, and the controversies surrounding the current POV expressed. My additions give the

4645:

Let the amber nectar flow all day and night. Let it run down the mountains and through the caverns and across the rich lawns to swamp the streets. Let it rain beer. Let the heavens open and shine forth beer. Let it all be beer. Wonderful beer. And let it be as deep as the heart of a lion.

2889:

I'd like to take a minute to let you know that I appreciate your support in my recently-closed RfA, which passed with a count of 56 in support, 7 in opposition, and 2 neutrals. I'll certainly try to justify your faith by using the tools wisely. Happy editing, and thanks again!

9091: 717:

I think it would be wise indeed if you were to refrain from reference to Majorly – by word or deed, implicit or explicit – for the next little while. Let Majorly handle his own affairs; there's no need for you to comment on whether or not he's reciprocating your withdrawal.

1921:

has been closed, and the support the community has shown will be with me forever. I have no way to properly express how grateful I am, and all I can tell you is this: I shall try not to disappoint you nor anyone else with my use of the buttons... and if I mess up, please

7897:

reverse change. So, to avoid any unpleasantness, I thought I'd better consult before I did. Have you any evidence for the existence of the word "bibliophilia" in an authoritative source for the English language? If so, I shall refrain; if not, I shall make the change.

1491:

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. Happy editing!

5446:. I am contacting you partly because your participation in the discussion would be welcome, but also because I have referred to your past comments, and want to give you the chance to ensure that I am not misconstruing them or using them out of context. Best, 3493:

I specifically said on that page, that I WAS GETTING STARTED. Sheesh, I know that it's a crude couple sentences. Can't you wait a second, when I specifically note that I'm in the middle of writing the article!? I'm about to take a formal complaint out on

8836:, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the 6813:

election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your

1675:) :-O ¿Do you have any especial criteria or policy to decide when pictures are appropiated? Sincerely, don't understand the problem... Beg you perdon if this message may sound too rude. It's only because my english is not as good as it should. :-) -- 6986: 6783: 595:

Calling someoen a troll regardless of their actions inflames the situation massivly. It's about as tactful as telling someone everyone else thinks they're weird. It's rude, and I thought nearly everyone was mature enough to know this. Evidently I was

8201: 8097: 7993: 7869: 1441:

me. The family tree is still incomplete, I didn't have time to finish it. But tbh, it was just way too incomprehensible before. But the thing is, now that you've reverted it, it doesn't even include any of the Olympian gods, which is a bit silly.

4344:

Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. Mizu onna

5468:

Hi Erik the Red 2. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic “current events” articles on Knowledge. I have noticed in the talk page archives at

3020:

article without your pre-approval. I shudder to think that you have aspirations to become an admin, but I guess when you go around acting like you are an admin with such clear warnings you don't really need the actual power or responsibility.

2294:

this). He can't be fully stopped, because he does his "work" at the N.Y. Public Library system, and an IP block would end up blocking every library user. He's a pest who turns up every week or so, but that's about it. Thanks fer listenin'. :)

2686:, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. 740:

It's just annoying that Majorly gets a "Get out of Jail Free" card while Kurt is blocked for the same behavior. I think the discussion will be far saner and more productive without either of us badgering those who provide comments. Erik the

3428:. Though this is not mandatory in any way, and should not be done for all newpages, where appropriate it keeps your fellow patrollers from wasting time reviewing the same page multiple times. In any event, keep up the good work! Thanks. 2174:

I'd strongly recommend using the prototype RFA (although I'm undecided about the overall merit of the the fromat). Your total edit count may be a bit low for some and a full and frank discussion will probably benefit rather than hinder.

5802: 6095: 7769: 7677: 7577: 7477: 7377: 7266: 7189: 7089: 6262:

of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank

6232:

6202:

6145:

6076:

6010:

5912:

5852:

5693:

5635:

5559:

5507:

5414:

5317:

5236:

5111:

5046:

4909:

4688:

4454:

for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of

4124:

1874:

1096:

I've seen your activity on evolution-related pages. I understand I was a little harsh on you previously, and I'm sorry. As we'll be working in close proximity on those pages I think I'd like to put that little episode behind me :-)

2233:(outdent) OK, I'll write up a nom statement as soon as I can once Ironhold's RFA is over (or whenever, I haven't been following the discussion on that RFA or on WT:RFA very closely, so I don't know exactly when you want to start) 1169:

Not a blockable offense. They were not warned, as far as I can tell, and so were not doing anything in violation of warnings. Having a radical deletionist POV and exercising it (nominating the world for deletion) is not vandalism

5769: 2816:

Since it's you who'll be taking it, do you have any preferences? Current idea is the same as last time, but with 2 days for questioning and a 'crat clerking it to remove irrelevant (repeated/general/hypothetical) questions.

3713: 5812: 5085:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!

9008: 5266:

of the WikiProject Greece newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank

3651:. You placed an A7 tag on the article, but I'm seeing weak claims of notability (CEO). Is there something going on here that I'm not seeing that would make speedy deletion the right course instead of prod/AfD? Thanks!-- 1513:

You were the first to mention Bob Dylan. You win a barnstar. Of course, there is no barnstar. Unless you want to plaster one here your-fine-self :-). Thanks for your contributions to my talkpage EtR, be well :-)

5596: 4677: 5100: 4898: 1863: 8968:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 5306: 4113: 3038:

that got you blocked in the first place. You are inserting random, irrelevant trivia that only serves to disparage Obama onto his article, and are harassing me on my talk page. That deserves a warning. Erik the

5225: 5035: 2304:

No, I knew, and I hate sockpuppets and impostors as much as the next guy. I just wanted to format the talk page correctly, because otherwise the following sections would be formatted as subsections. Erik the

9034: 5130: 8458: 6134: 5816: 5682: 3373:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

9087: 6065: 5999: 5820: 4571:

You're telling me!! I have a thousand or so talk page edits. But I'm sure that you, just like me - use the talk page to discuss Knowledge, not myspacey things. You'd pass right away. Ask Balloonman.

6834: 5901: 5841: 1870: 5624: 5107: 4905: 4684: 9083: 4201:

It is not an eye-for-an-eye system here. If you feel the editing or actions of others are biased, you should speak up and try to end that bias, rather than reciprocating with your own. Erik the

625:

Majorly, please be mature enough to disengage yourself from that discussion. The community was tired of my rants, and I am sure they are just as tired of yours. Erik Proxy-Connection: keep-alive

9063: 8171: 8155: 6915: 6876: 6631: 6191: 5042: 4120: 4052:

There is currently a discussion going on regarding the project's policy on how information on characters should be represented in articles on Shakespeare's plays. Please take part by clicking

8662: 8646: 8383: 8375: 8359: 7431: 7243: 7143: 6455: 5403: 4511:| to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste {{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}} and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies 8542: 8526: 8275: 8259: 7331: 7043: 6971: 6888: 6872: 6281: 5775: 5689: 5548: 3991:

Please advise what POV push means if that is a wikipedia term of art, and what I need to do to reinstate my additions to the article in a civilised and well adjudicated and public manner.

3988:

article a more neutral point of view than the none currently dominant in the article, and illuminates for the reader about the nature of controversy that extends into our current affairs.

1025: 8067: 8051: 7455: 7255: 7167: 6712: 6673: 6221: 6141: 6006: 5908: 5496: 1950:

no one has been attacked - please stop with your false red hearings - they are silly and do you no good. Please stand up for your points and you won't need to whine so much. thank you.

568:

Calling someone a troll for trolling is not incivility, but merely stating the truth. I'm removing myself from that and related threads. If Majorly is wise he will do the same. Erik the

8163: 7631: 7531: 7355: 7067: 6933: 6880: 6251: 6072: 5848: 5654: 8933: 8905: 8877: 8831: 8654: 8550: 8367: 7963: 7947: 7839: 7823: 7439: 7251: 7151: 6953: 6884: 6815: 6768: 6685: 6669: 6535: 6497: 6362: 6323: 6128: 6109: 5664: 5631: 5606: 3788:

The information is relevant to the article. It is a neutral fact published in the Chicago Tribune. It shows a linkage between William Ayers and Barack Obama. How is that irrelevant.

8857: 5835: 2004:. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on 9059: 8534: 8267: 7731: 7655: 7555: 7447: 7339: 7247: 7159: 7051: 6228: 6198: 5619: 5313: 5232: 3748: 1671:

in spanish wikipedia and wiki commons). Don't trully understand the reason for the deletion of the picture; I thougt it was relevant (maybe you don´t, but it was'nt in any case an

8179: 8059: 7347: 7059: 6730: 6677: 6593: 6509: 6493: 6418: 6335: 6319: 5555: 5503: 7898: 9053: 8670: 8391: 7747: 7639: 7539: 6750: 6681: 6258: 5410: 4701: 9103: 5979: 5889: 5124: 4922: 4611: 1887: 8558: 8283: 7955: 7831: 7647: 7547: 6555: 6501: 6380: 6327: 6105: 5330: 5204: 5140: 4137: 864: 5249: 5059: 2866:

which successfully passed with 60 supports, 0 opposes and 2 neutrals. I hope I'll be able to live up to everyone's expectations, and thank you for trusting me! All the best,

1354:

thing, especially from someone who opposed my previous RfA (and kudos, btw, on your attitude to the whole userboxen thing; i note it's come come up one SoWhy's RfA now too).

1149:- Did you look at their contribs? They basically nominated every small Linux distro for speedy deletion. Not exactly vandalism, but certainly not constructive contributions. 8075: 7739: 6575: 6505: 6400: 6331: 6043: 5794: 167: 5155: 4424: 867:. Not sure what to make of it. Are you using an external editor or something? It isn't a big deal, but I was almost 100% certain that you didn't know you were doing it. 6158: 5706: 1318: 6113: 2725:

Tis fine! You might want to check out the post-mortem, btw; depending on the consensus for the "utter failure" side of things you may want to run your RfA traditionally.

978:

See above... I'm starting to think that it is my internet connexion rather than the browser that is causing the problem. Tell me if you see anything else weird. Erik the

8919: 8891: 7971: 7847: 6089: 6023: 5262: 1199: 1147: 961: 6998: 5925: 5865: 3726: 5801:

International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for

5648: 3256: 3120: 2592:

Sorry, that was a mistake. I when viewing an old diff to access the old source, I accidentally clicked on a different link, which was a very reliable source. Erik the

2069: 2053: 6795: 6215: 5677: 8863: 6625: 5427: 5194: 3025: 2972: 6449: 5572: 4995:

Hi Erik, I added material to this article with footnote to Dylan biography which you deleted. I've added the material again with (even more) ref/cites. best wishes

860: 8793: 8788: 8783: 8778: 6245: 5520: 5443: 1698:

It might have been relevant, might not have been, just an image was inappropriate in that place, I think that it is a good image, and you should discuss it on the

6275: 3602:

Ok, well since your stated rationale is driving to drive editors to improve the article, why don't you make a post on the discussion page that encourages that?

667: 8886: 4266:, which was successful with 80 Support, 5 Oppose, 6 Neutral. The comments were overwhelming, and hopefully I can live up to the expectation of the community. 1610:

No matter what anyone else says, this will always trump any other oppose as the most epic of all time. "He would make a great admin, it's just so suspicious!"

9161: 4027:. It was nice to see all the kind comments I got from my supporters and I hope that I will be more useful to the community now that I have the tools again.-- 3274: 4547:

If I can find a nom, or when I finally convince my self that people will not look at my 650-odd user talk edits and accuse me of being a Myspacer. Erik the

882:

Weird. I definitely didn't realize I was doing it. I was just editing with Firefox; now I'm using Safari to see if the browser makes a difference. Erik the

9156: 9048: 7270: 5255: 4357: 3021: 2968: 9082:. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at 8942: 8914: 9124: 9117: 8929: 8901: 8873: 8837: 8205: 8101: 7997: 7873: 7765: 7673: 7573: 7473: 7373: 7185: 7085: 6982: 6810: 6779: 6605: 6429: 6170: 6101: 5660: 5602: 5200: 5136: 1259:

I don't think that it's an issue, as it includes my username and tiles in different colors, unlike Ril's, which is just standard, black tildes. Erik the

5219: 2555: 2508: 2451: 818:

It is a moot point now, my discussion entry deleted. Apparently this subject still remains historically obscure and something of a sore spot for many.

8997: 6048: 4626: 1951: 5276: 4875:

Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.

2801: 2777: 2532: 2490: 2475: 2436: 3244: 3225: 3201: 2661: 2622:

Wow--I clarified/challenged two votes (one being yours) and you accuse me of badgering. It seems that you have ill will against me for some reason. ~

3558: 3285: 931: 763: 727: 708: 8811: 3904: 3058: 3029: 3007: 2333: 2324: 1302: 1278: 3206:

It isn't a normal Wiki, it is a wiki where people post scholarly articles. Tell me which criteria of a reliable source it does not meet. Erik the

2412: 1721: 4668: 4165: 3796: 3736: 3705: 3688: 1989: 5723:

article. I'm planning a bit of a reorganisation, and would appreciate any thoughts on the talk page (topic is at or near the bottom). Cheers! --

4239: 4220: 2611: 1692: 1198:

As I said, not exactly vandalism, but still inappropriate and disruptive, and requiring admin attention. In the future please limit things like

1060: 1011: 997: 679: 8843: 8695: 8583: 8416: 8301: 8217: 8197: 8119: 8093: 7989: 7865: 5663:

election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote

5029: 4439: 4397:

all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced.

3995: 2851: 2759: 2275: 2124: 2100: 1853: 1831: 1424: 1399: 1098: 597: 552: 254: 8321: 4566: 3884: 3847: 3808: 3779: 3182: 3108: 1585:

that was a complete accident and I did not mean to delete your comment on the ANI board. I actually replied to it after your re-posted it. --

1572: 1553: 1216: 1193: 8223: 7207: 5458: 4934: 3648: 1790:

Completely unrelated to that, but you need to do something about your userpage. I'm using Firefox 3 and I can't click on your talk page tab.

1662: 1136: 945: 904: 607: 590: 7282: 6829: 6104:

selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up

5605:

selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up

5139:

selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up

4982: 3480: 3328: 1036: 9062:

begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the

9002: 8720: 8614: 8441: 8327: 8113: 7389: 7295: 7201: 7107: 2215: 2191: 2169: 2145: 1737: 840:

I'm not sure what it was you were trying to do here, but the result was that nonsense was added to the article, so I reverted your change.

9020: 5811:

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up

2714: 1807: 810: 9123:

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting

8630: 8608: 8510: 8343: 8239: 8135: 8031: 7927: 7803: 7711: 7611: 7511: 7489: 7411: 7311: 7224: 7123: 7101: 7023: 6419:

LeonidasSpartan shares his thoughts on how, as individual editors, we can deal with frustration and disappointment in our group endeavour

6185: 5433: 5361:

Our goal is to improve the quality of important poetry-related articles. There is no set deadline and participation is purely voluntary.

4651: 3622: 3597: 3573: 3528: 1959: 1926:! :) If you ever need my help, either for admin-related stuff or in any other way, you are welcome to ask, and I shall do my very best. 1654: 1342: 7689: 5987: 5962:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! 4842:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! 4795:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! 4587: 3578:

I can't write the article because I have not read the book and it has almost zero sources about it. Please stop harrassing me. Erik the

2480:

much better, although the word Userboxes is on the left and the userboxes are on the right(no biggie), other than that it looks great.--

2196:

Yup, that's what I've been recruited for, I wouldn't have accepted any offer otherwise because it would probably tank the RfA. Erik the

9025: 8494: 8015: 7885: 7781: 7589: 7395: 7007: 6164: 3425: 2642:

At the time my comment was made, you had responded to and questioned 2/3 of the previous opposes. That constitutes badgering. Erik the

1764: 1451: 849: 46:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 8009: 5742: 3945: 3456: 2083:

Hey Erik. I saw your comment on TravellingCari's talk page. I was considering nomming you soon anyways. Would you like me to nom you?

620: 9142: 8478: 7595: 6804: 2683: 2060: 1471: 1432: 4957: 4107: 4078: 3488: 3149:

Hey, thanks a lot for getting the image sorted out, I wasn't quite sure how to link it from commons. Also, thanks for expanding it.

9108: 7787: 7695: 7495: 4351: 4195: 4024: 3935: 2863: 2001: 1230: 8453: 6173:

elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.

6059: 7911: 5398: 5189: 4713: 3984:

The poster who didn't sign goes on to refer to some of my material as Nonsense from a country he names in a denigrating manner.

3309:

I'm glad it wasn't my mistake, but if you call it a neutral and put it in the neutral section, it's probably a neutral. Erik the

2980: 2035: 1945: 1330: 298: 161: 58:

that it is time for me to eschew my previous editing habits and just pop in here and there to improve the encyclopedia. Erik the

5004: 3503: 1329:. Unfortunately, the nominator is not content with this consensus and is now proposing that the article be merged. Please see 1163: 8947: 8925: 8897: 8869: 8853: 8823: 8691: 8579: 8447: 8412: 8247: 8143: 8039: 7935: 7811: 7719: 7619: 7519: 7419: 7319: 7234: 7131: 7031: 6862: 6659: 6483: 6363:

Catch up with our project's activities over the last month, including the new Recruitment working group and Strategy think tank

6309: 5757: 4044: 3960: 2287: 1918: 832: 8699: 8587: 8420: 8305: 6034: 5587:

Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --

5539:, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not! :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, -- 1936: 780:

Basicly what the guy says is true, there were Jewish councils in the Polish ghettos that took orders from the Germnans. Read

660: 8904:

election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the

8876:

election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the

6972:

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Knowledge

5896: 2936:

For your willingness to contact law enforcement when appropriate. Only slightly unfortunate that we collided on the report.

2636: 1594: 876: 9099: 9044: 8993: 6981:

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section

6604:

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section

6428:

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section

5023: 4560: 4463:

to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the

4263: 4214: 3878: 3841: 3773: 3682: 3591: 3552: 3522: 3474: 3322: 3219: 3176: 3102: 3052: 3001: 2845: 2795: 2753: 2655: 2605: 2526: 2469: 2430: 2365:

In praise of your wonderful contributions to expanding the depth, scope and character of Knowledge. Keep up the fine work!

2318: 2269: 2209: 2163: 2118: 1983: 1825: 1715: 1648: 1547: 1393: 1311: 1272: 1187: 1130: 1054: 991: 924: 897: 756: 701: 653: 583: 145: 71: 5983: 5885: 5543: 4618: 4607: 4168: 2021: 5764: 5203:

election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please

4928: 4490: 3896: 2976: 443: 17: 7902: 6954:

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

5994: 4497: 3405: 1753: 8980:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

5591: 5161: 4173: 3967: 1683:) 13:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC) Hi again, I decided to create my own page here in the english wikipedia (it's free) XD -- 1676: 1498: 527: 465: 108: 4862: 2074: 1437:

Hi. This is somewhat ironic, but 83.226.64.212 (the IP who's edit you reverted back to mine, and left a comment with)

801:

Juden Rat does not mean Jewish rats, Rat in German means council, in German towns they have a Rathaus, the city hall--

562: 5491: 5374: 4893: 4467:

and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply

4045: 3919: 3663: 1893: 1374: 1142: 972: 819: 452: 170:

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to

8822: 5301: 1252: 4988: 4974: 4949: 4755: 3437: 3397: 3358: 3157: 3016: 105: 77: 2988:

I'm not an admin, however any user can revert biased, policy violating edits. How have I threatened you? Erik the

2396: 2374: 827: 9095: 9040: 8989: 7906: 4468: 2696: 2586: 2250: 2245: 2095: 1848: 1802: 1779: 1500: 479: 294: 272: 6713:

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

5753: 5474:

participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below.

4053: 4036: 3956: 2734: 2016: 1630: 793: 3804: 3744: 3083: 2960:

Because it seems like you are acting like one the way you are threatening me and reverting everything I edit.

2907: 2298: 1461: 854: 349: 289: 5719:

Hi there. I noticed you've been involved, to a greater or lesser extent (yes, this is a form message), on the

4541: 4003: 3721: 3719: 2947: 2879: 1784: 1528: 1233:, you may want to remove the ~~~~ from your signature, as it could be confusing. Just wanted to let you know. 5871: 5732: 4725: 4093: 3303: 2955: 1699: 1468: 447: 399: 187: 38: 3509:

Dude, chill. I just added tags to attract more editors to the page in order to expand the article. Erik the

3132: 5355: 5336: 4978: 4953: 4056:. Further context, if needed, can be found by scanning the two previous talk sections on the page as well. 3723: 3401: 3362: 2900: 2826: 2694: 1108: 612:

I called Kurt a troll, but the difference is, he is one. I'm not (or at least nowhere near as bad as him).

417: 381: 222: 5752:

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to

4330: 3955:

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to

2545:

You've got it now two columns works perfect, good user page by the way I need to do something with mine.--

8985: 5958:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

5536: 5526: 5294: 5178: 4838:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

4791:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

4593: 4178:

okay so you've been monitoring me for a while now, i guess it could help because im still a rookie, but.

4143: 2705:

And from me as well. I thank you for supporting me in my RfA, Erik. Let's go raid the Scottish Coast. :)

1456: 519: 386: 310: 784:

by Isiah Trunk, it is an excellant historical account of Jewish collaboration during the war in Poland--

6769:

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

5737: 4100: 3421: 2773: 2551: 2504: 2486: 2447: 2408: 475: 408: 403: 327: 276: 226: 9090:(examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the 1727: 5931: 5478: 4186:

and so, why cant i have my views if thay are allowed to have theirs? just because these views clash?

3920: 3618: 345: 306: 6778:

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section

2617: 1027:

for example. I have asked at the Village Pump - Technical if anyone there knows what is causing it.

9067: 5578: 5394: 4989: 4475:

and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :)

3940: 3889:

Sorry. Didn't know it was. I thought someone was vandalizing it and I wanted to change it. Sorry.

3669:

My mistake. An AfD might be more appropriate. I'll start one. Thanks for the reminder. :) Erik the

3074:

consider it a priority to acquire at least a basic understanding of the image space. Thanks again--

2046: 1580: 1465: 1338: 723: 545: 501: 497: 332: 285: 2764: 5366: 5163: 4867: 4811: 4730: 4483: 4472: 3981:

more precise, and not collaborative discourse of the nature I expect on Jimmy Wales' Knowledge.

3900: 3452: 3334: 3230:

I just loggen on to it and made a test edit. The site is not reliable by any sense of the term. ~

2329:

It really adds injury to insult when you find yourself making style corrections to vandalism. :)

1590: 1292: 1242: 425: 314: 281: 6916:

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

936:

Yeah, I thought it was weird. I'll have to keep an eye out to see if firefox does that for me.

686:

I've already withdrawn myself completely, I'm just waiting for Majorly to reciprocate. Erik the

160:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to

8705: 8593: 8426: 8309: 5463: 4400: 3270: 2832:

Sounds good. I like the crat as clerk idea. I'll ask my nominator to see his opinion. Erik the

2710: 1680: 1604: 1496: 421: 412: 216: 141: 8456:" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so 2573:, whose reliablity is questioned at peer review, is better quality than a source published by 9079: 6029: 5451: 5281: 5272: 3931: 3700: 3693:

No problem. BTDT myself. I just like to check with experienced editors before I assume. :) --

3658: 2768: 2546: 2499: 2481: 2442: 2403: 1955: 1348: 823: 461: 456: 7764:

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section

4394:

Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed,

670:

and take note of TOAT's comment there. I would hate to see either of you blocked over this.

8976:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 8317: 8213: 8109: 4970: 4945: 4777: 4414: 4296: 4235: 4191: 4008: 3892: 3792: 3732: 3606: 3410: 3393: 3354: 3237: 3194: 3142: 2964: 2667: 2629: 2582: 2370: 1747: 1032: 1007: 968: 955: 845: 675: 353: 319: 6577:

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

8: 8981: 8883: 8483: 7891: 5971: 5728: 5390: 5011: 5000: 4851: 4804: 4548: 4202: 3866: 3829: 3761: 3670: 3642: 3579: 3540: 3510: 3462: 3310: 3207: 3187:

Surely a wiki is not considered reliable, even if it is written (mostly) by scientists? ~

3164: 3090: 3040: 2989: 2833: 2822: 2783: 2741: 2730: 2643: 2593: 2514: 2457: 2418: 2306: 2257: 2243: 2197: 2151: 2106: 2093: 2031: 1971: 1914: 1846: 1813: 1800: 1777: 1703: 1636: 1558:

LOL, if I'm your model, you'll never pass RFA :-). I have about 25% mainspace edits :-)

1535: 1416: 1381: 1366: 1334: 1260: 1175: 1118: 1042: 979: 910: 883: 806: 789: 742: 719: 687: 639: 569: 510: 394: 377: 340: 249: 59: 9007:

Hello I currently have a project known as the Roman and Byzantine military history page

6731:

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

6108:

by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the

3034:

It was not a threat but merely a warning. You get blocked and come back and keep making

8713: 8601: 8434: 8005: 7881: 7777: 7685: 7585: 7485: 7385: 7278: 7197: 7144:

From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report

7097: 6994: 6791: 6621: 6445: 6271: 6241: 6211: 6181: 6154: 6124: 6096:

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

6085: 6056: 6044:

Knowledge:Reference desk/Humanities#How many official Dictators to time of Roman Empire

6019: 5955: 5921: 5861: 5831: 5702: 5644: 5568: 5516: 5488: 5423: 5326: 5245: 5215: 5182: 5151: 5120: 5082: 5055: 4918: 4888: 4835: 4788: 4697: 4664: 4476: 4278: 4133: 3800: 3740: 3444: 3433: 3370: 3079: 2884: 2330: 2295: 1995: 1883: 1586: 1567: 1523: 1286: 1236: 1207: 1154: 390: 323: 212: 183: 9016: 9009:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Roman and Byzantine Military History

8957: 8948: 8704:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

8592:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

8487: 8463: 8425:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

6822: 5790: 5670: 5612: 4447: 4363: 4151: 4069: 3999: 3539:

That was someone else who added the deletion tag. Please stop attacking me. Erik the

3266: 3128: 2942: 2877: 2706: 2382: 2341: 2040: 2005: 1688: 1493: 1447: 1117:

Thanks a lot! I kind of overreacted there- Kurt is a touchy subject for me. Erik the

1103: 941: 872: 602: 557: 471: 173: 8726: 5876: 4598: 2105:

Yes, actually, you are a user I've looked up to for a while. Thanks a lot. Erik the

9138: 8977: 8961: 8471: 7672: