User:Joyous!/Talk archive 5

2747:

or three times (kept making a typo). I know the article was of questionable nature, but my friend entered it and I figured I would let the possible deletions be made by those who do so, and just fix the spelling. Next thing I know the article was gone and I had a message on my user page from Joy. In the car earlier this evening I read her entire User talk page and it has inspired me to join Wiki and work with some of the Recent Changes patrol. I was just upset when I saw the warning of a potential ban on my user talk page. I guess I overreacted and it must have been from a past IP or something. I'm showing up on a different IP now because I'm home now. I'm going to register an account to use from now on to avoid this sort of thing. --

1213:

reason I'm asking is that I would like to post a photo of the "Baby Ruth" sign that was once visible from Wrigley Field, but I would have to scan a photo from an old book, an old postcard, or something like that. I realize I could just do it without asking. I mean, what's the worst they could do to me? Kidnap my first-born? No, probably they would just delete it. However, my question reminds me of this joke: A guy sees a bunch of cars illegally parked. He asks a cop, "Can I park there?" The cop says, "No!" The guy says, "What about those other cars?" The cop says, "They didn't ask!" (Taken, without permission, from

2560:, I'll revert the edit, and then leave a fairly polite message on his talk page. Often, Skunk continues. But now, I'm watching him a little more closely. If he continues, the messages get rather less polite, and ultimately, if he's a stubborn Skunk, he'll get blocked from editing. The block is usually for 24 hours, because that's beyond the attention-span of the most common vandals. Let's face it--most of them are bored kids on summer vacation. 251:, because I'm the creator of the article. :-) The terminology is a little odd, but it's standard among philatelists, and the joint stamp issue seems to be the only context in which one speaks of "British Columbia and Vancouver Island" rather than just one or the other. Since they only issued the one stamp, I supposed it would be OK, if graceless, to say "British Columbia and Vancouver Island postage stamp". 2266: 99: ??? Please help. I know of a genuine site that has much to offer and should be on this list. What kind of article do I need to write in order for you not to ban it? I've looked on each one of the so-called articles on this list and I don't see how they are acceptable, yet mine were not. Please reply here and I will check back for your reply. THANK YOU. (posted by 1482:"... In 2002, Richard Preston published The Demon in the Freezer, a bestseller about the first major bioterror event in the U.S. and the government's ongoing efforts to protect against smallpox and other potential bioweapons. Demon is Preston's first nonfiction book since the The Hot Zone, also supported by the Foundation." 1581:

ABLE TO ACTUALLY ADD INFOMATION WITHOUT PROVEN OR RELIABLE SOURCES.I'LL CHECK INTO YOUR SITE AND FAMILIARIZE MYSELF WITH YOUR RULES AND REGS, BEFORE I ADD ANYTHING ELSE AND DEFINATELY BEFORE I READ AND TAKE TO HEART ANY OF THE INFORMATION ON THIS SITE, TO INSURE THAT I AM NOT JUST FILLING MY HEAD WITH A BUNCH OF "HOOPLAH"

206:. (BTW, external links just get single brackets on each end. Check out the markup on this edit to see exactly what I mean) I struggle with the concept of which external links are actually useful, and which fall under the heading of "advertising." The gray area is very large sometimes. If I were you, I'd ask that question 2690:

subpage. :) I've decided to finally try to put my professional skills to use on Knowledge. That, coupled with my recent discovery that command-clicking a link in my Safari browser will open it in a new tab, (previously, I was using the contextual pop-up menu). I've got the vandal bastards on the

2580:

A further aid to transparency is that every version of every page is saved. Look at the top of this page, at the tab marked "history." Click that tab. You'll see a list of every edit that's been made to this page. I can't sneak in an edit and then say "oh, I didn't do that," because the difference

1913:

is doing some serious conspiracy POV pushing on the London bombings article. I reverted him once and left him the NPOV welcome message on his talk page, but he went right back to the article. I'm not an admin and I don't want to get into a 3RR situation with this person, so I'm officially Passing The

728:

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge

2616:

you edited earlier. As I am the webmaster of www.caulbearer.org I can give permission to use the text presented in my definition/article on Knowledge, which I've just started to explore today. Aladdin's cave!! i just used some of the info there to save my poor little fingers! Anyway, I'm not sure if

2576:

article, the 60 people who have the article on their personal watchlists are going to check the edit to see what changed. And that's not counting the people who are monitoring all recent changes to all articles. I can absolutely guarantee that people are happy to drop by and berate you if you make

2571:

I think there is a real openness, because every edit is so transparent. For example, I can guarantee that when you posted your comment on my talk page, 20 people noticed that an anonymous editor had edited MY page, and dropped by to check it out and make sure that it wasn't a big ol' "go to hell and

2532:

What really makes the site work (in my humble and somewhat sleepy opinion) are the personalized watchlists. Every editor can add any article to a watchlist, so that whenever an edit is made to that article, it shows up on the list. I keep watch over about 500 articles right now, which sounds like a

2528:

that lists every edit made to every article in real-time. I only review edits made by anonymous users, and I'm not really looking for incorrect facts. I'm checking for out-and-out vandalism. ANY editor can reverse such edits, my "special powers" as an administrator/janitor just mean that I can do

2433:

Hmmm ... So I tried a naive edit on one of the main Wiki pages. I then read the rest of the page and realized that although the issue may well never be closed completely, it has indeed been thought about and evolved at such length already that I should not have written my note without further simple

1692:

It's a gray area. They don't seem to be commercial links, but they do seem to be self-promotion, or at any rate someone promoting a single website, which we consider to be spamming. If the person is actually contributing to the articles I usually cut them a bit more slack. If we allowed this kind

1687:

You recently deleted several of my links considering them irrelevant to the discussions on those pages (auras, pranic healing]. They are not commercial nor are they off topic. Interesting that the aura page is full of skeptics but no room for information on how to see one quite simply. Not to worry,

1580:

I DID NOT REALIZE THIS CHANGED INFO ON THE ACTUAL SITE.MY SON CREATED A NEW WORD/MEANING FOR THE NUMBER 1 WITH 1000 ZEROS, SIMILAR TO MILTON SORITA (something) A BOY WHO AT 9 YEARS OLD IN THE 1930S DID .HE CALLED A NUMBER 1 WITH 100 ZEROS "GOOGOL".I FIGURED THAT WOULD BE RIDICULOUS FOR ANYONE TO BE

285:

Good luck. That guy (whose IP address varies somewhat from entry to entry) must be checking that article 100 times a day in order to put back his inane comments about Dennis Miller. I understand that if a vandal just affects one entry, admins are not likely to do much about it. And with an anonymous

2746:

Sorry. I was on the way leaving my vacation house and really over reacted. It was an article titled 'Computer Years' when I first went to edit it from clicking the link above, it said there was no article, and if it was recently created to try a link called 'purge' I did and it worked. I edited two

2585:

and click the history tab. See where you made the edit that caught my attention? From the history page, you can see where I reverted the edit. On your talk page here, look to the left, to the link that says "user contributions." If you click that link, you can see every edit that's been made from

1517:

I'm assuming you're referring to the message left on your talk page dated April 28. That was referring to a spam link that was left in an article. However, since you are not using a registered Knowledge account, the message could have been intended for someone else who happened to edit under that

1365:

I am afraid that we can not transfer thousands of interactive web pages to explain what Music is, here. This is the Internet a link with description of what is at the other end of the link should be a better alternative. We have nothing to sell, we only offer free and unique knowledge which seems

1024:

It's also not only staggaring how much has been done, but also how much is left to be done! My talk page now has a substantial to-do list, and those are only the articles that I can work with without doing tons of research. But then Knowledge has always been inteded as a growing work-in-progress,

991:

To be more than just a "hi I'm new here", I do have two questions. You mention the not-so-uncommon vandalizations of your personal page. why? I mean, it's not like your page offers any inflammatory opinions. I know the internet is full of idiots, but it seems like such a pointless waste of time

309:

The thing that saddens me a bit is that the well-intentioned liberal policy of allowing non-registrees to enter stuff is that it leads to this kind of thing. At least it's not obscene like some of the other stuff I've seen, just inane. But I was drawn to wikipedia because of the vast knowledge that

123:

This makes each of them very notable. The problem here is that it sounds like you want to use Knowledge for advertising, which we do not allow. If the site in question is notable, and commentary on it can be written in a encyclopedic manner, then there may be a place for it on Knowledge. Please see

489:

I wanted to try and self-nominate myself again, but it appears that Cecropia made a bad call in dealing with my previous self-nomination... the moment I completed the first step of the self-nomination, the old self-nomination page came up. I tried moving it to my talkpage by copying the url of my

2500:

I see on your page that you're listed as a "janitor". So cleaning up the garbage is part of your job, eh? I'll have to think about that. Having a group of active "janitors" sounds a lot like having "editors" who have to approve suggested corrections or additions. So in a way the whole thing is

1872:

just a redirect to the more complete article, but then I looked at the talk page and the other tools. I found the other meaning through the "What links here" tool, and not being a follower of music from later than 1945, I had no real idea of the other's notability. It seemed safer to err on the

1478:

I have edited out the "fiction" section and changed it to "non-fiction". Richard Preston's The Hot Zone was put in non-fiction sections of bookstores because it was published as non-fiction. It was supported by an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grant: the Sloan foundation does not support fiction and

1212:

I have a question about photos. I'm unclear on what the policy is. I've seen photos that looked like they were basically scanned from some unknown source and posted. I wonder how much trouble I and/or you all would get into if I scanned an old photo for illustrative purposes here. The specific

1028:

Finally, this must be enormously expensive to keep up and running! I see that there is a "donations" link in the navigation bar, but do those really ammount to enough to pay for all of the hosting, bandwidth, and possibly salaries for those in charge of wikimedia? Sorry if I'm asking beyond your

1020:

and already I had to hit the "last 250" button to see the edit. And there are so many small, insidious changes people can make that are less obvious than inserting "justin is gay", like changing or deleting another member's vote on a VfD discussion! The fact that this whole project stays up and

293:

Thank you for your response. I checked the variants on his IP address, and his only target seems to be Dennis Miller. There seem to be several folks watching Miller's page, so I reckon we'll have to take turns from time to time until we can hunt down this nut and send a lightning bolt through his

210:. The anon user who asked the question on my talk page stepped WAY over the gray and into the black. He wrote an article on an online personals service that screamed ADVERTISEMENT, then linked it over and over and over into many articles, some of which only had a very tenuous connection to it. 1428:

You sent me a message asking me to stop vandalizing pages or else I would be blocked. I am new to wickipedia and not only have I not (purposely)) "vandlaized" anything but I have no such knowledge on how to do so. If I have inadvertently caused some harm to the site please inform me as to how it

732:

Thanks for experimenting with Knowledge. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use Knowledge:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing in articles will be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

724:

Attention: This IP address, 165.21.154.113, is registered to Singnet (ISP in Singapore) and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions

514:

As a result of a disagreement at another site, a member has come to Knowledge to change the definition of liberal <he deleted a segment>. I've noted the problem at the originating forum, and would put your page back the way it was before, but I'm not familiar with your 'revert' protocol.

263:

Hey Joy, I just thought I'd ask you because I was in the process of removing vandalism from the Burger King page, but you beat me to it. When I remove vandalism, I do it line-by-line, comparing it to the earlier edits. Is there a simple way to revert an article to the previous version? Thanks!

221:

Well, I went ahead and actually created an article for Manhunt, so the issue I was worried about isn't one anymore. And since I'm not affiliated with them in any way (wait, well, I'm acquaintances with one of the designers for the Japanese version of their website... so I'm two degrees away, I

2404:

I'm going to fix up the article on Adam Burkutally. I am a banking investment manager and am keen to let the world know what they're in for. Adam is a true no-brainer when it comes to scucess and he deserevs more recognition, I will go through my post and back it up with more links and linked

1135:

It's where instead of just outright vandalizing your page as a prank, the person will leave something that essentially amounts to vandalism (by the purposelessness of it), but also makes you waste energy trying to follow the vandalism to something. Another example would be leaving a link to a

2504:

I see that what I first did would be labeled vandalism (pretty much). If a vandal and a janitor both sit there making their changes back and forth for a day or two, and there have been say 100 edits each ... someone has the power to censor the vandal, right? And whoever has that power is

397:, (or whatever it looks like :) ), but there isn't much else that adminship entails that I am currently interested in. And then there is the issue of timing: my involvement in Eequor's recent RfA coupled with my recent blanking of my own users pages would give the voters plenty of 1492:

The author of the "fiction" section seems to have felt that Preston over-dramatized. I have found no evidence to support that. While The Hot Zone suffers the usual faults of popular non-fiction books, it seems no worse than Blackhawk Down or All the President's Men, to name just two.

803:

Thanks for the note on my talk page, it's always nice when someone appreciates the effort! I've been doing RC work for a while now and you start to get a feel for something that "smells" bad when you see it, that and the common vandal targets of course....anyway, thanks again!

2555:

that says one editor may not revert an article more than 3 times in any 24-hour period. However, an exception to that is if the reverts are to remove vandalism. Now, if someone comes along, (let's call him "Skunk") and drops a "Justin is SO gay!!" comment into an article on

47:

Well, I don't think we've really ever met on an article, but I think I was trying to revert vandalism one day and kept getting beat to the punch by you. I just got a little annoyed and came and vandalized your vandalism count. I just happened to notice the busted links and

920:

Thank you so much for your kind message. Your mastery of civil language is truly breathtaking. It's habitual to revert edits to userpages that appear to be vandalism, as there are many more editors here who prefer NOT to have their pages "vandalized." However, since

790:

Thanks for spotting the bad faith edits to the Columbus page. The ip before the one you caught had changed the page to note that Columbus set sail from Mexico in 1493 (which I must confess, as vandalism goes, it's pretty amusing). I reverted it back one more step.

31:

I apologise, but couldn't resist. If I've vandalized your page, surely you must change something -- but then there have been 28 incidents, so there's nothing to change. And if I haven't, then there have only been 27, so indeed I have. What, oh, what shall you do?

2496:

Ah. I looove the Marx brothers. I even managed to get my kids to watch a bunch of their movies as part of their education. Duck Soup was pretty zaney. My favorite is Monkey Business, but I realize there were a lot of things that I missed in some of them.

2462:). It went right back to the article after my 24-hour block. Oh, hello there, 68.34.229.133, I see the unsigned message "Uhh...Yeah..." above is from you. Do you think it's fun for the authors of the article too to see it messed up over and over again? The 301:

A software-controlled lightning bolt. A capital idea! I saw something about a rule against a single user doing more than a certain number of reverts in one day... except to fix "vandalism", right? Not that I have all day for this (unlike the "mad vandal").

1537:

My apologies if I am breaking any rules ... I simply wanted to share with others the really cool idea of customized clothing and there are some great sites out there that enable this type of product ... it is a knowledge resource for everyone (unsigned by

669:

Boy, I hate it when we're both closing VfD discussions at the same time. I was working on this one and when I finally finished and hit save, found an edit conflict where you'd already closed it with a different decision. Here's what I came up with:

322:

One more thing, then I'll leave you be. A technical question I'm curious about. Do you really keep all the versions in full, or just the differences somehow? If it's in full, how much freakin' disc space do you all have? It must rival Google's.

2338:

I was actually sad to see that the template titles weren't something like "polite warning," "slightly less polite warning," "gettin' cranky warning," and "Red-hot irate warning." But I don't think that would pass muster with most Wikipedians.

2593:

There are squabbles about keeping a neutral point of view, and discussion/arguments about what kinds of articles do and don't belong, but I think that somehow a marvelous thing has been created here. I'm proud to be a part of it.

2478:

P.S. Note that the anon's message was changed just before I managed to save. I hope that "ok" means "ok". 68.34.229.133, please just don't bring the squirrelly wrath to my Talk, I'm not in the mood for it, today or any other day.

182:

has traffic rank 1,615. Is it okay to add a page to a category if the article does not yet exist? ^.^ Also, had rank 844, and, although it has other uses, it is mostly used as a personals service. (Both numbers were taken from

2714:

Perhaps my being on a dialup IP, you are confusing ther actions of someone else with me? All I have done on this IP is edit an article that a friend wrote for spelling and formatting... is that against Knowledge's rules?

1346: 1488:

Googling any of the significant names ("Nancy Jaax", "Gerald Jaax", "Peter Jahrling"--add "Ebola" and "Reston" to reduce results) in The Hot Zone will lead to authorative articles (CNN, *.edu, etc.) supporting the book.

679:

The predominant argument for keeping was the google-count. After reviewing all the evidence, I consider the google-count argument to have been successfully refuted in this case. I am going to call this a "delete".

2388:

Thanks for your feedback on my Napoleon edits. It's so nice to hear that one's work goes noticed, and nicer still to know there are fellow adults using this site! Congratulations on your upcoming wedding :)

1611:

that would cover anonymous IP talk pages; essentially it requires that comments and warnings stay up for at least a week so that other admins and RC patrollers can see any relevant remarks. The proposal is at

2577:

a change that's not to their liking. If an edit is controversial, discussion can take place on the talk pages that accompany every article. (There's a link at the top of each article that says "discussion.")

2424:

This is the website to go to to watch Foamy movies. But there is a Parental Advisory for language and maybe some violence. Foamy is one of the funniest characters I have ever seen. I hope you like it.

2191:, and later relented, settling for adding the two articles to one another's "See also" sections. Does this mean I'm a faithless mergist, or an inclusionist who is occasionally tempted toward mergism? -- 1189:

Oh, oops. I totally misread your comment and missed the entire joke. I read, "What is 'wild goose' vandalism? The kind of shit that just happened to me?" Yeah, your definition is awesome then. :)

433:

article; unfortunately, looks like that guy just doesn't want that stub! I don't want to be responsible for reverting the article several times a day, so I'll let someone else take care of it for now.

2533:

lot, but checking them only takes a few minutes. My watched articles are composed of some that just interest me, all the articles that I've started, and those that call a siren call to vandals, like

1688:

I will not be adding any more links since it appears to upset the apple cart. No one is paying me to share. Try reading the topic of note and the link before you press the delete button for a change.

343:

I was beginning to think that the message on my userpage was working too! I've done a lot of RC patrol since I put it there and I hadn't been vandalised until now. I'm glad that it made you laugh.

891: 729:

number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

1636:. I thought it might be a hoax, but it turns out to be a real child actor. He's appearing in a TV series that was mentioned in the stub but with a red link, so I did a little research and wrote 473: 1997:

Thank you for the barnstar; that's very kind. I don't know whether to be happy that I have so many edits, or mortified that I spend so much time here. Joyous (talk) 22:27, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

2524:

I'm only "approving" edits in a very broad sense. What I was doing when I caught and removed your earlier edit is called "Recent Changes patrol," or "rc patrol," for short. We have a page

2546:

If a vandal and a janitor both sit there making their changes back and forth for a day or two, and there have been say 100 edits each ... someone has the power to censor the vandal, right?

133: 1632:

Thanks for your help in reverting the vandal who was spuriously adding my name to various articles. An oddity: The same IP had been used, only two hours earlier, to create a stub about

1277: 2624:

Hi, Denis. I'm sorry about tagging your article as a copyright problem; I didn't realize that you held the copyright. Most articles that originate from a website are flat-out stolen.

2566:

And whoever has that power is effectively approving or disapproving content then, right? Is the difference only one of style -- an attempted openness -- or is there a real difference?

2028: 1984: 1272: 476:

Joy, I'd like to award you this WikiThanks barnstar for helping me out quickly and graciously over the last couple of days after I randomly approached you for help. Thanks again!

2165:

the only thing joyous about deleting other people articles is the fact that we'll know that you won't pollute the world with your genes since you will never leave the computer.

1497:

Ok, I can see your point. Thanks for the note, and I apologize for the revert. By the way, if you sign your messages with ~~~~, it makes it a lot quicker to get back to you.

2644:

Permission granted for use of text by the Webmaster of www.caulbearer.org who may be contacted at caulbearer.org@gmail.com Webmaster Notice date: 31st July 2005. Denis Mc Gowan

1979:]. I think it is a shame that you haven't received much recognition for this (or if you just don't post awards anywhere). By the way, I like the new style of your user page. 393:

Oh, no thank you. :) I'm sorry, as I read the above, it occurs to me that it may have sounded like I was asking you to ask me that...I wasn't. :) I am envious of

1260:

Joy, I hereby award you the cutest looking monkey I could find on Knowledge. If I had known that you always wanted a monkey, I would have done this much sooner! ;-)

2454:

Joy, would you mind if I permablocked 68.34.229.133 the next time? It's a pure vandal account, and I think it's specially offensive the way it keeps wantonly messing up

996:

Second, I see that you identify as a mergist, a stance that makes sense to me. Are there other intra-wikipedia political parties? Is there a listing of them somewhere?

2437:

When I went back to remove my silly note, I saw your message. From a live person just a few moments ago, I guess? And my note was already gone as well. Fascinating.

2541:. Frequently-vandalized articles may be on the personal watchlists of 100 editors, so if one person doesn't catch and revert a problem edit, another will pretty soon. 1292: 2711:

Excuse me? Vandalizing Wiki? I would never think of doing such a thing, as a member of academia I value Knowledge greatly. Your mere suggestion is greatly offensive.

2211:

I've seen enough of what you've written to know that you're no fortune cookie, but as your "fortune cookie" reply goes, you make an excellent fortune cookie, too. --

2101:

As for whether or not the site should get a mention at all on that page, I'm not sure. They get an Alex.com traffic rating of 85,809, and ... OH: guess what, it's a

2063: 2029:

Once again, all judgements. I'm adding content to these catagories that is valid. Useful? Probably not. But usefulness does not indicate validity in the Wiki world.

2096:"People who are not familiar with sex tourism need to understand that there is a very distinct difference between legal sex tourism and illegal child sex tourism" 2052:

I can see no indication of any vandalism. What's going on? Since I've added my name to that user's page it may reflectly badly upon me. 03:31, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

1596: 2662: 2598: 2343: 2327: 1840: 1526: 1501: 1236: 1163: 1117: 1088: 929: 757: 654: 1693:

of behavior routinely we'd be a giant link-farm, and quite overrun with links, serving mainly to increase the google rank of other sites. Hope this helps...

2748: 1910: 1440: 1287: 1057: 137: 1518:

IP address. The best way to avoid messages intended for someone else is to register for a free account. If you have any other question, please let me know.

2716: 2505:

effectively approving or disapproving content then, right? Is the difference only one of style -- an attempted openness -- or is there a real difference?

2057: 2045: 1539: 825: 2009: 1990: 1825: 100: 36: 2659: 2595: 2340: 2324: 2171: 1837: 1523: 1498: 1233: 1160: 1114: 1085: 1021:

running really is a testament to the fact that most people really are benevolent at heart, something hard to see demonstrated on many internet forums.

926: 754: 651: 211: 150: 83: 1613: 2296: 2287: 2254: 2245: 2235: 2320: 2279: 119:

Yahoo! Personals 1 Adult FriendFinder 47 Tickle (dating service) 229 Eharmony 560 OkCupid 3241

222:

guess), it's not advertising. I tried to make the article as informative as possible. There was also a link to the article before it existed on

813: 1046:

I made the Water article blank because someone had defaced it with inappropriate language. I didn't feel like typing out a definition for it.

2283: 981: 518:

If I'd realized what the fella was going to do <thank goodness he bragged about his intention>, I wouldn't have mentioned Knowledge.

1799:

Thank you, Joy! :) Oh, yeah, the VFD...bit of an odd activity for me to be engaging in on my b-day. :) So I'm off to eat cake....

1366:

to be otherwise lacking here. How else can we provide effective information that can help clear up the current fuzz on this subject ?

1781:

Innocent? Sometimes IP ranges or shared proxies are blocked from editing Knowledge. This means that lots of innocent people can't edit....

1459:

users. So if you are reading this reply Matthew, comments left on your talk page were intended for other users and are irrelevant to you.

944:

you seem level headed, and uninvolve wit hte subject matter at hand, please, if you would, read the following page and pass judgement.

663: 2790:

for a final time, but s/he continued vandalizing by adding gibberish and making a minor vandalization. I support blocking his/her IP. --

1250: 490:

talkpage, and ended up creating an entirely new article. I'd like some help getting out of this mess... could you please help me out? --

2440:

I think I've even figured out how to respond to you (without being so totally obnoxious as to mess with a publicly-significant page).

1965:

but the page was protected with vandalism still in it (the first sentence of the "Murders" section). Could you fix this ASAP? Thanks.

2244:

They seem ok to me. I won't quit wikipedia and commit suicide if you revert them back and do the rest, but I think they are usefull.

1815: 286:

and varying logon, maybe it's not practical. In any case, I am uncertain how to see what other stuff that guy might be messing with.

2632:

stating that you are the copyright holder. Also, follow the link on the copyright violation notice and leave a similar note on the

2771: 294:

modem. >:) One more question: Do you have a way to "lock down" a page? I gather you do, but that you use that power sparingly.

753:, but there's no way to tell who actually made the edit, since you are using a dynamic IP address. It could have been anyone. 207: 2519:

Having a group of active "janitors" sounds a lot like having "editors" who have to approve suggested corrections or additions.

1475:

Here's why I made the changes I did. I think the change I made was justified as the Fiction section was something of a rant:

248: 2048:. This is an IP from which I sometimes make edits on accident (when I forget to log in). On that user's contributions page 1448: 2617:

an email from me while wearing my webmaster hat would help resolve the issue. The site email is caulbearer.org@gmail.com

2049: 1947: 1924: 1652:

Yes indeed, I would. Thanks for the chuckle! (laugh at me, but I actually Googled it to see if it was true... LOL...)

537:

I think they are a good editor, just probably don't know about our NPOV. I've sent them a message telling them about it.

2774:

article. I realize its still under VfD, but its nice to see its defended even in disputed status. Thanks for the help.

749:

I'm leaving the response here, since you'll probably enter via a different IP address next time. The "mis-editing" was

2134:

Er, yes, I'm sure there is. :) Sorry, I just meant the tone sounded POV. Your edits look great, as usual. :)

1380:"Our music theory articles could probably use your expertise" Theory is what you have when you do not have science. 310:

seemed to be there, and stuff like this compromises its credibility. That's just my opinion, I could be wrong. :)

2668:

Yes i have, it was an old refrence book in the Oxford library, that analysed Francis Bacon's book "The New Atlantis".

1017: 676:

I count 7 "deletes", 4 "keeps" (one troll vote discounted) and 3 who either abstained or were too ambiguous to call.

452:

article, and I can't seem to get the :Category:1946 births link at the bottom to work. I've already added him to the

2691:

run now, whoopie! :) Eh, maybe I should try writing an article or two every once in a while too, huh? ;-)

913:

Why are you reverting me? SPUI says on his talk page that he doesn't want modifications to his talk page reverted.

436:

Sometimes, do you just feel like you should give up, and not try to help improve the little stubs? :) –

2226:

Have a monkey for all your good work and for having the user below vandalise you. I also reverted your rollbackon

1934: 1640:. Thus the siege of vandalism resulted in a small expansion of our coverage. Strange are the ways of the wiki. 1836:

the notability of a newly created word. We document things AFTER they've become widely used and recognized.

1012:

I can't imagine how it can be expected that people on patrol keep up with the recent changes - I rewrote the

988:, I saw your user name in the discussion forum, and thought "wow, I didn't know individual users got pages!" 2633: 1873:

side of notability since there were two links that mentioned the name. Perhaps it should be a redirect to

1728: 2090:

Yeah, I think the additions to the "Prostitution in ..." pages are just pure spam. As far as the edits to

1937:

with this info, as opposed to bugging you with it. Sorry, Joy; I'm still kind of learning the ropes here.

737:

I assume the 3rd paragraph is YOU speaking to me. I am sorry for mis-editing whatever it was I misedited.

718:

Hi there Joy. I just discovered the "message" function. I just came to wikipedia and u left me a msg lol.

166:

Sorry, I was that person, (I was trying to stay away on a wikibreak...but it just wasn't working) :)

1903: 1599:

about ownership of anonymous IP talk pages—I couldn't find any policy either. (There's nothing at

2724: 2508:

Perhaps I should read more articles rather than asking you, questions that are probably in an FAQ list.

2736: 2700: 2153: 2117: 1633: 650:

You need a hobby. Thanks for alerting me to #10,000. I wasn't keeping close track, and I missed it!

82:

If no one blanks the page or adds obvious vandalism, I'll have no need to ever edit that page again.

52:

to fix them. If I caused you any offense, I am not really sorry (It had to be done). See ya around. --

2360: 2204: 1299: 750: 611:

Has it occurred to you that being an absent-minded snorkeler can be just slightly dangerous? ;-)

2590:

and see all 12,000 edits that I've made since I first arrived over a year ago. Nothing gets hidden.

95:

I created a few articles weeks ago regarding Online dating.. How does a site get listed on the page

1621: 1444: 568:

I use to take the high moral ground of agnostism, until I decided dogmatic atheisim is just easier.

635:

appears to be your 10,000 edit to Knowledge, so congrats again! :) (Wow, am I ever bored).

632: 2787: 1941: 1918: 2359:

were alright, but I guess not. I gave it my best efforts. No harm done. Thanks for your note.

1522:

By the way, signing your comments with ~~~~ makes it a lot easier to respond to your messages.

2316:

you live in da fucking trash can and you tell me not to vandalize shit you fucing pussy licker

2286:

are socks, and I've told Kelly Martin, but she doesn't like me, so that's why I'm telling you.

1282: 108: 2687: 2525: 2215: 2195: 2184: 1966: 542: 2762:

i reckon that vandalism is COOOL!!!!! 1337 F u, u cant block us, i got 1000 ips and masking

1267: 854: 740:

I am just curious, since it is so long since i came to wikipedia.. exactly WHAT did I do?

8: 2581:

is right there. If there's not enough history on your page to be interesting, go back to

2299: 2290: 2257: 2248: 2238: 1697: 1656: 1637: 1617: 1608: 1604: 1600: 1554: 1230: 1215: 879: 842: 805: 53: 2419: 405:

with my now superfluous efforts on rc patrol. ;-) See ya round the 'pedia. :)

2484: 2471: 1938: 1915: 1735: 1395:

Thanks for the little note you left on my talk page. It's much appreciated! :-) --

963: 477: 465: 457: 273: 272:

Your answer on my talk page makes perfect sense. Thanks for the data dump, Joy :)

265: 65: 74:

I just corrected the numbers on this page. Please do not revert them again. Thank you.

35:

P.S. Please don't block my IP address for what I hope you will find vaguely amusing.--

2463: 1713: 1584:

PS ARE YOU ONE OF THOSE WEBSITE POLICE GUYS.SORRY DONT KNOW THE CORRECT TERMINOLOGY!

1463: 948: 687: 503: 491: 2127:

It seems to me that there is a distinction between sex tourism and child sex tourism

959:

By your and Solipsist's request, I've restored the RFC. I hope it will be fruitful.

2775: 2212: 2192: 1977:

I noticed on your edit count that ou have nearly 12,000 edits to this encyclopedia

1717: 1408: 1396: 1354: 1113:

What is "wild goose" vandalism? The kind where the shit just happened to hit me?

1029:

range of knowledge, but you appeared to be a well-informed and experienced member.

945: 903: 890: 538: 75: 68: 2727:

only shows 2 edits, both of them to this page. What article are you referring to?

1821:

Don't you think the word cranton needs to be absorbed into the English language?

2629: 1962: 1874: 1865: 1667:

thank you for helping me out! I really didnt want it to say Fred Jones Teaching

1641: 1566: 1483: 1190: 1137: 1099: 925:

has made that request, I certainly will honor it. I hope you have a lovely day.

850: 252: 227: 188: 1709:

Please remember to use subst when warning users. For example {{subst:test}} --

472: 2732: 2696: 2393: 2295:

I didn't think of that. Well, I thought I'd let some admins know my suspicion.

2227: 2149: 2113: 2018: 1853: 1805: 1789: 1770: 1760:

turns up 14 hits, also doesn't sound so good. The final problem: Alexa.com has

1694: 1653: 1551: 1456: 1331: 1308: 1220: 1030: 876: 839: 838:

and thanks for all the hard work on RC patrol! It's endless fun, no? :-)

641: 623: 411: 381: 366: 324: 311: 303: 295: 287: 172: 129: 2676:

Hi, Joy! You must have messaged me just before I went to make dinner. :)

2413:

Ok. Then I'm going to spread Squirrely Wrath right here. If you don't mind.

2552: 2480: 2467: 2368: 2231: 2188: 1832:

I think you misunderstand what Knowledge's purpose is. It's not intended to

1732: 1416: 980:

Hi Joy, just set up my own account here, and when reading up on how to merge

960: 872: 772: 430: 423: 125: 2501:

much closer to what I'd have imagined would work best than it first sounds.

2587: 2056:

Nevermind. I just saw you left a note saying it was a test. :) Sorry!

1738: 1710: 1460: 966: 792: 779: 684: 449: 448:

Sorry to run to you again Joy, but I'm putting the finishing touches on my

356:

Sigh...I give up. A year ago, RC Patrol was fun. Now, everyone gets to the

344: 336: 17: 560:

Knowledge, the perfect place to get away from thinking about school...hmm.

2538: 2459: 2091: 2071: 1886: 1878: 1407:

Hello. I stopped by to thank you for restoring my page. Peace. :)

1350: 1318: 898: 437: 2612:

Just a line (or two maybe) on the copyright issue on the definition of

1901: 1452: 1013: 985: 1564: 2791: 2728: 2692: 2145: 2109: 1800: 1784: 1765: 1563:

My attention has been drawn from Knowledge by Chaku Wiki. I love it!

1384: 1326: 1322: 1303: 922: 636: 618: 406: 376: 361: 167: 1983: 698:

Ms. Stovall: You've foiled my first foray into Knowledge mischief.

456:

article in the births section. What am I doing wrong? Thanks again!

453: 2586:

this IP address. Those are saved permanently. I can look back to

2365: 1479:

apparently was satisfied enough with RP to give him another grant.

1073: 375:

That nice rollback button you have probably helps as well. :)

2658:

If you have any other questions or problems, please let me know.

998:

well it seems that rereading your opening page answered that one.

661: 2573: 2557: 2458:

article, a non-controversial, very good high culture article (by

1550:

you're too fast for me! LOL. Hope we didn't miss any. Cheers!

946:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/DreamGuy-2

223: 96: 2723:

You will need to provide her with more context that that. Your

683:

I guess I need to learn to count faster. Have a good evening.

67:

before updating the "Coalition casualties in Afghanistan" page.

2604: 2265: 2044:

Joyous-- you left a level 1 vandalism message on the page for

1470: 617:

Eh, ignore me. I'm just slightly bored at the moment. :)

464:

I see where I went wrong. Thanks again, Joy; you're the best.

59: 2534: 2144:

We get the strangest vandals around here, don't we? ;-)

2008:

about Knowledge is the lack of recognition given to editors.

1040: 865: 553:

Congratulations on the too many things that you are. :)

2628:

For starters, you might want to put a note on the article's

2019:

Vandalism is a judgement. All content is valid on Knowledge.

1864:

No, I only really know the railroad meaning which is behind

1590: 2582: 1869: 1054:

Im not vandilizing your site ... this is a true article.

2786:

Hi, Joy. I saw that you recently warned 203.144.21.77 on

1376:"Were you User:24.200.47.176 before you logged in?" yes 897:

Thank you for reverting the vandalism of my talk page! --

771:

Thank you for reverting my user page. I appreciate it. --

199: 2529:

it with one click, so I can be a little more efficient.

1575: 184: 112: 576:

There are some states where that can get you arrested.

2420:

http://ensim7.fuitadnet.com/~admin17/foamy/Foamy.html

2036:

How can I put a picture of Mr. Harris on the Article

1670:

thank you for switching it to Fred Jones (educator)!

1429:

happened so that I can be more cautious from now on.

203: 2572:

stay there" message. If I roll back an edit to the

1136:

non-existent article and asking your opinion on it.

1070:

Then why does the article on "Jordan Golson" stand?

1756:doesn't sound very promising, does it? A google on 1016:artcle, scanned it very briefly, then went over to 2105:site, so that simplifies things: SPAM!!! ;-) 1956: 701:Incidentally, do you know who Dr. O'Halloran is? 107:Forgive me for eavesdropping. The sites listed on 2311: 1614:Knowledge:Talk page/Anonymous talk pages proposal 1249: 2168:Have fun with your lack of life, puzzle guzzler 2004:You're more than weclome. Besides, one thing I 1508: 1074:This page should be modified as soon as possible 360:vandalism before I do, especially you. ;-) 1078: 733:Thanks, Joyous (talk) July 3, 2005 04:28 (UTC) 198:I honestly don't have much of an opinion about 1484:http://www.sloan.org/programs/edu_public.shtml 1098:This looks like "wild goose" vandalism to me. 351: 97:http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Online_dating 713: 693: 484: 132:, as well as all of our official policies at 2094:go, they currently are POV, with stuff like 1317:Of course it's housebroken! It is also into 429:Thanks for rolling back to my revert on the 335:Hi Joy! Thanks for the rv on my userpage. 2605:Copyright issue on definition of Caulbearer 2514:You are raising some interesting points. 1302:just wasn't up to par, I'm afraid. :) 908: 664:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Flick Shagwell 60:Coalition casualties in Afghanistan updates 2634:Big List of Potential Copyright Violations 1898:I'll just wait until my IP get's renewed. 2416:BOW DOWN TO YOUR LORD AND MASTER, FOAMY! 2332: 1591:Anonymous talk pages - edits and blanking 42: 2449: 2428: 2399: 2323:forgot to sign this, for some reason.) 2264: 1764:traffic rating for the site whatsoever. 1595:Hi Joy. Regarding your comments at the 1415:Thanks also for restoring my talk page. 1084:What is the problem with that article? 1004: 849:Ditto on the good RC patrol work =). -- 497: 149:Uh, yeah. What that person just said. 1159:I think my definition is more poetic. 1025:and there's always time to fix things. 992:to go around vandalizing users' pages. 875:and also helping you revert the pages. 811: 14: 2466:has instructions, please just use it. 871:Don't worry, I reported the vandal to 631:I could be wrong in the counting, but 208:Knowledge:Village pump (miscellaneous) 2781: 2671: 2024:(unsigned edit by User:67:166.73.202) 778:Thanks for reverting mine as well. -- 600:I thought you liked cats, not hounds. 249:British Columbia and Vancouver Island 2039: 1824:Don't you think the time has come? ( 1607:.) I've drafted a short addition to 1576:OOPS, I DIDNT KNOW I COULDNT DO THAT 1545: 502:I'd appreciate that greatly, Joy. -- 2234:, the links didn't look like spam. 2050:Special:Contributions/169.229.158.2 1961:Hi Joy, thanks for your reverts on 975: 443: 26: 23: 2739: ) 01:38, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 2703: ) 22:16, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 2491: 2405:information. Thanks for the note! 1747: 1627: 1321:, and likes to eat the occational 1278:Image:Yellow-breasted Capuchin.png 889: 785: 258: 242: 134:Category:Knowledge official policy 24: 2803: 2205:reply on Arkuat's other talk page 2160: 1616:, feel free to comment. Cheers, 1471:Fiction / Non-Fiction for "Ebola" 1256:The Knowledge Cutest Monkey Award 1064:No, that is why I created a wiki 833: 2408: 1982: 1868:. My first thought was to make 1758:"Insert Disc Two" "Chris Dunkle" 1679: 1273:Image:PNM MantledHowler Uwho.jpg 1252:File:White-throated Capuchin.jpg 1251: 471: 422: 280: 90: 2757: 2072: 2064: 2058: 2033:Go to www.tulsacouncil.org/tyc 1957:Charles Sobhraj page protection 1423: 915:Pull your head out of your ass. 2770:Thanks for fixing the blanked 2312:greetings you fucking ugly dog 1893: 1723: 1647: 13: 1: 2706: 2681:Did you rev up your keyboard? 2108:Need help reverting? :) 2082: 1856:. I suggest you leave it in. 1779:Nah, it was all very polite: 1662: 1532: 1509:What have i been vandalising? 1079:http://en.wikipedia.org/Water 855: 2794:15:12, August 1, 2005 (UTC) 2778:05:47, August 1, 2005 (UTC) 2765: 2383: 2240:16:34, July 29, 2005 (UTC) 2120:) 17:14, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 1852:Bush baby is a nickname for 1729:Knowledge:Merge/Bible verses 1624:) 15:50, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 819:leave the tunney page alone 548: 247:I'm not too surprised about 7: 2719:01:36, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 2665:20:28, July 31, 2005 (UTC) 2601:05:59, July 31, 2005 (UTC) 2292:03:47, July 30, 2005 (UTC) 2250:16:46, July 29, 2005 (UTC) 2218:04:55, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 2183:I just added merge tags to 2178: 2156:) 17:41, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 2138:cowsman...uh...I mean, func 2078:) 03:32, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 1969:11:36, July 27, 2005 (UTC) 1904:7 July 2005 London bombings 1881:00:30, July 26, 2005 (UTC) 1859: 1847: 1744:15:27, July 21, 2005 (UTC) 1529:19:47, July 18, 2005 (UTC) 1402: 1049: 972:21:44, July 12, 2005 (UTC) 885: 782:15:43, July 11, 2005 (UTC) 766: 401:. ;-) I'm prepared to 352:You're fast on the trigger! 317: 10: 2808: 2751:04:34, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 2686:Nope, not my keyboard, my 2474:04:31, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 2396:05:30, 30 July 2005 (UTC) 2346:22:43, July 29, 2005 (UTC) 2301:04:04, July 30, 2005 (UTC) 2269:MONKEY of personal attacks 2259:16:50, July 29, 2005 (UTC) 2198:06:41, 29 July 2005 (UTC) 1993:18:32, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 1929:03:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC) 1889:13:06, July 27, 2005 (UTC) 1843:01:04, July 24, 2005 (UTC) 1814: 1783:blah, blah, blah. :) 1775:14:54, 23 July 2005 (UTC) 1720:09:04, 21 July 2005 (UTC) 1659:01:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC) 1644:22:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 1557:02:40, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 1504:15:12, July 18, 2005 (UTC) 1439:Looks like Matthew was on 1411:20:55, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 1399:04:10, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 1390: 1387:04:24, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 1357:00:35, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 1313:23:55, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 1300:Image:Proboscis monkey.jpg 1263:Here were the runners-up: 1245: 1239:22:04, July 15, 2005 (UTC) 1223:21:53, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 1166:23:02, July 15, 2005 (UTC) 1120:17:58, July 15, 2005 (UTC) 1091:15:37, July 15, 2005 (UTC) 1033:17:35, 14 July 2005 (UTC) 951:01:59, 12 July 2005 (UTC) 932:16:10, July 11, 2005 (UTC) 798: 714:Hi there. U may not rem me 694:Ms. Stovall's disimpaction 509: 485:Joy, I've got a problem... 2487:04:50, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 2379:04:46, 30 July 2005 (UTC) 2221: 2012:23:30, 27 July 2005 (UTC) 1952:03:02, 28 July 2005 (UTC) 1902:Vandalism in progress at 1810:18:21, 24 July 2005 (UTC) 1794:15:13, 23 July 2005 (UTC) 1700:04:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC) 1569:15:40, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 1466:04:00, 18 July 2005 (UTC) 1419:21:59, 17 July 2005 (UTC) 1336:02:21, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 1293:Image:Red-shankedDouc.JPG 1207: 1193:03:56, 16 July 2005 (UTC) 1140:22:33, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 1102:16:59, 15 July 2005 (UTC) 939: 909:GAY SEX, ANAL, ALL NIGHT 905:July 9, 2005 16:45 (UTC) 545:July 6, 2005 02:49 (UTC) 440:July 3, 2005 20:37 (UTC) 330: 255:30 June 2005 12:55 (UTC) 226:the disambiguation page. 214:June 30, 2005 03:38 (UTC) 153:June 30, 2005 00:06 (UTC) 86:June 29, 2005 01:14 (UTC) 78:29 June 2005 01:06 (UTC) 71:28 June 2005 20:51 (UTC) 56:28 June 2005 16:16 (UTC) 39:01:39, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC) 2351:Yea, I tried, I figured 2278:I have a suspicion that 1935:where I should have gone 1933:So today, I stumbled up 1704: 1360: 1060:chose not to sign this.) 1039: 882:9 July 2005 07:12 (UTC) 864: 860:July 9, 2005 03:43 (UTC) 845:9 July 2005 02:31 (UTC) 808:9 July 2005 00:13 (UTC) 795:8 July 2005 17:52 (UTC) 775:8 July 2005 13:56 (UTC) 760:July 8, 2005 20:30 (UTC) 690:8 July 2005 00:52 (UTC) 673:{{subst:vt}} ambiguous. 657:July 7, 2005 12:05 (UTC) 646:7 July 2005 04:56 (UTC) 628:7 July 2005 02:37 (UTC) 584:Congratulations! :) 506:4 July 2005 03:30 (UTC) 494:4 July 2005 02:30 (UTC) 460:4 July 2005 02:06 (UTC) 371:3 July 2005 05:46 (UTC) 339:3 July 2005 05:10 (UTC) 327:2 July 2005 22:01 (UTC) 314:2 July 2005 22:08 (UTC) 306:2 July 2005 21:57 (UTC) 298:2 July 2005 21:46 (UTC) 290:2 July 2005 21:25 (UTC) 268:2 July 2005 20:29 (UTC) 191:30 June 2005 02:47 (UTC) 177:30 June 2005 00:09 (UTC) 140:29 June 2005 18:58 (UTC) 2620:Regards Denis Mc Gowan 1340: 1283:Image:Vervet monkey.jpg 1067:This isn't nonsense .. 1009:Thanks for your reply! 824:(unsigned edit left by 532: 527: 480:4 July 2005 02:58 (UTC) 468:4 July 2005 02:14 (UTC) 416:3 July 2005 14:57 (UTC) 386:3 July 2005 06:03 (UTC) 347:3 July 2005 05:18 (UTC) 276:2 July 2005 20:52 (UTC) 230:2 July 2005 00:41 (UTC) 2434:and obvious research. 2333:test warning templates 2270: 1972: 1257: 954: 894: 109:Category:Online dating 43:Reason for Corrections 2688:User:Func/monobook.js 2636:where your entry is. 2450:The Squirrel of Wrath 2429:Thanks for the lesson 2400:hey.. adam burkutally 2268: 2185:Chinese constellation 1914:Buck to you! Thanks, 1731:. Please contribute? 1451:), which is a shared 1268:Image:Tamarinface.jpg 1255: 1005:This is overwhelming! 893: 498:re: userpage lockdown 1752:Hi, Joy. Started in 1288:Image:Yakusaru s.jpg 2357:Discontinue warning 1638:Over There (series) 1634:Jimmy "Jax" Pinchak 1609:Knowledge:Talk page 1605:Knowledge:Talk page 1601:Knowledge:User page 1447: • 1216:The Joys of Yiddish 1058:User:151.196.110.72 581:soon-to-be-married 2782:Repeated vandalism 2672:high-speed reverts 2650:Cheers Joy :) 2271: 2170:(unsigned edit by 2046:User:169.229.158.2 1540:User:63.251.54.187 1258: 1056:(For some reason, 1001:Thanks, Decapod73 895: 826:User:212.2.172.137 725:without checking. 707:Who is John Galt? 111:get the following 2788:his/her talk page 2553:three-revert rule 2443:-- Mark Goldfain 2175: 2087:Hi, Joy. :) 2075: 2067: 2040:Vandalism Warning 2025: 1885:Agreed and done. 1826:user:81.86.246.34 1546:fictitious places 1455:used by multiple 1229:Answered on your 859: 101:User:66.176.76.58 2799: 2640:Copyright notice 2588:my contributions 2551:Knowledge has a 2377: 2374: 2371: 2363: 2172:User:24.69.37.37 2169: 2076: 2073: 2068: 2065: 2060: 2023: 1986: 1967:Lawrence Lavigne 1808: 1803: 1792: 1787: 1773: 1768: 1742: 1718:HOWS MY DRIVING) 1345:I blame you for 1334: 1329: 1311: 1306: 1253: 976:Chance encounter 970: 901: 857: 853: 644: 639: 626: 621: 475: 444:Category linking 414: 409: 399:food for thought 384: 379: 369: 364: 175: 170: 115:traffic ratings: 27:Latest vandalism 2807: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2784: 2768: 2760: 2709: 2674: 2657: 2654: 2630:discussion page 2607: 2512: 2494: 2492:Still wondering 2452: 2446: 2444: 2431: 2411: 2402: 2392:Regards, Rich 2386: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2361: 2335: 2314: 2224: 2181: 2163: 2103:membership only 2085: 2042: 2031: 2021: 1975: 1963:Charles Sobhraj 1959: 1907: 1896: 1875:Shay locomotive 1866:Shay locomotive 1862: 1850: 1819: 1806: 1801: 1790: 1785: 1771: 1766: 1750: 1748:Insert Disc Two 1740: 1726: 1707: 1682: 1665: 1650: 1630: 1628:My appreciation 1593: 1588: 1578: 1548: 1535: 1511: 1473: 1436: 1426: 1405: 1393: 1379: 1375: 1363: 1343: 1332: 1327: 1309: 1304: 1248: 1210: 1076: 1052: 1044: 1036: 1007: 978: 968: 957: 942: 936: 911: 899: 888: 869: 836: 817: 801: 788: 786:Columbus Revert 769: 736: 716: 696: 667: 642: 637: 624: 619: 597:a trivia-hound 551: 535: 530: 512: 500: 487: 446: 427: 412: 407: 382: 377: 367: 362: 354: 333: 320: 283: 261: 259:Reverting edits 245: 243:Surprise stamps 173: 168: 120: 93: 62: 45: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2805: 2783: 2780: 2767: 2764: 2759: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2749:70.111.137.225 2741: 2740: 2708: 2705: 2684: 2683: 2673: 2670: 2626: 2625: 2606: 2603: 2569: 2568: 2549: 2548: 2522: 2521: 2510: 2493: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2451: 2448: 2442: 2430: 2427: 2410: 2407: 2401: 2398: 2385: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2353:Polite warning 2334: 2331: 2313: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2228:J.J. Arrington 2223: 2220: 2209: 2208: 2180: 2177: 2162: 2161:Unhappy vandal 2159: 2158: 2157: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2084: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2041: 2038: 2030: 2027: 2020: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 1999: 1998: 1989:Happy editing. 1974: 1971: 1958: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1911:24.224.207.234 1906: 1900: 1895: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1861: 1858: 1854:George W. Bush 1849: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1818: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1796: 1795: 1749: 1746: 1725: 1722: 1706: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1681: 1678: 1664: 1661: 1649: 1646: 1629: 1626: 1618:TenOfAllTrades 1592: 1589: 1586: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1547: 1544: 1534: 1531: 1520: 1519: 1510: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1472: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1457:America Online 1441:152.163.100.70 1434: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1404: 1401: 1392: 1389: 1362: 1359: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1296: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1247: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1093: 1092: 1075: 1072: 1051: 1048: 1043: 1038: 1018:recent changes 1006: 1003: 977: 974: 956: 953: 941: 938: 934: 933: 910: 907: 887: 884: 868: 863: 862: 861: 835: 834:you're welcome 832: 831: 830: 816: 810: 806:Rx StrangeLove 800: 797: 787: 784: 768: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 715: 712: 695: 692: 666: 660: 659: 658: 615: 614: 613: 612: 606: 603: 602: 601: 595: 594: 593: 587: 586: 585: 579: 578: 577: 571: 570: 569: 563: 562: 561: 550: 547: 534: 531: 529: 526: 511: 508: 499: 496: 486: 483: 482: 481: 469: 445: 442: 426: 421: 420: 419: 418: 417: 388: 387: 353: 350: 349: 348: 332: 329: 319: 316: 282: 279: 278: 277: 260: 257: 244: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 216: 215: 193: 192: 179: 178: 159: 158: 157: 156: 155: 154: 142: 141: 138:209.92.136.131 118: 117: 116: 92: 89: 88: 87: 61: 58: 54:Lord Voldemort 44: 41: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2804: 2795: 2793: 2789: 2779: 2777: 2773: 2763: 2750: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2718: 2717:172.166.98.40 2712: 2704: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2689: 2682: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2669: 2666: 2664: 2661: 2655: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2637: 2635: 2631: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2618: 2615: 2610: 2609:Hiya Joyous, 2602: 2600: 2597: 2591: 2589: 2584: 2578: 2575: 2567: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2559: 2554: 2547: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2540: 2536: 2530: 2527: 2520: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2509: 2506: 2502: 2498: 2486: 2482: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2447: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2426: 2422: 2421: 2417: 2414: 2409:Uhh...Yeah... 2406: 2397: 2395: 2390: 2378: 2367: 2364: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2345: 2342: 2330: 2329: 2326: 2322: 2321:User:Gaaraxxx 2317: 2300: 2298: 2294: 2293: 2291: 2289: 2285: 2281: 2280:User:Gaaraxxx 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2267: 2258: 2256: 2252: 2251: 2249: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2239: 2237: 2233: 2232:Aaron Rodgers 2229: 2219: 2217: 2214: 2207: 2206: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2189:lunar mansion 2186: 2176: 2173: 2166: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2136: 2135: 2133: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2106: 2104: 2099: 2097: 2093: 2088: 2077: 2069: 2061: 2059:Semiconscious 2055: 2054: 2053: 2051: 2047: 2037: 2034: 2026: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1992: 1987: 1985: 1980: 1978: 1970: 1968: 1964: 1951: 1950: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1939:Fernando Rizo 1936: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1928: 1927: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1916:Fernando Rizo 1912: 1905: 1899: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1880: 1876: 1871: 1867: 1857: 1855: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1827: 1822: 1817: 1809: 1804: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1788: 1782: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1774: 1769: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1754:in early 2005 1745: 1743: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1721: 1719: 1715: 1712: 1699: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1680:Deleted Links 1677: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1645: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1625: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1585: 1582: 1568: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1556: 1553: 1543: 1541: 1530: 1528: 1525: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1503: 1500: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1480: 1476: 1465: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1432:Much Thanks, 1430: 1418: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1410: 1400: 1398: 1388: 1386: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1370: 1367: 1358: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1335: 1330: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1312: 1307: 1301: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1254: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1165: 1162: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1139: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1119: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1101: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1071: 1068: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1026: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1010: 1002: 999: 997: 993: 989: 987: 983: 973: 971: 965: 962: 952: 950: 947: 937: 931: 928: 924: 919: 918: 917: 916: 906: 904: 902: 892: 883: 881: 878: 874: 867: 858: 852: 848: 847: 846: 844: 841: 829: 827: 822: 821: 820: 815: 809: 807: 796: 794: 783: 781: 776: 774: 759: 756: 752: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 741: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 719: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 691: 689: 686: 681: 677: 674: 671: 665: 656: 653: 649: 648: 647: 645: 640: 634: 629: 627: 622: 610: 609: 607: 605:absent-minded 604: 599: 598: 596: 591: 590: 588: 583: 582: 580: 575: 574: 573:a book-lover 572: 567: 566: 564: 559: 558: 556: 555: 554: 546: 544: 540: 525: 522: 519: 516: 507: 505: 495: 493: 479: 478:Fernando Rizo 474: 470: 467: 466:Fernando Rizo 463: 462: 461: 459: 458:Fernando Rizo 455: 451: 441: 439: 434: 432: 431:Kevin Painter 425: 424:Kevin Painter 415: 410: 404: 400: 396: 392: 391: 390: 389: 385: 380: 374: 373: 372: 370: 365: 359: 346: 342: 341: 340: 338: 328: 326: 315: 313: 307: 305: 299: 297: 291: 289: 281:Dennis Miller 275: 274:Fernando Rizo 271: 270: 269: 267: 266:Fernando Rizo 256: 254: 250: 229: 225: 220: 219: 218: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 196: 195: 194: 190: 186: 181: 180: 176: 171: 165: 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 152: 148: 147: 146: 145: 144: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 122: 121: 114: 110: 106: 105: 104: 102: 98: 91:Online Dating 85: 81: 80: 79: 77: 72: 70: 66: 64:Please check 57: 55: 51: 40: 38: 33: 19: 2785: 2769: 2761: 2725:edit history 2713: 2710: 2685: 2680: 2675: 2667: 2656: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2645: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2627: 2619: 2613: 2611: 2608: 2592: 2579: 2570: 2565: 2550: 2545: 2531: 2523: 2518: 2513: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2455: 2453: 2445: 2439: 2436: 2432: 2423: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2403: 2391: 2387: 2356: 2352: 2337: 2336: 2318: 2315: 2225: 2210: 2202: 2182: 2167: 2164: 2137: 2126: 2107: 2102: 2100: 2095: 2089: 2086: 2043: 2035: 2032: 2022: 2010:Dbraceyrules 2005: 1991:Dbraceyrules 1988: 1981: 1976: 1960: 1948: 1942: 1925: 1919: 1908: 1897: 1863: 1851: 1833: 1823: 1820: 1780: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1751: 1727: 1708: 1686: 1683: 1675: 1672: 1669: 1666: 1651: 1631: 1594: 1583: 1579: 1549: 1536: 1521: 1512: 1491: 1487: 1481: 1477: 1474: 1431: 1427: 1424:Your message 1406: 1394: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1364: 1344: 1297: 1262: 1259: 1214: 1211: 1077: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1055: 1053: 1045: 1035: 1027: 1023: 1011: 1008: 1000: 995: 994: 990: 979: 958: 949:Gabrielsimon 943: 935: 914: 912: 900: BD2412 896: 870: 837: 823: 818: 814:David tunney 802: 789: 777: 770: 742: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 721:Here it is: 720: 717: 709: 706: 703: 700: 697: 682: 678: 675: 672: 668: 630: 616: 608:a snorkeler 552: 536: 523: 520: 517: 513: 504:Chanting Fox 501: 492:Chanting Fox 488: 450:Dennis Muren 447: 435: 428: 402: 398: 394: 357: 355: 334: 321: 308: 300: 292: 284: 262: 246: 94: 73: 63: 49: 46: 37:12.208.100.6 34: 30: 18:User:Joyous! 2776:Sleepnomore 2539:Dick Cheney 2284:User:Xxx123 2213:Eric Forste 2193:Eric Forste 2092:Sex tourism 1894:It's ok.... 1877:after all? 1724:Splurgists! 1684:Hello Joy, 1648:Uh, yeah... 1409:deeceevoice 1397:HappyCamper 1383:Thank you. 1369:Thank you. 1319:house music 982:water bears 880:(Sound Off) 565:an atheist 539:Evil Monkey 200:manhunt.net 76:Copperchair 69:Copperchair 2707:Vandalism? 2614:caulbearer 2083:Sexy Spam? 1695:Antandrus 1663:fred jones 1654:Antandrus 1642:JamesMLane 1587:THANK YOU 1567:Gemini6Ice 1552:Antandrus 1533:Zazzle.com 1453:IP address 1325:. :) 1191:Gemini6Ice 1138:Gemini6Ice 1100:Gemini6Ice 1014:Corn Snake 986:tardigrade 851:Spangineer 840:Antandrus 743:-CHarles. 710:-Kligmond 557:a teacher 521:So sorry. 395:the button 228:Gemini6Ice 189:Gemini6Ice 2394:RJSampson 2384:Thank you 2297:Howabout1 2288:Howabout1 2255:Howabout1 2246:Howabout1 2236:Howabout1 1834:establish 1741:>|< 1673:awesome! 1323:house fly 1298:This guy 1231:talk page 1221:Wahkeenah 1031:Decapod73 969:>|< 877:Zscout370 856:(háblame) 592:Aye, aye. 589:a sailor 549:Congrats! 403:just deal 325:Wahkeenah 312:Wahkeenah 304:Wahkeenah 296:Wahkeenah 288:Wahkeenah 185:Alexa.com 113:Alexa.com 2558:penguins 2511:-- Mark 2481:Bishonen 2468:Bishonen 2179:Mergism? 1860:Re: Shay 1848:Nickname 1711:BMIComp 1449:contribs 1435:Matthew 1417:Hyacinth 1050:unsigned 812:Vfd for 773:Scimitar 318:Question 2766:Thanks! 2758:...-.-" 2735:, 2731:( 2699:, 2695:( 2660:Joyous 2596:Joyous 2574:penguin 2464:Sandbox 2362:∞ 2341:Joyous 2325:Joyous 2253:Great. 1838:Joyous 1816:Cranton 1676:-chris 1524:Joyous 1499:Joyous 1461:Zzyzx11 1355:✎ 1246:Monkey! 1234:Joyous 1219:). d:) 1161:Joyous 1115:Joyous 1086:Joyous 927:Joyous 799:Thanks! 793:Camipco 780:jh51681 755:Joyous 685:Rossami 652:Joyous 541:∴ 510:Liberal 345:JeremyA 337:JeremyA 224:manhunt 204:gay.com 130:WP:NPOV 2772:JAXASS 2663:(talk) 2599:(talk) 2460:Geogre 2373:¿ 2344:(talk) 2328:(talk) 2222:Monkey 2216:(Talk) 2196:(talk) 1887:slambo 1879:slambo 1841:(talk) 1807:(talk) 1791:(talk) 1772:(talk) 1736:adiant 1698:(talk) 1657:(talk) 1555:(talk) 1527:(talk) 1502:(talk) 1464:(Talk) 1403:Thanks 1351:Cyrius 1333:(talk) 1310:(talk) 1237:(talk) 1208:Photos 1164:(talk) 1118:(talk) 1089:(talk) 964:adiant 940:an RFC 930:(talk) 886:Thanks 873:WP:VIP 843:(talk) 767:Thanks 758:(talk) 688:(talk) 655:(talk) 643:(talk) 625:(talk) 438:Mipadi 413:(talk) 383:(talk) 368:(talk) 331:Thanks 212:Joyous 174:(talk) 151:Joyous 126:WP:NOT 84:Joyous 2535:penis 2006:abhor 1909:Joy, 1714:(talk 1705:Subst 1513:hmm? 1391:Music 1372:akhu 1361:Music 1349:. -- 1041:Water 984:into 866:4chan 543:Hello 524:Beth 16:< 2792:Flex 2729:Func 2693:Func 2583:Wiki 2537:and 2526:here 2485:talk 2472:talk 2355:and 2282:and 2230:and 2203:See 2187:and 2146:Func 2110:Func 2074:home 2066:talk 1870:Shay 1802:func 1786:func 1767:func 1622:talk 1597:Pump 1445:talk 1385:Akhu 1347:this 1341:Link 1328:func 1305:func 923:SPUI 751:this 704:and 662:re: 638:func 633:this 620:func 533:Anon 528:oops 454:1946 408:func 378:func 363:func 358:good 253:Stan 202:and 169:func 128:and 2456:one 2366:Who 1973:Wow 1603:or 955:RFC 187:.) 50:HAD 2715:-- 2483:| 2470:| 2152:, 2148:( 2116:, 2112:( 2098:. 2070:· 1828:) 1762:no 1716:, 1542:) 791:-- 136:. 103:) 2737:c 2733:t 2701:c 2697:t 2564:' 2376:? 2370:? 2319:( 2174:) 2154:c 2150:t 2129:. 2118:c 2114:t 2062:( 1949:C 1946:/ 1943:T 1926:C 1923:/ 1920:T 1739:_ 1733:R 1620:( 1443:( 1353:| 967:_ 961:R 828:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index