473:
149:
that might interact in an interesting way with this - USC's system color-codes an article according to the "trustworthiness" of its author as determined by how long that author's edits tend to last... Demi's proposal would change the dynamics of how long an author's edits would tend to stick around,
198:
295:. Originally this is a method designed for warfare to confuse people and force them to mis-react. You can also turn it around and use it to enlighten people, and cause them to react well. I worry that sometimes perhaps I don't quite manage to pull that off.
29:. Technically, I only still do the occasional #editfri. Typically not on Friday. (OTOH, with vim support installed, I may actually edit usefully from time to time, just for old time's sake :-). Now, all new, sometimes anon edits from IPv6.
209:
370:) the correct answer is either 8 000 000 000 (decimal version) or 8 589 934 592 (binary version, "gibibyte"). If you look at the opinions listed on the yahoo page, see if you can answer the following questions ;-)
142:. The name sucks. The description of the idea sucks. But if you manage to read it anyway, the actual described concept rocks. I wonder if I could try this at some point? USC now has implemented
70:
This is stuff that is relevant to wikipedia in some way. Some is by others, some by myself. (page history will show when I have :-P). I don't believe in top posting: Newest links at the end!
97:
194:
18:
134:
117:
131:<- however, the solutions proposed here can at times be illegal. (except if you were backing up most wikipedias, of course. Except en.wikipedia, technically.)
270:
220:"Those who used text-only chat experienced 'drops in trust and happiness' amongst their fellow players; those who used voice chat did not."
351:
188:
79:
415:. Whichever version you use, Knowledge needs to continue to use iterative processes to stay afloat in the 21st century. (see also:
484:
139:
346:
449:
91:
48:
427:
215:
54:
422:
303:
264:
107:
94:. Contrary to what you might expect, Knowledge has lost several functions and abilities over time. Here's a list.
38:
282:
276:
507:
382:
How could the programmers have coded yahoo answers differently, to allow a more accurate answer to emerge? --
336:
128:
395:
43:
443:
317:
Ooh, very pretty, I hope it shows up in mainspace. How many people put that much work into anything? --
501:
51:
also used at wikimania 2011. (only person ever to use a wikipedia Policy/Guideline/Essay for slides )
498:
479:
430:
Scrum, Kanban, Waterfall? Whatever you call your process, it’s broken (this counts for wikis too)
363:
247:
Es ist nicht deine Schuld das die Welt ist wie sie ist, es wär nur deine Schuld wenn sie so bleibt.
222:. This also works in other online communities. Mediation becomes a lot easier with voice available.
111:
102:
59:
504:
170:
330:
495:
298:
178:
387:
322:
307:
314:
491:
150:
so watching the interactions between the two systems would be terrifically amusing. <-
8:
416:
165:
428:
http://blog.recursivity.com/post/487133749/scrum-kanban-waterfall-whatever-you-call-your
341:"The result is that novices can quickly get lost in Knowledge's Kafkaesque bureaucracy."
175:
404:
376:
what do you predict the answer would have been had they done a negotiated consensus?
357:
423:
http://www.freshnetworks.com/blog/2009/05/3-growth-of-a-healthy-online-community/
229:
203:
159:
225:
373:
What would the yahoo answer have been on the basis of simple majority (a vote?)
183:
123:
162:, rereading some of Aaron Swartz's writing. His thoughts are spot on. :-)
465:
446:
How to run an open source community. Applies to open content too, of course.
472:
249:
253:
235:
151:
118:
sv:Användardiskussion:213.101#Konsensus och "consensus decision-making"
23:
Yes, it is ok to edit this page. This is a wiki. So edit it! :-)
437:
433:
412:
288:
258:
444:
http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/open-source-community-simplified/
401:]. Wonderful example of persona behaviour. I must comment sometime!
367:
195:
de:Benutzer:DerHexer/Vier_Tage_in_der_englischsprachigen_Wikipedia
17:
143:
291:, I often try to work quicky, and get inside other people's
455:
238:... wasn't there an entire wiki dedicated to her worship?
210:
User:Badlydrawnjeff/Field_guide_to_proper_speedy_deletion
135:
m:Success stories - how has
Wikimedia changed your life?
285:, Jossi wrote this. <scratches head> Looks cool.
191:. (hey, the text itself was in all caps too :-) )
166:
how to conduct business (or in fact, any conversation)
65:
362:Why rating is not a good idea for an encyclopedia:
279:, I'm going to have to meditate on this... Ommmm!
271:Knowledge:How_to_contribute_to_Wikipedia_guidance
261:, several essays linked from this page are useful
226:What's more important? The Ghost, or the Shell?
124:http://www.multicians.org/thvv/proverbs.html
337:Economist: the battle for wikipedia's soul
73:
460:Resource manual for a living revolution
140:User:Demi/SuperTextPopupHistoryAnnotate
85:
456:http://www.mediawiki.org/Git/Tutorial
452:Edit fridays are already taken? zomg!
450:Knowledge:Ambassadors/Editing_Fridays
333:, a discussion on power structures.
273:, interesting, must watch. :-)
241:ut oh, what will this edit unleash?
13:
379:What did the programmers do RIGHT?
98:User:Gurch/Reports/ArbComElections
66:bookmarks/notes/stuff I've written
14:
518:
471:
265:User:Dragons flight/Log analysis
179:(direct link to original source)
16:
411:, is a business version of the
466:Knowledge policy in a nutshell
364:"How many bits in a gigabyte?"
325:) 13:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
283:Knowledge:Levels of competence
277:Knowledge:The_Zen_of_Wikipedia
212:Hmmm... <scratches head>
116:Discussion I'd like to watch:
1:
508:wikimedia:nl:User:Kim Bruning
502:wikibooks:ru:User:Kim Bruning
216:effect of voice chat on games
228:(or, what we can learn from
7:
390:) 10:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
354:(list of unpatrolled pages)
10:
523:
505:testwiki:User:Kim Bruning
496:wikinews:User:Kim Bruning
327:Awwww, where did that go?
299:meatball:FightingIsBoring
80:/All About Jewish Theatre
499:commons:User:Kim Bruning
308:meatball:HealthyConflict
32:
485:/messedrocker questions
74:Articles I'm working on
347:/Replace RFA (Take II)
310:<- et tu, Meatball?
189:WARNING ABOUT DELETION
331:"Why we banned legos"
92:/Lost functionalities
49:/Lost functionalities
315:User:Zenwhat/Sandbox
86:Diverse random stuff
417:Knowledge:Consensus
407:also known as the '
129:The digital ice age
55:/Tilburg University
492:m:User:Kim Bruning
199:Google Translation
176:Track II diplomacy
160:who runs wikipedia
436:better word than
405:Plan-Do-Check-Act
267:, yay statistics!
243:
514:
475:
358:Banality_of_Evil
304:fighting is good
239:
154:writing ;-)
108:/Refactoring RFA
20:
522:
521:
517:
516:
515:
513:
512:
511:
490:
463:
230:Masamune Shirow
88:
76:
68:
35:
12:
11:
5:
520:
488:
487:
482:
462:
461:
458:
453:
447:
441:
431:
425:
420:
402:
398:
393:
392:
391:
380:
377:
374:
360:
355:
349:
344:
334:
328:
311:
301:
296:
293:decision cycle
286:
280:
274:
268:
262:
256:
244:
233:
223:
213:
207:
201:
192:
186:
184:Knowledge:Song
181:
173:
168:
163:
157:
156:
155:
137:
132:
126:
121:
114:
105:
100:
95:
87:
84:
83:
82:
75:
72:
67:
64:
63:
62:
57:
52:
46:
41:
34:
31:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
519:
510:
509:
506:
503:
500:
497:
493:
486:
483:
481:
478:
477:
476:
474:
469:
467:
459:
457:
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
435:
432:
429:
426:
424:
421:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
400:
399:
397:
394:
389:
385:
381:
378:
375:
372:
371:
369:
365:
361:
359:
356:
353:
350:
348:
345:
342:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
305:
302:
300:
297:
294:
290:
287:
284:
281:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
255:
251:
248:
245:
242:
237:
234:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
214:
211:
208:
205:
202:
200:
196:
193:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
161:
158:
153:
148:
147:
145:
141:
138:
136:
133:
130:
127:
125:
122:
119:
115:
113:
109:
106:
104:
101:
99:
96:
93:
90:
89:
81:
78:
77:
71:
61:
58:
56:
53:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
39:Wikimania2010
37:
36:
30:
28:
24:
21:
19:
489:
470:
464:
409:Deming cycle
408:
383:
340:
318:
313:
292:
250:Deine Schuld
246:
240:
219:
69:
26:
25:
22:
15:
396:/servertime
384:Kim Bruning
319:Kim Bruning
236:User:SOPHIA
232: :-) )
44:/flossk2010
438:flash mob
434:Smart mob
413:OODA loop
289:OODA_Loop
259:OODA_Loop
254:Die Ă„rzte
144:something
480:/sandbox
368:Gigabyte
366:. (See:
204:WP:HAIKU
112:/rfatest
103:/sandpit
60:/sfk2012
352:PATROL!
171:/OmegaT
27:Status:
110:, and
306:!?!?
152:mel's
33:Talks
388:talk
323:talk
206:heh!
146:...
252:--
494:,
468::
339::
218:-
197:.
440:.
419:)
386:(
343:.
321:(
120:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
