User talk:Badagnani/Archive 17

1158:(and, in some cases, at some length). Is the reason you keep reiterating your belief that I have not answered them due simply to the fact that you do not like my answers, or philosophy of editing Knowledge? You are perfectly free to disagree with me, but to say that I have not answered your questions is simply not correct, so please don't continue with it. I received your message which was obviously written and submitted with great care, but the failure to stop the hounding, combined with the fact that what you wrote disregarded the clear bad faith represented by several of the editors, led me to believe such a path is not viable. My original request, which is simply that large removals be discussed prior to implementing when requested to do so by long-time editors, was eminently reasonable, and should be upheld. In fact, such a policy means that edit wars won't ever happen, because consensus eventually does emerge through such careful, collegial discussion. There is no hurry at Knowledge; discussion does take time, and should be engaged in. If admins would uphold this fundamental aspect of our project rather than advising editors to simply ignore poor behavior, using "Discussion" always and only after large deletions have been made, it would solve nearly all such problems. 890:

or right, he is being hounded by at least three editors from the RFC, all of whom hold serious grudges against Badagnani from past and recent disputes. When I pointed this out to them, they tried to follow my contributions as well, proving my point. This is like dealing with a wild pack of juvenile wolves, and I'm surprised that Knowledge tolerates this egregious behavior from any editor. Obviously, Badagnani has eroded some of his good faith due to his inability to deal with problems he has both created and contributed to in the past, but no matter the blame, a community is judged by how it treats its accused, and those who have little defense. My guess is that the editors (all of whom happen to be non-admins) doing this to Badagnani have the ok from several administrators. Basically it makes Knowledge look pretty bad when the so-called authorities condone this kind of bad behavior. The RFC should be deleted and the editors admonished. And Badagnani needs to have a mentor so he doesn't keep getting into these types of situations.

3817:

with anyone who has been following this page what I plan to edit. I am not looking to ruin anyone else's work or create a poorly cited diatribe of my thoughts. But, I think there are factual inaccuracies and a general lack of citations for several points. For instance, the page starts off with an uncited statement that he has been close with al-Qaeda since their beginning and has run a popular al-Qaeda training camp. This actually is incorrect. He was at odds with al-Qaeda until 9/11, and the Khalden Camp was not affiliated with al-Qaeda. It was actually shut down by the Taliban at al-Qaeda's request. My rewrite is extensively cited to news articles (from legitimate news organizations), books, CSRT and other government documents, and other sources. In some places I cite six or more sources for a given point. I have been working on compiling information about him for school and was hoping to update his page accordingly. Please e-mail me directly through my wikipedia ID if you have any questions or comments.

112:

2595:

have very often collaborated with editors, particularly on Asian cuisine articles, with several of us building on one another's edits, working together to produce the best possible articles. Yes, in this case it is "that bad." Regarding Korean nationalism, you need to examine the history of the page in question to see it in action (always in an attempt to remove text about dog meat). The Administrator's Noticeboard contains a section about Greek nationalists at this very moment, yet I did not see that the admin you refer to has admonished any of the editors making reference to this. I suppose it's the same double standard that makes requests for thoughtful, considered discussion by a long-time, productive, and sincere editor a blocking offense, while Wikistalking, hyperaggressive discussion page postings, and massive blanking without prior discussion (even when asked for such discussion numerous times) are consistently overlooked.

2047:"Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. Proper use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing errors or violations of Knowledge policy or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended both for Recent changes patrol and WikiProject Spam. The contribution logs can be used in the dispute resolution process to gather evidence to be presented in requests for comment, mediation, WP:ANI, and arbitration cases. The important component of wiki-hounding is disruption to another user's own enjoyment of editing, or to the project generally, for no overriding reason. If "following another user around" is accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, it may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions." From 2913:

could provide some opinions really worthwhile. So, would it be possible for you to take some time off and give an online interview via E-mail or online messenger? It would provide my project a lively voice of an actual editor, and this will be of a great meaning; your experience, concerns, opinions and ideas would add a lot to my project. Actually I'm in real need of something concrete; for my project is about the mechanism a biased version of explanation is settled, and as you will probably guess, understanding such things involves a lot more than just watching explicit process. Again, I would really, really appreciate your help. It will not take that long; in fact everything will depend completely upon your will. If you are willing to give some help, would you mind mailing me within April? Thanks a lot.

2501:

corrected. This is usually the case when collaborating with editors more knowledgeable than I on a given subject. Antagonistic messages left at my Discussion page, often made by aggressive editors attempting to enforce their own mistaken readings of our guidelines, are responded to as I see fit (in many cases to remove them entirely, if their language is overly vitriolic). The same question can and should be asked of the editors currently stalking me (for over 30 days straight, always in an effort to undo or delete my contributions, often on an incessant and repeated basis). In fact, the admin asking you the question about me has been unwilling, although he has been asked many times, to even request that the stalkers cease this behavior (which is against our WP policy

6491:. Leaving the former category with only two surnames undermines the credibility of our encyclopedia and ruined navigation for our users, for weeks, because the editor insisting on the recategorization could not be bothered to fix it for our users. As this is all clearly stated in earlier discussion, I assume you did not bother to read it before commenting on my discussion page (please do so), or that you are one of those WP editors who do not care about keeping our encyclopedia credible and useful for our users. Whatever the case, you are not welcome to post here again after your last, highly threatening message. 1253:

worst of my tenure here), a policy issue, while interceding strongly on a guideline issue (the removal of external links) also left me feeling that it would be difficult for me to evaluate your proposal. If it were my decision to accept your proposal or not, and I were not being pressured, your strongly ascerbic language above would not have been used. Finally, I take the strongest offense to the statement that "I have given nothing" to Knowledge. I am one of the 20 most productive editors, with over one thousand articles begun, and I always edit with our users foremost in our mind, in expanding our encyclopedia.

7534:, allowing our millions of users around the world to deal, for weeks, with broken categories. This situation is in. This situation is wrong and must be rectified immediately, lest our encyclopedia's credibility be undermined. Our users must be foremost in our minds with every edit we make, with enormous category deletions being of particular concern. In this case, the justification is "it's not a big deal, others will get to it later." The onus really is, in this case, on the editors who insisted on the destruction of the former categorization system. Add to this the element of 1189:

discussing after huge removals are made rather than before. It really is best if huge removals are discussed with care at "Discussion" prior to being made. Your point seems to be that if one "rises above" edit wars by refusing to revert huge removals, instead canvassing to get more editors to ask for the restoration of such content at "Discussion," one can avoid hounding. What happens in such cases, through the enabling of such aggressive and insistent deleting behavior, is that huge deletions are made, and stand, frequently impoverishing our articles' content.

1085:, I couldn't find one. I'm going to look for Banh bot loc (3), green rice noodles (5) Xoi ga (11) Xoi gac (13). They probably already exist, but this is a nice source to add. Anyway, thanks for your help. I think I looked at the galrand chrysanthemum but the leaves near the flowers looked so different. But looking again and checking some sources, I think that is correct. The leaves do look similar to chysanthemum leaves. Anyway. Thanks for your help. I like Vietnamese food a lot. Everyone likes Thai, but I would like to move to Vietnam now. :) 4812:) the fruit, which receives 4.7 times higher traffic than "biwa," the musical instrument, even though people who are searching for "biwa" will automatically be counted as traffic for the musical instrument because of its placement. Also, the traffic for Lake Biwa is not insignificant in comparison. I think presenting a disambiguation would be more friendlier. As such, I think having Biwa redirect to Biwa (musical instrument) for the time being, as a preliminary step prior to potentially making a switch to disambiguation first, meaningful. — 1966: 3822:

the result of a year long research project compiling more than 250 sources. If there was something in particular that you feel should be added, please do so. Otherwise, I would like to ask that you don't revert this page back to the more poorly cited version it was before. What I have written is more accurate based on news accounts, government documents, books, and other sources. If you have any questions please let me know. I will check your talk page frequently in the coming days and look forward to discussing this with you.

117:

2187:

to Wiktionary about the characters in question, right? I'm sure few people would bother to follow these links nor would they receive any proper definition of the term with such linking practices. Some terms (especially Chinese dishes) have no meaning in Chinese, so it would make absolutely no sense to link to them, especially when you know so little about the language. Link sparingly. A few Wiktionary links in the correct context is fine, but not this ludicrous edit-war cycle to insert space-taking and useless links.

3615:

feel free to contact me with your thoughts. Note: It does not matter who is right or wrong, the community does not support edit warring. While I think the community picks and chooses who to block in such cases (and I think they protect some editors from ever being blocked for this behavior when they should have been blocked a long time ago for repeatedly edit warring) your behavior is under very close scrutiny right now. I'm not sure why you are testing the administration, but I can tell you that there are some

3547: 38: 1717:

dedicated and sincere editors (implying that you are my mother, of all things), please don't post here again. Our admins need to be even-handed and uphold our project's fundamental ethos and policies. You seem unwilling to do so, so don't seem worthy of such a title. Further, we don't all agree that BRD is a valuable policy in all cases, especially when specifically requested by a long-time editor to utilize discussion before making huge removals from an article.

7554:

Categories are useful for going between related (and sometimes unrelated) articles and for maintenance purposes, but few people use them except those fairly familiar with Knowledge. Which means, generally, that editors use categories, and not casual readers. So, the deletion of a large section of categories might be inconvenient for us, yes, but probably won't impact the readers very much. I do not say this to justify actions, but rather to assure you that

4968: 5728: 5569: 3663: 5510: 4444: 4058: 3235: 1115:

content, or working in the collaborative manner described above, but just enjoy removing such, and don't really like discussing, even when asked. Those editors seem to have found one another over the past few weeks. I suppose, from your failure to do anything at all to stop their persistent hounding (a policy issue, not a guideline issue as the removal of the external links), you're one of these.

2144:

another warning, and it's not going to help your reputation on Knowledge. Additionally, I suggest you please stop this random Wiktionary linking; it only takes up extra space here and won't help a reader understand the term in any way. It's like trying to speak English by reading individual words from a Chinese/English dictionary. You end up with fragmented syllables that make no sense.

3092:. The page you link is the one I translated. It's not any worse than having a page for Texas and having tons of little towns called Texarkana, Heart of Texas, Texas Hills, the River Texas, Texas State University, etc. It does give some impetus to making the shire page the main Aliste page though, and letting the table of municipalities on that page help with the disambig. 5151:

American' articles. Further, he refuses to accept citations that a person's parents or grandparents are 'fooian American' as prima facie evidence that the person him/herself is 'fooian American' and demands explicit references for the person. I know of no such WP rules as he demands, but I more often work on categories than articles and their reference citations. Thanks

4028:, there will be a time when other editors simply revert all of your edits, oppose your ideas or ,in the worst circumstance, request ARBCOM to stop you from editing Knowledge. Mr. B, please try another way to work in Knowledge because the current one is not good at all and only bring you and other editors tetchiness. And I, personally, would be very sad if you got banned. 2656:

a long-time, productive, and sincere editor. The stalking (the worst I have ever experienced) is easily available in the edit histories of the editors engaging in it. If our admins really do live up to the position and tools with which they have been entrusted, they will do everything in their power to ensure that our project lives up to its founders' ideals and ethos.

1004: 3948:. I might see if I can do the same into Spanish and maybe Portuguese, though I lack some of the technical musical vocab. Worst/worst I translate as I can and let a native copyedit it. What's the Knowledge word for someone who throws up a rough article and a bunch of tags just to get the content out there, as opposed to sandboxing it for months until it looks nice? 3893:? I'm looking at the edits you've made since you've returned from your break, and the path you are choosing to go down has a dead end. If you want to be blocked again, please ignore what I'm saying, but if you want to actually get results, try to follow the steps outlined in the link above. If you need my help to make this happen, don't hesitate to ask. 1566:

content-creation often do have a fundamentalist reading of our guidelines, which, as written, are eminently reasonable. As I also stated, our project is not a war or posse-based one, it is one based on collaborating to create the best and most encyclopedic articles possible for our users, who must be foremost in our minds with each and every edit we make.

6869:

page right off the bat stating that they will block, they will ban, they will retaliate, they will attack, etc., such messages are indeed threatening in nature and not exhibiting the proper decorum necessary to preserve a collegial, collaborative environment to which we should aspire. As such I am entitled to remove such comments as I see fit.

5664: 5284:. It was pretty hideous for organisation and had about zero history, so I added a tiny bit of history from GoogleBooks just to cut off any "it's an ancient instrument dating back thousands of years in the Scottish Clans" sort of Sir Walter R. Scott romantic nationalist nonsense. If you have any input that'd be appreciated. 5436:"Gao" is uncooked rice, while "com" is cooked rice. I've never heard of it before, but it's conceivable that it exists. On the other hand, if it's a translation from a foreign term, the translator might not be aware that there are many different terms for rice and just chose the first word they found. 3200:(Correct format should be WP Indonesia) Solo is in central java - apologies re my comments - it was probably a small format error on my part and not yours - sometimes when viewing some changes it is possible to think the previous editor caused the problem when it is ones own problem. sorry about that 3116:

Actually I'm doing a group researching. So the members also posted letters on the other's user talk. First we wanna know how the contents are settled, and why there are certain pattern or tendency on the history. We selected NoGun-ri Massacre as the typical controversial issue. If you are willing to

2186:

Though there is no specific guideline that explictly disallows what you are doing, what you can infer from the community and various guidelines is pretty clear that such random linking is discouraged. After all, if this type of linking was correct then every foreign subject should have numerous links

1612:

A reasonable person accepts that when more and more people disagree with them, then they might actually be wrong. Where is your reasonable side? Where is the side of you that even cares what other people think? Have you even looked for others who agree with your very singular reading of our policies?

1204:

Well, you had your chance. You blew it. If I feel spat upon, then I'll say so. You offended me. Where is my apology? You were too proud to accept help, and now you complain. I'm not sorry for you. I offered to be your friend; you decided you'd rather be an enemy. I'd rather be your friend; I continue

931:

Do you think that you get to make whatever you want, without having to use reasons to convince other people that your edits are good? If people don't agree to use your links, then we don't use them. You have to either go along with consensus, or do what it takes to change consensus. Yelling at people

581:

may be Tan O (with all sorts of accents). Does that ring a bell? Also, is Can Tau (celery) different from our celery or same thing. I haven't looked yet to see what's on Knowledge for that one yet... I also have a photo of Hung lui, so I have to see what's there for that. Sorry, too many things going

7588:

to impose categories such as "Russian-language surnames" (a term not to be found in the literature), while "Russian surnames" is a well-understood topic documented thoroughly in dozens if not hundreds of reputable print sources. Destroying a system of categorization without undoing the damage caused

7238:

I feel as though the two of you are talking past each other a little bit. Badabnani, please understand that even if you consider such statements threatening, most of the community does not. Would it not be just as easy to simply leave the word "threat" out of the edit summaries when you remove the

5150:

You might want to look at all the 'fooian American' articles that Bulldog123 has been editing in the last few days and see if you can make any sense out of them. From what I can see, he refuses to accept the underlying bio article reference and wants references inserted for each image in the 'fooian

4738:

the instrument gets twice as many hits as the lake, and ten times as many as the trout; the fruit is named after the instrument, and it is not an common English name for the fruit. Secondly, all of the first few google results are concerning the instrument. Thirdly, the lake is usually prefixed with

3821:

I waited five days until I changed the page. I felt that this was a substantial enough time to allow people to share with me their questions or comments. As you can see from what I have changed I removed mostly uncited or poorly cited material and replaced it with heavily cited material. The page is

3614:

to be blocked for an extended period of time, I'm sure someone can fulfill that request. Otherwise, I suggest confining yourself to 1RR from here on out. Any deviation from that course could result in serious ramifications. I'm telling you this as a favor, and I do not mean any disrespect. Please

2813:

You still haven't said why you don't get another admin to help you. If I'm so bad, then why complain about me when you can easily get someone better to help you? Why haven't you found someone else? Am I the only admin willing to take your side? And you reject my conditions? Do you really want help?

2670:

The only 3 tools that admins have, that we don't, are: 1) protect/unprotect pages, 2) delete/undelete pages, 3) block/unblock users. They have no way of quickly sifting through hundreds and hundreds of edit diffs. Hence, you have to do the work of finding the evidence. If you don't, nobody else will

2655:

Thank you for your thoughts. It's so interesting that some issues are so easy for admins to see and comment on, and attract such great interest for them, while others they have such difficulty noting, even when regarding a serious policy issue, and when asked numerous times for assistance with, from

1973:

B, have you heard of this? It's also called "sweet rice waffler" on the package. I just ate them, and they were three rice and bean sweets: read bean, yellow, and (maybe) white, inside waffle with coconut. Something purple maybe too I foget now. I'm full and sleepy... I can't find anything about

1660:

The same pattern: the stalker (a policy issue, the worst stalker I have ever experienced in my tenure at WP) is not said a word to regarding 1) stalking, 2) reversion, or 3) highly aggressive edit summaries and discussion page postings, the most over-the-top I have ever experienced at WP. Our admins

1397:

Copa de Oro is different in two very important ways: (1) We do not have an independently sourced article about it. A link to a commercial site will not help us develop an independently sourced article about it, because no such page is independent of those selling it. (2) The link you wish to include

819:

I don't know what you mean about the history tab. No information there makes it clear why the links in question enjoy consensus support, so what do you want me to find there? All I see is Badagnani adding links, but nothing about how we know they enjoy consensus support. Nobody seems to be able - or

804:

Is the history tab at the top of your page broken? Have you tried using the "contributions" history? If you need guidance on how these functions work please let me know. It appears to me based on your sarcasm and attitude, as well as the bad advice you've offered, that you are part of the problem

562:

Cool. Thanks for the info. I kind of wanted to try it although it wasn't cheap, but I got the sense from teh store owner that he didn't want me to buy it so his Vietnamese customers could have it as part of their holiday celebration. Fun stuff. I was back last weekend and got some good stuff. I

116:

7480:

The editors who damaged the surname navigation demonstrate the ability to undo such damage by repopulating categories in a selective manner, either by using AWB, bots of their own, or by seeking the assistance of bot operators. As I have observed over a period of several years, the admins insisting

6350:

I honestly have no clue what you're trying to do. I come back after a quiet wikibreak, and notice you change back to a revision with numerous grammatical errors and a POV statement (fleeing the victorious communists, ???). I also notice that you've been the subject of a recent block (again). Unlike

5821:

Working on Knowledge requires communication between editors. Your user talk page is the primary forum for communicating with you. If you have a problem with communications on your user talk page, it is best to let make it clear specifically what within the communication is problematic and how one

4670:

photos. But I got in trouble with the store owner. Usually I'm there on the weekend so he isn't there. It was pretty classic. But I think we worked it all out in the end. Have you ever had green cake (Banh Da Leu +accent marks)? The photos would be better if I bought the stuff and unwrapped it, but

4115:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page

2912:

I am a student in Seoul National University in Korea doing a research project on Knowledge. I am very impressed about your insight especially on NoGun-ri Massacre pages. Reading your page, I see you are truly concerned about a variety of issues, and I appreciate your contributions. So I thought you

1805:

discussion of individual links and their value, at the pages in question. We must be reasonable in everything we do, and asking that editors evaluate each link with care، thoroughness, and deliberateness (as stated earlier, I only add the best available links as references) is eminently reasonable.

1716:

If you are willing to intervene on guideline issues but not on policy issues (the worst stalking I have ever experienced in many years at this project, as one of the most productive of this encyclopedia's content creators), but quite willing to use abusive language against one of our project's most

1301:

So, you've been arguing that the links should only be taken out with careful discussion. Are you willing to have that discussion on the talk page, or will you refuse to discuss the links on a case-by-case basis until your edit is reinstated? A short answer will suffice. I will happily discuss those

1252:

I do thank you for the very good things you have done and do not consider you an enemy. You did say, at the outset, that you hoped I would be gone from Knowledge, which chilled my blood then, and I believe you said it again a day or two ago. That, combined with the failure to stop the hounding (the

1226:

1157:

Please remember, moderate your tone. You are an admin, with a great deal of patience (as you said), and such a tone does not assist in making matters better. Regarding your insinuation that I have not answered your questions; to the contrary, I have answered each one with great care and seriousness

1114:

Because our project is about working together, not against one another. It's not a battle, it's a teamwork effort. I love working that way, and did, usually, until recently. One builds on the efforts and knowledge of the other. The thing is that some editors don't like to contribute new articles or

915:

At the same time, Badagnani has been responding to it badly. I'm trying to coach him to learn a less combative approach, but he's showing a lot of resistance to working with me. I think he really wants me to yell at someone, but that really isn't how I work. I can only teach him to empower himself,

889:

like, but there really isn't a clear consensus for removal, just several editors coming over from the RFC edit warring about it, so it is really 3-3 to remove, and with no clear consensus to remove the image should stay. But more importantly, regardless of Badagnani's arguments, whether he's wrong

6868:

Thank you for your opinions. I am a long-time editor who edits always with a mind to enhancing our encyclopedia for our users. Some editors don't seem to share this view but edit more with a mind toward being "enforcers," and, as such edit in a highly aggressive manner. When they show up at a talk

6819:

Hi. I'd like to implore, beg, beseech, and request, that you not use the words "highly threatening" or "threats". You seem to mean something different with the words, from the way everyone else intuits them, which is not helping understanding to come about. The general implication of the phrase to

5912:

is necessary. But you should not do what you did here, which you did twice. (I've no illusions that you will refrain from probably removing this edit as one that you deem to be "threatening", as you have done in the past, but I, like most editors, do like to try to engage with you rather than just

5244:

Is there another editor who understands Vietnamese that we can get to weigh in on the disputed edits on this page? I have confidence in your edits, of course :), but I think a third opinion with expertise would be helpful in ending the reverts. I hope all is well with you and you're enjoying your

4796:

I think your traffic analysis is not comprehensive, because you are biased in favor of your higher traffic argument. Even if the musical instrument received higher traffic, it doesn't make it a primary definition. Biwa should default to disambiguation first, then by argument the musical instrument

3825:

I also posted this above message to your talk page on May 4, but inadvertently posted it to the beginning of this page. Another wikipedia user told me that you might not realize I had posted on here since new messages show up at the bottom, not the top. Sorry for any inconvenience this has caused.

3063:

Yep, been mining es:WP a bunch this morning and this evening, with some minor forays into pt:WP ca:WP and as:WP. I can read Spanish and Portuguse well enough to translate about 95%, and can read most other Iberian languages well enough to hit 90%, though I have to use Google to get a few clues at

2765:

I'll help you, if you let me, but I'll do it my way. If you don't want that, then you don't want my help. However, it's not fair for you to complain that I won't enforce policy when I'm standing here offering to enforce it. All you have to do to get me to help you is agree to my conditions. I will

2719:

Since I untintentionally offended you, and I'm willing to apologize, do you think it's fair that you should apologize too, for unintentionally offending me to the bone? You insulted me so deeply that I find it difficult to type any response to you. I assume you didn't mean this. Are you willing to

2527:

so that it doesnt sound like real-world stalking) isn't that bad. The way they were doing it is rude, and annoying, but it isn't forbidden for them to edit the same articles you do. Very bad etiquette, especially by one or two of them, but not forbidden. I'd strongly recommend you cease mentioning

2480:

I was wondering if you could find a few examples in your archives, of someone giving you criticism, and you replying politely. GT has bet me $ 10 that there aren't any, but I don't have time to learn your entire contributing history here! (please visualize the grin on my face as I ask this, but do

1439:

It would be a mistake to refer to thoughtful and careful discussion as "arguing." Different long-time editors have different viewpoints regarding the purpose of Knowledge; some contribute and write articles while others seek to delete from them. Our users must be foremost in our mind, and our job,

1344:

This selection would be contingent on the editor wishing to remove a given link (I didn't wish to remove any of them, so didn't have a pressing need to discuss each one prior to the huge removal; I had scoured the Web to find them in the first place, and used the best one available for each). Once

221:

Substantial changes are often made to individual articles without much or any comment (such as reversion of vandalism or improvement of grammar), but when other long-time editors, in particular instances, request that deliberate and careful discussion be engaged in, engaging in such deliberate and

7161:

I've been trying to defend you for months now, in various discussions, and I'd like to continue doing so (or even to no longer have to), because I think you are a valuable content editor. But if you insist on using words in a way that you (now?) know are being badly interpreted every single time,

6756:

Admins are bound by our project's rules just as non-admins are. Closing an active discussion one day after it had been opened, on a category that had consistently been voted on as "keep," despite continued disruption over a period of years to our categories related to Jewish-related subjects (see

6635:

3816:

Hello, I have been researching Abu Zubaydah for quite some time and have compiled a mass of information which conflicts with several portions of his wikipedia page. I have rewritten the wikipedia page in Microsoft Word and was hoping to effectuate a major edit. Before I did so I wanted to discuss

2739:

I have ever experienced during my years working to make WP the best encyclopedia in the world. Did you somehow not understand that request? The stalking has been worse today than over the past 40 straight days. Further, the terrible profanity and cursing you subjected me to in a private email was

2594:

is a policy, and our admins do need to make sure it doesn't occur. The current 30+ days of stalking (with the stalking editors always undoing or removing my contributions at any and all pages I edit) is quite different from "editors editing the same pages"; from my very first edits at Knowledge I

1876:

You and I seem to disagree on how to read our guidelines, specifically regarding independent sourcing, and what to do when no independent sources are available. If two reasonable people disagree, and cannot come to accord, then surely the reasonable thing is to ask the question in a larger forum.

1394:

Yes, we are talking about the Copa de Oro link now, and I do appreciate that. I believe I have responded to you, with the main content being this: Pepsi is a notable product about which we have an independently sourced article. The best sources available are independent of the company, and we use

1377:

It is a "yes," as you can clearly read above. I do wish to discuss any of the references a given editor wishes to remove from the article, with care and thoroughness, in a collegial manner. In fact, in response to your request, I presented and thoroughly explained, through many paragraphs, a link

771:

I respectfully disagree with this advice. If someone is stalking you please get an impartial admin to intervene. There are clear policies on stalking that need to be respected. Baiting and disruption are an unfortunate part of editing on Knowledge, and those who engage in these actions should be

111:

7495:

I'm aware of the situation, and I agree that renaming the categories would have been a better choice, to avoid pushing work onto others. But you are asking the same, that others do work you don't wish to. Given time, this will all work out just fine. If you feel strongly about it, I believe a

7327:

Can you be more clear as to why you feel hurt, and be more specific as to what it is you wish to know from me? I do appreciate that you did not issue severe threats to block, ban, etc., which were the essence of the several comments I had earlier removed, and which it should be clear now are not

6529:

Please stop referring to comments by other people as 'threatening'. Nobody is threatening you with anything. People are asking you politely to stop behaving in certain ways. There is no threat. Please stop accusing other editors of threatening you. This is not a threat in any way. It is a polite

2120:

Editor Bulldog has once again removed loads of images without consensus such as those on French-Americans, Dutch-Americans, etc. I have replaced the images he has deleted, but it's a time-consuming process. I have sent him a message on his talk page asking him to stop with his unconstructive and

1188:

This is very offensive and I ask that you strike the above comment. As I said above, I believe your words to me were offered with great sincerity. However, your failure to stop the wikihounding led me to believe that should I follow your plan, I would again be left hounded, in perpetuity, always

1000:

Hi there, I noticed your interest in the improvement and development on wikipedia's articles based around alcoholic beverages, spirits and liqueurs. Perhaps you would consider signing yourself up as a member of Wikiproject Spirits? Joining a wikiproject is as simple as going to the project page,

786:

Impartial admin? Cool, go get one. I'm trying to help Badagnani, but he won't provide me with the information I need to do it. How can I make a rational, well-informed decision in a Wikihounding case if the editor appealing to me won't give me details about the edits involved? How can I say that

368:

Thank you for this. Going along with this, kindly do me the courtesy of undoing the edits of mine you followed me around to nearly a dozen articles reverting, and pledge to, in the future, discuss large deletions with care, seriousness, and collegiality prior to implementing such deletions, when

6953:

Threats or actions which deliberately expose other Knowledge editors to political, religious or other persecution by government, their employer or any others. Violations of this sort may result in a block for an extended period of time, which may be applied immediately by any administrator upon

2790:

people involved in the dispute to improve their methods of interaction, which I applaud. Please, please, take him at his word, forgive him any past mistakes/misunderstandings, apologize for any of your own, and, most difficult of all, recognize that some of your own habits need to be changed or

2143:

What is the basis for reverting all of my edits to pages that you contribute to? I don't know if you have some kind of grudge against me because you disagreed with my past edits, but it is especially inappropriate that you deal with it in such a snide and inappropriate manner. This can earn you

1804:

I'm very familiar, as a long-time WP editor, with which links we try to use according to our guidelines, and which we try not to use. This repeated assertion of your personal reading of the guidelines comes across very much as a lecture, and one which is not place in proper context, privileging

1591:

Our community's consensus is that we work to create the most thorough, encyclopedic, and best-sourced articles on given subjects. That is all I have ever done, and it is an admirable goal. Those who primarily wish to delete and remove content have their own philosophy, and that is normal in any

1565:

The asking of questions three or more times is becoming a bit bothersome. I had responded to you, in response to this same question, that the subjects I edit articles on often don't have many other interested editors. The ones who are attracted by the policy issues rather than content-adding or

3493:

soon. Honestly, most Iberian pipes are a much of a muchness in constrcution, but do represent distinct cultural and historical movements over time, so personally I'm not seeing a problem with a bunch of Iberian articles (ditto France) so long as there's either a difference in the construction

7079:

But, at Knowledge, the word "threat" has a more restricted/refined/exact usage. Similarly, the way "Consensus" and "Notability" and "Block" have a more exact Knowledge-usage than their plain dictionary-definition, and "Block" means something completely different from "Ban". If someone were to

1661:

do have a duty to, even-handedly, preserve order at our project. I see now, clearly, how things work with some admins. I suppose we all have our human frailties, and it does seem that you are yourself afraid of that editor, and this is why you have left no message for him. I do not blame you!

1312:

Of course I'm always interested to discuss articles I am interested in thoroughly. I would not have asked for such discussion, so many times, if I were not interested or committed to engaging in it. Keeping in mind that we have jobs and real lives, discussing 100 links all at once can be very

4852:

I have not seen any evidence that the musical instrument is not the primary usage of this term in English-language sources. Lake Biwa is always called with "Lake" before Biwa, and it's "Biwa" capitalized, while the fruit is always called "loquat" in English, as this is the English Knowledge.

3459:

The main bits we're missing right now are the Polish and German pipes. I can tackle the Polish stuff sometime later this month, as there are two pl. articles for the white and black pipes. If you're feeling ambitious with Google Translate, this German wiki has some great stuff to be mined:

1989:

Oh yeah I meant to mention that I hadn't tried the software yet. :) My computer is on its last legs so I am reluctant to add much in the way of software. I will try to cut and paste some of the accented letters and try to use them so maybe that will help...? Sorry. I guess I'm hopeless! :)

7553:

I believe that by worrying about "our encyclopedia's credibility be undermined" you are ascribing it far too much credibility to begin with, but I suppose that's not entirely a bad thing. But anyway... The categorization system, in general, is not a major part of Knowledge's public face.

2500:

Thank you for your message! Certainly I have had all forms of interaction with other editors, mostly quite productive and positive. Such interactions often take place at Discussion pages. When it has been indicated, and proven, that I have added material to an article in error, I have stood

7269:

If editors post at my discussion page in a collegial manner, I will of course respond to them in the same manner. I reserve the right, as do all WP editors, to remove unnecessarily inflammatory and highly provocative posts, which are against our project's fundamentally collaborative ethos.

7481:

on wrecking category navigation are never inclined to undo such damage themselves but instead always ask rank-and-file editors without such bot acceess to do so by hand. Please take a look at the edit history of the surname categories and what has become of them before commenting further.

4706:

Could you further explain reasoning for your recent move? The comment you left was "Not necessary to move," but this contradicts the fact that an explanation for the previous move was already given (by me) in the comment: "move non-primary definition in order to make room for disambig."

1554:

I hope I have addressed your points. I certainly don't mean to ignore any. The first question I asked you about the liqueurs article is one you still have not addressed. Namely: "How do you know that people agree with you?" Where are these people? You have yet to address this question.

4169:

Will check out the minor Latin languages later and see if I can find any Wikis that have at least two or three bagpipe articles to categorise. I imagine Catalan and Galician might at least. I can't really read Breton but might be able to pick them out by name, etc. Ditto for Polish.

2548:

1) Do you understand why GTBacchus was upset that you called another editor a "Korean-nationalist"? Accusing someone of doing something based on their heritage is considered racist by some people. Comment on content, not on the contributor, is the first rule of interacting positively.

745:

There is a right way to get behavior policies enforced, and there is a wrong way. Reporting people, as if to the police, is a very wrong way. I didn't make that fact true, but it's true. If you do that, you'll end up turning more and more Wikipedians against you. There's a better way.

2724:

00:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC) No response to my explanation of the "don't read policy" remark? Do you think it's fair to demand apologies from me without offering any for unintentional misunderstandings on your part? I'm happy to apologize for unintentional misunderstandings on my part.

6799:

if you were an admin reverting someone else's close. Go to DRV if you have an issue about the process. Do that sort of thing again and I'll block you for a week. You've been on a craze the last few days. I'd suggest you take a break before you find yourself in more trouble. --

6351:

before, you don't even try to discuss with me anymore and instead just revert every edit I make for whatever reason (not going into detail as I'd rather assume good faith). My patience is wearing, however, and I'd like it if we can actually come to a proper conclusion about this.

876:, and you wouldn't say anything about it. I asked, how can we demonstrate that your version is the one supported by consensus. I would ask that again about the ice cream picture. Most of the comments on the talk page don't support it. Do you think it is supported by a consensus? - 7097:

Secondly, If you only used the word "threatening" when someone was, literally, threatening to get you banned, then it would be understandable and it wouldn't be an issue. But you've used the word in edit summaries around 30 times this year, on this page alone. eg July so far:

6438:

Thank you for your opinions! I look forward to editing together with you in a positive manner. For now, let's encourage editors who damage our category system to fix said system rather than asking rank-and-file editors without access to bots to clean up their damage by hand.

2758:

Well, I posted here to apologize, and you're welcome to delete my postings if you want. I won't complain. It's "okay" for me to post here because you don't own this page, but like I said, you're welcome to delete this. I have offered you my help, and that offer remains.

726:

bad form. Go straight to the talk page, and start a section asking why the revert was made. Explain your reasons for the edit. Keep anything personal out of it - it's a dry content question. This is the stepping stone from which you can later make more powerful edits.

6775:. Reverting an official admin-closure is considered disruptive editing. Additionally, your bad faith assumptions and attacks directed toward users (and especially an administrator at that) should stop, unless you feel like being blocked yet again by an administrator. 760:

This is a practical recommendation. If one editor is pursuing you to multiple articles, then the most powerful way to defeat them is to stop moving, and deal with them on one article. If you can do this in the right way, they won't follow you anymore. Think about it.

6968:

If someone says they are going to report or block you for 3RR (etc), that could never be considered a "threat" in wiki-jargon, it is simply a statement of fact. It could be considered an aggressive statement, but it is not a "threat" (from the perspective of other

2678:

you. That much is obvious from the timestamps in various articles. But most of the edits appear to be just revert-wars, which establish nothing. I don't have time to search for proof that they were making actual-and-specific-and-clear-cut mistakes. You have to do

7004:

Thank you again for your opinions. A statement of intent to ban someone from editing an encyclopedia in which they have invested tens of thousands of hours and always edited in good faith (very serious indeed!) is indeed perceived as threatening, or as a threat.

4374:. But there is no blame to be attached to removing the original unsourced version: JBsupreme was not obliged to run the change past you, or anyone. The implication in your edit summary that the original deletion referred to your new version is also misleading. 2619:. You need to make clear exactly why you think the edits are HOUNDing (should be obviously close together from timestamps) and Tendencious. (and make it short or concise, with less adjectives & superlatives. Call it "blanking" instead of "massive blanking") 546:

Thanks for starting this article. Is there a holiday at the end of January that this food item would be part of? As I recall it's not a regular item, but the store owner said it was part of a holiday celebration. Chinese New Years even though it's Vietnamese?

7142:

I'll ask a final time: Do you understand how this difference in interpretation of the meaning ascribed to the word "threat" has been causing misunderstandings? Do you understand why some editors feel you have been using the word far too frequently and freely?

2954:

The fact is, often I myself am unsure about the pronunciation of certain words due to certain idiosyncrasies I've acquired. Also, as I am not Taiwanese, I cannot vouch for the official pronunciation in the ROC without looking up an ROC published dictionaries.

5222:

May not be worth pursuing. The categories were not deleted--good. The subcats do not mention race as far as I can see. So having all the cats named just with 'ethnic' instead of 'race and ethnic' is probably no big loss. There are bigger things to look at

7583:

are speedily repopulated while the editors responsible for the deletion of the former categories move on to other tasks (even after being asked to correct the situation over 20 times) is inexcusable. Regarding haste, it was similarly hasty, and represented

2761:

Have you offered to do anything about the insults to which you've subjected me? Is your offense to be taken seriously, and mine to be ignored? How is that fair? If I feel insulted, it doesn't matter, but if you feel insulted, it matters? How is that fair?

1686:

compared to what I've seen. You would do well to grow some thicker skin, and learn to deal with stalkers effectively, and not by running to the skirts of authority figures. If you thought admins were like police, then I'm happy for you to learn otherwise.

1592:

organization. However, I refuse to accept that our project is "posse-based," but based on reason and placing our users foremost in our minds with each and every edit we make, adhering to the inherently reasonable guidelines set out for us by our founders.

1679:

No. That editor is in the right in this case. He removed a non-independent source, per our policies, and you replaced it without discussion. If he has removed it again without discussion, you can be certain he will hear from me. I'll just check that now.

6820:

us, is something akin to "he was waving a loaded gun, literally, towards my head". If you use the phrase for something as mundane as a verbal disagreement, or sarcasm (as above), then you are (from our perspective) grossly-exaggerating, or using extreme

2466:

Background: I probably should have written something to you before this, my apologies that I have not. As you've probably seen, I've been trying to defend some of your actions. I'm not sure if I'm actually helping anyone, but I felt the urge to try.

3619:

itchy blocking fingers hovering over your user name. If you do feel the need to deviate from 1RR in the near future, don't be surprised if you find yourself blocked for a very long time. Stick to the talk page, and ask other users to help you.

7031:

Badagnani's explanation makes sense to me. I'm not aware of any policy that says he can't express himself and his opinions that good faith collaboration does not and should not involve threats and intimidation. Seems perfectly reasoanble to me.

7296:

Please, Badagnani. I spent over an hour writing the above to you, and you replied in under 2 minutes. I'm hurt, and found that quite rude. Could you give a complete response, to any of my questions and statements and explanations? Please? --

1470:. Even if you subtract out those people harassing you, your edit has not got consensus support. You seem to think that this is unimportant, as long as you can argue that your links are useful. However, consensus is very important, and it can 1130:

Your excuse for not getting others to work with us is that our project is about working together? That's insane. If it's all about working together, (I agree), then get more people and work together with them. Use your social skills. Do it.

912:

good reason for being in an article, despite our linking policies. The hounding I know about, and it's unfortunate. I'm talked with at least one of the editors involved, and I've been encouraging him to engage on a more constructive level.

7409:

learn to get along better with editors that you disagree with. It's a core part of any community. I think reading through that page (one of my favourites) might help you understand the diversity of perspectives that are welcomed here at

4553:

Thanks for reverting my removal of that content. I made a mistake in thinking it was the same source as before. My bad. Sorry about that. I have apologized to the editor and will note my mistake on the talk page. Thanks for catching it.

2078:

before finding some more substantial sources for this food, but I can't read italian and I don't trust google translate. Can you translate italian, or know someone interested in food and willing to translate the italian gelato article?

159:

I do believe that you will have a better time at Knowledge if you take a different approach. I hope my posting this here doesn't bother you. I just think you'd be happier editing here if you do it in a manner that generates less heat.

4568:

I had posted the entire bit on the article talk page already. And it looked like the same addition, perhaps because the new cite doesn't have a link so it's short and I only saw the old link. Anyway, I'll try to have a look tomorrow.

6696:. However, as you know, I need proofreading by native English speaker. Since you have been working with me on the article and you're very much interested in "what I'm editing" to Korean cuisine, your cooperation would be helpful.-- 6669:(took me a few minutes to track it down). So when Vegaswikian speedy closed the second discussion, it was because the first one had been closed 3 weeks before and not actioned. Hence the second nomination was not appropriate. -- 4185:

Got a bunch more, but for now Polish doesn't have enough material. I checked around, but a glance didn't show any other languages with more than two pipe articles, at least in languages I can semi-comprehend. Here are four more

6324:

Perhaps it'd make sense to switch to the simpler versions of the template, without the second parameter, instead? It's common and helpful for categories to have a bit of text explaining their intended use at the top. Cheers!

4879:. I've done some searching, and the vast majority of references and reference-works don't specifically mention the word "biwa". It's commonly pointed out that it is sometimes called the "Japanese plum" or "Japanese medlar", but 3007:

Wow, that was trippy, within ten seconds of my tossig up a translation of the Spanish Aliste page, you had a redirect up. Just trying to see if we're crossing wires here, as the two Alistes you list are municipalities and not

1177:

04:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC) By the way, I only advised you to ignore poor behavior in the very short term. At the same time, I offered to teach you how to deal with it very effectively. You spat on my offer, repeatedly. Thanks.

1843:

This is an unreasonable misreading of a guideline, and we must be reasonable in everything we do, keeping our users foremost in our mind, in our effort to provide for them the most thorough and encyclopedic articles possible.

3064:

times, and hit a few phrases I just can't get and leave out if they're not vital to the context. Lots of good pics there too. ca:WP has like 30 pages just of Catalan instruments, so I'll be headed back there at some point.

2712:....that I have unintentionally offended you. I never meant to do so, and I apologize for any offense that I have caused. My only intention is that you be able to edit here in peace. I have tried to help you, and I have been 1134:

I've been trying for days to discuss with you, and you stubbornly refuse to do it, because you'd rather ignore my substantive questions, and pretend you've already answered them. You know what question you've never answered?

2160: 601:, that is an adjective meaning "Chinese" (literally "boat," as the Chinese used to be referred to as "boat people." Whenever you see tàu as a modifier after a word, you'll know what that means. In this case, though, it's 180:, especially, "Knowledge is a volunteer community, and does not require its users to give any more time and effort than they wish. Focus on improving the encyclopedia itself, rather than demanding more from other users." 5109:

Hi Badagnani, I just found out that I'll be moving out of state for a new job. Unfortunately I won't have time in the foreseeable future for Knowledge, although I really liked it. How can I close my account? Thanks.

1858:

You say it's unreasonable. I disagree. How do we decide? Do we assume that your reading is correct, and mine wrong? Why? More people seem to agree with my reading. What makes you certain that your reading is correct?

5953:

None of his sources back up his specific voicing, which I know is wrong. What I was describing as incivil were repeated reverts with empty edit summaries and ignoring my pleads for discussion. Moreover, Hyacinth is

4775:

action is still encouraged most of the time, or when there is no doubt. Though in this case, where it is less clear-cut, engaging in discussion first might have been the prudent course of action. That's why we have

1363:

Ah. So that's a "no"? You refuse to do the simple things that it would take to show that your edit has consensus, and you're just going to insist that the burden is on others? Not impressive, Badagnani. Not at all.

1271:

said that I hoped you be gone. I can't say it, because I don't believe it. I also do not mean to suggest that you've "given nothing" to Knowledge. You've given a lot of good work. I meant that you were asking a lot

3183:

I'm sorry, can you be more clear in your question to me? I can't understand what you are asking. I added a WPINDONESIA project tag to that article's "Discussion" page, because as I understand Solo is in Indonesia.

4940:

Just an FYI, I did merge it, however there is at least one editor is who planning on taking this AFD result to DRV. Although they reverted the merge itself as premature, they didn't revert the redirect to it.

4337:) I'm bored of this kind of request from you because it sound like an order instead of a request from a friendly Wikipedian, and I feel that you never think and read an article carefully before you do anything. 1212:

away from your page? Did I not insist that you were right, that you the right to remove text from your own talk page? Where is my thanks for that? You ask for a lot, but you give nothing. I'm not sorry for you.

239:

Yet you do not participate in these so called "discussions". It's only when someone files a dispute or mediation that you respond. Most editors simply do not care about any bold editing done on articles such as

2166:

Hi, just saw your message about this article, sorry to see it deleted. I've stopped regularly editing Knowledge. I only log in occasionally now. And also sorry I couldn't help with your last lot of questions.

1058:

Hi Badagnani. Yes, you are right... Arabic is the official language of North African countries but the musical instruments have African origins and have nothing to do with Arabic. Hope you are doing great. --

772:

discouraged form doing so by third parties. Since the trolls are trying to get a reaction out of the editor targeted, that person's doing so just feeds them. Take care. Thanks for you help and collaboration.

183:

Many editors, myself included, will often make substantial changes to article without discussion, based upon the application of specific policies or guidelines. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this.

5680:(P.S. Given your "length of time in service", I realize that you're probably quite familiar with the policy. I presume you most likely didn't see the edit summary that accompanied the removal of the text. -- 1776:. There are over 1500, and if I'm so unreasonable, then it will be very, very easy for you to find a more reasonable one. So, get to it. Bring another admin, to tell me how wrong I am. I promise to listen. - 4394: 4117: 1227:

1080:

Okay, thanks for the catch. I think it is technically called Banh tet chuoi. Does that have a distince name? I also added a bit about the flat version of Banh chuoi. Should we do an article for Bahn tam

787:

these link removals are wrongful, if I can't argue about the consensus support that the links enjoy? Maybe you can convey this to Badagnani, and persuade him to share the information I need. Good luck. -

6887:

Now that you've decided to award yourself the role of lord and protector the encyclopedia, do you plan on letting the views of others matter at all or are you going to continue on your current path? --

3921:

procedures - Viriditas will help - and you'll either be vindicated or (as is always the risk) not. But constant open bad faith and personal attacks on other editors' motives will also have a dead end.

4261: 2477:

I hope you can agree that you have been involved in a fair number of disputes. I also hope you can agree that some of them are at least partly your fault (or, that you could have handled them better).

7463:). Most of us admins don't have bots, regardless of how much we might wish more of our tasks could be automated. I believe this to be a misconception, and would like to help clear it up. Cheers. 5280:

is somehow inaccurate (and I am one myself), so I figure might as well follow the standard for 80% of the cat. Sounds better the "ukulelist" or whatnot. Oh, minor sidenote, I'm trying to clean up

5666:. This is against Knowledge's copyright policy. You are welcome to use the information that is given in the sentence in your own words. You may also incorporate it into a quote in accordance with 4801:. The burden of proof should not be placed on the one that is preferring a default course of action. The talk page, which I checked before move, lacked any of said discussion, so I took course w/ 1581:

Well, if you can't find people who agree with you, even after looking, then you have to accept that your edit has not got consensus support. It's the rule I play by; why should you be different? -

5837:

What do you need to communicate here that can't be communicated on the article discussion page? Posting on an editor's talk page when it's clear you're not welcome will only inflame the dispute.

527: 5649: 4283:

The article you cited described a specific kind of confection made by a specific family in Hoi An. All the banh it I know are log-shaped (cylindrical). The pyramidal ones are called "banh u".

2441: 1606:

If no person can be found to agree with your reading of a guideline, that is a very good indication that your reading is incorrect. By your reasoning, you can do anything you want, as long as

1440:

through careful and collegial collaboration, is to provide the best, most thorough, and encyclopedic articles on each subject. This always involves using the best sources available (as at the

2098:

I has just removed a part of Trieu Thi Trinh article because they are sourced content and moved them into talkpage. I'm writing to inform you and I hope you won't revert it with no reason.--

5563: 5372: 1378:

verifying "Copa de Oro" coffee liqueur, which you failed to respond to at all, instead reiterating your own reading of our guidelines and failing to take into account anything I had said.

4458:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 4076:) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1739:

think BRD isn't valuable, then we drop it, but if fifteen other people think your links aren't valuable, then we keep them? How does that work? Why are your ideas assumed to be correct? -

1007:

If you have any questions regarding the project either ask on the project talk page or my personal talk page and I'm sure you'll get a quick response. Hope to see you around the project,

7538:: that nowhere in the considerable literature on surnames are "Russian-language surnames," for example, referred to, while "Russian surnames" are treated in many reliable print sources. 6505:

Badagnani, some editors have taken issue with your use of "highly threatening" comment. I wonder if you'd be willing to just describe assertive comments as unhelpful? Enjoy your Sunday.

5171: 332:. You should not compel editors to discuss whenever every single bit of information is removed. It disrupts the experience here and is the main cause for the edit warring issues lately. 6848:

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not vandalism.

5816: 5708:

Understandable. :) Inadvertent restoration is the downside of removing rather than deleting, but when it's a small passage it just doesn't seem worth the collateral damage to delete. --

4265: 2042: 4465:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

3962: 5472: 6772: 2556:

2) Do you understand that many of the sources you have added or defended at certain articles are simply not good enough - and, in some cases are worse than nothing? For example, in

3111: 6637: 1345:

they come up with one, we can research and discuss it, and, if they're really interested in liqueurs, we can probably work together to actually create an article on that liqueur.

3285: 1044:

Badagnani is right. Do not repost messages that an editor deletes from their own talk page. I have warned the user doing the restoring, and if he continues, he will be blocked. -

3993: 2904: 491:

problem is inherent to Marathi literate and illiterate folks irrespective of Hindi influence. In this particular case though I feel the previous writer didn't know how to type "

7530:

category simply moved on to other editing tasks they presumably found less tedious or more interesting (even after having been asked to repair the damage as had been done with

6735: 1549: 1511: 4686:

I will try to upload them soon. Some people don't like it when you take photos. What can I say? I'm putting my life on the line for Knowledge every time I go out there... :)

1703:

He hasn't reverted. Where are you initiating discussion on the issue? Why aren't you following the BRD cycle? Why are your opinions worth so much more than those of others? -

5373: 3521:. I wasn't sure if you would see this on the talk page, so feel free to move it there if you like. When I read the article, I see mostly a recipe, which tells me to add a 4466: 4239: 4159: 3986: 2159: 624:

So Can is celery? I think they sell regular celery too... Am I missing something? It looks pretty similar but the stalks are more slender or maybe just harvested younger.

523: 500: 475: 448: 4504: 1082: 6709: 6488: 5872: 2925: 5892: 5407: 3129: 2074:

article, but the net seems to be saturated with hyped up junk from enthusiasts and fluff from commercial enterprise. I think I will first get some of the info from the

1923:... as it says on the template, it's been deprecated (China's just too confusing a word, since it can be used for two different countries). For places on the mainland, 1139:

Why, Badagnani, why? Will it hurt so much, to go ask some questions? Am I the only person you know how to talk to? Do you enjoy this conversation we're having? If not,

7527: 6665:(outdenting) apologies for flippance, CaspianBlue is right, I am English, and we can use humour at inappropriate moments. However, Badagnani seems to have overlooked 3885:

Hi and welcome back. I hope you had a relaxing five days of rest. I'm looking at your contributions right now, and it seems like you don't understand the concept of

2740:

simply uncalled for--something I have never, ever done while at Knowledge. In light of these two things, why do you now feel it is okay to post to my Discussion page?

3016:

and see if you agree? Can you also read Spanish and glance at the es.wikipedia links to confirm? Oh, what thinks of the Iberian gaita variant pages I brought over?

2560:, Bulldog was quite correct that most of these sources are inappropriate. Most of them don't mention Danish/Denmark, or they are not from reliable enough sources for 5527:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 5041:

Hi Badagnani, how do you get your name to show after you make an edit? I'm new to wikipedia. Thank you in advance. Keith Beltham (my user name is KeithBeltham).

3125: 2921: 2421:. I was trying to find a project, but all I found was some sort of language project that seems very broad. Take care. I hope you can get some breathing room soon... 6078:

Based on your recent participation in several Food and Drink related merge discussions, I would like to point out several open discussions that might interest you:

5831: 5480: 4522: 2060: 848:

It appears, Badagnani, that you want to change the way Knowledge handles external links. Is that accurate? I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you - just asking. -

4250: 4220: 4179: 4138: 3972: 5293: 4509:

Ran across this randomly somehow, got a good basic article going. No PD pic, but the U of Montreal link has a good one. This looks a lot like a fidla or gue:

3719: 519: 496: 471: 444: 4133: 3243: 1331:, choose one link to talk about, and start a conversation about it. Doing that would be a great sign of your good-faith willingness to talk about these edits. - 7162:

then I don't know how to help. I could only understand it as willful stubbornness, or lack of language-comprehension, neither of which I can do anything about.

5539: 5259: 4432: 4046: 3573: 1425:

You seem to believe that arguing will accomplish what you want. Why do you believe that? In particular, do you think you can get your way without showing that

279: 157:, for example, is extremely likely to worsen a dispute, rather than improve it? Surely this isn't your goal - we wish to resole disputes, not to prolong them. 7363:

Specifically, I would like you to answer the 2 questions in my most recent (05:24) long post. Any additional response regarding the things I tried to explain

6959:

None of these have ever been leveled at you (asfarasIhaveseen), hence, when you state/claim that someone is "threatening" you, it isn't being taken seriously.

2176: 4499: 3838: 3830: 2782:

Note: Hi. Sorry to jump in. Badagnani, I most emphatically urge you to treat GTBacchus as a helping hand. He knows your situation well, and is acting within

976:

is ; approximately "yang meh" (in psuedo-pinyin) or "yahn meh" (in pseudo- um, English?). Tone on the first character is dipping, on the second is rising. --

413:- a collation of material to advance an argument, not collated previously - and no-one is obliged to discuss in advance the removal of material in breach of 121: 4695: 2470:

Intent: Here are some badly/bluntly phrased statements and questions. I hope they can help us all to find common ground so that we can adapt to each other.

2013: 1999: 572: 7046:

The question then, is how is one to raise the issue of 3RR and other disagreements, if all disagreements are interpreted as "threats and intimidation"? --

6839: 6630: 6614: 6336: 5931: 3908:

On that at least we agree. Back in March I asked Badagani, as did Ronz, to take any behavioural complaints - particularly those about hounding (note that

3651: 511:फोलनी - I never heard of that, at least it is not used in south-west Maharashtra. Not sure of the etymology either but verb - फोड means "to break open". 310: 6211: 5684: 3101: 3073: 3052: 2786:

comfort zone to assist you, and is demonstrating immense patience at the ANI thread. He is the best assistance you are likely to get. He is trying to get

1823:

Ok, I'll try not to lecture you. It's just that I'm very confident that what you call "my reading" is actually the consensus reading of many Wikipedians.

1462:

The point I was really trying to make here is that you don't seem to consider it relevant that more people disagree with you than agree with you. Look at

1420: 6222: 5379:

So I better understand the process, if the article already had an AfD consensus to redirect, shouldn't it still redirect, or do we need a new consensus?

3602: 7496:

simpler solution would be to approach bot operators yourself, and ask that a bot do the work or be written to do the work. You may make such a request

7187:(which here on wiki means "choice of language decisions") is to be confrontational to so many editors, especially admins, then I don't know how to help. 3393:

which provides hits on requesting pictures for articles. Is the explanation clear enough? How can we make this information more accessible and visible?

2359: 5786:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

5624:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

5497: 3725:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

3674: 7041: 6514: 6430: 6386: 6064: 6025: 4991:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4317: 4003: 3931: 830: 814: 791: 781: 698: 673: 618: 396:. Frankly, just because you have the ability to undo someone's edits does not mean you can defend the edits with statements such as "use Discusssion." 231: 7055: 6757:

Category talk:Jewish inventors) is highly inappropriate and it was thus necessary to allow discussion to continue, as our project's rules stipulate.

6716: 5712: 5703: 3761: 1829:

important that completeness, which you seem to advocate. What do you think of that? Which is more important, independent sourcing, or completeness? -

1489: 6401: 6235: 5985: 5492: 3777: 3144: 2940: 1474:

be demonstrated by the fact of other people actually agreeing with you. No amount of reasoned discussion from one person can demonstrate consensus.

1284:, I suppose. If you're ever represented by a lawyer in the future, be more communicative with them. Refusing to discuss your actions doesn't help. - 1246: 1220: 1182: 1151: 1108: 1099: 6649: 6318: 6304: 5967: 4040: 1825:

I claim that, if a non-independent source is the only source available, then we should not cover the topic at all, because independent sourcing is

1405:

Does this reply address your concerns. If not, please let me know what I've missed. I do mean to respond to your points, carefully and seriously. -

6747: 6619:

Could be called "disruptive editing" though, not "vandalism" with a "malicious intention". Besides, you seem like a British, but please remind of

6500: 6448: 4017: 3417: 531: 504: 479: 6897: 6785: 6766: 6466: 6189: 5864: 5846: 5466: 4427: 3750: 3560: 3531:

template. Isn't this standard procedure? In other words, do you think recipes should appear in articles or should they be moved to Wikibooks?

2682:

Or, ignore it and just edit articles, and resign yourself to the fact that people are infinitely diverse in their expectations of what Knowledge

355: 335: 303: 247: 212: 6915: 6199: 4797:

could potentially take place of primary definition. After that, it may be decided that the location of the primary definition should be the url

4326:

back. But why did you demand me "Please use "Discussion" prior to engaging in a page move of this type"?. I think this title totally conform to

2770: 2749: 1863: 1853: 1833: 1814: 1761: 1743: 1726: 1707: 1691: 1670: 1617: 1601: 1575: 1543: 1480: 1453: 1409: 1387: 1368: 1354: 1335: 1322: 1288: 1262: 1236: 1198: 1167: 1124: 965: 920: 899: 880: 750: 740: 731: 164: 7569: 7511: 7490: 7422: 7337: 7306: 7279: 7217: 7014: 6991: 6935:. I'll copy the list here, in case you didn't actually read the link. There are 4 types of promised-action that could be considered "threats": 6878: 6366: 4899: 4862: 4789: 4766: 3193: 2800: 2695: 2665: 2642: 2614: 2604: 2582: 2514: 7436: 7250: 6600: 6184: 5811: 5031: 3874: 3507: 3207: 2528:

it, especially so frequently - no admin is going to do anything about it, unless they start insulting you. If it continues or gets worse, the

1585: 1559: 1528: 1147:

03:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC) By the way, why should I do what you ask, when you've never done anything I ask you to do? Double-standard, much? -

362: 5618: 5335: 3657: 3321: 2887: 2345: 1955: 1313:

difficult, but a few at a time would be very doable. I think we have done this on a case-by-case basis in the past, for individual liqueurs.

23: 5022:, just brought it over from the Catalan. I hid one paragraph I wasn't quite comfortable translating, some technical stuff about technique. 1790:

The burden of proof is always on the one who wants to add content, not the one who removes it. The content must meet our criterion of being

6902:

A good example of hyperbole. Not helpful though. That kind of comment only results in destroying the possibility of dialogue. Go have some

6587: 6562: 4839: 4821: 4752: 3246:(butterfly? yellow butterfly?). It's great. Deep fried and sugar coated. I should take a picture, but I'm too busy putting it in my mouth. 2403: 2241: 154: 4953: 3957: 2840: 2381: 2321: 2283: 985: 274: 5645: 4930: 3968: 2340: 2302: 6809: 6728: 3170:

Or perhaps my always trying to separate conversations from project tags may have spoilt it - still not sure what you were trying to do

1402:

Distilleries, but to a company press release announcing a new promotion. That does not help us create an independently sourced article.

936: 866: 7598: 7547: 6795:

You are not an admin. If you want the right to close discussions how you see fit, run for adminship and win. Even then, you would be

6070: 5722: 5129:

Melonbarblaster has begun a discussion about the inclusion of dog meat in the article, please feel free to discuss on the talk page. --

4826:

Well reasoned. I'm inclined to agree now, that the primary page should be the disambig. (perhaps this thread should be moved/copied to

470:". I know I am correct but I understand your dilemma. Google is your friend. Search old and new term to find which one is correct. - 7474: 6568: 1104:

If you're right, it should be very easy to find others who agree with you. Why don't you just do that? What's stopping you? I'm not. -

5009: 2350:

I made some minor improvements to the article on spare ribs, a topic on which I am a noted expert (see my bio). You undid them. Why?

1242:

I never said that. Never would say it. I only tell the truth you see, and I don't hope for you to be gone. I hope for you to learn. -

765: 716: 5917: 5460: 4639: 4292: 2219: 244:

and List of * Americans, which obviously need some work done on them. I am strongly questioning your overall behavior on Knowledge.

7526:

were not (being left with one, two, or three surnames total), while the two editors most vocal in insisting on the deletion of the

5934:. I'm citing sources, anonymous is not and is accusing me of making invalid contributions and describing those as incivility. Also 5580: 5160: 2855: 2485:

Sorry for anything I have badly/baldly stated. I hope you see that I'm trying to assist everyone in the only way I know how to. --

2088: 1296: 439:फोडणी is the way we (Marathis) write Phodani. You can also use google search to verify this. Also check Marathi wikipedia article 297: 7460: 6417:

from category pages; if you disagree with the phrasing, seek consensus at an appropriate place (in this case it would probably be

4543: 3629: 2899: 2154: 1983: 7395: 6862: 4680: 3846: 3402: 3384: 3274: 3025: 2197: 1506: 1433: 1094: 6293: 5947: 1020: 426: 254: 143: 6831:

To put it bluntly/concisely/simply: If someone uses emotional language constantly, they are less-likely to be taken seriously.

6367: 5791: 5641: 5629: 5524: 4121: 4047: 3799: 3730: 3117:

help us and inquire something, please send me an e-mail. And I sincerely wanna interview you via e-mail or instant messenger.

2453: 862:

What do you want me to do, make people agree to use the picture you found? Do you think there's a way around persuading them? -

129: 5367: 4368:

JBsupreme rightly removed the section about native regions for wolfberry because it was challenged unsourced text at the time

3445: 2444:. There is no sign that you ever received a response, so I have answered on the above page. Sorry about the month's delay! 633: 591: 556: 6678: 6361: 4411: 4383: 2386: 2224: 2107: 1798: 6049: 5558: 5314: 5184: 4622: 3255: 2818: 2481:

take me seriously. If you simply never respond well to criticism (which some people don't) then I can't go on defending you.

2037: 1881: 1216:

Your guess about what my point seems to be is entirely wrong, by the way. You never bothered to find out what my point is. -

1048: 852: 712:

I'll see you there. One article at a time, one edit at a time. First important lesson - be the first to use the talk page. -

193: 5254: 4935: 4363:

Why was the region whence this species is indigenous removed summarily, prior to any discussion? Please don't do that again

4314:

but then I realized almost all English language source referred this temple as "Chua Bo De" or "Chua Bo De Buddhist Temple"

3437: 2823: 2729: 2364: 2351: 2307: 2269: 1945: 1780: 950: 7454: 5232: 5140: 4406: 3902: 3608: 3297: 2494: 2430: 1654: 384:

My statement did not necessarily mean that I would revert the edits (which were perfectly reasonable). It would also be a

5959: 5674: 5119: 5104: 5088: 5061: 5014: 3525: 3451: 3345: 3121: 2917: 2557: 2326: 2288: 956:

Badagnani, is there a reason you aren't letting GTBacchus help you? If it's pride, then we all know where that leads...

259: 7616: 6666: 6281: 6246: 4578: 4563: 4351: 3540: 2958:

This is especially true for neutral-tone things which varies greatly from speaker to speaker and from region to region.

2264: 2130: 1903: 1306: 1034: 452: 7580: 7531: 7519: 6703: 6640:) is highly inappropriate and it was thus necessary to allow discussion to continue, as our project's rules stipulate. 6484: 6277: 6217: 6010: 5084: 5057: 2858:

regarding you, but I just wanted to remind you about it again. It would be helpful if you could share your viewpoint.

857: 5212: 4867:

It was the fruit I was unsure about - I didn't have enough background to know whether this case was more analogous to

2851: 2829: 2505:. So how would we even know how they respond to criticism when admins appear too frightened even to ask them to stop? 2392: 2370: 2230: 2208: 7576: 7558:. Now, as I feel I have used up too much of your time already, I will be going to bed. Cheers, and happy editing. 7523: 7427:

Please? I've even added bold highlighting to my questions, though you do need to read the whole post for context. --

6708: 6480: 6298: 6265: 5880: 5873: 5319: 3224: 3177: 3165: 872:

You haven't cooperated with my attempt to help you. I asked you how we could demonstrate consensus for your links at

7589:

displays a lack of care which must characterize all editors of our encyclopedia, admins doubly (if not tenfold) so.

7123: 7120: 7117: 7114: 7111: 7105: 7102: 7099: 4599: 3862: 1070: 5756: 5594: 5145: 4974: 4958: 4277: 3976: 3851: 3695: 3336:. Can you show that similar IP's have followed you around? If so, we may have a foundation for a checkuser case. 1896: 1280:, like having simple conversations with me about edits that you expected me to defend. You wanted me to defend you 378: 7609: 3585: 3309: 342: 7612:

has evolved since you were first notified of the issue. I thought it could be helpful if you weighed in. Thanks,

6418: 6314: 6231: 6194:

Hello Badagnani! Here a German dissertation (with some minor errors but with many fresh insights): Zeng Jinshou:

5999: 5795: 5760: 5633: 5598: 5498: 4949: 4590:

peer review for Sylhet created for Good article, please contribute thanks Knowledge:Peer review/Sylhet/archive1.

4433: 3937: 3913: 3734: 3699: 3640: 3302: 2870: 2866: 2735:

I had asked you not to post here again due to your failure to address even a single word to the worst, incessant

2065: 971: 704: 6546: 5451:

The first result was written in Chinese. The text in other languages were generated using machine translation.

5445: 5426: 4319: 7204:

Please! Throw us a crumb of acknowledgment! Some of us are trying our damndest to give you a chance to be clear

7108: 6344: 6289: 4909: 3647: 2202: 1871: 1534:

I would be okay with that. You could simply copy the text rather than moving it, but either way would be fine.

91: 79: 74: 66: 7575:

Thank you for your opinion. I don't agree. Our encyclopedia is of great value and allowing categories such as

5908:

are not appropriate. If you disagree with a XfD close, you should approach the closer and discuss it, and use

5742:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 5583:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 4716: 3677:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 7459:

As to why you seem to believe administrators have bot powers (you've mentioned it a few times, most recently

6838:

avoid the words "threat" and "troll" and "vandal" and similar, unless you're referring to actual and literal

6411: 5905: 4418:

Thought you might be interested. Seems like a mess, but I'm not sure if the contents are covered elsewhere.

4412: 3858: 3265:

You haven't heard of the famous Hot and Sour and Sweet Soup? Lololol. Thanks for fixing my typo. Regards,

2808: 2252: 1517: 268:

or contacting the two admins who requested the user have a clickable signature directly on their talk pages.

6605:

What would you call taking the close notices off a CFD if it's not vandalism? Throwing teddy out of pram?--

6373:

Please stop the canvassing at the category talk page. Either fix the article(s) yourself, or seek advice at

1646:

discuss before removing. The rule is, if it's removed, discuss before restoring. Start following the rule. -

6814: 5523:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 4921:

should have an accent, whilst, since it's Catalan, it shouldn't. I'd appreciate it if you could weigh in.

4604: 4455: 4437: 4323: 4311: 4304: 3590: 3390: 2961:

Here are two dictionaries that I've found really helpful in looking up the pronunciation of Chinese words.

2720:

apologize? I apologize for offending you. It has never been my goal to do that, and I am sincerely sorry. -

440: 6166: 6091: 4031:

P/S: I won't do anything on your edits because I don't want to make the current situation more dramatic.--

3915: 2995: 2981: 1767: 406: 6674: 6610: 6374: 5922: 5735: 5576: 4628:

thanks a lot ! I noticed your edits some clics after the previous message ;) that's great ! big thanks !

4155: 3889:, although it's possible I'm mistaken. So, let me ask you: Have you ever followed the process outlined 3870: 3670: 3317: 2138: 993: 171: 6106: 4025: 3639:. You have completely failed to engage in discussion there, instead blindly repeating your edit comment 3012:, best as I can tell. I think the article I translated is about a much wider area. Can you glance at * 1613:

Is your conviction that you're right more powerful than any number of Wikipedians saying you're wrong? -

908:

were inline links to commercial sites for non-notable products, and that sort of link had better have a

6938: 6310: 6227: 5888: 5660: 5535: 5196: 4992: 4490:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 4451: 4395:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Badagnani__reported_by_User:Ronz_.28Result:_.29

4315: 3270: 3214: 2181: 1886: 134: 45: 4151: 3408:

Good question. We do need people to add photos to WP more. The FIST tool helps a lot in finding them.

348:

If you think I am wikihounding you, then so be it, I will try to stop the edits you claim are against

7037: 6510: 6285: 6045: 6006: 5897: 5883:. I have also raised the matter at AN/I (link available in the article discussion already provided). 5842: 5764: 5602: 5544: 5520: 5331: 5320: 5310: 5250: 5179: 4691: 4676: 4574: 4559: 4539: 4423: 4388: 4379: 4372: 4369: 3927: 3795: 3773: 3703: 3643: 3350: 3279: 3251: 2895: 2435: 2426: 2009: 1995: 1979: 1927: 1173:

You have yet to answer one simple question: "Who agrees with you?" I'm listening, very carefully... -

1090: 810: 777: 629: 587: 568: 552: 422: 208: 7076:

Badagnani. Your explanation makes sense in a general context, in a general use of the word "threat".

6303:

Hello, Badagnani. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

6136: 3812:

On April 28, 2009 I posted this to the Abu Zubaydah discussion page under the headline "Major Edit":

3553: 3546: 107:

On April 28, 2009 I posted this to the Abu Zubaydah discussion page under the headline "Major Edit":

6207: 5289: 5027: 4926: 4611:

I answered some of your concerns. If you can copyedit one section, that would be already helpful !

4518: 4246: 4216: 4175: 3953: 3890: 3842: 3834: 3503: 3441: 3097: 3069: 3048: 3021: 2355: 1395:

them. Having written that article, we link to the corporate homepage of the company that makes it.

981: 125: 5779:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

5617:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

4233: 4202: 3718:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

7080:

consistently misuse a word, with their own definition, then they would keep on being "corrected".

5963: 5217: 4534:

Sorry about messing the article up. What does "centering on Surry County, North Carolina" mean?

4194: 4129: 3945: 3938: 2246: 2126: 2093: 2021: 1917: 1785: 241: 6121: 4230: 946:

Do you agree to work my way, yes or no? If no, then don't me for anymore help. I work one way. -

292:

has been filed concerning your conduct on Knowledge. The RFC entry can be found by your name in

6697: 6670: 6624: 6606: 6594: 6342: 6196:

Chinas Musik und Musikerziehung im kulturellen Austausch mit den Nachbarländern und dem Westen.

5852: 5349: 5343: 5281: 5124: 5115: 5100: 5080: 5053: 4731: 4527: 4206: 4086:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

3997: 3980: 3866: 3804: 3431:

Can you say me please. Are you the creator of the category site "Americans of Polish Descent"?

3333: 3313: 3000: 2875: 2533: 2524: 1950: 1908: 1039: 843: 139:

I replied to your post at my talk page, in order to keep the discussion in one place. Cheers. -

6834:

I'd recommend trying to find alternative words that are less emotional and hyperbolic. Try to

6824:. This makes further communication much more difficult, because your words cannot be taken at 5670:. But we can't use the sentence as it is. Please do not restore it in that form. Thank you. -- 4967: 4198: 4190: 4147: 3213:

Ok took the time to check properly - it was, believe it or not some junk left over from 2004

222:

careful discussion prior to large deletions does become the reasonable and right thing to do.

7594: 7543: 7486: 7333: 7275: 7010: 6874: 6762: 6645: 6558: 6496: 6444: 6426: 6397: 6382: 6060: 6021: 5981: 5884: 5699: 5531: 4979: 4858: 4762: 4645: 4107: 4072:, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, 3413: 3398: 3380: 3266: 3189: 3140: 2936: 2836: 2745: 2707: 2661: 2600: 2510: 2458: 2399: 2377: 2336: 2317: 2298: 2279: 2237: 2215: 1849: 1810: 1757: 1722: 1666: 1597: 1571: 1539: 1521: 1463: 1449: 1383: 1350: 1328: 1318: 1258: 1232: 1194: 1163: 1120: 1075: 1014: 941: 736:

Please, trust me on this. Let me help you, ok? You have to do that the way I'm telling you. -

694: 686: 669: 614: 374: 227: 4853:

Certainly, in this light, the primary usage of "biwa" in English is the musical instrument.

4476:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

3944:

Dig it, our good work has inspired our Catalan friends to translate the entire dang list to

3135:

It is very nice to hear from you! I don't know much about the subject you mention, however.

2931:

It is very nice to hear from you! I don't know much about the subject you mention, however.

7033: 6893: 6805: 6743: 6724: 6506: 6462: 6240: 6041: 6002: 5955: 5838: 5327: 5306: 5246: 5176: 5072: 5045: 4687: 4672: 4605: 4570: 4555: 4535: 4495: 4419: 4375: 4327: 4236: 4163: 4081: 3923: 3880: 3791: 3769: 3486: 3260: 3247: 2891: 2422: 2005: 1991: 1975: 1892: 1794:

sourced; otherwise, any editor may remove it at any time. That's the rule we all play by. -

1626: 1086: 806: 773: 625: 583: 564: 548: 515: 418: 400: 204: 153:

and other noticeboards, and I think I'm noticing a disturbing pattern. Do you realize that

99: 6151: 5663:, was removed because, as indicated in edit summary, it was pasted entirely from the book 1639:

job to take it to the talk page. That's the rule I play by, why are you entitled to more?

8: 7613: 6947: 6203: 5914: 5799: 5772: 5709: 5681: 5671: 5637: 5610: 5285: 5200: 5023: 4922: 4595: 4514: 4347: 4255: 4242: 4212: 4171: 4036: 3949: 3898: 3783: 3738: 3711: 3625: 3536: 3499: 3423: 3341: 3327: 3093: 3065: 3044: 3043:, though I might make the shire the main page and make a "for other uses" disambig page. 3017: 2449: 2103: 977: 961: 895: 647: 54: 17: 3464: 2545:

2 questions. It would be really helpful if you could give simple "yes/no" style answers.

2532:

option is to start an RFC/UC on them (collect diffs of clear-cut edits that violate the

2442:

Knowledge talk:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Knowledge#Where are the welcome templates?

579: 7564: 7555: 7506: 7469: 7432: 7418: 7302: 7245: 7213: 7051: 6987: 6911: 6858: 6620: 6331: 5943: 5935: 5780: 5748: 5488: 5208: 5019: 5005: 4895: 4835: 4785: 4748: 4298: 4125: 4013: 3683: 3512: 3479: 3221: 3204: 3174: 3162: 2796: 2691: 2638: 2578: 2523:

Hi. To start off, I need to convince you that actually the stalking (preferably called

2490: 2122: 2033: 1939: 1610:

it's a good idea, and nobody may oppose you? How is your position different from that?

1025: 602: 539: 293: 4450:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

4077: 2633:

expect an admin to discover the evidence for you - you have to provide it to them. --

2622:

Remember, if those editors are removing what are actually inappropriate sources, then

2617: 462:

is never used in Marathi, we use ड. And a lot of Marathi people are confused between "

6179: 5898: 5807: 5199:. Please modify others' edits as you see fit, but avoid simply reverting them. See 5190: 5135: 5111: 5096: 5076: 5049: 4739:

the term "lake", and not referred to as just "Biwa". Hence, I believe the instrument

4480:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

4356: 4140: 4105:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 3746: 3687: 3369: 3359: 2084: 1467: 431: 5172:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_June_4#Category:New_York_City_musicians

4883:

is not a common name for it in English. Hence, I agree with Badagnani that the word

1965: 722:

Actually, let me put that more clearly. If you're reverted, don't revert back. It's

540: 6422: 6393: 6378: 6113: 6102: 6031: 5554: 5431: 5412: 5403: 5356: 5298: 5228: 5165: 5156: 5036: 4986: 4887:

refers overwhelmingly-primarily to the musical instrument, in the English language.

4805:. It just seemed the move comment "Not necessary to move" seemed to lack reasoning. 4101: 4065: 4051: 3636: 3599: 3592: 3581: 3490: 3453: 3394: 3376: 3229: 3215:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Homo_erectus_soloensis&oldid=7677402

3153: 2883: 905: 873: 705: 681: 177: 7399:, and come to the understanding that every perspective described there, exists in 7239:

statements, to avoid having people (like me) lecture you about it? Cheers, man.

3994:

WT:WikiProject China#Naming convention for Chinese foods and usages of Wikitionary

3605: 3469: 1877:

Would you agree? If not, how would two reasonable people decide such a question? -

1476:

Does this make sense? Do you agree that consensus requires more than one person? -

904:

I don't know so much about the ice-cream headache image. I know that the links at

6889: 6801: 6796: 6778: 6739: 6720: 6524: 6458: 6354: 6271: 6087: 5237: 4817: 4757:

Yes. And any move should have been discussed thoroughly prior to engaging in it.

4712: 4491: 4091: 3912:

is viewed as inflammatory these days) - to formal dispute resolution procedures:

3909: 3567: 2736: 2591: 2502: 2190: 2172: 2147: 2048: 2022: 1053: 656: 410: 349: 270: 6853:

Does that all make sense? Feel free to ask for clarifications. Much thanks. --

6825: 5755:

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's

5593:

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's

5473:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 June 6#Category:Surnames by country

4069: 4068:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge. This has been done under

3694:

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's

492: 488: 484: 467: 463: 459: 53:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

7590: 7539: 7497: 7482: 7329: 7271: 7006: 6903: 6870: 6843: 6758: 6683: 6641: 6579: 6554: 6538: 6492: 6440: 6257: 6143: 6098: 6072: 6056: 6017: 5977: 5860: 5827: 5787: 5695: 5654: 5625: 4943: 4854: 4802: 4772: 4758: 4591: 4583: 4528: 4402: 4343: 4032: 3894: 3757: 3726: 3621: 3532: 3409: 3337: 3293: 3185: 3136: 3089: 3040: 3013: 3001: 2932: 2876: 2860: 2832: 2815: 2767: 2741: 2726: 2721: 2657: 2596: 2506: 2445: 2408: 2395: 2373: 2332: 2313: 2294: 2275: 2260: 2233: 2211: 2112: 2099: 2056: 1900: 1878: 1860: 1845: 1830: 1806: 1795: 1777: 1753: 1740: 1718: 1704: 1688: 1662: 1651: 1647: 1614: 1593: 1582: 1567: 1556: 1535: 1525: 1503: 1477: 1445: 1430: 1429:

agree with you? This is a very serious question. I do hope you can answer it. -

1406: 1379: 1365: 1346: 1332: 1314: 1303: 1285: 1254: 1243: 1228: 1217: 1190: 1179: 1174: 1159: 1148: 1144: 1116: 1105: 1045: 1031: 994: 957: 947: 933: 917: 891: 877: 863: 849: 827: 788: 762: 747: 737: 728: 713: 690: 665: 610: 563:

still have to take some photos of the goodies... Cheers. Thanks for your help.

393: 370: 325: 321: 285: 265: 223: 189: 161: 140: 1650:

20:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC) Again, linking to non-independent sources, I see. -

822:

If you think I'm part of the problem, then I certainly encourage you again to

7603: 7559: 7501: 7464: 7428: 7414: 7298: 7240: 7209: 7047: 6983: 6907: 6854: 6571:

your very next edit? Please stop accusing other people of threatening you. →

6454: 6326: 5939: 5909: 5739: 5694:

It was my mistake. I had been attempting to undo edits by an earlier editor.

5667: 5484: 5456: 5441: 5422: 5204: 5001: 4891: 4831: 4781: 4777: 4744: 4632: 4615: 4487: 4477: 4470: 4459: 4288: 4273: 4009: 3218: 3201: 3171: 3159: 2991: 2977: 2792: 2687: 2634: 2574: 2561: 2550: 2486: 2418: 2414: 2029: 1934: 1060: 1009: 414: 389: 329: 315: 289: 6736:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Badagnani_reopening_CFD

3764:

are hanging out there also. May you find rhythm with the beat of the mighty

3572:

You may want to comment or merely observe silently as the thread unfolds at

7585: 7535: 6693: 6174: 6132: 6055:

A precocious youngster, I presume. Does he meet our notability guidelines?

5803: 5238: 5130: 4911: 4701: 4548: 4371:. You've now restored a different version, properly sourced, which is fine 3918: 3886: 3742: 2080: 352:. I do not want to cause irritation or any harm, even if we are opponents. 150: 826:. It's rather rash to speak of "bad advice" when you haven't tried it... - 640: 6943:

Threats of violence or other off-wiki action (particularly death threats)

5993: 5550: 5381: 5224: 5152: 4651: 4008:

Please join that discussion before more time is wasted on these reverts.

3784: 3577: 2882:

I saw this new article and thought you might be interested. This one too

2845: 1399: 1209: 409:: the text is preserved at the Talk page for possible repair. It's clear 6978:

Does that discrepancy make sense? We need to share a common vocabulary,

6307:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

6553:

Thank you very much for your friendly comment. It is accepted as such.

6128: 6117: 5924: 5727: 5568: 5481:

Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 25#Category:Surnames by country

4813: 4708: 3662: 3518: 2946: 2168: 1632: 651: 606: 598: 5305:

FYI. A bit difficult to make out, but maybe you can make sense of it.

1001:

scrolling to participants and following the instructions! Easy as pie

6821: 6572: 6531: 6250: 6037: 5856: 5823: 4917:

Some fellows on a quest to add accent marks to everything think that

4827: 4398: 3289: 2256: 2052: 661: 185: 3967:

I think you need to take the article move and wikitionary matter to

3031:

Not a big problem at all, there are indeed two municipalities named

199:

I am tempted to remove this inappropriate comment that comes off as

5530:

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

5509: 5452: 5437: 5418: 5299: 5068:

Hi Badagnani, thanks for your answer. What's four tildes? Keith

4868: 4629: 4612: 4510: 4443: 4284: 4269: 4057: 3474: 3120:

Sincerely, Bongeun my e-mail address is bongeun319@hanmail.net

2987: 2973: 1899:, asking for more input. It seemed like a reasonable thing to do. - 458:

That may be because they are not proficient in typing Marathi font

149:

Hi. Badagnani, I've noticed your name popping up in places such as

5276:

in the title instead of player. I have no reason to believe that

2967: 916:

but he has to trust me a little bit. I don't know if it'll work. -

6158: 6147: 6083: 6016:

Very interesting! But not the world's oldest musical instrument.

4918: 4655: 6842:(read the 4 types detailed in that link), or clear instances of 3234: 2716:

by your disrespectful reaction to my best attempts to help you.

6689: 5516: 5502: 4663: 4584: 4307:, let me make my point clear before we erupt into an edit war. 2071: 932:

for hounding you will never have that effect. Think about it. -

433: 3158:

So whats happening there? what you have put in looks very odd

2251:

An discussion on some of your recent editing has been started

1974:

them on Knowledge and I have a photo. Let me know. Thanks.

7394:

Thirdly, I'd request that you read through this entire page:

6162: 5564:

Proposed deletion of International Tuba Euphonium Association

5549:

Why did you put the chinese next to Van Lang in this article?

5374:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andrew Meyer (2nd nomination)

4872: 4671:

some of it is too sweet for me. Anyway, have a good weekend.

4659: 3765: 1516:

It would probably be appropriate to move our discussion from

1502:

sources available. That word you omitted is very important. -

1441: 6421:). (I don't fully agree with the final sentence, either.) - 5790:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 5628:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 5588:

Notability not asserted, no references, long untouched stub.

5326:

Weren't you working on cherry related subject a while back?

4467:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi

4111:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

4082:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

3729:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 3598:

I'm extremely disappointed to find you edit warring over at

3563:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3332:

I'm curious if you have any idea who the IP accounts are on

2004:

I can't find anything about it on the net. Nothing. Weird.

6593:

Vegaswikian accused Badagnani of "vandalizing Knowledge".--

5817:

Working on Knowledge requires communication between editors

5264:

I don't have a stance on most of the cat titles there, but

4890:

Sorry for any confusion I might have caused earlier. :) --

4884: 4798: 4667: 3574:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Attack page

3284:

A discussion on some of your recent edits has been started

7413:

So, 2 questions, and 1 request to read a page. Thanks. --

6931:

I understand that this is how you are using the word, but

5767:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 5605:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 3963:

Manual of Style for Chinese subjects and WikiProject China

3706:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 820:

willing? - to provide me with this essential information.

6214:

PS: And with many instruments which are not in the list!

5759:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 5597:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 3698:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 3365:

is not a recommended image request template. Please use

2440:

Hi Badagnani! On 23 April 2009 you posted a message at

1682:

By the way, this "worst stalking you've experienced" is

1003: 369:

requested to do so with sincerity by long-time editors.

4830:...). Do you have any unmentioned input, Badagnani? -- 4735: 2964: 2905:

I am a freshman researching on Wiki. Could you help me?

1030:

Tell me what's confusing, and maybe I can explain it. -

5095:

Hi Badagnani, ok now I see that! Thanks for helping.

3112:

Hi! I'm a SNU freshman. The researching subject is....

1205:

to offer help. Why do you continue to reject my help?

6223:

User:Badagnani reported by User:William Allen Simpson

4361:

Please could you stop these hostile edit summaries ("

1961:

Slightly squished from being wrapped in plastic food.

1496:

This always involves using the best sources available

6982:

a common set-of-definitions for that vocabulary. --

4393:

Some of your recent edits are being discussed here:

3790:

I thought this article might be of interest to you.

2161:

List of Chinese music ensembles in the United States

2028:

Thank you very much for your work launching his bio.

5874:

Talk:Pseudocide#Merge_tag_from_Celebrity_Death_Hoax

4080:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please 2075: 1772:If you don't like how I handle the situation, then 3604:while you are simultaneously the subject of an RFC 3434:Can I ask you to this article a few things,please 1498:" Correction: This always involves using the best 6530:request to stop treating other editors poorly. → 4726:reasoning for thinking the musical instrument is 4505:Whoa, did you know there's an Inuit bowed zither? 4024:If you continue reverting people's edit silently 3610:If you are trying to tell the community that you 2828:Do not post here (as requested on 26 March 2009: 2391:Do not post here (as requested on 26 March 2009: 2369:Do not post here (as requested on 26 March 2009: 2229:Do not post here (as requested on 26 March 2009: 2207:Do not post here (as requested on 26 March 2009: 2043:"fixing errors or violations of Knowledge policy" 1954: 1735:We don't all agree that your valuable either. If 6933:it is not the way everyone else here is using it 3642:. It won't do, especially in light of the above 3498:the history/repertoire/development/revival/etc. 2890:. It's prodded, I have no idea if it's notable. 1137:Why won't you go find people who agree with you? 6305:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 5659:Hi. The sentence you restored to this article, 2686:be - nobody agrees completely on that... :\ -- 1752:Please don't post here again (second request). 388:better place for all of us if you stick to the 7522:was swiftly repopulated, while others such as 6457:? "Damage our category system"? Really? -- 6453:I'm guessing you're dropping all pretenses of 6284:. You're just not being good, and you must be 5879:Could you please respond to the discussion at 5260:Ukulele musicians (and Highland bagpipe stuff) 4070:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 1302:links with you, one-by-one. What do you say? - 280:RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Badagnani) 4102:the page that has been nominated for deletion 3857:Please stop your current edit war about page 3635:I've blocked you for 24h for edit warring on 3389:I would appreciate your input to the article 2473:2 Specific things I'd request a reply about: 1635:. Stop. When your edits are taken you, it is 1276:without helping me by doing the small things 6623:if you want your word to sound legitimate.-- 4722:Hi. Sorry to jump in, but could you explain 3973:WT:Manual of Style (use of Chinese language) 3552:Hello, Badagnani. You have new messages at 2070:I'm trying to get some info to clean up the 296:, and the actual discussion can be found at 5976:Why are these posts on my discussion page? 5483:. Your participation and input is invited. 1933:(i.e., people's republic) is used. Cheers, 176:I think it would be very helpful to review 6392:Once again, please stop the canvassing. - 6282:Knowledge:Wikiquette_alerts#User:Badagnani 4124:the page or have a copy emailed to you. 1444:article, one of the best at our project). 5822:would go about resolving the problem. -- 4983:was updated with a fact from the article 4335:sorry if my following words are offensive 3768:. Ta ta tiki tiki ta ta. Or something... 1061: 7579:to contain three or four surnames while 6483:had two surnames in it for weeks, while 5581:International Tuba Euphonium Association 5475:in which you participated was closed as 5195:I noticed that you reverted my edits on 4808:I was personally searching for "biwa," ( 3233: 3088:Right, but they're basically all within 1964: 298:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Badagnani 7396:meta:Conflicting Knowledge philosophies 6245:There is a discussion regarding you at 6190:Traditional Chinese musical instruments 5958:this issue to at least two more users. 5738:template has been added to the article 5579:template has been added to the article 5467:Deletion review for Surnames by Country 4666:? Tempting isn't it. :) I got some new 4486:This is an automatic notification by a 3673:template has been added to the article 14: 6407:Also, please don't arbitrarily remove 6368:Category talk:Korean-language surnames 6036:Do you think this musician is notable 5525:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Kamora 2417:photo and for the project addition on 1100:Why don't you just go get more people? 51:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6276:I've blocked you for edit warring at 3658:Proposed deletion of Premadasa Hegoda 2346:Question about my edits to Spare Ribs 1062: 300:, where you may want to participate. 7608:I thought I'd let you know that the 7183:decisions and opinions, but if your 6715:What exactly is inappropriate about 5913:blocking you as a first resort ...) 3863:Talk:Political music in China#Marge? 1398:is not to the corporate homepage of 609:meaning "Western" (i.e., European). 32: 5519:, an article that you created, for 3310:Talk:Music of southern China#Merges 30: 7581:Category:Chinese-language surnames 7532:Category:Chinese-language surnames 7520:Category:Chinese-language surnames 6485:Category:Chinese-language surnames 6278:Category:English-language surnames 5726: 5723:Proposed deletion of Krishna Bhatt 5567: 4442: 4116:does get deleted, you can contact 4056: 3661: 3545: 3035:. For now I've notated the shire/ 31: 7627: 7577:Category:Polish-language surnames 7524:Category:Polish-language surnames 7367:perspective of, might be helpful. 6481:Category:Korean-language surnames 5802:to delete is reached. Thank you. 4654:? Are you ready to give up your 5642:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 5508: 4966: 3756:The article is now at AfD. Also 1956: 1913:Hi Badagnani - please don't use 1897:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Lists 1550:Speaking of unanswered questions 1512:It would probably be appropriate 1002: 203:a preachy and demeaning attack. 36: 6846:(whilst keeping in mind that: " 6779: 6377:or another appropriate page. - 6355: 6280:and per the concerns raised at 3969:WT:Naming conventions (Chinese) 3517:I'm curious about your view of 3375:, with appropriate parameters. 2413:Thanks very much for the great 2191: 2148: 1631:And now you're edit warring at 356: 336: 304: 248: 6638:Category talk:Jewish inventors 5853:Knowledge:Talk#User_talk_pages 3992:Update; I raise the matter to 2850:Badagnani, I realize you were 1524:. Would you be ok with that? - 805:and not part of the solution. 13: 1: 6487:was swiftly repopulated from 5798:, where it may be deleted if 5636:, where it may be deleted if 4413:Philippine musical instrument 3859:Talk:Political music in China 3737:, where it may be deleted if 3217:- my apologies even further! 2387:Fourth reminder to GraYoshi2x 2225:Second reminder to GraYoshi2x 1518:Knowledge talk:External links 1327:Ok, then, let's do it. Go to 24:User talk:Badagnani/Archive17 6688:I'm currently expanding the 5363: 4936:Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi 4456:Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi 4438:Abeer Qassim Hamza al-Janabi 4078:criteria for speedy deletion 3391:Knowledge:Requested pictures 3242:I'm eating something called 2824:Fifth reminder to GraYoshi2x 2674:The editors were definitely 2624:they are correct in doing so 2616:, or article history pages 2365:Third reminder to GraYoshi2x 2308:Fourth reminder to User:Ronz 2270:Second reminder to User:Ronz 1969:profile with bite taken out. 7: 6950:to userpages or talk pages. 6692:article, so I'm aiming for 5765:Knowledge's deletion policy 5603:Knowledge's deletion policy 5479:and is now under review at 5015:Since you like launeddas... 4454:. The nominated article is 4156:pt:Categoria:Gaitas-de-fole 3704:Knowledge's deletion policy 2327:Fifth reminder to User:Ronz 2289:Third reminder to User:Ronz 1957:File:Xôi Bánh Phòng 004.jpg 260:Re: Your question at WP:UAA 10: 7632: 7179:I agree with many of your 6218:WP:AN/EW for July 15, 2009 5197:List of capsicum cultivars 4650:Why are you interested in 3837:) 15:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 3607:and a current AN/I report. 3526:Copy to Wikibooks Cookbook 3385:16:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 3346:11:46, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 3322:05:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 3298:22:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 3275:06:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 3256:18:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3225:14:52, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 3208:14:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC) 3194:17:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3178:11:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3166:11:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3145:04:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3130:04:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3102:01:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3074:01:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3053:01:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3026:00:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 2996:20:26, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 2982:20:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 2941:05:14, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 2926:01:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 2900:22:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 2871:15:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 2841:04:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 2819:13:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 2801:00:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC) 2771:13:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 2766:help you, if you let me. - 2750:05:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 2730:03:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC) 2696:21:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2666:20:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2643:20:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2605:19:42, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2583:19:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2515:18:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2495:18:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2454:12:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2431:05:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2404:01:38, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2382:01:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC) 2360:12:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 2341:04:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 2322:20:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2303:18:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2284:18:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2265:02:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2242:02:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2220:02:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2198:02:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2177:07:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 2155:03:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC) 2131:06:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 2108:14:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 2038:03:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 2014:03:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 2000:02:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 1984:02:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 1946:22:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1904:13:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1882:21:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1864:12:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1854:05:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1834:21:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1815:20:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1799:20:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1781:13:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1762:23:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1744:13:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1727:05:43, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1708:21:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1692:21:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1671:20:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1655:20:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1618:21:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1602:20:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1586:20:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1576:20:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1560:20:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1544:20:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1529:19:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1507:20:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1481:20:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1454:20:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1434:18:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1410:20:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1388:20:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1369:18:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1355:18:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1336:18:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1323:18:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1307:18:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1289:05:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1263:04:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1247:04:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1237:04:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1221:04:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1199:04:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1183:04:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1168:04:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1152:03:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1125:03:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1109:03:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1095:18:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1071:03:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1049:01:28, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1035:22:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 1021:12:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 986:06:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 966:08:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 951:02:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 937:02:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 921:02:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 900:02:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 881:01:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 867:01:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 858:What do you want me to do? 853:22:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 831:04:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 815:02:37, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 792:23:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 782:23:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 766:22:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 751:22:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 741:21:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 732:21:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 717:21:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 699:21:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 674:21:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 634:21:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 619:21:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 592:21:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 573:20:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 557:20:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 532:08:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 505:07:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 480:07:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 453:07:10, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 427:03:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 379:04:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 363:03:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 343:03:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 311:00:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 275:19:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 255:22:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 232:19:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 213:18:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 194:18:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 165:21:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 144:15:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 7617:05:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC) 7599:05:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7570:05:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7548:05:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7512:05:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7491:05:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7475:05:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7455:I'm just a bit curious... 7437:06:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC) 7423:06:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7338:05:51, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7307:05:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7280:05:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7251:05:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7218:05:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7056:05:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7042:03:12, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 7015:02:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 6992:00:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 6916:00:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 6898:00:37, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 6879:00:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 6863:23:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6810:00:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 6786:22:58, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6767:22:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6748:21:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6729:21:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6710:Category:Jewish Inventors 6704:21:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6679:22:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6650:22:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6631:22:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6615:22:05, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6601:21:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6588:21:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6563:20:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6547:19:50, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6515:18:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6501:18:08, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6489:Category:Chinese surnames 6467:07:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6449:05:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6431:20:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 6402:07:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 6387:20:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 6362:20:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 6337:20:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 6319:07:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC) 6299:WP:AN/I for July 18, 2009 6294:21:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 6266:07:13, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 6236:05:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC) 6212:16:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 6185:05:11, 11 July 2009 (UTC) 5788:proposed deletion process 5713:23:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 5704:22:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 5685:18:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 5675:18:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC) 5668:non-free content policies 5650:19:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 5626:proposed deletion process 5559:06:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 5540:23:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 5493:05:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC) 5461:18:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 5446:18:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 5427:17:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 5408:17:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 5368:16:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC) 5336:20:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC) 5321:History of dried cherries 5315:05:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC) 5294:16:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 5255:18:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC) 5233:03:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC) 4743:the primary topic. :) -- 4473:with four tildes (~~~~). 4064:A tag has been placed on 3727:proposed deletion process 2968:Traditional Chinese (ROC) 2089:21:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 2061:20:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 320:I would like you to read 288:. Please be aware that a 7528:Category:Polish surnames 6065:23:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 6050:17:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 6026:15:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 6011:08:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 5986:18:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 5968:07:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 5948:07:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC) 5918:04:50, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 5893:03:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC) 5865:21:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 5847:21:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 5832:18:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC) 5812:20:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC) 5792:speedy deletion criteria 5630:speedy deletion criteria 5213:15:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 5185:07:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 5161:01:43, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 5146:fooian American articles 5141:02:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC) 5120:06:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 5105:07:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 5089:07:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 5062:06:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 5032:02:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 5010:02:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 4959:DYK for Gopchang jeongol 4954:04:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 4931:03:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 4900:21:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC) 4863:04:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 4840:21:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 4822:05:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 4790:04:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 4767:03:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 4753:18:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 4717:16:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 4696:18:50, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 4681:02:45, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 4640:20:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 4623:20:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 4600:15:26, 28 May 2009 (UTC) 4579:06:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 4564:06:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC) 4544:02:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 4523:02:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC) 4500:21:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC) 4428:00:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC) 4407:17:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC) 4384:15:07, 17 May 2009 (UTC) 4352:13:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC) 4293:04:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC) 4278:04:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC) 4251:15:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC) 4221:18:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 4180:17:23, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 4134:17:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC) 4041:12:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC) 4018:03:44, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 4004:18:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 3987:17:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 3958:16:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 3932:11:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC) 3903:09:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 3875:05:24, 11 May 2009 (UTC) 3852:Political music in China 3731:speedy deletion criteria 3489:and bringing it over to 3039:on the disambig page as 2965:Simplified Chinese (PRC) 2613:. Individual edit diffs 2609:Stalking: Then you need 6939:Threats of legal action 4993:Did you know? talk page 4195:ca:Categoria:Cornamuses 4152:fr:Catégorie:Cornemuses 3946:ca:Llista de cornamuses 3939:ca:Llista de cornamuses 3847:20:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 3800:19:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 3778:20:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 3751:22:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC) 3652:07:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 3630:12:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 3586:00:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 3541:13:58, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 3508:07:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 3446:19:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 3418:06:03, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 3403:06:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC) 3303:Music of southern China 2066:Speak and read Italian? 972:Yangmei in Shanghainese 242:Foam take-out container 201:a snide personal attack 130:15:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 7556:haste is not necessary 6667:the original CFD close 5757:criteria for inclusion 5731: 5640:to delete is reached. 5595:criteria for inclusion 5572: 5350:Talk:2008 Guizhou riot 5282:Great Highland Bagpipe 5203:for more information. 4447: 4207:no:Kategori:Sekkepipen 4143:in five more languages 4120:to request that they 4061: 3819: 3741:to delete is reached. 3696:criteria for inclusion 3666: 3550: 3485:Found another pipe on 3428:Hello dear Badagnani, 3239: 2203:Reminder to GraYoshi2x 2076:italian gelato article 1970: 1962: 114: 6419:WikiProject Languages 6311:William Allen Simpson 6228:William Allen Simpson 6198:Bremen 2003 (Diss.) ( 5796:Articles for Deletion 5794:or it can be sent to 5761:What Knowledge is not 5730: 5634:Articles for Deletion 5632:or it can be sent to 5599:What Knowledge is not 5571: 5499:Articles for deletion 4478:articles for deletion 4460:What Knowledge is not 4446: 4320:(look at the photoes) 4234:sv:Kategori:Säckpipor 4203:sv:Kategori:Säckpipan 4060: 3814: 3735:Articles for Deletion 3733:or it can be sent to 3700:What Knowledge is not 3665: 3554:Viriditas's talk page 3549: 3334:Talk:Buddha's delight 3237: 2951:It's the fifth tone. 1968: 1960: 1522:Talk:List of liqueurs 1464:Talk:List of liqueurs 1329:Talk:List of liqueurs 1141:do something about it 687:Garland chrysanthemum 109: 49:of past discussions. 6815:Meaning of the words 6412:Surnames by language 6286:William M. Connolley 6071:Proposed merges for 4736:http://stats.grok.se 4606:Talk:China_in_Africa 4469:. Please be sure to 4240:uk:Категорія:Волинки 4237:tr:Kategori:Gaydalar 4231:fi:Luokka:Säkkipilli 4164:tr:Kategori:Gaydalar 4160:ru:Категория:Волынки 3977:WT:WikiProject China 3644:William M. Connolley 3487:ast:Gaita_cabreiresa 1893:Knowledge talk:Lists 1774:go get another admin 290:request for comments 6455:assuming good faith 5471:The discussion for 4810:Eriobotrya japonica 4340:Yours respectfully 4260:It looks more like 4199:ast:Categoría:Gaita 4191:gl:Categoría:Gaitas 4148:es:Categoría:Gaitas 4118:one of these admins 2916:Sincerely, Bongeun 2139:Your random reverts 2121:random deletions.-- 1891:I've left notes at 1490:Independent sources 1421:I'm puzzled by this 995:Wikiproject Spirits 172:A friendly reminder 18:User talk:Badagnani 6157:Proposed merge of 6142:Proposed merge of 6127:Proposed merge of 6112:Proposed merge of 6097:Proposed merge of 6082:Proposed merge of 5998:Early instrument: 5936:chord-scale system 5932:User:87.69.130.159 5732: 5573: 5417:It is jiǔniàng. -- 5020:Reclam de xeremies 4871:/Courgette, or to 4471:sign your comments 4448: 4062: 3861:and discuss it at 3667: 3561:remove this notice 3551: 3480:de:Marktsackpfeife 3240: 2714:extremely insulted 2331:Do not post here. 2312:Do not post here. 2293:Do not post here. 2274:Do not post here. 2182:Wiktionary linking 1971: 1963: 824:find another admin 135:Replied at my page 6671:Elen of the Roads 6607:Elen of the Roads 6590: 6549: 6375:WikiProject Korea 6268: 6183: 5899:Steven Dale Green 5736:proposed deletion 5577:proposed deletion 5545:Names for Vietnam 5515:I have nominated 5362: 5348:You have mail at 5266:Ukulele musicians 5139: 5092: 5075:comment added by 5065: 5048:comment added by 4999: 4998: 4771:Not necessarily. 4637: 4620: 4141:Category:Bagpipes 3867:Anthony Appleyard 3671:proposed deletion 3355:Please note that 3351:Requesting images 3314:Anthony Appleyard 2573:Thanks again. -- 2436:Welcome templates 1942: 1427:other Wikipedians 1069: 535: 518:comment added by 97: 96: 61: 60: 55:current talk page 22:(Redirected from 7623: 6781: 6586: 6584: 6577: 6545: 6543: 6536: 6416: 6410: 6357: 6264: 6262: 6255: 6177: 6114:Maple spice cake 6103:Malabari paratha 5778: 5777: 5771: 5616: 5615: 5609: 5532:Little Professor 5512: 5406: 5400: 5397: 5394: 5391: 5388: 5385: 5364: 5361: 5359: 5354: 5133: 5091: 5069: 5064: 5042: 4987:Gopchang jeongol 4970: 4963: 4962: 4636: 4633: 4619: 4616: 4333:Mr. Badagnani, ( 4310:I moved it into 4097: 4096: 4090: 4066:Alley Cat Allies 4052:Alley Cat Allies 3717: 3716: 3710: 3675:Premadasa Hegoda 3637:Chaozhou xianshi 3600:Chaozhou xianshi 3593:Chaozhou xianshi 3564: 3530: 3524: 3491:Gaita cabreiresa 3465:de:Schäferpfeife 3454:List of bagpipes 3374: 3368: 3364: 3358: 3267:Piano non troppo 2884:Cornstalk fiddle 2852:notified earlier 2193: 2150: 1958: 1940: 1932: 1928:PRChina-geo-stub 1926: 1922: 1916: 1208:Did I not chase 1068: 1065: 1064: 1019: 1017: 1012: 1006: 906:List of liqueurs 874:List of liqueurs 706:List of liqueurs 534: 512: 358: 338: 306: 273: 250: 88: 63: 62: 40: 39: 33: 27: 7631: 7630: 7626: 7625: 7624: 7622: 7621: 7620: 7614:Good Ol’factory 7610:discussion here 7606: 7457: 7034:ChildofMidnight 6817: 6713: 6686: 6580: 6573: 6539: 6532: 6527: 6507:ChildofMidnight 6414: 6408: 6371: 6348: 6301: 6274: 6258: 6251: 6243: 6220: 6192: 6088:Jumble (cookie) 6076: 6042:ChildofMidnight 6034: 6003:ChildofMidnight 5996: 5928: 5915:Good Ol’factory 5902: 5877: 5839:ChildofMidnight 5819: 5775: 5769: 5768: 5725: 5657: 5613: 5607: 5606: 5566: 5547: 5513: 5506: 5469: 5434: 5415: 5398: 5395: 5392: 5389: 5386: 5383: 5380: 5377: 5357: 5355: 5346: 5328:ChildofMidnight 5324: 5307:ChildofMidnight 5303: 5262: 5247:ChildofMidnight 5242: 5220: 5218:category rename 5193: 5168: 5148: 5127: 5070: 5043: 5039: 5017: 4961: 4952: 4938: 4915: 4734:? According to 4704: 4688:ChildofMidnight 4673:ChildofMidnight 4648: 4634: 4617: 4609: 4588: 4571:ChildofMidnight 4556:ChildofMidnight 4551: 4536:ChildofMidnight 4532: 4507: 4441: 4420:ChildofMidnight 4416: 4391: 4389:Courtesy notice 4376:Gordonofcartoon 4359: 4322:and I reverted 4301: 4258: 4145: 4094: 4088: 4087: 4055: 4048:Speedy deletion 3965: 3942: 3924:Gordonofcartoon 3883: 3854: 3809:Hey Badagnani, 3807: 3792:ChildofMidnight 3788: 3770:ChildofMidnight 3762:Vijay Kangutkar 3714: 3708: 3707: 3660: 3596: 3570: 3565: 3558: 3528: 3522: 3515: 3457: 3426: 3372: 3366: 3362: 3356: 3353: 3330: 3305: 3282: 3280:Courtesy notice 3263: 3248:ChildofMidnight 3232: 3156: 3114: 3005: 2949: 2909:Dear Badagnani 2907: 2892:ChildofMidnight 2880: 2869: 2848: 2826: 2811: 2710: 2534:WP:Wikihounding 2525:WP:Wikihounding 2461: 2438: 2423:ChildofMidnight 2411: 2389: 2367: 2348: 2329: 2310: 2291: 2272: 2249: 2247:Courtesy notice 2227: 2205: 2184: 2164: 2141: 2115: 2096: 2094:Trieu Thi Trinh 2068: 2045: 2026: 2023:John Blake, Jr. 2006:ChildofMidnight 1992:ChildofMidnight 1976:ChildofMidnight 1953: 1930: 1924: 1920: 1914: 1911: 1889: 1874: 1788: 1786:Burden of proof 1770: 1629: 1552: 1514: 1492: 1423: 1299: 1102: 1087:ChildofMidnight 1078: 1056: 1042: 1028: 1015: 1010: 1008: 998: 974: 944: 885:That's what it 860: 846: 807:ChildofMidnight 774:ChildofMidnight 710: 657:Mentha aquatica 626:ChildofMidnight 584:ChildofMidnight 582:on at once. :) 565:ChildofMidnight 549:ChildofMidnight 544: 513: 437: 419:Gordonofcartoon 403: 318: 282: 269: 262: 205:ChildofMidnight 174: 137: 104:Hey Badagnani, 102: 84: 37: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 7629: 7605: 7602: 7573: 7572: 7517: 7516: 7515: 7514: 7456: 7453: 7452: 7451: 7450: 7449: 7448: 7447: 7446: 7445: 7444: 7443: 7442: 7441: 7440: 7439: 7411: 7380: 7379: 7378: 7377: 7376: 7375: 7374: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7370: 7369: 7349: 7348: 7347: 7346: 7345: 7344: 7343: 7342: 7341: 7340: 7328:welcome here. 7316: 7315: 7314: 7313: 7312: 7311: 7310: 7309: 7287: 7286: 7285: 7284: 7283: 7282: 7262: 7261: 7260: 7259: 7258: 7257: 7256: 7255: 7254: 7253: 7227: 7226: 7225: 7224: 7223: 7222: 7221: 7220: 7195: 7194: 7193: 7192: 7191: 7190: 7189: 7188: 7170: 7169: 7168: 7167: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7163: 7152: 7151: 7150: 7149: 7148: 7147: 7146: 7145: 7132: 7131: 7130: 7129: 7128: 7127: 7126: 7125: 7088: 7087: 7086: 7085: 7084: 7083: 7082: 7081: 7077: 7067: 7066: 7065: 7064: 7063: 7062: 7061: 7060: 7059: 7058: 7022: 7021: 7020: 7019: 7018: 7017: 6997: 6996: 6995: 6994: 6973: 6972: 6971: 6970: 6969:wiki-editors). 6963: 6962: 6961: 6960: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6951: 6944: 6941: 6929: 6928:(editconflict) 6923: 6922: 6921: 6920: 6919: 6918: 6882: 6881: 6816: 6813: 6793: 6792: 6791: 6790: 6789: 6788: 6751: 6750: 6712: 6707: 6685: 6682: 6663: 6662: 6661: 6660: 6659: 6658: 6657: 6656: 6655: 6654: 6653: 6652: 6526: 6523: 6522: 6521: 6520: 6519: 6518: 6517: 6474: 6473: 6472: 6471: 6470: 6469: 6405: 6404: 6370: 6365: 6347: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6308: 6300: 6297: 6273: 6270: 6242: 6239: 6225: 6219: 6216: 6204:Reiner Stoppok 6191: 6188: 6171: 6170: 6155: 6144:Butterfly cake 6140: 6125: 6110: 6099:Kerala porotta 6095: 6075: 6073:Food and Drink 6069: 6068: 6067: 6033: 6030: 6029: 6028: 5995: 5992: 5991: 5990: 5989: 5988: 5971: 5970: 5927: 5921: 5901: 5896: 5876: 5871: 5870: 5869: 5868: 5867: 5818: 5815: 5753: 5752: 5724: 5721: 5720: 5719: 5718: 5717: 5716: 5715: 5710:Moonriddengirl 5689: 5688: 5682:Moonriddengirl 5672:Moonriddengirl 5656: 5653: 5591: 5590: 5565: 5562: 5546: 5543: 5507: 5505: 5501:nomination of 5496: 5468: 5465: 5464: 5463: 5433: 5430: 5414: 5411: 5376: 5371: 5345: 5344:Arilang say Hi 5342: 5340: 5323: 5318: 5302: 5297: 5286:MatthewVanitas 5278:ukulele player 5261: 5258: 5241: 5236: 5219: 5216: 5192: 5189: 5167: 5164: 5147: 5144: 5126: 5125:Korean cuisine 5123: 5038: 5035: 5024:MatthewVanitas 5016: 5013: 4997: 4996: 4971: 4960: 4957: 4948: 4937: 4934: 4923:MatthewVanitas 4914: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4902: 4888: 4847: 4846: 4845: 4844: 4843: 4842: 4806: 4794: 4793: 4792: 4703: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4658:ways for some 4647: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4608: 4603: 4587: 4582: 4550: 4547: 4531: 4529:Benton Flippen 4526: 4515:MatthewVanitas 4506: 4503: 4440: 4436:nomination of 4431: 4415: 4410: 4390: 4387: 4358: 4355: 4300: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4257: 4254: 4243:MatthewVanitas 4228: 4227: 4213:MatthewVanitas 4209: 4205: 4201: 4197: 4193: 4188: 4187: 4172:MatthewVanitas 4166: 4162: 4158: 4154: 4150: 4144: 4137: 4054: 4050:nomination of 4045: 4044: 4043: 4029: 4022: 4021: 4020: 3964: 3961: 3950:MatthewVanitas 3941: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3882: 3879: 3878: 3877: 3853: 3850: 3839:ArthurThomas24 3831:ArthurThomas24 3806: 3803: 3787: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3758:Vikash Maharaj 3692: 3691: 3682:subject fails 3659: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3595: 3589: 3569: 3566: 3557: 3544: 3514: 3511: 3500:MatthewVanitas 3483: 3482: 3477: 3472: 3467: 3456: 3450: 3438:217.114.220.34 3425: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3352: 3349: 3329: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3304: 3301: 3281: 3278: 3262: 3259: 3231: 3228: 3211: 3210: 3197: 3196: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3148: 3147: 3113: 3110: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3094:MatthewVanitas 3090:Aliste (shire) 3081: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3066:MatthewVanitas 3056: 3055: 3045:MatthewVanitas 3041:Aliste (shire) 3018:MatthewVanitas 3014:Aliste (shire) 3004: 3002:Aliste (shire) 2999: 2948: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2906: 2903: 2879: 2877:Piva (bagpipe) 2874: 2865: 2847: 2844: 2825: 2822: 2810: 2809:Another admin? 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2753: 2752: 2709: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2680: 2672: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2627: 2620: 2611:specific proof 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2554: 2546: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2518: 2517: 2483: 2482: 2478: 2460: 2457: 2437: 2434: 2410: 2407: 2388: 2385: 2366: 2363: 2352:98.226.204.252 2347: 2344: 2328: 2325: 2309: 2306: 2290: 2287: 2271: 2268: 2248: 2245: 2226: 2223: 2204: 2201: 2183: 2180: 2163: 2158: 2140: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2114: 2111: 2095: 2092: 2067: 2064: 2044: 2041: 2025: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 1952: 1951:Xôi Bánh Phòng 1949: 1918:China-geo-stub 1910: 1909:China-geo-stub 1907: 1888: 1885: 1873: 1872:Reasonableness 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1818: 1817: 1787: 1784: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1730: 1729: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1674: 1673: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1579: 1578: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1513: 1510: 1491: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1457: 1456: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1358: 1357: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1298: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1240: 1239: 1202: 1201: 1171: 1170: 1128: 1127: 1101: 1098: 1077: 1074: 1055: 1052: 1041: 1040:Do not restore 1038: 1027: 1024: 997: 992: 990: 978:PalaceGuard008 973: 970: 969: 968: 943: 940: 929: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 859: 856: 845: 844:External links 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 797: 796: 795: 794: 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 709: 703: 702: 701: 677: 676: 644: 643: 622: 621: 576: 575: 543: 538: 537: 536: 509: 508: 507: 436: 430: 402: 399: 398: 397: 366: 365: 317: 314: 281: 278: 261: 258: 237: 236: 235: 234: 216: 215: 173: 170: 169: 168: 136: 133: 122:ArthurThomas24 101: 98: 95: 94: 89: 82: 77: 72: 69: 59: 58: 41: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7628: 7619: 7618: 7615: 7611: 7601: 7600: 7596: 7592: 7587: 7582: 7578: 7571: 7568: 7567: 7563: 7562: 7557: 7552: 7551: 7550: 7549: 7545: 7541: 7537: 7533: 7529: 7525: 7521: 7513: 7510: 7509: 7505: 7504: 7499: 7494: 7493: 7492: 7488: 7484: 7479: 7478: 7477: 7476: 7473: 7472: 7468: 7467: 7462: 7438: 7434: 7430: 7426: 7425: 7424: 7420: 7416: 7412: 7408: 7407: 7403:here. You've 7402: 7401:large numbers 7398: 7397: 7392: 7391: 7390: 7389: 7388: 7387: 7386: 7385: 7384: 7383: 7382: 7381: 7368: 7366: 7361: 7360: 7359: 7358: 7357: 7356: 7355: 7354: 7353: 7352: 7351: 7350: 7339: 7335: 7331: 7326: 7325: 7324: 7323: 7322: 7321: 7320: 7319: 7318: 7317: 7308: 7304: 7300: 7295: 7294: 7293: 7292: 7291: 7290: 7289: 7288: 7281: 7277: 7273: 7268: 7267: 7266: 7265: 7264: 7263: 7252: 7249: 7248: 7244: 7243: 7237: 7236: 7235: 7234: 7233: 7232: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7228: 7219: 7215: 7211: 7207: 7203: 7202: 7201: 7200: 7199: 7198: 7197: 7196: 7186: 7182: 7178: 7177: 7176: 7175: 7174: 7173: 7172: 7171: 7160: 7159: 7158: 7157: 7156: 7155: 7154: 7153: 7144: 7140: 7139: 7138: 7137: 7136: 7135: 7134: 7133: 7124: 7121: 7118: 7115: 7112: 7109: 7106: 7103: 7100: 7096: 7095: 7094: 7093: 7092: 7091: 7090: 7089: 7078: 7075: 7074: 7073: 7072: 7071: 7070: 7069: 7068: 7057: 7053: 7049: 7045: 7044: 7043: 7039: 7035: 7030: 7029: 7028: 7027: 7026: 7025: 7024: 7023: 7016: 7012: 7008: 7003: 7002: 7001: 7000: 6999: 6998: 6993: 6989: 6985: 6981: 6977: 6976: 6975: 6974: 6967: 6966: 6965: 6964: 6958: 6952: 6949: 6945: 6942: 6940: 6937: 6936: 6934: 6930: 6927: 6926: 6925: 6924: 6917: 6913: 6909: 6905: 6901: 6900: 6899: 6895: 6891: 6886: 6885: 6884: 6883: 6880: 6876: 6872: 6867: 6866: 6865: 6864: 6860: 6856: 6851: 6849: 6845: 6841: 6837: 6832: 6829: 6827: 6823: 6812: 6811: 6807: 6803: 6798: 6797:wheel-warring 6787: 6784: 6783: 6782: 6774: 6770: 6769: 6768: 6764: 6760: 6755: 6754: 6753: 6752: 6749: 6745: 6741: 6737: 6733: 6732: 6731: 6730: 6726: 6722: 6718: 6711: 6706: 6705: 6702: 6700: 6695: 6691: 6681: 6680: 6676: 6672: 6668: 6651: 6647: 6643: 6639: 6634: 6633: 6632: 6629: 6627: 6622: 6618: 6617: 6616: 6612: 6608: 6604: 6603: 6602: 6599: 6597: 6592: 6591: 6589: 6585: 6583: 6578: 6576: 6570: 6567:Then why was 6566: 6565: 6564: 6560: 6556: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6548: 6544: 6542: 6537: 6535: 6516: 6512: 6508: 6504: 6503: 6502: 6498: 6494: 6490: 6486: 6482: 6479:Yes, really. 6478: 6477: 6476: 6475: 6468: 6464: 6460: 6456: 6452: 6451: 6450: 6446: 6442: 6437: 6436: 6435: 6434: 6433: 6432: 6428: 6424: 6420: 6413: 6403: 6399: 6395: 6391: 6390: 6389: 6388: 6384: 6380: 6376: 6369: 6364: 6363: 6360: 6359: 6358: 6346: 6338: 6335: 6334: 6330: 6329: 6323: 6322: 6321: 6320: 6316: 6312: 6306: 6296: 6295: 6291: 6287: 6283: 6279: 6269: 6267: 6263: 6261: 6256: 6254: 6248: 6238: 6237: 6233: 6229: 6224: 6215: 6213: 6209: 6205: 6201: 6197: 6187: 6186: 6181: 6176: 6168: 6164: 6160: 6156: 6153: 6149: 6145: 6141: 6138: 6134: 6130: 6126: 6123: 6119: 6115: 6111: 6108: 6104: 6100: 6096: 6093: 6089: 6085: 6081: 6080: 6079: 6074: 6066: 6062: 6058: 6054: 6053: 6052: 6051: 6047: 6043: 6039: 6027: 6023: 6019: 6015: 6014: 6013: 6012: 6008: 6004: 6000: 5987: 5983: 5979: 5975: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5969: 5965: 5961: 5960:87.69.130.159 5957: 5956:wp:canvassing 5952: 5951: 5950: 5949: 5945: 5941: 5937: 5933: 5926: 5920: 5919: 5916: 5911: 5907: 5900: 5895: 5894: 5890: 5886: 5882: 5875: 5866: 5862: 5858: 5854: 5850: 5849: 5848: 5844: 5840: 5836: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5829: 5825: 5814: 5813: 5809: 5805: 5801: 5797: 5793: 5789: 5784: 5782: 5781:its talk page 5774: 5766: 5762: 5758: 5751: 5750: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5741: 5740:Krishna Bhatt 5737: 5729: 5714: 5711: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5701: 5697: 5693: 5692: 5691: 5690: 5686: 5683: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5676: 5673: 5669: 5665: 5662: 5652: 5651: 5647: 5643: 5639: 5635: 5631: 5627: 5622: 5620: 5619:its talk page 5612: 5604: 5600: 5596: 5589: 5586: 5585: 5584: 5582: 5578: 5570: 5561: 5560: 5556: 5552: 5542: 5541: 5537: 5533: 5528: 5526: 5522: 5518: 5511: 5504: 5500: 5495: 5494: 5490: 5486: 5482: 5478: 5474: 5462: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5449: 5448: 5447: 5443: 5439: 5429: 5428: 5424: 5420: 5410: 5409: 5405: 5402: 5401: 5375: 5370: 5369: 5366: 5365: 5360: 5351: 5341: 5338: 5337: 5333: 5329: 5322: 5317: 5316: 5312: 5308: 5301: 5296: 5295: 5291: 5287: 5283: 5279: 5275: 5271: 5267: 5257: 5256: 5252: 5248: 5240: 5235: 5234: 5230: 5226: 5215: 5214: 5210: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5188: 5186: 5182: 5181: 5178: 5173: 5163: 5162: 5158: 5154: 5143: 5142: 5137: 5132: 5122: 5121: 5117: 5113: 5107: 5106: 5102: 5098: 5093: 5090: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5074: 5066: 5063: 5059: 5055: 5051: 5047: 5034: 5033: 5029: 5025: 5021: 5012: 5011: 5007: 5003: 4994: 4990: 4989: 4988: 4982: 4981: 4980:Did you know? 4976: 4972: 4969: 4965: 4964: 4956: 4955: 4951: 4946: 4945: 4933: 4932: 4928: 4924: 4920: 4913: 4901: 4897: 4893: 4889: 4886: 4882: 4878: 4874: 4870: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4860: 4856: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4848: 4841: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4825: 4824: 4823: 4819: 4815: 4811: 4807: 4804: 4800: 4795: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4774: 4770: 4769: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4750: 4746: 4742: 4737: 4733: 4732:primary topic 4729: 4725: 4721: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4714: 4710: 4697: 4693: 4689: 4685: 4684: 4683: 4682: 4678: 4674: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4646:Taking photos 4641: 4638: 4631: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4621: 4614: 4607: 4602: 4601: 4597: 4593: 4586: 4581: 4580: 4576: 4572: 4566: 4565: 4561: 4557: 4546: 4545: 4541: 4537: 4530: 4525: 4524: 4520: 4516: 4512: 4502: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4479: 4474: 4472: 4468: 4463: 4461: 4457: 4453: 4445: 4439: 4435: 4430: 4429: 4425: 4421: 4414: 4409: 4408: 4404: 4400: 4396: 4386: 4385: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4370: 4366: 4364: 4354: 4353: 4349: 4345: 4341: 4338: 4336: 4331: 4329: 4328:WP:COMMONNAME 4325: 4321: 4318: 4316: 4313: 4308: 4306: 4294: 4290: 4286: 4282: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4275: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4253: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4241: 4238: 4235: 4232: 4225: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4218: 4214: 4210: 4208: 4204: 4200: 4196: 4192: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4177: 4173: 4167: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4142: 4136: 4135: 4131: 4127: 4126:Greedyhalibut 4123: 4119: 4114: 4110: 4109: 4108:the talk page 4104: 4103: 4093: 4084: 4083: 4079: 4075: 4071: 4067: 4059: 4053: 4049: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4007: 4006: 4005: 4002: 4000: 3995: 3991: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3985: 3983: 3978: 3974: 3970: 3960: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3947: 3940: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3920: 3916: 3914: 3911: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3876: 3872: 3868: 3864: 3860: 3856: 3855: 3849: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3836: 3832: 3827: 3823: 3818: 3813: 3810: 3802: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3786: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3767: 3763: 3759: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3752: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3723: 3721: 3720:its talk page 3713: 3705: 3701: 3697: 3690: 3689: 3685: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3676: 3672: 3664: 3653: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3638: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3618: 3613: 3609: 3606: 3603: 3601: 3594: 3588: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3575: 3562: 3555: 3548: 3543: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3527: 3520: 3510: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3492: 3488: 3481: 3478: 3476: 3473: 3471: 3470:de:Hümmelchen 3468: 3466: 3463: 3462: 3461: 3455: 3449: 3447: 3443: 3439: 3435: 3432: 3429: 3419: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3387: 3386: 3382: 3378: 3371: 3361: 3348: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3335: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3306: 3300: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3258: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3236: 3227: 3226: 3223: 3220: 3216: 3209: 3206: 3203: 3199: 3198: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3176: 3173: 3168: 3167: 3164: 3161: 3151: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3133: 3132: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3122:147.46.226.48 3118: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3003: 2998: 2997: 2993: 2989: 2984: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2970: 2969: 2966: 2962: 2959: 2956: 2952: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2918:121.170.42.47 2914: 2910: 2902: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2878: 2873: 2872: 2868: 2863: 2862: 2857: 2853: 2843: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2821: 2820: 2817: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2791:improved. -- 2789: 2785: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2773: 2772: 2769: 2763: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2738: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2728: 2723: 2717: 2715: 2708:It appears... 2697: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2663: 2659: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2632: 2628: 2625: 2621: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2593: 2590: 2589: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2552: 2547: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2535: 2531: 2526: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2459:A few queries 2456: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2433: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2419:rubbernecking 2416: 2415:steamed clams 2406: 2405: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2362: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2324: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2305: 2304: 2300: 2296: 2286: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2267: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2244: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2222: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2200: 2199: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2162: 2157: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2123:Jeanne Boleyn 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2077: 2073: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2024: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1967: 1959: 1948: 1947: 1944: 1943: 1936: 1929: 1919: 1906: 1905: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1865: 1862: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1842: 1841: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1797: 1793: 1792:independently 1783: 1782: 1779: 1775: 1768:Another admin 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1714: 1709: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1694: 1693: 1690: 1685: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1640: 1638: 1634: 1620: 1619: 1616: 1609: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1584: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1558: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1403: 1401: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1376: 1375: 1370: 1367: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1343: 1342: 1337: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1270: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1214: 1211: 1206: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1176: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1132: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1076:Banh and Bahn 1073: 1072: 1066: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1013: 1005: 996: 991: 988: 987: 983: 979: 967: 963: 959: 955: 954: 953: 952: 949: 942:Do you agree? 939: 938: 935: 923: 922: 919: 911: 907: 903: 902: 901: 897: 893: 888: 884: 883: 882: 879: 875: 871: 870: 869: 868: 865: 855: 854: 851: 833: 832: 829: 825: 818: 817: 816: 812: 808: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 793: 790: 785: 784: 783: 779: 775: 770: 769: 768: 767: 764: 752: 749: 744: 743: 742: 739: 735: 734: 733: 730: 725: 721: 720: 719: 718: 715: 707: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 683: 679: 678: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 658: 653: 649: 646: 645: 641: 638: 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 595: 594: 593: 589: 585: 580: 578:I think this 574: 570: 566: 561: 560: 559: 558: 554: 550: 542: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 510: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 483: 482: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 461: 457: 456: 455: 454: 450: 446: 442: 435: 429: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 395: 391: 387: 383: 382: 381: 380: 376: 372: 364: 361: 360: 359: 351: 347: 346: 345: 344: 341: 340: 339: 331: 327: 323: 313: 312: 309: 308: 307: 299: 295: 291: 287: 277: 276: 272: 267: 257: 256: 253: 252: 251: 243: 233: 229: 225: 220: 219: 218: 217: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 197: 196: 195: 191: 187: 181: 179: 167: 166: 163: 156: 152: 148: 147: 146: 145: 142: 132: 131: 127: 123: 118: 113: 108: 105: 93: 90: 87: 83: 81: 78: 76: 73: 70: 68: 65: 64: 56: 52: 48: 47: 42: 35: 34: 25: 19: 7607: 7574: 7565: 7560: 7518: 7507: 7502: 7500:. Cheers. 7470: 7465: 7458: 7405: 7404: 7400: 7393: 7364: 7362: 7246: 7241: 7205: 7184: 7180: 7141: 6979: 6932: 6852: 6847: 6835: 6833: 6830: 6818: 6794: 6777: 6776: 6714: 6698: 6687: 6664: 6625: 6595: 6581: 6574: 6540: 6533: 6528: 6406: 6372: 6353: 6352: 6349: 6332: 6327: 6302: 6275: 6259: 6252: 6244: 6241:Notification 6221: 6195: 6193: 6172: 6133:Cheeseburger 6077: 6035: 5997: 5929: 5903: 5881:this article 5878: 5820: 5785: 5754: 5746: 5733: 5658: 5623: 5592: 5587: 5574: 5548: 5529: 5514: 5476: 5470: 5435: 5416: 5382: 5378: 5353: 5352: 5347: 5339: 5325: 5304: 5277: 5273: 5269: 5265: 5263: 5243: 5221: 5201:WP:Reversion 5194: 5175: 5169: 5149: 5128: 5112:KeithBeltham 5108: 5097:KeithBeltham 5094: 5077:KeithBeltham 5067: 5050:KeithBeltham 5040: 5018: 5000: 4985: 4984: 4978: 4975:June 2, 2009 4942: 4939: 4916: 4912:Talk:Xeremia 4880: 4876: 4809: 4740: 4727: 4723: 4705: 4649: 4610: 4589: 4567: 4552: 4533: 4508: 4484:Please note: 4483: 4482: 4475: 4464: 4449: 4417: 4392: 4367: 4362: 4360: 4342: 4339: 4334: 4332: 4312:Bo De Pagoda 4309: 4305:your request 4303:In light of 4302: 4259: 4229: 4211: 4189: 4168: 4146: 4112: 4106: 4099: 4085: 4073: 4063: 3998: 3981: 3966: 3943: 3884: 3881:Welcome back 3828: 3824: 3820: 3815: 3811: 3808: 3805:Abu Zubaydah 3789: 3724: 3693: 3681: 3668: 3616: 3611: 3597: 3571: 3516: 3495: 3484: 3458: 3436: 3433: 3430: 3427: 3388: 3354: 3331: 3283: 3264: 3261:Hot and Sour 3241: 3238:My breakfast 3212: 3169: 3157: 3149: 3119: 3115: 3036: 3032: 3009: 3006: 2985: 2971: 2963: 2960: 2957: 2953: 2950: 2915: 2911: 2908: 2881: 2859: 2849: 2827: 2812: 2787: 2783: 2764: 2760: 2718: 2713: 2711: 2683: 2675: 2630: 2623: 2610: 2529: 2484: 2472: 2469: 2465: 2462: 2439: 2412: 2390: 2368: 2349: 2330: 2311: 2292: 2273: 2250: 2228: 2206: 2189: 2188: 2185: 2165: 2146: 2145: 2142: 2097: 2069: 2046: 2027: 1972: 1938: 1912: 1890: 1875: 1826: 1824: 1791: 1789: 1773: 1771: 1736: 1683: 1681: 1643: 1642:The rule is 1641: 1636: 1630: 1627:Edit warring 1611: 1607: 1580: 1553: 1515: 1499: 1495: 1493: 1475: 1471: 1426: 1424: 1404: 1396: 1300: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1241: 1215: 1207: 1203: 1172: 1140: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1103: 1079: 1057: 1043: 1029: 999: 989: 975: 945: 930: 914: 909: 886: 861: 847: 823: 821: 759: 723: 711: 680: 655: 623: 577: 545: 438: 404: 401:Tibetan goji 385: 367: 354: 353: 334: 333: 319: 302: 301: 283: 263: 246: 245: 238: 200: 182: 175: 158: 155:this comment 138: 119: 115: 110: 106: 103: 100:Abu Zubaydah 85: 50: 44: 6946:Threats of 6780:GraYoshi2x► 6621:WP:Civility 6423:Mike Rosoft 6394:Mike Rosoft 6379:Mike Rosoft 6356:GraYoshi2x► 5904:Edits like 5749:WP:MUSICBIO 5071:—Preceding 5044:—Preceding 4652:bacon vodka 4256:Re: Banh it 4100:the top of 3829:Thank You, 3785:Leigh Landy 3684:WP:MUSICBIO 3452:Shoring up 3424:Category... 3395:Traveler100 3377:Traveler100 3328:IP accounts 3308:Please see 2888:Noodle-core 2886:. One more 2192:GraYoshi2x► 2149:GraYoshi2x► 1500:independent 1400:Heaven Hill 1210:User:Sea888 514:—Preceding 120:Thank You, 43:This is an 7410:Knowledge. 6954:discovery. 6890:Ricky81682 6836:completely 6826:face value 6802:Ricky81682 6740:Ricky81682 6721:Ricky81682 6717:this close 6459:Ricky81682 6343:Regarding 6165:. Discuss 6150:. Discuss 6135:. Discuss 6129:Patty melt 6120:. Discuss 6118:Spice cake 6105:. Discuss 6090:. Discuss 5925:Thirteenth 5773:dated prod 5611:dated prod 5180:Farmbrough 4910:Help with 4662:alcoholic 4492:Erwin85Bot 4299:Chua Bo De 4226:Four more. 3917:. Follow 3712:dated prod 3688:WP:TEACHER 3519:Alcapurria 3513:Alcapurria 3033:Aliste XYZ 1887:By the way 1633:Fruit wine 1297:Discussion 1026:Confusing? 652:water mint 650:is either 541:Bánh chuối 520:कोल्हापुरी 497:कोल्हापुरी 472:कोल्हापुरी 445:कोल्हापुरी 392:essay and 386:much, much 271:KuyaBriBri 264:I suggest 92:Archive 18 86:Archive 17 80:Archive 16 75:Archive 15 67:Archive 10 7591:Badagnani 7540:Badagnani 7483:Badagnani 7330:Badagnani 7272:Badagnani 7185:behaviour 7007:Badagnani 6948:vandalism 6871:Badagnani 6844:vandalism 6822:hyperbole 6759:Badagnani 6642:Badagnani 6555:Badagnani 6493:Badagnani 6441:Badagnani 6180:blah blah 6057:Badagnani 6038:George Li 6018:Badagnani 5978:Badagnani 5923:Dispute: 5800:consensus 5696:Badagnani 5638:consensus 5358:Arilang 5272:cat with 5191:Reversion 5136:blah blah 4944:Jauerback 4855:Badagnani 4828:Talk:Biwa 4759:Badagnani 4592:Bangali71 4357:Wolfberry 4344:Amore Mio 4033:Amore Mio 4026:like this 3895:Viriditas 3739:consensus 3622:Viriditas 3533:Viriditas 3410:Badagnani 3338:Viriditas 3244:Bươm bướm 3186:Badagnani 3137:Badagnani 2933:Badagnani 2861:Jauerback 2833:Badagnani 2816:GTBacchus 2768:GTBacchus 2742:Badagnani 2727:GTBacchus 2722:GTBacchus 2676:following 2658:Badagnani 2597:Badagnani 2558:this edit 2507:Badagnani 2446:Dolphin51 2396:Badagnani 2374:Badagnani 2333:Badagnani 2314:Badagnani 2295:Badagnani 2276:Badagnani 2234:Badagnani 2212:Badagnani 2100:Amore Mio 1901:GTBacchus 1879:GTBacchus 1861:GTBacchus 1846:Badagnani 1831:GTBacchus 1807:Badagnani 1796:GTBacchus 1778:GTBacchus 1754:Badagnani 1741:GTBacchus 1719:Badagnani 1705:GTBacchus 1689:GTBacchus 1663:Badagnani 1652:GTBacchus 1648:GTBacchus 1615:GTBacchus 1608:you think 1594:Badagnani 1583:GTBacchus 1568:Badagnani 1557:GTBacchus 1536:Badagnani 1526:GTBacchus 1504:GTBacchus 1478:GTBacchus 1446:Badagnani 1431:GTBacchus 1407:GTBacchus 1380:Badagnani 1366:GTBacchus 1347:Badagnani 1333:GTBacchus 1315:Badagnani 1304:GTBacchus 1286:GTBacchus 1255:Badagnani 1244:GTBacchus 1229:Badagnani 1218:GTBacchus 1191:Badagnani 1180:GTBacchus 1175:GTBacchus 1160:Badagnani 1149:GTBacchus 1145:GTBacchus 1117:Badagnani 1106:GTBacchus 1046:GTBacchus 1032:GTBacchus 958:Viriditas 948:GTBacchus 934:GTBacchus 918:GTBacchus 892:Viriditas 878:GTBacchus 864:GTBacchus 850:GTBacchus 828:GTBacchus 789:GTBacchus 763:GTBacchus 748:GTBacchus 738:GTBacchus 729:GTBacchus 714:GTBacchus 691:Badagnani 666:Badagnani 662:spearmint 611:Badagnani 407:this edit 371:Badagnani 357:Eugene2x► 337:Eugene2x► 305:Eugene2x► 294:this list 286:Badagnani 249:Eugene2x► 224:Badagnani 178:WP:BATTLE 162:GTBacchus 141:GTBacchus 7561:lifebaka 7503:lifebaka 7466:lifebaka 7429:Quiddity 7415:Quiddity 7299:Quiddity 7242:lifebaka 7210:Quiddity 7048:Quiddity 6984:Quiddity 6908:Quiddity 6855:Quiddity 6328:lifebaka 6032:Musician 5940:Hyacinth 5521:deletion 5485:Alansohn 5432:Gao ruou 5413:Jiuniang 5300:Konakkol 5274:musician 5245:summer. 5205:ENeville 5166:Cat move 5085:contribs 5073:unsigned 5058:contribs 5046:unsigned 5037:Question 5002:Dravecky 4892:Quiddity 4869:Zucchini 4832:Quiddity 4782:Quiddity 4780:. :) -- 4745:Quiddity 4511:Tautirut 4452:deletion 4266:bánh tro 4139:Created 4010:Benjwong 3910:WP:STALK 3559:You can 3475:de:Dudey 3370:reqphoto 3360:reqimage 3230:Snacking 3154:Solo man 3010:comarcas 2793:Quiddity 2737:WP:STALK 2688:Quiddity 2635:Quiddity 2592:WP:STALK 2575:Quiddity 2536:policy). 2503:WP:STALK 2487:Quiddity 2463:Hello! 2049:WP:STALK 2030:Dogru144 1935:Grutness 1063:FayssalF 648:Húng lủi 597:If it's 528:contribs 516:unsigned 441:mr:फोडणी 411:WP:SYNTH 350:WP:STALK 7181:content 6840:threats 6699:Caspian 6626:Caspian 6596:Caspian 6525:Please. 6272:Blocked 6159:Majboos 6148:Cupcake 6084:Jumbals 5885:Manning 5804:Hekerui 5268:is the 5239:Bánh bò 4919:Xeremia 4803:WP:BOLD 4773:WP:BOLD 4664:elixirs 4656:ascetic 4324:MY EDIT 4186:though: 3999:Caspian 3982:Caspian 3743:Hekerui 3568:Sandbox 3037:comarca 2986:Yes -- 2854:of the 2784:his own 2671:either. 2562:WP:BLPs 2081:Sjschen 1684:nothing 1282:blindly 1278:I asked 1274:from me 1054:Krakebs 708:, then? 605:, with 603:cần tây 466:" and " 394:WP:DRNC 326:WP:BOLD 322:WP:DRNC 284:Hello, 266:WP:AN/I 46:archive 7406:got to 6734:Also, 6719:? -- 6690:Gejang 6684:Gejang 6200:Online 6175:Jeremy 5910:WP:DRV 5763:" and 5747:fails 5655:Nanyue 5601:" and 5551:Sea888 5517:Kamora 5503:Kamora 5477:delete 5225:Hmains 5153:Hmains 5131:Jeremy 4778:WP:BRD 4660:fleshy 4635:(talk) 4618:(talk) 4585:Sylhet 4264:, aka 4262:bánh ú 4122:userfy 4113:speedy 4092:hangon 3975:, and 3702:" and 3578:Tenmei 2684:should 2551:WP:NPA 2409:Thanks 2113:Images 2072:gelato 434:Chaunk 415:WP:NOR 390:WP:BRD 330:WP:BRD 328:, and 7586:WP:OR 7536:WP:OR 7208:. -- 6906:. -- 6738:. -- 6694:WP:GA 6163:Kabsa 5930:With 4950:dude. 4877:Pomme 4873:Apple 4814:Tokek 4709:Tokek 3919:WP:DR 3887:WP:DR 3766:tabla 2867:dude. 2679:that. 2169:LDHan 1468:WT:EL 1442:Pepsi 1269:never 887:looks 682:Tần ô 660:) or 495:". - 316:Essay 151:WP:AN 16:< 7595:talk 7544:talk 7498:here 7487:talk 7461:here 7433:talk 7419:talk 7334:talk 7303:talk 7276:talk 7214:talk 7052:talk 7038:talk 7011:talk 6988:talk 6912:talk 6894:talk 6875:talk 6859:talk 6806:talk 6773:this 6771:See 6763:talk 6744:talk 6725:talk 6701:blue 6675:talk 6646:talk 6628:blue 6611:talk 6598:blue 6575:ROUX 6569:this 6559:talk 6534:ROUX 6511:talk 6497:talk 6463:talk 6445:talk 6427:talk 6398:talk 6383:talk 6345:this 6315:talk 6290:talk 6253:ROUX 6249:. → 6232:talk 6208:talk 6202:) -- 6167:here 6161:and 6152:here 6137:here 6122:here 6107:here 6101:and 6092:here 6061:talk 6046:talk 6022:talk 6007:talk 5982:talk 5964:talk 5944:talk 5906:this 5889:talk 5861:talk 5857:Ronz 5855:. -- 5851:See 5843:talk 5828:talk 5824:Ronz 5808:talk 5700:talk 5661:here 5646:talk 5555:talk 5536:talk 5489:talk 5457:talk 5442:talk 5423:talk 5404:Talk 5332:talk 5311:talk 5290:talk 5270:only 5251:talk 5229:talk 5209:talk 5177:Rich 5170:See 5157:talk 5116:talk 5101:talk 5081:talk 5054:talk 5028:talk 5006:talk 4927:talk 4896:talk 4885:Biwa 4881:Biwa 4859:talk 4836:talk 4818:talk 4799:Biwa 4786:talk 4763:talk 4749:talk 4730:the 4724:your 4713:talk 4702:Biwa 4692:talk 4677:talk 4668:Banh 4596:talk 4575:talk 4560:talk 4549:Oops 4540:talk 4519:talk 4496:talk 4462:"). 4424:talk 4403:talk 4399:Ronz 4380:talk 4365:"). 4348:talk 4289:talk 4274:talk 4247:talk 4217:talk 4176:talk 4130:talk 4074:etc. 4037:talk 4014:talk 4001:blue 3984:blue 3979:. -- 3971:and 3954:talk 3928:talk 3899:talk 3891:here 3871:talk 3843:talk 3835:talk 3796:talk 3774:talk 3760:and 3747:talk 3686:and 3648:talk 3626:talk 3617:very 3612:want 3591:Re: 3582:talk 3576:. -- 3537:talk 3504:talk 3442:talk 3414:talk 3399:talk 3381:talk 3342:talk 3318:talk 3294:talk 3290:Ronz 3286:here 3271:talk 3252:talk 3222:Suro 3219:Satu 3205:Suro 3202:Satu 3190:talk 3175:Suro 3172:Satu 3163:Suro 3160:Satu 3141:talk 3126:talk 3098:talk 3070:talk 3049:talk 3022:talk 2992:talk 2978:talk 2937:talk 2922:talk 2896:talk 2837:talk 2797:talk 2746:talk 2692:talk 2662:talk 2639:talk 2601:talk 2579:talk 2530:only 2511:talk 2491:talk 2450:talk 2427:talk 2400:talk 2378:talk 2356:talk 2337:talk 2318:talk 2299:talk 2280:talk 2261:talk 2257:Ronz 2253:here 2238:talk 2216:talk 2173:talk 2127:talk 2104:talk 2085:talk 2057:talk 2053:Ronz 2051:. -- 2034:talk 2010:talk 1996:talk 1980:talk 1941:wha? 1895:and 1850:talk 1827:more 1811:talk 1758:talk 1723:talk 1667:talk 1637:your 1598:talk 1572:talk 1540:talk 1472:only 1466:and 1450:talk 1384:talk 1351:talk 1319:talk 1259:talk 1233:talk 1195:talk 1164:talk 1121:talk 1091:talk 1016:6403 1011:Cabe 982:Talk 962:talk 910:very 896:talk 811:talk 778:talk 724:very 695:talk 670:talk 639:See 630:talk 615:talk 588:talk 569:talk 553:talk 524:talk 501:talk 487:and 476:talk 449:talk 443:. - 423:talk 375:talk 228:talk 209:talk 190:talk 186:Ronz 126:talk 7604:FYI 6980:and 6904:tea 6850:") 6828:. 6247:WQA 6146:to 6131:to 6116:to 6086:to 5994:FYI 5453:DHN 5438:DHN 5419:ran 4973:On 4728:not 4630:Yug 4613:Yug 4488:bot 4434:AfD 4285:DHN 4270:DHN 4098:to 3996:.-- 3448:-- 2988:ran 2974:ran 2972:-- 2856:RFC 2846:RFC 2831:). 2788:all 2631:not 2629:Do 2394:). 2372:). 2232:). 2210:). 1937:... 1737:you 1644:not 1520:to 1143:. - 685:is 607:tây 599:tàu 432:Re: 405:Re 7597:) 7566:++ 7546:) 7508:++ 7489:) 7471:++ 7435:) 7421:) 7365:my 7336:) 7305:) 7278:) 7247:++ 7216:) 7206:er 7122:, 7119:, 7116:, 7113:, 7110:, 7107:, 7104:, 7101:, 7054:) 7040:) 7013:) 6990:) 6914:) 6896:) 6877:) 6861:) 6808:) 6765:) 6746:) 6727:) 6677:) 6648:) 6613:) 6561:) 6513:) 6499:) 6465:) 6447:) 6429:) 6415:}} 6409:{{ 6400:) 6385:) 6333:++ 6317:) 6309:-- 6292:) 6234:) 6226:-- 6210:) 6173:-- 6063:) 6048:) 6040:? 6024:) 6009:) 6001:. 5984:) 5966:) 5946:) 5938:. 5891:) 5863:) 5845:) 5830:) 5810:) 5783:. 5776:}} 5770:{{ 5734:A 5702:) 5648:) 5621:. 5614:}} 5608:{{ 5575:A 5557:) 5538:) 5491:) 5459:) 5444:) 5425:) 5334:) 5313:) 5292:) 5253:) 5231:) 5211:) 5187:. 5183:, 5174:. 5159:) 5118:) 5103:) 5087:) 5083:• 5060:) 5056:• 5030:) 5008:) 4995:. 4977:, 4929:) 4898:) 4861:) 4838:) 4820:) 4788:) 4765:) 4751:) 4741:is 4715:) 4694:) 4679:) 4598:) 4577:) 4562:) 4542:) 4521:) 4513:. 4498:) 4426:) 4405:) 4397:-- 4382:) 4350:) 4330:. 4291:) 4276:) 4268:. 4249:) 4219:) 4178:) 4132:) 4095:}} 4089:{{ 4039:) 4016:) 3956:) 3930:) 3901:) 3873:) 3865:. 3845:) 3798:) 3776:) 3749:) 3722:. 3715:}} 3709:{{ 3669:A 3650:) 3628:) 3584:) 3539:) 3529:}} 3523:{{ 3506:) 3496:or 3444:) 3416:) 3401:) 3383:) 3373:}} 3367:{{ 3363:}} 3357:{{ 3344:) 3320:) 3312:. 3296:) 3288:-- 3273:) 3254:) 3192:) 3143:) 3128:) 3100:) 3072:) 3051:) 3024:) 2994:) 2980:) 2947:芝麻 2939:) 2924:) 2898:) 2839:) 2799:) 2748:) 2694:) 2664:) 2641:) 2603:) 2581:) 2513:) 2493:) 2452:) 2429:) 2402:) 2380:) 2358:) 2339:) 2320:) 2301:) 2282:) 2263:) 2255:-- 2240:) 2218:) 2175:) 2129:) 2106:) 2087:) 2059:) 2036:) 2012:) 1998:) 1982:) 1931:}} 1925:{{ 1921:}} 1915:{{ 1852:) 1813:) 1760:) 1725:) 1669:) 1600:) 1574:) 1542:) 1452:) 1386:) 1353:) 1321:) 1267:I 1261:) 1235:) 1197:) 1166:) 1123:) 1093:) 1083:#2 1067:- 984:) 964:) 898:) 813:) 780:) 697:) 689:. 672:) 664:. 632:) 617:) 590:) 571:) 555:) 530:) 526:• 503:) 493:णी 489:नी 485:णी 478:) 468:णी 464:नी 460:ड़ 451:) 425:) 417:. 377:) 324:, 230:) 211:) 192:) 184:-- 128:) 71:← 7593:( 7542:( 7485:( 7431:( 7417:( 7332:( 7301:( 7274:( 7212:( 7050:( 7036:( 7009:( 6986:( 6910:( 6892:( 6873:( 6857:( 6804:( 6761:( 6742:( 6723:( 6673:( 6644:( 6609:( 6582:₪ 6557:( 6541:₪ 6509:( 6495:( 6461:( 6443:( 6425:( 6396:( 6381:( 6313:( 6288:( 6260:₪ 6230:( 6206:( 6182:) 6178:( 6169:. 6154:. 6139:. 6124:. 6109:. 6094:. 6059:( 6044:( 6020:( 6005:( 5980:( 5962:( 5942:( 5887:( 5859:( 5841:( 5826:( 5806:( 5698:( 5687:) 5644:( 5553:( 5534:( 5487:( 5455:( 5440:( 5421:( 5399:3 5396:8 5393:F 5390:J 5387:T 5384:C 5330:( 5309:( 5288:( 5249:( 5227:( 5207:( 5155:( 5138:) 5134:( 5114:( 5099:( 5079:( 5052:( 5026:( 5004:( 4947:/ 4925:( 4894:( 4875:/ 4857:( 4834:( 4816:( 4784:( 4761:( 4747:( 4711:( 4707:— 4690:( 4675:( 4594:( 4573:( 4558:( 4538:( 4517:( 4494:( 4422:( 4401:( 4378:( 4346:( 4287:( 4272:( 4245:( 4215:( 4174:( 4128:( 4035:( 4012:( 3952:( 3926:( 3897:( 3869:( 3841:( 3833:( 3794:( 3772:( 3745:( 3646:( 3624:( 3580:( 3556:. 3535:( 3502:( 3440:( 3412:( 3397:( 3379:( 3340:( 3316:( 3292:( 3269:( 3250:( 3188:( 3139:( 3124:( 3096:( 3068:( 3047:( 3020:( 2990:( 2976:( 2935:( 2920:( 2894:( 2864:/ 2835:( 2814:- 2795:( 2744:( 2725:- 2690:( 2660:( 2637:( 2626:. 2599:( 2577:( 2564:. 2553:) 2549:( 2509:( 2489:( 2448:( 2425:( 2398:( 2376:( 2354:( 2335:( 2316:( 2297:( 2278:( 2259:( 2236:( 2214:( 2171:( 2125:( 2102:( 2083:( 2055:( 2032:( 2008:( 1994:( 1978:( 1859:- 1848:( 1809:( 1756:( 1721:( 1687:- 1665:( 1596:( 1570:( 1555:- 1538:( 1494:" 1448:( 1382:( 1364:- 1349:( 1317:( 1257:( 1231:( 1193:( 1178:- 1162:( 1119:( 1089:( 980:( 960:( 894:( 809:( 776:( 761:- 746:- 727:- 693:( 668:( 654:( 642:. 628:( 613:( 586:( 567:( 551:( 522:( 499:( 474:( 447:( 421:( 373:( 226:( 207:( 188:( 160:- 124:( 57:. 26:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index