User talk:Bermicourt

5297:

to the writers of the MoS. As for the number of sources using certain spellings, I'm sure you can appreciate that when you're talking about games so obscure that you've only now added them to Knowledge, the sources are of a specialized nature the use in which is possibly not indicative of the way an average English speaker would use those terms. Specialized literature of all types tends to do things like emphasize its terminology with capitals against common use, which an average speaker would not do. Additionally, many of your sources for these games are also kind of ancient, no doubt employing deprecated pre-20th century language conventions. Both of these (but especially the first), I think, are sound arguments against taking the conventions of the table games community regarding capitalization and applying them to this specific segment of Knowledge against standard English conventions for capitalization.

467:, that's kind. To be honest I'm not sure what to do. I suppose my view is that we should call a halt to all portal creation and deletion activity and engage seriously to reach consensus on the purpose of portals, where they should be located, how they ought to be maintained and to what standards. But there seems to be no appetite for that while those who are driving for portal deletion continue to press home their advantage based on a one-sided view of their purpose. I suppose I'd rather move a portal to project space than see it deleted entirely, so that it can continue to be useful as a project tool. If that happens, I'd welcome your help. But in general I am rather reluctant to waste too much time on them while the rampage continues. It's the kind of behaviour that makes me want to quit Knowledge. 8692: 8523: 7718: 935:, no worries. I was just trying to tidy it up and source it properly and I guess you were doing something similar, by coincidence, at the same time. At some point I plan to compare the "official rules" (usually with card games there's no such thing) of the NNA - an organisation which doesn't seem have any official status and seems to be just self-proclaimed - with those on John McLeod's www.pagat.com website which is widely acknowledged in the literature as a reliable source. Some of the stuff about the electronic games may also be non-notable or bordering on advertising. 3117:

for the game is old and very obscure, which makes it hard for me to believe one could confidently sort out whether it originally referred to the game or the pieces. I did go check the OED, which has quotes for the cloak going back to 1719, and for the game going back to 1801. It endorses the view that the word is used for both the game and the pieces. There are numerous other uses (apparently at some point "dominoes" was slang for "teeth", and also for piano keys) that wouldn't make sense if it was not understood that the dominoes were the pieces. Happy editing,

3138:. I'll be amending the article to make this clear as I'm coming to a similar conclusion as I wade through domino rules, old and new. When the game first appeared in Europe, domino was the name of the game (going out was also called "going-" or "making domino"); and various other words were used for the tiles. In English they used 'pieces' to begin with, but by the mid-19th century American and British sources were using 'domino' to refer to the tiles and that use seems to be commonplace now, alongside "bones" and "tiles". Thanks for being forbearing. 2849:

hypothesis which formed the subtitle for the book. At the time, he proposed Ferrara as the most likely place for its invention among the first four tarot centers with Florence being the least likely. Since the mid-2000s, the prevailing theory is now the complete opposite. Also gone are his hypotheses on the Piedmontese game of Sedici and its relationship with Ferrara. In fact, most of the history of Piedmontese tarot games (the French reintroduction theory) was replaced by his later research as well as the research of McLeod and others.--

8738: 5344:

do the same. Personally I think my argument should have been enough to sway you, as I do believe it is a good one, and I think that if you'd take a step back from the issue and try to see it as something other than a conflict with someone ruining your good work with their lowly common Americanisms (I'm a Canadian and a Brit, btw, although that's neither here nor there), you might be able to be convinced. Either way, I don't think my being an admin plays (or should play) into the appropriate resolution of this matter at all. I'm open to

5385:"Ostkolonisation ". There is no known connection to the Opole of Poland. Of course circular villages have existed the world over, and The University of Cottbus' Institute of Heritage Management has catalogised them all very recently. However to put in an article on German Rundlinge, a prominent link to Opole is factually false, and can only come from a lay view. Sadly antique2020 who wrote this addition falls into this category. It is deeply misleading to have this unedited under "Rundlinge". cheers. Adrian Greenwood. agwendland 839:

to retain them in portal space, I'm in the process of moving them to project space where they can still be used to view and expand topics without irritating anti-portal editors. This will take time since the remaining one's have numerous subpages designed to enhance their appeal to readers, something which is now redundant. So I can't promise to do this quickly. But I wouldn't worry, they'll get deleted anyway. And those that are not "near the bottom" will fall into that category as deletionists make their way up the list.

8023:

certainly share your concerns with people substantively changing direct quotations, and altering once-sourced material to make it disagree with what the sources say. These seem to be unrelated matters, and I know that fending off bad edits (usually clueless or confused, not ill-meaning) can be a drain on one's patience. I hope that a WP-house-style versus game-publishers'-house-style mismatch is not actually enough to put you off the long-term encyclopedic boon you provide, especially in a topic area with few contributors.

7711: 3386: 1076: 5481: 1387: 119: 7763: 411: 6075: 8303: 5425:"Zwischen Ende 1998 und 2000 flog Swissair die einzige Langstrecke ab Basel: New York/Newark. Doch die für die Basler Pharma gedachte tägliche Verbindung war im Prinzip nur eine Reaktion auf ein Projekt eines potenziellen Konkurrenten, der eine Full-Businessclass-Boeing auf dieser Strecke einsetzen wollte. Die Strecke wurde aber nur halbherzig beworben. Auf dem Swissair-Werbeflyer für Passagiere aus den USA wurde das Angebot nach Basel schlicht nicht erwähnt." 3318:, God knows what else), without paying attention to the correct, well-established English terminology. Some German terms simply don't exist in English, some mean something else altogether if translated literally. These "articles" are misleading, mainly to non-native speakers, who take them to represent something real in English, which they don't. Please, do some research before doing any more of this! Eine wortwörtliche Übersetzung ohne vorherige Recherche ist 8460:. This is an issue that has hit other projects (e.g. bird names) too. While it may seem a relatively minor issue, it was frustrating to bring articles to a high standard in line with the sources only to see unnecessary and potentially confusing edits being made by editors who didn't always understand the subject matter and the sources behind them. The changes were also introducing unnecessary errors that I was having to clean up. I have better things to do. 7214: 2707:

climbing. I would like to add a section on the history, climbing style, and maybe a list of notable climbers. Would you like to collaborate? I'm not an English native speaker but I am a rock climber from that region. Since I'm relatively new to Knowledge, I would appreciate some guidance as to where I could first create a draft version of proposed changes. Or maybe we can discuss the changes first on the Talk page of the article? Would appreciate any help.

7928: 9012: 7660: 7604: 7548: 7492: 6883: 6825: 7935: 6564: 5656: 9178: 9138: 9098: 9058: 7726: 548: 9299: 8391: 7359: 31: 8945: 6140: 5975: 5866: 5774: 5165: 5069: 4972: 4768: 4677: 4582: 4167: 3871: 2917: 2438: 2253: 2160: 1902: 1747: 1560: 1468: 978: 313: 223: 8011: 6557: 7159: 5528: 9231: 8875: 509: 6943: 3102:

to research this myself. I suspect McLeod is right from a purist's point of view, but once the masses have adopted a word to mean something, however incorrectly, dictionaries and encyclopaedias are bound to follow these days. In the meantime, I'm happy for my edits to be reverted; otherwise I'll tidy them up when I've done a bit more digging. I'll certainly represent both views.

1880:

not smooth, but has four smooth bumps at the front and 3 at the rear; when its elytra are lowered, there is a small yellow spot at the base, on Vespillo this runs into the yellow band; the lowest yellow band does not reach the side, but is only an oval spot. The abdomen is not covered with yellow hair, but is smooth and black. These distinctive signs are always the same." HTH.

5725:

appreciate the case you made about seeing them as arguably interim in nature, even if they don't quite tick all the WP:RS boxes. Removing them entirely will arguably only result in some instances where Knowledge articles on solitaire games are absent of references for another next ten years, even though these are subjects that clearly deserve to be covered in Knowledge.

7372: 2734:. Then it's in your own workspace and no-one is going to fuss while you work on it. I often do this for articles and, when I'm happy, I move the page to mainspace or copy the content into an existing article. Obviously whatever we do must conform to Wiki guidance e.g. no marketing, be properly sourced etc. Hope that helps, Gruß. 4886:"Heading formats may contain spaces (as shown in the example above) or not. The key point is that they should be consistent throughout an article, all headings should contain a single space to the left and right of the "=" sign(s) or no spaces, the formats should not be intermingled in the same article. See further examples in 1336:

can add its English equivalent even though (we translators know) it's a tautology. I expanded the convention, partly to help me with consistency in the articles I created and also to try and establish consistency among editors translating from German. I did a lot of research of English-language sources in doing this. HTH.

7881:

via CFD speedy renames. But please don't create a slightly different category to one that has existed for years and then tag the older one for deletion with your own deletion rationale. It will likely be declined. Categories have specific rules and if you don't know about them, spend some time reviewing proposals at

1315:(use whichever is the widely accepted English form; if there is no English usage, prefer XX Bay.)" For many, less well known geographical features there is little or no mention in English sources, so we follow the pattern of the more well known examples. In the case in point the following would seem reasonable to me: 4284:... condescending and perhaps a little hasty. Knowledge doesn't require a source per sentence and it's usually helpful to request a source for a good faith edit from an editor before reverting and causing both of us unnecessary work. And none of your changes were cited either BTW. I've largely reinstated my edit at 8155:– whereby articles on a given topic may use title case if the relevant literature does, while other articles may follow the general practice of using lower case, then I may be motivated to return. But I don't expect that to happen anytime soon. In the meantime, I may see you on German Knowledge... Best regards. 8247:

Great shame to see you packing up! I'd always looked up to you as someone who knew their stuff on card games and was taking time to get the details right. Big boots to fill if they're now empty. My own edits in that area have just been workaday copyediting, weeding out silly house rules and sometimes

7473:

Reminder of own proposal: I propose merging Pusoy dos into Big two. Pusoy dos is a minor variant of Big two and I don't think it merits its own page. There are very few sources for this as a stand-alone game. One of the citations here goes to an archived article that is not a WP:RS; the other goes to

5296:

I had never in my life heard of a particular North American tendency to follow the normal accepted use of capitalization as opposed to a lax British one, and I'm not sure such a thing is actually real. Nor do I suspect that there's anything at all behind your ascribing American imperialist intentions

3116:

Hi Bermicourt, well, as I said, I don't really care about it (by which I mean: your edits didn't make the article worse and in particular left things perfectly understandable) and it certainly doesn't seem worth reverting over. From what little I have read about this, the origin of the word "domino"

2706:

Hi Bermicourt, I would like to expand/improve the article on the Saxon Switzerland Climbing Region in the course of the next weeks. My impression is, that the translation from the German page might not be entirely suitable within the English Knowledge and within the scope of articles relevant to rock

2641:

Hello. I have no dog in this fight, not even a very small one. I just read up on it a bit because I saw someone change CR to Czechia without comment ... which is, I think, what you do if you are very sure you are right, or are maybe hoping just to get away with it ... or something. So I had a look at

1657:

Please undo the move from Wiese to Wiese (Norwegian DJ). As a reason for doing this move, you state that there are "many people with the last name Wiese". That is correct. However, is is only one who is know for just Wiese and has that as his stage name. This artist has many millions plays on Spotify

898:

Apologies for overlapping edits, and thanks for getting the sources down! I know alternate names for card games can be a real unsourced mess on here - I was trying to be careful in my edits and don't think I lost anything through a revert, I was just trying to avoid having two separate lists of names

838:

Good work maybe, but now largely wasted. As you know, I think pageviews are a poor way to assess portals since a) they're not articles yet that's how we're treating them and b) they are not searchable and badly linked from mainspace, both of which could be fixed. But as it's clear there's no appetite

8214:

BTW in looking up the occasional fact, I notice that you're continuing to introduce errors into card game articles and breaking your own rules about capitalisation, but I've deleted my watchlist and not actively monitoring this any more. Such a shame that these articles will now go steadily downhill

8022:

I apologize for my over-caffeinated screed. It's alarming to me that you would consider just leaving the project entirely over a style dispute, and such a result is certainly not my intent. There is far more to quality game-related article writing (at which you are good) than some capital letters. I

7880:

Please do not make up your own speedy deletion criteria. CSD criteria are intentionally limited in scope. Both of the categories that you did this to have been merged which is preferable to deleting a longstanding category in favor of one that was just created today. Or they should have been renamed

5728:

Part of the problem is that it's a specialty area of study with few contributors, so over-vigilance and over-policing based on a cursory visit to those pages or the sources in question isn't helpful. And in some instances it wasn't just the citation that was removed, but also other content changes,

4068:

Yes, my focus is on researching and playing card games, especially traditional Austrian and German ones, although I have also forayed into other European and Anglo-American games and have researched a number of domino games too. I have close links with a number of experts in the field which helps. I

4043:

From your user page your board game interests seem to be card games. Anything else? I shall be extremely cautious in touching those pages and I shall certainly defer to you. I have put my interests on my user page. More generally I want to look at whatever metrics we have or can construct and trying

4039:

Okay. You haven't convinced me that Template:Sfn used in conjunction with Template:Cite book is a bad idea. However I no intention of telling you how to edit pages that you have more interest in than I. And you have more experience than I do, so maybe you're right. In any case it only makes sense to

1879:

The section entitled "Nicrophorus" reads: "It is certainly very similar to N. Vespillo, but not the same however. The difference is as follows: it is barely half as big. the club of the feelers is not brown, but black. Head and thorax (“breast shield”) are not covered in yellow hairs; the latter is

1171:

Hello! Thanks very much for compiling this useful article. I am wondering whether the table included in the article is exhaustive of the criteria that you give? As in, are all of the hills in Wiltshire that fall into the categories included in the table? The reason I ask is that I am looking to make

8796:

A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then

8200:

I was mainly referring to the three or four editors who built a good foundation before I began working on this topic in parallel with my research and writing. They're still around, but not very active. There are also two or three experts, but they've never been actively involved probably because of

7072:

page contains some errors: In American usage, canoeists nowadays also use double-bladed paddles in (open) canoes, and those are usually not called kayaks then. And for sporting competition purposes, the American distinction between a kayak and a canoe is not sometimes but almost always adopted (and

5635:

because this new item added by Tino Cannst is a minor fact and creates a bit of an imbalance, yet you did not even bother to comment on it, you just restored the new text that was added. Please follow Knowledge rules instead of restoring NEW text which is disputed. New text can be reverted and it's

5343:

I don't believe this discussion was fruitless at all. I heard your reasoning, and you heard mine. I also hoped that it was not a case of "neither of us is going to convince the other", as I go into these things with an open mind, able to be swayed by salient arguments. It's unfortunate if you don't

5276:

are usually not capitalized, and you will find that they're not capitalized in those articles. However, the popularity of a game is no basis for a policy on whether or not its name should be capitalized. Would we need to be constantly evaluating the popularity of games and moving them from one list

4936:

I agree wholeheartedly with you. Consistency within an article is desirable. I'm not suggesting that editors go on a campaign to check all articles, but if other edits are being made in the article, why not make sure other things (like heading formats) in the article are consistent. Editors already

3176:

You can google "Ohel Kuralları" for much more. I wouldn't think of adding a new version, but I was suprised that no version in the current page has the "10 + square of bid" scoring system. It does add interesting twists in late game where more tricks are available. I did come across a few web pages

3101:

it says "Dominoes: This is the name of the game. Contrary to popular usage, it is not the name of the tiles." As he is a games expert, I took my lead from him. However, it's always worth asking the question "why?" when we come across a different point of view, so in the light of your comment I plan

2676:

I have raised this several times on the project talk pages because every time I was given the reasonable response that Czechia is just an acceptable short (and indeed officially approved) form of CR, I found my edits in practice being changed to CR. The final time I raised the topic, it flushed out

2134:

Concerning the rules for trick taking. My understanding from my conversation with Daglinger is that you must follow suit if possible. If you cannot follow suit, you must play trump. Subject to these rules, you must head the trick if possible. That means that if you cannot follow suit and you cannot

1335:

are not usually split i.e. Wörschach stream is an unlikely translation. Rivers and streams are usually just called "the X". Rivers are almost always called "River X" or "the X river" in British English, but "X River" in American English. If we don't translate the generic part of the German name, we

6508:

caught my eye because it's reference section was almost entirely Harv/sfn errors. I explained in the ES I pinged you in what was causing that, but, looking at it now, there's still quite a few errors caused by a lack of citation in the bibliography. I tracked down Arnold 2007, but could you please

4292:

wrongly assumes I didn't read the background. In fact I did read the sorry saga of the move request, which went ahead despite a split vote and which has only made a poor situation worse. "Passenger railroad car" is the least universal and least common of the discussed options. Meanwhile, given the

4020:

a long while ago because it gave a consistent way of displaying references. What I didn't appreciate was that, unless it was linked to a full citation template in the bibliography, it generated error messages, even if the full reference was correctly entered manually. Basically you have to use one

3322:

ein grundsätzlicher Fehler, der kaum noch korrigiert werden kann, Ihre Arbeit und jene aller, die nach Ihnen etwas beitragen, ist für die Katz, verschwendet, umsonst, oder noch schlimmer: Sie ist irreführend. Übersetzer ist ein Beruf und muss durch harte Arbeit erlernt werden, Google Translate ist

3214:

page to review the point distribution for the four player game and to my surprise, the rules for the entire game were gone and replaced with another game. I was just wondering why you did that and if you would be willing to add the rules to the four player game back on top of what ever version you

2621:

yesterday and all seven were for the Leine ridge, but I lacked the courage to change it to a dab as I know some editors are keen to keep a surname page at the base name. I think you've done the right thing: it has no information about the surname and it clearly collects links intended for another

2063:

I'll take a closer look at the articles about various forms of "knack" later, but I alread have one comment. You use a translation as the title for Norrlandsknack, "Norseman's Knock", but you keep the original Swedish names for the other versions ("svängknack" etc.). I would recommend a consistent

7134:

When I come across one of your articles while fixing footnote errors I try to stick to your "text-based ref" style although I admit that if that's more work than updating the sfns, I'll go with the sfns. Treppenrommé has sfns referencing an uncited work dated 1988, so I'll leave it to you to sort

5376:

Hi Bermicourt I see you have just undone my deleted section on "Opole". Can we discuss this please? I am on the committee of the Rundlingsverein e V.,have lived for 16 years in a rundling village, and am probably the only native english speaking expert on Rundling villages. Most of the article is

5320:

when the only easily identifiable written sources (because of obscurity) are specialized publications might follow the letter of the law while breaking its spirit. And again, I argue that capitalizing in this one corner of Knowledge would cause more confusion than it prevents (even though I think

5280:

I won't get into a revert war with you over this, but I'd ask that you consider the issue of whether usage in gaming literature should trump common English capitalization rules, the Knowledge MoS, and the goal of a simple and consistent policy. Exceptions for specialized fields should not be made

5380:

There is an academic debate that has been going on since the days of Anneliese Krenzlin and Willi Schulz about the origins of the Rundling form. One by now widely discredited argument is that Rundlinge, because their original occupiers were indeed Slavic farmers, came in some way from the Slavic

5264:

states that the names of games are not capitalized. While the MoS is a guideline, I believe it's in agreement with common English usage not just in North America, but in general. I also don't believe that use in specialized literature is necessarily relevant to the issue. I further don't see how

4448:

Google shows nearly twice as many hits for "taken into service" than "entered into service", so I don't doubt that it's a common phrase. I'm guessing it may be more commonly used in Europe (where you're from) than in North America (where I'm from), which would explain the different perspectives.

3674:

NCRIVER says "If different rivers with the same name exist, disambiguate with parentheses using either the parent river, country or (if both in the same country) the largest geographical entity that distinguishes them" so I don't think that was appropriate and it appears to have simply been that

6442:

article with info from the German wiki article. As the sourcing of that German article is wonky, are you aware of any other sources to further improve the article? Especially for stuff like "first steam locomotive developed independently in Germany", sources would be nice to have. Best regards,

2067:

By the way, it interesting to note that "Norrland" has been used in other card games to denote variants that contain strong elements of gambling. There was for example a version of vira called "Norrlandsvira", which contained some contracts with larger payments and larger element of chance than

2034:

I was a member of the ICPS until recently. I am now involved in a patient's organisation and I am following the scientific literature in that area. I am afraid that means that I currently don't have time to write any texts or artciles for Knowledge, although it of course would be nice to have a

7474:

John McLeod's page for Big Two at pagat.com where he only gives Pusoy dos a couple of lines as a variant, not even a separate section. The essential differences can be added to Big Two without causing would any article-size or weighting problems.Bermicourt (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

4444:

of "taken into service" to "entered into service". Not disputing your change at all, but I do want to comment on it. In nearly five decades as a native English speaker I'd never seen the term "taken into service" until I read this article, whereas I see "entered into service" quite frequently.

2848:

still stands up, parts have become outdated and Dummett abandoned many theories stated in them. One such example was the French-origin theory of Spanish suits. If you read his article in volume 18 of the IPCS journal, you can see that had rejected it by 1988. The biggest change was the Ferrara

775:

is an original interview written by a boardgamegeek.com user who says on BGG that they "first published" the interview with playingcarddecks.com), but these card game rules seem questionable, with no suggestion that they aren't just repeating Pagat, Knowledge or the writer's own recollections.

2878:

is that it pulled together the history of cards (especially Tarot obviously) comprehensively in one place. It's big disadvantage is that it's now 40 years out of date. What would be brilliant would be an updated edition. McLeod and Dummett updated the actual games themselves in 2004 in their

2729:

That's great. I generally translate articles on German topics from German to English Wiki which is how this one got started. I'm happy to collaborate on improving this one. If you want to create a draft either of the entire article or of a section the best thing to do is create a page called

752:

had been adding to articles in the form of references. I hope that's uncontroversial. All of these sources were quick how-to-play blog entries written that same day, apparently by John himself (they are all credited to "John Taylor" who is "a content writer and freelancer through the company

6229:

and its talk. Mostly they're sifting through potential sources for the welter of new games coming out every day, a difficult task that I'm not really interested in. However, I've floated a few online sources for historical games, which were also welcomed. Just mentioning in case you know of

5724:

What other editors popping in might not realize is that many of the articles in question have had zero citations for over ten years or more. So the kinds of references we've been supplying improves things, being from reliable contributors, even if the site they're hosted on is not ideal. I

5384:

Wolfgang Meibeyer's argument has always been that the half-moon shape was created by Germanic overlords for their Slavic farmers, who cleared the forests in the 12th/13th century following the Wendenkreuzzug of 1147. This is pictured in the Sachsenspiegel, a near contemporary account of the

2649:

spelt right! (or, like, people changing England to UK and UK to England and Scotland to whatever.) I am just interested, I suppose, in the wiki-processes and wiki-thinking that went on, and would love to know if it did ever get closer to resolved. I'm certainly, absolutely, I promise you,

820: 8177:

Bermicourt, you had said on my talk page that "I and others have been working over several years to bring them to a higher standard". But I haven't found who else might be interested in these discussions, or in coordinating. Let me know if there's someone I should be in touch with.

5315:

I'm not advocating for "the average English reader's level of knowledge", though. I'm advocating for common English practice. I don't see this as an informal vs. formal issue. It's instead a specialized vs. common issue. I wouldn't call capitalizing industry terms "formal", and using

3675:

Lennart97 didn't notice the other river. The proposal fits in with that while the alternative doesn't. While partial disambiguation is occasionally used it has been controversial so I don't think it should have been done without more consensus at least. The primary topic example of

4917:

I'm aware that both spaced and unspaced are acceptable provided they are consistent within the article. Personally, I find spaced headings easier to read, but given that the choice is left to editors, it would make sense to stay with the format of the original editor as we do with

1209:

and currently reflects their highest hills down to Castle Ditches, with the exception of Scratchbury (197 m) which should immediately precede it. The last two in the list are included because, although there are higher hills, they are considered more notable. Hope that helps. :)

1848:

is a burying beetle: a curious type of insect that buries dead mice and birds below the ground before converting the carcass into an edible nest in which it raises its young. It's also becoming an important model organism in evolutionary biology. I've found the original formal

771:

From the profile links these look to be the same person, but even if it is some cosmic coincidence, would you agree that rules posted on this retailer's blog don't have the weight of rules published by Piatnik? On closer inspection the site does put out some original content

2681:

are acceptable, but on Knowledge if there is a small band of editors determined to spell something one way, regardless of the sources, it's almost impossible for reason to prevail. In your case, there are two options. If this is the first edit, then you can revert it under

2399:

Hi Bermicourt, there is a german page which could be translated into English for the english Knowledge. The page is ModuleWorks, it seems to be a company in Germany but it is operating internationally. What do you think? Or how can I request this? Thanks a ton in advance,

2064:

terminology, and I think it is best to keep the original Swedish names in this case. "Norseman's Knock" doesn't sound good. As you correctly point out in the text, Norrland is actually a geographical region. So, strictly speaking, Norseman is not a correct translation.

645:

I see what you mean. I've turned it into a direct link to the archive, but am not 100% sure if that's the way we're meant to do it. It might be better to link it from a suitable place within the text and just have the book, unlinked, in the Literature section.

7684:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

7628:

7572:

7516:

6907:

6849:

2019:

Hi! I am interested in card games and have been in mail contact with Austrian player Christian Daglinger about this fascinating game. I have been careful not to bombard him with questions, but I think I have managed to sort out all question marks now. Regards

8150:

thank you for those kind words and I will miss working with you. Sadly, the issue is not seen as minor by our style champions otherwise it wouldn't be enforced. If one day Knowledge can accept an inclusive "both/and" approach in these areas – as it does with

8749:

won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar.

2778:. I would welcome your input. Ignore the section on the history for now. This will take a bit longer but I thought I could first finish the other sections and start adding them to the main page. I've also created a draft on the German climber Bernd Arnold: 8455:

I'm really sorry to announce my retirement, triggered by a few style editors insisting on lower casing game names that are always capitalised in the subject matter texts and not permitting a sensible "both/and" approach as we have done for years with e.g.

1358:, it seems I haven't understand it fully before. Now it seems to me the best option is: "The lake is drained by the Wörschachbach which flows through the Wörschach Gorge...", because within the context its clear that the Wörschachbach is a river, and the 2538:

you made back in 2016, by any chance? It seems odd to have a redlinked summit so prominently listed over all this time, without supporting evidence. I've managed to add an illm link to ru-wiki, but feel a source is needed for this obscure point. Thanks,

2119:

I will try to contact Christian Daglinger again. I don't know if he is familiar with Knowledge and has an account. Perhaps it is better if we communicate by email. Do you have an address where I can reach you? My address is sten.helmfrid@bredband.net.

2093:

OK, I understand. If an English terminology already has been established, it makes sense to follow it. It is always nice with references to the Vikings, but I must point out that we have become much more mild-mannered during the last thousand years.

3986:

as a guide. I found it worked quite well, so long as the sources were fundamentally correct. It meant that if you click on the link in the References section it highlights the corresponding link in the Literature section. That's quite nice I think.

5321:

both are pretty negligible), even if in the specialized gaming literature it might arguably enhance clarity. Also, you must realize that saying "let's stop here" after you've made your point—instead of in place of making it—is just a wee bit rich.

3358:. But translation is an art, not a science. And please don't lecture me about so-called 'professional translators' - I've seen them make some real howlers in specialist literature. I've responded to your other comments at the talk pages concerned. 6911:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

6853:

8111:

This. I really value your contributions related to card games and I hope you'll reconsider. IMHO Knowledge's quality is steadily improving, minor issues like house style on capitalization should not be an impediment to our curation of content.

6253:

I'm making a list of card games articles where the pronouns are too ambiguous, hoping you'll find time to take a look. I still may change part of the article where there is less ambiguity, but in which case I'll identify the ambiguous section:

3570:

To be honest: for me it's very complicated to find out how to do that. I tried but failed. It would be really great if you can help or if you know someone who possibly can do the translation. Many thanks and best wishes from Zurich, Andrea

8728:

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

7477:@Bermicourt: given the lack of objection and the clear case, I think that it would be fine for you or any other used to merge these. You might have more expertise than me to do this elegantly! Klbrain (talk) 21:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC) 7687:

7631:

7575:

7519:

1684:

Well that's interesting and you are very welcome to propose a move request on the talk page and seek consensus that a Norwegian DJ is the primary topic on English Knowledge; which is what you should have done in the first place. Cheers.

4064:

I don't think the template combination is a bad idea; I just prefer not to use it. Probably because when importing references from de.wiki, converting them to use the template takes up valuable time that I'd rather spend on translation

1250:

where it's obvious to German readers what kind of object that is. To give this information in the English Knowledge, too, I added valley, mountain, river, gorge etc., although this is somewhat tautologous for someone who speaks German.

6991:

Hi, I see that you reverted some of the sfn fixes I made (well, I thought they were fixes) in deference to some bot process. I'm fairly new around here and I am curious about what sort of problems the sfn template might raise. Thanks.

6660:

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

4559:, but I can see the problem is that the German article also includes torpedo wagon as a sub-section, so they may change it back. Often, different wikis are at different stages of development, so there isn't always a one-to-one match. 620:

you reverted me. Ok, got it. But now, the reference within the final section "Literature" looks ugly... which was the reason why I changed the sorting. That has to be solved without a "ref", right? Can you do that? Thanks so far!

7318:

It does look like there are a lot of apps out there which can't call themselves "Shithead" due to app store rules and have to pick a different name, though (eg. "Sheethead", "Lucky Head"). Doesn't seem worth singling any out on

4435: 6929: 6664:

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be

4866:. However, Knowledge has been using unspaced headings (example: ==Heading2==) for years, and many articles contain headings using the non-spaced formats. Further, such non-spaced heading formats are used as examples in 2642:

the CR wikiproject, where I think there is nothing current, and then back through the archives, where I found you arguing for a guideline. This seemed to be to be very reasonable, but did you ever get anywhere with it?

2135:

head the trick, you must still undertrump if possible. I never asked if you must head the trick even if your partner is in the lead. I just presumed that you always have to head the trick, no matter who is in the lead.

677: 7443: 6374:

The article cites "Armanino 1977" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste

3301: 5729:

resulting in an overall regress of quality. But let's keep plugging away, and hopefully our efforts will lead to improvements in the long run. Thanks again for your contributions, involvement, and engagement.

701:

Hallo, es wäre schön, wenn du vielleicht behilflich sein kannst den Eintrag über den Venice TV Award im englischsprachigen Knowledge Portal sprachgerecht einzustellen? Vielen vielen Dank. Liebe Grüße Matthiasvon

9002: 1172:

an endurance hiking/running challenge that covers all significant hills in Wiltshire and I thought your list could be a good starting point - or even the finished item if it covers everything! Thanks, George

612: 9017: 9003: 8436:

fit in? I don't see a parameter for Concilia. Is it one of the Rerum Germanicarum series? Honestly, I've never been real fluent with the MGH, haha, and I would appreciate your help--I'm trying to clean up

4453:. Given that mine was a good-faith edit, and our disagreement appears to be one of British versus American English, I was surprised that you chose to rebuke me in a way that will live in my stats forever. 6689:

no, I was aware of the need for attribution from other language Wikipedias, but not from within the same Wiki. Thanks for pointing that out. I think I've fixed it, but let me know if it's still not right.

9310: 8711:

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to

5259:

Hi Bermicourt. In general, Knowledge avoids unnecessary capitalization, which is used almost exclusively for proper nouns, acronyms/initialisms, and to begin sentences. The capitalization section of the

1658:

and several articles and reviews on Google that justify this. I don't blame you for doing your job but in this case the decision was not right, so please undo as this is the right thing to do here:)

9026: 8082:. I just wanted to let you know that I've appreciated all of the work you've done on mountains in Europe, and on game articles. I think you're a positive force for Knowledge, and I hope you stay! — 8983: 8952: 8938: 5881: 8933: 5632:

where user Tino Cannst added new information, while at the same time removing an old long standing statement. I reverted that, so why are you restoring it? Also, I started a talk page discussion

4021:

system or the other; you can't mix and match. Personally I prefer to enter the full references manually - it's quicker - so when I come across places where I've generated error messages by using

756:

I noticed and removed one cardgamesplanet.com link in passing: it was a reference stuck needlessly after the name of the card game in the opening line, and is just a blog covered in poker ads. --

8721:

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the

6962: 5418:.) I use Google Translate to obtain basic facts from articles written in foreign languages; however, I do not trust it to translate complex information well. Here is the paragraph, which is in 2645:

I can't emphasize too strongly that I am not trying to reopen a debate, start a crusade or anything. I need a dispute like this like a hole in the head. I have enough difficulty trying to keep

9141: 9130: 8201:

real life busy-ness. In recent times, there have been a couple who have helped in tidying articles up and dealing with vandalism, but don't tend to create or expand articles. These include

9256: 6903: 9149: 8787: 7794:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. 2035:

German text on Matzlfangen and to involve Christian Daglinger. It sure would be nice to know what German card games you recently wrote about, and if possible also to read the articles.

4072:

Re the error log - yes, I've only just come across that and will certainly take a look at doing some fixes. Probably not in the next week or two as I'm on holiday with family. Cheers.

1237:

First of all, my apologies: I didn't realize my edit was already the second reversion, because the previous edit summary was "m" – instead I thought my reversion was the first one in

9109: 9069: 4465: 9189: 9128: 8097:

Ditto for the Rivers Project. If you stay, it will be positive for the encyclopedia, but perfectly understand if you wish to bow out. Good luck with whatever you decide. Regards.

6731:

It's always a happy result to get to close an AfD because the article is now in good shape. Thanks for teaching me something I didn't know about German history and architecture.

5663: 3393: 1295:

it's a good question. As a native English speaker, I feel I instinctively 'know' when to use "of" and when not to. I've tried to capture usage for these geographical terms under

1083: 8900: 8402: 715: 5749: 9101: 9090: 9061: 9050: 3338:

You need to learn some manners and to avoid making sweeping, over-the-top accusations that aren't true. I'm well aware of the terminology of English 'castellology' and German

9043: 6981: 7439: 6351:

Not really my main subject area, but when I checked Google and Google books there weren't many references at all. None for peace columns and a handful for victory columns.

3731:! Unfortunately there are some dangling references to sources. Could let us know the source for Dummett? And which of the Parlett books did you reference? I've temporarily 3332: 9321:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

9181: 9170: 8413:

during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.

3442: 3424:

and discussing any changes on the talk page. I agree with some of the other areas, so I think we can make some improvements. But you need to provide evidence to show that

5265:

capitalization of a game name would aid in clarity and avoid confusion; if anything, it's likely to cause confusion because capitals are understood to mean proper nouns.

632: 8551:

has no article here yet, you were the one coming to my mind - perhaps you make an exception on a generous day ;) - I just uploaded two more pics of it, follow "places".

5261: 4495:

With respect, I don't know that there is a "discussion about this at the talk page", so I would appreciate you don't make that assumption. There was a discussion at the

9088: 9048: 5743: 5721:

Thanks for all the work you've been doing on improving the solitaire articles. And thank you also for jumping in the discussion on my Talk page with your comments.

2775: 2731: 791: 2983:

if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2415:

Hi Elvira. You've already created this yourself, but your submission was declined on grounds of notability, so I'm reluctant to put my head in the same noose. Sorry.

3607:, as Lennart97 mentions. I am aware there is another river with the same name, but this river would be the clear primary topic for a river. As mentioned in NCRIVER: 2757: 2712: 1861:

and wondered if you might be willing to translate this? Whilst less vital, it would also be fantastic if you'd be able to translate the first page of the document (

9223: 9168: 5212: 3462: 3035: 2686:

and invite discussion on the talk page. The second option is to leave it - it won't be long before other editors swoop in to revert it whether BRD applies or not.

445: 6657:? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved. 5911: 5399: 6653:

and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at

753:

Upwork.com") with no context for where those rules came from. I assume they're cribbed from Pagat or Knowledge itself, which he links to in the blog entries.

6126: 2695: 9268: 8912: 8832: 3466: 1418:

I can try :) But since they are 19th century, you don't have to email them, you can just post them on wiki in a sandbox or such, they are public domain. --

6462:

You edited a sentence I wrote about the Laws of Backgammon which was published in 1931. I am happy to send you a copy if you don't believe its existence.

2500:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2315:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

2222:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1968:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1805:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1630:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1530:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1040:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

378:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

283:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

8997: 8779: 8775: 7338:

No worries. I think it's a genuine app and felt it worth mentioning as an alternative (and slightly more polite!) name. Certainly no promotion intended.

7202: 6496: 6226: 5820: 4213: 9284: 8722: 3310:

English has its own, centuries-old terminology regarding fortifications. You've been translating German articles into English like there's no tomorrow (

7395: 6871: 5761: 5116: 2869: 2850: 2401: 1786: 1665: 1200: 1179: 6845: 3220: 2663: 2203: 9163: 5222: 5172: 5076: 4979: 4775: 4684: 4589: 4261:

I really don't want to come down as condescending on this, but really, you've been here long enough that I shouldn't be having to revert edits like

9208: 7447: 6779: 6194:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 6033:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 5962: 5835:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 5227:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 5131:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 5034:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 4826:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 4734:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 4719: 4643:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 4228:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 3940:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to 3855: 3837: 3823: 3780: 3766: 3529: 3496: 2924: 809: 2798:

The article cites "Cotton 1674" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script (explained at

8928: 8849: 7462: 6745: 6463: 3799:, you added a reference to Birlinger & Pfaff 1916... but there isn't any source... do you still have that so we can add it to the article? - 2883:

Apart from the above article, can you recommend any others that bring Dummett's historical analysis up to date? We may not have a new edition of

2394: 2213: 1796: 797: 7735:

Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Knowledge! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦

5830: 4262: 9289: 9203: 8410: 8394: 8383: 6179: 6111: 6018: 4811: 4223: 3561: 3187: 9123: 9083: 7301: 5126: 4174: 3878: 1959: 953:

advertising the electronic games and its NNA link goes to Facebook where we see around 650 followers (very small for a national association).

8971:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 8964: 8960: 8048: 7680: 7624: 5633: 4853: 4363: 4143: 4121: 4107: 4081: 4059: 4034: 2790: 2409: 476: 4729: 4302: 4112:

Thanks, those three are fixed. I will continue to do this as I come across them anyway, but don't mind you flagging others up periodically.

3979: 3020:. Please help translate the article into an English article. Notice the German title when translated into English will sound wrong as well. 2351:

which mentions "Mayr and Sedlaczek" without explanation of who they are. Mayr also has an article, but it looks mostly like a stub. Thanks!

1949: 785: 607: 555:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

7902:

Thank you, that's helpful and I will follow that process in future. Just to say that the purpose was to align the categories with the main

7568: 5781: 3708: 3584: 2761: 2743: 2602: 1521: 274: 264: 6189: 6107: 6028: 5708: 5690: 5419: 5377:

mine. I am in regular personal contact with Professor Wolfgang Meibeyer, who is without argument the greatest living expert on Rundlinge.

4902: 4821: 4405: 3482: 1158: 1140: 944: 8314: 7648: 7592: 7512: 6924: 6366: 5543: 4499:, but given the fact that it has been quiet for well over 2months, I would assume it's concluded and not on the side that you advocated. 4484: 3925: 2716: 2424: 1694: 1219: 1031: 369: 9337: 8538: 6147: 6066: 5519: 5472: 4954: 4931: 4568: 4429: 3295: 2824:

it's the first entry in his list of works and there's even a link to an online copy. Do I really need to repeat it in the Bibliography?

2563: 2306: 1131:

warum nicht? Ist mir ein Vergnügen. So missing Germany, haven't been since March when I researched curious north German card games lol.

962: 8797:

you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

7536: 7424: 6525: 5630: 5460: 5019: 4628: 3935: 3694: 3551: 3537: 3523: 3147: 3126: 3111: 3016:

Please help and translate this article from German into English. The English translation at the moment is just a sub section of the

2964: 2811: 1021: 359: 8761: 5029: 4638: 4357: 3367: 2974: 2049:

Thanks for info. I have also been working with John McLeod. I helped him with his article on the Swedish card game vira 20 years ago.

1621: 1511: 887: 669: 655: 457: 8854: 8825: 8702:

The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to

8672: 7669: 7613: 7557: 7501: 7480: 6892: 6834: 6808: 6722: 6532: 5982: 2833: 2701: 2659: 2296: 1413: 580: 6774: 5277:

to the other as it waxes and wanes? The simple and elegant solution is capitalization in accordance with standard English practice.

4523: 4313:"Tyrolese" is an outdated 18th/19th century English term. Please stop insisting on using an outdated term. National Geographic uses 3669: 3655: 3495:

The revert included an edit summary explaining my edit and your friend didn't supply an edit summary so your revert was unhelpful.

3267:

Hi and sorry for changing something on your personal page, the other day. Of course I shouldn't have done what I did : I was like a

2887:, but it would be good to have an equivalent body of material, at least covering what's changed. I do have access to back issues of 2386: 860: 848: 6813: 5906: 5738: 2574:

Hello, since you were on the list of translators from German to English, I was wondering if you would be interested in translating

2491: 1733: 1430: 1373: 1345: 575: 532: 5361: 5330: 5306: 3732: 1454: 8341:

Have a good year whatever you do, - your help here is greatly appreciated, for mountains, castles, card games ... remembered! --

8326: 7699: 7643: 7091:

page: In British English the word kayak does not refer to an open canoe, but the word canoe can also be used for a kayak. So the

6740: 2481: 1611: 7587: 6405: 6198:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 6103: 6037:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 5839:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 5249: 5231:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 5135:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 5038:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4830:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4738:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4647:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 4232:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3944:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the 3227:. The reason they were deleted was that the article was nominated for deletion due to lack of sources and apparent overlap with 512:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

8934: 7531: 7281: 6866: 6102:

Hallo Bermicourt! Wir würden gerne eine Übersetzung von der deutschen Knowledge Seite "Edith Hlawati" anfordern. Viele Grüße!

5898: 5414:

Hello Bermicourt! I was wondering if you would like to translate a paragraph for me from German to English. (I found your name

5157: 2799: 1296: 1244:

Recently I revised a larger number of articles loosely based on a version in the German Knowledge. Often there were names like

617: 4249: 444:

Hello B, do you plan to move the other regional portals that you maintain to the corresponding WikiProject, like you did with

7182: 6931: 5626: 5152: 3744: 3410: 2587: 819:

Hello and thanks for all the good work with German regional portals. I see that there are a few more near the bottom of the

8270: 8106: 7385: 7197: 3808: 3473:

That's done. It probably needs some tweaking by an editor familiar with the sport. You should not edit your own bio though.

9280: 8924: 8845: 8422: 7149: 6092: 5716: 4755: 4274: 2782:. If you have time and this is of interest to you, I would be very happy about a review. Thank you so much and viele Grüße! 2671: 2655: 2109: 2083: 1118: 1100: 482: 439: 9267:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

8911:

You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself

6360: 5856: 4293:

resulting horlicks, I was simply trying to clarify who uses which terms in order to begin addressing its multiple issues.

3514:

is to go to the talk page and explain your 'bold' edit there. Otherwise we just end up with edit wars which is pointless.

2531: 1823: 9031: 8968: 8790:. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits. 6509:

add citations for Dummett 1980, Goren 1950, Gibson 1974, Parlett 1979, Pardon 1864, and _ 1881? (Should that last one be

5445: 3231:. The consensus was to 'keep' on the proviso that it was sourced. The only reliable source I could find for the game was 2636: 2579: 765: 431: 5766: 2752:

Great! Thank you for the advice! I will do that and let you know when I'm ready for some feedback and language editing.

2478:, rewards players for "daring and tormenting" certain top trumps, and that such tactics lend the game "a certain charm"? 2240: 1889: 1191: 9326: 9185: 9145: 9105: 9065: 8956: 8209:. The truth is that I'm a prolific editor, helped by having translation skills, but I don't have any obvious successor. 6953: 6935: 6654: 6060: 4549: 4508: 3458: 3236: 3092: 2009: 1874: 949:

PS in fact I suspect the National Nertz Association is a front for a commercial organisation as its official site is a

542: 8662: 8644: 8626: 8596: 8582: 8560: 8067: 7999: 5675: 5403: 4848: 3961: 3239:

who was cited in the original article. However, McLeod points to descriptions of two similarly named four-hand games:

2445: 985: 320: 230: 8757: 8381: 8062: 8036: 7983: 7906:

article which contains a recognised classification and naming system for card games, so I'm not inventing new names.

6612: 6195: 6034: 5836: 5395: 5228: 5132: 5035: 4827: 4735: 4664: 4644: 4441: 4229: 4159: 3941: 3504: 3051: 3029: 2980: 2497: 2312: 2219: 1965: 1802: 1673: 1627: 1527: 1475: 1255: 1187: 1037: 375: 280: 7972: 6714: 6698: 5615: 5593: 5576: 5559: 5513: 5488: 4003: 3566:

Dear Bermicourt, hopefully you can help: I'm looking for someone translating this article from German into English:

2332: 2260: 2167: 2152: 2147: 2129: 2113: 2087: 2058: 2044: 2029: 1909: 300: 8547:

yes, I've seen that with sadness, remembering great collaboration over many years, - nonetheless, when seeing that

7921: 7260: 7171: 6676: 6628: 5061: 4131: 3510:

It's good to include a comment with edits, but you didn't follow the right process after being reverted, which iaw

3256: 3006: 2858: 2575: 1991: 1754: 1739: 832: 9248:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

8892:

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

8432:

Hi Bermicourt--I saw you wrote up that nice MGH template, but I can't really figure out how to use it. Where does

8242: 8228: 7123: 7104: 7082: 6490: 5290: 5056: 2903: 1567: 1058: 396: 9276: 8920: 8841: 8264: 8255:

that was on my watchlist. If there was a discussion about whether and how to apply that change, I didn't see it.

8164: 8102: 7855:. At minimum, we need some kind of category for card game groups, but wouldn't term variant or family be better? 7347: 7285: 6601: 6427: 5440: 5381:

tribes further East (Poles, Czechs, Russians, etc). No evidence whatsoever has been cited to show any such link.

3851: 3833: 3804: 3776: 3740: 3437: 2519: 2360: 1858: 1647: 1407: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 8484: 7166:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months 7057: 6544: 872: 589:

and there are only scanned images for the german reviews of the game. Here are the links to the scanned images:

8282: 8091: 7429: 6948: 6550: 6215: 6056: 4669: 4490: 3843: 3373: 3002: 2554:

Sure, I've just added it. I'm happy to create the article for the red link by translating the German Wiki one.

1987: 1547: 1440: 1437: 1364:

can be subsumed under group B of WP:GERCON. I will change it accordingly in the near future. Thank you again --

1299:

as part of the Germany WikiProject. These are based on common usage. In some cases there are two options e.g. "

168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 8124: 7743: 7389: 4047:

Speaking of which, are you going to work on fixing errors on pages in your area of interest, using this page:

3280: 3199: 1282: 922: 773: 9039: 8323: 8251:

I saw the wave of apparently search-and-replace lower-case sweeping through the card game articles, but only

7915: 6345: 6097: 5645: 5497: 5409: 4278: 3618: 3195: 2569: 2548: 9309:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 8650: 8632: 8606: 8401:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 8356: 7867: 6182:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 6021:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5823:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5215:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5119:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 5022:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4814:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4722:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4631:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 4322: 4314: 4216:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3928:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 3078: 908: 863:

I made on the page you started? It seems to have been missing a noun which I couldn't guess. Thank you. --

8803:

Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated

8502:

The only exception is that I may occasionally correct glaring factual errors with e.g. card game articles.

7779: 7315:

as being promotional without checking who'd actually added it. No implication about your motives intended!

7063: 7042: 6478: 5967: 5947: 4760: 4420: 3640: 1677: 1063: 7835: 3575:

That's done, Andrea, although there are one or two loose ends to tidy up which I'll leave to the experts.

2631: 448:, and if so, could you give me a sense of timing and let me know if I can help with the moves in any way? 7815: 7273: 7225: 7221: 7207: 7203: 6633: 6505: 6498: 6006: 4859: 4334: 4285: 3796: 2879:

double-volume set which I now have, but it doesn't go over the general history of card sin the same way.

1829: 401: 37: 9024:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

8691: 8511: 8469: 8041: 7807: 6312: 1718: 9217: 8138: 8098: 8073: 7852: 7277: 7001: 6338: 6199: 6185: 6038: 6024: 5894: 5840: 5826: 5232: 5218: 5136: 5122: 5039: 5025: 4831: 4817: 4739: 4725: 4648: 4634: 4529: 4325:

and so on and on. Tyrolean is the correct name nowadays, so please stop reverting to an outdated tern.

4233: 4219: 3945: 3931: 3847: 3829: 3800: 3772: 3752: 3736: 2984: 2970: 2501: 2487: 2316: 2302: 2223: 2209: 2105: 2079: 1969: 1955: 1806: 1792: 1631: 1617: 1531: 1517: 1231: 1166: 1041: 1027: 814: 796:

Hello Bermicourt. There is currently a workshop going on about the creation of a new Portal Guideline:

743: 603: 379: 365: 337:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 284: 270: 215: 8187: 7896: 7332: 7144: 6703:

Thanks, as I mentioned, it isn't well-known. You are very experienced, I assume you've done it right.

6164:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5999:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5798:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5189:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 5093:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4996:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4792:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4701:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4606:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4191:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 4048: 3895:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2941:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2677:

some different views clearly opposed to the short version. So there is no consensus. That should mean

2462:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2277:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2184:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1926:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1771:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1584:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1492:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1002:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 247:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 9318: 9302: 9291: 9020:

has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the

8863: 8614: 8534: 8320: 7673: 7617: 7561: 7505: 7010: 6896: 6838: 5696: 5599: 5581: 5564: 5547: 5535: 5501: 4139: 4103: 4069:

and my family play board games, but am no expert and wouldn't have the time to expand into that area.

4055: 3999: 3863: 3610: 3488: 1706: 453: 8450: 8332: 8252: 7381: 6452: 9021: 6471: 6448: 6394: 6368: 5371: 5254: 4964: 4574: 4270: 3011: 2909: 2337: 2143: 2125: 2054: 2040: 2025: 1894: 1862: 1854: 1841: 1836: 970: 305: 7468: 4388: 3171: 8602: 8376: 8350: 7840: 7297: 7006: 6239: 6132: 5650: 4345: 3688: 3420:

I've reverted your changes because, in the contentious area of the title, we should be following

2583: 2245: 1853:

and would love to discuss this in the article, but it's a paragraph of German published in 1783 (

1669: 1381: 1254:

Do you really think that the "of" is appropriate here? I thought this phrase is not the case of "

1183: 484: 6639: 9333: 9035: 8658: 8640: 8622: 8592: 8556: 8433: 8418: 8372: 8346: 6286: 6088: 5734: 5704: 5671: 5611: 5589: 5572: 5555: 5509: 5197: 5184: 4289: 3406: 3205: 2005: 1323:

The lake is drained by the Wörschachbach stream which flows through the Wörschachklamm gorge...

1225: 1154: 1114: 1096: 918: 904: 781: 761: 571: 528: 7073:

the English language obliged): e.g. participating with a kayak is not allowed in canoe races.

4384: 4094:. Also I was thought I might look at "CS1 errors: extra text: volume" today, but I will leave 3224: 1996:

Thank you for another good one. I remember your mountain articles, - could you perhaps expand

748:

Thanks for the note. All I was doing here today was scrubbing out playingcarddecks.com, which

8530: 8475:

Well, I'm sorry to see you go. Gotta find another way to figure out how to use the template.

8059: 8033: 7872: 7736: 7704: 6785: 6331: 6152: 5987: 5958: 5890: 5786: 5620: 5466: 5177: 5081: 4984: 4780: 4689: 4594: 4461: 4179: 3883: 3720: 2929: 2854: 2839: 2792: 2450: 2430: 2405: 2265: 2172: 1914: 1870: 1759: 1605: 1572: 1552: 1480: 1460: 990: 854: 683: 599: 325: 235: 7847:

Quick note - is the term 'group' best here? No parent category for this term. Red links for

6963:

Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 21 § Glawnoje Raswedywatelnoje Uprawlenije

3235:

description of the three-hand game. He doesn't give rules for a four-hand variant, nor does

1326:

The lake is drained by the Wörschachbach which flows through the gorge of Wörschachklamm...

255:

is named after the seven of diamonds, which is depicted as a yellow dwarf on the game board

8783: 8441:, and my friend in Germany tells me I should remove the outdated Mansi. Thanks in advance, 7841: 7353: 7193: 6888: 6873: 6736: 6709: 6671: 6211: 5757: 5415: 5391: 5148: 4950: 4898: 4751: 4660: 4546: 4426: 4402: 4318: 4245: 4135: 4099: 4051: 4011: 3995: 3957: 3788: 3454: 3415: 3276: 3183: 3157: 3047: 3025: 2544: 2328: 2097: 2071: 1661: 1597: 1175: 464: 449: 8051:, etc.; if I'd seen those AfDs when they were open, I would have chimed in a like manner. 7377: 8: 9199: 8079: 7289: 7140: 6997: 6977: 6920: 6862: 6444: 6291: 6235: 5917: 5814: 5436: 5352:

to start, if you feel my position as an administrator is unfairly affecting the outcome.

4496: 4266: 3622: 3533: 3500: 3191: 3122: 3074: 2514: 2139: 2121: 2101: 2075: 2050: 2036: 2021: 2014: 1850: 1643: 1106: 593: 590: 8771: 8522: 8360: 8278: 8238: 8183: 7831: 7803: 7783: 7753: 7717: 7695: 7639: 7583: 7527: 7435: 7293: 7234: 7100: 7078: 6957: 6467: 6439: 6050: 5603: 4556: 4392: 4330: 3966: 3681: 3590: 3328: 3244: 3178: 2996: 2954: 2753: 2724: 2708: 2348: 1981: 1308: 1011: 868: 665: 628: 596: 6830: 6815: 6225:

Hi, Bermicourt. A couple of editors have begun a campaign to evaluate sources over at

4040:

me when a Knowledge page is mostly making page-specific references to offline sources.

2967:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2484:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2299:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2206:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1952:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1789:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1614:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1514:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 1300: 1024:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 362:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 267:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 9323: 9251:

Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

8654: 8636: 8618: 8588: 8568: 8552: 8414: 8368: 8342: 8260: 8202: 8118: 8087: 7861: 7420: 7328: 7320: 7306: 7256: 6804: 6770: 6751: 6402: 6306: 6084: 5852: 5810: 5802: 5793: 5730: 5700: 5667: 5607: 5585: 5568: 5551: 5505: 5357: 5326: 5302: 5286: 5245: 5052: 4844: 4412: 4396: 4198: 4186: 3604: 3489: 3402: 3311: 3262: 3228: 2958: 2807: 2614: 2608: 2236: 2001: 1819: 1714: 1543: 1448: 1424: 1401: 1267: 1150: 1149:, - perhaps one line also about the festival held there, with a redirect or two ;) -- 1126: 1110: 1092: 1054: 930: 914: 900: 777: 757: 567: 562: 524: 519: 392: 296: 91: 65: 8737: 8233:

It's sad to see you go. If I've made errors, who can point them out if you won't?

7243: 5281:

unless there's a very compelling argument for them. I don't think we have one here.

3323:

dagegen nur ein schnelle Hilfe für unterwegs. Thank you. Danke für Ihr Verständnis.

3066: 2894:

Should I revert all my recent changes or would you prefer to bring them up to date?

899:

on the go. The infobox should be using "alt_name" instead of "subtitle", I think? --

9305:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 9159: 9119: 9079: 8490: 8480: 8457: 8446: 8427: 8397:, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for 8216: 8172: 8152: 8054: 8028: 7995: 7968: 7175: 7037: 7020: 6986: 6724: 6282: 5110: 5097: 5088: 4919: 4504: 4457: 4456:

I'm not offended, but maybe be a bit less aggressive with reverting in the future?

3902: 3665: 3636: 3211: 3056: 2627: 2525: 2374: 2366: 2356: 2197: 1775: 1766: 1700: 1355: 1320:

The lake is drained by the Wörschachbach which flows through the Wörschach Gorge...

828: 805: 679: 424: 9245:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

8756:

led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the

3223:. You can also access the old rules from the history of the article, for example, 950: 8574: 8503: 8496: 8461: 8220: 8156: 8004: 7907: 7710: 7454: 7339: 7189: 7163: 7151: 7129: 7115: 7049: 6732: 6704: 6690: 6684: 6666: 6536: 6482: 6419: 6352: 6317: 6250: 6207: 6118: 5753: 5682: 5641: 5636:

up to the user to convince others for it's inclusion not the other way around. --

5452: 5144: 4946: 4923: 4912: 4894: 4747: 4656: 4560: 4543: 4535: 4515: 4476: 4423: 4399: 4370: 4349: 4294: 4241: 4207: 4113: 4073: 4026: 3953: 3815: 3758: 3700: 3647: 3576: 3543: 3515: 3474: 3429: 3359: 3287: 3272: 3248: 3139: 3103: 3043: 3021: 2895: 2825: 2735: 2687: 2594: 2555: 2540: 2416: 2378: 2324: 2188: 2179: 1943: 1881: 1725: 1686: 1369: 1337: 1278: 1259: 1211: 1132: 954: 936: 879: 840: 707: 647: 598:. It would be a great help if I can get these translations to expand the article. 503: 468: 101: 8972: 7778:

Hello Bermicourt, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this

7242:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be

6326: 5666:

were found precious. That's what you are, always. I cherish working with you! --

3385: 3342:

and the fact that some terms don't have an English equivalent, hence my work on

3167: 2293:

cards, giving it "that brisk and energetic feel" which is reflected in its name?

1075: 9242:

On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.

9195: 7927: 7438:, and you reverted it. Your edit summary reads “m”. Could your please explain? 7366: 7136: 6993: 6967: 6916: 6858: 6231: 5921: 5430: 4938: 4875: 4708: 4696: 4450: 4308: 3133: 3118: 3086: 3070: 3069:

in your view that the word "domino" cannot be used for the tiles themselves. --

3039: 3017: 2511: 1866: 1639: 913:

And hats off for the "Nerts" move, I was just wondering about that myself... --

8610: 8573:

for your friendship and collaboration, I've now added the article. Bless you.

8364: 3994:

article using a different approach. So I would appreciate hearing your views.

1386: 197: 9314: 9311:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Schleswig-Holstein (3rd nomination)

9306: 8548: 8406: 8398: 8274: 8234: 8195: 8179: 7882: 7827: 7799: 7691: 7665: 7650: 7635: 7609: 7594: 7579: 7523: 7401: 7167: 7096: 7095:

article is _not_ about the kayak in the narrower American sense of the word.

7074: 6457: 6046: 5925: 5902: 5695:

Thank you, - and yes, 3 people said so ;) - Listening to the charity concert

5349: 4472: 4341: 4326: 3728: 3721: 3511: 3421: 3324: 3315: 3232: 2992: 2683: 2646: 2370: 1977: 1652: 1238: 1146: 893: 864: 661: 640: 624: 118: 5480: 8256: 8206: 8145: 8131: 8114: 8083: 7857: 7762: 7553: 7538: 7416: 7412: 7324: 6800: 6796: 6766: 6762: 6413: 6398: 6302: 6297: 6172: 6159: 6011: 5994: 5848: 5353: 5345: 5322: 5317: 5298: 5282: 5241: 5202: 5048: 4887: 4867: 4840: 4804: 4787: 4288:, adding the relevant sources, so that should now be fine. Your comment at 4254: 4022: 4017: 3983: 3789: 3676: 3628: 3614: 3600: 3596: 3240: 2819: 2803: 2232: 1815: 1780: 1710: 1539: 1444: 1420: 1397: 1354:

Thank you very much for your enlightening explanations. Although I've read

1050: 558: 515: 499: 388: 292: 201: 7266:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

3096: 1206: 823:. Is there anything that should be done to maintain or move these pages? 494:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

410: 9155: 9115: 9075: 8476: 8442: 7991: 7964: 7848: 7497: 7482: 7162:

Hello, Bermicourt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that

7028: 6517: 6278: 6244: 5192: 5106: 5102: 4999: 4799: 4713: 4618: 4500: 4255: 3842:

Sorry to be a pain Bermicourt, but I've found another dangling ref - see

3661: 3632: 3271:

full speed on its track and by dint of habit, I made this sorry mistake.

2623: 2352: 1263: 824: 801: 749: 552: 8886:

On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

8818: 8302: 3428:

is the accepted English word in sources before changing that bit again.

1997: 1930: 1921: 203: 9298: 8390: 8078:

Hi, Bermicourt. I saw you remove yourself from the participant list at

7111: 6623: 6596: 6556: 6220: 6074: 5637: 5273: 4795: 4704: 4622: 4380: 3991: 3975: 3679:

is a base title not a qualified title namely one with brackets anyway.

2535: 1393:

This goat approves of your gaming articles! Thanks for your hard work!

1365: 1290: 1274: 586: 251: 242: 7725: 6904:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hoy (Lake Constance) (2nd nomination)

5880:

Your hook reached 10,807 views (900.6 per hour), making it one of the

5750:

Category talk:Nazi personnel who resisted the Holocaust#Correct title?

5655: 5428:

Please let me know if you would be available to do this. Thank you, —

3286:

Don't worries, that's entirely understandable. Keep up the good work.

8978:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may

7903: 7787: 7358: 6167: 6002: 5625:

Bermicourt, what are you doing? I'm not sure you understand the what

5206: 4194: 3974:

I would like to compare notes with you one what drew my attention to

3907: 3890: 3727:

Hi Bermicourt, really appreciate the effort you put into the article

3354: 3344: 2944: 2618: 2471: 2280: 1939: 1601: 1593: 1505: 547: 350: 8889:

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

7934: 6646:. Copying within Knowledge is acceptable but it must be attributed. 6563: 6139: 5974: 5865: 5773: 5164: 5068: 4971: 4767: 4676: 4581: 4166: 3870: 2916: 2437: 2252: 2159: 1901: 1746: 1559: 1467: 977: 312: 222: 8988: 7959: 7944: 7887: 7791: 6960:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at 6588: 6573: 6433: 6296:

You are interested in card games. Perhaps you would like to review

5004: 4991: 4942: 4879: 4863: 4610: 4601: 4539: 4416: 4127: 4095: 3898: 3042:. Can you please translate the article into a new English article? 2949: 2936: 1006: 997: 341: 332: 199: 4449:

Given that context, I'm surprised you resorted to a revert, which

1496: 1487: 878:

No problems; I've checked the original and clarified the meaning.

8438: 8292: 7405: 6789: 3990:

As far as I can tell you have resolved all the Sfn errors in the

3567: 2475: 2285: 2272: 1501: 1015: 8495:

Please note that I have retired for the reasons explained on my

8403:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Eifel (2nd nomination)

8215:

because we couldn't agree a "both/and" solution as we have with

7400:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

6784:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

6750:

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

6258: 6230:

additional quality sources that might be worth listing. Cheers.

4798:

was derived from the esteemed 16th-century Scottish and English

1863:

https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/44317#page/197/mode/1up

1855:

https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/44317#page/234/mode/1up

1205:

The list is based on the Database of British and Irish Hills at

859:

Hi, and thanks for all your work on WP. Could you please check

423:

Vielen Dank für Ihre vielen Übersetzungen im Laufe der Jahre! ♦

9230: 8874: 8010: 5527: 4091: 4087: 3447:

Hello, could you help me translate my personal wikipedia page:

3062: 538: 495: 488: 353:

ever invented than the fact that it was played by three players

8752: 7158: 7048:

Thanks for letting me know. I'll take a look at the guidance.

6942: 3735:

the citations. Hope you can help us retrieve these sources! -

3034:

Sorry for the mistake. The German article to be translated is

204: 23:

This user is no longer active on Knowledge as of January 2024.

9317:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

8409:

with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of

7237:). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use. 7092: 7088: 7069: 6643: 5269: 3915: 3348: 3162:

Here are some references for the Turkish version of Oh Hell:

2466: 2457: 2344: 2290: 2193: 2192:

imported bidding from the world's most successful card game,

1779:, if a seven is led, the player risks it being beaten by the 1588: 1579: 613:

Where to sort section "References", or, what about later Refs

346: 8718:, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive. 8649:

Some days later, a calf in the mist and chocolate cake, and

7323:

app store sources, not even for sourcing an alternate name.

5699:. I created the articles of the composer and the soprano. -- 4436:

Reverting "entered into service" versus "taken into service"

2779: 733: 508: 8786:, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who 8764:. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing! 6755: 6650: 6001:... that it is purportedly hard to find a more interesting 3971:

Hi. Thanks for sorting out the Polish translation issues.

3919: 3177:

in English where squared scoring is mentioned. One sample:

2953:, named after its highest card, the seven of diamonds, the 1439:, there's a picture of some grid related to the game. Also 1241:... I also didn't checked the de-4 babel on your userpage. 8780:

gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November

4471:

I've copied this to the talk page and responded there iaw

4025:, I just revert my edits to the non-template system. HTH. 3528:

I posted this before finding out that you agreed with me.

2776:

User:Bohnenkraut11/Saxon Switzerland climbing region draft

2732:

User:Bohnenkraut11/Saxon Switzerland climbing region draft

3448: 3268: 8704: 7885:

which will help you learn about the process. Thank you.

7851:; ditto for subcategories. I see this term also used at 7371: 6531:

Thanks for alerting me to that, Tamzin. See response on

5213:

Template:Did you know nominations/Doublets (tables game)

3771:

No probs :-) I converted it to the citation template. -

2343:

Would you consider translating the German article about

349:, it had little more in common with the most successful 8745: 8271:

User talk:Dicklyon#Happy New Year! Let's work together!

8205:

who was active until end 2022, but has gone quiet, and

7664:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

7608:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

7552:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

7496:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

7404:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 7284:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

6887:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

6829:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

6788:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 6754:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1705:

Did you know there is already a disambiguation page at

8831:

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself

8714: 8631:

Vacation pics uploaded, at least the first day, - and

7249:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

706:

Hallo Matthiasvon, hab' einen kurzen Artikel gemacht.

8804: 6271: 3613:

title while lesser-known ones add a qualifier, e.g.,

3091:

In this case, I can also quote a reliable source: at

1018:

idiom "my stomach's playing Kaschlan with my bowels"?

8955:

indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a

8788:

wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October

7668:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

7612:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

7556:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

7500:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

7313:

an app called Poohead has been developed for iPhones

7087:

I also noticed you made some mistakes regarding the

6956:

to determine whether its use and function meets the

6891:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

6833:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

6330:. Are you able to find any other sources to add? --- 6264: 6178: