User talk:Blaze Wolf/Archive 5

5332:

lately that I feel might be due to my Knowledge addiction which has caused me to feel a need to interact with every little thing on here. I'm not taking a break in an attempt to hide from my mistakes, but to help me make fewer of them. I know that we are all humans and that we will all make mistakes, however, sometimes you can make too many mistakes. During my break I will occasionally check my talk page or make a few minor edits (as in grammar or spelling fixes in articles), but I'm mostly going to try and stay off of Knowledge until I feel that I'm ready to return. ―

1473: 2752: 2678: 31: 1391: 9603: 8576: 5223: 7410: 5817: 5574: 4484: 4457: 3807: 3699: 3591: 3267: 444: 7383: 7140: 7113: 7086: 7059: 7032: 6870: 6816: 6762: 6708: 6249: 6222: 6195: 6141: 6114: 6087: 6060: 6033: 6006: 5979: 5925: 5871: 5844: 5790: 5655: 5628: 5601: 5547: 5520: 5493: 4781: 4727: 4646: 4619: 4592: 4538: 4430: 4403: 4241: 3780: 3672: 3645: 3618: 3564: 3537: 3483: 3429: 3402: 3375: 3348: 3240: 3213: 3132: 3105: 3051: 849: 687: 660: 606: 525: 498: 417: 363: 336: 255: 147: 7356: 7329: 7302: 7248: 7221: 6843: 6168: 5898: 5024: 4997: 4970: 4943: 4916: 4889: 4862: 4808: 4700: 4673: 4565: 4268: 3834: 3753: 3726: 903: 876: 822: 795: 768: 471: 6924: 3294: 714: 7464: 7437: 6789: 5763: 4835: 282: 7275: 7194: 7167: 7005: 6978: 6951: 6897: 6735: 6681: 5682: 5466: 5253: 4754: 4511: 4376: 4349: 4322: 4295: 3510: 3456: 3321: 3186: 3159: 3078: 741: 633: 228: 5952: 5736: 5709: 579: 552: 390: 309: 201: 174: 2156:

institutions and authors. I come from the City of Niš, I know the history of it very well and Albanian people were never a majority here. I respect Albanian people and it's scientist, but I'm afraid that in this case, references made in the article are not true and objective and I don't think they should have precedence over scientific research made by Serbian scientific institutions, considering the article is about a city in Serbia.

3886: 9347: 1063: 1021: 1558: 1149:

the core of the Teahouse and this traits is concomitant with any Teahouse host. if you intend to keep answering questions there Please be more mindful of your 'tone' you help out there, no doubt, but most of the answers you proffer albeit significantly correct comes off as rather passive or dismissive. Please take note and be conscious of this.

2511:, namely removing the "hand-selected" phrase that you flagged, and also fixed some formatting errors. I'm very grateful for your assistance on this, as I've struggled to find other editors interested in improving the article. Please let me know if there's anything else I should do here before these updates can be implemented. 7722:

comment by simply relocating the aforementioned template in my reply that "The consensus in the discussion in this thread was to remove the version number altogether". This way, saving them time from reading the whole discussion, in case they missed the diff in the article history. But, I understand. Thanks. --

7487:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

6272:

5047:

3857:

926:

9462:

Will do. I did a quick google of American v. British English preferences in Japan and found that, to the disappointment of many British English teachers, the former is preferred. I knew a guy who said he translated Japanese technical manuals. I exclaimed did he speak Japanese? His answer was that he

1830:

I was put on a global block list in January for “abuse” which I don’t understand because I’ve never made any contributions or edits to Knowledge. In fact, I was hospitalized for most of the month so this makes me think my accounts were hacked. I know I’m still able to read articles, but I don’t take

7877:

in order to get a Knowledge editor to create an article for a biography of a living person, to be more specific a tattoo artist. I am not quite experienced with how Knowledge works but as said I've been guided a little bit by Chris Troutman. I was wondering if you're accepting this kind of service.

9802:

It's alright. And you are correct when you say "I imagine longtime-users have lots of edits to review, and can breeze through processing certain types of edits (like content removals)." People who fight vandalism like me usually are seeing a lot of edits at once and usually edits that are removing

9777:

I'm still pretty new to Knowledge, so I don't know the best way to handle all situations here. I see the value in discussions on Talk pages. Though, it kind of sucks if you put time into research and thought into an edit, and that edit gets reverted without explanation, the onus is on you to start

5331:

So as I'm sure some people have noticed, I'm going to attempt to take a break from Knowledge. My reasoning is I feel that I've become addicted to Knowledge and it's been affecting my real life as it's become sort of a distraction. I've also been making a lot of stupid and easily avoidable mistakes

2872:

It seems you've recently really gotten into patrolling, especially with SWViewer. However, it's clearly generating a lot of heat though. Misuse of rollback reasons is very concerning. I've seen you roll back an edit as "unexplained", yet it clearly was (even if ultimately wrong), like at the AR-15

2836:

Hi, you appear to have used rollback on edits that have an edit summary explaining the removal of content. Moreover, your use of a Level 4 warning over the rephrasing of 3 words was entirely inappropriate. Note that these edits constitute disruptive or unconstructive edits at best, and do not fall

2155:

Hi, could you please stop reverting changes made to the City of Niš article? Numerous articles of Serbian cities have been changed and suggestions have been made that origins of their names come from Albanian/Proto-Albanian language and the references cites in those articles all come from Albanian

1148:

You give the correct answers most of the time, for that we are grateful but please remember to be consciously polite when answering questions, taking your time to welcome new editors asking questions there, spelling things out for them and taking your time to teach them in a very polite manner is

7660:

My apologies. When I view the page in SWViewer I can't tell whether or not a person is alive. Usually if someone adds something to a page regarding a person without a source and I catch in in SWViewer, I just revert it as a BLP vio since that's usually what it is. Thanks for adding it back with a

1310:

Who knows! I might have angered them at some point or offended them. Or maybe they just want to kill me because I exist. I don't know. All I know is that there may be a chance someone is out there wanting to kill me. Or there might not. I don't know. I'm not omniscient. Why are you even asking me

6340:

LMAO I was hoping nobody would notice. I'm still fairly new to Knowledge, so what I do with most of my edits is copy someone else's format and then add my own information and sources. I was planning to do the same with my userpage and I had Blaze's source code in one tab as reference and mine in

2898:

Hello Ferret! I understand what you have said and I will attempt to slow down. I feel the reason why I'm not taking as much time as I should evaluating each edit is because the feed on the left side is just going by quickly so my brain is thinking I need to quickly assess each edit to get to the

1042:

I've always been confused by short descriptions since most of the time whenever I see them, they're non-specific and vague. So like "2022 Video game" and not "2022 Splatoon game" or something. I think I tried asking about them once but never got a clear answer, and the page on short descriptions

7721:

your reply to the edit request because there was a different outcome in the discussion. Therefore, your reply with the template "not done" that more reliable sources are needed, no longer applied. So in order to inform the requesting editor of the conclusion of the discussion, I refactored the

2307:

because: "Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieces, whether written by the editors of the publication (editorials) or outside authors (invited op-eds and letters to the editor from notable figures) are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or author, but are

1772:

I literally use the software? I was part of the initial beta test of stickers before it changed to the current system. Im not sure how you expect someone to cite something like that in a software considering most things on discord don’t get public announcements except via the in-app changelog.

1173:

Hello Celestina! Would you mind providing an example of this? I always do my best to be friendly towards newcomers, however I'm not going to waste their time by (for example) telling them how to create a draft if the reason they want to is contrary to the purpose of Knowledge and having them

2238:

I apologize if I'm bothering you, but by reverting changes to the article you are a part of the problem. Why didn't you revert the changes made by Albanian users when they were made? I will discuss about it on the talk page of the article and I hope you will be a part of the conversation.

2198:

Discussions have been made, but I don't think there was any success in protecting the article from these changes. That is why I messaged you. Even the history of Niš article has been changed by Albanian user and again that was referenced with citations from Albanian research institutions.

2915:

Let the feed roll. If someone gets to it before you make a decision, that's fine! Don't get caught up in the *rush* of patrolling, in the "game" of trying to beat others to the punch. It's better to miss out on a revert than to give the wrong reason and end up in a discussion about it. --

2462:, I explained the removal of the content. The citations that Foorgood keeps restoring are all highly contested and controversial pieces of work, most of which share the personal opinion of a historian or political scientist, rather than just historically factual and neutral information 6299:

I wanted to use your Knowledge profile page as a base for mine and I accidentally edited yours instead of creating mine. I reverted the edit but I still wanted to apologize for that mistake. Nice to meet you though! I wasn't expecting to find another furry here in Knowledge.

9991:

suggesting some ideas for a possible list criterion for the article and thought you might be interested. I'm also trying to find out the best way to showcase a potential rewrite of the article, be it in my sandbox, a subpage, or some better alternative avenue. Thank you!

2873:

page. In the issue with the IP and the Lady Gaga song, you continuously reverted it as vandalism, despite it not been obvious vandalism, reasons being stated, and efforts to communicate with you. That made it a content dispute, even if it ultimately goes against the IP.

2279:

Sorry about that, I wasn't aware of that rule. As per the changes - how can changes made by Albanian users with sources from Albanian institutions cited have precedence over citations from Serbian research institutions about a Serbian city? It just doesn't make sense.

5369:

I like your user name. My spirit animal is a wolf, and I am addicted to pretty much all things wolf-related. Also, if I may add, (not to be rude or anything), but Knowledge seems like a strange addiction to me. Not like, say, a video game or anything. But you do you.

7514:

Hello all! I am back once again. However, a few things will change regarding my behavior from last year. First, I will not be nearly as active as I was last year. I will still be relatively active, however I won't be on pretty much every waking hour. Second, I will

1960:

Thanks for reverting that. It was indeed a mistake which is itself a part of another big mistake. About crosswiki antivandalism, I could say that anyone, no matter how many languages they speak, can become a patroller. Becoming a crosswiki patroller means that you

6647:

All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please

5432:

4207:

3017:

113:

9778:

the discussion... But I guess I see the value in that, too. I imagine longtime-users have lots of edits to review, and can breeze through processing certain types of edits (like content removals). And that status quo is desirable over new content, generally.

1196:

to use against anyone. In the end what I’m saying is you are doing okay at the Teahouse but there is always more room for improvement, being extremely polite is the bedrock of the Teahouse and the Teahouse is the most visited avenue. Keep up the good job.

9733:

The second edit (the one you reverted) was not technically "content removal"; it was a reversion of a recent edit made by another user, with an explanation of why I made the revert. The first edit was a content removal, which I explained in the edit

1704:

Hi, Was just wondering why I’ve been blocked from making edits when I’ve never attempted to make any. I use Knowledge for research topics and recreational interests. Also, for a time I noticed I was in something called a “sandbox”. Can you clarify?

961:. To reiterate, I removed the "hand-selected" phrase that you flagged and fixed some formatting errors. Really appreciate your help on this. I'm still learning about this platform and have been really encouraged by the response so far. 8706:

I too tried the copyright detector and, like you, got nothing matching more than a few words. However, it had so much the look of something copied from somewhere that I wonder if it was copied from a paper source, rather than online.

1014:'s edit adding to a short description of a letter of the alphabet. I think that this was a positive contribution adding to the information in the description; I believe that short descriptions mean to be a descriptive summary, not 2261:

I see no Albanian users that made unconstructive changes to the article. If you wish to continue contributing to WIkipedia, please change your username since usernames that imply your account is a bot account are not allowed. ―

2128:

Hello, I managed to find a solid source online related to exactly why those portraits were misattributed, please check my source. If I did something wrong with the source, please tell me or you can fix it yourself. Thank you.

7519:

not to be as stupid this year as I was last year.... and the year before that. Third.... uh... I dunno if there's a third yet (if there is I will edit this). Anyways, I am back! Hope to help out in any way I can this year. ―

8810:

one. Artist bios from museums aren't really super great because no author is attached, and because they may be somewhat of a conflict of interest. There's probably some guideline something somewhere talking more about it.

5384:

Hey I am very sorry about this situation! Recently my passwords have been hacked and stolen by a few of my late friends. I have taken this to the police in order to sort this problem out, so please be patience with me and

2937:

Mistakes happen. Don’t let this discourage you. You are a valuable editor. SWViewer is quite annoying sometimes. I had a bad experience with this tool. Furthermore, please refrain from altering other's comments as you did

1270:

IT's not shady. It's smart. It prevents me from being killed by some assassin who might really hate me for some reason. Also, they don't need to believe everything on my profile. For all you know it all could be a lie. ―

9594:

Thanks for helping out with the cleanup on my user page. I chose not to use the clear tag previously as it creates a weird artifact. A fix has been found, so the clear tag has been added. Have a barnstar for the help.

9118:

First, please do not create a new section for a reply (you can either use the button that says "reply" if available, or add a comment beneath mine with one extra colon to start). Second, your sandbox is located at

6430: 7644:

I added a line of Gisele's new exhibition at the Wits Art Museum, which you deleted. Please note, Gisele is not a living person. I will submit the addition agin, with a source reference for the exhibition.

1530: 1691: 7949:

You'd be surprised at the random places that people manage to turn up to. I've seen draft articles placed on the talk page of redirects to WP-space pages that aren't even related to article-writing.

2095:, and have fun. If a local user leave a message saying that you reverted an edit incorrectly, thank them with all your heart and learn how to stay away from that mistake next time. People can be 2025:

Sort of. I don't quite understand how those aren't language sensitive (besides blanking which is obvious, you're removing stuff) since those seem like it would be in the language on the wiki. ―

1727:

Hello Hope! I'm not sure what you mean. My guess is you were briefly logged out and your IP address was blocked from editing. As to why you were on a sandbox page I can't help you with that. ―

1553: 7993:

But I'm unable to help you with writing a BLP article as I am highly inexperienced in that area (The only article I've created is for a video game). If you haven't already, please ask at

3304: 8059: 6365:

I'm still on break currently but was just viewing an article on something I was curious about and saw your message and as SWinxy said, it's all fine. Thanks for reverting it though. ―

8147: 9737:

I feel that if someone has concerns about a content removal, they should explain their concerns, which Beyond My Ken has not done, either in their edit summary or on the Talk page.

9848:

Hello IP! When you initially added it it looked like you were jsut adding a random link to a comment from 2008. The next time you added it you said it was an image so I left it. ―

8253: 2852:

And do be aware that in some cases your edits could very well be construed as edit warring. The talk page is there, use it instead of reverting edits that you do not agree with.

9647:

No problem! I jsut saw that you added a bunch of break tags between 2 templates and I figured "Why not just used the clear tag?". DIdn't realized it created a weird artifact. ―

3299: 2959: 2005:

The most common and simple type of vandalism are test editing, inserting nonsense/gibberish, blanking and promotion, all of which are not language-sensitive. Do you get it now?

1989:

Am I still misunderstanding? Wouldn't it make sense for a vandal to be vandalizing in the language of the Wiki (since they most likely speak that language if they found it)? ―

1714: 9120: 983:

My apologies. I completely forgot to take another look at it. I've been a bit busy lately haven't had the time. But I will take a look when I have the opportunity to do so. ―

2592:

Hello Ashley! I'm currently on a long Wikibreak so I won't be able to do much to help you out with your draft for the time being. Remember that Knowledge has no deadline. ―

9803:

content that is sourced is usually deemed to be vandalism, though sometimes it isn't (and hopefully the user who removed the content lets us know that we made a mistake) ―

8169: 8139: 8125: 8089: 6907: 8419:

I'm a student of NIAMT Ranchi and I made some updates on NIAMT Knowledge but you reversed them. Please check the changes made by me was 100% true.Please revert it again.

3293: 9717:

Hello! The edit summary I saw didn't explain it. I saw your other edit summary but I'm not reverting either edit as you need to discuss this on the article talk page. ―

8168:

Which country are you from? I mean when I edited it for the first time, not when I reverted it. When I edited it for the first time how did you get to know in a minute.

6518: 6462: 4199: 4048: 3009: 3000: 2981: 2051:, and keep an eye on, say, a new user adding multiple links to their user page, next to a photo of themself smiling at the camera under which lies a line that states 9964: 9950: 9913: 9875: 9563: 9547: 8341: 8277: 8245: 7970:

They most likely ended up here because they were somehow sent to the SuggestBot suggestions talk page and I told them to try the Teahouse... and now they're here. ―

6558: 6478: 5153: 5105: 4144: 4120: 4056: 4040: 3466: 2986: 1625: 3004: 2580: 9865: 8293: 6494: 6398: 5121: 4064: 1865: 1116: 105: 8301: 8269: 6534: 6502: 6470: 5137: 5064: 4096: 4088: 3874: 1845: 1192:

I’m not oblivious of your heavy lifting or the good work you do, I wouldn’t point out to any specifics, because I’m not in the bad habit of collecting diffs of

8901: 8883: 8869: 8785: 8309: 8229: 8221: 7786: 6486: 6446: 6438: 6406: 5161: 5097: 5081: 4112: 4104: 4024: 4000: 3992: 943: 8832:

Actually I reverted because they added a statement that was unsourced, not realizing they had made edits prior to that. I didn't actually check the source. ―

2107: 2086: 2063: 2036: 2013: 2000: 9879: 8700: 6639: 5476: 5424: 3984: 3455: 2996: 2988: 2284: 1910:

but no admin has yet checked it. I recommend waiting until they are blocked before reverting because they will keep reverting you if they are not blocked. —

9568:

I initially requested it to be deleted because it seemed promotional. Bbb23 decided it would be better to move it to draft space where it is now located at

6322:

haha I was wondering what I saw. No worries about it. He's a chill dude. Not unsurprising at all to find a furry here—you'll probably find lots who edit on

2651:

Hello IP! I clearly made a mistake and have since reverted my edit. I noticed that you made some changes after I Reverted so feel free to add those back. ―

9960: 9946: 9924: 9909: 9887: 9871: 9828: 8237: 7812: 7804: 7796: 7788: 6414: 5089: 4016: 3461: 2619: 2603: 2558: 2544: 1744: 994: 8193: 8177: 8163: 8133: 8119: 2471: 1762: 9842: 8553: 8530: 8514: 8479: 8463: 8436: 8420: 8285: 7988: 7879: 6542: 5465: 5207: 5145: 4726: 4080: 4193: 1350:

What you're saying is making me uncomfortable. It feels like you're trying to get me to reveal personal info about myself. Please leave me alone now. ―

9442:

Hello! I'm honestly not quite sure. Technically it should use Japanese English but that's not a thing so I'd say discuss on the article's talk page. ―

8992: 8093: 7504: 6341:

another, and I ended making all the edits in Blaze's page thinking it was for my userpage. I still feel extremely embarrased about that mistake though.

6289: 3960: 3929: 2736: 1907: 1894: 1368: 1345: 1329: 1305: 1289: 1265: 1249: 1120: 767: 8152:

Well first I receive the notification that you reverted my edit, so I Clicked on that and second I didn't realize you were going to do it yourself. ―

5627: 2861: 2383: 9569: 8488:

to know what external links are appropriate (and they should only be placed in the external links section). You also added an unsourced statement in

8060:

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/delhi/tim-hortons-canadas-iconic-coffee-brand-comes-to-india-with-two-outlets-in-delhi-gurgaon-8090044/lite/

5413: 4737: 4072: 3131: 2973: 2961: 2662: 1248:

For someone who doesn't want to be known is kinda shady, how do you expect the readers to know that the profile you made about yourself is truthful?

8397:

Usually I don't bother requesting deletion people's sandboxes unless it's obviously promotional because it's a sandbox, the use is experimenting. ―

2791: 1810: 1514: 1231: 1208: 1185: 1137: 1029: 8261: 8173: 8143: 8129: 6649: 6510: 5719: 5708: 5471: 5434: 5379: 4209: 4032: 3019: 2453: 1754: 1746: 1529: 1376: 1361: 1337: 1322: 1297: 1282: 1257: 778: 335: 115: 2488: 1455: 1439: 1094: 1071: 1054: 9001:

Just was wondering how I can publish information about an individual I’m trying to create a page for so it can pop up when people google them? --

8673: 8657: 8371: 8325: 6550: 6454: 5169: 5113: 4537: 4136: 4008: 2951: 2256: 2240: 2216: 2200: 2176: 2160: 1832: 1722: 1706: 1693: 9870:

There is a version of minecraft for the Oculus Quest named Questcraft I think you should add something about that to the Minecraft wiki article

9010: 6596: 5762: 2273: 2232: 2192: 1738: 8355: 8333: 6580: 6566: 5638: 5364: 5268: 5191: 5177: 4753: 4177: 4163: 2427: 2144: 1683: 1665: 1104: 200: 9695:, I did in fact describe my changes with an edit summary. Could you review my edit summary, and remove the message on my Talk page? Thank you 8065:

Don't give the proof to me. Add it to the article when you add the new info. Otherwise I'll just undo your edit for not providing a source. ―

6221: 3964: 3950: 2925: 2910: 2571:. Please let me know if there's anything else I can help with before these updates can be implemented. I'm so grateful for your help on this. 2520: 2445: 1939: 1916: 8317: 6526: 6422: 5129: 4155: 4128: 3956: 3925: 3142: 1000: 632: 5654: 4915: 4780: 2995:

Meu caro, neste momento, não posso continuar este trabalho. Como faço para entrar em contato com Você mais tarde? Obrigado, Mário Marinho --

970: 9383: 5023: 4732: 3894:

Message added 15:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2549:

Thank you, Blaze Wolf, your help is sincerely appreciated. Please do take your time and let me know if I can be of any help as you review.

1604: 740: 9520:

Done. BTW: Why do chicken coups have two doors? If they had four doors, they'd be "chicken sedans". Well, maybe "Chicken saloons"? Cheers

5391:

I'm not sure if this message will even reach you so please be understanding as I am trying to sort out who did this, because it wasn't me!

2846: 2809:? If you know something about American football and the NFL, you know that's a clearly a hoax and a false information. The "source" used ( 1396:

I give you a cup of tea for helping revert vandalism on my talk page maybe one day we can sit down and have a nice chat with cups of tea!

1006: 8097: 7691:

Yep no problem! I'll modify the warning I gave you to just be for not adding a source instead of not adding a source to a BLP article. ―

5773: 5714: 4764: 3509: 1243: 773: 346: 8793: 7488: