1484:
22:
1238:
1361:
2216:
841:
242:
1273:
895:
1158:
665:
577:
1973:
1988:. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
1395:. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
1531:"provide solar panels and heat pumps to every home" this is misleading: "he would look to provide every home with a solar power connection and a small heat pump. “That’s something that I would want entirely paid for by the private sector,”" is what was said. you're version implies use of city hall funds
2071:
month, 2024-06, that I have 184 total edits and 164 edit summaries, so an 89.1% rate of using edit summaries. Looking at my contributions page, all major, mainspace edits have edit summaries. I often don't bother with edit summaries for minor edits, and I occasionally don't bother with edit summaries
357:
As you're the main editor who's arguing that the
Conservative Party leadership is 'now' vacant. I believe it would be best if 'you' would open an RFC on the matter, with a list of pages that RFC would effect. Should the 1922 committee choose an interim leader & thus a new prime minister to serve,
275:
So I've been (perhaps a little obsessively :P) involved with that article lately, and I definitely welcome your go at an overhaul (if anything, because it makes it easier to tackle the next overhaul :P ). I guess I just wanted to point out quick that I think - to pick an example - some of the content
1213:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
483:
I've updated them using "July 26, 2022", though that can be corrected by anyone. Now, to find out who's the "interim party leader". Meanwhile, I'm waiting to see what the UK Supreme Court's ruling will be on
Scotland holding another independence referendum. Odds are, they'll rule in favour of the UK
136:
The
Belfast Telegraph source you have put quite clearly supports the idea that a non-Unionist or Nationalist party could hold the dFM position and clearly contradicts the statement that this role "can only go to a party designating as Unionist or Nationalist."; indeed it supports the truth that this
554:
Even if this is not relevant to the current UK political situation, I was surprised to find out today that
Johnson was born an American citizen. Yes, I know that the family returned to Britain during his childhood. Well, Napoleon was ethnically Italian, Stalin was ethnically Georgian and Hitler was
2121:
The article is about a bunch of ideas that were promulgated mainly in the 16th, 17th, 18th century. I kinda presumed the reader will know that ideas from the 16th century are often wrong! The notion fell out of favour over time. When dealing with ideas popular in earlier times, I don't know that a
1663:
link
Bondegezou sent above which explains why this is important. Instead you edit warred against several other editors without discussing the issue on the talk page. Bondegezou hasn't gamed the system, they followed our process – one which you ignored – and has shown you patience. If you feel your
279:
Anyway, I guess instead of inspecting your changes with a magnifying glass, I should maybe rather be taking the opportunity to tackle the article more boldly myself :) (I think I've been burned so often in the past I kind of shy away from that - I guess that comes with gravitating towards editing
182:
The source was published prior to the announcement from the
Returning Officer whose decision it is to determine the day of the poll, so was wondering how that would be a reliable source? My understand is primary sources are allowed and this would be a valid time for a primary source, what do you
1847:
I take your point about making a large number of changes in a single edit, but the alternative is to make a large number of (very similar) changes in a large number of edits, which (I'm told) has the potential to annoy page-watchers. Another alternative would be to make no changes at all, of
1791:", please note than in no instance did I change the displayed text of any quoted material, or indeed of any other material in the article. My edit involved replacing piped links with redirects where the existing text was a pre-existing redirect to the same target as the pipe, as described at
1172:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the
161:
I suggest this isn't the sort of thing you should be coming here, to my Talk page, about. If there is an issue about an article, discuss it on the article's Talk page. That way, other editors can see the discussion and input. If you have further comments, go there.
140:"But if it finishes second, it can’t nominate a deputy First Minister if it sticks to its designation, as it is highly likely that either unionism or nationalism would be the largest designation, and the largest party from that section will therefore get the post."
1607:
This isn't about the content of the article. You were banned for your behaviour. If you want to be unbanned, you need to recognise that. If you want to improve the content of the article, discuss suggested changes on the Talk page. You still haven't done this.
865:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
869:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
523:. I suggest a poor decision at one article shouldn’t be spread to other articles in the interests of consistency. If I can gather the energy, I will try to help the editing community reach a consensus on the Boris Johnson article.
401:
I had a quick look and the website doesn't appear to have been updated since
Johnson's resignation, but if there are specific pages you see, do please share them in the appropriate discussions. That would be helpful. Of course,
1129:
Hi I just didn't have enough time this morning to add the album cover, which I always intended to do. I have now added the image. So I did revert your edit. However, if you still want to delete my edits, go ahead. No problem.
680:
276:
from multi-country outbreak might be worth throwing into an "timeline of the
Monkeypox" article, rather than just cutting out. Nothing I can't do myself of course, and if you feel differently that's fine as well of course!
100:
Congratulations! Thank you for creating a page about my compatriot, a native of the village of
Shmankivtsi Stepan Charnetsky. I will be grateful if you help with filling the page about my family village. Thank
2098:
I just restored the word "erroneous" removed by an IP. I see your sources almost all criticise the theory, but it isn't really that clear in the article. Shouldn't there be a section devoted to the debunking?
468:
The citation has No. 10 saying on 26 July that he has resigned, but it is not clear to me on what precise date he resigned. Leaving the precise date aside, yes, of course the other articles should be updated.
250:
2162:, you added a template to an article that no longer exists (ie, it has been deleted). You can tell that the template has been deleted because it appears in red at the bottom of the article with the text "
81:
But wasn't "Journey to the Center of the Mind" actually done by the Amboy Dukes? I guess it is possible that Yes did that song also, but there does not seem to be anything here on
Knowledge about it.
1302:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
924:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
373:
Thank you for your advice. I will see what other editors think. I hope you will be able to participate in any subsequent discussion, perhaps by bringing relevant sources to support your position.
272:
Hey, I've not gotten to looking over them (your changes) in detail (yet), but tl;dr version : Effort to tidy up is great, feels to me like its a bit of a shame to be throwing out content though.
1534:
my edit was better, and more accurate - if you have in issue with tone or neutrality that's one thing, but ditching accuracy for the ego win of 'being right' doesn't seem very wiki-cool to me
1659:
Bondegezou didn't do the same thing as you. They reverted you twice (two other people also reverted you) and encouraged you to take the discussion to the talk page. I urge you to read the
253:. Thank you. I mentioned your name not intended as any form of criticism but as you were one of the only other editor who substantially contributed to the discussion which came up there.
2064:
Those appear to be historical numbers, so going back to 2005. What's the point of looking at those? Do you want me to go back in time and tell my 2005 self to use more edit summaries?
1761:
I think we are experiencing a situation where an editor can't accept that their opinion is not an objective assessment of the situation, but an opinion with which no one else agrees.
1426:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics
1318:
940:
331:
1524:
He did say: " we need is two things. the political will - it needs to be a really strong mandate ... “The other side of it though is, ultimately, you need to get the banks on side"
1705:
1654:
1632:
1594:
1535:
1287:
909:
1491:
121:
106:
1833:
Carrie Symonds changes are unhelpful, I think, and obscure the narrative. IF you make a very large number of changes in one edit, it is difficult for other editors to respond.
2043:
which is what led to me posting these messages to all of the editors I noticed doing this. I included you so it didn't come across as though I was singling anyone else out.
2166:". Deleted templates do not add anything useful to an article. Restoring them is kind of pointless, and I don't understand why anyone would do that. The template itself
117:
102:
1518:
a delivery driver is not the same thing as a night delivery driver. from source: "who is currently a night delivery-man for a bakery" -1 accuracy points there
624:
1435:
321:
198:
The decision may be known about before the paperwork is published. But if you think there’s a problem with the secondary source given, then, sure, change it.
981:
815:
772:
744:
584:
556:
431:
222:
82:
430:
Are there any comments that you would care to make about the horrible overturning of the Roe vs. Wade decision here in the U.S. by the Supreme Court?
453:
BoJo resigned as party leader on July 26? Then perhaps his bio (including infobox) page & the Conservative party page, should also be updated :)
347:
125:
639:, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to
246:
634:
1111:
862:
504:, may we keep the three-related pages consistent, until a consensus is reached at Johnson's bio page. Maybe a RFC there, would be the way to go.
1345:
967:
1251:
829:
184:
1543:
2179:
2153:
315:
1055:
358:
until the party eventually elects a 'new' leader, during the RFC? Then the RFC can be closed, as the disputed topic would become moot.
1521:
you wrote: 'He said he would seek powers to reduce rents' yet I cannot find this quote anywhere? it's almost as if he never said it.
852:
415:
396:
382:
171:
1826:
1738:
1640:
1617:
1602:
1588:
1570:
882:
210:
1466:
1775:
1713:
1672:
643:. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2283:
1265:
887:
697:
292:
192:
177:
367:
2303:
1851:
Regarding Carrie Johnson → Carrie Symonds, again, these changes affect only the format of the link, not the displayed text. "
1353:
1024:
701:
303:
110:
2040:
1893:
1709:
1636:
1598:
1539:
1513:
1341:
963:
352:
335:
152:
2198:
2204:
1880:
1842:
1916:
1795:, and reducing the degree of overlinking of named characters such as Carrie Johnson/Symonds (linked 13 separate times).
1119:
1044:
655:
1832:
Apologies, I thought you had changed "BYOB" inappropriately and you had not. However, some of your Carrie Johnson-: -->
1105:
716:
614:
267:
338:. The task force’s goal is to improve any and all articles relating to the new outbreak. I hope you consider joining!
2145:
2131:
1719:
1206:
1095:
1081:
1067:
1001:
There's been an IP based used trying to change info and I am not clear why. It does seem something already discussed.
752:
640:
537:
That's great. But as I recommend, concentrate on the BLP & the other two related pages, will follow that result.
131:
2081:
2052:
2020:
1593:
Congratulations - looks like your fiction is now set in stone. shame that you seem to have little respect for truth
2039:
I wouldn't describe that as "nearly always". I noticed many contributors are failing to provide an edit summary at
1945:
1956:
780:
766:
439:
2287:
1508:
1337:
1018:
959:
823:
738:
569:
546:
532:
493:
478:
230:
2108:
1989:
1010:
1173:
743:
It is not clear what is meant by "hook". Clicking on the above link does not help. Can anybody please explain?
90:
43:
38:
262:
143:
This doesn't require "interpreting" primary legislation much less reading it. Suggest you change accordingly.
729:
and others. I was surprised there wasn’t an article on the topic and had a boring train journey to fill, so…
1147:
627:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page
1576:
1311:
1189:
1032:
933:
201:
It would make more sense to have this discussion on the article Talk page so other editors can contribute.
1901:
980:
I just read your page on here about Wendy Savage. The pro-choice movement needs more doctors such as her.
2275:
2227:
2205:
1647:
1323:
1193:
945:
564:
1259:
1227:
989:
2279:
2175:
693:
644:
630:
1934:
601:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was
1876:
1822:
1722:
and make a case there. You still have not done that. Please listen to the advice you are being given.
1460:
1370:
1201:
994:
856:
513:
462:
95:
2001:
1897:
1770:
1223:
1977:
2159:
2091:
1471:
1110:
hi, i've just requested an edit in the talk page of "Arains". Please edit it as required. Thanks
343:
327:
2299:
2170:. I'm struggling to find other ways to explain this, so please forgive me if I repeat myself.
1504:
1442:
1185:
1169:
995:
2186:
2171:
2142:
2105:
1299:
1144:
1077:
1040:
985:
921:
819:
776:
748:
689:
589:
560:
435:
226:
86:
1867:) both display the same text to the reader, and both link to the same target. The advice of
1248:
page, I am glad to see someone coming with interesting sources and clear information! :: -->
808:
2092:
1872:
1818:
1454:
1310:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1232:
932:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
605:
596:
425:
288:
8:
2291:
1807:
1766:
1561:
and follow its advice. Discuss proposed edits to the article on its Talk page, not here.
1431:
1219:
1177:
1165:
1124:
1054:. I'm not at all certain, but I think it tops out at 35 rows...? You could try asking at
1006:
878:
258:
216:
1180:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about
1115:
339:
235:
1184:. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
555:
born an Austrian. (This does not imply a comparison of Johnson to any of the above.)
2295:
2258:
1981:
1550:
1500:
1281:
903:
762:
712:
542:
509:
489:
458:
403:
392:
363:
148:
70:
2245:
2189:. Perhaps you could have given a slightly longer edit summary in your initial edit?
1907:
There’s no point posting these to my Talk page. Post them to the article Talk page.
2262:
2137:
2115:
2100:
1868:
1799:
1438:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the
1330:
1295:
1255:
1245:
1181:
1132:
1073:
1051:
1036:
952:
917:
804:
652:
444:
188:
2190:
2123:
2073:
2059:
2044:
2012:
2008:
1993:
1908:
1834:
1730:
1729:
declaration if you have a conflict of interest, as your prior editing suggested.
1609:
1580:
1562:
1376:
1218:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
1087:
1059:
975:
847:
831:
730:
610:
524:
470:
407:
374:
307:
284:
202:
163:
2244:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
2122:
framework of "debunking" particularly fits. But I'll look again at the article.
2118:, for restoring "erroneous". There's an IP editor who keeps trying to remove it.
1946:
https://superuser.com/questions/972259/can-cpu-overheating-cause-data-corruption
1483:
1391:
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
2236:
1957:
https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapc/comments/12z7zbq/cpu_damage_from_overheating/
1888:
1860:
1852:
1811:
1762:
1631:
On a long enough time scale - Every population gets the government it deserves
1307:
1210:
1002:
929:
874:
618:
299:
254:
2072:
on Talk. I do not see this as a problem. I did not find your message helpful.
1698:
I re-edit and explain in talk page (his not the article one - new user my bad)
55:
1726:
1660:
1558:
1554:
1303:
925:
21:
158:
I have re-worded the text to better fit the Belfast Telegraph's explanation.
116:
I just added more information about Stepan Charnetsky. Take a look, please.
1966:
1756:
1419:
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
1152:
758:
726:
708:
538:
520:
505:
485:
454:
388:
359:
302:
changes were needed, but happy to do things differently. I've suggested at
144:
59:
2268:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
2223:
2209:
1666:
800:
1360:
1314:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
936:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
249:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
61:
1803:
1792:
1291:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
913:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
387:
I believe the Conservative Party's official website, is a good source.
679:
Your hook reached 13,978 views (582.4 per hour), making it one of the
1788:
1777:
1272:
1237:
894:
2011:! No, I don't. I nearly always use edit summaries. Why the message?
664:
576:
137:
is open to the largest party of the largest designation. See also:
1935:
https://www.computerforum.com/threads/amd-dual-core-problems.58784/
1157:
794:
57:
757:
The line in a DYK beginning "Did you know..." is called the hook.
78:"journey to the center was the first from the classic lineup...."
1327:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
949:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1317:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1285:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1209:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
1027:. Does it have a maximum limit? I tried to add Independents as
939:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
907:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
1628:
You gamed the system to push fiction on Knowledge - super cool
62:
251:
Edit-warring, AGF violations, apparent tag-teaming by Alexbrn
1527:
none of that has to do with seeking powers, or lobbying
1380:. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and
75:
In the now-archived previous talk page, somebody wrote:
2286:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
1298:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
920:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
845:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
2251:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
2235:
No references. Cannot find sufficient sources to meet
2028:
31.6% of your total contributions have no edit summary
1200:
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
625:
Template:Did you know nominations/Jewish Indian theory
221:
Alan White, a drummer for Yes, passed away on May 26.
2034:
11% of your edits in June 2024 have no edit summary.
851:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
623:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
15:
1434:or you may learn more about this contentious topic
1413:
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
1192:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
326:Hello! I know you have an interest in the ongoing
1575:I see that you have now been blocked from editing
1664:edits are valid, explain why on the talk page. —
1406:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
1386:imply that there are any issues with your editing
283:Regards, and perhaps we'll see each other round,
1718:As multiple people have said, you need to go to
1216:even if you do not violate the three-revert rule
1176:to work toward making a version that represents
1416:follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
1398:Within contentious topics, editors should edit
1244:I noticed some of your comments on the dubious
863:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jamie Muhoberac
247:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1798:I'm happy to discuss further, but please read
304:Talk:2022_monkeypox_outbreak#Timeline_article?
322:2022 monkeypox outbreak task force invitation
2031:21% of your major edits have no edit summary
1058:. You might even be able to get it changed.
2025:The link provided (at "often") shows that:
1367:You have recently edited a page related to
1168:shows that you are currently engaged in an
1023:Hi Bondegezou, I have a question regarding
1686:So I make edit - explain reasons behind it
1482:
1056:Template talk:Infobox legislative election
593:was updated with a fact from the article
2154:Restoring templates that no longer exist
1031:but it didn't show up in the Infobox of
2257:notice, but please explain why in your
1871:is to prefer the former to the latter.
330:, so I wanted to invite you to the new
306:that we could have a timeline article.
1787:Regarding your revert of my edit at "
1692:I re-edit - make reasons more indepth
1025:Template:Infobox legislative election
2041:2024 United Kingdom general election
1704:yet to hear any reason for the edit
1683:again - and maybe I'm an idiot here.
1410:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge;
1282:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
904:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
449:Hello. Just wanted to let you know,
1701:I don't think the two are the same.
1680:I made my reasons on the edit bit -
1266:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
888:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
853:Knowledge's policies and guidelines
681:most viewed hooks of September 2022
245:There is currently a discussion at
13:
2246:deleted for any of several reasons
2230:because of the following concern:
2214:
1625:it's egos and admins - what a joke
1354:Introduction to contentious topics
1236:
1156:
1086:Sorry I couldn't be of more help!
14:
2314:
1720:Talk:2024 London mayoral election
1622:but you did the same thing as me.
1557:for more information. Also, read
1514:why do you keep undoing my edits?
861:The article will be discussed at
519:Apologies for the delayed reply,
2185:Thank you for your explanation,
1986:always fill in the summary field
1971:
1359:
1271:
893:
839:
663:
575:
240:
20:
1976:Hello. I have noticed that you
1695:he revert say take to talk page
1677:I clicked the wrong talk page -
1432:arbitration clerks' noticeboard
1422:refrain from gaming the system.
1321:and submit your choices on the
1205:—especially if you violate the
1164:Your recent editing history at
943:and submit your choices on the
609:, the erroneous idea that some
2304:15:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
1950:
1939:
1928:
1725:Also, you will need to make a
1072:Thank you for quick response.
781:15:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
767:16:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
753:01:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
739:13:21, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
717:13:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
702:08:29, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
656:00:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
178:Ref. Tiverton and Honiton edit
1:
2199:16:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
2180:15:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
1346:00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
1300:Knowledge arbitration process
968:00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
922:Knowledge arbitration process
824:04:03, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
771:Thank you for explaining it.
336:WikiProject of current events
332:monkeypox outbreak task force
1739:12:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1714:12:47, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1673:12:36, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1641:11:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1618:11:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1603:10:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1589:09:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1577:2024 London mayoral election
1571:09:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1553:or you will be banned. Read
1544:08:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
1509:16:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
1467:06:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
1096:11:04, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
1082:10:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
1068:10:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
1045:10:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
1033:Next Indian general election
1019:Next Indian general election
883:10:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
809:07:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
570:DYK for Jewish Indian theory
353:Open up an RFC on the matter
7:
2290:allows discussion to reach
2271:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
2254:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
2146:12:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
2132:10:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
2109:10:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
1689:he revert - no reason given
1260:05:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
1011:11:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
990:20:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
334:, which I started from the
280:controversial topics :P ).
10:
2319:
2282:exist. In particular, the
1881:08:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
1843:08:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
1827:07:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
1771:10:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
1706:Asingleshardofconsciousnes
1655:Asingleshardofconsciousnes
1633:Asingleshardofconsciousnes
1595:Asingleshardofconsciousnes
1536:Asingleshardofconsciousnes
1338:MediaWiki message delivery
1120:12:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
960:MediaWiki message delivery
565:15:32, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
547:12:44, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
533:12:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
268:Monkeypox outbreak article
126:11:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
111:05:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
91:17:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
2276:proposed deletion process
2082:15:58, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
2053:11:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
2021:11:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
2002:17:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
1984:. Please do your best to
1917:08:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
1902:08:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
1490:
1481:
1228:19:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
669:
662:
514:23:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
494:21:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
479:20:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
463:19:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
440:20:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
132:dFM position for Alliance
2194:
2127:
2077:
2016:
1912:
1838:
1734:
1613:
1584:
1566:
1430:you may ask them at the
1374:, a topic designated as
1335:to your user talk page.
1148:15:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
1091:
1063:
957:to your user talk page.
855:or whether it should be
734:
528:
474:
416:17:33, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
411:
397:17:30, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
383:17:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
378:
368:16:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
348:19:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
316:17:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
311:
293:15:58, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
263:04:39, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
231:03:35, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
211:05:46, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
206:
193:18:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
167:
2263:the article's talk page
2160:Special:Diff/1244180266
328:2022 monkeypox outbreak
172:10:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
153:05:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
2242:
2219:
1980:edit without using an
1241:
1161:
996:Brian Rose (podcaster)
645:Did you know talk page
2288:articles for deletion
2232:
2228:proposed for deletion
2218:
1371:Arab–Israeli conflict
1296:Arbitration Committee
1279:Hello! Voting in the
1240:
1160:
1106:Edit on "Arains" page
918:Arbitration Committee
901:Hello! Voting in the
611:lost tribes of Israel
2093:Jewish Indian theory
1727:conflict of interest
1472:Precious anniversary
1202:blocked from editing
635:Jewish Indian theory
613:became ancestors to
606:Jewish Indian theory
597:Jewish Indian theory
1478:
1166:Terrorism in Europe
814:WHAT is pointless?
641:the statistics page
2280:deletion processes
2220:
1476:
1405:
1401:
1393:contentious topics
1385:
1312:arbitration policy
1242:
1190:dispute resolution
1162:
934:arbitration policy
799:Ok its pointless.
2206:Proposed deletion
2164:template:gwenpool
1648:talk page stalker
1497:
1496:
1403:
1399:
1383:
1348:
1233:A kitten for you!
1207:three-revert rule
970:
687:
686:
638:
617:, influenced the
585:16 September 2022
96:Stepan Charnetsky
68:
67:
49:
48:
2310:
2273:
2272:
2256:
2255:
2217:
2187:NinjaRobotPirate
2172:NinjaRobotPirate
2165:
2140:
2103:
2063:
2050:
2047:
1999:
1996:
1990:your preferences
1975:
1974:
1959:
1954:
1948:
1943:
1937:
1932:
1866:
1858:
1776:Your revert at "
1658:
1651:
1486:
1479:
1475:
1463:
1457:
1447:
1441:
1363:
1336:
1334:
1275:
1246:Endemic COVID-19
1182:how this is done
1146:
1142:
1137:
1125:Yestoric infobox
958:
956:
897:
843:
842:
690:theleekycauldron
667:
660:
659:
628:
615:Native Americans
579:
244:
243:
118:Максим Огородник
103:Максим Огородник
63:
35:
34:
24:
16:
2318:
2317:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2284:speedy deletion
2270:
2269:
2253:
2252:
2215:
2213:
2163:
2156:
2138:
2101:
2096:
2057:
2048:
2045:
1997:
1994:
1972:
1969:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1955:
1951:
1944:
1940:
1933:
1929:
1891:
1873:Jean-de-Nivelle
1864:
1856:
1819:Jean-de-Nivelle
1782:
1759:
1652:
1645:
1516:
1474:
1465:
1461:
1456:Red-tailed hawk
1455:
1451:
1450:
1445:
1439:
1364:
1356:
1351:
1350:
1328:
1276:
1268:
1235:
1194:page protection
1155:
1138:
1133:
1131:
1127:
1108:
1021:
999:
978:
973:
972:
950:
898:
890:
872:
848:Jamie Muhoberac
844:
840:
836:
832:Jamie Muhoberac
797:
650:
649:
580:
572:
447:
428:
355:
324:
270:
241:
238:
219:
180:
134:
98:
73:
64:
58:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2316:
2294:for deletion.
2274:will stop the
2212:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2168:does not exist
2155:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2148:
2119:
2095:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2065:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2032:
2029:
1968:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1949:
1938:
1926:
1925:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1894:91.190.161.160
1890:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1861:Carrie Symonds
1853:Carrie Symonds
1849:
1812:MOS:REPEATLINK
1781:
1774:
1758:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1723:
1702:
1699:
1696:
1693:
1690:
1687:
1684:
1681:
1678:
1629:
1626:
1623:
1573:
1530:
1515:
1512:
1495:
1494:
1488:
1487:
1473:
1470:
1459:
1424:
1423:
1420:
1417:
1414:
1411:
1404:constructively
1387:
1365:
1358:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1319:the candidates
1288:eligible users
1277:
1270:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1234:
1231:
1220:Daniel Quinlan
1154:
1151:
1126:
1123:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1098:
1020:
1017:
1015:
998:
993:
977:
974:
941:the candidates
910:eligible users
899:
892:
891:
889:
886:
838:
837:
835:
830:Nomination of
828:
827:
826:
796:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
720:
719:
685:
684:
676:
675:
670:
668:
619:Book of Mormon
581:
574:
573:
571:
568:
552:
551:
550:
549:
499:
498:
497:
496:
446:
443:
427:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
354:
351:
323:
320:
319:
318:
269:
266:
237:
234:
218:
215:
214:
213:
199:
179:
176:
175:
174:
159:
133:
130:
129:
128:
97:
94:
72:
69:
66:
65:
60:
56:
54:
51:
50:
47:
46:
41:
31:
30:
25:
19:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2315:
2306:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2266:
2264:
2260:
2249:
2247:
2241:
2240:
2238:
2231:
2229:
2225:
2211:
2207:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2169:
2161:
2147:
2144:
2141:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2129:
2125:
2120:
2117:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2107:
2104:
2094:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2070:
2066:
2061:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2051:
2042:
2038:
2033:
2030:
2027:
2026:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2000:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1958:
1953:
1947:
1942:
1936:
1931:
1927:
1924:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1862:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1817:Best wishes,
1815:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1796:
1794:
1790:
1785:
1779:
1773:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1700:
1697:
1694:
1691:
1688:
1685:
1682:
1679:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1662:
1656:
1649:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1627:
1624:
1621:
1620:
1619:
1615:
1611:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1532:
1528:
1525:
1522:
1519:
1511:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1480:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1458:
1449:
1444:
1443:Ctopics/aware
1437:
1433:
1429:
1421:
1418:
1415:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1396:
1394:
1389:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1373:
1372:
1362:
1349:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1332:
1326:
1325:
1320:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1292:
1290:
1289:
1284:
1283:
1274:
1263:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1247:
1239:
1230:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1197:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1159:
1150:
1149:
1145:
1143:
1141:
1136:
1122:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1004:
997:
992:
991:
987:
983:
971:
969:
965:
961:
954:
948:
947:
942:
937:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
914:
912:
911:
906:
905:
896:
885:
884:
880:
876:
871:
867:
864:
858:
854:
850:
849:
833:
825:
821:
817:
813:
812:
811:
810:
806:
802:
782:
778:
774:
770:
769:
768:
764:
760:
756:
755:
754:
750:
746:
742:
741:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
723:
722:
721:
718:
714:
710:
706:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
691:
683:– nice work!
682:
678:
677:
674:
671:
666:
661:
658:
657:
654:
648:
646:
642:
636:
632:
626:
622:
620:
616:
612:
608:
607:
600:
599:
598:
592:
591:
586:
578:
567:
566:
562:
558:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
517:
516:
515:
511:
507:
503:
495:
491:
487:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
467:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
452:
445:Boris Johnson
442:
441:
437:
433:
417:
413:
409:
405:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
371:
370:
369:
365:
361:
350:
349:
345:
341:
340:Elijahandskip
337:
333:
329:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
290:
286:
281:
277:
273:
265:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
233:
232:
228:
224:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
196:
195:
194:
190:
186:
173:
169:
165:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
150:
146:
141:
138:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
104:
93:
92:
88:
84:
79:
76:
53:
52:
45:
42:
40:
37:
36:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
2296:AusLondonder
2278:, but other
2267:
2259:edit summary
2250:
2243:
2234:
2233:
2222:The article
2221:
2167:
2157:
2097:
2068:
2067:It says for
1985:
1982:edit summary
1970:
1952:
1941:
1930:
1922:
1892:
1816:
1808:WP:NOTBROKEN
1797:
1786:
1783:
1760:
1667:
1665:
1533:
1529:
1526:
1523:
1520:
1517:
1501:Gerda Arendt
1498:
1452:
1427:
1425:
1397:
1392:
1390:
1375:
1368:
1366:
1322:
1316:
1293:
1286:
1280:
1278:
1250:
1243:
1215:
1199:
1198:
1163:
1139:
1134:
1128:
1109:
1028:
1022:
1014:
1000:
979:
976:Wendy Savage
944:
938:
915:
908:
902:
900:
873:
868:
860:
846:
834:for deletion
798:
700:) (she/her)
688:
672:
651:
604:
602:
595:
594:
590:Did you know
588:
582:
553:
501:
500:
484:government.
450:
448:
429:
426:Roe vs. Wade
356:
325:
298:I felt some
282:
278:
274:
271:
239:
220:
181:
142:
139:
135:
99:
80:
77:
74:
26:
2224:Bruce Gowdy
2210:Bruce Gowdy
2139:Doug Weller
2116:Doug Weller
2102:Doug Weller
1992:. Thanks!
1889:Post Office
1448:template.
1377:contentious
1324:voting page
1186:noticeboard
1074:SharadSHRD7
1052:SharadSHRD7
1037:SharadSHRD7
982:Tesseract12
946:voting page
816:Tesseract12
773:Tesseract12
745:Tesseract12
707:Nice work!
673:Hook update
557:Tesseract12
432:Tesseract12
223:Tesseract12
83:Tesseract12
2191:Bondegezou
2124:Bondegezou
2074:Bondegezou
2060:Adam Black
2013:Bondegezou
2009:Adam Black
1923:References
1909:Bondegezou
1835:Bondegezou
1804:MOS:NOPIPE
1793:MOS:NOPIPE
1731:Bondegezou
1610:Bondegezou
1581:Bondegezou
1563:Bondegezou
1551:WP:EDITWAR
1492:Six years!
1428:procedures
1308:topic bans
1088:Bondegezou
1060:Bondegezou
930:topic bans
731:Bondegezou
631:here's how
525:Bondegezou
471:Bondegezou
408:Bondegezou
404:WP:PRIMARY
375:Bondegezou
308:Bondegezou
285:Sean Heron
236:ANI notice
203:Bondegezou
164:Bondegezou
2292:consensus
2226:has been
1967:June 2024
1869:WP:NOPIPE
1800:WP:NOPIPE
1789:Partygate
1778:Partygate
1763:Rankersbo
1757:Consensus
1400:carefully
1304:site bans
1178:consensus
1174:talk page
1153:July 2023
1003:Rankersbo
926:site bans
875:QuietHere
653:Vanamonde
603:... that
406:applies.
255:Nil Einne
217:Prog rock
71:Prog rock
44:Archive 2
39:Archive 1
2136:Thanks.
2114:Thanks,
1477:Precious
1214:warring—
1188:or seek
1170:edit war
1112:MT111222
1029:party38=
698:contribs
27:Archives
2237:WP:NBIO
1859:) and "
1848:course.
1331:NoACEMM
1211:reverts
953:NoACEMM
857:deleted
759:Johnbod
727:Johnbod
725:Thanks
709:Johnbod
539:GoodDay
521:GoodDay
506:GoodDay
486:GoodDay
455:GoodDay
389:GoodDay
360:GoodDay
300:WP:BOLD
183:think?
145:Trivran
2261:or on
1810:, and
1668:Czello
1661:WP:BRD
1559:WP:BRD
1555:WP:3RR
1549:Don't
1462:(nest)
1252:Groble
1140:Whales
801:Einahr
502:Please
185:Robidy
101:you!--
2049:Black
1998:Black
1978:often
1382:does
795:Hello
2300:talk
2195:talk
2176:talk
2143:talk
2128:talk
2106:talk
2078:talk
2069:this
2046:Adam
2017:talk
1995:Adam
1913:talk
1898:talk
1877:talk
1863:" (
1839:talk
1823:talk
1784:Hi,
1767:talk
1735:talk
1710:talk
1637:talk
1614:talk
1599:talk
1585:talk
1567:talk
1540:talk
1505:talk
1436:here
1402:and
1369:the
1342:talk
1294:The
1256:talk
1224:talk
1135:Seth
1116:talk
1092:talk
1078:talk
1064:talk
1041:talk
1007:talk
986:talk
964:talk
916:The
879:talk
820:talk
805:talk
777:talk
763:talk
749:talk
735:talk
713:talk
694:talk
561:talk
543:talk
529:talk
510:talk
490:talk
475:talk
459:talk
436:talk
412:talk
393:talk
379:talk
364:talk
344:talk
312:talk
289:talk
259:talk
227:talk
207:talk
189:talk
168:talk
149:talk
122:talk
107:talk
87:talk
2208:of
2158:In
2007:Hi
1855:" (
1814:.
1384:not
1196:.
1050:Hi
583:On
2302:)
2265:.
2248:.
2197:)
2178:)
2130:)
2080:)
2019:)
1915:)
1900:)
1879:)
1841:)
1825:)
1806:,
1802:,
1769:)
1737:)
1712:)
1639:)
1616:)
1601:)
1587:)
1579:.
1569:)
1542:)
1507:)
1499:--
1453:—
1446:}}
1440:{{
1388:.
1344:)
1333:}}
1329:{{
1306:,
1258:)
1226:)
1118:)
1094:)
1080:)
1066:)
1043:)
1035:.
1009:)
988:)
966:)
955:}}
951:{{
928:,
881:)
859:.
822:)
807:)
779:)
765:)
751:)
737:)
715:)
696:•
647:.
633:,
587:,
563:)
545:)
531:)
512:)
492:)
477:)
461:)
451:if
438:)
414:)
395:)
381:)
366:)
346:)
314:)
291:)
261:)
229:)
209:)
191:)
170:)
151:)
124:)
109:)
89:)
2298:(
2239:.
2193:(
2174:(
2126:(
2076:(
2062::
2058:@
2015:(
1911:(
1896:(
1875:(
1865:]
1857:]
1837:(
1821:(
1780:"
1765:(
1733:(
1708:(
1657::
1653:@
1650:)
1646:(
1635:(
1612:(
1597:(
1583:(
1565:(
1538:(
1503:(
1340:(
1254:(
1222:(
1114:(
1090:(
1076:(
1062:(
1039:(
1005:(
984:(
962:(
877:(
818:(
803:(
775:(
761:(
747:(
733:(
711:(
692:(
637:)
629:(
621:?
559:(
541:(
527:(
508:(
488:(
473:(
457:(
434:(
410:(
391:(
377:(
362:(
342:(
310:(
287:(
257:(
225:(
205:(
187:(
166:(
147:(
120:(
105:(
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
