483:. Unfortunately, the article - when originally written - was tagged incorrectly. When I created the article correctly tagged "Public Theater," I did so because Knowledge could not locate an entry when I searched for "Public Theater" (apparently Knowledge's search engine doesn't eliminate "A" and "The," otherwise it would have found the existing article, the creator of which - by the way - copied most of the material verbatim from the official website.) In any event, I find I can no longer move the article to the correct tag of "Public Theater," as Knowledge believes such an article already exists. Do you have any idea how to rectify this mistake? Thank you.
1010:
won't find me to be a problem. I like to write and edit and I saw a huge mess that no one had to date linked together. But if you don't like it you have my okay to do your own thing if you think that your way is better. On the other hand once you take a look at what I am doing once I have finished it (almost done), then you might want to help create one great article instead of leaving 4 to 5 stubs floating around. Let me know what you think, but in any event, its fine with me.
31:
1050:
connections, one of which reached into the royal family. Lay off the attitude and mean spirited stuff, life is too short and in Japan you must surely be getting the idea that a polite society is appreciated by everyone. Instead of accusing someone of ill intentions it is better to step back and see the whole picture. I wish you well, but please, no more unfriendly and mean spirited personal attacks. Thank you.
1019:
improve this article feel free to do so. I was adding what I believed to be a great improvement on a disjointed mess of one article and 4 stubs. However, I know that you have already engaged in reverting, but you won't find me joining in. I am working on other matters and I believe that I have made a decent contribution here. I look forward to reading your own improvements.
731:". It's regrettable if you've perceived my posts to be sneering, disrespectful or brimming with animosity — such a tone was not intended. My point is only this: Knowledge works when people treat each other with a certain level of respect; a hostile environment drives away some editors and ties up the time of others in endless flamewars.
1141:
matter anyway because it was clear from the technical evidence that there is no connection (I had already reviewed the edit history evidence and not found any indication there of sockpuppeting). Anyway, it's not anything to worry about, the accusation seemed unlikely from the start and is dealt with now. --
459:
Delete. During talk, page author User:Chan Han Xiang asked me for other opinions but mine, so I vfd'ed page. Opinion came, read above. He doesn’t like it, so he reverts. He is now in revert war mode. He hides his work behind anonymous IP. The comment from anonymous is kind of psychedelic, in the same
1193:
If either
Bishonen or myself have offended you, sorry! I know that Bish gets quite passionate about admin'ing the peer review page. It's a tough and relatively thankless job (not to mention it can get quite boring!), so I hope you'll take this into account. For myself, I suggested placing the delete
1140:
Hello
Carlton. The allegation was that you and Exploding Boy were accounts of the same person. It was made on Robert the Bruce's user page as part of his evidence there. There was no background or reasoning given for the allegation, so I don't know what caused this belief - but it doesn't really
1018:
Well that is your opinion and you are free to express it and you have. However, I believe that the 4 stub articles were either commercial propaganda, badly written in some instances or just stub entries which all belonged in one decent article about
Impotence. Again, if you feel motivated to try to
707:
Cool. Your unsolicited advice has been noted, logged, and discarded. Now maybe you can practice what you preach and save your univited schoolmarm act for where it might be welcomed -- which is not by myself. If you want to pick fights by hectoring people, I can't stop you -- you go right ahead, but
763:
Yet, expressing some misguided notion that it's your duty, somehow, to apply "peer pressure", you continue the hectoring, not merely quoting the
Knowledge guidelines, but preaching, like some sacred-word peddler or political fanatic, to make me fall into line with whatever standard of decorum that
749:
I've responded to your message, told that I read it, understood it, and rejected your unsolicited advice as unwelcome and even -- how do I put this? causing animosity -- and yet you persist. You've done your duty, and if you were sincerely just giving advice...well, you've done that already and if
495:
Please do NOT revert this entry to any version that includes enhancements that I added. Knowledge is not authorized to use the contributions I made to this article. And don't tell me it's not my right to revoke - I am in control of my work and can use it or authorize its use as I see fit. Thank
1189:
Calton, it appears that this is date stamped the 19 February. It perhaps wasn't the best place for peer review comments, I would have suggested taking to the RFC page. The peer review page is only for articles that need comments about how to get them to featured article candidates and is more for
1009:
I was responding to the comments on one of the Talk pages concerning duplication of text. I am building one major article at
Impotence. Hold on a moment until I am finished then take a look and if you don't like it you can add your bit to change the landscape. I don't engage in revert wars so you
1214:
Hi, Calton. I'm sorry any of what I wrote offended you, on any page, and surprised too. I wasn't particularly "passionate" about removing the listings (Ta bu shi, if you're going to insult me, have the good grace to do it in front of me, etc. ;-)), more concerned to tell you about better venues.
971:
Most of the people and organizations on the list deserve articles. What's more, we already have stub content in the bio blurbs about them on the YGL site. Our articles of people are most inadequate everywhere but the US, and these international "lists of leaders" are one way to flesh them
1049:
Look
Carlton lay off the personal attacks! I see that others have complained to you before about this behavior. It is not Wikipedian. I was civil and friendly to you and you were the opposite to me. I note that you work in Japan. I find that interesting since I have several close Japanese
1164:
from peer review. You'd be unlikely to get any help about them from peer review even if I left them, because what you ask is not the kind of thing reviewers want or expect to help with—please see the top of the page for the purpose of peer review, and also the peer review
415:
likes to say), pioneering technique, famous firsts or lasts (Alfred
Hitchcock's first movie and Marilyn Monroe's last, not Lenny Henry's first and Raul Julia's last), or something particularly unusual enough to engender curiosity by a potential encyclopaedia user.
438:
is borderline -- it makes your list but not mine, but I'm not quibbling over that. I AM quibbling over the thought that anything connected with it -- director, screenwriter, random references and in-jokes -- comes even close to being notable.
431:) was the biggest box-office flop of its time and essentially bankrupted United Artists Studio -- notable for either, really. His subsequent movies (two more, I believe, though I haven't tracked them) are notable only for their obscurity.
1097:
TO DEMONSTRATE THE IDEA. RICKK THEN DELETED THE BLOODY PAGE AND SAID HE'D THWART ANY OTHER ATTEMPTS TO RE-CREATE IT. HE THEREFORE PREVENTED ME FROM ALLLOWING THE COMMUNITY TO SEE THE SODDING IDEA AT ALL. OK - ANY QUESTIONS? ON MY FUCKING
1030:
I see that you have been very busy reverting everything with notes about show the necessity = obviously you have not been reading the Talk pages, have you, because you are accusing me of not doing something that I have already done! See:
783:
Your unsolicited schoolmarmery has been noted, logged, and rejected. Ignored. Tossed into the circular file. Sent to the bit bucket. Consigned to the scrap heap. Recycled with extreme prejudice. "Talk to the hand, 'cause the head ain't
388:
Hey I removed my comments. I still don't understand your definition of major release vs notable, but it doesnt seem necessary to get involved on personal level. I think we have spoken our piece, so I'll leave it at
1194:
tag on the peer review pages you submitted because they shouldn't really be on peer review yet. One of our issues with peer review is that we need to make sure that we don't get overloaded with requests (ala the
870:
859:
1123:
Don't worry about the message though. It's like water off a duck's back mate, like water off a duck's back. He doesn't realise it, but I'm quite happy to be insulted by a Nazi. It means that I'm on the
471:. And you, do not personally attack me. Rewrite a reasonable comment without having the intention of attack, just by writing not notable or something reasonable, even though you may not like my work.
284:! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the
1190:
comment on the overall article. The RFC page will solicit more specific feedback, for instance the images. Personally I think the images are inappropriate, but I've not said much about it.
909:
Just how long have you guys been having to deal with
Everyking? IMO, the guy is nuts. From what I've seen, he's been at this Ashleecruft for months. I got here in early January though. --
1235:
project; I beg to draw your attention to part 2 of the project - there are about 12,000 more images in need of tagging. Any assistance you could provide would be most welcome. thanks --
334:
965:
Do what you want with my list formatting. I find the canonical list-formatting to be too spaced out for my tastes, if the list is a long one, but I'm not tied to a particular format.
1201:
I do appreciate you asking for comment though. I'm just sorry that there was either a communication breakdown or that we offended you inadvertantly. This was not intentional! -
958:
225:
968:
The YGL forum does have its own article, created before the list, initially linked to it (check "what links here" when you find apparent orphans) and now linked from it.
451:
Calton, I'm not mad. Everyone has the rights to vote, and even though you do not like my article, I won't even mind you voting from your point of view. However, Gtabary
768:
carry in your head. Which tells me civility is not your goal, being holier-than-thou is. Perhaps you can go and find some children to practice your parenting skills on.
1173:
and removing them yourself, with an explanatory note on the talk pages? If that leads to disputes that can't be worked out on the talk pages, your next step would be
1094:
1108:
716:
sneering tone to be extraordinarily disrespectful and a pretty good source of animosity, to boot. If you have a problem, open an RFC and be done with it. --
873:. Renaming a category is not currently possible by any means other than deleting the old category and creating a new category. I'll list this category on
582:
400:
of "major" films every year. Throw in independent and pseudo-independent movies, art-house pictures, and foreign-language films and it's a veritable flood
1099:
411:
So what qualifies as notable? Something that makes a movie stand out from the flood. Awards and/or nominations, critical acclaim, boffo box office (as
549:
497:
484:
1069:
Hey, I wasn't kidding about the big fat "READ THIS FIRST No personal attacks" section at the top of the page. And yes I know he started it. --
1063:
942:? There was a vast gulf between merchants and nobility in PLC. While it is possible he was nobilitated, I'd like to see some source on that? --
390:
1166:
363:-"It's a terrible thing to spell our name with a capital L. Now somebody will think we are Scottish Lowlanders and not Islanders." - from
1051:
1035:
1020:
1011:
1215:"Insult" is certainly a strong word, and I do regret that I gave occasion for it. Insulting you was the furthest thing from my thought.
245:
to
Knowledge. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
1062:
516:
all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the
894:
460:
mood of the article. I still think this page and many others are excellent candidate for delete. --Gtabary 12:57, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
858:
264:
462:
Comment. Page author User:Chan Han Xiang is now into mood of vfd notice removale/tempering. --Gtabary 15:01, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
802:
If you have a problem, open an RFC and be done with it. If it's not worth an RFC, then put a sock in it and just go away. --
35:
852:
672:, get over yourself." I don't know what you mean exactly, but I would urge you to take the policy seriously. To quote, "
1112:
375:
I thought I had done that already, for the same exact reason. Some schmuck must have reverted my original redirect. --
874:
1226:
1151:
936:
404:. And what makes any of these arguably major motion pictures, given the volume, notable? "Major release" is NOT
1174:
723:
All I have done is ask you to follow a
Knowledge policy. Moreover, contacting you is one of the suggestions on
552:
Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at
646:
822:
326:
Seconded. Between the unilateral changes and the Zionist conspiracy hysteria, it's been almost unbearable.
866:
269:
249:
242:
668:, a policy that I believe is of great importance in a collaborative project like Knowledge. You say, "Oh,
571:
509:
560:
930:
452:
259:
219:
213:
207:
201:
195:
189:
183:
177:
171:
165:
159:
153:
147:
141:
135:
129:
123:
117:
111:
105:
99:
93:
87:
81:
75:
69:
63:
57:
51:
577:
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "
1232:
877:
to get it renamed, but thought I'd let you know about the naming convention for future reference. --
566:
513:
274:
525:
1249:
Thanks for the note; I've gfdl'd it (and a couple of others I'd uploaded at the same time, of the
976:
Once we have separate articles about these people, this list can disappear into a category...
556:
those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
419:
Take the work of director Michael Cimino. His first movie was some Clint Eastwood caper flick (
289:
683:
1239:
1135:
890:
661:
281:
1093:
LOOK, I'M FED UP WITH INTERFERENCE. OK - I SAID IN MY SUMMARY ON THE PUMP THAT I'D CREATE A
1202:
1129:
1118:
1082:
594:
I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
297:
8:
921:
910:
902:
848:
536:
license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Knowledge's license, the
468:
1220:
1182:
724:
665:
612:
I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:
480:
254:
467:
Accusations and personal attacks are not accepted. That is why I edited his comments.
1170:
946:
650:
637:
30:
884:
1236:
1156:
Calton, I'm sorry if I seem to be thwarting you, but I've removed your listings of
1145:
826:
732:
729:
Apply peer pressure (voicing displeasure each time rudeness or incivility happens)
697:
517:
376:
17:
1209:
1169:. Personally, I totally agree with you about those pictures. Have you tried being
1261:
1032:
878:
293:
333:
By the way, given HB's latest comments to you, you might be interested in this:
1250:
898:
619:
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "
349:
320:
285:
687:
1216:
1195:
1178:
529:
316:
585:. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
503:
998:
980:
943:
642:
897:, and I thought you might like to certify or at least endorse it. Thanks.
1142:
803:
717:
440:
368:
301:
490:
1161:
1070:
917:
545:
337:
327:
474:
343:
1254:
335:
Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/HistoryBuffEr and Jayjg/Evidence
1157:
994:
977:
641:. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. --
1244:
581:" template into their user page, but there are other options at
889:
Hi, I noticed you were at one point involved in the dispute at
696:
states that people must act with civility toward one another."
855:. Please edit it to help raise it to featured article status.
750:
you were sincere you would have just shrugged and walked away.
1177:, under the heading "Article content disputes". Best wishes,
997:. I've removed all offending phrases and tourist references.
682:
behavior that causes an atmosphere of animosity, disrespect,
434:
The choices are a judgement call, but some of them are easy.
1088:
865:
Hi - I noticed you created this category. According to the
427:) won a boatload of Oscars -- obviously notable. His third (
628:
537:
1076:
655:
396:
It's obvious, really: the major Hollywood studios release
660:
Hi; I'm afraid I don't appreciate your sarcastic tone on
988:
821:
I'd also like to point you to another Knowledge policy,
383:
952:
446:
310:
916:This guy is nuts! When will he stop reverting the
842:
479:You recently merged info from "Public Theater" to
319:page were quite apropos. Please stick around. --
1198:) otherwise it'll be harder to solicit feedback.
1004:
548:, to use our articles. Since you are among the
1064:Knowledge:Votes for deletion/Democrazy (movie)
292:or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --
871:category:Cities and towns in Saga Prefecture
860:category:Cities and Towns in Saga Prefecture
1231:You were kind enough to contribute to the
280:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
935:Could you point to any source for that
14:
944:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
1260:Ditto, Thanks for the reminder. :-)
1227:Return of the Untagged Image project
348:Copying my response to yours at the
1152:Peer review listings removed, sorry
853:Knowledge:Collaboration of the week
676:is a rule here on Knowledge. Where
436:Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle
423:) -- not very notable. His second (
23:
664:. I quite politely pointed you to
631:, I would like to know that too.
24:
1273:
938:member of the mercantile class...
875:Knowledge:Categories for deletion
627:". If you only prefer using the
583:Template messages/User namespace
572:Free the Rambot Articles Project
29:
1081:Thanx for pointing this out! -
981:
931:Krzysztof Zbaraski, a merchant?
621:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
615:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
597:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
579:{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
781:To repeat, slightly modified:
25:
13:
1:
823:Knowledge:No personal attacks
300:14:40, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC) and
1100:
993:Please have another look at
959:List of Young Global Leaders
867:Knowledge:Naming conventions
563:- Lots of questions answered
265:How to write a great article
102:04:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
78:23:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
72:02:27, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
28:
7:
1115:) 08:49, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
851:has been voted this week's
96:04:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
66:12:49, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
10:
1278:
520:Attribution-Share Alike (
500:14:07, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
496:you for your cooperation.
453:Knowledge:Personal attacks
1264:06:16, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1257:15:57, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1233:Knowledge:Untagged images
1223:09:37, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1185:19:15, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1148:12:44, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1132:13:06, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1085:20:07, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1073:10:06, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1014:06:30, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1001:18:35, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
985:21:20, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
949:10:39, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
913:01:09, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
881:17:54, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
720:05:49, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
703:13:08, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
487:14:27, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
443:10:40, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
421:Thunderbolt and Lightfoot
393:02:19, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
371:14:19, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
340:19:16, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
330:15:38, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
323:07:41, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
304:17:01, 2004 Nov 13 (UTC)
84:11:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
60:10:48, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
1205:06:12, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1054:07:25, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1038:06:53, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1023:06:48, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
924:05:52, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
905:05:38, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
869:this category should be
832:13:18, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
806:13:09, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
738:11:27, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
379:14:24, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
288:, add a question to the
144:22:59, 14 September 2007
90:07:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
1136:Robert the Bruce's RFAr
1095:Knowledge:Graffiti Wall
365:A River Runs Through It
222:07:02, 15 February 2022
180:09:20, 17 November 2012
162:09:50, 25 February 2009
150:23:59, 31 December 2007
120:07:20, 12 February 2007
114:23:59, 31 December 2006
54:20:23, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
48:12:21, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
1119:Aye, I'm watching him.
893:. Well, I've filed an
192:00:25, 3 November 2016
156:21:26, 8 February 2008
108:00:20, 4 December 2006
1128:side of the fence. -
895:RfC against Everyking
891:Autobiography (album)
885:RfC against Everyking
662:Knowledge:Peer Review
635:what you think at my
567:Multi-Licensing Guide
532:if they prefer. The
455:did this by saying:
315:Your comments on the
228:00:00, DAY MONTH YEAR
210:01:34, 16 March 2019
1210:Peer review listings
957:Hello, Calton. Re:
204:07:54, 28 June 2018
174:08:13, 19 April 2010
849:First Indochina War
680:here is defined as
561:Multi-Licensing FAQ
469:User:Chan Han Xiang
198:16:00, 13 June 2017
138:23:59, 30 June 2007
126:14:46, 4 April 2007
725:Knowledge:Civility
666:Knowledge:Civility
633:Please let me know
625:{{MultiLicensePD}}
481:The Public Theater
408:notable, clearly.
352:talk page. below.
270:Naming conventions
250:How to edit a page
216:01:20, 18 May 2021
186:00:00, 6 July 2015
168:15:03, 4 July 2009
132:23:59, 31 May 2007
847:Congratulations,
830:
736:
701:
504:Article Licensing
402:every single year
234:
233:
1269:
1105:
983:
828:
734:
699:
540:, but it allows
524:) v1.0 and v2.0
518:Creative Commons
512:to get users to
260:Picture tutorial
255:Editing tutorial
33:
26:
18:User talk:Calton
1277:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1247:
1229:
1212:
1203:Ta bu shi da yu
1154:
1138:
1130:Ta bu shi da yu
1121:
1091:
1083:Ta bu shi da yu
1079:
1067:
1033:Talk:Vardenafil
1007:
991:
955:
933:
887:
863:
845:
658:
510:started a drive
506:
493:
491:Patricia Heaton
477:
449:
425:The Deer Hunter
386:
346:
313:
275:Manual of Style
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1275:
1251:Rila Monastery
1246:
1243:
1228:
1225:
1211:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1199:
1191:
1167:removal policy
1153:
1150:
1137:
1134:
1120:
1117:
1090:
1087:
1078:
1075:
1066:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1025:
1024:
1006:
1003:
990:
987:
974:
973:
969:
966:
954:
951:
932:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
922:Riffsyphon1024
911:Riffsyphon1024
886:
883:
862:
857:
844:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
742:
741:
740:
739:
657:
654:
617:
616:
613:
610:
599:
598:
595:
592:
575:
574:
569:
564:
542:other projects
505:
502:
492:
489:
476:
475:Public Theater
473:
448:
445:
385:
382:
381:
380:
361:Norman Maclean
357:Norman MacLean
350:Norman Maclean
345:
344:Norman Maclean
342:
312:
309:
307:
278:
277:
272:
267:
262:
257:
252:
232:
231:
230:
229:
223:
217:
211:
205:
199:
193:
187:
181:
175:
169:
163:
157:
151:
145:
139:
133:
127:
121:
115:
109:
103:
97:
91:
85:
79:
73:
67:
61:
55:
49:
40:
39:
38:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1274:
1265:
1263:
1258:
1256:
1252:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1234:
1224:
1222:
1218:
1204:
1200:
1197:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1163:
1159:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1133:
1131:
1127:
1116:
1114:
1113:Contributions
1110:
1106:
1104:
1096:
1086:
1084:
1074:
1072:
1065:
1053:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1037:
1034:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1022:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1013:
1002:
1000:
996:
986:
984:
979:
970:
967:
964:
963:
962:
960:
950:
948:
945:
941:
939:
923:
919:
915:
914:
912:
908:
907:
906:
904:
900:
896:
892:
882:
880:
876:
872:
868:
861:
856:
854:
850:
831:
824:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
805:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
788:
785:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
767:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
737:
730:
726:
722:
721:
719:
715:
711:
706:
705:
704:
702:
695:
694:Civility rule
691:
689:
685:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
653:
652:
648:
644:
640:
639:
634:
630:
626:
622:
614:
611:
609:
606:
605:
604:
603:
596:
593:
591:
588:
587:
586:
584:
580:
573:
570:
568:
565:
562:
559:
558:
557:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
530:public domain
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:multi-license
511:
501:
499:
488:
486:
482:
472:
470:
465:
464:
461:
456:
454:
444:
442:
437:
432:
430:
429:Heaven's Gate
426:
422:
417:
414:
409:
407:
403:
399:
394:
392:
378:
374:
373:
372:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
351:
341:
339:
336:
331:
329:
324:
322:
318:
317:Yasser Arafat
308:
305:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
276:
273:
271:
268:
266:
263:
261:
258:
256:
253:
251:
248:
247:
246:
244:
239:
238:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
113:
110:
107:
104:
101:
98:
95:
92:
89:
86:
83:
80:
77:
74:
71:
68:
65:
62:
59:
56:
53:
50:
47:
44:
43:
42:
41:
37:
32:
27:
19:
1259:
1248:
1230:
1213:
1155:
1139:
1125:
1122:
1102:
1092:
1080:
1068:
1008:
992:
975:
956:
937:
934:
888:
864:
846:
786:
782:
765:
728:
713:
709:
693:
681:
677:
673:
669:
659:
636:
632:
624:
620:
618:
607:
601:
600:
589:
578:
576:
553:
541:
533:
528:or into the
521:
507:
494:
478:
466:
463:
458:
457:
450:
435:
433:
428:
424:
420:
418:
412:
410:
405:
401:
397:
395:
387:
364:
360:
356:
354:
347:
332:
325:
314:
306:
290:village pump
279:
240:
236:
235:
45:
1245:Pic tagging
1237:Tagishsimon
1098:TALKPAGE.--
784:listening."
377:ExplorerCDT
355:Redirected
241:Hello, and
1162:Downblouse
918:October 24
879:Rick Block
712:find that
678:incivility
546:WikiTravel
544:, such as
286:help pages
282:Wikipedian
1089:GrafWalls
920:page? --
899:Johnleemk
638:talk page
508:Hi, I've
321:Viriditas
294:Graham ☺
226:Archive31
220:Archive30
214:Archive29
208:Archive28
202:Archive27
196:Archive26
190:Archive25
184:Archive24
178:Archive23
172:Archive22
166:Archive21
160:Archive20
154:Archive19
148:Archive18
142:Archive17
136:Archive16
130:Archive15
124:Archive14
118:Archive13
112:Archive12
106:Archive11
100:Archive10
94:Archive09
88:Archive08
82:Archive07
76:Archive06
70:Archive05
64:Archive04
58:Archive03
52:Archive02
46:Archive01
1217:Bishonen
1196:VfD page
1179:Bishonen
1077:Oops :-)
684:conflict
674:Civility
656:Civility
623:" with "
608:Option 2
590:Option 1
550:top 2000
534:CC-by-sa
526:Licenses
522:CC-by-sa
406:a priori
237:Welcome!
36:Archives
1158:Upskirt
1052:MPLX/MH
1036:MPLX/MH
1021:MPLX/MH
1012:MPLX/MH
999:Nichalp
995:Gangtok
989:Gangtok
827:— Matt
733:— Matt
698:— Matt
647:comment
643:Ram-Man
554:minimum
413:Variety
391:Foolano
389:that.--
384:Foolano
243:welcome
1240:(talk)
1146:(talk)
1143:sannse
1103:Crypto
953:Lists!
829:Crypto
804:Calton
787:Capice
735:Crypto
718:Calton
700:Crypto
688:stress
670:please
441:Calton
398:dozens
369:Calton
302:Pedant
1253:). -
1126:right
1101:Alice
1071:Curps
651:talk)
447:Hello
338:Jayjg
328:Jayjg
311:Bravo
16:<
1221:Talk
1183:Talk
1171:bold
1160:and
1109:Talk
978:+sj
972:out.
947:Talk
903:Talk
843:COTW
714:your
692:the
686:and
629:GFDL
538:GFDL
298:Talk
1255:MPF
1175:RfC
1005:Hi!
961:,
766:you
727:: "
498:TOM
485:TOM
359:to
1262:jk
1219:|
1181:|
901:|
825:.
649:|
602:OR
439:--
367:--
296:|
1111:|
1107:(
982:+
940:)
789:?
710:I
690:,
645:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
