User talk:Calton/Archive06

3061:

consideration, and found myself in disagreement with it. So any suggestion that I "ignored" it is completely untrue. The only arguments that have been ignored here are mine. You continue to hold that "Schiavelli's own books" are sufficient reason to describe him as "Sicilian-American" - despite me having told you twice now that whatever way he describes himself in his books has no bearing on Knowledge. You cannot continue to argue that line, it is of no merit. I don't expect to agree with me, just as I have disagreed with you, but I do expect you not to resort to childish and inappropiate language such as "blithered", and "hand waiving" (that makes 3 times now; it seems to be a favourite phrase of yours, I've noticed you've used it against other editors you disagree with). And I do expect that any editor worth his/her salt would be prepared to debate their contributions, not just damn any others who hold a different point of view. If your arguments have any merit, they will withstand the queries and objections of others, so just what is it you are afraid of, Calton? I'm posting this on Schiavelli's talk page so others can have their say on the matter. I've displayed more than sufficient courtesy by keeping this between ourselves up till now. I regret that my courtesy has not been reciprocated, but I live in hope.

3209:

Calton's criteria) are not, in fact, holidays. Winter-Een-Mas is celebrated by thousands of gamers. Here is a partial list of other holidays listed on wikipedia that do not meet your criteria: World Day of the Sick, Darwin Day, Shrove Tuesday, Paul Mazza Day, Kyoto Protocol Day, Language Martyrs’ Day, Family Day, International Polar Bear Day, World Day of Prayer, St. Piran’s Day, Feast of St. Kieran, Mothering Sunday, Red Nose Day, Youth Day, Pi Day (listed as an unofficial holiday, but it is still up on wikipedia and has its own entry on wikipedia), Steak and Blowjob Day (also listed as an unofficial holiday, but it is still up on wikipedia AND has its own entry on wikipedia), Meat Out Day, World Day of Sleep, World Water Day, World Tuberculosis Day, International Railway Workers Day, Land Day, International Day of the Birds. Those are between Febuary 1 and April 1. My picking "World Toilet Day" was a reference to limited knowledge of holidays and missing several things you should delete because they aren't what you concider a holiday.

3289:, not far into the page, states that citations are there so people can look them up and read them. ChrisO put that citation in there. It references a confidential to the Church of Scientology document. That means that editors and public who read here, can not look it up and read it. It is not a good citation. Not only that, but it skirts the edge of legality. The Church of Scientology is well known for its defence of trade secrets. Not that ChrisO, nor you, nor myself would become involved, but I really don't want our beloved Knowledge to have to dance a court battle just because ChrisO wants to cite a source which is completely off 1409:

subheadings to break up his bloat. Since 131.107.0.73 was to some degree trying to restore the status quo, then yes, I stand by my statement that you got it backwards when you reverted him. I've done further restoration, and will go after the more obviously ridiculous of the new entries when I get the chance (such as 1998 - United States: The U.S. House of Representatives votes 390-0 to express the sense of the House that it is a national priority to provide affordable housing for all This is a notable event? This wouldn't even be a notable event in the Congressional Quarterly.). --Calton | Talk 02:32, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

3235:"World Toilet Day is not a holiday -- nor are the others you cite -- it is a day of observance, recognition, or proclamation. Congress, state legislatures, city councils, and random organizations issue these all the time, and anybody can proclaim anything they want -- Black History Month, Take Your Daughter to Work Day, National Brotherhood Week -- but they are NOT holidays. Putting lipstick on a pig doesn't make it Miss America, and a bunch of self-important game geeks slapping a "holiday" label on something they made up doesn't make things so. Your failure to understand this is not my problem. - 3315:

toward neutral information about Scientology. Whatever your POV about Scientology and the link, you are as free to provide neutral links within the article and within the talk page as I am. You somehow imply that the link can not possibly be neutrally biased. You further get into "no matter how smarmily or passive-aggressively you phrase it" which doesn't contribute to what was being talked about but is, like many of your posts, emotionally inflamatory. The discussion page invites a neutral link. Feel free to contribute.

2027: 31: 2652:

blame" I see as a request for the challenger to acknowledge an opposing point-of-view. "let me know and I'll use smaller words."...ouch, that hurts. And the circular "Rinse, lather, repeat." argument really came out of nowhere, eh? Perhaps re-read the chronological list of points I made that lead to the nomination and stop the circle at "The fact that he's nominating it for a fourth time." Though I think we agree that "appropriateness of

1557: 2813: 3578: 3571: 3285:, I have chose to communicate with you here. It is perfectly all right with me to talk about the accuracy, motivation or anything else about the cover of that book. What I wish to inform you of now is the citation which you reverted. The citation is contrary and counter to wiki's guidelines. The citation is not available to wiki editors nor to wiki readers. 3045:

them, and I respect them - but I continue to disagree with them, for the simple reason that they not the way things are done here. Our rules and policies are there for a purpose, and if you disagree with them it's open to you to institute change, but it's not open to you to simply flout them. Three days ago, I went to the trouble of explaining, yet again, on

1257:. Whether you want to look at yourself or not is your choice, but don't kid yourself by saying I'm not qualified so what I'm telling you isn't true. Tell me your "short words" post was an expression of anger or an attempt to resolve something, but don't try to shift the blame to me so you don't have to look at yourself. 1240:

contribution history. If you've made a sincere mistake (for example, you may be acutely concerned about privacy issues and believe that, public record or not, citing Mr Bauer's past legal problems was grossly unfair, to the point of attacking anyone who disagrees with you), that's ok, we can let it drop now.

652:

opposite of nitpicking and kneejerking. However, none of the editors on this page would do _even that_ until they realized that the alternative was a copyvio tag. Again, this page was a copyvio disaster for over a year, and nobody would do anything about it until I started enforcing the copyvio tagging. --

1567:. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! I was also surprised by the amount of people who stated clearly that they do care, be it by voting in for or against my candidacy. That's what Wiki community is about and I'm really pleased to see that it works. 3261:.svg", you might very well see a lot of dead links on your userpage in a couple of months... What I and others wanted to do is to spare you of the trouble, not to "mess with your userpage". Several of the flags you have on your userpage are also inexact, whereas the SVG versions are alot more accurate. — 3634:

As you may know, I recently accepted Everking's request for assistance from the AMA. I am asking this question to help me further understand the issues at hand. Regarding your recent back-and-forth on EK's talk page. If he were not under current arbcom sanction, would you have found his contributions

2954:

I noticed you've been reverting this article to a redirect. I admit that I am a fan of the comic, so I don't know if I can be an objective judge about the notability of the holiday. I would like to note though, that the deletion policy states: "If an article is repeatedly re-created by unassociated

2636:

I posted a more detailed explanation at the above afd as to why I think it is a bad faith nomination. If you still do not genuinely understand where I coming from please tell me what parts do not connect (do not compute, if you will) to the conclusion. I'm not saying that I am absolutely right, but I

1153:

I've got nothing against having English units there. Some people think in English units rather than in metric, as you point out. I don't but that's just me. I think, though, that there are those who do use Imperial (as opposed to US) gallons &c. even though the UK & Ireland have officially

1065:

implies pretty strongly that the Special Olympics are in some way deficient. If I don't understand a remark, and try to engage you in some dialog about it, snapping that I "shouldn't criticize" means that the error could only be mine. I won't comment on this any further that to say that openness to

859:

Wow, Calton, thanks for the crass and unyielding reply. You didn't even take part in the scientific debatem (see talk), and you've read none of the papers. It's quite impossible that you should be so sure Aetherometry is pseudoscience. It is not. Even if it's wrong, it would only be mistaken science,

374:

article it is clear that you have very strong views on this, and that your position is different to the one held by most of the other editors. Instead of just reverting the edits that you make that go against the established consensus, I think that I should ask you to work more on the discussion page

3329:

The Navy disclaimer means that the Navy -- as a matter of policy -- provides links, it doesn't endorse them, something you were apparently trying to obscure in your flurry of hand-waving rhetorical questions. Looks like you -- what's that term? Oh yeah, missed the point. And the less said about your

3242:

Yes, they are observances, and as such are listed on wikipedia. As such (and as I have proven it is celebrated and recognized by AT LEAST one store) Winter-Een-Mas should also be on wikipedia since at the very least it is an observance. Through your own logic you have proven Winter-Een-Mas should be

3049:

why I believe it's not OK to do what you insist on doing. After three days with no response from you, I made the change I foreshadowed. Now, you've just reverted me because I haven't been "paying attention" to your argument - yet you have given my argument no consideration whatsoever. At the very

2761:

Please review the evidence located above before accusing people of "making something up". There is ample evidence that there was ZERO COLLUSION and that they COULD NOT BE the same person. Go and have a look. Maybe you feel obligated to automatically support admins, but in this case, I think its a

2680:

that adds a rollback button to the non-admin interface when looking at diffs and 'revert' links when viewing a user's contribs list. This gives you one-click rollback, although it actually automates the normal manual process rather than doing it the admin way. It's quite good, though. You can get it

2049:

So far no punative measures have been offered to solve the problems regarding the behavior of those involved. I strongly urge people to post comments asking for a stronger proposed decision from the Arbitration Committee. Otherwise, this will be all for nothing. We need to lobby them to get a ban on

579:

Finally, you've all but accused me of a political agenda here. Carlton, I've resolved thousands of copyvios, but have almost no politically oriented edits (if you'd care to look). Politics aren't my thing, they don't interest me. I assure you that I have no political agenda whatsoever regarding this

2958:

An alternate solution would be to copy material from the historic Winter-een-mas article into a full section in Ctrl-Alt-Del, and make the winter-een-mas redirect to that section specifically. There used to be a whole sectionon it in the webcomic article, before it was moved into it's own article.

2554:

which questions Weinstein's research. I told Rjensen on his talk page that I know little about Weinstein, nor am I am much interested in the subject. As a layman not much interested in this subject, Rjensen argument wins by default, because you are unable or unwilling to provide evidence backing

2114:

Hi. I just wanted to report a theft... namely, that of your cool International Travels box by me! Do you mind if copy that code, altering only the countries visited, and giving you (and the others) credit? If you do mind, I could delete it, but it looks so pretty on my user page now, and reminds

1089:

I have in fact gone and read and re-read your comment several times since we started this strange little dance. I still think that it was poorly worded. I'm not sure how you would have liked me to phrase that, however I did not intend to "scold" you. If you could tell me what I should have said,

621:

That's right, thousands of resolved copyvios and pretty much no political edits, that's the kind of duck I am. As far as nitpicking and page blanking with a copyviotag, this page was an exceptional problem for over a year because nobody would do anything about it until I stepped in. The unpleasant

3314:

iniation of dialoge, My reason for posting that link becomes obvious when a person reads the talk page. Someone commented about how difficult it is to find a source of information about Scientology which is not biased. In reply I posted that link. You somehow missed the point. I post the link

3208:

On November 19 (found this on wikipedia the other day) is "World Toilet Day". No state celebrates it, no post office OR bank in the world is closed for it. There are NO "World Toilet Sales" for World Toilet Day anywhere. But it is up on wikipedia just the same as are MANY other holidays that (with

2651:

It truly does appear we are having a communication problem. What you see as "unearned snark" I see a plead for more detailed explanation of what is not being understood. What you see as a "bad writer" I see someone providing a detailed explanation of their point-of-view. What you see as "shift the

1692:

See there's where you're wrong. I would never make such lists as they ARE lists of indiscriminate information. However preceedent has established that we keep racial lists. I don't see how whites can be kept out if blacks, latinos, native americans, etc... DO get their own lists. Unless someone is

1266:

Your "short word" post was simple sarcasm and an expression of your uncontrolled anger. I can see it clear as day. I have no involvement here otherwise, and I'm not hot under the collar. Whether or not you will look at yourself is up to you, but I'm clear that I have no emotional involvement here.

1086:

I know I said I was moving on, but that last reply was just hilarious. I didn't get your name wrong despite it being in giant flashing letters at the top of your user page. I simply mashed an extra key when I typed it. And your complaint that I was obtuse I find tempered by the fact that rather

918:

In any case, here's a math problem for you: count the number of people adding the cat and the number of those removing it, then add them together. Divide the the number of people adding the cat by this sum, and compare the resulting ratio to the ratio of those removing it. What does this tell you?

3044:

Calton, asking people to "pay attention" is not what this ought to be about. That sort of language assumes that whatever you have to say is the final truth. Well, I'm sorry to disillusion you on that score. For the record, I have "paid attention". I have read your arguments, I have understood

2370:

This fallacy is a type of red herring in which a writer creates an oversimplified, easy-to-refute argument, places it in the mouth of his opponent, and then tries to "win" the debate by knocking down that empty or trivial argument. For instance, one speaker might be engaged in a debate concerning

1421:

said what s/he was doing) - I only came across this on RC Patrol. 131.107.0.73 had made over 250 edits in the span of 6 hours without a single comment. The edits to July 20, if made all at one time would have flagged anyone using CryotpDerk's VF, and when I looked at a sample of the edits I saw a

2619:

There are 3 "keep"'s; I think you missed Academic Challenger's vote at the end. That makes the count 7 delete (including the nominator), 4 keep (including 1 merge), which is no consensus, and therefore keep. I should perhaps have said "keep (no consensus)" instead of just "keep", but there is no

2476:

My question to you was a simple one: if Weinstein's research is so shabby, why are most researchers/historians (to my knowledge) accepting his information as fact? Why is the only person who argues that Weinstein a fraud and his research is shabby an anonymous wikipedian? I think this is not a

2394:

The opponent argues, "Tennessee should increase funding to unemployed single mothers during the first year after childbirth because they need sufficient money to provide medical care for their newborn children." The second speaker retorts, "My opponent believes that some parasites who don't work

2265:

Weinsteins research should not be believed. Has this wikipedian ever been to the Soviet archives? What credentials does he have to offer other than his annonymous assurances that what he says is true and what Weinstien says is incorrect? This anonymous wikipedian simply states that Weinstein's

651:

for resolving copyvios. Pages are supposed to be reverted to the pre-copyvio version (this eliminates the possibility of derivative work copyvios). I did not enforce this during the last few times a copyvio was found, instead letting people just edit the copyvio out. This was lax on my part, the

2418:

In this example, the second speaker is engaging in a straw man strategy, distorting the opposition's statement into an oversimplified form so he can more easily "win." However, the second speaker is only defeating a dummy-argument rather than honestly engaging in the real nuances of the debate.

2185:

I will go ahead and add this information, but I will also add the information of the other 7 committee members, listing the career of McCormack first, then Dickstein, then the other committee members. Why this order?: Because it is called the McCormack-Dickstein Committee, and Mccormack was the

1229:

You are forgiven for bringing up my unrelated dispute with SlimVirgin and for discounting my advice because of that. And it remains that your "short words" post could do nothing but make matters worse. I just held up a mirror for you to see what you are doing. You can look or not, whichever you

1239:

Were you asking for my mailing address, or being sarcastic? If the former, why would you need it? If the latter, how do you think sarcasm could possibly be helpful on the RfA talk page? I have cited your note in my own RfA statement and would like to politely suggest that you take a look at my

3703:

Thanks, Calton. Free Will Productions had uploaded three identical images, so I deleted two and left one, and I've left him a note asking whether he intends to use it. The article it was destined for has been deleted as a vanity piece. I can see one deleted edit for him: it was a template for

3445:

Hoookaaaay... we're obviously done here. I rest my case, and leave it to the proverbial jury of my Knowledge peers to decide if my revert should stand. Giggle if you will, but it's you who are violating Knowledge policy by forcing the linkspam in, not me. On a personal note, I'll repeat my

3216:

I find it disturbing you seem to have some problem with Winter-een-mas because it would appear others have complaints with you (found one when I posted my first post supporting winter-een-mas here). Several holidays are obscure. Winter-een-mas is new, but that does NOT exclude it from being a

1408:

My notes made it pretty clear that the problem was a large edit without any discussion or edit summaries. And that would be PedanticallySpeaking's unilateral addition of images (29 images) and dozens of minor events and births, not to mention his unilateral (and disputed) addition of numerous

3223:

EDIT: Also, you failed to research winter-een-mas. It is an anti commercialism holiday aka against "winter-een-mas" sales. Also: Winter-een-mas is recognized by EB Games (a subsidary of GameStop Corp) which has 2,280 stores in the US thus fulfilling one of your criteria for a Holiday (it is

2608:

No, it's not my second language that's why I clearly stated "that while heterosexuals are by no means a minority" and " are dedicated to protecting certain traditional family values such as straight marriage." I must say you do portray your ignorance in the fact that you can't even read the

3060:

Well, despite your claim, I certainly didn't receive any response to the above. (If you can show me where a response was posted, I will retract that. Otherwise, your claim remains on the record as an untruthful statement). I already told you that I gave your previous argument serious

1802:. I was interested in the Borges quote you mentioned. Please remember that AfD is a discussion to find consensus; I'm somewhat disturbed that you asked for "Deletion" without providing a rationale. I'm rather borderline on this road article, and could quite possibly be convinced. -- 945:

Haven't read the papers...mind reading skills...insulting math questions. But you haven't read any of them, Calton, or you'd have something to say about Aetherometry instead of your intended zingers. You employ the rhetorical device called the 'raspberry'. I don't think it's very

1682:

to heart... specifically the first 4 "petty" examples they use. And as for my list being a collection of indiscriminate information... consensus is on my side when you consider we keep lists of African Americans, Native Americans, etc... Keeping a list of white Americans is only

2984:; I think we should just be thankful that he doesn't try to force that stuff in. Would you mind if I archived the page there? I can leave in your thread with him (or the current parts of it) if you like, but Knowledge seems like an inappropriate place for your conversation. -- 493:

The page languished for over a year with huge amounts of copyvio material because nobody would do anything about it. The copyvios weren't removed until I stepped in and got serious. When a copyvio showed up I tagged the damn page until someone fixed it. It's that simple.

2490:

I am troubled that, as you say, Weinstein's research can not be verified. If Weinstein was a scientist, and his work could not be verified, his research would be dismissed. In science, work needs to be able to be replicated. But I think that history has more leneint

3467:

I won't engage with you about that latest "contribution", Calton. Whenever you wish to resume debating issues on principles, without resorting to personal abuse, I will be available. I regret you haven't managed to pick up some Japanese manners in your time there.

1819:

When recommendations are made, I will need you guys to check in and sign on that you agree with them. Otherwise this will be all for not. I intend on asking for a six month ban for Johnski from Knowledge as well as 1 year probation from editing DOM related articles.

537:

evidence of a copyvio. To be ACTUAL evidence of a copyvio, there should be, at minimum, some text to compare or reference to the thing being copied, so one can see if it's so. You did no such thing, merely presenting a diff and waving your hands wildly, crying "See?

1907:

I can't confirm or deny that the editor you inquired about is a sock of Iasson as I don't have any information on Iasson's old IPs. If you have a list of IPs he is known or suspected to have used, or a list of more recently banned sockpuppets, that would help me.

1136:

I've noticed that you've added an "English units" column to the table of Japanese units of area. I wonder whether you're intending to do the same for the other tables. It would be nice to have consistancy. If so, please remember to add two columns for volumes:

2998:, which I thoroughly enjoyed. As for "felafel" (the horror, the horror!), they do the same thing in South Africa (also seen "felaffel"). It's closer to the Arabic pronunciation "fəlæfəl", I guess. Thanks for archiving the page, I've been murdered by work. -- 2656:

nomination has bugger all to do with other lack of nominations." (emphasis mine). Anyways, I'm satisfied to leave this as is. I think I made my point (painfully) clear, and you made your counter-arguments. Also, you requested a list of other candidate articles:

3185:

Winter-Een-Mas IS a holiday contrary to your belief. Search it on wikipedia, you'll find Ctrl+Alt+Del. Scroll down. It is a holiday celebrated by gamers in the united states. Simply because you do not know something exists doesn't mean you should delete it.

339:

which according to Zephram Stark deteriorated due to the aggressive editing and other actions of Jayjg and SlimVirgin. He has waged a campaign to restore what he considers an adequate article, free of the complex ambiguities introduced by his opponents, see

787:

Calton, why don't you participate in the article's Talk page? WMC changed the category because he felt insulted by FrankZappo. There's no way that's appropriate and that's what I was referring to. Diving in with a catty remark isn't really constructive, is

3768:, or any other editor believed by an administrator to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of Johnski, may be blocked indefinitely by any administrator. The article may be unprotected (and reprotected) at the discretion of any admin who deems it safe to do so. 3680: 1092:

I do seem to have gotten you on the wrong side of the bed, and I hope that no lasting damage has been done. You have been pretty abrupt with me, though, and I'd hope that even if you disagree with everything else I've been saying you'll consider

270:

Thanks for fixing my form-filling bludner on the I/3RR page. Typical mistake of the over-tired to carefully get the fiddly little diffs right... and then totally fail to notice the great big template pointing to the wrong page. And so to bed!

435:, with more and more being noted on the talk page as they were uncovered. Many of these copyvios orriginated more than a year earlier and kept sneaking into the article over and over again. They included copied text and deravitive work. -- 1949:

I don't know why you are so bent on deleting this, but you are mistaken. Nick had nothing to do with the entry. We invited you to email and talk to us. If you care enough, you can find out the truth. Otherwise, just leave the page alone.

3200:

Mind telling me which states celebrate it? Are post offices and banks closed during it? Does Macy's or Wal-Mart have "Winter-Een-Mas Sales"? Any actual proof for this so-called holiday, other than something someone made up on a webpage?

1731:, that I was the original person who had included it - and with it, the anons have excuse to change it to something worse, like "Natural Science". Before it was reinstated again, the article saw no stupid changes during its course. -- 1892:

Calton, I could really use your advice for how I should deal with this situation. I think I should be able to add comments to the Talk page without a torrent of personal attacks. I don't know what the next step is. Can you advise me?

3657:

Just a quick update on the arbitration case, two new arbitrators voted and there now might be enough votes to close the case finally. We need to keep an eye on this and make sure whatever solution that passes is fully implemented.

760:, I'm pointing it out to all the people who voted on the previous one, as it's basically the same information, differently arranged. Had I known it existed at the time, I would have included it in the AfD. Too late now. Thanks. - 714: 2658: 1395:

Hi Calton. Well, the issue wasn't the edits. My notes made it pretty clear that the problem was a large edit without any discussion or edit summaries. This conversation is an exact example of why those things are important.

1008:

Oh, that's too bad. If you'd have been calling me "Uncle Arthur" it would have been funnier. I don't want to sound like I've got my knickers in a twist over it, and while I understand what you're saying about Kurt, use of

3212:

Winter-een-mas was created on a website- big deal. It is celebrated over the web and is the first day of a week of days which gamers celebrate their enjoyment of something... Kinda like most other holidays- a celebration.

2070:

I'm only following wikipedia policy...we aren't a how to guide book. Also it's not censorship to get rid of the unnecessary word "unwanted", or to add accurate information to wikipedia. You are to one censoring this site.

1331:

I have created a special arbitration talk page. This is to discuss what evidence we want as a group and to present and make recommendations before putting them on the arbitration page. Please feel free to make suggestions

3513:

OK, see what you're saying and it's a fair point. Just seems incongrous to have someone making a vaudeville appearance in the event list, while removing the death of a fairly well-known author. But it's no big deal.

2732:

was being considered for deletion, he's probably going to be particularly sensitive about the removal of the claim of notability. (Indeed, I'm almost certain that's why the word is on his user page in the first place.)

2908:

I wanted to send out this bulletin to re-spark interest in these projects and hopefully advance their progress. Please contribute in any spare time you may have, in order to make this section of wikipedia even better.

2637:

am one of thousands of different users with one of thousands of different points of view. I don't expect you to suscribe to it but if you are going to challenge it I expect you to try to understand it. Blind statement

1749:

deletion, but as you may have noticed I accidentally nominated it as an "article" for deletion when it should've been nominated as a "category" for deletion. I've since corrected it and you may want to re-vote now.

2568:

Anyway, I am not much interested in this subject. I was hoping you could provide evidence of your claim, but I really don't care one way or the other. Dickstien being a spy or not being spy doesn't matter to me.

3584:

Unfortunately, it failed to reach consensus. Nonetheless, it proved an opportunity to establish contacts and cooperation with many supportive editors, which will be beneficial to editing Knowledge in the future.

958: 1746: 603:

Walks like duck, etc. Your unflagging nitpicking of copyright issues on this particular article -- and your out-of-policy complete blankings for many, at worst, minor violations, makes me think otherwise.

2903: 2050:

users as well as having them banned from editing certain articles for a period of time. There needs to be a clear message to those involved to stop reverting the article. Your comments can be left here:

328: 2294: 1538: 1534: 3050:

least, courtesy would demand that you engage me in discussion about this, not just ignore me and revert me time and time again. This is a collaborative effort, not the work of any individual.

345: 2728:

Jack Sarfatti is easy enough to upset without having other people changing his user page on him. Given the lengthy and acrimonious discussions about his notability and 'encyclopedicity' when

1426:

page, and then followed it up 15 minutes later with the revert. Was I wrong? That's entirely possible, and I'll try to be careful, but we all have different levels of trust I guess. Cheers.--

313:

Thanks for your input to the discussion with the juvenile vandals, it's nice to have some support. And I like your little travel section on your user page - I just might copy that some time.

2661:, and don't forget the provincial ones. But please do not solely nominate the "No-Hope Party" as it is not a Wikipedian's job to be a crystal ball - no matter how right you think you are. -- 2332:

I appreciate your continued comments. First and foremost, I really don't care one way or another whether Dickstien is a spy. I have questioned Rjensen's edits continually and ruthlessly on

2204:

I will leave your edits simply because I need allies on this page. More than any other page I work on (and I work on many controversial pages) this is the one that gets attacked most.

749: 1267:

Take it as you will, or ignore it. Just don't kid yourself or me by saying I'm attached to anything here. Look or don't look. But don't shift the blame because you don't want to look.

774:

You have been requested to appear as a plantiff an arbitration case. Comments have been added on your behalf. If you wish to add comments please contact me. Here is a link to the case

3402:

Considering that you were numbering your reverts in the edit summaries, it seemed clear to me that you were counting on using the Three-Revert Rule as tactical cover for your actions.

1932: 1613: 982: 860:

because it's eminently falsifiable. If you believe you're striking a blow for the purity of knowledge by defending a category that is most certainly a slur, I'd say you're mistaken.

353: 3662: 3635:

to the MSK page helpful, irrelevent or hurtful to the goal of writing an encyclopedia? (I personally would argue irrelevent, but I'm trying to understand all perspectives.) Thanks!

727: 1816:

Ok guys, this is a last call for evidence. No one has posted evidence besides myself. At the end of this week, I'm going to let the Arbitration Committee know that we are done.

1530: 459:

First, can you show me where Ed claims I tagged as a copyvio an article he re-wrote from scratch. If he really said this I'd like to talk to him about it, because it's not true.

1637: 473:

All right, I misremembered the "from scratch" part, for which I apologize. On the other hand, you blanked the ENTIRE page, despite, as Ed Poor put it in his very next edit,

1175:

has long since ceased to be productive. May I suggest a cooling off period with regards to that thread and that any follow up discussions be take to individual talk pages.

1784:

There is quite a bit posted so far. If you could look at the areas I talked about on the talk page and hit some of the ones that I haven't yet touched, I'd appreciate it.

757: 750: 327:

Hi, Fred Bauder has drafted a finding of fact describing the focus of the dispute in the Zephram Stark arbitration case, and has added it to the proposed-decision page at

225: 2056:

I know this is a busy season for everyone, but this will only take a few minutes. We need to deal with this now. If not, this problem will continue to disrupt Knowledge.

2612: 365: 2624: 432: 3416:

would have no reason to mistakenly accuse me of violating 3RR. My actions were not a "tactical cover"; on the contrary, I was operating as openly as I possibly could.

1881: 1289: 1285: 1154:

gone metric. Tell you what, if you add U.S. gallons &c., I'll add the Imperial ones. How about U.S. dry verses wet gallons, do you think we should include both?

555: 516: 1928: 2842:

about why his Sicilian heritage is not the point and why his Italian background is what we should be talking about. Looking forward to your response there. Cheers

2755: 764: 3775: 3330:

phony-sympathy veiled legal threat -- I got that point, thank you -- the better, or else I might bring it to the attention of an admin and let them consider it. --

352:

I feel this is not an accurate way to summarize the dispute. Would you mind taking a look, please, and perhaps commenting on it? The discussion is taking place at

3428:

Perhaps now you'll see I've done so. It frankly flabbergasts me that you've apparently not seen it yet, but perhaps now you will, as I'm reprinting this comment

1569:

As my RfA voting failed with 71% support, I don't plan to reapply for adminship any more. However, I hope I might still be of some help to the community. Cheers!

431:

shows that Ed did not, by any streach of the imagination, re-write the article from scratch. The version I tagged had copyvios that were intially identified at

1958: 1799: 2977: 2629: 1897: 1438:

If you've been doing RC Patrol, you might have noticed that 131.107.0.73 has been doing this for MONTHS now (Kate's Tool says 1437 edits), and going by your

2293:

What other newbs has done on other wikipedia sites is irrelevant to this case at hand. I agree with you that many sites are poorly researched and foolish,

3346:

to which I reply. Whew, lucky for us you are around to make sure no one misunderstood that the Navy creates Webpages which do not have their endorsement.

2926: 2857: 1442:, it means that for you, "large edits by anon IPs: bad!" and "large edits by named editors: okay!" with no further examination necessary, even after I had 1066:

input is generally considered a positive trait. Feel free to tell me how you feel on my talk page, but I'm moving on. I really didn't mean to offend you.

705:

Dont waste your breath. As mentioned before, I think the guy gets a rise out of being a voluntary policeman for wikipedia, we should make a badge for him.

249: 3363:

Fascinating. So you revert my edits twice because the reasons in summary aren't good enough for you, and then you tell me to go to the talk page... when

2962:

One thing I know for sure though: It's not very constructive to be repeatedly recreating and reverting the article. What's your take on this situation?--

379: 3772: 2613: 1998: 1863: 1773: 1769: 1365: 1314: 1310: 3389: 2740:

notable, at least in his capacity as a widely-recognized Internet crank. By all means, scour our articles for neutrality—but leave other users' space.

1108: 1028: 1003: 3777: 3730: 2873: 2645: 2284:

Please prove me wrong. I welcome it. I don't like Rjensen, but I must admit his facts stack up much better than your so far non-existent accusations.

1979:

Can't help but notice the tense tone in all comments directed at you. May I respectfully suggest you adopt a less confrontational tone in your work? -

959: 1122: 2942: 2716: 2252:

First author:Weinstein, whose research was so convincing that several books (between a half dozen to a dozen) of all political persuations picked up.

1281: 1063:"Special Olympics of Data where every factoid is on equal footing with every other factoid, where my fountain pen is on par with, say, New York City" 2103: 1432: 1413:

First, I should apologize for the tone of my inital reply... no need for me to be so short. :) I'm not going to argue with you about the content of

3593: 3109: 2948: 2749: 1735: 1703: 407: 3661:

I'm pushing for a little bit tougher outcome, but realistically it's probably not going to happen. If you have time, please make some comments at

988:

Hee. I really just meant to "special olympics" bit. Kurt's statements usually require no editorialising, they stand on their own. Hee, Arthur.

3392:. There was no reason for that link to be in the article, as the website author prohibits its contents from being republished on Knowledge (see 2886: 2599:

So will you kindly restore the previous version for your version is lacking, and besides that it seems to repeate itsself if you read carefully.

1855: 3793: 2790:

Control your tone if you don't want people to think you are infact at fault, seperate from the evidence at hand. In fact, just pay attention to

1710: 1697: 1687: 1673: 3393: 3347: 3316: 3294: 3278: 1722: 1081: 1048: 2935: 709: 241:

You have no right to remove historical Co-op information, In large part, it is Casa-Z's history that defines what the usca co-op CZ is today.

2630: 2211:

being a spy. If Rjensen adds it back, I will silently support this, simply because this compromise defuses Rjensen questionable edits. (see

1466: 1454: 1402: 676:

Other way around, I'm very good at resolving copyvios. This page is, for the most part, copyvio free for the first time in over a year :-) --

3623: 3537: 3454: 3436: 3158: 2665: 1628: 1607: 1087:

than simply saying "and there is no R in my name" you choose to make an oblique comment that it took another 75 words for me to understand.

439: 3054: 2994:

Wow, that's hilarious! I've got to see if I can get a hold of that somewhere here in Israel. The only Australian film I've ever seen was

2570: 2298: 2219: 2043:

Just to make everyone aware, arbitrators have begun to write the proposed decision in the arbitration case. You can view the decision here:

1858: 1517: 706: 3065: 3002: 3171:

Great quote from Borges on the "Genius school" deletion page. I haven't heard that in a long time and it hit the nail right on the head.

2691:

to your monobook.js, or by copy-pasting the script at that location. I'm not sure if it is restricted only to the monobook skin or not. -

1974: 1621: 1600: 1983: 3731: 3378:

No, I reverted the first time because your stated reason was so breathtakingly and obviously bogus that it defied reason (see chutzpah)

3350: 3039: 1765: 1659: 1617: 1306: 2060: 3251:

The reason that png's are changed to svg's is that there ought to be only one copy of a given flag. Due to its vector-based form the

3143: 1564: 927: 845: 744: 720: 3112: 2878:

Sorry, I found your message just now. I guess I should be flattered in a way that my highly-edited paragraph found its way into a

2868: 1596:

Either the database is acting up or the edit history shows that you mistakenly reverted my addition of the tag. See for yourself:

1172: 732: 3232:

Again, for the record I need to show Calton's way of dealing with a situation, though I think most of you probably already know:

1321: 950: 864: 680: 656: 317: 3704:

penis-related stub (as it were), and it said: "00:23, February 1, 2006 RexNL deleted "User:Free Will Productions" (content was: '

3669: 3246: 3133:. That was why I (and my bot Zbot370) have been removing it. It needs to be orphaned to be deleted. 06:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3020: 2988: 2921: 2827: 1545: 1168: 3265: 1296: 584: 562: 498: 2897: 2780: 2676:(Well, apparently I chose the wrong spelling anyway. I'm positive it used to spelt that way. Anyway.) It's a script written by 2119: 1917: 2725:

for him. User pages aren't required to be neutral–or even particularly honest–as long as they aren't offensive or insulting.

1520: 1347: 1338: 428: 306: 3691: 2603: 2594: 2038: 1966: 1104: 1077: 1024: 999: 978: 837:

This requires some long and convoluted explanation on a talk page WHY, exactly? Are edit summaries too difficult to parse? --

1179: 519:. The example I gave is one of many you can find if you take a good look at the article's talk page and archived talk pages. 389:

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for taking photos of the Lounge, they will prove most helpful in illustrating the article. --

3505: 2819: 2817: 35: 3693: 3098: 2807: 2301: 2222: 2148: 2014:

for 24 hours. He has clearly broken the spirit, if not technical letter, of the 3RR rule and is simply gaming the system.

3714:

As for the other thing, no worries. Long time ago, water under the bridge. But thank you very much; I appreciate it. ;-)

3310:

Regarding the citation about the Navy link, which you pasted a lot of information about on my talk page, thus supporting

3124: 2711: 2194: 1636: 257: 3613: 2093: 1939: 1343:

I have begun to post evidence. Hopefully some of you can help me a bit with this. It's turning out to be a lot of work.

673:

Of course, if you don't have a political agenda, maybe it's just that you're not very good at what you're trying to do.

3590: 3319: 3220:

I must end this with an appology. I am very sorry you are offended by something you do not belive in but still exists.

2966: 1873: 1576: 402: 3338: 2144:, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information of anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces. 2851: 2005: 1843: 1806: 1446:

before you came up with the "large edits are a problem" rationale. Were you wrong? It's more than just "possible". --

1271: 1261: 1234: 1221: 622:

characters and name calling probably had something to do with scaring away anyone interested in cleaning up the mess.

3371: 2697: 2033: 1850:

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

1788: 3652: 2971: 2846: 2736:

Please leave his page alone. It does no one any harm. There's even a fair argument to be made that Jack Sarfatti

2537:

You can try to "weasel out" of, or downplay these facts, but so far, this is all the evidence I have been provided.

2084: 2075: 1727:

Why does it have to be reinstated? Without it, we have peace in the article, the anons are not incited to anything

1483: 1204: 301: 3647: 3259:. Most png flags are deprecated and redundant to their svg counterparts. Therefore most of the "Image:<xxx: --> 1824: 1590: 1586:

Hi. Why did you revert my addition of the {{deleteagain}} tag? Did I add it incorrectly? I'll revert back. --

360: 341: 3787: 2754: 1217:

What dispute exactly are you attempting to resolve, and how do you see this as bringing it closer to resolution?

792: 3720: 3472: 3429: 3385: 3224:

recognized by a store). Also Also: Forum I found listing Winter-Een-Mas events where people have CELEBRATED it.

3119: 2821: 1244: 3297: 2900: 2573: 2208: 2198: 2197:

page. It is true. He was a Soviet spy. While I reasearched it, I added the very long single footnote on the

1301: 1013:

as a derogatory term is outside the pale. Perhaps I'm being over sensitive, but it just seemed a bit callous.

475:

The first 4 paragraphs, having been written largely by me, can not posibly be considered a copyright violation.

2770: 1388: 3751: 3586: 3175: 3034: 3012:

links. This included deleting the fireflysun.com links. I've proposed removing all of the New Age links on

2891: 2802: 2395:

should get a free ride from the tax money of hard-working honest citizens. I'll show you why he's wrong. . ."

2109: 1882: 1525: 1326: 1128: 700: 396: 275: 2856:

I've asked the ArbCom to perform a sockpuppet check on Peter/Zephram. Please add any comments you may have

2583: 2463:

I am quite familar with this list, and I believe that my statment does not fall in any of these categories.

2124: 2051: 1754: 1702:"Then you're not paying attention." To what, the fact you're accusing me of eventually creating lists like 1276: 307: 2309: 1651:. I've already explained this article was not made to prove a point but per the conclusions of the AFD on 1597: 3450:. You're obviously a valued contributor to this website, but it's never too late to review. Cheers. -- 3413: 1377: 3194:

For all who are interested this message was the reply to my statement that winter-een-mas IS a holiday:

824:

added the tag because it's pseudoscience. I added the tag because it's pseudoscience. Period. Full stop.

696: 2931: 1902: 1162: 219: 213: 207: 201: 195: 189: 183: 177: 171: 165: 159: 153: 147: 141: 135: 129: 123: 117: 111: 105: 99: 93: 87: 81: 69: 63: 57: 51: 45: 2044: 3689: 3477: 3311: 2816:

Trying to impart common sense into the clueless is a tough job, one which you do particularly well.

2621: 1962: 1652: 1418: 1369: 1100: 1073: 1020: 995: 974: 805: 2080:

I wasn't trying to side step any policy and I made the section about health as neutral as possible.

1550: 1512: 3681:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of state-named Avenues in Washington, D.C. (second nomination)

3384:

Hmmm, maybe you'd also like to note that my stated reasons were stated on the talk page all along (

3252: 2912:

If you know anyone who may be interested in working on this project, please say something to them.

2745: 2297:

comes to mind, but wikipeidans conduct is irrelevant to the issue of whether Dickstein was a spy.

1780: 1422:

complexity that worried me. That was why I tried to engage the editor with my first comment to the

1333: 288: 281: 2882:

article. In any case, it looks like things came to a resolution. Thanks for letting me know. --

558:. Also, if you carefully read through the talk pages and archive you will find many, many more. -- 3763: 3738: 3302: 3149: 3130: 3046: 2839: 2702: 1922: 1464: 1430: 1400: 384: 253: 2115:

me of the old days in... various places. You and I've been to some of the same, it turns out. -

1706:

when I'm not going too? I 've paid close attention to that... regardless of how off base it is.

775: 448:

Carlton, I'm sorry you left such an angry note on my talk page. I hope we can talk this through.

3604: 3422:

Make a coherent, non-bogus argument on the Talk page, one that at least passes the giggle test.

3094: 2947: 2707:

I would like to wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and all the best for the New Year.

1913: 1886: 1867: 1423: 809: 3759: 3260:

flag large.png" are slated for deletion. If the links aren't changed to "Flag of <xxx: -->

3071: 2918: 2896:

Hi. You have listed yourself as a participant in one or more of the following wikiprojects:

2671: 2261:

Second author: An anonymous wikipedian who offers not a single shred of documentary evidence

2239:

If you were presented by two conflicting facts, presented by two different people, who would

1988: 533:

No, you gave a link to a diff on my Talk page and made the sweeping claim that this diff was

3227: 1931:. In a related development, another, in my mind, valuable Image gallery is up for deletion ( 692: 3755: 3718: 3684: 3030:

Hi Calton, I got my stub locations mixed up with cleanup tags, it's my bad, I'll fix them.

1954: 1095: 1068: 1015: 990: 969: 782: 245: 2448: 8: 3640: 3529: 3497: 2865: 2741: 1838: 1829: 1793: 1759: 1209: 1184: 1599:. I assume that was just a mistake. Plus, we have another problem now, this time with 1556: 769: 3707:{| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="background-color:lightblue"|Image:Penis_.jpg| 3674: 3358: 2833: 2791: 2333: 2212: 2100: 2090: 2065: 1573: 1461: 1427: 1397: 1142: 821: 399: 299: 280: 3747: 3103: 3081: 2995: 2766: 2722: 1909: 1811: 1732: 1253:. Your "short words" post clearly shows you are hot under the collar and that you're 1201: 393: 346:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Zephram_Stark/Evidence#ZS.27s_changes_to_Terrorism

30: 3396:), and several people have been aiming to rid the article of miscellaneous linkspam. 899:

So, how are those mind-reading classes working out for you? Still practicing, I see.

3629: 3335: 2915: 2677: 2152: 2126: 2031: 1707: 1694: 1684: 1670: 1656: 1581: 1542: 1451: 1385: 1318: 1293: 1045: 1035: 1010: 924: 842: 715:

This page is, for the most part, copyvio free for the first time in over a year :-)

422:

version was blanked 31 minutes later by User:Duk on grounds of being a "copyvio"...

329:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Zephram_Stark/Proposed_decision#Focus_of_dispute

17: 1460:

You're right. My apologies. I will try to be more careful in the future. Cheers.--

3790: 3715: 3462: 3270: 2934:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2266:

research should not be believed because he is the only source of the information.

1894: 1679: 1666: 1648: 1644: 1563:

I would like to express my thanks to all the people who took part in my (failed)

1352: 357: 322: 265: 2776: 2773: 2684: 1693:

racist of course which I'm trusting you and the majority of wikipedians are not.

3636: 3620: 3610: 3515: 3483: 3451: 3433: 3368: 3303: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3271: 3153: 3138: 2861: 2795: 2785: 2708: 2662: 2642: 2116: 2011: 1929:

Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Proposal_to_modify_WP:NOT_an_image_gallery

1835: 1803: 1625: 1604: 1587: 1268: 1258: 1231: 1218: 1176: 2151:

was actually a kind of compromise with Rjensen. Rjensen continued to bring up

2026: 1499: 3698: 3666: 3469: 3447: 3409: 3166: 3062: 3051: 3025: 3017: 2999: 2985: 2963: 2955:

editors after being deleted, this may be evidence of a need for an article."

2939: 2843: 2729: 2609:

paragraphy you condemn as "bollocks". Chooserr 01:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

2600: 2591: 2133: 2081: 2072: 2057: 1994: 1936: 1821: 1785: 1570: 1376:

of them) and overcategorization PedanticallySpeaking added, too, though. See

1344: 1335: 1138: 1038:

as a derogatory term is outside the pale. Perhaps I'm being over sensitive...

813: 777: 761: 741: 724: 677: 653: 581: 559: 495: 436: 371: 296: 292: 1502: 3743: 3172: 3031: 2824: 2763: 2002: 1751: 1198: 1123: 648: 433:

Talk:Winter_Soldier_Investigation/Archive3#Copyvio_and_derivatives.2C_again

390: 3545: 3189: 3180: 2228: 2159: 1779:

The talk page that I created for just those filling the complaint is here:

354:

Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Zephram_Stark/Workshop#Focus_of_dispute

3331: 3116: 2883: 2799: 2692: 2588: 2015: 1740: 1603:(the plural version). In any case, thanks for keeping an eye on this. -- 1447: 1381: 1194: 1041: 920: 838: 376: 314: 2193:

I went ahead and checked his facts and sources Rjensen mentioned on the

1539:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone/Workshop

1535:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone/Evidence

1215:"I write short words. You not grasp sense, but throw dirt in its place." 1040:

Yes, you are. If you don't understand a sentence, don't criticize it. --

3679:

An AfD that you recently particpated in has been recycled. Please see

3609:

Ah, what would I do without you, Calton? I don't think I could manage.

3262: 3013: 2981: 817: 515:

Second, I gave an example of the copyvio that you said didn't exist on

3619:

Do what you want, Calton. I don't feel I've ever violated the ruling.

2089:

Calton, you restored his "talc causes cancer" with your last revert.--

1980: 1241: 1155: 1146: 968:

Don't suppose I could get you to tone that down a little, could I? -

947: 861: 789: 737: 336: 272: 1944: 1491:

Hi, you don’t know me but we have had contact with a mutual person,

3482:

Hi, JFK's death clearly had historical import. But Ricky Valens?

3293:

anyway. Besides which, who cares? Its a picture, it sells books.

1508: 1492: 1485: 3663:

Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/Johnski/Proposed decision

2823:. As such, you get the very first of Raul's common sense bricks. 2140:

Dickstein was paid $ 1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the

1414: 1361: 1353: 3741:

and associated articles, shall be semi-protected. If necessary,

3725: 1798:

I hope you'll be able to respond to my reply to your comment on

375:

to establish a position that everyone is happy with. Thanks, --

236: 3236: 3202: 2812: 2477:"dummy-argument"/straw man argument, but a legitamate question. 2171:...The Congressman who promoted the story was a Soviet spy.... 1531:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone

1190: 3577: 1516:

I welcome and encourage your comments on the arbitration page.

1444:

provided you with a diff to show you what the latter was doing

3570: 3009: 758:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of music videos by name

751:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of music videos by year

554:

please re-read my response above, the example I gave was on

3325:

to which Carton replied on my talk page: "Missing the point

3197:"Short answer: bullshit. Longer answer: complete bullshit. 2936:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion#Template:Infobox Biography

2155:

being a Soviet spy, and ignored the rest of the committee.

2141: 2158:

Here is the relevant discussion between Rjensen and myself

2149:

Business_Plot#Members_of_the_McCormack-Dickstein_Committee

1290:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Winter Soldier/Workshop

1286:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Winter Soldier/Evidence

3256: 2641:

of not understanding are not useful counter-arguments. --

2435:

All of the logical fallacies can be found on my web blog:

2522:

Scholars/Historians have in fact relied on his findings.

2229:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Travb#Samuel_Dickstein

3367:. Would you care to READ the talk page, sir/madam? -- 2976:

I'm not sure you can get much more out of arguing with

2449:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/bailey83221/12903.html

1498:

I got your username from the Requests for comment/TDC-2

1372:. Looks like he should have tackled the excess images ( 3412:. I was numbering my reverts so that the person who 2349:

That said, I don't believe my argument is a straw man:

1800:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Florida State Road 678

2659:

Category:Candidates for the Canadian House of Commons

3365:

my reasons were explained in the talk page all along

3079:

Pseudoscience in categorisation. Aetherometry =: -->

2207:

I personally think you should return the mention of

2614:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Arthur Stanley Katz

1774:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Johnski/Workshop

1770:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Johnski/Evidence

1315:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Johnski/Workshop

1311:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Johnski/Evidence

756:In an effort to have this vote go as swimmingly as 366:

Please participate in the discussion on talk pages.

960:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Odle Middle School 719:Oops, I might have to retact the above statement. 3446:suggestion that you review Knowledge's policy on 1282:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Winter Soldier 331:, where it is currently being voted on. It says: 477:So I stand by my "knee-jerk" characterization.* 1368:was cutting back on the extreme bloat added by 295:and am looking for feedback. Please have a go! 3394:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Robin Artisson 3281:article, reinserting text which is counter to 3279:Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health 1173:Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration#Fred_Bauder 3665:. Hopefully, semi-protection will be enough. 3115:. I though you might wanted to know. Cheers, 3076:Uh, just to inform you - Aetherometry =: --> 2685:http://sam.zoy.org/wikipedia/godmode-light.js 2631:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Grant Neufeld 1440:we all have different levels of trust I guess 2927:TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Biography 1997:post, you might want to also keep an eye on 1768:has been accepted. Please place evidence at 1747:Category:African American basketball players 1533:has been reopened. Please place evidence at 1309:has been accepted. Please place evidence at 1284:has been accepted. Please place evidence at 1105: 1101: 1096: 1078: 1074: 1069: 1025: 1021: 1016: 1000: 996: 991: 979: 975: 970: 3152:, the SVG image was declared as a copyvio. 3108:A number of editors started an RfC against 3732:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Johnski 3711:(and the only contributor was 'Coofjdf'))" 3080:Pseudoscience is therefore redundant. ;-) 2904:Knowledge:WikiProject Off/Off-Off Broadway 2874:Thanks for letting me know about Aloha 243 1766:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Johnski 1507:Currently there is arbitration pending on 1307:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Johnski 820:added the tag because it's pseudoscience. 335:"The focus of this dispute is the article 1537:. You may make proposals and comments at 1288:. You may make proposals and comments at 3737:This request for arbitration is closed. 3408:In that case, I would also refer you to 2811: 1772:. Proposals and comments may be made at 1313:. Proposals and comments may be made at 408:Winter Soldier Investigation arbitration 3016:. Just so you're on the lookout :). -- 2186:chairman, dickstien the vice-chairman. 1834:Just curious, what does Matt. 7:3 say? 1669:too. *please note my dripping sarcasm* 1169:Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration 342:Talk:Terrorism/Archive_6#NPOV_solutions 14: 3786:templates substituted by a bot as per 3564:Thank you for your support on my RfA. 3390:Knowledge is not a collection of links 2898:Knowledge:WikiProject New York Theatre 2295:List of people described as Stalinists 1723:aetherometry and the pseudoscience tag 897:...and you've read none of the papers. 2336:, and don't care much for him either. 2218:Just a heads up on what is going on. 2132:Hi, I will leave your edits as is on 2717:Please don't edit others' user pages 1745:I noticed that you commented on the 1647:before accusing people of violating 3008:I just did a cleanup of all of the 2519:have access to the Soviet archives. 2195:Talk:Samuel Dickstein (congressman) 1975:perhaps some relaxation is in order 1249:Calton, I'm qualified because I am 1197:. This isn't intentional, is it? — 691:Calton, read my comments about him 23: 1935:). Please comment as you see fit. 1555: 647:actions; read the instructions on 370:Hi Calton, from your edits to the 24: 3805: 3771:For the Arbitration Committee, -- 3137:Thanks and sorry about the mess. 1057:misinterpreted that remark, than 1053:That reply was uncalled for. If 3576: 3569: 3129:That image is being replaced by 2838:Hi. I've put up an argument on 2683:document.write('<SCRIPT SRC=" 2025: 733:thought you might enjoy this :-) 29: 3788:Knowledge:Template substitution 3550: 3148:Actually, can you change it to 2550:Again, you have not provided a 2001:, created a few minutes ago. -- 1501:or the Requests for comment/TDC 1061:might do the same. The phrase 2901:Knowledge:WikiProject Broadway 2209:Samuel Dickstein (congressman) 2199:Samuel Dickstein (congressman) 1993:Thanks for following up on my 1230:choose, it matters not to me. 25: 13: 1: 2869:13:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 2847:01:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 2828:22:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC) 2803:01:00, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 2781:14:41, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 2750:15:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 2712:18:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 2698:10:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 2666:08:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 2646:06:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 2625:01:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 2604:01:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 2595:01:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 2574:19:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 2302:19:16, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2223:09:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2120:01:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2104:01:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2094:01:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2085:00:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2076:00:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 2061:00:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 2039:Arbitration Proposed Decision 2034:04:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 2006:00:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 1984:05:44, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 1940:15:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 1918:16:28, 10 December 2005 (UTC) 1883:Oklahoma Christian University 1854:Beats the hell out of me. -- 1674:21:52, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 1660:20:11, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 1629:13:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 1608:12:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 1591:12:45, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 1577:05:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 1546:01:34, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 1521:01:59, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 1467:03:56, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 1455:03:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 1433:02:55, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 1403:01:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 1389:01:21, 24 November 2005 (UTC) 1348:10:39, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1339:07:34, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1322:04:07, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1297:20:47, 20 November 2005 (UTC) 1272:07:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1262:06:28, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1245:06:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1235:05:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1222:05:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1205:02:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1180:02:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1129:Japanese units of measurement 1109:04:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 1082:01:55, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 1049:01:44, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 1029:01:34, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 1004:01:18, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 983:00:53, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 951:07:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 928:06:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 865:06:19, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 846:01:08, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 793:00:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 765:01:53, 13 November 2005 (UTC) 745:18:07, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 728:00:36, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 710:04:08, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 681:16:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 657:16:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 585:03:11, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 563:16:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 499:16:07, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 440:00:40, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 427:You are flat out wrong here. 3778:04:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC) 3721:06:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC) 3694:05:39, 30 January 2006 (UTC) 3670:12:06, 28 January 2006 (UTC) 3648:13:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 3624:04:41, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 3614:04:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC) 3538:00:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC) 3506:20:50, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 3473:00:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC) 3455:06:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 3437:06:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 3372:05:38, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 3351:16:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 3339:03:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 3320:02:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 3298:16:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC) 3266:09:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC) 3255:is inherently better to the 3176:13:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 3159:05:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC) 3144:06:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC) 3120:16:25, 14 January 2006 (UTC) 3099:01:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 3066:03:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC) 3055:01:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 3021:17:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC) 3003:12:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 1898:22:25, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1859:13:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1844:13:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 1825:01:37, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1807:02:08, 3 December 2005 (UTC) 1789:08:13, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 1755:05:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 1736:04:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 1711:17:12, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 1698:02:27, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 1688:00:48, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 403:01:06, 8 November 2005 (UTC) 380:06:12, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 361:20:54, 2 November 2005 (UTC) 318:08:09, 2 November 2005 (UTC) 302:06:46, 2 November 2005 (UTC) 276:06:40, 2 November 2005 (UTC) 102:04:40, 20 October 2006 (UTC) 78:23:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC) 72:02:27, 2 November 2005 (UTC) 28: 7: 3125:Image:Mexico flag large.png 3035:15:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 2989:12:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 2967:02:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC) 2943:07:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC) 2922:02:07, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 2887:08:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 2417: 2393: 2369: 1638:List of Caucasian Americans 1360:You've got it backwards on 308:St Michael's Grammar School 96:04:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC) 66:12:49, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 10: 3810: 3794:07:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC) 3575: 3568: 3247:Why change png's to svg's? 2932:Template:Infobox Biography 2681:either by adding the line 1969:) 04:09, 14 December 2005 1927:You recently commented at 1678:It's nice to see you take 3312:User:Mistress_Selina_Kyle 3228:Further on Winter-Een-Mas 2852:Your comments are welcome 2808:Raul's common sense brick 2723:Jack Sarfatti's user page 1653:List of African Americans 1380:for the awful details. -- 1370:User:PedanticallySpeaking 260:) 06:17, 3 November 2005 84:11:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC) 60:10:48, 19 July 2005 (UTC) 3706: 3653:Johnski Arbitration Case 3587:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 3150:Image:Flag of Mexico.png 3131:Image:Flag of Mexico.svg 3040:About "Paying Attention" 2972:Talk:Dream and Ehrenfels 2136:in regards to erasing: 556:requests for arbitration 517:requests for arbitration 144:22:59, 14 September 2007 90:07:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC) 3739:Dominion of Melchizedek 2756:User:Zordrac/Poetlister 770:Request for Arbitration 222:07:02, 15 February 2022 180:09:20, 17 November 2012 162:09:50, 25 February 2009 150:23:59, 31 December 2007 120:07:20, 12 February 2007 114:23:59, 31 December 2006 54:20:23, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC) 48:12:21, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC) 3077:Aether theories =: --> 3047:Schiavelli's talk page 2830: 2620:practical difference. 2504:Weinstein did in fact: 2275:Who would you believe? 1665:Wow, thanks for being 1561: 1424:User talk:131.107.0.73 810:Category:Pseudoscience 291:to speed up voting on 192:00:25, 3 November 2016 156:21:26, 8 February 2008 108:00:20, 4 December 2006 3414:called me a "dumbass" 2892:Broadway WikiProjects 2815: 2110:International travels 1559: 1526:Arbitration re-opened 1327:Arbitration Talk Page 228:00:00, DAY MONTH YEAR 210:01:34, 16 March 2019‎ 3078:Pseudophysics =: --> 2721:Please stop editing 2622:Eugene van der Pijll 2584:Would this suit you? 2167:Rjensen had written: 1862:Comment actually by 1419:PedanticallySpeaking 1302:Arbitration accepted 1277:Arbitration accepted 1090:that would be great. 962:aka Special Olympics 806:William M. Connolley 721:Is this another one? 204:07:54, 28 June 2018‎ 174:08:13, 19 April 2010 3448:assuming good faith 3277:Since you reverted 2978:User:172.134.11.168 1560:Thanks. WikiThanks. 1417:(although at least 198:16:00, 13 June 2017 138:23:59, 30 June 2007 126:14:46, 4 April 2007 3560:and silver linings 3386:look here, please! 2831: 2334:Talk:Business Plot 2213:Talk:Business Plot 1903:Sock check request 1764:Here is the info: 1562: 1189:...is pointing at 1163:Fred Bauder thread 1143:US customary units 216:01:20, 18 May 2021 186:00:00, 6 July 2015 168:15:03, 4 July 2009 132:23:59, 31 May 2007 3644: 3601: 3600: 3478:Historical import 3157: 3142: 3091: 3089: 2779: 2696: 2688:<\/SCRIPT: --> 1999:User:StatioRadion 1971: 1957:comment added by 1877: 1841: 812:tag because it's 262: 248:comment added by 234: 233: 3801: 3767: 3687: 3642: 3580: 3573: 3555:Storm clouds ... 3551: 3546:Thanks from Lulu 3535: 3532: 3527: 3524: 3521: 3518: 3503: 3500: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3486: 3156: 3141: 3090: 3087: 3083: 2996:Muriel's Wedding 2769: 2695: 2690: 2552:single historian 2420: 2396: 2372: 2366: 2187: 2172: 2153:Samuel Dickstein 2127:Samuel Dickstein 2029: 2023: 1970: 1951: 1887:anonymous editor 1861: 1839: 1643:Please remember 1614:protected delete 1484:Arbitration for 1364:: it looks like 1227:"forgive me for" 1106: 1102: 1098: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1036:Special Olympics 1026: 1022: 1018: 1011:Special Olympics 1001: 997: 993: 980: 976: 972: 261: 242: 33: 26: 18:User talk:Calton 3809: 3808: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3742: 3735: 3728: 3712: 3701: 3685: 3677: 3655: 3632: 3607: 3602: 3597: 3548: 3533: 3530: 3525: 3522: 3519: 3516: 3501: 3498: 3493: 3490: 3487: 3484: 3480: 3465: 3361: 3308: 3275: 3249: 3230: 3192: 3183: 3169: 3127: 3106: 3088: 3085: 3074: 3042: 3028: 2974: 2952: 2929: 2894: 2876: 2854: 2836: 2810: 2788: 2759: 2719: 2705: 2703:Merry Christmas 2682: 2674: 2634: 2617: 2589:Heteropride.com 2586: 2364: 2312: 2184: 2170: 2130: 2112: 2068: 2041: 2016: 2010:I have blocked 1991: 1977: 1959:140.247.237.231 1952: 1947: 1925: 1923:Image galleries 1905: 1890: 1832: 1814: 1796: 1762: 1743: 1725: 1641: 1584: 1579: 1553: 1528: 1489: 1357: 1329: 1304: 1279: 1212: 1187: 1165: 1134: 964: 785: 772: 754: 735: 717: 414:...his initial 410: 387: 385:Xbox 360 Lounge 368: 356:. Many thanks, 325: 311: 285: 268: 243: 239: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3807: 3797: 3796: 3782: 3734: 3729: 3727: 3724: 3700: 3697: 3676: 3673: 3654: 3651: 3631: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3606: 3605:My good friend 3603: 3599: 3598: 3583: 3581: 3574: 3566: 3565: 3562: 3557: 3549: 3547: 3544: 3543: 3542: 3541: 3540: 3479: 3476: 3464: 3461: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3440: 3439: 3425: 3424: 3418: 3417: 3405: 3404: 3398: 3397: 3381: 3380: 3360: 3357: 3356: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3327: 3326: 3307: 3301: 3274: 3269: 3248: 3245: 3243:on wikipedia. 3229: 3226: 3191: 3190:Winter-een-mas 3188: 3182: 3181:Winter-Een-Mas 3179: 3168: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3126: 3123: 3110:User:Theodore7 3105: 3102: 3095:Be eudaimonic! 3084: 3073: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3041: 3038: 3027: 3024: 3006: 3005: 2973: 2970: 2951: 2949:Winter-een-mas 2946: 2928: 2925: 2893: 2890: 2875: 2872: 2853: 2850: 2835: 2832: 2809: 2806: 2787: 2784: 2758: 2753: 2742:TenOfAllTrades 2718: 2715: 2704: 2701: 2673: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2633: 2628: 2616: 2611: 2585: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555:up your claim. 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2520: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2373: 2367: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2350: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2311: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2237: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2182: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2168: 2129: 2123: 2111: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2067: 2064: 2040: 2037: 2012:User:Ruy Lopez 1990: 1987: 1976: 1973: 1946: 1943: 1924: 1921: 1904: 1901: 1889: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1852: 1831: 1828: 1813: 1810: 1795: 1792: 1761: 1758: 1742: 1739: 1724: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1704:List of Humans 1640: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1583: 1580: 1568: 1554: 1552: 1551:Halibutt's RfA 1549: 1527: 1524: 1506: 1488: 1482: 1480: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1356: 1351: 1328: 1325: 1303: 1300: 1278: 1275: 1211: 1208: 1186: 1183: 1171:regarding the 1167:The thread on 1164: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1139:Imperial units 1133: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1067: 1014: 989: 967: 963: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 939: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 930: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 868: 867: 855: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 803: 784: 781: 771: 768: 753: 748: 734: 731: 716: 713: 690: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 594: 592: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 460: 452: 451: 450: 449: 443: 442: 412:Calton wrote; 409: 406: 386: 383: 367: 364: 350: 349: 324: 321: 310: 305: 284: 279: 267: 264: 238: 235: 232: 231: 230: 229: 223: 217: 211: 205: 199: 193: 187: 181: 175: 169: 163: 157: 151: 145: 139: 133: 127: 121: 115: 109: 103: 97: 91: 85: 79: 73: 67: 61: 55: 49: 40: 39: 38: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3806: 3795: 3792: 3789: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3780: 3779: 3776: 3774: 3769: 3765: 3761: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3740: 3733: 3723: 3722: 3719: 3717: 3710: 3705: 3696: 3695: 3692: 3690: 3688: 3682: 3672: 3671: 3668: 3664: 3659: 3650: 3649: 3646: 3638: 3625: 3622: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3612: 3595: 3592: 3588: 3582: 3579: 3572: 3567: 3563: 3561: 3558: 3556: 3553: 3552: 3539: 3536: 3528: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3504: 3496: 3475: 3474: 3471: 3456: 3453: 3449: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3441: 3438: 3435: 3432:. Salve! -- 3431: 3427: 3426: 3423: 3420: 3419: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3406: 3403: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3382: 3379: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3370: 3366: 3352: 3349: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3337: 3333: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3318: 3313: 3305: 3300: 3299: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3273: 3268: 3267: 3264: 3258: 3254: 3244: 3240: 3238: 3233: 3225: 3221: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3204: 3198: 3195: 3187: 3178: 3177: 3174: 3160: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3140: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3132: 3122: 3121: 3118: 3114: 3111: 3101: 3100: 3096: 3092: 3086:vécu heureuse 3072:pseudoscience 3067: 3064: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3053: 3048: 3037: 3036: 3033: 3023: 3022: 3019: 3015: 3014:the talk page 3011: 3004: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2969: 2968: 2965: 2960: 2956: 2950: 2945: 2944: 2941: 2938:. Thank you. 2937: 2933: 2924: 2923: 2920: 2917: 2913: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2902: 2899: 2889: 2888: 2885: 2881: 2880:Star-Bulletin 2871: 2870: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2849: 2848: 2845: 2841: 2840:his talk page 2829: 2826: 2822: 2820: 2818: 2814: 2805: 2804: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2783: 2782: 2778: 2775: 2772: 2768: 2765: 2757: 2752: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2734: 2731: 2730:Jack Sarfatti 2726: 2724: 2714: 2713: 2710: 2700: 2699: 2694: 2686: 2679: 2672:Godmode light 2667: 2664: 2660: 2655: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2644: 2640: 2632: 2627: 2626: 2623: 2615: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2602: 2597: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2575: 2572: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2450: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2368: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2335: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2303: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2264: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2242: 2238: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2221: 2216: 2214: 2210: 2205: 2202: 2200: 2196: 2183: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2169: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2160: 2156: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2145: 2143: 2137: 2135: 2134:Business Plot 2128: 2122: 2121: 2118: 2105: 2102: 2101:SarekOfVulcan 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2091:SarekOfVulcan 2087: 2086: 2083: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2063: 2062: 2059: 2054: 2052: 2047: 2045: 2036: 2035: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2022: 2021: 2013: 2008: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1989:Stari0 Radi0n 1986: 1985: 1982: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1945:Nick Rose Day 1942: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1900: 1899: 1896: 1888: 1884: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1865: 1860: 1857: 1853: 1851: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1842: 1837: 1827: 1826: 1823: 1817: 1809: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1791: 1790: 1787: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1757: 1756: 1753: 1748: 1738: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1712: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1696: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1686: 1681: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1672: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1639: 1630: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1589: 1578: 1575: 1572: 1566: 1558: 1548: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1523: 1522: 1519: 1514: 1513: 1510: 1504: 1503: 1500: 1496: 1494: 1487: 1481: 1468: 1465: 1463: 1462:Bookandcoffee 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1439: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1428:Bookandcoffee 1425: 1420: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1398:Bookandcoffee 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1355: 1350: 1349: 1346: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1334: 1324: 1323: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1299: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1274: 1273: 1270: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1247: 1246: 1243: 1237: 1236: 1233: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1216: 1207: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1157: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1131: 1130: 1125: 1124:English units 1110: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1012: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1002: 998: 994: 987: 986: 985: 984: 981: 977: 973: 961: 952: 949: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 929: 926: 922: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 898: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 866: 863: 858: 857: 856: 847: 844: 840: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 823: 822:Theresa knott 819: 815: 814:pseudoscience 811: 807: 804: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 791: 780: 779: 776: 767: 766: 763: 759: 752: 747: 746: 743: 739: 730: 729: 726: 722: 712: 711: 708: 703: 702: 698: 694: 682: 679: 675: 674: 672: 671: 670: 669: 658: 655: 650: 646: 645:out-of-policy 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 604: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 586: 583: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 564: 561: 557: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 539: 534: 531: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 518: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 500: 497: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 478: 474: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 466: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 447: 446: 445: 444: 441: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 423: 420: 419: 415: 405: 404: 401: 398: 395: 392: 382: 381: 378: 373: 372:Jack Sarfatti 363: 362: 359: 355: 347: 343: 338: 334: 333: 332: 330: 320: 319: 316: 309: 304: 303: 300: 298: 294: 290: 287:I have built 283: 278: 277: 274: 263: 259: 255: 251: 250:64.168.244.22 247: 227: 224: 221: 218: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 179: 176: 173: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 128: 125: 122: 119: 116: 113: 110: 107: 104: 101: 98: 95: 92: 89: 86: 83: 80: 77: 74: 71: 68: 65: 62: 59: 56: 53: 50: 47: 44: 43: 42: 41: 37: 32: 27: 19: 3781: 3773:Ryan Delaney 3770: 3736: 3713: 3708: 3702: 3678: 3660: 3656: 3633: 3608: 3559: 3554: 3481: 3466: 3430:on that page 3421: 3401: 3388:), and that 3377: 3364: 3362: 3328: 3309: 3276: 3250: 3241: 3234: 3231: 3222: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3207: 3199: 3196: 3193: 3184: 3170: 3128: 3107: 3075: 3043: 3029: 3007: 2975: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2930: 2914: 2911: 2907: 2895: 2879: 2877: 2855: 2837: 2789: 2760: 2737: 2735: 2727: 2720: 2706: 2675: 2653: 2638: 2635: 2618: 2607: 2598: 2587: 2551: 2262: 2240: 2226: 2217: 2206: 2203: 2192: 2181:I responded: 2157: 2147: 2139: 2138: 2131: 2113: 2088: 2079: 2069: 2055: 2048: 2042: 2019: 2017: 2009: 1992: 1978: 1948: 1926: 1910:Kelly Martin 1906: 1891: 1870: 1864:84.69.21.169 1849: 1833: 1818: 1815: 1797: 1783: 1778: 1763: 1744: 1733:Natalinasmpf 1728: 1726: 1642: 1585: 1529: 1515: 1505: 1497: 1490: 1479: 1443: 1441: 1437: 1407: 1373: 1366:131.107.0.73 1359: 1358: 1342: 1330: 1305: 1280: 1265: 1254: 1250: 1248: 1238: 1226: 1225: 1214: 1213: 1188: 1166: 1135: 1127: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1033: 965: 938: 896: 854: 786: 783:Aetherometry 773: 755: 736: 718: 704: 689: 644: 602: 593: 536: 532: 476: 472: 421: 418:from scratch 417: 416: 413: 411: 388: 369: 351: 326: 312: 286: 269: 240: 75: 3726:RFAR closed 3709:&nbs... 2916:Clarkefreak 2792:WP:Civility 2777:Eventualist 2774:Darwikinian 2771:Wishy Washy 2678:Sam Hocevar 2319:Mr. Calton, 1953:—Preceding 1830:Matthew 7:3 1794:AfD comment 1760:Arbitration 1708:Gateman1997 1695:Gateman1997 1685:Gateman1997 1671:Gateman1997 1657:Gateman1997 1543:Fred Bauder 1319:Fred Bauder 1294:Fred Bauder 1210:short words 1195:User:Calton 1185:Your sig... 244:—Preceding 237:So fuck off 3791:Pegasusbot 3760:block user 3756:page moves 3716:SlimVirgin 3675:DC streets 3359:Witchcraft 3257:PNG format 3253:SVG format 3217:holiday. 2982:Talk:Dream 2860:. Thanks! 2834:Schiavelli 2762:bad idea. 2365:Straw Man: 2236:Mr Calton, 2099:Thanks! -- 2066:Censorship 1895:Danlovejoy 1612:We need a 1565:RfA voting 1251:uninvolved 1034:...use of 808:added the 802:Quoting -- 643:As far as 580:article.-- 358:SlimVirgin 282:afd helper 3764:block log 3686:brenneman 3637:Hipocrite 3621:Everyking 3611:Everyking 3452:SwissCelt 3434:SwissCelt 3369:SwissCelt 3104:Theodore7 2862:Carbonite 2709:Guettarda 2663:maclean25 2643:maclean25 2310:straw man 2117:GTBacchus 1836:Sjakkalle 1812:Last Call 1804:Creidieki 1626:Viriditas 1622:Exicornts 1616:for both 1605:Viriditas 1601:Exicornts 1588:Viriditas 1396:Cheers.-- 1378:this link 1269:FuelWagon 1259:FuelWagon 1232:FuelWagon 1219:FuelWagon 1177:FuelWagon 1097:brenneman 1070:brenneman 1017:brenneman 992:brenneman 971:brenneman 966:Carlton, 738:Duck test 429:This diff 337:terrorism 226:Archive31 220:Archive30 214:Archive29 208:Archive28 202:Archive27 196:Archive26 190:Archive25 184:Archive24 178:Archive23 172:Archive22 166:Archive21 160:Archive20 154:Archive19 148:Archive18 142:Archive17 136:Archive16 130:Archive15 124:Archive14 118:Archive13 112:Archive12 106:Archive11 100:Archive10 94:Archive09 88:Archive08 82:Archive07 76:Archive06 70:Archive05 64:Archive04 58:Archive03 52:Archive02 46:Archive01 3752:contribs 3667:Davidpdx 3630:Everking 3470:JackofOz 3063:JackofOz 3052:JackofOz 3018:Mgreenbe 3000:Mgreenbe 2986:Mgreenbe 2964:TexasDex 2940:DreamGuy 2844:JackofOz 2601:Chooserr 2592:Chooserr 2371:welfare. 2243:believe? 2082:Chooserr 2073:Chooserr 2058:Davidpdx 1967:contribs 1955:unsigned 1937:Dsmdgold 1874:contribs 1856:CatWoman 1840:(Check!) 1822:Davidpdx 1786:Davidpdx 1680:WP:CIVIL 1667:WP:CIVIL 1649:WP:POINT 1645:WP:FAITH 1618:Exicornt 1582:Exicornt 1509:User:TDC 1493:User:TDC 1486:User:TDC 1345:Davidpdx 1336:Davidpdx 1255:involved 1149:16Nov05 946:elegant. 877:Quoting: 778:Davidpdx 762:R. fiend 535:a priori 297:jnothman 289:a script 258:contribs 246:unsigned 36:Archives 3744:Johnski 3463:Comment 3348:Terryeo 3317:Terryeo 3306:(again) 3304:WP:CITE 3295:Terryeo 3291:WP:CITE 3287:WP:CITE 3283:WP:CITE 3272:WP:CITE 3173:Kafziel 3032:Wnissen 2825:Raul654 2796:WP:DICK 2764:Zordrac 2020:ÉIREANN 2003:BadSeed 1752:YHoshua 1415:July 20 1362:July 20 1354:July 20 1199:Cryptic 1158:17Nov05 1132:article 391:anetode 323:Zephram 266:Whoops! 3410:WP:AGF 3332:Calton 3237:Calton 3203:Calton 3117:R.Koot 2884:KeithH 2800:Tznkai 2786:RE: AN 2767:(talk) 2693:Splash 2687:": --> 2491:rules. 2201:page. 1995:WP:VIP 1571:Halibu 1448:Calton 1382:Calton 1202:(talk) 1193:, not 1191:Calton 1059:others 1042:Calton 921:Calton 839:Calton 699:, and 695:: and 377:Apyule 315:Harro5 3699:Image 3263:Gabbe 3167:Quote 3082:Elle 3026:Stubs 3010:Dream 2571:Travb 2299:Travb 2220:Travb 1729:worse 1683:fair. 1518:Travb 1332:here: 1093:that. 818:Salsb 707:Travb 649:WP:CP 538:See?" 16:< 3748:talk 3683:. - 3643:Talk 3336:Talk 3154:Zach 3139:Zach 3113:here 2866:Talk 2858:here 2794:and 2746:talk 2654:this 2227:Re: 2142:NKVD 2125:Re: 2018:Fear 1981:Naif 1963:talk 1914:talk 1885:and 1868:talk 1624:. -- 1620:and 1452:Talk 1386:Talk 1242:Wyss 1156:Jimp 1147:Jimp 1141:and 1055:I've 1046:Talk 948:Pgio 925:Talk 862:Pgio 843:Talk 790:Pgio 701:here 697:here 693:here 344:and 293:AFDs 273:Alai 254:talk 3526:493 3494:493 2980:on 2689:'); 2263:why 2241:you 2046:. 1933:AfD 1776:. 1741:Cfd 1145:. 1126:in 788:it? 742:Duk 725:Duk 678:Duk 654:Duk 582:Duk 560:Duk 496:Duk 437:Duk 3762:• 3758:• 3754:• 3750:• 3639:- 3534:lk 3531:Ta 3523:ns 3520:yo 3517:Dl 3502:lk 3499:Ta 3491:ns 3488:yo 3485:Dl 3334:| 3239:" 3205:" 3097:) 2864:| 2798:-- 2748:) 2738:is 2215:) 2161:: 2053:. 1965:• 1916:) 1750:-- 1574:tt 1541:. 1511:. 1495:. 1450:| 1384:| 1374:29 1317:. 1292:. 1044:| 923:| 919:-- 841:| 816:. 740:-- 723:-- 494:-- 348:." 256:• 3766:) 3746:( 3645:» 3641:« 3596:) 3594:@ 3591:t 3589:( 3201:- 3093:( 2919:∞ 2744:( 2639:s 2030:\ 1961:( 1912:( 1876:) 1871:· 1866:( 1655:. 400:³ 397:² 394:¹ 252:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index