User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive10

472:

false, not relevant, certainly not verifiable, highly POV, and technically incorrect. If you choose to favor them simply because they will kiss your ass, whereas I will will not, then so be it. This is partly an experiment to see how Knowledge works, and whether the administrators respond to the value of the actual content, or to the social ass-kissing aspects of the various editors. For example, you appear ready to crunch down on perceived 3 rv's per day, claiming that I haven't explained myself (after about 1000 pages of Discussion!)and yet you totally ignore the gross violation of the Wiki policies against self-promotion and posting unverifiable "original research". And you don't bat an eye when the three crackpots expunge all the actual scientific content, like Steve Carlip's discussion, who is a distinguished and recognized expert, and replace it with Tom "faces on Mars" van Flandern.

2029:"128"/Zvonimir: Only other edit (apparently helpful) was back in February, for "List of schools in Colombia." If it's a dynamic IP that gets reassigned from session to session, that could explain the unrelatedness of the edits and why we haven't seen more from this IP. (Or maybe Bradford's now teaching in Colombia?) But what ordinary user (especially if he really is Russian), as their only edit of a session, would go to an AfD (which I believe had already fallen off the "front page"), to comment on how "obscure and unimportant" the person was? 71:

users put it on here...Have you ever clicked on the "random article" button? If you do, you will probably see that every article that pops up is totally bullshit and has no real meaning to it. Half of them are talking about the Turkistpinkintstan traid routs of 613 B.C., but then i put up one article about an up and coming band, which is actually contributing to society, and you just delete it??? Maybe if you had a soul, you could put the page back up, I'm sure you can do that can't you?

1480:

through it and you'll see, "saw Scientology for what it truly was" etc. I'm not a Scientologist but my friend is (who is such a sweet person) and it's just such a sneaky rude thing to put onto an encyclopedia page, talking as if their opinion of the church is fact (when it really is the complete opposite, but anyway). So I edited the parts out that were passive aggressive but someone kept putting it back, and I dont know why. Anyway, that's my issue. thanks for listening!!

2023:

times. His first vote was actually two edits. His second edit starts on the next line, with the words "vote to delete," and reiterates points already made in the first edit. It only looks like one vote because there is only one return, not two. It could be he thought of an extension for his first comment, but it could be a botched attempt to look like two people were voting, the first unsigned, the second a signed user. Later, he leaves a third delete remark, unsigned.

923: 900: 1486:" trying to get the people in the town to understand that Scientologists were not as bad as they thought, which she strongly believed at the time, and still does, for the most part. Even today she reminds people the average Scientologist is basically good, with the executives doing the harmful things. " 2084:

04:43: when I try to post my reply to Jonswift, I find "24" has edited the page and also changed my remarks. By editing from her first post, I undo her changes (but forgot Jonswift's). I use {unsigned} to identify Jonswift's comment, tell him he shouldn't edit other users' comments, and note that I'd

257:

log. Yes I make mistakes but very few. If I was making more errors then I would stop. For some reason, yesterday was poor with three or four articles deleted in error. I don't really count the Everton players as they are all up at AfD now. Some do get deleted as empty and are then recreated with info

1470:

I resent your comment. The skyline page is messy and not at all concise. I believe that I was making an improvement. Someone has made a gratuitously long list, probably to 'advertise' their city. Whether or not it was you is irrelevant, but I have a hunch it might have been. I would thank you not to

1257:

Per my comments in the new discussion on Haris Cizmic, et. al., I withdrew my nominations on my own. 'So an actual discussion can take place' implies that my withdrawing the nominations were not entirely valid. I assure you that they were. If this is merely re-opening the old AfDs, I hereby withdraw

471:

A very full explanation of why the Lesage article should be reverted has been given in the Discussion page for that article. All of my edits are factual, pertinent, verifiable, NPOV, and correct. In contrast, much of the material inserted by the well-known physics crackpots Minkst, Stowe, Schafer is

430:

Thanks again, this time for blocking "Fixwiki". I have my doubts that it will work, but hopefully his being disciplined will make him more cooperative. In any case, he needed this. BTW - That anon who reverted that article the day before yesterday very much was Fixwiki, who must have forgotten to

70:

If its too vulgar, just edit it a little bit, don't trash the whole article...and also, did you delete the "banner of belligerence" page for any reason? You didn't really offer any warning to change some of the content, you just kinda destroyed it. Half the stuff on this website gets on here because

1984:

article up for AfD, but I'm concerned that there may be some funky things going on with the discussion and the related articles. I think there may even be a possibility that Bradford himself is sockpuppeting the discussion in order to get the article deleted. Part of the Bradford controversy, which

1509:

hi,in response to that person i've never talked about it on talk because i dont know how to, i just found your username and was able to post something. this website is new to me. so i need to cite a source for her being a prostitute but all the other stuff doesnt need a source? i read in on a bunch

1069:

has repeatedly removed the tags after the fact, even after I posted on the article's talk page that such an act was bad form. His only edits were to the Chromavision page, and he has not participated in the discussion to defend his work. Can someone please get his attention so the process can go on

917:

hello, CambridgeBay. I have some questions about External Links. Frequently, I saw that some editor put the website adress on article that belongs to article. I mean they usually get warning on External Links, but some of them didn't get warning on Commercial Link. So, Could you explain to me which

801:

here. I think it was rude to accuse him of "disruption" and warn him with blocking, while deleting almost everything he produced. This was a very new user, presumably unfamiliar with Knowledge policies and guidelines, who hadn't even had a {{welcome}} posted on his talkpage. I think you should have

284:

underway. The article you deleted was part of that project, as it was a song which was intended to be performed at the Contest and which was ultimately not performed. I'll admit that I should have categorised it as a stub, since I was planning on returning to it later (after I've hunted out my copy

198:

if you want the desired outcome round here :) Anyway, CambridgeBayWeather: I just popped by to say I've restored the deleted edits. I see you edited the recreated article and didn't delete is this time so I assume you won't mind. I've had many dealings with Mal and I don't believe for one moment he

2352:

I was already a contributor on French & Spanish Knowledge, not from a long time - but the en.wikipedia is far most complete and I can't resist to edit here too. Indeed I'am actually essentially a careful reader and most of my contributions was to correct typing error or very little mistake on

1780:

Dude, I am in no way mad at you for deleting my article, it was called "Chris Palmieri" which is my name, and everything on there is true. It was just an expiriment to see how long it would last on here, not too long I see...well, so yeah, just letting you know that you were the one who ended this

996:

I don't get it - yes I'm new to Knowledge. I thought the purpose of this site was to share information. Does it matter if a picture of a Blanket Flower I contribute comes from my garden, my neighbors yard, or the state botanical society? It is a picture of a Blanket Flower - something Knowledge

877:

which was made in good faith. The IP (150.101.102.188) had removed a fair use image from the page, a perfectly valid reason for removal, since free images are available. Please do not use admin privileges to rollback a non-vandal edit, and verify the edit as far as possible. This is the third time

815:

It's always useful to get academics into editing and creating Knowledge articles in their specialty, so I hate to see them "bitten". Most people with other outlets for publishing are not likely to stick around if they feel unwelcome. On the other hand, it is difficult to know who would have stayed

233:

CambridgeBayWeather, I would *kindly* and hopefully *gently* advise you to look a bit harder at articles you're deleting. I have noticed in your talk page history here, that you have had similar reaction to mine.. and worse. A quick Google might help out. Don't get me wrong - I appreciate the time

2294:

You have an entry on yourself! I was creating one for a friend and his business. I forwarded him an article from the Onion today that I thought was funny about Knowledge and he didn't get it. So, I figured before I put a real entry in here, I would reference some of the jokes in the article so

2022:

Jonswift: claims to be new, but goes straight to an AfD. After I mention that I'd checked his contribs and noticed that his first and only edits were on this AfD, he joins a few other AfDs in the next half-hour, then disappears. Also, may have been trying to get away with voting two or even three

2032:

Massmato: the subtlest sockpuppet, if it is one. A new account, but clearly not a new user. Doing mostly AfDs (including relatively old, not just recent ones), of which Bradford is only one, but has also tagged a couple of articles for {afd}. Shows clear knowledge of Wiki lingo and policy. It's

1479:

Hey there, you said I could talk to you about something if I needed so here I am I have a big problem with the page on Tory Christman. The page was written by her, or someone close to her, and it has a lot of underhanded swipes at Scientology. The way they've worded a lot of the things, go read

199:

would create a hoax article so, assuming good fait,h I've restored it. If you have any disagreement please drop me a line on my talk page or nominate it for AFD. It's certainly not patent nonsense (gobbledegook) so wasn't a valid deletion anyway. (no reply needed unless you disagree. Cheers.) --

1242:

It looks like the pages are being punished for the sockpuppetry. As the one who nominated two of the pages for deletion, I withdrew them on the merits of the pages and the subjects, and even made a note that the sockpuppets did not make a difference in my decision to withdraw the nomination.

1667:

comes in the middle of a long edit war between a named user - who is just returning from a week long ban - and an anon user, who has been accused - by the named user - of being a sockpuppet. Your revert may have a destabilising effect. Please do be a little more careful in future. Thanks!

966:

thanks for your help. I originally came on here with big plans to re-write half of wikipedia and make it dissertation quality, but I realized the best way I can help is to watch for vandalism and try and correct it. Certain pages seem to be magnets for that sort of thing. Cheers

104:

The delete prod for nonnotability you placed on this article was removed, despite the fact that there has still been no effort made to prove that this band is of any importance whatsoever. I have replaced the prod, but I am wondering if it is not time for an AfD. Your thoughts?

229:

I re-created the page last night before I went to sleep, because I felt that, in the end, there would be no objections. The article is still very short of course, but I feel sure others will add to it once they become aware of its existence. I may well add to it later on myself.

158:

I have added identical shorts to the discussion pages of all articles. Also I have since added football stub templates as these need to be added to when the 2006/07 season starts or if any developments occur in pre-season. This being the case I think they are viable articles.

54:

Hi, I noticed that you deleted the page with a note saying copyright violation. How did you determine that it was a copyright violation? I had noted and attempted to fix some problems with the page (primarily the page name) but didn't suspect a copyright violation. Thanks

1985:

has been removed from the current article, is that he was accused of sockpuppeting on the college's student blog. I've been practicing AGF on the AfD and responding as if these are real individuals, but these are the accounts and IPs in the AfD that I am suspicious of:

2121:

March 6: in a likely unconnected edit, IP 141.217.85.67 changed the article from saying that Bradford was one of "fewer than fifteen" tenure-track Amerind faculty members to "fifty." This was probably vandalism, but that figure has stayed in the article. Checking

221:

I was being civil, although I admit to having been annoyed of course - I had only just created the article, then it was immediately nominated for speedy. I was adjusting other articles to point specifically to the newly created article, then it disappeared on me!

1510:

of websites but it isnt a big deal whether or not it goes up. i removed the text because it wasnt approrpriate for an encyclodpedia page and that picture of gerry armstrong i didnt mean to say it was mine i just thought becaue i found it. i take that back.

783:), whom you have warned with blocking for a previous copyvio. Erwin Schwab appears to be an astronomer and discoverer or co-discoverer of a number of asteroids, and it is quite possible that he was in fact the original author of the article you deleted. 2073:

03:19: Jonswift, who had already posted a delete vote, makes an unsigned comment again calling for delete, but also changes a reference in MY comment to "left-leaning blogs" to read "far left-leaning"; I prepare a note telling him not to edit others'

583:

When tagging orphaned fair use images, could you please use {{subst:orfud}} instead of {{or-cr}}? The reason is the former will sort them into categories by date and the latter does not, dumping it instead into a large bucket of orphaned images (see

2026:"24"/Barbara: All edits are on AfD or its article, until after I mention that I'd checked Jonswift's contribs, after which she visits a couple of other AfDs and vanishes (also, another "24" IP edited the article and a related article on April 16) 1845:

The SkyFX article you keep deleting on me is not spam its an article just like the ones describing Direcway and others. If you think I didn't add enough about it then feel free to add more but I'd appreciate it if you stopped deleting it.

2077:

04:27: "24," who calls herself Barbara, makes a post claiming to know him and to vouch for his military service and integrity; the story she tells of a cabal to ruin Bradford would actually make this incident more notable than the media

1227:

As my comment on the AfD page (and as the guy who started the whole mess in the first place) says, I think the pages shouldn't be sanctioned after the effort was made to fix them. If some editors need sanctioned, go after them instead.

2033:

possible that now that the puppeteer realizes that someone is watching and checking on him, he is trying to hide his singular concern in a flurry of edits. But he could be someone just piling on to an apparently overwhelming bandwagon.

2047:

Here's the background. Researching this case on Google, I found that what finally forced him to resign was evidence that his claim to be a Silver Star-decorated Green Beret turned out to be a peaceful stint in the Army

2438:

Re: unblocking him - I can see an argument for unblocking him and mentoring his every move, rather than having him work out that sockpuppetry is fun and everyone having to start this nonsense again… Nah - maybe not!

1111:

dude your just an asshole... i was fixing shit on the Delta chi page that my buddy changed cuz he is a dick... so A) don't worry about it and B) your a bitch and stop wasting your time on this stupid web site!!!

1807:

Thanks for the extra cat - the art needs a cleanup - although I agree with the sentiment of the last para its rather POV. Also I was there the week it was closed - will try uploading some piccies sometime too!

816:

and who would not, and one probably needs a thick skin to stay here anyway. But to try to remedy the situation: what about deleting the current version of his talkpage and sticking a welcome note there instead?

225:

Steve, its not like I haven't been an administrator of websites before myself dude. I ran one of the most popular eBBSes on the internet back in the early 1990s, when the internet was still basically text-only!

2249:

Apologies if infest any of your watched arts with dumb questions, have just come across stuff to do with hydro things in tassie not linked, so I ask dumb questions! Thanks for not being hassled about that :)

1088:

as an AfD without doing the proper legwork. I have commented to such in the AfD section, and have apologized to the author. What else needs to be done to close out the discussion and forget the whole thing?

936:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding

2113:

My original intent was to give you time to investigate these charges yourself, before putting up an {afdanons} sign. However, I'm not sure you're still up, so I may end up putting it up before I turn in.

2235:. The google cache of the page seems to include a list of 5 albums releases and links to third-party coverage, I struggle to understand how this comes anywhere near to being a speedy deletion candidate. 1210:. I'd like you to consider putting the article through a second AfD, given the massive bad-faith sockpuppet campaign waged by the author (yes, those are his sockpuppets bulking up the article). Cheers, 184:

consider to be "nonsense". I happen to come from Northern Ireland, and I do know for a fact that the dish Champ does indeed exist. I'm asking you to undelete the article ASAP, thank you very much. --

2254:

07:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC) That was the most obvious one - I just thought I'd warn you if you found things from me in cat listings or other places, at least you have been warned! :) best wishes

2103:

20:44: express my frustration that recent voters are ignoring the evidence I turned up, post more evidence (even though I suspected the reason for their behavior was that many were sockpuppets)

1501:

who finds it funny to create nonsensical articles and edit other people's so they appear stupid. This is just a quick thanks for reverting my user page, as I cannot stand this childish moron.

536:

this rapper is going to be a big name and making big noise. I am writing on him right now for TOOHOTMAGAZINE.COM and TOOHOTRADIO.COM his videos are in heavy rotation in the UK and should stay

42:

oh crap i did a mistake, i wanted everything to be centered because looks a little more organize, and i made a mistake of deleating the coordinates and the actual airport stats, my bad.

988: 802:

helped him by explaining the problem. It is highly unlikely that he would not have had or easily could have received the permission of his own observatory to post these texts here.

752:

Apologies if I've broken any rules, however the article itself contained no profanity, abuse, threats or offensive context, so I'd appreciate if this could be reviewed/reinstated.

718:. A block against him would be nice, but whether or not you do that some advice on how to proceed against him would be appreciated. Let me put it this way: Is it time to do an 2137:

article. The IP made three edits to that article, removing references to faking his military record and using assumed names on the blog from the account of her conflict with him(

1653: 2117:

I also mentioned that the AfD's article had been edited and counter-edited. I actually found that the problem editors weren't just the pro-Bradford ones. Here is the timeline:

1007: 749:

However, is it possible to reinstate the article for a short period of time ? as a few of the people I'd like to see it are in different timezones and were unable to view it.

152:

hello thankyou first for stopping a user speedy deleting for no reason. You have instead put delete discussion templates on the following articles (much more civil approach).

1977: 2081:

04:36: "24" edits my remarks, and has me saying that this was not notable enough, when I'd said I wasn't sure if it was notable enough, and bolds Jonswift's second delete

1337:. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. -- 1416:

apparently. I wanted to perma block this account but I guess It'd look a little vindictive to an outsider (rogue admin indef blocking account based on first edit). --

351: 2053:

Since this wasn't in the article, I looked through its history. I found that this information had been in the original version, only to be deleted a number of times.

2320:

I am now working on a few geographic articles on Canada, mostly trying to document populations and land areas. You'll probably see me hitting British Columbia next.

1836: 1412:

Yes I do, he is a "friend", an IP I've blocked a few times who has started some sort of vendetta. In my history all you see is him, he also created another account

1192:

I'm sorry I didn't tell you. Yes I sometimes edit while logged out. Thanks for the concern though. It should only take 2 or 3 seconds to get the tags back on. THX!

787:(named after his parents) may OTOH possiby be seen as vanity, but we do have articles on thousands of other asteroids and it should at least not be speedy deleted. 265: 215: 1217: 1566: 1182: 2358: 1384: 311: 258:

and thoses I don't re-delete. What of course doesn't show up so easily are the speedy tags I remove. Anyway, I didn't/don't take offence at anything you said.

88: 2215: 1066: 617: 613: 543: 1174:

I'm unclear on the etiquette here. If I withdraw my nomination, is it ok to remove the tag from the page I nominated? I've withdrawn the nomination for the

570: 2449: 1832: 1403: 1346: 1195: 688: 609: 362:

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. The first one is indefinately blocked and since the others haven't vandalised recently I'll leave them alone. --

1692: 1533: 1032: 505:

I am looking for people to help me create a wikiproject on hard rock. Are you interested, or do you know anyone who could join the project and help me. (

458: 439: 421: 407: 203: 2268:

Hey. :) Just stopped by to thank you for dealing with the puerile vandalism on my talk and user pages. (Thanks) And I saw your photo. How cute were

1413: 770: 759: 634: 2179:

July 19: as described on AfD, IP 130.94.134.250 deletes the para again, then posts the attack/nn speedy. After you take that down, he posts the PROD.

1207: 1169: 837: 820: 806: 84: 2336: 1273: 299: 155:

Kieran Agard Alan Kearney Steven Morrison Shaun Densmore John Irving (footballer) Matthew Elder Mathew Holt Michael Jensen (footballer) Cory Sinott

2333: 1769: 1744: 1004: 723: 451: 432: 414: 400: 2289: 2276: 2367: 1455: 1429: 730: 2145: 1759: 1522: 1203: 1175: 1062: 652: 560: 485: 509: 2255: 2251: 2205: 2057: 1809: 968: 168: 864: 2361: 1840: 1196: 1074: 1051: 1021: 59: 1536: 1262: 289: 109: 1557: 1093: 333: 2381:

Repeated "hilarious" vandalism, together with uploading "sidesplitting" images such as "Tony Blair with a moustache and beard drawn on"

1375: 1232: 1017:

Thanks for the positive feedback. I'll be adding to it as I go along. When I get my act together and do a bio, I'll send you a note. --

382: 1546: 956: 2432: 2417: 1324: 791: 1966: 1106: 602: 245: 188: 142: 140: 2310: 1442:

Thank you kindly. :) His other vandalism accounts have often done more than one edit, so the block was preventative too. Cheers --

1150: 1085: 526: 2306:

Most probably right about the surface, when I've seen the airstrip the runway was covered in snow, so I haven't actually seen it.

1939: 1247: 907: 1935:. Thanks! I checked into it, and found thta matters were worse, so the reversion had to go longer back in time. Hope you agree.-- 1880: 1812: 1672: 1471:

threaten me with expulsion from Knowledge and refer to what I was doing as vandalism. Ben Barone (Talk) 20:25, 8 July 2006 (EST)

1362: 1115: 648: 539: 481: 377: 80: 1920: 1552: 2239: 2195: 2166: 2152: 1583: 1164: 2315: 2258: 1489:

this in an encyclopeda to say who a person is? she's using this to spread her personal opinions disguised as something else.

396: 971: 889: 138: 2180: 2130: 1999: 1994: 1797: 1704: 1663:

I do understand that you are trying to revert vandals or suspected sockpuppets, but please note that your recent revert to

1290: 551: 2156: 2123: 1750: 531: 450:

One more thing - If "Fixwiki" does complain on about you, please let me know. I will be happy to back you up on this. --

746:

I appreciate this artice has absolutely no use to anyone except a small group of my friends, and accept it's deletion.

667: 2129:

April 16: a series of four edits from IP 24.208.219.233 deleted various passages unfavorable to Bradford (). Checking

860:

I made a redirect page for the WVU Field House, but the page reads Wvu field house. Is there a way to correct this? --

2263: 2049: 852:

Thanks for the heads up! I was just getting around to creating a page for Stansbury Hall when I got your message. :)

780: 241:

Anyway, out of conflicts sometimes arise friendships - that's how I got to know Steve! Good luck and all the best. --

2133:

shows that the only edits from that IP came during an eight-minute period on April 16, and the other target was the

1330: 1874: 684: 680: 585: 500: 388: 92: 1856: 2056:

But it was what happened when I posted my findings to AfD that really aroused my suspicions. You can look at the

699: 343: 325: 285:

of the song to provide more useful information on it), but simply deleting it seems a trifle heavy-handed to me.

878:

the user has been reverted (2nd by an admin) and it doesn't reflect too well on the 'pedia. Thanks and regards,

2138: 2004: 1989: 1513: 1012: 387:

Sorry to bug you with this, but I have a 3RR situation on my hands and no time to document it. The context is

49: 2009: 1698: 1127: 855: 660: 567: 493: 273: 262: 212: 17: 2281:

Ha! But aren't we all (hopefully) getting old(er)? Well, "old and gray" maybe. But, ah, those freckles.

1295: 238:, and looking at the deletion logs it certainly looks as though you work hard at maintaining the Knowledge. 136: 1981: 1971: 1677: 1318: 1286: 1056: 1031:

Thank you for bringing that to my attention, it is much appreciated. I'll be more careful in the future. --

1910: 65: 2162:

July 9: a one-sentence paragraph about him lying about his military service is added by IP 71.108.208.188

254: 2091:

05:09: I also tell "24"/Barbara not to edit my comments, and that it only serves to push me towards keep

1898: 687:

shows the attitude of Der alte Hexenmeister. In fact, there is an RfC against Der alte Hexenmeister at

2298: 1963: 1944: 1734: 1252: 676: 2172:

July 19: sentence added back by 71.108.208.188; contribs show that the other article he worked on was

1590: 2354: 1722: 1079: 1026: 875: 1904: 1817: 1563: 1222: 758: 564: 547: 259: 209: 147: 2233: 133: 1886: 1527: 695: 559:

I have no idea who Kellen Kash is but my talk page is not the place to discuss this. Please goto

281: 305: 2341: 1892: 1829: 1755:

I was in the middle of fixing things and got an edit conflict with you. I'll let you finish. --

1741: 1341: 1202:

Hello there. I've just finished investigating the claims of sockpuppetry on the AfD debate for

912: 576: 2353:

some articles. Hope to contribute more consistently in the next month, with more experience. (

743:

you recently deleted an article called "Dave's Flaps" which I added to the site this morning.

2366: 1926: 1802: 1728: 1134: 774: 348: 340: 330: 322: 274: 2445: 2428: 2413: 2384:

Utterly denying said "hilarious" vandalism despite the contribution and upload log evidence

2221: 1868: 1710: 1541: 1381: 1351: 1282: 668: 173: 165: 106: 99: 2040:

Of course, that's their contrib history as of the time I'm posting this. If he's watching

918:

Links are not allowed in article? I hope you could answer in my discussion Page. Thanks.

194:

Sorry to hijack your talk page, but Mal, admins can make mistakes and it's best to remain

8: 1849: 1716: 1571: 1237: 1214: 727: 455: 436: 418: 404: 357: 128: 466: 2088:

04:52: Jonswift apologizes, says he's "new" and doesn't have all the etiquette down yet

1380:

Apparently, I was a cocksucker for a while there, and I didn't even notice. Thanks! --

1145: 933: 784: 766: 630: 598: 515: 370: 316: 2391:

by slagging off a well-respected Wikipedian and again denying the evidence in the logs

1532:

I removed edits. Please do not reedit the article with with race motives. Thank you.

1275:, #2 is transcluded as a redlink and #3 was closed two days ago. Something wrong... - 2244: 2051: 2044:

edits, he could see this and start whipping up a storm of edits from these accounts.

1828:, thereby allowing a previously deleted article about a NN band be re-created. Logs: 1658: 1360: 1338: 1123: 894: 884: 656: 489: 392: 2397: 2286: 2273: 2212: 2202: 2134: 1825: 1818: 1788: 1519: 1315: 1155: 961: 904: 523: 34:

Okay, I will take your suggestion and ask in the talk pages to post links. Thanks.

1492: 1367: 2440: 2423: 2408: 2300: 2188: 2067:

03:19: second Jonswift edit, signed, possible attempt to look like a second voter

1669: 1449: 1423: 1397: 1277: 953: 946: 942: 929: 869: 703: 242: 195: 185: 833:

That looks much better! :-) I'm happy you took my criticism as well as you did.

2184: 1334: 1304: 1259: 1244: 1229: 1211: 1179: 1090: 1071: 982: 938: 861: 798: 719: 711: 577: 114: 2388: 2272:?!! Here's hoping you and Wally, June and Ward are all doing well. Cheers. 2097:

11:34: finally notice "far left" is still in my comment, and I take out "far"

1932: 1664: 1161: 1140: 715: 707: 622: 590: 506: 363: 200: 120: 2422:

Ah, there it is. Step 5 - "threaten to go and complain to Jimbo". Perfect.

2183:

show this IP to have broader interests than the others, though the edits to

2374: 2229: 2222: 2173: 1936: 1917: 1357: 1119: 1018: 879: 834: 817: 803: 788: 296: 174: 1465: 1178:

page. The current page is nothing like what it was when I nominated it. --

735: 321:

Like an RfA thanks, except I'm thanking you for helping with my AfD. =] --

2295:

that he would see the connection. Apparently, you didn't get it either.

1766: 1756: 1572: 1549: 1312: 1308: 1267: 286: 280:

It may interest you to know that there is currently a WikiProject on the

56: 43: 1655:

why cant i make a page about the funney games website? it is really fun

399:. I think that the case for a block against Fixwiki will be obvious. -- 339:

Better that you pointed it out that not doing anything at all, right? --

37: 2330:

What's an Englishman doing living up in the middle of nowhere, anyway?

2324: 2323:

Great to hear from you, Alan. Keep up the good work. And watch out for

2236: 2036:

Owmyeye: new account, only edits are to article's talk page and the AfD

1794: 1579: 1444: 1418: 1392: 516: 1916:

seems pretty clearly to be VW again. Thanks again for all the help. -

1504: 847: 431:

1954: 1296: 1098: 29: 2307: 26:

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

1187: 2144:

May 5: a section on the military service controversy is added by

2094:

05:20: "24" apologizes, and we continue with an amicable exchange

295:

Please see my pennyworth at the user:BigHaz Talk page. Cheers. --

124: 1775: 2151:

May 6: two edits from IP 66.184.168.65 remove the new section (

1953:

last warnings, you might as well go ahead and take action :D...

949:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! 413:

I saw the warning you gave "Fixwiki". Thank you very much. --

2085:

checked his contribs and found that he'd only edited this AfD.

976: 2159:

show another one-day editor interested in a single article.

2109:

19:48: Owmyeye votes delete, makes actual points; I respond

1498: 1356:

Your afd link for this goes to a band - is this an error?

2194:

July 21: "24" returns from AfD to again edit the article

1862: 1518:

They are encyclopaedic from a plane spotting perspective.

1497:

There is a certain user on Knowledge named Jack Harrison

922: 1855:

Hey, I hate to bug you, but you might want to check out

989:

Flowers - Don't submit pictures from your garden comment

2403:

request containing accusations of bias and incompetence

1781:

weird and bazarre expiriment. Talkk to you later man..

1686: 1474: 981:

You corrections seem OK to me. Sorry about the typos!

478:

A question: Who do I complain to about YOUR behavior?

1593: 702:, and the RfC. At this time, he is mostly violating 522:

Oops. I didn't look at the article history. Sorry! -

2126:

showed that was the sole Knowledge edit for that IP.

1824:

Curious as to why you deleted the protected article

797:

OK, to be honest with you, I think you you violated

689:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Der alte Hexenmeister

1976:I don't know how closely you've been following the 1647: 2064:03:10 UCT, July 20: first Jonswift edit, unsigned 1765:Let's use the official name for the aerodrome. -- 1208:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Djedamrazuk 1547:Knowledge:Village pump (assistance)#Nazi symbols 683:shows the nature of the difference of opinion. 2165:July 10: sentence deleted by IP 24.250.202.104 2100:15:10: "128" logs a delete vote, signs Zvonimir 765:I just categorized and fixed the formatting of 2349:Thank very much for your friendly welcome :-) 2015:I'll cover IPs related to the articles later. 640: 561:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Akala (rapper) 1390:And ditto, thanks for the revert! Regards -- 1107:Another satisfied Wikipedian leaves a comment 1931:Hi. You have just reverted som vandalism on 1483:edit: here's some of what i'm talking about 1197:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Haris Cizmic 180:Please do not arbitrarily delete an article 46:Sorry for the mistake dude, you are right. 2285:cute. :) Enjoy your Wiki break. Peace. 1160:Thanks for reverting my page from vandals 997:was missing, and I chose to contribute. 2070:03:00, July 21: I post what I'd found out 1170:Deleting AfD tag for withdrawn nomination 1303:Could you please discuss this revert on 679:(who is known on USENET as Androcles). 14: 1578:Yes, that looks much better. Thanks! ( 2106:16:53, July 22: Massmato votes delete 696:the theory of relativity edit history 608:The relevant images (that I saw) are 2176:, where he made flamebait POV edits. 2000:Special:Contributions/128.227.48.214 1995:Special:Contributions/24.250.202.104 475:Dude, you are out to lunch on this. 397:talk:Le Sage's theory of gravitation 310:Hey, man... why'd you drop that? -- 253:Just out of interest take a look at 23: 2387:Getting blocked and responding on 2060:, but here are the salient edits: 1683:He's a sockpuppet of blocked user 1376:Thanks for reverting my user page. 932:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 921: 24: 2461: 2169:; this IP will show up at the AfD 1648:{\displaystyle Insertformulahere} 1562:Yes, the translation is correct. 1358:Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! 1325:Robin Fletcher on deletion review 874:Hi! You'd reverted an IPs edits: 645:the post i made was substantial. 1558:Barney and Friends' Musical Park 1065:per the AfD procedure. The user 1000:Please explain what I did wrong 586:Category:Orphaned fairuse images 391:. Just look at the history, as 66:Why do you have to be doin that? 1070:in the right way? Thank you. -- 903:made me laugh so hard I cried. 700:user talk:Der alte Hexenmeister 389:Le Sage's theory of gravitation 2005:Special:Contributions/Massmato 1990:Special:Contributions/Jonswift 234:taken to combat vandalism and 208:I thought he was being civil. 13: 1: 2407:must be getting close to it! 2316:Nunavut/Northwest Territories 2228:I noticed you speedy deleted 2010:Special:Contributions/Owmyeye 18:User talk:CambridgeBayWeather 1982:William Bradford (professor) 1103:Why did you delete my page? 7: 2373:What's the opposite to the 2018:Here's why I suspect them: 1751:British Columbia aerodromes 532:Kellen Kash says keep AKALA 306:Deleting Tool of the System 10: 2466: 1329:An editor has asked for a 677:user:Der alte Hexenmeister 2450:12:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2433:11:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2418:11:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 2377:, I wonder. The sequence 2362:20:56, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 2337:22:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2311:21:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC) 2290:09:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 2277:09:07, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 2264:Beaver, iz dat you, bwoi? 2259:07:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 2240:00:16, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 2216:07:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 2206:06:30, 23 July 2006 (UTC) 2148:, another one-day editor. 1967:20:35, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1940:10:37, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 1921:22:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1841:17:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1813:16:52, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1798:15:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 1770:17:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 1760:17:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 1745:02:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 1673:20:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC) 1584:21:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 1567:20:20, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 1553:12:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1537:01:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 1523:15:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 1258:the nominations again. -- 1183:15:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1165:17:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1151:17:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1094:20:36, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 1075:21:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1052:16:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1022:18:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 1008:13:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 972:02:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 957:01:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 908:23:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 890:18:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 865:13:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 838:10:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 821:10:20, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 807:03:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 792:12:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 731:04:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 675:Basically, I am battling 635:18:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 603:16:55, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 571:14:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 527:11:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 510:20:51, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 459:17:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 440:17:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 422:01:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 408:18:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 378:13:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 352:17:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 334:17:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 300:08:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 290:08:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 266:13:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 246:13:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 216:12:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 204:12:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 189:00:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 169:22:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 143:14:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 119:Thank you for moving the 110:03:59, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 60:00:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 1456:23:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 1430:23:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 1404:23:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 1385:15:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC) 1363:15:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 1347:02:16, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 1291:21:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 1263:17:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 1248:15:53, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 1233:15:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 1218:12:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 501:WikiProject on Hard Rock 383:Need help woth "Fixwiki" 127:, much appreciated :) -- 1299:internal/external links 899:Just so you know, your 714:. He is not violating 467:explanation for reverts 282:Eurovision Song Contest 1649: 1514:Plane Spotting Reports 1130:) 16:56, 29 June 2006. 1013:Baffin Island Wildlife 985:2006-006-25 12:30 GMT 926: 663:) 00:24, 23 June 2006. 554:) 14:54, 22 June 2006. 496:) 19:46, 21 June 2006. 95:) 01:29, 19 June 2006. 50:Unionville High school 2211:Go ahead and post. -- 2191:are inflammatory POV. 1949:When you give a user 1650: 1206:. My findings are at 1118:comment was added by 1061:I tagged the article 993:CambridgeBayWeather, 925: 856:Renaming a page title 651:comment was added by 542:comment was added by 484:comment was added by 275:Boys And Girls (song) 83:comment was added by 1972:William Bradford AfD 1678:Jirachi J. Wishmaker 1591: 1493:Just a quick thanks. 1368:discovery island, bc 1311:09:35, 3 July 2006 ( 1057:Removing of AfD tags 669:Theory of relativity 618:Image:Childface3.jpg 614:Image:Childface2.jpg 1564:Academic Challenger 1067:Km2302@columbia.edu 610:Image:Childface.jpg 565:CambridgeBayWeather 260:CambridgeBayWeather 210:CambridgeBayWeather 1980:since putting the 1945:Barney and friends 1645: 1253:Missing something? 927: 785:33863 Elfriederwin 767:33863 Elfriederwin 2448: 2431: 2416: 1742:Danny Lilithborne 1289: 1131: 1080:Rescinding an AfD 1027:Your Talk Comment 664: 555: 497: 393:User talk:Fixwiki 96: 2457: 2444: 2427: 2412: 2402: 2396: 2135:Florence Roisman 1915: 1914: 1881:deleted contribs 1865: 1826:The Drift (band) 1819:The Drift (band) 1785:,Chris Palmieri 1739: 1738: 1705:deleted contribs 1689: 1654: 1652: 1651: 1646: 1466:The skyline page 1452: 1447: 1426: 1421: 1414:User:Baneskiller 1400: 1395: 1281: 1223:Haris Cizmic AfD 1148: 1143: 1139:No problem :) — 1113: 887: 882: 760:User:Erwinschwab 736:Article deletion 646: 625: 593: 537: 479: 375: 368: 346: 328: 148:Everton reserves 131: 123:article back to 78: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2400: 2394: 2371: 2359:ManuelfromParis 2344: 2318: 2304: 2301:Pelican Airport 2266: 2247: 2226: 2189:The Jawa Report 2153:cumulative diff 2139:cumulative diff 1974: 1962: 1959: 1947: 1929: 1866: 1861: 1860: 1852: 1822: 1805: 1791: 1778: 1753: 1690: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1661: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1576: 1560: 1544: 1530: 1528:Race-Hate edits 1516: 1507: 1495: 1477: 1468: 1450: 1445: 1424: 1419: 1398: 1393: 1382:Captain Disdain 1378: 1370: 1354: 1331:deletion review 1327: 1301: 1270: 1255: 1240: 1225: 1200: 1190: 1172: 1158: 1146: 1141: 1137: 1114:—The preceding 1109: 1101: 1082: 1059: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1029: 1015: 991: 979: 964: 951: 915: 897: 885: 880: 872: 858: 850: 763: 738: 673: 647:—The preceding 643: 623: 591: 581: 538:—The preceding 534: 520: 503: 480:—The preceding 469: 385: 371: 364: 360: 344: 326: 319: 312:ToolOfTheSystem 308: 278: 178: 166:SenorKristobbal 150: 129: 117: 102: 79:—The preceding 68: 52: 40: 38:airport infobox 32: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2463: 2453: 2452: 2405: 2404: 2392: 2385: 2382: 2370: 2365: 2343: 2342:New Wikipedian 2340: 2317: 2314: 2303: 2297: 2265: 2262: 2246: 2243: 2225: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2199: 2198: 2192: 2185:Muslim baiting 2177: 2170: 2163: 2160: 2149: 2142: 2127: 2111: 2110: 2107: 2104: 2101: 2098: 2095: 2092: 2089: 2086: 2082: 2079: 2075: 2071: 2068: 2065: 2038: 2037: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2013: 2012: 2007: 2002: 1997: 1992: 1973: 1970: 1960: 1957: 1946: 1943: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1851: 1848: 1821: 1816: 1804: 1801: 1790: 1787: 1784: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1679: 1676: 1660: 1657: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1635: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1575: 1570: 1559: 1556: 1543: 1540: 1529: 1526: 1515: 1512: 1506: 1505:tory christman 1503: 1494: 1491: 1476: 1473: 1467: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1407: 1406: 1377: 1374: 1369: 1366: 1353: 1350: 1335:Robin Fletcher 1326: 1323: 1305:Talk:Knowledge 1300: 1294: 1269: 1266: 1254: 1251: 1239: 1236: 1224: 1221: 1199: 1194: 1189: 1186: 1171: 1168: 1157: 1154: 1136: 1133: 1108: 1105: 1100: 1097: 1081: 1078: 1058: 1055: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1028: 1025: 1014: 1011: 990: 987: 978: 975: 963: 960: 920: 914: 913:External Link. 911: 896: 893: 871: 868: 857: 854: 849: 848:Stansbury Hall 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 826: 825: 824: 823: 810: 809: 762: 757: 737: 734: 672: 666: 642: 639: 638: 637: 580: 578:Template:or-cr 575: 574: 573: 544:67.166.176.158 533: 530: 519: 514: 502: 499: 468: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 445: 444: 443: 442: 425: 424: 384: 381: 359: 356: 355: 354: 318: 315: 307: 304: 303: 302: 277: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 219: 218: 206: 177: 172: 149: 146: 116: 113: 101: 98: 74:Thanks again, 67: 64: 51: 48: 39: 36: 31: 28: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2462: 2451: 2447: 2442: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2425: 2420: 2419: 2415: 2410: 2399: 2393: 2390: 2386: 2383: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2376: 2369: 2368:User:Piugmene 2364: 2363: 2360: 2356: 2350: 2347: 2339: 2338: 2335: 2331: 2328: 2326: 2321: 2313: 2312: 2309: 2302: 2296: 2292: 2291: 2288: 2284: 2279: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2253: 2242: 2241: 2238: 2234: 2231: 2224: 2217: 2214: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2204: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2175: 2171: 2168: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2147: 2143: 2140: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2125: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2115: 2108: 2105: 2102: 2099: 2096: 2093: 2090: 2087: 2083: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2059: 2054: 2052: 2050: 2045: 2043: 2035: 2031: 2028: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2011: 2008: 2006: 2003: 2001: 1998: 1996: 1993: 1991: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1983: 1979: 1969: 1968: 1965: 1956: 1952: 1942: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1933:Leyton Hewitt 1927:Leyton Hewitt 1922: 1919: 1912: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1894: 1891: 1888: 1887:nuke contribs 1885: 1882: 1879: 1876: 1873: 1870: 1864: 1858: 1854: 1853: 1847: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1833:MichaelZimmer 1830: 1827: 1820: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1803:Lake Margaret 1800: 1799: 1796: 1786: 1782: 1771: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1758: 1746: 1743: 1736: 1733: 1730: 1727: 1724: 1721: 1718: 1715: 1712: 1711:nuke contribs 1709: 1706: 1703: 1700: 1697: 1694: 1688: 1682: 1681: 1675: 1674: 1671: 1666: 1665:Hindu Rashtra 1656: 1642: 1639: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1612: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1565: 1555: 1554: 1551: 1548: 1539: 1538: 1535: 1525: 1524: 1521: 1511: 1502: 1500: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1472: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1448: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1422: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1396: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1383: 1373: 1365: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1349: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1332: 1322: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1298: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1279: 1274: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1250: 1249: 1246: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1220: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1198: 1193: 1185: 1184: 1181: 1177: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1144: 1135:^ That vandal 1132: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1104: 1099:Rough Justice 1096: 1095: 1092: 1087: 1077: 1076: 1073: 1068: 1064: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1010: 1009: 1006: 1001: 998: 994: 986: 984: 974: 973: 970: 959: 958: 955: 950: 948: 944: 940: 935: 931: 924: 919: 910: 909: 906: 902: 892: 891: 888: 883: 876: 867: 866: 863: 853: 839: 836: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 822: 819: 814: 813: 812: 811: 808: 805: 800: 796: 795: 794: 793: 790: 786: 782: 779: 776: 772: 768: 761: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 733: 732: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 692: 690: 686: 682: 678: 670: 665: 662: 658: 654: 650: 636: 632: 628: 627: 619: 615: 611: 607: 606: 605: 604: 600: 596: 595: 588:). Thanks. -- 587: 579: 572: 569: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 553: 549: 545: 541: 529: 528: 525: 518: 513: 511: 508: 498: 495: 491: 487: 483: 476: 473: 460: 457: 453: 449: 448: 447: 446: 441: 438: 434: 429: 428: 427: 426: 423: 420: 416: 412: 411: 410: 409: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 380: 379: 376: 374: 369: 367: 353: 350: 347: 342: 338: 337: 336: 335: 332: 329: 324: 314: 313: 301: 298: 294: 293: 292: 291: 288: 283: 276: 267: 264: 261: 256: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 244: 239: 237: 231: 227: 223: 217: 214: 211: 207: 205: 202: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 183: 176: 171: 170: 167: 163: 160: 156: 153: 145: 144: 141: 139: 137: 135: 132: 126: 122: 121:New Norwegian 112: 111: 108: 97: 94: 90: 86: 82: 75: 72: 63: 61: 58: 47: 45: 35: 30:SheetMusicFox 27: 19: 2421: 2406: 2375:Five Pillars 2372: 2351: 2348: 2345: 2332: 2329: 2322: 2319: 2305: 2293: 2282: 2280: 2269: 2267: 2248: 2230:ThaMuseMeant 2227: 2223:ThaMuseMeant 2200: 2174:James Dobson 2146:User:IndyLaw 2116: 2112: 2055: 2046: 2041: 2039: 2017: 2014: 1975: 1950: 1948: 1930: 1907: 1901: 1895: 1889: 1883: 1877: 1871: 1844: 1823: 1806: 1792: 1783: 1779: 1754: 1731: 1725: 1719: 1713: 1707: 1701: 1695: 1662: 1587: 1577: 1561: 1545: 1542:Nazi symbols 1534:86.42.136.83 1531: 1517: 1508: 1496: 1488: 1485: 1482: 1478: 1469: 1443: 1417: 1391: 1379: 1371: 1355: 1352:Haris Cizmic 1342: 1339:Deathphoenix 1328: 1307:? Thanks. -- 1302: 1278:CrazyRussian 1276: 1271: 1256: 1241: 1226: 1204:Haris Cizmic 1201: 1191: 1188:Wikipedian27 1176:Haris Cizmic 1173: 1159: 1138: 1110: 1102: 1083: 1063:Chromavision 1060: 1030: 1016: 1002: 999: 995: 992: 980: 965: 952: 947:subst:smile3 943:subst:smile2 928: 916: 898: 873: 859: 851: 777: 769:, posted by 764: 754: 751: 748: 745: 742: 739: 693: 674: 644: 629: ( 621: 620:. Thanks. -- 597: ( 589: 582: 535: 521: 507:BritisH PunK 504: 477: 474: 470: 386: 372: 365: 361: 320: 309: 279: 240: 235: 232: 228: 224: 220: 181: 179: 175:Champ (food) 164: 161: 157: 154: 151: 118: 103: 100:The Violence 76: 73: 69: 53: 41: 33: 25: 2325:polar bears 2287:deeceevoice 2274:deeceevoice 2213:Groggy Dice 2203:Groggy Dice 1859:diff. This 1850:New VW Sock 1776:Hahahaha... 1573:Tom McMahon 1520:KieranMaher 1372:good idea! 1238:Sockpuppets 939:subst:smile 771:Erwinschwab 740:Hi there, 694:Please see 524:Mike Rosoft 358:Re: Vandals 255:my deletion 77:frogman574 2441:Tonywalton 2424:Tonywalton 2409:Tonywalton 2283:Definitely 2155:); again, 1978:discussion 1905:block user 1899:filter log 1863:Energyblue 1729:block user 1723:filter log 1670:Hornplease 977:Ceilometer 954:*~Daniel~* 930:*~Daniel~* 681:thiss diff 517:Linlithgow 341:M1ss1ontom 323:M1ss1ontom 317:AfD thanks 85:Frogman574 2334:Backspace 2245:Greetings 1911:block log 1735:block log 1297:Knowledge 1260:DarkAudit 1245:DarkAudit 1230:DarkAudit 1212:Mackensen 1180:DarkAudit 1162:blink-182 1091:DarkAudit 1084:I put up 1072:DarkAudit 1005:Ccooper03 983:Pierre_cb 901:mayo poem 895:Mayo poem 862:DarkAudit 685:this diff 162:Thankyou 2256:SatuSuro 2252:SatuSuro 2232:as "nn" 2181:Contribs 2157:contribs 2131:contribs 2124:contribs 2074:comments 2048:Reserve. 1964:Contribs 1875:contribs 1810:SatuSuro 1789:Answered 1699:contribs 1142:getcrunk 1128:contribs 1116:unsigned 945:}} or {{ 934:WikiLove 881:=Nichalp 835:up+l+and 818:up+l+and 804:up+l+and 789:up+l+and 781:contribs 704:WP:CIVIL 661:contribs 649:unsigned 631:how now? 599:how now? 552:contribs 540:unsigned 494:contribs 482:unsigned 201:kingboyk 93:contribs 81:unsigned 2398:unblock 2078:version 2058:history 1918:pm_shef 1687:Jirachi 1659:Reverts 1120:J-Bones 1019:Pwyatt1 886:«Talk»= 870:Reverts 799:WP:BITE 755:thanks 712:WP:NPOV 653:Pdlawry 486:Fixwiki 297:Dweller 125:Nynorsk 107:Charles 62:btball 2389:WP:AIV 2196:(diff) 2167:(diff) 1767:Usgnus 1757:Usgnus 1550:Ilya K 1499:(here) 1475:HEY :P 1309:ais523 1215:(talk) 1156:Thanks 1147:what?! 1086:Theaxa 969:Ccosta 962:thanks 941:}}, {{ 716:WP:3RR 710:, and 708:WP:NOR 616:, and 568:(Talk) 366:Pilot| 287:BigHaz 263:(Talk) 236:gumph! 213:(Talk) 115:Thanks 44:ColBog 2346:Hi ! 2237:Kappa 1951:three 1795:Yurik 1580:ESkog 1287:email 905:Anand 671:issue 624:Brown 592:Brown 349:rs2k4 331:rs2k4 196:civil 134:ivind 57:Brian 16:< 2446:Talk 2429:Talk 2414:Talk 2355:talk 2187:and 1955:GofG 1893:logs 1869:talk 1857:this 1837:talk 1831:. -- 1717:logs 1693:talk 1446:Bane 1420:Bane 1394:Bane 1283:talk 1272:re: 1124:talk 1049:2010 775:talk 728:Talk 722:? -- 720:RfAr 657:talk 548:talk 490:talk 456:Talk 437:Talk 419:Talk 405:Talk 395:and 89:talk 2308:Qyd 2299:Re 2270:you 1333:of 1268:AfD 724:EMS 626:Cow 594:Cow 452:EMS 433:EMS 415:EMS 401:EMS 373:guy 243:Mal 186:Mal 182:you 105:--- 2401:}} 2395:{{ 2357:-- 2327:! 2201:-- 2141:). 2042:my 1937:HJ 1839:) 1793:-- 1740:. 1582:) 1321:) 1243:-- 1228:-- 1126:• 1089:-- 1003:-- 967:-- 937:{{ 726:| 706:, 698:, 691:. 659:• 641:hi 633:) 612:, 601:) 563:. 550:• 512:) 492:• 454:| 435:| 417:| 403:| 91:• 2443:| 2426:| 2411:| 1961:| 1958:| 1913:) 1908:· 1902:· 1896:· 1890:· 1884:· 1878:· 1872:· 1867:( 1835:( 1737:) 1732:· 1726:· 1720:· 1714:· 1708:· 1702:· 1696:· 1691:( 1643:e 1640:r 1637:e 1634:h 1631:a 1628:l 1625:u 1622:m 1619:r 1616:o 1613:f 1610:t 1607:r 1604:e 1601:s 1598:n 1595:I 1451:s 1425:s 1399:s 1343:ʕ 1319:C 1316:T 1313:U 1285:/ 1122:( 1047:9 1045:O 1043:3 1041:N 1039:5 1037:H 1035:3 1033:C 778:· 773:( 655:( 546:( 488:( 345:a 327:a 130:E 87:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index