1177:
plan shows it slightly further east more at the top of the low wing R - so that was the approx. site of it anyway - it had a diameter of 42 ft. - and was converted to a chapel by Nash. I suppose it must have been swept away when the ballroom and new kitchen block were built circa 1847. As you say the Queen's's gallery was the private chapel, the present balcony at the east end contained the Royal pew (today a very small private chapel is underneath the balcony - a folding screen enables it still to be opened up if the need should ever arise). The gallery was converted in 1961, and has recently been refurbished again reproducing many of the decorative features from the state rooms.
1248:, are just as much a part of the Grand Ducal Family as Prince Michael or Princess Alexandra are a part of the British Royal Family. And Prince Michael does not carry out official royal duties (this is stated on the BRF web page, although I believe once he and Prss. Michael attended a coronation in Africa) either way, the changes you made were wrong, and I would apreciate it if you would change it back. Regardless of whether or not the links are red! If they are someone will have to make stubs or disambigs. Thank you
274:
240:
472:
currently however, living in
Middlesbrough. The rivalry in South Shields is slightly more noticable since it is geographically and socially directly in the middle, and also because it has more of a mix of Necastle United and Sunderland AFC supporters. The rivalry is especially evident in the new town of Washington as it seems (I might be wrong) to have approximately an equal amount of Geordie and Mackem residents.
905:
916:
1017:
who perhaps are less intersted in the historic and architectural side, I've reinstated a couple of passages connected with the architecture and hard fact that should not (IMO) have been removed. I'll leave the rest to you, as the royalty expert, as I'm becoming tired of keep having to argue the worth of every dot and comma around this site. Regards
141:Привет, Крейг. Я немного вас не понял. Но, я думаю, вы окажете мне огромную услугу, если сможете найти этот источник, этот сайт, с которого вы загружали гербы для королевских семей Испании (royspa.jpg), Люксембурга, и так далее. Я буду благодарен, если вы найдёте этот сайт. А герб для герцогини Корнуольской я брал с сайта
657:
Be advised, I would check the law on the pictures of post cards here in the United States before tagging such. If you wish, we could consider all pictures unverified on
Knowledge. I do appreciate your considerate means of commenting, a fair approach, before deletion though. I also understand you are
471:
Hi. I was just wondering why you removed my edit on the Mackem rivalry page? What I added, I believe to be a fact. Perhaps we could work on making it more neutral if you thought it may offend anyone? I am originally from South
Shields, which is more or less equidistant from the rival cities. I am
1180:
I'm not sure either where is the best lace for it either - perhaps at the bottom of "20th century" - sort of beginning : "Following the war the chapel was restored and then became in 1961....." I don't know it' s difficult isn't it or I suppose directly after the paragraph where the Queen's
Gallery
1129:
Yes I do realise that many other articles have succession boxes for all manners of titles and positions. I only looked at this article as I was tidying up boxes in general and adding external links for the royal pages. Can I ask why you think the Grand Master position is important enough to be used
1061:
Kingdom. Perhaps we could try and get some sort of project together for the creation of the Coats of Arms. As you can see, I'm still pretty new to wikipedia and it's format (As apparent on my user page) but would love to use something like this to improve my knowledge of the site. Let me know! --
1016:
as it concerns (I think, if I remember correctly, some of your edits to the article) Personally, I can't see why these oft repeated stories can't remain as they make up the folklore of the plalace, especially as they all carry an explanation of non confirmation etc. In addition they interest people
1176:
If you click on the plan I drew of
Buckingham Palace (so you can see more clearly) - In an 1838 plan The octagon library was part of a complex of libraries which included the rooms marked A and H, - the octagon came off the bottom of the room marked H and the corridor K and partly in J. A later
988:
You deleted Image:Test tube 2 and a bit.png last month. Do you remember why you did that? The image was created by me and licenced under the gfdl. It was used on a page along with a series of other similar images, none of which were deleted and all of which were released under the same licence. It
1118:
I have no problem with the Duke and
Freemasonary. However I do not see the need for a succession box for the Grand Master. As with many articles, "succession box creep" has seen the addition of boxes for all sorts of positions and titles. I believe the boxes should focus on peergae titles, and in
1060:
Craigy, I am at work right now but I will get you that link to Maitre d'Armes and the clip art it came with. I've also gotten some clip art on my own for use with the program. I'm tryign to use Maitre d'Armes in conjungtion with
Photoshop to make some nice Coats of Arms for peers in the United
845:
I tryed to follow the link from previous "incarnations" of the article, to find out why the picture was removed, but couldn't find information about it (like a picture history page). If I click on the tameshigiri.jpg link, it takes me to an "upload picture" page. Was there a copyright problem or
404:
regarding whether the Royal
Marriages Act applies in Canada. One user thinks that the Act is part of Canadian law since it effects the line of succession. I say it does not effect the line of succession directly, and thus is only a UK law and the Queen only takes British govenrment advice on the
1185:
is only a small stub, I would personally make that a redirect, and have a whole section on the Queen's
Gallery on the BP page - keep things all together. I look forward to seeing what you decide. Why don't you write it as a complete paragraph and then move it about until you are happy. Regards
807:
The map had been there since before these current rules were introduced. It was tagged "map by me" or something like that (I can't check since you have deleted it), and it must have had my name on it since I uploaded it. As a matter of both policy and courtesy, you were obliged to check with me
304:
Just floated by your updates to the
Bedford dukes. You've done a great job of digging out those post nominals which can be a pain to confirm. Only one slight doubt. I have no idea where wiki opinion is on this one but socially people don't tend to list hon degrees as post nominals. I don't feel
475:
I don't want to offend anyone, however, I believe my edit should be included in the article in some form, as it is true that there are a considerable amount of people in both Newcastle and Sunderland who don't have a clue about the origins of the rivalry. They tend to attribute it entirely on
1119:
this case, succession to the throne- and refrain from adding any others. For instance I'm sure the Duke holds many positions which could have a succession box of their own, why single out the Grand Master title. I also removed the Lord Admiral box from Elizabeth II for similar reasons.
151:Крейг, мне кажется, что и герб Андре Массена (Image:André_Masséna_coa.png) вы брали на том же сайте, что и гербы королевских домов. По стилю герба можно найти сходства. Я буду очень благодарен, если бы вы смогли вспомнить или найти тот сайт, где вы находили эти гербы. Спасибо заранее.
476:
football, or in extreme cases, for no reason at all. Sometimes, whenever a Geordie or a Mackem makes a reference to the rivalry, I question them. Most of the time, their response was just "don't know why," or "because they are scum!" and cound not give a reasonable argument.
1224:
about the Coat of Arms used in the Sheffield article. I did this because looking at the city council's website it seems that they claim the authority to grant permission to use the Coat of Arms. However, I noticed that the version of the Coat of Arms that you uploaded for the
989:
was well over a year old yet you list recent changes to speedy deletion as your reason :-( It's easy enough for me to recreate the image, but I'm concerned about gung ho image deletions because deletion of images cannot be undone by other admins (unlike page deletions).
858:
Update :-) Hmmm, I didn't read your talk page before posting, so it seems I'm not the only one with deleted images. Sorry for not looking the links to speedy deletion criteria and Possible unfree images first, but maybe you should put these in a more proeminent place?
73:
Hello. I see you've been doing some mop and bucket work with a deleted image. I wasn't aware the image was going to be deleted until I saw your edit summaries. Do you happen to know why the image was deleted? Was it a source/copyright issue? If so, I have several of
1096:). Next time you delete an image, perhaps you could check that the uploader had been informed that the tag was insufficient, as the image had been tagged as a promophoto, which was correct, and sufficient. I'll find the photo again and re-upload it. Regards,
817:
This matter now seems to have been resolved: the image has been found, restored, and properly labelled. I apologise for my sharp words earlier. Please advise me if you intend deleting any of my other images (not unsourced photos, I accept they have to go).
577:
page. I did not originally post this image, but I know Seth and Jill (who took it) and it is now {PD}, just part of the world. I know they have seen the page and don't care, but I don't know what kind of proof you need...a letter? Let me know.
224:. If you have a status update (e.g. you intend to work on it in the future) or need help, you can update the collaboration page (which is linked from your desk). Also feel free to reply to the person who left you this message. --
489:
Hi. I applogies for 'spamming' your talkpage like this, but some time ago you was helpfull with comments on one of 'my' other articles on old Norwegian rifles and I wondered if you might be interested in helping out
106:
Thanks for your support on my RFA. I just got my computer back from having its hard drive replaced and I'm busily installing software on it -- I'll be back to PUI once I get that computer working correctly. :)
1229:
page is subtly different to the council's copyrighted version of the Coat of Arms. So, my question is, what was the source for the image that you uploaded and do you know who the copyright holder is? Thanks,
267:
Ah right, I see. Sorry, I thought it was meant for someone else like before (and I haven't had any sleep). I'm thinking about removing myself actually, I simply haven't got the time to be part of it anymore.
1075:
I can't seem to find a link to a working website with this on it.. I tried Yahoo and Google, I can zip up a copy along w/ the clip art I have if you would like ? Just let me know where to send it/upload it
1262:
Thanks for the information on the source of this image. At this stage I don't know whether or not the use of this image in the Sheffield article qualifies for fair use, so I'll leave it be for now.
1159:, & thus a peer of any GM of any other GL (usually country) is no small note. I know that's not a great explination, especially when compared to any other probable distinction of Dukes et. al....
954:
hello there Craigy144, could you please add the information about the copyright of this image? I stumbled upon it and it seems it has been tagged for deletion, which would be a pity... cheers
1307:
for AfD. But I noticed you had already deleted it as "pov". Is this appropriate? POV isn't a CSD. Much as I'd like non-notable bands to be speed-able, the fact is currently they are not. --
254:, and it has two issues which have been pending since May 24, 2005. I think we assume people add their desk to a regularly-checked watchlist, and thus know when things are added to it. --
41:
do not carry out royal duties, but they are nevertheless on the template. Sure, they have represented the Queen at several foreign events, but they do not do it on a regular basis. --
1328:
Your friend the anonymous vandal hit your Wikitravel user page. I have cleared it, but if there are any other Wikis where you have a user page, you might want to check them out. --
1244:
You changed this template, and i saw that you tried to explain youself on the talk page but were incorrect!! The Grand Duke's cousins, sibilings, nieces and nephews styled as
180:
176:
220:. If you or someone else has completed the task, you can close it by adding {{cleanup taskforce closed|ARTICLE NAME HERE}} to the article's talk page and removing it from
172:
168:
212:
because you have a task on your Cleanup Taskforce desk that has not been updated for over 30 days. If you do not wish to complete this task please assign it to another
798:
The map was my original artwork, as was stated at the image page. For what reason and by what right did you delete it, especially without consulting or notifying me?
356:
209:
1214:
808:
before you deleted it. I will now report you to the appropriate person (whoever that is). An apology might have the effect of moderating my language when I do so.
515:
and replacing with an historical coat of arms used by the Kings of Scotland . Since you have uploaded lots of coats of arms pages, you may like to take a look at
883:
The picture has been taken by me and as one of the founders of the THC Ministry I do have the right to publish it. Also, it was very relevant to this article.
26:
703:
251:
1204:
Hey mentor craigy. What do I do about an article that is about the wrong person? Does that meet the criteria for speedy deletion? Thanks for your help.
326:
156:
1018:
45:
593:
I draw your attention to pictures of old post cards on Knowledge, a legality here in the United States which is different than you may be accustom to.
720:
752:
737:
688:
I checked it out, and it seemed to be © 2 Digital, not Crown Copyright. So, if I'm correct, I had to lower the resolution to make it more fair use. --
1359:
1131:
1120:
520:
406:
975:
325:
was listed on WP:FAC. Since I've just nominated it for FAC, I would be gratefull if you could take the time to look it over and leave a comment at
193:
Ah, that should have been directed to Dmcdevit. I suppose it's good that I'm cleaning out this confusing table...thanks for your quick reply. --
1134:
970:
Hi Craigy - Thanks, I was obviously editing too fast that day (un-red-linking categories) - now you point it out it's obvious. D'oh! Cheers!
442:
this coming Sunday (the 11th of September) that you signed up for (as 'probable', so hopefully it's just a small push to get you to 'definite'
136:
27:
866:
853:
562:
291:
Ive been going back through and putting copyright notices on all the pictures (im almost done with most of them). have i left anything out?
1252:
1130:
in a succession box? While I admit I know nothing of the role, I can't see the importance over any of the Duke's other roles and positions.
1163:
92:
827:
258:
197:
1342:
You may or may not be thrilled to discover that you have been named as part of a Villainous Clique of Leftists by a certain individual!
63:
491:
960:
82:
228:
692:
523:
1234:
1021:
944:
360:
216:
who has space on their desk. If you do not wish to receive cleanup requests on your desk any more, you may remove yourself from
131:
998:
775:
Fine. But don't you usually warn the uploader on his talk page before making a deletion? Can the delete be reversed? Thank you.
401:
338:
1348:
1332:
1318:
1208:
1239:
1266:
1194:
1083:
552:
498:
187:
1094:
611:
597:
425:
1362:
1123:
1065:
1055:
582:
383:
715:
658:
attempting to clean house on the deletion back log page. How does one prove that a picture is unverified, as you tagged?
217:
213:
779:
770:
1108:
203:
124:
It's not up for deletion again, but I want to tell you that I am going to save it as a jpg image. Is that ok with you?
68:
321:
I apologise for 'spamming' your talkpage like this, but you was so helpfull to leave comments when the article on the
114:
822:
812:
802:
793:
461:
50:
1288:
683:
1213:
949:
1298:
1014:
924:
388:
Those last several hundred entries you added to the line of succession were awesome! Where did you find them?
503:
88:
Thanks for your reply. I've uploaded a couple of images to the commons and added them to the relevant pages.
1313:
978:
929:
119:
56:
1343:
835:
I'm sorry this might seem like a newbie question, but I'm a wikipedia newbie, so please bear with me :-).
1323:
1171:
1104:
706:
a day after it was uploaded; the new criterion requires seven days after it was marked with no source. --
558:
Much obliged. I'm not sure why it didn't show up before. Maybe the page hadn't been updated yet. Thanks!
418:
221:
871:
395:
285:
1199:
163:
305:
strongly on this issue but just thought we ought to have some sense of a policy one way or the other.
1257:
1006:
757:
697:
412:
1070:
1143:
OK sorry, I know this is an ancient post, but I saw it, so whatever. The title & role of GM in
539:
446:). It's at the Archery Tavern, just next to Lancaster Gate tube station, from 13:00 (BST) onwards.
38:
183:
are currently tagged as having backlogs. Do you still have a bot which could clean these out? --
1337:
995:
983:
439:
98:
1088:
935:
568:
311:
34:
862:
Anyway, after the image is gone, how do I find what was the original problem with it? Thanks
743:
458:
1051:
How are you getting or making these coat of arms ? Do you use the program Maire d'Armes? --
363:. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.
1353:
1113:
1046:
155:
Craigy, greatest thanks to you! My French is not bad, so it's not a problem. Thanks again!
934:
Hi Craigy144, there will probably be a meeting for the purpose of discussing Wikimedia UK
544:
Could you please post a direct URL to the discussions re: the copyright status of the two
8:
942:
548:
images you flagged earlier today? I can't seem to find the discussions anywhere. Thanks.
482:
278:
244:
128:
17:
992:
495:
335:
33:
I suppose it would be a better idea to take out the links, but if I recall correctly,
1007:
377:
370:
886:
I will add it again in the near future and would like you to not delete it anymore.
1345:
1271:
1249:
1182:
919:
784:
677:
664:
626:
455:
234:
OK now I'm confused, Beland. Why do I have a cleanup reminder on my talk page now?
111:
75:
60:
533:
Hi Craigy, could you give me a hint on how I add the sources & copyright...ta
1191:
1101:
1080:
1062:
1052:
955:
573:
Hi Craigy144, I'm Saudade7 and I just took off a flag you put on an image on the
1221:
939:
898:
819:
809:
799:
790:
711:
513:
430:
322:
312:
269:
235:
125:
1147:
is about the highest one could get in Masonry. a GM is the Master of that GL (
1205:
971:
838:
You have recently removed the link from the "tameshigiri.jpg" image from the
749:
734:
615:
579:
559:
549:
516:
273:
239:
1329:
1304:
1281:
1263:
1231:
1093:
Hi Craigy. I only just noticed that you'd deleted a picture I'd uploaded (
877:
863:
850:
746:
had an image, I wasn't sure if it had source or not but I guess it didn't.
689:
574:
389:
89:
79:
42:
528:
347:
1308:
1148:
1144:
965:
909:
789:
Did you delete the map of Thailand from the History of Thailand article?
672:
483:
422:
306:
292:
255:
225:
194:
184:
108:
588:
1187:
1097:
1032:
938:, which you might like to attend. You could add your name there if so.
893:
145:. Но почему-то, к сожалению, этот сайт уже несколько дней не работает.
466:
1226:
1160:
876:
I fail to see why you have removed the image that I had added to the
731:
I think it didn't have a source but now I don't know why it is gone!
707:
614:
suggests that Scotties uploads of old postcards are not copyvios. --
545:
1152:
1035:
the server keeps logging me out without warning - one of those days!
641:
1272:
839:
776:
767:
762:
Hi. I hadn't noticed you wanted to delete Image:TA-YUAN.png in the
742:
Ehm.. Don't you read my mind? You should get those brain implants!
509:
508:
What is your opinion on the correct coat of arms to display on the
1278:
I accidentally recreated it adding speedy tags, please redelete.
766:
article. Can you explain why??? I did the map myself. Thank you.
763:
376:
Because it is an orphan and is not currently linked to any page.
728:
isn't very usefull. Removed deleted? Hey, the image is gone! :D
299:
142:
604:
1156:
904:
915:
1358:
Thanks for your comments, its nice to be appreciated!
646:
343:
327:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Krag-Petersson
1181:is mentioned in "Use and public access". The page
842:article, saying that the image itself was removed.
651:
849:Would you shed some light on this for me, please?
603:The following note appears on User talk RHaworth *
78:taken by moi that could be inserted in its place.
479:Let me know how you feel about this. Take care!
137:Hi Craigy, that's me again, Leonid Lishnevetskiy
908:Today can be a beautiful day! Enjoy it! Hugs,
28:Template talk:Luxembourgish Grand Ducal Family
1246:Royal Highness or Imperial and Royal Highness
492:peer reviewing the article on the Kammerlader
721:Please add someting usefull in the summary
512:page? One user is removing the Royal Arms
384:Line of Succession to the British Throne
438:Just a quick note to remind you of the
361:Knowledge:Images and media for deletion
14:
449:Looking forward to seeing you there.
402:Talk:Queen's Privy Council for Canada
612:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.
598:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.
519:where the issue is being discussed.
828:Removed Image from Kenjutsu Article
671:===Craig, A message for you=== at *
23:
1220:Hi! I started a discussion on the
1155:. So, to be a Grand Master of all
24:
1373:
1013:You may want check out this dif
914:
903:
400:I would appreciate your view on
272:
238:
872:Removed image from THC Ministry
637:This is in reference to tags on
596:At your convenience please see
405:matter. Any views or comments?
396:View on the Royal Marriages Act
286:Copyright been added correctly?
159:1:58, 5 August 2005 (UTC +3:00)
867:05:18, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
854:05:09, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
823:13:51, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
813:03:27, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
803:02:05, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
794:01:37, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
780:22:41, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
771:22:08, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
753:22:43, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
738:21:53, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
716:19:34, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
524:19:55, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
499:11:30, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
247:) 06:08, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
208:Greetings. You are receiving
13:
1:
1253:22:31, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
1240:Luxembourg Grand Ducal Family
1235:00:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
1209:15:55, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
1195:14:02, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
1135:13:50, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
1124:08:59, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
462:14:01, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
426:10:56, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
409:20:41, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
392:19:23, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
380:14:55, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
373:14:49, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
281:) 06:17, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
55:Can you provide a source for
1363:21:33, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
1349:18:49, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
1333:21:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1319:20:49, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1289:20:01, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1267:03:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
1164:05:31, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
1109:16:05, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
1084:16:20, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
1066:16:14, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
1056:20:44, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
1022:11:14, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
999:05:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
979:12:06, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
7:
961:00:17, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
945:23:48, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
925:22:35, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
693:19:57, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
680:03:20:55, 2005-09-09 (UTC)
667:01:32:57, 2005-09-08 (UTC)
583:09:53, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
563:23:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
553:22:15, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
494:. Thank you for your time.
421:, where a poll is ongoing.
419:Talk:John, Duke of Burgundy
369:I apologize for the delay.
339:09:00, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
222:Knowledge:Cleanup Taskforce
181:Category:Copy to Wiktionary
177:Category:Move to Wikisource
10:
1378:
629:15:47:20, 2005-08-27 (UTC)
618:19:03:01, 2005-08-25 (UTC)
259:06:13, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
229:06:02, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
204:Cleanup Taskforce reminder
198:01:52, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
188:01:31, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
173:Category:Move to Wikiquote
169:Category:Move to Wikibooks
132:16:09, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
115:15:56, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
93:13:49, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
83:09:45, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
69:image:Penshaw Monument.JPG
64:14:19, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
46:11:52, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
51:Can you provide a source?
684:Re:Image:Princephil2.jpg
625:Interesting about Corel
605:A minor template problem
357:Image:Annescreenshot.png
332:Thank you for your time
295:August 16, 2005 (UTC -6)
214:Cleanup Taskforce member
39:Princess Michael of Kent
1215:Image:Sheffieldarms.PNG
950:Image:Hofburgthrone.jpg
210:this boilerplate notice
1303:I was about to submit
1157:Freemasonry in England
846:something like that?
642:Pictures of Pottsville
610:Note, mainly to self:
417:Kindly take a look at
352:Image deletion warning
744:Undredal stave church
661:Thanks and regards,
504:Scottish Coat of Arms
1299:That wasn't a speedy
930:Wikimedia UK meeting
704:Image:UTAH SR-24.PNG
120:Image:Wikifuhrer.PNG
1324:User page vandalism
1222:Sheffield talk page
359:has been listed at
252:User:Craigy144/Desk
218:the membership list
143:"The Royal Archive"
18:User talk:Craigy144
1200:Knowledge question
164:Transwiki backlogs
157:Леонид Лишневецкий
1258:Re: Sheffield COA
1172:Buckingham Palace
1107:
1008:Buckingham Palace
832:Hello Craigy144!
758:Image:TA-YUAN.png
698:Please be careful
413:John the Fearless
367:
366:
1369:
1286:
1151:), for instance
1100:
996:(a tenth stroke)
958:
922:
918:
912:
907:
540:Kate Bush images
529:adding copyright
445:
348:
276:
242:
76:Penshaw Monument
1377:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1356:
1340:
1338:evil conspiracy
1326:
1316:
1301:
1282:
1276:
1260:
1242:
1218:
1202:
1183:Queen's Gallery
1174:
1116:
1091:
1073:
1049:
1031:PS: Sorry it's
1011:
1001:
986:
984:Deleting images
968:
956:
952:
932:
920:
910:
901:
874:
830:
787:
760:
723:
700:
686:
591:
589:Dear Mr. Craig,
571:
542:
531:
506:
487:
469:
443:
433:
415:
398:
386:
346:
316:
302:
288:
206:
166:
139:
122:
101:
71:
53:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1375:
1355:
1352:
1339:
1336:
1325:
1322:
1312:
1300:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1275:
1270:
1259:
1256:
1241:
1238:
1217:
1212:
1201:
1198:
1173:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1138:
1137:
1115:
1112:
1090:
1089:Image deletion
1087:
1072:
1071:Maître d'armes
1069:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1010:
1005:
1003:
991:
985:
982:
967:
964:
951:
948:
931:
928:
900:
897:
892:
873:
870:
829:
826:
786:
783:
759:
756:
722:
719:
699:
696:
685:
682:
669:
655:
654:
649:
644:
639:
633:
632:
631:
630:
620:
619:
590:
587:
570:
569:image question
567:
566:
565:
541:
538:
530:
527:
505:
502:
486:
481:
468:
467:Mackem article
465:
432:
429:
414:
411:
397:
394:
385:
382:
365:
364:
354:
345:
342:
323:Krag-Petersson
315:
313:Krag-Petersson
310:
301:
298:
297:
296:
287:
284:
283:
282:
264:
263:
262:
261:
205:
202:
201:
200:
165:
162:
161:
160:
138:
135:
121:
118:
100:
97:
96:
95:
70:
67:
52:
49:
30:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1374:
1365:
1364:
1361:
1351:
1350:
1347:
1344:
1335:
1334:
1331:
1321:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1306:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1279:
1274:
1269:
1268:
1265:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1250:Mac Domhnaill
1247:
1237:
1236:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1216:
1211:
1210:
1207:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1189:
1184:
1178:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1133:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1122:
1111:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1077:
1068:
1067:
1064:
1058:
1057:
1054:
1044:
1034:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1020:
1015:
1009:
1004:
1000:
997:
994:
993:Theresa Knott
990:
981:
980:
977:
973:
963:
962:
959:
947:
946:
943:
941:
937:
927:
926:
923:
917:
913:
906:
896:
895:
890:
887:
884:
881:
879:
869:
868:
865:
860:
856:
855:
852:
847:
843:
841:
836:
833:
825:
824:
821:
815:
814:
811:
805:
804:
801:
796:
795:
792:
782:
781:
778:
773:
772:
769:
765:
755:
754:
751:
747:
745:
740:
739:
736:
732:
729:
727:
718:
717:
713:
709:
705:
695:
694:
691:
681:
679:
674:
673:
668:
666:
662:
659:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
634:
628:
624:
623:
622:
621:
617:
613:
609:
608:
607:
606:
601:
599:
594:
586:
584:
581:
576:
564:
561:
557:
556:
555:
554:
551:
547:
537:
534:
526:
525:
522:
518:
517:Talk:Scotland
514:
511:
501:
500:
497:
496:WegianWarrior
493:
485:
480:
477:
473:
464:
463:
460:
457:
453:
450:
447:
441:
440:London Meetup
436:
428:
427:
424:
420:
410:
408:
403:
393:
391:
381:
379:
374:
372:
362:
358:
355:
353:
350:
349:
341:
340:
337:
336:WegianWarrior
333:
330:
328:
324:
319:
314:
309:
308:
294:
290:
289:
280:
275:
271:
266:
265:
260:
257:
253:
250:Your desk is
249:
248:
246:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
199:
196:
192:
191:
190:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
158:
154:
153:
152:
150:
146:
144:
134:
133:
130:
127:
117:
116:
113:
110:
104:
94:
91:
87:
86:
85:
84:
81:
77:
66:
65:
62:
58:
48:
47:
44:
40:
36:
29:
19:
1357:
1354:Re:templates
1341:
1327:
1305:Eastern Lane
1302:
1283:
1280:
1277:
1261:
1245:
1243:
1219:
1203:
1179:
1175:
1117:
1114:Duke of Kent
1092:
1078:
1074:
1059:
1050:
1047:Coat of Arms
1042:
1019:81.131.14.98
1012:
1002:
987:
969:
953:
933:
902:
891:
889:Thank you.
888:
885:
882:
878:THC Ministry
875:
864:Claus Aranha
861:
857:
851:Claus Aranha
848:
844:
837:
834:
831:
816:
806:
797:
788:
774:
761:
748:
741:
733:
730:
726:rmvd deleted
725:
724:
702:You deleted
701:
687:
675:
670:
663:
660:
656:
636:
602:
595:
592:
575:Seth Shostak
572:
543:
535:
532:
507:
488:
478:
474:
470:
454:
451:
448:
437:
434:
416:
399:
387:
378:Thunderbrand
375:
371:Thunderbrand
368:
351:
334:
331:
320:
317:
303:
207:
167:
148:
147:
140:
123:
105:
103:Hey, Craig,
102:
99:kmccoy's RFA
72:
54:
32:
1149:Grand Lodge
1145:Freemasonry
936:this Sunday
647:Necho Allen
484:Kammerlader
300:Hon Degrees
129:(Sound Off)
61:Jimbo Wales
1360:Astrotrain
1132:Astrotrain
1121:Astrotrain
1081:Dudeness10
1063:Dudeness10
1053:Dudeness10
957:Gryffindor
536:royalbuff
521:Astrotrain
407:Astrotrain
1294:Thank you
1227:Sheffield
940:Cormaggio
880:article.
652:Yuengling
585:Saudade7
546:Kate Bush
126:Zscout370
1273:Allergan
1206:Taco325i
972:Stephenb
840:kenjutsu
785:Thailand
750:Agtfjott
735:Agtfjott
676:Thanks,
616:RHaworth
580:Saudade7
560:23skidoo
550:23skidoo
510:Scotland
456:James F.
1330:Cjensen
1314:Contrib
1284:Prodego
1264:JeremyA
1232:JeremyA
764:Ta-Yuan
690:Matjlav
452:Yours,
390:EgbertW
318:Hello.
90:The JPS
80:The JPS
43:Matjlav
1346:Paul B
1309:JiFish
921:smile!
911:Shauri
899:Smile!
459:(talk)
435:Heya,
431:Meetup
423:Arrigo
307:Alci12
293:nbgoku
270:Craigy
256:Beland
236:Craigy
226:Beland
195:Beland
185:Beland
179:, and
112:(talk)
109:kmccoy
35:Prince
1188:Giano
1098:Proto
1033:Giano
976:Talk)
894:Ferre
678:Scott
665:Scott
627:Scott
344:Image
16:<
1192:talk
1161:Grye
1153:UGLE
820:Adam
810:Adam
800:Adam
791:Adam
712:talk
708:SPUI
279:talk
245:talk
149:UPD:
57:this
37:and
966:CBE
777:PHG
768:PHG
600::
444:;-)
59:?--
1317:)
1311:(/
1190:|
1079:--
714:)
329:.
175:,
171:,
1105:c
1102:t
974:(
710:(
277:(
243:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
