User talk:Dominic/Archive21

3023:

feel having done that much wrong, I find no reason to hide behind multiple socks cowardly. I have to be a sado-mazo to be the author of those edits on Khojali article when I was one of the main users with Francis and Grandmaster involved in the past making the concessions to then have to change by undoing my own concessions. Just say yourself that at least you are set with me, you don't have to run any checkusers to confirm anything, I will endorse any socks I have used. But I refuse this admission to be used to attribute to me edits which I have not done. While a banned user is not protected by any of the policies, I think the minimum required decency to edit should be enough for Atabek and Grandmaster to refrain themselves in seing me everywhere each time a sock appear.

3512:

unblock, user koavf started by reverting tens of articles to the versions he had set before being blocked ignoring almost all the edits done in over half a year by a number of editors. Something I was not the only one to undo. After a couple of blocks, he started to wait for a few hours over the 24 h period from the last revert before reverting again. We (I and more editors) have tried discussion on talk pages, and even intervention from admins (FayssalF). There is no hope to get him leave his POV militantism away from Knowledge, and that is disgusting. I won't mention the controversial thousands of page moves and the chaos he created for which he clashed with a number of editors and can be seen from his recent talk archives. --

307:

area" left to administrator discression" whereas before you told me that such no consensus results default to the status quo. Apparently that only applies to the administrators you overturned. What appears to have happened to me is that two administrators each (independently) had to close difficult discussions with no clear numerical winner, so they weighed the arguments and decided in favor of deletion. Then at the DRV, you similarly find it within the discretionary range, and close it as overturn, with the reason that they should not have used their discretion. This is what strikes me as illogical. If the only reason in the end, still, is "They do let bias be acknowledged," that seems to have been adequately addressed.

3754:, which no-one would argue are all "candidates for Wiktionary". Fuzziness between the applicability of the two is grounds for filtering/re-sorting, not for declaring them to be interchangeable. If this isn't going to conform to the form and purpose of a stub type, then it shouldn't bear any naming or wording similarity to a stub type -- as it currently clearly does, apart from your obscurely-located "documentation", which is itself far from consistent with the much more prominent wording on the stub category page. Indeed, it could just be replaced with the Wiktionary template, and then deleted. Either way, it can't sensibly be a "deprecated stub template": it should either be a standard one, or not one at all. 3788:

mentioned it in the final credits). Now I could just edit the Commons description page to include my name or username, but I think it would look weird/suspicious if I did that. I would prefer it if someone with authority (specifically, the ability to verify my claim that I created the image through the deletion log), like an administrator such as yourself, could access the deleted image description page on Knowledge, and copy the infobox to the Commons description page. I chose to request you to do this simply because you were the one who deleted the image page on Knowledge. Thanks in advance, and also apologies in advance if my request seems a little petty. --

4976:'s discussion page a reference to emailing ArbCom. Would I be correct in assuming that an email then identifies the sender in real life? While I have no comment to make on the block, pro or con, I was surprised to read, given the drama on the discussion page, that no one had yet emailed ArbCom. Could it be because no one wants to have their on-line identity connected to their real lives, especially around such a contentious subject as Paedophilia? Could that not then weight the discussion in an unfair manner, a "process bias" as it were? Of course, if there is no way to tie the identities together, then there is no problem. 251:, not numbers. That's why I want to know why you keep repeating that claim when it is not clear to me that there were strong arguments for reversing two administrators' independent decisions. I read and reread your response, and the only argument I can find for the categories is "They do let bias be acknowledged." Which makes no sense because bias can be acknowledged on userpages; categories do not help that at all, and deleting them does not hinder that at all. Categories are for 1090: 4334:. So, what Molobo essentially has done is to try to pre-empt the creation of an article dealing with the psychological concept collective guilt as relates Germans today, and instead replaced it with frightfully POV article that essentially consists of a very POV and inflated listing of what should only be a chapter in the real article. Knowledge policy says "assume good faith". I think Molobo has used up the right for such assumptions a long time ago. -- 611: 768: 3449: 297:

manner as I could (again, I fail to see any COIs that I have with these user categories). Please take a step back and consider your own bias in this manner. I respect your opinion, but I do not agree. If you feel that this is an important issue that you must pursue further, or you feel that I am abusing my administrative tools in some manner, you are of course free to pursue some avenue in the dispute resolution chain. Best,

1348:. The editor(s) are posting derogatory information and although they have been reverted/warned, the same information is being replaced, now from a variety of user names. It seems to be the same editor using different accounts. If you could have a look at the history there from the past couple weeks and offer your own opinion, I would appreciate it. Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best regards, as always 270:

that this is clearly a lack of consensus that defaults to the original administrator's decision. But instead, you overturned teh decision, despite the seeming lack of consensus. Are you taking advantage of a lack of consensus to implement your personal opinion, criticizing the original administrators for both taking advantage of a lack of consensus to implement their personal opinions? It doesn't seem reasonable.

5008:

don't know how many of the other commentators might be influenced not to email because of the identification issue. You may be in the majority or you may not. My point is simply that if there is anyone who refrains from commenting, for or against, because of the identifiaction issue, then there is a possibility of bias. (If the pros and cons are equally reluctant, then the bias is only a technical one.)

2566: 3697:

is for articles that give word definitions or usage; and it was created as a holding cell for such articles. If the article gives encyclopedic information beyond such a definition, then a stub-sorter should resort it according to it's encyclopedic content, and not its form. Knowledge is not a dictionary. I can't even really figure out why you are characterizing my edit as a change.

175:" is a bit of an exaggeration; it was closer to no clear consensus at all. Now, yes, I realize you cited Tariqabjotu remark about the vote count, but is what were the specific arguments about the categories' merit besides the vote count? You stated that the "strength and weight of the argument lay" with that side, haven't given me any of those arguments. 3152:(unfortunately every ultranationalist will maximize the distribution of one ethnic group and minimize the rest). So he is pushing an OR view which simply contradicts plain facts. I think at least he should be blocked for 3rr but the problem goes further since he is making personal comments and does not understand Knowledge's OR policy. -- 4786:, editing the same article over and over, inserting the same text of Tajik over and over, and then repeating over and over that you're not Tajik, does not actually contribute to any kind of constructive editing neither establishes ground for softening a ban. And does it really matter which IP address in Germany you keep disrupting from? 3783:

defense, I think I may have added the infobox some time later after uploading the image, so it may not have been there when he/she uploaded it to Commons. Thus, as it stands now, there is no information on the image page attributing the image to me. Now normally, I wouldn't care about this, but this photo was used in an episode of

1161:'s edit histories, and I would strongly urge an unblocking. Looking at your edit history, it seems as though you haven't been online for 4 days, so maybe you've not seen the comments here and on WP:AN/I? I thought I'd give you 24 hours to persuade me otherwise, else I'll unblock him myself this time tomorrow. Best regards, - 833:}}. Since this involves a CheckUser you apparently handled, could you please take care of this request? The CheckUser block template states that administrators who wish to unblock this address must consult with the blocking administrator, and I do not want to undo your work as a CheckUser. Thank you very much. 3726:

bearing this tag are "deprecated", then by that logic it shouldn't be a stub tag at all (deprecated or otherwise), since that's on the contrary an explicit claim that the bearer is at least a potential full-fledged article, that just needs further work. You don't need a stub template for to populate

3721:

I'm certainly struggling with the concept of the "purpose" of a template being to be deprecated. A deprecated template (or indeed entity of any kind) would be one that should not ideally be used at all, presumably having served some actual purpose in the past, and on its way to eventual extinction.

3148:

has broken many Knowledge laws. They include 3rr, making racist outburts like:"Anti turk kurds or persians, stop editing my ethnic web-page, you can not play with facts; turks in iran are so strong and you are not" and "don't remove without any reasons. i understand you are presian and may belong to

1451:

Hi, you hard blocked this IP as being an open proxy earlier, I've run a few (newbies) checks (googling the IP, RBL and port scanning) and I find no evidence it is one. Since this user is asking his block to be reviewed, could you double check for me? You probably have much more knowledge of OP than I

228:

apply (i.e. a rule that should trump consensus)? My answer: No. Was there SPA involvement? I checked and I didn't notice any. What was the closing statement like? The closing admin was well-spoken, but the closing statement seemed to reflect personal opinion rather than some element of strong policy.

3782:

had uploaded the image to Commons, and the image page on Knowledge has been deleted. However, when Nagytibi uploaded it to Commons, he failed to include my green infobox in its description page, which contains details about the photo and attributes the image to me, including my real name. In his/her

3022:

I am just fed up of being accused of using those socks without having the power to answer back. I have emailed Thatcher requesting a checkusers, which was never in my knowledge run. Anatolmethanol was primarly created to counter Flavius disruptions a previously undefinitly banned user. Since I don't

269:

To be honest, it looks to me like "the closing statement seemed to reflect personal opinion" applies equally to you. Even on the basis of your votecounting, if no consensus is to default to the status quo, and the DRV most certainly did not have a 3:1 or 2:1 margin, but closer to 1:1, it seems to me

124:

You did participate in the DRV even if you didn't !vote in it, but that's beside the point. I think you misunderstand some of the points that I make. I don't care if some random category on my userpage gets deleted (heck, I didn't even know they were gone). You seriously think this biases me in some

110:

articles that can be deleted using the rule, should be deleted, according to general consensus." I think it is quite normal for administrators to have discretion in these matters, when it is clearly for the benefit of the encyclopedia. Let me ask you a question though. You say you felt the weight of

39:

in the matter. While I have certainly had user categories on my page that have been deleted, these were not the categories which I closed the DRV to undelete. Frankly, it would be just as easy to say that administrators who are opposed to user categorization and have no user categories on their page

4811:

has up to 2million people and is the largest concentration of Germany's Afghan and Iranian population (together some 50.000). Claiming that there is only one among all of them who edits Knowledge is just nonsense. And DerDoc ist not even writing from Germany, he edits from Vienna in Austria (1400km

3696:

of the template, and the category it assigns articles to has been permanently in the category for transwiki since its creation two years ago. I have no idea what discussion or guideline you are talking about that is to the contrary, but I think you are simply misreading things, if so. This template

3487:

for the period after the unblock, I just wonder if it is not time to take the case again and see if the user has ever changed. Judging by the amount of blocks and the problems he caused either in edit-warring or massive moving of pages without concensus, I doubt there is any hope he changed or will

84:

I agree with you; that was my point. I didn't participate in either the DRV or the UCFD, but would not have dreamed of closing it. What we should have had was someone who neither recently deleted such categories, nor recently had such categories deleted from his userpage, close it. In any case, you

3540:

of how it looks. He says on his user page that he is here (on Knowledge) to "try to particularly represent the interests of truth and the Sahrawis of Western Sahara (SADR)". and in another place he wrote he will do his utmost to free Western Sahara .. on Knowledge of course. So, if you let him do,

3535:

We have had very lengthy discussions, and we even discussed too much. If you look at the archives of many articles related to Western sahara, you will find that many editors (I, wikima, Juiced Lemon, FayssalF, Collounsbury, ...) were involved in the discussion with koavf. The outcome is always the

330:

I understand. That is why I have (several times now) asked what those strong arguments were that convinced you. So far, other than the vote count, the only one I have gotten from you is "They do let bias be acknowledged," which does not strike me as a strong argument, since I addressed it already.

237:

without a strong basis in policy, my own personal judgment of 2:1 and 3:1 majorities (which I personally view to be consensus) and the analysis of the arguments in the DRV (closing against consensus without strong policy backing) led me to overturn. I hope this answers your questions and addresses

137:

arguments in both related DRVs (why I linked back to the earlier DRV in the close of the second). I don't feel like I could say it any better than he did. Was that the only comment I decided upon? Of course not, but it was where I felt the strength and weight of the argument lay. Were there !votes

5007:

You are not "butting in" from my perspective. I am happy to have interested readers respond. I note you made a strong statement on A.Z.'s discussion page just before you came here, pointing out, from your personal knowledge, the mistake about there having been no emails to ArbComon the subject. I

4604: 4230:

on NP Watch. It obviously isn't a speedy, nor even a PROD, but I have left a note on the talk page. There is a lot of POV and I think it's arguable the content is so adrift from the title that it may never be any better than existing articles covering the same topics. When I looked into his edit

2413:

Sorry about the delay, I've been away. Having looked at the IP, it looks like a semi-static one, and not shared. The vandal has been on it for a few weeks now, and that's the only IP all the accounts listed above used, and there is no collateral, so I gave it a hardblock for 3 months. If he comes

1012:

Hello. I am posting this message on your talk page, as you are identified as an individual with oversight permission on the English Knowledge. On July 7, I sent a request for oversight to the appropriate email address. On July 8, that request was partially completed. Unfortunately, since that

306:

What isn't making sense to me is that your logic is not internally consistent. You apply a different standard to the administrators that you overturned than you do to yourself. Please take a minute to consider this: you just told me that " As for the 1:1 margin, this puts the closure in the "grey

296:

is one of the most important policies that we have, but it is also easy to abuse because of its potential ambiguities. As for the 1:1 margin, this puts the closure in the "grey area" left to administrator discression. I feel that I considered the DRV and UCFD and made my decision in as unbiased a

214:

Ok, as far as the UCFD is concerned, I thought both arguments had merit. Yes, the categories have the (slight) potential for divisivity. They do let bias be acknowledged. Black Falcon pointed out that this bias can be dealt with via userboxes (another user pointed out that not all editors have or

44:

have been improper--but I didn't. I must also contradict your assertion that I closed either DRV against consensus. I read and re-read the comments multiple times. In both cases, I felt the weight of the arguments (and the !vote count) was for undeltetion. Yes, there are some times when policy is

320:

If the arguments for overturning are strong in the 1:1 "grey area" of the DRV (as I thought they were), then an overturn is warranted. If the arguments were not strong in the DRV, I would not have overturned it (defaulting as you say to keep deleted). If the margin was closer in the UFCD, then I

5040:

When I send an email from my computer, it goes out with my return email address on it, from my browser. Perhaps there is a way, through a Yahoo account or something like that, to send an email that does not have a traceable route back to the sender. I don't know the answer. I couldn't do such a

3511:

This is not a virgin case of dispute resolution, Dmcdevit. This is a continuation to a case that the ArbCom had tried to solve by undoing the indef block you set on an extremely disruptive edit-warrior, and setting him on parole to get him change his habit of editing. But, immediately after the

388:

Well, it's a dynamic range, so there are going to be a lot of false positives. It is much easier to confirm sockpuppets that are suspected based on behavior than to discover existing sockpuppets based on the IP. It is easier to block the IP range and deal with any accounts that get through with

3787:

aired JAN'19 2006 (despite the fact that it's a crappy quality photo taken with an ancient camera phone), and I want the bragging rights among my friends (interestingly, no attribution for the photo was given in the show as far as I could tell, despite its cc-by license, though they may have

4200:

The original copyright holders did indeed note that their images are normally released under a noncommercial license, but that they were willing to license it freely for Knowledge. The image appears to be acceptable, despite their conflicting documentation on the website. It also looks like

3633: 1073:

nor have I even heard of the user. I use my real name to edit on wikipedia and have done for three years. Please remove my user block ASAP. A quick google search of my name would reveal that I am a real person editing under my real name, as indeed would a review of my edits, at least

223:

was a weak argument, although there is a valid counter-argument for using "interested in XXXX"). Because I was closing the DRV, I focused on the DRV discussion as well as the UCFD discussion, which served as a background frame of reference. I asked myself several questions: Did

4952:

This is a hosting company, and one with the descriptive name "Everyone's Internet." I'm afraid there will be proxy abuse from it again, but there is no way to separate out the proxies and the legitimate workplaces using their services, so I've unblocked it for now.

3681:

You don't think that there was no decision to deprecate it, a discussion concluding it wasn't deprecated, and a guideline that your change does not comply with is reason enough? Come to that, what reason was there for making the change in the first instance?

5041:

trace, but then I can't do a checkuser either. I had the impression that the only anonymous email was through a public computer, where you don't give your real identity when you rent time on the machine. Perhaps I'll ask at the Ref Desk. Thanks for your time.

544:

and looking back at my history, I actually remember interacting with 98E. They both edit images relating to hip hop artists, South Park, Crash Bandicoot, and stop signs. You can even compare their contributions (specifically the image namespace):

4266:). I've specialized on articles covering the Allied occupation of Germany and I believe he has followed me there for harassment purposes. I've crossed swords with him before, and believe it has continued during his block under such guises as 1343:

Dmcdevit, I hope this posting finds you well. I have a request for a checkuser and I was wondering if you can help me out. If it's not appropriate to ask you in person, please direct me further. There has been an on going issue at the article

4876:

you are urged to put your political feelings aside and tell the truth. i think many are so mad at derek that this is clouding their judgement. i am not convinced that greenwinged is polounit. i am more convinced that they are different.

2938:

Er... hmm. I wish someone had said something in the user talk page. I just shifted the IP to anon-only from hardblock before coming here to notify you and noticing this. I'm going to send you an email to clarify what the deal was here.

2718:

unblock-en-l from his @waitaki-dc.govt.nz email address, and from his position at the Waitaki District Council, he might be able to help you track down the original source of the abuse from this IP address that led to the checkuserblock.

101:

based on personal likes and dislikes of the subject, and not the merit of the article within an encyclopedia: the original closer gave a detailed rationale, and I don't understand why you are so dismissive. And your view of CSD is wrong,

3741:

is for. If it's going to be necessary to tag all the articles currently having this tag with both to achieve a "clean break" between the conceptually separate two entries, I'm willing to bite that bullet. Categorisation of the stub

3081:

All the ones I blocked myself are Artaxiad, but the unlikely referred to the new suspect. Regarding his odd edits, I also am not sure enough to declare that they are unrelated, but "unlikely" means that the IP evidence itself doesn't

3550:

That's not sufficient though. In all these recent reverts, have you been discussing? The problem is, it's quite obvious from the outside that "same behavior he was indef-blocked for" that he is engaging in now, is the same behavior

138:

with little substance on the keep/overturn side? Obviously. But there were also plenty of remarks like "Poisonous Trash" on the delete side of the UCFD and DRV as well. Yes, there is policy cited in the discussion (the ubiquitous

3602: 3595: 4566:

be reverted, I figured we needed something to let people know about this guy. Maybe if it were restored under semi-protection ... I dunno. Was wondering why this couldn't have gone to AfD ... I was just trying to help out.

3407:

Allthough I don't understand fully, I think you have selected image Niharika Acharya.jpg for to be copied on wikipedia commons. I thought that it is already on commons. I don't know why you yourself didn't copy it to commons.

2488:

Having looked, I do have one email from him more than a month ago, when, as you can see, I was not active. In any case, this is an Arbitration Committee ban, I just happened to have helped with it. Thanks for letting me know.

3036:. Note the two administrators who knew it was him and did nothing and since then he was disruptive if nothing else. Same goes for Adil, his creation of the armies of socks was very disruptive and his ban is yet to be reset. 3302:

article. That is, the larger image will, but any modifications done to size, etc. render the image blank in the article. I've tried to figure out what happened, and can't. (I think the same thing happened to a map on the

4374:

A bot marked it as "orphaned". The reason it's orphaned is due to a slash-and-burn of some 300 "trivia" sections, fomented by one editor and aided-and-abetted by an admin currently under arbcom scrutiny for his actions.

913:

has requested on his talk page that you review his block. You blocked him for six months based on checkuser evidence, but he claims that there is collateral damage. I have no opinion; I'm just trying to help. Cheers.

722: 79:

You say "it would be just as easy to say that administrators who are opposed to user categorization and have no user categories on their page (like you) are equally unqualified to close discussions on the topic," and

3070:

I'm confused by your comment "unrelated" on RFCU/Artaxiad 8, since you blocked a bunch of other socks. Does "unrelated" only refer to Gazifikator? If its not a sock of one of those banned users his edits re odd.

935:. Since it seems to identify a particular individual, it might be prudent to remove it from the history altogether. I'll go and delete the posting from the talk page now. Thanks in advance, old bean! Best regards, 432:) and we were wondering if you would be able to enforce a similar block on the user's ip range to limit new sock creation? He seemed to have faded away from day you enforced the block thru July 7ish... Thanks, -- 5062:

That is a personal setting you have on, though perhaps it was the default for your software. It is definitely alterable. Mine says "Dmcdevit" for my wiki wmail account, and my real name only for my private one.

2022:

and I'm wondering when it starts to make sense to report this to them (or is that completely useless?). In any case, if you could again look at a possible range block, it would be very much appreciated. Thanks,

1240: 146:. My point there was simply that the closing admin didn't like the consensus outcome, so the closing admin decided to toss it out the window. My point about CSD was that there is clear, unambiguous policy (i.e. 57:

usurpations, not just a few votes one way or the other), and the DRV discussions agreed with this point. Although I agree with your general argument about discussing and weighing the quality of the arguments,

816: 427:

You ended up assisting some members last month with regards to user Panairjadde who is banned from making edits on WP. We have some outstanding socks that need to be blocked (updated list can be found here,

3521:

That sound like spin. He's not in an edit war with himself. He's reverting every 24 hours, precisely because you and Wikima revert him every time, as well. And there is absolutely no discussion going on.

3107:

Hi, you previously blocked this user for under a checkuser block, and it appears that whoever it is is back and has knowledge of Knowledge. He's been canvassing talk pages, etc. Is this the same person?

709: 2827: 1575: 4049: 3959: 1757: 3869: 3160:"((Fascis and anti turk Doostzadeh, i saw ur racist and anti-turkic ideas, wikipedia is not a place for a fascist persian, you can not change facts and clean azeris in area showed in the map)) -- 2233: 1939: 1848: 3270:. XO Communications (an ISP) runs that block, and while there may be an open proxy among those 65K addresses, blocking the whole subnet is probably overkill. (As it was, there was a complaint on 2324: 2142: 2051: 1666: 3368:

Ack. The only way to rename and file (you can't just move, like with articles) is to reupload the file under the new name. All the spoken articles have already been moved to Commons by bot. Maybe

2736: 2469:. You'd think I'd cease to be surprised at that the way people make these threads and never bother talking to the person who made the original decision or even telling them about the thread... -- 2445: 1013:

time, my (several) requests for follow-up have gone without reply. On July 18, I posted a message to the talk page for Oversight, which has not yet received a response. If you could please

197:

Either one, if you like. What did you find compelling other than the vote count? Because the vote count, and a comment arguing for it, is all you have actually cited. What was it that they

4125:

for a month. You might want to adjust that last one: if the IP is dynamic then that's probably too much collateral damage but if it's static this should be made into a hard block. Cheers,

4412:

I just wanted to let you know that I nominated your image of the penguin life cycle as a featured picture candidate. If you are interested in checking out how the voting is going go to

3750:

actually populate that directly -- which it's never done, until your most recent edits. A much more natural reading of the purpose of this tag is that it's the stub type counterpart of

2033:

Hello, you seem to be back from vacation (I suppose). I hate to insist but I'd really appreciate your advice on the best course of action here. I have yet again blocked three new socks

726: 3281:

Rangeblocks are a very drastic measure, and should not be done without quite a bit of research first. Please be more cautious about blocking entire ranges in the future. Thanks! -

1074:

circumstantially. In my opinion, using bots to block long-standing user accounts with no other evidence of malfeasance is tantamount to lynch law. Sorry for the emotive language.

3290: 837: 1426: 3594: 753: 389:

further checks. Which is what I just did with the latest sock; I widened the IP range block a little, and I think that should cover it. The block is fairly long, for a month.

133:) can't be trusted to close a discussion following consensus? Who is left then to close discussions? The tooth fairy? If you want my justification for the close, I pointed to 3051: 4459: 3735: 3728: 4176: 2662: 3715: 3311: 1370:

that the account will not edit the same pages as it's suspected sock account but in number of artcles these two accounts have been used to clearly over come 3rr. Thanks

111:

the arguments was in favor of the undeletion; I'd like to know what specific arguments, other than the vote count, that you are talking about, because I'm not seeing it.

3355: 5174:

Ack! Thank you so much. That was a mistake in marking the checkboxes, and one which had the potential to affect a lot more legitimate users. I'm glad you mentioned it.

4773:"The article and the paragraph you want to have restored was written by Tajik (whose ban, by the way, may be lifted since the accusations against him were proved wrong) 32: 4706:

It was on an open proxy. There is no technical evidence to disprove Alex's conclusion that it was Adil. Please talk to him about changing the tags based on behavior.

4843: 3122:, by his own admission. Previously, is was used for sockpuppetry by him when he was banned, but now he is unbanned. However, if he is using it for disruption again, 2621: 4942:

Hi. Could you take a look at whether your range block reported at that talk page is still required? A user of that IP range is requesting to be unblocked. Thanks,

4455: 4271: 2821: 2449: 3666:

as "severely harming the former air of freedom floating at Knowledge's IRC channels". I believe it's a sign of the times, though. Please keep up the good work. --

4413: 4285: 3863: 3333: 2658: 3618: 2583: 3766: 3063: 1660: 1133:, and protests his innocence. In particular, he questions the evidence against him and the methodology used to acquire this evidence. Can you enlighten me? -- 3161: 3153: 1260: 1253: 848: 4183: 378:

I'm not so sure I understand the finer points of how checkuser works in practice so sorry if any of the above questions have super-obvious answers. Cheers,

4526: 3075: 2706: 2644: 1456: 1075: 995: 3797: 3040: 4878: 4267: 3321: 2607: 2480: 2470: 710: 1470:

I see from the block record that you have been concerned about this user's behaviour in the recent past. May I ask if you think his constant use of the

500:

See my response above. This one was in a nearby range he hadn't used before, but it just required an additional /24 block. Hopefully that should do it.

4299: 4281: 4205:

has sent them an email asking for clarification about the same matter a few days ago, though they've yet to reply to that particular question. Cheers.

2964: 2943: 331:

That's all I am asking, what are these for keeping that outweigh deletion and warrant reversing two administrators' decisions? 00:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

5215:

Hi, I'm writing to you because you wrote "Unnecessary. These have all been since blocked by Raul, along with he IP. I think the matter is resolved"

4503: 4491: 4179:

has a tag suggesting contacting such a person to verify we have appropriate licensing. Let me know if this is not actually the way I should do this.

2915: 1137: 795:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 263:, and if there were no good arguments brought to refute the claim, whether it "trumps consensus" doesn't make sense. In fact, I'm very surprised that 2538: 1404: 1371: 1148: 4338: 4194: 3134: 2456: 1209: 1170: 1066: 962: 953: 5153:" but the block doesn't appear to be anon-only. You know more than I do, so I can't do much more than point out what seems to be a discrepancy. – 4681:, which could potentially extend his current ArbCom restriction for no reason. So can this situation be addressed in the block log. Also, banned 3027: 5216: 4518: 4430: 4398: 3275: 3174: 2636: 1224: 987: 593: 4861: 4145: 3663: 2431: 2422: 1227: 589: 397: 5234: 4466:, can't find it at Wiktionary. I saw you were an admin over there as well, so could you take a quick look and see what happened to it. Thanks. 4213: 3064: 2542: 2439: 1555: 1247: 1215: 1078: 361: 325: 315: 301: 278: 242: 209: 192: 183: 166: 119: 5202: 5182: 4847: 3094: 2921:

Actually, I suspect this is the same sockpuppeteer the block was intended to stop. Please contact me in private if you need more information.

1198: 1118: 40:(like you) are equally unqualified to close discussions on the topic. Yes, if I'd have closed a "users who support the ACLU" discussion, that 5210: 5091:, I knew that checkuser only reveals the IP of a user, and I'm really sorry that the case wasn't obvious to me. Please accept my apologies.-- 4986:

Pardon me if I'm butting in, but I disagree that there is an inherent "process bias" as you put it, especially when the issue at hand policy-

4923: 4816:

conflict with others simply because of their ethnicity. And most of the time, you are busy reporting them to admins. Seems like you consider

4787: 4721: 4697: 4170: 4162: 4137:

This looks fine. And those are the only two users that have been on that IP, and it's the only IP they've used. I made it into a hard block.

3825: 3811: 3676: 3014: 2698: 915: 4961: 4588: 3285: 3245: 3218: 577: 4547: 4354: 3686: 2929: 2679: 2523: 1645: 1303: 1263:. It was moved to Commons in error, as Commons does not allow fair use, and I am attempting to get it removed from Commons. Thanks! — 651: 620: 5012: 4998: 4119: 4029: 3563: 3545: 3530: 3516: 3506: 3164: 2497: 5071: 5025: 4973: 4714: 2549:, he smiled at me and congratulated me for tracking down the likely (though not certain) puppeteer. Sorry to have bothered you with this. 2483: 1827: 1588: 1380: 865: 467: 452: 4909: 4129: 3939: 3380: 2303: 2009: 1918: 5045: 4652: 4386: 4062: 3972: 3845: 3758: 3705: 3262: 3204: 3181: 2394: 2212: 2121: 1736: 1232: 523: 508: 2407: 2027: 188:

The arguments in the DRV or the UCFD? I am assuming you are asking about the UCFD, correct? Because I just gave you one from the DRV.

3465: 3112: 2806: 1770: 5168: 4473: 4309: 1052: 693:

Thanks in part to your support, I am Knowledge's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words.

3882: 3855:

Hello. That guy just won't quit. He's back at it with what seems to be a new ISP (though from Australia again). I've indef-blocked

3170:

He's blocked for 24 hours for personal attacks by another admin. I'll monitor this one and if he steps over the line again, indef.

2631: 2577: 2246: 1952: 1861: 1374: 1057: 374:

another sock has been listed just a few minutes ago. Should we relist it as a separate checkuser case? Or can you do the follow-up?

45:

strong enough to contravene firm consensus, but these cases are usually given criteria for speedy deletion (i.e. recent changes to

3655: 3362: 3340: 2514: 371:

are any IPs blocked for long periods of time or should we expect to continue monitoring IPs in that range for possible disruption?

4946: 3537: 3229:

Dmcdevit, good to know that you still continue to accuse others of being sockpuppets ... of course without any proofs. Good job,

2337: 2155: 2064: 1679: 1458: 736:. This is a courtesy notice I'll be leaving for everyone who contributed in the last UCFD nomination and not in the current one. 142:), but this policy leaves quite a bit of interpretational room. I admit I made a mistake in linking my last comment to the essay 3372:, the creator of that bot, can create a bot to rename the misnamed files on Commons automatically. I recommend you ask him. :-) 3268: 3017: 73: 4165: 2668: 414: 5095: 4382:) are going to have to stay out, to prevent further edit warring. Kindly leave that picture alone until the issue is settled. 1621: 438: 5111: 4424: 3058: 2749: 1491: 1278: 382: 215:

want userboxes, but that these users may still want to declare bias). They also allow for networking and collaboration on an

4480: 4436:

This section was blanked. Per ArbCom, all appeals of blocks for pedophile activism should be directed to ArbCom in private.

4095: 4005: 3492: 2671:). Also, I can confirm (per the IRC request) that AjitPD is on the same Toronto IP range as Szhaider, and is a close match. 1017:, and if you could please assist me with the remainder of the original request, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you! 656:

Continuarei a trabalhar em prol dos interesses da comunidade e a melhorar segundo vossas sugestões. Calorosos cumprimentos,

4574: 4319: 3180: 1581: 1439: 1352: 1037: 939: 883: 859: 4246: 1803: 4980: 4839: 4725: 4242: 4055: 3965: 3432: 3415: 3345: 2596: 2587: 1179:

all that, esp. given the evidence individuals are providing in email. I originally did the unblock review and declined -

4361: 3915: 2279: 1985: 1894: 1544: 1014: 563: 4769: 4749: 4277: 3833: 3140: 2833: 2617: 1763: 1478: 1043: 811: 4737: 4558:

I debated long and hard myself about creating that ... but after finding out that this was a guy whose edits not only

2370: 2188: 2097: 1712: 1367: 933: 162:

is best for the encyclopedia--consensus be damned. I guess that's just where we will have to agree to disagree. Best,

4895: 4291: 3875: 3850: 2239: 1945: 1854: 1540:)? You can consult the references i've already provided in his/her talk page. Please trust me on this. Kind regards. 550: 5121: 4930: 2701: 2651: 918: 704: 4881: 4366: 3555:

are engaging in now. Banning him would be giving the upper hand to other edit warriors, not resolving the dispute.

3437: 3397: 3237:... now you have to explain why you banned me for no reason and prevented my from defending myself in the arbcom! - 3149:

pan-Iranist (fascism)". The user is uploading an ethnic map from separatist site that contradicts academic maps.

2974: 2553: 2330: 2148: 2057: 1672: 1412: 1333: 1297: 4444: 2782: 1420: 5100: 4153: 3327: 2467: 1549: 1444: 1357: 4690: 4483:. However, that article was alter deleted by another admin as you can see in the deletion log. Hope that helps. 3479:

was unblocked from his indef block to apparently give him another chance to edit differently, and was placed on

674: 4935: 3775: 3768: 3746:

is one thing, and may be justifiable on fuzzy family resemblance grounds, but that's a far cry from having the

3046: 2742: 2479:

Oh, he claims he did try to talk to you. But I still thought you might like to see the thread at some point. --

1522: 1474:

to tag edits that are patently not minor (such as reverting good faith edits) are problematic for our project?

1289: 419: 5089: 4790: 4700: 4533: 3670: 3659: 3589: 3256: 1615: 1032: 1002: 907: 645: 494: 5116: 4500: 4470: 4326:

Xxx236 where he refers to the article I had planned to create and had outlined a structure for in my Sandbox

4089: 3999: 3614: 3024: 2990: 1321: 1273: 596: 4635: 2871: 2473: 1797: 1632: 1601: 1481:

but I would appreciate guidance on the matter if I am wrong in the stance I expressed there. Respectfully...

871: 721:

This category is again nominated for discussion at user categories for discussion. Since you contributed to

4323: 4305: 4263: 4106: 4075: 4016: 3985: 3909: 3483:

for a year. He was blocked for extensive revert-warring and for other disruptive behaviour. looking at his

2625: 2273: 1979: 1888: 1608: 1252: 901: 790: 4175:

Hi Dmcdevit, I'm contacting you because you are listed as a person with an account on the OTRS system and

2888: 2839: 2364: 2182: 2091: 1814: 1783: 1706: 1639: 625:

I shall continue to work on behalf of the community's interests and improve according to your suggestions.

5227: 4308:). This latest activity by Molobo was began when I corrected yet another misleading text he had inserted 4113: 4082: 4023: 3992: 3926: 3895: 3647:

The barnstar is presented to Dmcdevit for his efforts in fostering civil discourse on Knowledge and IRC.

3480: 3470: 3100: 2570: 2290: 2259: 1996: 1965: 1905: 1874: 1293: 1233: 321:

think Jossi would have been justified in closing the UCFD as delete, but the margin was not close. Best,

5129: 5125: 3484: 2776: 2381: 2350: 2199: 2168: 2108: 2077: 1821: 1723: 1692: 975: 5222:. However, on examining the blog logs of Iantresman's suspected sock puppets, I see that one of them, 4729: 4350: 4344: 3933: 2864: 2558: 2297: 2003: 1912: 1790: 1153:

Hi. It does look like this block is in error, there doesn't seem to be any significant overlap between

929: 796: 403: 26: 2793: 2762: 2388: 2206: 2115: 1730: 368:

were you able to identify other socks we did not know about? If so are you saying you can't list them?

4967: 4784: 4404: 3902: 3778:. I was the original photographer and uploader of that photo quite a long time ago. Since then, user 3351: 2940: 2266: 1972: 1881: 1628: 1095: 546: 4664: 4102: 4012: 3839: 2800: 2715: 2573:

has been inactive, as a result of this all active taskforce members are being asked to re-register.

4553: 4497: 4467: 3438: 3296: 3271: 2845: 2444:

Dmcdevit, it appears you've gone on a wikibreak. Should you return, I invite you to take a look at

2357: 2175: 2084: 1810: 1699: 1569: 1479:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ACorticopia&diff=149629790&oldid=149231444

853: 457:

Much appreciated =) Do you mind blocking the rest of his unblocked socks as well? (updated list on

3922: 3354:

you just approved the transwiki of need to have "en-" prepended to their file names, according to

2286: 1992: 1901: 5147: 5092: 5017:

I'm not sure how an email would identify someone in real life. I don't understand what you mean.

4780: 4667: 4449: 4238: 4227: 4043: 3953: 3402: 2884: 2377: 2195: 2104: 1719: 1496: 1463: 1445: 830: 826: 818: 4331: 3541:

there sure will be no reverting war. The same behavior he was indef-blocked for is unchanged. --

877: 4936: 4886: 4191: 2789: 2769: 2611: 1751: 1595: 1484: 458: 429: 355: 93:

closing a discussion, that seems rather inappropriate. And I'm a bit taken aback that you cite

4812:

further south!). There is only one user who is disrupting and that is you, Atabek. You are in

4069: 3979: 1046:

and may I suggest an extension of the block? Things are nice and quiet when its in effect.. --

767: 5197: 5163: 4696:

claiming he is not Tajik, but says he only inserts Tajik's text :) on the talk page. Thanks.

4462:

because they had been prodded as having been transwikied to Wiktionary. The original editor,

3462: 3234: 3109: 3072: 2227: 1933: 1842: 1777: 1349: 1166: 959: 936: 783: 758: 663: 634: 531: 143: 94: 63: 3889: 2253: 1959: 1868: 267:, which essentially defines the project as an encyclopedia, is not a "strong" policy to you. 4915: 4835: 4761: 4756:

IP). All three are alleged socks which is totally impossible. You also need to explain why

4693: 4422: 4035:

whose pattern of hoax articles is unmistakable. I've also soft-blocked the accompanying IP

3821: 3793: 3318: 3308: 3157: 2685: 2344: 2318: 2162: 2136: 2071: 2045: 1686: 1408: 1400: 1385: 842: 4327: 2427:

That's great, thanks a lot. I'll let you know if he ever crawls out from under that rock!

1221: 1220:

Hi, Cause you were so helpfull last time. Can i please have your assistance again on this

1205:

I'd particularly like to see the usercheck results, as it doesn't seem to exist on RfUC.

8: 4571: 4219: 4159: 3751: 3386: 3101: 2998: 2983: 2756: 1134: 1007: 749: 408:

Hello. Yet again we have another (likely) sock puppet (again its probably AdilBaguirov):

364:. Call me clueless but I'm not sure I understand what your concluding sentence means but 3193: 3034: 889: 89:

consensus; you can point to some nonsense essay that says otherwise, but if you are the

5179: 5138: 5083: 5068: 5022: 4958: 4906: 4858: 4711: 4649: 4585: 4544: 4488: 4441: 4383: 4233: 4210: 4142: 4126: 3808: 3784: 3714:(to which I made explicit reference to in my edit summary). The discussion is located 3702: 3586: 3560: 3527: 3503: 3377: 3215: 3189: 3131: 3091: 3002: 2961: 2926: 2908: 2730: 2676: 2602: 2494: 2428: 2419: 2404: 2024: 1329: 1307: 950: 834: 809: 700: 688: 574: 505: 449: 394: 379: 312: 275: 206: 180: 116: 103: 2590:(if you were unable to reply to this notice in time, you can just add you name back). 554: 4916: 4678: 4674: 3610: 3252: 2695: 1338: 1315: 1283: 1269: 1145: 923: 322: 298: 260: 239: 220: 189: 163: 151: 139: 70: 17: 4764:

is unblocked after checkuser revealed that the accusations against both were wrong!

4378:

Until that issue is resolved, the trivia sections (such as this picture's place, in

4376: 3052:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:Dmcdevit_and_moving_images_to_the_commons

158:

in these grey areas. You seem to think that it's better for admin to do what he/she

5219: 5189: 5155: 4429: 4392:

If this image gets deleted, we can restore it once the ArbCom issue is dealt with.

4335: 4257: 4161:, as you also identified earlier several sock accounts associated with it. Thanks. 3842: 3667: 3448: 3369: 3010: 2550: 2453: 1244: 1206: 1195: 1162: 1154: 1126: 1115: 1082: 1059: 668: 639: 537: 475: 411: 134: 4479:

It was indeed transwikied. Transwikied articles go to the transwiki namespace, so

5106: 4686: 4417: 3817: 3789: 3119: 1464: 1345: 5187:

Ah, good thing we got that resolved, then. :) Thanks for the prompt response. –

2851: 557: 5230:. Would it be possible to reinstate the Leokor part of the checkuser request? 4995: 4943: 4658: 4628: 4594: 4568: 4393: 4379: 3711: 3337: 3199: 2545:

as a sock after I'd reported it at WP:AIV, when last I heard from Connell66 as

2533: 1363: 737: 714: 601: 560: 147: 59: 50: 2446:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#User:NuclearUmpf

5231: 5175: 5064: 5018: 4954: 4902: 4871: 4854: 4707: 4670: 4645: 4581: 4540: 4484: 4463: 4437: 4206: 4138: 3804: 3779: 3698: 3583: 3556: 3523: 3499: 3498:

Have you tried any dispute resolution? It looks like you are just reverting.

3429: 3412: 3373: 3282: 3224: 3211: 3171: 3127: 3123: 3087: 2957: 2922: 2901: 2672: 2546: 2518: 2490: 2415: 1521:

article. These redirects are misleading (see my comment on his/her talk page

1453: 1326: 1176: 946: 806: 695: 570: 569:

Yes, that is indeed him. I've renewed the IP block that had expired already.

501: 445: 390: 308: 293: 271: 264: 202: 176: 112: 46: 36: 4807:

assuming bad faith) is well known and notorious. And, for your information,

4182:

I'm questioning the licensing because the image claims cc-by-sa 3.0 but the

2877: 53:). Closes against 2:1 and 3:1 majorities were not warranted here (these are 4511: 4315: 3606: 3577: 3542: 3513: 3489: 3299: 3248: 3037: 2857: 2586:

within 15 days of receiving this notice your name will be removed from the

1541: 1311: 1264: 1158: 1130: 1089: 1070: 970: 481: 150:), and then there is policy that is much more open to interpretation (i.e. 3233:... And, yeah, THIS here is my IP. Go ahead and launch your CheckUser ... 5223: 5042: 5009: 4977: 4927: 4745: 4741: 4295: 4253: 4220: 3603:

the discussion of Image:US Government most-wanted Iraqi playing cards.jpg

3392: 3146: 3055: 3006: 2461: 1529: 1390: 1180: 1100: 1047: 1026: 658: 629: 583: 462: 433: 4892: 4776: 4757: 4733: 4682: 4202: 3476: 3359: 3238: 3158:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Iranian_Azeris&action=history

2994: 2986: 2976: 2691: 2593: 1525: 1506: 610: 409: 4620: 4358: 3755: 3683: 3623: 1537: 1518: 1431: 679:

Thanks • Obrigado • Gracias • Merci • Danke • Спасибо • Tack • Kiitos

515: 486: 4994:

e-mailed ArbCom on this issue, two days ago--real name and all. =)--

4891:

Thank you very much for the checkuser on Daddy Kindsoul/Soprani. --

4603: 4349:

Requesting your input concerning some speedy deletions. Please see:

3421: 3304: 2403:

And of course, these are only the ones I managed to catch. Cheers,

2018:... and these are just the ones I know about. The IP is again from 1533: 1514: 1510: 1502: 541: 238:

your concerns. I'm not sure what else I can tell you though. Best,

3658:

is appreciated. It is deplorable that a growing number of editors

3210:

Thanks for letting me know. I've blocked the IP in question, too.

4808: 4753: 4330:. The polish camp I refer to is by the way the ones described in 3632: 1042:...and he's creating new socks again. Please block existing ones 774: 540:, is he blocked or not? It's suspected that he's a sockpuppet of 4496:

Thanks. I must have been sleeping and forgot to click the link.

2541:…I just found it very strange that he smiled at me, then marked 825:

I noticed that someone was requesting an autoblock be lifted at

4618:

For cleaning up over half of the RFCU requests that were open.

2019: 1019: 730: 654:, que terminou sem sucesso com um resultado final de (80/22/3). 484:. Did he edit from that range you blocked, or something else? 444:

I've taken a look and extended the IP block which had expired.

2565: 1564: 623:, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). 4038: 3948: 3150: 2466:

There's a thread about your block of the runcorn sock farm:

35:. Let me first address your comments regarding my potential 4853:

Please don't fight this fight about Tajik on my talk page.

3295:

Both you and some bot recently made changes to this image:

2816: 1746: 1144:

It seems this block was illegitamite. Please restore asap--

778: 733: 681:

Esker • Köszönöm • Takk • Grazie • Hvala • ありがとう • 謝謝 • 谢谢

97:, when you (should) know that that essay is for people who 31:

Dmcdevit, I appreciate your concerns regarding my close of

3858: 3692:

Er, there was no "decision" to deprecate it? That was the

3033:

Here is the proof that Flavius is indef banned users sock

2569:

Hello, Dominic! You are receiving this notice because the

2222: 1928: 1837: 1558:. In any case, it seems StealBoy & friends are back. 553:. And not to mention them both starting similar galleries 4990:

and not necessarily policy itself. One way or another, I

3605:. Thanks for your prompt attention to this matter. — 3291:

Image:National-atlas-indian-reservations-south-dakota.gif

3156:

23:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC) Here is another comment: "

2313: 2131: 2040: 1655: 1477:

I have just left the following message on his talk page:

1099:. - without prejudice for self-confessed block evasion - 3358:. Are you aware of a method of automating this process? 895: 259:" seems backwards; consensus is based on arguments like 3596:

Image:US Government most-wanted Iraqi playing cards.jpg

3267:

Noticed that you blocked 67.155.0.0/16 this past winter

2725: 2414:

back, let me know, and I'll take a look at his new IP.

5134:. One curious thing, I noticed your block reason was " 3332:

Hello, Dmcdevit. Your participation in the discussion

3307:

article) Could you please take a look at it? Thanks -

1129:

complains that he's been blocked as a sockpuppet of

981:

Updated for July...one article de-FAed this month...

4724:

and comment on it. Also make sure you check my IP (

1292:. I've been able to confirm based on behavior that 711:

Category:Wikipedians who listen to video game music

4720:While you are at it, Dmcdevit, make sure you read 3422:http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Niharika_Acharya.jpg 5218:as a response to this request, which was made by 4760:is still banned, although his alleged sockpuppet 4322:some of the articles I recently edited. Note his 3454:Image now require commons categories Please add ] 974: 928:Dmc, I just found this posting on a talk page at 3488:ever change. Please have a look at this case. -- 985:Oh, and we ran into a Nadirali sock just then... 829:, and that the reason for blocking listed was {{ 4231:history, I felt you should be aware of this. -- 3774:Hi, I have a complicated request in regards to 3718:(this was flagged at the template's talk page). 2657:Yes indeed it is, and so is the blocked vandal 1125:Excuse the intrusion. My internet acquaintance 1067:Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents 255:users based on point of view. Your concept of " 4673:actually claims that it's most likely sock of 3803:Sorry, I was busy in real life. Done now. :-) 3536:same: no result. For a few days ago here is a 3065:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Artaxiad 1556:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/StealBoy 1175:Note - I've gone ahead and unblocked the guy. 362:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/StealBoy 4924:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Haham Hanuka 4677:. I think this comment unnecessarily targets 4158:Can you look into this new checkuser request 3456:Images without categories will not be moved. 1425:Dunno if Mackensen informed you, but there's 1324:) has also been blocked. Are there any more? 1239:Hi Dmcdevit, I'm wondering what you think of 131:or an admin who has never had a user category 3426:Category:Journalists from the United States 3009:are currently involved in revert warring at 2707:Checkuser block review request: 210.86.28.87 125:way? You think that an admin who has had an 1524:). Could you please restore the redirects ( 1381:Allegations of state terrorism in Sri Lanka 3145:Hi a new user (assuming it is not a sock) 2997:. This is a second time after the case of 1065:I have e-mailed you and left a message on 619:Thank you, Dmcdevit, for participating in 4922:Hello Dmcdevit! I need your expertise at 4601: 4226:.. is back and I caught his latest page, 3630: 958:Pleasure doing business with you! Peace! 787:was updated with a fact from the article 4351:User:CharonX#Regarding your T1 Deletions 2578:Knowledge:Cleanup Taskforce/Not Dead Yet 650:Obrigado, Dmcdevit, por participares no 4926:. Thank you for any feedback! Regards, 3001:. Among other listed accounts both new 2517:has been brought to RFAr. Best wishes, 14: 5109:, apparently affected by the block on 5105:Hey, there. Saw an unblock request at 2440:ZerOFaults/NuclearUmph/SevenOfDiamonds 1216:Requests for checkuser/Case/Silveriver 5211:Rejected Iantresman checkuser request 4481:wikt:Transwiki:Goat Glossary of Terms 4171:Verify licensing on OTRS for an image 4318:and during September 30 preceded to 3601:Hi. Please come and participate in 1554:Hello. I'm not sure if you remember 513:Hah, didn't see that there, thanks. 85:don't seem to understand that votes 4644:Thanks for your help clerking! :-) 4516:Did you get my emails from Monday? 3722:If you're rather claiming that all 3336:would be genuinely appreciated. -- 3235:your wrong accusations were exposed 2690:This is clearly an anon IP sock of 725:, you may wish to say something in 480:Another sock came through somehow, 23: 3664:have already been mischaracterized 3263:Please be careful with rangeblocks 1234:WP:ANI#Sockpuppets of Oldwindybear 609: 284:Replace my use of the word strong 62:. Going against consensus because 24: 5245: 4685:again reappeared on the same old 551:Special:Contributions/Tiger_white 106:says "it should be the case that 4602: 4314:I presume he then had a look at 3631: 3447: 3298:and now it will not link to the 2564: 1088: 976: 766: 4663:Hello Dmcdevit. Regarding this 4184:web page the picture comes from 3769:Image:Verrazano-Bridge-Dawn.jpg 3356:the standard presently observed 3317:Looks fine now - thanks again. 3126:might be the best place to go. 605: 536:Hi there. What's the deal with 154:). Admins shouldn't go against 4771:describes the situation well: 4371:FYI from another user page... 4252:I'm getting truly fed up with 3846:20:02, 30 September 2007 (UTC) 3798:06:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC) 3759:16:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 3710:The guidelines in question is 3706:12:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 3687:10:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 3671:19:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC) 3619:23:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 3590:18:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC) 3564:20:46, 22 September 2007 (UTC) 3546:08:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 3531:07:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 3517:07:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 3507:06:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC) 3493:19:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC) 3466:23:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC) 3433:19:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC) 3416:19:30, 17 September 2007 (UTC) 3398:06:00, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 3381:23:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3363:23:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC) 3341:11:15, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3322:02:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3312:01:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC) 3286:15:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 3257:13:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 3219:00:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 3205:23:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 3190:Yes, you officially have a fan 3175:22:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 3165:12:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 3135:22:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 3113:19:39, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 2965:22:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 2944:21:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC) 13: 1: 3095:09:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 3076:02:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC) 3059:16:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 3041:18:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 3028:01:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC) 3018:23:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 2991:User:Drosophilawhodoestnotfly 2930:23:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 360:Hello. Thanks for looking at 5235:20:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5203:23:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC) 5183:15:19, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5169:09:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5096:04:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5072:15:48, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5046:15:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5026:15:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 5013:05:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 4999:05:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 4981:04:37, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 4962:15:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC) 4947:06:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 4931:14:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC) 4910:22:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 4896:22:15, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 4882:16:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 4862:06:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC) 4848:18:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 4791:14:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 4715:06:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC) 4701:05:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 4653:22:20, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 4636:02:53, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 4589:23:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 4575:12:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 4548:23:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 4534:06:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 4504:06:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 4492:23:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 4474:19:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 4445:08:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC) 4425:23:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 4399:09:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 4387:09:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 3054:. Talk about you. Mahalo. -- 2620:) - I think it is obviously 2562: 1429:that's been defered to you. 1310:) is a sockpuppet of Bonny. 1069:. I am not a sockpuppet of 1038:Panairjedde block expired... 791:Biblioteca Nacional de Chile 7: 4828:Armenians as your enemies. 4669:of this identified sock of 4460:Talk:Goat Glossary of Terms 4362:00:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 4339:18:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 4247:03:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 4214:05:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 4195:16:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 4166:07:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 4146:05:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 4130:03:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 3826:06:33, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 3812:03:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 3729:Category:Copy to Wiktionary 3677:"Deprecation" of vocab-stub 3660:view civility as expendable 3346:Transwikied spoken articles 2916:01:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 2702:21:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 2680:01:54, 31 August 2007 (UTC) 2652:08:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 2597:00:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 2554:01:53, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 2524:00:46, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 2498:23:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2484:18:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2474:18:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 2457:23:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 2432:20:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2423:17:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2408:16:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2028:07:52, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1015:take a look at that message 821:involving a CheckUser block 219:topic (hence why I thought 10: 5250: 4783:, etc. socks listed under 3834:Sockpupets right to vanish 3475:Hi. For a few months ago, 3453: 3141:disruptive user pushing OR 2582:If you do not re-register 2576:For more information see: 1545:22:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1492:22:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 1459:10:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC) 1440:19:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 930:Talk:Saugeen-Maitland Hall 64:you don't like the outcome 51:policy on non-free content 4689:, disrupting the article 4608: 4186:states a CC attribution, 3851:StealBoy/Lyle123: new ISP 3637: 2982:Please, take a look here 1375:14:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC) 1353:17:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1334:07:47, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 1279:17:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1248:08:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1228:05:05, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1210:21:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1199:21:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1171:20:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1149:18:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1138:16:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1119:07:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1079:01:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC) 1053:16:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC) 1033:20:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 1003:05:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 963:21:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 954:05:15, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 945:Thanks, oversighted now. 940:23:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 919:18:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC) 838:06:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC) 812:17:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 754:13:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 705:09:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 675:00:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 646:00:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC) 597:17:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 578:12:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 564:10:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC) 547:Special:Contributions/98E 4832:is disruptive, Atabek. 4367:Image:ITawAPuttyTat1.JPG 3439:User:Betacommand/Commons 3272:User talk:67.155.169.170 3086:a connection, at least. 3025:Drosophilawhodoestnotfly 2993:and openly admits he is 2956:I've sent you an email. 524:20:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 509:20:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 495:15:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 468:22:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 453:20:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 439:16:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 415:15:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 398:20:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 383:10:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 326:00:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 316:23:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 302:23:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 279:22:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 243:20:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 210:19:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 193:19:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 184:19:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 167:16:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 120:22:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 74:18:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC) 60:voting is not always bad 5101:Rangeblock, anon or no? 4781:User:German-Orientalist 4692:and continues again at 4328:German_Collective_Guilt 4228:German collective guilt 4190:license. - thanks. -- 4154:Robert599 - Gazifikator 3656:firm stance on civility 3328:Spoken files on Commons 1550:StealBoy socks are back 1446:User talk:20.138.246.89 1358:Unblock and the results 827:User talk:151.75.190.98 819:User talk:151.75.190.98 797:Did you know? talk page 729:, which was started on 4937:User talk:216.12.193.9 4528:two years of monkeying 4456:Goat Glossary of Terms 3047:Admin noticeboard talk 2520:Firsfron of Ronchester 2450:User:MONGO/Ban evasion 1294:Ursul pacalit de vulpe 982: 627:Most sincere regards, 614: 459:User_talk:Dppowell/PPP 430:User_talk:Dppowell/PPP 420:Panairjadde assistance 4612:The Original Barnstar 4454:On 6 April I deleted 4316:my contributions list 3641:The Civility Barnstar 1421:You're needed at RFCU 1259:Hi. Please undelete 980: 613: 233:generally default to 229:Given that XfDs with 201:that was compelling? 129:category be deleted ( 4762:User:Tajik-Professor 4732:) and compare it to 4694:Talk:Safavid dynasty 4580:Responded by email. 4353:(and a semi-related 2941:Georgewilliamherbert 2515:The Poetlister block 1386:Thiruvalluvar Statue 1290:recent contributions 1261:Image:Picsingles.jpg 1254:Image:Picsingles.jpg 37:conflict of interest 4498:CambridgeBayWeather 4468:CambridgeBayWeather 4414:the nomination page 3752:Category:Vocabulary 3471:Unchanged behaviour 3244:Don't misquote me: 3184:in concert tonight! 3118:The IP is owned by 3102:User:64.131.205.111 2999:User:Anatolmethanol 2878:cross-wiki contribs 817:Unblock request at 723:the last discussion 247:Consensus is about 5093:U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 4801:bad faith attitude 4345:Divisive userboxes 3785:The Colbert Report 3736:copy to Wiktionary 3003:User:Andranikpasha 2989:appears under the 2714:Michael White has 2622:Spartathreehundred 2559:Please re-register 2513:Per your request, 983: 932:. The diff is here 673: 644: 615: 404:Another Sockpuppet 27:User Category DRVs 4968:Emails and ArbCom 4850: 4838:comment added by 4679:User:AdilBaguirov 4675:User:AdilBaguirov 4666:, the block log 4641: 4640: 4633: 4562:be reverted, but 4405:Penguin Lifecycle 4397: 3651: 3650: 3582:You've got mail. 3460: 3459: 3255: 2914: 2571:Cleanup Taskforce 1417: 1403:comment added by 803: 802: 686: 685: 657: 628: 99:make simple votes 18:User talk:Dominic 5241: 5201: 5194: 5167: 5160: 5152: 5146: 5143: 5137: 5133: 5120: 4901:No problem. :-) 4833: 4634: 4631: 4627: 4625: 4606: 4599: 4598: 4554:Amorrow LTA page 4529: 4521: 4420: 4396: 4124: 4122: 4085: 4065: 4063:deleted contribs 4041: 4034: 4032: 3995: 3975: 3973:deleted contribs 3951: 3944: 3942: 3905: 3885: 3883:deleted contribs 3861: 3816:Thanks a lot. -- 3740: 3734: 3635: 3628: 3627: 3451: 3444: 3443: 3395: 3251: 3202: 3197: 3110:The Evil Spartan 3011:Khojaly Massacre 2913: 2911: 2905: 2899: 2894: 2892: 2867: 2819: 2811: 2809: 2772: 2752: 2750:deleted contribs 2728: 2694:, please, check 2659:Indiansmellcurry 2647: 2639: 2568: 2521: 2399: 2397: 2360: 2340: 2338:deleted contribs 2316: 2308: 2306: 2269: 2249: 2247:deleted contribs 2225: 2217: 2215: 2178: 2158: 2156:deleted contribs 2134: 2126: 2124: 2087: 2067: 2065:deleted contribs 2043: 2014: 2012: 1975: 1955: 1953:deleted contribs 1931: 1923: 1921: 1884: 1864: 1862:deleted contribs 1840: 1832: 1830: 1793: 1773: 1771:deleted contribs 1749: 1741: 1739: 1702: 1682: 1680:deleted contribs 1658: 1650: 1648: 1611: 1591: 1589:deleted contribs 1567: 1489: 1487: 1438: 1436: 1416: 1397: 1350:Hamster Sandwich 1332: 1277: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1155:User:Gerry Lynch 1127:User:Gerry Lynch 1113: 1110: 1108: 1092: 1083:User:Gerry Lynch 1060:User:Gerry_Lynch 1058:Remove block on 1050: 1031: 1029: 1024: 998: 990: 978: 977:File:IndiaFA.JPG 960:Hamster Sandwich 937:Hamster Sandwich 912: 911: 866:deleted contribs 770: 763: 762: 745: 743: 671: 666: 661: 642: 637: 632: 606: 538:User:Tiger white 522: 520: 493: 491: 465: 436: 173:strong consensus 156:strong consensus 5249: 5248: 5244: 5243: 5242: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5213: 5190: 5188: 5156: 5154: 5150: 5144: 5141: 5135: 5130:WHOIS (partial) 5115: 5112:76.199.100.0/22 5110: 5107:User talk:Drono 5103: 5088:In response to 5086: 4970: 4940: 4920: 4889: 4874: 4742:HanseNet/Allice 4687:Safavid dynasty 4661: 4629: 4621: 4619: 4597: 4556: 4527: 4519: 4514: 4452: 4450:Deleted article 4434: 4418: 4407: 4369: 4347: 4224: 4173: 4156: 4098: 4078: 4058: 4037: 4036: 4008: 3988: 3968: 3947: 3946: 3918: 3898: 3878: 3857: 3856: 3853: 3838:Please comment. 3836: 3772: 3767:Attribution of 3738: 3732: 3731:; that's what 3679: 3662:. Your actions 3626: 3599: 3580: 3473: 3442: 3411:Anyway thanks. 3405: 3403:Thanks dmcdevit 3393: 3389: 3352:spoken articles 3348: 3330: 3319:AlexiusHoratius 3309:AlexiusHoratius 3293: 3265: 3227: 3200: 3188: 3186: 3143: 3120:User:YoSoyGuapo 3105: 3068: 3049: 2980: 2909: 2903: 2900: 2880: 2860: 2815: 2814: 2785: 2765: 2745: 2724: 2723: 2709: 2688: 2645: 2637: 2605: 2600: 2588:membership list 2561: 2536: 2519: 2464: 2442: 2373: 2353: 2333: 2312: 2311: 2282: 2262: 2242: 2221: 2220: 2191: 2171: 2151: 2130: 2129: 2100: 2080: 2060: 2039: 2038: 1988: 1968: 1948: 1927: 1926: 1897: 1877: 1857: 1836: 1835: 1806: 1786: 1766: 1745: 1744: 1715: 1695: 1675: 1654: 1653: 1624: 1604: 1584: 1563: 1562: 1552: 1509:article to the 1505:redirected the 1499: 1497:False redirects 1485: 1482: 1468: 1465:User:Corticopia 1449: 1432: 1430: 1423: 1398: 1360: 1346:SEIU Local 1.on 1341: 1325: 1286: 1267: 1257: 1237: 1218: 1186: 1184: 1181: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1063: 1048: 1040: 1027: 1020: 1018: 1010: 996: 988: 973: 926: 851: 847: 845: 823: 761: 752: 741: 739: 727:the current one 719: 691: 669: 664: 659: 640: 635: 630: 604: 586: 534: 516: 514: 487: 485: 478: 463: 434: 422: 406: 358: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5247: 5212: 5209: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5205: 5148:checkuserblock 5102: 5099: 5085: 5082: 5081: 5080: 5079: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5053: 5052: 5051: 5050: 5049: 5048: 5033: 5032: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5002: 5001: 4969: 4966: 4965: 4964: 4939: 4934: 4919: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4888: 4887:Daddy Kindsoul 4885: 4873: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4864: 4794: 4793: 4740:, provided by 4728:, provided by 4718: 4717: 4660: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4639: 4638: 4615: 4614: 4609: 4607: 4596: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4555: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4513: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4451: 4448: 4433: 4428: 4406: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4394:User:Zscout370 4380:Palatine uvula 4368: 4365: 4346: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4312: 4223: 4218: 4217: 4216: 4188:non-commercial 4172: 4169: 4155: 4152: 4151: 4150: 4149: 4148: 3852: 3849: 3835: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3828: 3771: 3765: 3764: 3763: 3762: 3761: 3719: 3678: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3654:Dominic, your 3649: 3648: 3644: 3643: 3638: 3636: 3625: 3622: 3598: 3593: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3472: 3469: 3458: 3457: 3455: 3452: 3441: 3436: 3404: 3401: 3388: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3347: 3344: 3329: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3292: 3289: 3264: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3226: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3185: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3142: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3104: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3067: 3062: 3048: 3045: 3044: 3043: 2979: 2975:Checkuser for 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2933: 2932: 2896: 2895: 2812: 2708: 2705: 2687: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2604: 2601: 2560: 2557: 2535: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2511: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2463: 2460: 2441: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2401: 2400: 2309: 2218: 2127: 2035: 2034: 2016: 2015: 1924: 1833: 1742: 1651: 1565:220.233.106.31 1551: 1548: 1501:Hi, Dmcdevit. 1498: 1495: 1467: 1462: 1448: 1443: 1422: 1419: 1396:just a few:)) 1394: 1393: 1388: 1383: 1364:User:Gnanapiti 1362:You unblocked 1359: 1356: 1340: 1337: 1285: 1282: 1256: 1251: 1236: 1231: 1217: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1202: 1201: 1173: 1151: 1141: 1140: 1135:Jonathan Drain 1122: 1121: 1062: 1056: 1039: 1036: 1009: 1006: 972: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 925: 922: 849:71.233.232.243 844: 841: 831:checkuserblock 822: 815: 801: 800: 771: 760: 757: 748: 718: 708: 690: 687: 684: 683: 680: 678: 677: 655: 649: 648: 626: 624: 616: 603: 600: 585: 582: 581: 580: 533: 530: 529: 528: 527: 526: 477: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 421: 418: 405: 402: 401: 400: 376: 375: 372: 369: 357: 356:StealBoy socks 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 333: 332: 261:WP:NOT#MYSPACE 144:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 95:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5246: 5237: 5236: 5233: 5229: 5225: 5221: 5217: 5204: 5199: 5195: 5193: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5181: 5177: 5173: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5165: 5161: 5159: 5149: 5140: 5131: 5127: 5123: 5118: 5113: 5108: 5098: 5097: 5094: 5090: 5073: 5070: 5066: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5056: 5055: 5054: 5047: 5044: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5027: 5024: 5020: 5016: 5015: 5014: 5011: 5006: 5005: 5004: 5003: 5000: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4985: 4984: 4983: 4982: 4979: 4975: 4972:I noticed on 4963: 4960: 4956: 4951: 4950: 4949: 4948: 4945: 4938: 4933: 4932: 4929: 4925: 4918: 4911: 4908: 4904: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4894: 4884: 4883: 4880: 4863: 4860: 4856: 4852: 4851: 4849: 4845: 4841: 4840:82.82.138.140 4837: 4831: 4827: 4824:Afghans, and 4823: 4819: 4815: 4810: 4806: 4802: 4799:Your general 4798: 4797: 4796: 4795: 4792: 4789: 4785: 4782: 4778: 4774: 4770: 4768:I think this 4767: 4766: 4765: 4763: 4759: 4755: 4751: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4738:80.171.47.194 4735: 4731: 4727: 4726:82.82.138.140 4723: 4716: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4699: 4695: 4691: 4688: 4684: 4680: 4676: 4672: 4671:User:Artaxiad 4668: 4665: 4654: 4651: 4647: 4643: 4642: 4637: 4632: 4626: 4624: 4617: 4616: 4613: 4610: 4605: 4600: 4590: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4578: 4577: 4576: 4573: 4570: 4565: 4561: 4549: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4531: 4530: 4523: 4522: 4505: 4502: 4499: 4495: 4494: 4493: 4490: 4486: 4482: 4478: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4472: 4469: 4465: 4464:User:GoatLink 4461: 4457: 4447: 4446: 4443: 4439: 4432: 4427: 4426: 4423: 4421: 4415: 4410: 4400: 4395: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4388: 4385: 4384:Baseball Bugs 4381: 4377: 4372: 4364: 4363: 4360: 4356: 4352: 4340: 4337: 4333: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4313: 4310: 4307: 4304: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4290: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4276: 4273: 4269: 4265: 4262: 4259: 4255: 4251: 4250: 4249: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4235: 4234:Rodhullandemu 4229: 4222: 4215: 4212: 4208: 4204: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4196: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4180: 4178: 4168: 4167: 4164: 4160: 4147: 4144: 4140: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4128: 4127:Pascal.Tesson 4121: 4118: 4115: 4112: 4108: 4104: 4101: 4097: 4094: 4091: 4088: 4084: 4081: 4077: 4074: 4071: 4068: 4064: 4061: 4057: 4054: 4051: 4048: 4045: 4040: 4039:58.168.36.197 4031: 4028: 4025: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4011: 4007: 4004: 4001: 3998: 3994: 3991: 3987: 3984: 3981: 3978: 3974: 3971: 3967: 3964: 3961: 3958: 3955: 3950: 3949:Yallowboy6666 3941: 3938: 3935: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3921: 3917: 3914: 3911: 3908: 3904: 3901: 3897: 3894: 3891: 3888: 3884: 3881: 3877: 3874: 3871: 3868: 3865: 3860: 3848: 3847: 3844: 3840: 3827: 3824: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3796: 3795: 3791: 3786: 3781: 3777: 3770: 3760: 3757: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3737: 3730: 3725: 3720: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3708: 3707: 3704: 3700: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3685: 3672: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3652: 3646: 3645: 3642: 3639: 3634: 3629: 3621: 3620: 3616: 3612: 3608: 3604: 3597: 3592: 3591: 3588: 3585: 3565: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3544: 3539: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3529: 3525: 3520: 3519: 3518: 3515: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3491: 3486: 3482: 3481:revert parole 3478: 3468: 3467: 3464: 3450: 3446: 3445: 3440: 3435: 3434: 3431: 3427: 3424: 3423: 3418: 3417: 3414: 3409: 3400: 3399: 3396: 3382: 3379: 3375: 3371: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3343: 3342: 3339: 3335: 3323: 3320: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3310: 3306: 3301: 3297: 3288: 3287: 3284: 3279: 3278:about this.) 3277: 3273: 3269: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3220: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3203: 3195: 3194:Join the club 3191: 3183: 3176: 3173: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3163: 3162:alidoostzadeh 3159: 3155: 3154:alidoostzadeh 3151: 3147: 3136: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3111: 3103: 3096: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3080: 3079: 3078: 3077: 3074: 3066: 3061: 3060: 3057: 3053: 3042: 3039: 3035: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3029: 3026: 3020: 3019: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2984: 2978: 2966: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2945: 2942: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2931: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2912: 2907: 2906: 2890: 2886: 2883: 2879: 2876: 2873: 2870: 2866: 2863: 2859: 2856: 2853: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2835: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2823: 2818: 2813: 2808: 2805: 2802: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2788: 2784: 2781: 2778: 2775: 2771: 2768: 2764: 2761: 2758: 2755: 2751: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2738: 2735: 2732: 2727: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2717: 2712: 2711:Hi Dmcdevit, 2704: 2703: 2700: 2696: 2693: 2681: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2667: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2641: 2640: 2633: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2616: 2613: 2609: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2591: 2589: 2585: 2580: 2579: 2574: 2572: 2567: 2556: 2555: 2552: 2548: 2547:User:LOZ: OOT 2544: 2540: 2525: 2522: 2516: 2512: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2499: 2496: 2492: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2482: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2472: 2468: 2459: 2458: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2433: 2430: 2429:Pascal.Tesson 2426: 2425: 2424: 2421: 2417: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2406: 2405:Pascal.Tesson 2396: 2393: 2390: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2376: 2372: 2369: 2366: 2363: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2349: 2346: 2343: 2339: 2336: 2332: 2329: 2326: 2323: 2320: 2315: 2310: 2305: 2302: 2299: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2285: 2281: 2278: 2275: 2272: 2268: 2265: 2261: 2258: 2255: 2252: 2248: 2245: 2241: 2238: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2224: 2219: 2214: 2211: 2208: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2194: 2190: 2187: 2184: 2181: 2177: 2174: 2170: 2167: 2164: 2161: 2157: 2154: 2150: 2147: 2144: 2141: 2138: 2133: 2128: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2083: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2070: 2066: 2063: 2059: 2056: 2053: 2050: 2047: 2042: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2031: 2030: 2029: 2026: 2025:Pascal.Tesson 2021: 2011: 2008: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1981: 1978: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1964: 1961: 1958: 1954: 1951: 1947: 1944: 1941: 1938: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1917: 1914: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1900: 1896: 1893: 1890: 1887: 1883: 1880: 1876: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1863: 1860: 1856: 1853: 1850: 1847: 1844: 1839: 1834: 1829: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1799: 1796: 1792: 1789: 1785: 1782: 1779: 1776: 1772: 1769: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1756: 1753: 1748: 1743: 1738: 1735: 1732: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1705: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1691: 1688: 1685: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1665: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1647: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1627: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1590: 1587: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1557: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1494: 1493: 1488: 1483:Gaimhreadhan 1480: 1475: 1473: 1466: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1455: 1447: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1435: 1428: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1402: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1355: 1354: 1351: 1347: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1328: 1323: 1320: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1308:Tones benefit 1305: 1302: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1288:Check out my 1281: 1280: 1275: 1271: 1266: 1262: 1255: 1250: 1249: 1246: 1242: 1235: 1230: 1229: 1226: 1222: 1211: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1192: 1178: 1174: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1112: 1098: 1097: 1091: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1077: 1076:91.125.114.14 1072: 1068: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1045: 1035: 1034: 1030: 1025: 1023: 1016: 1005: 1004: 1000: 999: 992: 991: 979: 964: 961: 957: 956: 955: 952: 948: 944: 943: 942: 941: 938: 934: 931: 921: 920: 917: 909: 906: 903: 900: 897: 894: 891: 888: 885: 882: 879: 876: 873: 870: 867: 864: 861: 858: 855: 850: 840: 839: 836: 835:Jesse Viviano 832: 828: 820: 814: 813: 810: 808: 798: 794: 793: 792: 786: 785: 784:Did you know? 780: 776: 772: 769: 765: 764: 759:July 12th DYK 756: 755: 751: 747: 746: 735: 732: 728: 724: 716: 712: 707: 706: 702: 698: 697: 682: 676: 672: 667: 662: 653: 647: 643: 638: 633: 622: 617: 612: 608: 607: 599: 598: 595: 591: 588:You can come 579: 576: 572: 568: 567: 566: 565: 562: 558: 555: 552: 548: 543: 539: 532:Sockpuppetry? 525: 521: 519: 512: 511: 510: 507: 503: 499: 498: 497: 496: 492: 490: 483: 469: 466: 460: 456: 455: 454: 451: 447: 443: 442: 441: 440: 437: 431: 425: 424:Hello there, 417: 416: 413: 410: 399: 396: 392: 387: 386: 385: 384: 381: 380:Pascal.Tesson 373: 370: 367: 366: 365: 363: 329: 328: 327: 324: 319: 318: 317: 314: 310: 305: 304: 303: 300: 295: 291: 287: 283: 282: 281: 280: 277: 273: 266: 262: 258: 257:strong policy 254: 250: 246: 245: 244: 241: 236: 232: 227: 226:strong policy 222: 218: 213: 212: 211: 208: 204: 200: 196: 195: 194: 191: 187: 186: 185: 182: 178: 174: 170: 169: 168: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 136: 135:tariqabjotu's 132: 128: 123: 122: 121: 118: 114: 109: 105: 100: 96: 92: 91:administrator 88: 83: 78: 77: 76: 75: 72: 68: 65: 61: 56: 52: 48: 43: 38: 34: 19: 5226:has a clean 5214: 5191: 5157: 5104: 5087: 4991: 4987: 4971: 4941: 4921: 4917:Haham hanuka 4890: 4879:Appealplease 4875: 4829: 4825: 4821: 4817: 4813: 4804: 4800: 4772: 4752:which is an 4750:193.170.48.2 4719: 4662: 4622: 4611: 4563: 4559: 4557: 4525: 4517: 4515: 4453: 4435: 4411: 4408: 4373: 4370: 4348: 4302: 4288: 4274: 4268:83.27.70.170 4260: 4232: 4225: 4192:SiobhanHansa 4187: 4181: 4174: 4157: 4116: 4110: 4099: 4092: 4086: 4079: 4072: 4066: 4059: 4052: 4046: 4026: 4020: 4009: 4002: 3996: 3989: 3982: 3976: 3969: 3962: 3956: 3936: 3930: 3919: 3912: 3906: 3899: 3892: 3886: 3879: 3872: 3866: 3854: 3837: 3820: 3792: 3773: 3747: 3743: 3723: 3693: 3680: 3640: 3600: 3581: 3552: 3474: 3461: 3428: 3425: 3419: 3410: 3406: 3391:No problem. 3390: 3349: 3331: 3300:South Dakota 3294: 3280: 3266: 3230: 3228: 3187: 3144: 3106: 3083: 3069: 3050: 3021: 2981: 2902: 2897: 2881: 2874: 2868: 2861: 2854: 2848: 2842: 2836: 2830: 2824: 2817:210.86.28.87 2803: 2797: 2786: 2779: 2773: 2766: 2759: 2753: 2746: 2739: 2733: 2713: 2710: 2689: 2665: 2646:bananabucket 2643: 2635: 2628: 2614: 2608:202.4.79.163 2606: 2592: 2581: 2575: 2563: 2543:User:X-Force 2537: 2510:Hi Dmcdevit, 2465: 2443: 2402: 2391: 2385: 2374: 2367: 2361: 2354: 2347: 2341: 2334: 2327: 2321: 2300: 2294: 2283: 2276: 2270: 2263: 2256: 2250: 2243: 2236: 2230: 2209: 2203: 2192: 2185: 2179: 2172: 2165: 2159: 2152: 2145: 2139: 2118: 2112: 2101: 2094: 2088: 2081: 2074: 2068: 2061: 2054: 2048: 2017: 2006: 2000: 1989: 1982: 1976: 1969: 1962: 1956: 1949: 1942: 1936: 1915: 1909: 1898: 1891: 1885: 1878: 1871: 1865: 1858: 1851: 1845: 1824: 1818: 1807: 1800: 1794: 1787: 1780: 1774: 1767: 1760: 1754: 1747:Lizardboy333 1733: 1727: 1716: 1709: 1703: 1696: 1689: 1683: 1676: 1669: 1663: 1642: 1636: 1625: 1618: 1612: 1605: 1598: 1592: 1585: 1578: 1572: 1553: 1500: 1476: 1471: 1469: 1450: 1433: 1424: 1395: 1361: 1342: 1318: 1306:) (formerly 1300: 1287: 1258: 1238: 1219: 1182: 1159:User:Runcorn 1146:Martin Wisse 1131:User:Runcorn 1102: 1093: 1071:User:Runcorn 1064: 1041: 1021: 1011: 997:bananabucket 994: 986: 984: 927: 904: 898: 892: 886: 880: 874: 868: 862: 856: 846: 843:Block review 824: 804: 789: 788: 782: 738: 720: 694: 692: 618: 592:to discuss. 587: 535: 517: 488: 482:User:Trapboy 479: 426: 423: 407: 377: 359: 323:IronGargoyle 299:IronGargoyle 289: 285: 268: 256: 252: 248: 240:IronGargoyle 234: 231:no consensus 230: 225: 217:encyclopedic 216: 198: 190:IronGargoyle 172: 164:IronGargoyle 159: 155: 130: 126: 107: 98: 90: 86: 81: 71:IronGargoyle 66: 54: 41: 30: 5220:Art LaPella 5192:Luna Santin 5158:Luna Santin 5117:block range 4834:—Preceding 4746:User:DerDoc 4336:Stor stark7 4282:83.27.74.68 4221:User:Molobo 4114:investigate 4024:investigate 3934:investigate 3859:Blueboy7777 3387:Name change 3370:Betacommand 3073:Thatcher131 3007:User:Hu1lee 2898:Thanks. -- 2858:proxy check 2801:investigate 2551:Proabivouac 2539:I guess not 2454:Proabivouac 2389:investigate 2298:investigate 2223:Deathboy333 2207:investigate 2116:investigate 2004:investigate 1929:Rattyboy333 1913:investigate 1838:Snakeboy333 1822:investigate 1731:investigate 1640:investigate 1530:Ephthalites 1399:—Preceding 1391:Sarathambal 1245:Proabivouac 1207:Gerry Lynch 412:Hajji Piruz 290:unambiguous 5084:An apology 4996:Dali-Llama 4777:User:Tajik 4758:User:Tajik 4734:User:Tajik 4683:User:Tajik 4419:ZeWrestler 4324:message to 4177:this image 4083:block user 4076:filter log 3993:block user 3986:filter log 3903:block user 3896:filter log 3776:this image 3477:User:Koavf 3350:All those 2995:User:Fadix 2987:User:Fadix 2977:User:Fadix 2865:block user 2840:filter log 2770:block user 2763:filter log 2697:. Thanks. 2692:User:Tajik 2686:CU request 2603:CU request 2358:block user 2351:filter log 2314:Diveboy555 2267:block user 2260:filter log 2176:block user 2169:filter log 2132:Badboy1111 2085:block user 2078:filter log 2041:Diedboy333 1973:block user 1966:filter log 1882:block user 1875:filter log 1791:block user 1784:filter log 1700:block user 1693:filter log 1656:Allyboy333 1609:block user 1602:filter log 1526:White Huns 1507:White Huns 1452:do ;). -- 1405:Taprobanus 1372:Taprobanus 1366:under the 902:block user 872:filter log 689:Thank you! 292:. I think 221:WP:MYSPACE 152:WP:MYSPACE 140:WP:MYSPACE 108:almost all 47:BLP policy 5228:block log 5139:anonblock 5122:block log 4944:Sandstein 4820:Iranian, 4539:Replied. 4332:this book 4103:CheckUser 4090:block log 4013:CheckUser 4000:block log 3923:CheckUser 3910:block log 3485:block log 3338:Macropode 3201:Nihiltres 2904:Netsnipe 2885:CheckUser 2872:block log 2790:CheckUser 2777:block log 2378:CheckUser 2365:block log 2287:CheckUser 2274:block log 2196:CheckUser 2183:block log 2105:CheckUser 2092:block log 1993:CheckUser 1980:block log 1902:CheckUser 1889:block log 1811:CheckUser 1798:block log 1720:CheckUser 1707:block log 1629:CheckUser 1616:block log 1538:Chionites 1519:Kidarites 1368:condition 1339:Checkuser 1284:Bonaparte 1008:Oversight 924:Oversight 908:block log 561:Spellcast 249:arguments 171:i think " 127:unrelated 5232:Cardamon 5176:Dmcdevit 5065:Dmcdevit 5019:Dmcdevit 4955:Dmcdevit 4903:Dmcdevit 4855:Dmcdevit 4836:unsigned 4814:constant 4754:Austrian 4708:Dmcdevit 4646:Dmcdevit 4582:Dmcdevit 4541:Dmcdevit 4520:Blnguyen 4485:Dmcdevit 4438:Dmcdevit 4431:Dyskolos 4306:contribs 4292:contribs 4278:contribs 4264:contribs 4243:contribs 4207:Dmcdevit 4139:Dmcdevit 4056:contribs 3966:contribs 3876:contribs 3805:Dmcdevit 3780:Nagytibi 3748:template 3744:category 3724:articles 3699:Dmcdevit 3615:contribs 3584:Picaroon 3557:Dmcdevit 3524:Dmcdevit 3500:Dmcdevit 3430:abhishka 3413:abhishka 3374:Dmcdevit 3305:Nebraska 3283:Jredmond 3212:Dmcdevit 3198:Cheers, 3182:Dmcdevit 3172:Moreschi 3128:Dmcdevit 3088:Dmcdevit 2958:Dmcdevit 2923:Dmcdevit 2834:contribs 2743:contribs 2726:Mwhitenz 2673:Dmcdevit 2669:contribs 2638:Blnguyen 2632:contribs 2618:contribs 2491:Dmcdevit 2416:Dmcdevit 2331:contribs 2240:contribs 2149:contribs 2058:contribs 1946:contribs 1855:contribs 1764:contribs 1673:contribs 1582:contribs 1534:Red Huns 1515:Red Huns 1511:Xionites 1503:User:Kaz 1454:lucasbfr 1413:contribs 1401:unsigned 1322:contribs 1304:contribs 1274:contribs 1225:ExtraDry 1094:User(s) 989:Blnguyen 947:Dmcdevit 860:contribs 807:Andrew c 594:Kingjeff 571:Dmcdevit 542:User:98E 502:Dmcdevit 476:Stealboy 446:Dmcdevit 391:Dmcdevit 309:Dmcdevit 272:Dmcdevit 253:grouping 203:Dmcdevit 177:Dmcdevit 113:Dmcdevit 69:. Best, 33:this DRV 4809:Hamburg 4569:Blueboy 4320:mess up 3822:գուտանգ 3794:գուտանգ 3712:WP:STUB 3694:purpose 3607:Jeff G. 3543:A Jalil 3514:A Jalil 3490:A Jalil 3274:and on 3253:(talky) 3249:Deskana 3084:support 3038:VartanM 2716:emailed 2481:W.marsh 2471:W.marsh 1542:E104421 1517:to the 1312:Indexxs 1265:Jeff G. 1223:Thanks 1096:blocked 775:12 July 715:WP:UCFD 652:meu RfB 148:WP:NFCC 55:radical 5224:Leokor 5126:global 5043:Bielle 5010:Bielle 4988:making 4978:Bielle 4928:gidonb 4805:always 4788:Atabek 4775:". So 4744:) and 4698:Atabek 4595:Thanks 4501:(Talk) 4471:(Talk) 4296:Granet 4254:Molobo 4163:Atabek 4120:cuwiki 4030:cuwiki 3940:cuwiki 3668:Ghirla 3538:sample 3420:Image 3394:Durova 3124:WP:ANI 3015:Atabek 2807:cuwiki 2699:Atabek 2534:Lights 2395:cuwiki 2304:cuwiki 2213:cuwiki 2122:cuwiki 2020:Exetel 2010:cuwiki 1919:cuwiki 1828:cuwiki 1737:cuwiki 1646:cuwiki 1427:a case 1177:WP:AGF 1049:Palffy 1028:talk 916:Shalom 731:8 July 621:my RfB 602:My RfB 556:& 549:& 464:Palffy 435:Palffy 294:WP:NOT 286:strong 265:WP:NOT 160:thinks 104:WT:CSD 87:aren't 67:is bad 4893:Yamla 4872:truth 4730:Arcor 4630:(Ni!) 4560:could 4409:Hey, 4357:). - 4203:Riana 3360:tgies 3239:Tajik 3231:admin 3225:Tajik 3056:Ali'i 2846:WHOIS 2594:RJFJR 1163:Arwel 878:WHOIS 717:again 696:Andre 461:) -- 288:with 42:might 16:< 5198:talk 5164:talk 5128:) · 4992:have 4974:A.Z. 4844:talk 4830:That 4748:'s ( 4736:'s ( 4722:this 4659:RfCU 4623:Kwsn 4564:must 4512:RFCU 4458:and 4416:. -- 4359:jc37 4300:talk 4286:talk 4272:talk 4258:talk 4239:talk 4070:logs 4044:talk 3980:logs 3954:talk 3945:and 3890:logs 3864:talk 3843:יודל 3818:Aram 3790:Aram 3756:Alai 3716:here 3684:Alai 3611:talk 3578:Ping 3334:here 3276:OTRS 3247:. -- 3005:and 2852:RBLs 2822:talk 2757:logs 2731:talk 2663:talk 2626:talk 2612:talk 2584:here 2345:logs 2319:talk 2254:logs 2228:talk 2163:logs 2137:talk 2072:logs 2046:talk 1960:logs 1934:talk 1869:logs 1843:talk 1778:logs 1752:talk 1687:logs 1661:talk 1596:logs 1570:talk 1513:and 1486:talk 1434:Kwsn 1409:talk 1330:khoi 1327:Khoi 1316:talk 1298:talk 1270:talk 1241:this 1167:talk 1157:and 1044:here 971:Info 896:http 890:RBLs 884:RDNS 854:talk 779:2007 742:Nate 734:2007 701:talk 590:here 518:Kwsn 489:Kwsn 235:keep 199:said 49:and 4826:all 4822:all 4818:all 4803:(= 4779:or 4355:DRV 4294:), 4280:), 4107:log 4050:tag 4017:log 3960:tag 3927:log 3870:tag 3587:(t) 3553:you 2889:log 2828:tag 2794:log 2737:tag 2634:). 2462:ANI 2382:log 2325:tag 2291:log 2234:tag 2200:log 2143:tag 2109:log 2052:tag 1997:log 1940:tag 1906:log 1849:tag 1815:log 1758:tag 1724:log 1667:tag 1633:log 1576:tag 773:On 750:(T) 740:Big 713:on 660:Hús 631:Hús 584:Rex 82:yes 5151:}} 5145:{{ 5142:}} 5136:{{ 5119:· 4846:) 4572:96 4532:) 4245:) 4241:- 4109:) 4096:CA 4019:) 4006:CA 3929:) 3916:CA 3841:-- 3739:}} 3733:{{ 3617:) 3192:. 3013:. 2985:. 2910:► 2796:) 2783:CA 2650:) 2448:, 2384:) 2371:CA 2293:) 2280:CA 2202:) 2189:CA 2111:) 2098:CA 1999:) 1986:CA 1908:) 1895:CA 1817:) 1804:CA 1726:) 1713:CA 1635:) 1622:CA 1536:= 1532:, 1528:= 1490:• 1415:) 1411:• 1187:is 1169:) 1107:is 1081:= 1001:) 805:-- 799:. 781:, 777:, 744:37 703:) 670:nd 641:nd 559:. 5200:) 5196:( 5180:t 5178:· 5166:) 5162:( 5132:) 5124:( 5114:( 5069:t 5067:· 5023:t 5021:· 4959:t 4957:· 4907:t 4905:· 4859:t 4857:· 4842:( 4712:t 4710:· 4650:t 4648:· 4586:t 4584:· 4545:t 4543:· 4524:( 4489:t 4487:· 4442:t 4440:· 4311:. 4303:· 4298:( 4289:· 4284:( 4275:· 4270:( 4261:· 4256:( 4237:( 4211:t 4209:· 4143:t 4141:· 4123:) 4117:· 4111:· 4105:( 4100:· 4093:· 4087:· 4080:· 4073:· 4067:· 4060:· 4053:· 4047:· 4042:( 4033:) 4027:· 4021:· 4015:( 4010:· 4003:· 3997:· 3990:· 3983:· 3977:· 3970:· 3963:· 3957:· 3952:( 3943:) 3937:· 3931:· 3925:( 3920:· 3913:· 3907:· 3900:· 3893:· 3887:· 3880:· 3873:· 3867:· 3862:( 3809:t 3807:· 3703:t 3701:· 3624:☆ 3613:| 3609:( 3561:t 3559:· 3528:t 3526:· 3504:t 3502:· 3463:β 3378:t 3376:· 3216:t 3214:· 3196:. 3132:t 3130:· 3092:t 3090:· 2962:t 2960:· 2927:t 2925:· 2893:) 2891:) 2887:( 2882:· 2875:· 2869:· 2862:· 2855:· 2849:· 2843:· 2837:· 2831:· 2825:· 2820:( 2810:) 2804:· 2798:· 2792:( 2787:· 2780:· 2774:· 2767:· 2760:· 2754:· 2747:· 2740:· 2734:· 2729:( 2677:t 2675:· 2666:· 2661:( 2642:( 2629:· 2624:( 2615:· 2610:( 2495:t 2493:· 2452:. 2420:t 2418:· 2398:) 2392:· 2386:· 2380:( 2375:· 2368:· 2362:· 2355:· 2348:· 2342:· 2335:· 2328:· 2322:· 2317:( 2307:) 2301:· 2295:· 2289:( 2284:· 2277:· 2271:· 2264:· 2257:· 2251:· 2244:· 2237:· 2231:· 2226:( 2216:) 2210:· 2204:· 2198:( 2193:· 2186:· 2180:· 2173:· 2166:· 2160:· 2153:· 2146:· 2140:· 2135:( 2125:) 2119:· 2113:· 2107:( 2102:· 2095:· 2089:· 2082:· 2075:· 2069:· 2062:· 2055:· 2049:· 2044:( 2013:) 2007:· 2001:· 1995:( 1990:· 1983:· 1977:· 1970:· 1963:· 1957:· 1950:· 1943:· 1937:· 1932:( 1922:) 1916:· 1910:· 1904:( 1899:· 1892:· 1886:· 1879:· 1872:· 1866:· 1859:· 1852:· 1846:· 1841:( 1831:) 1825:· 1819:· 1813:( 1808:· 1801:· 1795:· 1788:· 1781:· 1775:· 1768:· 1761:· 1755:· 1750:( 1740:) 1734:· 1728:· 1722:( 1717:· 1710:· 1704:· 1697:· 1690:· 1684:· 1677:· 1670:· 1664:· 1659:( 1649:) 1643:· 1637:· 1631:( 1626:· 1619:· 1613:· 1606:· 1599:· 1593:· 1586:· 1579:· 1573:· 1568:( 1472:m 1407:( 1319:· 1314:( 1301:· 1296:( 1276:) 1272:| 1268:( 1243:. 1196:☺ 1191:n 1189:o 1185:l 1183:A 1165:( 1116:☺ 1111:n 1109:o 1105:l 1103:A 1022:j 993:( 951:t 949:· 910:) 905:· 899:· 893:· 887:· 881:· 875:· 869:· 863:· 857:· 852:( 699:( 665:ö 636:ö 575:t 573:· 506:t 504:· 450:t 448:· 395:t 393:· 313:t 311:· 276:t 274:· 207:t 205:· 181:t 179:· 117:t 115:·

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.