User talk:Dominic/Archive 24

5845:

giving out someone's IP address on only a likelihood, and not a certainty, that they were doing anything wrong. My policy is usually to avoid giving any positive or negative statement on IP addresses at all, except where it becomes essential to the case. Note that I try to remain silent about IPs in cases like these even when it is a negative finding, so that my silence isn't an implicit connection. This is mostly a subjective determination, but usually that means that when there are multiple accounts and a finding of sockpuppetry, making any comment on the IPs is unnecessary because knowing the IP's status will not affect the finding of sockpuppetry against the main account. In this case, it doesn't seem like the repercussions against the alleged main account would be affected much by saying whether or not the IPs are related. The block against the main account applies to all accounts any IPs by that person, so making the IP known will only be necessary if in the future IP editing is used to evade the block.

2227:

to resolve on anything they want, but it won't change the fact. You might want to reflect on the meaning of the word "resolution": to resolve to do something is to have a determination to do it, BUT it is not necessarily to accomplish it; thus the UN General Assembly would like for Mayotte to be part of Comoros but it's not going to happen. And furthermore, nations that voted for these resolutions knew it wouldn't have any effect when they voted; in fact many nations vote cynically in such circumstances, thus allowing them to have things both ways: they can say to the Comorans "hey look, we supported you" but they won't really offend the French because the vote is essentially meaningless. You seem to be a pretty smart guy, so wake up and join the world of realpolitik!

3806:) for the details; I deleted a recent re-posting of this article after it had been tagged as having failed a previous AfD. Essentially, this editor has offered me some evidence that the article should be re-mounted; because of a comment in the earlier AfD that "Some unhappy ETS patients have an axe to grind about the side-effects of their surgery, so they are appropriating Knowledge in order to advance their cause, both in this and in the ETS entry" I wanted to proceed very carefully. My understanding of the relevant policies is that you should be consulted before anything else happens, and that if you were to agree that the article should be re-examined, the next step is 2933:

blocked, and didn't see the need to differentiate. Regarding the merit of the unblock request, I am always mystified by the amount of unblock requests I am asked to comment on just because I did CheckUser. What happened is that there was an ongoing sockpuppetry problem, and someone asked me to use the tool to find outstanding accounts. I don't have any greater authority or judgment here than you. In fact, I prefer to segregate the roles of commenting admin and CheckUser, so that my opinions an decisions as the former never appear to influence my judgments as the latter. (Which was all a polite way of trying to evade your request for comment. ;-) )

5883: 4823:

different editors just to see if they held any grudge against me, or Lar or JoshuaZ. And why should I bother emailing the foundation, just to get no response because they disagree? And I am certainly not filing any complaint with something as silly as AUSC. I am certain of what I say, and don't say this sort of thing lightly. I could have raised it some time back of course, but I thought Dominic had stopped playing games so did let the matter drop. Clearly I was incorrect in that assumption.

3235: 5772: 2180:. Now, your evidence here is not very persuasive. Your first point, about the UN resolutions, is simply wrong: there have been around four separate UN resolutions passed in the last 35 years each affirming the original resolution on the matter which stated that the "occupation by France of the Comorian island of Mayotte constitutes a flagrant encroachment on the national unity of the Comorian State." This is all discussed in the article itself, and referenced in 1523: 3268: 708: 5228:, you'll see that an editor on the other side of the I/P dispute agree with Nableezy and my supicions about Breein1007 being a sock account related to CM/NoCalton. An SPI was raised about Bree possibly being run by Canadian Monkey alittle while ago but it was closed because of the lack of a recent trail for CM shortly before he reactivated and you did your own Checkuser on him. I asked the clerk who closed that SPI to consider reopening it (see 5734: 2153:

actually live there have just voted overwhelmingly to become even more so. You refer to UN resolutions: the only ones I know of are PROPOSED resolutions which were vetoed by France and are thus null and void. Arab and African organizationa you mention have also expressed vain desires about about how they would like things to be in Palestine, for example; this doesn't change the real situation in the world people actually live in.

4734: 6284: 4842:

insist that you are sure of it and that you have evidence, but refuse to actually file a complaint to settle the matter. As a fellow CheckUser, I know you understand the gravity of the accusation. If you are actually serious about it, you should act in the way that a serious complainant would; and that does not involve vague accusations on talk pages which seem to have no purpose other than to damage someone's reputation.

3708: 3638: 3561: 5906: 2250:

General Assembly resolutions can be ignored, however this is not how any reliable sources on the matter view them. I don't understand your partisanship here; what we are describing is not what we ourselves think is true, but how the situation is understood by reliable sources. Regarding Mayotte rejoining Comoros, I of course I agree that "it's not going to happen," and, indeed, you will see

4796:

As to your substantive complaints about activity and interest, you should have raised them during the election period. I would have told you that while it is true that I have been doing a lot of traveling and moving recently and I fully admit my low level of recent activity, I am here to stay and soonto be back to normal schedules, so I expect to be able to give AuSc all the time it needs.

2828:

the topic at hand. Is this comic in any way historically significant enough for inclusion on a general physics article, or is it just something we put there because we like? The idea that we would include the image in the article if we could sounds ridiculous to me. The inclusion, and especially the link's title, is embarrassingly unprofessional for an encyclopedia article.

1300:

assume the dispute is either over or futile, and so I reintroduce these changes. I'm aware that these reverts are not "classic" vandalism, but as ungrounded, strongly POV-flavoured removal of relevant information, they are not far from it. Of course, you are right that PMK1 wasn't doing it to harm the project, but other than that, some features of vandalism are apparent.

1250:

think you need to be careful, because the attitudes of both you and PMK1, regardless of who is right, would really make editing those articles unpleasant for anyone else who wants to get involved. Your comment here about it being bordering on vandalism is part of that. I can easily tell that the reason you had the disagreement was because you both thought you were

2223:

Assembly resolutions, whereas what I had in mind was Security Council Resolutions, which are the only ones that have any effect. The General Assembly, like the Arab and African associations you mention, is a highly politicized body; all of these groups have made all sorts of partisan resolutions over the years, but their effect is merely propogandistic.

2576:." But simply clicking on these two links is enough to establish that this is not, in fact, the case. It would appear that you deleted an article that had not in fact been transwikied. I would ask you to either undo your deletion (to preserve the edit history), or alternatively make sure that you do transwiki the material you deleted. Thank you. -- 4249:

SPI case because the two accounts I suspect to be his so far are already blocked. What I'm after is trying to get my suspicions confirmed so that some sort of rangeblock can be placed; otherwise he could just keep coming back (some schools have a different IP address for each computer in the school). The two accounts which I've found are

1159:(Sorry for not replying sooner.) I may have used the wrong block template here. However, what I meant wasn't that he was one of the accounts named in the last sockpuppetry case, but that he was a sockpuppet account discovered when the latest Pickbothmanlol sockpuppet (Tollund man) was checked by me, and was confirmed by CheckUser. See 2387:

common types of vandal usernames that are preoblematic enough to need to be treated with oversight, and should not be spread with UAA reports. Similarly outing like "X's name is Y," "X lives in Canton, Michigan," "X goes to school at Y," and so on should be directed to oversight. And of course, err on the side of caution. Thanks.

6141:

one when suspicions turn out to be unfounded. I think if we talk about it calmly we can reach an understanding, and I can clearly articulate why I thought the check was warranted. But after all that all those screenfulls of words, could you perhaps post a succinct summary of what you would still like me to answer?

1341: 78:

in the technical aspects of it? Just be aware that it's a job that can often be stressful and frustrating, as well as tedious (which I know you're expert at), so you have to make sure you're ready before you commit yourself. Take it from me, it was a big relief when I resigned from that particular tool. :-)

4257:. If necessary I can explain what makes me suspicious of these two particular accounts, since I realize it would not be obvious to most other editors, and because "Soap thinks you're ScienceGolfFan" isn't really going to convince a checkuser. (I am 100 percent sure, though; not just 99% sure.) -- 6140:

Irvine, I have seen the discussions, both there and on ANI. You should know that I sympathize with your situation. I have been in this job long enough to know the stress that a sockpuppetry investigation can cause. It is always a hazard of the decision to perform a check, and an even more unfortunate

5709:

and belong to the same range of IP addresses. There is not supposed to be anything secretive about that fact. Note that usually in cases like these, simply using a different internet connection (like home or school instead of the library) will be sufficient to be able to register an account. However,

5191:

I admit a response has been slower in coming than I would like. I am still new to the committee, and, to be frank, so far it has been frustrating. We need to come up with a better system than posting unfocused smatterings of comments to a mailing list. I am hoping to work on making it more efficient,

4841:

I am not nor have I ever leaked or played "games." I don't hold grudges against any of the people you mention, including you. In fact, despite any disagreements we may have had, I quite like Lar, who I have known and worked with for a while. Again, I think it is unreasonable to make an accusation and

2750:

I don't have much to add besides what is apparent. The service is indeed an anonymizing proxy, and shouldn't really be unblocked. There is no reason to think this account is connected to any abuse on the IP. If they need to use it to edit (perhaps due to editing from China) IPBE should be considered.

2214:

There is nothing "confusing" about calling a vote to become an integral part of the French nation, as opposed to being a mere territory or "overseas collectivity", "more French". When Alaska became a state it become more American;if Puerto Rico voted to become a state it would too. We, and the people

2175:

However, if you would like to discuss the issue of the island's political status absent the red herring of the recent vote, that's fine. Unfortunately, the "truth" is not that Mayotte is part of France, but rather that France claims and administers Mayotte as a part of France. Nor is "the truth" what

1949:

of users, which is why I put that custom block message. Please feel free to assume good faith liberally in the absence of evidence that this user is a vandal and give out IP block exemptions. If you do give IPBE, try to note the block at fault, so we can keep track of it (since user rights don't have

1907:

for extended abuse of editing privileges. On 30 March they spent a short time abusing the unblock and helpme templates, so I reblocked without talk page rights. I'll undo this shortly when they've got bored and gone away - this is just to let you know as it varies your previous block. Hope that's OK,

1307:

I accept your advice that I should be more careful in my wording (didn't mean to offend PMK1 or anybody, he's actually a pretty reasonable (though a bit stubborn) guy compared to other people who share his views on the matters involved), but I still don't think there was anything that much wrong with

1226:

Thinking back, I should have been more careful in my wording, but I'm multitasking at the moment and I'm not a native speaker, so I realize now that it may have had an unintended threatening twist: I apologize for that :) My intention was to say that the user got what he should have expected to get.

1222:

Thanks for the heads up. By "face the consequences" I didn't mean some kind of threat, but rather that PMK1, who began adding such POV material to the article, is practically asking for counter-material: the two ways to balance an article to NPOV are to have the POV content in balance or to remove it

529:

Actually, I'd rather not. I think it makes more sense if the CheckUser doesn't become involved in discussions over blocks, and restricts themselves to the technical evidence only. That way the evidence will be more credible, and they won't get stuck in the case where a CheckUser is advocating a block

446:

Hi Dmcdevit, you were the person who blocked my IP 84.45.219.185 - thank you for doing that. I apologise for the puerile behaviour from this IP. Since the offending computers had the OS re-installed and spyware cleaned, hopefully there should not be any more vandalism. I apologise for the compromised

91:

Well that's my thought process right now. The thing is, I obviously devote alot of time to Knowledge, so that's not really an issue. I mean I'm averaging about 300-400 edits every day, so obviously, I have time. :) I'm somewhat familiar with the technical aspects of the position. It's really a matter

5844:

Findings regarding IP addresses are much more sensitive than normal findings of sockpuppetry, because an IP is personal information. Additionally, normally, we can only talk about accounts being related in terms of probabilities, but that is problematic for IP addresses, because it means we could be

5331:

The weekend now being unambiguously, globaly, certainly over, I'm going to have to insist that the Audit Subcommittee release a statement in a specified timeframe. If the comittee cannot release a statement within the next 24 hours, I'm going to mark the comittee as historical and sugest a return to

4795:

Majorly, you have repeatedly made insinuations with no particular substance to be refuted; though I can say that I have never visited or heard of your blog. I am tired of your accusations, honestly. It is clear to me that people do not seem to agree with you or we wouldn't be having this discussion.

4185:

Actually, I got a chuckle out of the placeholder logo and caption, so maybe it's a good fit. If you want the logo at the beginning, we could put both, or make an image that splices them half-and-half, but they are already pictured in my response to the logo question. It's your call, but I don't mind

4122:

I viewed your contributions page when I stumbled across two or three other crime-related articles that you nominated for Afd. Given our differences of opinion, I was indeed looking for other articles that I thought should be kept but I did not make any recommendations simply to be contrary to you. I

2799:

The editors earlier discussed and essentially unanminously agreed that this link should be in place. The presence of (appropriate) jokes in physics articles and text books is an entirely appropriate and traditional thing, and this particular comic is written by a physics expert. If it wasn't for the

1303:

He doesn't want images that represent the Bulgarian point of view included and he counters any attempt to reduce the number of Macedonian POV images, or at least images that are captioned in a POV manner. What I'm trying to do is, basically, have a more or less equal or balanced number of POV images

816:

there is no critical commentary on the fair use images, but the fact that there isn't—and apparently can't be since the sources don't exist—is even more reason why the images are superfluous and decorative, failing to meet our policy. If there is nothing that can be said about them, then they do not

77:

I'm not exactly back, but neither am I not back. ;-) I'm just always hanging around, sometimes doing a little here or at Wiktionary or even Wikisource, when I'm in the mood. But I'm still much more busy in my studies than I used to be, though. I think you'd be great at CheckUser. Are you experienced

66:

Are you back? :-D I hope so. You've been missed around these parts. I passed 120,000 edits in your absence. I know I know. :) I'm actually considering going for CheckUser under the new policy. I know I'm qualified. It's really just a matter of deciding whether I want the responsibility. Anyway. Drop

6448:

Sorry, that was my error. HistorianofScience is a confirmed sockpuppet, and came up in my recent check. I recognized it as soon as I saw you mention it and was surprised I hadn't included it. Just an oversight on my part with all the copying and pasting of usernames going on. It's on the same range

5704:

Hi Carptrash. From one library worker to another ;-), I assure you that the problems you have been having are the last thing we want to happen. If you are helping library patrons register accounts and become editors of Knowledge, than that is great and should be encouraged. The issue here is likely

5223:

you will see that before these two were equated some of us thought that another account was run by one or the other of them. If your checkuser on them showed up the same ISP/geopraphical area as indicated by the two IP addresses that Nableezy mentions in that thread, then could you please prompt an

4809:

Majorly, for your information, I followed up with the two arbs that you named yesterday. My email correspondence with them makes it clear that there is not evidence from an investigation that shows that Dominic is Wikileaker. As I told you in IRC, you needed to let the matter drop, or file a formal

4248:

to help if more ScienceGolfFanatic socks ever returned. I've been emailing him off and on since July and I had come to suspect that he'd be back as soon as school started since he'd be able to evade his rangeblock. I am pretty sure that he is back now, but I don't really think I should add to the

2985:

From my perspective, it looks like the three of you were simply carrying on an outside conflict within the pages of SPI. There is not typically a need for any discussion at all, except for the original inquiry and any pertinent comments from the parties mentioned. It's not just that it takes longer

2827:

a commercial project. Can you honestly say that a link misleadingly-named "XKCD demonstrates the life and death importance of centrifugal force" to a comic adds anything of value to an article on physics? I doesn't demonstrate any such thing; it's a joke, and a good one in fact, but not relevant to

2644:

You are an admin, and I should not need to explain this to you. You invoked a CSD (A5), which did not apply. I assume it was an honest mistake. Now I have drawn your attention to the mistake you made, you would be expected to clean up after yourself, and not trust that "it will be cleaned up before

2226:

In the neutrality section you refer to there is section titled "Let the facts speak for themselves". The simple fact is that Mayotte is French. ANOTHER fact is that some international organizations don't like this fact and have voted resolutions opposing it, opposing a FACT. Of course they are free

2029:

The proliferation of lists of words which have no encyclopedic significance besides their etymological relation is not an argument for keeping the one that I did delete. The idea seems to be that while we would of course reject an article on a single word that consisted of just its etymology, if we

1230:

I don't think those warnings were necessary though, I'm not a disruptive editor and I've been here long enough to know about WP:DR, edit warring, ABMAC and the like. You should have just assumed that, I believe. The article has been thoroughly POV-ized and I was merely trying to help balance it out

151:

Dictionaries discuss words themselves, while encyclopedias discuss the concepts the words represent. So the rule of thumb is whether the article actually goes being merely describing the word. To me, the six sentences establish a definition and explanation of meaning, an alternative definition, two

6366:

I haven't, in fact, intentionally ignored you. I have been mostly too busy in the real world to edit here the last couple of weeks. I do find it a bit tiresome to receive the bulk of your ire just because I am the only one responding, though. I think you can guess what the tone of my response will

5559:

Your were never blocked directly, and nor was your specific IP address. What happened was that the range of IP addresses that you use was blocked to stop a prolific sockpuppeteer. This block should not affect you in any way, since it only targets logged-out editing and new account creation. If you

4822:

Oh, there is evidence alright. I tried to work out who Wikileaker was for a long time, and it involved several editors in different ways. I spent a lot of time looking over posts, times and edits trying to establish who to rule out, who to rule in. I looked at background, activity and conflicts of

4622:

I am not sure about that result. I am currently traveling and don't have much time to check it out. But I will note that that is a Dutch ISP that looks like a hosting company. It's is most likely that the blocked user was only blocked while trying to log in from a hotspot or some similar location,

2932:

To be clear, Mrpotatohead 2 is definitely LeHappy, but my interpretation would be that Advanceforward and all the other dozen or so socks I blocked were a different entity, and a much more long-term problem. At the time, I was just blocking socks of one or more users that were already indefinitely

2845:

If it was PD or had a compatible license, I'd certainly have put it in the article myself. It's a great example of how the confusion between points of view on centrifugal force has made its way even into popular culture, and it will get people thinking about the problem at hand. I agree that the

2552:

I would ask you to be careful and judicious about deleting transwikied titles. In my experience, nine out of ten stay around as disambiguation pages or redirects, and the edit history is useful for the purposes of building such. Since "deletion" on Knowledge simply means "hiding edit history from

1249:

Since apparently the AE discussion has already been archived, I'll reply here. I understand you are not a new editors, but I do feel that your behavior merited at least some kind of comment, if only to get you to think about what you were doing, since you clearly let the disagreement get heated. I

916:

I remember once I tried combining all of the previous logos before the checkmark logo that got deleted into a single file along with the descriptions. I still have it on my computer and I can show it to you if you want. This would eliminate many problems and would provide only ~4 non-free logos in

786:

I don't see any valid reason why you would remove all of those images before discussing it first on the articles. While it is a poor habit, I often do revert then discuss it. In Canadian television, there is little to no history known of why they choose that logo, except for certain occasions like

4771:

Obviously, I opposed you, because I believe you are Wikileaker on Knowledge Review, and the same individual who leaked several emails from the Arbcom mailing list and left several anonymous hurtful comments on my blog. I make this accusation based on various factors that were determined by me and

2386:

Just try to remember that there are actual people behind the Wikipedians being referenced here, so anything that seems like it could cause problems for people in the real world should be treated sensitively. This means libel and personal information. "X is a rapist," "X is a pedophile," these are

2034:

is even more esoteric. These lists are of course at home at Wiktionary, where such lists (as appendices) already exist. I'm afraid I don't see the problem. The ideal solution is this: a well sourced article on the general linguistic phenomenon (assuming it is significant) of English words derived

1652:

Jack, I understand your position, but I'm not about to release private correspondence when Pixelface would clearly not want it to be. Now, whether I run a check based on a private request or not is a separate matter, but since the request was merely to double-check a check already done by John, I

1299:

I admit I have a tendency to insist on certain revisions and thus engage in edit warring, but I'm almost always discussing the changes on the talk page. I've attempted several times to solve this issue to no avail: when people don't offer any sensible explanation as to why they're reverting me, I

2249:

It is painfully clear that this is your personal opinion, and not, as you say, "the simple fact." What sources do you have for your strange claims that an overseas collectivity is less a part of France than an overseas department? It's interesting, but not exactly relevant, that you feel that UN

1799:

I wanted to chime in on this. I'm trying to figure out what happened with this block, but I can't find any history of what the problems were with the range, or any trail of less-severe blocks. Starting with a two-month block -- if that's actually the case -- seems a bit much, especially when you

5133:

whom you previously blocked. Same interests, tone, pattern of jumping into contentious AfD's, reporting editors for enforcement, jumping into edit wars. As I said, this concerns me especially because sanctioned editors who have made these AE reports under their main accounts have been sharply

2222:

My point about UN resolutions is NOT "simply wrong"; if you read what I actually said you'll see that I only referred to my personal knowledge (at the moment of writing). What you say about UN resolutions is indeed true, as far as it goes; what you fail to mention is that these are only General

2168:

You are confusing the issue. There was no vote to become "more French;" that is your interpretation. The vote changed the administration of a French-administered overseas collectivity to a French-administered overseas department. We don't say that any other overseas collectivity which is not in

1784:

Thanks for the reply: you appear to be right --since I've never been blocked I got confused by the instructions on the page (especially since IPs don't have the "my talk" tab at the top). It's a bit messy because the IP for the iPhone keeps changing in that range --as you undoubtedly took into

902:

I was thinking more like that you should choose the one or two that have real historical significance, and, along with the infobox image, keep those. But honestly, a gallery like that one is still only there for decorative purposes. Does the use of 10 logos really convey more information than 3

6154:

Actually, I find the explanation offered by yourself and Nathan - that the check was necessary because of an apparent confession by one of the users involved to being my sockpuppet - to be reasonable. I would expect such additional grounds would be necessary, given the flawed initial report by

2152:

Your notion of neutral is very strange; I think most people who consult wikipedia would like to know what the real situation is, as to the size of a country for example, not what some other people would like it to be. The truth is that Mayotte is part of France, not Comoros, and the people who

5574:

I am not particularly knowledgeable about how IP addresses work, but my concern, since i was editing in a library at the time I was blocked was that the sockpuppeteer that you were intending to block was operating from the library, and that did not seem possible. I am all in favor of keeping

1743:

Hello. As far as I can tell, all iPhones in at least the Twin Cities have been not only blocked, but also prevented from writing on their own talk pages by one of your blocks. It came up at a party I was at last night, when it came up I was an Admin on Knowledge someone complained that they

2695: 559:

Yes, that's what I read. It doesn't matter what the copyright holder's opinion of copyright is. If they want their work to be in the public domain, they have to release it. If that's the only text, then it is clear that they have not done so, or even released it freely. Being allowed to copy

4147:

I didn't mean to suggest that you were just being disagreeing with me to be contrarian, but it did seem like you were just participating because you disagreed with me. I don't want to sound like I am trying to discourage participation from people who disagree with me, and I am glad you are

3612:

in an attempt to consolidate information about that editor. Could I impose upon you to verify the status of the sockpuppets listed there? I figure either you may have run across some of them in your investigations, or perhaps you'll find new information there that you could use. Regards,

2052:

I mean, that's a reasonable position. But what I object to is that you did the move and deletion unilaterally, with no warning or announcement and no allowance for discussion. The fact that so many other etymological word lists exist in Knowledge is at least evidence that there isn't broad

4333:

Yeah, I was pretty disturbed how much it seems that people who have received little actually significant media and academic coverage get articles written about them if they happen to be murderers or similar criminals. Unfortunately, it seems there is no end to these type of articles. :-)

1744:

couldn't make a change on their iPhone; I tried my iPhone (I don't edit from it) and it was blocked too. I think blocking the entire spectrum of 32.148.0.0/16 for 2 months, without permitting unblock requests, is too much collateral damage and bad PR. Please consider loosing it. --

515:, whom I blocked this morning for disruption with a bit of CU evidence, is now asking for a block review. I've told ANI that reviewer(s) can unblock without asking me, but I have requested that they ask you for confirmation first as the duty CU on the case. Sorry to volunteer you! ➲ 3863:

The two things that you have presented are a self-published essay on someone's personal website (presumably you are the author) and a single passing, trivial mention in a journal article. That's nothing to write an article about, so the original grounds for deletion, that this is

3776:

is where the discussion is. So there is an disagreement between me and another editor on what the page should be I believe it should be the one posted above and he thinks it should be Manchester, New Hampshire mayoral election, 2009 just wondering if you could contribute thanks

4458:

I think it is so obivous that a checkuser is not needed, but i have never requested one before, so don't know the procedure. Do you think a new checkuser is needed? Could you do one if needed, or do i have to fill out a form somewhere? I left a msg with the blocking admins too

2300:

HideUser is a function given to oversighters with the new RevisionDelete system, which allows them to remove the username in a single click while blocking an account. The username will be replaced by "(username removed)" in all logs and contributions, and will disappear from

2122:, is arguably even more appropriate than most, in that it at least includes references to a scholarly source on the subject of English words from Latin verb forms, rather than just being assembled out of collected dictionary entries. On the other hand, if you're right that 4455:. He is pretending to not be user:AKR619 (the sockmaster), but the editing pattern is obvious. His edits to these article already earned him more than one indefinate block in the past, and since the indef, his IP was warned and blocked a few times, so seems incorrigible. 5826:

before it was marked as complete. There is no indication of the checkip result for the suspected IPsocks. The actions of those IPs were what seem to have induced PilgrimRose to create a sock, so it seems only fair to get an answer whether or not the IPs=Wikid77. Thanks,

4741:

A sandwich didn't seem appropriate. We needed something a little more celebratory! Congratulations on your appointment to the AUSC. I'm happy to say, in public, that you had my support. Good luck, and keep up the good work DMC! As always, you have my very best regards.

2196:, where the internationally recognized borders of the country include Northern Cyprus, despite the fact that it has no de facto control. Of course, this doesn't mean that we shouldn't explain the status of Mayotte in the article, but it already does that painstakingly. 2117:

issues in this particular case?) My argument, though, is basically the following: the existence of lots of other etymological word lists in Knowledge is evidence that the broad Knowledge consensus is in favor of the inclusion of such articles. And the one in question,

1041:

I assumed you no longer needed it, as the UK blocking issues were resolved long ago. In any case, there is no real reason to have the flag on an account that is not in use, so I saw it as a maintenance issue. If there is some reason you need it, don't let me stop you.

6054: 6315:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 2188:, Knowledge does not take Israel's law as our guide for defining political status, but follows international convention by not including them in the map, population, area statistics, and referring to them as "adjacent" and "occupied" territories. Similarly, see 4878: 3810:. My experience in this area is extremely limited -- for instance, I've never closed an AfD -- and so I am hoping that your greater experience will guide this process from here. May I hear from you on this topic, please? Thanks in advance for your trouble. 5575:

disruptive elements out of wikipedia, I was just surprised and a bit disturbed to get caught up in that net. I'll just assume that you understand what you are doing (including that it blocks "innocent" editors from posting) and thank you for your efforts.

6386:

This is an interesting allegation (sockpuppetry). Is there a way one can change or delete an existing user name? For identification purposes, I would rather use a different user name (MuJami). As Racepacket pointed out, I made this request previously.

5739:

Thank you for being one of the people who has made 2009 such an interesting and enlightening year for me. It has certainly had its challenges, but also many highlights. I wish you peace and contentment in 2010, and a joyous holiday season to you and yours.

2636:

alone. This is work people have invested in documenting the term. It may be arguable that this work would be more at home at wiktionary, which is why we have the transwiki process. The A5 criterion will allow you to delete the edit history at en-wiki only

1666:

Dominic, I was not intending to imply that you should reveal whatever was emailed to you; rather I feel that the allegation, which includes an assertion of 'evidence', should be made publicly and that the one so asserting should put up or shut up. Cheers,

1416:. As I noted when I made the block, I could see that some editors would be affected and would need IPBE (many on the IP already do). Just use your own best judgment as to whether it's an innocent user or a Hamish Ross sleeper account caught in the block. 903:

illustrative ones? Would the omission of several of the ones currently there be detrimental to the readers' understanding of the subject? I think the answer to these questions is "no," based on the lack of reference to the logos in the body of the text.

2970:. Next time I will ask an advice from a clerk. This report was indeed approved by a clerk. Please note that I did not mention Russavia anywhere in this report, and I only replied about IPs coming from the same area. Perhaps I should not. Sorry for that. 4542:

That's quite an old block, and the indefinite expiry may have been a misclick or overzealousness on my part. Reducing the expiration date and converting it to a soft-block sound like a good idea to me. We can deal with any future abuse as it crops up.

2512:

I did not realize he was a sockpuppet. In the future, I would recommend that you use "sockpuppet of X" in the block summary for the socks, instead of the original reason for blocking the original puppeteer. Anyway, thanks for clarifying. No harm, no

4352:. I don't know what kind of article it was, but anyways, what Christensen did in the year 1997, killing two cops, happens to be one of the most well-known murder cases of the last couple of decades in Finland. Some web links (in Finnish or Swedish): 2498:

It was a sockpuppet. If you check my block log around that time, you'll see a bunch of accounts blocked for the same (overly-cryptic, sorry about that) reason. Some have a bit more obvious trolling edits. Let me know if you still have any questions.

1610:

I emailed the evidence to Dominic, and he can confim that he received it. And it should not be made public, otherwise a sockpuppet like you could use it to improve your socking methods. I've apologized to the people who are deserving of one. Cheers,

4772:

some other editors, including at least two arbitrators. Additionally, you are barely here at all, hardly interested in the encyclopedia, and you have already proven yourself to be abusive in other roles (such as IRC op). I couldn't think of anyone

2184:. The "real situation" that people live in is that the French administer an island that is internationally recognized to be the sovereign territory of another country. Your invocation of Palestine is especially pertinent, since, as you'll see at 6263:

I'm not sure if you noticed, but that deletion is four years old. :-) Your point is well taken, but the amount of time since I have been active in image deletion could be measured in years at this point, so you don't have much to worry from me.

5710:

if you plan on ever helping someone to register an account in the future, let me know and I think I can give your account an exemption to the IP block that will allow you to register accounts for others (while you are logged into your account).

3012:. I thought the report was justified and provided some evidence, but everyone can be wrong. BTW, in the first link I gave you (Vlad fedorov), that was an evasion of ArbCom ban. I did not press the issue, so only secondary account was blocked... 2913:

offer (and is continuing to improve it as I write this). As you may know, I'm always one for giving people a second chance should they give an indication they wish to make an about-face and contribute to the encyclopedia. The user described at

2594:

transwikied? If you haven't, you could be doing rather a lot of damage here. Please make sure that each article you delete on the basis of "has been transwikied" has really been transwikied. Otherwise undelete them, or transwiki them yourself!

2614:. It's true that the suggestions generated by the template didn't make sense in this case. My feeling on redirects and disambiguations is that if there is an actual need for something to point somewhere else, it will get created before long. 1759:

I am very aware of the consequences of this block. It was only done as a result of a lot of very nasty and persistent vandalism. However, note that it is an "anon. only" block, so that anyone should be able to log in to edit. As well, users

4296:

I had also asked Hersfold to look into it, and 64.231.200.0/22 has been blocked. I just forgot to say something here. Unfortunately, I am not a CheckUser any longer, so you'll have to try to follow up with one of those two in the future.

4082:

I've removed in error your sysop bit flag when fulfilling RfP meta request. I apologize for this. I've checked and a local en.wiki bureaucrat has already fixed my error and your sysop flag has been set. Thank you for your understanding.

5543:

I'm editing away and all of a sudden I was knocked off line and got logged off and discovered that my whatever number had been blocked, just now, by, I think, you. If there is vandalism happening from here I'd like to know. Einar aka

2109:, it's hard for me to be objective about it because I mostly wrote it. So I'm not sure if the arguments I'd make against the deletion are valid or not—if I'm the only one defending it, you're probably right. (Perhaps we should seek a 645:

for requesting reassessment of the article, but you should not make it again without a discussion and approval, since it has previously failed such a discussion. Let me know if you need help with this, and sorry for the confusion.

5523:

It looks like that was the only account. He was able to use a public school network to evade the disabling of account creation on his main IPs. I have blocked the school IP, which will hopefully prevent him from doing it again.

3409:

sockpuppets in the above SPI case. I didn't want to add anything to the above case because it's now closed but still hasn't been archived so I prefer not to mess with it for now. I wanted to ask you if you'd be willing to check

2368:

I'll keep what you said about UAA reporting in mind, but could you specify how I'm supposed to distinguish between those usernames that are supposed to be reported at WP:UAA and those that are supposed to be reported at WP:RFO?

3773: 2664:

is not a transwikied article, but existed before. For all your talk about having to explain things to me, you could have just said that from the beginning, if that's what you meant. Having said that, you clearly already turned

960:

and he is asking for the block to be withdrawn. As the account is very fresh and he's never edited outside his user talk page, I'm a bit suspicious. Hoping for input, so I've put the unblock request on hold. What do you think?

1883:. Sorry for conflict. Do what you wish, though I suggest being sure that the ip's history of vandalism remains clear to vandalism fighters and the reason for deletion is clear to other admins. Thanks for your work. Cheers, -- 1308:

my actions. I discussed, had no reasonable arguments presented against my point, and I made changes to the article. My edit summaries were more of a disagreement with the way the article has been going than some kind of anger.

530:

based on their own findings, and the impartiality of their findings become questioned. In any case, admins don't need a CheckUser's permission for anything; it's just an extra button to help fight abuse, not extra authority.

4127:

keep on three or four of them (acknowledging that there was not a strong argument to keep them around), and I avoided commenting "delete" in three or four others that I thought would go away via snowball. You can also check

1717: 1800:

consider that you are blocking literally tens of thousands of computers across the country. Like I said, I don't know what the history is on this, but if you could offer some, the transparency would probably go a long way.

2254:: "As a practical matter, however, these resolutions have little effect and there is no foreseeable likelihood that Mayotte will become de facto part of Comoros without its people's consent." What is at issue here is 1258:, to harm the project, not when you are acting in good faith. You can probably imagine how insulting it would sound if you are acting in good faith, then, and how it would hurt attempts to come to resolve a conflict. 3841:

Thank you in advance for restoring this important article. The fact that there are depressed/angry people suffering this condition is no reason at all to delete a wikipedia article. There are many people angry about

3202:

Reasons: removal of non-public personal information, the subject has specifically asked for the information to be expunged from the history, the case is clear, and there is no editorial reason to keep the revision.

2035:

from Latin verbs, and a link to the Wiktionary appendix listing them all. The list doesn't make much sense here; you can't click on the words to get information about them, since we only have encyclopedia articles.

980:. All of the other accounts on the IP are related to that sockpuppetry, and there is no obvious sign that it's a shared IP, so I would be wary about unblocking that account unless he has a satisfactory explanation. 5990: 5031:

After the rewrite, it does look better, but that's still a big difference between Knowledge and Wiktionary. If Wiktionary people are aware of such pitfalls, there needs to be a better venue than just talk pages.

579:...please don't forget to lock out his user talk page and email access as well. He's been known to abuse both of these unblock methods, and if we know it's him it's safer to knock them out ahead of time. Thanks! 2079:

In my opinion, it was a simple case of fitting the cited criterion for speedy deletion. Do you actually have an objection to the deletion, or just the process. I am open to discussing the merits of the article.

6155:

Snowded. Elonka has now offered a brief explanation on her talkpage for her own actions in bundling four additional users into the check. I'm content to let the matter rest at this point. Thanks for your time.

5294: 5173: 3394: 3255: 2123: 2119: 2011: 1972: 4709:

I was trying to say that it has the most individual projects by language (en. wikt, fr.wikt, ja.wikt, etc.). I know that is a confusing wording. If you can think of a better way of saying it, please do.

3128:. Could you, by email if appropriate, explain the basis of your determination that Mcmlxxxvi1986 was a sock. This relates to an inquiry on unblock-en-l by a user who is an obvious sock of Mcmlxxxvi1986. 200:

Yeah, that's weird. I've reverted it, though I think you would have been completely acceptable for you to revert something that obviously wrong yourself. The bot doesn't even have feelings to hurt. ;-)

92:

of the stress. As you probably know, I've been avoiding stress on here for about 2 years now. :) But on the other hand, I know it's a very needed position and I think I'd do a good job. So we'll see. --

2610:

There wasn't any suggestion in the article that the word had been borrowed by the English language. In which case, it wouldn't make sense to look for the article at "jutsu," but at the correct script,

6311:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

5374:

Thank you for releasing the report. It is difficult for any comittee to write a document. I apologize for being such a bother through the process, and merely hope that no one holds it against anyone.

1684: 868:

project, and restrictively-licensed media should be used sparingly. I would suggest you pick the logos that are truly important to the article and display those, but remove most of the existing ones.

5429: 3424: 4655: 791:'s checker board logo or their checkmark logo, which has to do with the station's name sounding those words. Most of the time only the date used is known. That's why there only the date is used. 2173:, is less French (in the political sense) than other parts of France. Similarly, this vote has no bearing on whether or not the island is considered French. It is just administered differently. 5685:

not being able to do it. For what? if someone is doing anti wikipedia stuff from the library I work in I'd like to know. I'm not great at understanding how IP numbers work, but this is not (

2719: 549:"Designed to be the opposite of copyright, a kopimi notice specifically requests that people copy the work for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial." says the article on the Pirate Party. 6390:

As there does not appear to be a method to edit one's user name I thought it best to create a "new" profile. Unfortunately (yet understandably)someone misconstrued this act as sockpuppetry.

5231:) but they have given me no indication of an opinion on this. GIven that we now now that CM was part of an active puppet farm, I think that a check on Bree is definitely appropriate. Thanks.-- 812:

I'm not about to start a discussion before every time I make an edit to make an article conform to our non-free media policies. Your reason here is mistaken, in my opinion. It doesn't matter

4860: 6077: 5657:

Thanks, Alison. I was about to look into this, and saw you beat me to it. :-) I somehow missed your message on the 6th, Carptrash, so I apologize for that. I wasn't ignoring you, or even

755: 282:

contains an error. I'm not sure where the version you uploaded came from, but it was already in the original recording and the uploader edited the article to match his error in the text.

5560:

ever find yourself blocked again, you simply need to log in. The reason that the block message is so vague is to avoid unnecessarily outing the sockpuppeteer's IP address and location.

1864:, I'd suggest not deleting the page of a repeat vandal ip# while they are blocked; I don't think that qualifies as "Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup". Thanks. -- 1223:

outright. Since administrators have reverted my removing of the Macedonian POV content, I tried to add a map that represents the other view, but I've been reverted several times now.

4277:

J.delanoy was able to help and he confirmed that those two accounts are in fact SGF, and that SGF has been editing from school. Hopefully all the IP's should be softblocked now. --

6346: 6491:

Yes, I confirmed that the account you reported was a sockpuppet. Therefore, I blocked the IP that he used to create the sockpuppet, in hopes of preventing further occurrences. :-)

6070:

from a relative new redlinked userpage account. Within three days or starting its account and within its first half dozen edits, it starting nominating article for deletion. See

3287: 125:. A Wiktionary editor will eventually reformat it to Wiktionary standards and move it to the main namespace, or you can go ahead and read the style guidelines and do it yourself. 4408:

with DGG before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to

3521: 2349:

No, user pages are not deleted automatically. If they exist, they should be deleted first (and then the deletion logs will be one of the things that the name gets removed from).

6278: 4674: 4245: 397:) so that's why I prodded it. He removed it with "Prodding no good, see edit history", I mean, WTF?! It's been transwikified and therefore it's no longer needed on Knowledge. 3911:. :) Someone else actually had to tell me about it as I hadn't seen it. Lately I've been AVERAGING 400 edits a day. So. Somehow 2 bad ones make me a vandal. Good grief. :) -- 1563:, so that's the spelling that my fingers emitted. This sort of thing is one of the reasons I frequent this site; I learn things everyday. Thanks for pointing it out. Cheers, 6549:

and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

4162: 761: 6367:

be—not much different from our previous exchange. However, I will ask for other auditors to weigh in, as hearing from more than one should be more satisfying, in any case.

2702:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 2057:

that such lists are unencyclopedic; and I think it's the editor's responsibility to establish consensus before making a drastic move like transwikiing and speedy deletion.

6521: 5632:

I've reviewed the situation here independently and have to say that we cannot lift this (somewhat narrow) rangeblock at this time. What you can do is direct the person to

4995: 4016: 1839:

Could you comment on this user's unblock request? He's being hit by an open proxy rangeblock for XO communications, and says there's no proxy running at his IP address.

6088: 6073:. I.e. this account does not feel like a new user and given the kinds of AfDs and the confirmed SPI in the one mentioned above, I think it may be the same guy? Best, -- 2744: 2641:

the content has been moved to wiktionary, nb correctly preserving the history to satisfy GFDL. If you want to delete content for other reasons than A5, do not invoke A5.

1879:

Okay, I see what you were doing now; I didn't before, as there was no indication of the actual reason for deletion in your deletion summary. I replied to your message at

5984: 1738: 3316: 4894: 1975: 780: 1396: 6332: 3500:

as a possible sock of Brexx. Forgivenesss started editing shortly after the two confirmed socks were confirmed and blocked and is editing all of the same articles.

3331: 2986:

to look at a page with a lot of debate, but also, everyone will tend to avoid wading into messes like that, so it's in your own best interest not to let it happen.

881:

I can remove some of the logos that are of poor quality and the logos that are similar, if that makes it better. I have now removed 33% of the logos from the page.

5423: 4179: 3292: 1190: 641:. However, you recreated the article afterwards, and so it was deleted again. If you would like to create the article again, you should follow the instructions at 633:

I noticed that two weeks ago (8-Feb-09) you deleted the Lessno page. May I ask what was the logic behind the deletion of the Lessno article? Thanks... Ned Terziev

616: 152:

classifications for the phrase (a cliche and a tautology), and an early dating (etymology), but nothing beyond description of the words as words. Do you disagree?

2192:, where the internationally unrecognized occupation of Western Sahara is not part of our definition of the country despite Morocco's de facto administration, and 1124: 2262:

status of the island. No respected international bodies nor any major national governments besides France recognize Mayotte as part of France's de jure borders.

1413: 1382: 977: 4532:) is requesting an unblock, part of your block of 72.29.64.0/19. The IP looks good for a softblock to me; I don't know if you want to comment on the range.. -- 6532: 5409: 1764:

be able to edit their talk pages, for unblock requests. I did not intend to block talk page edits, and as far as I can tell from the log, they aren't blocked:

1160: 325: 5297:

If there isn't an explanation forthcoming within the next 48 hours regarding the mandate of the subcommittee, I will ask that it be folded back up as failed.

6067: 4657: 4163: 1532:

Not sure what it is that you want in the open. I have double-checked John's findings and can confirm that Someguy1221 and Jack (who, apparently, can't spell

43: 1406: 6522: 5594:

Okay. I am at the library (which is blocked) with a patron who is trying to set up an account and I find that the library is still blocked. This is not (

4040:

Aw.... I'm going to miss you and using you (:)). It's such a crime you know? ;) Good luck with your endeavours, and thanks for all the help you've done. --

3950: 3177: 2714: 2683: 1753: 235: 228: 4210:

Nice to see you here again. You popped up on my watchlist, and I was compelled to come and say hello. You've been missed, F.R.! Best regards, as always,

3831:

1. There now exists an online treatise on the subject, a treatise which contains approximately 200 references to mainstream published medical literature.

292: 6401: 5271: 4563: 4519: 4318:

Nice job getting rid of a bunch of articles on non-notable murderers. It's surprising how articles on non-notable murderers can stay around for so long.

4225:

I've been missed? I should say the same to you. ;-) Nice to hear from you, though. I hope you are doing well, in both wiki and real-world endeavors. :-)

4132:

to see that I've commented in quite a few crime-related articles that you did not nominate. I apologize if you feel I've been wikistalking. Best wishes,

3017: 2975: 1966: 1186: 612: 469: 462: 3982: 2428:(since reverted and editor blocked), but you might want to know about it in case you want to alert the police, as I probably would in such a situation. 5240: 5232: 4866: 4219: 3348: 1154: 1129: 271: 3275: 731:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 6231: 5206: 4250: 3965: 3169: 3142: 321: 3868:

still seem to apply. Of course, anyone is welcome make a request at the deletion review, but I wouldn't recommend it. You aren't likely to get far.

2946:

Well I wanted to make sure I had the socks sorted correctly. This helps a lot, and makes me more comfortable in giving Mr. P another shot. Thanks, –

2219:

less French than actual departments of the nation: the people do not have the same status, rights, and obligations as citizens of the nation proper.

1892: 6349: 5042: 4951: 4765: 4233: 3895: 3300: 3293: 2915: 39: 6546: 4690: 4609:

as a proxy. I find open port 5060 which is usually used for sip, whatever that is, Session Initiation Protocol. Could this actually be exploited?

4056: 1629: 1620: 1592:

Elsewhere, Pixelface has asserted that he had 'evidence' and I feel that this mere assertion should be backed up, in an open manner, <joke: -->

1243: 1211: 6360: 6257: 3932: 2483:, I only see one edit, which was certainly not trolling, and the user has no deleted contributions. Where did this trolling take place? Yours, -- 2023: 1492: 6040:

Hey why do i get a message in a red rectangle about "bad edits" while i'm tagging some users you blocked as sockpuppets of a notorious bad boy?

5254: 5225: 4353: 4200: 2800:

fact that we couldn't get a license for it (it's licensed non commercial, but the wikipedia is commercial), this would be in the article. It is

1671: 1598: 1567: 1544: 1323: 1266: 1231:

or clean it up, that's why I've been insistent with the reverts. The removal of such useful, relevant content is basically bordering vandalism.

568: 310: 6060: 5054: 3881:

Thanks for your response; upon reflection, I agree and will take no action with respect to re-mounting the article. I've directed the user to

3792: 3601: 3013: 2971: 620: 247: 218: 209: 96: 86: 6513: 6499: 6474: 6375: 6316: 5869: 5853: 5607: 4647: 4631: 4421: 4194: 3157: 681: 4397: 4386: 3382: 3248: 2836: 2425: 1733: 1436: 1424: 692: 265: 169: 160: 146: 133: 6189: 5718: 5568: 5397: 5352: 5320: 5200: 5112: 5090: 4342: 3945: 3876: 3802:

with respect to the above-captioned article; the link will take you to an AfD discussion that you closed in 2005. Please see my talk page (

3545: 2677: 2622: 2535: 2522: 2507: 2411: 2395: 1936: 1661: 1647: 674: 360: 6164: 6149: 6108: 6099: 6056: 5652: 5636:- which will enable them to request an account be created for them. They should then be able to log in just fine and bypass the block :) - 5364: 4836: 4817: 4704: 4156: 4129: 4069: 3362: 2855: 2759: 2691: 2684: 1958: 1170: 1002: 988: 606: 433: 4850: 4804: 3762: 3021: 2994: 933: 911: 897: 876: 859: 807: 538: 6337: 5918: 5823: 5811: 5669: 5532: 5499: 4551: 3494: 2327: 2313: 2228: 2154: 1924: 1711: 1278: 226: 31:

so your spoken version of it must have become outdated (tho i did not listen to it). please delete this bit after reading. thanks. peet

6553: 6433:, who is not blocked and hasn't come up in the CU. Do I need to start a new SPI or cna you run the additional check based on this info? 6351:

You then ignored the response. Why? Meanwhile, the language I find so offensive remains in the official AUSC report. Please respond. --

6272: 4505: 3692: 2380: 1794: 1775: 1071: 1050: 6457: 6305: 6049: 4718: 4305: 3936: 3099: 3052: 2954: 2941: 2703: 2553:

non-admins", I see little merit in deleting transwikied articles, just try to turn them into an appropriate redirect or disambig page.

2270: 2236: 2204: 1983: 1822: 1286: 1217: 1105: 5134:

criticized for doing so. The reason for concern seems clear enough, so please let me know if you need something additional. Thanks,

4699:. In the Signpost article, what does "It is also the largest sister project in terms of number of projects" mean? (Watching) - Dank ( 2817: 2590:

Oh dear. I see that you are deleting many many articles for "transwikification". Have you not made sure for each one that they really

2135: 2088: 2066: 2043: 1500:

and I are on different parts of the globe. In all likelihood, Someguy1221 is not just not in my area but more like most of the way to

1162:. I have also received an email from this user, and I will see if there could be an innocent explanation for his sharing the same IP. 412: 5442: 4580: 4109: 3437: 3396: 3145:(another Shuppiluliuma sock), with identical (rare) user agent strings. As well, Mcmlxxxvi1986 edited the same set of articles, like 1718:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard#Proposal for unban, apology, amnesty for Jvolkblum and related others, and topic ban for Orlady

486: 5389:

I don't fault you for your impatience. I am happy it is finished, and will try to make sure things run more smoothly in the future.

5192:

but, for the moment, I will stop making promises on when something will be ready. (Which isn't to say I'm not still working on it.)

4291: 3189: 2876: 253:

Wow, that was silly. I was copying and pasting the same summary to several articles, but I can't imagine what possessed me to write

4384: 4370:. So, if also the article about him was deleted because of an assumption that he is non-notable, that assumption is clearly wrong. 5025: 2492: 194: 6300:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

5786: 5689:) a good thing. I will try the link above (thanks for it) but I doubt that I will get the chance with that particular patron. 5346: 4482: 3820: 3609: 2480: 1987: 660: 592: 456: 3786: 2926: 6172: 5265: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1979: 1873: 1850: 1526: 638: 6071: 5306: 4947: 4141: 4012: 1917: 6570: 6005: 5793:

for comment. Myself and another user are requesting a checkuser solely to get the IP for geolocation to call the police per

5517: 4490:

I just noticed comments above about checkuser status. Sorry to hear that. I go searching for the checkuser request page then.

3908: 3697: 1995: 1991: 750: 654: 6413: 4034: 3622: 3368: 1194: 1092:. The sockpuppetry case seems unrelated and doesn't name that editor, although I wouldn't be surprised if it was related to 115: 6485: 6178: 6030: 5972: 5764: 3135: 2900: 2892: 2363: 1477: 1185:

I am contemplating doing something extremely nasty to you. You reverted all my unblock declines. Why? You fucking prick...

970: 523: 6226: 5475: 4616: 3915: 3857: 3470: 3223: 344: 6320: 5893: 5838: 4984: 4271: 4001: 3836:

2. A citation of the word Coproscindosis, along with its definition, has been published in a mainstream medical journal.

3627: 3093: 3046: 2725: 2336: 560:

something is far different from being allowed to modify it and distribute derivatives, which is what Wikimedia requires.

366: 5617:

So Demonic: Are you going to help me resolve this issue? Your name keeps appearing as the bloicker. What's Up, Doc?

4969: 4751: 2339:

being sent to the user), what happens to the user pages? Are the user pages deleted or is the page title replaced with "

714: 6409: 6240:. The page had an OTRS ticket, the Commons transfer page did not. Please be more careful in checking what you delete. — 6134: 5780: 5435: 5008: 4574: 4529: 4254: 3920: 3430: 3271: 3260: 2126:

is unencyclopedic and ought to be deleted, the same is true for all of the other ones I listed above and more besides.

480: 5351:

I have opened a case to attempt to get some clarity on the mandate of the Audit Subcomittee. The case can be found at

5283: 2632:

the edit histories you have erroneously deleted, claiming they had been transwikied. You have deleted 55 revisions at

2440: 1978:

with no discussion and then speedy-deleted? Knowledge has a very large number of lists of English words by etymology (

1716:

Hi. I have opened an Unban request on behalf of Jvolkblum and others, which also includes a ban request on Orlady, at

1706: 553: 302:'s work. All I did was approve the file's move from Knowledge to Commons. So I'm afraid I can't really help much. :-( 187: 5312:

We are planning to meet as a group on IRC before tomorrow night, at which point I hope we can finalize our thoughts.

5220: 5143: 4536: 4327: 3304: 2794: 368: 71: 4404:

with the following edit summary '(BLP is irrelevant as a reason. He's dead, and so is his wife.)'. Please consider

2896: 1765: 1374: 6442: 6035: 5383: 5341: 5012: 4434: 3256: 2699: 1843: 1355:

A big thank you for dealing with all those vandals and deleting pages during the time non-admins couldn't edit! :)

1204: 331: 5185: 4148:

understanding about why it made me feel uncomfortable even though I believe you that you didn't mean it that way.

3241: 3234: 2357: 1277:

I am sure that the conflict will be resolved. Your intervention could possibly be extended to the pag itself, no?

6301: 6292: 6217:

for the same reason. Since you did the CU on the original Torkmann SPI, could you check these as well? Thanks,

5163: 4961: 3767: 2654: 2604: 2585: 2294: 2258:

the de facto situation in Mayotte (which you describe well and which is not in dispute), but how to describe the

47: 5966: 4936: 3009: 2979: 2823:

Hi. I am not a vandal, and don't really appreciate being reverted as one. As well, please not that Knowledge is

2469: 1035: 272: 122: 5935: 4870: 4789: 4664:

Your interview will be published next week. I just want to double check with you on whether it's ready or not.

4444: 4379: 3928: 3540: 3516: 3327: 3312: 3185: 2739: 2474: 2285:

Per your comment in irc: what's "hideuser", and what affect does it have on name changes? (Watchlisting) - Dan

1145: 574: 5925:

policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure

5698: 5626: 5584: 5553: 5229: 4096: 4015:

today. However, I noticed that in addition to removing your oversighter and checkuser flags, the steward also

2162: 6312: 5076: 5064: 3992:

Dear Dominic, I only updated the pop. estimates with UN 2009 datas; sorry but I dont'know further details. --

3123: 3076: 2789: 1458: 1120: 1101: 1055:

No, no issues, just saw it in the rights log and wondered if there was something specific I wasn't aware of.

5724: 5469: 4640:

The problem is still there after 10 days, I'm going to unblock and see if there is any actual exploitation.

4604: 3587: 3464: 510: 6344:

Please post your thoughts succinctly and without the rhetoric and I will be happy to keep talking about it.

5962: 5633: 5403: 4810:

complaint with AUSC or the Foundation instead of making these allegations without any supportive evidence.

4680:

Not sure if you read the previous message because I just realized I made 2 topic names that are identical.

3971: 3969: 3111: 3064: 2177: 827:

If that's the case then, there are several American stations that can use your logo removal treatment like

181: 51: 5858:

Thank you for the clarification. I just wanted to be sure it wasn't an accidental oversight. No objection.

5790: 5705:

not your library at all. Rather, your library and a prolific banned user are fellow customers of the same

5486: 5455: 5153:

Hi Dominic, any updates on my SPI issue? Still waiting for your second opinion? Hope you have a good day.

4592: 3481: 3450: 2628:

indeed it will. By editors forced to do the same work you had deleted earlier on. I will ask you again to

498: 6559: 6253: 4989: 4117: 3837: 3117: 3070: 1898: 628: 5493: 5295:

Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Audit_Subcommittee#Regarding_disputed_oversights_for_an_Arbitrator.

5099:

Not really important; just idle curiosity since I noticed that you blocked ~50000 IPs. I understand the

3488: 6537: 5797:. Could you do a checkuser and get me the location and I will take it from there and make the call. - 5462: 5288: 5261: 5174:

Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Audit_Subcommittee#Regarding_illicit_oversights_for_an_Arbitrator.

4747: 4598: 4287: 4267: 4239: 4215: 3921: 3891: 3828:

Two very pertinent facts exist today that were not present during the 2005 deletion of Corposcindosis:

3816: 3803: 3457: 1832: 1522: 732: 698: 504: 67:

me a line and let me know how you are doing. If you are back, it's nice to have you around again. :) --

6012: 4909: 1559:— I don't recall ever noticing the distinct spellings. To me, the primary usage of the term refers to 1463: 334:), who you recently indef blocked as a vandal, is asking to be unblocked. You might want to comment. — 5899: 5706: 3997: 3882: 3807: 3323: 3308: 3181: 3173: 3105: 3058: 1079: 642: 461: 4994:

I posted a comment/question on the wikipedia story. I was hoping someone like you would respond at

1132:

was also blocked, but doesn't appear anywhere in the sockpuppetry case. Just thought I'd add that.

1112: 381:

discussion page regarding his removal of PRODs without giving a good summary. If you have a look at

5943: 5482: 4917: 4623:

and asking them to try from their regular internet connection will solve the problem on their end.

4586: 4452: 4440: 4027: 3722: 3652: 3527:

Hi! The SPI case has been archived so I re-opened the case with the above listed suspect's account.

3477: 3194: 3141:

Mcmlxxxvi1986 has had just one IP in his month of editing, and it was an exact mach with the IP of

2886: 2181: 1855: 1388: 1116: 1097: 951: 492: 452: 441: 104: 6381: 5748: 4913: 4874: 6430: 5863: 5832: 4941: 4368: 4365: 4362: 4019:

you. Just wanted to send you a heads up in case you want to make use of the tools in the future.

3087: 3040: 2804:

appropriate to link to material that we cannot include in the wikipedia for licensing reasons.- (

2660:

Thanks, but your patronizing language is not a great way to start a conversation. It's true that

1316: 1236: 1090:"(account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (CheckedSockpuppet|Pickbothmanlol)" 843:. I've found some commentary for the logos you removed again from previous revisions of the page. 316: 299: 290: 5251: 2569: 6405: 6045: 5933:. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5877: 5805: 5126: 5004: 4568: 4523: 3791: 3595: 3418: 2712: 1888: 1880: 1869: 474: 4359: 707: 6468: 6356: 6328: 6194: 6185: 5449: 5257: 5236: 5130: 5038: 4743: 4686: 4670: 4644: 4613: 4443:

in the past, showing him to be a sockpuppet of indef blocked user:AKR619. He has returned to

4417: 4356: 4211: 4175: 3886: 3811: 3618: 3444: 3199:

Will you please delete the entire revision history of user:yofiued, except for 1 June 2009?

3163: 3132: 3029: 1861: 1180: 719: 378: 283: 165:

OK, I looked at the refs again and they aren't as deep as I remembered. It's a fair call. --

5978: 5412:

you said "let me know if it continues", it seems to me we have a fresh Bobmack89x puppet in

3003: 3000: 389:

tab, and you will see that he removed my PROD from the article. There is alreay an entry on

6545:

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at

6509: 6481: 6420: 6397: 6222: 6116: 5245: 5216: 4557: 4513: 3993: 3941: 3903: 3758: 3688: 3579:

even though the bot is down. It's more work, with suddenly less clerks and CUs, so thanks!

3283: 2813: 1433: 1403: 957: 670: 35: 4077: 8: 5817: 5694: 5622: 5603: 5580: 5549: 5379: 5360: 5337: 5302: 5181: 5159: 5108: 5072: 4323: 4020: 4006: 3978: 3853: 3377: 3209: 2968: 2907: 2882: 2650: 2600: 2581: 2518: 2488: 2406: 2375: 1904: 1643: 1616: 1560: 1473: 448: 243: 6476:... but I reported an editor account. Could you confirm? Sorry, just want to be sure. - 2216: 2170: 6567: 6529: 6426: 6297: 6160: 6130: 5930: 5890: 5139: 5120: 4831: 4814: 4784: 4137: 4049: 3536: 3512: 3358: 3082: 3035: 2872: 2851: 2733: 2419: 1932: 1913: 1833: 1668: 1626: 1595: 1564: 1518: 1363: 1319: 1313: 1239: 1233: 1140: 998: 966: 746: 550: 408: 356: 340: 286: 262: 206: 157: 142:" -- there was more information there other that "only of a dictionary definition." -- 130: 83: 3006: 760:

Please discuss your recent changes to these article in the conversation about this in

637:

Yes, the article was deleted as a result of the discussion in which you participated:

6496: 6454: 6372: 6269: 6146: 6096: 6041: 6026: 5926: 5850: 5799: 5794: 5715: 5666: 5565: 5529: 5394: 5317: 5279: 5197: 5087: 5058: 5016: 4999: 4980: 4847: 4801: 4762: 4715: 4628: 4548: 4349: 4339: 4313: 4302: 4230: 4191: 4153: 4106: 4066: 3935:

which is a far better article than the one we have in mainspace now. I see you have

3873: 3345: 3219: 3154: 3146: 2991: 2938: 2833: 2756: 2707: 2674: 2619: 2532: 2504: 2392: 2354: 2310: 2302: 2267: 2201: 2085: 2040: 1955: 1884: 1865: 1772: 1729: 1658: 1541: 1421: 1331: 1263: 1167: 1085: 1047: 985: 926: 908: 890: 873: 852: 822: 800: 773: 689: 651: 611:

Hahaha, "safer". As if Grawp can harm the site through an unblock request. Pathetic.

603: 565: 535: 518: 430: 307: 17: 5743:

In honour of the season, I hope you will enjoy a little musical token. Your choice:

6505: 6477: 6352: 6324: 6181: 5859: 5828: 5760: 5513: 5033: 4927: 4890: 4681: 4665: 4641: 4610: 4498: 4475: 4448: 4413: 4393: 4170: 3912: 3782: 3614: 3585: 3129: 2782: 2527:

Yeah, I agree. It didn't strike me at the time, blocking them all at once. Thanks.

2462: 2323: 2290: 2280: 2251: 1818: 1578: 1497: 1454: 1016: 1010: 215: 191: 105: 93: 68: 6528:

Just to let you know that it was relisted to check on another IP that popped up. –

5998: 121:

Normally, a transwikied article goes to the transwiki namespace, so it will be at

6449:

as the others, so I already followed that account down its rabbit hole, too. :-)

6249: 6218: 6180:. I want to make absolutely sure you've been given a chance to respond to it. -- 5369: 5326: 5082:

I purposefully did not name them. If you would like, I can fill you in by email.

4899: 3987: 3754: 3684: 3279: 3274:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

2805: 2445: 2147: 1840: 1790: 1749: 1430: 1400: 1201: 1064: 1028: 666: 421:

For what it's worth, transwikied articles like that can usually be speedied. Try

279: 61: 5882: 3832: 2030:

make a list of them, then it's encyclopedic. And one for derivations from Latin

422: 139: 6538: 6438: 6237: 6214: 6210: 5953: 5690: 5618: 5599: 5576: 5545: 5375: 5356: 5333: 5298: 5177: 5168: 5154: 5104: 5100: 5068: 5020: 4700: 4696: 4464: 4319: 3974: 3849: 3843: 3799: 3371: 2962: 2952: 2924: 2646: 2596: 2577: 2514: 2484: 2431: 2401: 2370: 2232: 2158: 1699: 1639: 1612: 1469: 1282: 544: 239: 166: 143: 112: 28: 5939:

article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the

5744: 6206: 6195: 6156: 6126: 6105: 6074: 5922: 5910: 5887: 5212: 5148: 5135: 4811: 4728: 4426: 4409: 4405: 4375: 4169:

Thanks! Which Wiktionary logo should we use at the beginning of the article?

4133: 4043: 3576: 3531: 3507: 3354: 2868: 2847: 2729: 2545: 2131: 2114: 2106: 2062: 2054: 2019: 1928: 1909: 1688: 1356: 1133: 994: 962: 742: 580: 404: 351: 335: 258: 202: 153: 126: 79: 5355:. You are a named party only in your capacity as a member of the Committee. 4905: 3340:

No problem. By the way, I think you may have forgotten to block Shashamula.

2573: 1096:

sockpuppetry case. Did you refer to the wrong case? Am I missing something?

6492: 6450: 6368: 6265: 6142: 6121:

Hello, Dominic. I thought I should draw your attention to this discussion.

6092: 6022: 5846: 5771: 5711: 5662: 5561: 5525: 5390: 5313: 5275: 5193: 5083: 4976: 4843: 4825: 4797: 4778: 4758: 4711: 4624: 4544: 4335: 4298: 4226: 4187: 4149: 4102: 4092: 4062: 3961: 3955: 3869: 3865: 3341: 3215: 3150: 2987: 2934: 2864: 2829: 2765: 2752: 2670: 2615: 2528: 2500: 2388: 2350: 2306: 2263: 2197: 2110: 2081: 2036: 1951: 1768: 1725: 1721: 1654: 1537: 1444: 1417: 1392: 1259: 1163: 1115:

and there's no signed of the named editor. Can you clarify please? Thanks.

1043: 981: 920: 904: 884: 869: 865: 864:

You are just demonstrating how unnecessary most of that is. Knowledge is a

846: 818: 794: 767: 685: 647: 599: 561: 531: 426: 303: 3958: 3307:, which you might possibly be able to action, though arguably I'm fishing 2335:

If the account has any user pages (such as a talk page due to messages or

6425:

Thanks for running a CU on Peter Damian. One of the socks you uncovered,

6202: 5756: 5637: 5509: 4921: 4886: 4533: 4491: 4468: 3778: 3580: 3551: 2773: 2453: 2319: 2286: 1923:

FYI there is an unblock request for an account related to the above IP -

1814: 1487: 1450: 5733: 5332:

the "loud shouting and backchannel influence peddling" method of audit.

3267: 1340: 6241: 5677:

Is this really as secretive as it needs to be? Okay I was embarrassed

5538: 4904:

Hello Dominic, I have granted you CU and OS flag. You can subscribe to

3406: 2400:

Ah yes, I see what you mean. I'll keep that in mind next time. Thanks.

1786: 1745: 1311:

Like PMK1 said, any third-party comments are welcome on the talk page.

1058: 1022: 726: 390: 6122: 6089:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Webley455 sockpuppetry

2669:

into a disambiguation page, so I don't know what you expect me to do.

2661: 2611: 6434: 6296:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 5048: 4877:

for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the

4460: 4280: 4260: 3210:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Yofiued&action=history

2947: 2919: 2846:

tongue-in-cheek EL label should be made more straightforward though.

1692: 1505: 6504:

Ah... I didn't actually block the account itself. I'll do so now! -

6283: 2918:, for example, turned around and made many positive contributions. – 2881:

It seems CU led you to clean out a sock drawer , perhaps related to

2479:

Hi, I saw that you blocked this user for "trolling", but looking at

684:. Just needs to be reformatted and moved to the Appendix namespace. 394: 6104:

Interesting. Thank you for the reply and fast work! Sincerely, --

5681:, trying to help a patron at the library I work in to register and 4733: 4401: 4371: 3605: 2127: 2058: 2015: 1556: 1552: 1533: 1514: 1510: 1482:

Makes sense. I would suggest that this be done in the open. I'm in

3707: 3637: 6547:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#Transcendental Meditation movement

5686: 5595: 4088: 3560: 2189: 840: 836: 832: 788: 6125:

As Checkuser in this case you may have something useful to add.

3228: 2720:

Your proxy block, asking for a review. Could you look into this

6473:

I'm a tiny bit confused... you wrote that you blocked an IP...

6429:, is the selfdeclared (by both named accounts) same as account 3702: 3632: 2564:

is the transwikied article? I know that the transwiki template

2193: 2185: 1015:

Out of interest, why have you removed the IP block exempt from

828: 5905: 5293:

Hi. I have asked a followup question at the now quite delayed

4348:

Hi! I noticed that you have recently deleted an article about

447:

computers , but now that's been sorted, it shouldn't recur. --

6066:

In the AfD that brought forth the most recent SPI, I noticed

4861:

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

3743: 3673: 3303:. I've also added a request there for others on the good 'ol 2666: 2633: 2557: 2546: 1603: 5253:

you might want to check the followup SPI report filed today.

4996:

Knowledge talk:Knowledge Signpost/2009-11-16/Sister projects

4948:

n:WN:WiktLookup#Wiktionary_lookup_gadget_(Hover_box_variety)

3251:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1304:

or no POV images at all, in order to have some kind of NPOV.

756:

Re: Recent removals of fair use images on E! Canada stations

5508:

Would it be better if I just opened a new report? Thanks,

5418: 4946:

Hi, you could have some more information about the tool at

3413: 3008:, but I have never been reported to ANI for doing this, as 2698:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 1483: 400:

In other words, I totaly agree with you about RasterFaAye.

382: 5250:

As a principal in the past SPI related to user JuliaHavey,

4881:. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. 3968:. There has been recent IP socking as recent as late July. 278:

An anon messaged us saying that the audio for the article

111:

Want to let me in on where you transwiki'd my article? --

4954:

But also (sorry these two following links are external):

234:

Hi. I think you want to rewrite you reason for proposing

190:

for me? It was a basic move. No idea what ClueBot off. --

5909:

Hello Dominic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a

4061:

I'm not going anywhere, no need for teary goodbyes. ;-)

3503:

Let me know if you'd prefer that I list it over at SPI.

2863:

I agree. It's a perfect external link, consistent with

2568:

that "its dictionary counterpart can be found at either

6554:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration

5224:

admin to take appropriate action. Also, if you look at

3772:

Just wondering if I could get you opinion on something

3367:

Just a heads-up, I changed your block on 134.50.0.0/16.

3276:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

2014:

would be more at home in Knowledge than in Wiktionary.

978:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Petersantos/Archive

6279:

Fair use rationale for File:1980 plebiscite ballot.jpg

5997: 5598:) a good thing. Can you please unblock me? Einar aka 5410:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bobmack89x/Archive

5353:

Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Audit_Subcommittee

3774:

Talk:Manchester mayoral election, 2009 (New Hampshire)

2105:

So, I do object to the deletion, but, as described in

5219:

as likely part of the same sock farm. If you look at

4658:

User:OhanaUnited/Sister Projects Interview/Wiktionary

4164:

User:OhanaUnited/Sister Projects Interview/Wiktionary

214:

I know, but I felt like it was more proper not to. --

6523:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Scalabrineformvp

6123:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Elonka#Explanation

5822:

I'm wondering if the checkuser work was finished on

6319:. If you have any questions please ask them at the 4447:to revert to a non-consensus version, and also to 2010:, and many others). For this reason it seems as if 1739:

You blocked all AT&T iPhones in the Twin Cities

1486:, as is well known, and as logs will show. Indeed, 5917:of the articles that you created is tagged as an 4392:Hello Dominic, this is an automated message from 3170:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Meowy/Archive 1254:. Vandalism is when you do something you know is 27:hi, just wanted to inform you that i have edited 4952:n:MediaWiki_talk:Gadget-dictionaryLookupHover.js 4101:Don't worry about it. Thanks for your help. :-) 3604:, I see that you also mentioned likely socks of 3301:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Muntuwandi 3294:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Muntuwandi 1691:regarding Pixelface's behaviour in this matter. 3933:User:Dominic/Workshop/Archivo Nacional de Chile 1383:Users on hard-blocked IP address 194.176.105.39 6061:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Drawn Some 5125:Hi Dominic, I emailed you earlier today about 3608:. I have transcluded some of your results to 3602:Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nrcprm2026 2424:Hi. I apologize for drawing your attention to 1927:, and a minor discussion involving the block. 1625:please consider yourself trouted again, jeers 1387:There are currently 2 users on the IP address 352: 336: 6011: 4439:Hi, i noticed you a perfomed checkuser on IP 4396:to inform you the PROD template you added to 3939:that should be pushed out as well. *nudge* 3206:This is in accordance with Knowledge policy. 2215:who live there, do consider territories like 6057:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Torkmann 5789:made and it was deleted. It was brought to 4130:Knowledge:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Crime 3951:IP sock investigaton related to chiropractic 2692:List of United Nations peacekeeping missions 2685:List of United Nations peacekeeping missions 1908:if not feel free to reverse it at any time. 350:Never mind, I see that the user is a sock. — 138:Oh, I'm just not sure how this falls under " 5824:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikid77 2124:List of English words from Latin verb forms 2120:List of English words from Latin verb forms 2012:List of English words from Latin verb forms 1973:List of English words from Latin verb forms 1967:List of English words from Latin verb forms 5864: 5833: 5211:Hi, I notice that you recently identified 3240:Hello, Dominic. You have new messages at 2999:Yes, I agree. I filed several SPI reports 2305:. It is governed by the oversight policy. 1724:expressed interest in hearing your views. 1399:. Is it okay to give these users an IPBE? 273:Knowledge:Help desk#Error in audio article 6232:Please be more careful with ncd deletions 5919:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person 5207:Supplement to a recent CU you carried out 3558: 3397:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Brexx 2897:User talk:Mrpotatohead 2#Unblock requests 1338: 817:contribute significantly to the article. 723:was updated with a fact from the article 357: 341: 6348:I immediately took the time to respond. 6290:Thanks for uploading or contributing to 5881: 4757:Thanks for your support (and cake). :-) 4732: 2895:). As such, could you comment on or at 6083:It's not Torkmann, but it's definitely 5129:, which seems likely to be a return of 4776:suitable for the role, if I am honest. 3610:Knowledge:Sockpuppet_investigations/TDC 2481:Special:Contributions/CaptchaCompliance 2450:He says he's very sorry for vandalism. 1084:You blocked an editor on my watchlist ( 14: 4427:Learn how to opt out of these messages 3299:Per your comment at ANI, I've updated 1638:Thank you Dominic. I appreciate it. -- 639:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Lessno 5929:, all biographies should be based on 4737:That whole big slice is just for you! 4412:for community discussion. Thank you, 3746:; 777 College Ave, Suite 101, Tempe 3676:; 777 College Ave, Suite 101, Tempe 3600:Per your checkuser investigations at 2967:Thank you for processing this report 2867:; thanks, Wolfkeeper, for adding it. 1767:. Could you try checking that again? 1594:. But that's just my take ;) Cheers, 917:the article (excluding the infobox). 4400:has been removed. It was removed by 4201:It looks like you've seen a ghost... 1945:This is school IP that is shared by 6338:This is not the way to treat people 1712:comment on Unban proposal requested 285:What is the origin of your file? - 23: 6282: 4865:As you participated in the recent 4244:You offered on the very bottom of 3272:Template:Copy to Wikimedia Commons 3261:Template:Copy to Wikimedia Commons 3233: 1653:didn't think it was worth a fuss. 1218:Slavic-speakers of Greek Macedonia 665:Where has it been transwikied to? 24: 6581: 3305:Ancient Egyptian race controversy 2178:neutrality is a different concept 1349:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 5904: 5770: 5732: 4879:SecurePoll feedback and workshop 3706: 3636: 3559: 3266: 3174:User talk:Nixeagle#Onlyoneanswer 2770:You have hot mail (not hotmail) 1593:or an apology made</joke: --> 1589:(thank you) re the confirmation. 1521: 1339: 993:Thanks. I declined the request. 706: 6293:File:1980 plebiscite ballot.jpg 5347:Arbitration case involving you. 4920:. Congratulations and regards, 4884:For the Arbitration Committee, 4493: 4470: 3405:You recently found a couple of 3322:Thanks for your response there 2340: 1141: 682:List of English irregular verbs 661:List of English irregular verbs 6321:Media copyright questions page 6173:My response to the AUSC report 4500: 4477: 4445:List of science fiction themes 4343:07:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 4328:15:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 4306:01:59, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 4292:01:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 4272:02:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 4234:06:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 4220:02:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 4195:02:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 4180:14:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC) 4157:10:17, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 4142:06:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 3929:Ministry of Education of Chile 3714:In the area? You're invited to 3644:In the area? You're invited to 3575:Thanks for sticking around at 3395:Possible additional sock from 238:for deletion. Funny though:-) 13: 1: 6571:19:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 6533:18:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 6514:13:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 6500:13:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 6486:13:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 6458:09:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 6443:09:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 6376:10:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 6213:, and had previously blocked 5923:biographies of living persons 5839:20:44, 31 December 2009 (UTC) 5812:03:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC) 5765:01:23, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 5585:15:20, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 5569:02:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 5554:00:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 5533:06:42, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 5518:01:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 5398:00:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC) 5384:14:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 5365:18:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 5342:14:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 5164:18:42, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 5144:23:54, 28 November 2009 (UTC) 5113:05:53, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 5091:05:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 5077:05:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 5043:14:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC) 5026:18:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC) 4985:20:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 4937:11:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 4895:08:07, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 4851:01:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC) 4837:22:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 4818:21:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 4805:18:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 4790:17:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 4766:02:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 4752:21:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC) 4719:18:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 4705:16:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 4691:03:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC) 4648:22:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC) 4110:08:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 4097:09:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 4070:08:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 4057:21:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 4035:23:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 4002:11:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 3176:Who was the puppet master of 1468:It's a bit urgent. Thanks. -- 1146: 1003:05:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 989:04:41, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 971:04:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC) 912:07:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 898:07:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 877:07:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 860:06:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 808:02:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC) 781:07:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 751:02:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC) 693:10:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 675:03:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 655:00:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 607:05:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC) 593:03:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC) 569:20:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 554:20:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 539:02:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 524:21:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 457:09:34, 16 February 2009 (UTC) 434:01:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC) 413:16:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 361:17:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 345:15:08, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 311:08:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 298:The audio file is completely 293:08:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC) 266:22:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 248:20:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC) 52:12:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC) 6414:01:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC) 6361:19:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 6333:07:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 6317:criteria for speedy deletion 6273:22:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC) 6258:01:11, 26 January 2010 (UTC) 6227:13:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC) 6190:22:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC) 6165:16:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 6150:06:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 6135:18:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC) 6109:23:58, 14 January 2010 (UTC) 6100:10:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 6078:17:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC) 5719:11:11, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 5699:23:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC) 5634:Knowledge:Request an account 5321:22:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC) 5307:19:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC) 5284:12:21, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 5266:02:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 5241:16:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC) 5201:05:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 5186:16:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 4675:23:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC) 4632:03:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC) 4617:01:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC) 4552:17:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 4537:16:57, 26 October 2009 (UTC) 4506:11:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 4483:11:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 4431:21:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 4380:21:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC) 3378:Make articles, not wikidrama 2364:Your comment on my talk page 1135: 598:Thanks for letting me know. 219:11:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 210:23:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 195:20:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 170:04:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 161:01:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 147:19:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 134:05:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 116:04:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 97:20:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 87:04:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC) 72:11:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC) 7: 6560:Knowledge:Arbitration guide 6050:21:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 6031:19:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC) 5894:14:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC) 5870:20:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC) 5854:01:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC) 5670:20:27, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 5653:20:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 5627:18:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 5608:18:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 5226:this archived comment to me 5053:Who's the pupetteer behind 4869:election, or in one of two 4422:21:43, 3 October 2009 (UTC) 4251:Joejoejoejoejoejoejoejoejoe 4011:Well, it was a pity to see 3698:First Phoenix meetup today! 3628:First Phoenix meetup today! 3242:Paine Ellsworth's talk page 2645:long" (viz., by others). -- 1903:Hi. On 9 March you blocked 1502:the other side of the globe 377:I reply to your message on 10: 6586: 5949:tag. Here is the article: 5781:Emergency Checkuser Needed 5270:It might be worth looking 4873:that relate to the use of 3983:01:11, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 3922:National Archives of Chile 3734:: Sunday, June 28, 3:00pm 3664:: Sunday, June 28, 3:00pm 3353:I have sent you an email. 2760:17:39, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 2745:17:00, 30 April 2009 (UTC) 2715:20:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 2696:featured list removal here 2678:20:41, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2655:15:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 2623:20:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 2605:13:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 2586:13:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC) 2570:Wiktionary:Transwiki:Jutsu 2536:05:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 2523:04:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 2508:03:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 2493:03:41, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 2470:21:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 2441:08:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC) 1918:11:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 1893:12:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1874:05:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC) 1851:20:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 1795:20:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1776:22:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 1754:19:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 1734:00:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 1707:03:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1672:02:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1662:01:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 1648:19:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1630:02:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1621:20:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1599:10:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1568:04:57, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 1545:04:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1527:04:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC) 1478:22:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 1459:20:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 1437:11:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 1425:10:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 1407:10:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 1088:) with an edit summary of 123:Transwiki:It is what it is 6342:One week ago, you wrote: 6304:and edit it to include a 6302:the file description page 5707:internet service provider 3964:According to Whois these 3946:13:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 3916:07:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 3896:21:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 3877:02:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 3858:00:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC) 3763:06:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 3738: 3730: 3712: 3705: 3693:06:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC) 3668: 3660: 3642: 3635: 3623:22:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3588:19:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 3565: 3546:12:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 3522:17:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 3383:15:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 3363:02:35, 22 June 2009 (UTC) 3349:23:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC) 3332:21:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 3317:16:55, 20 June 2009 (UTC) 3288:17:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC) 2901:fairly promising response 2795:xkcd in centrifugal force 2412:13:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC) 2396:12:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC) 2381:09:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC) 2358:23:48, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 2328:03:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 2314:03:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 2295:22:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC) 2271:23:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 2237:20:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 2205:10:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 2163:09:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 2136:15:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 2089:03:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 2067:16:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 2044:09:47, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 2024:18:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC) 1959:01:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC) 1937:20:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 1391:which you hard-blocked - 1375:20:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC) 1345: 1324:11:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 1287:11:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 1267:06:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC) 1244:13:54, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 1212:14:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 1195:12:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 1171:20:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 1155:18:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 1125:13:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 1106:14:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC) 1072:13:58, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 1051:01:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC) 1036:22:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC) 934:05:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 643:Knowledge:Deletion review 621:12:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 6036:Recent users you blocked 4435:Checkuser 220.237.74.225 4406:discussing your concerns 4206:Blink blink. (rubs eyes) 4186:how it looks currently. 3821:17:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 3787:05:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC) 3723:Phoenix Wikimedia Meetup 3653:Phoenix Wikimedia Meetup 3224:04:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 3190:15:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC) 3158:06:26, 17 May 2009 (UTC) 3136:00:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC) 2556:In the specific case of 1429:Thank you for the info. 976:The block is related to 956:An autoblock has caught 6431:User:HistorianofScience 3798:I've been contacted by 3768:could i get you opinion 3022:17:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2995:16:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2980:15:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2955:16:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2942:16:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2927:15:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2877:03:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2856:14:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2837:12:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2818:01:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 2790:22:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 2560:, I must also ask you, 1950:expiries like blocks). 1823:18:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 1412:This is the IP used by 733:Did you know? talk page 369:Edit summaries and PROD 6287: 6236:You deleted the image 5896: 5886:Best Wishes for 2010, 5127:User:Mr. Hicks The III 4738: 3257:Templates for deletion 3238: 3010:had happened right now 2700:featured list criteria 2475:User:CaptchaCompliance 1881:User talk:Infrogmation 575:When blocking Grawp... 6286: 6209:as Torkman socks per 5885: 5131:User:I am Dr. Drakken 4918:#wikimedia-oversights 4736: 4451:, but with a new IP: 4385:Removal of PROD from 3973:This justifies a CU. 3237: 1862:User talk:65.5.128.20 1585:re my spelling), and 1536:;-) ) are unrelated. 5404:New Bobmack89x sock? 5217:User:Canadian Monkey 4914:#wikimedia-checkuser 4871:requests for comment 4123:think I recommended 3569:The Admin's Barnstar 3324:William M. Connolley 3309:William M. Connolley 3149:, as Shuppiluliuma. 1905:User:194.176.105.39 958:User talk:Ren Newman 182:If you are around... 5661:to be demonic. ;-) 5156:Multi‑Xfer<: --> 5103:reasoning. Cheers. 4990:Wiktionary question 4118:Recent AfD comments 2318:Thanks much. - Dan 2113:, to get around my 1899:User:194.176.105.39 1561:Columbia University 1117:Delicious carbuncle 1111:I've rechecked the 1098:Delicious carbuncle 629:Lessno page deleted 6306:fair use rationale 6288: 6201:I've just blocked 5913:alerting you that 5897: 5725:Season's greetings 5289:Audit Subcommittee 5067:) ? Just curious. 4867:Audit Subcommittee 4739: 4240:ScienceGolfFanatic 3885:on his talk page. 3751: 3681: 3583: 3249:remove this notice 3239: 3178:user:Onlyoneanswer 2899:? He's prepared a 2342:(Username removed) 1834:User talk:Jmancini 1200:Already blocked. 699:DYK for John Biehl 300:Yeanold Viskersenn 236:BEST Travel Source 229:BEST Travel Source 6462:Allright, thanks! 6427:User:I love SUV's 6417: 6400:comment added by 6017: 5900:Unreferenced BLPs 5868: 5837: 5814: 5778: 5777: 5024: 4934: 4430: 4350:Steen Christensen 4055: 3909:I just don't know 3894: 3866:original research 3819: 3750: 3749: 3701: 3680: 3679: 3631: 3593: 3592: 3581: 3544: 3520: 3147:Economy of Turkey 2742: 2736: 2690:I have nominated 2653: 2603: 2584: 2439: 2303:Special:Listusers 2182:footnotes 4 and 5 1607: 1397:Toaster wasn't... 1380: 1379: 1151: 1113:sockpuppetry case 1086:User:Richard Hock 1080:Sockpuppet blocks 1070: 1034: 1001: 969: 932: 896: 858: 806: 779: 739: 738: 715:February 25, 2009 463:User:Lookie Louis 227:Prodd summary on 186:Could you revert 55: 38:comment added by 18:User talk:Dominic 6577: 6416: 6394: 6393:Please advise. 6313:my contributions 6245: 6059:and the related 6016: 6015: 6001: 5957: 5948: 5942: 5931:reliable sources 5908: 5866: 5862: 5835: 5831: 5808: 5802: 5798: 5774: 5736: 5729: 5728: 5650: 5647: 5645: 5504: 5502: 5465: 5445: 5443:deleted contribs 5421: 5258:Rhode Island Red 5002: 4968: 4960: 4932: 4928: 4925: 4834: 4828: 4787: 4781: 4744:Hamster Sandwich 4608: 4581:deleted contribs 4502: 4495: 4479: 4472: 4449:WWE Hall of Fame 4424: 4212:Hamster Sandwich 4054: 4052: 4041: 4030: 3966:set of IPs match 3944: 3913:User:Woohookitty 3890: 3887:Accounting4Taste 3815: 3812:Accounting4Taste 3710: 3703: 3640: 3633: 3563: 3556: 3555: 3534: 3510: 3499: 3497: 3460: 3440: 3438:deleted contribs 3416: 3374: 3270: 3252: 3195:Requsted Service 3127: 3100:deleted contribs 3080: 3053:deleted contribs 2912: 2906: 2788: 2785: 2740: 2734: 2710: 2649: 2599: 2580: 2574:Wiktionary:Jutsu 2468: 2465: 2438: 2436: 2429: 2409: 2404: 2378: 2373: 2344: 2217:Saint Barthélemy 2171:Saint Barthélemy 1856:Deleting ip page 1848: 1697: 1601: 1579:bahasa Indonesia 1525: 1496:and stated that 1495: 1371: 1361: 1343: 1336: 1335: 1209: 1152: 1147: 1142: 1137: 1130:User:Tollund man 1069: 1067: 1056: 1033: 1031: 1020: 1017:User:SockOfPedro 997: 965: 952:Autoblock review 931: 929: 923: 918: 895: 893: 887: 882: 857: 855: 849: 844: 805: 803: 797: 792: 778: 776: 770: 765: 710: 703: 702: 522: 514: 487:deleted contribs 442:IP address block 358: 354: 342: 338: 216:User:Woohookitty 192:User:Woohookitty 106:It is what it is 94:User:Woohookitty 69:User:Woohookitty 54: 32: 6585: 6584: 6580: 6579: 6578: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6543: 6526: 6510:Ta bu shi da yu 6482:Ta bu shi da yu 6471: 6423: 6395: 6384: 6340: 6281: 6243: 6234: 6199: 6175: 6119: 6064: 6038: 5958: 5946: 5944:unreferencedBLP 5940: 5902: 5880: 5820: 5806: 5800: 5783: 5727: 5643: 5641: 5638: 5541: 5478: 5458: 5438: 5417: 5416: 5406: 5372: 5349: 5329: 5291: 5248: 5209: 5171: 5151: 5123: 5051: 4992: 4966: 4958: 4944: 4942:Wiktionary tool 4930: 4923: 4902: 4863: 4832: 4826: 4785: 4779: 4731: 4662: 4566: 4562:You've blocked 4560: 4516: 4437: 4390: 4316: 4290: 4270: 4242: 4203: 4167: 4120: 4080: 4050: 4042: 4028: 4009: 3994:Conte di Cavour 3990: 3953: 3942:John Vandenberg 3940: 3927:After creating 3925: 3906: 3883:deletion review 3808:deletion review 3796: 3770: 3726: 3700: 3656: 3630: 3598: 3554: 3473: 3453: 3433: 3412: 3411: 3400: 3381: 3370: 3297: 3264: 3253: 3246: 3231: 3197: 3166: 3085: 3038: 3032: 2965: 2910: 2904: 2797: 2783: 2771: 2768: 2726:User talk:時勢造英雄 2722: 2708: 2688: 2550: 2477: 2463: 2451: 2448: 2432: 2430: 2422: 2407: 2402: 2376: 2371: 2366: 2283: 2150: 1969: 1901: 1858: 1844: 1837: 1741: 1714: 1703: 1693: 1513: 1491: 1466: 1464:You've got mail 1447: 1385: 1372: 1365: 1357: 1334: 1220: 1205: 1183: 1082: 1065: 1057: 1029: 1021: 1013: 954: 927: 921: 919: 891: 885: 883: 853: 847: 845: 801: 795: 793: 774: 768: 766: 758: 701: 663: 631: 577: 547: 516: 472: 466: 444: 372: 319: 317:Unblock request 280:Julie Kirkbride 276: 232: 184: 109: 64: 33: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6583: 6564: 6563: 6557: 6542: 6536: 6525: 6520: 6519: 6518: 6517: 6516: 6470: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6463: 6422: 6419: 6383: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6339: 6336: 6280: 6277: 6276: 6275: 6238:File:Ongal.jpg 6233: 6230: 6215:User:Politoman 6198: 6193: 6174: 6171: 6170: 6169: 6168: 6167: 6118: 6115: 6114: 6113: 6112: 6111: 6063: 6053: 6037: 6034: 6019: 6018: 5954:Sonia Tschorne 5901: 5898: 5879: 5878:Happy New Year 5876: 5875: 5874: 5873: 5872: 5819: 5816: 5787:suicide threat 5782: 5779: 5776: 5775: 5768: 5754: 5742: 5737: 5726: 5723: 5722: 5721: 5675: 5674: 5673: 5672: 5615: 5614: 5613: 5612: 5611: 5610: 5572: 5571: 5540: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5506: 5505: 5405: 5402: 5401: 5400: 5371: 5368: 5348: 5345: 5328: 5325: 5324: 5323: 5290: 5287: 5247: 5244: 5208: 5205: 5204: 5203: 5170: 5167: 5150: 5147: 5122: 5119: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5094: 5093: 5050: 5047: 5046: 5045: 4991: 4988: 4973: 4972: 4970:Otourly's blog 4964: 4962:Bawolff's blog 4943: 4940: 4912:for access to 4901: 4898: 4885: 4883: 4882: 4862: 4859: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4807: 4769: 4768: 4730: 4727: 4726: 4725: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4661: 4654: 4653: 4652: 4651: 4650: 4635: 4634: 4559: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4515: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4465:User:Wizardman 4453:220.237.74.225 4441:210.49.251.226 4436: 4433: 4389: 4383: 4346: 4345: 4315: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4286: 4266: 4241: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4208: 4207: 4202: 4199: 4198: 4197: 4166: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4119: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4112: 4079: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4008: 4005: 3989: 3986: 3962:76.222.232.146 3956:207.215.246.46 3952: 3949: 3924: 3919: 3905: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3846:for example. 3844:Bernard Madoff 3825: 3800:User:Ace Baker 3795: 3793:Corposcindosis 3790: 3769: 3766: 3748: 3747: 3736: 3735: 3728: 3727: 3720: 3717: 3716: 3711: 3699: 3696: 3678: 3677: 3666: 3665: 3658: 3657: 3650: 3647: 3646: 3641: 3629: 3626: 3597: 3596:Investigations 3594: 3591: 3590: 3572: 3571: 3566: 3564: 3553: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3528: 3399: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3375: 3335: 3334: 3296: 3291: 3263: 3259:nomination of 3254: 3245: 3232: 3230: 3227: 3196: 3193: 3165: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 2964: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2916:User:Xeno/RFAQ 2883:Mrpotatohead 2 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2840: 2839: 2796: 2793: 2767: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2728:. Thanks! -- 2721: 2718: 2687: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2626: 2625: 2549: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2476: 2473: 2447: 2444: 2421: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2365: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2282: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2252:in the article 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2224: 2220: 2209: 2208: 2176:we are after, 2169:dispute, like 2149: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2047: 2046: 1968: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1940: 1939: 1900: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1857: 1854: 1836: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1779: 1778: 1740: 1737: 1713: 1710: 1701: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1590: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1509: 1508:to Bali is in 1465: 1462: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1389:194.176.105.39 1384: 1381: 1378: 1377: 1364: 1352: 1351: 1346: 1344: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1270: 1269: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1081: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 953: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 757: 754: 737: 736: 711: 700: 697: 696: 695: 662: 659: 658: 657: 630: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 588: 585: 576: 573: 572: 571: 546: 543: 542: 541: 465: 460: 449:Litherlandsand 443: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 416: 415: 371: 365: 364: 363: 318: 315: 314: 313: 275: 270: 269: 268: 257:. :-) Thanks. 231: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 183: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 108: 103: 102: 101: 100: 99: 63: 60: 58: 26: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6582: 6573: 6572: 6569: 6561: 6558: 6555: 6552: 6551: 6550: 6548: 6540: 6535: 6534: 6531: 6524: 6515: 6511: 6507: 6503: 6502: 6501: 6498: 6494: 6490: 6489: 6488: 6487: 6483: 6479: 6475: 6469:Clarification 6461: 6460: 6459: 6456: 6452: 6447: 6446: 6445: 6444: 6440: 6436: 6432: 6428: 6418: 6415: 6411: 6407: 6403: 6399: 6391: 6388: 6382:Sock's Puppet 6377: 6374: 6370: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6358: 6354: 6350: 6347: 6345: 6335: 6334: 6330: 6326: 6323:. Thank you. 6322: 6318: 6314: 6309: 6307: 6303: 6299: 6295: 6294: 6285: 6274: 6271: 6267: 6262: 6261: 6260: 6259: 6255: 6251: 6247: 6239: 6229: 6228: 6224: 6220: 6216: 6212: 6208: 6207:User:Prop3v56 6204: 6197: 6196:User:Torkmann 6192: 6191: 6187: 6183: 6179: 6166: 6162: 6158: 6153: 6152: 6151: 6148: 6144: 6139: 6138: 6137: 6136: 6132: 6128: 6124: 6110: 6107: 6103: 6102: 6101: 6098: 6094: 6090: 6086: 6082: 6081: 6080: 6079: 6076: 6072: 6069: 6062: 6058: 6052: 6051: 6047: 6043: 6033: 6032: 6028: 6024: 6014: 6010: 6007: 6004: 6000: 5996: 5992: 5989: 5986: 5983: 5980: 5977: 5974: 5971: 5968: 5964: 5961: 5960:Find sources: 5955: 5952: 5951: 5950: 5945: 5938: 5937: 5932: 5928: 5927:verifiability 5924: 5920: 5916: 5912: 5907: 5895: 5892: 5889: 5884: 5871: 5867: 5861: 5857: 5856: 5855: 5852: 5848: 5843: 5842: 5841: 5840: 5836: 5830: 5825: 5815: 5813: 5809: 5803: 5796: 5792: 5788: 5773: 5769: 5767: 5766: 5762: 5758: 5752: 5750: 5746: 5738: 5735: 5731: 5730: 5720: 5717: 5713: 5708: 5703: 5702: 5701: 5700: 5696: 5692: 5688: 5684: 5680: 5671: 5668: 5664: 5660: 5656: 5655: 5654: 5651: 5649: 5635: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5624: 5620: 5609: 5605: 5601: 5597: 5593: 5592: 5591: 5590: 5589: 5588: 5587: 5586: 5582: 5578: 5570: 5567: 5563: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5551: 5547: 5534: 5531: 5527: 5522: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5515: 5511: 5501: 5498: 5495: 5492: 5488: 5484: 5481: 5477: 5474: 5471: 5468: 5464: 5461: 5457: 5454: 5451: 5448: 5444: 5441: 5437: 5434: 5431: 5428: 5425: 5420: 5415: 5414: 5413: 5411: 5399: 5396: 5392: 5388: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5381: 5377: 5367: 5366: 5362: 5358: 5354: 5344: 5343: 5339: 5335: 5322: 5319: 5315: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5304: 5300: 5296: 5286: 5285: 5281: 5277: 5273: 5268: 5267: 5263: 5259: 5255: 5252: 5243: 5242: 5238: 5234: 5230: 5227: 5222: 5218: 5214: 5213:User:NoCal100 5202: 5199: 5195: 5190: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5183: 5179: 5175: 5166: 5165: 5161: 5157: 5146: 5145: 5141: 5137: 5132: 5128: 5114: 5110: 5106: 5102: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5092: 5089: 5085: 5081: 5080: 5079: 5078: 5074: 5070: 5066: 5063: 5060: 5056: 5044: 5041: 5040: 5037: 5036: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5022: 5018: 5014: 5010: 5006: 5001: 4997: 4987: 4986: 4982: 4978: 4971: 4965: 4963: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4953: 4949: 4939: 4938: 4935: 4926: 4919: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4897: 4896: 4892: 4888: 4880: 4876: 4872: 4868: 4852: 4849: 4845: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4835: 4830: 4829: 4821: 4820: 4819: 4816: 4813: 4808: 4806: 4803: 4799: 4794: 4793: 4792: 4791: 4788: 4783: 4782: 4775: 4767: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4755: 4754: 4753: 4749: 4745: 4735: 4720: 4717: 4713: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4702: 4698: 4694: 4693: 4692: 4689: 4688: 4685: 4684: 4679: 4678: 4677: 4676: 4673: 4672: 4669: 4668: 4659: 4649: 4646: 4643: 4639: 4638: 4637: 4636: 4633: 4630: 4626: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4615: 4612: 4606: 4603: 4600: 4597: 4594: 4591: 4588: 4585: 4582: 4579: 4576: 4573: 4570: 4565: 4553: 4550: 4546: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4535: 4531: 4528: 4525: 4521: 4507: 4504: 4503: 4497: 4496: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4481: 4480: 4474: 4473: 4466: 4462: 4456: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4442: 4432: 4428: 4423: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4388: 4382: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4366: 4363: 4360: 4357: 4354: 4351: 4344: 4341: 4337: 4332: 4331: 4330: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4307: 4304: 4300: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4289: 4288:Contributions 4284: 4283: 4282: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4269: 4268:Contributions 4264: 4263: 4262: 4256: 4252: 4247: 4235: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4217: 4213: 4205: 4204: 4196: 4193: 4189: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4178: 4177: 4174: 4173: 4165: 4158: 4155: 4151: 4146: 4145: 4144: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4131: 4126: 4111: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4086: 4085: 4084: 4071: 4068: 4064: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4053: 4047: 4046: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4036: 4033: 4031: 4024: 4023: 4018: 4014: 4004: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3985: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3970: 3967: 3963: 3960: 3959:69.234.129.52 3957: 3948: 3947: 3943: 3938: 3934: 3930: 3923: 3918: 3917: 3914: 3910: 3897: 3893: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3879: 3878: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3847: 3845: 3839: 3838: 3834: 3833: 3829: 3826: 3823: 3822: 3818: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3794: 3789: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3775: 3765: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3724: 3719: 3718: 3715: 3709: 3704: 3695: 3694: 3690: 3686: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3654: 3649: 3648: 3645: 3639: 3634: 3625: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3589: 3586: 3584: 3578: 3574: 3573: 3570: 3567: 3562: 3557: 3547: 3542: 3538: 3533: 3529: 3526: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3518: 3514: 3509: 3504: 3501: 3496: 3493: 3490: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3476: 3472: 3469: 3466: 3463: 3459: 3456: 3452: 3449: 3446: 3443: 3439: 3436: 3432: 3429: 3426: 3423: 3420: 3415: 3408: 3403: 3398: 3384: 3379: 3373: 3369: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3302: 3295: 3290: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3278:. Thank you. 3277: 3273: 3269: 3262: 3258: 3250: 3243: 3236: 3226: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3212: 3211: 3207: 3204: 3200: 3192: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3164:Onlyoneanswer 3159: 3156: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3134: 3131: 3125: 3122: 3119: 3116: 3113: 3110: 3107: 3104: 3101: 3098: 3095: 3092: 3089: 3084: 3083:Shuppiluliuma 3081:as a sock of 3078: 3075: 3072: 3069: 3066: 3063: 3060: 3057: 3054: 3051: 3048: 3045: 3042: 3037: 3036:Mcmlxxxvi1986 3030:Mcmlxxxvi1986 3023: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3007: 3004: 3001: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2993: 2989: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2956: 2953: 2951: 2950: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2940: 2936: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2925: 2923: 2922: 2917: 2909: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2884: 2879: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2838: 2835: 2831: 2826: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2792: 2791: 2786: 2780: 2779: 2777: 2761: 2758: 2754: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2743: 2737: 2731: 2727: 2717: 2716: 2713: 2711: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2686: 2679: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2663: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2642: 2640: 2635: 2631: 2624: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2593: 2588: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2554: 2548: 2537: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2506: 2502: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2472: 2471: 2466: 2460: 2459: 2457: 2443: 2442: 2437: 2435: 2427: 2413: 2410: 2405: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2394: 2390: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2379: 2374: 2359: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2343: 2338: 2337:user warnings 2329: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2272: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2225: 2221: 2218: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2207: 2206: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2172: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2125: 2121: 2116: 2112: 2111:third opinion 2108: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2090: 2087: 2083: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2033: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1974: 1960: 1957: 1953: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1906: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1847: 1842: 1835: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1777: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1736: 1735: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1709: 1708: 1705: 1704: 1698: 1696: 1690: 1686: 1673: 1670: 1669:Jack Merridew 1665: 1664: 1663: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1631: 1628: 1627:Jack Merridew 1624: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1605: 1600: 1597: 1596:Jack Merridew 1591: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1565:Jack Merridew 1562: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519:Jack Merridew 1516: 1512: 1507: 1504:. aside; the 1503: 1499: 1494: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1438: 1435: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1376: 1373: 1370: 1369: 1362: 1360: 1354: 1353: 1350: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1318: 1315: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1268: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1235: 1228: 1224: 1213: 1210: 1208: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1181:Contemplation 1172: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1153: 1150: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1131: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1073: 1068: 1062: 1061: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1045: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1032: 1026: 1025: 1018: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 991: 990: 987: 983: 979: 975: 974: 973: 972: 968: 964: 959: 935: 930: 924: 915: 914: 913: 910: 906: 901: 900: 899: 894: 888: 880: 879: 878: 875: 871: 867: 863: 862: 861: 856: 850: 842: 838: 834: 830: 826: 825: 824: 820: 815: 811: 810: 809: 804: 798: 790: 785: 784: 783: 782: 777: 771: 764:. Thank you. 763: 753: 752: 748: 744: 734: 730: 729: 728: 722: 721: 720:Did you know? 716: 712: 709: 705: 704: 694: 691: 687: 683: 679: 678: 677: 676: 672: 668: 656: 653: 649: 644: 640: 636: 635: 634: 622: 618: 614: 610: 609: 608: 605: 601: 597: 596: 595: 594: 591: 590: 589: 586: 583: 570: 567: 563: 558: 557: 556: 555: 552: 551:ViperSnake151 540: 537: 533: 528: 527: 526: 525: 521: 520: 512: 509: 506: 503: 500: 497: 494: 491: 488: 485: 482: 479: 476: 471: 464: 459: 458: 454: 450: 435: 432: 428: 424: 420: 419: 418: 417: 414: 410: 406: 403: 402: 401: 398: 396: 392: 388: 384: 380: 379:RasterFaAye's 375: 370: 362: 359: 355: 349: 348: 347: 346: 343: 339: 333: 330: 327: 323: 312: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296: 295: 294: 291: 288: 284: 281: 274: 267: 264: 260: 256: 252: 251: 250: 249: 245: 241: 237: 230: 220: 217: 213: 212: 211: 208: 204: 199: 198: 197: 196: 193: 189: 171: 168: 164: 163: 162: 159: 155: 150: 149: 148: 145: 141: 137: 136: 135: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119: 118: 117: 114: 107: 98: 95: 90: 89: 88: 85: 81: 76: 75: 74: 73: 70: 59: 56: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 30: 19: 6565: 6544: 6527: 6472: 6424: 6421:Peter Damian 6402:John E. Rhea 6392: 6389: 6385: 6343: 6341: 6310: 6291: 6289: 6235: 6200: 6176: 6120: 6117:Irvine22 SPI 6084: 6065: 6042:Tempaccount5 6039: 6020: 6008: 6002: 5994: 5987: 5981: 5975: 5969: 5959: 5934: 5914: 5903: 5821: 5801:NeutralHomer 5785:There was a 5784: 5753: 5741: 5682: 5678: 5676: 5658: 5639: 5616: 5573: 5542: 5507: 5496: 5490: 5479: 5472: 5466: 5459: 5452: 5446: 5439: 5432: 5426: 5419:Belomorkanal 5408:Hi, over at 5407: 5373: 5350: 5330: 5292: 5269: 5249: 5246:SPI Followup 5210: 5172: 5152: 5124: 5061: 5052: 5039: 5034: 5000:TonyTheTiger 4993: 4974: 4959:(in English) 4945: 4908:and contact 4903: 4864: 4824: 4777: 4773: 4770: 4740: 4701:push to talk 4687: 4682: 4671: 4666: 4663: 4601: 4595: 4589: 4583: 4577: 4571: 4564:82.95.182.23 4561: 4558:82.95.182.23 4526: 4520:72.29.65.254 4518:Hi Dominic. 4517: 4514:72.29.65.254 4499: 4492: 4476: 4469: 4457: 4438: 4391: 4347: 4317: 4279: 4278: 4259: 4258: 4255:Tmffqfs Tpdl 4243: 4209: 4176: 4171: 4168: 4124: 4121: 4081: 4044: 4025: 4021: 4010: 3991: 3954: 3931:, I noticed 3926: 3907: 3904:You know Dom 3848: 3840: 3835: 3830: 3827: 3824: 3797: 3771: 3752: 3739: 3731: 3721: 3713: 3682: 3669: 3661: 3651: 3643: 3599: 3568: 3505: 3502: 3491: 3485: 3474: 3467: 3461: 3454: 3447: 3441: 3434: 3427: 3421: 3414:Forgivenesss 3404: 3401: 3298: 3265: 3213: 3208: 3205: 3201: 3198: 3167: 3120: 3114: 3108: 3102: 3096: 3090: 3073: 3067: 3061: 3055: 3049: 3043: 3034:You blocked 3033: 2966: 2948: 2920: 2889: 2880: 2862: 2824: 2809: 2801: 2798: 2775: 2774: 2769: 2723: 2689: 2643: 2638: 2629: 2627: 2591: 2589: 2565: 2561: 2555: 2551: 2478: 2455: 2454: 2449: 2433: 2423: 2367: 2341: 2334: 2324:push to talk 2291:push to talk 2284: 2259: 2255: 2174: 2151: 2031: 1970: 1946: 1902: 1885:Infrogmation 1866:Infrogmation 1859: 1845: 1838: 1761: 1742: 1722:User:MBisanz 1715: 1700: 1694: 1682: 1587:terima kasih 1586: 1582: 1574: 1501: 1493:done a check 1481: 1467: 1448: 1386: 1367: 1366: 1358: 1348: 1312: 1255: 1251: 1232: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1206: 1187:Incidentally 1184: 1148: 1134: 1093: 1089: 1083: 1059: 1023: 1014: 955: 866:free content 813: 759: 740: 725: 724: 718: 664: 632: 613:Incidentally 582: 581: 578: 548: 517: 507: 501: 495: 489: 483: 477: 470:Lookie Louis 468:Hi Dominic! 467: 445: 399: 386: 385:, click the 376: 373: 328: 320: 277: 254: 233: 185: 110: 65: 57: 25: 6539:Arbitration 6396:—Preceding 6353:JohnWBarber 6325:Killiondude 6203:User:Reg7ha 6182:JohnWBarber 6055:Concerning 5985:free images 5860:LeadSongDog 5829:LeadSongDog 5818:CU followup 5745:traditional 5494:investigate 5256:Thank you. 5233:Peter cohen 5221:this thread 5035:OhanaUnited 4967:(in French) 4906:checkuser-l 4683:OhanaUnited 4667:OhanaUnited 4414:SDPatrolBot 4398:David Brame 4394:SDPatrolBot 4387:David Brame 4172:OhanaUnited 4007:De-righted? 3744:CUPZ Coffee 3674:CUPZ Coffee 3615:Xenophrenic 3489:investigate 3229:New message 3168:Please see 1976:transwikied 1785:account. -- 1498:Someguy1221 1414:Hamish Ross 34:—Preceding 6508:(formerly 6480:(formerly 6219:NawlinWiki 6087:. :-) See 5795:WP:SUICIDE 5463:block user 5456:filter log 5121:Sock issue 5017:WP:CHICAGO 4875:SecurePoll 4599:block user 4593:filter log 4467:). Thanks! 4017:desysopped 3755:EdwardsBot 3685:EdwardsBot 3458:block user 3451:filter log 3407:User:Brexx 3280:Beeblebrox 3214:Thank you 3143:Bambam1986 3118:block user 3112:filter log 3071:block user 3065:filter log 2908:2nd chance 2810:Wolfkeeper 2434:Sandstein 2420:ANI threat 1984:Portuguese 1813:Thanks. — 1434:Od Mishehu 1404:Od Mishehu 727:John Biehl 667:DuncanHill 505:block user 499:filter log 405:-calvinps- 391:Wiktionary 322:MSNBC Muse 6566:Thanks, – 6085:something 6021:Thanks!-- 5865:come howl 5834:come howl 5691:Carptrash 5619:Carptrash 5600:Carptrash 5577:Carptrash 5546:Carptrash 5483:CheckUser 5470:block log 5376:Hipocrite 5357:Hipocrite 5334:Hipocrite 5299:Hipocrite 5178:Hipocrite 5155:<: --> 5105:Abecedare 5069:Abecedare 4975:Regards, 4695:Gratz on 4605:block log 4461:User:Mark 4320:Joe Chill 4314:Murderers 4246:this page 4078:I'm sorry 3975:QuackGuru 3850:Ace Baker 3732:Time/Date 3662:Time/Date 3478:CheckUser 3465:block log 3372:Nishkid64 3124:block log 3077:block log 2515:Aervanath 2485:Aervanath 2426:this edit 2055:consensus 1925:User:Yyem 1683:There is 1640:Pixelface 1613:Pixelface 1470:Pixelface 1431:עוד מישהו 1401:עוד מישהו 1332:Barnstar! 928:Speak up! 892:Speak up! 854:Speak up! 802:Speak up! 775:Speak up! 511:block log 423:WP:CSD#A5 395:wikt:bint 240:Rettetast 167:Kendrick7 144:Kendrick7 113:Kendrick7 40:Duke.peet 29:this page 6568:MuZemike 6530:MuZemike 6410:contribs 6398:unsigned 6298:fair use 6254:contribs 6177:is here 6157:Irvine22 6127:Irvine22 6106:A Nobody 6075:A Nobody 5888:FloNight 5436:contribs 5136:Mackan79 5065:contribs 4812:FloNight 4575:contribs 4530:contribs 4134:Location 4045:Kanonkas 3937:two more 3606:User:TDC 3541:contribs 3532:Big Bird 3530:Thanks! 3517:contribs 3508:Big Bird 3506:Thanks! 3431:contribs 3355:Kobolola 3247:You can 3094:contribs 3047:contribs 2893:contribs 2869:Dicklyon 2848:Dicklyon 2802:entirely 2741:contribs 2730:Jayron32 2709:Scorpion 2630:undelete 2281:Hideuser 1971:Why was 1929:Euryalus 1910:Euryalus 1685:a thread 1557:Colombia 1553:Columbia 1534:Colombia 1515:Colombia 1511:Columbia 1506:antipode 1359:Versus22 1320:Bozhinov 1240:Bozhinov 1136:Lychosis 1011:Question 995:Dekimasu 963:Dekimasu 922:єmarsee 886:єmarsee 848:єmarsee 796:єmarsee 769:єmarsee 743:Dravecky 680:It's at 481:contribs 387:History' 374:Hi Dom! 332:contribs 259:Dmcdevit 203:Dmcdevit 154:Dmcdevit 127:Dmcdevit 80:Dmcdevit 48:contribs 36:unsigned 6493:Dominic 6451:Dominic 6369:Dominic 6266:Dominic 6211:WP:DUCK 6143:Dominic 6093:Dominic 6023:DASHBot 5991:WP refs 5979:scholar 5847:Dominic 5712:Dominic 5687:opinion 5663:Dominic 5596:opinion 5562:Dominic 5526:Dominic 5391:Dominic 5370:Thanks. 5327:Weekend 5314:Dominic 5276:TraceyR 5274:too. -- 5194:Dominic 5101:WP:DENY 5084:Dominic 5055:Commabo 5021:WP:LOTM 4977:Otourly 4900:CU + OS 4844:Dominic 4827:Majorly 4798:Dominic 4780:Majorly 4759:Dominic 4712:Dominic 4697:WP:AUSC 4625:Dominic 4545:Dominic 4336:Dominic 4299:Dominic 4227:Dominic 4188:Dominic 4150:Dominic 4103:Dominic 4063:Dominic 3988:Comoros 3870:Dominic 3342:Dominic 3216:YoFIUEd 3151:Dominic 3014:Biophys 2988:Dominic 2972:Biophys 2935:Dominic 2830:Dominic 2753:Dominic 2671:Dominic 2616:Dominic 2566:claimed 2529:Dominic 2513:foul.-- 2501:Dominic 2446:Sunholm 2389:Dominic 2351:Dominic 2307:Dominic 2264:Dominic 2260:de jure 2198:Dominic 2190:Morocco 2148:MAYOTTE 2082:Dominic 2037:Dominic 1988:Yiddish 1952:Dominic 1860:Hi. Re 1769:Dominic 1726:doncram 1655:Dominic 1538:Dominic 1418:Dominic 1393:AulaTPN 1260:Dominic 1164:Dominic 1044:Dominic 982:Dominic 905:Dominic 870:Dominic 841:KTTV-TV 837:KCOP-TV 833:KTLA-TV 819:Dominic 789:CHEK-TV 686:Dominic 648:Dominic 600:Dominic 562:Dominic 532:Dominic 519:redvers 427:Dominic 304:Dominic 62:Pssssst 6541:notice 5963:Google 5921:. The 5757:Risker 5755:Best, 5749:cheeky 5659:trying 5510:CliffC 5500:cuwiki 4887:Risker 4656:About 4534:zzuuzz 3779:Gang14 3582:Nathan 3495:cuwiki 2963:Thanks 2662:wikt:術 2612:wikt:術 2320:Dank55 2287:Dank55 2194:Cyprus 2186:Israel 2115:WP:OWN 2107:WP:OWN 2008:Korean 2004:Turkic 2000:Hebrew 1980:French 1815:Bdb484 1762:should 1689:WP:ANI 1602:Happy 1451:Daniel 829:WGN-TV 545:Kopimi 353:Travis 337:Travis 6506:Tbsdy 6478:Tbsdy 6006:JSTOR 5967:books 5683:again 5679:again 5149:Howdy 4922:Leina 4910:an op 4729:Cake! 4660:again 4051:Talk 3740:Place 3670:Place 2903:to a 2865:WP:EL 2778:levse 2724:See: 2706:. -- 2667:jutsu 2639:after 2634:jutsu 2562:where 2558:Jutsu 2547:Jutsu 2458:levse 2408:venin 2377:venin 2032:verbs 1996:Tamil 1992:Dutch 1846:juice 1841:Mango 1787:Bobak 1746:Bobak 1604:Nyepi 1583:sorry 1314:Todor 1256:wrong 1252:right 1234:Todor 1207:juice 1202:Mango 1066:Chat 1060:Pedro 1030:Chat 1024:Pedro 393:(see 16:< 6439:talk 6435:Fram 6406:talk 6357:talk 6329:talk 6250:talk 6223:talk 6205:and 6186:talk 6161:talk 6131:talk 6068:this 6046:talk 6027:talk 5999:FENS 5973:news 5891:♥♥♥♥ 5807:Talk 5761:talk 5695:talk 5623:talk 5604:talk 5581:talk 5550:talk 5514:talk 5450:logs 5424:talk 5380:talk 5361:talk 5338:talk 5303:talk 5280:talk 5272:here 5262:talk 5237:talk 5215:and 5182:talk 5169:Ping 5160:talk 5140:talk 5109:talk 5073:talk 5059:talk 4981:talk 4916:and 4891:talk 4833:talk 4815:♥♥♥♥ 4786:talk 4774:less 4748:talk 4645:Talk 4642:Fred 4614:Talk 4611:Fred 4587:logs 4569:talk 4524:talk 4463:and 4418:talk 4376:talk 4367:and 4324:talk 4281:Soap 4261:Soap 4253:and 4216:talk 4138:talk 4125:weak 4093:talk 4029:Talk 4013:this 3998:talk 3979:talk 3892:talk 3854:talk 3817:talk 3804:here 3783:talk 3759:talk 3689:talk 3619:talk 3537:talk 3513:talk 3445:logs 3419:talk 3402:Hi! 3359:talk 3328:talk 3313:talk 3284:talk 3220:talk 3186:talk 3172:and 3133:Talk 3130:Fred 3106:logs 3088:talk 3059:logs 3041:talk 3018:talk 2976:talk 2949:xeno 2921:xeno 2887:talk 2873:talk 2852:talk 2814:Talk 2806:User 2784:Talk 2766:Ping 2735:talk 2704:here 2694:for 2651:(��) 2601:(��) 2592:were 2582:(��) 2519:talk 2489:talk 2464:Talk 2403:Anti 2372:Anti 2233:talk 2229:Wran 2159:talk 2155:Wran 2132:talk 2063:talk 2020:talk 1947:lots 1933:talk 1914:talk 1889:talk 1870:talk 1819:talk 1791:talk 1750:talk 1730:talk 1695:Reyk 1644:talk 1617:talk 1581:for 1575:Maaf 1555:vs. 1490:has 1488:John 1484:Bali 1474:talk 1455:talk 1449:Ya! 1445:iPod 1395:and 1368:talk 1283:talk 1279:PMK1 1191:talk 1121:talk 1102:talk 1094:some 762:here 747:talk 671:talk 617:talk 587:fold 584:Hers 493:logs 475:talk 453:talk 409:talk 383:Bint 367:RE: 326:talk 255:that 244:talk 188:this 44:talk 6512:) 6484:) 6013:TWL 5936:686 5911:bot 5791:ANI 5747:or 5487:log 5430:tag 5013:bio 4998:.-- 4501:Mod 4494:Yob 4478:Mod 4471:Yob 4410:AfD 4402:DGG 4372:,,n 3577:SPI 3552:SPI 3482:log 3425:tag 3182:PBS 2825:not 2647:dab 2597:dab 2578:dab 2572:or 2345:"? 2256:not 2128:AJD 2059:AJD 2016:AJD 1720:. 1702:YO! 1687:at 1551:re 814:why 713:On 287:Mgm 6441:) 6412:) 6408:• 6359:) 6331:) 6308:. 6256:) 6252:• 6246:DJ 6242:Th 6225:) 6188:) 6163:) 6133:) 6091:. 6048:) 6029:) 5993:) 5956:- 5947:}} 5941:{{ 5810:• 5804:• 5763:) 5751:. 5697:) 5644:is 5625:) 5606:) 5583:) 5552:) 5539:Hi 5516:) 5489:) 5476:CA 5382:) 5363:) 5340:) 5305:) 5282:) 5264:) 5239:) 5184:) 5176:. 5162:) 5142:) 5111:) 5075:) 5023:) 4983:) 4950:, 4893:) 4750:) 4703:) 4420:) 4378:) 4364:, 4361:, 4358:, 4355:, 4326:) 4218:) 4140:) 4095:) 4089:M/ 4087:-- 4048:: 4022:NW 4000:) 3981:) 3856:) 3785:) 3761:) 3753:-- 3742:: 3691:) 3683:-- 3672:: 3621:) 3539:• 3515:• 3484:) 3471:CA 3361:) 3330:) 3315:) 3286:) 3222:) 3188:) 3180:-- 3020:) 3002:, 2978:) 2911:}} 2905:{{ 2875:) 2854:) 2816:) 2808:) 2787:• 2781:• 2772:— 2595:-- 2521:) 2491:) 2467:• 2461:• 2452:— 2326:) 2293:) 2235:) 2161:) 2134:) 2065:) 2022:) 2006:, 2002:, 1998:, 1994:, 1990:, 1986:, 1982:, 1935:) 1916:) 1891:) 1872:) 1821:) 1793:) 1752:) 1732:) 1646:) 1619:) 1611:-- 1517:. 1476:) 1457:) 1285:) 1193:) 1123:) 1104:) 1063:: 1027:: 1019:? 999:よ! 967:よ! 925:• 889:• 851:• 839:, 835:, 831:, 799:• 772:• 749:) 741:-- 735:. 717:, 673:) 619:) 455:) 425:. 411:) 246:) 140:A5 50:) 46:• 6562:. 6556:; 6497:t 6495:· 6455:t 6453:· 6437:( 6404:( 6373:t 6371:· 6355:( 6327:( 6270:t 6268:· 6248:( 6244:e 6221:( 6184:( 6159:( 6147:t 6145:· 6129:( 6097:t 6095:· 6044:( 6025:( 6009:· 6003:· 5995:· 5988:· 5982:· 5976:· 5970:· 5965:( 5915:1 5851:t 5849:· 5759:( 5716:t 5714:· 5693:( 5667:t 5665:· 5648:n 5646:o 5642:l 5640:A 5621:( 5602:( 5579:( 5566:t 5564:· 5548:( 5530:t 5528:· 5512:( 5503:) 5497:· 5491:· 5485:( 5480:· 5473:· 5467:· 5460:· 5453:· 5447:· 5440:· 5433:· 5427:· 5422:( 5395:t 5393:· 5378:( 5359:( 5336:( 5318:t 5316:· 5301:( 5278:( 5260:( 5235:( 5198:t 5196:· 5180:( 5158:( 5138:( 5107:( 5088:t 5086:· 5071:( 5062:· 5057:( 5049:Q 5019:/ 5015:/ 5011:/ 5009:c 5007:/ 5005:t 5003:( 4979:( 4933:) 4931:t 4929:( 4924:D 4889:( 4848:t 4846:· 4802:t 4800:· 4763:t 4761:· 4746:( 4716:t 4714:· 4629:t 4627:· 4607:) 4602:· 4596:· 4590:· 4584:· 4578:· 4572:· 4567:( 4549:t 4547:· 4527:· 4522:( 4459:( 4429:) 4425:( 4416:( 4374:( 4340:t 4338:· 4322:( 4303:t 4301:· 4285:/ 4265:/ 4231:t 4229:· 4214:( 4192:t 4190:· 4154:t 4152:· 4136:( 4107:t 4105:· 4091:( 4067:t 4065:· 4032:) 4026:( 3996:( 3977:( 3889:: 3874:t 3872:· 3852:( 3814:: 3781:( 3757:( 3687:( 3617:( 3543:) 3535:( 3519:) 3511:( 3498:) 3492:· 3486:· 3480:( 3475:· 3468:· 3462:· 3455:· 3448:· 3442:· 3435:· 3428:· 3422:· 3417:( 3380:) 3376:( 3357:( 3346:t 3344:· 3326:( 3311:( 3282:( 3244:. 3218:( 3184:( 3155:t 3153:· 3126:) 3121:· 3115:· 3109:· 3103:· 3097:· 3091:· 3086:( 3079:) 3074:· 3068:· 3062:· 3056:· 3050:· 3044:· 3039:( 3016:( 3005:, 2992:t 2990:· 2974:( 2939:t 2937:· 2890:· 2885:( 2871:( 2850:( 2834:t 2832:· 2812:( 2776:R 2757:t 2755:· 2738:. 2732:. 2675:t 2673:· 2620:t 2618:· 2533:t 2531:· 2517:( 2505:t 2503:· 2487:( 2456:R 2393:t 2391:· 2355:t 2353:· 2322:( 2311:t 2309:· 2289:( 2268:t 2266:· 2231:( 2202:t 2200:· 2157:( 2130:( 2086:t 2084:· 2061:( 2041:t 2039:· 2018:( 1956:t 1954:· 1931:( 1912:( 1887:( 1868:( 1817:( 1789:( 1773:t 1771:· 1748:( 1728:( 1659:t 1657:· 1642:( 1615:( 1606:. 1577:( 1542:t 1540:· 1472:( 1453:( 1422:t 1420:· 1317:→ 1281:( 1264:t 1262:· 1237:→ 1189:( 1168:t 1166:· 1149:C 1144:/ 1119:( 1100:( 1048:t 1046:· 986:t 984:· 909:t 907:· 874:t 872:· 823:t 821:· 745:( 690:t 688:· 669:( 652:t 650:· 615:( 604:t 602:· 566:t 564:· 536:t 534:· 513:) 508:· 502:· 496:· 490:· 484:· 478:· 473:( 451:( 431:t 429:· 407:( 329:· 324:( 308:t 306:· 289:| 263:t 261:· 242:( 207:t 205:· 158:t 156:· 131:t 129:· 84:t 82:· 42:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index