User talk:Fæ/2014

248:

Science. I'm all too sure that even if someone started articles on all 25 professors Knowledge would delete half of them for being non-notable. It would be a powerful thing in academia if someone started a project with the intention of giving deep and sympathetic coverage to all the professors of the world, or at least the UK to start, that combined contributions from subjects and others to develop robust well-researched profiles. While every prof has some sort of page, many are rudimentary; lab websites are still by and large back at the Web 1.0 stage where people rolled their own. For many personal websites that awful "Hot Or Not" site now known as Facebook managed to vacuum them up, and true, that wasn't a good thing, but maybe you could do better by the world than that creep Zuckerberg. Imagine if instead of debating, arguing, watching your stuff get deleted, pleading, and being put down for what you did, you were just busy making a resource the world could value. Then when Knowledge came around asking to reuse it you could tell them to come back in, oh, 2015, maybe later, once you write up some restrictions.

1200:

even though a statement was made at that time. I note that original quality photographs have not been supplied to OTRS, if these are available, then providing the original digital versions (with verifiable EXIF data) by email would be a means of gaining credible validation that the original files are in Ms O'Callaghan's possession. In the absence of additional validation such as this, then if documentation for a transfer of copyright were not arranged before MacNaughten's death, a representative of his estate needs to be asked to make a release. In terms of Ms O'Callaghan's presence on Knowledge, the photographs are not irreplacable, so grounds such a fair use do not apply.

1578:

like this one. The restoration should be un-merged, I'm surprised that an administrator would make this error, as it should be common knowledge that restorations are considered derivatives from an original archive quality scan. There may have been a misunderstanding about what these chromolithographs are, due to the unusual hand-coloured process. If you think it is worth me commenting on the merge to ensure things are put back as they were, give me a nudge with a link to the discussion on my Commons talk page. Thanks for your work on restorations, they are much appreciated and add a great deal of educational value.

1938: 31: 827: 2080: 582: 526: 2281: 470: 1607: 1290:

and at the moment that's not how things work around here. Taking it to the BLP noticeboard and asking for "action", though, is threatening and inappropriate - especially when the user had already taken action in striking his comments. You were attempting to go above and beyond the normal Wikiquette, expecting full removal of comments. Comments which, like it or not, reflect the 2012 committee's thoughts on the matter.

1499: 2427:

woman and no LGBT contributors are prepared to be open, no doubt one can use the rationale that it is nobody's business, however resulting negative perception to openly identifying minorities in our community would be understandable. Personally, I draw a parallel with my experience of living at a time when my country had a government with no openly gay MPs, even though the community knew darn well there were gay MPs.

2172:. An RfC might not be particularly effective, because the questions are two-fold. The first question is whether or not the manual of style's policy on identity can really be said to apply in this situation, since d'Eon existed before anyone had such a concept as "gender identity", and there are tactical reasons why she would have chosen to live as a woman no matter what her preferred gender. Assuming that she is 2247: 2359: 2019: 1974: 1738: 420: 1684: 2181:?" Generally RfCs are supposed to address exactly one question, and since if d'Eon's life as a woman can be considered an expression of gender identity that moots the second question (which pronouns to use and when), that's the question we should ask. If it comes down that this is a special ("edge") case, then hopefully people from the RfC will stick around to hash out the pronoun question. 1274:. At the moment, I'm going to settle for a verbose warning. You know I'm well aware of your history and situation - I've done a lot of investigation into it since I've been on the committee, firstly by taking the lead on finding a situation where you can be unbanned and more recently by looking into your editing history to see whether the committee should be relaxing your restrictions. 244:

because a few didn't have categories? If that Commons bot that nags you about forgetting categories were a flesh-and-blood (or rather tin-and-chrome) Robbie that knocked on the door instead of leaving comments on my talk page, I'd have emptied a gun into it by now. The lack of gratitude from some people for what you did do is remarkable.

301:, sometimes it needs an entry added to a dab page. Probably just an oversight as you're an experienced editor, but I worry about these entries which can't easily be found, thinking about the reader who'd arrive at the other LH and assume there wasn't an article about your one, or the editor who'd create a new article accidentally at 1282:

Arbcom pages and therefore Arbcom/Clerks should have been the first port of call, that's no big deal and I don't blame you for not thinking that would have been the place to go, it just would have stopped the escalation. As would talking to your friends, who would have offered you advice on how to handle the matter.

2407:

control such things), you should report the harassment to the WMF. Homophobia, indeed harassment of any sort, is abhorrent. I doubt there's much that can be done, but they might be able to build a file on the person(s) responsible. Feel free to let me know if any of it comes onto the wiki and I'll stamp on it.

2406:

Much as I don't like the way your phrased your question (partly because how editors self-identify is their business, and they shouldn't be criticised for wishing to keep it to themselves; partly because the implication is that being a straight white male is something to be ashamed of, when nobody can

2025:

Luckily I'm about to go on holiday, and I'm determined to not take a keyboard even if I do take a tablet. Maybe by the time I return, the article will be much improved... it's already had significantly more attention than in the last 5 years, so the process is working out. I'm glad you are keeping an

976:

I've seen your name as the uploader of a lot of images from the Imperial War Museum archive. I've found a bunch of images that I'd like to upload, but am unsure about the appropriate permission tag. They are all listed as IWM non commercial license, but are pretty well all German photographs from WW!

774:

I am saddened that an indefinite restriction introduced after my controversial ban, is stopping me from proposing funding for LGBT related content creation projects, approaching LGBT archives to open up their collections to the benefit of Knowledge, or even applying for jobs in related open-knowledge

2347:

The numbers of open women and LGBT folks running in the election is low this year, I do believe this is an issue and a future Arbcom should do more to encourage editors who openly are part of, or even advocate, minority groups should be seen to be active and welcome in Arbcom rather than expected to

1717:

Thanks for your comments. Glancing at some of this, I, too, am troubled by many of Plarem's edits. I see you mentioned the DRN topic at ANI. Depending on what happens, you might consider a conduct-related board for these issues. In retrospect, I wish I had looked more carefully at the article before

1457:

I worked on the Warren Cup back in 2010, many old friends have too. It would be a great one to work on as there are a number of excellent sources, some quite recent new publications. I have some photographs I might get around to uploading too. Unfortunately, though it is identified as Roman artwork,

1277:

Yet, whilst I'd been focussing on where things can be relaxed, you've been returning to old habits. You see, your issue has never been with your editing, nor with the harassment you've received - both are issues, but not the crux of the matter. The issue at the heart of things is the way you attempt

1244:

In particular, please take a close look at the Wikimedia Foundation's draft annual plan. As they have a projected budget of over $ 60 million (including the grants that they will provide to other movement entities), their plans need extra scrutiny by the community to make sure that they are spending

1159:

2. Ms O'Callaghan does, I believe, own the copyright of File:Patricia O'Callaghan.jpg and File:Patricia O'Callaghan (La Perla hosiery).jpg. However, the photographer who took the photographs, Andrew MacNaughten, is now deceased. Ms O'Callaghan assures me that, before he died, Mr MacNaughten assigned

1000:

If you have some exemplar images to discuss, then I'll take a look. German photographs in the IWM archives are complex, for example if seized property during WWI/II then in the UK they are declared as public domain due to expired Crown Copyright, however this may not be recognized in other countries

2014:

It's only day 1 of the RfC, others may turn up. I happened to be talking about Paulin as someone who dropped out of popular arts shows quite a few years back, so looked up the Knowledge article to check his age. The bias was obvious, however as touching anything around Israel/Palestine is likely to

1782:

if any of this looks critical of a past admin action, I have no issue with a block for edit warring in this case. I have mentioned natural justice, which I hope there is scope for in the way admin actions are considered, particularly if a newish editor has inflammatory comments directed at them, as

1285:

What I do take issue with is your application of BLP. The BLP policy is there for protection of living people and their families. It's basically a strengthening of other Knowledge policies when they're related to BLPs. It is designed primarily for people who are likely to be harmed by Knowledge but

1281:

For example, looking at this whole Kurtis situation - I won't go into whether you did try to subvert the committee, though I'm happy to debate the matter if you want to focus on that. What's more important is how you handled things over the past few days. I'll lay aside the fact that it happened on

1236:

to request your input on the four proposals that have been submitted to the FDC in this round. The FDC reviews these proposals on behalf of the Wikimedia movement, as it is movement money that they spend, and in order to review them effectively we need to understand your perspective on them, and to

2433:

As for a harassment file, based on my past experience and what I supplied to them during a police investigation, the WMF have one, going back over the last few years. I'll just never get to see it, as they have stated in public. This approach does not feel supportive to me, as the target, but more

2391:

No problem Doug. I would encourage all regular Wikipedians to support collegiate discussion about how we can create a safer space for women and open LGBT Wikimedians, especially as timing would indicate that asking an LGBT question of Arbcom candidates has immediately made me the target of a fresh

1577:

Sorry you have been experiencing this issue. As far as I am aware, these were not identical duplicates, the Commons API ought to have taken care of that, along with my own search for the LCCN before upload. Note that there uploads were finished some time ago, and I am unaware of any other problems

1289:

Now, what you've done is taken comments made in the Knowledge space, and attempted to control what is said there by invoking BLP. By letter of policy, you are not incorrect about the scope of BLP - though applying such a broad scope to BLP would affect every comment made about any Knowledge editor

1163:

3. Although I am not certain about this, the copyright of the cover images of her five solo albums may technically belong to the recording label Marquis Classics. However, Ms O'Callaghan tells me that she was recently involved in a long and costly legal dispute with Marquis and has now severed all

762:

It is possible, but it would be entirely subject on my Arbcom appeal against an edit restriction which I shall attempt this month. I have been helping with GLAM related and women-focused editathons, hence the recent biographies I have created, but I had to walk away from an opportunity for an LGBT

247:

I really wonder if, with all your skills for collecting and processing images, going to events, and running bots, you might not do far better spending your time setting up a Wiki or some other kind of site to deal with the kind of material that you pointed out is in short supply regarding Women In

1874:

how far my "job" extends in evaluating AN3 reports is a judgment matter. Generally, I scrutinize other editors' behavior on the article, and in this case I didn't so much. I think the block I imposed was deserved. I don't regret it. Whether any other sanctions should have been imposed is dicey. I

1733:

Thanks for taking a second look. For various reasons, including my involvement in WM-LGBT+, I'll not take a lead on making a new proposal, though I am currently happy to add to the factual evidence, so that any pattern here is easier to see and hopefully one or more current admins might pay close

1199:

Andrew MacNaughten's copyrights are under the discretion of his estate. Should Ms O'Callaghan wish to make a legal statement, this should be on the understanding that copyright was transferred permanently to herself. A lack of evidence was the reason that a photograph failed verification in 2013,

2426:

Thanks for the thought. I did read your comment previously about my question, it is a difficult area of openness that I would rather not get marginalized as disruption or trolling, that under those labels can be legitimately ignored by the great and the good. If we end up with an Arbcom where no

1345:

This incident has left me disillusioned about how I can help this open knowledge project in the topics I know most about, and how I am likely to be seen and negatively represented by fellow Wikipedians in the future. I think I need some space to think about that before making any decisions about

1341:

I made a serious mistake in not asking the right people for advice on how to handle the issue. As I mentioned by email, I was a bit confused as to how to interpret policy and, to be honest, I cannot claim properly to understand Arbcom related process and policy even now. I am going to absorb and

243:

Alright - I take that back. I'm sure there were lots of folks in Ashkelon who knew better than to beat away a gift-horse for a lack of orthodontic work, and I don't want to be racist. But what do you call people who say that it's a bad thing that someone contributed countless images to Commons

2176:

covered by this, the further question is what pronouns to use. I'd say we should adjust the RfC statement to be simpler, "The Chevalier d'Éon, was an 18th century French diplomat, spy and soldier, whose first 49 years were spent as a man, and whose last 33 years were spent as a woman. Given the

1151:

Dear Fae. Many thanks for your message. I apologise that the issue of these photographs has become complicated. I myself have spent many hours trying to understand the copyright issues involved here and trying to find the best way of uploading them onto Wikimedia Commons. Let me try to explain:

1064:

would be sufficient as the photographer is unknown. The dates range from 1905 to 1918 which makes them comfortably over 70. There are other rationales that may apply depending on whether the German state released these as part of an archive, however you would need better provenance than the IWM

668:

It's no big deal. The notices were placed automatically by Twinkle. I know who the real creator is, although I'm confused as to how you recreated the first of these two articles within hours of them being marked for deletion at an AfD in which you participated. I doubt that I'll ever get to the

64:

I am considering a few edits over the next couple of months, so have decided to un-mark my account as retired. The idea of editing the English Knowledge is still a challenge, hopefully some people might find reasons to be positively encouraging for the limited number of edits I am likely to be

2226:

Yes, totally understandable. I'm trying to wrangle the RfC as best I can to a decision about the substantive issues. At this point there's quite a few comments, so no point closing the barn doors after the horses have escaped. We seem to have a decent amount of eyes on the article, though, so

1160:

to her copyright of all the photographs he took of her. She does not, however, have documentary proof of this which seems to have made her hesitant to assert ownership. I personally do not believe this is important since in these unusual circumstances the photographs clearly do belong to her.

1203:

I am sorry to hear of a past legal dispute with the production company. As the master digital copies do not appear to be owned by Ms O'Callaghan, OTRS volunteers need to be cautious in claiming that lower quality versions taken from the website are verified based solely on a statement by Ms

1581:

PS I'm aware that I may be confused about what has been done here. I would need to be able to see my original upload and the file that is considered a duplicate to understand it properly. Unfortunately if files and image pages are deleted, there is nothing for me to look at.

188:

Nothing wrong with the apology page as a whole, but the mention of the block would be covered under "recording of perceived flaws", which would only be acceptable if you intend to use it for some form of dispute resolution. Simply removing the mention of the block would be

2184:

I put this on your talk page rather than in the discussion there because I didn't want to clutter up the discussion (I find that the more "blocks of text" you get in RfCs, the less likely you are to get robust participation). Please let me know if you take issue with this

1278:

to deal with problems. This might be a quiet word to people behind the scenes, discrediting your opponents or over-zealously applying a policy - there are many techniques at manipulating situations out there and they're not conducive to a collaborative atmosphere.

114:

This block, created after the Arbcom case against me, is related to harassment by Youreallycan. This seems a relevant context for understanding my apology from a historiological viewpoint. Is there anything you would like to see corrected or added to the footnote?

2343:

Thanks for replying and this note. I am happy to see most candidates including yourself have taken the question seriously, and explained the related values and experience they would bring to LGBT related cases. This was all I was hoping to achieve by asking the

1557: 1553: 2211:

Thanks for adding your note in the RfC. I'll park this on the assumption that this will be sufficient, though I have no problem if you want to rewrite it and sign under your name. Real life has made me more unavailable this week than I was expecting.

1155:

1. There are two distinct types of images involved here: photographs of Ms O'Callaghan taken in 2011 by the professional Toronto photographer Andrew MacNaughten and images of the covers of her five solo albums released by the Marquis Classics label.

1473:

PS the Lothair Crystal has been put on display much more prominently in the BM. My photographs are being used in the current article (which came out rather well), but with new lighting and placement, it may be possible to arrange a higher quality

608:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

552:

691:

It is quite normal for a friendly admin to userfy deleted articles on request if there is an expectation that the contributor intends to make a good faith attempt to address the issues. Were I still an admin, I would still be a friendly one.

902:

If I get a bit further with the pywikipediabot application, I'll tidy the source code and publish it on-wiki. It just piggy-backs on Robin's AWB code, which in turn relies on a spreadsheet of data. At the moment it is not terribly smart.

1998:

We seem to have a minor problem with some editors who think BLPs are the very best mechanism since sliced bread to dump on others (one even says he agrees with "many" things the victim says :) ) I hope there are lurkers about. Cheers.

1286:

have not the knowledge to stop the harm. There are lots of other people it does affect, but that's where the spirit lies. What it doesn't allow is sanitising of biographies, control of content by the subject or anything like that.

1544:

Fæ, why are you uploading TIFFs from the LoC that already existed as part of the documentation of a featured picture? Hedwig just accidentally deleted the FP documentation one while trying to clean up two of your recent uploads.

1763:

behavior might be going on, at least that's not the primary job. Your block was correct, and keep this in mind: blocking the one party doesn't mean the other was right. Mark Miller is now also having a look at the editor, BTW.

1875:

just would rather have made an intentional choice not to sanction anyone else rather than not really notice it because I was moving a bit quickly. The good news is that these "promotion" edits by Plarem are being looked at.--

1309:"... trust the community to judge what is suitable material to stay on Knowledge or not, and if I find it upsetting, I'll just take an extended wiki-break and let others worry about it and advise me if I need to do anything." 1311:

Your BLP/N request didn't trust others to make a judgement, it framed the situation over-broadly as a BLP issue, pouring lots of victimisation in to manipulate the outcome. That echoes the ARCA request, just days earlier.

2227:

hopefully we can come to some consensus during the duration of the RfC. If it's not satisfactorily resolved at that point, I'll just make a second, more focused RfC to clean up anything on which the consensus is unclear.

2352: 2326: 214:

Please do something more useful than fabricating upsetting drama on my talk page immediately after I ended my long retirement from this project. A single block log entry is a statement of fact, not a perceived flaw.

1469:

a 1st century artwork, the dating has been challenged by some fringe sources. I'll have a think about it. The GWToolset is a priority on my time, but I'll check with my tame historian to see what sources are worth

129:

Are you saying you were the recipient of the e-mail in question? If not, then you should not mention it on your user page, though even if you were I do not think it would be appropriate to mention per WP:POLEMIC.--

1612:

For all the work you've recently been doing with HABS uploads, tagging with NRHP reference numbers, and otherwise improving the quality of images related to sites on the NRHP, you deserve much more than a cookie!

612:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

556:

1492: 1462:

20th century. Due to the technical issues in dating silverware, that you are probably aware of, it is unlikely that this will be resolved unless there is a detailed investigation funded in the future.

1549: 1640: 1207:

Please do not feel there is a time limit on these issues. Should an administrator chose to delete any of the images in question, they can be easily undeleted once the copyright release is verified.

1297:) is an attempt at controlling his comments. Doing so at an administrative noticeboard (which includes the BLP noticeboard) appears to be an attempt to use bullying tactics to get your own way. 1360:

I don't blame anyone for not getting Arbcom processes - they're convoluted and even I (a committee member) don't understand many. Really, you needn't worry about that small part of my comment.

1204:

O'Callaghan. Album covers are often copyright of the production company rather than the artist as it is the production company that normally arranges and pays for the professional photography.

1426:

to at least GA standard, and possibly FA if that's doable? I've been meaning to cover it for a while and it fits into the work I've been doing on and off concerning British Museum artefacts (

1563:

I presume this was accidental, of course, but this could become a massive problem if every featured picture I have with a Library of Congress original scan gets the documentation broken.

330:

Yes, I used to do a fair amount of dabs but after being away from editing for so long have got rusty. I knew either someone else would improve this, or I would return to it in a few weeks.

1117: 650:). This was such a long time ago, I no longer remember the circumstances and don't really want to spend my volunteer time investigating them without having sysop access to the history. -- 935:, which includes a field for license. That's important, since, of course, files include a license parameter in themselves. I've fixed this one, but wanted to point it out for future. -- 1300:

It's unsurprising that Kurtis felt aggrieved by this turn of events, leading to the ANI thread - again, I wish he'd come to a committee member or clerk. I was surprised to see you say

2292: 605: 1346:

continuing and whether in the long term, this will just serve to make me more depressed, rather than returning to the enjoyable and exciting experience it was years ago. Thanks --

763:

editathon during UK diversity month (there has never been a UK based LGBT editathon), and I had to give up any idea of a personal project to improve articles and media related to

515: 533: 517: 297:

while stub-sorting. Please remember, if you create an article at a disambiguated title like this, to provide a link from the undisambiguated title: here I've added a hatnote at

171:

If you believe my apology should be deleted from Knowledge as being irrelevant, then that would be a matter to raise elsewhere as I do not understand the rationale for doing so.

398:

I've already emailed Jonathan about attending the editathon at the Petrie museum and hopefully will bump into you soon. (Not alas at Wikimania - it clashes with my honeymoon).

1636: 1227: 549: 1515: 482:

Dear Fae, thanks very much for running the outreach event in Falmouth. Especially with the extra journey hassle now that the railway line to Cornwall has been washed out.

2430:

If there is a debate on this in the coming year, I hope you add your viewpoint and take time to ponder if things on this project are great as they are, or should change.

302: 268: 2120:

Hi, I was not watching the sub-page and so thought that it had yet to be attended to. I'll take up the points raised in the next couple of weeks and rerun the GA. --

1302:"After giving an apology for your actions, you now appear to be deliberately working against WP:BLPTALK by finding new ways to publish your allegation on Knowledge" 2274: 2284: 1783:

not everyone finds it easy to respond with kindness or patience especially when trying to discuss controversial matters that they might feel passionate about. --

775:

projects. I have some hope that might change in time to make a difference for Wiki Loves Pride, but I do not have the luxury of being able to make any promises.

864: 174:

Thanks for your concern but if you wish to pursue this, could you do so somewhere other than my talk page, such as by raising a deletion request against it? --

1170:

I appreciate you giving your attention to this issue and I am more than happy to answers any questions you may have and to share any information that I have.

1248:

We will also send you a message to ask you for your input in future rounds of the FDC. If you don't want to receive such messages, then please say so below.

833:

I am taking part in the Women's day editathon in the Petrie Museum today. So any article I am working on may be contributed to by new users in this context.

711: 1238: 1260: 622: 566: 333:

I have approached KCL about releasing some portraits for women professors in the IoP, if that happens it'll attract people to improving them a bit more. --

2315: 1797:

No, no criticism was intended. I am merely responding to Bbb's well-known penchant for self-chastisement, a product of their strict Catholic upbringing.

1391: 1465:

Arbcom's restriction to images of sexuality dating before 1,000AD, means that I probably should not add my photographs to the article as though this is

589: 573: 59: 637: 731: 367:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

2107: 1167:

4. I believe that Ms O'Callaghan herself is currently on holiday in Australia and she may, or may not, be responding to emails at the moment.

1146: 1194:, though if there are any statements you would like on record, I recommend setting these out by email so that they can be referenced on OTRS. 712: 509: 2087:

for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article.

1707: 741:

Hi Fae. Any chance of a London-based project for Wiki Loves Pride 2014? An edit-a-thon, a photo project, etc.? No pressure, just curious. --

224: 209: 183: 149: 124: 2142:, no worries. My workload has dramatically increased of late so I will be unable to deal with that GA, but I wish you all the best for it! 1184: 778:

The days when I was in the top 400 contributors on Knowledge and had huge fun helping others, seems like much longer than two years ago. --

1412: 203: 143: 102: 74: 2481: 1718:

blocking the other editor, but in this instance they were being reverted by multiple users, not just Plarem, which is not a good sign.--

1398: 1377: 1355: 787: 384: 2377:

My bad. I thought I was watching my questions page and didn't notice yours. Sorry. I'm obviously a supporter although a straight male.

2151: 2129: 2057: 1385: 924: 271:

involving you has been archived. The comments made by arbitrators may be helpful in proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee,

963: 954: 500:

Thanks. It was nice to have the chance to spend time with some very interesting GLAM people who share our vision of open knowledge. --

2164:

Thanks for making this RfC, but I would suggest a more neutral wording if you don't mind. The relevant policy has nothing to do with

594: 538: 491: 435: 2040:

Mais, je suis en vacances aussi - and I find my usual "admirers" have shown up to prevent any real fixes for horrid BLPs. Cheers.

1970:

Thanks, a great barnstar. It was a good use of one of my old and dusty Knowledge custom tools from when I used to be an admin here.

1591: 2443: 2421: 1987: 1912: 1657: 1221: 1100: 1074: 1032: 1010: 2401: 2386: 756: 1898: 1848: 1834: 1820: 1486: 977:

or earlier. Your advice would be very much appreciated. I'm sure that you'll be glad to know that I've found good homes for the

912: 892: 719: 2233: 2221: 2206: 1825:

Never cook with a wine (sherry, whatever) that you wouldn't drink. "Cooking x" is not a product intended for human consumption.

1687:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

1125: 2049: 2035: 324: 288: 2372: 1806: 1792: 1773: 1140: 701: 678: 659: 1961: 1884: 1751: 1622: 1112: 348: 108: 1451: 342: 283: 2462:

Just wondering if you have any thoughts re: the idea of WMF hosting a genealogy project. If so, feel free to contribute to

2337: 1652: 1571: 2268: 1952:

For your help determining a pattern of disruptive behavior from a POV editor on a large number of LGBT related articles.--

1503: 994: 876: 2457: 2311: 2177:

specific facts of her life, should her life as a woman be considered an expressed gender identification according to the

1759:, as an admin patrolling the 3R/EW thing you did exactly what you should have done. It is not your job to look into what 771:

as this was interpreted by some Arbcom members as "sexuality". It would have been neat to have a successful DYK in place.

1422:

Hi Fae, it's good to see that you've been let out of chokey (a bit, anyway). Would you care to collaborate on improving

2434:

focused on protecting the interests of the WMF. I guess that's a discussion for some other time or in another place. --

2288: 2074: 1190:

Thanks for getting back to me. I'll informally pick up on a few of these points and put a link to this conversation on

888: 2353:

Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#Knowledge:Arbitration.2FRequests.2FCase.2FInteractions_at_GGTF_closed

1315:

Fae, behaviour like this needs to stop - otherwise you will not be able to play a part in building this encyclopedia.

410: 2329:. Feel free to take a look at your leisure, and if you would like any elaboration or clarification feel free to ask. 816: 85: 2191: 1332: 939: 2320: 1458:

notably by the British Museum, a few sources dispute this, claiming a much later creation, possibly as late as the

279: 157:

Information available as block logs do not fit the description at the guideline you have linked to, in particular:

160:

The note is not "Very divisive", it is just a statement of the block log and I would be unclear as who it divides.

1293:

Kurtis responded appropriately by striking his comments at your request. Insisting on their removal (against our

1237:

ensure that any questions you have about them have been appropriately answered. The proposals are linked to from

896: 487: 198: 138: 97: 257: 1417: 647: 2178: 2169: 1525:

I am helping with the Physiologists conference wikilounge today. Drop me a note if there are any odd edits. --

1928: 1630: 1020: 736: 262: 2197:

There have been a couple of comments already, so I'll take a look at how to amend, probably this weekend. --

1270:

Fae, I've been reviewing the recent situation with Kurtis and I'm am seriously considering blocking you for

361: 294: 163:

The note is not "offensive material", if it were then I doubt that it would be reproduced in the block log.

2015:

blow up in your face, I limited myself to a tag and the request at BLP/N - a wise choice as it turns out.

857: 1558:

File:Detroit_Publishing_Co._-_A_Yeoman_of_the_Guard_(N.B._actually_a_Yeoman_Warder),_full_restoration.jpg

1534: 460: 1727: 1554:

File:Detroit Publishing Co. - A Yeoman of the Guard (N.B. actually a Yeoman Warder) - Original scan.tiff

455: 2474: 1539: 1371: 1326: 1304:. That appears to be assigning bad faith motives to Kurtis' complaint, motives that I don't see there. 971: 749: 483: 190: 130: 89: 65:

making, as well as those queuing up to find reasons to be unpleasant or unkind at my expense. Thanks --

38: 2159: 2008: 305:, etc. There are a lot of these unlinked article ... which is why when stub-sorting I usually check. 2241: 2147: 2103: 1703: 1618: 1597: 978: 932: 598: 542: 166:

The note is "related to encyclopedia editing", if my apology and its context is relevant to editing.

928: 380: 368: 238: 2307: 2059: 1659: 837: 793: 406: 2262: 1191: 1560:, a featured picture here and on en-wiki, but the deletion removed all the FP documentation. 2467: 2416: 1957: 1511: 1361: 1316: 1180: 1096: 1028: 990: 945:

Thanks for that. Over the years it is hard to keep track of these local working practices. --

742: 722:, so I have restored it, and am letting you know in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, 718:

Back in February 2011 you PRODded this article, and it was deleted. Undeletion has now been

2382: 2143: 2115: 2099: 2094: 1699: 1694: 1614: 1407: 1307:

We discussed reducing drama when the committee unblocked you. You suggested that you would

842: 389: 276: 79: 1294: 1048: 1044: 1040: 8: 1648: 1447: 1256: 960: 936: 882: 821: 811: 376: 1889:

I think "looked at" is kind of an understatement for that list that Fae drew up on DRN!

1118:

Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ#Request_for_clarification_.28January_2014.29

364:

tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some categories to the article. Thanks!

2298: 1861: 1520: 1435: 1058: 641: 402: 372: 2258: 2045: 2004: 1566: 918: 441: 2439: 2397: 2368: 2217: 2202: 2125: 2031: 1983: 1788: 1747: 1587: 1530: 1482: 1351: 1342:

review your warning here and take a break from editing on Knowledge to give it time.

1217: 1136: 1070: 1006: 950: 908: 872: 853: 783: 697: 655: 505: 451: 431: 338: 220: 179: 120: 70: 2408: 2327:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2014/Candidates/Ks0stm/Questions

1953: 1894: 1830: 1802: 1769: 1507: 1271: 1176: 1121: 1092: 1024: 986: 982: 727: 674: 618: 562: 887:

Hi fæ! Would you share a code to create articles on SSSI in wales with me? Thanks

2378: 2084: 1908: 1880: 1844: 1816: 1723: 1678: 1439: 1402: 1265: 273: 47: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

17: 1712: 1644: 1443: 1431: 1427: 1390:

An arbitration amendment request(Fae), to which you contributed, resulted in a

1252: 804: 315: 1937: 798:

I realised as soon as I got to the talk page, which I know I should have read

2228: 2186: 2165: 395:

I will drop a colleague a note and hopefully have an email for OTRS shortly.

354: 298: 253: 1637:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Philately/Archive 8#Catalog numbers as references

2090: 2041: 2000: 1690: 1674: 826: 768: 764: 2463: 1669:

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

1550:

File:A yeoman of the guard (Beefeater), London, England-LCCN2002696943.tif

2330: 1890: 1869: 1826: 1798: 1765: 1241:. Please provide your feedback through the talk pages for each proposal. 723: 670: 631: 614: 558: 426:

I'm due to be part of the UCL week, so hopefully things will coincide. --

2079: 923:

Hi, Fae. :) I just wanted to let you know that the tag you've placed at

2351:

I see you commented below a related suggestion for an Arbcom review at

2070: 2063: 1993: 1904: 1876: 1840: 1812: 1779: 1756: 1719: 1670: 1663: 1423: 2435: 2393: 2364: 2213: 2198: 2137: 2121: 2027: 1979: 1784: 1743: 1583: 1526: 1478: 1347: 1213: 1132: 1066: 1002: 946: 904: 868: 849: 779: 693: 651: 501: 447: 427: 334: 216: 175: 116: 66: 469: 306: 1839:

You cook with bacon, which was not intended for human consumption.--

1606: 1493:

Discussion at Talk:Cory Doctorow#Cory Doctorow and Creative Commons

1091:

Thanks, I'll get busy! Some of the others are straightforward , btw.

416:

Wikimania can't compete with a honeymoon. Welcome to married bliss.

1233: 606:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Thakur Dal Singh (2nd nomination)

249: 2253:

And a kitten back at ya! Speak truth to power and all that...

2246: 1903:

Understatement is a product of my strict Buddhist upbringing.--

1734:

attention both now, and going forwards to minimize disruption.

1239:

meta:Grants:APG/Proposals/Community/Review#Proposals_for_review

550:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Col. Raj Singh, Raja of Kasli

2392:

batch of anti-gay related attacks off-wiki (mostly email). --

1683: 1131:

Thanks for the link, I had no idea how this stuff worked. --

2355:, highlighting it as others may follow the link from here. 2293:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2466:. And apologies if I have made this request before. --- 587:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

531:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

371:. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at 2325:

Just a note that I replied to your question for me at

1811:

Ha! You've been nipping at the cooking sherry again.--

1504:

Talk:Cory Doctorow#Cory Doctorow and Creative Commons

1228:

Your input is invited on this round of FDC proposals!

593:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

537:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

2291:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 1001:and so is not a suitable rationale for Commons. -- 636:. Please take these up with the original creator, 669:bottom of that because I don;t have the tools. - 2275:Nomination for deletion of Template:Hide comment 1635:Based on your participation in this discusssion 1232:Hello! I'm reaching out to you on behalf of the 353:Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. Fæ, thanks for creating 985:pictures that you recently uploaded- thanks! 713:General Assembly and Church of the First Born 2179:manual of style's policy on gender identity 1556:, which was part of the documentation for 1502:You are invited to join the discussion at 925:Talk:Norwegian-British Chamber of Commerce 60:Moving to wikibreak rather than retirement 1935: 1639:3+ years ago you may want to comment on 14: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1397:The original discussion can be found 931:, is for files. For articles, we use 360:I've just tagged the page, using our 2356: 2016: 1971: 1735: 1272:treating wikipedia as a battleground 446:I am at the NMMC editathon today. -- 417: 25: 1147:Photographs of Patricia O'Callaghan 595:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 539:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 23: 2245: 1401:. For the arbitration committee -- 1386:Arbitration amendment request(Fae) 1245:the movement's money effectively. 1021:User:TheLongTone/sandbox#iwm links 825: 24: 2492: 1946:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar 604:The article will be discussed at 548:The article will be discussed at 293:Hallo Fae, I've just come across 2357: 2279: 2078: 2017: 1972: 1936: 1736: 1682: 1605: 1497: 1197: 865:Knowledge Signpost on 12th March 580: 524: 468: 418: 29: 2234:16:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2222:15:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC) 2207:08:46, 21 September 2014 (UTC) 2192:17:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 2152:13:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 2130:07:25, 19 September 2014 (UTC) 2108:15:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 1037:Okay, looking at the first 3: 289:Finding disambiguated articles 13: 1: 2269:17:24, 28 November 2014 (UTC) 2050:22:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 2036:22:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 2009:20:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC) 1234:Funds Dissemination Committee 1113:Clarification request archive 1065:provides to work this out. -- 702:23:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 679:23:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 660:20:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 623:20:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 567:19:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC) 534:Col. Raj Singh, Raja of Kasli 518:Col. Raj Singh, Raja of Kasli 510:20:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 492:11:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 456:11:22, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 349:Ways to improve Sabine Landau 2482:17:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC) 2444:16:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC) 2422:15:05, 8 December 2014 (UTC) 2402:14:44, 8 December 2014 (UTC) 2387:07:39, 8 December 2014 (UTC) 2373:11:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC) 2338:20:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC) 2316:10:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC) 802:, and restored immediately. 436:13:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 411:12:41, 3 February 2014 (UTC) 385:20:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC) 343:15:28, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 325:15:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC) 295:Louise Howard (psychiatrist) 284:04:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 7: 2458:Wikimedia genealogy project 1988:09:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC) 1962:20:39, 24 August 2014 (UTC) 1913:15:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1899:15:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1885:15:01, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1866:No need to apologize, Fae. 1849:15:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1835:15:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1821:15:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1807:14:57, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1793:14:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1774:14:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1752:14:21, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1728:14:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC) 1338:Thanks for writing this up. 258:08:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 225:08:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 210:01:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 184:19:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 150:18:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 125:17:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 109:17:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 88:on your apology sub-page?-- 75:18:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 10: 2497: 1708:18:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC) 1261:19:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC) 1222:09:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC) 1185:07:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC) 1164:contact with the company. 1101:17:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 1075:17:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 1033:16:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 1011:16:40, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 995:15:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC) 964:16:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 955:16:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 940:16:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 913:16:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC) 897:19:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC) 877:07:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC) 817:14:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC) 788:18:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 757:17:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 154:I have said no such thing. 2418:Penny for your thoughts? 1942: 1677:-status according to the 1653:13:03, 23 July 2014 (UTC) 1623:11:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC) 1592:06:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 1572:06:12, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 1516:02:12, 17 June 2014 (UTC) 1141:11:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC) 1126:11:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC) 979:Cody Michelin Cup biplane 933:Template:ConfirmationOTRS 858:15:11, 8 March 2014 (UTC) 732:09:53, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 467: 86:mention YRC being blocked 84:I am curious, why do you 2321:ArbCom election question 1535:11:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC) 1487:07:59, 22 May 2014 (UTC) 1452:18:28, 21 May 2014 (UTC) 1413:16:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC) 1378:12:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 1356:12:53, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 1333:12:17, 15 May 2014 (UTC) 929:Template:OTRS permission 597:or whether it should be 541:or whether it should be 303:Louise Howard (academic) 838:Margaret Stefana Drower 2289:nominated for deletion 2250: 1418:Suggestion for editing 1192:Commons:Commons:OTRS/N 830: 720:requested at WP:REFUND 476:The Real Life Barnstar 2285:Template:Hide comment 2249: 2089:Message delivered by 1689:Message delivered by 1631:Stamp catalog numbers 829: 737:Wiki Loves Pride 2014 484:Jonathan Cardy (WMUK) 269:clarification request 263:Clarification request 42:of past discussions. 1778:Oh, my apologies to 1641:a renewed duscussion 843:Elinor Wight Gardner 193:The Devil's Advocate 133:The Devil's Advocate 92:The Devil's Advocate 2348:stay in the closet. 2170:the manual of style 2073:you nominated as a 1929:A barnstar for you! 1643:on the same topic. 1173:Best regards Roger 461:A barnstar for you! 2251: 2168:, but rather with 1673:you nominated for 1540:TIFFs from the LoC 1436:Guisborough Helmet 972:Uploading pictures 831: 2267: 2242:A kitten for you! 2097: 1967: 1966: 1865: 1697: 1628: 1627: 1598:A cookie for you! 1124: 983:Short Triple-Twin 959:I feel you. :/ -- 497: 496: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2488: 2477: 2470: 2469:Another Believer 2419: 2413: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2335: 2314: 2305: 2301: 2283: 2282: 2256: 2231: 2189: 2141: 2119: 2088: 2082: 2022: 2021: 2020: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1940: 1933: 1932: 1873: 1859: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1688: 1686: 1609: 1602: 1601: 1570: 1501: 1500: 1410: 1405: 1374: 1368: 1329: 1323: 1120: 1063: 1057: 814: 807: 752: 745: 744:Another Believer 635: 590:Thakur Dal Singh 584: 583: 574:Thakur Dal Singh 528: 527: 472: 465: 464: 423: 422: 421: 322: 313: 239:The philistines! 206: 201: 195: 146: 141: 135: 105: 100: 94: 33: 32: 26: 2496: 2495: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2480: 2475: 2468: 2464:this discussion 2460: 2417: 2409: 2358: 2331: 2323: 2303: 2297: 2296: 2280: 2277: 2244: 2229: 2187: 2162: 2160:Chevalier d'Eon 2144:Midnightblueowl 2135: 2116:Midnightblueowl 2113: 2100:Midnightblueowl 2095:Midnightblueowl 2093:, on behalf of 2085:Talk:Warren Cup 2067: 2018: 1996: 1973: 1931: 1867: 1737: 1715: 1700:Midnightblueowl 1695:Midnightblueowl 1693:, on behalf of 1667: 1633: 1615:Dudemanfellabra 1600: 1564: 1542: 1523: 1498: 1495: 1440:Lothair Crystal 1420: 1408: 1403: 1388: 1372: 1362: 1327: 1317: 1268: 1230: 1149: 1115: 1061: 1055: 974: 921: 889:Muhammad Shuaib 885: 863:As featured in 824: 812: 805: 796: 794:Norwegian stuff 755: 750: 743: 739: 716: 629: 585: 581: 529: 525: 522: 463: 444: 419: 392: 351: 316: 307: 291: 265: 241: 208: 204: 199: 191: 148: 144: 139: 131: 107: 103: 98: 90: 82: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2494: 2472: 2459: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2431: 2428: 2349: 2345: 2322: 2319: 2276: 2273: 2271: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2209: 2161: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2066: 2062:nomination of 2056: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2023: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1965: 1964: 1949: 1948: 1943: 1941: 1930: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1714: 1711: 1666: 1662:nomination of 1656: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1625: 1610: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1579: 1548:Specifically, 1541: 1538: 1522: 1519: 1494: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1475: 1471: 1463: 1432:Standard of Ur 1428:Cyrus Cylinder 1419: 1416: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1343: 1339: 1267: 1264: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1209: 1208: 1205: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1014: 1013: 973: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 961:Moonriddengirl 937:Moonriddengirl 920: 917: 916: 915: 884: 881: 880: 879: 846: 845: 840: 823: 820: 795: 792: 791: 790: 776: 772: 767:in advance of 747: 738: 735: 715: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 684: 683: 682: 681: 663: 662: 579: 578: 577: 572:Nomination of 523: 521: 516:Nomination of 514: 513: 512: 495: 494: 479: 478: 473: 462: 459: 443: 440: 439: 438: 424: 391: 388: 377:Carriearchdale 350: 347: 346: 345: 331: 290: 287: 264: 261: 240: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 197: 172: 169: 168: 167: 164: 161: 155: 137: 96: 81: 78: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2493: 2484: 2483: 2478: 2471: 2465: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2432: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2420: 2414: 2412: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2399: 2395: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2336: 2334: 2328: 2318: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2304:Pigsonthewing 2300: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2272: 2270: 2266: 2264: 2263:Talkie-Talkie 2260: 2254: 2248: 2235: 2232: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2190: 2182: 2180: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2139: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2117: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2096: 2092: 2086: 2081: 2076: 2072: 2065: 2061: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2026:eye on it. -- 2024: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1969: 1968: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1947: 1944: 1939: 1934: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1871: 1863: 1862:edit conflict 1858: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1781: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1725: 1721: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1696: 1692: 1685: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1665: 1661: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1611: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1561: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1546: 1537: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1470:re-reviewing. 1468: 1464: 1461: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1415: 1414: 1411: 1406: 1400: 1395: 1393: 1379: 1375: 1369: 1367: 1366: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1344: 1340: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1324: 1322: 1321: 1313: 1310: 1305: 1303: 1298: 1296: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1273: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1246: 1242: 1240: 1235: 1223: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1193: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1171: 1168: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1060: 1053: 1049: 1047: 1045: 1043: 1041: 1039: 1038: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1004: 999: 998: 997: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 965: 962: 958: 957: 956: 952: 948: 944: 943: 942: 941: 938: 934: 930: 926: 914: 910: 906: 901: 900: 899: 898: 894: 890: 878: 874: 870: 866: 862: 861: 860: 859: 855: 851: 844: 841: 839: 836: 835: 834: 828: 819: 818: 815: 810: 808: 801: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 770: 766: 761: 760: 759: 758: 753: 746: 734: 733: 729: 725: 721: 714: 703: 699: 695: 690: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 680: 676: 672: 667: 666: 665: 664: 661: 657: 653: 649: 646: 643: 639: 633: 627: 626: 625: 624: 620: 616: 610: 607: 602: 600: 596: 592: 591: 575: 571: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 554: 551: 546: 544: 540: 536: 535: 519: 511: 507: 503: 499: 498: 493: 489: 485: 481: 480: 477: 474: 471: 466: 458: 457: 453: 449: 437: 433: 429: 425: 415: 414: 413: 412: 408: 404: 403:Mr impossible 399: 396: 394:<Sigh: --> 387: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 365: 363: 362:page curation 358: 356: 355:Sabine Landau 344: 340: 336: 332: 329: 328: 327: 326: 323: 321: 320: 314: 312: 311: 304: 300: 299:Louise Howard 296: 286: 285: 282: 281: 278: 275: 270: 260: 259: 255: 251: 245: 226: 222: 218: 213: 212: 211: 207: 202: 196: 194: 189:sufficient.-- 187: 186: 185: 181: 177: 173: 170: 165: 162: 159: 158: 156: 153: 152: 151: 147: 142: 136: 134: 128: 127: 126: 122: 118: 113: 112: 111: 110: 106: 101: 95: 93: 87: 77: 76: 72: 68: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2461: 2410: 2332: 2324: 2312:Andy's edits 2308:Talk to Andy 2299:Andy Mabbett 2278: 2259:Carolmooredc 2257: 2255: 2252: 2183: 2173: 2163: 2075:good article 2069:The article 2068: 1997: 1945: 1760: 1716: 1668: 1634: 1567:Adam Cuerden 1565: 1562: 1547: 1543: 1524: 1496: 1466: 1459: 1421: 1396: 1389: 1364: 1363: 1319: 1318: 1314: 1308: 1306: 1301: 1299: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1269: 1250: 1247: 1243: 1231: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1116: 975: 922: 886: 847: 832: 803: 799: 797: 765:suffragettes 740: 717: 644: 611: 603: 588: 586: 576:for deletion 555: 547: 532: 530: 520:for deletion 475: 445: 400: 397: 393: 390:The Letter A 373:the Teahouse 369:my talk page 366: 359: 352: 318: 317: 309: 308: 292: 272: 266: 246: 242: 192: 132: 91: 83: 80:Apology page 63: 55: 43: 37: 18:User talk:Fæ 2411:HJ Mitchell 2077:has failed 1954:Mark Miller 1508:Xb2u7Zjzc32 1506:. Thanks. 1474:photograph. 1404:S Philbrick 1177:Carlofantom 1093:TheLongTone 1054:For all 3, 1025:TheLongTone 987:TheLongTone 883:SSSI script 813:talk to me? 769:Women's Day 36:This is an 2379:Dougweller 2071:Warren Cup 2064:Warren Cup 1671:Warren Cup 1664:Warren Cup 1521:Wikilounge 1424:Warren Cup 1295:guidelines 1019:Linked in 2344:question. 2287:has been 1645:ww2censor 1552:replaced 1444:Prioryman 1253:Mike Peel 1059:PD-old-70 1023:, thanks. 919:OTRS tags 822:Editathon 806:Jimfbleak 442:Editathon 2230:0x0077BE 2188:0x0077BE 2185:wording. 1679:criteria 1467:probably 1251:Thanks! 648:contribs 638:Pkandhal 2091:Legobot 2042:Collect 2001:Collect 1691:Legobot 1266:Warning 599:deleted 543:deleted 39:archive 2333:Ks0stm 2166:WP:BLP 2083:; see 1891:Drmies 1870:Drmies 1827:Drmies 1799:Drmies 1766:Drmies 1713:Plarem 1442:etc). 1409:(Talk) 1392:motion 1122:NE Ent 981:& 724:JohnCD 671:Sitush 632:Sitush 615:Sitush 559:Sitush 205:cntrb. 145:cntrb. 104:cntrb. 2058:Your 1905:Bbb23 1877:Bbb23 1841:Bbb23 1813:Bbb23 1780:Bbb23 1761:other 1757:Bbb23 1720:Bbb23 1658:Your 800:first 16:< 2476:Talk 2440:talk 2398:talk 2383:talk 2369:talk 2218:talk 2203:talk 2148:talk 2126:talk 2104:talk 2046:talk 2032:talk 2005:talk 1984:talk 1958:talk 1909:talk 1895:talk 1881:talk 1845:talk 1831:talk 1817:talk 1803:talk 1789:talk 1770:talk 1748:talk 1724:talk 1704:talk 1649:talk 1619:talk 1588:talk 1531:talk 1512:talk 1483:talk 1448:talk 1399:here 1373:talk 1365:Worm 1352:talk 1328:talk 1320:Worm 1257:talk 1218:talk 1181:talk 1137:talk 1097:talk 1071:talk 1029:talk 1007:talk 991:talk 951:talk 909:talk 893:talk 873:talk 867:. -- 854:talk 784:talk 751:Talk 728:talk 698:talk 675:talk 656:talk 642:talk 619:talk 563:talk 506:talk 488:talk 452:talk 432:talk 407:talk 381:talk 339:talk 280:7754 277:chen 267:The 254:talk 221:talk 200:tlk. 180:talk 140:tlk. 121:talk 99:tlk. 71:talk 2306:); 2174:not 2134:Hi 2098:-- 1698:-- 628:Hi 310:Pam 250:Wnt 2442:) 2436:Fæ 2415:| 2400:) 2394:Fæ 2385:) 2371:) 2365:Fæ 2363:-- 2310:; 2295:. 2220:) 2214:Fæ 2212:-- 2205:) 2199:Fæ 2150:) 2138:Fæ 2128:) 2122:Fæ 2106:) 2060:GA 2048:) 2034:) 2028:Fæ 2007:) 1994:Hi 1986:) 1980:Fæ 1978:-- 1960:) 1911:) 1897:) 1883:) 1847:) 1833:) 1819:) 1805:) 1791:) 1785:Fæ 1772:) 1750:) 1744:Fæ 1742:-- 1726:) 1706:) 1681:. 1675:GA 1660:GA 1651:) 1621:) 1590:) 1584:Fæ 1582:-- 1533:) 1527:Fæ 1514:) 1485:) 1479:Fæ 1477:-- 1460:18 1450:) 1438:, 1434:, 1430:, 1394:. 1376:) 1354:) 1348:Fæ 1331:) 1259:) 1220:) 1214:Fæ 1212:-- 1183:) 1139:) 1133:Fæ 1099:) 1073:) 1067:Fæ 1062:}} 1056:{{ 1031:) 1009:) 1003:Fæ 993:) 953:) 947:Fæ 927:, 911:) 905:Fæ 903:-- 895:) 875:) 869:Fæ 856:) 850:Fæ 848:-- 809:- 786:) 780:Fæ 730:) 700:) 694:Fæ 692:-- 677:) 658:) 652:Fæ 621:) 601:. 565:) 545:. 508:) 502:Fæ 490:) 454:) 448:Fæ 434:) 428:Fæ 409:) 401:-- 383:) 375:. 357:! 341:) 335:Fæ 274:Rs 256:) 223:) 217:Fæ 182:) 176:Fæ 123:) 117:Fæ 115:-- 73:) 67:Fæ 2479:) 2473:( 2438:( 2396:( 2381:( 2367:( 2302:( 2265:) 2261:( 2216:( 2201:( 2146:( 2140:: 2136:@ 2124:( 2118:: 2114:@ 2102:( 2044:( 2030:( 2003:( 1982:( 1956:( 1907:( 1893:( 1879:( 1872:: 1868:@ 1864:) 1860:( 1843:( 1829:( 1815:( 1801:( 1787:( 1768:( 1746:( 1722:( 1702:( 1647:( 1617:( 1586:( 1529:( 1510:( 1481:( 1446:( 1370:( 1350:( 1325:( 1255:( 1216:( 1179:( 1135:( 1095:( 1069:( 1027:( 1005:( 989:( 949:( 907:( 891:( 871:( 852:( 782:( 754:) 748:( 726:( 696:( 673:( 654:( 645:· 640:( 634:: 630:@ 617:( 561:( 504:( 486:( 450:( 430:( 405:( 379:( 337:( 319:D 252:( 219:( 178:( 119:( 69:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index