Knowledge

User talk:Headbomb

Source 📝

653: 522: 142: 76: 160: 190: 579:(MMA fighter). However, I it seems AlertBot has not picked it up to put it in WP:MMA's article alert AFC section. Could you please check if it has been picked up or if i have made an error while submitting? Thank you in advance for your help, and I again apologize for the inconvenience. 575:, i apologize for the inconvenience but I wanted to ask if it is possible that AlertBot did not send the article I submitted to the appropriate WikiProject or if I may have done something wrong while creating it. I submitted the following draft for review a few days ago: 546:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
643: 549:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has
412:. But you've tried that several times and convinced few people, and admitted that Verywell is often "not the greatest". There's already other more reliable sources here, so I fail to see why Verywell is needed. 664: 645: 566: 340:. I don't see anything about it being predatory online (though it's apparently published some articles about predatory snails), but I thought you might be interested in looking into it. 658:
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
489:
I'm struggling to figure out how I can get people to listen to me. It will definitely take a lot of time to collect the evidence I need. Time which I don't have right now... -
375: 681: 261: 269: 241: 217: 209: 225: 591: 197: 386:. Ever since, noone has unbanned them, either because of gross stupidity, or due to a conspiracy to keep them banished. I have evidence of both. 249: 233: 531: 542: 300: 312: 510: 669: 337: 282: 295: 561: 502: 435: 486:
Guess what? None of those websites are banned. It is advised against citing them, but you can still link to them.
624: 422: 443:
The spamlist should not be used to ban popular press sources. If you ban Verywell, then you should also ban:
349: 89: 440:
People weren't convinced because they didn't pay attention. You can't convince people who are close-minded.
290: 662:
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
637: 448: 262:
Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Knowledge editors
173: 210:
Courts order Knowledge to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
535: 383: 333: 402: 382:, citing a tiny shred of evidence that quickly falls apart on inspection. An admin than impulsively 659: 368: 496: 396: 218:
Indian courts order Knowledge to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
44: 665:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Articles with outdated impact factors
646:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 3 § Articles with outdated impact factors
476: 345: 152: 29: 389:
I see you are an admin. Can you remove those sites from the banlist? Thanks! Have a nice day,
39: 34: 582:
P.S: You have a really great page and I hope I can contribute as much as you have one day.
327: 306: 189: 111:
at the start of your message to make sure I see it in case I have unwatched your talk page.
8: 54: 491: 468: 391: 379: 49: 341: 360: 677: 632: 576: 557: 456: 452: 430: 75: 608: 587: 628: 426: 149: 616: 444: 414: 409: 19: 480: 472: 460: 673: 553: 354: 121: 106: 599: 583: 572: 464: 614:, then it'll be picked up by the bot. 21:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 567:
AA possible article not detected issue, or possible mistake of mine.
364: 334:
https://search.worldcat.org/title/cainozoic-research/oclc/51307519
408:
First I'm not an admin. The place to raise these issues is that
527: 512: 103:
a message on your talk page, please reply there. You can put
15: 367:
sites are in fact *unjustly* banned. They don't belong on
526:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
118:
a message, I will reply here, and will typically use
530:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to
270:Jump in the line, rock your body in time 604:You need to tag it's talk page to with 543:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/SureAI 378:three of the four Verywell sites to 254:tes defending the English Knowledge? 226:A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics 136: 70: 532:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 338:Knowledge talk:Notability (species) 166:Daily run finished without issue! ( 13: 242:Are you ready for admin elections? 14: 692: 540:The article will be discussed at 371:, because they aren't spamsites. 92:to leave me a new message at the 651: 520: 188: 158: 140: 74: 1: 682:08:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC) 638:21:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 592:20:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC) 7: 562:17:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC) 503:19:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 436:14:47, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 403:08:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 350:16:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC) 234:asilvering's RfA debriefing 10: 697: 374:In December 2018, someone 670:categories for discussion 53: 48: 43: 38: 33: 28: 23: 18: 534:or whether it should be 359:Hi Headbomb. Regarding 83:Welcome to my talkpage! 336:has been mentioned at 126:to get your attention. 571:Greetings, this is 644:CfD nomination at 469:Medical News Today 131: 85: 672:page. Thank you. 500: 400: 328:Publisher for you 325: 324: 321: 320: 260:Recent research: 198:26 September 2024 181: 180: 135: 134: 129: 81: 60: 59: 688: 655: 654: 636: 613: 607: 603: 577:Draft:Grant Neal 524: 523: 501: 494: 457:Healthy Children 453:Psychology Today 434: 401: 394: 384:banned the sites 309: 268:Traffic report: 240:News and notes: 216:Community view: 192: 185: 184: 176: 169: 165: 162: 161: 144: 143: 137: 125: 110: 96:of my talk page. 78: 71: 65: 64: 16: 696: 695: 691: 690: 689: 687: 686: 685: 656: 652: 649: 615: 611: 605: 597: 569: 551: 525: 521: 517: 490: 413: 390: 357: 332:This journal: 330: 317: 305: 275: 274: 171: 167: 163: 159: 157: 141: 119: 104: 12: 11: 5: 694: 660:categorization 650: 648: 642: 641: 640: 568: 565: 519: 518: 516: 511:Nomination of 509: 508: 507: 506: 505: 487: 484: 449:Women's Health 441: 356: 353: 329: 326: 323: 322: 319: 318: 316: 315: 310: 303: 298: 293: 287: 286: 285: 277: 276: 273: 272: 265: 264: 257: 256: 245: 244: 237: 236: 229: 228: 221: 220: 213: 212: 208:In the media: 205: 204: 201: 200: 194: 193: 182: 179: 178: 150:User:AAlertBot 147: 145: 133: 132: 128: 127: 112: 97: 79: 68: 61: 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 27: 22: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 693: 684: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 661: 647: 639: 634: 630: 626: 622: 618: 610: 601: 596: 595: 594: 593: 589: 585: 580: 578: 574: 564: 563: 559: 555: 548: 545: 544: 537: 533: 529: 514: 504: 498: 493: 492:Manifestation 488: 485: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 439: 438: 437: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 411: 407: 406: 405: 404: 398: 393: 392:Manifestation 387: 385: 381: 377: 372: 370: 366: 362: 352: 351: 347: 343: 339: 335: 314: 311: 308: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 289: 288: 284: 281: 280: 279: 278: 271: 267: 266: 263: 259: 258: 255: 253: 247: 246: 243: 239: 238: 235: 231: 230: 227: 224:Serendipity: 223: 222: 219: 215: 214: 211: 207: 206: 203: 202: 199: 196: 195: 191: 187: 186: 183: 175: 156: 154: 151: 146: 139: 138: 123: 117: 113: 108: 102: 98: 95: 91: 87: 86: 84: 80: 77: 73: 72: 69: 67: 66: 63: 56: 51: 46: 41: 36: 31: 26: 21: 17: 663: 657: 620: 581: 570: 552: 541: 539: 515:for deletion 481:Investopedia 473:Daily Mirror 461:ScienceDaily 445:Men's Health 418: 388: 373: 369:the spamlist 358: 342:WhatamIdoing 331: 251: 172:30 Sep 2024 148: 116:you leave me 115: 114:Likewise if 100: 93: 82: 62: 24: 477:Sunday Mail 307:Suggestions 283:Single page 168:As of 03:27 124:|USERNAME}} 109:|Headbomb}} 101:I leave you 465:Healthline 291:Front page 550:finished. 301:Subscribe 248:Gallery: 232:Opinion: 45:Resources 617:Headbomb 415:Headbomb 376:reported 365:Verywell 355:Verywell 313:Archives 250:Are Ludd 130:Headbomb 30:Archives 668:on the 536:deleted 40:Sandbox 35:My work 674:Gonnym 609:WP MMA 554:IgelRM 528:SureAI 513:SureAI 410:WP:RSN 380:WT:SBL 363:: the 153:status 94:bottom 88:Click 600:HC226 584:HC226 573:HC226 296:About 55:Stats 678:talk 588:talk 558:talk 497:talk 397:talk 361:this 346:talk 90:here 50:News 25:Talk 20:User 174:UTC 99:If 680:) 631:· 627:· 623:· 612:}} 606:{{ 590:) 560:) 538:. 479:, 475:, 471:, 467:, 463:, 459:, 455:, 451:, 447:, 429:· 425:· 421:· 348:) 252:ai 177:) 170:, 122:re 120:{{ 107:re 105:{{ 676:( 635:} 633:b 629:p 625:c 621:t 619:{ 602:: 598:@ 586:( 556:( 499:) 495:( 483:. 433:} 431:b 427:p 423:c 419:t 417:{ 399:) 395:( 344:( 164:Y 155::

Index

User
Talk
Archives
My work
Sandbox
Resources
News
Stats

here
re
re
User:AAlertBot
status
UTC
The Signpost
26 September 2024
Courts order Knowledge to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
Indian courts order Knowledge to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
asilvering's RfA debriefing
Are you ready for admin elections?
Are Luddaites defending the English Knowledge?
Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Knowledge editors
Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Single page
Front page
About
Subscribe
Suggestions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.