User talk:Hyacinth/February 14 2014 - 18 July 2015

10526:

easier to find similar looking images, but of course we can't source that exact view (because if we did it would be a copyright violation). The image you replaced it with is, I believe, clearly worse in multiple respects. As a bitmap image it does not scale as well as an svg image. I think the strange projection (in which far-away features are mysteriously larger than nearer ones) is both ugly and mathematically wrong. And, it is much less accurate as an example of a Schlegel diagram, because the Schlegel diagram is supposed to be a projection of all of the features of the polytope (vertices, edges, and higher dimensional faces) while your preferred image throws the higher dimensional stuff away leaving a different object, the skeleton of the polytope. The two images have different sizes of the inner cube with respect to the outer one, but that is not a problem: this size parameter can be adjusted in the construction of a Schlegel diagram by adjusting the location of the four-dimensional center of projection relative to the hypercube and the hyperplane of projection. Rather than just keeping on reverting, please explain yourself. —

3049:

content with an 11 seconds sample of that 2 mins work at the Allmusic site :-( To see how remote (on the cycle of 5ths) the case you mention is, consider that if he had chosen to work in A-flat dorian (a not unreasonable 6 flats signature, or would it have been for that time?) then he would have had to use a B-triple-flat for his doubly-lowered 2nd degree. Speaking of which, there is a minute number of cases of very remote accidentals (C-double-flat, F-double-flat, B-triple-flat, E-triple-flat; E-double-sharp, B-double-sharp, F-triple-sharp, C-triple-sharp). Some of them are listed at Don Byrd's site. I wonder if you've ever looked at any such case. Maybe they are less remote than they look (if the sections where they are found use incomplete signatures because the composers did not want to use double-accidentals in the key signature) but still, they seem to be cases which would not be covered by my table. The earliest example I found in Don's list was a C-triple-sharp in a 1805 work by Antoine Reicha (to use his French name:-)

2813:

ought to be analyzed solely in one key, or if modulations may be considered to take place, and this has a direct bearing on your question. Modulations can always be invoked to explain the presence of this or that chromatic note (unless modulations are not deemed to exist), which only leaves the question of how far modulations may carry the tonality, and this is the nub of the problem. Handel and Haydn should present no problems, Schubert and Berlioz are probably still safe, and so on, until we reach more doubtful cases in the later 19th century, such as Wagner, or Puccini, or … Schoenberg?—so where do we finally draw the line? The classic distant-key conundrum dates back well before the Common Practice Era, and this is Adrian Willaert's compositional jest in response to a request to resolve a dispute about whether the whole tone can be divided into equal semitones: a setting of Horace's fifth epistle, "Quid non ebrietas", in which the final cadence results in the tenor coming to rest on

11313: 9698:"Table of intervals not exceeding the octave", pp. 453-456, but this table, so far as I can see, does not include many of the terms attributed to it in this footnote, or its expressions are inaccurately reproduced: "low semitone" (Ellis: "Pythagorean limma"); "diatonic second semitone" (Ellis: "diatonic or just semitone"); "high semitone" (Ellis: "Great limma"); "minor tone" (Ellis: "minor tone of just intonation, 'grave second' of the major scale"); "minor third" (Ellis: "just minor third"); "major third" (Ellis: "just major third"); "Super major third" (Ellis: "supermajor third"); "Fifth"(Ellis: "Just and Pythagorean fifth"). 11287: 11443: 11261: 11209: 11391: 11417: 3089:

performed a whole tone lower than notated. Of course when certain music theorists sing the final cadence, it will not come to rest on an in-tune octave but instead (because of their stubborn insistence on theoretical exactitude) on the badly out-of-tune augmented seventh. Willaert's position is clear: no composer or singer with an ounce of musical nouse would do such a foolish thing—theory be damned! I'm afraid I do not know of an online source for the score of "Quid non ebrietas", but the primary musicological treatment is Edward Lowinsky's 1956 article, "Adrian Willaert's Chromatic 'Duo' Re-examined," in the

11456: 11339: 11274: 11430: 11404: 11183: 11365: 11326: 11235: 11196: 11170: 11378: 11352: 11157: 11248: 11222: 11300: 11144: 3805: 5378: 5341: 5303: 3282: 10501: 31: 3453: 3487: 12651: 6704: 6648: 6592: 6536: 6480: 6424: 6165: 4726: 4670: 4614: 4558: 3561: 12309: 10375: 3203:

article and Facebook entry) but, like so many composers in American academia, he seems to have succeeded very well in keeping his head below the parapet. I think you are right to question his notability on the strength (or, rather, weakness) of his biographical article, though I hope someone will prove your concerns are unfounded. Every composer deserves all the help he can get, though out-and-out self-promotion on Knowledge is not the way to do it.—

12849: 12814: 12490: 12168: 12132: 10334: 7867: 8822: 8728: 3878: 12552: 6288: 5058: 4961: 4864: 7356: 2978: 2970: 2337: 2309: 2281: 2243: 2215: 2166: 2138: 2079: 2051: 2002: 1974: 1915: 1851: 1771: 1707: 3026: 2874: 2866: 2839: 2817: 900: 757: 698: 628: 600: 541: 471: 443: 405: 377: 328: 300: 272: 234: 206: 5156: 8968: 10513: 11875: 11617: 10872: 10429: 9622: 9542: 8134: 8070: 7262: 7188: 7121: 12450: 9909: 5263: 4837:

the Knowledge page on quartal harmony have heavy emphasis on perfect fourths. Perhaps more importantly, when you hear this passage, the prominent melodic intervals are the descending fifths and ascending minor ninths, and the harmonic intervals you hear are mostly minor thirds and tritones—I don't think the listener hears the distinctive quartal sonority that you get in op. 9 and Ives's

3149:(this article he apparently wrote himself in 2006 -- eight years that article has been around! -- and it contains not one single reference to one single independant verifiable source, for which reason I've nominated that article for deletion), well our Sato thought that it was vital to have syllables for those tonal functions too so he added the "Sato System" to the article 3816:

to think of it the same applies to the natural of the C. It is true that in real scores courtesy accidentals are rarely enclosed in brackets but there you have a context which clarifies things and scores are meant for an already somewhat sophisticated readership. What do you think? And would that be a lot of work? I have the feeling that many readers who turn to article

11532:

article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through

12670:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6723:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6667:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6611:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6555:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6499:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6443:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 6184:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4745:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4689:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4633:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4577:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3580:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3191:"Nouse" (I have also seen it spelled "nowse") rhymes with "house". It comes from the Greek word νοῦς (rhymes with "loose"), which means "intellect" or "wit", but in English has more the sense of "know-how" or "wisdom born of experience" (as opposed to "book learning"). A similar colloquialism drawn from either French or Spanish is "savvy". 3075:

This of course automatically adds a flat to the scale, and this is usually reflected by a one-flat signature—very rarely, in the case of the fifth and sixth tones, a two-flat signature. "Doubly transposed" chants were also possible, but this reaches the allowable limit of two-flat signatures. At this point, the system of

5861:. I thought maybe we should combine these essays into a larger one that basically says (1) mistakes are allowed, (2) it's okay to admit you're not sure, (3) common mistakes to avoid, and (4) admitting when you're wrong. I've only recently started playing around in the Knowledge namespace created a shortcut for " 2627:—a cousin of the "diminished dominant seventh" of jazz theory, and the diminished octave cannot plausibly be regarded as an enharmonically spelled because of its stable use in an arpeggio in the countertenor voice shortly afterward). It would not surprise me in the slightest if someone were to find examples of 9363:

to 700px, otherwise it appeared truncated. However. this change apparently also undid some of your recent changes, among others your addition of "tuning" to "Meantone temperament". This was by no means my intention and I cannot figure out how it happened. Anyway, I do not dare to restore this myself,

4787:

In fact, the eight pitches that do occur in the excerpt (C, Db, Eb, E, Gb, G, A, Bb) can be put into four perfect fifths (CG, GbDb, AE, EbBb) in a way that illustrates that each note has exactly one other note that's a perfect fifth/fourth away. So I don't see how you could form a quartal chord with

3815:

flat by virtue of the key signature. In other words that flat is a courtesy or cautionary accidental. Given that there is no context as in a real score, wouldn't it be preferable to enclose that flat in brackets in order to emphasize the fact that it is a courtesy not a necessary accidental? And come

3111:

From the way you put it I take it you had no trouble finding Don Byrd's site. Incidentally, I don't know if you know, but Don Byrd was the designer of one of the first computer music typesetting programs. Moving from Don Byrd's "rooster" (which, coincidentally is a bird) to Willaert's "donkey" -- are

12236:

an older verison of the article edited by user "saraleec" added some info in the article about a chord progression and the feeling it produced was hopeful, beforehand she/he talked about selecting chord for a specific purpose.. and then the progression.. textual " For example, selecting a minor key,

12029:

Hello, Hyacinth, there is a redirect from "Mother chord" to "All-interval twelve-tone row". In the lead section of "All-interval twelve-tone row", "Mother chord" is not mentioned at all. In the section "Grandmother chord", it is mentioned but not explained. As I neither know what a "mother chord" is

11121:

Thank you for the quick edit and the welcome speech! "750 cents" and "950 cents" start correct now, but the notes are 100 cents too low when seperated (650 cents and 850 cents respectively). "450 cents" is great, but now when I checked them all I noticed that "900 cents" is missing the notes played

9697:

refering to p. 644 of Ellis' translation of Helmholtz. You added that this refered to the "Additions by the translator". However, both in the original 2d, 3d and 4th editions (there is no later one), as in the Dover reprint, the Additions by the translator are pp. 430-556. The Additions do include a

9420:

Well, what I didn't understand, is why, while I worked at the image, your recent addition of "tuning" after "Meantone temperament" disappeared. I think that the whole somehow reverted to an earlier version of the article, but I don't know enough about WP's functioning to imagine how this happened. I

5777:

If you play the guitar (or other string instrument) you could tune an open string to the key of the song/chord, and then check that open string with an automatic tuner (many of which are available online for free, apparently). With the tuner one may be able to tell the note (or nearest note), and if

5741:

It sounds to me like it's "between the cracks", I'd say it's close to F. I assume it's due to it being from a video (possibly a video of a video). (If a sound recording gets slowed down or sped up to half or twice the speed everything becomes an octave lower or higher. If it only gets changed a tiny

2749:

4. Responding, for clear cut cases, the only ones for which this table may be useful, I answered that those degrees do not exist. I still question that in clear and unambiguous C major you'd ever need to spell F as E-sharp, C as B-sharp, E as F-flat or B as C-flat and if that's the case then I think

10257:

Maybe it is possible to design a picture starting with the large heap, then somehow indicating the removal of the first 1, 2, 3 pebbles. To avoid "=", e.g. a heap/nonheap border could be indicated somehow. However, I don't know how to illustrate that it's a problem which collections are immediately

9437:

Reducing the image to no wider than 1.35 (inches? cm?) would make it unreadable, as you certainly realized. I think that, once centered as you positioned it, it should come between the introductory text and the table of contents, but'll further think of it before making the change. If you think the

4836:

Even so, isn't it kind of a stretch to call it a quartal chord, since the fourths you highlight are in fact given as fifths in the excerpt? The musicians and music theorists I know all seem to use "quartal" to describe chords made out of perfect fourths. And all of the other classical examples on

3202:

I think I have only just heard of Kentaro Sato, though perhaps it was from his Wikip[edia article, or from one of his interventions on music-theory articles like the ones you mention. He certainly exists (to judge from a quick Google search, which does actually turn up a little beyond his Knowledge

3074:

encompasses both the "round" and "square" B (that is, B-flat and B-natural). Especially in the fifth and sixth tones (Lydian and Hypolydian), where the "round" B occurs more often than the "square" one, a one-flat signature may occur. In addition, chants could be transposed—which meant up a fourth.

10525:

Please explain what you dislike about the existing hypercube Schegel diagram that has caused you to repeatedly add unnecessary cleanup tags to it and/or try to replace it with what I believe is a worse image. It is a very standard example of a Schlegel diagram so if you really need to it should be

9429:

intention. The reason why I didn't correct this myself is that apparently at the same time you had made some changes in the figures of the table, and I was unable to check whether these as well had returned to the earlier version – the possibility was implied in my mention of the diseappearance of

8413:

The fact that you ignored my request is not very nice. I repeat it: please restore them and start a proper deletion discussion if you feel they are unnecessary. Otherwise your actions look like abuse of admin power: improper deletion (abuse of WP:SPEEDY) and refusal to even discuss it. But in good

3162:

which I've also removed. Mercifully he did not try to actually inject a description of the "Sato System" for orchestration into that article. Now, has anyone ever heard of a composer called Kentaro Sato? The only data I got on Google was from the very WP autobiography Sato had managed to create in

12417:

I think it's great all the work you've done on music articles. I am also very impressed with your 100,000 edit award! That is true dedication to Knowledge! I love editing and improving articles in music, film, and unusual topics. I think the addition of the "Thanks" button is a great improvement,

11079:

Some of the midi files on the 24-EDO table are wrong. What should be 750 cents is 800 cents and what should be 950 cents is 1000 cents. Also I think the midi file for 450 cents should have the notes played together in the beginning, just like in the other files. BlueMeeple 12:09, 15 December 2014

3021:

The cycle of fifths is precisely the key here. Willaert compose the counterpoint in such a way as to force the tenor around the circle of fifths until it has traversed it twice. The signature of all four parts is one flat (transposed Dorian) but, by the time the end is reached, the tenor has been

3079:

takes over, which means that all other necessary or desirable sharps and flats must either be written in as accidentals, or simply be provided by the performer, following well-established rules. ("Opposite transposition", for example, which means down a fourth instead of up, must be accomplished

2812:

Although there is a certain danger here of making "clear-cut major key" depend on a definition that excludes any chromatic notes at all, I do take your point. There is an issue of where to draw the line, and of course theorists do not agree on things such as whether or not a piece of tonal music

12782:

Can you bring me back the source for articles like Project Shrine Maiden (deleted by Xezbeth in 2012/2013), Pichi no Shiro de Rokkuman to Pati (deleted in 2014 by Fram), Sonic CD: The Movie (deleted in August 2011), Japanese Ritual Day (deleted by Fram in 2014), Cheerleaders (the one Black Kite

12527:

and made a few copy-edits to try and improve the prose in the article. I think some or all of the article was written by a non-native speaker of English. I could go no further in my edits because I am unfamiliar with the topic. I'm wondering if you could work on the article, or perhaps just the

6802:

Hello. The explanation provided by the Template:ShouldBeText text is that a file, "consists purely of information which is better suited to representation in wikitext". Essentially, the template text says "ShouldBeText". If this is adequate and clear, why would it ever be necessary to provide a

3048:

It's always fun to converse with you. You almost always point to new directions (at least for me). The old Fleming is quite popular on YouTube. A search on his name returns something like 3000 results. There are dozens of videos of "Vecchie letrose" but none of "Quid non ebrietas". I had to be

11531:

templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography

9155:"typical example" I didn't say that, didn't introduce the example. It's in the text as an example of circular defining. If you know a "more circular" example, please use it. Seeing as religion is generally not the calmest of topics at the best of times, something blander would be good anyway. 3088:

upon which Willaert relies for his little jest: strategically placed flats in the cantus oblige the tenor to follow suit, but the two parts are so constructed that the cantus can spring back to the naturals, while the tenor must keep on adding flats, until at the end the entire line is being

11914: 11656: 10911: 8031:

that permits the addition of "Category:Knowledge requested XXX photographs" rather than the automatic "Category:Knowledge requested photographs of XXX". However, I moved all uses of "Category:Knowledge requested biology photographs" to "Category:Knowledge requested photographs of biology".

6142:

setting Balanescu Quartet to the American string quartets category. What did you base that on? AFAIK, they are based in London. The leader is Romanian and writes a lot of Romanian folk music-inspired songs for the quartet. I'm not sure if it fits in any country-category. What do you think?

2720:

Clearly the table is for clear cut cases. I was wondering where in WP someone could get simple information as to how to spell accidentals according to the key they're in. That's what I was asking Hyacinth about. Now when one doesn't know if one is in major or minor, if one doesn't have an

3096:

I was not previously aware of Rejcha's (to use the Czech spelling ;-) use of extreme accidentals, but it does not greatly surprise me, considering the metrical extravagance of some of his piano fugues. I have also not known about Don Byrd's website. Thank you for calling my attention to

3144:

4. The designers of that system were apparently of the opinion that you can at least ignore those remote functions for the purpose for which they had designed their system (just like I thought I could ignore them for my table for the reasons I gave above). Now some guy by the name of

12237:

but with mostly major chords (i.e. III, VI, VII) might convey a hopeful feeling." where did he/she found that info? no refernce? no nothing? also the user link is in red wikipedia catn fin the user.. can you help, i would like to find more info about feeling and chord progressions..

2774:

4 do not exist in major. If that's wrong and there are examples to the contrary in music from common practice period I'd like to know about them. 20th c. music was not the kind of music I thought this table was for. This said I enjoyed very much your observations regarding Britten's

3157:

because I did not agree with the necessity to have syllables for those degrees but because I have never heard of the "Sato System" and the only reference provided was his own website. The same Sato has a "Sato System" for orchestration and had added a link to his website to article

10122:

The missing fundamental is a psychoacoustic concept. The ear and brain have no access to wavelength-like input, just time and frequency. And in real dispersive media, wavelength and frequency are not exactly inversely related. It's best not to mix wavelength into this concept.

7385:

or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our

2559:

of a first-inversion tonic triad. Britten was extraordinarily skillful at discovering imaginative intervallic relations of this sort, and the first two notes in the piano accompaniment to this same piece supplies my favorite example of unambiguous diminished octaves,

12283:

is currently a redirect to an article, so "key signature" has 2 articles pasted together now - with sections out of order and a duplicate reference list. I am not sure about the reason for this change, but wanted to let you know in case it was a mistake. Thank you.

3198:

magazine, December 2010) of a new edition of the score, so it does not likely include that score. I'm not sure I like the suggestions, found in the sidebar to that page, for where I might find a copy: The top item in the list is the library of my local county

3796: 4783:

you created featuring an excerpt of Schoenberg's op. 7 string quartet is labeled as an example of quartal harmony, but I don't see how this is the case. There don't appear to be any perfect fourths that occur either simultaneously or as consecutive notes.

9741:). It is a bit odd to quote an edition which Ellis himself had considered in need of revision; the subsequent ones include a long list of "intervals", as said above, in which he does not reproduce some of the terms he had utilised in the first edition. – 3820:

where this image is used are beginners, kids and generally people unfamiliar with musical technicalities (who else would need to go to WP in order to learn what a transposing instrument is?) whom it is important not to confuse about elementary matters of

6491: 6435: 5009: 2706:. Of course, as soon as you have crossed over into 20th-century extended tonality, even the question of whether you are in the major or minor mode may be doubtful, which is why so many composers do not specify a key at all in the titles of their works.— 11926: 11668: 10923: 6472: 10454: 10252:

the psychological temptation to claim "one pebble more or less can't affect the heap property" works better for sufficiently large heaps than for small nonheaps (collections of 2 and 9 pebbles "look quite different", while such of 100002 and 100009

9647: 9567: 8159: 8095: 7287: 7213: 7146: 6416: 10676:, your tagging was particularly silly, because the three references already present are all available online so you can see for yourself what they're cited for and add the footnotes yourself rather than demanding that someone else do it for you. — 4912: 12335:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

10401:

8278:

It isn't an upload of a photo, but this will supply an image of the photo to a person reading the article: I fixed the link at the bottom of the article, the link to pictures of the Ahenk. I did not upload one, as I can't think of a fair-use

9701:

You may consider that I should correct this in the article, instead of complaining... But there are so many things that need correcting and, as I said before, I don't quite understand the purpose of this article. I am willing to try, but...

11552:. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. 4791:

There are also a few errors: there should be a key signature with a B flat at the beginning of the line, and the last note for the cello should be a G (and should probably be in tenor clef instead of alto), according to the edition I have.

2395:. There you will find shorter versions which feature only the diatonic functions and roman numerals. The problem with the above table may be that it is difficult to determine where to end. For example, why does the above table not include 4031:

The third B???? I only see two Bs in the image. I'm asking about the third V not the third (?) B which I can't even see. The second line of text in the image is: "A:I B:V V V and other keys A:I B:I". Are we agreed on that?

2999:

These are the scale functions you'd have to accept exist if you accept a doubly-lowered 2nd degree and you insist both voices are in the same key/mode. Incidentally what signature does Willaert's tenor have and what signature his cantus?

8477:

Since I am not an admin, I cannot recreate them myself other than reposting them. I'd appreciate it if you could one-click (I hope) undue the deletion; it would also (I hope) save them from another erroneus speedy in the future. Cheers,

3030:. The joke, of course, is that in order for the final octave to be true, the succession of flatting semitones must accumulate to the correct interval. Whether this is to be managed by using theoretical equal-tempered semitones, or by an 6176: 4893: 4872: 4955: 11314: 6157: 7377:

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

3845:: You may or may not agree with my points, but if you do, and do intend to change the image, please let me know before you do, as I have some other small suggestions to make this image even more useful in the context of article 6603: 6547: 3163:

2006 and expand little by little over the years (with never a shred of any reference to any source whatsoever). Did I miss something? Am I being unfair out of ignorance to one of the great young composers of the 21st century?

11288: 10103:. It only makes it less convenient for others to see who is commenting. If you're trying to keep your IP address confidential, that doesn't work since anybody who checks the page history can see your IP next to your edits. — 5106: 4858: 11910: 11652: 10907: 6787:, I don't see why it would ever be necessary to provide a reason other than or in addition to those already explained in the template text. Could you give me an example of where use of this new parameter would be useful? — 6584: 6528: 6523: 11444: 11262: 11210: 11075:

Hello! I'm very new at editing Knowledge, I hope I'm doing it right..? I just noticed some mistakes in the midi files you made for quarter tones. I added this on the article's talk page, I'm not sure if you got notified:

4737: 4569: 12621:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 6467: 6357:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 6054:(which you created) and replacing the page with a description of "what nationality could mean for the purpose of editing Knowledge biography articles and categorizing people." which I briefly outlined in the discussion. 5127:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 5030:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 4933:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the 2779:(and I went immediately to YouTube to listen to it again) so if you do have examples which do not fit in with my claim, even from non common practice music, even from 20th c. music, I'd be delighted to hear about them, 12779:(where they SHOULD belong). I recently discovered that, and most of what I'm asking for is really random. I've asked some other admins about this one, but they said they can't do the deleting, so this is my last stop. 12614:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on

10313:. This is not enough rational since the decision of including "Hilbert's problems" in this category is not sourced, or even explained. I looked at the article and it isn't mentioned anywhere that they are conjectures. 6350:

5508:

and the like, even where the user has changed the language code to "ell" in the template call. This behavior appears to be hard-coded into the extension and can't be changed by users. So now some Greek speakers are in

5120:

5023:

4926:

11392: 4718: 4550: 11545: 11418: 5087: 5066: 4681: 4625: 3470:

Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Knowledge Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

12339:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

11457: 11340: 11275: 11184: 10405:

12600: 11431: 11405: 11366: 11327: 11236: 6208: 4662: 4606: 8091: 3864: 3837: 11197: 11171: 11158: 6635: 6579: 5047: 11379: 11353: 11249: 11223: 5583:

Thank you for contributing to Knowledge. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically

4950: 12203: 5052: 2843:

2:-) Whew! Doubly-lowered 2nd degree. It would show better what you and Willaert are proposing if we write the scale degrees in the order of the cycle of 5ths rather than like I did within the octave. So

4769: 4601: 12662: 12581: 12560: 12209: 9928: 9896: 8392:"07:42 . . Hyacinth (talk | contribs) deleted page Template:Reqphotograph ‎(unnecessary, unused) 07:42 . . Hyacinth (talk | contribs) deleted page Template:Requested photograph ‎(unnecessary, unused)" 4162:

Now I get it. Thanks Hyacinth. The reason I got confused was that I had wrongly assumed B:V to be the second theme and I didn't know what to make of the second V. Now you've cleared things up. Thanks.

3885:

What is the 3rd section of the exposition supposed to be? The so called codetta? I'm not sure since your caption says this is the simplest possible sonata form while the codetta is not always present.

9643: 9563: 9191:

You did say that "circular definition" should be removed as an example because it is not typical. Since you have not removed the "Judaism" example, it can only be assumed it is typical or exceptional.

4713: 4657: 11301: 5290: 8395:

Can you restore them? They are useful for finding the right template through searching. If you feel they are not needed, please use a deletion discussion so we can hear what others think. Thanks, --

12643: 11483:

Yes, now they're all correct! I checked only the midis that were wrong the last time, but if you didn't change anything else... I also like that you changed the name of 900 cents to "Major sixth".

11145: 9946: 5144: 6249: 3120:

contain the score? Or is it just text? They won't let me look at it. Maybe you'll be luckier. To add a comedy note to all of this: you know that the movable do system has no syllables for degrees

12478: 12576:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 7283: 6312:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 5082:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 4985:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 4888:; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Knowledge. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please: 3553: 10153: 6747: 2702:

4 in a major key, I'll grant you (since its natural progression is to the minor-third degree), but Britten's scores would still be the place I would start looking. Another likely composer is

12694: 12546: 6814:

A 'reason' parameter provides a redundancy check, preventing inappropriate tagging of files. The 'reason' parameter also provides space for specifying which type of MediaWiki special syntax.

6047: 3604: 12638: 6696: 11697: 10450: 9169:. What we want is a competent source discussing specifically definitions and issues surrounding them. There should be a ton of philosophical textbooks on the topic, and many logics texts. 7837:

as the two images you added don't exist. However after looking at your edits (and wow you've uploaded a lot of pictures on commons) I assume maybe this is a name typo or forgot to upload?

11955: 9013: 9737:

My apologies. I did not know this (first) edition, which is different from the subsequent ones, all reproducing the second edition, as does the Dover reprint (they are all available on

8155: 7209: 6336: 5254: 4388: 2725:

to one's key, if the questions of spelling become complicated and/or ambiguous then of course such a table loses most of its point. Hyacinth questioned why I didn't include columns for

6851: 5996: 5666: 4426: 3739: 3410: 10359: 10143: 6691: 3337: 7142: 12436: 12143: 10345: 3188:

No problem finding Don Byrd's website, no. It is very entertaining, thanks again for bringing it to my attention. I was not familiar with the French idiom, either, so again, thanks.

6847: 5992: 5662: 5278: 4422: 3735: 3406: 12872: 12441: 12192: 3680:

redirects to "WP:DISPUTE", but since there is no dispute Knowledge doesn't have the best guides to discussion in this instance.) If you would like to start a discussion, I assume

12837: 7886: 12513: 12391:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 12207:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 11953:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 11695:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 10062: 9991: 7581:

Hi, you seem to be a good editor. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the Skogssamer article that I have created. For any improvements that you can find. Thanks.--

12179: 12156: 12120: 10860: 9830: 9349: 6380: 4318: 3791: 3438: 12017: 11863: 10980: 10614: 10417: 6659: 6317: 6296: 4990: 4969: 4467: 12917: 10215: 9093: 8954: 12860: 12465: 12393: 8593: 5461: 5249: 3070:

Before about 1620, key signatures rarely if ever venture beyond two flats, and sharp signatures are unknown. This originates from the tone system of chant theory, where the

12825: 12501: 12226: 9772: 9750: 9728: 9482: 9447: 9410: 8382: 8333: 7972: 7714: 7566: 7079: 6036: 5706: 5407: 5370: 4456: 4242: 7820: 7456: 7109: 7023: 6970: 6640: 6267:

Out of curiosity, is there are reason you asked me? In regards to clarifying the policy and/or discussion, is there anything specific that you are wondering about either?

11564: 10762: 10286: 8811: 6881: 5889: 11949: 10170: 12349: 10714: 10700: 10564: 10267: 7075: 4850: 4827: 4238: 3212: 12257: 11477: 11114: 10635: 9530: 8407: 7775: 4846: 4800: 4374: 4356: 3697: 3659: 3645: 3306: 11817: 11604: 8710: 8696: 8649: 8631: 7056: 5954: 5924: 3179: 3106: 3065: 3043: 3016: 2830: 2807: 2715: 2691: 2654: 12742: 12360: 12161: 9996: 9951: 8267: 6282: 3252: 2382: 11680: 11510: 11492: 11131: 10638:, this is not necessarily even a problem for short enough articles. Moreover, for longer articles without adequate inline references (whether they are footnotes or 9888: 9867: 9277: 9241: 9208: 9178: 9146: 8909: 6823: 5853:. I kinda wanted to create something along the lines of "Correct me if I'm wrong" and then thought about creating a shortcut to your page. But I also see we have 12842: 12253: 12171: 12080: 11938: 11797: 10935: 10794: 10327: 10132: 9782: 9518:. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. 9283: 6276: 5526: 4210: 4200: 4178: 4153: 4123: 4078: 4048: 4014: 3992: 3967: 3945: 3920: 3707: 3354: 3267: 2524: 2416: 11778: 11757: 9373: 8998: 7674: 5553:, there are six configuration variables, of which any of the first four look like they could be relevant. I'm rapidly getting out of my technical depth here. :-) 12852: 12807: 12483: 12457: 12387: 11977: 11823: 10940: 10728: 10570: 8517: 8490: 8464: 6261: 5824: 5787: 5756: 5628: 3547: 2675:. In any case the C-flat is given by the table as a lowered 2nd degree of B-flat major. So there should be no problem with C-flat as a chromatic tone in G minor. 12072: 12054: 11059: 10789: 8426: 7636: 6993: 4508: 64:

Do you now where I can find a table like this (hopefully better made) giving the spellings of all diatonic and chromatic tones in the commonly used major keys?

12877: 12817: 12412: 12125: 10175: 9053: 8914: 8055: 8041: 7512: 6152: 5562: 5544: 4804: 11037: 11016: 8006:, while there are other templates used by various WikiProjects that use the former category. Do you have any thoughts on how to address this inconsistency? -- 7670: 6084: 4544: 4494: 12135: 8527: 7854: 5874: 5413: 5332: 5197: 4795:

If you are/were looking for examples of quartal harmonies with Schoenberg, you might try the first chamber symphony op. 9. It has some prominent examples. —

6989: 5494: 5480: 12293: 8722: 8338: 8293: 8245: 7891: 7642: 7518: 5964: 5634: 4408: 9713: 3763: 12197: 11801: 7999: 7780: 7408: 7061: 6975: 6886: 4517: 12802: 11972: 11716: 6796: 12765: 12298: 11518: 10739: 10535: 9126: 7615: 6829: 4005:

The article was not structured after the image, nor was the image structured after the article. I would guess the third B is the second subject group.

3901: 3236:

Hi Hyacinth. How are you doing? You had two noisy guests, didn't you? We've left. But I thought I'd stop by to see how you were enjoying the silence:)

12541: 7403: 5219: 4341: 3759: 12783:

deleted in 2014, when it got moved to her userspace), and Video games with something about chicken soup. (It's a G1, which is PERFECT for RW Wiki.)

12316: 12300: 11484: 11123: 11088: 10754: 9262: 8015: 12717: 12407: 10685: 8607:

you moved a page to a non-recommended style and then you protected move action. I do not understand why you did that. Especially the protection. --

4403: 3117: 12418:

because it allows editors to have positive interactions--rather than just reversion messages. I look forward to more collaboration with you on the

10364: 7987: 4811: 9852: 6069: 5215: 3929:

No. I'm asking what the third section of the exposition in your picture is? Under "Exposition" I can see "A:I B:V V". What is that third V?

12332: 11528: 10733: 10322: 9683: 9614: 9492: 8616: 8387: 7983: 5592:. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our 3386: 12754: 11904: 11646: 11067: 10901: 10485: 10148: 4069:

Sorry, insomnia (if I have any excuse). I mean the third roman numeral: the second V in the first B. This looks like the second subject group.

3522: 9158:"MW is RS" Huh? I say "X is A, not B", and you ask me if I mean "X is B, not A"?!? I hope this clarifies it for you: If you want to support a 7849: 6942: 6918: 6411: 6128: 6110: 5192: 4290: 10398: 10314: 9504: 5933:

was not meant to be merged with the others. Was just a comment about my only contribution to the essays. I was thinking more about merging

3349: 3321: 11589: 8203: 8126: 7536: 7343: 5609: 5431: 5175:, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on 4347:

Is there a discussion about you contacting me to ask where a merger discussion is? If so, where is this discussion about you contacting me?

3382: 12368: 12039: 10542: 9841: 9460:

I misunderstood, or half understood. Presumably you edited an older version of the article, thereby undoing later edits while saving yours.

8959: 8109:-She likes to play the saxophone, piano, and the ]. Her friends call her Shrella Cinderella because she sings a lot and loves animals, just 7250: 7181: 7874: 7040: 6938: 6914: 4286: 4266: 11537: 8816: 8083: 7590: 4529: 4479: 59: 10705:

I would have done that if I thought the lack of footnotes was problematic. But I didn't when I added the references and I still don't. —

7532: 5427: 3626: 12376: 12231: 11899: 11641: 11541: 10896: 10117: 3258:

After consideration I would say the chart above is not on Knowledge because Knowledge is not a handbook, and otherwise I'm doing okay.

7426: 4262: 12897: 12608: 12321: 12100: 11997: 11891: 11843: 11633: 10960: 10946: 10888: 10810: 10594: 10387: 10195: 10012: 9971: 9810: 9299: 9073: 8934: 8543: 8362: 8313: 7907: 7800: 7658: 7546: 7436: 7089: 7003: 6902: 6861: 6344: 6234: 5980: 5650: 5441: 5229: 5114: 5017: 4920: 4436: 4329: 4226: 3723: 3370: 8288: 2821:

2 against 1 in the cantus. Of course, this piece isn't in a major key, either, but I think the principle is well illustrated by it.—

12475: 10137: 8666:

from when I moved the page to end in "⋯", I did it because an editor or editors moved all the similarly titled pages to end in "⋯".

7748: 7391: 5839: 5809: 5771: 5732: 12682: 10111: 7493: 7422: 6735: 6679: 6623: 6567: 6511: 6455: 6196: 4757: 4701: 4645: 4589: 3592: 11610: 10985: 10799:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

10220: 10001:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

9288:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

8532:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

8208: 7896:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

7647:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

6891:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

6239: 5969:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

5639:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

5172: 4215:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3712:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

3572: 3359:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2671:

In major keys? I was saying nothing of minor keys. I was questioning the existence of raised 3rd and 7th and lowered 4th and 1st

9503:

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether John Fonville should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at

7766:

the quotation which has caused bewilderment on the talk page. I find the assertion puzzling, too. Can you help clarifying it? --

11868: 11763: 11729: 10865: 8889: 8791: 7753: 3681: 8414:

faith, I am sure you meant to reply and were too busy and forgot to, right? So, please, kindly, restore them. Thanks again. --

7539:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7429:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7082:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6996:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6854:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5434:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5222:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 4429:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 12893: 12890:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 12607:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

12096: 12093:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 11993: 11990:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 11839: 11836:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 10956: 10953:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 10806: 10803:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 10767: 10590: 10587:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 10191: 10188:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 10008: 10005:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9967: 9964:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9806: 9803:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9295: 9292:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 9069: 9066:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8930: 8927:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8539: 8536:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8358: 8355:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 8309: 8306:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7903: 7900:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7796: 7793:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7654: 7651:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 7542: 7432: 7085: 6999: 6898: 6895:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 6857: 6715: 6343:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

6133: 5976: 5973:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5646: 5643:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 5437: 5225: 5113:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

5016:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

4919:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject,

4432: 4222: 4219:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3719: 3716:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3685: 3614: 3366: 3363:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3116:? -- how do you pronounce "nouse"? Rhymes with ... ? (browse? blues? prose?). Regarding the "Quid non ebrietas" score: would 3299:, for taking care of Pulitzer Prize winners in music and other music, for gnomish work adding templates and categories, for 11721: 10691:

Theoretically, you could have edited "Unreferenced" to "No footnotes", rather reverting twice and then asking me to do it.

10413: 10355: 8845:; secondary-source coverage of food challenges are always about specific types of challenge, for which full articles exist. 7052: 4842: 4796: 12704: 12626: 12622: 12569: 12398: 12214: 11960: 11702: 11022:

That will do - although I am now curious about the right meaning for the term. Are we missing the meaning as used there?

10639: 10158: 6362: 6358: 6305: 5597: 5402: 5365: 5327: 5132: 5128: 5075: 5035: 5031: 4978: 4938: 4934: 4881: 9195: 9135:

When you wrote "MW is RS only for usage, not for definition" did you mean "MW is RS only for definition, not for usage"?

9104: 12856: 12821: 12794: 12497: 12443: 12249: 12175: 12139: 11793: 10549: 10341: 10091: 9902: 7855: 5256: 12666:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 11577: 6719:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6663:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6607:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6551:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6495:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6439:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6180:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4818:. There is more than one kind of fourth, and any pitches may be seen as derived from fifths (C & B: C-G-D-A-E-B). 4741:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4685:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4629:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4573:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3576:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 12757: 12709: 12263: 11943: 10020: 9957: 9788: 9635: 9555: 9098: 6835: 5988: 5658: 5384: 5347: 5309: 4414: 4400: 3731: 3633: 3402: 5912:

Content removal may include mistakes, but often regards addition and removal of intentionally inappropriate content.

5377: 5340: 5302: 12617: 11685: 11096: 9396:

intention, not yours, and hopefully if you know that I did it, you know at least a little of how it happened. See:

6353: 5844: 5123: 5026: 4929: 4774: 9389:: "Note that lead images should usually be no wider than upright=1.35 (which is the default equivalent of 300px)." 9033:

It's a pleasure, and I sincerely hope that you enjoy your continued improvement of this inspiring encyclopedia! –

6139: 9354: 8893: 8795: 8674: 8637: 7977: 7608:

used in the article. For example, "skogssamer" is not capitalized in the intro, except when it begins a sentence.

7048: 5865:" for when I review article changes. How would I got about proposing this merger of essays, if at all? Cheers! 5466: 5295: 9225:"Judaism" This example has the structure mentioned in the article text, the "circular definition" image did not. 5794: 3650:

I don't have an opinion, but well it's a large change, it was discussed at WP Classical music or somewhere yes?

7786: 7754: 5934: 5850: 12671: 12273: 7390:

for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see

6724: 6668: 6612: 6556: 6500: 6444: 6185: 4746: 4690: 4634: 4578: 3581: 12882:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

12793:

Now, I'm sorry I ask a lot, but this is the last time I ask, so please help out with this. Thanks in advance

12381: 12359:

Hi! Since you're a regular contributor to music articles, would you be interested in commenting or reviewing

12085:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

11982:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

11828:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

10945:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

10743: 10575:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

10230: 10180:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9956:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9787:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

9058:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8919:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8678: 8449: 8343:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

8298:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7785:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7523:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7413:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

7066:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6980:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6949: 6834:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

6752: 6041: 5418:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

5286: 5202:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

4413:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3869: 2496:. I don't think, for example, that E-sharp, B-sharp, F-flat and C-flat really exist as chromatic alterations 11764:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template%3AClassical_mechanics&diff=641616606&oldid=640244663

11730:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template%3AClassical_mechanics&diff=640244663&oldid=639206897

10722: 10453:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

10292: 9646:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

9566:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

8158:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

8094:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

7286:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

7212:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

7145:

again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on

12518: 12472: 11783: 11722: 9746: 9709: 9443: 9369: 8986: 8770: 7740: 3797:

Wouldn't it be preferable these courtesy accidentals be shown enclosed in brackets for the sake of clarity?

3301: 12523:

Hello, Hyacinth -- I have searched for an editor who is interested in ethnomusicology. I read the article

9228:"MW is RS" Since you obviously have read what I wrote, maybe you can explain what possessed you to ask me 6390:

Please don't add redlinks to articles. If you plan on creating an article on a subject, make the article

2537:

If I may intrude on this discussion: I don't know about analysis, but it is very difficult to see how he C

12770: 12748: 10035: 9877: 8881: 8833: 8783: 8739: 8220: 7067: 7028: 4234: 3532: 12529: 11792:

and ask your help. Please explain: what means this term: the 'Opera'-tinged vocal dynamo ? Thank you! -

10773: 6048:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Biography#Nationality of people from disputed territory/country/colony/region

5945:

as I see them being related. Yes, admitting fault is different than apologizing, but they are related.

12565: 11536:

and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as

10263: 10166: 9514:

is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on

9307: 8885: 8787: 7771: 7275: 6301: 6065: 5071: 4974: 4877: 38: 6101:

Cat for string quartet: there was not really what we know today as Austria in Beethoven's time, no? --

5550: 3080:

without the use of either signature or accidentals, because sharps are entirely outside the system of

12325: 11739: 10391: 8682: 6116: 12367:? It's received one editor's comments but not much follow-up yet, so anything would be appreciated. 9166: 4841:

and that is taught in ear-training and music theory classes in conservatory as the quartal sound. —

4362: 3153:(granted not the best written in the whole of WP). I've deleted that insertion of the "Sato System" 12699: 12431: 11691: 11533: 11047: 10800: 10710: 10681: 10666: 10531: 10490: 10298: 10002: 9580:

uk/music/2009/apr/14/obituary-maria-curcio Obituary: Maria Curcio]" ''The Guardian'', 14 April 2009

9289: 8533: 8025: 8003: 7993: 7897: 7744: 7648: 7399: 6892: 6075:

Please feel free to create guideline/help content at WP:Nationality, I would appreciate such work.

5970: 5640: 5282: 5270: 5168: 4380: 4323: 4216: 3954:

I may still not understand what you are asking. The third roman numeral is, to me, quite clearly a

3713: 3360: 2645:

1 elsewhere in Britten's output, especially in the music he wrote after the Second String Quartet.—

9591:

obituaries/5121311/Maria-Curcio.html Music obituaries: Maria Curcio]", ''Telegraph'', 7 April 2009

12883: 12611:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 12469: 12240: 11774: 11753: 10656: 10274: 9835: 9742: 9705: 9694: 9688: 9439: 9365: 9360: 8985:

with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going

8735: 8670: 8439: 8252: 7945: 7382: 7348: 6407: 6347:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 5398: 5361: 5323: 5117:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 5020:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 4923:, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject). 4337: 3655: 3622: 3443: 10672:

to tag the specific facts that you have been unable to locate sources for. Also, in the case of

7159:

and Times of William Schuman'' (features many photos and excerpts from William Schuman's scores)

2783:

I would not say such examples immediately would invalidate my answer to Hyacinth. Now after the

12798: 12086: 11934: 11676: 11585: 11524: 10931: 10087: 9660:

com/violin_mastery/david_mannes.html The Philosophy of Violin Teaching]", ''TheViolinSite.com''

9535: 8706: 8663: 8645: 8612: 8249: 7881: 7666: 7500: 6781: 6771: 6124: 6106: 5950: 5885: 5870: 5490: 5476: 4780: 3846: 3817: 3345: 3317: 10151:. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 9738: 8850:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

8752:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

7622: 6148: 12761: 12713: 10673: 10646: 10628: 10619: 10442: 10337: 10259: 10162: 9268:

You're mixing up different and separate issues here, one of which has nothing to do with me.

8299: 8186:

the twin city of Calcutta, India. A commerce graduate fro one of the most reputed colleges of

7845: 7767: 6981: 6761: 6051: 5616: 5185: 5176: 4396: 3208: 3102: 3039: 2826: 2711: 2650: 10473: 9671: 9602: 8191: 8114: 7762: 7331: 7238: 7169: 3804: 2502:

Have you ever seen lowered 4th and 1st degree or raised 3rd and 7th degree used in analysis?

12868: 12833: 12738: 12524: 12493: 12280: 12245: 12050: 12022: 11886:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

11813: 11628:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

11600: 11506: 11488: 11473: 11127: 11110: 11092: 11084: 11055: 10883:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

10783: 10758: 10696: 10481: 10422: 10282: 10100: 10079: 9885: 9863: 9849: 9768: 9724: 9679: 9610: 9515: 9478: 9406: 9273: 9258: 9237: 9204: 9174: 9142: 9122: 9037: 8692: 8627: 8598: 8460: 8263: 8199: 8122: 8037: 7632: 7508: 7387: 7339: 7246: 7177: 6819: 6792: 6743: 6687: 6631: 6575: 6519: 6463: 6272: 6204: 6096: 6080: 5920: 5820: 5783: 5752: 5745:

It sounds like it opens, at least, with I-ii-vi-V. If I play F-E-D-C it sounds about right.

5624: 5572: 5540: 4823: 4504: 4370: 4352: 4196: 4149: 4074: 4010: 3963: 3916: 3693: 3677: 3641: 3543: 3334: 3263: 2703: 2597:, the chord above it includes a second diminished octave: it is a "doubly diminished-fifth 2412: 10772:

Could you take a look to your series of "Template:List of music students by teacher/...".

9844:

added a link to globalchant.org to quite a few singing/renaissance/etc. related articles.

7033:

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by

8: 12609:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

12537: 12509: 12425: 12289: 11527:, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject 10742:

can make fellow editor Noted this particular language may usually have Simplified style:

10706: 10677: 10527: 10408: 10350: 10308: 9942: 9898: 9468: 9397: 9322: 8897: 8868: 8799: 7395: 7363: 6345:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

6257: 5115:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

5018:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

4921:

requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license

4173: 4118: 4043: 3987: 3940: 3896: 3859: 3832: 3247: 3174: 3060: 3011: 2802: 2686: 2519: 2377: 9927:. Since you had some involvement with these redirects, you might want to participate in 7474:? Clearly, 'ur' is the top-level code and most commonly used code for the language. The 4103:

Ok. Whew. Now we're getting somewhere (to quote Oliver Hardy:) Thanks. Then what is the

3636:, that you don't like the information being removed from the teacher's articles, or...? 12787: 12222: 11789: 11770: 11749: 10128: 8905: 8551: 8224: 8147: 7870: 7859: 7825: 7574: 7201: 6757:

Hello Hyacinth. I'm a bit confused by your recent addition of a "reason" parameter to

6403: 5392: 5355: 5317: 5149: 4815: 4461: 4333: 4141: 3755: 3651: 3618: 3292: 3034:

accumulation of various differently sized semitones is naturally up to the performers.—

2791:

and I discovered that when an Italian tenor sings it I can make out none of the words.

47: 17: 12708:

I've removed the hatnote but it might be better to make a disambiguation page instead.

9003: 6046:

Hello. I would like to give you a heads up, and would like to invite your comment on

12913: 12904: