User talk:Knowledge Seeker

2035:

no feeling from where those questioning you are coming from. And worst of all, you are DEAD WRONG. Einstein's Special Theory has NOTHING AT ALL to do with intermolecular forces. These contractions are not physical forces but geometrical effects so there is no chance of anything "breaking up", and analogies with things "cooling down" are unwarranted and bound to lead people astray. And what kind of semi-literate crap is "if you boost into its new rest frame...". First time I've seen "boost" as an intransitive verb. And what the hell is "it will shrink back to its preferred size through the action of intermolecular forces (or it will break if you accelerated it too much)"? Someone asks a straightforward question re: how a hula hoop might behave if it was rotation near the speed of light, and gets some garbage about the hula hoop's "preferred size". My preferred size of the hula hoop is about 2 inches in circumference and firmly around your neck. What a load of steaming tripe! Natch, the guy who wrote in can't make head or tail of what you are raving about, and then when he says so, you revert to your usual tactic of basically calling him stupid. You have never been able to perceive that your "explanations" are badly written and badly thought out. I have suggested before that you write out your thoughts, if one can call them that on a word processor, have a good think about them, edit them, print them out, and then wipe your bum on them. Knowledge Seeker is not the one who is stupid, and I am seriously suggesting you get another hobby apart from patronising and insulting those "seekers of knowledge" who write in here. You are nowhere near as knowledgeable as you make out, your pedagological style REALLY stinks and you do little more than discourage people from enquiring. Your literary style is at the very forefront of dim and stylistically ugly scrawling. And you follow the same pattern over and over again. You needlessly complicate everything with badly written and pretentious crap, then when the asker says he doesn't understand, you put him in a dunce's cap on a stool in the corner. NOT ONCE have you ever admitted that your answer might be less than the very best and most lucid way of approaching the problem, and you seem to completely oblivious to the plain and irrefutable fact that your material is full of grammatical and spelling errors. Please go away. Myles325a (talk) 23:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

435:

box and searched Separation of Human Organism this was to see if anything related to my theory of how we came about as human form. I am 48 years old, in my early 20's I thought maybe we came from the ocean, or a body of water. I have theory that is of the formation of our male and female structure, the nose the knees the shoulders, the escape of the elbows and such in a degree of strength and the escape of certain areas of weakness, though may strongly be related to a steady separation of delicateness and security. Such as the back of the knee and the softness of the breast and the groin, parts which consist of matter which seem to be a bouyancy matter. For the breasts being of same sortness, bouyancy a floating being of matter which is left astray and or flamboyant, though I guess another word could be used. Anyway my thought was a period of time as of one separating in the air of light or just a period after separating and let the rest take it's course, though by now in trueness I've recognised that air and light are a preffered matter in a separation of some sort. I've read this similarity of growth concerning air and light, just do not have the material here to rectify it.2:09.p.m.e.s.t.

2567:. The novel was originally written as course material at the University of California San Diego, Department of Computer Science and Engineering. I read the links you sent regarding policy on external links. The speculative nature of the material you deleted probably justifies the removal more than "self promotion." I point out, however, that much of the material on this subject is both fictional and speculative, including movies, stories, and futuristic speculation. In the realm of "common sense," such speculation is, at the same time, food for serious thought and engaging to one's imagination; it is rarely offensive. 377:

featured status. It covers, as you point out, a great deal of information, spanning multiple disciplines. I’m really not qualified to write about any of them in much detail. I’ve done my best to synthesize what appears to me to be the most well-accepted and up-to-date information. Still, I’ve had to focus on biological trends, since that’s what I know best. I think the article would require dedicated attention from several people with specializations in different areas to get the article to featured status, and unfortunately, I lack the time these days to attempt to coordinate that. —

2560:"Hello, and welcome to Knowledge! I noticed you added a number of links to a web site, perhaps your own work, and I wanted to let you know that I've removed them for now. Knowledge has a relatively stringent policy regarding external links: see WP:EXT, and in particular, Knowledge:External links#Advertising and conflicts of interest. If you feel that the link merits inclusion, then perhaps you could discuss its use on the associated discussion pages. Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions. — Knowledge Seeker দ 03:35, 5 May 2010 (UTC" 4790:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 4740:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 3948:: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the 968: 4259: 4398: 1343:

you’re suggesting that because his old username is under a username block, his talk page should be protected, that’s a different matter — one I didn’t see in the protection rationale nor made clear to Adrian. If you are going to protect it for that reason, I would suggest first placing a prominent notice at the top directing users to his new page. It’s quite an amusing name — blocked for length, not for inappropriateness — and other users may wish to contact him. —

4217: 397: 4486: 2175: 2130: 2068: 46: 4823: 4535: 4371: 4030: 1949: 294: 3231: 4666:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 4461:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 3539:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 3495:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 3396:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 3352:(i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at 3181: 2815: 3064:

contributions that should have been present. Not the first time something like that has happened, unfortunately -- I was caught up in a less public but more sloppily handled similar matter, myself, details unimportant. Anyway, subject matter experts like you are always in short supply and I hope you'll realize that you have the enduring respect of that portion of the community that cares about quality contributions. Best wishes,

21: 194: 4326: 3103:(i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 2789:(i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 4771: 4721: 4647: 4442: 3520: 3476: 3377: 3333: 3853: 4278: 3084: 2773: 1180:? That block was a (somewhat questionable) username block; it was not issued for any wrongdoing. Did you consider simply explaining to him that he should use his new username instead of his old username to reply? And why does it matter if other users were trying to get him to communicate? He is free to communicate if he wishes. If that’s all there is, then I’m going to remove the protection. 4151: 4104: 3803: 3780: 3768: 4206: 1778: 1500: 1405: 934: 3531:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 3388:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 4658:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 4453:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 3487:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 3344:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 3095:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 4732:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the 546: 3987:

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent

2034:

Just reading BenRG's alphabet soup bulls***t above, and then his insolent and arrogant rejoinder below to the effect that his answer WAS certainly clear and simple is something he has been doing for some time. Ben, you write like a old boxer gripping a pen in his palsied hands. You have no style, and

376:

will be my most important legacies at Knowledge. Unfortunately, even though I was quite attached to the clock analogy, it appears a number of other users did not appreciate it, judging from their comments on the talk page. I think, though, that there would still be a lot of work to get the article to

271:

It’s always nice to meet fellow knowledge seekers on Knowledge! I apologize for the lengthy delay in my response; I have not been active on Knowledge for quite some time. Even now, I’ve been popping in more to say hello than to do any serious editing. I’d be happy, though, to discuss tips and whatnot

3021:

Sorry for the less than positive response you received at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard. As you can see, Knowledge is not running as well as it could and therefore we need you help. Any contributions you make will get us that much closer to being a better functioning project. Any suggestions you have

2780:

in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have

2304:

Could you let me know if you are still interesting in being involved with Admin Coaching, or if you would prefer to have your name removed from the "reconfirmation" list. If you want to be involved, could you please move your entry from "Reconfirmation" to "Active" and indicate how many students you

1926:

Guettarda! I meant for so long to respond to this, but I wanted to write a detailed response and so kept putting it off. I have only popped into Knowledge intermittently, though I still read articles all the time. Thank you for your kind messages. I'm hoping to do some occasional editing and hope to

1643:

that the article had been mentioned as a source in a news article. (This was four years ago, when Knowledge was not nearly as prominent as it is today.) I took a look at the article (as a layperson; I have no special background in literature). It does make sense, but was not immediately intuitive to

1300:

be protected (especially in the presence of another account making controversial edits). I'm dismayed you find this case any different, and the unprovoked attack he made on his talk page is the manner in which administrators are to act against, and certainly not something to be endorsed. I would not

699:

Further review leads me to believe that if the user does indeed promise to refrain from such behaviour, that an unblock should be fine, all circumstances considered. He should be watched though, and, in truth, his actions really are blockworthy, considering. However, I am happy for an unblock if you

434:

My first search was a user talk to see what I had floating around, I came across user talk llkali, this lead me to Origin of Life. Through this I researched Amphiphiles along with Natural Selection both from the paragraphs of The Origin of Life. While on natural selection I went to the left search

2832:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be

3206:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

1116:

Ah, yes. That edit was inappropriate. However, it was two and a half days ago and he was already blocked for it (a block which was later removed). This is now well “after the fact” and I don’t believe that it is sufficient justification for protection. I’ll wait to see, though, if the protecting

259:

When I saw that nickname I felt I could have used it too :). Well, I'm writing just to say that I'm also a knowledge seeker (I can easily say I'm interested in everything) and, well, I guess it would be good for both to share sources of information, learning tips or whatever, if you like. I look

1342:

That was a single episode of vandalism from over two days ago. I do not think this demonstrates that "user and sockpuppet are vandalising page". Furthermore, if Adrian is vandalizing a page, then he should be blocked; protecting the page he is vandalizing doesn’t really make sense to me. Now if

3063:

Hi KS. Good to see you back. I think that the removal of admin status from inactive users was, in retrospect, poor policy as it has caused at least as many problems as it was supposed to solve. Time will tell, I guess. In any case, it was handled without the degree of respect for past

4547:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

3984:. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right. 3880:

established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

1731:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are 678:

Perhaps I should have been clearer in my definition of "vandalism" - he created a nonsense article disparaging Jimmy Wales. It seems clear that he is an obvious vandal and disruptor by both his creation of the CSD'd article and the comment he left on the user's page. --

315: 2843:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines.

1669:

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader,

1291:

As above, the diffs presented by Joshua is that which is the most enlightening. Telling us to "go rot in hell fuctard" is hardly the most productive of measures users should conduct whilst in the quest for an unblock, or in this case the follow up of a review

3557: 487:

to update your status and move your entry to the Active list. Also, please remember to update your capacity (5th table variable) in the form of a fraction (eg. 2/3 means you are currently coaching 2 students, and could accept 1 more student). Thank you.

4042:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

2381:). An editor has commented that they don't think there is a violation. I can see why the nominator reported it, but contribs so far show no evidence that the account has been set up to harass or otherwise impersonate you. Feel free to comment at UAA. 2581: 3870: 4782:(i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the 907:

articles they create and that others will edit them, but then use a template naming the creator prominently as a troublemaker. (The template essentially would be read as “Knowledge Seeker or someone else may have a conflict of interest.”) —

2401:

was taken (that was my original user name), and so changed the spelling. The issue is that there could be potential confusion between us, though if the user wishes to continue with the name, I have no objections. I am quite impressed with

1293: 1253: 1005: 1665:

I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Knowledge. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

4714: 3513: 4640: 4435: 3469: 3326: 2040:

Thanks for your message. I wasn't thrilled with the tone of his answer, though it's sometimes easy to convey the wrong emotion. In the future, I hope all three of us will be able to communicate in a clear, courteous way. Thanks! —

3370: 3077: 2710:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

2672:

2634:

2596:

3935:

based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your

2102:

Thank you for informing me. I'm a bit sorry to see them go — I remember the adventure when I first organized the Medicine Collaboration of the Week! But it looks like they're no longer needed. I appreciate the notice. —

2009:

Jonathunder, I wanted to thank you for your invitations. Unfortunately, I have now moved out of Minnesota, so I won't be able to attend any of these in the future. Look forward to running into you around Knowledge! —

1273:

I think the requesting editor may have misjudged the situation. I’m going to remove the protection for now. If you have links to the vandalism or other information I should be aware of, please let me know. Thanks! —

2738:

I read your definition of putrescible and found it very useful. Can you tell me and the wikipedia community at large, the source of your definition - in particular that it is the decomposition of animal proteins?

3988:

when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available

3435:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1517:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!

1433:

951:

2695: 1681:

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

459:

I was not able to follow most of what you were saying, nor do I understand the purpose of your communication. Perhaps if you grouped your thoughts into sentences I would have an easier time understanding. —

1150:

Also, I should have mentioned earlier, said user was still using his page to contact and communicate with other users despite the block, also, other users were trying to get him to communicate with them...

4601: 2864: 2707: 2696: 4802:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — 4752:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — 4670:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — 3048:

if you are interested. We are also discusssing issues and leaving suggestions on the talk page there. If you have any improvements or thoughts you'd like to share, they would be most welcome. Thanks.

4775: 4725: 4651: 4559:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 4465:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 4446: 4337:

When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (

4054:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3543:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 3524: 3499:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 3480: 3400:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 3381: 3356:. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 3337: 3088: 2777: 2657: 2593: 2582: 1736: 3169: 2958: 2669: 2658: 503:

Interesting. I had previously requested candidates to coach and was ignored or declined. In any case, I’m afraid I am not on Knowledge frequently enough these days to serve as a proper coach. —

3797:

for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the

2858: 2835: 848:

tag in good faith - or rather, because he genuinely felt that the article was slanted due to interference by the stent people. But I agree some scrutiny of the edit history would have helped.

3794: 2803: 4095: 3835: 4759: 4383: 3627:

to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this

2619: 2614: 2528:

In the article written about the origins of the Earth, it is academically dishonest to present an unproved theory as fact when the information given is based on opinion and not science.

1220:

Certainly. Though if he makes edits like that, it would probably be better to block him rather than protect the pages he vandalizes. Let me know if you encounter any problems with him. —

1049:

Actually, what I meant was, could you share the “diff” links to the specific edits you consider abusive? Are you referring to the unblock request to which I responded several days ago? —

4474: 3552: 3508: 3409: 3365: 3112: 4676: 4387: 4764: 4575: 4119: 4070: 2952: 2912: 2631: 2620: 2872: 1201:

Very well, but should the user start to use the page for innappropriate edits like the diff provided, I will request protection, and, the summary thing is a target I am working on.

3671: 4687: 483:

project. We are currently conducting a reconfirmation drive to give coaches the opportunity to update their information and capacity to participate in the project. Please visit

3949: 2728: 820:

Ha! I was toying with the idea of working on some medical articles and thought I’d look back on some of the old ones I’d done. Apparently, though, I’m being accused of having a

60: 3865:(also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned 4166: 3741: 2966: 3961: 3040:

Hi again, KS. I just saw your response on the noticeboard and wanted to thank you for your understanding. It's possible that the survey you received was part of a series of

2690: 2920: 2901: 3220: 2906: 3644: 3596: 240:

Ah, old friend, I still do hope to return to more active writing at some point. Right now, all I can hope to do is poke my head in here and there and do some cleaning. —

4861: 4834: 3603: 2985: 2977: 1537: 1510: 1473: 1414: 1027: 979: 944: 2853: 1492:

you see there is this editor called User talk:TharkunColl who has a racist image on his user page, can you do me a favour and give him a warning about it or delete it.

3923: 3280: 2652: 798:

Ah, that’s good to know. I hope you have changed the password. He created a user page for you; would you like to keep it or would you like me to delete it for you? —

4879: 4142: 2927: 52: 4137: 1084: 4808: 4014: 2766: 2751: 2539: 352:

programs always use in the last 5 years. What is left to get it to featured article status? Its a very large amount of information.. the History of the Earth...

203: 4088: 3873:

with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

3660: 3650: 1453: 3053: 3030: 1177: 467: 4795: 4745: 710: 3573: 2972: 2368: 991: 4345: 4903: 4593: 3616: 3238: 2925:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8g

2713:

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

2675:

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

2637:

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

2599:

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

2055: 731: 689: 3609: 2026: 4898: 4813: 3981: 3623: 2162: 2117: 2071: 2060: 2048: 4290: 4180: 2947: 2479:

Hi KS, thanks for the message on my talkpage. At the moment, MCOTW has gone into hibernation a bit, as I found enthusiasm for collaboration to be waning.

1487: 1281: 520:

NP, I understand, hopefully such things (as asking for and not getting a coachee) will become a more infrequent occurance with more active coordinators.

3733: 3464: 2747: 2493:) (one of our current hardworking medical editors) has expressed an interest in getting MCOTW going, but on the whole nothing has really been happening. 2178: 2167: 2133: 2122: 3587: 2971:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --

1257: 661: 4600: 4356: 4304: 2798: 1831:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –

4635: 2351: 1765: 1227: 1210: 1159: 1124: 1079: 1056: 1039: 4412:(John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Knowledge seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009. 4220: 2877:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

2283: 2240: 2017: 1708: 805: 787: 590: 1651: 452: 4846: 4798:, Administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at 4748:, Administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at 4240: 4158: 3966: 3940:

in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the

3225: 2271: 2254: 2095: 1934: 1898: 1826: 1805: 419: 4779: 4729: 4655: 4450: 3528: 3484: 3385: 3341: 3092: 2202: 2157: 1619:

a while back, and I was wondering if you can look at it again sometime, or at the very least, read it and tell me if it makes any sense at all. --

1094: 915: 889: 279: 247: 4423: 4419: 4194: 4019: 2563:

The link is to a short science fiction novel by me which appears in reference four of Related Science Fiction on the SIGMM CARPE Research Site:

2463: 2442: 2413: 1849: 1644:

me. You might consider moving the example earlier (perhaps even into the introduction), since that was what really helped me to understand it. —

1603: 528: 510: 384: 3057: 2759: 1381: 1350: 1310: 644: 627: 3321: 2110: 1812: 724:

Looks like there’s still hope! He’s expressed some contrition on his talk page, and another administrator has removed the block. Let’s hope! —

3164: 3044:

that being performed to try and get editors editing again. And also to fix some of the problems we've found. You can find more information at

1835: 899:

Oh, I don’t doubt that he meant well when he placed it. But it's a pretty poorly phrased template when you think about it. We tell people to “

4427: 1373: 1316: 1302: 4266: 4262: 2337: 304: 3148: 3131: 2075: 4308: 4252: 4248: 3571:? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on 2733: 2397:

Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. I agree; I see no evidence of malicious intent; the user in question likely saw that

2182: 2137: 4527: 4224: 4198: 3907: 986:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send

35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 4193:

from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please

3745: 1324: 496: 4709: 4232: 4185: 3980:, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at 3632: 3117: 4883: 3638: 3567: 3072: 4522: 4270: 4236: 3793:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a

3693: 322: 4694:

have more central expertise to looking stuff over...as I am a psychiatrist my knowledge can be rather pedunculated as it were...

4681: 4348:

closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (

1989: 671: 660:

You blocked this user for “vandalism and severe personal attacks”. The only edit I see that matches either of those criteria is

3932: 3893: 3414: 3301: 3170: 2804: 2308:

If I do not hear from you within a week, I will assume that you would like to have your name removed from the list of coaches.

2292: 1728: 1194: 1019: 474: 3025:

I would like to encourage you to ask for your admin bit back. I'm sure it will be granted without any problems. Best of luck.

2219: 1981: 4857: 4228: 4190: 3914: 3195:, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. 3034: 2829:, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. 2378: 2031:

I have had run ins with this guy before, and I put in the following comment after his "answer" to your reasonable question.

1790: 1477: 211: 56: 2543: 1481: 361: 332: 4611: 4589: 4315: 4244: 4084: 4010: 3989: 3975: 3957: 3460: 3160: 1422: 610: 426: 404: 157: 149: 4865: 3859:

Hello, Knowledge Seeker. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

2576: 1960: 1694: 1009: 771: 755: 4875: 4783: 4733: 4659: 4454: 3532: 3488: 3389: 3345: 3096: 2782: 1919: 831: 141: 133: 125: 117: 109: 101: 93: 85: 77: 3809:

email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

1880: 1462:

I User: Adrian Fletcher hereby award you with the WIKI-Medal for Valour and defence of the oppressed. Congradulations.

778:

I am sorry about that. My ex friend got a hold of my password and decided to go on a vandalism spree. I truly am sorry.

344:

Is on the contest list for reaching Featured article status. Why did the Geologic Clock concept get booted? It's what

4830: 4144: 4097: 3447:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3203: 3188: 3174: 3011: 2755: 2535: 2331: 2163: 2118: 2056: 1751: 1628: 1588: 1418: 868: 4294: 1187:, you state “This user believes that every Wiki edit should have a summary”, yet very few of yours do. Why is that? — 903:” but then use a template attacking not the article, but the editors who have worked on it. We tell people they don’t 3049: 3026: 2518: 2235: 1732: 1724: 448: 440: 1548: 167: 4360: 3774:. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at 821: 573: 4585: 4080: 4006: 3953: 3899: 3558:

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

3456: 3305: 3156: 2822: 2808: 2298: 1862: 1727:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 1267: 603:

May I ask why your signature does not link to your user page? This makes it difficult to communicate with you. —

484: 264: 1865:. Could you please update your status, and if you are still interested, drop me a note on my talk page? Thanks, 1372:

Who may wish to contact him? It is clear from that talk page alone that the Adrian Fletcher is his new account.

1301:

wish for unprotection at this time, and would call for more administrator consensus before any action doing so.

4705: 3941: 3717: 2456:

Ah, that could be useful, though I don't think I'd like the way it would look. I appreciate the tip, though. —

1260:”. Would you mind sharing some of those edits? Both the vandalism and the sockpuppet edits would be helpful. — 2433:

on your user pages. As I said at UAA, I saw no evidence that the name was created or being used in bad faith.

2390: 1910:

Glad to see you drop by for a visit, good to know that you're still alive :) Hope things are well with you.

233: 4298: 3007: 2305:

would be willing to have (obviously, if you are actively coaching at the moment, then please indicate this!)

1584: 708: 687: 27: 3709: 2496:

I am quite busy in meatspace but I might tackle an article at the time. Some of my recent work has included

177:

I may add section headers and attribution for comments, and I may adjust margins and alignment for clarity.

4568: 4344:

Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Knowledge, an

4063: 2962: 2916: 2868: 2508:, but this is on a backburner currently. I will gladly assist with any personal project you might take on. 2490: 1822: 1400:

Thanks, you have always (in my mind at least) done the right thing. You are a most honourable WIKI-HERO.

1378: 1321: 1307: 444: 436: 337: 2716: 2678: 2640: 2602: 4787: 4737: 4663: 4580: 4458: 4363:

to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

4075: 3866: 3536: 3492: 3452: 3393: 3349: 3293: 3242: 3136: 3100: 2786: 2194: 2149: 2087: 1772: 876: 4479: 3297: 3208: 3069: 1941: 1675: 2781:

been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the

2344:

I'm afraid I've been away from Knowledge too much to serve as a proper coach. Thank you for asking. —

3917:. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC) 3016: 2372: 391: 3886:

Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective

3845: 4515: 4111: 3122:

Might be interesting to classify by the three disease areas covered (Heart, kidney/brain and PAD).

3003: 2549: 2505: 1426: 929:

Thank you so much for having enough faith in me to allow me to be unblocked. Best Friends Forever.

702: 681: 480: 286: 3721: 3690:

journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages

59:! Head to its talk page to organize our efforts. Continue to nominate topics for future months at 4851: 4780: