User talk:Knowledge Seeker/Archive5

536:

am relatively new to Knowledge, so I might be adding an extra space somewhere, but I have NOT damaged anyone else's messages. I carefully looked at the user talk pages that you listed to see if I had interrupted any words, etcetera, and I had not. This is probably a mutual mistake, but the bottom line is that I haven't damaged anyone else's user talk. As for "picking" fights, if you knew the stories about my battle with Moriori you would realize that he was definitely the aggressor. If there weren't a "no legal threats" policy on Knowledge he would be in big trouble in the "real world" for slandering me. As for Raul654, I'm currently trying to resolve my conflicts with him. But DESpiegel put an unspeakably obscene message on my user talk page for no apparent reason. I had never had a bad word to say about him, in fact (very ironically), I had just complemented him as one of the "decent" users of Knowledge. I regretted the rather vicious tone of my first message to you almost immediately (after all, you're not Moriori or DESpiegel) and I changed it just four minutes later. I have no plans to go to arbitration about you, and if I am sending my messages incorrectly out of ignorance I would appreciate some technical Knowledge advice. Sorry for anything false I said about you.

1708:

and when I go in and read them the majority never have responses after and extended period of time. The discussion board doesn't work well. The California Highways is a perfect of example of why it doesn't work well, hit the edit link and it tells you right off that it was too long, and people were ignoring it. The AFD is the best choice if you need to have serious discussion about deleting or spliting a large thread that may cause controversy, I expected there would be controversy and there was confirming I was right to use afd to create discussion. I will encourage others to use it in that mannor until something like

2137:

white supremist (odd, since I happen to be of mixed Kenyan/European origins, but he didn't know that,) and ignored an apology and offer of truce. This little scrap evolved into a full-blown Left vs. Right political debate, until Guettarda discontinued his rebutals, dismissing my own responses as "hate speech." This tactic happens to be a highly common tuck-tail-and-run strategy of the beaten Left-winger, so I continued to chastize Guettarda by referring to him as "comrade Guettarda," a fairly accurate label given his political orientations.

215:

way it was displayed and what the text of the fair use policy says, I believed was fair use for a Knowledge article. Of course, I was hoping for something a little more "free," and thought I'd check at those wonderful open access databases at PubMed. And I found a treasure trove. So I uploaded an image as a .gif file to the same page as the earlier, fair use pic. However, the gif file image quality is poor. Do you mind deleting that page in its entirety? The addy is Image:Hemagglutinin.gif —

2073:

irresponsible outburst towards Graft, but I believe someone has compromised the security of my login and used my name to post messages. If you don't want to believe me, then Ok, but I don't know what else to tell you. It really hurts my trust for Knowledge. Perhaps I will be forced to make a new user name for myself. Well, no matter. The world is full of cowards and imbeciles, and I'm sure Knowledge has its share of them as well. Again, my apologies.

1167:. Or, if there is an administrator with whom you are friends, you can just ask him or her. I just happen to be one of those. Nominating for deletion is fine, but for simple cases like this it is a waste of time for people to vote on it and for an administrator to close the discussion and so on. Just let me know on my talk page which images you no longer need. You can refer to them with links in this manner: 1428:—great start!—and for using my picture. The buildings there are beautiful, and it's impossible to capture it on film (or memory cards). One cannot even photograph more than a small bit of a room, such as the ceiling or a wall, so it is very hard to do it justice. I was proud of how that photograph turned out, although it only hints at the splendor of the real thing. — 551:

talk, so please modify rather than delete my messages, since they are very important, especially the ones to Raul654. As I told someone else, I'm ignorant but well-intentioned. Thank you. Wait a minute, though, this message looks the same as the others. What am I doing wrong? I'm sure I'm bumbling terribly but I don't know how.

1079:, too). Feel free to change them back if you preferred the old version. Mainly it was changing external links to wikilinks (and adding interwikis), and I also added a Babel template on your German page to indicate that you don't speak German (I have the same on my German page). Hope you don't mind me intruding! — 2196:

hacked into my username and posted the comments. That's why I changed to MedCorpman. I'm sure you, as a fellow Wikipedian, would also be frustrated to have to completely start over. I have no trust for internet security, so in my paranoia the change was made, and I haven't had any problems since.

1449:

Hi: My name is Tess and I work for a global independent research firm in New York. I am interested in hiring you for a Knowledge editing project, based on your technology and medical experience and expertise. I attempted to email you through your user page. If you received it, please read it over

535:

I was completely mistaken about three messages of mine being deleted. One of them is missing, I believe, but the most important one is still in tact. I realize that you had nothing to do with the matter, so I'm sorry for overreacting. At the same time, I REALLY don't know what you're talking about. I

510:

I did not edit other people's messages and apparently you just edited out at least three of mine. Return them or I go straight to arbitration (I'm perfectly serious). I've been lied about by Moriori and Raul654 and sent an unsolicited obscene message by DESpiegel, so you picked a VERY bad time to toy

327:

KS - Got your message. I removed the footnotes because I was just looking for consistency. I understand there to be two styles of annotation - either do inline references, with a footnotes section, or just have a "works cited" section, were all sources are listed alphabetically, like you would see in

2217:

Salva/MedCorpman, I don't understand why you can't refrain from insulting him when in your comments. There are several users on Knowledge whom I'm not particularly fond of, and I try to avoid them if possible; if I do encounter them, I try to treat them with respect—even to vandals I use politeness.

424:

Thanks for the kind note and information. I am new at this and still trying to find my way. I am in the middle of writing up an extensive article on the pre-history of psychotherapy that will blend into psychology in America up to William James, and then eventually head on from there. Like I said in

328:

the Encyclopedia Brittanica. So, I removed the footnotes because I figured we were sticking with the latter format. If we have some inline references, we should have all references, and I feel like that's a bit cumbersome for a Knowledge article. Let me read up on WP policy and see what the norm is.

1685:

To split an article or change part of it does not require any formal process; rather, one should bring it up on the article's discussion page, or for simple or uncontroversial changes, do it oneself. AfD is reserved for cases when one feels the article itself should be deleted. Please don't use the

1639:

71Demon, I don't believe your nomination of this article for deletion was appropriate. Nominating something for deletion should not be used to draw attention to in article, in my opinion—one shouldn't nominate something for deletion if one does not actually believe it should be deleted. Please keep

1035:

Thanks, I was a little uncertain about uploading that photo, but now I'm glad that I did. It was taken during my first winter in Chicago, so it makes me feel a little bit nostalgic for the time when everything here was new to me and I hadn't got sick of getting parking tickets every time the street

1020:

Just saw your picture of Lincoln Park in the winter. I recently moved from Chicago to a small city in Minnesota. There are many aspects of Chicago I was happy to leave behind: the traffic, the lack of parking, and so on. And yet I do miss it as well. Seeing your photograph definitely made me feel a

379:

I don't think I'd like to be nominated immediately, and I would like to wait one or two weeks and spend some more time before the next nomination. I haven't been very active lately, but I'll spend some time now on VfD's and RC patroling. You can go ahead and nominate me, but after one or two weeks.

214:

Hey KS. How are things? I was wondering if you could help me with an image issue. I've been preparing some images for the article I'm working on for H5N1. Hemagglutinin is a pretty important issue, so I've been looking for nice images of it. I found an excellent one on a lab website that, given the

2136:

No, I don't deny any of what I said to Graft, and as I said before - it was spoken out of frustration. Subsequently, Guettarda continued to patronize me long after I had made amends with Graft, judging that my comments were a result of hate (untrue.) Furthermore, he made assumptions that I was a

1707:

So following this principal, on the California Highways I should just go in and delete the listing and replace it with a grided box showing the numbers. I would do this because to me it is logical, easy to navigate, and non-controversial. 90% of the editors don't read the discussion page anyway,

119:

While I appreciate your concern, the fact is that at this point my continued involvement would merely prove the point that Edwardian was making. Clearly, he and I suffering from a personality conflict, the end result of which would have been my not haivng the wherewithal to continue collaborating

1489:

are not appropriate for Knowledge. We are a community working to build an encyclopedia. You are welcome to join us, but please treat other editors with courtesy and respect. The comments you have left other users are not productive; if you have a specific complaint against someone you are free to

1127:

Thanks for taking care of my user page! To tell the truth, I'd rather vandals take out their frustration on my user page and leave articles alone. If it happens again, you don't have to tell me; in general you can assume you have permission to revert vandalism to people's user page (and I have my

826:

Oddly enough, while I was thinking yesterday I contemplated leaving a note updating you on my opinion on this matter. In hindsight I had realized that this was not a personal attack. I think I was just a bit gung ho in defending an editor who gets a lot of hostility (deserved or not) from other

342:

Thank you very much for your kind words. I've learned from the example of others so many times, it is nice to know someone could take something positive from my style. Yes, I've had to drastically cut back on WP time. I got busted at work a while back. Written counselling statement, the whole

1960:

are highly inappropriate. Please treat other editors with civility and respect. We can politely disagree on matters and discuss them rationally. Personal attacks such as the ones you made have no place on Knowledge. Those attributes are irrelevant; what matters is the content of what people say.

1926:

He started off as a bit of a troll, but he seemed to settle down. He always seemed earnest and well-intentioned, if a little misled, and I gave him the benefit of the doubt. Graft and he had long conversations about the meaning of life or something - which is why it seems all the more wrong to

1522:

I did not censor you, nor did I remove any of your comments. Please do not make inflammatory accusations. I am not certain what relevance the hippies have, but I certainly do not hate you. Please don't take criticism personally, and please don't criticize in this manner either. We can discuss or

550:

To be honest, Knowledge Seeker, I thought that I was doing a favor to other users by increasing the space between my messages and their. I was pressing "enter". I'll stop, and by the way, Raul654 and I have been able to communicate, so apparently I haven't been causing serious damage to his user

401:

The previous notices placed by individuals onto the 'WikiProject Clinical medicine' page's sections of articles in progress or for peer review all got moved into an archive (hardly makes them current notices). The MCOTW discussion page has discussd having a list of pages at an inbetween stage of

2195:

page - after viewing your link, I was surprised to find that my statements towards Graft had been reverted under my own name. I don't know how this happened - because I wasn't even at my computer when the comments were reverted. The only explanation that I could formulate was that someone had

1846:

as a second article because you have listed an interest in Medicine. If you choose to accept this assignment we will deny all knowledge of the secretary's involvement... This message will self destruct... (LOL!) (let me know if you don't want this article, I'm new at try to assign articles).

1574:

is one of our founding concepts. In addition, you must treat all editors here with respect, regardless of your views on their philosophies. If you cannot tolerate working with those who share different political or economic beliefs, then I am afraid Knowledge is probably not the place for you;

1670:

entry that I could find after doing a search. The AFD was appropriate in the instance because I felt that sections of the article should be delete, and replaced with a template to make navigation easier. Now the people in the discussion expressed some valid points, that partially changed my

699:

Hello, It’s Moe Epsilon. I have contacted you about me leaving Knowledge. This is a decision I do not favor but there are too many vandals and thickheaded people on Knowledge for me to care anymore. I feel there is nothing I can give on Knowledge that someone won’t criticize. I don’t feel any

2072:

last spring in which he stated that someone was tinkering with his reputation on Knowledge by naming sites after him or something? I do know that both he and I had similar viewpoints about most of the issues dealing with creationism. This may be difficult for you to believe given my recent

309:

Hello and thanks for your message. I have explained to the user Edwardian that i do not wish my real name to be shown on here. However, he keeps posting my name on his talk page, so i am forced to keep changing it back. He is the reason that i asked my user name to be changed. I am sorry but

1222:

Thanks for your support, Fff, but Iasson doesn't really bother me. I'm not really sure he has a secret agenda; I think it he just has some strong ideas and is misunderstood. It is a shame that we were not able to convince him to change his ways before his Arbitration Committee case. —

1927:

throw something like that back into someone's face when it came out in the first place because Salva asked Graft his thoughts on these questions. If I hadn't been so personally insulted I might have blocked him for 12 hours for personal attacks, but I'm far from impartial here.

700:

appreciation for what I have done. I thought if I could make any kind of an impact, I would. I wrote this to you because I was going to contact the nicest users I had talked to over my period on Knowledge. Thank you for making my stay on Knowledge a little better. —

565:

I didn't really know the guy, I just answered his question on the help desk or somehwere and he thanked me. And then he asked for advice about his (many) conflicts. I told him to cool down. We had some back and forth and he indicated that he had solved his beef with

1450:

and contact me with any questions. If you did not receive this email, please let me know and I would be more than happy to tell you more about this project. (You can call 512-651-1797 or email tfurman@glgroup.com). Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon!

993:

Wow, I didn't know the book was that meaningful to you; now I'm especially glad I came across their blog. Yes, I'm glad to keep encountering you, and I'm especially glad you are helping to improve the neuroscience/neuroanatomy articles on Knowledge. I'm an

1262:. I can't really give you specific suggestions because I am not familiar with the subject (and after reading the introduction myself, I don't really understand what it's talking about or what a "Roman Emperor (Dominate)" is). There's always the generic {{ 1896:

Am I paranoid, or is it interesting that once he finds himself arguing with 2.5 Indians (I'm guessing from the pic you used to have up), he's suddenly attacking people's religion, and making accusations of racism? Ok, let me rephrase that, I

1191: 310:

everytime he will be writing my real name on his talk page or anywhere else, i will simply keep changing it. So you may want to tell him to stop instead. I will not stop until he understands that he cannot use my real name on here. --

2226:'s comments, not yours. Regardless, it doesn't much matter now. I am sure you can use either Salva31 or MedCorpman, whichever you please. Good luck on your training, and be sure to avoid Ship 51 or 39 or whatever it was called. — 788:, that would look cooler & gives a better look. But I don't want to change the picture & have people get mad @ me, is there a Talk or some way I can tell my idea and see if they like it. Same thing goes with the 657: 361:

Hi KS, thanks for the note a while back. I don't get a chance to get on line much, thus the delay in answering you. Regarding SPUI, I saw a polite request you left on his talk page. Can I ask, what was the result?

1575:

however, I hope you are able to overcome any prejudices you may have and join with us to make a better encyclopedia. Please refrain from making any further statements of hatred towards other classes of people. —

265:

KS, so sorry to bug you again. Would it be too much trouble for you to delete the following images which are not required? The last two I will replace with more suitable ones soon. Nothing links to these pages.

868:

Looks like a troll to me. Blocked indefinitely, and added {{Impostor|Knowledge Seeker}} to it. Feel free to unblock if you think the block is inappropriate, its your username after all. Happy editing! --

1823:

Hi, I'm just posting a friendly notice stating that I have got Brain Teasers on my user page that you're welcome to have a go at. Will post new questions one day after they have been answered. Thanks...

1912:

To tell the truth, I'm not sure what to think. I was pretty shocked to hear him say all that. It'll be hard to take him seriously after this. I'm not sure what he hoped to accomplish by this tirade. —

1862:; realize that I'm on a bit of a wikibreak right now so it'll be slow progress. I'm still around, but have had to significantly curtail my time on Knowledge, but I'm still lurking in the corner. — 1258:

Well, there are several options. If you are familiar with the subject, you may fix it up yourself—just click the "edit this page" tab at the top of the article! Or, you may make suggestions on the

463:

hey there, got your message about the MCOTF on carcinogensis. Afraid Ive been away on holiday and sorting out my new place at university. Is the subject now good or does it need more improvement?

1212: 1147:

Thanks for the signature thingy. I got it now. And is there a way for me to delete Images (That I Uploaded). If they wont put them on the artical, I dont want to wast space. Thanks! --

521:

To the best of my knowledge, I didn't edit anyone else's messages, and one of the messages I wrote was to thank someone, so why would I vandalize his user talk? What ARE you talking about?

492:

Hey Seeker: there's a mortality stat that you placed in the article (I think) that I can't seem to find a source for. Was wondering if you could find your source and cite it? Thanks bud.—

2166:.) I have no further quarrel with cowardly bigots like Guettarda who seize every opportunity to turn everything into a race-hate argument then run before a means to an end is in sight. 439:

Hello Knowledge Seeker, Im Moe Epsilon. I am sorry for the inappropriate use of the vprotect templete, I didn't know you couldn't protect it. I was trying to protect it from vandals. —

646: 1508:

OF COURSE you decide to censor me and remove those comments...because you love the hippies and hate me...anyway I won't revert you becuse that would take more out of my time...--

1313:

Who do you think I am? besides... the cleanup is a bit confusing and I haven't used it in a long while. You were listed as an expert in cleanup, so I figured you could assist. -

792:

pictures I uploaded. somone keeps erasing them out of the artical, is there a talk I can say my ideas to. Same thing for other other articals. & how do I get on to a Talk.

1671:

opinion. They are discussing making changes to make the page load faster. The Wikify entry wouldn't have been appropriate either, and Wiki had determined it was oversize. --

1804:

Unfortunately, while I like that picture, I don't think Knowledge will be able to use it. Could you point me to where you read about the special tag so I can take a look? —

394: 343:

nine yards. I won't be here much until I get cable modem at home. Then I'll be skipping sleep to patrol Recent Changes and New Pages. :-) Again, thank you. Take care.

267: 2039:. Frustration is no excuse for making the sort of comments you did. Those type of comments never belong on Knowledge. Please remain civil and courteous with other users. — 1205: 414: 2218:

I have no particular desire to block you, but if upon your return you continue this behavior, someone will surely block you. I still don't understand your confusion on

1975:

I was not responsible for removing anyone's comments. And when was the last time a creationist was taken seriously by anyone on the evolution page? Please refer to

967: 555: 525: 515: 1420:

appropriate, although as I said, I feel that any notices like that should direct the concerned party to the administrator's talk page. Too often people run off to

1299: 661: 1811: 1184: 1582: 1552: 1534: 1512: 1366: 1317: 1277: 1005: 983: 574:

much leeway, as he's made legal threats before. But this is his first block, so let's see if it wakes him up (and doesn't make him worse). I just don't know...

1789: 1148: 813: 802: 2200: 1601: 1549: 1509: 1314: 1248: 851: 844: 407: 395: 2046: 1919: 1103: 1468: 961: 918: 896: 2110: 2077: 1983: 1716: 1693: 1675: 1435: 1135: 1060: 1043: 1785: 1772: 1626: 168: 1883: 1869: 504: 311: 1230: 1028: 2162:

I appreciate your empathy and your mediation. If you want to block me, fine. I will be leaving Knowledge for a long while (nine weeks, at the very

767: 754: 2005: 1651: 876: 642: 540: 27:

This is an archive of old discussions. You may edit this page to fix malformed signatures or to update links, but please direct new comments to my

956:

MindHacks link: I loved that book and was extremely pleased to see something I helped write referenced on their site. I keep running into you and

570:. Then he exploded and got himself blocked. For now I guess all we can do is stay calm but be clear and firm. Though I'm not inclined to give him 2035:

have always taken you seriously, have I not? And I've seen others patiently explain to you why certain edits or sentences do or do not belong in

1406: 425:

my post, I will be putting it on my page for perusal and comments before hand. So, maybe in the near future we will run into each other again.

1086: 2103:

are you referring to? The only recent objectionable ones I remember are the ones to Graft, which it appears you acknowledge making, right? —

677:

Seeker, just a heads up in case you haven't heard. DR has just been discharged from hospital; was in the ICU, so sounds like it was serious.—

545: 816: 1424:

to complain without even attempting to first discuss matters with the administrator. In any case, it is up to you. And thanks for creating

664: 2068:

page. I would swear on the Bible if neccessary. I don't have the slightest clue what's going on, except I recall reading some edits by

351: 63: 1388:. It appears that the notice is not appropriate as suggested by you. Accordingly, I am removing the same. Thanks for the suggestion. -- 1270:

and find a member with expertise in this area. Let me know if these suggestions helped, or if you would like further advice. Thanks! —

1209: 2031:

sometimes hard to take seriously people who still believe that different species were created suddenly and individually. Yet at least

1454: 429: 1736: 862: 1797: 1120: 93:

Whoops! :) Yeah, I reverted father back than the other editor. And yes, you did vote for me, thank you!!! Very much appreciated. :)

1570:

Your dislike of Communists is not relevant (unless you are disclosing a potential bias). You are welcome to edit Knowledge but the

1501: 945: 1754: 1156: 120:

just as indicated. I think it's best for me to withdraw, as I did, and let it become a sleeping dog, at least for the time being.

2027:'s comments. I am not sure how this could be done without intent; however, I will assume it was inadvertant. You are correct; it 1828: 660:-I kbnow you must be busy as a doctor and all, but time-sensitive VOTES are occurring -please stop by both places and VOTE; Thx-- 1851: 838: 740: 332: 467: 1251: 477:

Have placed your user page in category physician. Hope you agree. At least those men in white :-) can now find each other. --

389: 1177:. The preceding colon is important; otherwise you'll put the image itself in your comment. Any other questions? Just ask! — 314: 1612: 1392: 1014: 620: 204: 2233: 1968: 148: 1344: 403: 1931: 1905: 1961:

Statements such as those will significantly reduce your credibility. Finally, please do not remove others' comments. —

1173: 124: 83: 1732: 1633: 1619:

Thank you for informing me, BD2412, and for your hard work in tallying the votes. I will take a look at the AfD's. —

889:

today. At least this was more creative than the tired old user-page vandalism. And this is my first real impostor! —

596:

and I changed the password and now I dont remember what the password is anymore! What do I do? PLEASE respond on the

366: 998:

doctor. Residency's keeping me busy, but there are so many Knowledge articles that could be expanded or written! —

337: 257: 228: 106: 1527:. I am happy to help you out and answer your questions but you must modify your attitude toward other editors. — 1384:

Hello, I thought the message was appropriate, as it was appearing on another administrator’s user page, namely,

1953: 271: 2020: 1259: 1247:

needs a cleanup - the lead section definitely - but I don't know what tag to add! How do we sort this out? -

1164: 797:

How do you get that signature on after your post. Do you write that, or is it something that you can put on?

419: 402:

development, namely where others are sought, if having a specific interest, to help with a topic. I decided

1762: 1744: 1444: 1340: 1069: 2064:

I am profoundly sorry. This is going to sound completely ridiculous - I did NOT post those back onto the

881:

Hehe—thanks, Bishonen and Chris, for your sharp eyes. I did find it pretty amusing, though. It looks like

1109: 1053:

Oh man, I used to dread those orange signs. I think I would have rather the streets just remain dirty! —

843: 807: 552: 537: 530: 522: 512: 1788:. But it's copyrighted. They say something about a special tag. Could you help me understand tags. — 2230: 2107: 2043: 1965: 1916: 1866: 1839: 1808: 1769: 1726: 1690: 1648: 1641: 1623: 1579: 1531: 1498: 1491: 1465: 1432: 1363: 1296: 1274: 1227: 1181: 1132: 1083: 1057: 1025: 1002: 942: 893: 193: 102: 28: 17: 1200:

and his friends. Please stop false accusations. I have never used any alternative account. -- Iasson.

1128:

page on my watchlist, as do most people I believe). Again, thanks, and I appreciate your vigilance! —

854:

really a sock puppet of your, or merely a troll who needs blocking? Please see the userpage. Regards,

1879:

Thanks for taking the H5N1 article. I understand wiki-breaks. I was on wiki-sickleave for a while.

1833: 1793: 1152: 182:

Please never hesitate to let me know if you have concerns with any administrative action I may make.

1114:

There was a little vandalism to your page today. Thought you might want to know. See you around.

1244: 319: 935: 174: 821: 633: 290:

Just orange tagging your page in case you missed this, KS. Tough call nights, or something? Best—

725: 590:

Hi again Knowledge Seeker. I am Moe Epsilon. I have a question for you. I was messing around in

1992:"And when was the last time a creationist was taken seriously by anyone on the evolution page?" 1818: 275: 197: 1595: 2227: 2104: 2040: 1962: 1913: 1863: 1805: 1766: 1687: 1645: 1620: 1576: 1528: 1495: 1490:

discuss it with them (politely). If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my

1462: 1429: 1360: 1293: 1271: 1224: 1178: 1129: 1080: 1054: 1022: 999: 939: 890: 719: 712: 615: 597: 458: 451: 163: 143: 1343:. You'll also want to find someone with expertise in this area; you can find the members at 236:

Sorry, I should add I've already uploaded a jpg version that's great. You can see it in the

683: 499: 385: 297: 285: 251: 222: 79: 72: 1548:

I hate Communists that's all I CANNOT tolerate them! (and those Hippie peace protesters)--

1359:. If those steps are confusing I'll be happy to take you through them—just let me know! — 1192:

Is it possible for you to stop naming any sockpuppet you discover around as my sockpuppet?

8: 1976: 1779: 902: 764: 751: 737: 1379: 915: 873: 859: 653: 579: 44: 179:

Oh, Seeker of Knowledge ... thank you for voting on my RfA, very much appreciated! :)

1475: 1142: 1118: 1040: 995: 928: 831: 371: 348: 201: 1751: 1610: 1263: 835: 827:

users. Anyway, I appreciate your response, even if it is a little belated. =) --

746:

Just curious whats you speciality, and i assume you at mayo, being in rochester. --

701: 604: 440: 155: 135: 560: 2197: 957: 785: 678: 493: 411: 381: 304: 291: 279: 245: 216: 67: 2223: 2219: 2192: 2100: 2065: 2024: 2002: 1957: 1928: 1902: 1825: 1571: 1421: 1355:, which is why I didn't realize you were soliciting my help as a member of the 1094: 886: 760: 747: 733: 729: 585: 189: 98: 1891: 1524: 1451: 1385: 1239: 1163:

There are several ways to do it; the standard way would be to nominate it on

912: 907: 870: 855: 575: 464: 237: 129: 121: 114: 41: 2074: 1980: 1713: 1672: 1403: 1389: 1356: 1267: 1197: 1115: 1037: 828: 567: 426: 356: 344: 88: 47: 1266:}} tag which you can stick on the article. Or, you may with to peruse the 487: 66:. I will do my best to serve the Knowledge community as an administrator. 2099:

I don't doubt your sincerity, but I am a bit confused. Which comments on

2069: 1748: 1605: 975: 882: 478: 363: 329: 57: 1880: 1848: 1425: 1399: 953: 1461:

Thank you for your kind offer, Wikitess. I have replied via e-mail. —

1021:

bit homesick—in a good way. So I thought I'd pop by and say thanks. —

2036: 1740: 1486: 1482: 1352: 1204:

Dont bother about this guy. He is well known to all wikipedians as a

812:

Thanks for answering my question, and congrats on becoming a doctor.

789: 185: 94: 1640:

this in mind in the future. Feel free to ask me any questions on my

1936: 1731:

Hello Knowledge Seeker. I'm contacting you since you are listed at

1348: 40:

Good point, I hadn't been particularly clear on that one. Thanks.

1600:

Hi. The mass of colors we voted on before has been undeleted and

134:

Thanks for your correction to the "related collaboration" title.

1339:

a bit tricky but it looks like they're trying a new approach at

625: 603:

OK thank you, I was e-mailed a new password, thanks again !!! —

320: 1662:

of the article should be deleted. Wiki doesn't see to have a

2001:

I take it these comments are supposed to be taken seriously?

1901:

paranoid...but does his comments seem curious nonetheless?

1858:

It's on my watchlist, so I see changes. I'll gladly work on

775: 1979:, and perhaps you will come to understand my frustration. 1859: 1843: 691: 472: 1076: 1288:

Wait, if you're who I think you are, why are you asking

35: 1743:. If you are near Minneapolis at that time, please see 1842:

at the cleanup taskforce but I just added the article

408:

Knowledge:WikiProject Clinical medicine/Collaboration

396:

Knowledge:WikiProject Clinical medicine/Collaboration

244:

Yes please, KS. The gif page. all revisions. Thanks!—

1196:

In case its IP profile matches mine, it is probably

672: 434: 410:. Please comment, praise or criticise at will :-) 1416:Well, I think that if you like it, the template is 1402:, and took an image from your user page. Thanks. -- 658:

Knowledge:Featured_article_candidates/Terri_Schiavo

209: 641:I am talking it out with the major participants: 1784:Knowledge Seeker. Wikipedians like my image on 2191:I'm not sure exactly what happened last on the 1761:Thank you for your kind invitation. Replied at 1075:Hi, Bluemoose. I edited your user page (and on 901:I also still remember fondly my first impostor 784:I have found a Hubble Classification chart for 1335:Certainly, I'd be happy to assist—the process 938:in a blog; thought you might be interested. — 630:Harry Potter is a reporter on the CH10 news. 1206:virtual blocker and a user with secret agenda 911:for admins. Now you're truly one of us ;) -- 960:around. What's your field within medicine? 2222:—the link I provides showing you removing 780:Thanks K.S. I would like some advice... 1093:Thats fine, thanks for letting me know! 1739:and am plannnig a Knowledge meetup for 1686:AfD process like this in the future. — 14: 1838:I don't know how often you check your 1735:. I'm going to be at a conference in 1523:argue politely, without resorting to 1341:WP:CT#Alternate streamlined procedure 505:I Didn't Edit Other People's Messages 1345:Knowledge:Cleanup Taskforce/Members 1174:Image:Gonda building, closer up.jpg 23: 24: 2245: 1733:Category:Wikipedians in Minnesota 1036:cleaning comes around. :-) 511:with important messages of mine. 643:the Fac editor, Mark aka Raul654 154:You said you STARTED the MCOTW? 728:, means comment or comments in 582:07:30, September 6, 2005 (UTC) 272:Image:Hemagglutinin lateral.jpg 2023:of yours which removed one of 1627:07:03, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 1613:01:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 1583:06:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 1553:03:52, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 1535:06:55, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 1513:06:50, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 1502:06:48, 29 September 2005 (UTC) 1469:06:51, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 1455:19:25, 28 September 2005 (UTC) 1436:06:44, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 1407:15:20, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 1393:13:50, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 1367:06:29, 30 September 2005 (UTC) 1318:07:20, 27 September 2005 (UTC) 1300:06:49, 27 September 2005 (UTC) 1278:06:38, 27 September 2005 (UTC) 1252:08:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 1231:16:34, 25 September 2005 (UTC) 1213:09:20, 25 September 2005 (UTC) 1185:08:18, 26 September 2005 (UTC) 1157:15:17, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 1136:08:10, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 1121:20:46, 23 September 2005 (UTC) 1104:08:50, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1087:03:05, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1061:07:58, 24 September 2005 (UTC) 1044:04:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1029:04:20, 22 September 2005 (UTC) 1006:05:24, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 984:03:27, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 946:01:55, 17 September 2005 (UTC) 919:11:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 897:05:16, 21 September 2005 (UTC) 877:14:34, 20 September 2005 (UTC) 863:12:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC) 839:02:33, 17 September 2005 (UTC) 817:01:45, 17 September 2005 (UTC) 768:09:07, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 755:08:41, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 741:05:29, 14 September 2005 (UTC) 665:09:05, 10 September 2005 (UTC) 13: 1: 1165:Knowledge:Images for deletion 638:thx for your caution re 3RR: 621:00:58, 8 September 2005 (UTC) 556:08:16, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 541:07:53, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 526:06:56, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 516:06:52, 5 September 2005 (UTC) 481:02:11, August 27, 2005 (UTC) 2234:06:36, 31 October 2005 (UTC) 2201:17:44, 25 October 2005 (UTC) 2111:07:03, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 2078:16:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 2047:06:07, 18 October 2005 (UTC) 2006:08:49, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 1984:05:17, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 1969:04:48, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 1932:05:16, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 1920:05:10, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 1906:04:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC) 1884:05:15, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 1870:04:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 1852:00:58, 12 October 2005 (UTC) 1829:05:12, 11 October 2005 (UTC) 1763:Knowledge:Meetup/Minneapolis 1745:Knowledge:Meetup/Minneapolis 1602:relisted as individual AfD's 1015:Re: Image:ChicagoWinter1.jpg 268:Image:Asthma screen shot.JPG 233:06:55:13, 2005-08-12 (UTC) 54:08:41, August 6, 2005 (UTC) 7: 1812:04:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 1798:22:28, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 1773:04:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 1755:20:35, 3 October 2005 (UTC) 1717:14:33, 2 October 2005 (UTC) 1694:07:58, 2 October 2005 (UTC) 1676:06:22, 2 October 2005 (UTC) 1652:06:13, 2 October 2005 (UTC) 1452:Tess - Gerson Lehrman Group 1347:(my areas of expertise are 688:01:08:44, 2005-09-13 (UTC) 546:Sorry, I Was Typing "Enter" 501:14:58:42, 2005-09-01 (UTC) 468:12:57, 24 August 2005 (UTC) 430:18:08, 20 August 2005 (UTC) 415:01:27, 19 August 2005 (UTC) 390:21:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC) 367:04:58, 18 August 2005 (UTC) 352:20:18, 15 August 2005 (UTC) 333:06:57, 15 August 2005 (UTC) 315:11:32, 13 August 2005 (UTC) 262:07:27:11, 2005-08-12 (UTC) 205:18:29, 11 August 2005 (UTC) 169:06:02, 11 August 2005 (UTC) 149:05:45, 11 August 2005 (UTC) 10: 2250: 2019:Salva, I was referring to 726:User_talk:Boothy443#My_RFA 287:07:55:57, 2005-08-18 (UTC) 125:13:43, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 107:02:25, 9 August 2005 (UTC) 84:21:03, 8 August 2005 (UTC) 18:User talk:Knowledge Seeker 1634:California Highway System 885:was upset that I blocked 850:Hi, Knowledge Seeker. Is 652:PS: We need help at both 62:Thank you for supporting 1710:article for modification 1245:Roman Emperor (Dominate) 696:Dear Knowledge Seeker, 338:Involuntary Wikivacation 406:and create the subpage 276:Image:Neuraminidase.jpg 1398:BTW, I created a stub 553:Felix Frederick Bruyns 538:Felix Frederick Bruyns 523:Felix Frederick Bruyns 513:Felix Frederick Bruyns 1572:neutral point of view 649:the recent reverter. 598:Moe Epsilon talk page 420:Psychotherapy comment 1658:I disagree. I felt 1445:Paid Editing Project 1070:editing my user page 561:I know what you mean 1977:User talk:Guettarda 1668:change this article 1208:. Just ignore him. 1110:User page vandalism 903:User:Chris 73 sucks 852:User:KnowledgeLoser 845:User:KnowledgeLoser 808:Re: Newest Articles 724:Two days ago, see: 531:A Qualified Apology 1727:Minneapolis meetup 1664:split this article 654:Talk:Terri_Schiavo 1834:Cleanup Taskforce 1481:Your comments to 1268:Cleanup Taskforce 996:internal medicine 979: 971: 662:GordonWattsDotCom 82: 2241: 2228:Knowledge Seeker 2105:Knowledge Seeker 2041:Knowledge Seeker 1963:Knowledge Seeker 1948: 1947: 1943: 1914:Knowledge Seeker 1864:Knowledge Seeker 1806:Knowledge Seeker 1767:Knowledge Seeker 1688:Knowledge Seeker 1646:Knowledge Seeker 1621:Knowledge Seeker 1608: 1577:Knowledge Seeker 1529:Knowledge Seeker 1525:personal attacks 1496:Knowledge Seeker 1463:Knowledge Seeker 1430:Knowledge Seeker 1361:Knowledge Seeker 1294:Knowledge Seeker 1272:Knowledge Seeker 1225:Knowledge Seeker 1179:Knowledge Seeker 1176: 1170: 1130:Knowledge Seeker 1101: 1081:Knowledge Seeker 1055:Knowledge Seeker 1023:Knowledge Seeker 1000:Knowledge Seeker 980: 977: 972: 969: 964: 940:Knowledge Seeker 891:Knowledge Seeker 836:HOWS MY DRIVING) 715: 710: 707: 704: 686: 681: 618: 613: 610: 607: 496: 488:Asthma mortality 454: 449: 446: 443: 294: 282: 260: 254: 248: 231: 225: 219: 166: 161: 158: 146: 141: 138: 76: 71: 52: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2123: 2055: 1972: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1939: 1938: 1924: 1894: 1874: 1836: 1821: 1816: 1790:Hurricane Devon 1782: 1777: 1729: 1712:is created. -- 1700: 1655: 1636: 1631: 1606: 1598: 1593: 1541: 1505: 1478: 1473: 1447: 1442: 1382: 1377: 1306: 1282: 1242: 1237: 1194: 1189: 1172: 1168: 1149:Hurricane Devon 1145: 1140: 1112: 1095: 1090: 1072: 1067: 1032: 1017: 1012: 976: 968: 962: 952:Thanks for the 949: 931: 848: 824: 822:Personal attack 814:Rentastrawberry 810: 803:Hurricane Devon 786:Hubble Sequence 778: 759:Interesting. -- 722: 713: 708: 705: 702: 694: 684: 679: 675: 636: 634:re your comment 628: 616: 611: 608: 605: 588: 563: 548: 533: 518: 507: 494: 490: 475: 461: 452: 447: 444: 441: 437: 422: 399: 374: 359: 340: 325: 307: 292: 280: 258: 252: 246: 229: 223: 217: 212: 177: 164: 159: 156: 144: 139: 136: 132: 117: 91: 74: 60: 49: 38: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2247: 2224:User:Guettarda 2220:Talk:Evolution 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2193:Talk:Evolution 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2101:Talk:Evolution 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2066:Talk:Evolution 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1987: 1986: 1958:Talk:Evolution 1950: 1937: 1935: 1923: 1922: 1909: 1893: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1873: 1872: 1855: 1835: 1832: 1820: 1819:Brain Teasers: 1817: 1815: 1814: 1801: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1775: 1758: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1637: 1635: 1632: 1630: 1629: 1616: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1550:Anti-Communist 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1510:Anti-Communist 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1471: 1458: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1315:203.134.166.99 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1283: 1281: 1280: 1255: 1249:203.134.166.99 1241: 1238: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1187: 1160: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1138: 1124: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1073: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 988: 987: 986: 932: 930: 927: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 887:User:Bank Able 847: 842: 823: 820: 809: 806: 799: 798: 794: 793: 777: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 721: 718: 693: 690: 674: 671: 669: 635: 632: 627: 624: 593:my preferances 587: 584: 562: 559: 547: 544: 532: 529: 509: 506: 503: 489: 486: 484: 474: 471: 460: 457: 436: 433: 421: 418: 398: 393: 373: 370: 358: 355: 339: 336: 324: 318: 306: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 288: 278:. Much thanks— 211: 208: 176: 173: 172: 171: 131: 128: 116: 113: 111: 90: 87: 59: 56: 37: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2246: 2236: 2235: 2232: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2202: 2199: 2194: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2165: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2112: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2079: 2076: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2007: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1985: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1973: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1964: 1959: 1955: 1944: 1934: 1933: 1930: 1921: 1918: 1915: 1911: 1910: 1908: 1907: 1904: 1900: 1885: 1882: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1868: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1854: 1853: 1850: 1845: 1841: 1831: 1830: 1827: 1813: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1802: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1774: 1771: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1757: 1756: 1753: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1718: 1715: 1711: 1706: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1695: 1692: 1689: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1643: 1628: 1625: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1615: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1603: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1526: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1507: 1506: 1504: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1493: 1488: 1484: 1470: 1467: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1437: 1434: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1408: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1387: 1386:User:Hemanshu 1368: 1365: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1256: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1246: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1199: 1186: 1183: 1180: 1175: 1166: 1162: 1161: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1126: 1125: 1123: 1122: 1119: 1117: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1092: 1091: 1089: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1062: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1042: 1039: 1034: 1033: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1007: 1004: 1001: 997: 992: 991: 990: 989: 985: 981: 973: 965: 963:Semiconscious 959: 955: 951: 950: 948: 947: 944: 941: 937: 920: 917: 914: 910: 909: 908:Coming of age 904: 900: 899: 898: 895: 892: 888: 884: 880: 879: 878: 875: 872: 867: 866: 865: 864: 861: 857: 853: 846: 841: 840: 837: 833: 830: 819: 818: 815: 805: 804: 796: 795: 791: 787: 783: 782: 781: 769: 766: 762: 758: 757: 756: 753: 749: 745: 744: 743: 742: 739: 735: 731: 727: 720:Re: Barnstars 717: 716: 711: 697: 689: 687: 682: 670: 667: 666: 663: 659: 655: 650: 648: 644: 639: 631: 623: 622: 619: 614: 601: 599: 595: 594: 583: 581: 577: 573: 569: 558: 557: 554: 543: 542: 539: 528: 527: 524: 519: 517: 514: 502: 500: 497: 485: 482: 480: 470: 469: 466: 459:carcinogensis 456: 455: 450: 432: 431: 428: 417: 416: 413: 409: 405: 397: 392: 391: 387: 383: 377: 369: 368: 365: 354: 353: 350: 346: 335: 334: 331: 322: 317: 316: 313: 298: 295: 289: 286: 283: 277: 273: 269: 264: 263: 261: 255: 249: 243: 242: 241: 239: 238:Hemagglutinin 234: 232: 226: 220: 207: 206: 202: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 180: 175:Func's RfA :) 170: 167: 162: 153: 152: 151: 150: 147: 142: 127: 126: 123: 112: 109: 108: 104: 100: 96: 86: 85: 81: 77: 69: 65: 55: 53: 46: 43: 33: 32: 30: 19: 2216: 2163: 2032: 2028: 1956:you made at 1951: 1925: 1898: 1895: 1837: 1822: 1783: 1730: 1709: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1644:. Thanks! — 1638: 1604:. Cheers! -- 1599: 1480: 1448: 1417: 1383: 1336: 1289: 1243: 1198:User:Faethon 1195: 1171:which gives 1146: 1113: 1097: 1096: 1074: 1019: 936:this mention 934:Came across 933: 906: 905:. It's like 849: 825: 811: 800: 779: 723: 698: 695: 676: 668: 651: 640: 637: 629: 602: 592: 591: 589: 571: 564: 549: 534: 520: 508: 491: 483: 479:Nomen Nescio 476: 462: 438: 423: 400: 378: 375: 360: 341: 326: 308: 235: 213: 184: 181: 178: 133: 118: 110: 92: 61: 39: 26: 25: 2070:User:Ungtss 1952:Salva, the 1780:Image help! 1737:Minneapolis 1596:Color AfD's 883:User:Iasson 626:NO ITS TRUE 412:David Ruben 2198:MedCorpman 1786:HD 28185 b 1426:Amber Fort 1400:Amber Fort 1380:Suggestion 958:encephalon 954:cerebellum 680:encephalon 495:Encephalon 404:to be bold 382:Stevey7788 380:Thanks. — 293:Encephalon 281:Encephalon 247:Encephalon 218:Encephalon 68:Flcelloguy 2037:Evolution 2025:Guettarda 2021:this edit 2003:Aaarrrggh 1929:Guettarda 1903:Guettarda 1826:Spawn Man 1741:October 8 1642:talk page 1492:talk page 1487:User:Mirv 1483:User:El C 1476:of course 1353:Star Trek 1260:talk page 1143:Question? 929:MindHacks 801:Thanks - 790:Dire Wolf 776:Thank You 761:Boothy443 748:Boothy443 734:Boothy443 685:ὲγκέφαλον 372:Adminship 323:Footnotes 240:article. 29:talk page 1954:comments 1349:medicine 913:Chris 73 871:Chris 73 856:Bishonen 692:Farewell 576:Dmcdevit 473:Category 465:PhatRita 1714:71Demon 1673:71Demon 1422:WP:AN/I 1404:Bhadani 1390:Bhadani 1264:cleanup 1116:Psy guy 1038:JeremyA 829:BMIComp 647:Taxman, 568:Moriori 427:Rsugden 376:Hello, 345:SWAdair 312:etronic 305:Headers 36:Zxcvbnm 1940:": --> 1749:Angela 1607:BD2412 1418:mostly 1098:Martin 1041:(talk) 765:comhrá 752:comhrá 738:comhrá 586:SWD316 364:Jennet 330:Mr.Bip 321:Asthma 75:note? 64:my RfA 45:adiant 2164:least 2075:Salva 1981:Salva 1892:Salva 1881:RJFJR 1849:RJFJR 1357:WP:CT 1240:Help! 832:(talk 730:Irish 673:David 435:Sorry 130:SCOTW 122:siafu 115:MCOTW 80:Desk 51:|< 50:: --> 16:< 1942:edit 1860:H5N1 1844:H5N1 1840:desk 1794:Talk 1765:. — 1660:part 1494:. — 1485:and 1351:and 1292:? — 1153:Talk 978:home 970:talk 916:Talk 874:Talk 860:talk 732:. -- 656:and 645:and 386:talk 357:SPUI 349:Talk 210:Help 186:Func 165:k C. 145:k C. 95:Func 89:Hehe 1666:or 1210:Fff 1077:de: 572:too 160:ryc 140:ryc 58:RfA 2029:is 1899:am 1796:) 1747:. 1337:is 1290:me 1155:) 982:) 974:· 858:| 834:, 763:| 750:| 736:| 600:. 498:| 388:) 347:| 296:| 284:| 274:, 270:, 256:| 250:| 227:| 221:| 203:) 196:, 192:, 188:( 157:De 137:De 105:) 101:, 97:( 78:| 73:A 2231:দ 2108:দ 2044:দ 2033:I 1966:দ 1946:] 1917:দ 1867:দ 1809:দ 1792:( 1770:দ 1752:. 1691:দ 1649:দ 1624:দ 1580:দ 1532:দ 1499:দ 1466:দ 1433:দ 1364:দ 1297:দ 1275:দ 1228:দ 1182:দ 1169:] 1151:( 1133:দ 1084:দ 1058:দ 1026:দ 1003:দ 966:( 943:দ 894:দ 714:ε 709:e 706:o 703:M 617:ε 612:e 609:o 606:M 580:t 578:· 453:ε 448:e 445:o 442:M 384:( 259:Σ 253:ζ 230:Σ 224:ζ 200:, 198:e 194:c 190:t 103:c 99:t 70:| 48:_ 42:R 31:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

User talk: Seeker/Archive5 - Knowledge

Index