642:. Someone needs to go through his uploads (which may have been transferred to Commons by now) and get rid of them all! In the past when confronted by the fact he's just taken copyright images, Mwhite148 has just simply repeated the implausible claim they were made by a friend - he's still a schoolchild which probably explains his behaviour. I don't have time to deal with this and so apologies for "dumping" it on you - you just seemed the most appropriate person to let know given that you closed that PUF discussion. Hopefully you can find an image-copyright wikignome to do the grunt work - if I knew a board where they hung out, I'd have taken it there instead, any suggestions where to look in future?
1248:
1597:
while the dispute is ongoing, the tag ought to say. The logical conclusion of your argument is that you like the title, so it shouldn't go up. That doesn't follow. And 2) you argue this isn't the first go around. So what? Clearly the issue has been brought up before without going anywhere. Unless you can point me to a thread on the talk history that shows where this was resolved (good luck with that, but I have my doubts). Thus, if the debate is unresolved, and the request is not ridiculous to the point of absurdity (e.g., "we should move it to
3460:
it would never go up. I never said it was perfect. It changed quite a bit... but I'm kinda lost. is the newest version of my thing relevent? I felt like the fact that the church eventually had to save their pastor's national bacon made it a big enough deal, regardless of how we define who's name the pastor made the original statement in. this whole first week i feel like I've stomped through some weird delicate ecosystem but I'm just editing the way I'd edit a term paper or a group assignment back in college. what are your thoughts dude?
943:
need to go step by step if everyone is really serous to want to solve this dispute. So the tag is the very first and essential step, which means at least all participants should admit there is dispute on the title. If we cannot go through this step, forget next step. Otherwise, as you mentioned, this discussion will go nowhere, and will go along a dead loop again and again. It just wastes time. It was far beyond my expectation that the NPOV tag itself can cause such problem. ...--Lvhis (talk) 19:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
2606:
enough to attract attention even before anyone knew who he was doesn't speak well of his chances of becoming a positive contributor, but (2) the "standard offer" isn't going to result in anything any worse than what is going on right now (whacking the new socks every few months). Do you have any objections to giving the user what he wants? (Namely, a blessing to come back with a new account on or after
December 9, 2011 with the understanding that he will work peaceably and use only that one account.) --
1851:
time. The audacity of this individual to continue his warring on an ANI thread. I do not want to continue this with him; he is a troll, a sockmaster with over 100 sockpuppets, and a vandal. I have created a registered account, as someone suggested on the ANI thread I do, and I will not use it until I am notified of the consensus view on the situation. I do not want to engage a troll and vandal; please tell him to stay away. I do not understand why he keeps getting away with this. Thanks.
795:
466:
31:
1867:
free to use your new account, and just specify that it's you, and we can work from there. If you're particularly worried about it getting blocked or being misaccused, feel free to place a note on your userpage about your identity and explain that one of the two admins handling the issue advised you to do this (while adminship is nothing special, and my word shouldn't mean more than anyone else's, hopefully this will assuage any potential concerns that might arrise from anyone).
1451:, leads me to believe that you will accept no compromise – even if only for the interim time, until the formal dispute resolution process is finished, after which the tag will be removed, and the title changed (or not change) to reflect the outcome of that formal process. I had believed I had clearly stated those were the terms of having the tag placed on the article. However, I fear that once the process runs it's course, and the outcome is not in
931:" below on 06:14, 16 May 2011. BTW, for what I did on this issue I think I also deserved the AGF, but did not deserve a suppositional 24 hour block that was mainly resulted from that you were busy and didn't read the discussion closely enough. I was and am surprised that the NPOV-title tag itself has made a big deal there, and fully agree on what you described as "such a stupid thing". I ever left a message on Feb 25 in
1120:
2692:
verifying any vandalism that I did. For your kind information I suspect Kerala related pages in wiki are in the hands of
Trivandrum biased editors. Some users informed you, that I am doing editing with some other ips. For the past 3 years, I have only one internet connection and its ip address is 59.93.43.177. I ready to provide more references on your request regarding any of the points mentioned above.
3513:
3440:
3232:
3192:
2500:
2278:
1989:
907:
771:
382:
3578:
3080:
2560:
432:
3348:
which is why I included it and people agreed that a criticisms section was needed. in fact I discovered by looking at 2006 history logs that it had one but lyoncc chipped and chipped away at it till it was donefor. a major institution needs a criticism/controversy section especally when it finds itself criticized and controversied wouldn't you say?
695:, who you have indefinitely blocked. I don't know if either one is likely to be Meowy; perhaps the SPI doesn't answer that. MosMusy has broken 3RR, according to my analysis, and it's about Armenia. This would show a common interest between him and Meowy. What would you think of an indef block of MosMusy for abusing multiple accounts? Thanks,
2683:(39 pairs of trains). You can get these informations from the above mentioned Indian Railway website. It is proved that some anonymous ips and users tried to mistook to administrators and they succeeded it. They all are Trivandrum biased editors. If you look at their contributions in detail you can find it. Then about
1551:, you stated "As a constructive step, can you point to a threshold we can cross together?". I already did. Compromise with the editors on the other side of the issue and allow the tag to be placed on the article while the mediation takes place, then once mediation is over (however the outcome), it will be removed. –
1425:-- I plan to offer no further comments on this specific subject. I hope that the effort to write clearly in this talk page thread will lead to better and more effective prose in future. Thank you for the investment of time in trying to come to grips with a perspective which is not fully congruent with yours. --
1671:
person, looks like, it is. I even provided diffs of his nationalistic edits in previous years where he added
Armenian flags to Azerbaijani articles and added "Armenia Forever!". Where does this stand and how is this supported by the spirit of Knowledge?? Last I heard sockmasters should be blocked. Thank you.
1481:, before accusing me of not reading the substantive threads and discussion and research done on what the title of the article should be, please check your facts. Did I not go through the archives and search for relevant discussion content for the purpose of filing the Request for Mediation? Did I somehow
3574:
It also explains why so many of these images of living people are of such good quality. Either that template is a spectacular success at making people upload images about their subjects (with a high percentage of people closely connected to the subjet), or it's a spectacular success at helping people
1886:
On to another issue. I will begin using my account perhaps after today when this particular discussion is over, and so I will likely no longer edit with this IP address. I may not receive any messages placed on the talk page because I won't be paying attention to it. I think that it is better to have
1720:
I have placed sanctions on the editor; however, he is appealing, and I think it's only fair that I ask a second opinion from another administrator. I cannot promise how the conversation will go, but we certainly plan to make it fair. Without question, someone will be upset by the outcome. By the way,
1704:
I understand and I appreciate your response but considering the fact that he vandalized the page
Azerbaijan in the past by nationalistic comments like "Armenia forever" and replacing Azerbaijani flag and coat of arms with Armenian, AND that he does the same thing with his Mov25 account AND then again
942:
I don't mind if that page got locked, but do mind it was locked without that tag. Without that tag, the discussion is just like "closed door" discussion. I think this discussion needs to attract more users or readers, as an "open door" discussion as
Knowledge (the đź’•) prefers. The second point is, we
3459:
you seem cool man. thanks for all your help. maybe you can tell me what I'm doing wrong. I'm going crazy here. originally I posted that thing as opposed to talk about it cause I knew the people who wanted me to use the talk page wanted to talk it into oblivion so there would neve rbe a consensus and
3347:
I'm a noob I admit it. I read your article on coat racks and I compared it to my post on saddleback. I admit that the original was rough but I was more than willing to let other editors edit it to their liking which they did. It was entirely relevent to major political action the church took in 2008
2957:
I saw your message related to my picture being up for deletion. If you check the first one I uploaded you'll see it's of inferior quality. Also, I don't understand what you mean by "obsolete". The theater is still there and at the same location, unless you mean something else please reply and let
1850:
Magog, I can't believe this, but the sockpuppet of
Mykungfu -- 24* -- is edit warring on the ANI thread you began. I posed a response to an editor there and 24 moved it. I reversed that move once and requested in the edit summary that he not move it again, however he went ahead and moved it a second
3415:
thank you for stepping in. I know that at least a controversy section is appropriate for an
Orginization of this size. I was attempting to get the ball rolling. can you tell us in the saddleback talk page what we have to do to get it in? FYI FYI Lyoncc follows my every move to make sure nothing bad
2621:
No I don't have a problem with that. Eagles247 and I are both a little sick of the wikilawyering in the situation and kind of just wanted it to go away, which is frankly why we forgot about it. I think a standard offer is a good idea; that said, he did ask a while ago, so if you're going to make a
1596:
Third off: on to what you responded above (I'd really not dwell on the points 1 and 2... I brought them up for simple edification). You seem to have said, 1) the tag is unjustified because the dispute over the name is unjustified. But that doesn't follow at all: the dispute is over the content, and
710:
You know, Ed, I'm just not very familiar with this case. My comments were related only to another case I was familiar with, and I indefinitely blocked the second user because it was an illegal sock account (but I didn't block the main account, to which he could return). I'm sorry, I'll have to keep
555:
I don't intend to edit war, and I am aware of the rules. I know that V7-Sport is as well, and yet he continues. I admit I am am annoyed at his following me to that article in order to edit war and don't appreciate his uncivil remarks, including the above accusations he is spreading around and spear
2212:
I guess you're right about the praising by proxy, and the peacock terms should be removed. Nevertheless, Brandston does appear to be all those things, at least according to the IESNA publication cited in note 2. But I get your point and will do. One last thing. Do you have to eventually remove the
1882:
Magog, thanks for the reply. He moved my comment once and I reversed that. He then slickly moved the comment again without actually using the Undo option. So, he moved my comment, I moved it back, and he reverted my move. I stated in the edit summary that I would appreciate if the comment were not
1592:
Second off, I probably shouldn't say anything, but I'm compelled to anyway: it took you five paragraphs to explain why you're offended by the term "verbose." A more..., er..., succinct way to respond would be "Please don't call me verbose, it's the lowest level of disagreement (refer to diagram on
3638:
see them, if you know what I mean. Strictly speaking, we probably should get OTRS permission, but I really doubt it will be an issue. We can always just take it down with a DMCA notice; I know that sounds bad, but the uploader did say "I am the author", and we have no way of disproving that's her
2778:
Dear Magog, I posted an image I created by adding some overlay graphics to some NASA and USGS images. I received an automated email, and tried to add the source info, but all the wiki markup and jargon is getting me really confused. I hope I did it right. The image is really truly bonafide clean.
2691:
to wiki. Actually I took a gap in May month in wiki. Surprisingly, the same samaleks is missing the same May month. Then I came in to wiki on June, suddenly user
Samaleks reached in wiki. I do not have any solid proofs regarding these. I request you to check at least my contributions to wiki for
2642:
Dear Magog, First of all this is not a request. Here I am providing some facts, and please accept it, if it is good for wiki. You have completely mistook my views and edits. On May 4th you blocked me due to edit warring in Kochi. Once you told me “If you will agree to wait for consensus before
1866:
All I see is that he moved your comment, which you found inappropriate. That's not edit warring - he didn't revert even once. Edit warring necessarily involves multiple reversion, and the only reversion was by you (which was justified; anything else would have been unjustified). In any case, feel
3397:
Hi Scott: thanks for bringing the discussion to my talk page. I want to first off state I'm only giving my opinion: it's not something that's written in gold anywhere, and good-faith users will probably disagree on it. That said, I feel pretty strongly in this case that the criticism section was
2605:
asking about the "standard offer". It looks like this ANI thread disappeared with no real decision of any kind. My personal opinion is (1) I don't especially think it's the best use of our time to worry about rehabilitating contributors with issues and that his edits evidently were tendentious
868:
Yes, I think it's entirely appropriate, because there is an ongoing dispute on the issue. At this point, I can only say: shame on them for making a big deal out of such a stupid thing, but shame on you for trying to remove a legitimate tag letting the casual reader know about a disagreement just
1584:
Response to Tenmei: first off, I don't think AJL was making an ad hominem: it was a simple request to say what you have to say less verbosely. I have experience with this: some editors on
Knowledge manage to write around in circles and say the same thing 25 times over, spending too much time on
1670:
Why does this person get away with sockpuppeting when his MosMusy account was blocked, then being blocked as Mov25, and finally continuing the same behavior as MosMusy after Mov25 was now blocked. I thought sockpuppeting and sockmastering was not encouraged. But now I see with handling of this
3676:
Well they're two different images; they clearly don't belong in the same file. BTW, the way to split an image is to delete it, and restore only the versions that aren't on commons. Then, if the image is covering up the commons version because they have the same filename, you can either move
3371:
articles were dealt with during the 2009 arbitration, trying to put any controversy/criticism (particularly in the Warren article) in the body of the article, rather than call it out separately. There are 7 archive pages of the arbitration linked in the most recent discussion section of the
2910:
2119:), so the consensus is poor as a precedent. I would be willing to close the poll as "flagicons not supported for this page only at this time, until there is clear evidence of more editors supporting them" but that's it. Not to mention, I like them myself, although I'd only give it a
1782:@Magog the Ogre. MosMusy's 2-3 year old edits presented here are really bad... In the meanwhile, to clarify who you deal with, I would like to draw your attention to Neftchi's recent edits. Being aware that Onnik Krikoryan is not just a blogger, but also a reputable journalist (see
3544:
to
Commons because the files are reviewed so they should be ok. However, I skipped a few because they did not look ok but you found one more. If you have the time it would be nice with a second opinion on the files so you are most welcome to help with the files my bot reviewed.
1605:
that we afford others out of fairness, and because we'd want them to afford it to us when they think they're right but we're convinced their wrong. Unless you're unable to fathom any way whatsoever that they could be entitled to a different opinion than you (in which case, see
153:
Hi, Maldives was like Afghanistan, no copyright protection. So I based the template on PD-Afghanistan. Perhaps the link to the US code is useless. I will have to do more research on this. But Maldives only introduced copyright protection in 2010. I can see that we need a
2666:
article:- Somebody trying to put Nemom railway station name Trivandrum Nemom. There is no such name for that station. For any reference www.indianrail.gov.in. and also somebody put some express trains stop there. Till date (14/06/2011) no expess trains stops at Nemom. Then
1906:
Responding to the first question: I don't see it being moved twice. Maybe I'm just missing something. In response to the second, we can wait for this discussion to finish up, and then we will do with CATW whatever we allow for the rest of your accounts (IP, new account).
2647:, Commercial Capital of Kerala is a valid one and a group ips and users trying to remove it. The commercial capital tag is an official and it has n number official and unofficial references. The tags for other cities in kerala remain same without any reference. For eg:
289:
The fact is the image was not being used in a way that discussed its famousness; it was being used for illustrative purposes (the infobox). I don't see this image being irreplaceable unless the only reason it's included is to show a famous image drawn by the author.
177:
My apologies for using your talk page as a sandbox, however for the purposes of the testing, I could not use the WP:Sandbox, nor my own. If you have any questions for me about the purpose (if not obvious), please feel free to ask away on my talk page. Thanks, –
1890:
And third -- how can I go about getting the CAtruth block removed? I can't access the account, but I just want to avoid any future headaches. I would appreciate if it could be unblocked. Again, I don't think I'll ever be able to use it again anyway. Thanks.
211:
However, for some retired or disbanded groups, or retired individuals whose notability rests in large part on their earlier visual appearance, a new picture may not serve the same purpose as an image taken during their career, in which case the use would be
3630:
2 -Tough call - the username of the local guy is Drfrogsplat, and the flickr username is Frogé. This user is still around; you might consider leaving a talk page message, and if not responded, FFD or just moving it to commons, based on your own subjective
539:
and his last revert summery was simply "1st rv", indicating that he was ready to take it up to 3. I'd appreciate it if you could take a second to reiterate that 3rr isn't a guarantee of 3 reversions and that we are supposed to adhere to WP:BRD. -Thanks
1705:
continues the same behavior with his unblocked MosMusy account, isn't enough proof of unchanging pattern, and not enough to restrict this editor somehow? With all the abundance of evidence, no one should hesitate to impose sanctions on this editor.
2569:
Blocked. IIRC, this isn't the first time this has happened with Bijuts, but seeing as I lack definitive proof that the IP is him, I will not extend his block log. Don't worry about it; prolific sockers always end up indef blocked anyway in the end
2727:. In fact, it doesn't matter whether your point is correct or not; it is most important that you stop edit warring. Also, if someone undoes your edit, they're well within Knowledge's accepted precedence; if you put it back, you're not (see
869:
because you like the status quo. If it were up to me, I'd think that a 24 hour block (given the warnings previously meted out on this page) of Lvhis, Oda Mari, STSC, and John Smith's would have been more appropriate than locking the page.
1725:
of him replacing the flag inappropriately and literally vandalizing? In the right circumstances, the edits you describe might be legitimate, but in many they might not be; vandalism isn't appropriate, and I'm sure Mov25 is aware of that.
3541:
1188:-- Is it fair to conclude that you each appear to accept one or more implied premises? IMO, your acceptance of unstated premises only serves to endorse and validate a concurrent refusal to acknowledge or engage what has gone before.
1598:
3149:
Hmm; well thanks! I think I need to add something about the turmoil in Syria though; thousands of people being murdered by the government while people in the rest of the world complain about... tax rates. But I do appreciate!
2445:
You posted something about "until this is resolved," as though the Keeplocal tag is a problem that needs to be fixed. Perhaps I misunderstood the point of what you wrote, but if that wasn't what you meant, what did you mean?
2145:
Hi Magog, you recently tagged this page as an advertisment. Thank you for pointing out the poor writing. The page has now been rewritten and a few other sources have been added. Do you think the tag can be removed? Thanks
3308:
Oh right; yeah, if I had seen it was you that marked it, I would have just deleted it. I think the rules are a bit overkill with file formats, but as a user on commons, surely you know that people can get upset (a little
133:. There was an image on English Knowledge at the previous location which is the same as the image at the latter location; when the en.wp image was deleted, a different commons image showed through. Thanks anyway though.
2599:
2482:
My apologies, I didn't see the previous edit that in effect requested deletion. I'm sorry, I was thinking this was some new KeepLocal issue that had emerged. I should have looked more carefully before commenting.
3133:
I like your "Completely original and (hopefully non-partisan) observations about political issues, from an American perspective" especially Russia+journalist - it is good that sb see this problem with media
1215:-- I plan to contribute no more to this thread. An unresolved issues are better addressed in some other venue. I hope my diffs are construed as arguably constructive steps in an unfolding process. --
890:
2687:: Till date I never revert any new contribution done by samaleks. You can check our contributions and edit history. Samaleks always trying to revert my edits. Even I appreciated him for creating a
2169:
No, in all honesty it still sounds like a plug for the man. Check out this sentence for example: "Having heard about Mr. Rossi's creativity and design capabilities Howard Brandston one of the most
2923:
638:
but there is a comment by an IP at the very end of the discussion that correctly identifies that the images Mwhite148 claimed he had "got from a friend who abandoned them" are simply taken from
3597:
1316:. What part of this graphic and this caption do you persist in misunderstanding? As an alternative, please do explain what you perceive I misunderstand when I rely on this specific phrase at
2389:
I'm not sure I understand your statement in its entirety. Nevertheless, I can affirm that you jumped into this edit war late, and were as guilty as anyone, and frankly deserved to be blocked.
1601:"), then the tags ought to stay. This isn't a difficult concept: if there's a dispute, the tag goes up until the dispute is somehow settled. Whether you agree with it or not - it's respect of
1501:
I am merely attempting to find a solution that everyone can compromise towards that will remove the title as a battleground topic. And yes, it is a battleground topic, as obvious from the
967:
556:
heading. I find it very uncivil. Please advise each of us. I asked him to step away and allow other editors to handle the content question on this new article he followed me to. Thanks.
3189:
Heh. That may have been like the second or third time I've ever dropped and f-bomb on Knowledge; I try to avoid that. But the word just fit so well that it was just begging to be used.
193:
2675:
Railway Station handles 41 pairs of trains daily. In the same page stations include like Kasaragod Railway stations handles (34 pairs of TRAINS), ALLEPPY station (26 pairs of trains),
2413:. There's no problem whatsoever with an image uploaded to WP being copied to the Commons but not deleted, and there's a strong consensus that it be allowed, so please just let it be.
534:
and understands that 3rr is not a license to make 3 reversions but is steadfastly ignoring that. He is obviously trying to suck me in and get me booted again. He has reverted twice,
1845:
994:. As a matter of fact, I had nothing to do with the specific tagging of this article. In fact, I paid little notice at the time; but this issue has fully engaged my attention now.
1761:
he added Armenian power and vandalized the page. This editor very well knows the rules and yet he continues to defy Knowledge rules and regulations. I gave more examples in the
1096:
As a good first step, it is necessary to acknowledge the reasonable points which have been presented in extended talk thread discussions about this very topic. If not, why not?
3639:(e.g., she might have created a username under her husband's name, or they might have a joint account against our policy). Regardless, the onus lies on the uploader, not on us.
2643:
editing again, you may be able to avoid sanctions”. That means, eventhough it is a valid information, we shoulld convince all those who are against it illogically? For about
1166:
Do you see my point? This cannot be expressed more succinctly. Some issues are not simple. Sometimes first impressions do not offer the best or most constructive analysis. --
1900:
1860:
1003:: In the absence of talk page responses to reasonable questions, the POV-title "tag" is unjustified -- pending the necessary engagement in discussion threads in this venue.
1521:, your response was indeed very much "excessively verbose", however, I am willing to look past that in order to respond sufficiently to your queries. I explicitly asked you
537:
115:- the two photos in question are definately NOT duplicates - one is a colour photo of an aircraft on the ground, the other a bloack-and-white photo of an aircraft in flight.
3328:
I could have just left it be, and let it be deleted as an unused non-free, but I thought it was dishonest to not mention it is free. Image politics can get so complicated.
2093:. Consensus opinion rejecting the use of flagicoms in the infobox and in tables on this page seems plain; and the reasons which inform this decision are clearly expressed.
894:(I'll assume good faith regarding your comment directed about me). I completely agree that it should be on there too, but I thought I would get an outside opinion first. –
2832:
1440:
Alright then, I will attempt to address your concerns stated above, in no particular order (I'll sign after each point so that you may address each point individually).
2948:
1286:
In this context, "verbose" is non-responsive. The label "verbose" is an easy gambit, a cheap trick. Your words do not engage any explicit issue to which I can respond.
2241:
No; anyone can remove the tag. However, as a new user, I would recommend getting a second opinion. Also, it may or may not be relevant but you might want to check out
711:
my judgment to myself, as I know basically nothing more than you. However, given that it is regarding Armenia, you might consider heavier sanctions, like a topic ban.
2463:, which has some unfortunate wording about not being resolved. I was declining the deletion by this method (and not simply removing the tag) because this problem has
1312:-- In order to be very, very clear, I reproduce the familiar pyramid graphic. It is not "verbose" to point to the caption which appears along with this graphic at
1224:
1207:
1175:
1795:
1791:
1327:
In a thread concerned with the title of an article about a controversial subject, the unhelpful label "verbose" is not in the top three sections of the pyramid.
904:
Oops! I guess I didn't read the discussion closely enough. Thanks for the good faith though, making it unnecessary for me to assume the assumption of good faith.
1259:-- Again I ask: What is the "pro-Knowledge" point-of-view? In the context of this question, "verbose" is a non-responsive ephithet, a label. You may repeat it
155:
2969:
3024:
2659:
is the capital of India, but a group of peoples and ips come and it is not, and then is it mandatory we should convince them? I don’t know much about it wiki.
2587:
1457:
favor (i.e. the name is changed to "Diaoyu Islands" or "Pinnacle Islands", however likely or unlikely), somehow you will raise a fuss about it, even though we
651:
3525:
3451:
2984:
2810:
979:-- No, please think again. The POV tag should not be posted. The reasoning you both express is arguable, but flawed in a way which bodes ill for the future.
453:
393:
2289:
2254:
2206:
1916:
1876:
1103:
999:
3658:
3159:
3108:
670:
3059:
2511:
2476:
2436:
2061:
782:
741:
720:
329:
299:
3730:
Tried but id didn't work. I even moved the file to Commons and the wrong file was transfered :-o But I tried one today and it worked. So there is hope. --
3322:
3287:
3273:
3243:
2862:
I was the original uploader of this image on en.wikipedia, which was a screenshot from a book. There is no record of that on wikipedia now or on commons.
1809:
535:
142:
2779:
Public domain images mashed up with a little overlay annotation....by me. I promise. Swear I created it, and did not rip this image off from somewhere.
617:
597:
3407:
2886:
1839:
1735:
1698:
1664:
3381:
3203:
2744:
2398:
2132:
1686:
Whoa whoa, he's not getting away with anything here. He sockpuppetted, and received a block extension of approximately 60 hours for that back in April
1619:
918:
878:
625:
305:
So does that mean that if the image had been used in the body of the article to illustrate Crumb's style, then it wouldn't have been up for deletion?
3724:
3690:
3651:
3590:
3569:
1469:
to see what the community has to say, but I would like to see a response from you first before I do, and hopefully they will alleviate my concerns. –
959:
2928:
1950:
1787:
688:
565:
2190:
1387:
Perhaps you do not know that there is extensive research which informs the choice of article title? No part of this research has been subjected to
3337:
3302:
3258:
3223:
2631:
424:
284:
I admit the process is a bit cumbersome; if I have time I'll be bold and change it some day so all discussion takes place on the talk page anyway.
1555:
1543:
1513:
3627:
1 - I'd say take it to FFD, based only on the fact that the author given bears no resemblance to the username which is in fact a person's name.
3480:
3425:
3357:
1489:
1434:
266:
1783:
276:
2911:
Image Permissions - apologies - don't know how to comply with the posting requirement, but have responded to your message on Wyrdlights page
2757:
1689:(and had the second account blocked permanently to force him to use his first account). But there hasn't been any sockpuppetry since then.
108:
3437:, let me know, and we can try to handle it further from there. Hopefully polite discussion can fix it before we have to go there though.
2794:
1585:
tangents; this makes it very hard to read their responses. While I didn't think your comment above involved any tangents (in this case),
1539:
what I asked for. How can one proceed with attempting to resolve the dispute when you keep bringing up how no one else understands it? –
403:
373:
2877:
Sorry about that; I completely missed that the attribution was from de.wikipedia, which was uploaded after it was to here. I'll fix it.
2047:
Is the image worth moving to Commons? Usually the answer is yes, but if it's an orphaned userpage image or something, it can be deleted.
1533:. Instead, you proceeded to post a slightly different re-wording of the same "WP:DR says " that you post over and over again, which was
1505:
archived threads – unless you disagree with that? Also, do you agree that having one less item to battle over would benefit the article
1071:
creates, we are compelled to recognize that the strategic and needlessly provocative addition of a POV-title tag was, in this instance,
344:
2603:
2383:
2185:
architectural lighting design firm in New York" (emphasis mine). While I realize that's praising Mr. Brandston, 1) it's overdone (four
1774:
1714:
1680:
1649:
314:
237:
2067:
It does partialy, It's analysing the permissions side I get cautious about because of having been overly deletion happy in the past.
3605:
3601:
2037:)? This includes architecture in many countries. The only way you won't have to worry about the problem is if the source country has
729:
415:
I am unable to transfer this image to commons because of the license template not being recognized by commons mover. Can you help? --
250:
2574:). If there is any more block evasion, let me know, although I might not be around (see ugly message at the top of the page)... try
2269:
2233:
2161:
1758:
1750:
1746:
1742:
224:
an important part of his persona—especially the way he depicts himself in his famous autobiographical period (mainly in the 1980s),
167:
3700:
work but when I did it yesterday the new file showed up instead of the old one. Even if I deleted and only restored the old one. --
2552:
1961:
Hi, as you seem to be familiar with image policy, I'd appreciate your having a look at some of my recent laughable attempts to add
847:
747:
I hereby award you the very small and discreet admin's barnstar ( * ) for figuring out how to place people under supervision under
3416:
is ever said about any christian anywhere no matter what the sourcework says. thanks again for showing my noobishness the way! :)
1986:
The information template use seems to be pretty good. It's really not at all complicated; just put the stuff in the right fields
1299:. Why not decide to look again at what I've written above? On further reflection, why not address the content of what I wrote --
1194:
This begs a question: What moves us towards constructive resolution rather than an enduring impasse? What helps us to fashion a
1093:
encourages us to hope that those who perceive a problematic issue will decide to confine themselves to constructive contributions.
3502:
will help all parties come to an agreement, but it takes a really long time. My recommendation at this point is that you post at
3293:
No, I meant the now commons, which is actually a higher quality different version. But non-the-less it has been deleted. Thanks,
3209:
3183:
2905:
2871:
2090:
810:
2622:
six month timer, you might consider starting it back when he first asked, which was about a week or two before I posted on ANI.
2615:
2538:
1745:
he replaced the state symbols of Azerbaijan and wrote about humiliating defeat for Azerbaijan and Armenian freedom fighters. In
1269:"tag" remains foggy, a mere opinion which you introduce in order to deflect attention from substantive matters. It is a hollow
760:
704:
442:
124:
2109:
898:
862:
3538:
2728:
2525:
2491:
2454:
2421:
684:
580:
549:
358:
3050:
1935:
2194:
2023:
1234:
Tenmei, can you please explain (without being excessively verbose) in which way our reasoning is flawed? We understand the
3123:
3071:
3036:
3018:
2717:
2123:
myself, because I only like them for aesthetic reasons (aesthetics can help the reader better relate to the article IMHO).
2076:
1980:
1569:
3476:
3143:
2786:
2369:
2116:
2115:
I would have a problem doing that. Let me explain: the flagicons are used on many similar tables across Knowledge (e.g.,
635:
571:
Ironic that you have accused me of following you as you post here... I have been adhering to the BRD cycle, you haven't.
408:
182:
94:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
3739:
3709:
3670:
3621:
3554:
2330:
2322:
1992:. As for moving images to Commons, your edits generally seem pretty good; I'd recommend you check the following things:
1589:
requires us to assume it's a reasonable request and wasn't made to degrade either the conversation or you in particular.
1473:
1414:
1242:
3609:
2229:
1892:
1852:
2700:
2301:
3510:, where people are glad to help users who are new and/or need experience in consensus making. I hope that clarifies
2464:
2461:
2096:
Hopefully, the results of this poll will help avert further disputes about this very narrow topic in the context of
1749:
example he again replaced the state symbols of Azerbaijan with Armenia's flag and coat of arms. And he did it again
1627:
3657:
Thank you. I moved all files that looked good. Once those are deleted the rest will be checked again. Are you sure
3342:
1996:
1191:
In other words, is it fair to conclued that you make yourself part of our problem rather than part of our solution.
335:
3661:
could/should be split? If yes we need a description. Anyway I tried to split up some files but it did not work. --
1365:
Perhaps you are unaware that the record of threads developed across the span of many months supports the title of
1160:
Can we agree that it is forward-looking to re-focus on content rather than validating a tactic? If not now, when?
158:
article with all the refs. At the time of the new law, it appeared in some newspapers and the government website.
2703:
2295:
1928:
3581:. I'm betting on the former. But hey if you want to advertise that placeholder template, I'd sure recommend it.
2340:
2315:
2705:. Is these are allowable in wiki? If I am going to edit these again, I am sure, I will get a block from you.
854:
talk page) and seeing if you agree that the tag should be placed on the article, particularly taking a look at
767:
1020:, we are able to parse the different types of arguments in terms of their strategic content. In other words,
1009:. This is not an evidence of bias, but rather a pro-Knowledge stance in the face of an uncooperative strategy.
588:
Bernie, how about you come clean as to what your longtime IP edits were. Where have you edited from as an IP?
3596:
Yeah! It is just hard to transfer to Commons if you do not use the right bot ;-) Anyway what do you think of
2856:
2593:
1823:), as your petitions on this page do somewhat come across as trying to get an enemy, so to speak, in trouble.
1632:
Hello, you are the admin who had blocked Mov25 earlier for sockpuppetry. He has returned with a new account:
244:
3560:
Oh that does explain a few things! I couldn't figure out why all the images had such a similar format, lol.
2801:
Unfortunately, I've gone through a lot of images today; can you point which one you're talking about to me?
2245:. I don't personally know your affiliation to the subject, but I still want to make you aware just in case.
1687:
928:
3083:
Anyway, I can't delete the image on commons because I only have admin status here; but if you mark it with
2732:
2724:
1128:
1006:
1819:@Neftchi: yup, that's pretty bad. I would like to remind you though that Knowledge is not a battleground (
3642:
4 - Looks good to me; doesn't have the legalese about estates and the like; doubt we need it. See above.
2848:
932:
630:
There are a large number of copyright map images being used on UK general election articles, uploaded by
409:
187:
3715:
That is a caching problem; clear your browser cache and purge the page, and it should appear correctly.
3490:
This is a pretty complicated situation; it will require working it out on both of your part, as well as
1798:
edits. This is a characteristic and very recent example to reveal the nature of Neftchi as an editor. --
1593:
the side)." See? I said the same thing you said, except I only said it in one paragraph, and in one way.
1499:
I am not disagreeing with the choice of the article title, I honestly could really care less what it is.
3720:
3686:
3647:
3586:
3565:
3521:
3447:
3403:
3318:
3283:
3269:
3239:
3199:
3155:
3104:
2980:
2882:
2806:
2768:
2750:
2740:
2627:
2583:
2507:
2472:
2432:
2394:
2285:
2250:
2202:
2128:
2057:
1912:
1872:
1835:
1731:
1694:
1660:
1615:
1282:
914:
874:
778:
737:
716:
666:
613:
593:
449:
389:
349:
325:
295:
138:
38:
200:
the image." But where was the debate? Could I be pointed to it? Because I wasn't even aware of it.
3165:
2688:
2676:
2260:
Thanks for the suggestions Magog. I'll ask for a second opinion in the Editor assistance. Take care.
1565:
do not have nothing against you); I am merely attempting to provoke some thoughtful contributions. –
982:
In contrast, the rationale which supports a more nuanced analysis is informed by the edit history of
163:
1946:
220:
been brought up to me, I certainly would have brought up this quote, as Crumb's image is well known
3086:
2816:
1238:
process, so please don't keep bringing that up over and over and over and over... again, please. –
1146:
788:
131:
47:
17:
3398:
overwrought, and I will list my reasons on the talk page, which I really should have done anyway.
2836:
1229:
814:
481:
246:; good catch). I simply took your comment off the file description page which you had left in the
3472:
3421:
3353:
3094:
2965:
2790:
2410:
2319:
1370:
1150:
987:
420:
366:
2844:
3507:
3278:
Oh, I see, you mean after you nominated it for undeletion. Yeah, the npd was redundant, sorry.
2828:
2265:
2225:
2151:
2138:
2081:
1896:
1856:
1820:
841:
354:
3139:
3119:
3067:
3046:
3032:
3014:
2975:
I'm going to move this comment to the deletion discussion, where it's best to bring this up.
2823:
2696:
2663:
1799:
1382:
1296:
647:
473:
465:
243:
You're right; "debate" is misleading (in fact I've already corrected it for future reference
102:
3009:
Can you delete it also on commons? And can you delete other images by this uploader? Thanks
2189:
terms in one sentence), and 2) it's praising the subject of the article by proxy. Check out
1352:
informs my rejection of both because a bare assertion has not been married with elements of
992:
I did participate actively in the development of both the articles and the talk page threads
3491:
3464:
2782:
2217:
2157:
2072:
1976:
1965:
1922:
1124:
756:
700:
676:
561:
527:
510:
362:
310:
233:
159:
2893:
1942:
8:
3716:
3682:
3643:
3582:
3561:
3517:
3443:
3399:
3333:
3314:
3298:
3279:
3265:
3254:
3235:
3219:
3195:
3151:
3100:
3055:
2976:
2919:
2878:
2802:
2764:
2736:
2623:
2579:
2544:
2530:
2503:
2468:
2428:
2390:
2281:
2246:
2198:
2124:
2053:
1908:
1868:
1831:
1727:
1690:
1656:
1611:
1602:
1212:
1181:
972:
927:
very much for your wonderful explanation on the NPOV-title tag issue here and there the "
924:
910:
870:
774:
733:
712:
662:
609:
589:
517:
445:
385:
321:
291:
148:
134:
120:
639:
3468:
3417:
3392:
3349:
2961:
2680:
2637:
1579:
1247:
576:
545:
416:
400:
370:
2840:
1448:
459:
228:
he no longer looks like his most famous portraits of himself (he has grown a beard).
3533:
3377:
3368:
2901:
2867:
2404:
2261:
2221:
2186:
2147:
2013:
1770:
1710:
1676:
1645:
1149:. The development of our talk pages informs a heightened alertness to "value-added"
1123:
This American idiomatic expression also serves to distill the accumulated threads at
821:
802:
794:
488:
172:
112:
3681:
to commons, or you can move the file itself so it doesn't block the underlying one.
1024:
helps us to recognize and acknowledge categories of constructive comments, such as:
3503:
3178:
3135:
3115:
3063:
3042:
3028:
3010:
2713:
2379:
2105:
2003:
1826:@Ashot: sadly, I'm not particularly surprised. I didn't expect anyone hear to have
1762:
1637:
1529:
process (again), which (in my opinion) was a reasonable request – I was asking for
1430:
1410:
1220:
1203:
1171:
748:
643:
3506:
and ask for help; if that doesn't work, then frankly you might want to move on to
217:
204:
3735:
3705:
3666:
3617:
3550:
3434:
2537:
Hi. You recently blocked this user for edit warring. But he has evaded his block
2518:
2484:
2447:
2414:
2370:
I don't mind if that page got locked, but do mind it was locked without that tag.
2312:
2068:
2038:
1972:
1392:
1378:
1366:
1357:
1331:-- at last? Do you begin to grasp the emerging outlines of an recurrent pattern?
1112:
1036:
983:
955:
851:
752:
696:
557:
306:
229:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
3494:
on the part of all editors involved (something which sometimes we sadly lack).
3329:
3294:
3250:
3215:
2915:
2672:
2571:
2139:
2034:
2030:
1956:
1722:
1607:
1328:
1278:
631:
116:
2409:
Magog, you're an admin, so you should know not to keep bucking consensus like
3495:
3004:
2684:
2575:
2346:
2336:
2308:
2242:
2019:
and move it to commons without problem, regardless of issues presented below.
1586:
1466:
1303:
1270:
1154:
1108:
1090:
1084:
1049:
855:
658:
572:
541:
531:
3249:
And you nominating it for deletion, after I already did, is also redundant.
2949:
Knowledge:Files for deletion/2011 June 25#File:Paris Theater From Flickr.jpg
2374:
Can you envision an alternative approach which we have not yet perceived? --
1753:, in fact he vandalized the page after an admin corrected it and even wrote
1485:
a discussion somewhere? If I did, why did you not bring it up before now? –
3373:
3128:
2897:
2863:
2361:
2353:
are each correct, is is possible that both misconstrue the problem at hand?
1766:
1706:
1672:
1641:
1633:
1526:
1349:
1317:
1313:
1274:
1235:
1107:: Last week, I heard a television commentator use an idiom to describe the
1068:
1043:
1021:
1017:
677:
130:
Actually I don't believe that was an error: the history is a bit deceiving
1345:
B. The "verbose" label is only affixed because someone "thinks it is true"
858:? If you'd rather not make a decision, I completely understand. Thanks. –
3499:
3433:
If after this discussion, things go well, but you feel like you're being
3364:
3175:
2709:
2611:
2531:
2375:
2350:
2326:
2101:
2044:
Is the image properly sourced, and does it have the requisite permission?
1932:
1827:
1566:
1552:
1540:
1510:
1486:
1470:
1426:
1422:
1406:
1335:
1309:
1256:
1239:
1216:
1199:
1185:
1167:
976:
895:
859:
831:
498:
341:
179:
661:. Depending on the nature of the uploads, I might dump it there anyway.
3731:
3701:
3662:
3613:
3546:
2652:
2365:
1388:
1374:
1353:
1291:
1265:
1116:
1057:
1031:
951:
692:
2460:
I didn't write it at all; I converted NowCommons to NotMovedToCommons
530:
who is in a slow motion, multi-front edit war. He has been advised of
2656:
2177:
architectural lighting designers in the U.S.A. asked him to join his
1402:
3171:
2648:
1509:, rather than leaving it open for a potential battleground item? –
1142:
2695:
You just check the edit summaries of ip address 117.230.140.22 in
1561:
Please do not take any of my comments as a personal attack (and I
1342:
A. The POV tag is only affixed because someone "thinks it is true"
3634:
3 - I hate these. When I see spouse uploads, I kind of pretend I
2357:
608:
I'm waiting Bernie. Cuz your edits look exactly like Giovanni's.
2191:
Knowledge:Writing better articles#Avoid peacock and weasel terms
2033:(that meets the threshold of originality and doesn't fall under
1465:
process. I am considering raising this particular discussion at
1373:? The title has been subjected to a process which includes (a)
691:. MosMusy is confirmed by checkuser as the same as another guy,
2668:
2607:
1046:
also identifies argumentative strategies which are unhelpful:
3512:
3439:
3231:
3191:
2644:
2499:
2277:
2097:
1988:
1295:
tangent which serves in no way to enhance the quality of our
906:
770:
381:
3577:
3079:
2731:). Again, rather than just undoing edits, please read up on
2213:
advertisment tag or can any editor (ex. me) do it? Thanks.
2193:. If you still have questions, we have a lot of editors at
884:
LOL, I never removed the tag in the first place; in fact,
3542:
Category:Reviewed images of people replacing placeholders
2958:
me have some further explanations, thank you in advance.
1846:
Banned Mykungfu sockpuppet edit warring on the ANI thread
1087:
without substantial explanation or verifiable foundation.
1005:
Mere "contradiction" without support is unpersuasive per
1599:
The Islands owned by China but stupidly claimed by Japan
3372:
Saddleback article, if you want to wade through them.--
1141:
The content of the "tag" is construed to function as a
262:
please archive the discussion on the talk page between
3575:
to pretend they took a lot of photos they didn't take
3027:- I am unable to find source but it is probably copy
1971:
to images and identify possible images for Commons...
2427:
What are you talking about? I declined the deletion.
2341:"It's a POV-magnet, and edit wars happen frequently."
2325:
mirrors the reasoning which informed the judgment of
2998:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
2942:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
1289:
In other words, your resort to "verbose" becomes an
1277:
encourages me to disregard because, in the words of
657:
Yes; for long term copyright abuse, the location is
2602:, 24.239.153.58 (UnclePaco) posted on my talk page
2091:
Talk:BRICS#Consolidated discussion about flag icons
886:
I don't believe I've ever edited the article itself
258:"Closing administrator: if ... the decision is to
3540:<- Good work. My plan is to move all files in
2992:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
2517:Thanks, and I'm sorry again for snapping at you.
2086:Please consider closing a poll on a talk page --
1883:removed again, though he moved it a second time.
1334:Paraphrasing the words of the first paragraph of
689:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Meowy/Archive
3363:FYI - The controversy/criticism sections of the
2892:Thanks. I created it originally for the article
1741:He has a long history of vandalism. For example
1196:flexible management strategy for future disputes
801:Hello, Magog the Ogre. You have new messages at
472:Hello, Magog the Ogre. You have new messages at
196:, stating that "The result of the debate was to
1251:Stay in the top three sections of this pyramid.
2022:Is the image free in its home country? I have
1322:Stay in the top three sections of this pyramid
2364:strategy rather than suppressing it. Compare
256:template. As you can see, that template says
3229:Heh, it was two different deletion notices.
2758:commons:File:NEPTUNE Canada overview map.jpg
2723:Instead of edit warring, please make use of
1927:Would you please mind taking a look at this
1395:has been explained as context for a POV tag.
1360:to which a constructive response is possible
3170:I like anyone who knows how to summarize a
1401:As a constructive step, can you point to a
1523:explain the reasoning that you find flawed
990:. Please consider this: Unlike you both,
968:What is the "pro-Knowledge" point-of-view?
687:. I noticed that you took some actions in
626:Whole bunch of copyright-infringing images
320:It means I wouldn't have deleted it; yes.
216:If I had been aware of the debate and had
3606:File:David Louis Edelman Author Photo.jpg
3602:File:Daniel Smith-Christopher in 2009.jpg
2929:message from archiveeditor about an image
730:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Mov25
640:a website that claims copyright over them
634:- you deleted one of them as a result of
3498:will give you a black and white answer;
3264:Where did you nominate it for deletion?
2302:User talk:Ged UK#Senkaku Islands dispute
1246:
2300:Please consider what I have written at
513:comment added 02:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC).
14:
2339:'s succinct analysis bears repeating:
203:Also, you point to bullet point #1 of
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
3598:File:Author Lauren Groff May 2008.jpg
2729:Knowledge:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
2360:. It is a mismatch which rewards an
2329:when he locked one of these articles
359:File:Ti psixi tha paradoseis mori.jpg
2936:The following discussion is closed.
2195:Knowledge:Editor assistance/Requests
25:
3313:upset even) over the PNG/SVG wars.
2243:the conflict of interest guidelines
2117:Use of capital punishment by nation
2024:List of countries' copyright length
23:
3610:File:GIDDINGS-FRANKLIN-HENRY-2.JPG
2679:(Just 9 pairs of trains only) and
793:
464:
207:, the second part of which reads:
24:
3750:
1121:"This was not their first rodeo."
194:File talk:Crumb self portrait.jpg
3576:
3511:
3438:
3230:
3190:
3078:
2558:
2498:
2276:
2052:Does this answer your question?
1987:
1391:as a context for a POV-tag. No
1083:. It is only a variant form of
905:
846:Would you mind taking a look at
769:
430:
380:
251:Di-replaceable fair use disputed
29:
3210:File:Pirate Party of Canada.png
3077:Funny how those redlinks work?
2197:who can help you out. Cheers!
1999:? If not, you can tag it with
1655:I'll comment on the SPI page.
1131:. In other words, this is not
766:I've added it to my userpage:
13:
1:
3099:, it will be deleted faster.
2857:commons:File:Kollmann-Sun.png
2662:Then about recent block with
2655:(Evergreen City) etc... ..
2442:You declined which deletion?
1497:, let me state very clearly:
1447:, the statement you provided
2733:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
2725:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
2026:bookmarked for pd-old stuff.
1129:Talk:Senkaku Islands dispute
933:User Bobthefish2's talk page
817:at any time by removing the
522:I'm dealing with an editor (
484:at any time by removing the
7:
1931:about images? Thank you. –
732:, where i've taken action.
685:a currently-open 3RR report
410:File:NEMap-doton-Aurora.png
379:Not perfect but they work.
10:
3755:
2763:(this line added later by
2345:Despite the ways in which
1765:. Is this what you meant?
1636:. Could you please review
1525:, and to not bring up the
1405:we can cross together? --
1067:In the very clear context
1028:Refuting the Central Point
3481:06:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
3452:23:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
3426:22:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
3408:22:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
3382:22:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
3358:22:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
3338:21:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3323:00:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3303:00:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3288:00:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3274:00:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3259:00:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3244:00:00, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
3224:23:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
3214:Thank-you Mr. Redundant.
3204:23:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
3184:22:56, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
3160:11:47, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3144:11:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3124:11:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3109:11:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3072:11:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3058:is probably ok (FOP) but
3051:11:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3037:11:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
3019:11:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
2985:00:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
2970:20:29, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
2924:08:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
2906:22:27, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
2887:22:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
2872:22:18, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
2811:23:46, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2795:23:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2745:15:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2718:08:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
2632:02:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
2356:IMO, this is a temporary
1283:"there is no there there"
3740:08:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3725:06:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3710:06:38, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3691:03:41, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
3671:19:59, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
3652:16:04, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
3622:15:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
3591:14:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
3570:14:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
3555:14:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
3526:12:40, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
3343:this newbie is confused!
2995:Please do not modify it.
2939:Please do not modify it.
2616:23:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
2588:19:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
2553:19:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
2526:01:47, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
2512:22:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
2492:22:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
2477:22:00, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
2455:21:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
2437:21:30, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
2422:21:27, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
2399:21:32, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
2384:19:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
2290:21:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
2270:07:13, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
2255:22:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
2234:10:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
2207:08:22, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
2162:17:55, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
2133:08:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
2110:16:29, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
2077:08:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
2062:06:53, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
1997:threshold of originality
1995:Does the image meet the
1981:13:46, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
1951:15:03, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1936:08:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1917:03:46, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1901:03:38, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1877:03:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1861:21:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1840:14:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1810:11:57, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1775:11:12, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1736:03:11, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1715:18:30, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1699:15:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1681:14:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1665:03:07, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
1650:21:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
1620:06:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1570:06:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1556:06:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1544:06:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1514:06:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1490:06:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1474:06:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1435:01:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1415:23:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
1243:19:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
1225:01:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
1208:23:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
1176:17:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
960:05:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
919:05:55, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
899:17:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
879:07:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
863:04:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
811:05:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
783:04:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
761:03:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
742:03:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
671:05:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
652:01:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
618:07:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
598:23:25, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
581:20:22, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
566:20:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
550:19:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
454:23:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
441:. It was kind of a pain
425:18:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
336:125.whatever.whatever.88
18:User talk:Magog the Ogre
2320:Senkaku Islands dispute
2296:Senkaku Islands dispute
1757:as a new headline. And
1398:These are marginalised.
1371:Senkaku Islands dispute
1147:"value-added" component
988:Senkaku Islands dispute
721:07:09, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
705:02:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
474:Dream Focus's talk page
404:09:19, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
394:08:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
374:07:31, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
367:File:OiTreisXarites.jpg
345:08:53, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
330:06:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
315:06:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
300:04:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
238:04:29, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
183:01:12, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
168:22:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
143:09:30, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
125:08:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
3508:Knowledge:Adopt-a-user
1887:a registered account.
1628:Mov25's new sockpuppet
1252:
945:
798:
469:
460:Talkback - Dream Focus
355:File:OiAparadektoi.jpg
340:Thanks for the db-u1.
2824:File:Kollmann-Sun.png
2735:and put it into use.
2594:UnclePaco and Friends
2275:You're very welcome.
1383:collaborative editing
1297:collaborative editing
1250:
1007:WP:Dispute Resolution
940:
797:
468:
369:. Are they ok now? --
156:Copyright in Maldives
42:of past discussions.
3025:File:James kelly.jpg
2651:(Cultural Capital),
2311:'s decision to lock
2307:It is probable that
1640:of the sock master.
1198:which are likely? --
1125:Talk:Senkaku Islands
683:MosMusy is named in
363:File:NtoltseVita.jpg
3056:File:Futa wheel.jpg
2039:freedom of panorama
1790:), he still posted
1461:hashed it out in a
803:MosMusy's talk page
636:this PUF discussion
188:Crumb self portrait
3060:File:Futa logo.jpg
2751:Newbie is Confused
2681:Trivandrum Central
1253:
1054:Responding to Tone
815:remove this notice
799:
482:remove this notice
470:
350:Fair use rationale
3484:
3467:comment added by
3396:
3369:Saddleback Church
3166:LOL - clusterfuck
2894:Clavier-Ăśbung III
2785:comment added by
2524:
2490:
2465:cropped up before
2453:
2420:
2237:
2220:comment added by
1755:"ARMENIA FOREVER"
1583:
893:
192:Hi. You deleted
113:Dassault Mirage 5
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
3746:
3659:File:CLÉSTON.JPG
3580:
3515:
3483:
3461:
3442:
3390:
3234:
3194:
3098:
3090:
3082:
2997:
2941:
2853:
2852:
2817:Kollmann-Sun.png
2797:
2774:
2773:
2565:
2562:
2561:
2551:
2549:
2523:
2521:
2502:
2489:
2487:
2452:
2450:
2419:
2417:
2368:'s explanation:
2280:
2236:
2214:
2165:
2031:derivative image
2018:
2012:
2008:
2002:
1991:
1970:
1964:
1806:
1577:
1081:not constructive
950:Thanks again! --
909:
888:
838:
836:
830:
826:
820:
789:Talkback MosMusy
773:
514:
505:
503:
497:
493:
487:
437:
434:
433:
384:
281:
275:
271:
265:
255:
249:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3754:
3753:
3749:
3748:
3747:
3745:
3744:
3743:
3536:
3462:
3345:
3212:
3168:
3131:
3092:
3084:
3007:
3002:
2993:
2937:
2931:
2913:
2826:
2822:
2819:
2780:
2771:) 26 June 2011)
2761:
2760:
2753:
2640:
2600:This ANI thread
2596:
2563:
2559:
2545:
2542:
2535:
2519:
2485:
2448:
2415:
2407:
2313:Senkaku Islands
2298:
2215:
2155:
2143:
2084:
2016:
2010:
2006:
2000:
1968:
1962:
1959:
1925:
1848:
1821:WP:BATTLEGROUND
1800:
1630:
1393:counterargument
1379:counterargument
1367:Senkaku Islands
1358:counterargument
1232:
1113:Osama bin Laden
1106:
1037:Counterargument
1002:
984:Senkaku Islands
970:
852:Senkaku Islands
844:
839:
834:
828:
824:
818:
808:
791:
681:
628:
520:
508:
506:
501:
495:
491:
485:
479:
462:
435:
431:
413:
352:
338:
279:
273:
269:
263:
253:
247:
190:
175:
160:Graeme Bartlett
151:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3752:
3728:
3727:
3717:Magog the Ogre
3696:I know how is
3694:
3693:
3683:Magog the Ogre
3655:
3654:
3644:Magog the Ogre
3640:
3632:
3628:
3594:
3593:
3583:Magog the Ogre
3572:
3562:Magog the Ogre
3535:
3532:
3531:
3530:
3529:
3528:
3518:Magog the Ogre
3457:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3444:Magog the Ogre
3413:
3412:
3411:
3410:
3400:Magog the Ogre
3385:
3384:
3344:
3341:
3326:
3325:
3315:Magog the Ogre
3291:
3290:
3280:Magog the Ogre
3276:
3266:Magog the Ogre
3247:
3246:
3236:Magog the Ogre
3211:
3208:
3207:
3206:
3196:Magog the Ogre
3174:accurately. -
3167:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3152:Magog the Ogre
3130:
3127:
3112:
3111:
3101:Magog the Ogre
3006:
3003:
3001:
3000:
2988:
2987:
2977:Magog the Ogre
2952:
2951:
2945:
2944:
2932:
2930:
2927:
2912:
2909:
2890:
2889:
2879:Magog the Ogre
2860:
2859:
2854:
2818:
2815:
2814:
2813:
2803:Magog the Ogre
2776:
2775:
2765:Magog the Ogre
2752:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2737:Magog the Ogre
2673:Ernakulam Town
2639:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2624:Magog the Ogre
2595:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2580:Magog the Ogre
2534:
2529:
2515:
2514:
2504:Magog the Ogre
2480:
2479:
2469:Magog the Ogre
2440:
2439:
2429:Magog the Ogre
2406:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2391:Magog the Ogre
2297:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2282:Magog the Ogre
2258:
2257:
2247:Magog the Ogre
2210:
2209:
2199:Magog the Ogre
2160:comment added
2142:
2140:Maurizio Rossi
2137:
2136:
2135:
2125:Magog the Ogre
2083:
2082:Talk page poll
2080:
2065:
2064:
2054:Magog the Ogre
2050:
2049:
2048:
2045:
2042:
2027:
2020:
1958:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1924:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1909:Magog the Ogre
1880:
1879:
1869:Magog the Ogre
1847:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1832:Magog the Ogre
1824:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1739:
1738:
1728:Magog the Ogre
1721:do you have a
1702:
1701:
1691:Magog the Ogre
1668:
1667:
1657:Magog the Ogre
1629:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1612:Magog the Ogre
1594:
1590:
1559:
1558:
1546:
1516:
1492:
1476:
1438:
1437:
1419:
1418:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1346:
1343:
1279:Gertrude Stein
1231:
1228:
1213:Magog the Ogre
1211:
1210:
1182:Magog the Ogre
1179:
1178:
1163:
1162:
1137:
1136:
1102:
1099:
1098:
1077:not reasonable
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1055:
1052:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1034:
1029:
1012:
1011:
998:
973:Magog the Ogre
969:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
939:
938:
937:
936:
925:Magog the Ogre
911:Magog the Ogre
882:
881:
871:Magog the Ogre
843:
842:NPOV-title tag
840:
809:Message added
807:
792:
790:
787:
786:
785:
775:Magog the Ogre
745:
744:
734:Magog the Ogre
725:
724:
723:
713:Magog the Ogre
680:
675:
674:
673:
663:Magog the Ogre
632:User:Mwhite148
627:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
610:Magog the Ogre
603:
602:
601:
600:
590:Magog the Ogre
569:
568:
519:
516:
478:
463:
461:
458:
457:
456:
446:Magog the Ogre
412:
407:
397:
396:
386:Magog the Ogre
351:
348:
337:
334:
333:
332:
322:Magog the Ogre
303:
302:
292:Magog the Ogre
286:
285:
189:
186:
174:
171:
150:
147:
146:
145:
135:Magog the Ogre
104:
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3751:
3742:
3741:
3737:
3733:
3726:
3722:
3718:
3714:
3713:
3712:
3711:
3707:
3703:
3699:
3692:
3688:
3684:
3680:
3675:
3674:
3673:
3672:
3668:
3664:
3660:
3653:
3649:
3645:
3641:
3637:
3633:
3629:
3626:
3625:
3624:
3623:
3619:
3615:
3611:
3607:
3603:
3599:
3592:
3588:
3584:
3579:
3573:
3571:
3567:
3563:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3556:
3552:
3548:
3543:
3539:
3527:
3523:
3519:
3514:
3509:
3505:
3501:
3497:
3493:
3489:
3488:
3487:
3486:
3485:
3482:
3478:
3474:
3470:
3469:Scottdude2000
3466:
3453:
3449:
3445:
3441:
3436:
3432:
3431:
3430:
3429:
3428:
3427:
3423:
3419:
3418:Scottdude2000
3409:
3405:
3401:
3394:
3393:edit conflict
3389:
3388:
3387:
3386:
3383:
3379:
3375:
3370:
3366:
3362:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3355:
3351:
3350:Scottdude2000
3340:
3339:
3335:
3331:
3324:
3320:
3316:
3312:
3307:
3306:
3305:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3289:
3285:
3281:
3277:
3275:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3256:
3252:
3245:
3241:
3237:
3233:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3221:
3217:
3205:
3201:
3197:
3193:
3188:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3182:
3181:
3177:
3173:
3161:
3157:
3153:
3148:
3147:
3146:
3145:
3141:
3137:
3126:
3125:
3121:
3117:
3110:
3106:
3102:
3096:
3088:
3081:
3076:
3075:
3074:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3039:
3038:
3034:
3030:
3026:
3021:
3020:
3016:
3012:
2999:
2996:
2990:
2989:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2971:
2967:
2963:
2962:Archiveeditor
2959:
2955:
2950:
2947:
2946:
2943:
2940:
2934:
2933:
2926:
2925:
2921:
2917:
2908:
2907:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2888:
2884:
2880:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2858:
2855:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2838:
2834:
2830:
2825:
2821:
2820:
2812:
2808:
2804:
2800:
2799:
2798:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2787:142.104.222.5
2784:
2772:
2770:
2766:
2759:
2755:
2754:
2746:
2742:
2738:
2734:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2715:
2711:
2706:
2704:
2701:
2698:
2693:
2690:
2686:
2685:User:Samaleks
2682:
2678:
2674:
2670:
2665:
2660:
2658:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2604:
2601:
2589:
2585:
2581:
2577:
2573:
2568:
2557:
2556:
2555:
2554:
2550:
2548:
2540:
2539:here as an IP
2533:
2528:
2527:
2522:
2513:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2493:
2488:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2466:
2462:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2456:
2451:
2443:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2418:
2412:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2372:
2371:
2367:
2363:
2359:
2354:
2352:
2348:
2343:
2342:
2338:
2334:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2321:
2317:
2314:
2310:
2305:
2303:
2291:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2274:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2267:
2263:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2163:
2159:
2153:
2149:
2141:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2094:
2092:
2089:
2079:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2046:
2043:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2025:
2021:
2015:
2005:
1998:
1994:
1993:
1990:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1967:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1934:
1930:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1888:
1884:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1825:
1822:
1818:
1817:
1812:
1811:
1807:
1805:
1802:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1763:investigation
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1591:
1588:
1581:
1580:edit conflict
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1568:
1564:
1557:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1538:
1537:
1532:
1531:clarification
1528:
1524:
1520:
1517:
1515:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1455:
1450:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1421:
1420:
1417:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1399:
1396:
1394:
1390:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1344:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1337:
1332:
1330:
1325:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1305:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1287:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:contradiction
1268:
1267:
1262:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1241:
1237:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1192:
1189:
1187:
1183:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1109:US Navy Seals
1105:
1101:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1092:
1086:
1085:contradiction
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:not justified
1070:
1066:
1065:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1050:Contradiction
1048:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1016:According to
1014:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1001:
997:
996:
995:
993:
989:
985:
980:
978:
974:
961:
957:
953:
949:
948:
947:
946:
944:
934:
930:
926:
922:
921:
920:
916:
912:
908:
903:
902:
901:
900:
897:
892:
887:
880:
876:
872:
867:
866:
865:
864:
861:
857:
853:
849:
833:
823:
816:
812:
806:
804:
796:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
765:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
750:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
726:
722:
718:
714:
709:
708:
707:
706:
702:
698:
694:
690:
686:
679:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
655:
654:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
633:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
605:
604:
599:
595:
591:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
567:
563:
559:
554:
553:
552:
551:
547:
543:
538:
536:
533:
529:
525:
515:
512:
500:
490:
483:
477:
475:
467:
455:
451:
447:
443:
440:
429:
428:
427:
426:
422:
418:
411:
406:
405:
402:
401:GhostFace1234
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
372:
371:GhostFace1234
368:
364:
360:
356:
347:
346:
343:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
317:
316:
312:
308:
301:
297:
293:
288:
287:
283:
278:
268:
261:
252:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
213:
208:
206:
201:
199:
195:
185:
184:
181:
170:
169:
165:
161:
157:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
128:
127:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
107:Ogrebot made
103:Ogrebot error
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
3729:
3697:
3695:
3678:
3656:
3635:
3595:
3537:
3463:— Preceding
3458:
3414:
3346:
3327:
3310:
3292:
3248:
3213:
3179:
3169:
3132:
3113:
3054:
3040:
3022:
3008:
2994:
2991:
2960:
2956:
2953:
2938:
2935:
2914:
2891:
2861:
2781:— Preceding
2777:
2762:
2707:
2694:
2661:
2641:
2597:
2566:
2546:
2536:
2516:
2481:
2444:
2441:
2408:
2373:
2362:edit warring
2355:
2344:
2335:
2306:
2299:
2262:Jeremyjoshua
2259:
2222:Jeremyjoshua
2211:
2182:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2148:Jeremyjoshua
2144:
2121:weak support
2120:
2095:
2087:
2085:
2066:
1960:
1943:Nedim ArdoÄźa
1929:help request
1926:
1923:Help request
1893:97.77.103.82
1889:
1885:
1881:
1853:97.77.103.82
1849:
1808:
1804:
1801:
1754:
1740:
1703:
1669:
1631:
1562:
1560:
1548:
1535:
1534:
1530:
1522:
1518:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1482:
1478:
1462:
1458:
1453:
1452:
1444:
1439:
1400:
1397:
1386:
1381:; and (c) a
1333:
1326:
1321:
1308:
1300:
1290:
1288:
1285:
1264:
1260:
1233:
1195:
1193:
1190:
1180:
1159:
1140:
1135:first rodeo.
1132:
1095:
1088:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1015:
1004:
991:
981:
971:
941:
891:I never have
885:
883:
856:my post here
845:
800:
746:
682:
678:User:MosMusy
629:
570:
523:
521:
507:
471:
438:
414:
398:
353:
339:
304:
259:
257:
225:
221:
215:
210:
209:
202:
197:
191:
176:
152:
106:
75:
43:
37:
3365:Rick Warren
3136:Bulwersator
3116:Bulwersator
3091:instead of
3064:Bulwersator
3062:may be not
3043:Bulwersator
3029:Bulwersator
3023:Especially
3011:Bulwersator
2689:new article
2532:User:Bijuts
2216:—Preceding
2183:prestigious
2156:—Preceding
1966:information
1828:clean hands
1119:explained,
1111:who killed
1104:ARGUMENT #2
1089:In future,
1000:ARGUMENT #1
935:as follows:
848:this thread
644:TheGrappler
518:Hello Magog
509:—Preceding
444:, granted.
218:WP:NFC#UULP
212:acceptable.
205:WP:NFC#UULP
149:PD-Maldives
36:This is an
3492:competence
2653:Trivandrum
2638:Some Facts
2598:Regarding
2520:SlimVirgin
2486:SlimVirgin
2449:SlimVirgin
2416:SlimVirgin
2069:Sfan00 IMG
2035:de minimis
1973:Sfan00 IMG
1638:this case
1389:refutation
1377:; and (b)
1375:refutation
1354:refutation
1292:ad hominem
1266:ad hominem
1263:, but the
1261:ad nauseam
1117:Dick Couch
1058:Ad Hominem
1032:Refutation
923:Thank you
813:. You can
753:EdJohnston
697:EdJohnston
693:User:Mov25
558:BernieW650
528:BernieW650
417:Sreejith K
307:Acidtoyman
230:Acidtoyman
111:change to
95:Archive 20
87:Archive 15
82:Archive 14
76:Archive 13
70:Archive 12
65:Archive 11
60:Archive 10
3631:judgment.
3534:Good work
3504:WP:NPOV/N
3330:117Avenue
3295:117Avenue
3251:117Avenue
3216:117Avenue
3172:situation
2916:WyrdLight
2699:article-
2677:Kochuveli
2657:New Delhi
2497:It's OK.
2405:KeepLocal
1759:again (4)
1403:threshold
837:template.
749:WP:ARBAA2
728:FYI, see
524:Giovann..
504:template.
399:Thanks!--
173:Apologies
117:Nigel Ish
3477:contribs
3465:unsigned
2783:unsigned
2649:Thrissur
2578:if not.
2547:Abhishek
2347:Nihonjoe
2337:Nihonjoe
2309:Nihonjoe
2230:contribs
2218:unsigned
2179:renowned
2175:prolific
2029:Is it a
2014:PD-shape
1941:~Thanks
1751:here (3)
1747:this (2)
1743:here (1)
1503:numerous
1385:process.
1230:Response
1143:headnote
929:Response
850:(on the
822:Talkback
573:V7-sport
542:V7-sport
489:Talkback
480:You can
3435:stalked
3374:Lyonscc
3114:Thanks
3087:copyvio
2898:Mathsci
2864:Mathsci
2837:history
2572:WP:ROPE
2358:bandaid
2187:peacock
2158:undated
2004:PD-text
1767:Neftchi
1707:Neftchi
1673:Neftchi
1642:Neftchi
1634:MosMusy
1608:WP:MPOV
1603:process
1459:already
1153:. (See
511:undated
39:archive
3698:should
3636:didn't
3496:WP:RFC
3095:delete
2710:Bijuts
2671:page,
2669:Kerala
2576:WP:ANI
2376:Tenmei
2351:Ged UK
2327:Ged UK
2171:gifted
2102:Tenmei
1957:Images
1587:WP:AGF
1563:really
1519:Fourth
1479:Second
1467:WP:ANI
1463:formal
1427:Tenmei
1407:Tenmei
1304:WP:FOC
1273:which
1217:Tenmei
1200:Tenmei
1186:Ajl772
1168:Tenmei
1155:WP:FOC
1151:"spin"
1091:WP:AGF
889:Nope,
659:WP:CCI
532:WP:BRD
526:eeer,
342:Barong
260:Delete
198:delete
3732:MGA73
3702:MGA73
3663:MGA73
3614:MGA73
3547:MGA73
3005:Image
2845:watch
2841:links
2697:Nemom
2664:Nemom
2645:Kochi
2366:Lvhis
2098:BRICS
1803:Ashot
1549:Fifth
1527:WP:DR
1495:Third
1445:First
1350:WP:DR
1318:WP:DR
1314:WP:DR
1275:WP:DR
1236:WP:DR
1069:WP:DR
1044:WP:DR
1022:WP:DR
1018:WP:DR
952:Lvhis
16:<
3736:talk
3721:talk
3706:talk
3687:talk
3667:talk
3648:talk
3618:talk
3612:? --
3587:talk
3566:talk
3551:talk
3522:talk
3500:WP:M
3473:talk
3448:talk
3422:talk
3404:talk
3378:talk
3367:and
3354:talk
3334:talk
3319:talk
3299:talk
3284:talk
3270:talk
3255:talk
3240:talk
3220:talk
3200:talk
3156:talk
3140:talk
3129:Info
3120:talk
3105:talk
3068:talk
3047:talk
3041:Heh
3033:talk
3015:talk
2981:talk
2966:talk
2954:Hi,
2920:talk
2902:talk
2883:talk
2868:talk
2849:logs
2833:talk
2829:edit
2807:talk
2791:talk
2769:talk
2756:See
2741:talk
2714:talk
2702:and
2628:talk
2612:talk
2584:talk
2567:Done
2508:talk
2473:talk
2433:talk
2411:this
2395:talk
2380:talk
2349:and
2331:here
2323:here
2318:and
2316:here
2286:talk
2266:talk
2251:talk
2226:talk
2203:talk
2181:and
2173:and
2152:talk
2129:talk
2106:talk
2100:. --
2073:talk
2058:talk
1977:talk
1947:talk
1913:talk
1897:talk
1873:talk
1857:talk
1836:talk
1796:this
1794:and
1792:this
1788:here
1786:and
1784:here
1771:talk
1732:talk
1723:diff
1711:talk
1695:talk
1677:talk
1661:talk
1646:talk
1616:talk
1507:more
1483:miss
1454:your
1449:here
1431:talk
1411:talk
1369:and
1336:WP:V
1221:talk
1204:talk
1184:and
1172:talk
1127:and
1079:and
986:and
975:and
956:talk
915:talk
875:talk
779:talk
757:talk
738:talk
717:talk
701:talk
667:talk
648:talk
614:talk
594:talk
577:talk
562:talk
546:talk
450:talk
439:Done
421:talk
390:talk
326:talk
311:talk
296:talk
272:and
234:talk
164:talk
139:talk
121:talk
109:this
3311:too
3180:Boy
3176:Roy
2304:.
2154:)
2088:see
2009:or
1933:AJL
1610:).
1567:AJL
1553:AJL
1541:AJL
1536:not
1511:AJL
1487:AJL
1471:AJL
1423:AJL
1356:or
1348:C.
1329:Aha
1320:: "
1310:AJL
1301:see
1257:AJL
1240:AJL
1145:or
1133:our
1115:.
977:AJL
896:AJL
860:AJL
827:or
540:MTO
494:or
267:Rtd
226:and
222:and
180:AJL
3738:)
3723:)
3708:)
3689:)
3679:it
3669:)
3650:)
3620:)
3608:+
3604:+
3600:+
3589:)
3568:)
3553:)
3545:--
3524:)
3516:.
3479:)
3475:•
3450:)
3424:)
3406:)
3380:)
3356:)
3336:)
3321:)
3301:)
3286:)
3272:)
3257:)
3242:)
3222:)
3202:)
3158:)
3142:)
3122:)
3107:)
3097:}}
3093:{{
3089:}}
3085:{{
3070:)
3049:)
3035:)
3017:)
2983:)
2968:)
2922:)
2904:)
2896:.
2885:)
2870:)
2847:|
2843:|
2839:|
2835:|
2831:|
2809:)
2793:)
2743:)
2716:)
2708:--
2630:)
2614:)
2586:)
2541:.
2510:)
2475:)
2467:.
2435:)
2397:)
2382:)
2288:)
2268:)
2253:)
2232:)
2228:•
2205:)
2131:)
2108:)
2075:)
2060:)
2017:}}
2011:{{
2007:}}
2001:{{
1979:)
1969:}}
1963:{{
1949:)
1915:)
1899:)
1875:)
1859:)
1838:)
1830:.
1773:)
1734:)
1713:)
1697:)
1679:)
1663:)
1648:)
1618:)
1433:)
1413:)
1338:,
1324:."
1281:,
1223:)
1206:)
1174:)
1075:,
958:)
917:)
877:)
835:}}
832:Tb
829:{{
825:}}
819:{{
781:)
759:)
751:.
740:)
719:)
703:)
669:)
650:)
616:)
596:)
579:)
564:)
548:)
502:}}
499:Tb
496:{{
492:}}
486:{{
452:)
423:)
392:)
365:,
361:,
357:,
328:)
313:)
298:)
282:."
280:}}
277:Rb
274:{{
270:}}
264:{{
254:}}
248:{{
236:)
166:)
141:)
123:)
91:→
3734:(
3719:(
3704:(
3685:(
3665:(
3646:(
3616:(
3585:(
3564:(
3549:(
3520:(
3471:(
3446:(
3420:(
3402:(
3395:)
3391:(
3376:(
3352:(
3332:(
3317:(
3297:(
3282:(
3268:(
3253:(
3238:(
3218:(
3198:(
3154:(
3138:(
3118:(
3103:(
3066:(
3045:(
3031:(
3013:(
2979:(
2964:(
2918:(
2900:(
2881:(
2866:(
2851:)
2827:(
2805:(
2789:(
2767:(
2739:(
2712:(
2626:(
2610:(
2608:B
2582:(
2570:(
2564:Y
2543:—
2506:(
2471:(
2431:(
2393:(
2378:(
2333:.
2284:(
2264:(
2249:(
2224:(
2201:(
2164:.
2150:(
2127:(
2104:(
2071:(
2056:(
2041:.
1975:(
1945:(
1911:(
1895:(
1871:(
1855:(
1834:(
1769:(
1730:(
1709:(
1693:(
1675:(
1659:(
1644:(
1614:(
1582:)
1578:(
1429:(
1409:(
1306:?
1219:(
1202:(
1170:(
1157:)
1060:.
954:(
913:(
873:(
805:.
777:(
755:(
736:(
715:(
699:(
665:(
646:(
612:(
592:(
575:(
560:(
544:(
476:.
448:(
436:Y
419:(
388:(
324:(
309:(
294:(
232:(
162:(
137:(
119:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
