543:, I do appreciate your reasonable dialogue and your not casting aspersions. I would prefer to have the discussion on the talk page with the status quo in place, as I don't think other editors reverting is really a fair metric. Also, lest my latest reversion explanation be considered "trolling", I want to be clear that I don't mean it to be. That is how conservatives see it, just as people with other views might see whitewashing on other pages -- even if reliable sources are involved in both. Thank you for understanding.
1181:
1616:
1501:
1017:
406:
351:
930:
1820:
1097:
223:
1571:, could you elaborate? This note you posted speaks of "past disruption in this topic area", but it does not mention what topic area. I am not aware of having disrupted any topic areas lately (with a handful of exceptions from quite a while ago! Which you can see by scrolling up on my talk page.) Anyway hope you are well and just want to see if you can elaborate, or maybe it was an error / has some incorrect text? --
706:, there is no master list of reliable sources, rather, like basically everything else here, things are hashed out in discussion. One thing I often do when confronted with an issue like that is to search the archives at the noticeboard to see if there has been a relevant thread -- and often there has, at least for sources which aren't brand new. You certainly aren't bound by whatever conclusion was reached, since
498:-- I don't know why you would assume that. I do know what it is, and consider it reliable. However, other reliable sources have other views about the subject in question. My understanding -- as has been explained to me on other pages -- is that a disputed change should achieve consensus on the talk page first. Is that not correct? Thank you.
576:
You say "that's not how this works" in the edit discussion -- but that is how it worked on the
Cernovich page. Does it ultimately just come down to how many different editors revert for a different side as to whether the status quo or the change is put up while discussion on the talk page is ongoing?
622:
Trump's abuse of the term "fake news" is already covered in the paragraph preceding the content you are pushing. The statement as you prefer it is devoid of the essential context that his claims of "fake news" are pretextual, which is present in the previous paragraph. So you're adding content that
521:
cycle. In this specific case, I broke with that practice because two other editors also reverted you, and because I don't really think you've offered an explanation for your revert beyond personal disagreement with a reliable source. I'm open to discussing this with you on the talk page, but you're
1730:
Hi, I have that page on my watchlist given the recent controversy. JBL is correct it means one revert of anything once every 24 hours, and you can’t do more than one even if unrelated. Consecutive edits count as one revert, but otherwise you shouldn’t be reverting more than once.
1716:-- I believe you will see you are mistaken; my reversions here are different from the one I had made previously, and thus are not 1RR. Additionally, I did make a note on the talk page regarding the edit in question, no? Thank you. I hope you are doing well in the pandemic! --
1596:. As the notice says it doesn't mean you've done anything wrong. Its job is merely to alert you that DS is present in the area so you pay extra attention to things like edit notices. I've put the correctly worded alert below. Sorry about the incorrect notice before,
562:
is a bright-line rule that prohibits editors from making more than 3 reverts in a 24 hour period. You've already crossed that line. If you revert again, you're very likely to be temporarily blocked from making edits. It's time to open a talk page discussion
320:
was the third time you've added almost the exact same text to the talk page. There's no reason for this. Other editors can see what you've written, and people are less likely to hear you out when you repeat yourself. Please don't do that.
1033:
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
1348:
595:, so there's some slightly more restrictive standards in place regarding the editing. The common denominator in both cases is that you were the lone editor reverting and multiple experienced editors disagreed with your reasoning.
557:
I'm sorry, but I don't think that's going to happen. In part because you yourself are saying you don't actually object to including the opinion, and your objections aren't really rooted in a policy. Just to be clear:
1766:
Super-technically there was an intervening edit, but I don’t think any admin is going to block over the timing of a copy edit. I was more coming by to say be careful :) I know these rules can be confusing.
1062:
1847:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1697:
You've now violated it. Simultaneously, you've demanded that someone who has been explaining each of their edits on the talkpage use the talkpage, without using it yourself. Not a good look. --
1071:
It means you are making edits that introduce a risk of a topic ban or other restriction based on your current edits. The first notice was about post-1932 US politics, this one about biographies.
517:
editors to gain consensus prior to making changes, although it may be a good idea to seek consensus first if you know that your edits are likely to be controversial. Normally I try to follow the
522:
going to have an extremely tough time persuading editors to keep out a CJR source. You're probably better off making a suggestion about adding content that might offer additional context.
1411:
191:. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!
1863:
1652:
1537:
1054:
442:
387:
1373:
1249:. You have been blocked for an additional 72 hours. Failure to discuss your changes will simply lead to increasing blocks, so I'm not sure what your end game is. Knowledge works on
1833:
1645:
1530:
1047:
435:
380:
1632:
You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
1898:
367:
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
1637:
1522:
1039:
427:
372:
1660:
872:
1291:
866:
157:
1633:
1593:
1518:
1035:
423:
395:
368:
1911:, of whether or not the theory that a genetic link exists between race and intelligence is a fringe theory. This RfC supercedes the recent RfC on this topic at
1108:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
234:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
591:
The lead paragraph of
Cernovich's entry is a little different: it's been hammered out over a long time with a lot of input from different editors, and it's a
1927:
1387:. The editor In question had zero history on the Illegal Immigration in the United States page, and was solely asked to go there to help Edit5001 edit-war.
917:'s political rant? It is very one-sided, and I, and I'm sure many others, disagree. Is this political viewpoint Wiki's official policy, or just his opinion?
1889:
343:
106:
22:
860:
642:
Shouldn't editors use less politically biased language than your first sentence here? This is an encylopedia, not the
Democratic National Committee.
1343:
799:
751:, a non-partisan chart. Use only sources that are in the green and yellow boxes, and even then avoid using those near the bottom of the yellow box.
466:
975:
1725:
1776:
1761:
1740:
1663:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
1548:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
1396:
1065:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
453:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
398:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
1006:
967:
989:
1605:
1580:
1142:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
268:
to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
1810:
736:
603:
586:
571:
552:
530:
1682:
1805:
1487:
1323:
687:
669:
651:
1084:
1561:
1473:
507:
487:
102:
98:
1429:
1545:
1309:
1151:
884:
710:, but it will give you a sense of where things stand. Anyway, that's just my approach, feel free to ignore! Have a nice day.
277:
110:
1265:
1493:
1319:
450:
329:
1885:
878:
72:
1459:
1213:
905:
42:
1440:
1416:
471:
168:
153:
30:
310:
300:
719:
1788:
950:
1881:
1656:
1541:
1435:
If an edit you make is reverted you must discuss on the talk page and wait 24 hours before reinstating your edit.
1285:
or maybe simply a topic ban as it seems so obvious will be the next step given this editor's last 10 or so edits.
1169:
1058:
478:
I'm assuming that you actually don't know what it is. Note that its chairman is the editor in chief for
Reuters.
446:
391:
211:
91:
1305:
636:
317:
305:
Hey there. I just wanted to let you know that I refactored your comment here because it didn't comply with the
141:
33:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Knowledge:
1706:
1517:
You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
1235:
422:
You have shown interest in . Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called
295:
62:
309:. New comments should go at the bottom of a section. You can read a little more about how to use talk pages
1856:
1147:
1113:
273:
239:
1868:
938:
934:
160:, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being
337:
okay, thank you for formatting correctly. Just want to make sure my statement is in the correct section.
1904:
1801:
1641:
1526:
1392:
1109:
1043:
845:
656:
Biased in what way? It's been likened to Stalin and McCarthy, and unaanimously condened by the Senate.
472:
431:
376:
235:
57:
1296:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
1189:
1157:
283:
161:
1592:
sorry about that. I gave the code wrong (r+i rather than r-i). I did this because of your revert at
1120:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
980:
It's not reliably published, ie it has no editorial control and articles can change at any moment.
855:
775:
697:
246:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
67:
1245:
to discuss your changes — just went back straight to reverting the same edits, which I deem to be
1702:
617:
121:
1772:
1736:
1206:
1143:
1101:
1090:
901:
748:
269:
227:
208:
188:
184:
117:
37:
1844:
1797:
1388:
1297:
986:
947:
484:
463:
1622:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
1507:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
1023:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
412:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
357:
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.
1923:
1855:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1794:
1422:
1380:
1313:
1174:
958:
Thank you for the note. I have added a note clarifying that I believe he is in good faith.
759:
133:
84:
8:
1601:
1557:
1117:
923:
243:
1316:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
1713:
1698:
1369:
1349:
Your input is requested on changes to the
Illegal Immigration in the United States page
216:
176:
52:
179:
is a good place to start learning about
Knowledge. If you have any questions, see the
1827:
1768:
1753:
1745:
1732:
1717:
1674:
1587:
1572:
1465:
1403:
1355:
1339:
1330:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
998:
959:
914:
897:
890:
766:
728:
715:
679:
643:
578:
544:
499:
192:
841:
1875:
1840:
1219:
1166:
981:
942:
493:
479:
458:
292:
16:
1447:. Please don't violate the editing restrictions again or you may be sanctioned at
1361:
758:
should factor heavily into how we rate sources for factual accuracy. They are the
623:
actually degrades the accuracy of the article without adding any new information.
1919:
1139:
265:
149:
1852:
1597:
1568:
1553:
1384:
1254:
1105:
231:
1752:, made several consecutive edits. So my edits are valid under 1RR, correct? --
1912:
1908:
1848:
1483:
1455:
1444:
1443:
which you didn't participate in. Also, please note that the article is under
1426:
1365:
1250:
1079:
823:
755:
707:
703:
664:
658:
631:
625:
592:
559:
518:
306:
180:
128:
1479:
It's all good. I look forward to any comments you have on the talk page. -
1448:
1335:
1331:
1282:
1246:
1202:
1198:
1180:
711:
47:
1795:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Darryl.jensen
577:
That's what appears to be the case. At any rate, I won't revert further.
1692:
1212:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
1162:
596:
564:
536:
523:
322:
288:
1859:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1615:
1500:
1216:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
1128:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
1016:
405:
350:
254:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
1837:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1301:
832:
804:
784:
869:. Here'll you find sources that are deprecated. Don't use them at all.
1819:
1276:
1262:
1232:
929:
145:
26:
87:– do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
1480:
1452:
1073:
674:
Check sources. That all had nothing to do with his use of the term
167:
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as
Knowledge is
1257:
is on you to secure this consensus for any material which you are
1464:
Apologies, I saw the 1RR but missed the section on the talk page
1362:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Illegal_immigration_to_the_United_States
913:
First, thank you much for this explanation! But, why the link to
1872:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1628:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
1513:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
1029:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
418:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
363:
imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
105:. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be
97:
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a
1862:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
1831:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
1138:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
264:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
788:
827:
937:
when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on
836:
79:
Please bear these points in mind while editing
Knowledge:
800:"The Principles of the Truth-O-Meter: How we fact-check"
1843:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1300:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1899:
RfC on racial hereditarianism at the R&I talk-page
1360:
Please look at the recent changes and discussions at
1364:
and give your thoughts/make edits you deem fitting.
1205:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
1133:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
873:WP:NPOV means neutral editing, not neutral content
259:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
867:WP:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources
1292:Disambiguation link notification for December 20
1907:revisits the question, considered last year at
1748:I see, thanks. But I made one revert, and then
103:Knowledge's Biography of Living Persons policy
1915:that was closed as improperly formulated.
1651:For additional information, please see the
1636:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
1536:For additional information, please see the
1521:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
1402:Apologies, wasn’t totally sure about that.
1053:For additional information, please see the
1038:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
776:Poynter International Fact Checking Network
441:For additional information, please see the
426:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
386:For additional information, please see the
371:is in effect. Any administrator may impose
344:Discretionary sanctions alerts, please read
94:– this is one of Knowledge's core policies.
1918:Your participation is welcome. Thank you.
1648:, when making edits related to the topic.
1533:, when making edits related to the topic.
1150:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
1104:according to the reverts you have made on
1050:, when making edits related to the topic.
861:WP:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)
798:Holan, Angie Drobnic (February 12, 2018).
438:, when making edits related to the topic.
383:, when making edits related to the topic.
276:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to
230:according to the reverts you have made on
1100:You currently appear to be engaged in an
226:You currently appear to be engaged in an
1640:on editors who do not strictly follow
1525:on editors who do not strictly follow
1042:on editors who do not strictly follow
430:on editors who do not strictly follow
375:on editors who do not strictly follow
140:Do not add troublesome content to any
797:
1828:2020 Arbitration Committee elections
1673:Got it, thank you for clarifying. --
1154:. If you engage in an edit war, you
976:You can't cite Knowledge as a source
280:. If you engage in an edit war, you
1811:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
1653:guidance on discretionary sanctions
1538:guidance on discretionary sanctions
1055:guidance on discretionary sanctions
513:There is definitely no policy that
443:guidance on discretionary sanctions
388:guidance on discretionary sanctions
127:If you are testing, please use the
13:
1179:
14:
1938:
1421:Hi MaximumIdeas. You violated an
1152:request temporary page protection
278:request temporary page protection
101:to any Knowledge page and follow
1818:
1614:
1499:
1095:
1015:
928:
404:
349:
221:
1866:and submit your choices on the
885:WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
1793:You have been mentioned here:
1379:This is what's referred to as
1170:00:44, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
1112:with others, to avoid editing
1085:23:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
1007:16:34, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
990:15:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
238:with others, to avoid editing
1:
1890:03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
1845:Knowledge arbitration process
1494:Discretionary sanctions alert
1344:08:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
1193:from editing for a period of
879:WP:Reliable sources checklist
851:Resources here at Knowledge:
38:The five pillars of Knowledge
842:Washington Post fact checker
535:Makes sense. For the record
63:How to write a great article
7:
1488:15:50, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
1474:14:58, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
1460:14:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
1412:15:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
1397:15:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
1374:03:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
1266:19:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
1236:03:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
968:15:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
951:15:07, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
939:Talk:Antifa (United States)
906:01:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
737:14:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
720:13:38, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
688:14:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
670:13:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
652:12:53, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
637:09:12, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
604:16:14, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
587:15:18, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
572:15:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
553:14:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
531:14:45, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
508:12:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
488:11:58, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
467:11:56, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
330:20:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
10:
1943:
1905:Talk:Race and intelligence
1882:MediaWiki message delivery
1646:page-specific restrictions
1531:page-specific restrictions
1417:Edit restriction violation
1048:page-specific restrictions
473:Columbia Journalism Review
436:page-specific restrictions
381:page-specific restrictions
296:01:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
212:22:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
122:abuse of multiple accounts
73:Simplified Manual of Style
1214:guide to appealing blocks
1207:make useful contributions
744:Here are some resources:
301:Talk pages and repetition
43:Contributing to Knowledge
1880:to your user talk page.
1806:23:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
1789:Sockpuppet investigation
1757:
1750:more than 24 hours later
1721:
1678:
1576:
1469:
1407:
1118:try to reach a consensus
1002:
963:
732:
683:
647:
582:
548:
503:
244:try to reach a consensus
183:, add a question to the
1928:20:57, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
1777:02:14, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
1762:02:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
1741:02:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
1726:03:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
1707:02:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
1683:03:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
1657:Arbitration Committee's
1634:discretionary sanctions
1606:02:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
1581:02:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
1562:02:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
1542:Arbitration Committee's
1519:discretionary sanctions
1144:appropriate noticeboard
1059:Arbitration Committee's
1036:discretionary sanctions
447:Arbitration Committee's
424:discretionary sanctions
392:Arbitration Committee's
369:discretionary sanctions
270:appropriate noticeboard
1253:—not by fiat— and the
1184:
1841:Arbitration Committee
1825:Hello! Voting in the
1594:Race and intellegence
1298:Vox (political party)
1224:Your reason here ~~~~
1183:
762:, so use them often.
702:Per your question at
92:neutral point of view
1642:Knowledge's policies
1527:Knowledge's policies
1332:opt-out instructions
1044:Knowledge's policies
749:The Media Bias Chart
708:consensus can change
519:Bold, Revert, Delete
432:Knowledge's policies
377:Knowledge's policies
307:talk page guidelines
162:blocked from editing
158:promotional messages
1310:fix with Dab solver
933:Please remember to
1857:arbitration policy
1322:• Join us at the
1312:). Such links are
1203:disruptive editing
1185:
1148:dispute resolution
316:More importantly:
274:dispute resolution
177:Knowledge tutorial
85:Respect copyrights
68:Naming conventions
48:How to edit a page
31:your contributions
1896:
1895:
1327:
1314:usually incorrect
1083:
935:assume good faith
915:User:JzG/Politics
891:User:JzG/Politics
856:WP:Citing sources
767:Poynter Institute
668:
635:
1934:
1879:
1822:
1815:
1814:
1798:Snooganssnoogans
1618:
1591:
1503:
1389:Snooganssnoogans
1359:
1317:
1306:check to confirm
1280:
1241:You didn't even
1227:
1123:Points to note:
1099:
1098:
1077:
1019:
984:
945:
932:
816:
814:
812:
698:Reliable Sources
662:
629:
601:
569:
541:
528:
496:
482:
461:
408:
353:
327:
249:Points to note:
225:
224:
205:
202:
199:
196:
136:
111:reliable sources
58:Picture tutorial
53:Editing tutorial
29:. Thank you for
1942:
1941:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1901:
1873:
1813:
1791:
1695:
1666:
1665:
1619:
1585:
1551:
1550:
1504:
1496:
1419:
1353:
1351:
1324:DPL WikiProject
1294:
1274:
1230:
1229:
1217:
1210:
1177:
1096:
1093:
1068:
1067:
1020:
982:
978:
943:
926:
810:
808:
700:
620:
618:Not really, no.
597:
565:
537:
524:
494:
480:
476:
459:
456:
455:
409:
401:
400:
354:
346:
323:
303:
232:Mike Cernovich‎
222:
219:
203:
200:
197:
194:
132:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1940:
1900:
1897:
1894:
1893:
1864:the candidates
1834:eligible users
1823:
1812:
1809:
1790:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1694:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1620:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1505:
1498:
1497:
1495:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1418:
1415:
1400:
1399:
1350:
1347:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1269:
1268:
1211:
1187:You have been
1186:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1136:
1135:
1130:
1106:Mike Cernovich
1092:
1091:September 2019
1089:
1088:
1087:
1021:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
977:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
925:
922:
921:
920:
919:
918:
894:
893:
888:
882:
876:
870:
864:
858:
849:
848:
839:
830:
820:
819:
818:
817:
792:
791:
781:
780:
779:
778:
770:
769:
753:
752:
742:
741:
740:
739:
699:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
619:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
475:
470:
410:
403:
402:
355:
348:
347:
345:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
302:
299:
262:
261:
256:
218:
215:
173:
172:
165:
138:
125:
114:
109:with multiple
95:
88:
76:
75:
70:
65:
60:
55:
50:
45:
40:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1939:
1930:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1916:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1892:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1877:
1871:
1870:
1865:
1860:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1836:
1835:
1830:
1829:
1824:
1821:
1817:
1816:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1796:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1664:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1649:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1630:
1629:
1627:
1617:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1589:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1549:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1534:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1515:
1514:
1512:
1502:
1489:
1485:
1482:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1454:
1450:
1446:
1442:
1437:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1428:
1427:Tulsi Gabbard
1424:
1414:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1381:WP:CANVASSING
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1357:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1328:
1325:
1321:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1284:
1278:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1267:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1234:
1225:
1221:
1215:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1191:
1182:
1172:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1160:from editing.
1159:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1051:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1031:
1030:
1028:
1018:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
988:
985:
969:
965:
961:
957:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
949:
946:
941:. Thank you.
940:
936:
931:
916:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
903:
899:
896:Have fun! --
892:
889:
886:
883:
880:
877:
874:
871:
868:
865:
862:
859:
857:
854:
853:
852:
847:
846:Glenn Kessler
843:
840:
838:
834:
831:
829:
825:
824:FactCheck.org
822:
821:
807:
806:
801:
796:
795:
794:
793:
790:
786:
783:
782:
777:
774:
773:
772:
771:
768:
765:
764:
763:
761:
760:gold standard
757:
756:Fact checkers
750:
747:
746:
745:
738:
734:
730:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
672:
671:
666:
661:
660:
655:
654:
653:
649:
645:
641:
640:
639:
638:
633:
628:
627:
605:
602:
600:
594:
590:
589:
588:
584:
580:
575:
574:
573:
570:
568:
561:
556:
555:
554:
550:
546:
542:
540:
534:
533:
532:
529:
527:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
509:
505:
501:
497:
490:
489:
486:
483:
474:
469:
468:
465:
462:
454:
452:
448:
444:
439:
437:
433:
429:
425:
420:
419:
417:
407:
399:
397:
393:
389:
384:
382:
378:
374:
370:
365:
364:
362:
352:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
326:
319:
314:
312:
308:
298:
297:
294:
290:
287:
286:from editing.
285:
279:
275:
271:
267:
260:
257:
255:
252:
251:
250:
247:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
214:
213:
210:
207:
206:
190:
187:or ask me on
186:
182:
178:
170:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
130:
126:
123:
119:
115:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:living person
96:
93:
89:
86:
83:
82:
81:
80:
74:
71:
69:
66:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
35:
34:
32:
28:
24:
1917:
1902:
1867:
1861:
1838:
1832:
1826:
1792:
1769:TonyBallioni
1754:MaximumIdeas
1749:
1746:TonyBallioni
1733:TonyBallioni
1718:MaximumIdeas
1696:
1675:MaximumIdeas
1650:
1631:
1625:
1623:
1621:
1588:MaximumIdeas
1573:MaximumIdeas
1552:
1535:
1516:
1510:
1508:
1506:
1466:MaximumIdeas
1463:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1420:
1404:MaximumIdeas
1401:
1356:MaximumIdeas
1352:
1329:
1295:
1258:
1242:
1231:
1223:
1199:edit warring
1194:
1188:
1175:October 2019
1155:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1122:
1114:disruptively
1094:
1072:
1052:
1032:
1026:
1024:
1022:
999:MaximumIdeas
979:
960:MaximumIdeas
927:
898:BullRangifer
895:
850:
809:. Retrieved
803:
754:
743:
729:MaximumIdeas
701:
680:MaximumIdeas
675:
657:
644:MaximumIdeas
624:
621:
598:
579:MaximumIdeas
566:
545:MaximumIdeas
538:
525:
514:
500:MaximumIdeas
491:
477:
457:
440:
421:
415:
413:
411:
385:
366:
360:
358:
356:
324:
318:this comment
315:
304:
281:
263:
258:
253:
248:
240:disruptively
220:
193:
189:my talk page
185:village pump
174:
118:edit warring
78:
77:
20:
1869:voting page
1439:I opened a
1423:restriction
1259:introducing
1110:collaborate
997:ok, thanks
983:Doug Weller
944:Doug Weller
924:August 2019
811:October 20,
727:Thank you!
676:"fake news"
495:Doug Weller
481:Doug Weller
460:Doug Weller
236:collaborate
169:not a forum
154:advertising
146:copyrighted
144:, such as:
90:Maintain a
1920:NightHeron
1903:An RfC at
1853:topic bans
1441:discussion
1334:. Thanks,
1318:(Read the
1302:Anti-Islam
1247:disruptive
833:Snopes.com
805:PolitiFact
785:PolitiFact
217:April 2019
181:help pages
107:referenced
21:Hello and
1849:site bans
1659:decision
1644:, or the
1638:sanctions
1598:Barkeep49
1569:Barkeep49
1554:Barkeep49
1544:decision
1529:, or the
1523:sanctions
1251:consensus
1140:talk page
1116:, and to
1061:decision
1046:, or the
1040:sanctions
563:yourself.
449:decision
434:, or the
428:sanctions
394:decision
379:, or the
373:sanctions
266:talk page
242:, and to
27:Knowledge
1655:and the
1624:It does
1540:and the
1509:It does
1366:Edit5001
1281:I think
1222:|reason=
1195:24 hours
1146:or seek
1102:edit war
1057:and the
1025:It does
515:requires
445:and the
414:It does
390:and the
359:It does
272:or seek
228:edit war
17:Welcome!
1876:NoACEMM
1385:WP:GANG
1336:DPL bot
1220:unblock
1190:blocked
1158:blocked
1156:may be
881:(essay)
875:(essay)
863:(MEDRS)
837:website
828:website
789:website
712:Dumuzid
284:blocked
282:may be
142:article
129:Sandbox
23:welcome
1913:WP:RSN
1909:WP:FTN
1445:WP:1RR
1163:Calton
887:(RS/N)
704:WP:RSN
599:Nblund
593:WP:BLP
567:Nblund
560:WP:3RR
539:Nblund
526:Nblund
325:Nblund
289:Calton
209:(talk)
148:text,
1449:WP:AE
1283:WP:AE
1080:help!
665:Help!
632:Help!
150:libel
134:do so
1924:talk
1886:talk
1839:The
1802:talk
1773:talk
1758:talk
1737:talk
1722:talk
1703:talk
1679:talk
1661:here
1602:talk
1577:talk
1558:talk
1546:here
1470:talk
1451:. -
1430:here
1408:talk
1393:talk
1383:and
1370:talk
1340:talk
1277:El C
1263:El_C
1255:onus
1233:El_C
1201:and
1197:for
1167:Talk
1063:here
1003:talk
987:talk
964:talk
948:talk
902:talk
813:2018
733:talk
716:talk
684:talk
648:talk
583:talk
549:talk
504:talk
485:talk
464:talk
451:here
396:here
311:here
293:Talk
175:The
1714:JBL
1712:Hi
1699:JBL
1693:1RR
1626:not
1567:Hi
1511:not
1486:đź–‹
1458:đź–‹
1425:on
1320:FAQ
1243:try
1074:Guy
1027:not
659:Guy
626:Guy
492:Hi
416:not
361:not
313:.
204:Fir
201:een
198:rgr
195:Eve
156:or
131:to
120:or
116:No
25:to
1926:)
1888:)
1878:}}
1874:{{
1851:,
1804:)
1775:)
1760:)
1739:)
1724:)
1705:)
1681:)
1604:)
1579:)
1560:)
1481:Mr
1472:)
1453:Mr
1410:)
1395:)
1372:)
1342:)
1326:.)
1308:|
1261:.
1228:.
1226:}}
1218:{{
1209:.
1165:|
1005:)
966:)
904:)
844:,
835:-
826:-
802:.
787:-
735:)
718:)
686:)
678:.
650:)
585:)
551:)
506:)
291:|
152:,
1922:(
1884:(
1800:(
1771:(
1756:(
1735:(
1720:(
1701:(
1677:(
1600:(
1590::
1586:@
1575:(
1556:(
1484:X
1468:(
1456:X
1406:(
1391:(
1368:(
1358::
1354:@
1338:(
1304:(
1279::
1275:@
1082:)
1078:(
1001:(
962:(
900:(
815:.
731:(
714:(
682:(
667:)
663:(
646:(
634:)
630:(
581:(
547:(
502:(
171:.
164:.
137:.
124:.
113:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.