2199:. The "new" intro is not mine nor new. I didn't really know what to do with it, but I also dislike the "old intro". The old intro uses coordinate system, which is just as technical, in fact the same thing, as a chart, which is short for coordinate chart if you will. The "new intro" used to be under the heading "Technical description" but the real technical description was below that. I think much in the "new intro" is/could be introductory. I preserved the "old intro" because I was not yet done with merging it with the new.
2101:. I want to add the more general definition of a scalar field, but I also want to preserve the specific case of Euclidean space. What is needed is an introductional paragraph that doesn't discriminate towards simplistic definitions. This is probably best accomplished by being very informal. Perhaps you could give such an intro a try? Meanwhile I will leave the old stuff mostly alone while I add some more general stuff.
3004:" (and leaving "del" as redirect); the fact that the TeX symbol is \nabla while \del is unknown seems some justification to me (in addition to my own, sometimes 'nonstandard' background...), while "del" is extremly likely to become ambigious (Spanish article, Computer key,...) (There might be a "procedure" fur such a suggestion, but I don't know it well...)
1584:. So I think it's safe to consider cat:PDEs as maths. Hence, I'd agree with your assumption. Perhaps, when you're done, you can make a list of articles appearing on the old LoMT that are not in one of the maths categories, and we can see whether they are in the wrong category or we need to redesignate some categories as mathematical. --
2051:
Thank you very much, I appreciate your trying to clear this up. I can't understand why linus thinks I threatened to VfD his user page, if he really does believe that. If it wouldn't be too much trouble, perhaps you could post on his user page as well, I'd like this dispute about nothing to go away.
1594:
I was also thinking of making a list of articles appearing on the old LoMT that are not in one of the maths categories! Actually I tried it once. There were several hunderd articles, if not one thousand. Many of them are redirects, red links, or disambig. Some were things I was not sure about. I will
1546:
is not; both of them are in the category. However, if articles from such "dubious" categories are not automatically added, then it will be hard to keep LoMT up-to-date. Since the boundary between maths and non-maths is arbitrary, and currently a lot of boundary cases are listed on LoMT, I think there
385:
I actually do all the changes by hand. All the bot does, is (a) identify the pages with likely misspellings from a local copy of math articles of
Knowledge, (b) fetch fresh copies of those (c) use ispell to suggest changes, (d) apply the changes I decide, and (e) upload stuff back to wikipedia. So, I
2349:
Your bot added "Hobbler-Bosch synthesis" on 19 May, which was subsequently moved to "Half of humanity is alive now". Today, your bot added "Half of humanity is alive now" but it did not delete "Hobbler-Bosch synthesis". Just wanted to let you know (of course it's easy for me to fix by hand), because
1838:
Hi
Stevertigo. If I think of it, my request was indeed not well-placed, and your reaction was to be expected. So, please accept my appologies. About the edit summaries themselves, I think their point is at least partially to give an idea about what an editor changed when somebody else is examining a
1557:
So far, I operate from the assumption that if an article is really math, then it will also show up in more specific categories besides the generic
Category:Equations. And you are right, there are issues sometimes with what a math article is. But as you said, if we err, we could err towards adding an
1315:
Hello Oleg. I was promoted to admin today, and I wanted to thank you for the time yo took to consider my RfA. As a result of your comments, and those of others about my low edit count (and possible inexperience in certain areas of WP), I will proceed with caution when using my privileges. I hope not
244:
PS The above also implies that we were at the same time and at the same place for at least one year, but somehow we never intersected. (Though I remember seeing you in the computer labs quite often, but that was before I started contributing here, so I had no obvious reason to get to talk to you :)
223:
Mathematics and Its
Applications is that kind of thing. It employs professors, mostly but not all with temporary appointments, and zillions of postdocs, and I suspect nearly no one else is affiliated with that organization. So I have doubts about the appropriateness of the category link you added.
1817:
Hi Rudy. I sort of thought that editing a new user's page to make it conform to the manual of style should be fine, as that's a good way of showing the user how the pages should look like (especially with the issue of capitalization, which a huge number of people get wrong). But I see your point, a
1619:
On additions: it is probably better to add inclusively, and let people delete anything actually annoying by hand. I'm a bit busy right now with other copyediting, and also bad hair days with my ISP. Anyway, thanks also from me for all your work on this, Oleg; you could have it in various languages.
1344:
I have a nice formula and graph display system on my site, which is easier than latex (and less powerful), but it is more appealing to high school math teacher types. It works wherever I need to display dynamically generated formulas. Example: 2x^2-3x-5 will display as it should. I am saying this
1097:
I did the same to the Julia page as I did to the
Mandelbrot page and that I did because it did not look good having both "wikisource" and "commons" together in the "extarnal links" section. First I just moved the two links above the headline but that did not look good either so I inserted the new
3126:
Other question: is there some "official guideline" about having a "topic" page about just one meaning of "topic", and a "topic (disambig)" page linking to all others? When is this justified? number of links? "age" of the "topic" page? length(= level of developedness) of the "topic" page? Why not
2840:
I strongly recommend checking all links by hand before deleting, as I've already had to replace a couple that were erroneously removed. As it stands, it looks like a local DNS problem would cause a link to be incorrectly flagged as dead. Not sure what other failure modes are, but they seem to be
2591:, right? My bot can certainly visit any single external link. It can scan for the words "not found" when downloading an external link. However, a user would still need to go through each of those suspicious links and make sure they are indeed dead pages. Then my bot could go and remove the links.
1743:
page, kind of "all these formulae are in fact a consequence of the second one, as all of them give the volume of rotational body (to be explained) by the formula V=\pi\int\rho(z)dz". I hesitate, because I know that the "pi" page is really a most public place (and thus should be considered almost
2528:
I think any tutorial you find online might do the job. When I learned it myself I found it easiest to get a paper written in LaTeX, and then modify it piece by piece. All you need to learn how to type the formulas, and how to split an article in sections. Should be doable for a computer science
1465:
and its subcategories to LoMT? In that case, I won't have to add any new articles myself; I just make sure that they are in a maths category and they will eventually appear automatically in LoMT. On a related issue: would it be possible to make a huge page containing all the LoMT subpages, from
1212:
I changed only those wich are math related (6 or so), and I fixed by hand some style issues. I do not plan to change more. Changing to the new template will be a tricky process, I am not sure a bot can do the job without user supervision and occasional tweaks. I wish the people who changed the
421:
I think what the page you pointed to says is that one should be careful with converting
British to American English and vice-versa. No, I don't do that, I don't even bother to examine which variant shows up more often in an article. If you have other suggestions, please let me know. Thanks.
3296:
I think the list is a little bit too long, also. But the list is just ALL the unary operators that C has. I BELIEVE that there are only very few programming unary operators that is not in that list. Therefore, it's a kind of difficult to cut some off because there are just almost all of
2162:, I liked the "old intro" much more than what you inserted. Nobody will understand all that chart thing, while the old introduction was using plain words. I think it is good to keep things simpler, at least in the introductory part, as this is a general encyclopedia not a scientific paper.
1856:
that my edit doesnt need it, though this isnt always the case. Im more than happy to respond to questions about a particular edit, and I appreciate your retraction (specificity is a virtue) as well as your general desire for clarity and clarification that compelled your original note.
2360:
I had noticed the above. I put that "Hobbler-Bosch synthesis" article on my list of articles to be removed, because I am too lazy to remove it by hand. The bot is now running again (to fix some other things) and will take care of removing this article too. Thanks for letting me
1474:? Then we can track all the changes at once with the "Related changes" link, and finally rule our section of Knowledge :) But perhaps the people administrating the servers will not be happy with it; I'm not sure how hard such a page would be on the servers. All the best,
78:
Help! Somebody highjacked Paul's account while he is on vacation, and doing all kinds of things in here! Or is it a clerverly devised bot Paul wrote? :) Or does Paul mean this is what vacation means, away from work, able to concentrate on
Knowledge full time?
2179:
Yes, this is the same as for
Laplace operator, but now I'm trying to also preserve the simpler special cases whilst adding the general case. The problem is obtaining logical article structure. I also like to keep things simple, but I also like to get things
1340:
I am also thinking of opening a wiki on algebra.com, with the purpose of writing lessons or, rather, pages that clarify issues that are typically causing difficulties for students. One day I will merge those into wikipedia, after consulting the elders here.
3081:
do you think its \nabla and not \del? I can't see any justification to call it "del" - except that maybe today's students prefer simple 3 letter words instead of so long and "strange" (un-American?) 5 letter words... (I'm kidding... hum... so to say...)!
1072:
page and am learning about the categorizing of academia as i go (being rather non-academic myself). my name s
Matthew, by the way. took a glance at your page and saw you re in academic math - wicked! all the best with that and in enjoying wiki.
50:. Perhaps you should request that the page be speedy deleted, this should work since you are the sole editior of the page. In case you don't know how, you just add the template {{delete}} to that page, you could also list the article here
2699:
I fully agree that
Knowledge could do with less external links. I'm just afraid that some people might start complaining if links to pages that were once very good but have since gone down or were moved to another address are removed.
314:), and the other projects world costline data onto the screen using various map projections and rolls the globe around in arbitrary directions - the idewa being that it allows you to see how the various projections distort the map. (
1547:
is a good case to make things easy to automate and add all of Category:Equations. As far as I see, the only use of LoMT is to use the "Related changes" link, and in that case it doesn't matter if the list has a few more entries. --
2408:
I completely agree with you that this is one very important problem and i certainly do not not consider the problem a "pathological science". I did not choose that name. That was a misunderstanding. I chose the title of the talk:
1067:
no, you were fine, Oleg (if i may use what is your first name, i presume). i deserved it for the calculus re-edit, which was half rashness and half not having had a morning coffee. i m at work trying to compile an all-inclusive
645:, I think my replacement "higher dimensions" looked better than the original "multidimensions" — all in one word. But I agree that the current "more than one dimension" is even better. I will pay more attention at the context.
3021:
Right, the TeX symbol is \nabla, and I aways wished it were \grad or something; or, as you say, \del. However, that's how that operator is pronounced, "del". So, I myself would be happier if the article stays where it
1806:
I'll update it this week and try to follow the manual of style. I noticed you modified some other user pages too, I think pointing it out on the user talk page would have been a better idea, but no hard feelings ;)
2596:
So, if my bot spits out a very long list of potential dead links, are you willing to go through each of those and certify which is dead and which is only apparently dead? Then my bot could take care of the rest.
1490:
I am not yet done with the List of mathematical topics; I went only through around 10-20 categories or so, of the around 200-300 available. So, I will keep on adding more articles in the next several days/weeks.
237:
And I certainly should have known better. I was a grad student at the Unversity of Minnesota until last August, and being in applied math I certainly intersected with the institute on quite a bit of occasions.
147:
Thanks. I inspect a good chuck of the changes by the bot, and I did see this particular one. However, I thought that it does not matter so much if the space is there or not. Do you think that can be an issue?
2868:
Checking for "not found" (case-insensitive) soon after after "404" might reduce the number of false positives, but that would still flag pages that talked about HTML errors. Definitely a useful tool, though.
1639:
Hey, thanks for bringing that to my attention, I wasn't aware there was discussion about it. I've added what I think should be done to the talk page, so you can go check it out and see if that sounds good.
3253:
into Numeral system and operator. I list some computer unary operator there but being not math major, I can list only the factorial (!) there. Would you mind to add some more examples there? Thank you. -
302:
Well, the screensaver isn't strictly to do with wikipedia, but seeing as I am going to the trouble of getting on top of all this math, it seems a shame not to write it down somewhere. Most of the stuff in
991:
Actually I've also noticed you fix dozens of legitimate spelling mistakes, including some of mine. I guess it's a human tendency to make more noise over mistakes than things done right. Sorry about that.
2610:
I would be willing to do that, but if it could sort on "Host not found" and 404s I could clean up the most serious mess first. BTW, what would you think of redirecting dead links to where possible? --
1852:
I too get annoyed with people whom I perceive to habitually neglect making any comment whatsoever. I usually (always have) make at least a short comment though, and if I dont its probably because I'm
1604:. My concern would be that when we query this page for recent changes, it might take a long time to load, especially like today, when the server is kind of slow. But looks like the only issue to me.
612:
Thank you guys. When I spellcheck with the bot, I don't have just the word in front of me, but also a large chunck of contents, so again, it is just as if I spell by hand in an editor, but faster.
2661:
So again. A bot is good at making a list of bad links, and once it is instructed which to remove, or what to replace with what, it can do that. Anything more intelligent needs to be done by hand.
2900:
2158:
MarSch, it is up to you what you write on math articles. I am just afraid that your attempts to make articles more precise makes them much harder to read for other people. For example, again at
322:
Got it. Just one remark. It is good to sign your posts. That is accomplished by putting four tildas one after another — ~~~~, which Knowledge will replace by your username and date, like this:
2557:
and its talk page. I will read it. Though my major is computer science, not only computer science itself, but also my master thesis is highly related to mathematics. Thank you very much. --
535:
I have all the pages on my watchlist, so I will see if some reversions happen. So far, you are the only one. And again, ultimately it is me who decides the changes, so the bot is innocent. :)
2627:
OK, let us assume that any page containing "Host not found" and 404s means that page is dead. I think that's indeed a safe assumption, so we don't need to actually investigate them by hand.
2916:. Especially, there are so many 'fixed points' in mathemetics. Do all of them really belong to mathemetics? Please check them if you have time & are interested. Thank you very much.
1226:
Thanks a lot for the offer of help--it looks like mvs is exactly what I need. FYI, mvs doesn't use "libwww-perl/..." for its User-agent: header; from line 140 of WWW::Mediawiki::Client:
980:
I was delighted to see your message. So far (see above), all I've been getting was complaints about how I misjudged something when doing spelling. (But those are getting rare lately :)
1601:
1513:
1011:, it is you to whom I was thinly alluding above. :) (I should have put more smilies there, as it seems I make too many people feel bad about themselves, for one reason or another. :)
1899:
Agree. It does not look to mathematical. I would be fine with any of the two above categories. By the way, if you don't know how to categorize an article, maybe it is better left in
1345:
because I will try to use this system for handling formulae on these lesson pages, rather than the standard wikipedia math stuff. Later, these images can be imported by other means.
3280:. Now, about examples, I sort of feel one could shorten the number of C++ examples, just several to give an idea of what is going on could be enough. But that's only an opinion.
2927:
2427:
2411:
2366:
Also, in general, my bot does not remove articles by itself, and this is intentional. A human needs to decide in each case if a certain article added should be removed or not.
880:
I usually do write an edit summary, maybe 85% of the time. I just leave it blank when my contribution is very simple. But I will do my best to always write an edit summary :)
1839:
list of changes (like watchlist, or the recent changes). Sometimes it saves the time of looking at a diff, and putting edit summary seems to be good (and required) practice.
2524:
2. I am a candidacy for master in computer science, CSU San Bernardino. My advisor suggests me to use TeX as soon as possible. Do you know any good tutorial about TeX?
2316:
Sorry. I usually do, but sometimes I forget, or I have made lots of different minor changes (so if I tried to list them all it would take longer than making the changes
2785:. Please note that those are all math articles, since all I searched is my own copy of the math articles on Knowledge. Let me know if there is anything I can help with.
904:
Hi there, thanks for the reminder. This was my first Knowledge article, and I unfortunately, neglected to fix it (style issues/PNG issues). I'll take care of this soon.
1256:
so you are right, the User-agent is something else. I meant to say that it uses the libwww-perl library one way or another, which follows from the LWP::UserAgent-: -->
1693:
Thanks for your welcom message. Also, thanks for pointing out that variable names should be italicized! I read with a speech synthesizer, so the distinction between
2554:
1921:: Do you think this article should be in Mathematics at all? I think the categorization under Science would be enough, else it should probably go under terminology.
3063:
2996:
was once again so quick... maybe even too quick for WP (your edit is sometimes somehow lost in the history...); you didn't catch one typo of mine, though (if =: -->
2890:
2873:
2859:
2782:
2644:. I am not sure if it is worth the trouble. From my experinence with external links, Knowledge needs less of them, and not more. But either way, finding a link to
1796:
If I think about it, you are right. Sorry. However, probably it is a good idea to follow the manual of style even on your user page. But that's for you to decide.
666:
If its not the bots fault, it is the operator who needs more education in the improper change of "the same 80 kelvin interval" to "the same 80 Kelvin interval" at
47:
39:
35:
2577:
Would it be possible to use your for checking if dead links (external) are still alive? I've come across some dead ones already while I visit very few of them. --
2415:. This is all i wanted, and i am very unhappy that i am put in a corner in which i do not belong. Please (re-)read what i wrote and reconsider your statement. —
1624:
386:
do only the crucial step, deciding if a word is trully misspelled, and what the spelling should be. So, if there is any mistake, it is all my fault, not the bot.
2822:
2789:
2278:
1538:
I'm starting to realize that automatically adding new articles to LoMT is not as simple as I thought, as your example of Category:Equations shows. I think that
168:
And the reason for the bug is very simple. The bot did not expect to find a page where there is absolutely nothing but a category. I will fix it. Thanks again!
1448:
1435:
1143:
He - he :) Wait till I correlate the spelling mistakes with their contributors, and make the list of top misspellers of all time. The first three will go ...
2370:
1608:
1562:
1529:
3304:
3284:
2973:
2948:
2024:
693:
Sorry! I promise to stick to pure grammatical errors. (I thought that since it was Farenheight, and Celcius, then it must be Kelvin. Now I see I am wrong.)
3041:
2016:, so that's why it got put back. I did notice your removal and the fact that it came back. So, if you think that article is indeed not worth having in the
2013:
1865:
1600:
I think you noticed, I also asked Charles to comment on the virtual master list thing. On the bus to school, I was now thinking about it. We could name it
1432:
275:
2442:
2756:
2729:
2725:
Sounds good. Then I will print out a list of possibly bad links, and let us see what you would like to do about it. :) I will get to this later today.
2704:
2682:
2614:
2601:
2301:
2166:
1949:
1827:
1800:
520:(this is an eternal source of confusion, believe me). Does this bot do something to detect changes it made that were reverted like some of the others?
2068:
1461:
Mulţumesc foarte mult for the excellent work on List of mathematical topics. Are you planning to regularly run a bot that adds the new articles from
3234:
3196:
3173:
3118:
3094:
3035:
1775:
1089:
2547:
2533:
1698:
1701:
2518:
1337:
Oleg, thanks for correcting me. I will use proper capitalization from now on and will review a couple other articles to which I made changes.
1101:
129:
43:
3312:
1715:
2567:
1581:
3042:
2434:
1895:: While the concept is fundamental to mathematics the article is not really important, maybe it should go into terminology or foundations?
1811:
1790:
2354:
1733:
1035:
Hi Oleg, thanks for the style pointer. I've always been an agressive capitalizer--maybe that's why I did so well in high school German.
918:
I use a custom-written computer program that counts British and American spellings. It only considers unambiguous instances. For example,
198:
The article looks indeed more complete now. Forgive me for not saying more, but I don't know much about that math area. Thanks and enjoy!
3059:
You are of course supposed to vote! (And your vote better be a "support" :) You can put your vote before mine, as you are the nominator.
3159:
1929:
1656:
1059:
Sounds good. I should have posted on your talk page rather than reverting your work though. Hope that did not make you too mad. Cheers,
838:
That's fine. In case my reply was upset, sorry for that. I will resume my spelling when I manage to improve the results to error ratio.
464:
I use American ispell, but I don't touch British spellings (I do remember from when I learned English, those -ise, -our, and what not).
2020:(which I am not sure), then you can remove it from the list, and from the math categories, and then it will not show up again. Cheers,
861:
And thanks for the tip on capitalization. As you can tell, I'm still getting settled in here. Nice to see that someone noticed me =)
345:
I can try. I cannot do it today, as I have to go home now, but you can post it on my talk page and I will look at it tomorrow. Cheers,
1911:
2845:
3258:
1767:
I do not think the Pi page is any different than any other page. I think your edits make sense. You could write on the talk page of
1688:
219:
means an organization that anyone in, or in many cases anyone interested in, the profession can join. I don't think the Institute
1967:
1182:
Unfortunately I know nothing about q-analogs. You're all welcome to start a new article, and I can help if you have any questions.
1573:
185:
Thanks for your annoyed comments about this article — you persuaded me to actually finish it. I hope you like how it turned out.
2818:
Oh, and note that my bot has a bug. It forgot to strip the dot or the comma at the end of some links. I will fix that sometime.
3074:
Hi, no problem concerning the edit conflicts, I get well along with it; don't think twice before doing what you feel needed...
3028:
1846:
1649:
65:
Hi Paul. I put the speedy deletion template and explained on that page why it should be deleted. Thanks for pointing this out!
1761:
1665:
By the way, I changed your user page a bit, to make it conform to the manual of style. Oleg Alexandrov 22:24, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
2058:
1939:
1425:
807:
Oops, sorry about that. Don't worry, it's not your fault, I'm sure you'll pick them up quickly. :-) I didn't even know about
87:
I'm just nervously doing a little editing while waiting till it's time to go to the airport, and then it's off to Sicily ;-)
3166:
3069:
2120:
2041:
1993:
1781:
930:. '-ize' endings are acceptable in UK English and the norm in U.S. English. '-ise' is only used in UK English and so on...
310:
I already have a couple of other screensavers. One is an implementation of "quasitiler" (for which I had to find out about
3015:
1903:, as there it is more visible, and could be categorized by somebody else (I know some people go from time to time through
2581:
2396:
1588:
1551:
1478:
1201:
784:
Yes, yes! I made that change before you told me about the list! I am taking off to today to learn British spellings. :(
159:
I can answer my own question. I think that extra space in the template introduces extra space in the article. So, sorry!
2336:
2855:) would check each individual link. I checked a bunch myself, and found just one false positive from what I remember.
1786:
You 'downcased' my User Page. I disagree however that the manual of style applies to user pages so I reverted this. --
1187:
BTW, you should have kept that default welcome I put on your page, it has good links, especially the manual of style.
1023:
Your name crops up quite often on my watchlist too. But hey, at least I am not the only lousy speller on wikipedia :)
2452:
1935:
Some questions on editing: Is it possible to have an article/category named 'Mathematical foo' listed under 'Foo'? --
1706:
967:
I must be a really lousy speller..it seems like every ten minutes you pick up another one of my spelling mistakes.--
441:
Yes, that's all I was pointing out. People get mad if you change one to the other. I'm not sure what ispell is. -
2841:
happening (does your script flag _anything_ with "404" in it as bad, or does it check in a more robust manner?). --
2149:. MarSch, that article is also used by physicists. There is no need to put the words C right in the first sentence.
232:
You are very right. When I added that category I did think something was odd, but did not pay much attention to it.
1098:
headline, (the best idéa I came up with). But if you do not like this? then please try to find a better solution.
1509:
1505:
1471:
1467:
731:
to your dictionary to avoid trouble — changing British to U.S. will earn you silly accusations of ethnocentrism.
330:
206:
2005:
1496:
1388:
2344:
1818:
user's page is a user's page, and ultimately the user decides what to be there. So, I will not do that again.
1069:
1725:
Hi; just in case: don't panic when you notice I become "active" again, I'm not really "back at work"... ;-)
1521:
By the way, one issue which we will need to discuss in a while is, what is a math category? For example, is
746:
fulfill is another UK/US difference. I forgot which is which, but you changed UK spelling in US spelling in
3048:
I submitted it. Thank you for your offer to help. One thing i don't know: Am i supposed to vote, myself? —
125:
3137:
having a robot change links to "topic" on pages of Category:former_category to "topic (former_category)|"
2539:
3. I want to have a doctorial study after I graduate. UC system is my favorite. Any suggestions to me?
2484:
s are! Therefore, I forget that "math literature uses bold only for vectors" (I know that) and bold all
2401:
2017:
268:
179:
2908:
My thesis is to speedup a kind of solving matrix. That's part of the reason why you see my bad work on
281:
If you are interested, ulimately I hope to build a java screen saver that does quasifuchan limit sets. (
1720:
1397:
1389:
1238:
642:
555:
1750:(PS: and one could even discuss if the length and area formulae are not also a special case of this.)
585:. However, that's the only mistake I found in the seven pages on my watchlist, so please continue. --
3230:
Yes, I don't always get what you want. Part of it is me being dumb. But can you be more explicit? :)
2909:
2453:
1535:"Such a virtual master page" would be what I was thinking of; I think it would be a useful resource.
939:
51:
17:
1516:. What do you think of such a virtual master page? Maybe we should discuss this in a larger setting.
3244:
1634:
975:
That's the whole point of my spelling project, to make certain people feel bad about themselves. :)
315:
294:
About the java screen saver, I am not sure I understand what that has to do with Knowledge. Enjoy!
282:
97:
Welcome back! Hope you had a good time, and are now ready to plounge back in the virtual world. :)
1221:
26:
3052:
2870:
2842:
2419:
2046:
1842:
But, it seems you have been here for much longer than me, so I won't bug you more about that. :)
1042:
267:
178:
2987:
2331:
2320:
it wouldn't fit in the edit-summary box)--one can always look at the diff. Maybe I should put
1886:
893:
363:
356:
338:
261:
3185:
So you think "Del" is more frequently used instead of nabla than on Computer keyboards ? ;-)
2558:
2384:
Oleg, Thanks for the welcome to Knowledge. If you get a chance to take a look at my work on
2038:
1990:
1739:
Just was thinking about, however, adding a comment after all the volume/area formulae on the
1621:
1577:
710:
Wow, that's quite subtle. I might have made that mistake also. Learn something new everyday.
403:
304:
260:
I appreciate the help and advice you have given me, and have adapted my editing accordingly.
109:
91:
58:
2462:
The reason that makes me write the following statements is just let you know WHY I bold all
2297:
How do you like my changes to the technical def, starting with explaining what a chart is?--
1357:
1265:
215:
Mathematic and Its Applications, but the article says it's a professional society. Usually
193:
Well, if my comment looked annoyed, but that made you finish the article, then that is good!
3281:
3277:
3231:
3170:
3091:
3060:
3032:
2945:
2887:
2856:
2819:
2786:
2753:
2726:
2679:
2598:
2544:
2543:
Well, I can't help you here. Ask your current adviser, he/she might have good suggestions.
2530:
2515:
2431:
2367:
2275:
2163:
2092:
2065:
2021:
1946:
1926:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1862:
1843:
1824:
1797:
1772:
1730:
1653:
1605:
1559:
1526:
1462:
1445:
1422:
1409:
1325:
1303:
1287:
1275:
1258:
1214:
1188:
1144:
1132:
1110:
1082:
1060:
1012:
981:
839:
785:
694:
646:
536:
465:
423:
392:
346:
323:
295:
246:
199:
169:
149:
98:
80:
66:
1871:
1195:
913:
8:
2402:
1977:
How does Mathbot determine if an article is mathematics related? Is it the <math: -->
1964:
1955:
1880:
1873:
1676:
Thanks for that, I'm so used to capitalizing everything that I just did that by reflex.
1569:
1539:
582:
517:
856:
3049:
2752:
It seems I will not get to this today. But I will certainly do that this week. Cheers,
2572:
2416:
1963:
Hopefully I'm helping to make a dent in these seemingly infinite unclassified stubs. --
1892:
1522:
225:
140:
2379:
2351:
2328:
2082:
1712:
1585:
1548:
1475:
1363:
1349:
1175:
1160:
751:
679:
667:
586:
1925:
Well, that article has a paragraph about mathematics. I would leave it where it is.
1095:
I doubt the wisdom of inserting the ==Sister projects about the Julia set== heading.
938:
I've created a British/American Spelling Guide. If you're interested, check it out:
3301:
3255:
2970:
2924:
2564:
2389:
2385:
2035:
1987:
1729:
I don't quite understand what you want to say in here. But OK, I will not panic :)
747:
106:
88:
55:
2079:
Not that I haven't contributed hundred of equations with the correct <math: -->
1576:. A quick look at that category shows all its articles are maths, except possibly
1047:
i see your point now on how better to categorize articles, in particular with the
3273:
3265:
2056:
1972:
1858:
1833:
1543:
1401:
1024:
402:
Yes, I am glad that you are in the loop. :-) Have you read through this stuff:
3264:
I did do some changes, I moved most of the content to the more specific article
1270:
Hi Oleg, I am relatively new here, but will try to contribute as much as I can.
765:
Noting that fulfil is on the list I gave — really, add them all, I mean it. :-)
3001:
2993:
2459:
Sorry for having done ugly things so that the real experts feel uncomfortable.
1747:
Maybe the above phrase up to "body", with adequate link, but w/o more details?
1378:
1205:
1074:
1052:
750:. I couldn't be bothered to revert, even though UK is of course much better ;)
638:
559:
492:
442:
407:
375:
2412:
finding suitable category to express the idea of pointless scientific efforts
1030:
887:
728:
369:
3319:
3193:
3156:
3115:
3012:
2270:
are rather poor section titles. There is also a bug in the first sentence in
1758:
1431:
Sorry, was just demonstrating to a friend that truly, you can edit anything.
1416:
1036:
1008:
993:
865:
812:
766:
732:
711:
521:
186:
136:
105:
Thanks. I'm back, but I'm a bit addled, so "plounge" sounds about right ;-)
3087:
2393:
2146:
2129:
2105:
2098:
1677:
1641:
1456:
1282:
I see you are from Moldova... I am actually from Russia, currently at MSU.
881:
2912:. Now, I may have done a bad thing about categorizing/listing again: the
1310:
1174:
article, but there is certainly much more that could and should be said. (
1151:
899:
374:
do you have a page explaining how your spell checking pseudo-bot works? -
2913:
2852:
2701:
2611:
2578:
2466:
s. They are nothing about arguing with you. Originally, I want to bold
2298:
2117:
2086:
2004:
Now, my bot looks at all articles contained in a math category listed in
1936:
1808:
1787:
2648:
would need to be done by hand, so if you are willing, I will not mind...
3214:
2053:
1978:
tags? The reason I ask is because I'm in the middle of disambiguating
1317:
1136:
968:
953:
942:
931:
907:
2502:
to be λ so that they are consistent but I fail. I can not change the
2311:
1332:
1170:-analog article. We could start with the information I added the the
1375:
1295:
1233:
1163:. I'm new here and still trying to figure out these little details.
2851:
You are right, my script only looks for 404 messages. I hoped Rudy (
1369:
3189:
3186:
3152:
3149:
3111:
3108:
3008:
3005:
2491:
Beside for sorry about that, could you help me three other things?
2271:
2219:
2196:
2159:
2133:
1771:
about your plans, and if nobody objects, you can go ahead. Cheers,
1754:
1751:
1171:
1152:
1048:
311:
3300:
Hope some real computer science expert (I am not) can solve it. -
2132:(you can take a diff and see). I think you did the same thing for
2128:
About the grammar. You used only lower case letters at the end of
1495:
Yes, I do plan to run this bot regularly, after I make a definite
1421:
Thanks for removing the bad words you put in a wikipedia article.
872:
1999:
First, thank you for your great disambiguation work for fraction!
926:
are both correct in U.S. English, but in UK English, it's always
2678:
idea. Fine with me as long as you do the part the bot can't. :)
335:
It's an integral I'm working on and it's deceptively difficult.
2443:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Talk:Squaring_the_circle
1918:
1362:
Hi Oleg, thanks for the welcome! I'll check out those links :)
675:
1444:
And now you saw how fast sometimes bad things get noticed! :)
1252:
new(); my $ agent = 'WWW::Mediawiki::Client/' . $ VERSION;
1109:
I don't have any solutions. I am just good at criticizing. :)
3269:
3250:
2901:
Please check what I edit so that I don't mislead some others.
2470:
only, because it looks really like a slash, /. After I bold
2116:
I don't know what my mistake was, but I would like to know.--
1286:
Right. Actually I am ethnically Romanian, with poor Russian.
1229:
140: my $ agent = 'WWW::Mediawiki::Client/' . $ VERSION;
727:
is actually a legitimate British spelling. I advise you add
255:
73:
38:. However there is no user by that name it should have been
3141:
2112:
Also, MarSch, you should pay more attention to the grammar.
1823:
Welcome from me too. Thank you for your categorizing work.
1081:
Nice to meet you Matthew. Thank you for your warm message.
2081:
syntax, but thanks for noticing and correcting my slip at
1126:
962:
3210:
3134:
maybe making temporarily "topic" a redirect to that page,
2675:
2645:
2641:
1525:
math, since it has equations from physics and chemistry?
124:
Your categories/language links bot has a minor bug. See
2494:
1. I find that there is inconsistency about using λ and
353:
It's on my talk page in the problems section; last one.
116:
2674:
So, just tell me if you would like to proceed with the
1768:
1740:
1485:
I was very pleased with you thanking me in Romanian. :)
671:
289:
Great you moved it. I might visit it from time to time.
3027:
But that's my opinion. You can of course post this on
1324:
Congratulations! You have the traits of a good admin.
1135:
pointing out spelling mistakes --- for all eternity.--
3182:
You did not yet get me on the 2nd level of thought...
3140:
but aiming at having "topic" being ultimately (thus,
1090:
Headline, (wery funny! a headline about a headline =)
2274:. I think you should pay more attention to details.
276:
User:Pmurray_bigpond.com/Geometry of Complex Numbers
2392:, I'd appreciate any suggestions that you have. --
2108:in the same way. BTW, in you edit summary you said
1512:, that's very easy to make, see the wiki source of
3313:removed not well-explained and unhelpful paragraph
2222:was that you did not capitalize things properly in
2074:
2009:
1350:http://www.algebra.com/algebra/services/rendering/
952:See my talk page for the answer to your question.
54:to provide an explanation. Sorry for the trouble.
3167:Knowledge:Disambiguation#Types of disambiguation
2426:It all started with you putting this article in
3249:Sorry to bother you again. I split the article
3000:Now I wanted to suggest you a move : "del" to "
1504:As far as a page containing all the pages from
382:Got it, madman with a mad robot gone astray! :)
3169:(thanks to Paul August for this information).
3031:and see what others will have to say. Cheers,
2944:I will take a look at it later today. Cheers,
1202:Template talk:mergewith#Merge template changes
44:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/Participants
1582:Particle in a spherically symmetric potential
3131:moving "topic" to "topic (former_category)",
3043:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Paul August
2474:s, suddently I feel that the protagonists,
34:I happened to see your welcome message to
3209:What's your point? Are you trying to say
2553:By the way, thank you for telling me the
42:. This was do to a mistake I made on the
2563:Thank you very much, I learn a lot. ^^
1204:before changing more merge templates. -
1574:Category:Partial differential equations
1274:Relax, do no more than what is fun. :)
1246:I think you are referring to the lines:
14:
3029:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics
2969:It becomes clear and neat, thank you.
1650:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics
1294:My twin's name is Oleg. So strange...
877:Hello, Oleg! Thanks for your welcome!
211:I don't know much about the Institute
3293:The changes are marvelous. Thank you.
1945:Try this ]. Is that what you wanted?
1711:I'll add edit summary next time :) --
1400:and changed all necessary redirects.
2498:in that article. I try to make all
1744:"locked" for edits, in some sense).
2430:. That's what my remark was about.
1354:I am still learning. Thanks. Igor.
331:Would you assist me with a problem?
278:while I am still investigating it.
207:The two IMAs may be quite different
23:
2097:Hi Oleg, our paths cross again at
1408:Thanks a lot for letting me know!
1159:First, thanks for the link fix on
24:
3332:
1602:List of mathematical topics (A-Z)
1514:List of mathematical topics (A-C)
3103:For me, no question, because it
2350:this may not be intentional. --
2104:I'm also planning on working on
1960:Thank you for the thank you. :)
1689:Thanks, regarding variable names
3213:should be an article about the
2329:Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
1510:List of mathematical topics (Z)
1506:List of mathematical topics (A)
1472:List of mathematical topics (Z)
1468:List of mathematical topics (A)
46:. So you inadvertently created
2006:list of mathematics categories
1986:, and the bot re-inserted it.
1497:List of mathematics categories
1374:I replyed again on my talk. –
13:
1:
2441:This discussion continued on
2428:Category:Pathological science
1070:Category:Academic disciplines
3070:still more WP technicalities
2640:About redirecting things to
1782:Modifications to my userpage
1257:new(); thing above. Cheers,
1222:Certain user-agents excluded
729:a bunch of British spellings
581:Another (partial) revert at
404:User:Omegatron#Spell_checker
27:jScott Trapp vs jScott.trapp
7:
2018:list of mathematical topics
1984:List of Mathematical topics
1316:to disappoint you. Thanks.
1302:Coincidences do happen. :)
1251:{ua} = LWP::UserAgent-: -->
1043:will oblige on categorizing
678:, and many other sources.
269:Geometry of Complex Numbers
180:Matrix chain multiplication
10:
3337:
1595:try this again in a while.
1398:Continuous linear operator
1390:Continuous linear operator
1213:templates thought better.
1208:12:42, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
910:00:19, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC)
643:discrete Fourier transform
556:discrete Fourier transform
378:04:08, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
61:18:02, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC)
3055:22:29, 2005 May 24 (UTC)
2910:Characteristic polynomial
2454:Characteristic polynomial
2422:16:50, 2005 May 21 (UTC)
2341:19:12, 2005 May 20 (UTC)
2324:for the reason you gave.
2089:06:23, 2005 May 20 (UTC)
2030:Thanks, I've 'corrected'
1707:Thank you for your advice
1644:21:28, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
1558:article rather than not.
1404:22:51, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1385:00:56, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1366:07:25, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1320:20:11, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1298:03:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1242:04:54, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
1139:02:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1077:01:38, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1055:01:20, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1039:10:07, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1027:21:49, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
971:21:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
940:User:SpNeo/Spelling Guide
934:16:09, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
562:06:17, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
516:was spelled correctly in
495:06:17, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
491:Yeah that's fine then. -
445:05:46, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
410:04:31, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
366:04:36, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
359:03:13, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
341:03:06, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
264:04:40, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
228:23:43, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
189:06:53, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
143:03:25, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
112:22:00, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
101:19:06, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
83:17:48, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
52:Knowledge:Speedy deletion
18:User talk:Oleg Alexandrov
3305:06:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
3285:18:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
3259:18:30, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
3235:15:06, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
3197:13:15, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
3174:21:06, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
3160:13:58, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
3119:13:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
3095:21:06, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
3064:22:32, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
3036:22:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
3016:22:20, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
2974:03:25, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
2949:18:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2928:17:55, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2891:15:20, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
2874:05:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
2860:05:19, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
2846:04:11, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
2823:02:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
2790:02:19, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
2757:23:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2730:20:14, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2705:19:19, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2683:18:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2615:13:14, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2602:02:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
2582:23:32, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
2568:00:30, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
2548:21:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
2534:21:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
2519:21:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
2478:s, are not as strong as
2435:17:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
2397:01:51, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
2371:20:50, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
2355:20:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
2302:16:04, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
2279:17:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
2167:15:46, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
2136:— the "old intro" thing.
2121:14:33, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
2069:15:39, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
2059:02:16, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
2042:02:34, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
2025:02:21, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
1994:01:58, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
1968:22:45, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
1950:22:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1940:22:31, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1930:22:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1912:22:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1866:01:13, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1847:01:05, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1828:20:25, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1812:11:47, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1801:00:22, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1791:00:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
1776:20:15, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
1762:18:39, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
1734:20:15, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
1680:23:03, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
1412:23:01, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1328:20:40, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1306:04:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1290:04:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1278:04:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1261:05:58, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1217:15:01, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1196:Changing merge templates
1191:20:18, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1147:03:23, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1113:20:02, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1104:18:40, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1085:01:40, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1063:01:21, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
1015:23:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
996:22:33, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
984:21:35, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
956:07:58, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
945:16:11, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
914:Spelling standardization
884:09:59, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
842:23:00, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
815:21:26, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
788:17:38, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
769:17:35, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
754:11:49, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
735:04:20, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
714:04:02, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
697:01:54, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
682:01:51, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
649:16:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
589:12:44, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
554:I changed your edits to
539:05:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
524:05:43, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
468:05:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
426:05:11, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
395:04:23, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
349:03:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
326:05:36, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
316:User:Pmurray bigpond.com
298:05:09, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
283:User:Pmurray bigpond.com
249:23:52, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
202:16:00, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
172:04:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
152:04:06, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
69:18:12, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
3272:was talking about both
2781:Hi Rudy. Here you are,
2555:WikiProject Mathematics
2246:Besides, both this, and
1982:, and pulled it out of
1716:16:52, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
1702:00:11, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
1657:22:23, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1625:17:37, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
1609:17:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1589:15:48, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1563:15:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1552:14:31, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
1530:23:11, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
1479:22:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
1449:05:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
1436:05:53, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
1426:05:48, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
1358:Thanks for your welcome
1266:Thanks for your welcome
1166:I agree that we need a
1120:I can take that =) // S
868:05:11, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
857:Thanks for your welcome
3144:) the "disambig" page.
3090:, as he invented TeX.
3077:Concerning \nabla, so
2905:Dear Oleg Alexandrov:
2783:User:mathbot/Bad links
894:Talk:Analytic_function
48:User_talk:JScott_Trapp
40:User_talk:jScott.trapp
36:User_talk:JScott_Trapp
2345:Mathbot bug / feature
305:Mobius Transformation
3278:unary numeral system
1905:Category:Mathematics
1901:Category:Mathematics
1578:Chaplygin's equation
1463:Category:Mathematics
391:Other questions? :)
274:I am moving this to
217:professional society
2403:Squaring the circle
1881:Talk:Lie derivative
1874:Talk:Lie derivative
1396:I created a stubby
583:Christoffel symbols
518:dynamic programming
3217:? Come on, man! :)
2871:Christopher Thomas
2843:Christopher Thomas
2587:You mean using by
2514:I modified those.
2390:Burnside's theorem
2014:Category:Fractions
1907:doing just that).
1893:Abstract structure
1721:recent minor edits
1570:Laplace's equation
1540:Laplace's equation
1523:Category:Equations
1161:Gaussian binomials
1051:article. regards
1031:Overcapitalization
888:Analytic functions
370:your bots scare me
89:Paul August's Bot
2992:Hi, your edit to
2488:s smart-aleckly.
2445:
2083:linear regression
2012:was contained in
668:Equation of state
364:Guardian of Light
357:Guardian of Light
339:Guardian of Light
262:Guardian of Light
3328:
3245:Bother you again
2440:
2386:Character theory
2258:== something ==
1697:and x is lost.
1648:I wrote more on
1635:Calculus sidebar
1622:Charles Matthews
1572:also appears in
1311:Regarding my RfA
1178:forgot to sign)
900:Proof Techniques
748:equation solving
723:Found another —
318:forgot to sign)
285:forgot to sign)
3336:
3335:
3331:
3330:
3329:
3327:
3326:
3325:
3315:
3282:Oleg Alexandrov
3274:unary operation
3266:unary operation
3247:
3232:Oleg Alexandrov
3171:Oleg Alexandrov
3107:to be \nabla !
3092:Oleg Alexandrov
3072:
3061:Oleg Alexandrov
3046:
3033:Oleg Alexandrov
2990:
2946:Oleg Alexandrov
2903:
2888:Oleg Alexandrov
2857:Oleg Alexandrov
2820:Oleg Alexandrov
2787:Oleg Alexandrov
2754:Oleg Alexandrov
2727:Oleg Alexandrov
2680:Oleg Alexandrov
2599:Oleg Alexandrov
2575:
2545:Oleg Alexandrov
2531:Oleg Alexandrov
2516:Oleg Alexandrov
2457:
2432:Oleg Alexandrov
2406:
2382:
2368:Oleg Alexandrov
2347:
2339:
2334:
2314:
2276:Oleg Alexandrov
2259:
2235:
2234:== old intro==
2218:My point about
2164:Oleg Alexandrov
2095:
2077:
2066:Oleg Alexandrov
2052:Thanks again.
2049:
2047:linus confusion
2022:Oleg Alexandrov
1975:
1958:
1947:Oleg Alexandrov
1927:Oleg Alexandrov
1909:Oleg Alexandrov
1889:
1877:
1844:Oleg Alexandrov
1836:
1825:Oleg Alexandrov
1798:Oleg Alexandrov
1784:
1773:Oleg Alexandrov
1731:Oleg Alexandrov
1723:
1709:
1691:
1654:Oleg Alexandrov
1637:
1606:Oleg Alexandrov
1560:Oleg Alexandrov
1544:Larmor equation
1527:Oleg Alexandrov
1459:
1446:Oleg Alexandrov
1423:Oleg Alexandrov
1419:
1410:Oleg Alexandrov
1394:
1372:
1360:
1335:
1326:Oleg Alexandrov
1313:
1304:Oleg Alexandrov
1288:Oleg Alexandrov
1276:Oleg Alexandrov
1268:
1259:Oleg Alexandrov
1253:
1241:
1230:
1224:
1215:Oleg Alexandrov
1198:
1189:Oleg Alexandrov
1157:
1145:Oleg Alexandrov
1133:Oleg Alexandrov
1129:
1111:Oleg Alexandrov
1092:
1083:Oleg Alexandrov
1061:Oleg Alexandrov
1045:
1033:
1013:Oleg Alexandrov
982:Oleg Alexandrov
965:
916:
902:
890:
875:
859:
840:Oleg Alexandrov
786:Oleg Alexandrov
695:Oleg Alexandrov
647:Oleg Alexandrov
558:as well. :-) -
537:Oleg Alexandrov
466:Oleg Alexandrov
424:Oleg Alexandrov
393:Oleg Alexandrov
372:
347:Oleg Alexandrov
333:
324:Oleg Alexandrov
296:Oleg Alexandrov
272:
258:
247:Oleg Alexandrov
209:
200:Oleg Alexandrov
183:
170:Oleg Alexandrov
150:Oleg Alexandrov
119:
99:Oleg Alexandrov
81:Oleg Alexandrov
76:
67:Oleg Alexandrov
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3334:
3324:
3323:
3314:
3311:
3310:
3309:
3308:
3307:
3298:
3294:
3288:
3287:
3246:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3240:
3239:
3238:
3237:
3223:
3222:
3221:
3220:
3219:
3218:
3202:
3201:
3200:
3199:
3183:
3177:
3176:
3146:
3145:
3138:
3135:
3132:
3124:
3123:
3122:
3121:
3098:
3097:
3071:
3068:
3067:
3066:
3045:
3040:
3039:
3038:
3024:
3023:
3002:nabla operator
2994:Hardy notation
2989:
2988:suggested move
2986:
2985:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2980:
2979:
2978:
2977:
2976:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2952:
2951:
2935:
2934:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2930:
2902:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2863:
2862:
2838:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2798:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2794:
2793:
2792:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2760:
2759:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2714:
2713:
2712:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2667:
2666:
2665:
2664:
2663:
2662:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2650:
2649:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2605:
2604:
2593:
2592:
2574:
2571:
2551:
2550:
2537:
2536:
2522:
2521:
2456:
2451:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2405:
2400:
2381:
2378:
2376:
2374:
2373:
2363:
2362:
2346:
2343:
2337:
2332:
2313:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2172:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2150:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2114:
2113:
2094:
2091:
2080:</math: -->
2076:
2073:
2072:
2071:
2048:
2045:
2028:
2027:
2001:
2000:
1974:
1971:
1965:TheParanoidOne
1957:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1933:
1932:
1915:
1914:
1888:
1887:Categorization
1885:
1876:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1835:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1820:
1819:
1804:
1803:
1783:
1780:
1779:
1778:
1737:
1736:
1722:
1719:
1708:
1705:
1690:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1660:
1659:
1636:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1612:
1611:
1597:
1596:
1568:You're right:
1566:
1565:
1542:is maths, and
1533:
1532:
1518:
1517:
1501:
1500:
1492:
1491:
1487:
1486:
1458:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1439:
1438:
1418:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1393:
1387:
1371:
1368:
1359:
1356:
1334:
1333:External Links
1331:
1330:
1329:
1312:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1292:
1291:
1280:
1279:
1267:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1237:
1228:
1223:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1184:
1183:
1156:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1128:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1115:
1114:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1065:
1064:
1044:
1041:
1032:
1029:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
986:
985:
977:
976:
964:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
947:
946:
915:
912:
901:
898:
889:
886:
874:
871:
870:
869:
858:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
758:
757:
756:
755:
737:
736:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
686:
685:
684:
683:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
528:
527:
526:
525:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
414:
413:
412:
411:
397:
396:
388:
387:
383:
371:
368:
351:
350:
332:
329:
328:
327:
300:
299:
291:
290:
271:
266:
257:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
239:
238:
234:
233:
208:
205:
204:
203:
195:
194:
182:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
163:
162:
161:
160:
154:
153:
118:
115:
114:
113:
95:
94:
75:
72:
71:
70:
28:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3333:
3321:
3320:Talk:distance
3317:
3316:
3306:
3303:
3299:
3295:
3292:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3286:
3283:
3279:
3275:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3262:
3261:
3260:
3257:
3252:
3236:
3233:
3229:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3224:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3207:
3206:
3205:
3204:
3203:
3198:
3195:
3191:
3187:
3184:
3181:
3180:
3179:
3178:
3175:
3172:
3168:
3164:
3163:
3162:
3161:
3158:
3154:
3150:
3143:
3139:
3136:
3133:
3130:
3129:
3128:
3120:
3117:
3113:
3109:
3106:
3102:
3101:
3100:
3099:
3096:
3093:
3089:
3085:
3084:
3083:
3080:
3075:
3065:
3062:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3054:
3051:
3044:
3037:
3034:
3030:
3026:
3025:
3020:
3019:
3018:
3017:
3014:
3010:
3006:
3003:
2998:
2995:
2975:
2972:
2968:
2967:
2966:
2965:
2964:
2963:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2959:
2950:
2947:
2943:
2942:
2941:
2940:
2939:
2938:
2937:
2936:
2929:
2926:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2918:
2917:
2915:
2911:
2906:
2892:
2889:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2882:
2881:
2880:
2875:
2872:
2867:
2866:
2865:
2864:
2861:
2858:
2854:
2850:
2849:
2848:
2847:
2844:
2824:
2821:
2817:
2816:
2815:
2814:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2791:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2758:
2755:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2747:
2746:
2745:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2731:
2728:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2718:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2706:
2703:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2684:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2668:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2647:
2643:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2616:
2613:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2603:
2600:
2595:
2594:
2590:
2586:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2580:
2570:
2569:
2566:
2561:
2560:
2556:
2549:
2546:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2535:
2532:
2527:
2526:
2525:
2520:
2517:
2513:
2512:
2511:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2497:
2492:
2489:
2487:
2483:
2482:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2465:
2460:
2455:
2446:
2444:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2421:
2418:
2414:
2413:
2404:
2399:
2398:
2395:
2394:Michael Stone
2391:
2387:
2377:
2372:
2369:
2365:
2364:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2353:
2342:
2340:
2335:
2330:
2325:
2323:
2319:
2303:
2300:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2280:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2237:
2236:
2221:
2217:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2198:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2173:
2168:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2148:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2122:
2119:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2107:
2102:
2100:
2090:
2088:
2084:
2070:
2067:
2063:
2062:
2061:
2060:
2057:
2055:
2044:
2043:
2040:
2037:
2033:
2026:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2003:
2002:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1992:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1970:
1969:
1966:
1961:
1951:
1948:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1938:
1931:
1928:
1924:
1923:
1922:
1920:
1913:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1894:
1884:
1882:
1875:
1867:
1864:
1860:
1855:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1845:
1840:
1829:
1826:
1822:
1821:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1802:
1799:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1789:
1777:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1742:
1735:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1718:
1717:
1714:
1704:
1703:
1700:
1696:
1679:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1658:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1646:
1645:
1643:
1626:
1623:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1610:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1598:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1564:
1561:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1550:
1545:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1489:
1488:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1480:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1464:
1450:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1437:
1434:
1433:24.18.237.107
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1424:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1403:
1399:
1391:
1386:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1377:
1370:RE Formatting
1367:
1365:
1355:
1352:
1351:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1327:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1319:
1305:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1297:
1289:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1277:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1260:
1255:
1254:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1235:
1227:
1216:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1207:
1203:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1164:
1162:
1154:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1134:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1103:
1096:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1076:
1071:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1054:
1050:
1040:
1038:
1028:
1026:
1014:
1010:
1007:That's right
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
995:
990:
989:
988:
987:
983:
979:
978:
974:
973:
972:
970:
955:
951:
950:
949:
948:
944:
941:
937:
936:
935:
933:
929:
925:
921:
911:
909:
905:
897:
895:
885:
883:
878:
867:
864:
863:
862:
841:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
814:
810:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
787:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
768:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
753:
749:
745:
741:
740:
739:
738:
734:
730:
726:
722:
721:
713:
709:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
696:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
664:
663:
662:
648:
644:
641:'s change at
640:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
588:
584:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
561:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
538:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
509:
508:
494:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
467:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
433:
425:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
390:
389:
384:
381:
380:
379:
377:
367:
365:
360:
358:
354:
348:
344:
343:
342:
340:
336:
325:
321:
320:
319:
317:
313:
308:
306:
297:
293:
292:
288:
287:
286:
284:
279:
277:
270:
265:
263:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
235:
231:
230:
229:
227:
226:Michael Hardy
222:
218:
214:
201:
197:
196:
192:
191:
190:
188:
181:
171:
167:
166:
165:
164:
158:
157:
156:
155:
151:
146:
145:
144:
142:
138:
133:
131:
127:
122:
111:
108:
104:
103:
102:
100:
93:
90:
86:
85:
84:
82:
68:
64:
63:
62:
60:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
32:
19:
3248:
3147:
3125:
3104:
3088:Donald Knuth
3078:
3076:
3073:
3047:
2999:
2991:
2907:
2904:
2839:
2588:
2576:
2562:
2552:
2538:
2523:
2507:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2493:
2490:
2485:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2467:
2463:
2461:
2458:
2439:
2410:
2407:
2383:
2375:
2352:Jitse Niesen
2348:
2326:
2321:
2317:
2315:
2312:Edit Summary
2147:scalar field
2130:scalar field
2115:
2106:vector field
2103:
2099:Scalar field
2096:
2093:Scalar field
2078:
2064:I tried. :)
2050:
2031:
2029:
1983:
1979:
1976:
1962:
1959:
1934:
1916:
1890:
1878:
1853:
1841:
1837:
1805:
1785:
1749:
1746:
1738:
1724:
1713:Mosesofmason
1710:
1694:
1692:
1638:
1586:Jitse Niesen
1567:
1549:Jitse Niesen
1537:
1534:
1476:Jitse Niesen
1460:
1420:
1395:
1380:
1379:
1373:
1364:Conskeptical
1361:
1353:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1336:
1314:
1293:
1281:
1269:
1250:$ self-: -->
1231:
1225:
1199:
1176:Vince Vatter
1167:
1165:
1158:
1130:
1099:
1094:
1093:
1066:
1046:
1034:
1022:
966:
927:
923:
919:
917:
906:
903:
891:
879:
876:
873:Edit summary
860:
808:
752:Jitse Niesen
743:
724:
680:Gene Nygaard
587:Jitse Niesen
513:
373:
362:Any leeway?
361:
355:
352:
337:
334:
309:
301:
280:
273:
259:
220:
216:
212:
210:
184:
134:
130:Template:0-9
123:
120:
107:Paul August
96:
77:
56:Paul August
33:
30:
3302:Jacob grace
3256:Jacob grace
2971:Jacob grace
2925:Jacob grace
2914:fixed point
2676:archive.org
2646:archive.org
2642:archive.org
2565:Jacob grace
2559:Jacob grace
2036:Josh Parris
1988:Josh Parris
1200:Please see
3318:(moved to
3215:delete key
2573:Dead links
1402:MathMartin
1348:check out
1025:MathMartin
512:Just FYI,
126:its change
3050:Sebastian
2506:s in the
2417:Sebastian
2380:Greetings
2322:something
2180:complete.
1956:Thank you
1879:Moved to
1206:Omegatron
1075:Mayumashu
1053:Mayumashu
639:Omegatron
560:Omegatron
493:Omegatron
443:Omegatron
408:Omegatron
376:Omegatron
312:zonotopes
307:is mine.
256:Thank You
121:Hi Oleg,
74:Vacation?
31:Hi Oleg.
2886:Thanks.
2529:guy. :)
2272:manifold
2220:manifold
2197:manifold
2160:manifold
2134:manifold
2032:Fraction
2010:fraction
1980:Fraction
1854:assuming
1232:Cheers!
1172:q-series
1153:Q-analog
1127:Hell ...
1049:calculus
1037:Sympleko
963:Spelling
866:Reedbeta
725:practise
137:dbenbenn
135:Cheers,
2510:field.
2508:Example
2338:contrib
1973:Mathbot
1678:Sholtar
1642:Sholtar
1392:created
1155:article
1102:Solkoll
882:Porcher
742:fulfil
670:. See
514:memoize
117:Bot bug
3053:(talk)
2853:R.Koot
2702:R.Koot
2612:R.Koot
2579:R.Koot
2420:(talk)
2299:MarSch
2195:As to
2145:About
2118:MarSch
2087:Miguel
2054:Jayjg
1937:R.Koot
1919:Theory
1809:R.Koot
1788:R.Koot
809:fulfil
676:kelvin
637:About
3297:them.
3270:unary
3268:, as
3251:Unary
2997:it).
2361:know.
1872:from
1834:Sorry
1699:Chris
1417:Sorry
1318:Phils
1137:CSTAR
969:CSTAR
954:SpNeo
943:SpNeo
932:SpNeo
908:Tygar
892:See
16:<
3276:and
3194:Talk
3165:See
3157:Talk
3142:asap
3116:Talk
3086:Ask
3013:Talk
2333:talk
2085:. —
2075:math
1759:Talk
1580:and
1457:LoMT
1296:Igny
1234:Demi
1009:Deco
994:Deco
928:grey
924:gray
922:and
920:grey
813:Deco
767:Deco
733:Deco
712:Deco
522:Deco
406:? -
187:Deco
141:talk
3211:del
3190:MFH
3153:MFH
3112:MFH
3105:has
3079:why
3022:is.
3009:MFH
2589:bot
2388:or
2318:and
1917:On
1891:On
1755:MFH
1508:to
1470:to
1131:Is
1100://
221:FOR
128:to
3192::
3188:—
3155::
3151:—
3148:?
3114::
3110:—
3011::
3007:—
2869:--
2700:--
2327:--
2034:.
2008:.
1883:.
1859:SV
1807:--
1769:Pi
1757::
1753:—
1741:Pi
1652:.
1481:.
1381:CD
1376:AB
896:.
811:.
744:vs
674:,
672:SI
213:OF
139:|
132:.
3322:)
2504:t
2500:t
2496:t
2486:A
2481:I
2476:A
2472:I
2468:I
2464:A
2039:✉
1991:✉
1863:t
1861:|
1857:-
1695:x
1499:.
1239:C
1236:/
1168:q
110:☎
92:☎
59:☎
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.