Knowledge

User talk:Oleg Alexandrov/Archive2

Source 📝

2199:. The "new" intro is not mine nor new. I didn't really know what to do with it, but I also dislike the "old intro". The old intro uses coordinate system, which is just as technical, in fact the same thing, as a chart, which is short for coordinate chart if you will. The "new intro" used to be under the heading "Technical description" but the real technical description was below that. I think much in the "new intro" is/could be introductory. I preserved the "old intro" because I was not yet done with merging it with the new. 2101:. I want to add the more general definition of a scalar field, but I also want to preserve the specific case of Euclidean space. What is needed is an introductional paragraph that doesn't discriminate towards simplistic definitions. This is probably best accomplished by being very informal. Perhaps you could give such an intro a try? Meanwhile I will leave the old stuff mostly alone while I add some more general stuff. 3004:" (and leaving "del" as redirect); the fact that the TeX symbol is \nabla while \del is unknown seems some justification to me (in addition to my own, sometimes 'nonstandard' background...), while "del" is extremly likely to become ambigious (Spanish article, Computer key,...) (There might be a "procedure" fur such a suggestion, but I don't know it well...) 1584:. So I think it's safe to consider cat:PDEs as maths. Hence, I'd agree with your assumption. Perhaps, when you're done, you can make a list of articles appearing on the old LoMT that are not in one of the maths categories, and we can see whether they are in the wrong category or we need to redesignate some categories as mathematical. -- 2051:
Thank you very much, I appreciate your trying to clear this up. I can't understand why linus thinks I threatened to VfD his user page, if he really does believe that. If it wouldn't be too much trouble, perhaps you could post on his user page as well, I'd like this dispute about nothing to go away.
1594:
I was also thinking of making a list of articles appearing on the old LoMT that are not in one of the maths categories! Actually I tried it once. There were several hunderd articles, if not one thousand. Many of them are redirects, red links, or disambig. Some were things I was not sure about. I will
1546:
is not; both of them are in the category. However, if articles from such "dubious" categories are not automatically added, then it will be hard to keep LoMT up-to-date. Since the boundary between maths and non-maths is arbitrary, and currently a lot of boundary cases are listed on LoMT, I think there
385:
I actually do all the changes by hand. All the bot does, is (a) identify the pages with likely misspellings from a local copy of math articles of Knowledge, (b) fetch fresh copies of those (c) use ispell to suggest changes, (d) apply the changes I decide, and (e) upload stuff back to wikipedia. So, I
2349:
Your bot added "Hobbler-Bosch synthesis" on 19 May, which was subsequently moved to "Half of humanity is alive now". Today, your bot added "Half of humanity is alive now" but it did not delete "Hobbler-Bosch synthesis". Just wanted to let you know (of course it's easy for me to fix by hand), because
1838:
Hi Stevertigo. If I think of it, my request was indeed not well-placed, and your reaction was to be expected. So, please accept my appologies. About the edit summaries themselves, I think their point is at least partially to give an idea about what an editor changed when somebody else is examining a
1557:
So far, I operate from the assumption that if an article is really math, then it will also show up in more specific categories besides the generic Category:Equations. And you are right, there are issues sometimes with what a math article is. But as you said, if we err, we could err towards adding an
1315:
Hello Oleg. I was promoted to admin today, and I wanted to thank you for the time yo took to consider my RfA. As a result of your comments, and those of others about my low edit count (and possible inexperience in certain areas of WP), I will proceed with caution when using my privileges. I hope not
244:
PS The above also implies that we were at the same time and at the same place for at least one year, but somehow we never intersected. (Though I remember seeing you in the computer labs quite often, but that was before I started contributing here, so I had no obvious reason to get to talk to you :)
223:
Mathematics and Its Applications is that kind of thing. It employs professors, mostly but not all with temporary appointments, and zillions of postdocs, and I suspect nearly no one else is affiliated with that organization. So I have doubts about the appropriateness of the category link you added.
1817:
Hi Rudy. I sort of thought that editing a new user's page to make it conform to the manual of style should be fine, as that's a good way of showing the user how the pages should look like (especially with the issue of capitalization, which a huge number of people get wrong). But I see your point, a
1619:
On additions: it is probably better to add inclusively, and let people delete anything actually annoying by hand. I'm a bit busy right now with other copyediting, and also bad hair days with my ISP. Anyway, thanks also from me for all your work on this, Oleg; you could have it in various languages.
1344:
I have a nice formula and graph display system on my site, which is easier than latex (and less powerful), but it is more appealing to high school math teacher types. It works wherever I need to display dynamically generated formulas. Example: 2x^2-3x-5 will display as it should. I am saying this
1097:
I did the same to the Julia page as I did to the Mandelbrot page and that I did because it did not look good having both "wikisource" and "commons" together in the "extarnal links" section. First I just moved the two links above the headline but that did not look good either so I inserted the new
3126:
Other question: is there some "official guideline" about having a "topic" page about just one meaning of "topic", and a "topic (disambig)" page linking to all others? When is this justified? number of links? "age" of the "topic" page? length(= level of developedness) of the "topic" page? Why not
2840:
I strongly recommend checking all links by hand before deleting, as I've already had to replace a couple that were erroneously removed. As it stands, it looks like a local DNS problem would cause a link to be incorrectly flagged as dead. Not sure what other failure modes are, but they seem to be
2591:, right? My bot can certainly visit any single external link. It can scan for the words "not found" when downloading an external link. However, a user would still need to go through each of those suspicious links and make sure they are indeed dead pages. Then my bot could go and remove the links. 1743:
page, kind of "all these formulae are in fact a consequence of the second one, as all of them give the volume of rotational body (to be explained) by the formula V=\pi\int\rho(z)dz". I hesitate, because I know that the "pi" page is really a most public place (and thus should be considered almost
2528:
I think any tutorial you find online might do the job. When I learned it myself I found it easiest to get a paper written in LaTeX, and then modify it piece by piece. All you need to learn how to type the formulas, and how to split an article in sections. Should be doable for a computer science
1465:
and its subcategories to LoMT? In that case, I won't have to add any new articles myself; I just make sure that they are in a maths category and they will eventually appear automatically in LoMT. On a related issue: would it be possible to make a huge page containing all the LoMT subpages, from
1212:
I changed only those wich are math related (6 or so), and I fixed by hand some style issues. I do not plan to change more. Changing to the new template will be a tricky process, I am not sure a bot can do the job without user supervision and occasional tweaks. I wish the people who changed the
421:
I think what the page you pointed to says is that one should be careful with converting British to American English and vice-versa. No, I don't do that, I don't even bother to examine which variant shows up more often in an article. If you have other suggestions, please let me know. Thanks.
3296:
I think the list is a little bit too long, also. But the list is just ALL the unary operators that C has. I BELIEVE that there are only very few programming unary operators that is not in that list. Therefore, it's a kind of difficult to cut some off because there are just almost all of
2162:, I liked the "old intro" much more than what you inserted. Nobody will understand all that chart thing, while the old introduction was using plain words. I think it is good to keep things simpler, at least in the introductory part, as this is a general encyclopedia not a scientific paper. 1856:
that my edit doesnt need it, though this isnt always the case. Im more than happy to respond to questions about a particular edit, and I appreciate your retraction (specificity is a virtue) as well as your general desire for clarity and clarification that compelled your original note.
2360:
I had noticed the above. I put that "Hobbler-Bosch synthesis" article on my list of articles to be removed, because I am too lazy to remove it by hand. The bot is now running again (to fix some other things) and will take care of removing this article too. Thanks for letting me
1474:? Then we can track all the changes at once with the "Related changes" link, and finally rule our section of Knowledge :) But perhaps the people administrating the servers will not be happy with it; I'm not sure how hard such a page would be on the servers. All the best, 78:
Help! Somebody highjacked Paul's account while he is on vacation, and doing all kinds of things in here! Or is it a clerverly devised bot Paul wrote? :) Or does Paul mean this is what vacation means, away from work, able to concentrate on Knowledge full time?
2179:
Yes, this is the same as for Laplace operator, but now I'm trying to also preserve the simpler special cases whilst adding the general case. The problem is obtaining logical article structure. I also like to keep things simple, but I also like to get things
1340:
I am also thinking of opening a wiki on algebra.com, with the purpose of writing lessons or, rather, pages that clarify issues that are typically causing difficulties for students. One day I will merge those into wikipedia, after consulting the elders here.
3081:
do you think its \nabla and not \del? I can't see any justification to call it "del" - except that maybe today's students prefer simple 3 letter words instead of so long and "strange" (un-American?) 5 letter words... (I'm kidding... hum... so to say...)!
1072:
page and am learning about the categorizing of academia as i go (being rather non-academic myself). my name s Matthew, by the way. took a glance at your page and saw you re in academic math - wicked! all the best with that and in enjoying wiki.
50:. Perhaps you should request that the page be speedy deleted, this should work since you are the sole editior of the page. In case you don't know how, you just add the template {{delete}} to that page, you could also list the article here 2699:
I fully agree that Knowledge could do with less external links. I'm just afraid that some people might start complaining if links to pages that were once very good but have since gone down or were moved to another address are removed.
314:), and the other projects world costline data onto the screen using various map projections and rolls the globe around in arbitrary directions - the idewa being that it allows you to see how the various projections distort the map. ( 1547:
is a good case to make things easy to automate and add all of Category:Equations. As far as I see, the only use of LoMT is to use the "Related changes" link, and in that case it doesn't matter if the list has a few more entries. --
2408:
I completely agree with you that this is one very important problem and i certainly do not not consider the problem a "pathological science". I did not choose that name. That was a misunderstanding. I chose the title of the talk:
1067:
no, you were fine, Oleg (if i may use what is your first name, i presume). i deserved it for the calculus re-edit, which was half rashness and half not having had a morning coffee. i m at work trying to compile an all-inclusive
645:, I think my replacement "higher dimensions" looked better than the original "multidimensions" — all in one word. But I agree that the current "more than one dimension" is even better. I will pay more attention at the context. 3021:
Right, the TeX symbol is \nabla, and I aways wished it were \grad or something; or, as you say, \del. However, that's how that operator is pronounced, "del". So, I myself would be happier if the article stays where it
1806:
I'll update it this week and try to follow the manual of style. I noticed you modified some other user pages too, I think pointing it out on the user talk page would have been a better idea, but no hard feelings ;)
2596:
So, if my bot spits out a very long list of potential dead links, are you willing to go through each of those and certify which is dead and which is only apparently dead? Then my bot could take care of the rest.
1490:
I am not yet done with the List of mathematical topics; I went only through around 10-20 categories or so, of the around 200-300 available. So, I will keep on adding more articles in the next several days/weeks.
237:
And I certainly should have known better. I was a grad student at the Unversity of Minnesota until last August, and being in applied math I certainly intersected with the institute on quite a bit of occasions.
147:
Thanks. I inspect a good chuck of the changes by the bot, and I did see this particular one. However, I thought that it does not matter so much if the space is there or not. Do you think that can be an issue?
2868:
Checking for "not found" (case-insensitive) soon after after "404" might reduce the number of false positives, but that would still flag pages that talked about HTML errors. Definitely a useful tool, though.
1639:
Hey, thanks for bringing that to my attention, I wasn't aware there was discussion about it. I've added what I think should be done to the talk page, so you can go check it out and see if that sounds good.
3253:
into Numeral system and operator. I list some computer unary operator there but being not math major, I can list only the factorial (!) there. Would you mind to add some more examples there? Thank you. -
302:
Well, the screensaver isn't strictly to do with wikipedia, but seeing as I am going to the trouble of getting on top of all this math, it seems a shame not to write it down somewhere. Most of the stuff in
991:
Actually I've also noticed you fix dozens of legitimate spelling mistakes, including some of mine. I guess it's a human tendency to make more noise over mistakes than things done right. Sorry about that.
2610:
I would be willing to do that, but if it could sort on "Host not found" and 404s I could clean up the most serious mess first. BTW, what would you think of redirecting dead links to where possible? --
1852:
I too get annoyed with people whom I perceive to habitually neglect making any comment whatsoever. I usually (always have) make at least a short comment though, and if I dont its probably because I'm
1604:. My concern would be that when we query this page for recent changes, it might take a long time to load, especially like today, when the server is kind of slow. But looks like the only issue to me. 612:
Thank you guys. When I spellcheck with the bot, I don't have just the word in front of me, but also a large chunck of contents, so again, it is just as if I spell by hand in an editor, but faster.
2661:
So again. A bot is good at making a list of bad links, and once it is instructed which to remove, or what to replace with what, it can do that. Anything more intelligent needs to be done by hand.
2900: 2158:
MarSch, it is up to you what you write on math articles. I am just afraid that your attempts to make articles more precise makes them much harder to read for other people. For example, again at
322:
Got it. Just one remark. It is good to sign your posts. That is accomplished by putting four tildas one after another — ~~~~, which Knowledge will replace by your username and date, like this:
2557:
and its talk page. I will read it. Though my major is computer science, not only computer science itself, but also my master thesis is highly related to mathematics. Thank you very much. --
535:
I have all the pages on my watchlist, so I will see if some reversions happen. So far, you are the only one. And again, ultimately it is me who decides the changes, so the bot is innocent. :)
2627:
OK, let us assume that any page containing "Host not found" and 404s means that page is dead. I think that's indeed a safe assumption, so we don't need to actually investigate them by hand.
2916:. Especially, there are so many 'fixed points' in mathemetics. Do all of them really belong to mathemetics? Please check them if you have time & are interested. Thank you very much. 1226:
Thanks a lot for the offer of help--it looks like mvs is exactly what I need. FYI, mvs doesn't use "libwww-perl/..." for its User-agent: header; from line 140 of WWW::Mediawiki::Client:
980:
I was delighted to see your message. So far (see above), all I've been getting was complaints about how I misjudged something when doing spelling. (But those are getting rare lately :)
1601: 1513: 1011:, it is you to whom I was thinly alluding above. :) (I should have put more smilies there, as it seems I make too many people feel bad about themselves, for one reason or another. :) 1899:
Agree. It does not look to mathematical. I would be fine with any of the two above categories. By the way, if you don't know how to categorize an article, maybe it is better left in
1345:
because I will try to use this system for handling formulae on these lesson pages, rather than the standard wikipedia math stuff. Later, these images can be imported by other means.
3280:. Now, about examples, I sort of feel one could shorten the number of C++ examples, just several to give an idea of what is going on could be enough. But that's only an opinion. 2927: 2427: 2411: 2366:
Also, in general, my bot does not remove articles by itself, and this is intentional. A human needs to decide in each case if a certain article added should be removed or not.
880:
I usually do write an edit summary, maybe 85% of the time. I just leave it blank when my contribution is very simple. But I will do my best to always write an edit summary :)
1839:
list of changes (like watchlist, or the recent changes). Sometimes it saves the time of looking at a diff, and putting edit summary seems to be good (and required) practice.
2524:
2. I am a candidacy for master in computer science, CSU San Bernardino. My advisor suggests me to use TeX as soon as possible. Do you know any good tutorial about TeX?
2316:
Sorry. I usually do, but sometimes I forget, or I have made lots of different minor changes (so if I tried to list them all it would take longer than making the changes
2785:. Please note that those are all math articles, since all I searched is my own copy of the math articles on Knowledge. Let me know if there is anything I can help with. 904:
Hi there, thanks for the reminder. This was my first Knowledge article, and I unfortunately, neglected to fix it (style issues/PNG issues). I'll take care of this soon.
1256:
so you are right, the User-agent is something else. I meant to say that it uses the libwww-perl library one way or another, which follows from the LWP::UserAgent-: -->
1693:
Thanks for your welcom message. Also, thanks for pointing out that variable names should be italicized! I read with a speech synthesizer, so the distinction between
2554: 1921:: Do you think this article should be in Mathematics at all? I think the categorization under Science would be enough, else it should probably go under terminology. 3063: 2996:
was once again so quick... maybe even too quick for WP (your edit is sometimes somehow lost in the history...); you didn't catch one typo of mine, though (if =: -->
2890: 2873: 2859: 2782: 2644:. I am not sure if it is worth the trouble. From my experinence with external links, Knowledge needs less of them, and not more. But either way, finding a link to 1796:
If I think about it, you are right. Sorry. However, probably it is a good idea to follow the manual of style even on your user page. But that's for you to decide.
666:
If its not the bots fault, it is the operator who needs more education in the improper change of "the same 80 kelvin interval" to "the same 80 Kelvin interval" at
47: 39: 35: 2577:
Would it be possible to use your for checking if dead links (external) are still alive? I've come across some dead ones already while I visit very few of them. --
2415:. This is all i wanted, and i am very unhappy that i am put in a corner in which i do not belong. Please (re-)read what i wrote and reconsider your statement. — 1624: 386:
do only the crucial step, deciding if a word is trully misspelled, and what the spelling should be. So, if there is any mistake, it is all my fault, not the bot.
2822: 2789: 2278: 1538:
I'm starting to realize that automatically adding new articles to LoMT is not as simple as I thought, as your example of Category:Equations shows. I think that
168:
And the reason for the bug is very simple. The bot did not expect to find a page where there is absolutely nothing but a category. I will fix it. Thanks again!
1448: 1435: 1143:
He - he :) Wait till I correlate the spelling mistakes with their contributors, and make the list of top misspellers of all time. The first three will go ...
2370: 1608: 1562: 1529: 3304: 3284: 2973: 2948: 2024: 693:
Sorry! I promise to stick to pure grammatical errors. (I thought that since it was Farenheight, and Celcius, then it must be Kelvin. Now I see I am wrong.)
3041: 2016:, so that's why it got put back. I did notice your removal and the fact that it came back. So, if you think that article is indeed not worth having in the 2013: 1865: 1600:
I think you noticed, I also asked Charles to comment on the virtual master list thing. On the bus to school, I was now thinking about it. We could name it
1432: 275: 2442: 2756: 2729: 2725:
Sounds good. Then I will print out a list of possibly bad links, and let us see what you would like to do about it. :) I will get to this later today.
2704: 2682: 2614: 2601: 2301: 2166: 1949: 1827: 1800: 520:(this is an eternal source of confusion, believe me). Does this bot do something to detect changes it made that were reverted like some of the others? 2068: 1461:
Mulţumesc foarte mult for the excellent work on List of mathematical topics. Are you planning to regularly run a bot that adds the new articles from
3234: 3196: 3173: 3118: 3094: 3035: 1775: 1089: 2547: 2533: 1698: 1701: 2518: 1337:
Oleg, thanks for correcting me. I will use proper capitalization from now on and will review a couple other articles to which I made changes.
1101: 129: 43: 3312: 1715: 2567: 1581: 3042: 2434: 1895:: While the concept is fundamental to mathematics the article is not really important, maybe it should go into terminology or foundations? 1811: 1790: 2354: 1733: 1035:
Hi Oleg, thanks for the style pointer. I've always been an agressive capitalizer--maybe that's why I did so well in high school German.
918:
I use a custom-written computer program that counts British and American spellings. It only considers unambiguous instances. For example,
198:
The article looks indeed more complete now. Forgive me for not saying more, but I don't know much about that math area. Thanks and enjoy!
3059:
You are of course supposed to vote! (And your vote better be a "support" :) You can put your vote before mine, as you are the nominator.
3159: 1929: 1656: 1059:
Sounds good. I should have posted on your talk page rather than reverting your work though. Hope that did not make you too mad. Cheers,
838:
That's fine. In case my reply was upset, sorry for that. I will resume my spelling when I manage to improve the results to error ratio.
464:
I use American ispell, but I don't touch British spellings (I do remember from when I learned English, those -ise, -our, and what not).
2020:(which I am not sure), then you can remove it from the list, and from the math categories, and then it will not show up again. Cheers, 861:
And thanks for the tip on capitalization. As you can tell, I'm still getting settled in here. Nice to see that someone noticed me =)
345:
I can try. I cannot do it today, as I have to go home now, but you can post it on my talk page and I will look at it tomorrow. Cheers,
1911: 2845: 3258: 1767:
I do not think the Pi page is any different than any other page. I think your edits make sense. You could write on the talk page of
1688: 219:
means an organization that anyone in, or in many cases anyone interested in, the profession can join. I don't think the Institute
1967: 1182:
Unfortunately I know nothing about q-analogs. You're all welcome to start a new article, and I can help if you have any questions.
1573: 185:
Thanks for your annoyed comments about this article — you persuaded me to actually finish it. I hope you like how it turned out.
2818:
Oh, and note that my bot has a bug. It forgot to strip the dot or the comma at the end of some links. I will fix that sometime.
3074:
Hi, no problem concerning the edit conflicts, I get well along with it; don't think twice before doing what you feel needed...
3028: 1846: 1649: 65:
Hi Paul. I put the speedy deletion template and explained on that page why it should be deleted. Thanks for pointing this out!
1761: 1665:
By the way, I changed your user page a bit, to make it conform to the manual of style. Oleg Alexandrov 22:24, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
2058: 1939: 1425: 807:
Oops, sorry about that. Don't worry, it's not your fault, I'm sure you'll pick them up quickly. :-) I didn't even know about
87:
I'm just nervously doing a little editing while waiting till it's time to go to the airport, and then it's off to Sicily ;-)
3166: 3069: 2120: 2041: 1993: 1781: 930:. '-ize' endings are acceptable in UK English and the norm in U.S. English. '-ise' is only used in UK English and so on... 310:
I already have a couple of other screensavers. One is an implementation of "quasitiler" (for which I had to find out about
3015: 1903:, as there it is more visible, and could be categorized by somebody else (I know some people go from time to time through 2581: 2396: 1588: 1551: 1478: 1201: 784:
Yes, yes! I made that change before you told me about the list! I am taking off to today to learn British spellings. :(
159:
I can answer my own question. I think that extra space in the template introduces extra space in the article. So, sorry!
2336: 2855:) would check each individual link. I checked a bunch myself, and found just one false positive from what I remember. 1786:
You 'downcased' my User Page. I disagree however that the manual of style applies to user pages so I reverted this. --
1187:
BTW, you should have kept that default welcome I put on your page, it has good links, especially the manual of style.
1023:
Your name crops up quite often on my watchlist too. But hey, at least I am not the only lousy speller on wikipedia :)
2452: 1935:
Some questions on editing: Is it possible to have an article/category named 'Mathematical foo' listed under 'Foo'? --
1706: 967:
I must be a really lousy speller..it seems like every ten minutes you pick up another one of my spelling mistakes.--
441:
Yes, that's all I was pointing out. People get mad if you change one to the other. I'm not sure what ispell is. -
2841:
happening (does your script flag _anything_ with "404" in it as bad, or does it check in a more robust manner?). --
2149:. MarSch, that article is also used by physicists. There is no need to put the words C right in the first sentence. 232:
You are very right. When I added that category I did think something was odd, but did not pay much attention to it.
1098:
headline, (the best idéa I came up with). But if you do not like this? then please try to find a better solution.
1509: 1505: 1471: 1467: 731:
to your dictionary to avoid trouble — changing British to U.S. will earn you silly accusations of ethnocentrism.
330: 206: 2005: 1496: 1388: 2344: 1818:
user's page is a user's page, and ultimately the user decides what to be there. So, I will not do that again.
1069: 1725:
Hi; just in case: don't panic when you notice I become "active" again, I'm not really "back at work"... ;-)
1521:
By the way, one issue which we will need to discuss in a while is, what is a math category? For example, is
746:
fulfill is another UK/US difference. I forgot which is which, but you changed UK spelling in US spelling in
3048:
I submitted it. Thank you for your offer to help. One thing i don't know: Am i supposed to vote, myself? —
125: 3137:
having a robot change links to "topic" on pages of Category:former_category to "topic (former_category)|"
2539:
3. I want to have a doctorial study after I graduate. UC system is my favorite. Any suggestions to me?
2484:
s are! Therefore, I forget that "math literature uses bold only for vectors" (I know that) and bold all
2401: 2017: 268: 179: 2908:
My thesis is to speedup a kind of solving matrix. That's part of the reason why you see my bad work on
281:
If you are interested, ulimately I hope to build a java screen saver that does quasifuchan limit sets. (
1720: 1397: 1389: 1238: 642: 555: 1750:(PS: and one could even discuss if the length and area formulae are not also a special case of this.) 585:. However, that's the only mistake I found in the seven pages on my watchlist, so please continue. -- 3230:
Yes, I don't always get what you want. Part of it is me being dumb. But can you be more explicit? :)
2909: 2453: 1535:"Such a virtual master page" would be what I was thinking of; I think it would be a useful resource. 939: 51: 17: 1516:. What do you think of such a virtual master page? Maybe we should discuss this in a larger setting. 3244: 1634: 975:
That's the whole point of my spelling project, to make certain people feel bad about themselves. :)
315: 294:
About the java screen saver, I am not sure I understand what that has to do with Knowledge. Enjoy!
282: 97:
Welcome back! Hope you had a good time, and are now ready to plounge back in the virtual world. :)
1221: 26: 3052: 2870: 2842: 2419: 2046: 1842:
But, it seems you have been here for much longer than me, so I won't bug you more about that. :)
1042: 267: 178: 2987: 2331: 2320:
it wouldn't fit in the edit-summary box)--one can always look at the diff. Maybe I should put
1886: 893: 363: 356: 338: 261: 3185:
So you think "Del" is more frequently used instead of nabla than on Computer keyboards ? ;-)
2558: 2384:
Oleg, Thanks for the welcome to Knowledge. If you get a chance to take a look at my work on
2038: 1990: 1739:
Just was thinking about, however, adding a comment after all the volume/area formulae on the
1621: 1577: 710:
Wow, that's quite subtle. I might have made that mistake also. Learn something new everyday.
403: 304: 260:
I appreciate the help and advice you have given me, and have adapted my editing accordingly.
109: 91: 58: 2462:
The reason that makes me write the following statements is just let you know WHY I bold all
2297:
How do you like my changes to the technical def, starting with explaining what a chart is?--
1357: 1265: 215:
Mathematic and Its Applications, but the article says it's a professional society. Usually
193:
Well, if my comment looked annoyed, but that made you finish the article, then that is good!
3281: 3277: 3231: 3170: 3091: 3060: 3032: 2945: 2887: 2856: 2819: 2786: 2753: 2726: 2679: 2598: 2544: 2543:
Well, I can't help you here. Ask your current adviser, he/she might have good suggestions.
2530: 2515: 2431: 2367: 2275: 2163: 2092: 2065: 2021: 1946: 1926: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1862: 1843: 1824: 1797: 1772: 1730: 1653: 1605: 1559: 1526: 1462: 1445: 1422: 1409: 1325: 1303: 1287: 1275: 1258: 1214: 1188: 1144: 1132: 1110: 1082: 1060: 1012: 981: 839: 785: 694: 646: 536: 465: 423: 392: 346: 323: 295: 246: 199: 169: 149: 98: 80: 66: 1871: 1195: 913: 8: 2402: 1977:
How does Mathbot determine if an article is mathematics related? Is it the <math: -->
1964: 1955: 1880: 1873: 1676:
Thanks for that, I'm so used to capitalizing everything that I just did that by reflex.
1569: 1539: 582: 517: 856: 3049: 2752:
It seems I will not get to this today. But I will certainly do that this week. Cheers,
2572: 2416: 1963:
Hopefully I'm helping to make a dent in these seemingly infinite unclassified stubs. --
1892: 1522: 225: 140: 2379: 2351: 2328: 2082: 1712: 1585: 1548: 1475: 1363: 1349: 1175: 1160: 751: 679: 667: 586: 1925:
Well, that article has a paragraph about mathematics. I would leave it where it is.
1095:
I doubt the wisdom of inserting the ==Sister projects about the Julia set== heading.
938:
I've created a British/American Spelling Guide. If you're interested, check it out:
3301: 3255: 2970: 2924: 2564: 2389: 2385: 2035: 1987: 1729:
I don't quite understand what you want to say in here. But OK, I will not panic :)
747: 106: 88: 55: 2079:
Not that I haven't contributed hundred of equations with the correct <math: -->
1576:. A quick look at that category shows all its articles are maths, except possibly 1047:
i see your point now on how better to categorize articles, in particular with the
3273: 3265: 2056: 1972: 1858: 1833: 1543: 1401: 1024: 402:
Yes, I am glad that you are in the loop.  :-) Have you read through this stuff:
3264:
I did do some changes, I moved most of the content to the more specific article
1270:
Hi Oleg, I am relatively new here, but will try to contribute as much as I can.
765:
Noting that fulfil is on the list I gave — really, add them all, I mean it. :-)
3001: 2993: 2459:
Sorry for having done ugly things so that the real experts feel uncomfortable.
1747:
Maybe the above phrase up to "body", with adequate link, but w/o more details?
1378: 1205: 1074: 1052: 750:. I couldn't be bothered to revert, even though UK is of course much better ;) 638: 559: 492: 442: 407: 375: 2412:
finding suitable category to express the idea of pointless scientific efforts
1030: 887: 728: 369: 3319: 3193: 3156: 3115: 3012: 2270:
are rather poor section titles. There is also a bug in the first sentence in
1758: 1431:
Sorry, was just demonstrating to a friend that truly, you can edit anything.
1416: 1036: 1008: 993: 865: 812: 766: 732: 711: 521: 186: 136: 105:
Thanks. I'm back, but I'm a bit addled, so "plounge" sounds about right ;-)
3087: 2393: 2146: 2129: 2105: 2098: 1677: 1641: 1456: 1282:
I see you are from Moldova... I am actually from Russia, currently at MSU.
881: 2912:. Now, I may have done a bad thing about categorizing/listing again: the 1310: 1174:
article, but there is certainly much more that could and should be said. (
1151: 899: 374:
do you have a page explaining how your spell checking pseudo-bot works? -
2913: 2852: 2701: 2611: 2578: 2466:
s. They are nothing about arguing with you. Originally, I want to bold
2298: 2117: 2086: 2004:
Now, my bot looks at all articles contained in a math category listed in
1936: 1808: 1787: 2648:
would need to be done by hand, so if you are willing, I will not mind...
3214: 2053: 1978:
tags? The reason I ask is because I'm in the middle of disambiguating
1317: 1136: 968: 953: 942: 931: 907: 2502:
to be λ so that they are consistent but I fail. I can not change the
2311: 1332: 1170:-analog article. We could start with the information I added the the 1375: 1295: 1233: 1163:. I'm new here and still trying to figure out these little details. 2851:
You are right, my script only looks for 404 messages. I hoped Rudy (
1369: 3189: 3186: 3152: 3149: 3111: 3108: 3008: 3005: 2491:
Beside for sorry about that, could you help me three other things?
2271: 2219: 2196: 2159: 2133: 1771:
about your plans, and if nobody objects, you can go ahead. Cheers,
1754: 1751: 1171: 1152: 1048: 311: 3300:
Hope some real computer science expert (I am not) can solve it. -
2132:(you can take a diff and see). I think you did the same thing for 2128:
About the grammar. You used only lower case letters at the end of
1495:
Yes, I do plan to run this bot regularly, after I make a definite
1421:
Thanks for removing the bad words you put in a wikipedia article.
872: 1999:
First, thank you for your great disambiguation work for fraction!
926:
are both correct in U.S. English, but in UK English, it's always
2678:
idea. Fine with me as long as you do the part the bot can't. :)
335:
It's an integral I'm working on and it's deceptively difficult.
2443:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Talk:Squaring_the_circle
1918: 1362:
Hi Oleg, thanks for the welcome! I'll check out those links :)
675: 1444:
And now you saw how fast sometimes bad things get noticed! :)
1252:
new(); my $ agent = 'WWW::Mediawiki::Client/' . $ VERSION;
1109:
I don't have any solutions. I am just good at criticizing. :)
3269: 3250: 2901:
Please check what I edit so that I don't mislead some others.
2470:
only, because it looks really like a slash, /. After I bold
2116:
I don't know what my mistake was, but I would like to know.--
1286:
Right. Actually I am ethnically Romanian, with poor Russian.
1229:
140: my $ agent = 'WWW::Mediawiki::Client/' . $ VERSION;
727:
is actually a legitimate British spelling. I advise you add
255: 73: 38:. However there is no user by that name it should have been 3141: 2112:
Also, MarSch, you should pay more attention to the grammar.
1823:
Welcome from me too. Thank you for your categorizing work.
1081:
Nice to meet you Matthew. Thank you for your warm message.
2081:
syntax, but thanks for noticing and correcting my slip at
1126: 962: 3210: 3134:
maybe making temporarily "topic" a redirect to that page,
2675: 2645: 2641: 1525:
math, since it has equations from physics and chemistry?
124:
Your categories/language links bot has a minor bug. See
2494:
1. I find that there is inconsistency about using λ and
353:
It's on my talk page in the problems section; last one.
116: 2674:
So, just tell me if you would like to proceed with the
1768: 1740: 1485:
I was very pleased with you thanking me in Romanian. :)
671: 289:
Great you moved it. I might visit it from time to time.
3027:
But that's my opinion. You can of course post this on
1324:
Congratulations! You have the traits of a good admin.
1135:
pointing out spelling mistakes --- for all eternity.--
3182:
You did not yet get me on the 2nd level of thought...
3140:
but aiming at having "topic" being ultimately (thus,
1090:
Headline, (wery funny! a headline about a headline =)
2274:. I think you should pay more attention to details. 276:
User:Pmurray_bigpond.com/Geometry of Complex Numbers
2392:, I'd appreciate any suggestions that you have. -- 2108:in the same way. BTW, in you edit summary you said 1512:, that's very easy to make, see the wiki source of 3313:removed not well-explained and unhelpful paragraph 2222:was that you did not capitalize things properly in 2074: 2009: 1350:http://www.algebra.com/algebra/services/rendering/ 952:See my talk page for the answer to your question. 54:to provide an explanation. Sorry for the trouble. 3167:Knowledge:Disambiguation#Types of disambiguation 2426:It all started with you putting this article in 3249:Sorry to bother you again. I split the article 3000:Now I wanted to suggest you a move : "del" to " 1504:As far as a page containing all the pages from 382:Got it, madman with a mad robot gone astray! :) 3169:(thanks to Paul August for this information). 3031:and see what others will have to say. Cheers, 2944:I will take a look at it later today. Cheers, 1202:Template talk:mergewith#Merge template changes 44:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/Participants 1582:Particle in a spherically symmetric potential 3131:moving "topic" to "topic (former_category)", 3043:Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Paul August 2474:s, suddently I feel that the protagonists, 34:I happened to see your welcome message to 3209:What's your point? Are you trying to say 2553:By the way, thank you for telling me the 42:. This was do to a mistake I made on the 2563:Thank you very much, I learn a lot. ^^ 1204:before changing more merge templates. - 1574:Category:Partial differential equations 1274:Relax, do no more than what is fun. :) 1246:I think you are referring to the lines: 14: 3029:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics 2969:It becomes clear and neat, thank you. 1650:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Mathematics 1294:My twin's name is Oleg. So strange... 877:Hello, Oleg! Thanks for your welcome! 211:I don't know much about the Institute 3293:The changes are marvelous. Thank you. 1945:Try this ]. Is that what you wanted? 1711:I'll add edit summary next time :) -- 1400:and changed all necessary redirects. 2498:in that article. I try to make all 1744:"locked" for edits, in some sense). 2430:. That's what my remark was about. 1354:I am still learning. Thanks. Igor. 331:Would you assist me with a problem? 278:while I am still investigating it. 207:The two IMAs may be quite different 23: 2097:Hi Oleg, our paths cross again at 1408:Thanks a lot for letting me know! 1159:First, thanks for the link fix on 24: 3332: 1602:List of mathematical topics (A-Z) 1514:List of mathematical topics (A-C) 3103:For me, no question, because it 2350:this may not be intentional. -- 2104:I'm also planning on working on 1960:Thank you for the thank you. :) 1689:Thanks, regarding variable names 3213:should be an article about the 2329:Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley 1510:List of mathematical topics (Z) 1506:List of mathematical topics (A) 1472:List of mathematical topics (Z) 1468:List of mathematical topics (A) 46:. So you inadvertently created 2006:list of mathematics categories 1986:, and the bot re-inserted it. 1497:List of mathematics categories 1374:I replyed again on my talk. – 13: 1: 2441:This discussion continued on 2428:Category:Pathological science 1070:Category:Academic disciplines 3070:still more WP technicalities 2640:About redirecting things to 1782:Modifications to my userpage 1257:new(); thing above. Cheers, 1222:Certain user-agents excluded 729:a bunch of British spellings 581:Another (partial) revert at 404:User:Omegatron#Spell_checker 27:jScott Trapp vs jScott.trapp 7: 2018:list of mathematical topics 1984:List of Mathematical topics 1316:to disappoint you. Thanks. 1302:Coincidences do happen. :) 1251:{ua} = LWP::UserAgent-: --> 1043:will oblige on categorizing 678:, and many other sources. 269:Geometry of Complex Numbers 180:Matrix chain multiplication 10: 3337: 1595:try this again in a while. 1398:Continuous linear operator 1390:Continuous linear operator 1213:templates thought better. 1208:12:42, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC) 910:00:19, Apr 11, 2005 (UTC) 643:discrete Fourier transform 556:discrete Fourier transform 378:04:08, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC) 61:18:02, Mar 22, 2005 (UTC) 3055:22:29, 2005 May 24 (UTC) 2910:Characteristic polynomial 2454:Characteristic polynomial 2422:16:50, 2005 May 21 (UTC) 2341:19:12, 2005 May 20 (UTC) 2324:for the reason you gave. 2089:06:23, 2005 May 20 (UTC) 2030:Thanks, I've 'corrected' 1707:Thank you for your advice 1644:21:28, May 3, 2005 (UTC) 1558:article rather than not. 1404:22:51, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1385:00:56, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1366:07:25, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1320:20:11, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1298:03:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1242:04:54, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC) 1139:02:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1077:01:38, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1055:01:20, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1039:10:07, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1027:21:49, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 971:21:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 940:User:SpNeo/Spelling Guide 934:16:09, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 562:06:17, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC) 516:was spelled correctly in 495:06:17, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC) 491:Yeah that's fine then. - 445:05:46, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC) 410:04:31, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC) 366:04:36, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 359:03:13, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 341:03:06, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 264:04:40, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC) 228:23:43, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) 189:06:53, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) 143:03:25, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC) 112:22:00, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC) 101:19:06, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) 83:17:48, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC) 52:Knowledge:Speedy deletion 18:User talk:Oleg Alexandrov 3305:06:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC) 3285:18:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC) 3259:18:30, 26 May 2005 (UTC) 3235:15:06, 26 May 2005 (UTC) 3197:13:15, 26 May 2005 (UTC) 3174:21:06, 25 May 2005 (UTC) 3160:13:58, 25 May 2005 (UTC) 3119:13:11, 26 May 2005 (UTC) 3095:21:06, 25 May 2005 (UTC) 3064:22:32, 24 May 2005 (UTC) 3036:22:24, 24 May 2005 (UTC) 3016:22:20, 24 May 2005 (UTC) 2974:03:25, 24 May 2005 (UTC) 2949:18:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2928:17:55, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2891:15:20, 31 May 2005 (UTC) 2874:05:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC) 2860:05:19, 31 May 2005 (UTC) 2846:04:11, 31 May 2005 (UTC) 2823:02:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC) 2790:02:19, 29 May 2005 (UTC) 2757:23:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2730:20:14, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2705:19:19, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2683:18:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2615:13:14, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2602:02:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC) 2582:23:32, 22 May 2005 (UTC) 2568:00:30, 22 May 2005 (UTC) 2548:21:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC) 2534:21:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC) 2519:21:01, 21 May 2005 (UTC) 2478:s, are not as strong as 2435:17:32, 21 May 2005 (UTC) 2397:01:51, 21 May 2005 (UTC) 2371:20:50, 20 May 2005 (UTC) 2355:20:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC) 2302:16:04, 20 May 2005 (UTC) 2279:17:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC) 2167:15:46, 20 May 2005 (UTC) 2136:— the "old intro" thing. 2121:14:33, 20 May 2005 (UTC) 2069:15:39, 19 May 2005 (UTC) 2059:02:16, 19 May 2005 (UTC) 2042:02:34, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 2025:02:21, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 1994:01:58, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 1968:22:45, 16 May 2005 (UTC) 1950:22:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1940:22:31, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1930:22:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1912:22:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1866:01:13, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1847:01:05, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1828:20:25, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1812:11:47, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1801:00:22, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1791:00:17, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 1776:20:15, 10 May 2005 (UTC) 1762:18:39, 10 May 2005 (UTC) 1734:20:15, 10 May 2005 (UTC) 1680:23:03, May 3, 2005 (UTC) 1412:23:01, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1328:20:40, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1306:04:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1290:04:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1278:04:34, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1261:05:58, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1217:15:01, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1196:Changing merge templates 1191:20:18, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1147:03:23, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1113:20:02, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1104:18:40, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1085:01:40, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1063:01:21, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1015:23:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 996:22:33, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 984:21:35, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC) 956:07:58, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC) 945:16:11, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC) 914:Spelling standardization 884:09:59, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) 842:23:00, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 815:21:26, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 788:17:38, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 769:17:35, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 754:11:49, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 735:04:20, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 714:04:02, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 697:01:54, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 682:01:51, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) 649:16:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 589:12:44, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 554:I changed your edits to 539:05:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 524:05:43, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 468:05:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 426:05:11, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 395:04:23, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 349:03:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) 326:05:36, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC) 316:User:Pmurray bigpond.com 298:05:09, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC) 283:User:Pmurray bigpond.com 249:23:52, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC) 202:16:00, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) 172:04:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC) 152:04:06, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC) 69:18:12, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC) 3272:was talking about both 2781:Hi Rudy. Here you are, 2555:WikiProject Mathematics 2246:Besides, both this, and 1982:, and pulled it out of 1716:16:52, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 1702:00:11, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 1657:22:23, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1625:17:37, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1609:17:53, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1589:15:48, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1563:15:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1552:14:31, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1530:23:11, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1479:22:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1449:05:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1436:05:53, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1426:05:48, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1358:Thanks for your welcome 1266:Thanks for your welcome 1166:I agree that we need a 1120:I can take that =) // S 868:05:11, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) 857:Thanks for your welcome 3144:) the "disambig" page. 3090:, as he invented TeX. 3077:Concerning \nabla, so 2905:Dear Oleg Alexandrov: 2783:User:mathbot/Bad links 894:Talk:Analytic_function 48:User_talk:JScott_Trapp 40:User_talk:jScott.trapp 36:User_talk:JScott_Trapp 2345:Mathbot bug / feature 305:Mobius Transformation 3278:unary numeral system 1905:Category:Mathematics 1901:Category:Mathematics 1578:Chaplygin's equation 1463:Category:Mathematics 391:Other questions? :) 274:I am moving this to 217:professional society 2403:Squaring the circle 1881:Talk:Lie derivative 1874:Talk:Lie derivative 1396:I created a stubby 583:Christoffel symbols 518:dynamic programming 3217:? Come on, man! :) 2871:Christopher Thomas 2843:Christopher Thomas 2587:You mean using by 2514:I modified those. 2390:Burnside's theorem 2014:Category:Fractions 1907:doing just that). 1893:Abstract structure 1721:recent minor edits 1570:Laplace's equation 1540:Laplace's equation 1523:Category:Equations 1161:Gaussian binomials 1051:article. regards 1031:Overcapitalization 888:Analytic functions 370:your bots scare me 89:Paul August's Bot 2992:Hi, your edit to 2488:s smart-aleckly. 2445: 2083:linear regression 2012:was contained in 668:Equation of state 364:Guardian of Light 357:Guardian of Light 339:Guardian of Light 262:Guardian of Light 3328: 3245:Bother you again 2440: 2386:Character theory 2258:== something == 1697:and x is lost. 1648:I wrote more on 1635:Calculus sidebar 1622:Charles Matthews 1572:also appears in 1311:Regarding my RfA 1178:forgot to sign) 900:Proof Techniques 748:equation solving 723:Found another — 318:forgot to sign) 285:forgot to sign) 3336: 3335: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3315: 3282:Oleg Alexandrov 3274:unary operation 3266:unary operation 3247: 3232:Oleg Alexandrov 3171:Oleg Alexandrov 3107:to be \nabla ! 3092:Oleg Alexandrov 3072: 3061:Oleg Alexandrov 3046: 3033:Oleg Alexandrov 2990: 2946:Oleg Alexandrov 2903: 2888:Oleg Alexandrov 2857:Oleg Alexandrov 2820:Oleg Alexandrov 2787:Oleg Alexandrov 2754:Oleg Alexandrov 2727:Oleg Alexandrov 2680:Oleg Alexandrov 2599:Oleg Alexandrov 2575: 2545:Oleg Alexandrov 2531:Oleg Alexandrov 2516:Oleg Alexandrov 2457: 2432:Oleg Alexandrov 2406: 2382: 2368:Oleg Alexandrov 2347: 2339: 2334: 2314: 2276:Oleg Alexandrov 2259: 2235: 2234:== old intro== 2218:My point about 2164:Oleg Alexandrov 2095: 2077: 2066:Oleg Alexandrov 2052:Thanks again. 2049: 2047:linus confusion 2022:Oleg Alexandrov 1975: 1958: 1947:Oleg Alexandrov 1927:Oleg Alexandrov 1909:Oleg Alexandrov 1889: 1877: 1844:Oleg Alexandrov 1836: 1825:Oleg Alexandrov 1798:Oleg Alexandrov 1784: 1773:Oleg Alexandrov 1731:Oleg Alexandrov 1723: 1709: 1691: 1654:Oleg Alexandrov 1637: 1606:Oleg Alexandrov 1560:Oleg Alexandrov 1544:Larmor equation 1527:Oleg Alexandrov 1459: 1446:Oleg Alexandrov 1423:Oleg Alexandrov 1419: 1410:Oleg Alexandrov 1394: 1372: 1360: 1335: 1326:Oleg Alexandrov 1313: 1304:Oleg Alexandrov 1288:Oleg Alexandrov 1276:Oleg Alexandrov 1268: 1259:Oleg Alexandrov 1253: 1241: 1230: 1224: 1215:Oleg Alexandrov 1198: 1189:Oleg Alexandrov 1157: 1145:Oleg Alexandrov 1133:Oleg Alexandrov 1129: 1111:Oleg Alexandrov 1092: 1083:Oleg Alexandrov 1061:Oleg Alexandrov 1045: 1033: 1013:Oleg Alexandrov 982:Oleg Alexandrov 965: 916: 902: 890: 875: 859: 840:Oleg Alexandrov 786:Oleg Alexandrov 695:Oleg Alexandrov 647:Oleg Alexandrov 558:as well. :-) - 537:Oleg Alexandrov 466:Oleg Alexandrov 424:Oleg Alexandrov 393:Oleg Alexandrov 372: 347:Oleg Alexandrov 333: 324:Oleg Alexandrov 296:Oleg Alexandrov 272: 258: 247:Oleg Alexandrov 209: 200:Oleg Alexandrov 183: 170:Oleg Alexandrov 150:Oleg Alexandrov 119: 99:Oleg Alexandrov 81:Oleg Alexandrov 76: 67:Oleg Alexandrov 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3334: 3324: 3323: 3314: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3298: 3294: 3288: 3287: 3246: 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3183: 3177: 3176: 3146: 3145: 3138: 3135: 3132: 3124: 3123: 3122: 3121: 3098: 3097: 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3045: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3024: 3023: 3002:nabla operator 2994:Hardy notation 2989: 2988:suggested move 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2902: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2863: 2862: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2605: 2604: 2593: 2592: 2574: 2571: 2551: 2550: 2537: 2536: 2522: 2521: 2456: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2405: 2400: 2381: 2378: 2376: 2374: 2373: 2363: 2362: 2346: 2343: 2337: 2332: 2313: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2114: 2113: 2094: 2091: 2080:</math: --> 2076: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2048: 2045: 2028: 2027: 2001: 2000: 1974: 1971: 1965:TheParanoidOne 1957: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1933: 1932: 1915: 1914: 1888: 1887:Categorization 1885: 1876: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1820: 1819: 1804: 1803: 1783: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1737: 1736: 1722: 1719: 1708: 1705: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1660: 1659: 1636: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1612: 1611: 1597: 1596: 1568:You're right: 1566: 1565: 1542:is maths, and 1533: 1532: 1518: 1517: 1501: 1500: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1439: 1438: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1393: 1387: 1371: 1368: 1359: 1356: 1334: 1333:External Links 1331: 1330: 1329: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1292: 1291: 1280: 1279: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1237: 1228: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1184: 1183: 1156: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1115: 1114: 1091: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1065: 1064: 1044: 1041: 1032: 1029: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 986: 985: 977: 976: 964: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 947: 946: 915: 912: 901: 898: 889: 886: 874: 871: 870: 869: 858: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 796: 795: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 775: 774: 773: 772: 771: 770: 758: 757: 756: 755: 737: 736: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 686: 685: 684: 683: 661: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 650: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 565: 564: 563: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 528: 527: 526: 525: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 470: 469: 453: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 432: 431: 430: 429: 428: 427: 414: 413: 412: 411: 397: 396: 388: 387: 383: 371: 368: 351: 350: 332: 329: 328: 327: 300: 299: 291: 290: 271: 266: 257: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 239: 238: 234: 233: 208: 205: 204: 203: 195: 194: 182: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 163: 162: 161: 160: 154: 153: 118: 115: 114: 113: 95: 94: 75: 72: 71: 70: 28: 25: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3333: 3321: 3320:Talk:distance 3317: 3316: 3306: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3292: 3291: 3290: 3289: 3286: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3260: 3257: 3252: 3236: 3233: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3204: 3203: 3198: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3184: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3175: 3172: 3168: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3133: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3120: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3099: 3096: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3080: 3075: 3065: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3054: 3051: 3044: 3037: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3025: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3003: 2998: 2995: 2975: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2950: 2947: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2929: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2915: 2911: 2906: 2892: 2889: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2875: 2872: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2861: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2844: 2824: 2821: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2791: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2758: 2755: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2731: 2728: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2706: 2703: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2684: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2616: 2613: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2603: 2600: 2595: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2580: 2570: 2569: 2566: 2561: 2560: 2556: 2549: 2546: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2535: 2532: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2520: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2497: 2492: 2489: 2487: 2483: 2482: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2460: 2455: 2446: 2444: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2433: 2429: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2421: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2404: 2399: 2398: 2395: 2394:Michael Stone 2391: 2387: 2377: 2372: 2369: 2365: 2364: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2353: 2342: 2340: 2335: 2330: 2325: 2323: 2319: 2303: 2300: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2280: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2198: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2168: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2119: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2107: 2102: 2100: 2090: 2088: 2084: 2070: 2067: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2057: 2055: 2044: 2043: 2040: 2037: 2033: 2026: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1992: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1970: 1969: 1966: 1961: 1951: 1948: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1938: 1931: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1920: 1913: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1894: 1884: 1882: 1875: 1867: 1864: 1860: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1845: 1840: 1829: 1826: 1822: 1821: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1810: 1802: 1799: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1789: 1777: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1735: 1732: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1718: 1717: 1714: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1696: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1643: 1626: 1623: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1564: 1561: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1545: 1541: 1536: 1531: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1488: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1464: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1433:24.18.237.107 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1424: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1403: 1399: 1391: 1386: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1377: 1370:RE Formatting 1367: 1365: 1355: 1352: 1351: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1327: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1319: 1305: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1297: 1289: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1260: 1255: 1254: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1240: 1235: 1227: 1216: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1207: 1203: 1190: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1164: 1162: 1154: 1146: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1138: 1134: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1103: 1096: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1076: 1071: 1062: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1054: 1050: 1040: 1038: 1028: 1026: 1014: 1010: 1007:That's right 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 995: 990: 989: 988: 987: 983: 979: 978: 974: 973: 972: 970: 955: 951: 950: 949: 948: 944: 941: 937: 936: 935: 933: 929: 925: 921: 911: 909: 905: 897: 895: 885: 883: 878: 867: 864: 863: 862: 841: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 814: 810: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 787: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 768: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 753: 749: 745: 741: 740: 739: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 721: 713: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 696: 692: 691: 690: 689: 688: 687: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 664: 663: 662: 648: 644: 641:'s change at 640: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 588: 584: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 561: 557: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 538: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 523: 519: 515: 511: 510: 509: 508: 494: 490: 489: 488: 487: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 467: 463: 462: 461: 460: 459: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 444: 440: 439: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 425: 420: 419: 418: 417: 416: 415: 409: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 394: 390: 389: 384: 381: 380: 379: 377: 367: 365: 360: 358: 354: 348: 344: 343: 342: 340: 336: 325: 321: 320: 319: 317: 313: 308: 306: 297: 293: 292: 288: 287: 286: 284: 279: 277: 270: 265: 263: 248: 243: 242: 241: 240: 236: 235: 231: 230: 229: 227: 226:Michael Hardy 222: 218: 214: 201: 197: 196: 192: 191: 190: 188: 181: 171: 167: 166: 165: 164: 158: 157: 156: 155: 151: 146: 145: 144: 142: 138: 133: 131: 127: 122: 111: 108: 104: 103: 102: 100: 93: 90: 86: 85: 84: 82: 68: 64: 63: 62: 60: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 32: 19: 3248: 3147: 3125: 3104: 3088:Donald Knuth 3078: 3076: 3073: 3047: 2999: 2991: 2907: 2904: 2839: 2588: 2576: 2562: 2552: 2538: 2523: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2493: 2490: 2485: 2480: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2439: 2410: 2407: 2383: 2375: 2352:Jitse Niesen 2348: 2326: 2321: 2317: 2315: 2312:Edit Summary 2147:scalar field 2130:scalar field 2115: 2106:vector field 2103: 2099:Scalar field 2096: 2093:Scalar field 2078: 2064:I tried. :) 2050: 2031: 2029: 1983: 1979: 1976: 1962: 1959: 1934: 1916: 1890: 1878: 1853: 1841: 1837: 1805: 1785: 1749: 1746: 1738: 1724: 1713:Mosesofmason 1710: 1694: 1692: 1638: 1586:Jitse Niesen 1567: 1549:Jitse Niesen 1537: 1534: 1476:Jitse Niesen 1460: 1420: 1395: 1380: 1379: 1373: 1364:Conskeptical 1361: 1353: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1336: 1314: 1293: 1281: 1269: 1250:$ self-: --> 1231: 1225: 1199: 1176:Vince Vatter 1167: 1165: 1158: 1130: 1099: 1094: 1093: 1066: 1046: 1034: 1022: 966: 927: 923: 919: 917: 906: 903: 891: 879: 876: 873:Edit summary 860: 808: 752:Jitse Niesen 743: 724: 680:Gene Nygaard 587:Jitse Niesen 513: 373: 362:Any leeway? 361: 355: 352: 337: 334: 309: 301: 280: 273: 259: 220: 216: 212: 210: 184: 134: 130:Template:0-9 123: 120: 107:Paul August 96: 77: 56:Paul August 33: 30: 3302:Jacob grace 3256:Jacob grace 2971:Jacob grace 2925:Jacob grace 2914:fixed point 2676:archive.org 2646:archive.org 2642:archive.org 2565:Jacob grace 2559:Jacob grace 2036:Josh Parris 1988:Josh Parris 1200:Please see 3318:(moved to 3215:delete key 2573:Dead links 1402:MathMartin 1348:check out 1025:MathMartin 512:Just FYI, 126:its change 3050:Sebastian 2506:s in the 2417:Sebastian 2380:Greetings 2322:something 2180:complete. 1956:Thank you 1879:Moved to 1206:Omegatron 1075:Mayumashu 1053:Mayumashu 639:Omegatron 560:Omegatron 493:Omegatron 443:Omegatron 408:Omegatron 376:Omegatron 312:zonotopes 307:is mine. 256:Thank You 121:Hi Oleg, 74:Vacation? 31:Hi Oleg. 2886:Thanks. 2529:guy. :) 2272:manifold 2220:manifold 2197:manifold 2160:manifold 2134:manifold 2032:Fraction 2010:fraction 1980:Fraction 1854:assuming 1232:Cheers! 1172:q-series 1153:Q-analog 1127:Hell ... 1049:calculus 1037:Sympleko 963:Spelling 866:Reedbeta 725:practise 137:dbenbenn 135:Cheers, 2510:field. 2508:Example 2338:contrib 1973:Mathbot 1678:Sholtar 1642:Sholtar 1392:created 1155:article 1102:Solkoll 882:Porcher 742:fulfil 670:. See 514:memoize 117:Bot bug 3053:(talk) 2853:R.Koot 2702:R.Koot 2612:R.Koot 2579:R.Koot 2420:(talk) 2299:MarSch 2195:As to 2145:About 2118:MarSch 2087:Miguel 2054:Jayjg 1937:R.Koot 1919:Theory 1809:R.Koot 1788:R.Koot 809:fulfil 676:kelvin 637:About 3297:them. 3270:unary 3268:, as 3251:Unary 2997:it). 2361:know. 1872:from 1834:Sorry 1699:Chris 1417:Sorry 1318:Phils 1137:CSTAR 969:CSTAR 954:SpNeo 943:SpNeo 932:SpNeo 908:Tygar 892:See 16:< 3276:and 3194:Talk 3165:See 3157:Talk 3142:asap 3116:Talk 3086:Ask 3013:Talk 2333:talk 2085:. — 2075:math 1759:Talk 1580:and 1457:LoMT 1296:Igny 1234:Demi 1009:Deco 994:Deco 928:grey 924:gray 922:and 920:grey 813:Deco 767:Deco 733:Deco 712:Deco 522:Deco 406:? - 187:Deco 141:talk 3211:del 3190:MFH 3153:MFH 3112:MFH 3105:has 3079:why 3022:is. 3009:MFH 2589:bot 2388:or 2318:and 1917:On 1891:On 1755:MFH 1508:to 1470:to 1131:Is 1100:// 221:FOR 128:to 3192:: 3188:— 3155:: 3151:— 3148:? 3114:: 3110:— 3011:: 3007:— 2869:-- 2700:-- 2327:-- 2034:. 2008:. 1883:. 1859:SV 1807:-- 1769:Pi 1757:: 1753:— 1741:Pi 1652:. 1481:. 1381:CD 1376:AB 896:. 811:. 744:vs 674:, 672:SI 213:OF 139:| 132:. 3322:) 2504:t 2500:t 2496:t 2486:A 2481:I 2476:A 2472:I 2468:I 2464:A 2039:✉ 1991:✉ 1863:t 1861:| 1857:- 1695:x 1499:. 1239:C 1236:/ 1168:q 110:☎ 92:☎ 59:☎

Index

User talk:Oleg Alexandrov
User_talk:JScott_Trapp
User_talk:jScott.trapp
Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics/Participants
User_talk:JScott_Trapp
Knowledge:Speedy deletion
Paul August

Oleg Alexandrov
Oleg Alexandrov
Paul August's Bot

Oleg Alexandrov
Paul August

its change
Template:0-9
dbenbenn
talk
Oleg Alexandrov
Oleg Alexandrov
Matrix chain multiplication
Deco
Oleg Alexandrov
Michael Hardy
Oleg Alexandrov
Guardian of Light
Geometry of Complex Numbers
User:Pmurray_bigpond.com/Geometry of Complex Numbers
User:Pmurray bigpond.com

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.