User talk:ReaderofthePack/Archive 16

2221:

as having good faith. Now while I know you wanted to prove your point with notability and to a degree I can respect that, but did you stop to think that maybe I did see the comments as bad faith and harassment that might come across as something that would drive this particular female editor away from Knowledge? Just because I'm nominating the article for deletion and thus is likely to have an opposing viewpoint doesn't mean that all of my comments should have been seen as something to throw to the side. I'm not permanently leaving Knowledge, but I do think that you need to think about how your comments come across to other people. Holding a long series of comments with another editor about how you believe that few nominators do a proper search (even going so far as to say things that come across as you saying that people are deliberately not putting information in pages) and that the nominations are "dumb" does not really come across well. That's the sort of thing that should be held on talk pages, not at AfDs because it's so easy to assume that you're indirectly talking about the nominator. If you were the nominator and someone started doing the same thing (and you genuinely believe that you're right and you did a thorough search), wouldn't you be offended? Especially if that person started accusing you of being "part of the problem" with Knowledge? Especially if that person was making comments that gave off the impression that they had done zero research on your prior edits on Knowledge? It's extremely offputting, to say the least.

2197:

questions about the search procedure, then the best thing to do is ask how and where they searched for articles or to just quietly put the sources on the page and vote "keep". Not only does the comments on the Donovan AfD come across as a bit of a personal attack against my editing, but it also makes me extremely concerned that you may be doing this to other editors. I'm used to getting questioned since I'm a very frequent editor and an admin, but please understand that this sort of thing can run off other editors if they think that you are not assuming good faith. Not only can this be seen as aggressive behavior, but it also puts a lot of people on the defensive when it comes to AfDs and interacting with you, especially since we cannot see inflections, body language, and general gestures on the Internet. You may not have intended anything you've said to come across as as overly negative, but that's how it can come across and it really isn't beneficial in the slightest. If you do think that someone (even myself) frequently make bad nominations then bring it up on the editor's talk page or go to

841:

mainspace. We can't really indefinitely host draftspace copies of articles, especially if there's already a mainspace version. It'd just always be considered a bit redundant and unnecessary for the most part. Was there anything particular that you wanted from the article? From what I can see there weren't any sources in the draft copy and the bulk of the draft copy was a debate between editors, all of which was from July of last year. The article is differently phrased than the draft copy, but not really enough to where it'd make an overwhelming difference. I don't have any true issue with restoring it, but I don't really see where there's that much of a need for it unless you wanted to save the page debate for some reason. If I do restore it, it'll be as a page in your userspace rather than in the draftspace since odds are it'd just be renominated again in another 6 months.

591:

make everything far more confusing than it would be if they had a person who spoke/read Ukrainian. The pages they made kind of give off the impression that they were relying fairly heavily on Google Translate since that's sort of the same way they look when I use GT for foreign language pages. Basically what I'm kind of concerned about is that their level of English may be so poor that they aren't really ready to edit on the English language WikiProject yet and would probably benefit more from editing on the Ukrainian Knowledge or just requesting pages on the Ukraine WikiProject until their English gets a little better. It's pretty much the same reason why I don't edit on some of the foreign language Wikipedias, as my language level is so poor that I wouldn't be able to really create a proper page.

2267:

winning, but because I want to ensure that if/when an article is kept at AfD, that it won't be nominated again a few months later for a lack of coverage. While I can understand your passion for wanting to keep articles, the sad truth is that notablity guidelines are strict and a lot of the people, items, and topics may deserve an article, they also may not have the depth of coverage to really survive an AfD. Heck, a great example of this would be many of the horror authors from the 1980s. Many of them were household names and sold exceedingly well, yet they never gained the coverage to pass notability guidelines. Another example would be several erotica authors like Sunny, who are popular but never really gained that much coverage.

2281:

at AfD it's a good idea to stay on the topic of that particular AfD unless those other AfDs or editors are extremely pertinent to that AfD. If you think that there is a bad trend of unreasonable nominations at AfD and its' done by a very general set of editors, take that up on the AfD page or on a user talk page. Do not use another AfD to talk about that because it runs the risk of turning into what you see here. It's just that easy for things to be taken in a completely different manner than what you intended. In all fairness that looks like it's what was happening with the things I was saying to you, as you're now assuming that everything I'm writing to you from this point on will be an attempt to "win".

2888:

about web tools in a general manner. I also didn't really see anything about the website's editorial process, so that was another reason that it came off as unreliable per Knowledge's purposes. The reason why a transparent editorial process is so important is that there are a lot of websites that accept articles "as is". Sometimes they'll state it outright on the article's page (usually by saying something about the content being only the work of the author, doesn't reflect their views, and so on), but in many cases you have to really hunt to find evidence that the editorial staff actively edits articles that are written by people who aren't staff members.

2262:

understand that this is why you need to be careful about where you discuss things adn how you discuss them. If you mention multiple faults with other AfDs or editors on another AfD then odds are high that someone will assume that you are indirectly talking about them- especially if you follow the comments up with more comments that also give the impression that you were indirectly talking about that person. It's an easy thing to do, considering how often I see people do this on various AfDs on Knowledge, and it's especially easy to do since you are not personally there to provide inflections and body language to show that you are

962:

need to condense this anyway in order to avoid having the article be too overly long, so it'd probably be better to try to finesse it now. Other than that, it's pretty much just a matter of waiting until he gets more coverage for his work. The thing to be careful of is that participation in notable films/shows/etc doesn't always mean that he would gain notability- this is usually reserved for the people who play very, very large roles in the production process like the director, executive producer, and so on- the people at the top rungs.

1373:

passage in my userspace in order to show that a book mention was lengthy enough to be used as a RS since the book wasn't really available in Google Books at that point in time and looking for terms in the book didn't bring up any visible results. It's just that easy for people to contest sources, especially if they're difficult to view. In any case about the WFP, it may be that I'm on my work computer, which can sometimes restrict views. I'll try to take a look at it when I get home and see if that makes a difference.

31: 2797:

well-known and respectful SEO web news portals like searchengineland.com. Obviously, there are no newspaper articles about this subject, since it's only web-existant and I have never heard about any newspapers or magazines, writing about this subjects, which are known/ well-respected in SEO world. So, my question is which of sources, I have provided, are unreliable, and can you give me suggestions on what type of sources would be considered reliable concerning this topic?

1396: 3727: 261: 2100:. I posting to the IP's talk page, I tried posting to the article talk page, and I've run through the templated warnings. The problem is that I've seen similar issues declined at AIV recently as "not vandalism". If I go to ANI again, I'm afraid that it's just going to turn into another long debate about whether I'm overreacting to the IP's edits. I'm not really sure what to do. I requested temporary page protection as an interim solution, but 118: 181: 1463: 339: 1429: 715: 1837: 1209: 768: 2960:. That's usually the main thing that proves to be an issue with anything computer, internet, or software related since there can be a lot of people working with the topic at some level, especially if it's open source. I will openly admit that I am fairly strict with notability, but that's partially because I want to ensure that when it does pass through AfC that it doesn't get second guessed. 3746:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 571:

wasted my time). i also had a look at the article's creator who as a wikinewbie has made 3 articles which are all up for deletion! This may be disheartening for them. As a wikiveteran, do you know any wikiuncles or aunties that could offer to help them or do you have any suggestions to assist them so we dont lose a budding wikieditor?

2108:. So, now I ask you: what in the world am I supposed to do? I'm beginning to think that maybe I should just take the page off my watchlist and let the IP editor do what he/she will, as I'm tired of fighting over this. I agree with many of the IP's edits, but there seems to be no way at all to discuss the ones with which I disagree. 2285:

can have different connotations depending on where you are saying them. You've only been editing on Knowledge since September of last year, so you haven't yet had the ability to experience this more fully, but I again have to ask you: please be careful of what you say and where you say them. I can't say that enough because if you

2343:, and left a comment on its talk page, to the effect that the publishing party sentence makes the article weaker rather than stronger. I agree with your reasoning for the AFD, but did not feel strongly enough either way to !vote. If it does not improve from the current state, eventually it will get nominated for AFD again. — 1634:

Jerusalem and how it was becoming unnecessarily complicated. Unfortunately, I phrased it in a very unfortunate manner. "What a tangled thread we weave" (thread to avoid using web, which would make it sound like I was saying someone was lying). Unfortunately another user (I would highlight, but I don't want

3500:

Now as far as the article goes it's kind of tough to say specific points because there are bits here and there that are sort of iffy. They're not technically promotional/non-formal, but they're written in a way that could set off some editors' spidey sense, which is sort of what happened with me. I'm

3223:

Done! I found a ton of sources and since you've already submitted it, I've accepted it to the mainspace. My only concern is that rather than include a section on the controversy, we may want to briefly mention it in the article's lead and redirect them to the section on the author's article that goes

2487:

Not requesting a re-review just advice from the same reviewer if possible. I have removed items that had citations which weren't considered much good by wiki and added some more third party citations so most are now from third party, not primary. Tone has changed some - but I'll be doing some more of

1796:

Oh yeah- that's a given. I remember getting into a bit of an argument at an AfD once where someone tried to argue against notability just by saying it was a self-published book, which I objected to on the basis that I didn't want people to automatically assume that sp books were non-notable, which is

590:

and a Ukrainian-fluent editor to step in and talk with the editor, since there seems to be a pretty big language barrier. I think that we could invite them to the Teahouse, but I'm very, very concerned that this may not be very helpful since they may not speak English very well or at all, which would

570:

Hi Tokyogirl79, I had a look at this article which you put up for deletion and couldnt resist playing with it (creating talk page to ukraine project, deorphaning, adding categories and notices), i think its the wikikitten in me:) (i agree that it should be deleted in its present form so have probably

3701:

Hmm... I've re-written portions of it to take some promotional-ish language out and I've added some sources into the article. I'm leaning towards it passing notability guidelines now. There's still an issue with some of the sources sort of being primary or database type listings, but the scholarship

2955:

would be usable because of the connection, but it'd be worth mentioning as well. If these are approved then they could push it pass the notability barrier. One thing to be careful of, however, is that you need to make sure that none of the articles were written by someone who is involved with Google

2865:

sources. They can prove that the tool exists and that the developer's page can be accessed, but they cannot show notability. This is because it's generally expected that anything that can be indexed in a database (businesses, software, tools, people, etc) will be indexed somewhere. In many instances

2855:

it would not be usable as a reliable source. If you can prove that the blog is routinely quoted in reliable sources (not primary ones that are associated with him or other blogs) as a reliable and authoritative source, then it can be used. The thing to remember here is that while a person could be a

2796:

Hello. I have received a message from you that article about Google pagespeed tools has been declined due to unreliable sources. At the same time all sources i have provided are from actual official Google Developers pages, official Google Coder blog, official Google WebmasterTools Central Portal or

2717:

Thanks for your help, i figured i had some unreliable sources on the article and i have taken them off. 360nobs, Jaguda and other sources left do have an editorial team that review each content before posting hence, making them very reliable. Will look forward to my article on the mainspace. Thanks

2289:

used the AfD as a forum to talk about other nominations and editors, odds are that I probably would have just shrugged this off or been more calm in talking to you. I'm not trying to say that I couldn't have phrased myself more clearly at the AfD, but you could have as well. This is getting long and

2280:

At the very least please try not to discuss other AfDs or other editors' activities on another AfD. I've been assured by another editor that you likely didn't mean it that way, but please understand: it's extremely easy for people to take comments in a way you did not intend. That's why when you are

1771:

linked, but most of them are blogs. I'll admit that books aren't my strong suit, so if you've got any advice or help, that'd be appreciated. I tried checking WikiProject Novels, but it seems pretty dead over there. Mostly, I'm worried that any article about a self-published book will face intense

1372:

usable because it was too brief to be used. (This happened a lot with Highbeam before I got approved for an account.) Basically, there have been too many cases where people have argued for a source, only to find out that it wasn't usable. I know that in one instance I had to write out an entire book

506:

Thanks for coming back to me! I'm happy that the article feedback seems to be a go-ahead one. I'm just a bit desperate about the coverage & the sourcing - there's just not that much useful stuff about the 3-piece-band other than what I've found so far. My problem is to find a good sourcing about

489:

The article doesn't seem promotional any longer, at least not to where I'd worry about it, but I am concerned about the lack of coverage. You have a lot of coverage about things that the band members have done independently of the ensemble, but not really that much that's about the group itself. You

3187:

was immensely helpful, I've been working on improving the article to make sure it is up to snuff. I can't thank you enough and I appreciate your offer to help. I just graduated and as such no longer have access to my university's library or catalog resources. Once again, thank you, and have a great

2603:

I found Bezalel Inc. under item of Bezalel was removed to draft because of the problem of verifiable reference. Actually, I knew this wireless charger from one technical event, and I think it is really cool! And, I just found more reference from News organization, like LA times, etc. Maybe we can

2272:

My point with the sources was mostly that when I have an article up for AfD and argue against it, it's rarely because I want to win but because I want to ensure that the article will be safe from deletion from that point onwards. When trying to keep articles I try to avoid making arguments based on

2266:

talking about that specific nominator or AfD. Even if you think that the AfD was about me "winning", I really want you to take away from this that you should likely think about how your wording may come across to other people. I do have to assure you that my harshness on the sources is not about me

2241:

I mean, the big thing is that by commenting on all of these other AfDs and nominations in my AfD (rather than each other's talk pages) it really comes across like you are indirectly saying those things about my nomination. If you did something and then people started making comments about how other

2220:

I'm also going to reply on this here so I don't drag out the AfD with more comments but... I do want to say that I was fairly offended that you remarked that I was overly confrontation and driving away female editors. A large bulk of my conversation was about how I did not see your earlier comments

2039:

Hi there, I have removed any references to Conscience's website and replaced those links from other sources including BBC news, Huffington Post and the Backbencher. I have also added a Controversies section featuring criticism of Conscience found in the London Telegraph to remove any NPOV concerns.

1164:. The thing is, I've reinstated articles that were deleted via A7 before and it ended up that the admin various reasons they didn't want to restore it. This doesn't look like it'd be one of those cases, but I'd still prefer to wait for GB fan to have a chance to log back in and restore the article. 1155:

I still kind of don't like restoring an A7 without the deleting admin's OK, especially if I'm not overly familiar with that admin's editing style. If it'd been by an admin I was more familiar with I'd be more likely to do it if I know that they'd approve it, but I'm still kind of uncomfortable with

961:

to the point where it's a little intrusive. You could probably work on condensing a little of the material as well, since at this point in time he hasn't done a huge amount of work and he has more coverage of this than some of the bigger filmmakers out there. If/when he does get more coverage you'd

641:

Nah, it's a good idea to follow up on stuff like this to ensure that everyone is given a fair chance to learn policy and procedure. I know that unfortunately a lot of editors don't do this and a lot of people get discouraged and leave because of it, so this definitely doesn't deserve a trouting. If

2831:

The problem with this source is that it looks to be one of the blogs that HuffPo runs on its website. If it was a staff member then it might be usable, but from what I can see on Ivanovs's profile he's one of the bloggers. If you can show that this went through the HuffPo's editorial staff then it

2284:

I do think that this last bit is good advice, but I'm afraid that you are just doing to discredit it because you think I'm doing "sour grapes". I can't stress enough: please be careful with what you write and where you write it. Don't censor yourself, but please try to consider that what you write

2196:

procedure doesn't come across as very good faith, nor does calling other editors' nominations of articles "dumb". Furthermore, when you say that searches coming up blank are "patently untrue", understand that you are implying that the editor is lying about performing a thorough search. If you have

1633:

thing to do (if,so, I apologise), but as I don't know you very well and you have no connection to Israel-Palestine topics as far as I know, I figure you're a good person to ask about this. Could I get your opinion on these edits? I made a comment in this RFC about now the topic of how to represent

1337:

review. When I follow the link and scroll to the bottom of the page, I see the review, albeit buried in all the other text from that page of the paper, and with all formatting removed. Perhaps WFP only makes it available for free to users in certain locations or something. Earlier I encouraged the

1282:

Hi Tokyogirl79 ! Thank you for your support with the article about the International Union of Bilateral Chambers of Commerce and Industry and for moving it to Draft. I've made some changes on the article, please if you can just take a look and let me know if it is ok now and if i should continue.

840:

Well... the issue with the draftspace article is that there weren't any edits past July of last year, apart from someone nominating it as an abandoned draft. For all practical purposes the draft hadn't been edited and would be considered abandoned, especially if there was already an article in the

449:

But sadly I was left without any reply so far and asked myself why it is that I don't hear anything back? Could you please let me know, if I'm getting there after I've edited down quite a lot? I would appreciate another look on it, before I would resubmit it and also further suggestions would be

1638:

to cause disruption on your talk page) took it in a way I didn't intend and in retrospect, can't quite understand, and things got bad. I would appreciate it if you could look at all the diffs and give me your opinion as a neutral party. I think this is better than me further giving my side of the

1129:

has only 48 edits. You stated "you only put WP:PRIMARY sources in the article" but I made no edits to the article, just the talk page. I'd appreciate it if you could userfy it for my now, so I can fix it for Bartolomeorastrelli. Deleting articles by users with 48 edits in a manner that they can't

3474:

OK with it, Monster Mutsume is surprisingly good. I'd initially dismissed it as wank fodder due to some of the pictures I've seen of the manga on the Internet, but at it's heart it has a pretty decent story (of sorts). It kind of reminds me of Tenchi Muyo with how the harem is set up. I can also

2887:

The problem with this one was mostly that I didn't see where it really discussed Google PageSpeed. It discussed things that GPS would cover, but it was never actually named in the article and unless the articles state that it's about this specific tool then we have to assume that they're talking

1585:

Hi Tokyogirl79, ive just assessed the above article for child lit as start and mid importance but noticed that the project banner says - This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. - is this an issue? (it still showed up on the unassessed articles page of child lit).

1082:

I'm always a little leery about stepping on the toes of other editors. I don't anticipate him having a huge issue, but general procedure is for the deleting admin to approve recreation of an A7 or for it to go through DRV. So far it just looks like GB fan is off Knowledge for the moment since he

1720:

XD Don't be bitter! I'll see what I can find about this. I don't know about the Kirkus Review source since they started doing paid reviews in the last few years. Those are labeled Kirkus Indie (and this isn't one of those reviews) but it'd probably get dumped on if it came to AfD. I think that

2261:

One last comment. This isn't about "winning". Frankly, if you'd commented on the sources without the long drawn out discussion about the other AfDs and the other editors, I would't have thought anything about it and might even have been more willing to work with you. However you really need to

1813:

That's frustrating. I can't imagine a more tempting target than self-published genre fiction. Although, I did run into someone who deliberately created unreferenced microstubs on obviously notable topics. The idea was to disruptively make a point about heavy-handed speedy deletion on NPP.

3438:

thanks for your review of my wikipedia article about the Fair Stone Standard. I updated the article and the text segments in question. Are there other parts where a formal tone is missing? Off-topic: Got any good and new shoujo manga to recommend? I still need a present for my girlfriend ;)

980:

Thanks heaps for your reply! Like I said he is not notable for the film work, this is more in the background rather than his story and book which has had media coverage etc. I just do not know how to word this correctly to make it relevant. I am ideally looking for someone to help me word it

2877:

This one was sort of iffy because I couldn't see where this was a staff member's article and the person who wrote it is in marketing. That doesn't automatically mean that the person who wrote it was hired to market Page Speed, but it is enough to where I'd recommend running this through

2123:

Have you taken this to third opinion yet? I can't remember if you had or not. I can see where you're coming from with this and I'd rather that it include both amounts as opposed to just one, unless one amount has been confirmed by the studio and/or reported on by other sources.

3569:

I've only ever really read the light novels, which are pretty good so far. I've finished the third volume, but I will admit that I am a little afraid that it'll get somewhat redundant as the series progresses since later story arcs seem to take place over multiple volumes.

1704:

On an somewhat related note, I felt all proud of myself when I gathered enough interviews and other sources from my searches to possibly improve Moody's article. And then I noticed that you had already added every source I found. A year ago. I'm trying not to be bitter.

729:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your kitten must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

1721:

offhand it'd probably be better to do one for the whole series instead of the individual novels. You can always create articles for the book and then redirect them to the main series page if you think that you may be able to find additional sources over time, though.

3487:. It took me a while to get into light novels since I didn't really get into the Haruhi Suzumiya or Spice and Wolf series, but these are pretty fun to read, especially the Dungeon series since they have a fairly unique perspective on JRPGs. Heh... has she read the 1225:, factors into that picture. Reviewing will begin soon and I'll need your help to be able to present our work. Please review our proposal and give us feedback. If you would be interested in seeing this presentation, whether you are attending or not, please 3264:. I made a critical error and mis-read the timestamps; csw1854's submission pre-dated the sock edits which moved the article into mainspace, making this easily explainable as the socks copying his work and not vice-versa. I didn't see anything else at the 1367:

Well... without seeing it we can't really tell if it's going to be usable or not. There have been a lot of times in the past where I'd assumed that something was usable, only for someone to come forward with a fuller copy of the text and say that it

1083:

hasn't edited for a few hours, so I don't think he's going to decline it. Now if he doesn't answer by this time tomorrow then I'll look into userfying it for you. I just want to make sure that he has the ability to look over the request first.

2388:

much for your great contibutions & improvements! I was so angry when I saw my stub was proposed for deletion, I ignored it from then on - I had trouble finding refs online that would justify its importance, but you have done a great job!

3702:

does get news coverage each year when the recipients are announced. I'm somewhat on the fence still with this one, but I think that I will approve it based on the news sources I found along with the news sources you had in the article.

3589: 2871:

This is another database type listing. In this instance it looks like this is the type that is usually created via information submitted by the developer, so this is a good example of the type that's a primary source at the same

2893:

This is a page in a marketing website and they're a Google Certified Partner, so that gives off the impression that they were hired by Google to write about GPS or would at the very least have a vested interest in writing about

3461:

is supposed to be pretty good, as is Love at Fourteen. Those aren't shoujo, though, since the former is seinen and the latter is josei. My Little Monster is pretty good and that's definitely shoujo, so I'd recommend that.

3260:)? The editor behind this account made an unblock request yesterday which I declined. In looking at his edits, I was able to easily see his addition of a draft article which was an exact duplicate of the deleted article 2927:

This one is usable. It's about GPS and is by a staff member. The only thing to be careful about with TC articles is that sometimes they're heavily based on press releases, but this doesn't seem to be the case with this

1964: 1352:. In any case, thanks for your time reviewing the draft. I didn't accept it through AfC myself because I'd contributed to it and wanted a second opinion. I can't carp if I disagree with some parts of that opinion :-) 465:

Sorry about that! This year so far has been a bit of a cluster of various things IRL that have decreased my time on Knowledge. I won't bore you with the details, though. I'll earmark it to look at later on tonight.

2882:, the reliable sources noticeboard. I also didn't entirely see where there was anything that said that the contributed articles were edited, so again, this is something that should be run through the noticeboard. 3386:

I appreciate @Coolabahapple's comments regarding the notability of my sources. I have given another attempt to improve my content as well as the references. I would like to know if I am on the right track now.

1639:

story as that would be tainted by my own perceptions and emotions. I'm trying to figure out what our disagreement is over and what I might be doing wrong here/not seeing. Thank you very much for your time.

2938:

So far there were only three articles that really sort of passed muster- the rest were primary sources, didn't mention GPS in the article, or had issues with the editorial oversight. I'd recommend running

3695: 143:

and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving!

3681: 1113: 1277: 1012:

Ooops, didn't even check to see if it was a dab page, my bad. Either way as you said it's still copyvio, and the accounts have been doing nothing constructive, clearly not here to contribute, IMO. -

2507: 786:

and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a glass of milk, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Enjoy!

2314:

I have made a report on a user due to multiple issues such as vandalism, dispute edit, criticizing me and original research. I am wondering that I am reported on right place. Please have a look.

380: 3340: 3011: 3306: 2977: 2579: 2488:

that. There is still work to do on the article, need to add a couple more citations... I'm just trying to get an idea if the article has been improved or if I'm going down the wrong track.

2051: 1323: 3533:

I watched Sword Art Online, but found the second season to be lacking and never finished it. Does the story pick up? My time resources are not what they used to be... I miss my studies ;)

2734: 1122: 459: 251:- to have you around on Knowledge, Tokyogirl, so here's just a quiet ‘’all the best’’ to you for 2015 and I hope you’ll continue to be around on Knowledge for a long time to come. 2856:

reliable source in other outlets, this doesn't automatically mean that their blogs or personal websites would be considered automatically reliable since those are self-published sources.

3738: 3662:

Thank you for reviewing my submission previously. I have taken your comments into the editing. Could I know if I am on the right track with regards to the notability of the references?

3406: 3068: 2768: 2541: 2902: 3378: 3049: 2655: 1776:), but these are mainstream, traditionally published books with a large number of reviews. If you think it's best to do a single article on the entire series, I'll do that instead. 1561:: Hmm... I may try to see if I can find any sources. I seem to remember that she hadn't really gotten a ton of coverage for her other works, but I'll double check just to make sure. 3719: 1814:

Unsurprisingly, he was blocked shortly after berating several overly enthusiastic patrolers. Anyway, I haven't started that article yet. I'm so lazy. But thanks for the sources!

1303: 1160:

and you have to ask the deleting admin to reinstate it. If they decline you (or haven't been on Knowledge for a very long period of time) then you can go through deletion review at

3224:

into more depth. I kind of edited it some to fit what sourcing I could find, but I'm fairly sure that I borked it up in the process since the expulsion affair had a lot going on.

2806: 886:. I've also removed the AfC tag so it doesn't show up on the G13 lists (which I presume exist somewhere, although I've never seen it), so hopefully it shouldn't get tagged again. 3530:

Whoa, thanks alot for that comprehensive list. You do know your stuff... Im more of an anime and shounen guy and shoujo doesn't really tickle my fancy. Will check out your tips!

2689: 2457: 2423: 1913: 2759: 2729: 2532: 1959: 1271: 1939:

allowing us information about "the production" that can use to inform out readers... plot, cast, crew, shoot locations, etc. The film is to be released in just 6 weeks and

3770: 2502: 2192:

I've replied on there, but I have to caution you about your tone. You need to assume good faith when it comes to nominations. Saying that the editor did not do a proper

1919: 414: 1714: 2680: 2448: 530: 2571: 2513: 1855:

It isn't very involved and should only take a minute. If you need more info about what the different skills mean (e.g. writing, communication), please refer to

703: 564: 2417: 521:

I have overworked the coverage about the band related parts and would appreciate to hear you view on it, if it could be close to be submitted again? Thank you.

3457:

Hmm... I don't read as much shoujo as I used to and a lot of what I do tends to be scanlations, but here's what I've been looking at recently: I've heard that

3150: 2315: 2151: 2135: 1823: 1808: 1785: 1732: 1317: 516: 501: 477: 405: 3261: 2398: 1001: 3713: 3687: 3673: 3620: 3601: 3581: 3546: 3520: 3443: 3424: 3398: 3370: 3312: 3172: 3060: 3041: 2983: 2064: 1701:. Think that's enough? Or would it be better to create an article about the entire series? Would that survive Afd if each book had only a couple reviews? 1672: 3466:

is freaking awesome, mostly because it's lead character is an incredibly likable character and because it's slightly unusual to have a male lead like that.

2290:

rambling, but I hope that you will take this into consideration, otherwise I can guarantee that you likely will run into other people that react as I have.

1690: 973: 653: 602: 2971: 2242:

people who did the same stuff were wrong and their actions were "dumb" then don't you think that it would come across like they were trying to insult you?

1667: 1520:

If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

1038: 1027:

Yeah... I'm actually in the process of blocking them now, after looking at their edit history. I don't think warning them again would accomplish anything.

2301: 2253: 2232: 2212: 1758: 1195: 957:

I think that one of the biggest thing so far would just be to work on the citations to make them a little more even. You've got a lot of places where you

2798: 2740: 2616: 1831: 1384: 681: 3475:

recommend some new light novels since there's been some really good ones out lately. Yen Press has published quite a few and I recommend the following:

1529: 3506: 3476: 3235: 3218: 2597: 695: 1677:

Hi there! I have a question for you (or anyone else that might be watching your page). I got it into my head that I wanted to create an article on

1230: 1217: 1175: 1139: 1094: 558: 1619: 917: 897: 870: 852: 587: 2899:

This one was like Smashing Magazine in that it never explicitly mentioned GPS and there wasn't really anything to show the site's editorial process.

1572: 3558: 3451: 2117: 1451: 1203: 3501:

going to bring in a third opinion on the page since it may be possible that I'm being too strict, which is entirely a possibility. I'll also tag

2835: 1291: 797: 2408:

also needs more secondary sources, especially the section on Christian priest and after, if you have the time & resources, which I do not.

1931:

tells us how we may determine if "the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines." It does not state coverage must somehow be

1921: 1443: 1348:

I don't think you should assume that a source is unusable just because you haven't been able to view it to verify it. That seems to go against

1345:

that the editor who first added it didn't make it up and correctly evaluated its quality as a source. I'm trying to get hold of a print copy.

3538:@Fair Stone: I reviewed the text again and removed the marketing blah blah, hope I got everything. Thanks for bringing in a third opinion :) 1595: 1549: 754: 2379: 2043: 1995: 1976: 635: 617: 580: 546: 3300: 3054:

Dear Tokyogirl79, Thank you for your comments. I have since added some references based on your suggestions. Are these considered reliable?

1107: 2105: 2925: 1021: 1413: 1116: 2846:

source. The thing about primary sources is that while they can be used to back up basic details, they cannot be used to show notability.

450:

welcomed in case it is in your opinion getting nowhere near a submittable article - although I of course hope it'll do how it is now...

225:, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. 2584: 1643: 1640: 2352: 2374: 2183: 1624: 1600: 1494:

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

2201:

or to another admin. Don't use the AfD as a place to complain about that editor or about other editors. That's not what AfD is for.

951: 3111: 1361: 3758: 1655: 1652: 1649: 1646: 1605:

Hello. I have responded to the review for the' False production' article. It can be found at the Articles for creation help desk.

3505:

in this conversation since he closed the original AfD for Fair Stone back in 2009 and could probably help give a good opinion on

2940: 2912: 2904:

This also didn't mention GPS. There were also concerns about the editorial process, but mostly it was that it didn't mention GPS.

2523: 1419: 1330:. You may be right, but I'm not sure what I'm missing in the applicable guidelines and policies. I'll see what the consensus is. 1110: 2885: 1119: 3129: 2907: 2650: 540: 396: 3470:

is also one that I've heard a lot of good things about, and that's also shoujo. If she's really OK with fanservice and I mean

2951:

to really give them close scrutiny and if they pass muster there, then they can be used to show notability. I don't know that

2329: 2897: 2363: 673: 3268:

other than this, and I don't see anything independently suspicious. Any objection to unblocking, or is there more to this?

3197: 3611: 3554: 3322: 2993: 2076: 1909: 1267: 1156:

reinstating an A7 without waiting for the deleting admin to weigh in. The thing is, A7 deletions can't be restored through

97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2636:

seems to be supported by independent reliable sources, such as CNET and the subject now appears to be notable. Thank you.

1495: 1402:

Thanks for the note Tokyogirl. Done! (I am a little bummed that you AREN'T actually from Japan, but I'll get over it :-)

1069: 445:, I have requested your feedback/help already on 22nd March, then another time on 12th April re my article review here: 3430: 2750: 1935:

about the unreleased film itself when it states "the production" (of the film). The trailer brought the production the

1540:

well looks like what happened was someone edited a redirect you made-if you want it to go back to a redirect go ahead!

3742:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3281: 2866:

the database entries are edited or submitted by the developer, so it can sometimes also be viewed as a primary source.

2829: 1869: 1742: 1659: 3188:

day! You're helping me learn how to navigate wikipedia's rules much better, the examples were exactly what I needed.

1862:

Profile creation, invitations, and automated matching of editors, profile creation, that will be coordinated through

1773: 831: 3331: 3093:- looks like the award organisation official website - primary source, could be included in external links section? 3079: 3002: 2671: 2056: 3591: 3356: 3097: 3027: 2840: 1966: 1905: 1263: 2952: 2891: 446: 1850: 1578: 1299: 708: 3747: 3207:: I can help look for those sources with my college's databases, so I'll try to get to that later on tonight. 349: 3344: 3257: 3015: 2784: 2557: 2439: 563: 3352: 3104: 3023: 2357: 1986: 1893: 1866:

and a few gadgets may not be ready for our pilot, and will have to be done manually until they are ready.

1856: 1251: 153: 3336: 3007: 2944: 2875: 2772: 2705: 2575: 2545: 2517: 2473: 1452: 1130:

understand or find opaque is, in my opinion, a sure way to drive inexperienced editors from the project.

1007: 327: 217:, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a 691: 3458: 2780: 2553: 2277:

because that's a good way to get an argument depreciated, particularly if the article goes back to AfD.

2113: 1819: 1781: 1710: 936: 664:

Thank you for all your help, guidance, and for assuming good intent as opposed to being an evil genius

526: 512: 455: 390: 38: 2849: 2764: 2537: 1221:. I'll be talking about the state of finding help spaces on en.wiki and how our new mentorship space, 108: 3488: 3122:

Here are some great wiki info that I have found useful in this regard - General notability guideline

2918:, but I can't quite tell if they edit the contributed posts or not. It's another one I'd run through 2693: 2461: 2334: 1956: 1390: 430: 357: 205: 47: 17: 3645: 642:

anything, you trying to follow up with this and show good faith with an editor deserves a barnstar.

3691: 3677: 3629: 3605: 3550: 3447: 3402: 3374: 3316: 3064: 3045: 2987: 2837:

This one does have an editorial staff and it was written by a staff member, so it should be usable.

2701: 2469: 2413: 2394: 2070: 1126: 1017: 347:

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can

2685: 2453: 1698: 316:! I want to redo the Minetest article in the Beta space. Could you please move the old article to 3492: 3146: 2157: 1591: 1409: 997: 947: 793: 750: 631: 613: 576: 554: 418: 136: 3633: 3348: 3112:

https://www.vardforbundet.se/Agenda/Aktuellt/Nytt-stipendie-for-kreativa-sjukskoterskestudenter/

3019: 2082: 3395:

I am grateful for the help and support I got from the editorial community. Thank you so much!

2909:

This didn't mention GPS. The writer is an editor for the site, so otherwise there was no issue.

2802: 2744: 2621: 1579: 1478: 1349: 1310: 1104: 669: 447:

https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Tokyogirl79#Re_submission_Atlantic_Horns_by_Guruness_Brownie

426: 324: 3641: 3265: 608:

thanks for your help, it didn't occur to me that there would be a wikipedia Ukraine (duh:)).

410: 3706: 3625: 3574: 3513: 3417: 3228: 3211: 3165: 3119:

So, although, providing info about the award I would not say that they are reliable sources.

2964: 2629: 2309: 2294: 2246: 2225: 2205: 2179: 2144: 2128: 2109: 2093: 1815: 1801: 1777: 1751: 1725: 1706: 1565: 1377: 1188: 1168: 1087: 1031: 985: 966: 890: 845: 699: 646: 595: 522: 508: 494: 484: 470: 451: 386: 2776: 2549: 2020: 3542: 2725: 2665: 2633: 2612: 2593: 2348: 1949: 1880: 1663: 1357: 1287: 1239: 927: 883: 229: 198: 1215:

Hey ReaderofthePack. I've put in a submission for a presentation at Wikimania 2015 called

8: 3502: 2409: 2390: 2140:

Ah... I think I see what happened with the numbers. I'll weigh in on the article's page.

2089: 1694: 1630: 1615: 1499: 1470: 1456: 2697: 2465: 2008: 1747:. I've got to get ready for work, so I'll try to get back on later and find some more. 1338:

author of the draft to incorporate material from it, but maybe she can't see it either.

1184:

It looks like he's come back on since then and restored it, so nothing more to do here.

332: 213:

is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes

3193: 3158: 3142: 1587: 1405: 1295: 993: 958: 943: 803: 789: 783: 746: 726: 627: 609: 572: 550: 214: 140: 2016: 3766: 3251: 3178: 3137: 2862: 2843: 2498: 2433: 2000: 1686: 1510: 1474: 1135: 1065: 1013: 738: 694:(which I didn't know that was a thing! XD). Thank you also for all you've done here. 665: 549:

Just wondering whether you would like to use your magic powers to speed delete it??

1341:

You may be right about Prairie Fire, it could just be a capsule review. I guess I'm

422: 303: 3703: 3637: 3571: 3510: 3484: 3414: 3225: 3208: 3162: 2961: 2645: 2325: 2291: 2258: 2243: 2222: 2217: 2202: 2193: 2189: 2175: 2141: 2125: 2047: 2004: 1980: 1940: 1798: 1767:

I was afraid the Kirkus source might be unhelpful. Moody's official website has a

1748: 1722: 1562: 1374: 1185: 1165: 1157: 1084: 1051: 1028: 982: 963: 913: 887: 866: 842: 827: 818:

Hi, the draft has not been abandoned at all but rather the article was created see

737:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or kittynap their kitten with {{ 687: 643: 592: 491: 467: 442: 311: 2915: 3463: 3241: 2914:

This one was sort of iffy. It is about GPS and there is an editorial process per

2721: 2661: 2608: 2589: 2344: 2340: 2163: 2097: 1944: 1901: 1884: 1875: 1745: 1545: 1525: 1503: 1488: 1439: 1353: 1259: 1243: 1234: 1222: 1044: 734: 623: 218: 1218:

Is Two the Magic Number?: The Co-op and New Editor Engagement through Mentorship

1125:) - if any of these are not RS then tell me. The user that created the article, 1103:

If you didn't see it, I included seven links from Google News in the talk page (

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3293: 3274: 2948: 2919: 2879: 2622: 2167: 2101: 1947:. I believe the article is a suitable stub that will be expanded and improved. 1611: 861:

Yes please do restore it in my userspace as the debate was rather instructive.

659: 317: 291: 283: 222: 3184: 3098:

http://www.aldreicentrum.se/Nyheter/Stipendiechans-for-sjukskoterskestudenter/

3467: 3204: 3189: 3123: 2957: 2852: 2274: 2198: 1936: 1928: 1483: 1342: 1161: 180: 2035:

Hi there, my page was rejected with a NPOV tag and I have just resubmitted.

1741:

Here's one for the series as a whole, but could be used for Autumn as well:

1233:(you do not need to attend Wikimania to express interest in presentations). 3762: 3743: 3247: 3133: 2494: 2429: 2171: 2012: 1863: 1150: 1131: 1077: 1061: 813: 367: 295: 274:

Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!

3665: 3390: 3055: 3480: 3090: 2638: 2367: 2321: 1682: 909: 879: 862: 837: 823: 2869: 254: 3105:

http://bloggar.aftonbladet.se/hovbloggen/2013/09/drottning-silvias-nya/

2861:

This is a routine database type listing and at best they're considered

2405: 1558: 1541: 1521: 1435: 260: 3491:

mangas? That's an interesting spin on the whole idea of shoujo, as is

1768: 171: 117: 3288: 3269: 1395: 279: 126: 2162:

Hi Tokyo girl, would you be willing to revisit your nomination of

1428: 1278:

International Union of Bilateral Chambers of Commerce and Industry

686:

Hi Tokyogirl79; thank you for the deletion of my user page. I saw

344:

Hello, ReaderofthePack. Please check your email; you've got mail!

2508:

17:30:41, 20 March 2015 review of submission by Consumptionsgirls

1057: 819: 1689:. The problem is that I've been able to find very few reviews: 381:

22:02:23, 15 April 2015 review of submission by Guruness Brownie

2859: 1836: 1208: 782:

A tall, cool glass of milk just for you! Milk somehow promotes

722: 714: 690:'s Synchbot deleting a whole bunch of pages, replacing it with 3307:

11:20:50, 24 March 2015 review of submission by Maybelline Ooi

2978:

10:55:38, 23 March 2015 review of submission by Maybelline Ooi

2092:, where the editor has been edit warring to remove mention of 3185:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Journey_To_The_Forbidden_China

1333:

I was surprised that you couldn't confirm the content of the

767: 2735:

18:59:10, 23 March 2015 review of submission by SEOMozinator

1608:

I highly appreciate your timely and professional response.

3078:

I have had a look at the 4 references you have included in

1518:

Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.

2656:

23:09:58, 23 March 2015 review of submission by MustaphaNG

1853:

as soon as you are able, as the pilot begins on March 4th.

1487:

will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a

1060:

now please? I've contacted GB Fan and he's doing nothing.

3720:

Orphaned non-free image File:Cybernatural 2014 poster.jpg

3666:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Queen_Silvia_Nursing_Award

3391:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Queen_Silvia_Nursing_Award

3056:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Queen_Silvia_Nursing_Award

2851:

This looks to be a self published blog-type post and per

2424:

11:04:01, 17 March 2015 review of submission by Drowz0r

2104:

suggested that maybe this was not the best idea when I

2040:

Please let me know if that deals with your concerns :)

490:

need more coverage that's specifically about the band.

147:

A day before thanksgiving where I am but, close enough.

3757:

will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

3183:

Hey Tokygirl79, the comment you posted on the article

2956:

or the tool itself at a level where that would pose a

2316:

Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism

3590:

Request on 08:56:55, 26 March 2015 for assistance on

3495:. They're both seinen, but they have shoujo elements. 1772:

scrutiny. I've created a few articles on books (eg,

1965:

Request on 16:24:05, 5 March 2015 for assistance on

622:

ps. you may wish to hit me with a fish? Maybe not a

545:

Hi Tokyogirl79, came across this article for afd:

3246:Tokyogirl79, can you help with review the block of 981:correctly :) Thanks heaps for your response so far 939:until it is notable? Is it written incorrectly? :) 806:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message! 2166:for deletion? There do seem to have been sources 2032:Help on Conscience: Taxes for Peace not War draft 246: 3477:Is It Wrong to Try to Pick Up Girls in a Dungeon? 1872:on how we will be manually performing these tasks 1491:that directly supports material in the article. 2632:. I was wondering if you could unprotect it, as 2604:post it. Maybe someone want do more edit to it. 1477:because it appears to have no references. Under 935:Please give me advice and on how I can build up 1868:In preparation for the pilot, please read over 1797:something that's a pretty big trend right now. 3753:Note that any non-free images not used in any 1922:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Monkey Kingdom 3413:I'll try to take a look at it later tonight. 2630:create protected this page on 30 January 2014 1847:You can now make your profile at The Co-op! 1673:Creating an article on a self-published novel 547:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Shubham Gupta 507:the current group. Will try to dig deeper... 159:to their talk page with a friendly message. 3107:- author of article appears to be a blogger 1943:can be through common sense application of 1832:Co-op: Mentor profiles and final pilot prep 733:Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{ 682:Thank you for the deletion of the user page 3136:, Primary, secondary and tertiary sources 1874:until the automated components are ready. 626:because as a wikikit i may just eat it:) 2273:passion or anything that would fall into 2061:The IP editor who was removing sources, 1231:the signup at the bottom of the proposal 1204:WP:Co-op: Presentation at Wikimania 2015 802:Spread the goodness of milk by adding {{ 149:Spread the goodness of turkey by adding 2174:and some others that eluded you. Best, 1326:about the reliability of the review in 788:and some milk for you and your kitten:) 14: 3130:Knowledge:Identifying reliable sources 3091:http://www.queensilvianursingaward.se/ 1502:. Once you have provided at least one 178: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3526:———————————————————————————————————— 2380:Alan Watts - Tao: The Watercourse Way 2368: 3100:- advert/press release for the award 2366:, comments would be appreciated. :) 348: 25: 1664:Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie 23: 3725: 2585:Hi, one question for an draft page 1849:Please set up your mentor profile 1835: 1461: 1394: 1207: 713: 337: 259: 116: 24: 3781: 3739:File:Cybernatural 2014 poster.jpg 1774:Zombie Movies: The Ultimate Guide 1625:Could I ask your opinion on this? 1601:Concerning: Recent Article Review 745:For being so kind to wikinewbies! 3332:Draft:Queen Silvia Nursing Award 3132:, Knowledge:Independent sources 3080:Draft:Queen Silvia Nursing Award 3003:Draft:Queen Silvia Nursing Award 2088:, is still at it, especially at 1843:Hey mentors, two announcements: 1769:really extensive list of reviews 1427: 1322:As you suggested, I've asked at 766: 179: 29: 3084:Here are some comments on them: 2812:Here's a layout of the sources: 1420:A bowl of strawberries for you! 1056:Can you go ahead and reinstate 112: 1744:. Here's another one I found: 721:Coolabahapple has given you a 541:Since you can speed delete.... 109:A thanksgiving Turkey for you! 13: 1: 3748:our policy for non-free media 3114:- looks like a press release. 1809:09:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1786:07:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1759:03:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1733:03:19, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1715:03:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1668:01:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC) 1620:15:14, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1596:14:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1573:02:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1550:01:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1530:01:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1444:01:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC) 1414:16:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 1385:10:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 1362:09:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 1304:00:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC) 1272:13:19, 25 February 2015 (UTC) 1196:12:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 1176:11:46, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 1140:11:39, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 1095:09:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 1070:07:55, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 1039:06:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 1022:06:21, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 1002:04:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 974:04:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC) 952:19:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 918:09:03, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 898:08:55, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 871:08:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 853:08:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 832:08:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 798:05:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 755:05:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC) 704:23:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 674:20:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 654:11:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 636:11:25, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 618:11:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 603:04:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 581:03:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 559:11:15, 22 February 2015 (UTC) 237: 230: 211: 210: 206: 199: 163: 125: 3759:criteria for speedy deletion 3594:submission by Maybelline Ooi 2760:Draft:Google PageSpeed Tools 2533:Draft:Compulsive consumption 1950: 1927:My explanation of my !vote: 1681:, a self-published novel by 1484:biography of a living person 1315:Thanks for your comments on 353:at any time by removing the 188: 7: 2628:Hello, it appears that you 2410:D A Patriarche, BSc (talk) 2391:D A Patriarche, BSc (talk) 2326: 10: 3786: 3771:16:15, 29 March 2015 (UTC) 3714:10:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 3696:08:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 3682:08:56, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 3582:04:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 3559:08:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 3521:08:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3459:The Devil Is a Part-Timer! 3452:08:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3431:Fair Stone Standard review 3425:04:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC) 3407:11:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3379:11:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3301:11:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC) 3282:14:34, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 3236:08:46, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3219:03:32, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3198:16:06, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 3173:04:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3151:00:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 3069:10:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 3050:10:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 2972:04:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC) 2807:18:59, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 2730:23:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC) 2651:18:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC) 2617:21:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 2598:21:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 2580:17:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 2503:11:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 2418:03:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 2399:02:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC) 2375:20:05, 15 March 2015 (UTC) 2353:01:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC) 2330:14:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 2302:11:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 2254:08:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 2233:08:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 2152:04:23, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 2136:04:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC) 1906:MediaWiki message delivery 1264:MediaWiki message delivery 937:User:DmitryPopovRU/sandbox 517:06:11, 17 April 2015 (UTC) 502:04:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC) 478:11:21, 16 April 2015 (UTC) 460:22:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC) 3726: 3489:Puella Magi Madoka Magica 2213:05:55, 9 March 2015 (UTC) 2184:13:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC) 2118:19:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC) 2052:16:24, 5 March 2015 (UTC) 1960:23:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 1937:requisite media attention 1914:12:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 1900:This message was send by 1824:05:29, 1 March 2015 (UTC) 1629:Hi, I hope this isn't an 1496:Referencing for beginners 1258:This message was send by 959:overlink to various cites 772: 765: 185: 18:User talk:ReaderofthePack 3442:Greetings from Germany! 2681:Draft:MCskill ThaPreacha 2449:Draft:Pirate Party Wales 2057:IP user removing sources 1127:User:Bartolomeorastrelli 531:18:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC) 298:(see "invisible note"). 294:. Originally created by 3493:Magical Girl Apocalypse 3287:One more bump on this. 882:Done- I've moved it to 333:Seeking your assistance 3731: 3670:Thank you in advance! 2339:Hi! I looked again at 2319:User:Jaimal.sumbria -- 1840: 1580:Troubletwisters Series 1466: 1399: 1212: 718: 709:A kitten to look after 342: 325:User:AKA Casey Rollins 290:This message promotes 264: 121: 3736:Thanks for uploading 3729: 1839: 1506:, you may remove the 1481:, this newly created 1475:proposed for deletion 1465: 1398: 1211: 717: 565:Lviv through the ages 341: 304:Beta Minetest Article 276:From a fellow editor, 267:Dear ReaderofthePack, 263: 120: 42:of past discussions. 2634:Draft:SCP Foundation 2358:Involuntary celibacy 2106:asked her for advice 1969:submission by ZRay22 1895:Opt-out Instructions 1318:Draft:Battered Soles 1253:Opt-out Instructions 406:Draft:Atlantic Horns 3621:User:Maybelline Ooi 2090:Stormbreaker (film) 1471:Jennifer A. Nielsen 1457:Jennifer A. Nielsen 1335:Winnipeg Free Press 1008:Sacred Heart School 588:Ukraine WikiProject 154:Thanksgiving Turkey 3732: 3659:Dear Tokyogirl79, 3383:Dear Tokyogirl79, 3266:sock investigation 1870:these instructions 1857:these descriptions 1841: 1685:. Mostly because 1467: 1400: 1213: 725:! Kittens promote 719: 350:remove this notice 343: 265: 200:Michael Q. Schmidt 190:Happy New Year !!! 139:! Turkeys promote 122: 3744:claim of fair use 3562: 3545:comment added by 3075:Hi Maybelline Ooi 2945:Search Engine Lab 2934: 2933: 2572:Consumptionsgirls 2514:Consumptionsgirls 1916: 1453:Proposed deletion 1449: 1448: 1391:A kitten for you! 1307: 1290:comment added by 1274: 811: 810: 692:global user pages 299: 244: 243: 169: 168: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3777: 3734: 3728: 3710: 3650: 3649: 3578: 3561: 3539: 3517: 3507:Draft:Fair Stone 3485:Sword Art Online 3435:Hi Tokyogirl79, 3421: 3361: 3360: 3298: 3291: 3279: 3272: 3232: 3215: 3169: 3032: 3031: 2968: 2832:could be usable. 2817: 2816: 2789: 2788: 2710: 2709: 2641: 2562: 2561: 2478: 2477: 2372: 2327: 2324: 2298: 2250: 2229: 2209: 2148: 2132: 2110:NinjaRobotPirate 2087: 2086: 2067: 2025: 2024: 1952: 1899: 1816:NinjaRobotPirate 1805: 1778:NinjaRobotPirate 1755: 1729: 1707:NinjaRobotPirate 1569: 1515: 1509: 1498:, or ask at the 1479:Knowledge policy 1464: 1431: 1424: 1423: 1381: 1306: 1284: 1257: 1192: 1172: 1154: 1091: 1081: 1055: 1035: 989: 970: 932:Hi Tokypgirl79, 894: 884:User:Tkuvho/1/ ∞ 849: 770: 763: 762: 650: 599: 523:Guruness Brownie 509:Guruness Brownie 498: 488: 485:Guruness Brownie 474: 452:Guruness Brownie 435: 434: 387:Guruness Brownie 374: 372: 366: 362: 356: 352: 340: 315: 289: 273: 240: 239: 238: 234: 207: 201: 192: 183: 176: 175: 164: 161: 158: 152: 135:has given you a 133: 113: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3785: 3784: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3723: 3722: 3708: 3623: 3619: 3596: 3576: 3540: 3515: 3464:My Love Story!! 3433: 3419: 3334: 3330: 3309: 3294: 3289: 3275: 3270: 3244: 3230: 3213: 3181: 3167: 3005: 3001: 2980: 2966: 2953:HyperLinksMedia 2941:ProgrammableWeb 2935: 2822: 2762: 2758: 2737: 2683: 2679: 2658: 2639: 2626: 2623:SCP Foundation‎ 2600:Hi Tokyogirl79 2587: 2535: 2531: 2510: 2451: 2447: 2426: 2382: 2360: 2337: 2335:Rebecca Donovan 2320: 2312: 2296: 2248: 2227: 2207: 2164:Rebecca Donovan 2160: 2158:Rebecca Donovan 2146: 2130: 2098:Box Office Mojo 2068: 2063: 2062: 2059: 1998: 1994: 1971: 1925: 1885:Knowledge:Co-op 1834: 1803: 1753: 1727: 1675: 1666:| 9 Adar 5775 1627: 1603: 1583: 1567: 1513: 1507: 1504:reliable source 1489:reliable source 1462: 1460: 1422: 1393: 1379: 1350:WP:SOURCEACCESS 1313: 1285: 1280: 1244:Knowledge:Co-op 1206: 1190: 1170: 1148: 1089: 1075: 1049: 1047: 1033: 1010: 987: 968: 930: 892: 847: 816: 804:subst:Give milk 761: 711: 684: 662: 648: 597: 586:I've asked the 568: 543: 496: 482: 472: 408: 404: 383: 375: 370: 364: 360: 358:You've got mail 354: 346: 338: 335: 328:Talk with Casey 309: 306: 301: 269: 257: 255:Happy New Year! 249: 236: 219:Merry Christmas 174: 156: 150: 127: 111: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3783: 3721: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3688:Maybelline Ooi 3674:Maybelline Ooi 3656: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3617: 3602:Maybelline Ooi 3595: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3564: 3563: 3547:FairStoneLabel 3535: 3534: 3531: 3524: 3523: 3503:King of Hearts 3497: 3496: 3444:FairStoneLabel 3432: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3399:Maybelline Ooi 3371:Maybelline Ooi 3367: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3328: 3313:Maybelline Ooi 3308: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3243: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3221: 3180: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3154: 3153: 3140: 3127: 3120: 3116: 3115: 3108: 3101: 3094: 3086: 3085: 3082: 3076: 3061:Maybelline Ooi 3042:Maybelline Ooi 3038: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 2999: 2984:Maybelline Ooi 2979: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2923: 2910: 2905: 2900: 2895: 2889: 2883: 2873: 2867: 2857: 2847: 2838: 2833: 2824: 2823: 2820: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2795: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2756: 2736: 2733: 2716: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2677: 2657: 2654: 2625: 2620: 2586: 2583: 2568: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2529: 2509: 2506: 2484: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2479: 2445: 2425: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2381: 2378: 2359: 2356: 2336: 2333: 2311: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2282: 2278: 2269: 2268: 2256: 2236: 2235: 2215: 2168:sugarscape.com 2159: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2138: 2065:165.228.41.149 2058: 2055: 2038: 2031: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 1992: 1970: 1963: 1924: 1918: 1890: 1889: 1860: 1833: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1762: 1761: 1736: 1735: 1699:Kirkus Reviews 1674: 1671: 1626: 1623: 1602: 1599: 1582: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1534: 1459: 1450: 1447: 1446: 1432: 1421: 1418: 1416: 1392: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1328:Pickle Me This 1312: 1311:Battered Soles 1309: 1279: 1276: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1179: 1178: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1098: 1097: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1004: 977: 976: 929: 926: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 901: 900: 876: 875: 874: 873: 856: 855: 815: 812: 809: 808: 779: 778: 773: 771: 739:subst:Kittynap 712: 710: 707: 683: 680: 678: 661: 658: 657: 656: 606: 605: 567: 562: 542: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 480: 441: 439: 438: 437: 436: 402: 382: 379: 345: 336: 334: 331: 318:Draft:Minetest 305: 302: 277: 275: 271:HAPPY NEW YEAR 268: 258: 256: 253: 248: 245: 242: 241: 228: 223:Happy New Year 194: 193: 186: 184: 173: 172:Happy New Year 170: 167: 166: 123: 110: 107: 105: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3782: 3773: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3761:. Thank you. 3760: 3756: 3751: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3740: 3733: 3715: 3712: 3711: 3705: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3668: 3667: 3663: 3660: 3657: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3631: 3627: 3622: 3618: 3616: 3615: 3613: 3610: 3607: 3603: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3593: 3583: 3580: 3579: 3573: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3537: 3536: 3532: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3522: 3519: 3518: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3499: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3473: 3469: 3468:Kamisama Kiss 3465: 3460: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3440: 3436: 3426: 3423: 3422: 3416: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3393: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3381: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3333: 3329: 3327: 3326: 3324: 3321: 3318: 3314: 3311: 3310: 3302: 3299: 3297: 3292: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3280: 3278: 3273: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3256: 3253: 3249: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3227: 3222: 3220: 3217: 3216: 3210: 3206: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3186: 3174: 3171: 3170: 3164: 3160: 3159:Coolabahapple 3156: 3155: 3152: 3148: 3144: 3143:Coolabahapple 3141: 3139: 3135: 3131: 3128: 3125: 3121: 3118: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3106: 3102: 3099: 3095: 3092: 3088: 3087: 3083: 3081: 3077: 3074: 3073: 3072: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3057: 3052: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3004: 3000: 2998: 2997: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2985: 2982: 2981: 2973: 2970: 2969: 2963: 2959: 2954: 2950: 2946: 2942: 2937: 2936: 2926: 2924: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2911: 2908: 2906: 2903: 2901: 2898: 2896: 2892: 2890: 2886: 2884: 2881: 2876: 2874: 2870: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2848: 2845: 2841: 2839: 2836: 2834: 2830: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2819: 2818: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2761: 2757: 2755: 2754: 2752: 2749: 2746: 2742: 2739: 2738: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2682: 2678: 2676: 2675: 2673: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2660: 2659: 2653: 2652: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2643: 2642: 2635: 2631: 2624: 2619: 2618: 2614: 2610: 2605: 2601: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2534: 2530: 2528: 2527: 2525: 2522: 2519: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2505: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2485: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2450: 2446: 2444: 2443: 2441: 2438: 2435: 2431: 2428: 2427: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2387: 2377: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2365: 2355: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2332: 2331: 2328: 2323: 2317: 2310:User-reported 2303: 2300: 2299: 2293: 2288: 2283: 2279: 2276: 2271: 2270: 2265: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2252: 2251: 2245: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2234: 2231: 2230: 2224: 2219: 2216: 2214: 2211: 2210: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2191: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2143: 2139: 2137: 2134: 2133: 2127: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2084: 2081: 2078: 2075: 2072: 2066: 2054: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2036: 2033: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1997: 1993: 1991: 1990: 1988: 1985: 1982: 1978: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1962: 1961: 1958: 1957: 1954: 1953: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1923: 1917: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1897: 1896: 1887: 1886: 1882:on behalf of 1881: 1879: 1878: 1873: 1871: 1865: 1861: 1858: 1854: 1852: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1838: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1800: 1795: 1794: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1760: 1757: 1756: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1734: 1731: 1730: 1724: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1702: 1700: 1696: 1695:Dread Central 1692: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1670: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1631:inappropriate 1622: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1606: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1588:Coolabahapple 1581: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1564: 1560: 1557: 1556: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1532: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1512: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1492: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1458: 1454: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1417: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1406:Internegative 1403: 1397: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1346: 1344: 1339: 1336: 1331: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1319: 1308: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1275: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1255: 1254: 1248: 1246: 1245: 1241:on behalf of 1240: 1238: 1237: 1232: 1228: 1227:add your name 1224: 1220: 1219: 1210: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1187: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1152: 1147: 1146: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1118: 1115: 1112: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1086: 1079: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1053: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1003: 999: 995: 994:DmitryPopovRU 991: 990: 984: 979: 978: 975: 972: 971: 965: 960: 956: 955: 954: 953: 949: 945: 944:DmitryPopovRU 940: 938: 933: 919: 915: 911: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 899: 896: 895: 889: 885: 881: 878: 877: 872: 868: 864: 860: 859: 858: 857: 854: 851: 850: 844: 839: 836: 835: 834: 833: 829: 825: 821: 807: 805: 800: 799: 795: 791: 790:Coolabahapple 785: 781: 780: 777: 774: 769: 764: 760: 758: 757: 756: 752: 748: 747:Coolabahapple 742: 740: 736: 731: 728: 724: 716: 706: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 679: 676: 675: 671: 667: 655: 652: 651: 645: 640: 639: 638: 637: 633: 629: 628:Coolabahapple 625: 620: 619: 615: 611: 610:Coolabahapple 604: 601: 600: 594: 589: 585: 584: 583: 582: 578: 574: 573:Coolabahapple 566: 561: 560: 556: 552: 551:Coolabahapple 548: 532: 528: 524: 520: 519: 518: 514: 510: 505: 504: 503: 500: 499: 493: 486: 481: 479: 476: 475: 469: 464: 463: 462: 461: 457: 453: 448: 444: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 412: 407: 403: 401: 400: 398: 395: 392: 388: 385: 384: 378: 369: 359: 351: 330: 329: 326: 321: 319: 313: 300: 297: 293: 287: 285: 281: 272: 262: 252: 235: 233: 226: 224: 220: 216: 209: 208: 203: 202: 196: 195: 191: 187: 182: 177: 165: 160: 155: 148: 142: 138: 134: 132: 131: 124: 119: 115: 114: 106: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3754: 3752: 3737: 3735: 3724: 3707: 3686: 3672: 3669: 3664: 3661: 3658: 3655: 3608: 3597: 3575: 3541:— Preceding 3525: 3514: 3471: 3441: 3437: 3434: 3418: 3397: 3394: 3389: 3385: 3382: 3369: 3366: 3319: 3295: 3276: 3254: 3245: 3229: 3212: 3182: 3166: 3059: 3053: 3040: 3037: 2990: 2965: 2799:SEOMozinator 2794: 2747: 2741:SEOMozinator 2720: 2715: 2668: 2646: 2644: 2637: 2627: 2606: 2602: 2588: 2570: 2567: 2520: 2493: 2490: 2486: 2483: 2436: 2404:The article 2385: 2383: 2369: 2361: 2338: 2313: 2295: 2286: 2263: 2247: 2226: 2206: 2172:Boston Globe 2161: 2145: 2129: 2096:in favor of 2079: 2073: 2060: 2042: 2037: 2034: 2030: 1983: 1972: 1955: 1948: 1932: 1926: 1894: 1891: 1883: 1876: 1867: 1848: 1842: 1802: 1752: 1726: 1703: 1678: 1676: 1635: 1628: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1584: 1566: 1533: 1517: 1493: 1482: 1469:The article 1468: 1404: 1401: 1378: 1369: 1347: 1340: 1334: 1332: 1327: 1316: 1314: 1286:— Preceding 1283:Thank you! 1281: 1252: 1249: 1242: 1235: 1226: 1216: 1214: 1189: 1169: 1088: 1048: 1032: 1014:War wizard90 1011: 986: 967: 941: 934: 931: 928:Alex Gilbert 891: 846: 817: 801: 787: 775: 759: 744: 743: 735:subst:Kitten 732: 720: 685: 677: 666:Chrisabraham 663: 647: 621: 607: 596: 569: 544: 495: 471: 440: 393: 376: 322: 307: 288: 270: 266: 250: 231: 212: 204: 197: 189: 162: 146: 145: 129: 128: 104: 78: 43: 37: 3704:Tokyogirl79 3572:Tokyogirl79 3511:Tokyogirl79 3481:Accel World 3415:Tokyogirl79 3226:Tokyogirl79 3209:Tokyogirl79 3163:Tokyogirl79 2962:Tokyogirl79 2341:the article 2292:Tokyogirl79 2259:E.M.Gregory 2244:Tokyogirl79 2223:Tokyogirl79 2218:E.M.Gregory 2203:Tokyogirl79 2190:E.M.Gregory 2176:E.M.Gregory 2142:Tokyogirl79 2126:Tokyogirl79 2094:The Numbers 1996:User:ZRay22 1877:I, JethroBT 1799:Tokyogirl79 1749:Tokyogirl79 1723:Tokyogirl79 1683:David Moody 1563:Tokyogirl79 1375:Tokyogirl79 1236:I, JethroBT 1186:Tokyogirl79 1166:Tokyogirl79 1085:Tokyogirl79 1052:Tokyogirl79 1029:Tokyogirl79 983:Tokyogirl79 964:Tokyogirl79 888:Tokyogirl79 843:Tokyogirl79 776:Mmm - Milk! 696:DivineAlpha 688:Pathoschild 644:Tokyogirl79 593:Tokyogirl79 492:Tokyogirl79 468:Tokyogirl79 443:Tokyogirl79 312:Tokyogirl79 36:This is an 3138:WP:PRIMARY 2863:WP:TRIVIAL 2844:WP:PRIMARY 2842:This is a 2722:MustaphaNG 2662:MustaphaNG 2609:Oyecrystal 2590:Oyecrystal 2406:Alan Watts 2345:Neonorange 1941:exceptions 1902:Jim Carter 1354:Worldbruce 1260:Jim Carter 1132:-- Aronzak 1062:-- Aronzak 942:Thanks! -- 280:FWiW Bzuk 98:Archive 20 90:Archive 18 85:Archive 17 79:Archive 16 73:Archive 15 68:Archive 14 60:Archive 10 3509:as well. 3200:Clone019 3179:Thank you 2916:this page 2194:WP:BEFORE 2102:SummerPhD 1951:Schmidt, 1687:I like it 1612:Habatchii 1500:help desk 1473:has been 1434:For you! 1223:The Co-op 1158:WP:REFUND 377:Thanks:3 373:template. 3755:articles 3612:contribs 3555:contribs 3543:unsigned 3323:contribs 3258:contribs 3205:Clone019 3190:Clone019 2994:contribs 2947:through 2928:article. 2751:contribs 2718:again. 2672:contribs 2524:contribs 2440:contribs 2077:contribs 1987:contribs 1904:through 1691:Time Out 1511:prod blp 1300:contribs 1292:Ivladoiu 1288:unsigned 1262:through 908:Thanks. 784:WikiLove 727:WikiLove 397:contribs 292:WikiLove 215:WikiLove 141:WikiLove 3763:Stefan2 3709:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3684:Maybel 3634:history 3577:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3516:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3420:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3409:Maybel 3345:history 3248:Csw1854 3242:Csw1854 3231:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3214:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3168:(｡◕‿◕｡) 3157:Thanks 3071:Maybel 3016:history 2967:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2949:WP:RS/N 2920:WP:RS/N 2880:WP:RS/N 2773:history 2694:history 2607:Thanks! 2546:history 2495:Drowz0r 2491:Thanks 2462:history 2430:Drowz0r 2384:Thanks 2362:RFC is 2297:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2249:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2228:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2208:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2147:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2131:(｡◕‿◕｡) 2009:history 1864:HostBot 1804:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1754:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1728:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1660:Seventh 1636:a fight 1586:thanks 1568:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1380:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1324:WP:RS/N 1191:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1171:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1151:Aronzak 1090:(｡◕‿◕｡) 1078:Aronzak 1058:Ed Lyon 1045:Ed Lyon 1034:(｡◕‿◕｡) 988:(｡◕‿◕｡) 969:(｡◕‿◕｡) 893:(｡◕‿◕｡) 848:(｡◕‿◕｡) 649:(｡◕‿◕｡) 598:(｡◕‿◕｡) 497:(｡◕‿◕｡) 473:(｡◕‿◕｡) 419:history 296:Nahnah4 39:archive 3483:, and 3472:really 3296:(talk) 3277:(talk) 3124:WP:GNG 2958:WP:COI 2853:WP:SPS 2640:Puffin 2370:Valoem 2287:hadn't 2275:WP:NOT 2199:WP:ANI 2044:ZRay22 1977:ZRay22 1945:policy 1929:WP:NFF 1697:, and 1679:Autumn 1650:Fourth 1644:Second 1370:wasn't 1343:WP:AGF 1162:WP:DRV 910:Tkuvho 880:Tkuvho 863:Tkuvho 838:Tkuvho 824:Tkuvho 723:kitten 660:Mahalo 624:minnow 137:Turkey 3642:watch 3638:links 3353:watch 3349:links 3134:WP:IS 3024:watch 3020:links 2894:them. 2872:time. 2821:Title 2781:watch 2777:links 2702:watch 2698:links 2554:watch 2550:links 2470:watch 2466:links 2322:Anton 2318:: --> 2083:WHOIS 2017:watch 2013:links 1920:inre 1656:Sixth 1653:Fifth 1647:Third 1641:First 1559:Wgolf 1542:Wgolf 1522:Wgolf 1516:tag. 1436:Wgolf 427:watch 423:links 308:Hey, 221:and a 16:< 3767:talk 3692:talk 3678:talk 3646:logs 3630:talk 3626:edit 3606:talk 3551:talk 3448:talk 3403:talk 3375:talk 3357:logs 3341:talk 3337:edit 3317:talk 3290:Kuru 3271:Kuru 3262:here 3252:talk 3194:talk 3147:talk 3065:talk 3046:talk 3028:logs 3012:talk 3008:edit 2988:talk 2943:and 2803:talk 2785:logs 2769:talk 2765:edit 2745:talk 2726:talk 2706:logs 2690:talk 2686:edit 2666:talk 2613:talk 2594:talk 2576:talk 2558:logs 2542:talk 2538:edit 2518:talk 2499:talk 2474:logs 2458:talk 2454:edit 2434:talk 2414:talk 2395:talk 2349:talk 2180:talk 2114:talk 2071:talk 2048:talk 2021:logs 2005:talk 2001:edit 1981:talk 1933:only 1910:talk 1851:here 1820:talk 1782:talk 1711:talk 1658:and 1616:talk 1592:talk 1546:talk 1526:talk 1440:talk 1410:talk 1358:talk 1296:talk 1268:talk 1247:. 1136:talk 1066:talk 1018:talk 998:talk 992:! -- 948:talk 914:talk 867:talk 828:talk 814:1/ ∞ 794:talk 751:talk 700:talk 670:talk 632:talk 614:talk 577:talk 555:talk 527:talk 513:talk 456:talk 431:logs 415:talk 411:edit 391:talk 284:talk 247:Nice 3750:). 3592:AfC 3096:2) 3089:1) 2264:not 1967:AfC 1455:of 1229:to 820:1/∞ 368:ygm 363:or 286:) 232:MQS 130:Lor 3769:) 3694:) 3680:) 3644:| 3640:| 3636:| 3632:| 3628:| 3614:) 3557:) 3553:• 3479:, 3450:) 3405:) 3377:) 3355:| 3351:| 3347:| 3343:| 3339:| 3325:) 3196:) 3161:! 3149:) 3110:4) 3103:3) 3067:) 3048:) 3026:| 3022:| 3018:| 3014:| 3010:| 2996:) 2805:) 2783:| 2779:| 2775:| 2771:| 2767:| 2753:) 2728:) 2704:| 2700:| 2696:| 2692:| 2688:| 2674:) 2615:) 2596:) 2578:) 2556:| 2552:| 2548:| 2544:| 2540:| 2526:) 2501:) 2472:| 2468:| 2464:| 2460:| 2456:| 2442:) 2416:) 2397:) 2386:so 2364:up 2351:) 2182:) 2170:, 2116:) 2050:) 2019:| 2015:| 2011:| 2007:| 2003:| 1989:) 1912:) 1898:) 1822:) 1784:) 1713:) 1693:, 1662:. 1618:) 1594:) 1548:) 1528:) 1514:}} 1508:{{ 1442:) 1412:) 1360:) 1302:) 1298:• 1270:) 1256:) 1138:) 1068:) 1020:) 1000:) 950:) 916:) 869:) 830:) 822:. 796:) 753:) 741:}} 702:) 672:) 634:) 616:) 579:) 557:) 529:) 515:) 458:) 429:| 425:| 421:| 417:| 413:| 399:) 371:}} 365:{{ 361:}} 355:{{ 323:-- 320:? 278:-- 227:- 157:}} 151:{{ 94:→ 64:← 3765:( 3730:⚠ 3690:( 3676:( 3648:) 3624:( 3609:· 3604:( 3549:( 3446:( 3401:( 3373:( 3359:) 3335:( 3320:· 3315:( 3255:· 3250:( 3192:( 3145:( 3126:, 3063:( 3044:( 3030:) 3006:( 2991:· 2986:( 2922:. 2801:( 2787:) 2763:( 2748:· 2743:( 2724:( 2708:) 2684:( 2669:· 2664:( 2611:( 2592:( 2574:( 2560:) 2536:( 2521:· 2516:( 2497:( 2476:) 2452:( 2437:· 2432:( 2412:( 2393:( 2347:( 2178:( 2112:( 2085:) 2080:· 2074:· 2069:( 2046:( 2023:) 1999:( 1984:· 1979:( 1908:( 1892:( 1888:. 1859:. 1818:( 1780:( 1709:( 1614:( 1590:( 1544:( 1524:( 1438:( 1408:( 1356:( 1320:. 1294:( 1266:( 1250:( 1153:: 1149:@ 1134:( 1123:7 1120:6 1117:4 1114:3 1111:2 1108:1 1105:5 1080:: 1076:@ 1064:( 1054:: 1050:@ 1016:( 996:( 946:( 912:( 865:( 826:( 792:( 749:( 698:( 668:( 630:( 612:( 575:( 553:( 525:( 511:( 487:: 483:@ 454:( 433:) 409:( 394:· 389:( 314:: 310:@ 282:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index