User talk:RoySmith/Archive 31

1588:). There is much content like this online - most not linked at all to his private sector 'day job' but instead focussed on his advocacy, campaigning and academic research. The website of the Patchwork Foundation, for example, states: "Widely acknowledged as the pre-eminent British Planner of his generation, Jonathan Manns leads on regeneration and place-making projects as Board Director and Head of Planning and Development at Rockwell Property. A tireless promoter of planning, he is a writer, speaker, lecturer, campaigner and founder of the APPG for London’s Planning and Built Environment. As a thought-leader, his opinion pieces have featured in the Guardian, Evening Standard and in international titles, while he has also authored and edited for academic journals including the Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal. In 2014, he edited Kaleidoscope City, an acclaimed collection of essays tackling big built environment questions through a London lens. He has advised on, and contributed to, research by the European Union, UK Government, RICS, London School of Economics and UCL." I'm fairly new to Knowledge and this would be my first attempt at a person. There seems to be a lot of information about him on Google and I wonder whether given the passage of time it may be therefore that he warrants inclusion. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Also, assuming I'm right, it would be good to get your advice on focus and tone. 3133:

about the Whitbread 1974-74 race that I cited. I can assure you, that the books I've cited ("En course en tour du monde" and "La saga des Kriter") do tell a lot more. In fact "En course en tour de monde" is written by the skipper Jack Grout. It is only about Kriter and telling how she was built and the experiences during the race. The other one talks about all boats that were sponsored by the Kriter champagne company. I can send you some pages of the books if you like. All what comes after the race is first hand information. We have the information on our private homepage kriter.tv but I took down the citation since the last reviewer criticized it as the homepage of the manufacturer or something like that. My partner found her in Baltimore. He had direct communication with the Frenchman and with the architect of Kriter George Auzepy-Brenneur. I got to know Kriter in 2017 and I can guarantee you that she's a special boat. Also seeing the reactions of French sailors when they see her is just amazing. And I thought she deserves to be mentioned also on wikipedia. But if it is too complicated to get the article passed, I'll give up. It's not that important to waste more time. It's just a bit disappointing that some other, similarly important, sailing yachts got accepted even with less references (

1796:). In your review, you suggest naming the topic as "Dokuchayev University..." and I agree with you that it will more appropriate, but it is not possible to do it for different reasons. Firstly, the name of the university in English as "Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchayev" is approved at a meeting of the Academic Council of the University and already registered in the Ministry of education and Science of Ukraine. Secondly, the official English forms (papers, Diplomas and Diplomas Supplements) of the university contain the name "Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchayev". Thirdly, the name "Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchayev" is linked to the different academic and scientific databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Global Research Identifier Database, etc. I look forward to your reply Thank you for your time and hope you're doing well. 1214:

edits had improved neutrality and cleared up the appearance of being an advertisment, especially after your comment above about progress, but if you are now saying that it currently sounds like a marketing brochure then clearly those edits have not left the draft in a suitable state. I will leave this alone for some period of time to think it over, and then either try for one final submission for review and stop if that fails, or just proceed straight to marking it for deletion. For what it's worth, I do think the company's technology was interesting, which is why I thought an article should exist. That opinion is, of course, very likely influenced by the COI, so perhaps I shouldn't be suprised about notability-based rejection. Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions and to provide all of the feedback that you have, I do appreciate it.--

2988:, it is my first article here in wikipedia. I still think, it is a very interesting project about using smartphones for easy detection of food quality, to bring sophisticated analytics methods near ordinary people hands. It is strictly academic project, not commercial project and I am not involved in it, I only want to inform community about it. I made some cuts in text, so I would like to ask you about some review and help with form. Is it right, that I can't use official link of this project as one of sources? Thanks a lot, 1936: 647: 188: 166: 136: 31: 125: 1153:

comments here (e.g. deletion, edit to highlight any difference with other biotechs, etc), but I feel like they would be solely based on your comments here rather than working to a set of common standards. Ideally I'd like to have some set of Knowledge guidelines to make an informed decision about whether to proceed with the draft, aid with any further editing, and increase the chance of success in any future review. Thank you again for your feedback so far. --

980:, Hi, thanks for your note. The thing that immediately jumped out at me was the first sentence where you called the subject, "award-winning". That immediately sets off my spam alarm. To be honest, most of this sounds like you're trying to sell something, or at least present the organization in the best possible light. Don't tell the reader why the subject is great. Just tell the reader what the subject has done, and let them come to their own conclusion. 2219: 2169: 1405: 3063: 1382: 434: 262: 305: 506: 3188:

for me/us. Thinking about the personal connection, it's actually right that citing the book of Jack Grout is probably falling into this policy as well, since Kriter was born after his idea and he navigate her (partly) through the race. But never mind, I guess the wikipedia world is non of my business, I rather stay with the real world. Thank you anyway again for the time you took for the review and for your reply. Take care.

177: 1188:, which is why medical trials are done double-blind. It is virtually impossible for somebody who is involved with a company to stand back far enough to write a good encyclopedia article about it. Inevitably it comes out sounding like a marketing brochure. That is certainly the case here. My recommendation to you is that you stop here, because additional attempts to get this published are likely to be futile. -- 155: 3608: 1540: 199: 2737:, The last action taken (by me) was to reject the draft. That's the template with the red stopsign on it. I did that because, after so many trips through the review process, I had little hope this would improve to the point where it could be accepted. My recommendation at this point, if you wish to work on this more, is to click the big blue "Ask for advice" button and seek assistance from the help desk. -- 2837: 3411: 1130:), and that the reasons for that rejection would be (1) sharing a similar fate with many other biotech startups, and (2) belief that all the references in the draft are just coverage of press releases. Is that a correct interpretation? Even if those points were true (which I'm not sure that they are, WSJ example notwithstanding), in what way would either of those points fail at Knowledge's 117: 714: 1281:

can’t answer that, but I can say that they were conscious (and in hindsight, poor) attempts to meet notability criteria rather than advertise. So in response to your last sentence, I wouldn’t reference OxSyBio if I wrote about the technology in an article like 3D bioprinting, though I understand why you felt the obligation to add that point. --

1079:, Taking a look at the current version, here's my thoughts. The first sentence should say what the company does (or did). What I see here is, "...aimed to develop", which says to me they didn't actually get there. My next thought is, "If they didn't do what they set out to do, what did they do to justify us having an article about them?" 516:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Knowledge can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 855:

that "You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable." I was wondering if you can guide me on this, as I only used terms that were commonly associated with this individual to ensure citation is in line too. thank you

3430:

was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with

3385:

Some of the things called out are the proper names (i.e. "National Gallery of Victoria") so that's to be expected. But, as much as possible, you should be writing in your own words. For example (although this really is a minor point), a short phrase like "acquired by the National Gallery in London"

1599:

The general rule is that after some significant amount of time has passed (4 years certainly qualifies), if you believe the subject is now more notable than they were before, anybody is free to write a new article. I have no opinion on whether the subject is notable now, but don't let that stop you.

3276:

is my private account, I am a human being and I have produced the content created under my account myself. Some information needed to produce the content has been given to me personally by other human beings. The same is true for the picture: I did not take it myself but the human who took it handed

3132:

Dear RoySmith, thank you for reviewing our article and for the explanations for your choice to decline it (the previous reviewer was not of help at all in this respect). Since the glory of Kriter dates back to 1974, there are not too many sources online that tell her story except the general sources

2064:

If you forget your password you can ask for a new one to be sent to your email address. You need to know your email address or your username. You can choose that you need to enter both your email address and your username. This is a preference. This is to get fewer password reset emails someone else

1213:

and as you say, COI editing is discouraged, but it's not banned. Personally, I agree with that allowance considering the approval process involves other people, and anyone can edit, but I don't mean to start an argument about this as I know you have a different take. I did think that the post-review

657:

community for a Symposium on Knowledge and COVID-19, which aims to answer questions the public may have about Knowledge's coverage of the pandemic. The event includes four speakers, all of whom are active contributors to the topic area on Knowledge, but bring different perspectives, backgrounds, and

2720:, Thank you for your swift reply, Roy. Forgive my naivety, but will the re-review still happen automatically given the article was rejected rather than merely declined, due to a lack of substantial edits? Let me know either way - and any feedback is very much appreciated! Best Wishes, Doogierev. -- 1280:

For the record, I don't believe the COI influenced the draft in the way that you seem to be implying. Certainly the most problematic sections (i.e. the removed parts related to funding and media appearances) were not conscious attempts at advertising. Were they an unconscious attempt of the same? I

1152:

requirements, including the summary quote above, the list of five primary criteria, and everything on the requirements page. Are there any further Knowledge resourses/rules/guidelines that you could provide please? There are several next courses of action that I could imagine following on from your

1118:

Thank you very much for reading the edited version and providing the extra feedback. I do completely understand the "advertisement" complaint: the removed sections were originally written while going through the notability guidelines, but they were a poor way of addressing them and after re-reading

1020:

The rejection on notability-grounds: this was the second rejection for that reason, and I hoped that the edits since the first rejection (as per edit history and the draft's talk page) would be sufficient to cover that issue. By "sufficient" I mean that I believe that they meet the critera given at

854:

I had previously attempted to write for a page on a politician and this time around with COVID I had some tried to write for an International Makeup Artist and was definitely challenging as the type of sources available can be very different from the former. I was confused with the new comment left

3187:

before starting the article. However, I decided anyway to create it since it definitely is no political or personal harassment of any person or subject. Our intention was simply to share some knowledge that otherwise will get lost in this digital world. It is of no financial or political advantage

2752:

Hi Roy, I’ve tried to seek help from the Help Desk and have sent a polite heads up to other reviewers of the fundamental changes I’ve made. But I haven’t received any responses - I assume given my article has been rejected? I just wondered you could take another look at the article and let me know

1649:

On a somewhat more practical matter, good sources are the most important thing. I find the best way write a good article is to start by doing research and listing all the sources I find. I'll generally sort them into two or three groups (really solid sources, not so great sources, random passing

1583:

Hi Roy. You deleted an article under the name Jonathan Manns in 2016. I think it may be the same person, the urbanist, I was thinking of making a page for. I am interested in urbanism and he is well-known in the UK. He appears also to speaks at prestigious institutions and events. He's referenced

1054:

I decided to go ahead with edits to cover the second issue mentioned above, i.e. to address the additional rejection-reason of reading like an advertisement. I believe that I have removed all references to primary materials, and ensured that the language is neutral. It should now avoid the issues

2684:

which you previously marked for deletion due to lack of substantial edits. I think this was in part due to the fact that I wasn't giving enough comment on the minor edits I was making, and I will certainly learn from this experience before submitting my next article! Let me know if there are any

2418:

Hello Mr. Smith, thank you for reviewing my Knowledge page. I wanted to inform you that the Mishkin Gallery is an art gallery that creates exhibitions, so the references are articles detailing those exhibitions. Therefore, the sources are providing significant coverage to the art gallery and the

1084:

Reading further, what I get is, "OK, this is a university biotech spinout who burned through £11M in the five years they were in business and didn't achieve anything". In other words, just like the vast majority of biotech startups. So, again, I'm left trying to figure out what they did that's

1032:

I don't have any specific questions on the second point, which was rejection for reading like an advertisement. After a re-read, I believe I understand why that feedback was given and I will edit in an attempt to fix it, although that may be moot depending on the outcome of the references issue.

808:'s improvements. Looking over what's there now, I think the first two sections are pretty good, but I'm wondering if the Centers & Initiatives section really adds anything. I'd suggest trimming that section back significantly, and then resubmitting to see what another reviewer thinks. -- 1096:

Taking a quick look at the references, I don't consider anything that has to do with funding announcements to be useful. Startups close funding rounds all the time (well, at least until they run out of money). Each time they get more funding, they send out press releases to all the industry

1487:

Would you please provide more specific feedback regarding the rejection? In the submission, there is a Reference section listing various published and reliable resources. For example, IBM Systems Magazine, BMC, and IntelliMagic official websites. Do you have any suggestions on how shall more

989:

looks pretty good, at least from the point of view of not being promotional. I don't know if the subject is notable (based on what's there now, probably not, but I recognize it's an incomplete draft), but at least it's written in an encyclopedic style of just presenting facts without making

1180:. I just looked at your user page and noticed your COI declaration. It's good and proper that you made that declaration, but to be honest, I didn't have to see the banner to know the COI existed. Everything about this draft screamed out COI. Please note, in particular, where it says, 1584:

variously in the book "Outskirts" by Jon Grindrod. In a Government report he authored late in 2016 he was described by Dr Rupa Huq MP as of of "Britains pre-eminent urbanists". In recent news articles he has been cited as a "pre-eminent British chartered surveyor and town planner" (CIAT:

3386:

could easily be re-written to use "purchased" or "bought". I'd say as long as you provide direct attribution for the longer quotes, you're fine. Keep in mind, however, that other reviewers may have a stricter view of this, so avoiding those long quotes completely would be even better.

2662:. It's not going to be a useful exercise to compare your draft with other existing pages. We have lots of pages that fail to meet our guidelines because they have not received the proper scrutiny. Using them as an argument to justify another page isn't going to be productive. -- 1101:? Of course they are; they are a top-tier paper in the financial world. But, "Oxford Spinout OxSyBio Lures Investors to ‘Bio-Printing’ Technology" is basically just coverage of a press release. They got something on the PR newswire, did due-diligence to make sure it's true, and 1706:

Hi, thanks for the reviewing of my draft. I asked for help and, I think, managed to make it better. I removed the "Rules" section, deleted the phrases that might look as a toy promotion and the paragraphs that didn't have enough sources. Can you please have another look? Thanks!

613:

redirects. This doesn't sound right, because if a troll could game this easily: go around creating redirects at promising titles, wait until other editors pick up on those topics, and then wreck havoc by outing oneself as a banned sockmaster and trigger a cascade of redlinks!

3313:

and fixed the errors every time for which I was always thankful to you for your support and cooperation but today I just checked my page and have found some other moderator removing the descriptions and ruining my entire page. All my efforts and struggle have been ruined.

990:

judgements. The only place I see some hint of promotionalism coming in is the first sentence. I would change "known for founding" to "who founded". But, that's pretty minor, and I suspect you were just following a stock example outline of how to write a biography.

2126: 788:

I just made a few revisions (added sentence by sentence citations, as well as added citation names), but I mainly wanted to see if you had any guidance for improving the article so I can continue to revise it? Thank you for your time and hope you're doing well.

1141:"Knowledge bases its decision about whether an organization is notable enough to justify a separate article on the verifiable evidence that the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the organization or product" 2613:

valid, while mine are not? In my submission, I offer multiple references. Why are all the references from The New York Times, The Atlantic, Artdaily, and the others not valid? Also, I want to inform you that the Mishkin Gallery publishes art catalogues:

1619:

It may sounds stupid but I'm a little nervous about this - my first article (which I was certain to be notable) has just been reviewed and found otherwise. Could I suggest an article to you or would it be best "for review" by the general community?

1029:) are primarily about the same topic as the draft, there's several of them, they're secondary sources etc. Could you explain specifically how those references fail to meet the critera please? I'll attempt to fix the draft or delete as appropriate. 782: 1696:

I've had a go and put it for review (I tried to save it to the Sandbox but couldn't quite work out how). If you were minded to take a look and make some suggestions, that would be a huge help (if not your support so far has been great anyway,

1240:? I do feel obligated to point out, however, that if you find yourself wanting to write something like, "OxSyBio was involved in this" in any of those articles, you might want to stop and think about whether that's your COI speaking. -- 1090:

Looking back at the version I reviewed, at that time there was a lot more about funding, and the whole "Notable media appearances", which is all gone now. That stuff was what triggered the "advertisement" complaint, so at least progress

828:

Dear RoySmith, Thank you for making time to review this article/list. I made revisions to the article/list based on your suggestions. I hope this now addresses the issues you've raised. I welcome any additional suggestions. Thank you,

1264:

to add the technology there, but I didn't feel that it would fit very well in that article's current state. It's quite broad and a bit haphazard, so I tried a new article (the OxSyBio draft) instead. I didn't think of looking at

1821: 2943:

and going to the trouble of reviewing it. I am interested in updating the article so that it, hopefully, reaches B-Class. I was wandering if you could give me advice on how to update the article and what flaws it has. Thanks,

3326:, and thus anybody can edit it. What I would suggest is that if you see an edit that you disagree with, contact the user on their talk page and discuss with them why they made that change. You might also want to read about 2962:, Hi, and thanks for your note. To be honest, I'm not that familiar with the details of the article rating system, and the C rating I gave your article when I accepted it was just a rough guess. My suggestion is to ask at 1119:

the draft since your review, I agree that they looked like advertisement. I'm glad that this aspect looks better after the recent edit, and it is useful feedback for me whether or not this particular draft goes any further.

3476: 1201:

Thank you for the additional comments. You're right, that situation isn't very satisfying (regarding guidelines/judgement), but I understand the practical need for it. It is good to understand how things work in any case.

3144:) but I doubt that youtube videos are ok references for wikipedia. If you can give me some hints on what kind of sources would be needed to get the article accepted, I'll see if I can find something else online. Thanks! 2873:

As per your suggestion, I have replaced the citation that seemed to be responsible for the draft's rejection. I was wondering if you'd be so kind as to look at what I used instead and see if it meets with your approval.

890: 2454:

Before I answer, please go back to the draft and fix up the references. You've got one that's just a URL (flatirondistrict.nyc), another that has the title "about" and nothing else. This makes it hard to review. --

930: 3162:, There's a bunch of issues here. First, from what you wrote above, you obviously have some sort of connection to the boat. But, to be honest, I could tell that just by reading the draft. Please take a look at 3277:

over the copyrights to me. If any or all of the above is against the wikipedia policies, I hereby apologies to the wikipedia community and will take action by deleting my account and the content I have produced.

1787: 2503:. Also, the link that you considered just a url includes the Mishkin Gallery in the url, and I changed the link that was titled "about" in the references, so that it includes the Mishkin Gallery in its url. 658:

interests. The event is free and open to the public, broadcast live on YouTube and Facebook, and questions taken from viewers on these platforms. Abstracts and speaker bios are available on the event page.

497: 2013:

We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues!

3426: 3166:

to understand our policy on conflicts of interest. The short answer there is that while it's not strictly forbidden for people to write about COI subjects, the results are almost never good. --

776: 1965:

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

1473: 1171:, I know this isn't going to be very satisfying, but the guidelines are just that: guidelines. Ultimately, decisions about what's notable and what's not require a certain amount of judgement. 2410: 2133: 1910: 1793: 3350:

Hi Roy, thanks for reviewing my article but im not sure what ive done wrong ? Is it that the quotes should have their source in the article rather than just in the footnote ? Easy to fix !

2795:

I don't know if this is just an artifact of the difference in our timezones but as I started to work on the open cases this morning I see you've reserved around a third of them to yourself.

1600:

The worst that might happen is somebody objects and brings it back to AfD. The way to avoid that is to make sure you have plenty of good solid sources and the article is well written. --

3579: 1815: 3318:

Hi. I don't know exactly which edits you feel are a problem, but it is certainly true that many different people will edit an article once it is created. I know it can feel like it's

3471: 971: 3404: 1134:

requirements? I've re-read them again and I can't reconcile your comments with those criteria. E.g. the main point of the criteria page seems to be summed up in this single sentence:

3558:

I added a note that the numbers refer to file numbers in the ÁBTL. I also went through the published references and transformed them into Template:Rp format, as per your suggestion.

1510: 1771: 1634:. There's a learning curve, so it's expected that new editors will not get things right the first time. That's why we have the draft process. What I would suggest is reading 1630:

Thanks for your note. Don't be nervous! I see you're a new user, so you can't directly create an article; you need to go through the draft review process like you did with

798: 2137: 2302: 3070:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from May 26. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from May 27. It will be on all wikis from May 28 (

2833:

That one is an ideal training case (a class I couldn't do as a trainee 'cos I wasn't an admin while a trainee). Looks like you've got Callanecc's day planned out already

1389:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 May. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 May. It will be on all wikis from 14 May (

540:- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 2323: 2162:. Graphs will hopefully work better for everyone who uses Javascript. It will not work for users who don't use Javascript. This will not affect diagrams in image files. 1861: 1651: 1646:

who participated in the original AfD; they have a lot of experience and might be willing to give you some additional advice and/or review your draft when you write it.

513: 499: 441:

of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 5 May. It will be on non-Knowledge wikis and some Wikipedias from 6 May. It will be on all wikis from 7 May (

3418: 1517: 1498: 662: 637: 628: 358: 143: 1017:

Hello, thank you for reviewing the draft I created (link below as requested). Would you be able to provide some specific feedback regarding the rejection please?

570: 2985: 2860: 2344: 1852: 411:. This can for example affect global renames, password changes, changing or confirming your email address and logging in to new wikis. This will happen around 3089: 2270: 1441: 460: 3621: 3344: 1625: 1594: 1553: 707: 3377: 874: 751: 3443: 3278: 3273: 3244: 3230: 3203: 3189: 3159: 3145: 3003:

I'm going to leave the re-review to somebody else, but from a quick glance, you've got something really weird going on with the reference formatting. See

2314: 2308: 1026: 3109: 2605:). I was looking at other colleges galleries' Knowledge pages, and I do not understand why my page is being rejected. For example, why are the sources of 2290: 1461: 480: 3359: 2648: 2536: 2447: 1729: 1715: 236: 3434:

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

3343: 1902: 1833: 1710: 844: 621: 2905: 1566: 1527: 1182:

COI editing is strongly discouraged on Knowledge. ... Editors with a COI are sometimes unaware of whether or how much it has influenced their editing.

214: 996: 2989: 1979:

Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda.

575: 3634: 3266: 3223: 3173: 1723: 105: 3601: 3337: 3306: 2814: 2655: 2636: 2543: 2524: 2467: 2435: 1739: 1036: 870: 856: 335: 317: 3398: 767: 191: 3126: 2729: 1631: 838: 815: 3595: 3018: 2784: 2744: 2710: 2575:

So, I'm afraid none of these are very useful. The fact that other wikipedia pages reference the gallery doesn't have any bearing. Please see

605:

thoroughly) we should punish other editors who work on a page that happens to be created by a spammer / banned sockmaster, as has happened to

147: 2929: 2888: 2669: 2595: 2485: 2462: 2402: 2388: 1952:

This month, as part of Wikimedia NYC's commitment to the well-being of members, we will hold WikiWednesday online via Zoom videoconferencing!

1781: 1672: 1533: 1006: 884: 830: 821: 340: 2973: 2364: 1290: 1223: 1162: 1070: 1049: 2850: 2828: 2777:, I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to decline. Many people have invested significant amount of time in trying to help you, to no avail. -- 1282: 1229: 1215: 1168: 1154: 1076: 1062: 1041: 537: 169: 2997: 1247: 1195: 1112: 408: 247: 2500: 1012: 921: 2813:, My bad. When I get into something, I tend to just dive in deep. I'll dial it back. Thank you for alerting me to the issue. I know 3391:

Also note that I was commenting specifically on the quoting issue. Other reviewers may still have other issues, unrelated to that. --

1701: 1232:, I agree that the technology is interesting. If your intent is to write about the technology, perhaps you could work on our existing 330: 2753:

what you think. I think I’ve taken this as far as I can now, so if it’s still not up to standard I’ll move to Articles for deletion.

626: 139: 3291: 427:

You can get a notification when someone links to a page you created. You can soon turn these notifications off for individual pages.

3286: 3238: 3197: 3153: 2953: 3097: 3085: 3040: 3025: 2278: 2266: 2052: 2037: 1449: 1437: 1311: 1296: 1059:. If you would be willing to read the edited draft, I would be interested to find out if you would agree - but no worries if not. 468: 456: 380: 365: 2129: 1506: 1126:

Notability: my understanding from your comment here is that the edited draft would still be rejected on notability-grounds (i.e.

2492: 3553: 2768: 2694: 2557:

Flatiron Partnership: This is a local business development group, reporting on a neighborhood gallery. It's also basically a

2369:

Technically it probably should be a new case. But I've reopened the current one to save us some time and paperwork so go for.

2151: 3093: 2979: 2353:, Hmmm. I'm a clerk-in-training-wheels, so I'm not 100% sure. I think the answer is, "Please open a new case", but pinging 2328: 2274: 1811: 1445: 822: 464: 210: 110: 3229:

Yup, taken by us. Maybe an older one from the race would have been nicer but I didn't know how it works with the copyright.

2615: 2331:) - to discover that the SPI has just been closed. As it has not been archived, can this be added?, or are you prepared to 2122: 1761: 946: 864: 282: 3467: 581: 354: 1607: 520:, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like 2963: 1969: 1585: 563: 934: 294: 3053: 3039:

from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.

2051:

from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.

1915: 1658:

might get you some useful feedback too. Once you've got your sources lined up, the actual writing is relatively easy.

1310:

from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.

942: 379:

from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you.

293:

created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see

3310: 3292: 2934: 2610: 1989: 1843: 926: 2511: 2858: 2619: 2606: 2022: 693: 3080: 3035: 2419:

exhibitions it features. Also, many of the sources are from art magazines, which are reliable, secondary sources.

2261: 2047: 2021:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 1432: 1306: 692:(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from 451: 375: 3552:

The ÁBTL abbreviation was explained in the first reference, it is the official abbreviation of the archive, see:

3498: 3478: 3463: 2380: 1823: 892: 350: 3208: 3439: 3252: 2644: 2623: 2532: 2443: 1097:

publications, and rack up a bunch of perfunctory coverage. As a perfect example, is the Wall Street Journal a

912: 1662: 3619:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

2804: 2478:, then let me know which three references you believe are the best ones, and I'll review those in detail. -- 2155: 1985: 1959: 1927: 1917: 1654:. Then ping me (or Onel5969 if he's willing) to get a quick feel for the quality of the sources. Asking at 1551:

has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath

1502: 999:, instead of, "She has also been recognized as an Ashoka Fellow", I would say, "She is an Ashoka Fellow". -- 552: 492: 251: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3516: 2551:

The Ticker: This is a Baruch student newspaper, reporting on an event happening at the college. That's not

225: 3554:

https://hu.wikipedia.org/%C3%81llambiztons%C3%A1gi_Szolg%C3%A1latok_T%C3%B6rt%C3%A9neti_Lev%C3%A9lt%C3%A1ra

3532: 1732:, Hi. I'm buried in a few other things right now, so I'm going to leave it to somebody else to review. -- 1127: 1022: 938: 1650:

mentions). I do all that before I start writing. I would start by doing that and listing the sources at

1481:

Hope you are doing well. Thanks for reviewing my draft about Z/OS Encryption Readiness Technology (zERT):

3124: 2925: 2884: 2422:

Can you please clarify why you rejected the Knowledge page, if it adheres to the reference requirements?

1807: 725:

and adding perfect categories to this article. you made it much better and more meaningful than it was.

2104: 2100: 1363: 1359: 1347: 1253:

I'll leave this alone. Is Db-author the appropriate tag for me to add to the draft for deletion please?

412: 396: 229: 3520: 3056:. The changes that needed to happen for this to work could cause problems for some scripts or gadgets. 2685:

further improvements you think could be made, and stay safe in these tough times. Best Wishes, Doogie.

1973: 1943: 986: 654: 547: 240: 38: 3071: 2918:

Okay, I'll submit it now, but could you perhaps look at it anyway and give me any advice before hand?

2501:

https://theticker.org/ticker/2019/11/25/the-mishkin-gallery-presents-the-brotherhood-of-new-blockheads

2088: 1390: 442: 3528: 3256: 2940: 2675: 1877: 1328: 3512: 3067: 1386: 438: 2512:

https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_university_art_museums_and_galleries_in_New_York_State#cite_note-6

2506:

Also, I would like to direct your attention to Knowledge pages that reference the Mishkin Gallery:

1745: 843: 805: 320:

with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.

3507: 3282: 3234: 3193: 3149: 2821:

asked me to be on the lookout for a case that needed merging so we can work on that together. --

1865: 1562: 3140:. There's a youtube video about the Whitbread 1973-74 race where she appears at 5min and 24min ( 2066: 1184:

Surely, as a scientist (or at least somebody involved with science in some way), you know about

3302: 2921: 2895: 2880: 1873: 1719: 1571: 1857: 278: 3355: 2565: 2552: 2493:

https://www.flatirondistrict.nyc/discover-flatiron/flatiron-history/19/sidney-mishkin-gallery

2384: 1906: 1837: 747: 618: 2491:

Hello, thank you for clarifying! I have resubmitted the page. These are the best 3 sources:

590:'s original idea wouldn't be accepted anyway, so I'm carrying this sub-thread here instead. 187: 165: 3369: 3248: 2640: 2632: 2528: 2520: 2439: 2431: 2084: 2030: 1803: 1799: 1639: 1494: 1482: 794: 701: 218: 135: 3524: 2898:, Thanks for your note. I'm going to leave it for another reviewer to take a look at. -- 2068: 8: 3612: 3575: 3492: 2993: 2764: 2725: 2690: 2616:

https://www.amazon.com/Wrestling-History-Celebration-Self-Taught-Collection/dp/B002O6ZJN6

2558: 2376: 2087:. If you use an iPhone to read or edit Knowledge and see bugs on the mobile site you can 1544: 958:

Hi Roy, can you please specify what section of the article did not meet the neutral POV?

682: 1578: 1266: 1237: 3592: 3453: 3395: 3334: 3263: 3220: 3170: 3015: 2970: 2902: 2825: 2781: 2741: 2707: 2666: 2592: 2517:

Please let me know your thoughts on the submission and your advice on how to proceed.

2482: 2459: 2361: 1778: 1757: 1736: 1669: 1604: 1558: 1524: 1244: 1192: 1109: 1003: 967: 906: 881: 860: 812: 764: 47: 17: 3368:, Hi, thanks for your note. Yes, the biggest issue was the large quotes. Please see 3105: 2286: 2208:. You will have to update your gadgets, scripts or user styles. This is so we can use 1586:

https://ciat.org.uk/resource/first-global-standards-for-land-measurement-released.html

1457: 1270: 476: 3630: 3616: 3298: 2949: 2470:, To follow up on that, it would help me with the review if you could take a look at 2398: 2340: 1947: 1548: 1185: 1056: 959: 3625:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

3438:

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all

2703:, Thank you for your note. I'm going to let another reviewer take a look at it. -- 1869: 1557:

and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

597:

is unnecessarily pessimistic and antagonistic. What you're saying is that, to avoid

3365: 3351: 2846: 2800: 2681: 2496: 1889:

Hi there! Thank you for providing your comments to the submission: Mohamed Dirani.

1746: 834: 757: 743: 722: 615: 523: 2252: 2096: 1355: 1343: 804:

The draft is quite different now from when I reviewed it, much of which is due to

728:

your generous work was the real meaning of the following quote from persian Poet "

404: 392: 2475: 2471: 1286: 1219: 1158: 1149: 1131: 1066: 1045: 790: 598: 594: 2620:

https://www.amazon.com/Painting-poetry-painting-Wallace-exhibition/dp/B0006PEM8K

2601:

Thank you for your help. I have resubmitted the Knowledge page for your review (

2223: 646: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3585: 3571: 3488: 3004: 2818: 2774: 2760: 2734: 2721: 2700: 2686: 2659: 2585: 2576: 2561:, which we traditionally don't give much weight to when determining notability. 2371: 2354: 2332: 1935: 1572: 1261: 1233: 606: 602: 586:

The discussion got archived before I had time to respond, but it is clear that

567: 559: 3141: 3024: 2036: 1331:. Before this only autopatrollers on Commons could import photos from Flickr. 1295: 678: 566:. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- 364: 3589: 3561:

Hope everything is clear now, please do let me know if it looks good to you.

3392: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3260: 3217: 3184: 3180: 3167: 3163: 3012: 3008: 2967: 2912: 2899: 2867: 2822: 2778: 2738: 2717: 2704: 2663: 2589: 2479: 2456: 2358: 1775: 1767: 1753: 1733: 1691: 1681: 1666: 1655: 1643: 1635: 1614: 1601: 1521: 1408:

JavaScript scripts and gadgets can no longer check multiple keys at once via

1241: 1210: 1189: 1177: 1106: 1000: 977: 963: 902: 878: 809: 761: 729: 718: 531: 517: 2624:

https://www.amazon.com/Indian-Space-Painters-American-Abstract/dp/B000MI6YJQ

1520:, Thanks for your note. I'll respond in comments directly on the draft. -- 3626: 2959: 2945: 2584:

As for advice on how to proceed, you'll need to find sources which satisfy

2394: 2350: 2336: 1148:

I still feel that current draft includes sufficient references to meet the

1098: 610: 3216:

BTW, did you take the photograph of Kriter that's used in the article? --

2099:

will be on read-only for a few minutes on 19 May. This will happen around

1488:

references be added? Or whether the existing resources are not qualified?

1483:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Z/OS_Encryption_Readiness_Technology_(zERT)

1358:

will be on read-only for a few minutes on 19 May. This will happen around

1346:

will be on read-only for a few minutes on 12 May. This will happen around

124: 2842: 2810: 2796: 2790: 1638:

to learn what we need for a good biographical article. Then try writing

1273:, which doesn't seem to exist (the article exists, but not the section). 587: 395:

will be on read-only for a few minutes on 5 May. This will happen around

2564:

This is also an interview, with the gallery's director. So, again, not

2003: 1955: 1661:

BTW, most of the articles I start never go anywhere. You can browse my

274: 2159: 1788:

Draft: Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchayev

1579:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Manns

1102: 407:

will be on read-only for a few minutes on 7 May. This will also affect

3259:, specifically, "a user account should be used only by one person" -- 1794:

Draft:Kharkiv_National_Agrarian_University_named_after_V.V._Dokuchayev

3373: 2103:. English Knowledge will be on read-only for a few minutes on 21 May 1362:. English Knowledge will be on read-only for a few minutes on 21 May 985:

By comparison, I looked at some of the other drafts you've created.

3547: 2984:

Hello. I would like to ask you for help with correct form of artice

1269:

until your suggestion here, but the only promising article there is

960:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Harambee_Youth_Employment_Accelerator

3607: 3255:. Since you keep using, "we", I also feel obligated to point out 3137: 3101: 2282: 1539: 1453: 472: 2817:

looks like I grabbed it and then didn't do anything with it, but

2251:. You might need to update your gadgets, scripts or user styles. 1954:

To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit

1686:

Thanks - That's really supportive and helpful. I'll do just that!

505: 304: 261: 176: 154: 2966:

for more specific advice on how that project rates articles. --

851: 783:

Draft:Seattle University Albers School of Business and Economics

777:

Draft:Seattle University Albers School of Business and Economics

2602: 2426: 2412: 2080: 1474:

Feedback for draft: z/OS Encryption Readiness Technology (zERT)

1324: 1025:. The added references (particularly the ones mentioned on the 543:

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

2588:. If you can't do that, then the draft can't be accepted. -- 2319: 1893: 198: 3057: 2213: 2209: 2163: 2110: 2108: 2092: 1425: 1369: 1367: 1351: 873:, It appears you copied text from khushmag.com. Please see 416: 400: 217:

for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at

1332: 428: 116: 3417:

Hi RoySmith, you are receiving this notice because you are

3410: 2079:

There is a bug that creates problems for iPhone users with

850:

Hi RoySmith, thank you for reviewing this page moments ago

721:

for your time , attention and professional edit on Article

3405:

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

3134: 2507: 781:

Hi RoySmith, Thanks for taking the time to review my AfC (

289: 2172:

Some CSS for the skins has been simplified. This affects

2065:

asked for. This is now available on all Wikimedia wikis.

1892:

I've addressed your comments and just resubmitted today:

3588:, I'm going to leave it for somebody else to reveiw. -- 675:

Saturday May 9, 6:00PM - 8:00PM EST (22:00 - 24:00 UTC)

3448: 3007:

and/or ask for help on how they should be formatted at

2629:

Please let me know your current thoughts, thank you.

1958:. More information about how to connect is available 3444:

Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery

2680:

Hello Roy, Hope you're doing well. I have re-edited

2309:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakurjiofficial

2303:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakurjiofficial

3548:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Ferenc_V%C3%B6lgyesi

3477:Request on 18:33:56, 27 May 2020 for assistance on 1822:Request on 09:12:08, 18 May 2020 for assistance on 1946:community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening 1752:Hi, would you mind userfying this article for me? 1236:article, or one of the related articles listed at 891:Request on 03:26:06, 7 May 2020 for assistance on 3207: 3138:https://en.wikipedia.org/Peter_von_Danzig_(ship)) 2136:. This was removed to get more specific depicts. 2497:https://www.sandmagazine.com/The-Mishkin-Gallery 2307:Hi RoySmith - Firstly, thanks for your work at 760:, Your kind words are very much appreciated! -- 738:Wait for God to give you back better in desert." 3247:, Information about copyrights is available at 852:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Vithya_Visvendra 562:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 3421:as an active Articles for Creation reviewer. 3309:Being a moderator, you always checked my page 2603:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Mishkin_Gallery 2546:, I looked at the three sources you suggested. 2427:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Mishkin_Gallery 2413:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Mishkin_Gallery 536:(to require that you be credited), or any tag 1894:https://en.wikipedia.org/Draft:Mohamed_Dirani 736:"Do the good things and throw it into Dijlah, 708:Your contribution on Muhammad Ashrafi Article 2141:There is no new MediaWiki version this week. 1972:and our favorite local articles, as well as 645: 3546:Hi Roy, thanks for reviewing this article: 3142:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBBm5Xa8DeA 922:Draft:Harambee Youth Employment Accelerator 3345:Gallia family Hoffman apartment collection 1792:Dear Roy, thank you for reviewing my AfC ( 3135:https://en.wikipedia.org/Great_Britain_II 2658:, All I can say is please carefully read 2508:https://en.wikipedia.org/Frederic_Mishkin 285:and share your thoughts on the talk page. 3427:a list of reviewers by area of expertise 2939:Hello. Thank you for accepting my draft 2815:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/41.210.3.16 2006:(optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30) 1950:(7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. 576:BOGOF, but punishing established editors 3052:The visual editor will now work in the 2158:in the reader's browser. This will use 1986:WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC 1055:explained at the given rejection link: 14: 3062: 2425:This is a link to the Knowledge page: 1381: 1176:I also want to draw your attention to 433: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3602:DYK nomination of The Lincoln Project 2218: 2168: 1534:DYK nomination of The Lincoln Project 1404: 823:Draft:List of former consulting firms 106:Administrators' newsletter – May 2020 2834: 2335:it?, or do I have to start again? - 2107:. This is for database maintenance. 1901:Warmest regards, Arief Tjitra Salim 1366:. This is for database maintenance. 1350:. This is for database maintenance. 1323:Everyone can now import photos from 415:. This is for database maintenance. 399:. This is for database maintenance. 25: 2964:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Politics 1770:, I can't see any reason why not. 1013:Further feedback for draft: OxSyBio 663:Symposium on Knowledge and COVID-19 638:Symposium on Knowledge and COVID-19 629:Symposium on Knowledge and COVID-19 564:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 111:News and updates for administrators 23: 3409: 3380:will show you the specific places. 3030: 2607:Binghamton University's Art Museum 2132:on Commons. The beta version used 2042: 1934: 1702:Fixed the Dog Puller draft article 1642:and see how it goes. I'm pinging 1301: 1260:I did originally consider editing 1128:WP:NCORP#How to apply the criteria 1023:WP:NCORP#How to apply the criteria 504: 370: 295:User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs 239:has been proposed to create a new 115: 113:from the past month (April 2020). 24: 3645: 3446:to your user talk page. Regards, 3324:owned by the community as a whole 3311:List of Pakistani Peace Laureates 3293:List of Pakistani Peace Laureates 3606: 3209: 3061: 2835: 2317:to add another suspected sock - 2217: 2167: 2097:Several wikis including Wikidata 1538: 1424:to check one at a time instead. 1403: 1380: 1356:Several wikis including Wikidata 712: 432: 303: 260: 252:bureaucrat activity requirements 197: 186: 175: 164: 153: 134: 123: 29: 3328:the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle 2579:to get an idea of what we need. 2226:has been changed. This affects 1663:collection of unfinished drafts 593:I think your interpretation of 558:This is an automated notice by 498:Unspecified source/license for 232:global group has been created. 3253:Knowledge:Copyright violations 3183:, sure I've had a look at the 1928:ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC 1918:ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC 1772:User:Chubbles/Brutality (band) 250:has been proposed to make the 13: 1: 3617:Did You Know nominations page 2980:Declined Draft:FoodSmartphone 1549:Did You Know nominations page 553:Knowledge:File copyright tags 2682:the article referenced above 2031:Wikimedia New York City Team 2002:7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via 1942:You are invited to join the 702:Wikimedia New York City Team 653:You are invited to join the 7: 2204:. They will have to remove 1968:This month, we'll focus on 10: 3650: 3611:Hello! Your submission of 3464:MediaWiki message delivery 2125:for Android can let users 1543:Hello! Your submission of 987:Draft:Quratulain Bakhteari 548:Knowledge:Image use policy 351:MediaWiki message delivery 318:request for comment closed 283:review the proposed design 3257:Knowledge:Username policy 3118:14:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 2941:1960 Cypriot by-elections 2935:1960 Cypriot by-elections 2299:17:19, 18 May 2020 (UTC) 2246:. They can no longer use 2033:16:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC) 1970:WikiProject New York City 1925: 1826:submission by Arief Salim 1652:Draft talk:Jonathan Manns 1470:20:41, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 995:Along the same lines, in 636: 528:(to release all rights), 203:Guideline and policy news 3635:21:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC) 3596:18:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC) 3580:18:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC) 3472:16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC) 3399:13:48, 27 May 2020 (UTC) 3360:03:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC) 3338:20:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 3307:17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 3287:19:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 3267:17:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 3239:17:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 3224:14:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 3198:09:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 3174:23:26, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 3154:23:14, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 3110:Subscribe or unsubscribe 3019:21:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 2998:21:14, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 2974:01:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 2954:00:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 2930:15:43, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2906:13:15, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2889:07:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC) 2851:14:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 2829:14:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 2805:09:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 2785:00:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 2769:00:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 2745:21:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2730:22:05, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 2711:20:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2695:23:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC) 2670:00:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 2649:00:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC) 2403:12:50, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 2393:Resolved - thanks all - 2389:12:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 2365:12:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 2345:08:29, 19 May 2020 (UTC) 2291:Subscribe or unsubscribe 1911:09:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC) 1816:09:46, 17 May 2020 (UTC) 1782:21:24, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 1762:18:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC) 1740:22:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 1724:21:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 1673:17:09, 14 May 2020 (UTC) 1567:15:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1528:12:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1511:06:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC) 1462:Subscribe or unsubscribe 1291:07:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 1271:3D_printing#Bio-printing 704:14:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC) 489:16:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 481:Subscribe or unsubscribe 3622:your nomination's entry 3481:submission by Mkalman84 3047:Changes later this week 2596:21:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 2537:20:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC) 2486:02:03, 7 May 2020 (UTC) 2463:23:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 2448:23:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 2116:Changes later this week 1898:Once again, thank you! 1608:15:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 1554:your nomination's entry 1414:mw.user.tokens.exists() 1375:Changes later this week 1267:3D bioprinting#See also 1248:16:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1238:3D bioprinting#See also 1224:15:48, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1196:12:52, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1163:09:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1113:00:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC) 1071:20:42, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 1050:18:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 1007:14:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC) 972:03:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC) 885:15:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 865:05:58, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 839:07:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC) 816:23:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC) 799:21:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC) 768:18:03, 5 May 2020 (UTC) 752:17:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC) 622:21:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 571:19:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC) 514:File:I Don't Always.jpg 500:File:I Don't Always.jpg 422:Changes later this week 359:01:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC) 331:Discuss this newsletter 211:Discretionary sanctions 3414: 3214: 2134:computer-aided tagging 1939: 1209:I had previously read 895:submission by Jump4130 740: 650: 509: 279:the talk pages project 230:edit filter maintainer 120: 3508:Draft:Ferenc Völgyesi 3413: 3213: 2357:for confirmation. -- 1990:optional RSVP on-wiki 1938: 734: 649: 512:Thanks for uploading 508: 493:Image without license 129:Administrator changes 119: 42:of past discussions. 3440:massmessage mailings 3370:Knowledge:Quotations 3249:Knowledge:Copyrights 3210:File:Kriter 2007.jpg 2986:Draft:FoodSmartphone 2861:Draft:Mallam (title) 1853:Draft:Mohamed Dirani 1640:Draft:Jonathan Manns 1327:to Commons with the 277:has been working on 3613:The Lincoln Project 3431:a fellow reviewer. 3376:for guidance. The 1545:The Lincoln Project 806:DragonflySixtyseven 248:request for comment 237:request for comment 3415: 3322:, but it's really 3215: 3026:Tech News: 2020-22 2038:Tech News: 2020-21 1960:on the meetup page 1940: 1410:mw.config.exists() 1297:Tech News: 2020-20 962:Thank you. -Jimmy 685: 651: 601:(so as to enforce 510: 366:Tech News: 2020-19 228:on Meta-Wiki, the 121: 18:User talk:RoySmith 3460: 3457: 3272:For the records, 3086:Tech News writers 2922:O.ominirabluejack 2896:O.ominirabluejack 2881:O.ominirabluejack 2676:Draft: Joe Seddon 2651: 2635:comment added by 2539: 2523:comment added by 2450: 2434:comment added by 2267:Tech News writers 2182:div#p-interaction 2026: 2018: 2017: 1983:Wednesday May 20 1976:past and future. 1818: 1802:comment added by 1665:if you like. -- 1518:Erin Zhang YiChen 1513: 1499:Erin Zhang YiChen 1497:comment added by 1438:Tech News writers 1186:confirmation bias 1027:draft's talk page 875:the earwig report 697: 689: 688: 660: 457:Tech News writers 361: 226:recent discussion 181:Oversight changes 159:CheckUser changes 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3641: 3610: 3537: 3536: 3459: 3451: 3437: 3211: 3065: 3064: 2911:You're welcome, 2840: 2839: 2838: 2630: 2518: 2429: 2411:Mishkin Gallery 2326: 2250: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2221: 2220: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2194:div#p-namespaces 2191: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2178:div#p-navigation 2175: 2171: 2170: 2020: 1974:Wiki Loves Pride 1923: 1922: 1882: 1881: 1797: 1747:Brutality (band) 1711:Draft:Dog Puller 1695: 1685: 1629: 1618: 1598: 1542: 1492: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1384: 1383: 951: 950: 877:for details. -- 845:Vithya Visvendra 723:Muhammad Ashrafi 716: 715: 691: 634: 633: 609:and me with the 535: 527: 436: 435: 348: 307: 292: 264: 241:main page editor 201: 190: 179: 168: 157: 138: 127: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3649: 3648: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3604: 3510: 3506: 3483: 3461: 3447: 3407: 3348: 3296: 3130: 3116: 3115: 3043:are available. 3029: 2982: 2937: 2864: 2836: 2793: 2678: 2416: 2320:Educationsarsai 2318: 2313:I just went to 2305: 2297: 2296: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2224:the Vector skin 2205: 2201: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2055:are available. 2041: 1921: 1855: 1851: 1828: 1804:AndriyPopov1980 1790: 1750: 1704: 1689: 1679: 1623: 1612: 1592: 1576: 1536: 1476: 1468: 1467: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1314:are available. 1300: 1105:this piece. -- 1099:reliable source 1015: 997:Draft:Jess Ladd 924: 920: 897: 848: 826: 779: 726: 717:Thank you Dear 713: 710: 632: 578: 534:|cc-by-sa-4.0}} 529: 521: 503: 495: 487: 486: 383:are available. 369: 362: 346: 345: 288: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3647: 3603: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3570: 3543: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3504: 3482: 3475: 3442:, you may add 3408: 3406: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3389: 3387: 3383: 3381: 3347: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3295: 3290: 3270: 3269: 3227: 3226: 3177: 3176: 3129: 3123: 3121: 3088:and posted by 3076: 3075: 3059: 3031: 3028: 3023: 3022: 3021: 2981: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2936: 2933: 2909: 2908: 2877:Warm regards, 2863: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2792: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2714: 2713: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2599: 2598: 2582: 2580: 2573: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2566:WP:INDEPENDENT 2562: 2555: 2553:WP:INDEPENDENT 2547: 2489: 2488: 2465: 2415: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2367: 2312: 2304: 2301: 2269:and posted by 2257: 2256: 2215: 2198:div#p-variants 2174:div#p-personal 2165: 2146:Future changes 2143: 2142: 2139: 2113: 2112: 2094: 2071: 2070: 2059:Recent changes 2043: 2040: 2035: 2016: 2015: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 1996: 1995: 1931: 1930: 1920: 1914: 1888: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1849: 1827: 1820: 1789: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1749: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1703: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1687: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1659: 1647: 1626:Turningworldly 1610: 1595:Turningworldly 1575: 1573:Jonathan Manns 1570: 1535: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1475: 1472: 1440:and posted by 1428: 1427: 1416:. You can use 1398:Future changes 1395: 1394: 1372: 1371: 1353: 1335: 1334: 1318:Recent changes 1302: 1299: 1294: 1278: 1277: 1262:3D bioprinting 1258: 1257: 1251: 1250: 1234:3D bioprinting 1207: 1206: 1199: 1198: 1174: 1172: 1146: 1145: 1139: 1138: 1124: 1123: 1116: 1115: 1094: 1092: 1088: 1086: 1082: 1080: 1014: 1011: 1010: 1009: 993: 991: 983: 981: 957: 955: 954: 953: 952: 918: 896: 889: 888: 887: 847: 842: 825: 820: 819: 818: 778: 775: 773: 771: 770: 737: 711: 709: 706: 687: 686: 673: 672: 671: 670: 642: 641: 631: 625: 607:User:Plantdrew 584: 583: 577: 574: 556: 555: 550: 502: 496: 494: 491: 459:and posted by 447: 446: 430: 419: 418: 402: 371: 368: 363: 347: 344: 343: 338: 333: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 301: 300: 299: 298: 286: 266:Technical news 258: 257: 256: 255: 244: 233: 222: 195: 194: 173: 172: 151: 150: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3646: 3637: 3636: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3623: 3618: 3614: 3609: 3597: 3594: 3591: 3587: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3568: 3565: 3562: 3559: 3556: 3555: 3550: 3549: 3544: 3534: 3530: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3509: 3505: 3503: 3502: 3500: 3497: 3494: 3490: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3480: 3474: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3458: 3455: 3450: 3445: 3441: 3435: 3432: 3429: 3428: 3422: 3420: 3412: 3400: 3397: 3394: 3390: 3388: 3384: 3382: 3379: 3378:earwig report 3375: 3371: 3367: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3346: 3339: 3336: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3294: 3289: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3279:SailingRegina 3275: 3274:SailingRegina 3268: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3245:SailingRegina 3243: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3231:SailingRegina 3225: 3222: 3219: 3212: 3205: 3204:SailingRegina 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3195: 3191: 3190:SailingRegina 3186: 3182: 3175: 3172: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3160:SailingRegina 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3146:SailingRegina 3143: 3139: 3136: 3128: 3122: 3119: 3114: 3113: 3111: 3107: 3106:Give feedback 3103: 3099: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3082: 3073: 3069: 3060: 3058: 3055: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3044: 3042: 3038: 3037: 3027: 3020: 3017: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2975: 2972: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2942: 2932: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2916: 2914: 2907: 2904: 2901: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2890: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2875: 2871: 2869: 2862: 2852: 2848: 2844: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2827: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2786: 2783: 2780: 2776: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2757: 2754: 2746: 2743: 2740: 2736: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2716: 2715: 2712: 2709: 2706: 2702: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2692: 2688: 2683: 2671: 2668: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2627: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2612: 2611:Shiva Gallery 2608: 2604: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2581: 2578: 2574: 2572: 2567: 2563: 2560: 2556: 2554: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2522: 2515: 2513: 2509: 2504: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2487: 2484: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2466: 2464: 2461: 2458: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2437: 2433: 2428: 2423: 2420: 2414: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2373: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2325: 2321: 2316: 2310: 2300: 2295: 2294: 2292: 2288: 2287:Give feedback 2284: 2280: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2263: 2254: 2232:#p-namespaces 2225: 2222:Some CSS for 2216: 2214: 2211: 2166: 2164: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2140: 2138: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2124: 2123:Knowledge app 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2111: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2095: 2093: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2069: 2067: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2054: 2050: 2049: 2039: 2034: 2032: 2027: 2024: 2014: 2007: 2005: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1993: 1991: 1987: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1977: 1975: 1971: 1966: 1963: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1944:Wikimedia NYC 1937: 1933: 1932: 1929: 1926:May 20, 7pm: 1924: 1919: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1890: 1879: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1854: 1850: 1848: 1847: 1845: 1842: 1839: 1835: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1825: 1819: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1795: 1783: 1780: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1748: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1693: 1688: 1683: 1678: 1674: 1671: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1657: 1653: 1648: 1645: 1644:User:Onel5969 1641: 1637: 1633: 1627: 1622: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1603: 1596: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1587: 1581: 1580: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1559:MartinPoulter 1556: 1555: 1550: 1546: 1541: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1519: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1479: 1471: 1466: 1465: 1463: 1459: 1458:Give feedback 1455: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1434: 1426: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1392: 1388: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1370: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1333: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1313: 1309: 1308: 1298: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1272: 1268: 1263: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1212: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1173: 1170: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1133: 1129: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1095: 1093: 1089: 1087: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1058: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1038: 1037:Draft:OxSyBio 1034: 1030: 1028: 1024: 1018: 1008: 1005: 1002: 998: 994: 992: 988: 984: 982: 979: 976: 975: 974: 973: 969: 965: 961: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 923: 919: 917: 916: 914: 911: 908: 904: 901: 900: 899: 894: 886: 883: 880: 876: 872: 869: 868: 867: 866: 862: 858: 853: 846: 841: 840: 836: 832: 824: 817: 814: 811: 807: 803: 802: 801: 800: 796: 792: 786: 784: 774: 769: 766: 763: 759: 756: 755: 754: 753: 749: 745: 739: 733: 731: 730:Saadi Shirazi 724: 720: 719:user:RoySmith 705: 703: 698: 695: 684: 680: 676: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 659: 656: 655:Wikimedia NYC 648: 644: 643: 639: 635: 630: 624: 623: 620: 617: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 591: 589: 582: 580: 579: 573: 572: 569: 565: 561: 554: 551: 549: 546: 545: 544: 541: 539: 533: 525: 519: 518:copyright tag 515: 507: 501: 490: 485: 484: 482: 478: 477:Give feedback 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453: 444: 440: 431: 429: 426: 425: 424: 423: 417: 414: 410: 406: 403: 401: 398: 394: 391: 390: 389: 388: 384: 382: 378: 377: 367: 360: 356: 352: 342: 339: 337: 334: 332: 329: 328: 319: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309:Miscellaneous 306: 296: 291: 287: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 263: 253: 249: 245: 242: 238: 234: 231: 227: 223: 220: 219:WP:GS/COVID19 216: 212: 209: 208: 207: 206: 205: 204: 200: 193: 189: 185: 184: 183: 182: 178: 171: 167: 163: 162: 161: 160: 156: 149: 145: 144:Kaisershatner 141: 137: 133: 132: 131: 130: 126: 118: 114: 112: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3620: 3605: 3569: 3566: 3563: 3560: 3557: 3551: 3545: 3542: 3495: 3484: 3462: 3436: 3433: 3425: 3423: 3416: 3349: 3320:your article 3319: 3299:Nawab Afridi 3297: 3271: 3228: 3178: 3131: 3127:Draft:Kriter 3120: 3117: 3084:prepared by 3079: 3078: 3077: 3046: 3045: 3041:Translations 3034: 3032: 2983: 2938: 2920: 2917: 2910: 2879: 2876: 2872: 2865: 2794: 2758: 2755: 2751: 2679: 2631:— Preceding 2628: 2600: 2559:WP:INTERVIEW 2519:— Preceding 2516: 2505: 2490: 2430:— Preceding 2424: 2421: 2417: 2370: 2306: 2298: 2265:prepared by 2260: 2259: 2258: 2145: 2144: 2115: 2114: 2073: 2072: 2058: 2057: 2053:Translations 2046: 2044: 2028: 2019: 2012: 2001: 1984: 1978: 1967: 1964: 1951: 1941: 1900: 1897: 1891: 1887: 1840: 1829: 1798:— Preceding 1791: 1751: 1730:AnimaloverUA 1716:AnimaloverUA 1714: 1709: 1705: 1632:Draft:Filcao 1582: 1577: 1552: 1537: 1493:— Preceding 1491:Thank you! 1490: 1486: 1480: 1477: 1469: 1436:prepared by 1431: 1430: 1429: 1397: 1396: 1374: 1373: 1337: 1336: 1329:UploadWizard 1317: 1316: 1312:Translations 1305: 1303: 1279: 1259: 1252: 1208: 1200: 1181: 1147: 1140: 1125: 1117: 1085:note-worthy. 1061: 1053: 1040: 1035: 1031: 1019: 1016: 956: 909: 898: 849: 827: 787: 780: 772: 741: 735: 727: 699: 690: 674: 661: 652: 592: 585: 557: 542: 511: 488: 455:prepared by 450: 449: 448: 421: 420: 386: 385: 381:Translations 374: 372: 308: 302: 275:Editing team 265: 259: 254:more strict. 224:Following a 202: 196: 180: 174: 158: 152: 128: 122: 109: 78: 43: 37: 3366:Rohanstorey 3352:Rohanstorey 3068:new version 3054:Modern skin 2756:Stay safe, 2244:#p-cactions 2236:#p-personal 2228:#p-variants 2089:report them 1903:Arief Salim 1834:Arief Salim 1478:Hello Roy, 1387:new version 1103:churned out 758:Soheilsiami 744:Soheilsiami 677:online via 627:Sat May 9: 611:Job's tears 439:new version 409:CentralAuth 290:Enterprisey 192:HJ Mitchell 36:This is an 3564:All best, 3094:Contribute 2759:Doogierev 2275:Contribute 2202:div#footer 2190:div#p-lang 2160:Javascript 1446:Contribute 1057:WP:ARTSPAM 791:EastIrving 465:Contribute 405:Some wikis 393:Some wikis 281:. You can 243:usergroup. 215:authorized 213:have been 148:Malcolmxl5 98:Archive 35 90:Archive 33 85:Archive 32 79:Archive 31 73:Archive 30 68:Archive 29 60:Archive 25 3586:Mkalman84 3572:Mkalman84 3489:Mkalman84 3424:Recently 3374:MOS:QUOTE 3098:Translate 3081:Tech news 3036:tech news 2990:Cairek007 2819:Callanecc 2775:Doogierev 2761:Doogierev 2735:Doogierev 2722:Doogierev 2701:Doogierev 2687:Doogierev 2372:Callanecc 2355:Callanecc 2279:Translate 2262:Tech news 2105:05:00 UTC 2101:05:00 UTC 2048:tech news 2023:this list 1956:this link 1697:thanks!). 1450:Translate 1433:Tech news 1364:05:00 UTC 1360:05:00 UTC 1348:05:00 UTC 1307:tech news 694:this list 568:MifterBot 560:MifterBot 469:Translate 452:Tech news 413:05:00 UTC 397:05:00 UTC 376:tech news 336:Subscribe 170:Callanecc 140:Gnangarra 3590:RoySmith 3499:contribs 3449:Sam-2727 3393:RoySmith 3332:RoySmith 3261:RoySmith 3218:RoySmith 3181:RoySmith 3168:RoySmith 3102:Get help 3072:calendar 3013:RoySmith 2968:RoySmith 2913:RoySmith 2900:RoySmith 2868:RoySmith 2823:RoySmith 2779:RoySmith 2739:RoySmith 2718:RoySmith 2705:RoySmith 2664:RoySmith 2656:Ameds918 2645:contribs 2637:Ameds918 2633:unsigned 2590:RoySmith 2544:Ameds918 2533:contribs 2525:Ameds918 2521:unsigned 2480:RoySmith 2476:WP:THREE 2472:WP:NCORP 2468:Ameds918 2457:RoySmith 2444:contribs 2436:Ameds918 2432:unsigned 2381:contribs 2359:RoySmith 2329:contribs 2315:that SPI 2283:Get help 2240:#p-views 2186:div#p-tb 2156:rendered 2154:will be 2074:Problems 1916:May 20: 1844:contribs 1812:contribs 1800:unsigned 1776:RoySmith 1768:Chubbles 1754:Chubbles 1734:RoySmith 1692:RoySmith 1682:RoySmith 1667:RoySmith 1615:RoySmith 1602:RoySmith 1522:RoySmith 1507:contribs 1495:unsigned 1454:Get help 1418:exists() 1391:calendar 1338:Problems 1242:RoySmith 1190:RoySmith 1150:WP:NCORP 1132:WP:NCORP 1107:RoySmith 1001:RoySmith 978:Jump4130 964:Jump4130 913:contribs 903:Jump4130 879:RoySmith 871:Infohand 857:Infohand 810:RoySmith 762:RoySmith 683:Facebook 640:(May 9) 599:WP:BOGOF 595:WP:BOGOF 473:Get help 443:calendar 387:Problems 349:Sent by 3627:Yoninah 3615:at the 3567:Mihaly 3521:history 3125:Review 3033:Latest 3005:WP:CITE 2960:KnolGua 2946:KnolGua 2866:Hello, 2841:Enjoy! 2660:WP:NORG 2586:WP:NORG 2577:WP:NORG 2395:Arjayay 2351:Arjayay 2337:Arjayay 2333:WP:Duck 2253:See how 2130:depicts 2045:Latest 1866:history 1547:at the 1344:Commons 1304:Latest 935:history 679:YouTube 603:WP:DENY 524:PD-self 373:Latest 341:Archive 39:archive 3593:(talk) 3419:listed 3396:(talk) 3335:(talk) 3330:. -- 3264:(talk) 3221:(talk) 3185:WP:COI 3171:(talk) 3164:WP:COI 3016:(talk) 3009:WP:TEA 2971:(talk) 2903:(talk) 2843:Cabayi 2826:(talk) 2811:Cabayi 2797:Cabayi 2782:(talk) 2742:(talk) 2708:(talk) 2667:(talk) 2622:, and 2593:(talk) 2499:, and 2483:(talk) 2460:(talk) 2362:(talk) 2152:Graphs 2085:Safari 2081:iOS 13 1779:(talk) 1737:(talk) 1670:(talk) 1656:WP:TEA 1636:WP:BIO 1605:(talk) 1525:(talk) 1325:Flickr 1245:(talk) 1211:WP:COI 1193:(talk) 1178:WP:COI 1110:(talk) 1091:there. 1004:(talk) 882:(talk) 831:JQ1776 813:(talk) 765:(talk) 616:Deryck 588:Cabayi 3529:watch 3525:links 3179:Dear 2248:: --> 2210:HTML5 1948:salon 1874:watch 1870:links 1422:get() 1283:Cog77 1230:Cog77 1216:Cog77 1169:Cog77 1155:Cog77 1077:Cog77 1063:Cog77 1042:Cog77 943:watch 939:links 16:< 3631:talk 3576:talk 3533:logs 3517:talk 3513:edit 3493:talk 3468:talk 3454:talk 3372:and 3356:talk 3303:talk 3283:talk 3251:and 3235:talk 3194:talk 3150:talk 3066:The 2994:talk 2950:talk 2926:talk 2915:... 2885:talk 2870:... 2859:RE: 2847:talk 2801:talk 2765:talk 2726:talk 2691:talk 2641:talk 2609:and 2529:talk 2510:and 2474:and 2440:talk 2399:talk 2385:logs 2377:talk 2341:talk 2324:talk 2242:and 2200:and 2121:The 2083:and 2004:Zoom 1907:talk 1878:logs 1862:talk 1858:edit 1838:talk 1808:talk 1758:talk 1720:talk 1563:talk 1503:talk 1385:The 1287:talk 1220:talk 1159:talk 1067:talk 1046:talk 968:talk 947:logs 931:talk 927:edit 907:talk 861:talk 835:talk 795:talk 748:talk 681:and 538:here 532:self 437:The 355:talk 273:The 3479:AfC 3090:bot 3011:-- 2791:SPI 2271:bot 2206:div 2127:add 1962:. 1824:AfC 1774:-- 1442:bot 1420:or 1412:or 893:AfC 461:bot 3633:) 3578:) 3531:| 3527:| 3523:| 3519:| 3515:| 3501:) 3470:) 3456:) 3358:) 3305:) 3285:) 3237:) 3206:, 3196:) 3152:) 3108:• 3104:• 3100:• 3096:• 3092:• 3074:). 2996:) 2952:) 2928:) 2891:. 2887:) 2849:) 2803:) 2767:) 2728:) 2693:) 2647:) 2643:• 2626:. 2618:, 2535:) 2531:• 2514:. 2495:, 2446:) 2442:• 2401:) 2387:) 2383:• 2379:• 2343:) 2327:· 2289:• 2285:• 2281:• 2277:• 2273:• 2249:ul 2238:, 2234:, 2230:, 2212:. 2196:, 2192:, 2188:, 2184:, 2180:, 2176:, 2091:. 2029:-- 2025:.) 1909:) 1876:| 1872:| 1868:| 1864:| 1860:| 1846:) 1814:) 1810:• 1760:) 1722:) 1565:) 1509:) 1505:• 1460:• 1456:• 1452:• 1448:• 1444:• 1393:). 1289:) 1222:) 1161:) 1069:) 1048:) 970:) 945:| 941:| 937:| 933:| 929:| 915:) 863:) 837:) 797:) 785:) 750:) 742:-- 732:" 700:-- 696:.) 619:C. 530:{{ 526:}} 522:{{ 479:• 475:• 471:• 467:• 463:• 445:). 357:) 316:A 246:A 235:A 146:• 142:• 94:→ 64:← 3629:( 3574:( 3535:) 3511:( 3496:· 3491:( 3466:( 3452:( 3354:( 3301:( 3281:( 3233:( 3192:( 3148:( 3112:. 2992:( 2948:( 2924:( 2883:( 2845:( 2799:( 2763:( 2724:( 2689:( 2639:( 2568:. 2527:( 2438:( 2397:( 2375:( 2339:( 2322:( 2311:. 2293:. 2255:. 1994:. 1992:) 1988:( 1905:( 1880:) 1856:( 1841:· 1836:( 1806:( 1756:( 1718:( 1694:: 1690:@ 1684:: 1680:@ 1628:: 1624:@ 1617:: 1613:@ 1597:: 1593:@ 1561:( 1501:( 1464:. 1285:( 1218:( 1157:( 1065:( 1044:( 966:( 949:) 925:( 910:· 905:( 859:( 833:( 793:( 746:( 483:. 353:( 297:. 221:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index