933:
blocked years ago, I only started editing in August. Given the large time gap between that account’s ban and my activity, this situation feels unfair. This block won’t serve as a learning experience for me, as I already understand that having multiple accounts is not permitted—and I don't have any, nor do I intend to. The articles I work on are full of non-neutral points of view, and addressing them through noticeboard discussions and reliable sources is enough to bring about change. I don't need multiple accounts to engage in edit wars, because i don't edit war. If there's suspicion that an account tagged as a sockmaster is mine, feel free to remove or block it. It makes no difference to me. I believe SPI technical data also shows no socks from my side. This sock block (as well as a report) is being used from a group of connected editors that revert changes made on RS so they could push their own POV. I even asked admin for a timed block, where i would know when i could edit again, but i was ignored. ] (]) 18:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
906:
blocked years ago, I only started editing in August. Given the large time gap between that account’s ban and my activity, this situation feels unfair. This block won’t serve as a learning experience for me, as I already understand that having multiple accounts is not permitted—and I don't have any, nor do I intend to. The articles I work on are full of non-neutral points of view, and addressing them through noticeboard discussions and reliable sources is enough to bring about change. I don't need multiple accounts to engage in edit wars, because i don't edit war. If there's suspicion that an account tagged as a sockmaster is mine, feel free to remove or block it. It makes no difference to me. I believe SPI technical data also shows no socks from my side. This sock block (as well as a report) is being used from a group of connected editors that revert changes made on RS so they could push their own POV. I even asked admin for a timed block, where i would know when i could edit again, but i was ignored. ] (]) 18:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
879:
blocked years ago, I only started editing in August. Given the large time gap between that account’s ban and my activity, this situation feels unfair. This block won’t serve as a learning experience for me, as I already understand that having multiple accounts is not permitted—and I don't have any, nor do I intend to. The articles I work on are full of non-neutral points of view, and addressing them through noticeboard discussions and reliable sources is enough to bring about change. I don't need multiple accounts to engage in edit wars, because i don't edit war. If there's suspicion that an account tagged as a sockmaster is mine, feel free to remove or block it. It makes no difference to me. I believe SPI technical data also shows no socks from my side. This sock block (as well as a report) is being used from a group of connected editors that revert changes made on RS so they could push their own POV. I even asked admin for a timed block, where i would know when i could edit again, but i was ignored. ] (]) 18:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
809:
blocked years ago, I only started editing in August. Given the large time gap between that account’s ban and my activity, this situation feels unfair. This block won’t serve as a learning experience for me, as I already understand that having multiple accounts is not permitted—and I don't have any, nor do I intend to. The articles I work on are full of non-neutral points of view, and addressing them through noticeboard discussions and reliable sources is enough to bring about change. I don't need multiple accounts to engage in edit wars, because i don't edit war. If there's suspicion that an account tagged as a sockmaster is mine, feel free to remove or block it. It makes no difference to me. I believe SPI technical data also shows no socks from my side. This sock block (as well as a report) is being used from a group of connected editors that revert changes made on RS so they could push their own POV. I even asked admin for a timed block, where i would know when i could edit again, but i was ignored.
24:
728:
242:
55:. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
333:
Hey, while i understand that block is there to prevent any further damages and i am willing to wait, i have a question. I can see why you agree that i might be a sock account, but in fact this is the only account i have access to and the only one i use. There is not a single account connected to this
219:
If you have recommendation for any other way to solve this, it would be great. The only reason why i was included in this small edit war by Alltan was because they kept removing sources that are definitely RS, like
Historical institute of University of Montenegro, and i dont mind extended protection
184:
Hey, i am sorry, maybe i got frustrated and made some mistakes while editing, but keep in mind that i tried discussion on talk page, which led nowhere due to stonewalling, i tried dispute resolution, but other editors such as Alltan didn't want to respond at all, i tried RfC but they spam it so much
932:
I was banned for alleged sockpuppeting due to similarities between my editing behavior and that of another editor from over a year ago. The block is specifically for sockpuppeting, not for disruptive editing or vandalism. Even though one administrator believes I may be linked to an account that was
905:
I was banned for alleged sockpuppeting due to similarities between my editing behavior and that of another editor from over a year ago. The block is specifically for sockpuppeting, not for disruptive editing or vandalism. Even though one administrator believes I may be linked to an account that was
878:
I was banned for alleged sockpuppeting due to similarities between my editing behavior and that of another editor from over a year ago. The block is specifically for sockpuppeting, not for disruptive editing or vandalism. Even though one administrator believes I may be linked to an account that was
808:
I was banned for alleged sockpuppeting due to similarities between my editing behavior and that of another editor from over a year ago. The block is specifically for sockpuppeting, not for disruptive editing or vandalism. Even though one administrator believes I may be linked to an account that was
337:
I am asking to see what kind of problematic behaviour i had in my 520 edits, and what can i do to get this account unblocked, so i could use unblock tag later when i feel like editing. I have a feeling this block might be used to rewrite article i've been editing back to non NPOV version, as can be
1015:
If you want even more exact reason why i don't think technical SPI showed any sockpuppeting, i can explain further. Even though i dont have a static IP, i assure you that none of the accounts that can even be closely related to me have ever been used from my IP or my PC. That's what i meant when i
211:
The article itself currently states that KuÄŤi are of
Albanian origin, with stack of sources that are terrible, only 3 talk about origin itself, and other editors claim that that is scientific consensus, while i have other writers, including Historical institute of University of Montenegro, which
199:
because he is not a historian, but an engineer, claiming he is not an expert in the field (he wrote 6 books on the tribe). I said ok, we can compromise, i don't need to use him. But then they keep inserting quotes from Mulić Jusuf, who is an agriculture professor and has nothing to do with the
216:, as the tribe was formed in the second part of XV century, and census data from that period shows mixed names, religion was defined in 1455. when tribe was orthodox, but we have info that they were mixed in 16th century, so tribe was definitely mixed both in ethnic and religious ways.
370:
This is the only account i have. The only account that i can access and the only account i edit from. I am sure the IP checks seem fine, and as can be seen from history of articles i edit, there were no socks that were mine, i even reported all the users that were disruptive and
203:
After that, i wanted to use
Rastislav Petrović, who has a PhD in history and his thesis was about the tribe itself, and he wrote a book based on it, but he was deemed a nationalist, because he supported Yugoslavia in wars during the 90s. But those same editors will use
528:
Pellumb Xhufi is not a BLP policy breach. I had sources for all the claims, and you can't speak of negative bias, as the article is what i read first on
Albanian wiki, and i mostly used sources from there, except for Austrian Academy of Sciences which i found by
560:
I don't think your denial of socking is credible, so I am not going to unblock you, and a topic ban, even if you accepted it, would not change my opposition to an unblock. Also, your statement that the standard offer is "out of scope" is sophistic
399:. Of course you'll need to explain the evidence presented at the sock puppet investigation in a reasonable manner. And you will need to follow the instructions in the block notice to request unblocking. And listing all your accounts
427:
I am heeding to his advice. I use noticeboards, i discuss everything in the talk pages, i back up if other editors disagree with the change and only try to do it again if i got OK from noticeboards.
192:) is heavily edited to promote one POV, and even slight change that can affect that POV is either reverted, or pushed down so first few lines of each section state whatever their POV is.
86:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics
682:
against other editors. I didn't have time to search more about the subject, but it was clear to me since the early days of this account that it didn't belong to a new editor
634:
I was pinged for some reason or another. I did not expand the articles in question and I'm not that interested in the topic, which is overrated anyway. Nevertheless,
148:
270:
788:
685:
and I gave him the chance to come clean about it and he claimed that he didn't have any other account. Many aspects of editing strongly suggested otherwise.--
578:
That's all. I said i don't have any socks, and this is the only account i use, and i will keep it that way in the scope you decide so i could appeal then.
511:
95:
446:
Ok, so admin thinks i am a sock of account that was banned 1 year ago. Fine. 1 year has passed, and that's literally out of scope of standard offer.
205:
170:. If a voluntary free time activity makes you upset, you can always seek alternatives. Knowledge is full of them. Good luck and best regards,
288:
602:
I've reverted the new section you just added; you may not use your Talk page for anything other than discussing or appealing your block.--
281:
374:
There was no disruptive editing from my side, if i talked any more in the talk pages of article i edit it would be considered spamming :)
510:
Without this sockpuppetry block in place, I would have reported you for repeated personal attacks and blatant BLP policy breaches on
292:
764:
792:
16:
121:
848:
422:
299:
575:
Cool. I won't try to convince you. I am trying to ask when will i be able, based on your opinion, to request unblocking.
863:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "
255:
711:
694:
555:
458:
439:
408:
377:
I am asking what should i do, or how long should i wait, because this is indefinite ban which doesn't have duration.
541:
523:
759:
678:
The account
Setxbmap was engaged in many disputes, including potential BLP violations about living academics and
570:
498:
476:
683:
229:
782:
274:
179:
751:
1046:
1025:
1010:
996:
978:
669:
655:
625:
611:
587:
386:
365:
208:, who is deemed a nationalist by other Albanian historians and Austrian academy of Sciences. It really sucks.
747:
315:
895:
773:
832:
818:
642:
care to share what led you to impose permanent block so fast? Was the behavioral evidence solid? Ty. —
235:
159:
769:
735:
250:
136:
960:
851:
to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
334:
one, that i use to disrupt any discussions, or to edit war, or to prevent others from contributing.
856:
755:
778:
690:
551:
418:
404:
167:
519:
260:
102:
350:
155:
894:
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
532:
You didn't report me for anything, so yeah. I will fix Xhufi article when i get a chance :)
679:
8:
837:
830:
In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please
163:
91:
841:
719:
686:
547:
464:
414:
400:
175:
117:
840:
by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these
515:
449:
As far as the topic ban goes, that would suck as i am only interested in
Montenegro.
213:
298:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review
Knowledge's
220:
as i will have 500 edits soon (i edit other articles regarding
Montenegro as well)
98:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the
992:
956:
890:
the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting
650:
607:
566:
361:
311:
195:
For example, in the latest dispute with other editors, they claimed i can't cite
36:
128:
51:
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
1017:
1002:
970:
810:
742:
703:
661:
617:
579:
533:
490:
468:
450:
431:
392:
378:
342:
221:
144:
140:
1040:
984:
171:
113:
921:
the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting
396:
132:
79:
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
131:
has been temporarily removed by extended-confirmed protection, and that
23:
988:
952:
644:
637:
603:
562:
486:
357:
328:
307:
185:
that nobody is able to read it and people just lose will to contribute.
616:
Tnx. In your opinion, the best time to appeal would be in 6 months?
321:
287:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be
265:
166:
from the conflict. Please always take your time and remember that
241:
189:
302:, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
949:
I believe SPI technical data also shows no socks from my side
40:. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and
969:
Because i don't have any accounts other than this one.
271:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/NekSeOvajVijekGordi
338:
seen currently by removing RS that were added by me.
94:or you may learn more about this contentious topic
73:
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
341:Again, this is the ONLY account i have access to.
66:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
46:imply that there are any issues with your editing
1038:
1016:said i doubt technical evidence showed anything
844:instead for quick attention by an administrator.
188:In my opinion, article where i am most active (
162:provide helpful ideas and uncountable ways for
127:...noting that your writing access to the page
76:follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
58:Within contentious topics, editors should edit
393:topic ban on anything to do with the Balkans.
836:. If no block is listed, then you have been
508:There was no disruptive editing from my side
898:, explaining why the request was declined.
660:It's not permanent as far as i understand.
30:You have recently edited a page related to
356:What accounts don't you have access to?--
304:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
135:in a contentious topic area may lead to
867:" with the name of the blocking admin:
702:Feel free to use your own talk page :)
430:This block has nothing to do with that
1039:
699:Never got banned for any of that tho.
413:And heeding ToBeFree's wise advice.
154:If the area becomes too heated, the
149:in a longer message to other editors
70:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge;
212:claim mixed origin. And it's kinda
13:
726:
273:. Note that multiple accounts are
240:
17:Introduction to contentious topics
14:
1058:
951:. What makes you believe that?--
22:
833:check the list of active blocks
734:This user is asking that their
151:applies to everyone, of course.
92:arbitration clerks' noticeboard
82:refrain from gaming the system.
1026:21:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1011:21:06, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
997:20:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
979:20:48, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
961:20:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
819:18:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
712:20:33, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
695:20:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
670:18:09, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
656:17:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
626:17:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
612:17:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
588:22:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
571:22:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
556:21:23, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
542:20:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
524:20:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
499:22:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
477:21:06, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
459:16:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
440:17:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
423:16:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
409:16:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
387:15:47, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
366:15:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
351:15:32, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
316:13:13, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
269:per the evidence presented at
230:00:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
180:00:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
122:00:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
910:{{subst:Decline reason here}}
892:{{subst:Decline reason here}}
546:I already shared my opinions
32:Eastern Europe or the Balkans
7:
168:Knowledge is not compulsory
147:. The advice I've provided
10:
1063:
849:guide to appealing blocks
300:guide to appealing blocks
261:abusing multiple accounts
1021:
1006:
974:
814:
707:
665:
621:
583:
537:
494:
472:
454:
435:
391:Perhaps agreeing to a a
382:
346:
266:User:NekSeOvajVijekGordi
225:
90:you may ask them at the
34:, a topic designated as
236:Blocked as a sockpuppet
930:{{unblock reviewed |1=
903:{{unblock reviewed |1=
874:blocking administrator
865:blocking administrator
731:
245:
925:with your rationale:
872:{{Unblock on hold |1=
779:change block settings
730:
244:
1047:Requests for unblock
983:I wonder about your
263:as a sockpuppet of
937:accept reason here
923:Accept reason here
732:
246:
65:
61:
53:contentious topics
45:
1001:And why is that?
548:-- Deepfriedokra
415:-- Deepfriedokra
401:-- Deepfriedokra
259:from editing for
63:
59:
43:
1054:
940:
924:
913:
893:
882:
866:
847:Please read our
798:
796:
785:
767:
765:deleted contribs
729:
653:
652:(words are wind)
647:
641:
332:
305:
268:
197:Predrag Petrović
160:community portal
145:interaction bans
107:
101:
26:
1062:
1061:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1037:
1036:
945:
944:
943:
929:
922:
902:
891:
871:
864:
860:
821:
786:
776:
762:
745:
727:
722:
720:unblock request
651:
645:
635:
326:
324:
319:
318:
303:
296:
264:
238:
111:
110:
105:
99:
27:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1060:
1050:
1049:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1013:
964:
963:
942:
941:
915:
914:
896:default reason
884:
883:
861:
855:
854:
853:
852:
845:
807:
803:Request reason
800:
725:
721:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
700:
675:
674:
673:
672:
631:
630:
629:
628:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
576:
530:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
483:
482:
481:
480:
479:
467:any opinions?
447:
444:
443:
442:
428:
397:standard offer
375:
372:
323:
320:
297:
248:You have been
247:
239:
237:
234:
233:
232:
217:
209:
201:
193:
186:
182:
152:
84:
83:
80:
77:
74:
71:
64:constructively
47:
28:
21:
20:
18:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1059:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1042:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1014:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:
998:
994:
990:
986:
982:
981:
980:
976:
972:
968:
967:
966:
965:
962:
958:
954:
950:
947:
946:
938:
934:
928:
927:
926:
920:
911:
907:
901:
900:
899:
897:
889:
880:
875:
870:
869:
868:
858:
857:Administrator
850:
846:
843:
839:
835:
834:
829:
828:
827:
825:
820:
816:
812:
806:
804:
799:
794:
790:
784:
780:
775:
771:
766:
761:
757:
756:global blocks
753:
752:active blocks
749:
744:
739:
737:
724:
713:
709:
705:
701:
698:
697:
696:
692:
688:
687:Maleschreiber
684:
681:
680:WP:ASPERSIONS
677:
676:
671:
667:
663:
659:
658:
657:
654:
649:
648:
639:
633:
632:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:
613:
609:
605:
601:
600:
589:
585:
581:
577:
574:
573:
572:
568:
564:
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
526:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:PĂ«llumb Xhufi
509:
506:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:Deepfriedokra
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
339:
335:
330:
317:
313:
309:
301:
294:
290:
286:
284:
283:
276:
272:
267:
262:
258:
257:
253:
252:
243:
231:
227:
223:
218:
215:
210:
207:
206:Pellumb Xhufi
202:
198:
194:
191:
187:
183:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
126:
125:
124:
123:
119:
115:
109:
104:
103:Ctopics/aware
97:
93:
89:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
68:
67:
56:
54:
49:
41:
39:
38:
33:
25:
948:
936:
931:
918:
916:
909:
904:
887:
885:
877:
873:
862:
842:instructions
831:
823:
822:
802:
801:
774:creation log
741:
733:
723:
643:
516:Lezhjani1444
507:
395:Perhaps the
340:
336:
325:
282:illegitimate
280:
278:
256:indefinitely
254:
249:
196:
133:edit warring
129:KuÄŤi (tribe)
112:
87:
85:
57:
52:
50:
35:
31:
29:
908:|decline =
881:|3 = ~~~~}}
838:autoblocked
738:be reviewed
561:nonsense.--
164:disengaging
156:Task Center
108:template.
37:contentious
985:competence
935:|accept =
770:filter log
214:WP:BLUESKY
172:~ ToBeFree
141:topic bans
114:~ ToBeFree
88:procedures
1018:Setxkbmap
1003:Setxkbmap
971:Setxkbmap
859:use only:
811:Setxkbmap
789:checkuser
748:block log
743:Setxkbmap
704:Setxkbmap
662:Setxkbmap
618:Setxkbmap
580:Setxkbmap
534:Setxkbmap
491:Setxkbmap
489:Nothing?
469:Setxkbmap
451:Setxkbmap
432:Setxkbmap
379:Setxkbmap
343:Setxkbmap
222:Setxkbmap
60:carefully
1041:Category
760:contribs
289:reverted
279:not for
158:and the
917:If you
888:decline
886:If you
783:unblock
529:myself.
293:deleted
285:reasons
275:allowed
251:blocked
939:~~~~}}
919:accept
912:~~~~}}
371:socks.
277:, but
200:tribe.
137:blocks
989:Bbb23
953:Bbb23
824:Notes
736:block
646:Sadko
638:Bbb23
604:Bbb23
563:Bbb23
487:Bbb23
358:Bbb23
329:Bbb23
322:block
308:Bbb23
42:does
1022:talk
1007:talk
993:talk
975:talk
957:talk
815:talk
708:talk
691:talk
666:talk
622:talk
608:talk
584:talk
567:talk
552:talk
538:talk
520:talk
495:talk
473:talk
455:talk
436:talk
419:talk
405:talk
383:talk
362:talk
347:talk
312:talk
295:.
226:talk
190:KuÄŤi
176:talk
118:talk
96:here
62:and
987:.--
876:|2=
793:log
306:.
291:or
143:or
44:not
1043::
1024:)
1009:)
995:)
977:)
959:)
826::
817:)
805::
787:•
781:•
777:•
772:•
768:•
763:•
758:•
754:•
750:•
740::
710:)
693:)
668:)
624:)
610:)
586:)
569:)
554:)
540:)
522:)
514:.
497:)
475:)
457:)
438:)
421:)
407:)
385:)
364:)
349:)
314:)
228:)
178:)
139:,
120:)
106:}}
100:{{
48:.
1020:(
1005:(
991:(
973:(
955:(
813:(
797:)
795:)
791:(
746:(
706:(
689:(
664:(
640::
636:@
620:(
606:(
582:(
565:(
550:(
536:(
518:(
493:(
485:@
471:(
463:@
453:(
434:(
417:(
403:(
381:(
360:(
345:(
331::
327:@
310:(
224:(
174:(
116:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
